CIVILIZATION JIHAD
PART 2 of 2
By
Kristie Pelletier and Michael S. Coffman
November 7, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
Ongoing Efforts
Frank Gaffney, Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Reagan has outlined the stealth phases of Civilization Jihad in greater detail at his site, muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com:
1. Keep the infidels ignorant of the true nature and progress of Sharia. This requires Information Dominance. After the 9/11 Commission Report was published in 2004, Islamic organizations demanded the words that offend them be removed from public documents. The government complied across the board. Nine hundred pages were stripped from the FBI training manual and these terms can no longer be used: Islam, Muslim, jihad, enemy, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, al Qaeda, caliphate, Sharia law.
2. Prohibit, or at least discourage blasphemy and slander against Islam, Allah, Mohammed, and their followers.
The OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) is enforcing Information Dominance. The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) is a declaration of the member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference adopted in Cairo in 1990. It gives an overview on the Islamic perspective on human rights, and affirms Islamic Sharia as its sole source.
March 25, 2010, the Defamation of Religion resolution passed the UN’s human rights council, resolution #A/HRC/13/L.1 A similar resolution passed in 2011 with language like “defamation” removed making it less offensive to proponents of freedom as resolution 16/18. Though it was temporarily shelved at the UN general assembly in September, 2012, the OIC will not be giving up any time soon. They do not see this newest resolution as having replaced that which they have been pursuing fervently for so many years. On the contrary, they affirm their dedication to see their original goals through to fruition. In a document produced by the OIC, they have clearly stated what they want:
The OIC:
Affirms categorically the firm determination of Member States to continue their effective cooperation and close consultations to combat Islamophobia, defamation of all divine religions, and incitement to hatred, hostility and discrimination against Muslims;
Furthermore, the OIC:
Calls upon all States to prevent any advocacy of religious discrimination, hostility or violence and defamation of Islam by incorporating legal and administrative measures which render defamation illegal and punishable by law, and also urges all Member States to adopt specific and relevant educational measures at all levels
The OIC has pushed this strategy relentlessly at the international level for more than a decade. The OIC, the largest international organization next to the UN, is Saudi based and is basically a religious arm whose major practical purpose for the past decade has been to combat defamation of Islam. Twenty percent of Saudi Arabia’s national budget goes toward the expansion of Islam. Saudi Arabia is a religiously restricted nation where a Muslim can face death for leaving Islam.
This is serious. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has stated,
In recent years, USCIRF has been seriously concerned about initiatives by some UN member states to create an international legal norm, or redefine existing norms, to protect religions, rather than individuals, from alleged “defamation.” Instead of helping to address religious persecution and discrimination, as its proponents allege, a global ban on the so-called “defamation of religions” would exacerbate these problems and undermine fundamental individual rights, including religious freedom and free expression. Essentially, it would be an international blasphemy law.
Gaffney provides further examples of how the U.S. has fallen victim to this Islamic agenda:
3. Demand Concession
• 2006: Metropolitan Airport Authority, Minneapolis-St. Paul: a cab driver can refuse to service the blind because of their dogs which are seen by many Muslims as unclean.
• Foot baths and prayer rooms in public places at taxpayer expense.
• Triumphalist Mosques and Islamic Centers
4. Utilize Educational Vehicles
• Penetrate and subvert school systems
• Establishing Islamic Charter Schools
• Skewing Textbooks
• Using Curricula to proselytize
• Enforcing with testing, favoritism toward Islam
• Insinuating Islamic Speakers
• Money to Universities to set up Middle East Studies Departmentso Appointing anti-American professors
o Giving scholarships to students
5. Subvert institutions through one-sided interfaith dialogue
(They do not intend to build bridges. Their faith requires them to bring all to Islam. It is a ONE-WAY bridge!)
• Interfaith Seminars, panels, services
• Borrowing Christian churches and synagogues for Muslim worship
• Condemnation of Islamophobia
• Prohibiting defamation of religion
• Enlisting support for mosque building
• Touting shared faith traditions, practices
• Interfaith excursions
A group of Muslim leaders sent an open letter to the leaders of the Christian churches in America. This was the collective response of the recipients. Loving God and Neighbor Together; A Christian response to ‘A Common World Between Us and You’: The problem with this document is that it claims we all, Muslims and Christians alike serve the same “one God,” and that we must engage in interfaith dialogue as those who seek each other's good, for the one God unceasingly seeks our good.” The document was signed by over 300 church leaders including Rick Warren and Bill Hybels. While it is important for Christians to reach out in love to all Muslims, they must be aware of the goals of groups like the Muslim Brotherhood which try to force us, our children and our grandchildren into the iron grip of Sharia.
