MORE PRETENSE OF REPRESENTATION & NEW 9/11 LAWSUIT
March 6, 2006
On March 2, 2006, the counterfeit U.S. Senate passed the insidious un-Patriot Act by a vote of 89-10. This vote flies in the face of a massive outcry from millions of Americans against the Patriot Act and more than 440 cities and counties who refuse to enforce it. Next week the House will do the same. It no longer matters how strong or massive opposition is to what's going on in Washington, DC, the iron fist of totalitarian government continues to squeeze the last gasping breaths of liberty from we the people. There is no longer any pretense these people in Congress (with the exception of one or two) represent we the people or even pretend to uphold the U.S. Constitution. They are far, far beyond that.
As with all great civilizations who have withered into dust because of despotism and tyranny, the enforcement of these unconstitutional laws are being carried out by Americans too cowardly to walk away from their jobs or those so desperate for a paycheck, they are turning on their fellow Americans even as I write this column. Susan Elmes, who lives in Seattle was recently followed and then harassed by government agents for exercising her First Amendment rights which no government has the right to infringe, impede or nullify. Ms. Elmes apparently displayed a number of bumper stickers on her private vehicle criticizing Bush's war mongering policies. For exercising her right to free speech, government henchmen investigated her.
Last month, George Barisich was cited by dragoons from "Homeland Security" for allegedly selling tee shirts near a FEMA facility. Barisich is a victim of hurricane Katrina and his shirts carry an anti-FEMA message; see story here.
The Providence (RI) Journal reported in a column a few days ago titled, 'Pay too much and you could raise the alarm,' shows just how far Congress as a whole has gone in furthering a police state. Retired school teacher, Walter Soehnge and his wife relocated from Texas. When Walter and his wife determined their JC Penny Platinum Master Card balance was too high, they decided to make a hefty payment to bring it down. They wrote a check in the amount of $6,522.00 and sent it off to the bank. Guess what? The payment was red flagged and their account was not credited. Soehnge discovered after working his way through endless phone calls, that because their monthly payment was larger than normal, "Homeland Security" had to be notified! Eventually, after an endless hassle that he should never have had to waste his time pursuing, Soehnge's money was released and his account credited.
This type of snooping is a blueprint of past dictators like Lenin, Stalin and Hitler and it was given to you by the U.S. Congress and kissed by both Billy Clinton and George Bush. These are not isolated cases and I can tell you as sure as the sun shines, we the people will see more and more of these types of incidents as the people turn up the heat on the scavengers selling us out in the District of Deceit (formerly known as Washington, DC).
In all these cases, this type of harassment was carried out by government employees who allegedly took an oath to uphold, preserve and defend the U.S. Constitution and by hard up Americans taking jobs with the Nazi-style "Homeland Security." Americans turning on Americans for a paycheck. America being destroyed from within by Americans.
We do have a recent victory which demonstrates that if you stand up to tyranny, you can win:
"Pennsylvania's requirement that buyers provide a Social Security number to purchase a gun or obtain a concealed weapons permit was struck down yesterday by a federal judge. The state law violated the federal Privacy Act, U.S. District Judge Juan R. Sanchez ruled. "This issue has been largely overlooked in Pennsylvania and other states for a long time," said lawyer J. Dwight Yoder, who brought the case on behalf of a retired U.S. Army officer from Lancaster. "This ruling is about privacy, not guns. We weren't looking to circumvent gun laws."
"Lawyers for the Pennsylvania State Police are reviewing the decision and considering an appeal, spokesman Jack Lewis said. By requiring applicants to provide Social Security numbers, Lewis said, his agency "simply has followed the requirements of the state's Uniform Firearms Act." The wider impact of yesterday's ruling - whether, for example, other Pennsylvania Social Security requirements would be deemed invalid - was uncertain.
"One reason is that there are two large exceptions to the Privacy Act's protection of Social Security numbers. The act does not apply to state and local government programs specifically exempted by federal law, such as driver's license applications, or to programs from before 1974, such as voter registration. Sanchez's ruling noted that the right of privacy as to Social Security numbers exists under a federal law, not as a right the U.S. Supreme Court had interpreted as protected by the Constitution.
