HISTORY OF WORLD WAR III
September 26, 2012
American Intellectual Elite and Its French Revolution On U.S. Soil
Four of my History of World War III asks, “When will World
War III end?”
can only end when the French
Revolution on American soil ends.
however, and tragically, may never happen.
Grand, Worldwide Left owes all of its roots to the French Revolution,
the Communard and Voltaire’s prescient description of Paris’
intellectual community as “enlightened despots.”
has its Conservative
Intellectuals, Thomas Sowell being one of its most eloquently realistic.
There is, however, nothing “elitist” about his writings.
It is unrelenting common sense.
the other hand, here is a perfect
example of a French Revolutionary pundit of the Left, Maureen Dowd,
and her most recent and mildly anti-Semitic, boldly anti-Israel inferences.
note the immediate French culinary allusion in her article’s first
RYAN has not sautéed in foreign policy in his years
on Capitol Hill.” Italics mine.
42-year-old congressman is no Middle East savant …”
in the very next sentence … the italics mine.
now, his (Paul Ryan’s) idea of a border dispute has more likely
involved Wisconsin and Illinois.”
certain insider’s laugh must now come from her Eastern Seaboard,
Chicago and Hollywood fan club. Let most of the Midwest rot in its own
Maureen Dowd in the
midst of her hauteur
continues, “Yet Ryan got up at the Values Voter Summit here on
Friday and skewered the Obama administration as it struggled to manage
the Middle East mess left by clumsily mixed American signals toward
the Arab Spring and the disastrous legacy of war-obsessed Republicans.”
mixed American signals toward the Arab Spring …”
… we hadn’t heard of The Arab Spring until Obama entered
the White House. Is there room … or an opening for negotiations
here? Something regarding a “shared blame” of sorts?
she goes on, “Ryan bemoaned ‘the slaughter of brave dissidents
in Syria. Mobs storming American embassies and consulates. Iran four
years closer to gaining a nuclear weapon. Israel, our best ally in the
region, treated with indifference bordering on contempt by the Obama
administration.’ American foreign policy, he said, ‘needs
moral clarity and firmness of purpose.’”
here comes the revelation of Ms. Dowd’s decades of inner-circle,
Washington Beltway expertise, laced with the always impressively ancient
even Wikipedia we have the normal simplification of “Manichean”:
as used in contemporary popular discourse refers to someone who sees
the world as a struggle between Good and Evil.”
publication of her New York Times interview certainly makes her part
of a “popular discourse”.
one can only conclude that Manichean, when translated, must
mean, to a certain extent, that Ms. Dowd considers the idea of “Good
and Evil” possibly passé!
at least, Good versus Evil is the foolish, out-of-fashion,
possibly outré and dated dialectic which died with the
death of melodrama and was roundly demolished by not only Marxist theory
but dialectical practice by even such “dated” Americans
as the Nixon/Kissinger rapprochements with Mao Zedong of dialectically
victorious Communist China.
put, the likes of Paul Ryan and his following are “unenlightened.”
despite my Ivy League education, Fulbright Scholarship and thirty years
of having lived in New York City, am equally “unenlightened.”
presume that Ms. Dowd might feel the same way about Thomas
a thrilling debate that would be: Dowd versus Sowell regarding almost
anything under the sun.
on the other hand, in a debate with Ms. Dowd, would cheat. My position
is that the Holy Bible, its depth and longevity, will unrelentingly
defy and ultimately defeat everything that Das Kapital, The
Communist Manifesto and The New York Times’ dreamed-of Progressive
New World Order have to offer.
audiences therefore would be found behind either the Judeo-Christian
Bible or behind the principle reading list for the editorial staff of
The New York Times.
At this point, it looks like I might be on the losing end. History has
frequently been declaring an end of Judeo-Christianity for five thousand
all over now!”