The god of Islam and the God of Christianity are not the same entity. The inscription on the ceiling inside the Dome of the Rock, a prime Muslim monument which stands in Jerusalem clearly states;
O People of the Book! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning God save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a Messenger of God, and His Word which He conveyed unto Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His messengers, and say not 'Three' - Cease! (it is) better for you! - God is only One God. Far be it removed from His transcendent majesty that He should have a son. ... Whoso disbelieveth the revelations of God (will find that) lo! God is swift at reckoning!
Gaffney continues:
6. Sharia Compliant Finance; already, financial institutions in the U.S. must hire Sharia authorities to determine whether a transaction is Sharia compliant or not.
(Note: A name you will recognize by now, Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, is one of the most preeminent Sharia compliant finance industry’s advisors. He is paid handsomely to advise. Under Sharia, at least 1/8 of zakat (one of the 5 pillars of Islam which concerns financial giving) must go to support jihad. Qaradawi surely adheres to zakat. For the institutions who utilize his advisory services, this constitutes material support for terrorism.
The world’s largest purveyor of Sharia-compliant insurance products was purchased in 2008 by the federal government with tax money; AIG. Over $1 billion went directly into the company’s Sharia compliant division.)
7. Place Muslim Brothers into positions from which they can exercise influence. (This will be discussed at length in the next article.)
Each of these stealth stages are running concurrently; very successfully. These plans have been known by our government for several years now. The question remains, why does our leadership pave the way for the Islamists? It has been reported that Obama has enlisted Qaradawi in secret talks between the U.S. and the Taliban.
Rashad Hussain, President Obama’s Special Envoy to The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, met with Qaradawi envoy Abdallah bin Bayyah, and well known Muslim Brotherhood leader in his own right. The meeting was supposedly to discuss the rights of religious minorities. That cannot possibly be taken seriously when the Muslim Brotherhood seeks to eradicate the entire planet of all other religions but their version of Islam.
Obama Supporting Islamist Activity
Our President devoted half his speech at the UN this year to the grievances of the Muslim world, saying among other statements, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
In 2010, Charles Boden, NASA administrator told Al Jazeera that when he accepted his position, Obama charged him with 3 tasks;
One, he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; [second], he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science and engineering — science, math and engineering.
President Obama is turning NASA into a vehicle for Muslim outreach… why?
Currently the scandal in Libya proves further that the current administration will do anything NOT to confront Islamic terrorism. Obama, Hillary Clinton and even the head of the CIA, had initially all publicly blamed the badly produced short film, The Innocence of Muslims for the outbreak of violence that caused the death of four Americans in Libya. The truth is; the attacks were carried out by Islamic militants. The truth surrounding all of the things that were taking place in Libya is slowly but surely coming out. What we are left with is another attack on Americans by jihadists and an administration that was caught red-handed removing security in Libya, not providing aid once the attack was underway, and then lying about what motivated the attack.
Less than 10 days following the deaths of the four Americans, including the Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, Sheikh Abu Mundhir Al-Shinqiti issued a fatwa approving the killing of the U.S. ambassador and the others and called for the deaths of more American ambassadors. This is the kind of jihad we are facing, from the top down within the Muslim hierarchy. We are past the point where the argument can realistically be made that the leadership of our nation does not know the nature and scope of this jihad against us.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts! |
The question then becomes, “Why is the Obama administration doing all they can to allow Islamists into American politics and culture?” It can be only one of three reasons; 1) Obama is a Muslim (or possibly an Islamist) himself as has been suggested by many researchers, 2) a progressive liberal whose ideology has been shown to blind adherents to reality for over a hundred years, or 3) a progressive ideologue who wants to destroy America, and is using radical Islam as one tool to do it. There really isn’t any other possibility. No rational American would ever invite radical Islam into America knowing their plan is to destroy America as we have known it.
In the next article, Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in key areas of the Obama Administration will be discussed, as well as the Nation that is most responsible for the spread of radical Islam and financing of Islamic terrorism.
Click here for part -----> 1,