Additional Titles









The Leipzig

Sept. 11: Hold Government

An Economic Assault on
African-Americans and Others in The US

Why The 28-Page Gap?


More Cuddy







Part 19




By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
August 8, 2005

Regarding health, including mental health, President Bush in 2004 called for the creation of a national electronic patient health record system by 2014. Not only will this allow physicians to share important information regarding our health, but it will eventually be used by the power elite as a means of population monitoring and control. The American people should resist the use of mental health screenings to further these goals, and U.S. Rep. Ron Paul's "Parental Consent Act of 2005" (H.R. 181) should receive even greater public support in this regard.

One way to show such support is by signing The Liberty Committee's petition in support of H.R. 181, which will be given to House Speaker Dennis Hastert and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. As of August 4, 2005 the petititon has been signed by nearly 10,000 people, and it reads as follows: "The American tradition of parents deciding what is best for their children is under attack. Powerful corporations, institutions, and politicians are quietly moving to have the federal government implement universal mental-health screening of children. This would likely lead to the forced drugging of children. The New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (a presidential commission formed in 2002) is the front group for this attack on the family.

Michael Hogan, chairman of the commission and director of the Ohio Department of Mental Health, thinks universal screening is a good idea. It's just that Mr. Hogan fears recommending it now is 'a little premature and probably controversial' although it 'might be the right thing to do.' (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, January 20, 2005) A little premature? Probably controversial? You bet it is ! No parental consent? The right thing to do? No it is not ! I strongly urge you to schedule a vote on H.R. 181---Parental Consent Act of 2005 and support its passage. H.R. 181 would prohibit the use of federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental-health screening program. Congress and President Bush can act quickly when they want to act. In 2003, the Do-Not-Call Implementation Act was passed by Congress and signed by President Bush in less than six weeks. You acted quickly to stop telemarketers from calling people at home. Act just as quickly now to block the forced mental health screening of children."

The power elite, which was mentioned at the beginning of Part 18 and which is moving us ever closer to world government, also at times likes to "set up" people. For example, in the early 1930s, Pennsylvania Governor Gifford Pinchot (Skull & Bones member mentioned in Part 11 of this series) was worried about the popularity of patriotic Marine General Smedley Butler. Pinchot persuaded Butler to run for the U.S. Senate, but then secretly backed his primary opponent. In Jules Archer's THE PLOT TO SEIZE THE WHITE HOUSE, one finds that "Paul Comly French of the PHILADELPHIA RECORD revealed that Governor Pinchot had set Butler up for defeat to eliminate him as a political threat." Shortly after this occurred, General Butler delivered a speech stating: "War is just a racket....Only a small inside group knows what it is about....It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses...."

General Butler's speech correctly revealed the attitude of the power elite toward the masses. British Lord Esher (one of Cecil Rhodes' key implementers of his secret society's plan "to take the government of the whole world") wrote in his diary on August 3, 1917: "No American is likely to be killed (in the First World War) before November. This is unfortunate, as (President) Wilson may require to be steadied before then and only the death of young Americans can ensure him stability." Esher also wrote: "No one can truly say that the sufferings of the world have been in vain, for they have regenerated all nations, and ours in particular. Can there be any doubt but that the war has made for progress and not for retrogression?" Concerning the American power elite's attitude about this, Lord Esher wrote in his diary on August 11, 1917: "Mr. Henry Morgenthau asked me to call on him....(He) was one of the principal supporters of President Wilson in the campaign for the Presidency, and he possesses the friendship and confidence of the President....They are ready to sacrifice the lives of American citizens....Mr. Morgenthau realizes the importance upon the morale of the French army and the French people of cementing the Alliance by shedding American blood at the earliest possible moment. If many lives have to be sacrificed, the influence upon the American people can only be beneficent." Henry Morgenthau, Sr. was a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which both Professor Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University) and Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. (CFR member and Harvard University professor) described as a "front" for the power elite.

Another key figure implementing Cecil Rhodes' plan, Arnold Toynbee, delivered a speech (not long before General Butler's speech) to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen, in which he revealed: "We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly be ostracized or discredited." This was published in the November 1931 edition of INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, the journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the British branch of the CFR.

A few years later, U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson (Skull & Bones member who initiated George H. W. Bush into Skull & Bones) wrote in his own diary on November 21, 1941: "President Roosevelt brought up the event that we are likely to be attacked perhaps (as soon as) next Monday, for the Japanese are notorious for making an attack without warning, and the question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot."

The power elite wants to reduce the population of the earth. Prince Philip of England has been head of the World Wildlife Fund and the World Wide Fund for Nature, and he has used his affiliation with the World Wildlife Federation to preach population control. He has even been reported to have said that if he were reincarnated, he would come back as a virus to reduce the population. In addition to viruses, genetically modified foods are becoming more prevalent and will not only result in more allergies but also human immune deficiencies, which will cause deaths. For those who survive, the power elite wants to tell them what to do (e.g., requiring "voluntary" service in order to graduate from high school, gain college admission, and obtain employment).

In case you think all this sounds like George Orwell's "Big Brother" and the fulfillment of Biblical End Times prophecy, note the following May 12, 2005 exchange on Alex Jones' talk show between the host and Bergen County, NJ, Chief of Police Jack Schmidig who has an implanted Verichip----

Jones: "In ten years if they say you've got to use this (chip) to buy and sell, you said you're happy with that, Chief."

Police Chief: "I wouldn't object to it."

