---

Additional Titles

CZARS: ARE THEY CONSTITUTIONAL?

 

 

By: Devvy
September 8, 2009
� 2009 - NewsWithViews.com

“I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.” — General Douglas MacArthur

Americans have been shell shocked at the number of so-called "czars" the usurper in the White House has been appointing. Not only the numbers, but the backgrounds and political ideology has begun to scare people into action.

Van Jones has resigned amid an avalanche of calls for his head. Imagine a Czar calling Republicans "assholes" and being stupid enough to allow it on film! Then came the next shock to American sensibilities discovered from other film of Van Jones: this "liberal progressive" is a Red! How could Obama/Soetoro have selected a communist and who vetted him? Well, no one vetted Obama/Soetoro and since these czars are not cabinet nominees, why should the FBI bother?

They didn't bother with Obama/Soetoro and we know he is a devout Marxist through and through. Oh, relax. I don't see a "red under every bed", but the history Obama/Soetoro can't cover up or hide is there for anyone who takes the time to find out who that guy is and what he stands for. Americans didn't want to hear anything negative about Obama/Soetoro during the phony presidential race because any criticism turned into a race issue and Obama/Soetoro plays it like a master violinist.

Willliam Z. Foster said there would someday be a communist in the White House. That day arrived on January 20, 2009. In his book, Toward Soviet America, on page 271, Foster writes, "The American Soviet Government will be organized along the broad lines of the Russian Soviets." He goes on to give the blue print and how it will be done. As he outlined, it has been done to America right under everyone's nose. You can read the forward to the book as I have scanned it here. Written by Francis E. Walter, Chairman, Committee on un-American Activities, House of Representatives. Never mind the screeching and squalling from the Hollyweird "progressives" or university intelligenzia. Get the facts and let the useful fools spew their bombastic gas.

Oh, but, who cares what some old dead guy said in a dusty old book years ago? Well, try: 'The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors,' for some light reading. This book is fully foot noted with sources and copies of documents. It should shake denial right out of your vocabulary.

When you finished with those, read The Communist International, of the three tomes, read this one first: 1919-1943 Documents.

The author acknowledges her work would not have been possible without the "generosity" of the Rockefeller Foundation. These three volumes (at a cost of about $135.00 each when you can find one), go step by step how the countries on the globe will first be colonized, who will get destroyed in war and the relentless march towards world communism. You can see history laid out right before your eyes. The quest for global domination under communism isn't dead, folks.

Kevin Hornbuckle was elected to the city council in Eugene, Oregon, in 1992, as a registered Democrat and then came out of the closet to proudly announce in an interview: "I'd simply point out that Communists in the United States are fighting for health care, housing and jobs as a human right. I'm proud to be a communist."

How many more Communists are in the closet undermining and subverting our Constitution and sovereignty? Not only are they being elected to public office under false pretenses, these America haters are teaching in high end colleges and universities throughout the country. Your son or daughter is being taught the toxic and destructive doctrine called communitarianism (communist morality); see here.

Comrade Obama's "czars"

Global warming hoax czar-ette is Carol Browning, the former Clinton-era director of the unconstitutional Environmental Protection Agency (1993-2000). Browner is a "liberal progressive." She is a socialist right down to her red knickers.

Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People's Organs Without Explicit Consent
September 04, 2009

(CNSNews.com) – "Cass Sunstein, President Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else when they die unless that person has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken. Under such a policy, hospitals would harvest organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done."

The list goes on. Yesterday (Labor Day), the usurper announced his selection for Manufacturing Czar. I give credit to Glenn Beck, actually his staff, for their meticulous research of all Obama/Soetoro's anti-American czars. The entire list is here. Please note how many have 'unknown' next to salary. The American people are being raped in taxes to pay for all these comrades, yet we are not allowed to know what these dangerous individuals are being paid?

The whole crew is part of Obama/Soetoro's agenda to restructure our constitutional republic into a modern day Soviet Union. Okay, scoff all you want at such a statement. I know otherwise because I have studied this for almost 20 years while boobs out there who huff and puff and say it ain't so have been glued to the great programmer (TV) watching nonsense. If you want to know how Americans have been seduced over time to accept what once was the unacceptable, read these when you have time:

Communizing America
Funny how things jog your memory

You can't fight your enemy if you can't identify who they are and their battle plan.

