Related
Articles:
Other Devvy Articles:
The Carnage of Uninsured Motorists
DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST A PREFERRED BEHAVIOR?
By: Devvy
January 25, 2004
NewsWithViews.com
Notre Dame, a Catholic college, recently brought the ultimate shame to its campus when it opened its first queer film festival. 'Queer eye for the straight guy,' is yet another abomination on the great programmer, (TV). Queer is a socially acceptable adjective for all those under the sexually depraved umbrella: lesbian, homosexual, transgendered, bi-sexual, transsexual, transvestite, multi-sexual, so please save the hate mail for someone else.
This past week, the nation has been watching political correctness skulk to its all time moral decline ever with the illegal "marriage" stampede by two people of the same sex taking place in several cities. There's no need to rehash much of the points already being made about Mayor Gavin Newsom breaking the law, he clearly has and appears to be reveling in his new found fame. Da' Mayor isn't what's important here, it's the justification this sycophant uses in front of the microphone to justify the promotion of sexual perverts.
Mayor Newsom justifies his politically correct lawbreaking by attempting to convince Americans that he took an oath of office to uphold the California Constitution which forbids discrimination against "sexual orientation."
The discrimination label is what the queer population in this country depend on to make their case that their sexual perversions are due to their "orientation." For those who missed my last article on this, People are Forgetting the Act, let me once again help you to understand this ruse:
What does the word "orientation" mean?
Worldnet (r) 1.7: Orientation: adjustment or adaptation to a new environment, situation or belief. WorldNet Dictionary: Orientation: n. a course introducing a new situation or environment; the act of orientating; n. a predisposition in favor of something; a "predilection for expensive cars"; "his sexual preferences"; "showed a Marxist orientation"
In none of the dictionaries I checked the definition of "orientation," did I find any connection between being born with a desire to sleep with the same sex. I did, however, find the word preference in almost every definition. Think about that.
In the previously mentioned article, I covered the history of how the label "sexual preference" magically was converted into "sexual orientation." However, this jiggling around of words did not change the most important fact: same sex is a preference and has nothing to do with being "born" queer.
Shameful exploitation of the civil rights and women's vote movement
The lost souls in the queer community try to use the civil rights movement or women voting as part of their family of those who used to be discriminated against, but are now liberated. The sexually depraved decked out $500 designer suits kissing each other on national television to soften up the image of what they do to each other, use these past events in history as their discrimination crutch.
There is no legitimate connection between the horrible discrimination against black Americans that used to and sadly still does happen in America. For reasons of his own, the Lord made humans in different colors, sizes and shapes. Thankfully, people in this country finally found the courage to stand up against those who thought it perfectly okay to treat black Americans like animals and joined together to say no more would such hideous behavior be tolerated in this country.
A human being is born with whatever skin color the Lord decides and no one should be treated any differently because they are white, brown, red, black or olive skinned. The key word here is born - a skin color is what a human being is born with, not something they prefer at some later date.
Centuries ago, it was part of the American landscape that men believed women shouldn't vote. As time progressed, this changed and women were given the right to vote. Were women being discriminated against in this instance? Of course they were - they were told they could not vote because they were born a woman. The key word here is born - an event which no baby has any control over whatsoever. They are born either male or female.
Over the past 25 years since AIDS was first diagnosed and tied to the homosexual community, a minuscule percentage of Americans suddenly erupted onto the politically correct scene coming into its own. They found an opening when a concept called "tolerance" was suddenly beat into the heads of Americans at every turn. There is a world of difference between being tolerant and being forced to accept that which is a moral abomination.
Genetic, preference or social?
This is the entire crux of the matter: is a man or woman born queer or are other factors involved? The following research was provided by the dreaded Concerned Families of Maryland. I say dreaded, because this type of information isn't welcome among the queer community or the government's "mainstream" media apparatus. Heaven forbid anyone should be concerned about their families and the brainwashing going on to introduce American's children into the "gay lifestyle" in the government indoctrination centers, aka public schools.
From Concerned Families of Maryland:
"William H. Masters, co-director of the Masters and Johnson Institute, Virginia E. Brown, and Robert C. Kolodny stated categorically in their 1982 work Human Sexuality: "The genetic theory of homosexuality has been generally discarded today."
"Robert Kronemeyer, in his work Overcoming Homosexuality, writes: "With rare exceptions, homosexuality is neither inherited nor the result of some glandular disturbance or the scrambling of genes or chromosomes. Homosexuals are made, not born that way. I firmly believe that homosexuality is a learned response to early painful experiences and that it can be unlearned. For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy, it is curable."
"Dr. John DeCecco, professor of psychology at San Francisco State University and the editor of the 25-volume Journal of Homosexuality, expressed the same view in a 1989 USA Today article: "The idea that people are born into one type of sexual behavior is entirely foolish." Dr. John DeCecco goes on to state; "Homosexuality, is a behavior, not a condition, and something that some people can and do change, just like they sometimes change other tastes and personality traits." One thing is clear, and that is its hardly an established scientific fact accepted by the entire medical field.