Dowd goes on to say in her most subtly degrading manner, “A moral,
muscular foreign policy; a disdain for weakness and diplomacy; a duty
to invade and bomb Israel’s neighbors; a divine right to pre-emption
— it’s all ominously familiar.”
familiar is the anti-Semitism of not only recent history and the history
of World War II but, finally, 5,000 years of Biblical history.
though, through those millenniums, a “moral and muscular foreign
policy” by beleaguered Jews have kept the Jewish race alive.
does human history for Maureen Dowd seem to begin and end with the French
doesn’t she see the increasingly numerous assaults of Radical
Islam upon both Israel and America as threats?
is she so … well … French?!
doesn’t she take the anti-Semitic, anti-Israel threats of Iran’s
Muammar Ahmadinejad as seriously as the threats that Hitler posed to
all of European Jews, Gypsies and basically non-Germans?
in regard to such virulently spreading anti-Semitism, is Maureen Dowd
so reminiscent of World War II France and Marshall Pétain?!
Kissingerized, highly sophisticated, urbane and shamelessly negotiable
“Real Politic” is Maureen Dowd wallowing in?
further “opines” “You can draw a direct line from
the hyperpower manifesto of the Project for the New American Century,
which the neocons, abetted by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, used
to prod an insecure and uninformed president into invading Iraq —
a wildly misguided attempt to intimidate Arabs through the shock of
overwhelming force. How’s that going for us?”
Arab world had nothing to do with the Bush Family’s invasions
Congressional Research Service we read this:
… despite the highly volatile questions Americans have about Saudi
involvement in 9/11, both the Bush and Obama administrations have maintained
a close relationship with the Arab world, an agreeable connection which
still existed during and following the war in Iraq.
Saddam Hussein was no one’s friend in the Middle East.
applause over Hussein’s defeat and death was hardly limited to
Ms. Dowd claims there was a “neo-con, Cheney/Rumsfeld” conspiracy,
devoid of any Arab consent.
of this blind but very French bunker she writes: “After 9/11,
the neocons captured one Republican president who was naïve about
the world. Now, amid contagious Arab rage sparked on the 11th anniversary
of 9/11, they have captured another would-be Republican president and
vice president, both jejeune about the world.”
is one of the more apt translations for Mr. Dowd’s pejorative
use of “jejeune.”
neocons are so “boring”! Quel Cauchemar!”
least T. S. Eliot’s Portrait of a Lady … includes
the love of friendship.
these friendships, life, what cauchemar!”
taking Eliot’s own and increasing distance from the “Lady”
he is portraying … he dons the air of a consummately more discreet
version of Maureen Dowd.
willing, Eliot is the character he is satirizing most in his “Portrait
of a Lady.”
Maureen Dowd’s exegesis of Paul Ryan’s true intent and/or
the real villain is apparently a man named Dan
of Dowd’s defenders at the Huffington
Post compares Dan Senor, metaphorically mind you, to convicted felon,
Jew” for a “neo-con” … at least in the minds
of Dowd et Al … “is all Jews”.
The major subject of concern, for both Paul Ryan and, one would hope,
for Maureen Dowd as well, is Israel. In one sense, and certainly in
my opinion, Israel does, indeed, represent all Jews.
for Dowd et Al, it doesn’t. That is why Dan Senor’s pro-Israel
beliefs are her target.
is Dowd’s claims against Dan Senor: “Senor is emblematic
of how much trouble America blundered into in the Middle East —
trillions wasted, so many lives and limbs lost — because of how
little we fathom the culture and sectarian politics. We’re still
stumbling in the dark. We not only don’t know who our allies and
enemies are, we don’t know who our allies’ and enemies’
allies and enemies are.”
is unequivocally neither a friend of the Free World nor one of its allies.
Canada recently withdrew its embassies from Iran and expelled
Iran’s ambassador in Ottawa.
the above cited article on Stephen Harper, “His government's recent
decision to close the Canadian Embassy in Iran, expel the Iranian ambassador
in Ottawa, and cut off ties with this rogue state, is a significant
statement about the Harper government's stand on human rights, justice,
democracy and global security.”
personally consider Stephen Harper, at this present moment, the greatest
leader within the entire Free World.
says “we don’t know who our allies and our enemies are?!”
and its present leader Muammar Ahmadinejad are not the most openly avowed
enemy of both Israel and America?!?!
beg your pardon, Ms. Dowd?”
being able to deal with such clarity, if only because of its lack of
French subtlety contained in France’s Vichy years, Ms. Dowd concentrates
upon the still-little-known figure of Dan Senor.
