January 21, 2013
The public inauguration day this round is today because yesterday was a Sunday. The "official" swearing in was yesterday and it has been reported Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, was to use Lincoln's Bible. Good old Abraham Lincoln:
"Bennett is especially critical of how the Lincoln Cult uses black historical figures as pawns in its defense of "Father Abraham." For example, he contends that there is no way to get around the fact that Lincoln was a lifelong white supremacist, loudly proclaiming that he was opposed to "making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people." He said far worse things than that, as Bennett documents. The typical response of the Lincoln Cult is to "find a slave or a former slave or, better, a Black officeholder to say that he adores Lincoln and doesn't care what people say . . . "
"Why, one would ask, is such a distinguished African-American journalist so incensed over the Lincoln myth? It is because of his twenty years of painstaking research, resulting in this book, that proves, among other things, what a vulgar racist Lincoln was. Bennett provides quote after quote of Lincoln's own words, habitually using the N-word so much that people in Washington thought he was weirdly consumed by his racism. Bennett tells of first-hand accounts by some of Lincoln's generals of how they left a meeting with him during a crisis in the war in which the president spent most of his time in the meeting telling off-color "darkie" jokes (Lincoln's language). General James Wadsworth, for example, was "shocked by the racism in the Lincoln White House."
The joke is on Barry Soetoro.
For the second time, a criminal who is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office, will be sworn in by turn coat, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts.
"Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
"Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Co-counsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison. Obama Forgerygate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number."
So, on February 15, 2013, three weeks after the usurper is "sworn" into office, once AGAIN justices on the U.S. Supreme Court will look at the evidence millions have already seen! Is this not incredible?
Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, released a forged birth certificate to the world. There isn't a scintilla of proof he was born in Hawaii. Despite what $16 million dollar a year pimp, Bill O'Reilly says, two ads in a newspaper in Hawaii does not qualify as proof Soetoro was born there. It sure as heck doesn't qualify him as a 'natural born citizen'. But, then, O'Reilly certainly has never let facts stand in his way as he bloviates five nights a week.
There's no question Soetoro's Selective Service Registration Card was altered; a forgery and a felony. It also means he cannot hold any job in the U.S. government: Register for the Draft: It's Still the Law - "Federal Jobs - men born after December 31, 1959 must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service." Soetoro should have to pay back his salary and more than a billion dollars in expenses to the American people.
It has already been proven Soetoro's SSN didn't clear with E-Verify, the program designed to check SSNs to keep illegals from obtaining employment in the U.S. E-Verify says Soetoro's SSN doesn't match his name. Now, is he an illegal alien on top of all his other crimes?
There's no question in my mind his passport records were sanitized:
February 15, 2013, won't be the first time the U.S. Supreme Court has looked at Soetoro.
Chief Justice John Roberts Meets with Obama in Private (January 15, 2009)
"To say I was floored when I read the news item is an understatement. A 'ceremonial' meeting between a president elect and justices of the Supreme Court is somewhat traditional. HOWEVER, in this instance, it's flat out wrong. Chief Justice Roberts has cases on the docket where Obama is the defendant or is the subject of the litigation. Roberts and the other eight justices have already held two 'Distribution for Conferences' on the Donofrio and Wrotnoski cases on Obama's citizenship ineligibility. They just turned away one of Phil Berg's cases a few days ago; that one is still in the Third Circuit. Tomorrow is the fourth case; another from Phil Berg.
"On Wednesday, Roberts meets with the man at the heart of that case in private. Two days later, he sits down to discuss the case with the other justices after having a closed door meeting with the defendant! There is still the Lightfoot v Bowen case to be heard in conference, January 23, 2009. Again, Chief Justice Roberts will sit in that private meeting to discuss whether the case should go to oral arguments. Does anyone see major conflict of interest here? How can Chief Justice Roberts meet with Obama behind closed doors under such circumstances?"
most of those justices don't know at this point and time Soetoro is the
biggest fraud (next to the "Federal" Reserve Banking Act of
1913) in the history of this country?
Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility
"U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading” the issue. The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court's budget earlier this week."
Some joke, Justice Thomas.
