WITHOUT MORALS, EVERYTHING IS NORMAL
By
Betty Freauf
November 2, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
James Madison wrote in Federalist 51: What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. However, we not only do not have angels governing men but we have progressives who deny the existence of God and without His guidelines (Ten Commandments) we end up with anarchy.[1]
Completely ignoring this statement by Madison, Democrat President Woodrow Wilson argued that progress and evolution had brought human beings to a place and time where we didn’t have to worry about limited government. He rejected what the Founders identified as a fixed or unchanging human nature, and thought we should be governed by an “elite” class of people who are not subject to political forces or constitutional checks and balances- a class of people such as we find in our modern bureaucracy.[1]
Wilson was elected in 1912 and re-elected in 1916. He and the founders of modern liberalism call these doctrines of limited government that appear in the Declaration and the Constitution obsolete. They argue we now live in the age of progress and that government must be an engine of that progress.[2]
Democrat Roosevelt was elected in 1932, re-elected in 1936, and unconstitutionally re-elected in 1940 and 1944, where he died in office. Like Barack Obama who is following in the tracks of these two preceding progressive (socialist) presidents, New Deal Franklin Roosevelt had made it clear, even before he was elected president, that government had a new and different role to play in American life than that assigned to it by the Constitution. In an October 1932 radio address, he stated: “… I have…described the spirit of my program as a ‘new deal,’ which in plain English for a changed concept of the duty and responsibility of Government toward economic life.”[2]
In his view, selfish behavior on the part of individuals and corporations must give way to rational social action informed by a benevolent government and the organized intelligence of the bureaucracy. Consequently, the role of government was no longer the protection of the natural or political rights of individuals. The old constitutional distinction between government and society – or between the public and private spheres – as the ground of liberalism and a bulwark against political tyranny had created, in Roosevelt’s view, economic tyranny. To solve this, government itself would become a tool of benevolence working on behalf of the people.[2]
Not until Franklin D. Roosevelt came to power in 1933 did the whole Communist propelled and communist-managed drive again begin to take visible and tangible and positive steps in their program to make the U.S. ultimately succumb to a one-world Communist Tyranny. In the early 1950s, Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis) whipped fear into frenzy, charging that communists occupied high-ranking positions in the State Department and other government agencies. He was demonized and eventually stripped of his power influence. The House Committee on un-American Activities once investigated communist and other subversive organizations. Of the 45 declared goals of the Communists to take over America, Goal 34 eliminated this committee.
But then there was radio talk show host and prolific author of many political articles, Alan Stang (now deceased) who had a different story to tell. He claimed the Republican Party was also red from the start. Many conservatives lately have been taking a new look at the so-called conservative Republican Party and wondering if a third party of genuine Constitutionalist elected officials who honor their oaths should be created because both Republicans and Democrats have finally awakened from their dark sleep and have realized that America is in deep trouble with the two-party system. And while the media and key players in the Republican Party have criticized Michael Lee and Ted Cruz for their efforts to defund Obamacare resulting in the R’s being blamed for the government shut down, these two have become overnight sensations for trying to fulfill their campaign promise to the people.
OUR CHILDREN THE RED TARGET
In his 1961 book Communism and Your Child by Herbert Romerstein indicated in the Introduction that our children were the Red Target and how Red-run summer camps for children had existed in the U.S. continuously since 1925 and unsuspecting parents placed their children in these camps run by hard-core Communist agitators whose job it was to work among children to combat religious influences among them. On the cover of his book he placed his 1948 Membership Card from the Communist Party U.S.A. signed October 30, 1947.
He
went on to explain during the 1930’s the “Workers Child,”
a Communist magazine for teachers and children’s group leaders
suggested “the best method to combat the effects of religion among
children was to introduce Scientific ways that blast religious teaching.
Enter
sex expert Alfred Kinsey, who we now know was a pedophile using
science as a cover for the indulging of his perversion. He claimed that
children are sexual from birth, that relations with adults don’t
harm them, etc. Kinsey
was a scientific fraud and 
misrepresented
data for the purposes of legitimizing perversion and formative years
have far-reaching consequences. Goal 17 for the Communist Takeover of
America was to get control of the schools. Use them as transmission
belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum.
Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in the
textbooks.
WITHOUT MORALS, EVERYTHING IS NORMAL
But lets leave Kinsey behind and jump to pacesetter Degenerate Degeneres who now has a popular T.V. show on NBC. To begin the process of normalization she was chosen to declare war on the steps of the U.S. Capitol in 1998 along with a bipartisan demonstration led by congress people and senators using Matthew Shepard’s death in Wyoming as a “cause,” which later turned out to have been a “false flag” and disinformation. In 2008, Ellen, at age 50, said she planned to marry longtime girlfriend after a Supreme Court’s ruling allowing such marriages. When she announced it, her studio audience leapt to its feet in approval. Homosexual characters are now a staple of TV and film. Communist Goal 26 is to present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
My 1828 Noah Webster dictionary has sodomy listed but not homosexuals so step by step the goal of making sodomy more acceptable, they changed the name and instead of being “queer,” they became “gay” and were successful in getting the Psychiatry profession to remove the term” insanity” from its diagnostic manual; however, my KJV still says in Hebrew 10:31, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God.”
