NATIONWIDE SCHOOL LOCKDOWN POLICIES

 

 

 

Nancy Levant
May 8, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

I�ve read and seen enough to know that America�s declared national emergency � declared nearly 75 years ago � has ushered into this nation the policies, legislative intentions, and paramilitary systems that gave rise to a forth-coming declaration of Martial Law and full suspension/permanent elimination of our Constitution and subsequent rights of the people. And, of course, when the people finally realize such, they aren�t going to like abject slavery.

At the extreme reluctance of an assistant principle of an American public high school, he gave me his school�s �mandatory� emergency/lockdown policies, which he told me were not to be disclosed, in full, to anyone in his �community.� However, he was concerned enough about the mandates of these policies, that he handed me the 4 inch, 3-ring binder, with the promise that I would not show it to anyone. To this I agreed.

The policies were specifically written to classroom teachers and school administrators, and pretty much what one might imagine. Should any threat, including community disaster, weather emergency, or for other reasons designated by local or national emergency authorities occur, teachers lock the classrooms, have children sit quietly against the walls, etc. But the �no contact� rules between parents and children � no phone calls, no cell phones, no admission of known parents - was more than disturbing, because the concept of �lockdown� also serves a Martial Law scenario.

The following is Webster�s dictionary definition of �lockdown:�

�The confinement of prisoners to their cells for all or most of the day as a temporary security measure�

Now, we know that we the people do not know what our �representatives� are doing. They have been legislating unknown missions for decades, but here is something that is surely unknown to the people of this nation, which demonstrates the paramilitary mind set, global mentality, and intentions of our so-called �representatives. I offer the following �Fact Sheet� for your consideration, copied from U.S. Department of State website, which was accessed from and linked to a site called The Partnership for Effective Peacekeeping (effectivepeacekeeping.org). Note that all the following underlining is my added emphasis:

�Fact Sheet
Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and
Stabilization
Washington, DC
August 23, 2006

A Whole-of-Government Approach To Prevent, Resolve, and Transform Conflict

�Our Reconstruction and Stabilization Office must be able to help a failed state to exercise responsible sovereignty and to prevent its territory from becoming a source of global instability.� � Secretary Rice, January 18, 2006

�The United States is committed to helping countries prevent or emerge from conflict. With nearly half of recovering countries falling back into conflict within a few years, the need for concerted international attention is compelling, and the threat that inaction poses for international security is ever-present. In 2004, the President launched the Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization to harness the full breadth of U.S. skills and resources to transform conflict.

Mandate
The National Security Strategy charges S/CRS with integrating all relevant U.S. resources and assets in conducting reconstruction and stabilization operations. The Coordinator, Ambassador John Herbst, supports the Secretary of State in her role under the December 2005 Presidential Directive as the government-wide lead for conflict management efforts.

Transformational Diplomacy�Tipping the Balance Towards Peace
Focused, collaborative planning, underpinned by an operational arm, helps us better understand conflict; and ultimately better direct diplomatic, development, and when necessary, military resources, to manage conflict and its consequences. S/CRS serves as a U.S. conduit to:

Partnerships for Prevention and Recovery
The U.S. strongly supports international efforts to foster cooperation and interoperability to increase the collective impact of peacebuilding. S/CRS consults regularly with bilateral partners, United Nations, NATO, and EU. S/CRS also facilitates dialogue among NGOs, civilians and the military to define humanitarian space and cooperation, and works with NGOs to share expertise on early warning, assessment and prevention activities, and security sector matters.

Ensuring Integrated Response�Process Matters
Conflict transformation starts with civilian-led planning that identifies the sources of conflict and instability; sets forth an overarching U.S. goal; and provides a common blueprint from which program planning can flow. S/CRS provides support for conflict assessment, strategic planning, sectoral expertise, lessons learned, and metrics and evaluation.

Applying the principles for strategic planning: Haiti and Sudan; Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba; Scenario-based planning for a range of states at risk of increased conflict.