During the fake presidential election race in 2008, Barry Soetoro, solicited campaign funds via the Internet, boob tube and radio to the tune of about $700 million dollars. There have been several indepth articles about hundreds of millions being illegal foreign donors and no one, not the FEC or the gutless cowards in the Outlaw Congress has done anything about it. Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham, is in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343, wire fraud. The Criminal-in-Chief did the same thing this last fake election; $1.6 billion. Wire fraud is a federal felony. For those crimes alone, if convicted, he would serve the rest of his miserable life in a federal prison where he belongs. Let's not forget using the U.S. Post Office to solicit campagn funds: mail fraud. Also a federal felony.
When Soetoro was sworn in by Roberts in 2008, he committed perjury. He will do the same at the public ceremony today. How many crimes will it take?
Going on five years, judges from several states, several Secretary's of State, the U.S. Supreme Court, former Gov. Linda Lingel of Hawaii and EVERY member of the Outlaw Congress, including Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, have all allowed this incredible, blatant usurpation of an office never seen in the history of this country. Gutless cowards, all of them. This is an on-going conspiracy that should be either a federal or state RICO case.
Why have they all covered up the truth? It's two fold.
First, Soetoro is bi-racial. Half Negro (black is not a race) and half Caucasian (white is not a race). Apparently, Americans with dark skin like being called black. I don't, because if we're ever going to be a color blind country, stop using colors to define an athlete or the first (race) to win an Oscar or the first (race) to become a mayor. Anyway, the assumption has been that if Soetoro was found to be constitutionally ineligible, which he is because of his dual citizenship, black Americans would burn down the country. However, using the excuse of something that might happen cannot ever be an excuse to allow someone to usurp the office of President of these united States of America.
Second, since Soetoro was and is forever constitutionally ineligible, every bill he's signed is not a law. They are all null and void. Every treaty he's signed is null and void. Every federal judicial appointment, including the U.S. Supreme Court are all null and void. Not to mention his unlawful actions as Commander-in-Chief. A constitutional crisis of immense proportions, but one that can be dealt with rationally.
On January 9, 2009, every member of the Outlaw Congress sat mute, including hot shots like Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint and other so-called leaders, while the electoral college votes were read and accepted. Not one had the courage to stand up for the U.S. Constitution or their oath of office. The issue of Soetoro's eligibility was raging at the time and they knew it.
On January 4, 2013, once again, not one member of the U.S. House of Representatives or one member of the unlawfully seated U.S. Senate, not one had the courage to stand up and stop the vote. Millions of Americans know the truth and Congress knows the truth. Every member of Congress was sent a package with the concrete evidence of Soetoro's crimes. Not one stood up for the truth.
Soetoro cannot be impeached. He has never held the office of president because he usurped the office. Because he was ineligible in 2008 and 2012, no one had the right to vote for him. Period.
The Oval Office has been vacant since George Bush left office.
It is still empty.
Is there any other way the putative president could be removed from office other than a quo warranto action? Mario Apuzzo, is an attorney who has been representing plaintiffs in cases involving the putative president's ineligibility. Mario has raised the issue of standing, a judicial hallucination, in a case, Bond v. United States, 564 U. S. decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, June 16, 2011 [emphasis mine]:
"Applying the Bond decision to a case challenging Obama's eligibility, one would have to be criminally charged or be compelled to pay money under a statute passed by Congress when Obama was President. One would argue that under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, laws passed by Congress need the action or inaction of the President (the veto power) before they are allowed to become laws. This requirement satisfies separation of powers and checks and balances doctrine. One would argue that Congress passed the charging statute, with the President's action or inaction. One would argue that a legitimate President must satisfy the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which contains the "natural born Citizen" clause. Then one would argue that the law is not valid because it never was presented to a legitimate President for consideration under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, arguing that Obama is not a legitimate President because he does not meet the requirements of the "natural born Citizen" clause..."
Dr. Edwin Vieira raised this very remedy way back in Dec. 2008:
"For a extensive class of litigants who absolutely do have “standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility will come into existence, and demand relief as a matter of undeniable constitutional right and practical necessity, as soon as Obama’s Department of Justice attempts to enforce through criminal prosecutions some of the controversial legislation that the new Congress will enact and Obama will sign—such as statutes aimed at stripping common Americans of the firearms to which (in Obama’s derisive terminology) they “cling.”
