MENTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL
Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
At the end of Part 11 of this series, I referred to SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) as being dangerous. According to Dr. Ann Blake Tracy, director of the International Coalition for Drug Awareness, SSRI increase serotonin while decreasing the metabolism of serotonin. Horror stories of homicide and suicide abound concerning children and adults on SSRI antidepressants, with people on the drugs saying what they were doing didn't seem real. In Evelyn Pringle's article, "Bush-backed drug marketing schemes" (ONLINE JOURNAL, April 25, 2005), Dr. Tracy explained that SSRI suppress "the REM state or dream state (of sleep)....These drugs allow a person to be awake but at any time they can slip into the REM state. This is why people often discuss how they couldn't tell the difference between the dream and reality. These drugs are horribly damaging to the entire system." Dr. Tracy also forecast that if President Bush's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health recommendations result in more children being given these dangerous SSRI, then we had better prepare for even more horror stories of death in the future. SSRI are banned for children in the United Kingdom, and in February 2005, Adderall was taken off the market in Canada because it was linked to 20 sudden deaths (14 were children) and a dozen strokes.
According to Encarnacion Pyle's article, "Even babies getting treated as mentally ill" (THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH, April 25, 2005), "Doctors prescribed sedatives and powerful, mood-altering medications for nearly 700 babies and toddlers on Medicaid last summer....'It's shocking,' said Dr. Ellen Bassuk, associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. 'Who's really being helped by these children being drugged? The babies? Or their caregivers? These medications are not benign; they can give dangerous side effects, and have to be closely monitored.'" Pyle's article went on to describe how Ohio parents Mike and Janet Hall's daughter Stephanie had been placed on Ritalin after her first grade teacher pressured them into drugging her. Stephanie died of a heart attack in January 1996, the morning after a doctor doubled her daily dose.
Americans should protest the widespread drugging of our children, and resist any efforts by the power elite to control us by increasing the number of our youth placed on dangerous SSRI. Of course, the power elite understands there will always be a rebellious remnant opposing their will. However, tactics have already been developed for handling protesters, and the complacent American public (and that includes some of you who are reading this) has apparently decided it's not worth the effort to do anything about these infringements upon our rights. After all, haven't most Americans been complacent about Congress "robbing" from their Social Security so-called "trust fund" for years? Had the American people held Congress accountable for this "robbery," there probably wouldn't be a crisis in Social Security funds for the future.
How did this happen? Basically, the power elite "turned off" the average American regarding protests, causing them to see protesters as radical extremists with whom they would not want to be associated. In this regard, the power elite actually supported radical protesters. And if you doubt this, then read James Simon Kunen's THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT (1968), in which the author tells of an SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) strategy meeting he attended where a student was giving a report about an SDS convention the student had recently attended, and the student's report revealed that "men from Business International Roundtables... tried to buy up a few radicals. Those men are the world's industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are going to go. They're the left wing of the ruling class. They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago. We were also offered ESSO (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move more to the left."
More recently concerning how the power elite handles protest movements, Lewis Lapham related in "Crowd Control" (HARPER'S MAGAZINE, October 2004) that around May 2002, "the Department of Homeland Security issued an all-points bulletin advising the nation's law enforcement agencies to keep a sharp watch for any citizens who might have 'expressed dislike of attitudes and decisions of the U.S. government.'...On the (April 15, 2000) night preceding the Washington protest against the policies of the World Bank/IMF, city police raided an assembly point on Florida Avenue. Supposedly responding to a complaint about zoning and fire-code violations, they confiscated the next day's handbills and parade puppets....In Washington on September 27, 2002, the police arrested 400 people in Pershing Park for 'failure to obey' an unspecified order that was never given. Restrained in 'flexicuffs' that tethered one wrist to the opposite ankle, the detainees could neither stand up nor lie down....In October 2003 the FBI sent a memorandum to 15,000 local law enforcement agencies citing as examples of potential criminal activities the use of tape recorders and video cameras as well as wearing sunglasses or headscarves....In some jurisdictions cell phones qualify as 'instruments of crime' and, if it so pleases the arresting officer, the possession of one constitutes a misdemeanor."
An additional tactic of the power elite to thwart the efforts of those opposing their will is the formation of "controlled opposition" groups. These are used to draw out, monitor, control, and if necessary discredit any opponents. There are basically 2 ways of doing this, with chemicals and psychologically. Under the CIA's infamous MK-Ultra program in the 1950s, there was a May 5, 1955 document indicating its Technical Services Staff/Chemical Division is partly "devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods: Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public...."
