NewsWithViews.com
NewsWithViews on Pinterest NewsWithViews on Google+



Additional Titles

Other
Stone
Articles:

Coming Soon

 

More
Stone
Articles:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quantcast

CAN OUR 2016 ELECTION BE RIGGED? YOU BET

 

By Roger Stone
August 18, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

Donald Trump has said publicly that he fears the next election will be rigged. Based both on technical capability and recent history, Trump’s concerns are not unfounded.

A recent study by Stanford University proved that Hillary Clinton’s campaign rigged the system to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.

What was done to Bernie Sanders in Wisconsin is stunning.

Why would the Clintons not cheat again?

The issue here is both voter fraud, which is limited but does happen, and election theft through the manipulation of the computerized voting machines, particularly the DIEBOLD/PES voting machines in wide usage in most states.

POLITICO profiled a Princeton professor - who has demonstrated how the electronic voting machines that are most widely used can be hacked in five minutes or less! Robert Fitrakis Professor of Political Science in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department at Columbus State Community College has written a must-read book on the strip and flip technique sued to rig these machines. Professor Fitrakis is a Green Party activist.

A Computer hacker showed CBS how to vote multiple times using a simple $15.00 electronic device.

To be very clear both parties have engaged in this skullduggery and it is the party in power in each state that has custody of the machines and control of their programing. This year the results of machines in Pennsylvania, Virginia and Ohio where Governor John Kasich controls the machines must be matched with exit polls for example. Illinois is another obvious state where Trump has been running surprisingly strongly in what has become a Blue state. Does anyone trust Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a longtime Clinton hatchet man. not to monkey with the machines. I don’t. He was using City funded Community groups to recruit anti-Trump “protestors” who posed such a threat to public safety the Trump Chicago event was canceled when the Secret Service couldn’t guarantee his safety.

How do the pols of both parties do it. As easy as determining, on the basis of honest polling, who is going to win. Then, if it isn’t your candidate, simply have the votes for the other guy be given to your guy and vice versa. You keep the total vote the same. This is where the “strip and flip” technique described by Professor Fitrakis comes in.

Maybe you don’t need all the votes the other guy was going to get. If you have a plan in mind, involving votes and their redistribution, you can find a programmer who can design the machine instructions to produce that outcome. Or you can hack the machine you are voting in with that $15 device that you can get at BEST BUY.

Europe has rejected electronic voting machines because they are untrustworthy. This is not a secret. The media continues a drum beat insisting voter fraud is non existent without ever addressing the more ominous question of manipulation of the voting machines. It keeps those in control in control.

Additionally some states still use machines that include no paper trail. The ‘evidence” is destroyed. Florida’s machines have no paper trail in Bush v. Gore.

In Europe, they use exit polling to determine who won and lost. The tabulated vote only serves as a formal verification. But that is done with paper ballots and hand counts under supervision, the way we used to do it.

Here’s the recipe now:

(1) Publish a poll contrived to suggest the result you are going to bring about.
(2) Manipulate the machines to bring about precisely your desired outcome.

As someone with great sentimental attachment to the Republican Party as I joined as the party of Goldwater, both parties have engaged in voting machine manipulation. Nowhere in the country has this been more true than Wisconsin where there is irrefutable evidence that Scott Walker and the Reince Prebus machine rigged as many as five elections including the defeat of a Walker recall election.

Mathematician and voting statistic expert Richard Charnin has produced a compelling study by comparing polling to actual results and exit polls to make a compelling case for voting machine manipulation in the Badger state.

When the Trump vs. Cruz primary took place the same pattern emerged again of a Marquette University poll showing a 20 point shift from Trump ahead by 10% to Trump behind by 10%, which was simply absurd. Shifts like that don’t happen over brief intervals of time, absent a nuclear explosion. It didn’t make any sense—unless you knew what was going on was an “instant replay” of Walker’s victories. The machine Priebus bill was delivering for Cruz big time.

Today the polling industry has been reported to be “in a state of crisis” because they are altering their samples to favor Hillary. The Reuters poll actually got busted for oversampling Democrats in order to inflate Hillary’s lead. We even had the absurdity of a Gallup poll proclaiming that 51% of those who had heard Trump’s speech were less likely to vote for him, which was endlessly repeated by the shills at MSNBC.

I predicted that Trump would lead in the polls after his highly successful convention (despite the media frenzy over the non issue of a Melania Trump staffer plagiarizing a handful of words). In fact post convention polling for the Trump effort by Hillary hasn’t exactly had smooth sailing.

Julian Assange of Wikileaks said he had inconvertible proof that as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton armed Isis LINK. The IRS has opened an investigation to the Clinton Foundation and it’s many offshoots and Hillary got caught lying about what FBI director Comey did say.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

*required field

But you will see less of Hillary’s problems in the mainstream media, which has gone completely overboard in its relentless, even hysterical, efforts to lambast Trump and promote Hillary. Every remotely objective commentator has been stunned. Trump will however have an opportunity to drive these points home in the debates.

We are now living in a fake reality of constructed data and phony polls. The computerized voting machines can be hacked and rigged and after the experience of Bernie Sanders there is no reason to believe they won’t be. Don’t be taken in.

[Editors Note. In order to wake up the population, we need to increase the hits to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh) and mention NewsWithViews.com on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]

Please, click on "Mass E-mailing" below and send this article to all your friends.

2016 Roger Stone - All Rights Reserved

Share This Article

Click Here For Mass E-mailing

 


Roger Stone is a legendary and seasoned American political consultant and strategist who played a key role in the election of Republican presidents, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George H.W. Bush. He is a veteran of eight national presidential campaigns. He was also instrumental in the 2000 Florida recount which elected George W. Bush. Aside from politics, he’s also known for his personal style, and writes the annual, “Ten Best and Worst Dressed Men and Women in the World” column for Stonezone.com and serves as men’s style correspondent for the Daily Caller.

He is the author of New York Times bestseller, The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ and The Clinton’s War on Women, and his latest, Jeb! And the Bush Crime Family. Roger Stone has written for Fox Opinion, Breitbart News, StoneZone.com, the Daily Caller, Op-Ed page of the New York Times, and now for NewsWithViews.com.

Website: Stonezone.com

E-Mail: Not Available


 

Home

To be very clear both parties have engaged in this skullduggery and it is the party in power in each state that has custody of the machines and control of their programing.