Additional Titles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other
Stang
Articles:

Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Fuel, and Big Fascism

The Communist Plan For Women

 

More
Stang
Articles

 

 

 

 

 

HIGH COURT SPITS IN YOUR FACE


by Alan Stang
December 12, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

[Announcement: Did you know Alan Stang has a new radio show? Click here for details.]

By now you know that the Supreme Court has denied certiorari without comment to New Jersey attorney Leo Donofrio’s petition, a document that was simple enough for even a Member of Congress to understand. Donofrio’s argument did not depend on where Illegal Alien-Elect Hussein was born. All the evidence available so far – including the fact that he refuses to produce a genuine Hawaiian birth certificate and the fact that his grandmother says she was there when he was born in Mombasa – says he is not a natural born citizen and therefore is ineligible to be President.

But, again, Leo Donofrio’s argument did not depend on that. On one of his own sites, Hussein says that he was a British subject (as well as an American) when he was born, because that is what his father was. Remember, that is what Hussein says himself. And a dual-citizen at birth – a citizen born with divided loyalties – cannot be natural born. He cannot be President.

Also, remember that Donofrio was not asking the Supreme Court to rule that Hussein cannot be President. His petition simply asked that, since Hussein’s eligibility has been seriously challenged, he be required to prove it. As many observers have noted, this should have been quite simple. Although everything about the man is secret – his college records, his law school records, his medical records, his client records and on and on and on – had he simply produced a non-forged, genuine birth certificate, his citizenship and all other questions would have disappeared.

What principle has the High Court installed with this ruling? If a candidate for the presidency no longer must prove his eligibility under the law – the Constitution – then certainly no one else is required to prove his eligibility for any other government job. To whom more is granted, more is required. More is required of a candidate for President. If he is not required, certainly you are not either.

Until now, you needed to validate your resume to get a driver’s license or a library card, to qualify for Medicare, to work in the Post Office, etc. Now you don’t. The liars at the law schools will say this is poppycock. Ignore them Wait for the lawsuits. Wait for the lawsuits from other illegal aliens like Hussein, who maintain that they need prove nothing because Hussein does not.

The Court once again, as it has so many times for so many years, has spit in the face of the U.S. Constitution. By invalidating the clear and crucial constitutional language about presidential eligibility, it has invalidated the Constitution itself, or at least tried to. Before you argue that my argument is not based in law, remember that the process I mention goes all the way back to 1954 and Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), in which the Warren Court cited not law, but a book by a foreign Communist to foment a revolution that led to riot, murder and outrages like forced school busing. (See my book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights.)

Indeed, the Court has spit again in your face. Need I remind you that you are superior to the Supreme Court, that the only power it has is power you have delegated, power you could rescind and take back. Need I remind you that you are superior to the President, to the Congress, indeed, to the Constitution itself, which you created. And now the Low Court has spit in your face.

Here are some thoughts from the President of the United States: “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.

“Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.” — Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277

“This member of the Government was at first considered as the most harmless and helpless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what the law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt.” — Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:114

In other words, the Supreme Court does not deserve the reverence it receives. It has no more of your delegated power than the other branches. It is not superior to them. It is merely co-equal. It is nine politicians in black robes. Again, this comes to us from the President of the United States. In the face of this usurpation, where are we headed?

Go to republicbroadcasting.org, click on my archives, which are free and find my show, The Sting of Stang, for Monday, December 08, 2008. Go to the second hour and listen to Barbara, calling in from Nevada. Barbara is America talking. Listen to the pain and outrage in her voice. Yes, Bob Dylan, something is “blowin’ in the wind,” but it is not what you think.


Advertisement

Now go to the last scene of “Tora, Tora, Tora.” Remember. Aided everywhere by swindler, traitor, mass murderer Frank Roosevelt, the Japanese have just successfully attacked Pearl Harbor. Admiral Yamamoto is strolling alone on deck, musing. Yes, the attack was successful but Yamamoto has studied in the United States and he wonders, “Have we awakened a sleeping tiger?”

That is what I hear blowing in the wind. Hussein said recently that Americans should stop their present frenzied purchase of guns. Hussein said they have nothing to fear because he is a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. Of course his record from the beginning gives him the lie. His appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General confirms that he will do everything he can to confiscate your guns. It is difficult to believe that any man could be as big a liar as former President Billy Bubba Slime (“I did not have sex with that woman”), but Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein could surpass him.

Indeed, a bill is now circulating through state legislatures that would require registration of all ammunition and eventual confiscation. The theory apparently is that if they can’t get your guns they will neutralize them by taking the ammo. They are trying to sneak it through into law before you hear about it. Question: What do you intend to do with all those guns? Whom would you shoot?