"Still, Robert Ellis Smith, publisher of the Privacy Journal in Providence, R.I., said yesterday's ruling was "significant because it comes at a time when most government agencies are requiring more and more information from people."
"The decision is part of a trend in the last 10 years as courts realize the importance of keeping Social Security numbers confidential because of identity theft," Smith said. Smith, who is also a lawyer and journalist, was a paid expert for Michael Stollenwerk, the retired Army officer who brought the case in federal court in Philadelphia. Stollenwerk said yesterday he hoped the ruling would inspire others to challenge government demands for Social Security numbers. He also said he hoped it would encourage local and state officials to review application requirements. "A lot of state governments have blown off this law," said Stollenwerk, now a law student at Georgetown University. "I think someone had to stand up to the government and say, 'I'm going to challenge this.'" (End of excerpt)
Americans should not have to go through these hoops, be harassed for bumper stickers, tee shirt slogans or have government agencies snooping around their bank accounts for transactions as innocent as paying down a credit card balance. Oh, that's right: it's all for the nebulous "war on terror" which came into our lives as a result of 9/11. This is just the tip of the iceberg because Americans not in a self imposed coma know, with a few rare exceptions, there has been no integrity, no honesty and no regard for the law of the land in Washington, DC for the past one hundred years. Government employees lie on a daily basis on every issue under the sun. Elected, non elected in paper pushing jobs, it doesn't matter, they lie through their teeth and my columns, along with a thousand other columnists, have spent years exposing lies both at the state, county and federal levels.
In case you missed this one, it's important regarding the truth about 9/11 and stopping domestic terror cells:
Exclusive: FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds is ready to talk
'Gag Ordered' Former Translator Seeks to Tell Congress and the American People What She Knows Online Petition Launched Calling on Congress to Hold Joint Public Hearings by the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to Finally Allow the Truth of Her Allegations to be Told. The full story can be read here.
Another example of deceiving we the people:
Data mining program continues after lawmakers order it closed/February 25, 2006
"A controversial intelligence data mining program, which was closed by lawmakers over privacy concerns two years ago, has continued to receive funding and remained in operation under different code names in different agencies, according to today's National Journal. Full column here.
And, speaking of rotten deals, many have requested I write about the UAE port scam. This outrage has been covered extensively by all forms of media. Patrick Briley has been doing an excellent job of connecting the dots in his columns on this sickening sell out and major security threat. His research is impeccable and goes far, far beyond even the excellent coverage by Lou Dobbs on CNN. There's no need to duplicate efforts here, so I highly recommend you read Patrick's columns on this issue. I continue to receive information and data on this and have been forwarding it along to him.
Additionally, Wayne Madsen has been doing excellent in-depth investigative reports on the port sell out. And before I get a load of e-mails: Yes, I am aware that Madsen is a Democrat, but he does not spare any Democrat who doesn't uphold the law or is corrupt. Here is a sample:
"March 3, 2006 -- The Israeli, Dubai, Chertoff connection -- its just the tip of the Russian-Israeli mafia and "Al Qaeda" iceberg. Michael Brown, the former head of FEMA, deserves credit for blowing the whistle on the "agenda" of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff."
However, there may be good news on the horizon. UPI reported on March 4, 2006, that Chertoff, an evil devil, is on his way out:
"Washington, March 3, 2006 (UPI) -- Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security in President George W. Bush's Cabinet, has "only a few days left" on the job, it was reported."
Another very interesting read is this one: Something's Rotten in Dubai: The Ports Deal, The President's Bro, Homeland Non-Security & ICE
"The approval of Dubai-owned DP World to run the ports has brought out a lot of security issues that should have been raised at least 4.5 years ago, after 9/11. But there are a lot of issues associated with this that HAVEN'T come to light."
Lets not forget how active the UAE has been in sex trafficking of children:
"An estimated 10-20,000 women and girls are trafficked annually to India, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A small number of women and girls are trafficked through Bangladesh from Burma to India."
