WHEN WILL IRAQ ATTACK THE US?
By Devvy Kidd
February 7, 2003
This administration, over the past six months or so, has been trying to convince the American people that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction and that Saddam Hussein intends to immediately use them on US as soon as the last batch of nuclear materials is cooked. That is the justification for this current, massive propaganda campaign to get the people behind invading a foreign country without provocation or a formal declaration of war by Congress.
As I have said in so many pieces, Saddam Hussein is a living monster. However, I submit to you that while being evil, he's not stupid. Just for the sake of argument, let's say that six months, a year or two down the road, Hussein manages to put together a "weapon of mass destruction." Would he really be stupid enough to launch a nuclear weapon of any kind at the U.S.? Before he took such action, it's not unreasonable to think that he would weigh the pros and cons of such an action.
Pro: A big bang. Kill some Americans. Enlarge his ego and put the fear of Allah into some of the weaker factions in his region of the world.
Con: Even Hussein realizes that if he took any direct action against the people of this country, chemical-biological or any kind of nuke, it would immediately spell the end of Iraq. The people of this country would settle for nothing less than turning Iraq into a major wasteland that would take a hundred years to recover - except the oil fields. Those would no doubt be protected using our military as part of the "peacekeeping," critical for the new world order masters when they knock off countries one by one and install puppet governments.
It is already being reported that Mr. Bush has picked the individual to become the next president of Iraq once Hussein is ousted or killed. What about the people of Iraq? Who are we to shove the U.S. President's choice for their new leadership down their throats? This will just continue to foster hatred towards America and her people.
How would you feel if Vladimir Putin decided that our president had to be removed and he would choose a replacement that we would have to accept, backed up by the "global community?" Think about that.
Hussein has seen the wrath of America before: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Libya, Afghanistan. No matter how much he hates US, my money says he would not attack these united States of America. Someone else might and make it look like that waste of human skin. No surprise. This government has been involved in this kind of deception for decades. I highly recommend a book by John Stockwell titled The Praetorian Guard: The U.S. Role in the New World Order. Stockwell is the CIAs highest ranking officer ever to quit the agency and expose the truth of its repulsive and illegal operations.
I suppose the final irony to this situation and one which must be causing Mr. Bush and his war council a great deal of embarrassment, is the fact that later this year, Iraq will be seated as the new president for the U.N.-established Conference on Disarmament. Scotty: Beam me up.
Food for Thought
Five months before 9-11, in May 2001, the Bush administration gifted $43 million dollars in aid to the Taliban controlled government. This unconstitutional looting of our treasury was gleefully announced by NWO point dog, Colin Powell. Does even the most ardent Bush supporter believe for a nano-second that this Taliban controlled government wasn't between the camel sheets with Osama Bin Laden and Mr. Bush didn't know it?
America hied on over to Afghanistan to find Osama Bin Laden after 9-11. Mr. Bush is no longer concerned with finding the CIAs former bagman. How strange and one has to wonder why? I would draw your attention to the testimony of John J. Maresca, VP, International Relations, Unocal Corporation to House Committee on International Relations/Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, February 12, 1998, Washington, DC:
"Mr. Chairman, I am John Maresca, Vice President, International Relations, of Unocal Corporation. Unocal is one of the world's leading energy resource and project development companies...
"Today we would like to focus on three issues concerning this region, its resources and U.S. policy...
"A second option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean.
"One obvious potential route south would be across Iran. However, this option is foreclosed for American companies because of U.S. sanctions legislation. The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own unique challenges.
"The country has been involved in bitter warfare for almost two decades. The territory across which the pipeline would extend is controlled by the Taliban, an Islamic movement that is not recognized as a government by most other nations. From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company.
"In spite of this, a route through Afghanistan appears to be the best option with the fewest technical obstacles."
I guess no one should have been surprised that very quickly after the fall of the Taliban, guess who Mr. Bush installed as the President of Afghanistan? Hamid Karzai, a former Unocal consultant. It seems that the oil cartels got their way. We had 9-11, the Taliban was conveniently removed and construction of those oil pipelines is well underway.
Now, for the "ordering" of the new world, it's time to knock off Iraq. Is there any history here? Let's travel back to September 16, 2002 and a revelation that never made Peter Jennings nightly sound bites, but was confirmed and picked up by truth seekers in the independent media:
Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
A secret blueprint for US global domination revealed that Mr. Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.
This blueprint, revealed plans for the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Jeb Bush, brother of our current President. This document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).
What an amazing coincidence. This plan showed that Bush and his carefully selected pro-war lackeys intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. From the document:
"The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
Additionally, it describes peace-keeping missions as 'demanding American political leadership rather than that of the United Nations' and hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological weapons -- which the nation has banned -- in decades to come.
