LIBERAL MEDIA SAYS DEMOCRATS IN TROUBLE
Jon Christian Ryter
September 8, 2010
Gannett, the nation's largest newspaper chain reported in its Sept. 3-6 weekend edition of USA Today that the Democrats could be in peril this November. "Democratic congressional candidates face a political landscape even rockier than those in 1994 and 2006 that ended with election upheavals that changed control of Congress, a USA Today/Gallup Poll finds." True, but misleading.
In 1994, the Democrats lost control of the House and Senate because the Democratic majority enacted what has proven to be the biggest "jobs export bill" in the history of the world—a treaty that the US Senate was afraid to ratify. So, the Senate disguised the treaty as a jobs incentive bill called the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA] and enacted it. As he signed the legislation into law, President Bill Clinton. Clinton assured the American people that NAFTA was a piece of legislation that would increase jobs in the United States. Of course, we now know that Clinton lied. It was never designed to be a jobs bill—except in the third world where our jobs were going to be sent. And, course, what the legislation provided was a swinging door that swung both ways. Jobs out. Foreign-made, American-branded goods back in. Add to that Bill Clinton's regressive tax hike that went back a year and taxed the American people for George H.W. Bush's last year in office. The media noted it was the largest tax increase in the history of the world—until Barack Hussein Obama arrived in Washington.
If the American people do not take the purse As he blamed George W. Bush for his own folly, it took Obama less than a year to double the national debt.strings of America away from the far left in the House, and take the "advise andconsent" mandate over judicial and executive branch appointments from the US Senate that allowed them to rubberstamp the confirmation of Marxists into key slots in the Obama Executive Branch, Obama will be able to collapse the political infrastructure, and in the resulting chaos, replace the world's greatest republic with a communist nightmare will make every conspiracy theory of the past two decades a reality overnight.
On Sept. 3, US News & World Report blogger Danielle Kurtzleben reported that "...fully 51% of registered voters said they preferred Republican House candidates as opposed to 41% who said they would vote Democratic...Historically, midterm elections commonly go against the presidential party." The leftwing media, by reporting that a major political upset for the Democrats is looming large in November, actually hopes that the right will get overly comfortable and as they did in 2006. In that election cycle, Christian conservatives decided to teach the Republican Party a lesson and when they see candidates in both major parties they dislike equally, sit out the election of 2012. If they do, they will technically throw their "non-votes" to the left by not voting against them. Or, voting their "consciences" by deliberately throwing their votes away on third party candidates who will drain votes from the Republican, and who couldn't win if they were the only people in the race, reelect the social progressives who will then think they have a mandate from the public to increase the economic rape of the American people as they did in 2006.
In the mid-term Election of 2006, about 19 million Republicans sat out the election. There are approximately 55 million registered Republicans in the United States. Thirty-five million, six hundred seventy-four thousand eight hundred and eight voted. There were 42,082,311 Democratic votes cast. Had only half of the conservative couch potatoes voted, Obama's stimulus bills would not stimulated enough votes to get out of committee. Obamacare would have been sutured shut and filed beside the boxes of Hillary Clinton's failed Health Security Act of 1993 in the National Archives warehouse in Baltimore. And Obama would not be busy redistributing the wealth of the America's working class "rich" or trying to secretly enact Cap & Trade before the midterm elections on the fear that after the election, there might not be a quorum of social progressives left in either the House or Senate.
Again, fanciful talk. The left knows that when the right is convinced an easy victory lies ahead, lazy conservatives are content to let someone else do the voting. Liberals, for some reason, always make it to the polls. That's why over 80% of all voting precincts in the United States are controlled by Democrats.
But it is very true that as the Election campaign of 2010 moves into full swing over the Labor Day weekend, voters have made it clear they are not only dissatisfied with the agenda of the White House and the complicity of rank and file Democrats with Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid [D-NV] and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] they are even more fed up with the arrogance of petty politicians who see themselves as lords over the rest of us.
This time, however, the voters have made it clear they are fed up with the political game of overlords and serfs being played by both political parties. The votes that fed-up voters will be casting in November will not be "for" anyone. Rather, they will be votes against social progressivism, Marxism, and Islamofacism.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Further, they will be votes against the arrogance of stupid politicians who still think they fooled the people while they were stealing their country, and/or have convinced them that they actually have the constitutional authority to lord over them, and decree that double-dippers (seniors collecting benefits from a bankrupt Social Security system will they collect medical benefits from a bankrupt healthcare system) must be euthanized to save the government's Ponzi scheme. Whenever government plutocrats decide they are the lord of the people it's time to replace the plutocrats.