Jones: "And you have to have this mark to buy and sell---you're saying if that happens, you don't have a problem with it."

Police Chief: "I don't." According to an Associated Press article, "Cub Foods experiment with fingerprint checkout" (BRAINERD DISPATCH, May 16, 2005), in early May 2005 grocer Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co. said it would provide fingerprint checkout at 80 stores in the Southeast. The system was made for the grocer by biometrics company Pay By Touch, which said later in the year its system will be at other national retail chains. Warning about this, Beth Givens (director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse in California) remarked: "It's unfortunate that people are willing to sacrifice their privacy for convenience. This gets people used to taking their fingerprints. Little by little we are losing our sensitivity to the collection of very personal data."

At this point, one might say that the American people love freedom too much to submit to the designs of the power elite. However, it seems that another terrorist attack in the U.S. could change that. U.S. General Tommy Franks was interviewed by CIGAR AFICIONADO (December 2003) and said that another terrorist attack inflicting heavy casualties "(would cause) our population to question our Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass-casualty-producing event....In a practical sense, the people will demand that the Constitution be abandoned in favor of a military government for protection." As U.S. Rep. Ron Paul stated in "It Can't Happen Here" (the heading of his December 20, 2004 newsletter): "We are not yet living in a total police state, but it is fast approaching. The seeds of future tyranny have been sown, and many of our basic protections against government have been undermined....We ought to be concerned that we have laid the foundation for tyranny by making the public more docile, more accustomed to government bullying, and more accepting of arbitrary authority---all in the name of security. Our love of liberty, above all, has been so diminished, that we tolerate intrusions into our privacy that would have been abhorred just a few years ago....Those who believe a police state can't happen here are poor students of history. Every government, democratic or not, is capable of tyranny. We must understand this, if we hope to remain a free people."

Tom DeWeese (president of the American Policy Center) in "Agenda 21 or Freedom 21: Making the right choice" (THE ECOLOGIC POWERHOUSE, June 2005) writes about a controlled society, and comments: "Control today has a name---Agenda 21. This is the name of a policy document that was first unveiled at the United Nations' Earth Summit in 1992. Implementation is through a policy called Sustainable Development. This program is now the official policy of the United States, and is being systematically imposed in every single state of the Union, and in every city and town. There are very few exceptions....Children will be taken care of every day---in public education centers, that not only provide a centrally planned curriculum, but also provide for all physical and mental health needs....If you choose freedom, then there is a counter to Agenda 21 and its Sustainable Development program. It's called Freedom 21, and it's quickly growing into a 'freedom movement.' Freedom 21 is not an organization. It is a loose coaliton of groups and individuals who believe that our nation's Founding Fathers had it right, when they established this nation as one with tightly controlled reins on government. The Founding Fathers believed that all individuals were born with their rights of individual liberty, and that government's job is to protect those rights, as individuals pursue their own dreams and goals. That's the basis for the Freedom 21 agenda." The Freedom 21 National Conference for this year (2005) occurred July 14 to 16 in Reno, Nevada. For more information, see .

Unfortunately, a blow to freedom around the world occurred on June 17, 2005 when the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "United Nations Reform Act of 2005" by a vote of 221 to 184. Congressman Ron Paul in his column ("NeoCon Global Government") for the week of June 13 stressed that this bill "expanded the power of the United Nations beyond the dreams of even the most ardent left-wing, one-world globalists. But this time the UN power grabbers aren't European liberals; they are American neo-conservatives, who plan to use the UN to implement their own brand of world government....Specifically, the legislation redefines terrorism very broadly for the UN's official purposes---and charges it to take action on behalf of both governments and international organizations. What does this mean? The official adoption of this definition by the United Nations would have the effect of making resistance to any government or any international organization an international crime. It would make any attempt to overthrow a government an international causus belli for UN military action....Any such activity would constitute justification for United Nations action inside that country....What if this were in place when the Contras were fighting against the Marxist regime in Nicaragua?...This new policy is given teeth by creating a 'Peacebuilding Commission,' which will serve as the implementing force for the internationalization of what were formerly internal affairs of sovereign nations....This new commission will create the beginning of a global UN army. It will claim the right to intervene in any conflict anywhere on the globe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formally into the picture as well. It is a complete new world order, but undertaken with the enthusiastic support of many of those who consider themselves among the most strident UN critics."

In the first year of the presidency of Bill Clinton, globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski authored OUT OF CONTROL: GLOBAL TURMOIL ON THE EVE OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, in which he referred to "the fading of religion and of patriotism." Regarding "Western liberal democratic societies," he wrote that "the fact is that religion has ceased to be a major social force." And concerning national sovereignty, he commented that "by the end of the century the once evocative concept of exclusive state sovereignty has come to be displaced by the much more popular notion of inclusive international interdependence."

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

It is my hope, however, that this series will inspire people to keep informed and then take appropriate action when needed to restore Biblical morality and traditional education, and to preserve the traditional family, the principles upon which America was founded (including the right to reject mental health screenings as an invasion of privacy), and our national sovereignty---for the sake of America's future. First and foremost, of course, is the hope that more and more people will PRAY FOR AMERICA.

------> To read Part 1 through 18 click here

� 2005 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved

Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or Truth?"

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.

E-Mail: Not Available










It is my hope, however, that this series will inspire people to keep informed and then take appropriate action when needed to restore Biblical morality and traditional education, and to preserve the traditional family, the principles upon which America was founded...