Dan Senor’s years in Canada at the University of Western Ontario
has, since I’m a Canadian resident, my automatic bias in his favor.
his time at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem has most of my interest,
particularly in light of Ms. Dowd’s attacks upon him.
years at Harvard?
must forgive him for those. It’s an obligatory corner of my lapsed
relationship to religion and the Ivy League.
I cannot forgive is Maureen Dowd’s appeasement of Iran’s
undeniable Adolf Hitler. It’s Muammar Ahmadinejad: “If President
Romney acceded to Netanyahu’s outrageous demand for clear red
lines on Iran, this global confrontation would be a tiny foretaste of
the conflagration to come.”
“Neville Chamberlain” Dowd!
again, Ms. Dowd mustn’t be anymore of a fan of Winston Churchill
than the President she so lamely defends. Both the President and Dowd
have cast the bust of Churchill back into halls of the British Embassy.
wonder she’d hand Israel to complete destruction in the same way
Chamberlain opened the door to Hitler’s invasion of Poland.
do I stress the controversy now surrounding Maureen
lived with her judgments and those of the New York Times for 30 years
in the sometimes oppressively close quarters of Manhattan, I find her
glib contempt or, perhaps I should say, Attitudes des Elites,
painfully reminiscent of Maximilien Robespierre’s infamously liberated
hear Maureen Dowd, rather like Robespierre’s own version of Marie
Antoinette, proclaiming “Let Israel eat the guillotine!”
actually did “eat the guillotine.” The blade from his own
personal “Raison d’Etat” in the Place
de la Concorde stuck in his jaw and failed to cut his head off.
He was bandaged, brought back to his cell and more efficiently executed
the next day.
something Biblical about that exquisite justice for Robespierre and
his death by his own instrument of French Revolution! Rather like Jezebel’s
death by Elijah’s prophecy: Jezebel fulfilled the prophecy, being
eaten alive by dogs. Her sin in God’s eyes and Elijah’s?
She demanded the death of the firstborn in all Baal-worshipping families.
somewhat like legalized abortion, doesn’t it?
back in America, with Obama in power, as were Robespierre and Jezebel
for a time, the President’s favorite, literary carnivores are
out chewing up the political opposition with typically flared, contempt-filled
and nostalgically French nostrils.
Established Elite of the New York Times and the Washington Post and
Time Magazine must rule!!
the equally Francophilial elite of the American Supreme Court pushed
things a bit too far with the Roe v Wade Decision legalizing abortion
for the insouciantly homicidal and increasingly revolutionary “Progressive
Elitists of the American Supreme Court had certainly made the same mistake
over a century and a half before with the Dred Scott Decision of 1857
legalizing slavery. That hellish decision and 89 years of slavery ended
with the American Civil War.
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
these pro-abortion Elitists, rather like the 89 year-old pro-slavers
in the Southern Confederacy, are determined to turn the entire world
into a Globalized European Union/North and South American Union and
Sino/Soviet Union of the Orient? All “Unions” then combine
to create the Progressively Marxist/Leninist New World Order Union!
And do so regardless of a few obviously death-dealing obsessions such
as Radical Islam and the inevitable tyranny within a fully Communist
New World Order?
populations worldwide undeniably dwarf the citizens of Israel …
ergo … even by Democratic standards, … Israel, for the sake
of the Progressive New World Order, may just have to “go!”
room for minorities?
is the most eloquent of recent revelations about tyranny and the end
to not only minorities but all forms of free speech.
read the piece slowly and in its entirety.
Hirsi Ali possesses a courage that Ms. Dowd could not possibly possess
let alone comprehend.
woman, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, all by herself, defies all that Muammar Ahmadinejad
of Iran stands for.
bless Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
may God have mercy upon the soulless contempt for Israel that Maureen
Dowd feels almost addictively obliged to rain down upon Israel and its
here for part -----> 1,
2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7,
� 2012 - Michael Moriarty
- All Rights Reserved