As for any other credible scientific proof, Concerned Families also provides this well known, as least to those who do the homework, debunking of "proof" that men or women are born queer:
"The most recent research suggesting that homosexuality may be caused by biological factors came out in 1993 and 1994 issues of Science magazine, which was subsequently reported in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. The genetic research performed by Hamer et. al, suggested the Xq28 gene may be linked to homosexuality, and the NY Times ran this story as "fact".
"However, equally competent researchers at Stanford Medical, Yale and Columbia Universities attempted duplicating Hamer's experiments with larger sample spaces. None of them could duplicate Hamer's experiment -- meaning what Hamer had put forth was scientifically dishonest, based on socio-political bias and not empirical fact. Hamer is not alone in this disgrace.
"The 1991 findings of Dr. Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in San Diego. Dr. LeVay studied the brains of 41 cadavers, including 19 homosexual males. He found that "a tiny area believed to control sexual activity [the hypothalamus] was less than half the size in the gay men than in the heterosexuals."
"The study was seized upon by many as "irrefutable evidence". Some scientists profess not to be surprised at all by LeVay's finding of brain differences, says John Money, a leading psychologist at Johns Hopkins University states "The real question is, when did it get there? Was it prenatal, neonatal, during childhood, puberty? That we do not know."
"Problems with his findings include: (1) all 19 of the homosexual men had died of AIDS, something that many researchers believe could very well account for or contribute to the differences; (2) there was no way to know the sexual history of the "heterosexual" men; (3) there is no way to determine if the smaller hypothalamuses were the cause or the result of homosexuality; (4) Three of the "heterosexual men" also appeared to have small hypothalamuses; and (5) Dr. LeVay, a homosexual himself, admitted that his study was not entirely a dispassionate scientific endeavor. In addition there is much controversy over how the brains were weighed and the fact remains that Dr. LeVey's experiment has never been repeated."
The scent of money
One of the constant chants heard during all the media coverage of this unlawful marriage bonanza is that same sex "couples" should be allowed to enjoy the same benefits as heterosexual couples who marry. Really? Why? Because they're being "discriminated" against by not being allowed to marry? How about two women and a man getting married? Shouldn't they be allowed to enjoy the same benefits of married heterosexual couples? How about women who have sex with animals besides same sex and want to get married? Why should they be denied dental or life insurance benefits? Why, I can hear the discrimination hammer already being echoed in the background once this Pandora's Box is kicked open.
The queer community has cohabitated for decades without ever breaking stride. But with the advent of political correctness and the ability to buy the favors of politicians with big money or with so many serving in public office who have a pro-queer marriage stand, suddenly this tiny percentage of people are making demands that will enhance their legitimacy and their pocketbooks.
Of course, there's much more to this movement than covered in this article and I highly encourage Americans to read Rushing to Sodom by Jon Ryter. It is a highly provocative piece loaded with facts you probably haven't read, but should.
The bottom line
There is nothing normal, healthy or "loving" in what queers do to each others bodies, never mind forsaking their souls. I do not advocate violence or mistreatment of any group in the queer community. I pity them because I know their lives would be enriched a thousand percent if they would just stop their destructive, chosen sexual preferences. As a pre-Vatican II Catholic, I do "hate the sin, but love the sinner" as our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, commands that we do.
An uplifting example of giving up this preferred sexual lifestyle is Anne Heche. She is a talented, lovely young woman who had some very real problems in her head, but turned from the filth of lesbian sex to marriage and motherhood. She has never looked better and appears to be very happy. If Ms. Heche were born queer, how then was she able to suddenly become normal?
How about the enormous queer population in prisons? What? They all just discovered they were born queer once sentenced to three hots and a cot for 20 years? Can a caucasian American suddenly become a black American? Of course not. The individual is born with flesh color skin which does not turn black at will or visa versa. Queer sex is not an accident of birth, it is a preference.
No amount of media coverage of two 50 year old women with flowers in their hair or two men in designer jeans kissing on the tube, is going to make their preferred sexual habits normal, natural or healthy. No amount of media coverage or promotion by the politically correct can back up their argument that not allowing queers to marry discriminates against them. As these individuals prefer to sleep with others of the same sex, it is a choice. How then can you discriminate against someone who chooses such a destructive and unhealthy lifestyle? Don't be fooled. All this is for the sole purpose of legitimizing such behavior as a marriage to receive life insurance, hospital benefits and any other monetary gains they can find.
No amount of media coverage or propaganda by self-interest groups can make me respect, accept, promote or condone that which God calls an abomination. My faith forbids it and I believe the laws of God are to be obeyed, not adjusted to fit the latest social trends.
This massive move to marry same sex individuals is just one more deliberate shot to destroy the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman. This massive move to marry same sex individuals is just one more giant leap towards the destruction of our Republic by destroying our moral foundations and our traditions. Speak up now America or forever hold your peace and watch this nation implode from within.
� 2004 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
Please,
Help Us Wake Up America
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Has been a guest more than 1600 times on radio shows, ran for Congress twice and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com Devvy's web site is: www.devvy.com; e-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net
"The discrimination label is what the queer population in this country depend on to make their case that their sexual perversions are due to their "orientation.""