Are these czars constitutional? That means does Obama/Soetoro have any legal authority to "appoint" these people?

No, he does not. Remember when new world order minion, Papa Bush, appointed Bill Bennett his new "drug czar"? Where were conservatives then? Why weren't they demanding Bennett be sent on his way because Bush had no legal authority to appoint this czar? Now, "conservative" Republicans in Congress are making lots of noise about Obama's czars. Same old hypocrites.

Many are jumping up and down chanting, "This is socialism." No, it's communism. There is a difference between all these forms of government:

Marxism: The political and economic ideas of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as developed into a system of thought that gives class struggle a primary role in leading society from bourgeois democracy under capitalism to a socialist society and thence to Communism.

Advertisement

Communism: A theory or system of government in communal ownership as in goods and property are distributed for a11, except those at the top who control the masses.

Fascism: A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism; oppressive or dictatorial control.

Obama/Soetoro is often referred to as a "cultural Marxist." He is that and more. The usurper spent 20 years attending Rev. Wright's church and getting a good dose of Marxism dressed up as "Black Liberation Theology." Oh, that's right. Obama/Soetoro didn't hear any of it, just like Billy Clinton didn't inhale or "have sex with that woman." For a superb analysis on that issue, read: The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology

Last February, Senator Robert Byrd, to his credit, sent the usurper a letter admonishing him for all these czars. Why? Byrd patiently explained to the hot shot lawyer in the White HOuse that they violated "both the constitutional system of checks and balances and the constitutional separation of powers, and is a clear attempt to evade congressional oversight." I can find no reference (on the Internet) that Byrd raised an objection to Papa's Bush's unconstitutional appointment of Bill Bennett. However, since Obama has "appointed" more czars than any past ruler of Russia, I guess Byrd feels the senate is being pushed aside.

Obama’s Unconstitutional “Czars” - August 29, 2009: "As I read it, the Constitution is very specific about whom the President may appoint and he can do so only within parameters “established by law” and this applies specifically to the “heads of departments.” I interpret this to mean Cabinet Secretaries, all of whom must be vetted and approved for their positions by the Senate.

"The Republican National Committee's conservative caucus recently passed a resolution expressing their concern noting that “The U.S. Constitution explicitly states government officers with significant authority (called ‘principal officers’) must be nominated by the President and are subject to a vote of the U.S. Senate.”

Obama’s appointments are clearly “principal officers” though it will be argued that they are only advisors to the office of the President. Clearly, Obama’s appointments are not heads of departments, but they appear to have been granted an unknown degree of influence and control as regards their responsibilities. They function “in the dark.”

What can be done?

This is the crux of the matter. Individuals and businesses must fight back. How? If any decision, recommendation, policy or otherwise is issued that affects you or your business, a lawsuit must be filed. Not pro se (meaning by the individual), but by experienced constitutional attorneys who know the U.S. Constitution and the Leviathan maze called federal courts. Who says we have to take this from Obama's "czars"? I say we don't. No one wants to do more court battles, but this issue of czars and conflict with the supreme law of the land must be resolved as quickly as possible. Both parties have sat back over the decades and allowed this kind of nonsense to go on and under Obama/Soetoro, it has reached the breaking point.

For one thing, as a usurper, Obama/Soetoro has no legal authority to do anything. He sure as heck has no legal authority to appoint these czars with their toxic ideology to run rough shod over we the people. This is our country, not theirs.

There are outstanding constitutional law firms in this country with the best legal minds who can take this to court and win. The question is: Will we fight or simply whimper along with a thousand excuses?

I highly recommend these research items and commentary:

1 - Van Jones Mystery Solved?
2 - Red & Green
3 - Obama's communists
4 - Leading “Progressive” Describes Obama-Chavez Axis

1 - Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection
2 - Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection
3 - List of Communist goals (most already a done deal)

---

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country as well as her own; ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker.

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

Devvy's website: www.devvy.com

It isn't possible to respond to 20,000 emails a month. Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section on her web site; it has been updated and filled with answers to frequently asked questions and links to reliable research sources

E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net

---

 

Home