Haven't we all heard the rhetoric lately from Mr. Bush and his cabinet that the U.S. will go it alone and posh to the UN? A familiar ring once one has read this "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century."
How did those who wrote this blueprint for war mongering know that Mr. Bush would be elected?
There is more history about Iraq and the NWO courtesy of Counterfeit U.S. Senator Joe Biden. Old Joe gave a speech titled ‘On the Threshold of the New World Order: The Wilsonian Vision and American Foreign Policy in the 1900s and Beyond," addressed to the U.S. Senate, Washington, DC, June 29, June 30 and July 1, 1992:
"Two years ago, an act of aggression by an Arab despot against a tiny Arab sheikdom led the president of the U.S. [Bush, Sr.] to invoke a magisterial phrase. He spoke, in rare visionary terms, of a "New World Order" in which wrongs would be put right through collective action....
"One may surmise that the President did not follow through with the concept of a New World Order because he had not thought it through - just as the Administration has consistently lacked any guiding principle that would give coherence to its policy towards Iraq.
"An America Ready for Renewal and Change. To be more than merely utopian, the American agenda for a New World Order must not only aspire to realistic goals internationally, it must be grounded in the only feasible foundation for the foreign policy of our democracy: a sound base of public support."
On February 6, 2003, the same Joe Biden told Matt Lauer on the Today show that it was very important to bring in the other countries of the world so the U.S. wouldn't be forced to go into Iraq and "hold that country together alone for years and years to come." What did I say in a recent piece posted on newswithviews.com? http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd7.htm
"Anyone who thinks we're just going for a little foray into Iraq and then leave, hasn't studied at the game plan."
Who gets the oil?
But, what about those oil fields? From the Drudge Report, January 29, 2003: US Studying International Law To Determine Oil Field Rights In Event Of War With Iraq
"If U.S. forces find themselves in control of Iraq, international law would give them a large degree of leeway in managing the country's oil fields, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.
"Some analysts expect Washington -- eager to avoid accusations of going to war for oil - - to refrain from making big decisions about the industry in the early days of any Iraqi occupation.
"But international treaties concerning military occupation and precedents dating to the early 1800s give the administration ammunition to press for a more aggressive role in Iraq's oil patch.
"For now, military planners are focused on how best to secure oil infrastructure and protect it from possible sabotage by Saddam Hussein, officials say. But Pentagon and State Department attorneys also are debating how to interpret various treaties and precedents for a number of scenarios that may unfold in Iraq."
The buzzards are already circling the future road kill.
The proper role of America's military
Our freedom fighters volunteer to serve this country. They take an oath to preserve and protect our Constitution, our land and our people. Bring our troops home so they can do that if some foreign power stupidly decides to invade or attack US - instead of being deployed in 120 countries doing such things as:
In Bosnia today, full bird Colonels are so busy "peacekeeping," they spend their time teaching the local kids how to use computers. Our Army dentists are in places like New Guinea giving free dental work to village after village. The list would fill a book.
The border states should call out their national guard to shore up our porous borders and stop the massive, all out invasion of illegals and terrorists. All 50 states of the Union should have their law enforcement hunting down all these terrorist cells and every illegal alien they find, put them on a bus or plane and get them the hell out of here now. They know exactly where to begin looking.
None of this will happen until the people of this nation unite in their resolve to demand that America stop its march towards a one world government. Mr. Bush and our new world order Congress will go ahead and bury Iraq, sparing those precious oil fields regardless of what you and I want. After all, this is no longer our country. It belongs to the silent hands that rule this world, buying governments and moving countries around like pieces on a chess board.
Terrorists in US biding their time
No one should be surprised if these Muslim terrorist cells and their cohorts, estimated in the 3,000+ range, who live in this country and hate US, begin systematic attacks right here in your front yard once this undeclared, unconstitutional war begins.
After all, they have no regard for human life. For these terrorists, killing Americans entitles them to a deluxe carpet ride to Allah's magic kingdom. Meanwhile, Unocal and the other oil cartels are busy building those big pipelines to connect Communist China to the oil from existing pipeline infrastructures in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. Built on the blood of Americans.
"We ask for peace and justice from all nations; and we will remain uprightly neutral in fact." --Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1806. ME 11:111
© 2003 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
Devvy Kidd is the founder and Director of POWER (Project on Winning Economic Reform). Has been a guest on more than 1500 radio shows, given hundreds of speeches and has run for Congress twice. Sales of her little booklets, "Why A Bankrupt America" and "Blind Loyalty" sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy's web site is: www.devvy.com