Buckeroo in White House to send out the posse...again
On March 1, 2006, Bush said he is confident Bin Laden would be captured. This is another flip flop by Bush, but will no doubt be excused away by mewling brown-nosers like Shallow Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and others who are willfully blind to facts that cannot be disputed about Bush's lies, 9/11 and his endless "war on terror."
On September 13, 2001, Mr. Bush said, "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
Hundreds of billions of dollars later and countless lives lost, Bush had a change of heart on March 13, 2002: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
Four years later, Bush has decided to revive his manhunt rhetoric. Personally, I believe Bin Laden is already dead and has been for along time. Bush needs to keep dragging him and alleged tapes made by Bin Laden in order to continue creating fear in this country. Keep selling the boogie man to Americans to justify this monumental fraud called 9/11 and the unconstitutional invasions into Afghanistan and Iraq. Why do I believe this? I became aware of a radio interview with a Gary McClaren who claimed he was told in an interview with Eric Haney that Bin Laden was killed in the massive bombing of Tora Bora, Afghanistan on December 15, 2001. I sent e-mail to Haney. He responded in the affirmative that Bin Laden was killed that day. Who is Haney? You can visit his web site: CSM Eric L. Haney, USA (Ret). "For more than twenty years, Command Sergeant Major (retired) Eric L. Haney served in the United States Army's most demanding combat units: As a Combat Infantryman, as a Ranger, and ultimately, as a founding member and eight-year veteran of the Army's super secret counter-terrorist arm, Delta Force."
I have received e-mail from a few active duty soldiers who were in Afghanistan at the time and told me that it was common knowledge that the military was 100% certain that Bin Laden was in that mountain stronghold at the time and that the bombing that took place sealed his fate, he is dead. The only way to determine whether or not this is true is for some courageous member of Congress to hold hearings and haul the soldiers who took part in the bombing that day (and their commanders), put them under oath and let's get the truth. I would venture to say that Haney probably has a lot of close friends who are active or in a position to know whether or not this is true and if it is, the American people have the right to know - just the same as we have a right to know if our military or National Guard shot down Flight 93.
After I came back from Shanksville, Pennsylvania last August, I wrote in my investigative report, part II:
I also wrote about an interview with a man who claims to have interviewed the pilot who shot down Flight 93, a Col. Donn de Grand-Pre, U.S. Army (Ret.):
Excerpt: "Colonel, before we take these four final calls, go over that a little bit slower for folks. That's a big deal. You talked to the pilot, a friend of yours, who shot down Flight 93 that was going for the Capitol or the White House. And go over that for folks.
"DGP: Okay, quick rundown. They were out of Hector Field, Fargo, North Dakota. A bunch, this 119 Fighter Group and they are called the Happy Hooligans. They are probably the best interceptors that we have in the country. They were moved to Langley Air Force Base from Hector Field down to Southern Virginia. And when the klaxon horn went off at 9:35, those two pilots put down their coffee and shot into their aircraft and took off. They didn't know where they were going initially but by 10:00 hours, they had rendezvoused over Southern Pennsylvania. That's about 250 miles in just a matter of minutes and engaged 93 with two side-winder missiles. And they accomplished their objective. Now Hector Field, I use to fly out of Hector Field some time ago. I know most of those pilots. I could name names. I know the National Guard Adj. General. And they were decorated about a year later and I have the full write up of that story in my book....
"It is my understanding that the actual individual who "pulled the trigger" is a Maj. Rick Gibney." (End of excerpt)
Part II: More on Flight 93; Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against DOD "to force the release of a video that allegedly shows United Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. For part 2 click below.
Click here for part -----> 2
© 2006 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Your complimentary copy of the 32-page report may be obtained from El Dorado Gold. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com.
Devvy's website: www.devvy.com
E-mail is: firstname.lastname@example.org
As with all great civilizations who have withered into dust because of despotism and tyranny, the enforcement of these unconstitutional laws are being carried out by Americans too cowardly to walk away from their jobs or those so desperate for a paycheck, they are turning on their fellow Americans even as I write this column.