---

Additional Titles

 

By Servando Gonzalez
May 27, 2014
NewsWithViews.com

[Servando Gonzales is the author of Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People and I Dare Call It treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of the America.]

Just recently, the city of Carson, California, introduced an ordinance that would impose criminal penalties for anyone convicted of bullying school children and young adults. The ordinance would make it a misdemeanor to cause any Carson residents from kindergarten through age 25 to “feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed or molested” without necessarily requiring a threat of physical harm.

But I don’t understand this hypocritical campaign against bullying when most American role models, in fiction and real life, are nothing but bullies.

U.S. action movies, novels and video games, as well as their own government’s actions, at home and abroad, have conditioned Americans to believe that strong is better than weak, big is better than small, and violent force is better than peaceful dialogue. In synthesis: it is good to be a bully,[1] and the biggest bully of all is the U.S. government itself.

Actually, what children are doing in American schools is learning from their role models in fiction and real life, to survive in a country of bullies by becoming bullies themselves. No wonder football, which is basically a game of bullying, is America’s preferred sport[2] that some fanatics see it as a form of religion.[3]

To most Americans, politics, particularly international politics, is nothing but a huge football game in which they must be the winner at all costs. Just recently, John Kerry, acting as U.S. Secretary of State on behalf of his CFR masters, told the Russians: “You lost the Cold War. Get over it!” Americans don’t like losers.

But war is not a game. Games have rules, and players have to abide by them. War has no rules. It is a zero-sum game in which the winner takes all. The problem, however, is that between nuclear powers war may mean that everyone loses.

During the Cold War days, a sign on the door of a conference room in the State Department read: “In a Nuclear Age, Nations Must Make War Like Porcupines Make Love—Carefully.” Apparently, however, both President Kennedy and Soviet premier Khrushchev independently arrived at a conclusion that went a step further than the sign’s advice: In a nuclear age, nuclear powers should not make war at all.

It seems that, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, somebody took down the sign, because the warmongers in both factions of the Repucratic Party are itching for a fight. It seems that is has not crossed their narrow minds that, more likely than not, a military confrontation with Russia will rapidly escalate into an all-out nuclear exchange. In this potential conflict, even the winner can become a loser.

Unfortunately, most Russian intercontinental nuclear missiles are targeted at American cities instead of Wall Street, the Pocantico Hills in upstate New York, 58 E 68th St. in Manhattan, or the Patagonia. These are some of the places where the true enemies of Russia and America have planned to hole up waiting for the Armageddon they are desperately trying to provoke to get rid of the rest of us, the “useless eaters” who are consuming the earth’s natural resources that, by their warped version of Natural Law, belong to them.[4]

Just a few days ago, while listening to a “conservative” radio host, a brainwashed caller expressed his conviction that a Russian invasion of the Ukraine would pose a direct threat to the national security of the United States. Now, just a glance at a world map will convince anybody that the Ukraine is several thousand miles from America’s borders. So, it beats me how whatever happens in a distant country so far away from American shores would become a threat to the national security of the U.S.[5]

Granted, a Russian attack on the Ukraine may be a threat to the interests of some international banksters, oil magnates and CEOs of U.S.-based transnational corporations, but their interests highly differ from the interests of the American people. Actually, their goal of implementing a system of global slavery, which they call the New World Order, is diametrically opposed to the interests of a large majority of Americans.

Undoubtedly, Russia has already become a threat to the dreams of global domination of the conspirators pushing hard for the implementation of the final steps of their New Gay World Order. Moreover, it is rapidly becoming a threat to the people who want to turn America into a communo-fascist totalitarian dictatorship. Seen from this perspective, we should thank the Russian people for rousting the conspirators from their totalitarian dream and reminding them of the real world—a world that, despite their best efforts, they cannot fully control anymore.

For almost two centuries, and particularly after the end of WWII in 1945, the U.S. has been the uncontested, unopposed world bully pushing the conspirators New Gay World Order down other peoples’ throats. Some unscrupulous Americans created the most incredible pretexts to justify wars of aggression against less powerful countries, and the government and the mainstream press brainwashed the American people to believe that the wars were justified, because these countries were a threat to the national security of the United States.

Because of the trickle-down effect, one way or another, the American people somehow profited from the exploits of the bully. For example, 400,000 Americans died fighting WWII, 36,500 died in Korea, 58,000 in Vietnam, but their deaths not only contributed to increasing the fortunes of the American corporations involved in the wars, but the economic expansion of these corporations also brought jobs and good economic times for most Americans.

However, the transformation of American corporations into multinational ones dramatically changed the rules of the game. Encouraged and assisted by the U.S. government under the guise of “free trade,” these corporations felt no responsibility to keep American jobs at home and moved their operations abroad. They found that employing foreigners at extremely low wages was much more profitable than hiring Americans, and we must to keep in mind that the corporations’ ultimate goal is to maximize their profits.

This explains why, despite innumerable, unending, unnecessary wars all around the globe since the end of the Vietnam War, they have not brought economic benefits for the American people. The American people supply the soldiers to die in defense of the New World Order, but the oil magnates, Wall Street bankers and stockholders of transnational corporations are the only ones who are increasing their fortunes.

Despite the fact that Americans pay in blood and money for the maintenance of the vast U.S. economic empire,[6] it solely benefits less than 1 percent of the U.S. population. Being the world’s bully does not seem as attractive to most Americans as it was thirty years ago.

Nevertheless, back in 1950, National Security Council Report 68 warned that Soviet acquisition of atomic weapons heralded an irreversible shift in geopolitical momentum in Russia’s favor. International-relations scholars in American universities and think tanks commonly speak of this moment as a transition from a multipolar to a world of Cold War bipolarity.