Psychologically, the means can be rather basic. First, an individual may be taunted until he or she reacts with an emotional outburst, and then he or she is accused of "acting like a maniac" (a mental health problem). Another means involves a political candidate, for example, having an opponent who is so extreme that the public feels it has no choice but to vote for the original candidate. An example of this might be if a presidential candidate wins election even though, as Governor of a state, he executed a born-again Christian woman who was a model prisoner bringing other prisoners to Christ according to her warden, while at the same time as Governor the candidate commuted to a life sentence another prisoner who murdered many people, including a little boy (the son of the host of TV's "America's Most Wanted") after that prisoner and his homosexual "companion" abused the little boy. Then as President, he appoints homosexuals to prominent positions; his federal agents raid a church in Indiana arresting the pastor and seizing the property (even though the previous very liberal President did not take such action against the pastor and church); a terrorist attack that he could have easily prevented occurs killing thousands of Americans; he refers positively to Ozzy Osbourne's music (e.g.,"Sabbath Bloody Sabbath" and "Facing Hell") which is occultic, demonic, and praises Lucifer/Satan; he dramatically increases federal domestic funding of Planned Parenthood over the previous liberal President's funding; he supports a pro-abortion rights and pro-homosexual rights Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania while opposing a strong prolife Republican candidate; and he flashes his middle finger at a TV camera in late October 2004 before making an announcement regarding a sports event. How could such a candidate garner the votes of enough Christians to win re-election? Perhaps he would squeak out a victory by just one state (Ohio) only if his opponent is the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate (pro-abortion rights and pro-homosexual rights), from Massachusetts, and a friendly member of the same secret society (Skull & Bones) as the President, and if his opponent conveniently runs a lack-luster campaign.
If any future terrorist acts occur, they will be used by the power elite to cause the public "voluntarily" to request greater control over us by the power elite for the security of all in the form of a one-world government. By the way, haven't you wondered why there hasn't been a terrorist attack in the U.S. in the years since the 9-11 attacks in 2001? If tons of drugs are still bypassing our security checkpoints into this country, isn't it logical that at least small amounts of biological or chemical weapons could be slipped in as well? Think about why this hasn't happened if it would be relatively easy for terrorists to have done it ! And while you're at it, also think about the following statement by longtime Middle East CIA agent Robert Baer in his SEE NO EVIL (2002): "The other day a reporter friend told me that one of the highest-ranking CIA officials had said to him, off the record, that when the dust finally clears, Americans will see that September 11 was a triumph for the intelligence community not a failure."
Prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there was a bill introduced in Congress that sought to do what the "REAL ID Act" (mentioned in Part 10 of this series) seeks to do, transforming states' drivers' licenses into de facto national ID cards. At the time, an outraged public forced Congress to back down and the bill died. However, after the attacks of 9/11, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 418 ("The REAL ID Act") as did the U.S. Senate on May 10, 2005, and U.S. Rep. Ron Paul warned of the consequences in his weekly column for May 9, 2005, titled "National ID Cards Won't Stop Terrorism or Illegal Immigration." He projected that "within two years every American will need a conforming national ID card to participate in ordinary activities. This REAL ID Act establishes a massive, centrally-coordinated database of highly personal information about American citizens....The legislation also grants open-ended authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security to require biometric information on IDs in the future. This means your harmless looking driver's license could contain a retina scan, fingerprints, DNA information, or radio frequency technology....A careful reading also reveals that states will be required to participate in the 'Drivers License Agreement,' which...creates a massive database of sensitive information on American citizens that can be shared with Canada and Mexico !...Nationalizing standards for drivers' licenses and birth certificates in a federal bill creates a national ID system, pure and simple....Any refusal (by states) to comply would mean their residents could not get a job, receive Social Security, or travel by plane....One overriding point has been forgotten: Criminals don't obey laws !...National ID cards will be used to track the law-abiding masses, not criminals."
Of course, for Big Brother to track everyone, it will be necessary to have the ability to locate individuals at any given moment. In that regard, it should soon be possible to link GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) technology with RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology. For example, some Japanese schoolchildren are now wearing tennis shoes (made in the U.S.) that can be tracked by GPS. The implanted device is still too large to be put in most personal apparel, though, but Checkpoint Systems, Inc., has developed "Liberty" portals which can tell if something on your person with an RFID chip has passed through a doorway of a store. Therefore, with GPS and RFID technology, Big Brother will soon be able to tell exactly where you are at any given time.