"For example, in a criminal prosecution under a new statute that reinstates the Clinton “assault-weapons ban” (or some equally obnoxious affront to Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 and the Second Amendment), the defendant will undeniably have “standing” to challenge the indictment on the grounds that no statute imposing such a ban even exists, because the original “Bill which passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” was never “presented to the President of the United States”, and therefore could never “become a Law,” inasmuch as the supposed “President,” Barack Obama, being constitutionally ineligible for that office, was then and remains thereafter nothing but an usurper. [See Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 and Article II, Section 1, 4]
"Plainly, a criminal trial arising under a supposed law of the United States is a “Case” to which “the judicial Power [of the United States] shall extend”; and the defense as well will raise a specific issue “arising under th[e] Constitution, [and] the Laws of the United States.” [Article III, Section 2, Clause 1] The defendant will be suffering serious “injury in fact:” namely, a criminal indictment and a compulsory trial, with the possibility of a conviction, imprisonment, and, if the infraction is called a “felony,” the forfeiture of many civil rights even after his release from incarceration. The prosecutor on one side and the defendant on the other will be adversaries espousing diametrically opposed and irreconcilable positions—so the “Case” cannot be deemed in any way collusive. The purported statute's invalidity by virtue of its legal nonexistence will be “ripe” for decision, because the statute is the basis for the indictment, and its invalidity the foundation of the defense to the charge. And, unless and until the prosecutor importunes the court to dismiss the indictment with prejudice, the issue of the putative statute's legal nonexistence and inapplicability to the defendant will be anything but moot."
A federal grand jury could indict him for all the crimes above and probably more, but it will never happen with the racist unlawfully holding the office of Attorney General, Eric Holder. That's right. Biden, Holder - the whole bunch of them were nominated by an impostor who does not hold the office of president. The same for the two socialists on the Supreme Court, Kagan and Sotomayor.
Soetoro is a private citizen and can be indicted and charged for all of the above crimes. Larry Klayman, famed attorney who started Judicial Watch, has been working to use a grand jury; see here. Any Attorney General in any state, I believe, could go for a state RICO:
"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations or RICO is defined as a pattern of racketeering activity connected to an enterprise. The law defines 35 offenses as constituting racketeering, including gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, drug dealing, bribery, mail and wire fraud to name a few. These crimes are known as "predicate" offenses. To charge under RICO, at least two predicate crimes within 10 years must have been committed through the enterprise. RICO crimes can be either civil or criminal depending on the type of activity and their punishment is enforced by international, federal and state laws. To consult State Legislation regarding RICO laws and regulations please see the Criminal Code by State page." Also covered is identity theft. We have no idea who Barry Soetoro is and that is a national security threat.
Never in my life have I ever seen anything like this; Watergate pales in comparison. The breadth and scope of this ongoing conspiracy is staggering. The fact that members of the U.S. Supreme Court are going to actually sit in conference and consider evidence of crimes against the fraud the Chief Justice just swore less than a month before is, well, one can hardly find the words.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
The hubris of the malignant, narcissist and habitual liar playing our president is unmatched in the history of this country. We are not going away, Barry Soetoro. You and that militant Marxist you're married to will have we the people doing everything in our power to drive your sorry backside out of office. In the meantime, I believe pursuing state Attorney General's to step forward and go for a grand jury and/or a RICO is one we should focus on. If you belong to a large group, gather as many signatures as you can, write a paper outlining the evidence, what witnesses could be called and petition for your Republican Attorney General to go after Soetoro. Here is the list of Attorney General's for all 50 states. Politely remind them about their next election.
Motion Filed: National Archives Caught Altering Hawaii Arrival Records
For August 7, 1961
2- Dozens of cowardly judges have used the judicial hallucination called 'standing'
3- Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference - Full Video 7.17.12
4- Remove the Tyrant Now
5- Justice Sotomayor: Tax Evasion, Perjury - What Did Obama Know & When?
6- GOP Senators Ignore Sotomayor's Criminal Activities
© 2013 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.
Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.
E-mail is: firstname.lastname@example.org