But the implosion and fall of the Soviet Union in 1998 and the collapse of the Soviet empire left the U.S. (actually, the CFR conspirators who control the U.S.) as the sole, uncontested superpower in a new unipolar world. The most vivid expression of these dream was the infamous report “Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century,”[7] a sort of new Mein Kampf produced by the madmen of the Project for the New American Century. Not by chance, most of them were CFR members.

Former national-security adviser Brent Scowcroft, a proud PNAC and CFR member, declared at the time that the United States found itself “standing alone at the height of power. It was, it is, an unparalleled situation in history, one which presents us with the rarest opportunity to shape the world.”[8] He didn’t say, though, that it was an opportunity to shape the world into the New Gay World Order conceived by the CFR conspirators.

But the conspirators’ dream of a unipolar world under their full control was conceived before the PNAC’s imperialist manifesto. As early as 1992, way before the fall of the Soviet Union, Under Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and his deputy Scooter Libby, both of them trusted CFR agents, authored the produced the Defense Planning Guidance for the 1994-1999 fiscal years, later known as the Wolfowitz Doctrine.

Not intended for public release, it was leaked to the New York Times on March 7, 1992, and sparked a public controversy about U.S. foreign and defense policy. The document was widely criticized as imperialist as the document outlined a policy of unilateralism and pre-emptive military action to suppress potential threats (to the interests of the CFR conspirators) from other nations and prevent any other nation from rising to superpower status.

Such was the public’s outcry that the document was hastily re-written under the close supervision of U.S. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney (CFR) and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell (CFR) before being officially released on April 16, 1992. Many of its tenets re-emerged in the Bush Doctrine, which was described by Senator Edward M. Kennedy (not a CFR member) as “a call for 21st century American imperialism that no other nation can or should accept.”

Now, given the fact that all the people involved in the promotion of a new unipolar world of uncontested U.S. imperialism were CFR agents, one can safely infer that both the PNAC’s manifesto and the Wolfowitz doctrine were concoctions developed at the secret CFR conciliabula, and behind them was the hands of their true masters, the Rockefellers.

Nevertheless, seizing the opportunity of the fall of the Soviet empire, the globalist conspirators brought most of the former Warsaw Pact nations into NATO and encouraged the spread of “free” market economies and “democratic” institutions [9]— all of them under their control— throughout the former communist world.

Even more, not only have the CFR conspirators who control the U. S. pushed most of the world under the control of institutions largely made in America by the conspirators themselves (the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, the GATT), they have also retained the lion’s share in these arrangements. As expected, these institutions have proved to be disastrous to the world, including the U.S..

But the “unipolar moment” was short-lived. The losers of the Cold War, China and Russia, got a second wind and it resulted in the present era of a multipolar global system with several unequal great (nuclear) powers — a quite different outcome from what the CFR conspirators had in their feverish minds.

Back to square one.

Now, even if these bullies were pro-imperialist American patriots of the Teddy Roosevelt style, their imperialist dreams and actions would be immoral, unethical and objectionable. But no. These neo-imperialists bullies are not true American patriots. Proof of it is that all of them belong to the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization that for more than half a century has been openly promoting the idea of abolishing the Constitution and eliminating U.S. sovereignty.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily E-Mail Alerts!

The true, secret goal of the CFR bullies[10] and their masters is to use the U.S. armed forces to impose the neo-slavery of the New Gay World Order upon America and the rest of the world. They are not American patriots by any stretch of the imagination. They are traitors of the worst kind.

The bully nation model developed by the CFR conspirators has become obsolete. As Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler put it, “There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.”[11]

� 2014 Servando Gonzalez - All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. A sign of this is that in the late 1970s, a book titled Winning Through Intimidation topped the best-seller lists and IBM’s slogan for its sales people was “It’s hard to be humble when you know you’re the best!”
2. Chuck Baldwin, “Thoughts on Super Bowl and Sports in General,” NewsWithViews.com, February 6, 2014.
3. See, Jennifer Harper, “Half of American fans say “supernatural” forces are in play during sports events,” The Washington Times, January 21, 2013
4. See, Servando Gonzalez, “CFR Madmen Itching for a Nuclear Armageddon,”
5. On the other hand, Castro’s Cuba is just 90 miles from America’s shores. Moreover, Venezuela is a country occupied by 60 thousand troops of Castro’s army, and nobody in America seems to care about this attack on a democratic country much closer to the U.S. borders than the Ukraine. Of course, Fidel Castro, a long-time secret agent of the CFR conspirators, is no threat to them.
6. According to CFR’s mouthpiece Arthur Schlesinger Jr., “American troops might be sent into combat not just in defense of the United States but in defense of world order. U.S. soldiers would have to kill and die for what many would regard as an abstraction and do so when the life of their own nation was not in danger.” “Back to the Womb? Isolationism’s Renewed Threat,” Foreign Affairs, July/August 1995.
7. Project for the New American Century, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century,” September 2000.
8. Scowcroft quoted in Steven Ambrose and Douglas Brinkley, eds., Witness to America (New York: HarperCollins, 1999), p. 579.
9. History shows that the U.S., acting on behalf of the CFR globalist conspirators, has promoted human rights in word only. While mouthing platitudes to the concept, it consistently supported brutal autocrats, staged coups against nationalist leaders and exploited Third World resources.
10. An interesting characteristic of most of these bullies, like Wolfowitz and Cheney, is that they managed themselves to avoid fighting in the wars they promoted.
11. General Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket (Los Angeles: Feral House, 2003).