AN AMERICAN ISSUE
January 2, 2006
"They (in Saudi Arabia) have a saying, My father rode a camel, I drive a car, my son rides in a jet airplane - his son will ride a camel." Page 31, Crossing the Rubicon
I get e-mail from Bush supporters all the time accusing me of being a liberal and that I surely must have voted for John Kerry, whose political ideology is communism. My December 30, 2005, WND column brought roughly 50 e-mails calling me every name in the book, saying I don't know what I'm talking about regarding the unlawful invasion of Iraq, I must be a flaming liberal, I hate our military, and on and on and on. The theme is the same: if you don't support Bush's agenda, you're soft on terrorism, you hate our military, you're a liberal and, you surely must have wanted Saddam Hussein to stay in power. If you don't support the agenda of the Democratic Party, you are a right wing whatever who wants old people starving in the streets, and you want to take away a woman's "right" to kill her unborn children.
Yep, I sure am a flaming liberal. I hate abortion. I have been writing about the dangers of the toxic sodomite deathstyle for a decade. I walked away from the Republican Party in '96. I kept listening to their BS after the phony "Republican revolution" when they took control of Congress in '95. I finally came to the conclusion that their agenda was the same as the Democratic Party, they just package and sell the same lies under different rhetoric.
Since the Republicans took control of Congress, they have not eliminated one unconstitutional law or treaty - not one. They have not removed one federal judge destroying our rights. Not one. I have been chronicling the actions of both the Democratic and Republican parties for more than a decade. Those in denial will continue to call me names, but it will not change hard, documented facts.
I don't call Bush president because I didn't vote for him; I voted for Michael Peroutka of the Constitution Party. I have no respect for George Bush who continues to trash the Constitution and Bill of Rights - all in the name of the "war on terrorism." President Teddy Roosevelt stated it well on May 7, 1918, when he said (in part): "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
I believe in this republic and am deeply saddened that tens of millions of Americans are either willfully blind or simply care nothing for the sacrifices made by so many that gave us freedom. So many Americans are in denial, they willfully believe lies because they cannot and will not accept the documented truth about their party favorite, Democrat or Republican.
No writer can please everyone all the time. A difference of opinions and different ideas in the marketplace of public discussion is a good thing. I only ask people to do as I have done over the past 16 years: do the research, get the facts. I have read more treaties and pieces of legislation than most members of Congress. I have read more books, fully documented, than 99.9999% of the people who send me nasty, in denial e-mail.
The issue of Iraq isn't about being a Democrat, Republican or member of any political party. It's an American issue. Those not in denial, know Saddam Hussein was not a threat to these united States of America. He was a broken tin-pot dictator who had no intention of lobbing nukes at the U.S. Bush's unconstitutional invasion of Iraq has nothing to do with liberating the Iraqi people. Let me quote again Jeri Lynn Ball, author of The Great Communitarian Hoax, The Voices of America's Destruction, Master's of Seduction and Time Bomb:
"In Stalin's Russia, notes Mikahil Heller, enemies were blamed for everything; they were used to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968) and the invasion of Afghanistan in 1980. The Soviet Communists were thus able to manipulate Soviet citizens into supporting government hunts for "terrorists," "traitors," and spies, for "liberation wars" for humanity. Using Marxist-Leninist strategies, the Russian, Chinese and U.S. ruling elites have sought to frighten Americans and other populaces with the specter of ruthless mass terror. They have created enemies and blamed them for everything including terrorist acts. They have used them to justify the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries and to manipulate Americans into supporting government hunts in the exact same manner as the Communist Russians. Their aim is to manipulate whole populations into supporting "wars of national liberation" and achieving not only the sovietization of "liberated" undeveloped countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, but also the full altruization and sovietization of the United States and other Western nations.
"On September 20, 2001, President Bush said, "Americans are asking: Who attacked our country? The evidence we have gathers all points to ...al Qaeda...This group and its leader - a person named Osama bin Laden - are linked to many other organizations in different countries...There are thousands of these terrorists in more than 60 countries. They are recruited from their own nations...and brought to camps in places like Afghanistan, where they are trained in the tactics of terrors. They are sent...to hide in countries around the world to plot evil and destruction."
"The Russian and Communist Chinese have been arming and inciting "wars of national liberation" for years. On September 14, 2002, Bush, Jr., said, "...Saddam Hussein's regime has proven itself a grave and gathering danger...We must stand up for our security...The world community must do so, as well." Globlalist communitarians including America's leaders deliberately built up Saddam Hussein's regime, then sought to "liberate" Iraq.
"By waging the "battle of Iraq" and by preparing our future battles in the ongoing "war against terrorism," the globalist elites have been able to carry forward their chief goals. First, in Iraq, Americans once again were manipulated into fighting a "war of national liberation" and helping an "oppressed people." On April 5, 2003, Bush, Jr., said, "...liberation is coming. The people of Iraq have my pledge: Out fighting forces will press on until their oppressors are gone." Second, globalists have been able to implement their plans for the sovietization of the Iraqi society. On May 1, 2003, Bush, Jr., declared, "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended...And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country." On May 3, 2003, Bush, Jr., said, "Our coalition has much work to do in Iraq...We are helping to rebuild Iraq..." The Socialist/Communist coalition has justified its programs and policies on ideological grounds, holding that its aims are to liberate and improve man and society. Then it proceeds to instill Soviet communitarian ideology and community values into the masses."
This is what the war in Iraq is about:
"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective - a new world order - can emerge ... Iraq itself controls some 10 percent of the world's proven oil reserves ... We cannot permit a resource so vital to be dominated by one so ruthless. And we won't ... At this very moment, they (our soldiers) serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That's why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun." Bush (41), speech on Iraqi aggression in the Persian Gulf, Sept. 11, 1990
As for 9/11: Why do hundreds of family members who lost sons, brothers, fathers, husbands, sisters, cousins, wives - why do they not believe the government's version of 9/11? Are all these people wackos? Part of a "left" or "right" wing conspiracy?
There is far, far more to 9/11 and the justification of the illegal invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq than the average American can even imagine. As much as I know took me 18 months after 9/11 to get out of denial. There were too many unanswered questions and once I began the hard research, I got sick to my soul. While I have read every book out there on 9/11, in my humble opinion the only two books every American should read about 9/11 are Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Ruppert and The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson.
I also strongly recommend you get the DVD of the McKinney briefing on 9/11 which includes wives and mothers whose husbands and sons died on that day. I watched this event on C-SPAN and, quite frankly, it was shocking and beyond disturbing. The families of those murdered have done the most extraordinary and exhaustive investigations into 9/11. What they have found is ugly, but it is the truth and all Americans should want the truth over comfortable lies.
Crossing the Rubicon has sold more than 100,000 copies, second only to the Kean cover up Commission Report on 9/11. Crossing the Rubicon is 564 pages, but has 900 foot notes to back up everything in the book. It is one of the most thoroughly researched books I have ever read and believe me, I didn't want to read it, but I had to in order to make sure in my own mind. If the families who have suffered so much don't believe the government, what does that tell you? For part 2 click below.
Click here for part -----> 2
� 2006 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Your complimentary copy of the 32-page report may be obtained from El Dorado Gold. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com.
Devvy's website: www.devvy.com
E-mail is: email@example.com
I don't call Bush president because I didn't vote for him; I voted for Michael Peroutka of the Constitution Party. I have no respect for George Bush who continues to trash the Constitution and Bill of Rights...