Devvy Kidd -- A closer look at the 2008 presidential candidates

A CLOSER LOOK AT THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES

By: Devvy
November 15, 2007

� 2007 - NewsWithViews.com

I'm on my way to Southern California on business; then on to Northern California to be with my family on Thanksgiving. Because of my schedule this trip, I won't be doing any columns for two weeks, so I decided to get this election one done. I hope the Thanksgiving holiday might give people a little extra time to look real hard at all candidates running for president. Regardless of your political party affiliation, I sincerely wish all Americans a safe and enjoyable Thanksgiving with family and friends. Despite the massive problems we are facing, we still have much to be thankful for and with God's blessings, we will find the strength to continue our fight for America's future.

As someone who has been in the trenches full time for 18 years, I've seen and heard just about every standard election cycle promise which always converts into a lie after the candidate is sworn into office. Millions of young Americans will vote in November 2008. These young adults were in grade school when Hillary Clinton and the tramp she's married to dirtied the White House and brought shame to this nation. How I want to gag every time I hear, "You go girl!" in reference to Hillary Rodam Clinton. The females who chant this vacuous nonsense will vote for this menace to America simply because she has two mammary glands and a vagina. Needy, whining, dependent women who claim to be "liberated" and "empowered," but in fact are the ones always bitching and moaning with their hands out for more from mother government and they demand you pay for it. In the meantime, Hillary is trying very hard to look like a real man. The whole thing is revolting.

Of course, it goes without saying that a real man would never vote for Hillary Clinton, although I did see a segment on cable a few weeks ago of some males walking up the street carrying a big banner that read, Hillary for President; this was in New Hampshire. I thought these are the "sensitive," kinder, gentler new breed of wimps who would support this shrew who has stood by her business partner for more than 25 years while he screws anything in skirts from 16-60. A "husband" with a rape charge hanging over his head, Hillary stands by Bill, but she won't fix him cookies. No self-respecting woman would stay married to a pig like Bill Clinton, but theirs isn't a marriage, it's a con against the American people. Both of them are narcissists who feed off each other. Some cheeky fellow sent me this e-mail last week because he took exception when I identified Hillary Clinton as a Marxist: "Hillary is not a Marxist anything you f**king moron..Jesus Christ.. what the hell is wrong with you f**ks? Try reading some Marx first you stupid f**k. You should be censored for your idiocy. he is not only not a Marxist of any sort, she is even futher away from being a commie.. she is a liberal.."

Potty mouth's email is typical of what comes into my cyber mail box everyday. I'm sure his mother would be proud, but he does have that in common with Hillary who is legendary for her filthy mouth, hatred of our military and bitchy temper. But, that's what this new generation of sissies seem to want in their female politicians, or perhaps they secretly want a dominatrix experience and Hillary the Hun is the closest they will get. A further step into the Twilight Zone brings us this: "Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, has joined the fray, sounding off in a Baptist Press column about why we, as Christians, need to be willing to overlook the evil within candidates and actually have a moral obligation to make utilitarian compromises and vote only for those who are electable." That's how slaves are made.

On the very serious side, it is a difficult process for Americans in deciding who to vote for to be our next president. It is a heavy responsibility made more so by the machines that work behind the curtain and play a deadly game with our lives and country. In the end, the electoral college will cast their votes (which seem to be months BEFORE the general election) and choose for us. If there is a close outcome, guess who decides the presidency? "If no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most electoral votes." Who will control the House in November 2008? The Democrats.

I can tell you unequivocally that the voting rolls in this country are so tainted with illegals, deceased, felons and what I call "extended family voting", we will have no idea as to any accurate vote count unless the voting rolls are purged before the election and only hand marked ballots (NO machines in any form) are used, counted in front of the general public before they leave the precincts. The whole purpose of giving driver's licenses to illegal aliens (NOT immigrants) is because illegals register Democrat. Period. Since 1993 I have been wearing out my vocal cords and fingers trying to get Americans to demand Congress get rid of the Motor Voter Act of 1993 because it has been the biggest tool yet in fraudulent voter registration. Registering on line is even worse. What is "extended family voting"? Registered voters, you pick any first name you like: A. Gonzalez, B. Gonzalez, C. Gonzalez, D. Gonzalez, C. Chen, D Chen, E, Chen and so on. The addresses turn out to be an empty lot in LA or empty warehouse in NYC. This is how U.S. Rep. Loretta Sanchez got "elected" and I'm convinced she's an illegal alien.

Too many Americans will vote one issue: Save social security! The tried and true slogan every election cycle. Social security can't be saved. More money for education! The tried and true slogan every election cycle and despite a trillion dollars in my lifetime, America's education system is worse than a massive failure, the system is nothing more than an indoctrination engine for social engineering and to seduce America's children into accepting global governance. Females will vote for Hillary Clinton because she promises to protect their "right" to kill an unborn baby dressed up as "protecting your reproductive rights." What hogwash. Reproductive rights means a woman deciding whether or not to conceive a child. Can you show me one law in any of the 50 states of the Union that prohibits a woman's right to reproduce? Not a court order for junkies having babies while on crack, but any law that denies a woman her right to reproduce? Of course you can't, because there are no such laws. Abortion interferes with your reproductive rights. Reproduction means having a child. Abortion reverses the process.