More cases like Leo Donofrio’s are moving through the courts. A day or so after you read this, another will arrive at the Supreme Court. Hey, High Court! This is your chance to prove me a fool. What a delight it would be say I was wrong; to celebrate the Supreme Court’s reaffirmation that the Constitution is supreme. How likely is it that the Court will show such judicial courage?

The few media morons and conspiracy factotums who have mentioned the issue now say the High Court ruling settles the matter. James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal scoffs at the issue. Rush Humbug, Sissy Levin, Shallow Sean Hannitwit, Loopy Laura, Hugh Blewitt & Company go out of their way to avoid it. Los Angeles radio faggot Al Rantel and Bull Dyke Tammy Bruce apparently did mention it but contrary orders must have gone down because now they tell their listeners not to. Tammy warned that bloggers who do so would be permanently banned from her site.

But the issue will not go away. If the High Court fails to require Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein to prove his eligibility, it will fester. Innumerable ramifications will erupt during his “Administration.” Suppose, in obedience to his Caucasian masters, he orders the military to make war on Iran (without the Declaration of War the Constitution requires, no less). What would the military do?

Dr. Edwin Vieira has four degrees from Harvard University, but he has overcome this handicap and can speak intelligible English. Among many other accomplishments, Dr. Vieira is the author of the masterful Pieces of Eight, the definitive monetary history of the United States, which in the present financial debacle is more relevant than ever. I strongly recommend you read it.

Dr. Vieira is a consummate constitutional authority. He says that if just one member of the House and one member of the Senate were to challenge Hussein’s eligibility to serve as President in writing when the Electoral College’s votes arrive in the Senate, the Congress would have to conduct a full investigation, complete with witnesses, testimony and documents. Dr. Vieira urges you to get in touch with your Congressmen and Senators for the purpose.

Remember, you are not asking them to deny the presidency to Hussein. You are merely asking them to require him to prove his eligibility. This should be very easy to do for lame ducks like Tar Heel Elizabeth Dole, for instance, who has nothing political to lose and therefore nothing to fear. On her way out, lame ducks like her could have the last laugh by performing this historic service to the Constitution.

In the middle of all this, here comes Bill Richardson. He is presently Governor of New Mexico. He has been ambassador to the Communist UN and energy secretary in the Bubba Slime administration. He served seven terms in the House of Representatives. He is a top Democrat. He ran for President against Hussein. Indeed, Hussein has named him his Secretary of Commerce.

And despite his name, he is a Latino. He speaks Spanish fluently. His credentials as a Democrud “liberal” are flawless. Recently, Richardson gave an interview in Spanish to French television. In that interview, he said, “Obama es un inmigrante.” What this mean is obvious even if you don’t know any Spanish. Here is the translation of Richardson’s remarks on the French videotape:

“Barack Obama is the best candidate for the Hispanic community because our community wants a united country. Obama is an immigrant. When he speaks to Latinos, he doesn’t just speak about immigration and civil rights. . . .” Remember, this is not a criticism of Hussein, not an attack. Top Democrud Richardson means this as a high compliment. So his comment is what the lawyers call an “admission against interest.”

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!


Enter Your E-Mail Address:

And he says Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein is an “immigrant.” That means he is not a “natural born citizen.” Which in turn means he is ineligible to be President. Here is the link to the interview. Go there and listen a few times: Then pass our slogan along.

Repatriation – Not Inauguration.

[Announcement: Alan Stang's radio show, The Sting of Stang, airs from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Central, M-F, via Republic Broadcasting Network. Call him on the air at (800) 313-9443. To listen, go to republicbroadcasting.org and click on Listen Live. If you can't listen at that time, do so via the archives, which are free. I'll be talking about the various manifestations of the conspiracy for world government, its tactics, such as the illegal alien invasion, its purposes and its players, from Jorge W. Boosh on down.]

© 2008 - Alan Stang - All Rights Reserved

Share This Article

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale


Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace’s original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives for journalistic excellence. One of Stang’s exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened. Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation.

His first book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in only one per cent of its reviews.

Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN’s Cross Fire. Because he and his wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in “Havana,” directed by Sydney Pollack and starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time). Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it.

Website: AlanStang.com

E-Mail: stangfeedback@gmail.com


 

Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indeed, a bill is now circulating through state legislatures that would require registration of all ammunition and eventual confiscation. The theory apparently is that if they can’t get your guns they will neutralize them by taking the ammo.