Selwyn Duke in his 10/7/2013 New American article, “The Slippery Slope to Pedophilia” said it is unlikely that many Americans now believe that pedophilia will soon be accepted in this country, but it is riding the same track to respectability as did homosexual “Marriage.” The next step after normalization and tolerance is engendering sympathy and affection, and entertainment’s role in this is simple to understand. Just as people condemn the sin but not the sinner, they also have trouble loving the sinner but not the sin. This is why a mother can accept even a son’s heinous crimes and why people will justify the scandalous behavior of a favorite politician or sports figure. Likewise, when people come to like a T.V. show – and more specifically, a character on it – they generally start to accept what the character represents. One homosexual couple had a baby – now a toddler.
WHATEVER YOU LEGALIZE YOU GET MORE
Coach Dave Daubenmire in his article, “Laws Have Consequences,” did an excellent job of connecting the dots. In a litany of things that once were immoral or unconstitutional and after the government legalized them we’ve only gotten more! He mentioned in 1950 only 5% of marriages ended in divorce. There were no “no-fault” divorce laws then. I was a legal secretary in the late 1950’s and I typed up divorce papers. If my memory serves me correctly, a required waiting period of one year was mandated before a second marriage was allowed. This gave the couple a “cooling” off period to possibly reconsider the damage they may have caused from the divorce and perhaps chances for reconciliation. Discredit the family as an institution and encourage promiscuity and easy divorce is Goal 40 for the Communist Take Over of America.
I have sat in the waiting room at the V.A. hospital in Portland, Oregon and often in conversations I learn it is not uncommon to find a divorced woman who has been invited back to the ex-husband’s home when she falls on hard time. They quickly say they aren’t sleeping together but the ex is putting a roof over their heads. Wouldn’t it have been better to work things out before the divorce? Bear in mind, these are generally older women so it might not hold true today for the career oriented younger woman – many of them are turning to lesbianism. And as an aside – it was recently revealed in an “advice” column by a gray haired elderly woman she was singled out by a lesbian couple because they determined she had money.
President Reagan said in his memoirs one of his biggest regrets was signing the first “no fault” divorce law into effect as governor of California. Passage of no-fault divorce laws by all other states were followed by explosions of divorce, illegitimacy, and uncontrollable social spending, empowering Democrat administrations while Republicans nervously stood aside on both issues.
Bill Randles, 51, has been a pastor since 1982 of the Believers in Grace Fellowship church, a non-denominational, Pentecostal church in Marion, Iowa. In a desire to interpret the handwriting on the wall for the last days, he has written “A Sword on the Land,” A Muslim World in Bible Prophecy. He meticulously takes his readers with scripture through the Old Testament to what he considers the “last days” and says Iran is a prime example that truly “evil spirits” are driving the nations of the world towards Armageddon.
He writes the West is in a state of civilizational paralysis, having forsaken the “cultural” part of its culture, i.e. Christianity. He further says the intellectual “elites” over the last century have led in a rebellion against the religion that made the Judeo-Christian West the greatest civilization in history. We haven’t had the will to absolutely and resolutely defend our own civilizations, having bought into the philosophy of atheists and degenerates. Liberty and the rule of law were ideals that Western people would die on the battlefield to defend, or even to liberate others to enjoy. We were not all Christians, of course, but we operated out of a Judeo-Christian ethos, willing to sacrifice blood and treasure to save others.
| Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts! |
He asks the questions for today: Who would want to shed one drop of blood for the obvious lie that is multi-Culturalism? Who would die so that homosexuality could be freely expressed anywhere in the world? Why would we fight to defend the “gains” of the disaster that was the sexual revolution? Through immigration and abortion and birth control, they seem to be trying to neutralize and cancel out the civilization that once was. And then to my dismay, he tells how the media is “celebrating” the first openly homosexual Army general, a lesbian and if true, perhaps that explains why a 10/28/2013 article by Todd Starnes says “Army Briefing Labels Tea Party, Christians as Terror Threats.”
However, he does end with a happy note. All that is holy, good and decent may have been profaned and trampled underfoot, and “weeping may endure for the night, but in the morning, shouts of joy!” Marantha! His book can be purchased through Amazon or Believersingrace.com. The cost is $15. Lighthouse Publishing will also soon be distributing it.
Footnotes:
1.
Book: Imprimis on The Constitution by Larry Arnn at Hillsdale ©2012
P. 270
2.
Book: Imprimis on Politics by John Marini at Hillsdale © 2012 P.
16
� 2013 Betty Freauf - All Rights Reserved
Share
This Article