And if anyone needs "assistance" in accepting a one-world government, the means of accomplishing that have been available to Big Brother for quite some time. Concerning the power elite's ability to control someone's memory, in PRISONER No.7: RUDOLF HESS by Lt. Col. Eugene K. Bird, one reads in the chapter titled "A Secret Drug" that Dr. John Rawlings Rees (mentioned earlier in this series of articles on mental health, education and social control) of Tavistock and the British War Ministry examined Nazi prisoner Rudolf Hess 35 times. Rees and his associates via chemicals caused Hess' memory to fail and then "explained that they could bring back the memory with an injection" of the narcotic Evipan. Hess was told "that while under its influence, he would remember the past he had forgotten." Hess was injected on May 7, 1944.
Concerning the power elite's ability to control someone's behavior, I have already explained in Part 6 of this series how the Nazis used sodium fluoride in water supplies to cause those in their occupied territories to become less resistant to domination. And I further explained how in the late 1940s, President Harry Truman appointed Oscar Ewing to head the Federal Security Agency which included the Public Health Service, and Ewing hired Edward Bernays for a propaganda campaign to place fluoride in Americans' supply of drinking water (note on the label of a can of sodium fluoride from the 1950s reproduced here. It states, "WARNING: May Be Fatal If Swallowed"). [Click here to see label]
More recently concerning the power elite's ability to control behavior, IBM's 2020 neural chip implant has already been tested on unsuspecting (sedated before implanting) Soledad prisoners, and it provides a visual and audio record of all events in which the subjects are involved. It has been used to reduce aggression, to make the subjects lethargic, or to disable them. Similarly, in the mid-1980s, Dr. Sigmund Gieriech of Britain's Whitehall Scientific Institute for the Betterment of Humanity developed a tiny computer (Electro Computer Brain Enhancer, ECBE) which fits at the base of one's brain, attaching to its electrical system and monitoring brain waves. Experiments on prisoners at Birmingham, England's maximum security Rehabilitation Center for the criminally insane were successful (whenever a criminal thought occurred, a jolt of electricity reminded the prisoner not to do what he was thinking about). Civilian volunteer Dr. Ormond Shell also carried one in his brain and related, "I don't even know that it's in my head. It stores a list of mathematical formulas for me....It certainly has made my work easier. I think soon there will be models out that anyone can use. It really is something that everyone should have." Perhaps Big Brother will see to it that everyone does indeed have an ECBE, so that if you fail to accept the one-world government, all Big Brother has to do is give you an electrical jolt via the ECBE and you will no longer have such "negative" thoughts ! And to track each person's sensation from an ECBE or anything else, by 2025 A.D. British Telecom's artificial-life team headed by Dr. Chris Winter expects to have developed a small computer chip (implanted behind the eye) that will record a person's every sensation, which can then be played back by a computer.
If you think the possibility of the power elite using ECBEs to give electrical jolts to those objecting to their will is far-fetched, you need to realize that for many years leading Socialists have advocated killing people to fulfill their plans. In THE INTELLIGENT WOMAN'S GUIDE TO SOCIALISM AND CAPITALISM (1928), Fabian Socialist author George Bernard Shaw explained that "under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner." About 25 years later, Fabian Socialist Bertrand Russell in THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON SOCIETY postulated that "Population can be kept from increasing....Perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full....A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government....This authority should deal out the world's food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population, it should not on that account receive any more food."
The advocacy of killing people has not been limited to Fabian Socialists, as in the November 1991 edition of the UNESCO COURIER, Jacques Cousteau was quoted as declaring: "It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. But the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable." And six years later, the Minneapolis STAR-TRIBUNE on January 12, 1997 published "The Methusaleh dilemma: Can America afford grandma and grandpa?" in which demographer Barbara Logue is quoted as follows while speaking at the annual conference of the American Economic Association: "It's time for the U.S. to consider moving from birth control to 'death control.'...Death control clearly has considerable potential as a reallocative mechanism for scarce resources such as health care."
© 2005 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or Truth?"
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.
E-Mail: Not Available
advocacy of killing people has not been limited to Fabian Socialists,
as in the November 1991 edition of the UNESCO COURIER, Jacques Cousteau
was quoted as declaring: "It's terrible to have to say this. World population
must be stabilized and to do that, we must eliminate 350,000 people per