By
J.B. Williams
December 6, 2011
NewsWithViews.com
At
first glance, I had some doubts about all the hoopla over the pending
Defense
Authorization Act and claims that it was essentially a declaration
of war on American citizens, under the guise of national security and
annual defense appropriations.
Then
I read the bill and connected the dots that every American must connect
immediately.
The
treasonous text in that bill reads as follows; (pay close attention
to the areas in bold)
(a)
In General- Congress affirms that the authority of the President
to use all necessary and appropriate force [1] pursuant to
the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
Law 107-40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the
United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)
pending disposition under the law of war.[2]
(b)
Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as
follows:
(1) A person
who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks
that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible
for those attacks.
(2) A person
who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban,
or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against
the United States or its coalition partners,[3] including
any person who has committed a belligerent act[4] or has directly
supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.[5]
Before
directly addressing this text and in an effort to fully grasp how this
text is an act of treason against the American people, there are a few
fundamental facts one must understand.
•
Our Armed Services exist for one reason alone, at the service of the
people, to protect and defend the Unites States, The U.S. Constitution
and the American people against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.
This is the primary purpose and function of our federal government. • The Laws
of War as written by William Winthrop, also known as Military
Law or the Uniform
Code of Military Justice, operate entirely separate and independent
from the Civil Justice System, including the suspension of fundamental
Constitutional Rights for both members of the Military and those designated
enemy combatants. • Following Bill
Clinton’s lead in 1996 and immediately upon seizing office,
the Obama Administration issued a Homeland
Security Report directly identifying members of the US Military,
Veterans and American citizens with dissenting views towards the current
direction of our country as “potential
domestic terrorists” and “right-wing extremists.” • The Obama Administration has been cross-training
state and local law enforcement agencies on dealing with “urban
warfare” aimed at so-called “right-wing extremists”
which is now defined as anyone opposed to Global
Governance and national socialism. • American courts no longer enforce the law or
the Constitution. Instead, they make up the law as they go via unbridled
interpretation powers exceeding their constitutional authority, all
in the name of “social justice,” not to be confused with
actual justice.
As
a result, the language in Sections 1031 and 1032 of the Defense
Authorization Act amount to treason against the American people,
as an open-ended power of the Executive Branch to indefinitely detain,
incarcerate and interrogate American citizens on the basis of suspicion
or accusations without even bring any criminal charges, much less providing
due process of the law.
What
if the person sitting in the Oval Office is a foreign born domestic
enemy of the United States? -- What if the Administration is willing
to use the full power of the federal government and the U.S. Military
to force its political will upon the people, deeming every dissenter
as a “potential domestic terrorist?” -- What if the American
courts make up laws as they go without any regard for written laws or
the U.S. Constitution?
Advertisement
Guess
what? That’s exactly what we have today!
The
current Defense Authorization Act gives the President of the United
States the unbridled power to use the U.S. Military against American
citizens, their Constitutional Rights suspended under the Laws of War.
That’s
what this text says and that’s how today’s courts will interpret
that language.
Breaking
Down the Text
1
-“authority of the President to use all necessary
and appropriate force” – Appropriate force is not
the same thing as necessary force. Military force against American citizens
is entirely inappropriate. But if the federal government keeps destroying
the constitutional republic, it may well become necessary. NO single
politician can be trusted with this much power.
2
-“Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40)
includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to
detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition
under the law of war.” – Use of Military force
against American citizens is entirely inappropriate and even unconstitutional,
whether deemed necessary or not. Placing American citizens under the
Laws of War is placing them under Martial Law, including the suspension
of all Constitutional Rights. It is an act of war against the American
people and that is an act of treason.
3
-“associated forces that are engaged in hostilities
against the United States or its coalition partners,”
– What constitutes “associated forces” – “engaged
in hostilities against the United States?” Are Wall Street protesters
engaged in hostilities against the United States? Are college students
protesting higher tuitions engaged in hostilities against the United
States when they smash store windows or set cars on fire? Is someone
engaged in hostilities against France or England a potential domestic
terrorist? Are Tea Party rallies an act of aggression against the federal
government of the United States? Is the mere accusation enough?
4
-“any person who has committed a belligerent
act” – All of the acts described in item above
can be deemed “belligerent acts.” Is there any such thing
as wrongful prosecution under the Laws of War? You had better read the
Laws of War.
5
-“has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such
enemy forces” – Is Ron Paul guilty of hostile acts
in support of enemy forces for blaming the United States for all the
attacks on the United States? Paul is one of only six House Republicans
to vote against the bill. Is Code Pink guilty of aiding and abetting
enemy forces? Are they subject to U.S. Military attacks on US soil for
their hostile actions in support of our nation’s enemies? Are
members of congress currently bankrupting the nation acting hostile
and belligerent towards the United States?
The
U.S.
House passed this bill on May 26, 2011 by a vote of 322-96, including
Tea Party darlings Michelle Bachmann, Marco Rubio and Allen West.
The
Senate
bill passed on December 1, 2011 by a vote of 93-7. Merry Christmas!
Only three Senate Republicans voted against the bill, Coburn (OK), Lee
(UT) and Paul (KY). Did all other Republicans know what they were voting
for?
If
you are still trying to figure out just how far your federal government
is willing to go to complete implementation of UN
Agenda 21 and the U.S.
Global Governance Plan, look no further than the passage of the
Defense
Authorization Act for 2012, paying very close attention to the text
discussed in this column.
Could
this new law place American soldiers in direct violation of their oaths
to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution and the American people
against all enemies?
The
legislation itself does not… but an order from the President of
the United States to go to weapons against American citizens certainly
would. How would American soldiers react to such an outrageous order?
Only time will tell…
Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Our
federal government is 100% committed to implementing a plan
for Global Government which will bring about the end of American
sovereignty, security and superiority in the world. Citizens willing
to stand opposed may indeed fall within the provisional power just granted
to the President in this legislation and could well find themselves
persecuted under the Laws of War rather than the Civil Justice System.
More
than ever in U.S. history, it is vital that the American people to know
their enemies and their options. Unless they can find a way to keep
Obama from signing this bill into law, their options will be limited
to the broad interpretations of today’s broken legal system.
JB Williams
is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense
commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy.
He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. He
is also a Founder of Freedom Force USA and a staunch conservative actively
engaged in returning the power to the right people in America.
Share
This Article
