GLOBAL BACKLASH AGAINST GLOBALIZATION?
For decades, global elitists have claimed special knowledge that they alone could solve the world�s problems if only we (the ignorant masses) would leave them alone to get on with it. It would create jobs and economic prosperity, they said. They promised peace and security. Truly, what�s not to like about their New World Order?
Imagine how shocked they were when Financial Times published the results of an FT/Harris poll (July 22, 2007) which showed almost universal disdain for the very policies that were supposed to save us. According to the FT article,
Yet, their clever defense is already built into the FT title: �Globalization backlash in rich nations�.
That�s right, it�s only the selfish rich nations who are resisting globalization. And, we should slap more taxes on ourselves to teach ourselves a lesson.
But wait, does this mean that poor nations are embracing globalization?
Apparently, anti-globalization riots and protests in 3rd world countries aren�t taken into account. Nor does it seem to matter that communist and other brutal dictatorships don�t even allow dissent; remember that there are plenty of dictatorships involved with the global elite, including countries like communist China.
In the FT/Harris poll, the question was posed: �Do you think globalization is having a positive or negative effect in your country?�
Less than 20 percent of citizen respondents in the UK, France, Spain and the U.S. viewed it as having a positive effect. Germany and Italy were a bit higher.
Still, well over 50 percent of all respondents voted �No� to globalization.
Another shock to the pro-globalization elite is the overwhelming passage (362-63 on July 24, 2007) of the Duncan Hunter Amendment (H.R. 3074) to the Transportation Appropriations Act, �prohibiting the use of federal funds for participation in working groups under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), including the creation of the NAFTA Super Highway.�
�The proposed NAFTA Super Highway presents significant challenges to our nation�s security, the safety of vehicle motorists, and will likely drive down wages for American workers,� said Congressman Hunter. �Much like NAFTA, the super highway is designed to serve the interests of our trading partners and will lead to neither security nor prosperity.�
Congressman Duncan Hunter, also a presidential candidate, told his fellow congressional colleagues,
Obviously, criticism of globalization in the U.S. is certainly not limited to citizens only.
What end-run will the global elite devise to counter these negative sentiments? Will they simply stiffen their necks even more and barge ahead in defiance of citizens and Congress alike?
If history is a guide, they will most likely dismiss all such criticisms as coming from ignorant people who don�t know any better in the first place.
For further information on globalization, see The
� 2007 Patrick Wood -
All Rights Reserved
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Patrick M. Wood is editor of The August Review, which builds on his original research with the late Dr. Antony C. Sutton, who was formerly a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution for War, Peace and Revolution at Stanford University. Their 1977-1982 newsletter, Trilateral Observer, was the original authoritative critique on the New International Economic Order spearheaded by members of the Trilateral Commission.
Their highly regarded two-volume book, Trilaterals Over Washington, became a standard reference on global elitism. Wood's ongoing work is to build a knowledge center that provides a comprehensive and scholarly source of information on globalism in all its related forms: political, economic and religious.
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web Site: www.AugustReview.com
Imagine how shocked they were when Financial Times published the results of an FT/Harris poll (July 22, 2007) which showed almost universal disdain for the very policies that were supposed to save us.