Too many Americans will vote for a candidate based strictly on name recognition. Too many Americans will not take the time to do any research into a candidate, even if that candidate is an incumbent because they're either too lazy or too afraid to find out their choice might present a moral problem for them. I wrote a column about this in June 2007. My e-mail box filled up from average, ordinary Americans who have been registered Democrats all their lives, but said they simply could not and would not vote for Clinton, Obama, Edwards or any other candidate who is pro-sodomy, pro-abortion and in Hillary's case, such an accomplished liar ("Everybody in politics lies, but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it's troubling." David Geffen, media mogul). This is a real dilemma for Democrats, just as it is for a lot of Republicans regarding their choices.

In the next few months, these candidates will receive endorsements from various individuals which they hope will sway your vote. Last week's jaw dropper was Evangelical Christian grand poohbah, Pat Robertson, endorsing a pro-abortion (including partial birth abortion), pro-sodomy/lesbian, crook like Rudy Julie Annie. However, when you walk into the voting booth and cast your vote, it is YOUR vote and no one else's. Whether it counts or not (except for those lucky folks in New Hampshire), we must all vote our conscience and ask yourself: Is my candidate a true advocate of constitutional government and a moral individual of integrity or has he/she sold out my country? Any candidate who voted for the Patriot Act and to eliminate Habeas Corpus has no business in Congress or the White House. That would be Biden, Clinton, McCain, Hunter, Tancredo. I'm sorry, but you can't play favorites when it comes to the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That's how slaves are made.

The files below contain links on candidates Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Romney, Giuliani, McCain, Huckabee and Ron Paul. While many think they know their candidate, they might be disappointed when credible facts come out. Many won't care because they want mother government, not freedom and liberty. Many won't care because their candidate has promised them the moon as they rake in the campaign cash. Big money makes for big lies. Because there is so much information on the Internet, I tried (which required countless hours of reading and sifting through junk) to find the most factual articles and columns instead of just cheer leading. There are no files for Kucinich, Thompson, Hunter, Tancredo, Richardson, Biden or Keyes. This isn't to marginalize these candidates because I know they have sincere, dedicated supporters, but I don't believe they will be in the race for the duration due to lack of money. It is the nature of a race.

Please keep these in mind when you are evaluating a candidate: Jurisdiction, treaties, and executive orders. These are must reads: Creating the New Soviet Man in America, Why an Income Tax is Not Necessary to Fund the Federal Government; also available on audio to download to your IPod or a CD free; The Right argument on taxes; Collectivism vs Individualism; The factual and legal truth about social security. Patriots vs Politicians. Several dozen of my columns on these issues are available free on my site; down load to your IPod or a CD and listen while you drive.

In-depth look at the candidates. Index here or go straight to file page: Romney, Obama, McCain, Edwards, Giuliani, Huckabee, Clinton, Ron Paul.

Did you know the Communist Party USA endorsed John Kerry in 2004? Why? Because they felt he would continue to further the agenda for world communism via the official Democratic Party. Back in 1996, in my Blind Loyalty booklet, I outlined the 56 members of Congress who belonged to the "Progressive Caucus" and information on their twin, the DSA: Democratic Socialists of America. All Democrats. The controlled, dominant media puppets have convinced most Americans that communism is dead, but nothing could be further from the truth. Below are the goals of the communist party entered into the Congressional Record in 1963. How can anyone deny the Democrat Party has been pursuing these goals for decades? How can anyone deny the Republican Party is also pursuing the same agenda? They have just been able to hide it better - until the Internet came along and Americans suddenly found a world of credible research at their fingertips. Compare these goals to your candidate and ask yourself if this is what you want for America? The full list is here and remember, communism can only thrive in a Godless nation. Goals:

Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war. (Done); Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites. (Done); Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination. (Done); Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N. (Done); Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N. (Mostly done); Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Done);

Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party. (Done and they teach openly in U.S. colleges); Do away with all loyalty oaths. (Done); Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States. (Done and in progress); Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights. (Done); Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks. (Done);

Infiltrate the press. (Done); Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy making positions. (Done); Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures. (Done, they call themselves liberals); Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms." (Done); Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art." (Done, i.e., "art" of Jesus being smeared with feces); Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press. (Done);

Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. (Done); Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." (Done); Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch." (Done); Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state." (Done); Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. (Done)

Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." (Done); Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." (Done); Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc. (Done); Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus. (Done);

Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities. (Done); Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat]. (Done); Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals. (Done); Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. (Done big time);

Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. (Done big time); Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government. (In progress); Internationalize the Panama Canal. (Done); Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike. (In progress).

I rest my case.

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs to no organization.

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site (www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

Devvy's website: www.devvy.com

Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section on her web site. It is filled with answers to frequently asked questions and links to reliable research sources.

E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net

Home