Building Civilian Capacity
Human Resources

And from the Library of Congress (Thomas) - again all non-clickable underlining is my added emphasis:

S.613
Title: A bill to enhance the overseas stabilization and reconstruction capabilities of the United States Government, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Lugar, Richard G. [IN] (introduced 2/15/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Related Bills: H.R.1084
Latest Major Action: 4/10/2007 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 112.
Senate Reports: 110-50

SUMMARY AS OF:
2/15/2007--Introduced.

Reconstruction and Stabilization Civilian Management Act of 2007 - States that the purpose of this Act is to provide for the development, as a core mission of the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), of an expert civilian response capability to carry out stabilization and reconstruction activities in a country or region that is in, or is in transition from, conflict or civil strife. Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize the President to furnish assistance and permit the export of goods and services to assist in stabilizing and reconstructing a country or region that is in, or is in transition from, conflict or civil strife.

Amends the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to establish within the Department an Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization.

Authorizes the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of USAID, to establish a Response Readiness Corps to provide stabilization and reconstruction activities in foreign countries or regions that are at risk of, in, or are in transition from, conflict or civil strife.

Provides that the Corps shall have: (1) an active federal component of up to 250 personnel and a standby federal component of up to 2000 personnel; and (2) a non-federal Civilian Reserve of at least 500 personnel (which may include federal retirees).

Amend the Foreign Service Act to authorize the Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army, to establish a stabilization and reconstruction curriculum for use in programs of the Foreign Service Institute, the National Defense University, and the United States Army War College.

Sets forth related personnel provisions.�

Well, let�s first wonder how many of Senator Lugar�s constituency requested the following legislation for the great state of Indiana? This Bill, in true veiled fashion, looks like a �foreign country/foreign mission bill.� Not so. Refer to the underlining. What you see is more paramilitary systems, legislation, and �response� teams funded and set into place on American soil, administered on American soil, and more �partnering� and expansion of the powers of existing paramilitary systems. This is exactly the kind of �legislation� that we the people know nothing about, never asked for, never agreed to fund, and is always hidden from view. Now imagine the resources that will be allocated to the Reconstruction and Stabilization Civilian Management Act of 2007.

Now, back to school lockdown policies. It is this writer�s belief that America, by the design of America�s �leadership,� is 1) running the full economy of the nation on war powers and activities, 2) is in full partnership with global partners to dissolve the united States, 3) is in full preparation to enact the �crisis� that will result in the full military take-over of the united States, and 4) is in the planning and practice stages of separating American adults from their children. Why would I think such a thing? Why would our government want to separate American adults from their children?

I will tell you why. It is a perfect psychological operation to address new governmental concerns about potential resistance from America�s �prime of life� adults. Remember that our once standard military is gone from American soil � and I guarantee you that they won�t be returning to American soil. So, the only potential resistance to the overthrowing of constitutional America comes from non-military American adults, many of which being armed adults. Now, you lock down their children, make it impossible for parents to communicate with their children, retrieve their children, or even to gain information about their children, and I guarantee you that the �use� of American children to enforce all �new rule� orders will work. Our �representatives� are not so stupid after all.

Watch the language in the legislation. Remember that we the people are not driving the wagon, nor have we even attempted to do so for a century or more.

Governmental commissions, committees, think tanks, presidents, and global paramilitary partners are working double-time to establish the lockdown of the united States of America, the NAU, and all other mandates of the fully operational one-world government. And it is America�s custom-made military systems that are being used to enforce this totalitarian government all over the world. The wars in the Mid-East? Just another global �region� in the making, and also under full military coercion.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts! Enter Your E-Mail Address:

When the real �crisis� befalls this nation, the crisis that will subject and subordinate the American people beneath a full-blown police state, you might ask yourselves where you want your children to be at that point in treasonous time � locked down away from you or with you. Which is better? Your guess is as good as mine.

� 2007 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserved