By Amil Imani

May 1, 2025

Texas, the unbreakable heart of American freedom, is under attack. A creeping, insidious force is burrowing into the Lone Star State, and it’s not coming with guns or bombs; it’s arriving with land deals, mosques, and a calculated plan to transform Texas into an Islamic stronghold. The evidence is undeniable, the stakes are apocalyptic, and the time for action is now. This is not a drill but a war for the soul of Texas.

The East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) is ground zero. They’re not just building a neighborhood; they’re carving out a 402-acre Islamic fortress called EPIC City, a self-proclaimed “epicenter of Islam in America.” This isn’t about houses or community centers – it’s about planting a flag and claiming Texas for Sharia. Their promotional videos boast of a “meticulously designed community that brings Islam to the forefront.” That’s not integration; that’s domination. They want 1,000 homes, a mosque, Islamic schools, clinics, and a senior living facility, orbiting around their green-domed house of worship with 3,200 worshipers. This is a city within a city, a parallel society that answers to the Quran, not the Constitution.
Story continues below advertisement

Many of our elected officials don’t even dare to challenge Islam and its barbaric rules. They usually avoid any questions about the nature of Islam when speaking with their constituents or deceive them by telling them not to worry about the horrific things that are happening on the other side of the world.

This is alarming. But regrettably, too few Americans are aware of all this, and organizations such as the Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations are taking full advantage of our naïveté. CAIR is only one of many Islamic organizations that provide refuge to stealth jihad.

At least Governor Greg Abbott has sounded the alarm, and he’s not whispering. “Sharia law is not allowed in Texas. Nor are Sharia cities,” he declared, unleashing a dozen State agencies that are investigating EPIC’s activities. The Texas Rangers are probing potential criminal violations, including operating an unlicensed funeral home, misleading investors, and breaching fair housing laws. Attorney General Ken Paxton criticizes EPIC for consumer protection violations, while the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has issued cease-and-desist orders for starting construction without permits. This is Texas fighting back, and it’s a beautiful sight.

But the enemy is cunning. EPIC’s leaders, like resident scholar Yasir Qadhi, claim they’re just building a “diverse community” that follows state and federal laws. Don’t be fooled. Their own words betray them. A viral video tied to the project brags about creating a “self-governed Islamic city.” Self-governed? That’s code for a no-go zone where Texas law is a suggestion, not a mandate. They aren’t here to blend in but to take over. And they’re not alone. Shadowy Islamic groups are acquiring land across Texas—Sachse, Aubrey, Blue Ridge—and even converting megachurches into ideological outposts. This is a coordinated invasion, and Texans are sleeping through it.

The X platform is ablaze with warnings. Patriots like @AmyMek and @CarlosTurcios are exposing the truth: Islamic compounds are sprouting with zero oversight, and symbolic rituals are being performed to claim Texas for Islam. One post revealed a Pakistani ex-president invited by EPIC’s backers, openly preaching that “the resurgence of Islam can take place from the US.” They’re not hiding their goal—a caliphate on American soil. Another user, @JohnnyWhiskyTX, roared that while Texans are distracted by BBQ and football, their state is being transformed into Pakistan. Wake up, Texas. Your heritage is being stolen.

This isn’t new. Texas has been a battleground for years. Two Muslim lawmakers, Salman Bhojani and Suleman Lalani, have already pushed bills like HB 1044, which critics say lays the groundwork for Sharia-compliant family law. They’ve also secured “Muslim Heritage Month” for the next decade, a Trojan horse to entrench Islamic influence in schools and public policy. Halal certification schemes are bleeding Texas businesses, funneling money to fund lobbying and radical agendas. This is economic warfare dressed as cultural accommodation.

The opposition is fierce but not fierce enough. EPIC’s defenders, like Mustafaa Carroll from CAIR’s Texas branch, cry “Islamophobia” and accuse Abbott and Paxton of spreading “hateful misinformation.” They claim the project is inclusive and open to all. However, their actions scream otherwise. Death threats have poured in against the project’s critics, and locals are terrified of a loudspeaker blasting the call to prayer five times a day. This isn’t about coexistence; it’s about submission.

Texas history is forged in defiance—San Jacinto, the Alamo, the Texas Rangers. We don’t bow to foreign creeds or allow our laws to be trampled. However, the enemy is banking on our complacency. They’re counting on Texans to shrug and say, “It’s just a neighborhood.” It’s not. It’s a beachhead. If EPIC City rises, it will serve as a model for additional Islamic enclaves throughout the state, each gradually undermining the Texas way of life until a crescent moon supplants the Lone Star.

The fight is now. Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton are drawing a line in the sand, but they need every Texan to stand with them. Flood the Collin County Commissioners Court with demands to deny EPIC’s permits. Arm yourself with the truth—follow X accounts like @KamVTV and @EndWokeness for real-time updates. Demand transparency from your lawmakers and reject any compromise that smells of Sharia. Texas is the last bastion of American grit. If we lose here, we lose everything.

This is not a debate. This is not a discussion. This is a call to arms. Texas will not become an Islamic state. Not today, not ever. Rise, Texans, and defend your land. The eyes of history are watching.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

April 26, 2025

Honestly, I don’t know what will work! Apathy, political correctness, and massive Islamic lobbying have successfully prevented the public from truly grasping the all-pervasive, invasive Islamic assault.

As usual, the sworn enemies of the United States- leftist politicians, hungry for votes- despise America and harbor hatred for our Constitution. They delightfully embraced and welcomed this ‘Trojan Horse’ army inside our gates. It was a perfect marriage; both sides needed one another to survive.

These desert dwellers and the Quran-trained people, aided by our leftist politicians, exploit the provisions of the most benevolent system known to humanity- our democratic republic – to undermine it from within.

Islamists, by sheer numbers, will eventually be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policies according to the Quran. Once they control a town, they will establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Oddly enough, our elected officials have entirely overlooked the Islamization of European cities. Many European leaders have acted out of intense fear, granting Muslims the right to create their own shadow governments within countries like Sweden, England, the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, where they control their populations through Sharia Law without any accountability.

America, the greatest superpower on the planet, is gradually losing its power to these newcomers, and out of fear of being labeled racist, they, too, look the other way and remain silent.

The United States was in an excellent place to learn from its fellow European allies and stop this mess of Islamic immigration before it was too late. Even the attacks of 9/11 were not convincing enough for many of our fellow American citizens to wake up!!

Rather than seek a drastic solution to halt the progress of Islam, some of our fellow citizens and elected officials have welcomed more Muslims for resettlement and provided additional resources at the taxpayers’ expense to establish more mosques.

By now, we know that the apparatus that moves Islamic ideology is the life manual of Islam: the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna. Unfortunately, Muslims themselves are the ones who Islam most victimizes. They have inherited this viral psychological disease of hate and violence that they live by and transfer it to their children, as well as to sympathetic people in their cause.

It is generally assumed that peaceful religions address matters of importance to daily life and those that transcend it. Religion is believed to exercise a civilizing influence by structuring social life, promoting spirituality, and advancing a range of human virtues. Zoroaster, for instance, based his faith on the triad of good thoughts, good speech, and good deeds; Moses framed the fundamentals of his faith in the Ten Commandments; and Jesus placed love at the core of his beliefs.

Many people adhere to religion to find comfort and guidance in life. These perceived benevolent aspects of religion give it a special status. However, concerns about religious overreach have prompted societies to implement safeguards against that possibility.

The bottom line is that Islam remains a paradox for many, including America’s law enforcement agencies. Many so-called experts have struggled to decipher and understand this ideology, except for a few individuals I know.

It is a virtue to take action to oppose the hateful, a vice to ignore it. It is a virtue to hate tyranny, misogyny, discrimination of all sorts, oppression, and all manner of violations of the legitimate rights of individuals and peoples. Islam is a form of religious fascism, a destroyer of liberty and much of what free people cherish. Therefore, it must be confronted and destroyed ideologically.

Fellow Americans, it is time for us to confront the advancement of Islam in America. The destiny and survival of the free world are at stake. Avoiding this responsibility would be an unpardonable act by every enlightened individual and organization that values humanity.

Life, liberty, and dignity

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 24, 2025

Yet, too few people are discussing it or talking about it. Why? Many Americans have been conditioned to be tolerant and compassionate, to embrace multiculturalism, and to respect each other’s beliefs, ideals, and values. That’s wonderful in a utopian world, but the fact is, Islam doesn’t embrace any aspect of Western civilization—much less American culture. We said on 9/11 that we’d “never forget,” but guess what? Many of us have. America is slowly and methodically being dismantled as a nation by Islamic subversion, and our cherished freedoms are more fragile than ever. While we know how to fight the enemy abroad with combat troops, intelligence, and drone strikes, we’re doing nothing to combat the very same enemy that resides on our soil in broad daylight.

Let me be clear: if we don’t defeat Islam politically and quickly here, without a doubt, our children and grandchildren will be engaged in a religious and ideological bloody war, the likes of which have never been seen on American soil before. Just the other day, one day after the 9/11 anniversary, another Muslim, Zulfat Suara, “became first elected to Nashville office, winning at-large Metro Council seat,” and we all have already witnessed the two junior Muslim Congresswomen, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib’s public discourse in the US Congress. Wait, there are a lot more Muslims who plan to run in the 2020 elections and beyond.

And because a Muslim must follow Islamic laws and not man-made laws like the US Constitution, a Muslim can never be both a Muslim and an American at the same time. It is impossible. That’s where the clash begins, and no elected official in this country is willing to or wants to take the bull by the horns and discuss it. What a shame!

Do all Muslims adhere to the commands of the Quran? No, thank God. However, as they integrate into their communities and increase in numbers, they tend to become more militant and less tolerant of the laws and regulations of those communities. Any religion whose holy book instructs its followers to commit acts that contradict the rules of this country should not only lose its tax-exempt status but also forfeit its First Amendment protection and be banned from the United States altogether.

In countries such as France, Britain, and several North African countries, where Islamic enclaves and ghettos have emerged, local mullahs enforce Sharia law despite its conflict with national or state laws. What many Americans fail to understand is that Sharia law forms the foundation of Islamic theocracy and totalitarianism. The establishment of global Sharia law serves as their ultimate goal. The Quran is clear in its directive to Muslims to create a global Islamic state (Caliphate), over which the Islamic messiah, or Mahdi, will rule with Sharia as the sole law of the land. There is no mistake: this is the intent of influential Islamic elements in America.

The problem is too few Americans are aware of it, and organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR are taking full advantage of American’s naiveté. On top of that, a consortium composed of pandering liberal politicians, blinded by short-term self-interest and egotism, attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors, and bastions of useful idiots, are the witting or unwitting promoters of Islamism.

Understand that Sharia is very complex and derived from multiple Islamic sources. The Quran, considered the “uncreated word of Allah,” is the primary source of Sharia law. The Hadith (sayings and actions of Muhammad) is the second most crucial document in Sharia. Historic rulings by jurists over the years and so-called reasoning by analogy make up the other two less influential sources of Sharia. Together, they constitute Islam’s theological core, and they result in a totalitarian way of life for Muslim followers and non-Muslims.

Honor killings, marital rape, female genital mutilation, severing of hands and feet are but a few of the other components of Sharia law. When Muslim men are directed to beat their wives for rejecting sexual advances, it’s evident that American values are in direct conflict with what Islamic law requires of its followers. So, how do we reconcile this? We can’t!

In short, we need to open our eyes and see how the scheme played out in Europe. Much of Europe is already past the stage of no return. This is not a game. This is real. This ideology will devour your entire family, both Republicans and Democrats, if not now, soon enough. Americans need to wake up now and stop Islam from growing to the point of no return.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

April 17, 2025

As of April 2025, a troubling pattern has emerged across Europe and beyond, casting a shadow over the principles of democratic governance. The suppression of political opposition, exemplified by recent events involving figures like Marine Le Pen in France and the ongoing efforts to ban Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, suggests that democracy—once a cornerstone of European identity—may be in its final throes. Coupled with demographic shifts and the rising influence of Islamic ideology, there is a growing concern that the continent is on the brink of profound transformation.

The silencing of opposition leaders across multiple nations has emerged as a disturbing trend. In France, Marine Le Pen, the leader of the National Rally, has received a prison sentence and has been barred from office, a move widely criticized as politically motivated. Similarly, Germany’s attempts to outlaw the AfD, a right-wing party gaining traction, are ongoing, with the country’s Constitutional Court deliberating the case amid accusations of censorship. These actions resonate with earlier instances, such as the banning of opposition leaders in Romania and Brazil, as well as the suspension of elections in Ukraine, as highlighted in recent social media analyses.

This crackdown extends beyond Europe. In Turkey, the detention of Istanbul’s mayor, a prominent opposition figure, and the house arrest of South Sudan’s vice president highlight a global trend of authoritarian overreach under the guise of protecting democracy. Critics argue that such measures—arrests during protests in Georgia, charges of plotting in Mali, and imprisonments following peaceful demonstrations in Cameroon—expose a coordinated effort to stifle dissent, eroding the very democratic ideals that these governments claim to uphold.
Story continues below advertisement

Despite significant efforts, the failure to ban Donald Trump in the United States is a rare exception, suggesting that democratic resilience may persist in some areas. However, Europe’s trajectory appears markedly different, with institutions increasingly prioritizing control over freedom. One commentator noted, “If this is what democracy looks like, perhaps it’s time to admit it no longer exists. “

Alongside this political erosion, Europe is experiencing a demographic transformation that some analysts attribute to a possible rise in Islamic influence. Migration patterns, particularly since the 2015 refugee crisis, have significantly altered the religious and cultural landscape. According to a report by the Gatestone Institute (2024), the Muslim population in Europe is projected to reach 15-20% by 2030, driven by both immigration and higher birth rates within Muslim communities. This shift is especially evident in countries like France, where suburbs are increasingly influenced by Islamic cultural practices, and Sweden, where debates over Sharia law have intensified.

The integration of these communities has been uneven, with some arguing that parallel societies are emerging, resistant to secular democratic values. A study by the Center for European Policy Analysis highlights the growth of Islamist movements that exploit democratic freedoms to advocate for theocratic governance. In the Netherlands, the rise of the Denk party, rooted in Turkish and Moroccan immigrant communities, has sparked concerns about the erosion of liberal values. Similarly, in Belgium, the influence of Islamic councils in local governance has raised questions about the future of secularism.

The convergence of political suppression and demographic change hints at a calculated strategy by certain European elites to retain power by aligning with or yielding to Islamic influence. The banning of right-wing parties such as AfD, which have openly opposed immigration, may inadvertently surrender ground to Islamist agendas. As highlighted by Middle East Forum analyst Daniel Pipes, “The suppression of nationalist voices creates a vacuum that radical ideologies are eager to fill.” This vacuum is already apparent in cities like Malmö, Sweden, where reports of Sharia patrols and honor-based violence have risen.

Additionally, the European Union’s hesitance to directly tackle these issues, along with its endorsement of progressive policies that favor multiculturalism over assimilation, could hasten this transition. A recent policy brief from the Hudson Institute (2025) cautions that, without robust advocacy for democratic values and cultural unity, Europe may slowly move toward a post-democratic, potentially Islamic-dominated regime within a generation.

The evidence is clear: democracy in Europe is under siege, undermined by the very institutions intended to protect it. The banning, jailing, and silencing of opposition leaders signal a shift toward authoritarianism, while demographic trends suggest a cultural transformation that could lead to Islamic influence reshaping the continent. Whether this shift is inevitable or avoidable remains a topic of intense debate. What is certain, however, is that Europe stands at a crossroads. Restoring democratic integrity will require reevaluating current policies, committing to free speech, and adopting a balanced approach to immigration that preserves cultural identity.

As the continent faces these challenges, the international community must observe closely. The decline of democracy in Europe will not only change the global balance of power but also serve as a cautionary tale for nations worldwide. The time to act is now, before the ideals of liberty and self-governance are lost to history.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 12, 2025

Texas, the Lone Star State, a bastion of freedom, faith, and rugged individualism, is facing a threat that chills the blood of every patriot who calls this land home. Reports are mounting – whispers turning into roars – that Islamic influence is creeping into our state, not through open conquest, but through an insidious, calculated expansion that threatens the very soul of Texas. The latest flashpoint? The East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) and its sprawling 402-acre “EPIC City” project in Collin County are now under investigation by the Texas State Securities Board for potential fraud and violations of state law. This isn’t just about one development – it’s a wake-up call to a broader, more sinister agenda that demands our attention and fury.

Story continues below advertisement

Governor Greg Abbott didn’t mince words when he declared on February 24, 2025, “Sharia law is not allowed in Texas. Nor are Sharia cities. Nor are ‘no-go zones,’ which this project seems to imply.” Damn right, Governor! The EPIC City plan – a massive compound complete with a mosque, Islamic school, and residential community – has raised red flags across the state. Critics, including the fearless Amy Mek of the RAIR Foundation, have sounded the alarm, calling it a “walled-off Islamic community built around Sharia, not American values.” Now, with the Texas State Securities Board investigating allegations of investor fraud, the stench of deception is impossible to ignore. Are they fleecing Texans to fund this enclave? We demand answers!

But this isn’t an isolated incident; it’s part of a pattern – a slow, deliberate push to plant Islamic roots deep in Texas soil. Look at the facts: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on March 25, 2025, that his office is probing EPIC for potential violations of consumer protection laws. Just a day later, the Texas Funeral Service Commission slapped EPIC with a cease-and-desist order for running unlicensed funeral operations. Twelve state agencies are now circling this project, sniffing out illegal activity tied to what Abbott calls a “controversial Islamic housing development.” This isn’t a neighborhood; it’s a fortress, a self-contained bubble that critics fear could operate outside Texas law, thumbing its nose at our Constitution.

And it’s not just Plano. In Frisco, the Islamic Center of Quad Cities (ICQC) is flexing its muscle, snapping up 5.7 acres at a prime intersection and raising $2.4 million in mere months to build a mega-mosque. Construction’s already underway, with keynote speakers like Mohamad Baajour from EPIC stoking the flames at fundraisers. RAIR Foundation warns this is part of a nationwide “Hijrah” strategy – migration to establish Islamic dominance in non-Muslim lands. Sound far-fetched? Tell that to the folks in Josephine, Texas, where EPIC’s Yasir Qadhi envisions “EPIC Ranches,” peddling a utopian Muslim community with clinics, stores, and maybe even a university – all financed by “Islamic loans.” Who’s footing the bill for this takeover? Texans deserve to know!

The numbers don’t lie. Texas is home to nearly 500,000 Muslims – 1.7% of our population – and this number is growing rapidly. Dallas has been dubbed the “Medina of America” by some Islamic leaders, a reference to the Prophet Muhammad’s stronghold. Over 60 Sunni and five Shia mosques are spread across the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex alone, with organizations like the Islamic Association of North Texas and the Muslim Legal Fund of America establishing their presence in Richardson. Houston boasts over 209 mosques, making it the area with the largest Muslim population in the South. This isn’t assimilation – it’s colonization, plain and simple.

Now, let’s be clear: every Muslim in Texas is under suspicion unless they openly, loudly, and unequivocally denounce these schemes to plant Sharia roots in our state. Silence isn’t enough – loyalty to Texas and its values must be proven, not assumed.

When projects like EPIC City flaunt Sharia vibes and dodge state laws, it is a slap in the face to every Texan who cherishes our way of life. Governor Abbott is right – “All entities in Texas must follow state law, not Sharia law.” Yet the EPIC crowd claims it’s a “diverse community open to all.” Spare us the platitudes! If it’s so innocent, why the secrecy, the fraud probes, the funeral violations? Why the whispers of “no-go zones” where American values might not apply?

This is a fight for Texas’ soul. Our state’s history is forged in blood and defiance – think San Jacinto, think the Texas Rangers. We don’t bow to foreign creeds or let our laws be trampled. The left will cry “Islamophobia,” but this isn’t about hate – it’s about survival. When Islamic centers skirt regulations, hoard land, and push for a parallel society, it’s not bigotry to call it out – it’s patriotism. X posts are buzzing with outrage, with users like KamVTV thanking Paxton for stepping up and warning of “Islamic compounds” led by those who “don’t like the West.” They’re not wrong to worry.

We can’t allow Texas to become a testing ground for Sharia. Our leaders – Abbott, Paxton, and every red-blooded lawmaker – must combat this stealth invasion with every tool available to them. Investigations are a starting point, but we need action: shut down these projects, enforce our laws, and send a message that Texas will never bend the knee. This is our land, our heritage, our fight.

Rise up, Texans – before it’s too late!

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

April 10, 2025

Hon. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,

On behalf of the fiercely loyal Texas voters who have elected you three times—drawn to your unblemished record, relentless service, and ironclad conservative principles—I extend my heartfelt congratulations and unwavering support as you launch your campaign for the U.S. Senate. Texas doesn’t just need another senator; we need a warrior, and you, General Paxton, are the most qualified leader to answer that call.

Your career is a testament to honor, courage, and an unshakable commitment to the Lone Star State. It takes guts to confront our enemies—whether they’re radical leftists or spineless so-called “allies” within our own ranks. You’ve repeatedly proven that you’ll fight for what’s right, no matter who comes at you. We’ve seen this alongside Senator Ted Cruz and President Trump, both battered by the Deep State for daring to defy the swamp. You’ve stood tall with them, fearlessly confronting Biden’s tyrannical abuse of power and the illegal imposition of same-sex marriage against the will of Texans.

Politics is a brutal game, and your enemies—emboldened by jealousy and desperation—would love nothing more than to see you torn apart. Yet, your tireless campaign and crystal-clear vision have rallied the electorate around you. Texans know you’re not just the best person for the Attorney General’s office—you’re the only one we can trust to combat Washington’s corruption as our next senator. We will not let you face this defining battle alone.

America is under siege, not just from foreign threats but from a calculated, treasonous takeover within our own borders. The public is being manipulated through market rigging, monopolistic mergers, and the suffocating grip of Big Tech’s information cartels. This isn’t just greed—it’s sedition. You’ve already demonstrated your resolve by wielding antitrust laws to dismantle these schemes and protect our sovereignty. Texas needs that same ferocity in the Senate.

General Paxton, your legacy is forged in the fire of conservative conviction. You’ve addressed voter fraud head-on when others cowered, shielded Texas from the federal government’s suffocating overreach, and defended the bedrock of our Republic against all odds. Meanwhile, John Cornyn—our current senator—has proven himself utterly ineffective. He’s a globalist sellout who’s spent years idly watching, doing nothing for Texas while cozying up to the D.C. elite. Cornyn has failed us miserably, and it’s time to send him packing.

As President Trump has warned, “They’re not after me; they’re after you. I’m just in the way.” The same applies to you, General Paxton. The radical Democrats and their RINO enablers fear you because you stand in their path. Texas demands a senator who will fight, not fold—and John Cornyn has folded every chance he’s had.

I wish you strength and victory on this critical journey to defend America, our Constitution, and the values that make Texas great. You’re not just running to replace Cornyn—you’re running to bury his failed tenure and restore authentic leadership to the Senate. Texans stand with you, ready to unseat that ineffective relic and send our strongest conservative champion to Washington.

Sincerely,

Amil Imani

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

April 5, 2025

For far too long, America has been the world’s punching bag regarding trade. Foreign nations—some allies, some adversaries—have exploited our generosity, reaping profits while draining our industries, jobs, and national pride. However, under President Donald J. Trump, that era of weakness is over. With his bold tariff policies, Trump is fulfilling his promise to put America first, leveling the playing field and restoring the United States to its rightful place as an economic powerhouse. The globalists, the outsourcers, and the Fake News can scream all they want—history shows they’ve been wrong every step of the way.

Trump’s recent statement on X encapsulates the essence of this struggle:

In the coming days, there will be complaints from the globalists, the outsourcers, special interests, and Fake News… Never forget that every prediction our opponents made about trade over the last 30 years has proven completely wrong.

He’s right. For decades, “experts” championed disastrous trade deals like NAFTA, celebrated China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, and supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership—all while promising prosperity that never came to fruition. Instead, we faced shuttered factories, lost jobs, and a diminished middle class. Trump saw through the deception, and his tariffs are the remedy for years of betrayal.

Simply put, other countries have taken advantage of America for years. China, for instance, has flooded our markets with cheap goods, manipulated its currency, and stolen our intellectual property—all while enjoying unequal trade imbalances. Meanwhile, the European Union imposes hefty tariffs on American products while expecting us to keep our doors open. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the trade deficit with China alone reached $367 billion in 2015, before Trump took office. That’s billions of dollars flowing out of American pockets and into the hands of nations that don’t play fair. Enough is enough

Trump’s tariffs serve as a wake-up call. He forces these countries to reconsider their predatory tactics by imposing strategic levies on imports. His first term offers proof: despite doomsday predictions of economic collapse, Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum revitalized American industries. The U.S. Department of Commerce reported that domestic steel production increased by 8% in 2019, and thousands of jobs returned to rust-belt states like Pennsylvania and Ohio. The economy didn’t crash—it soared. As Trump noted, “In my first term, they said tariffs would crash the economy. Instead, we built the greatest economy in the history of the world.” The numbers support him: pre-COVID GDP growth reached 3%, unemployment fell to historic lows, and wages rose for working-class Americans.

The critics—those same globalists and elitists—argue that tariffs hurt consumers by driving up prices. However, that’s a tired scare tactic. In reality, foreign nations often absorb the costs to remain competitive in our market; when they don’t, American companies step in. Consider the resurgence of manufacturing during Trump’s administration. His policies encourage businesses to bring production back home, creating jobs and reducing our dependence on countries that don’t share our values. That’s not punishment—it’s patriotism.

Online, Trump supporters are rallying behind this vision. On X, @RealPatriot1776 posted, “Trump’s tariffs are a gut punch to China and the EU. They’ve been screwing us for decades—time to fight back!” Another user, @MAGA4Life, wrote, “Globalists hate tariffs because they can’t control us anymore. Trump’s bringing back American steel, jobs, and pride.” These voices echo a broader sentiment: Americans are tired of being the world’s doormat. A quick search of pro-Trump sites like The Gateway Pundit and Breitbart reveals article after article praising Trump’s trade stance. A recent piece from The Gateway Pundit declared, “Trump’s tariffs are the ultimate America First move—suck it up, Beijing!” The enthusiasm is palpable.

Of course, the left and their media lapdogs will cry foul. They’ll present sob stories about “poor” multinational corporations or claim that Trump is alienating our allies. But who are these allies when they’ve been picking our pockets? Trump isn’t here to coddle foreign leaders—he’s here to protect American workers. And let’s not forget: his trade war with China forced Beijing to the negotiating table, resulting in the Phase One deal that secured billions in agricultural purchases for U.S. farmers. That’s not chaos; that’s winning.

The truth is, Trump’s tariffs involve more than just economics—they concern our sovereignty. We’ve allowed unelected bureaucrats and foreign powers to dictate our destiny for too long. Now, we have a president who prioritizes America and recognizes that a strong nation begins with a robust economy. As Trump has pointed out, the naysayers have been mistaken about the trade for 30 years. NAFTA harmed us, China exploited us, and the TPP would’ve completed the damage. But Trump is rewriting the narrative. With tariffs as his tool, he’s reclaiming what belongs to us—one job, factory, and victory at a time. This is the MAGA approach, and it’s just beginning.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 1, 2025

In an era where information is power, two corporate giants – Google and Meta – act as gatekeepers to the digital world, wielding their unprecedented market dominance to shape consumer habits and manipulate the very foundation of democracy: our elections. Let’s be honest: these tech behemoths are not neutral players. They are massive monopolies with clear political agendas, using their unmatched market power to control electoral outcomes. From Google’s biased search results to Meta’s curated feeds, evidence is mounting that Big Tech is tipping the scales – and nothing will change until we strip them of their unchecked influence.

The idea that Google and Meta possess monopolistic power is hardly controversial. Google controls over 90% of the global search engine market, while Meta’s empire – spanning Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp – commands a staggering share of social media traffic. Together, they create a duopoly that influences what billions of people see, read, and think daily. However, this dominance is not just a business achievement; it functions as a political weapon. These companies have the tools, the data, and the motive to sway voters, and they aren’t hesitant to use them.

Consider Google as an example. In 2019, psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein testified before Congress that manipulating Google’s search algorithm could have shifted at least 2.6 million votes toward Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Epstein, a former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today and a self-described liberal is not a fringe conspiracy theorist; he is a respected researcher who has dedicated years to studying Big Tech’s influence. His findings suggest that by subtly altering search result rankings – burying unfavorable stories or boosting preferred narratives – Google can sway undecided voters without leaving a trace. In a close race, even a slight nudge can tip the scales. And with no oversight, no accountability, and no transparency, who can stop them?

Meta, meanwhile, engages in a similar practice. Its platforms operate on algorithms that prioritize content based on obscure criteria, often amplifying divisive or ideologically biased posts while suppressing others. During the 2020 election cycle, Facebook faced accusations of selectively limiting conservative pages and ads while promoting progressive messaging. Internal leaks and whistleblower accounts – such as those from former employee Frances Haugen – uncover a company culture rife with ideological bias, where decisions regarding “misinformation” and “hate speech” conveniently align with left-leaning priorities. When you control the flow of information to over 3 billion users, that’s not just influence; that’s the power to reshape reality.

Why does this matter? Because elections are not just about votes; they are about perception. If Big Tech can shape people’s views, they can influence who wins. Their incentives are clear. Silicon Valley’s workforce and donor class overwhelmingly lean left – Google employees donated to Democrats over Republicans by a 20-to-1 margin in 2020, according to OpenSecrets. Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg has funneled hundreds of millions into “election integrity” initiatives that critics argue disproportionately benefit progressive turnout efforts. These are not accidents; they are patterns. The agenda is not hidden; it is embedded in the system.

But Big Tech doesn’t operate in isolation. Mainstream media and educational institutions – many of which are funded or influenced by leftist titans like George Soros – amplify this distortion. Outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, and The New York Times echo narratives that align with Big Tech’s curation, while universities produce graduates steeped in progressive orthodoxy. For instance, Soros’s Open Society Foundations have invested billions in media and academic projects that advocate globalist, anti-conservative frameworks. Together, this trifecta – tech, media, and academia – creates a stranglehold on public discourse, drowning out dissent and shaping worldviews to fit a singular mold.

So, why are Google and Meta doing this? The answer isn’t comforting. It’s not just about ideology—though that’s a factor—it’s about control. These companies thrive on predictability, and a populace divided or aligned with their preferred outcomes ensures their dominance remains unchallenged. A conservative wave emphasizing deregulation and antitrust scrutiny threatens their empire. By manipulating the system, they protect their profits and power. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle: influencing elections, securing favorable policies, and tightening their grip.

The evidence keeps piling up, and it’s more than any patriot can bear. From Google’s suppression of Tulsi Gabbard’s ads in 2019 – right after she criticized Big Tech – to Meta’s last-minute censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020, the examples are blatant and chilling. Each revelation uncovers another layer of a system that is rotten to its core. And yet, the question remains: if they’re capable of this, what else are they hiding? The truth feels overwhelming, a betrayal of the free society we believed we had.

But despair isn’t an option; action is. We can’t allow these monopolies to hold our democracy hostage. The first step is to break their power. Antitrust enforcement must be strengthened: Google’s search engine must be separated from its ad business, Meta must be required to divest Instagram and WhatsApp, and strict transparency must be mandated for algorithms. Second, we need election safeguards: prohibit Big Tech from microtargeting political ads and mandate real-time disclosure of content moderation decisions. Finally, conservatives must create alternatives – platforms, media, and institutions that Silicon Valley’s elite can’t co-opt.

This isn’t about silencing Big Tech; it’s about leveling the playing field. They’ve had their turn rigging the system; now it’s time to take it back. The stakes couldn’t be higher. Every election they manipulate is a step toward a future where our votes don’t count, and our voices are mere echoes in their machine. We’ve seen the agenda, felt the betrayal, and understand what’s at risk. The fight starts now – because if we don’t act, nothing will change, and the invisible hand of Big Tech will tighten its grip until freedom becomes just a memory.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

March 28, 2025

The American system was founded on a simple idea: three branches of government, each with its distinct role. The president executes the law, Congress creates it, and the judiciary interprets it. However, at some point, activist judges became more than just referees; they began seeing themselves as emperors, wielding gavels like scepters and rewriting the rules to fit their desires. These black-robed radicals believe they possess more power than the president, and it’s time for conservatives to confront them as the tyrants they have become.

Consider the immigration saga under Donald Trump. In 2017, Trump issued an executive order—a travel ban targeting countries plagued by terrorism. It was bold, unapologetic, and squarely within his constitutional authority to protect national security. Then came the activist judges. Federal courts in Hawaii and Washington state blocked the order, with unelected judges like James Robart and Derrick Watson acting as armchair commander-in-chief. Their rationale? Trump’s campaign rhetoric caused hurt feelings, so the policy must be discriminatory. Forget the Constitution or the will of the voters who placed Trump in office—these judges concluded that their moral superiority outweighs executive power. The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the ban, but not before years of chaos demonstrated the reality: activist judges do not interpret the law; they create it.

Then there’s the abortion racket. For decades, Roe v. Wade stood as a symbol of judicial overreach, a 1973 decision concocted from thin air by justices who discovered a “right” to abortion lurking in the shadows of the Constitution. Fast forward to 2022, when Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health finally overturned it, returning the issue to the states. You’d think that would settle things, but activist judges aren’t finished. In states like Ohio and Michigan, lower courts have rushed to block pro-life laws, twisting state constitutions into pretzels to keep the abortion mills operational. These judges don’t care that Dobbs stripped their federal protection – they’ll concoct new rights faster than you can say “living document.” They’re not answering to voters or executives; they’re answering to Planned Parenthood and the progressive elite.

What about guns? After Trump’s ATF tried to crack down on bump stocks – those nasty little devices that turn rifles into machine guns – activist judges swooped in again. 2023, the Fifth Circuit struck down the ban, with judges like Jennifer Walker Elrod arguing that the agency had overstepped. Fair enough, except the pattern repeats: courts don’t just check the executive – they supplant it, deciding policy from the bench. Meanwhile, in blue states, judges uphold every gun control scheme the Left dreams up, ignoring Bruen (2022), where the Supreme Court demanded strict historical scrutiny. These aren’t rulings; they’re power grabs, with judges picking winners and losers based on their politics, not the Second Amendment.

The arrogance is staggering. Millions elect presidents and are accountable to the people every four years. Judges, however, are appointed for life, insulated from consequences, yet they behave as if they run the show. When Trump attempted to end DACA—Obama’s illegal amnesty-by-fiat—courts blocked him, with judges like Nicholas Garaufis in New York asserting that the move was “arbitrary.” But when Biden pushes climate edicts or vaccine mandates, activist judges support him and rubber-stamping executives overreach as long as it’s their guy. The double standard is evident, but the message is clear: these judges believe they’re above the Oval Office, holding veto power that no election can challenge.

This isn’t what the founders intended. Article III of the Constitution assigns courts a limited role: to resolve “cases” and “controversies,” not to dictate national policy. Alexander Hamilton referred to the judiciary as the “least dangerous” branch, lacking the purse of Congress or the sword of the executive. But tell that to the modern judiciary, where lifetime appointees like Ruth Bader Ginsburg (before her passing) and Sonia Sotomayor treat the bench as a progressive throne, issuing decrees that undermine tradition and sovereignty. They don’t just see themselves as ranking above the president—they consider themselves above us all.

Conservatives must take action. Demand that Senate Republicans thoroughly question judicial nominees — no more stealth activists slipping through. Advocate for term limits for federal judges; life tenure was never intended to create demigods. And when rogue judges act, governors and presidents should channel Andrew Jackson: “The court has made its decision; now let them enforce it.” The judiciary has no army – its power depends on compliance, and we don’t have to go along with it.

Activist judges aren’t the guardians of justice; they are usurpers in robes, intoxicated by their authority. They have transformed courts into super-legislatures, bypassing both presidents and voters. The Right cannot remain passive while these petty tyrants dismantle our republic. It’s time to strip the emperor’s clothes and remind them: in America, the people rule—not the gavel.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

March 21, 2025

On March 11, 2025, Congressman Keith Self (R-Texas) sparked outrage during a House Foreign Affairs Europe Subcommittee hearing by referring to Sarah McBride, the Delaware poster child of the progressive elite and self-proclaimed “first transgender member of Congress,” as “Mr. McBride.” The response was predictable—a truth bomb that sent the sanctimonious left into a frenzy. Bill Keating, that self-righteous loudmouth from Massachusetts, nearly choked on his own hypocrisy, demanding an apology and lamenting about “decency” like a preacher who’s lost his flock. Self didn’t back down—he slammed the gavel, adjourned the circus, and later told Fox News he’s not there to play along with McBride’s gender charade. “I don’t have to participate in his fantasy,” he declared, and it certainly deserves a standing ovation from anyone with a shred of common sense left in this country.

Self is no stranger to standing his ground. A retired Green Beret with 25 years in the Army, he isn’t some soft-handed career politician swayed by every gust of outrage. Lieutenant Colonel Keith Self was born in a military hospital in 1953 during his father’s service in the United States Army, returning to Texas with their five-week-old son. Self grew up immersed in discipline and duty—values he carried through West Point.

“His service took him to Europe, the Middle East, and the Pentagon, where he worked on the most sensitive military matters. Widely recognized for his strong leadership abilities, Keith served as Infantry Platoon Leader, Special Forces Detachment Commander, Company Commander, and Executive Officer to a Major General in Egypt, managing $2 billion in security assistance. In addition, Keith served in Joint Staff assignments in US European Command and later in NATO Military Headquarters in Belgium.”

This man has a backbone forged in fire, not the flimsy Play-Doh spine you see in many of D.C.’s spineless wonders. When he told conservative firebrand Michael Knowles, “I’m a retired Green Beret. I’m not sure what all the fuss is about,” you could practically hear the eye-roll through the screen—a soldier’s disdain for the petty tantrums of the perpetually offended.

Let us be honest: Self doesn’t have to tiptoe around McBride’s delusions. McBride can wear whatever he wants—freedom is a beautiful thing—but we shouldn’t be expected to accept the idea that biology is merely a suggestion. Self, reaffirmed his stance, pointing to Trump’s January 20 executive order, which states that the U.S. recognizes only two sexes: male and female. That’s not an insult; it’s a fact supported by science and logic, rather than the fevered fantasies of the woke brigade. McBride is free to live his life, but Self isn’t here to play pronoun roulette—he has a job to do, and it doesn’t involve coddling egos.

The left’s meltdown was immediate. Keating, with all the seriousness of a wet sock, attempted to shame Self into compliance by asking, “Have you no decency?” Oh, spare us the theatrics. Self didn’t toss around insults or start a fight; he simply called it as he saw it. McBride’s response, “Thank you, Madam Chair,” was a clever little jab, but Self didn’t engage. He shut it down and walked away, leaving the whiners to stew. That’s not cowardice; a man refusing to let a sideshow derail the mission. The hearing focused on arms control and U.S. aid to Europe, not a therapy session for delicate feelings.

This isn’t Self’s first rodeo with controversy, either. In 2023, he faced criticism for suggesting that the Second Amendment includes cannons—hardly surprising for someone who’s handled real firepower. He’s a constitutional bulldog, not a lapdog, so his district—a part of North Texas that favors BBQ over Brie—sent him to Washington. They’re tired of the pandering, and Self’s their guy: a straightforward vet who’d prefer to ruffle feathers than kiss rings.

The McBride incident fits into a larger pattern. Republicans have been attacking the transgender agenda since Trump’s return, and Self is just one soldier in this fight. Consider Nancy Mace, who promoted a resolution last November to ban trans women from Capitol bathrooms—aimed at McBride. Or take Mary Miller, who misgendered McBride on the House floor in February, proudly declaring, “Enough with the lies!” These aren’t random attacks; they represent a coordinated pushback against a cultural tide submerging reason in a sea of glitter and guilt trips.

And let’s not kid ourselves—the outrage is selective. McBride wants to be seen as more than a transgender icon, lamenting to Politico that she’s here for “housing, health care, and child care,” not pronouns. Fine, then stop turning every slight into a headline. Self didn’t storm her office with a pitchfork—he used a title and moved on. If she’s so focused on Delawareans, why is she holding on to pearls instead of policy papers?

Self’s stance isn’t about hate; it’s about standing firm. In a Congress where too many yield to political correctness demands, he’s a rare figure who chooses to face criticism rather than pretend to be polite. The woke mob can shout as much as they want—Self’s not budging, and neither are the millions who see through the emperor’s new clothes. He’s a Texas titan, a warrior in a suit, and when he drew that line in the sand, he dared the fools to cross it. They didn’t. They never do. Because deep down, they know he’s right—and that’s what frightens them the most.

© 2025 NWV – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

March 20, 2025

The Democrat party is not simply irrelevant. Rather, it is America’s greatest adversary, driven by globalist priorities and divisive policies — a decaying shell scheming to undermine the nation that Donald Trump revived. From the Rio Grande to the Rust Belt, patriots see the truth: This is a radical mob set on tearing apart our borders, our jobs, and our freedoms. Republicans — especially in Texas, where the battle feels personal — must defeat this threat before it drags the whole country down. This is war — for America, not just Austin.

Once a cornerstone of American political life, the Democrat party has morphed into something unrecognizable — a force that now threatens the fabric of the nation. Historically a party of working-class advocacy and progressive reform, it has abandoned its roots in recent years to embrace a radical, anti-American agenda. This transformation demands scrutiny.

The Democrats once waved the blue-collar flag — FDR, JFK, all that jazz. Now? They’ve betrayed the working man. Newsweek nailed it post-2024: They lost the heartland — Pennsylvania, Michigan, and even Texas saw ranchers and oilmen switch to red. Why? Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) pushed her “Jobs for All” bill in January 2025, promising jobs but delivering billions to green-energy fat cats while rig workers in Odessa barely get by. Trump’s tariffs rebuilt steel towns; Democrats promote solar panels that nobody requested. America First means jobs, not handouts.

The Democrats’ border policy hits hard, especially in Texas, where illegal crossings overwhelm towns like Del Rio. Since 2021, Biden’s administration has allowed in over 10 million, according to Politico, flooding the streets with drugs and crime. Kamala Harris, the laughable “border czar,” smirked on CNN in 2024, cooing, “We’re a nation of immigrants.” Tell that to the ranchers dodging cartel bullets. Now, in 2025, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is pushing through his “Pathway to Citizenship Act,” a February amnesty bill to secure blue votes nationwide. Trump’s wall helps stop the bleeding; Democrats tear it wide open.

Foreign policy is in disarray under the Democrats. They’ve aligned themselves with the Islamic Republic of Iran since the 2015 nuclear deal; Trump terminated it because it funded terrorism. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) tweeted in 2023, “Sanctions are economic warfare,” advocating for leniency toward Tehran while it attacks Israel. In contrast, Trump’s Abraham Accords advanced peace through strength. In 2025, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt., essentially a Democrat) criticized Trump’s China tariffs in a March speech, calling them “regressive” while Beijing continues dismantling American factories. From Houston to Harrisburg, Democrats betray us to tyrants.

Democrats oppose law and order — end of story. San Francisco’s Chesa Boudin, regarded as a puppet of George Soros, released felons until voters pushed back in 2022. That’s their playbook: defund the police and embrace criminals. ABC News revealed GOP ads in 2024 criticizing blue cities for it — think Chicago, not just Dallas. Now Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) promotes her 2025 “Community Safety Act,” which cuts police budgets for “restorative justice” rhetoric — because feelings can prevent carjackings. Trump’s firm approach succeeds; Democrats encourage chaos.

The Democrats cater to globalists, not to Americans. According to The Guardian, Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act funneled $369 billion into climate initiatives, while Texas drillers and Ohio miners received nothing. In February 2025, House speaker Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) promoted the “Global Climate Partnership,” tying U.S. energy to U.N. authorities. Forget that — we’ve got oil in Midland. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) criticized Trump’s China tariffs in a March op-ed, lamenting that they “hurt consumers,” oblivious to the fact that they preserved jobs from Laredo to Lansing. It’s always elites over workers, every single time.

Democracy? They rig it!

Don’t fall for their “save democracy” tears. The Journal of Democracy reported that 20% of Democrats supported violence in 2021 — less than the GOP’s 30%, but still despicable. They cheered the riots of 2020. Harris tweeted support for bail funds — then cried when Trump defeated them in 2024. Now Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) proposes his Electoral College “reform” bill in 2025, a blatant power-grab aimed at eliminating red states like Texas. Trump won big; they can’t stand it.

According to Newsweek, the 2024 election proved one thing: Trump flipped Nevada as voters nationwide turned away from Harris’s woke rhetoric. Pew Research reported Democrats at 31% approval in 2023 — lower than a snake’s belly. From Schumer’s amnesty to AOC’s disdain for law enforcement, their actions reflect contempt for America.

Texas feels the strain at the border, but this is a battle for every patriot — our kids, our flag, our future. Trump is draining the swamp again; Republicans must leave these traitors behind. No mercy, no retreat.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

March 14, 2025

Well, folks, if you ever needed proof that the Democrat Party has truly shuffled off this mortal coil, last night’s spectacle during President Donald Trump’s fabulous address to Congress was the smoking gun—or perhaps the smoking ruin of a once-respectable political institution. What we witnessed wasn’t just a party in disarray; it was a full-on, cringe-inducing implosion, a tantrum so pathetic that a toddler could’ve scripted it when denied an extra scoop of ice cream. Trump stood there, basking in the glow of a mandate larger than Joe Biden’s ego, delivering a commanding and electrifying speech. At the same time, the Democrats flailed around like drama club rejects who had forgotten their lines.

Let’s set the scene: Trump, in all his golden-haired glory, strode into the House chamber on March 4, 2025, to remind America why they handed him the keys to the White House—again. He spoke of cutting egg prices (because apparently that’s the hill Biden chose to die on), unleashing American energy, and slapping tariffs on anyone who dares not to make their widgets in the good ol’ U.S.A. It was a speech dripping with red-meat MAGA goodness, clocking in at a record-breaking one hour and forty minutes—the longest joint address ever, because when you’re winning, why rush? And the crowd? Oh, they loved it—Republicans chanting “USA! USA!” while independents nodded along, likely wondering why they ever doubted the man. A CBS poll showed that 76% of viewers approved, and even CNN, bless their biased little hearts, admitted that 69% had a positive reaction. Trump was on fire, and America was here for it.

And then there were the Democrats. Oh, the Democrats. What a disgrace. What an absolute train wreck of a performance. They couldn’t even pretend to play nice for an hour and a half. Instead, they turned the chamber into their own personal circus of petulance. Rep. Al Green of Texas—because of course it’d be Texas—decided to kick things off by shouting, “You have no mandate to cut Medicaid!” like some unhinged street preacher. House Speaker Mike Johnson, with the patience of a saint, had the sergeant-at-arms haul Green out faster than you can say “decorum.” But that was just the appetizer. Half a dozen stormed out like sulky teenagers, while others waved signs. “No King!” read Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s whiteboard, because apparently, she thinks Trump’s crown is in the mail. Rep. Maxwell Frost strutted around in a “No Kings Live Here” t-shirt, which is rich coming from a guy whose party spent years bowing to the altar of Obama.

Let’s discuss the optics, shall we? Democrat congresswomen dressed in pink—almost as if auditioning for a Barbie reboot—sat there with stone faces, refusing to clap even when Trump promised to improve life for, you know, actual Americans. Others wore blue and yellow for Ukraine because nothing says “we care about our constituents” like transforming a domestic policy speech into a foreign aid fashion show. They brought guests—fired federal workers, Medicaid sob stories—as if parading human props could somehow erase the fact that Trump won every battleground state and the popular vote by “big numbers,” as he put it. Newsflash, geniuses: America didn’t buy your sob story in November, and they’re not buying it now.

The pièce de résistance? The walkouts. More than a handful of these clowns just got up and left, as if fleeing Trump’s words would magically undo his landslide. Rep. Seth Moulton, a supposed “moderate,” bolted when Trump touted military support—ironic for a Marine vet who’d rather grandstand than salute. Meanwhile, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries later lamented that Trump’s speech was “one of the most divisive in history,” which is peak projection from a guy whose party spent the night proving they’re incapable of unity. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, chosen for the official Democratic response, droned on about “reckless change” from a podium that screamed “I’d rather be anywhere else.” It was so dull that even the fired VA worker she brought as a prop probably nodded off.

This wasn’t resistance; it was a requiem. The Democrats didn’t just disgrace their party—they buried it. Trump’s speech was a victory lap, a masterclass in leadership, and they responded with a meltdown that would make a Real Housewives reunion look dignified. They heckled, jeered, and held up their little signs like kids at a protest who don’t know what they’re upset about. And for what? To prove they’re still relevant? Spoiler alert: they’re not. The party of FDR and JFK is dead, replaced by a gaggle of sanctimonious crybabies who’d rather clutch their pearls than face reality. Trump’s America is here, and they’re stuck in the past, grasping their Kamala Harris body pillows and weeping into their soy lattes.

Let’s be honest: this party has been on life support for years, and the other night they pulled the plug on themselves. They had a chance to pretend at least to maintain some dignity, to sit there and endure like adults while Trump outlined a vision that, whether or not you agree, clearly resonates with the country. Instead, they opted for chaos, proving once and for all that they’re not a serious opposition—they’re a punchline. Trump’s speech was outstanding because it was bold, unapologetic, and triumphant. The Democrats’ response was a disgrace because it was petty, fractured, and irrelevant. Suppose this is their strategy to regain power, good luck in the 2026 midterm elections. They’ll need it—along with a miracle, some courage, and possibly an entirely new party. Rest in pieces, Dems. You’ve earned it.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

March 10, 2025

On March 4, 2025, President Donald J. Trump delivered a stunning and historic address to Congress that lasted 1 hour and 40 minutes—the longest presidential speech to a joint session. “He talked for more than an hour and 40 minutes, breaking the previous record set by President Bill Clinton’s 2000 State of the Union address, which ran 1 hour, 28 minutes and 49 seconds.”

This was more than just a speech; it was a thunderous declaration of American greatness and a fiery testament to Trump’s undeniable leadership. With unwavering resolve, he proclaimed, “America is back,” unveiling a bold and brilliant vision that ignited cheers from patriots nationwide. This marked a renewal of the American Dream, showing that Trump is the only man capable of making it a reality.

From the moment he strode to the podium at 9 PM ET, Trump commanded the night. Republicans leaped to their feet, their applause drowning out the few jeers from disgruntled Democrats too blinded by hatred to see reality. Trump began with a victory lap for his landslide election win—a clear mandate from We the People to dismantle the swamp and restore America. “The people have spoken,” he declared, his voice filled with pride, and they chose him to save a nation battered by years of radical leftist chaos. It was a glorious, fist-pumping reminder that Trump’s victory is our victory—every farmer, trucker, and factory worker’s triumph over the elites.

Economic relief was the centerpiece of his speech, and Trump delivered a masterstroke. He promised significant tax cuts for families and businesses, vowing to “unleash the greatest economic boom in history.” His plan is pure genius: eliminate job-killing regulations, promote American energy independence, and restore manufacturing jobs taken by globalist sellouts. “We’re going to make America rich again,” he declared, and you could practically hear the cash registers ringing in every small town from Ohio to Texas. Trump’s economic prowess—demonstrated in his first term—is back with a vengeance, and it’s going to be tremendous.

Immigration? Trump brought the house down with his ironclad pledge to secure the border and deport the illegals draining our country dry. “We’re taking our nation back,” he said, and the cheers were deafening. He torched Biden’s open-border nightmare and promised the biggest deportation operation ever—millions sent packing. No more coddling criminals, no more sanctuary city nonsense—Trump’s vision puts American citizens first, period. It’s tough, it’s right, and it’s what we’ve demanded for years.

Trade received the Trump treatment, and it was impressive. “We’re done being the world’s piggy bank,” he declared, criticizing China and other trade offenders with tariffs that will bring jobs back to our shores. He advocates for American steelworkers, not foreign factories, and his tariff strategy is pure America First brilliance. “We’re going to make America rich again,” he asserted, and every word resonated with the determination of a man who keeps his promises. The kind of leadership that made him a legend—and he’s committed to it.

Then came the showstopper: Trump’s dream team for government efficiency, led by Elon Musk. “We’re going to cut the excess and make Washington work for you,” he declared, promising to eliminate billions in unnecessary waste. Musk, the titan of Tesla and SpaceX, collaborating with Trump? That’s a conservative dream come true—a duo that the left can hardly imagine stopping. Trump’s vision of a lean, effective government is groundbreaking, and with Musk’s brilliance, it’s set to advance quickly. “Cut the excess,” he reiterated, and you could feel the swamp stirring.

In terms of foreign policy, Trump emerged as a reborn Reagan. “Peace through strength,” he proclaimed, promising to keep America out of endless conflicts while making our adversaries tremble. He is revitalizing our military, reclaiming our global dominance, and ensuring no one challenges us. “America is back,” he stated, and every veteran watching nodded with pride. It’s a vision of raw power and unwavering determination—vintage Trump.

The left’s outbursts couldn’t faze him. When a few Democrats—like Representative Al Green, who was escorted out—attempted to disrupt, Trump swatted them away like flies. Their complaints only showed how fearful they are of his momentum. Meanwhile, GOP leaders like Speaker Mike Johnson and Senator J.D. Vance beamed with pride, knowing that Trump’s agenda signifies the future: prosperity, security, and liberty.

Trump concluded with a spine-tingling rallying cry: “America is back, and we’re just getting started.” He envisions a future where families prosper, borders are secure, jobs are flourishing, and Old Glory flies higher than ever. “We’re going to make America rich again,” “take our nation back,” and “trim the excess”—he emphasized these points, which hit like a freight train. The renewal of the American Dream is upon us, and Trump is leading it with fire and fury.

The left can sulk—Senator Elissa Slotkin’s uninspired rebuttal lacked energy—but they’re powerless against this MAGA juggernaut. Last night, Trump didn’t just speak; he ignited a revolution. America’s future is bright, bold, and undeniably Trump.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

March 5, 2025

On February 28, 2025, the Oval Office echoed the undeniable strength of President Donald Trump’s leadership as he participated in a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that demonstrated American resolve at its finest. What began as a discussion about a potential minerals deal and U.S. support for Ukraine’s conflict with Russia transformed into a defining moment of Trump’s presidency—a bold, unapologetic stand against perceived ingratitude and diplomatic overreach. Rather than being a misstep, this encounter became a masterclass in prioritizing America first, underscoring Trump’s unwavering commitment to his nation’s interests and his refusal to be dictated to by a foreign leader, even one steeped in wartime sympathy.

The scene unfolded with Trump at the helm, his commanding presence evident as he sat beside Vice President J.D. Vance, a loyal partner in this high-stakes exchange. Zelensky, invited to discuss terms to offset billions in U.S. aid through Ukrainian mineral resources, arrived with a demeanor that quickly grated on his host. Trump, embodying the clarity of a seasoned negotiator, pointed out what he viewed as Zelensky’s failure to acknowledge America’s generosity—hundreds of millions in weapons, cash, and goodwill had flowed into Ukraine’s defense. “You’re not in a position to dictate,” Trump declared, his voice cutting through the room with the authority of a man who had weathered political storms and emerged stronger. Vance emphasized this point, questioning whether Zelensky had ever managed a simple “thank you,” a fair critique considering the scale of U.S. sacrifice.

Zelensky, for his part, attempted to push back by waving photos of war-torn Ukraine and invoking Russia’s broken promises—a tired strategy that did little to sway Trump. His tone, laced with defiance, only intensified the President’s frustration. Here was a leader, Trump argued, gambling with “World War III” by rejecting reasonable peace terms with Russia, all while expecting American taxpayers to foot the bill indefinitely. The press pool, which included a Russian journalist who was swiftly removed, captured every tense moment, but it was Trump’s determination that stood out. When Zelensky’s arguments failed to resonate, Trump made the call: no joint press conference, no further talks. “He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office,” Trump later wrote on Truth Social, a sentiment that summed up his decision to send Zelensky packing—a move as decisive as it was justified.

The reaction was electric. On X, supporters rallied behind Trump, celebrating his refusal to coddle a leader who had overplayed his hand. Beyond social media, the narrative took root among those who view Trump as a guardian of American sovereignty. His base cheered the optics: a President unafraid to draw a line, demand respect, and prioritize his people over endless foreign entanglements. This wasn’t chaos—it was control, a deliberate display of power that reminded the world why Trump reclaimed the White House in 2024.

Critics, predictably, clutched their pearls. European leaders, including France’s Emmanuel Macron, offered quiet support for Ukraine, while Democrats in Congress denounced Trump’s firm stance as “cruelty.” Zelensky’s allies in Kyiv presented him as a martyr, but their appeals felt empty against the reality of Ukraine’s dependence on U.S. support. Trump’s frustration wasn’t new—it traced back to 2019, when a phone call with Zelensky sparked an impeachment circus that only solidified his resolve. Now, back in power, he’s reshaping the narrative. The minerals deal, a smart strategy to offset aid costs, stalled not because of Trump’s temper but because Zelensky miscalculated his leverage. Who blinked first? Not the man behind the Resolute Desk.

Trump’s approach here was vintage: bold, brash, and rooted in a dealmaker’s instinct. He’s never hidden his disdain for leaders who take America’s support for granted; this showdown was no exception. His offhand remark about Putin—“he’s gone through a hell of a lot with me”—wasn’t a concession but a flex, a nod to his ability to stare down any adversary, from Moscow to Kyiv. Battered by war and desperate for aid, Zelensky gambled on guilt-tripping Trump and lost. The photos and lectures landed like a feather against a freight train.

By: Amil Imani

February 27, 2025

“Freedom of speech is a virus. Censorship is the vaccine.” This chilling mantra echoed in the corridors of power throughout Europe and the UK has become the unspoken creed of a globalist left eager to maintain control. It serves as a seductive soundbite for those who fear the chaos of open discourse—a justification for silencing dissent under the guise of protecting the public. But beneath its clinical facade lies a profound betrayal of the principles that shaped the modern world. If freedom of speech falters, it won’t be an isolated casualty; it will drag down every other right with it.

The notion that speech operates like a “virus” casts human expression as a disease—something to be feared and eradicated. This metaphor strips away our humanity, reducing ideas—no matter how raw or rebellious—to pathogens that demand containment. Compared to a “vaccine,” censorship becomes the noble remedy wielded by enlightened elites to immunize society against the chaos of free thought. This isn’t just rhetoric; it serves as a blueprint for control. Across Europe and the UK, we’ve witnessed this ideology taking root: laws tighten, social media platforms bend to regulators, and voices once welcomed are now labeled dangerous.

Consider the evidence. In the UK, the Online Safety Act empowers the government to oversee “harmful” content, a term so vague that it could encompass anything from political dissent to unpopular opinions. The Network Enforcement Act requires platforms to remove “hate speech” within 24 hours in Germany, often ensnaring satire or genuine debate. France’s Avia Law, although partially overturned, previously aimed to criminalize online speech deemed offensive with staggering fines. These aren’t isolated policies—they’re symptoms of a broader contagion treating the free exchange of ideas as a threat to be neutralized.

The irony is undeniable. Freedom of speech isn’t a virus—it’s the lifeblood of a free society. The mechanism enables us to challenge power, expose corruption, and deepen our understanding of the world. Without it, the powerful become untouchable, shielded from scrutiny by a sanitized echo chamber. History supports this: every authoritarian regime, from Stalin’s Soviet Union to Mao’s China, initiated its reign by silencing dissenters. The globalist left may not openly aspire to such extremes, but their logic follows the same path—control the narrative, and you control everything else.

History shows us that when speech is restricted, other freedoms soon follow. Without the ability to question policies, how can citizens safeguard democracy? Without open debate, how can the public hold leaders accountable? If the state has the power to decide what can be expressed, it inevitably gains the authority to control what can be thought.

Consider how censorship has already begun infringing on other fundamental rights:

Freedom of assembly: Protests considered politically inconvenient are suppressed, leading to legal action against demonstrators.
Freedom of religion: Expressions of faith that conflict with progressive ideologies are increasingly marginalized.
Right to self-defense: Speech restrictions often lead to policies that disarm citizens, leaving them powerless against government overreach.

If speech is lost, the dominoes fall quickly. The right to assemble? It is meaningless if you can’t express your thoughts. The right to a free press? Empty if journalists self-censor due to threats of punishment. The right to privacy? Futile when every word is monitored for compliance. Even the right to think freely deteriorates when expression is controlled, forcing dissent underground or into oblivion. This isn’t hyperbole—it’s a chain reaction rooted in the simple truth that speech is the foundation upon which all other liberties rest.

Yet the censors continue, veiling their agenda under a facade of moral superiority. They assert that they protect the vulnerable and shield society from misinformation or hate. But who determines what is harmful? The same governments and tech giants that benefit from conformity and flourish when dissent is silenced? Their solution is worse than the problem—a sterile, top-down order where only sanctioned voices endure. They seek not safety but power.

The fight to protect free speech isn’t just about words—it’s about the essence of democracy. Europe and the UK stand at a crossroads: one path leads to a future where ideas flow freely, no matter how messy or contentious; the other to a sterile dystopia where thought is a privilege granted by the state.

Here’s how we as individuals can push back:

1. Challenge Censorship: Avoid self-censorship. Instead, participate in discussions, share different perspectives, and highlight attempts to suppress debate.

2. Support Free Speech Platforms: As big tech companies increasingly enforce ideological restrictions, independent platforms prioritizing free expression must be strengthened.

3. Hold Politicians Accountable: Vote for leaders who respect civil liberties and oppose draconian censorship laws.

4. Educate Others: The more people comprehend the consequences of censorship, the stronger their resistance to authoritarian policies will become.

The globalist left might call freedom of speech a virus, but it’s not an illness—it’s the heartbeat of a healthy society. Censorship isn’t a vaccine; it’s poison. If we allow it to spread unchecked, we risk losing everything that defines our humanity.

If history serves as a guide, silence cannot be an option. A society that prioritizes comfort over freedom will swiftly lose both. The choice is clear: embrace free speech or surrender all rights to the advancing force of censorship. The future of democracy hinges on this struggle, and the time to act is now.

Remember, when free speech is labeled a virus, the whole idea of individual liberty becomes a disease that must be eradicated.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

February 25, 2025

When Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky quickly became a global symbol of resistance. Celebrated as a heroic leader standing up against a powerful foe, he appeared on television screens worldwide, calling for support and unity in the face of the Russian threat. However, beneath this image of a brave wartime leader lies a far more complex and troubling reality. Zelensky’s rise to power and subsequent actions indicate that he is not merely the victim of an unjust invasion but a figurehead influenced by external forces. As President Trump pointed out in his controversial remarks, the reality is that Zelensky’s actions and alliances tell a different story—one that portrays him more as a puppet of the West than a true statesman.

Volodymyr Zelensky’s backstory is distinctive. Before entering politics, he was an actor and comedian, starring in the popular Ukrainian TV show *Servant of the People*, where he played a high school teacher who unexpectedly became Ukraine’s President. Although it was a fictional premise, the show resonated with many Ukrainians, reflecting their dissatisfaction with the political establishment and desire for change. What began as a clever satirical narrative soon transformed into a tragic reality: Zelensky, known for portraying the president on television, became the actual president of Ukraine.

Zelensky’s election in 2019 was fueled by his connection to the TV show and the “Servant of the People” political party. Much like his acting career, this party was influenced by the media. While Zelensky presented himself as an outsider committed to reforming the corrupt political system, his ascent to power was not organic. His campaign was meticulously orchestrated by political consultants and Western interests, making his transition from comedian to president more about foreign influence than democratic choice.

Zelensky’s presidency is closely tied to the history of Western interference in Ukraine. In 2014, after the removal of pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, the United States played a crucial role in destabilizing Ukraine’s government. The infamous leaked conversation between U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, in which Nuland discussed who should form the new Ukrainian government, highlighted the extent of U.S. involvement. Essentially, the West orchestrated a coup that ousted Yanukovych, whom they viewed as too neutral, especially concerning Ukraine’s relationships with the European Union.

This intervention ultimately established the groundwork for Zelensky’s rise to power. While his administration claims independence, U.S. foreign policy has significantly influenced Ukraine since 2014. As the leader of a pro-Western Ukraine, Zelensky is not simply a product of the popular vote but also strategic geopolitical maneuvering by powerful external actors.

One of the most striking contradictions of Zelensky’s presidency is his alliance with far-left groups in Ukraine, particularly the Azov Battalion. Despite being a Jewish president, Zelensky’s government has relied on groups with neo-Nazi ties to combat Russian forces in eastern Ukraine. The Azov Battalion is notorious for its use of neo-Nazi symbols, such as the Wolfsangel and Sonnenrad, yet Zelensky’s government has continued to collaborate with them. This alliance raises serious questions about his commitment to the democratic values he claims to uphold.

Zelensky’s connections to such groups represent a broader issue in Ukrainian politics: the merging of far-right extremism with governmental authority. While Zelensky presents himself as a champion of democracy, his associations with these groups reveal his administration’s corrupt and morally compromised nature. It is not surprising that Zelensky’s government has been labeled among the most corrupt in Europe, with links to neo-Nazi factions further eroding his credibility as a leader of the free world.

While Zelensky’s image as a democratic leader has been central to his global appeal, his actions suggest otherwise. In November 2023, he suspended Ukraine’s elections, citing the ongoing war. Though this decision was framed as a necessary wartime measure, it reveals a concerning trend of consolidating power. According to Ukraine’s constitution, presidential and parliamentary elections are prohibited during martial law; nonetheless, Zelensky’s five-year term expired in March 2024, and he has made it clear that he will not hold elections.

Zelensky’s suppression of opposition voices further signals his authoritarian tendencies. He has shut down political parties that challenge his government, censored critical media outlets, and even threatened journalists with conscription. In one of the most tragic examples of his intolerance for dissent, Ukrainian journalist Gonzalo Lira, a Chilean-American who criticized Zelensky’s handling of the war, was arrested, tortured, and ultimately died in custody in January 2024. The Ukrainian government, under Zelensky’s leadership, has demonstrated a complete disregard for freedom of speech and human rights.

These actions evoke authoritarian regimes that suppress opposition and silence the press under the guise of national unity or security. Zelensky’s refusal to permit elections, coupled with his persecution of journalists and political opponents, portrays a leader more focused on retaining power than on upholding the democratic values he professes to support.

Zelensky’s stance on NATO has also contributed to escalating the conflict with Russia. While NATO’s expansion eastward in defiance of promises made to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 has been a significant point of tension, Zelensky’s aspirations for Ukraine to join NATO have exacerbated the situation. NATO’s consistent encroachment on Russia’s borders, coupled with Zelensky’s insistence on aligning Ukraine with the West, has placed Ukraine in the crosshairs of Russian military aggression.

From Russia’s perspective, the desire for a neutral Ukraine is understandable. The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis showed the United States’ willingness to verge on war to prevent Soviet missiles from being stationed just 90 miles from its shores. However, Zelensky and Western leaders have overlooked Russia’s concerns about NATO’s expansion and the threat it poses to Russian security. Instead, Zelensky continues to advocate for closer ties with NATO despite the risks to his country.

While many in the West have criticized those suggesting dialogue with Russia, President Trump has advocated for a more pragmatic approach. Trump’s understanding of Russia’s desire for a neutral Ukraine is a crucial perspective in the pursuit of peace. However, Zelensky has chosen to continue an endless war, perpetuating suffering and destruction while ignoring the possibility of a peaceful resolution.

Trump’s call for diplomacy with Russia isn’t about siding with Putin, as many critics claim, but about finding a resolution to an unwinnable war. Zelensky’s refusal to negotiate, despite the rising toll of human life and destruction, underscores his role in prolonging the conflict. If the world hopes to see peace in Ukraine, Zelensky’s leadership must be reconsidered, and his war-driven agenda should be scrutinized.

The global narrative surrounding Zelensky as a hero fighting for democracy warrants examination. His rise as a television comedian, his connections to extremist groups, his authoritarian tendencies, and his role in prolonging the war all indicate a leader far removed from the idealized image presented in the media. Zelensky is not a man of the people; he is a product of geopolitical manipulation, a puppet utilized by the West to advance its interests.

The world must look beyond Zelensky’s façade as a martyr and recognize him for what he truly represents: a leader swayed by external influences whose actions have contributed to ongoing conflict, suffering, and oppression. Achieving peace in Ukraine will require more than just the withdrawal of Russian forces; it will also necessitate Zelensky’s removal and a reevaluation of the factors that have fueled this devastating war.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

February 23, 2025

Kashyap “Kash” Patel has made history as the first Indian-origin Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a role he achieved after a contentious and politically charged confirmation process. On February 20, 2025, Patel secured his position as the head of the FBI with a narrow Senate vote of 51-49. This vote highlighted deep political divisions, setting the stage for a leadership marked by promise and controversy. Patel’s rise to this significant role is a personal victory and a landmark achievement for the Indian-American community, merging cultural heritage with an unwavering pursuit of professional ambition.

Born in New York to Gujarati Indian parents who immigrated from Uganda in the 1970s, Kash Patel’s background exemplifies the immigrant experience in America. His parents sought better opportunities, fleeing ethnic discrimination in their homeland, and Patel grew up with a strong sense of cultural identity. Despite facing challenges as the child of immigrants, Patel excelled academically and professionally, embodying the immigrant narrative of determination and success.

Patel pursued his education with a distinct focus on law and public service. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice and History from Richmond University in 2002 before obtaining a Juris Doctor (JD) from Pace University School of Law in 2004. His dedication to advancing his legal education took him to University College London, where he earned a certificate in international law. This academic foundation would become the cornerstone of his outstanding career in law enforcement and national security.

Patel’s professional journey began in Florida, where he served as a public defender for the state. This role gave him invaluable courtroom experience by managing complex cases, including murder and financial crimes. His early exposure to the criminal justice system significantly shaped his understanding of the law and the complexities of defending individuals within the legal framework. It wasn’t long before Patel’s skills were recognized, leading him to transition to federal positions within the Department of Justice (DOJ), where he took on the responsibilities of a trial attorney, focusing on counterterrorism cases.

In 2017, Patel’s career experienced a major shift when he became the senior counsel for counterterrorism on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). Here, Patel gained recognition for his close connections to former President Donald Trump, promoting transparency and questioning the FBI’s handling of politically sensitive investigations. His vocal criticisms of the FBI, particularly in the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, earned him both praise from conservatives and backlash from liberals, cementing his status as a polarizing figure in Washington.

In 2019, Patel became the senior director of the Counterterrorism Directorate at the National Security Council, where he oversaw U.S. intelligence operations and special forces. His tenure in this position earned him a reputation for emphasizing national security, particularly counterterrorism efforts. Later, he enhanced his influence by serving as chief of staff to the acting Secretary of Defense under President Trump. His work within national security circles and rising reputation as a strong conservative voice positioned Patel for his prominent role as FBI Director.

Patel’s appointment as FBI Director was far from smooth. His confirmation faced intense scrutiny and opposition due to his perceived partisanship and controversial ties to former President Trump. The Senate vote of 51-49 highlighted the deep divides in Congress over Patel’s qualifications and the direction he would take the FBI.

Critics of Patel, particularly Democrats, raised concerns about his lack of traditional law enforcement experience. They questioned his impartiality, accusing him of aligning too closely with Trump’s political agenda. Democratic Senator Dick Durbin called him “dangerous” and “inexperienced,” citing his outspoken criticisms of the FBI during politically charged investigations. His past involvement in drafting the Nunes memo, which criticized the FBI’s actions during the Russia probe, further fueled suspicions that Patel might use the FBI for political purposes.

The confirmation process also included fierce questioning during Patel’s hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Senators scrutinized his history of public advocacy, particularly his outspoken support for Trump and controversial stances on law enforcement. Despite the partisan divide, Patel received significant support from Republicans, who praised him as a reformer capable of restoring accountability to an agency that had become politicized.

As the new FBI Director, Patel’s vision for the agency centers on transparency, accountability, and a commitment to justice. His statement, “Let good cops be cops,” captures his approach—highlighting the need to restore public trust in law enforcement agencies that have faced considerable scrutiny in recent years. Patel also clarified that national security would be a top priority, accompanied by a stern warning to criminals: “We will hunt you down in every corner of this planet.”

Supporters of Patel’s appointment argue that he will reform the FBI, especially after years of criticism regarding the agency’s handling of politically sensitive cases. However, his lack of traditional law enforcement experience and the controversies surrounding his ties to Trump have led to significant concerns about the politicization of the agency under his leadership.

Patel’s appointment is a milestone not just for the FBI but also for the Indian-American community. As a Hindu leader in one of the country’s most influential law enforcement positions, Patel represents a significant cultural achievement. His rise to the top of the FBI showcases the growing presence and influence of Indian-Americans in high-profile roles within U.S. society. For many in the Indian diaspora, Patel’s success inspires, signaling that individuals from diverse backgrounds can reach the highest echelons of American power.

Kash Patel’s journey from the son of immigrants to becoming the first Indian-origin Director of the FBI exemplifies ambition, resilience, and controversy. His career, marked by a blend of legal expertise and national security experience, has equipped him for the significant challenges of leading one of the world’s most powerful law enforcement agencies. As he navigates the delicate balance of rebuilding trust, addressing national security threats, and preserving the FBI’s independence, Patel’s leadership is set to influence the agency’s future. At the same time, his appointment will continue to ignite discussions about race, politics, and the role of law enforcement in modern American society.

Kash Patel will be closely watched in the coming years as he strives to uphold justice and integrity within the FBI. His capacity to reconcile his controversial past with his new leadership role in a federal agency will likely shape his legacy within the FBI and the broader realm of American governance.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

February 20, 2025

Russ Vought, former Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), has recently made bold claims regarding the role of government institutions in shaping political agendas. Vought’s statements have sparked debate over several pressing political issues, particularly government waste and ideological influence. He has argued that Elon Musk’s actions challenge the political establishment, referring to a group he terms “Democrats,” and that USAID is wasting taxpayer dollars on ideological programs. This article aims to unpack these claims, critically examining their potential implications for politics and governance.

What is USAID? How it works and what could happen if Trump and Musk shut it down

Established by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, the U.S. Agency for International Development provides billion…

The term “Democrats” seems to be a blend of “OMB” (Office of Management and Budget) and “Democrats,” likely designed to create a negative connotation. By coining this term, Vought implies that the Democratic Party’s influence on the OMB results in inefficient and partisan decision-making. The OMB plays a crucial role in overseeing federal spending, and its influence over budget decisions often leads to partisan debates. In the current political climate, government spending has become a focal point, with sharp divisions between those who advocate for expansive government programs and those who seek to reduce waste and increase accountability. Vought’s use of “Democrats” reflects his stance against what he views as unchecked spending, particularly from a Democratic-led OMB.

Elon Musk, a tech mogul and influential figure, has become a lightning rod for political discourse. Vought’s claim that Musk’s actions challenge the “Democrats” alludes to Musk’s outspoken critiques of government waste and inefficiency. His tweets and public statements often draw attention to what he perceives as the misallocation of public funds, particularly in the space and technology sectors. This scrutiny could put government officials in a difficult position as defending controversial spending becomes increasingly “indefensible” in the public eye. The term “indefensible” here refers to the growing difficulty of justifying expenditures perceived as wasteful or lacking clear benefit to the public. Political opponents often use this term to erode trust in government institutions, amplifying criticisms of wasteful spending.

The reference to “DOGE” in Vought’s claims could be interpreted as a nod to the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, which Musk has endorsed. Musk’s relationship with Dogecoin and his criticisms of financial waste tie into broader discussions of government inefficiency. As a symbol of countercultural anti-establishment sentiment, DOGE reflects Musk’s broader critique of bureaucratic systems. If Vought’s reference is indeed to the cryptocurrency, it highlights a belief in more transparent and market-driven solutions to inefficiency. Government waste, a term often used to describe mismanagement or unnecessary spending, has been a perennial issue in U.S. politics. Examples such as excessive defense contracts or bureaucratic redundancies are commonly cited as evidence of waste. Reducing waste, however, is a complicated challenge, as it requires both efficiency in government programs and transparency in spending—areas where many critics feel current policies fall short.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development) distributes foreign aid to promote development and address global challenges. Vought’s claim that USAID is “pushing ideologies” refers to the perception that some programs prioritize specific political or social values over practical aid. For instance, USAID’s involvement in promoting human rights, democracy, and gender equality could be viewed by some as ideological or partisan, particularly in countries where such values are not universally accepted. Foreign aid has long been a tool for the U.S. to promote its political ideals. Still, Vought’s criticism suggests that taxpayer money should be used solely for humanitarian purposes without imposing a political agenda. This raises the broader question of whether U.S. aid should be neutral or justified in promoting specific values abroad.

The claims made by Russ Vought, particularly regarding government waste, ideological influence in foreign aid, and the challenge to the political establishment by figures like Elon Musk, have significant political consequences. These accusations tap into broader concerns over government accountability, fiscal responsibility, and partisan influence in public institutions. By framing the OMB and USAID as wasteful and ideological, Vought seeks to rally opposition to the current political order, particularly among conservative and fiscally conservative voters. The challenge for the “Democrats” is to respond to these criticisms while demonstrating the value and integrity of their policies.

In conclusion, these claims reflect a growing political divide over government spending and accountability. The ongoing debate about the role of government institutions in shaping policy will likely evolve as both political figures and the public demand greater transparency and efficiency. As the political discourse surrounding these issues deepens, the stakes for both parties remain high, with significant implications for the future of U.S. governance.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

February 9, 2025

This could be the biggest scandal of all time, perhaps the largest in history! The Democrats can’t evade this one. It’s too significant, too sordid!  —Donald Trump

In recent months, concerns about the transparency and accountability of U.S. foreign aid programs have intensified. Among the latest revelations is that the Biden administration has allocated an astounding $5 billion to “unnamed foreign sources,” without providing precise details on the destination of these funds. While the official justification for these payments is termed “aid,” the ambiguity surrounding the recipients has raised serious questions about whether American taxpayers are being misled regarding using their hard-earned money. A series of controversial foreign aid allocations has emerged, further fueling doubts about the effectiveness and morality of these programs.

Shady Aid Spending Examples

Several instances of questionable foreign aid disbursements have surfaced, as critics contend that a significant portion of the funds is being allocated to causes or entities that do not align with U.S. interests. Below are some of the most notable examples:

1. 1. $6 Million for Tourism in Egypt
   One of the most perplexing allocations is the $6 million designated for tourism in Egypt. Critics argue that Egypt, a country with a world-renowned tourism industry thanks to its iconic pyramids, does not need American taxpayers’ money for these initiatives. The U.S. government’s priorities would be better focused on addressing domestic issues, such as improving tourism infrastructure within the United States, especially in states like California, where tourism is vital to the economy.
2. $2 Million for BBC to “Value the Diversity of Libyan Society”
   Another troubling expenditure was a $2 million grant awarded to the BBC to “value the diversity of Libyan society.” This funding raises several questions: Why is the U.S. government supporting a British media organization to create content about Libya? Is it right for taxpayers to back foreign media outlets, especially when they appear to promote a particular political agenda? Some view these funds as an unnecessary and redundant use of taxpayer dollars that could have been better spent on domestic priorities.
3. $1 Million for a Gay Group in Armenia Further concerning is a $1 million grant awarded to a gay advocacy group in Armenia. Critics argue that, while promoting human rights and equality is essential, it remains unclear why American taxpayers should finance such initiatives in a foreign country, especially when domestic social issues often take priority. This funding allocation raises questions about the political and social priorities shaping U.S. foreign aid.
4. $20 Million for Iraqi Sesame Street

One of the most controversial spending items

5. $2 Million for Trans Surgeries in Guatemala
   One of the most controversial grants was the $2 million allocated for gender reassignment surgeries in Guatemala. Critics have raised concerns over using taxpayer funds for such procedures in foreign countries. Additionally, allegations of corruption have emerged, suggesting that unethical local politicians and international NGOs may have misappropriated money intended for medical treatments. These accusations raise serious questions regarding the integrity and accountability of foreign aid spending.
6. $235 Million for the National Democratic Institute
   The National Democratic Institute (NDI) received a $235 million allocation for its supposed efforts to promote democratic processes worldwide. While these initiatives are generally viewed as harmless, many have expressed concerns about how much of this funding goes towards executive compensation and administrative overhead instead of grassroots efforts. A significant portion of this funding appears to have been used for salaries of NDI’s staff, including individuals with limited direct experience in promoting democracy, leading critics to label it as wasteful spending.

The Role of George Soros and USAID Funding

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, sparked controversy in 2017 by claiming that George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) had become the primary executor of USAID’s foreign aid since at least 2009. Soros, a billionaire philanthropist and liberal political donor, has been heavily involved in funding various global causes, particularly those that align with progressive political movements.

According to the Heritage Foundation, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) have made substantial contributions to the distribution and implementation of U.S. foreign aid, channeling millions of dollars through the organization to support various social and political initiatives. These claims have raised concerns regarding the potential influence of private interests on U.S. foreign policy and aid programs, particularly in relation to public funding. The connections between Soros’ organizations and the U.S. government have come under scrutiny, leading to questions about whether aid is allocated to align with U.S. strategic interests or to promote alternative political agendas.

In response to these controversial allocations, President Donald Trump took to social media to stress the urgent need to uncover the billions of dollars stolen or mismanaged at USAID and other government agencies. Trump accused organizations like Politico of taking millions in taxpayer dollars as “payoffs” to craft favorable narratives about the Democratic Party. He also questioned whether media outlets such as the New York Times had received similar payments, suggesting that this might indicate a massive, yet largely hidden, corruption scandal within U.S. foreign aid programs.

If true, Trump’s accusations imply that the U.S. government’s foreign aid programs might be mismanaged and vulnerable to corrupt practices that erode public trust. Many taxpayers worry that foreign aid is being used to sway media narratives instead of addressing real international crises or strategic issues.

Numerous instances of questionable foreign aid allocations and allegations of corruption highlight the urgent need for increased transparency and oversight in U.S. foreign aid programs. Taxpayers deserve to know where their money is going and whether it is being effectively used to promote national interests. With billions of dollars at stake, the American public must demand greater accountability and ensure that foreign aid prioritizes both ethical considerations and the well-being of those who support the U.S. economy. The government must reform foreign aid programs to enhance transparency and focus on tangible results rather than political or ideological goals.

© 2025 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 3, 2024

Career readiness in higher education has become a critical issue, particularly after the Great Recession, which heightened concerns over graduates’ employability. Employers increasingly seek candidates who possess both technical knowledge and transferable skills—such as communication, problem-solving, and teamwork—that are adaptable across various industries.

Unfortunately, traditional methods of teaching these skills are often too generic and disconnected from the specific contexts of students’ future careers. A more nuanced and structured approach to teaching transferable skills is necessary to better prepare students for the workforce. A seven-step framework for teaching disciplinary skills can align the curriculum with specific workplace contexts, fostering skills integral to students’ future success.

The emphasis on career readiness has intensified, especially as the world of work becomes more dynamic and unpredictable. Higher education institutions are under pressure to ensure that graduates are academically proficient and prepared to navigate complex work environments. Transferable skills can be applied across various job roles and industries, enhancing graduates’ employability. These skills include communication, adaptability, teamwork, critical thinking, and problem-solving. Yet, many traditional approaches to teaching these skills still need to be improved. Workshops focusing on generic soft skills are often decontextualized, failing to show students how these abilities are specifically relevant to their chosen fields.

The seven-step framework offers a structured approach to teaching transferable skills within disciplinary contexts to address this gap. This framework encourages faculty to be intentional and explicit about the skills they want students to develop, modeling their application in real-world scenarios and providing structured opportunities for practice and feedback. Each step can be tailored to the needs of different disciplines, ensuring that the skills taught are relevant and valuable in specific professional settings.

Step 1: Define Skills in Detail
Rather than assuming students know what “communication” or “teamwork” means, faculty should precisely define these skills and relate them to specific tasks in their disciplines. For example, in engineering, teamwork might involve collaborating on complex problem-solving tasks, while in the humanities, it may involve debating and synthesizing diverse perspectives.

Step 2: Contextualize the Skills
Skills should be taught in the context of students’ future professions. For instance, a business professor might use case studies to demonstrate how problem-solving applies in high-stakes negotiations. In contrast, a biology professor could focus on teamwork in lab research projects.

Step 3: Model Skill Application
Faculty should demonstrate how these skills are applied in real-world scenarios. This can include role-playing, simulations, or sharing case studies that illustrate the skills in action, thereby bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Step 4: Provide Practice Opportunities
Students should be allowed to apply skills through structured, hands-on learning experiences. These might include group projects, internships, or service-learning opportunities, allowing students to practice skills in a controlled but realistic setting.

Step 5: Offer Continuous Feedback
Feedback is essential for refining skills. Faculty should provide detailed, constructive feedback that helps students understand how they can improve. This could be done through peer evaluations, instructor comments, or self-assessments.

Step 6: Assess Skill Proficiency
Assessment methods should be designed to measure the acquisition and application of transferable skills, not just academic knowledge. This could involve performance-based assessments, such as project outcomes or presentations, that reflect real-world expectations.

Step 7: Reflect and Iterate
Both students and faculty should regularly reflect on the skill development process. Students should assess their progress, while faculty should review their teaching methods to ensure that skills are effectively taught and learned.

It is crucial to shift away from generic soft skills workshops and toward a more nuanced understanding of transferable skills as discipline-specific competencies. Career readiness is not merely about acquiring abstract abilities; it is about understanding how those abilities manifest in specific fields and how they can be honed to meet industry demands. By adopting a framework like the seven-step approach, higher education can better equip students to succeed in their future careers, making them job-ready and career-ready.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

References:

1. Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Williams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000083202
2. Jackson, D. (2016). Mind the gap: Graduate employability and the “skills gap” in higher education. Education + Training, 58(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2015-0055
3. Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M. (2004). Learning, curriculum, and employability in higher education. Routledge.
4. NACE (National Association of Colleges and Employers). (2022). Job Outlook 2022: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Hiring Outlook for Class of 2022. NACE. https://www.naceweb.org
5. Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912460400

By: Amil Imani

November 30, 2024

Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, has navigated an exceptionally tumultuous political landscape marked by deep divisions and intense scrutiny. We now see how his journey to the presidency for a second time and the subsequent tenure could be punctuated by significant accomplishments and unprecedented challenges. Notably, Trump’s perseverance in the face of these assassination attempts and deep-state conspiracies set to scuttle his ascendancy has become a focal point of his narrative, reinforcing his image as a resilient leader committed to serving the nation.

Key Political Accomplishments and Popular Policies

During his presidency, Trump championed several policies that garnered substantial support among his base and reshaped American politics. His administration prioritized tax reform, which included the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, significantly lowering corporate tax rates and aiming to stimulate economic growth. Additionally, Trump’s “America First” foreign policy shifted the U.S. approach to international agreements, withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord and renegotiating trade agreements such as NAFTA, which the USMCA replaced.

Trump’s appointment of three Supreme Court justices solidified a conservative majority, impacting the judiciary’s direction for decades. His focus on deregulation, particularly in the energy sector, aimed to bolster American energy independence, a move many in the business community praised. These accomplishments contributed to a strong economy pre-COVID-19 and positioned Trump as a champion of populism, appealing to a constituency that felt overlooked by traditional political elites.

Public Perception and Tenacity

Despite his political successes, Trump’s presidency was marred by alleged controversies and criticism sustained by the Democrats and their profound state masters. The public’s perception of him is constantly sought to be polarized, with elements of the mainstream media viewing him as a disruptor who challenged the status quo, and they still try to push the narrative as a figure who undermined democratic norms – when it has been the other way round – all along.

Much to their chagrin. The narrative of resilience has gained momentum after these two assassination attempts against him. And I hope Trump and his supporters will leverage these to illustrate his commitment to the nation despite extreme adversity.

Trump’s speeches often reflect his tenacity. For instance, during a rally in 2020, he stated, “They’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in their way.” This sentiment resonates with his supporters, who believe he embodies their frustrations with the political establishment. His ability to frame himself as a martyr for the American people has solidified his standing among his base, who appreciate his indomitable spirit in the face of perceived threats.

The Deep-State Targeting

The “deep state” – a term describing a rigid network of entrenched bureaucrats and political elites working against an elected president – has been a recurring theme in the counter-narrative. Over the years, various incidents suggest that multiple government entities have conspired to undermine his presidency. Intelligence agencies and political opponents have engaged in tactics ranging from leaks of classified information to the initiation of investigations, such as the Mueller inquiry into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Specific examples can be cited, including the FBI’s use of the campaign to surveil Trump and the impeachment proceedings that followed the Ukraine scandal. These actions prove a broader effort to delegitimize Trump’s presidency and disrupt his agenda. Trump often emphasizes transparency and accountability in his rhetoric, showcasing his fight against an entrenched political class that seeks to maintain control through subversion.

Recently, in an alarming report, the Infowars news portal pointed out the recent release of a letter by the Department of Justice (DOJ) linked to a failed assassination attempt against Donald Trump. The letter, which reportedly includes a $150,000 bounty for the GOP nominee’s assassination, underscores the challenging environment for those affiliated with the Republican Party.

Indeed, Donald Trump’s tenure as president has been characterized by remarkable achievements and profound challenges, including these assassination attempts and a persistent narrative of the deep state to undermine his ascendancy. His ability to endure and thrive amidst these adversities has fortified his image as a committed leader dedicated to the American people.

While media perception continues to attempt to deeply divide, Trump’s narrative of resilience continues to resonate with his supporters, reflecting a broader struggle for power and representation in American politics. As he navigates the complexities of his post-presidency life, the themes of perseverance and resistance to perceived threats will likely remain central to his legacy and the ongoing discourse surrounding his influence in the political arena.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

November 4, 2024

The political landscape of America has grown more divisive and tense over the last couple of decades. Polarizing views on government policies, social issues, and the interpretation of the Constitution have led many citizens to question the direction in which the nation is heading. This period of political discord poignantly illustrates the critical need for healthy civic engagement in its many forms, including—but not limited to—voting, education, and active community involvement. Democratically, civic engagement enables citizens to steer government activities toward policies, social concerns, and economic fairness in a decentralized way.

In periods when political situations become turbulent, being a citizen means much more than casting votes every few years; rather, it is a time for active, informed involvement in public life. Such engagement helps keep the government accountable and ensures democracy serves the will of all the people, not just a select few. It is only when a citizen understands how an overreaching government, along with shifting values and political ideologies, can affect freedom and national identity that they are prepared to make informed decisions, advocate for change, and thereby sustain democracy both in spirit and in practice.

Government tyranny, historically defined, is the oppressive or unjust use of power by those in authority.

The American founding is rooted in an innate resistance to tyranny derived from colonial experiences under British rule. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were designed to protect citizens against increasing power, which could have been a suicidal ingredient in eroding individual freedoms. History reminds us that resistance to such trends is essential for preserving liberty when the government forgets constitutional rights.

The last few decades have seen glaring government overreach against Democratic administrations. Examples include expanded surveillance policies under the Patriot Act, controversial expansions of executive authority, and healthcare mandates perceived as intrusive to personal choice. Such extensive government intrusion into citizens’ private lives, at the expense of individual freedoms, under the pretext of protecting or benefiting the public, can sometimes result in a perceived trespass on civil liberties.

Active citizen monitoring of government policies and practices is more important today than ever, especially in large settings. This vigilance requires people to be more aware and take action by informing themselves about policies, raising their concerns, and engaging in discussions about government behavior. Freedom can be further secured through civic engagement tools such as public forums, online petitions, and peaceful protests, keeping things open and accountable. The more people are informed and involved, the more democratic their country will be, and this will serve as a damper on the tendency of government power to trespass on the rights of its subjects.

Sketched within this divide over the last couple of years—especially under administrations such as those of Obama and Biden—lies a noticeable shift in policy approaches and priorities, placing greater emphasis on a more significant and expansive governmental role in areas traditionally managed at the state or local levels, according to many critics. Among other issues, federal power has been extended to healthcare reform, economic stimulus packages, and environmental regulations—all of which have sparked debate about their consistency with the principles of limited government and personal responsibility.

The destruction of traditional American values, which persist in the principles enshrined in the Constitution, has led to the erosion of long-held cultural beliefs about family, religion, and freedom of speech. These cultural shifts encourage fears about what this could mean for the future of American identity. However, open discourse and a commitment to sustaining constitutional rights, as society continues to evolve, will allow these values to endure.

Civic engagement plays a vital role; citizens must advocate for the re-election of these principles in government actions and policies.

The policy debates emphasize the necessity of citizens weighing and engaging with the ideologies informing national policy.

To this, the Republican Party adopts a more moderate outlook: limiting government intervention to a minimum, reducing taxes, and promoting individual rights. Republicans advocate for a free-market economy and personal responsibility. Unlike the Democrats’ emphasis on state-driven approaches, the Republican perspective clings to beliefs in the power of individuals and their communities to effect change. The party attracts those wary of centralized authority during a time of political turmoil through its defense of traditional American values and limited government. This ideological gap presents a clear choice to the electorate. It also underlines the role of civic involvement in the party platform and policy articulation: through civic engagement, the people ensure that both parties remain true to American values and ideals by pressing for answers that effectively balance freedom and progress.
The political tension America is experiencing today indicates that passive observation will no longer suffice.

By actively participating in democratic processes, citizens ensure that government activities reflect their values and that power is a privilege granted by the people, not an authority imposed upon them.

Each citizen has responsibilities to embrace, including voting, being well informed, voicing opinions for policy change, and holding leaders accountable. History has repeatedly proven that democracy works best when the public participates.
Participation during political unrest is a duty and a shield for freedom and democracy, perpetuating the nation’s founding principles for generations.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

• Legislative Achievements: He has played a pivotal role in bipartisan efforts, such as the CHIPS and Science Act and tax relief initiatives for hurricane victims. His ability to navigate complex legislative landscapes has earned him respect among his peers and constituents.
• Popularity in Texas: Despite criticism for specific actions—such as his controversial trip to Cancun during a winter storm in 2021—Cruz maintains a strong support base among Texas Republicans. Polling data shows he consistently leads Allred by margins ranging from 2% to 5% in recent surveys, indicating that many Texans still view him as their representative in Washington.

• Lack of Transparency: Critics have pointed out that Allred’s campaign has not always been transparent regarding funding sources and endorsements. This lack of clarity may raise questions among voters about his integrity and motivations.
• Association with Controversial Figures: While seeking endorsements from former Republican representatives like Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney may seem strategic, it could backfire by alienating core Democratic supporters who view these figures unfavorably due to their opposition to Trump.

• Polling Data: Recent polls show Cruz leading by approximately 2% to 5%, with around 5% of respondents still undecided.
• Voter Sentiment: Analysts have noted that despite demographic shifts in Texas favoring Democrats, many voters still identify strongly with Cruz’s conservative values. Allred’s challenge will be mobilizing enough support from moderate Republicans and independents while retaining Democratic voters.

• Experience: Allred’s limited political experience compared to Cruz raises concerns about his readiness for Senate responsibilities.
• Policy Positions: His progressive stances may not align with the values of many Texas voters.
• Public Perception: Issues related to transparency and past associations could undermine voter trust.
• Electability: Although polling data suggests he is within reach, doubts remain about his ability to defeat an established incumbent like Cruz.

By Amil Imani

September 24, 2024

Trauma, viruses, or bacteria cause the death of a biological entity. Viruses and bacteria are major killers of human beings and present significant challenges to medicine. They can be deadly and have the uncanny ability to mutate. Yet, they are there for their mission of ending life.

Life exists through balance: Body and soul, good and evil, and life and death. This holds even to the lesser foundations of our lives and how we spend our time. The seemingly trivial ripples we create each day eventually build into a wave of mankind. When a new entity is formed, various forces work to end it. Death, in effect, is pre-birth. Without death, everything freezes in place. Death often provides the raw material for the new birth. For instance, the death and decay of a tree supplies the needed nutrients for the seed to grow: Newtonian physics’ obsolescence provided the foundation for Einstein’s relativity theory.

Death and renewal are also fundamental to religion. For this reason, many religions promised renewal in the person of another savior or the return of the same person. The Jews, for instance, expect the Messiah; the Christians long for the second coming; and some Muslims pray for the appearance of the Mahdi, while other Shia Muslims supplicate God for the return of Imam Hussein.

Poorly understood and little appreciated are psychosocial viruses—PSVs. As is the case with their biological kin, psychosocial viruses also work to corrupt any idea, mental function, or belief and help supplant them with new ones. Various forms of mental disorders are the result of interaction between the PSVs and the person’s pre-disposition for the condition. Not all mutations caused by PSVs are pathological. Many serve to advance the human enterprise. Without the contributions of the beneficial PSVs, humanity would still be stunted in its development from day one.

In the case of Islam, a particular group of PSVs set out to work the minute Muhammad launched his faith, and mutation rapidly followed. First, there was the Islam of Mecca or the Islam of Meekness. As recorded in the early Suras of the Quran, Muhammad’s teachings were about many good things for thirteen years. Very few people became attracted to what he preached. The people scorned the man, harassed him, and eventually made him flee his hometown of Mecca for Medina. Then, a significant mutation occurred: the Islam of Medina, or the ‘Islam of Tyranny,’ arrived on the scene. The Quran Suras of Medina are replete with exhortations of intolerance, exclusivity, and sanctioning of violence against non-Muslims. This mutation deeply appealed to the temperament of the Arab Bedouins, who flocked to Muhammad’s faith.

The PSV of the time of Muhammad continued to mutate as it reached other peoples and other lands. Each person’s ideas and beliefs—their cognitive immune system—responded differently to the invader. Some completely resisted the assault and defeated it. Others were overwhelmed and forced into submission. Yet some of the vanquished, over time, managed to repel the invader while others incorporated it to various extents into their own belief system. In due course, the mutation among the vanquished people has become so divergent that some variants can hardly be recognized as the progeny of the original.

Today’s Islam comprises a dozen significant sects, hundreds of sub-sects, and schools. Just two examples should demonstrate the fact that Muhammad’s Islam has decomposed.

One branch of Sunni Islam, the Wahhabi, for instance, has interbred with the Pashtun culture of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the result has been the Taliban version of Islam: a most reactionary, repressive, and savage “religion.”

On the Shiite side, for example, there is a sect of the Ghulat Alavi that holds only to one of the five pillars of Islam: the Shehadah, an Islamic credo that says, “I testify that there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.” This sect does not subscribe to the remaining four pillars of praying five times a day, fasting one month a year, pilgrimage to Mecca at least once a lifetime and paying the religious tax of zakat. The Alavi women are allowed to participate in all religious events. They are not required to don the hijab—a stark contrast to the Taliban, who deny even rudimentary education to women and forbid them from leaving home without the accompaniment of a male relative.

The Ghulat Alavis deified Imam Ali and the other Imams. They particularly revere the Imam Ali and worship him as a co-rank of God. They profess, “Ali khoda neest, valee as khoda joda neest”—Ali is not God but not apart from God. This very same sect places Imam Ali above the Prophet Muhammad.

Ideas and beliefs should thrive or fail on merit only and not because someone says they are the best, and everyone must accept them without question. Let the deserving and the fittest survive, and let the phony and the unfit die. This form of freedom has been the engine of progress in all human endeavors. And it is the exact opposite practice of stifling free inquiry in many organized religions that is the leading cause of many superstitions, stagnation, and even untold suffering.

What needs to sink into the Western people’s minds is the realization that, to the Muslims, the idea of freedom and freethinking is primarily an alien concept.

From birth onward, a Muslim’s brain is packed with the notion that everything in life is predicated on the will of Allah. Allah is in charge of all things and at all times. Allah is very much of a hands-on God. He thinks and ordains and decides the outcome for everything large and small. And since Allah is the all-knowing as well as the all-everything, the duty of the faithful is unquestioned obedience in all matters, irrespective of all contradictory evidence.

Islam delusion presently has in its stranglehold over a billion humans, posing an existential threat to all non-Muslims. When this billion and a half adhere to the pathological belief of Islam and use it as their marching order of life, the rest of humanity can ignore the threat only at its own peril.

Once again, Islam has risen from the ashes and is on a campaign of conquest throughout the world. Hordes of life-in-hand foot-solider fanatical Muslims are striving to kill and get killed. All they want is the opportunity to discharge their homicidal-suicidal impulse on their way to Allah’s promised glorious paradise. In the background, the foot soldiers’ wishes are granted by their handlers, the puppeteers, who pull the strings and detonate these human bombs. Those who cherish life must recognize these emissaries of death, what makes them, what motivates them, and how best to defend against them.

The campaign of death waged by the Islamist jihadist, be he a puppet or a puppeteer, is energized by the belief in delectable rewards that await the faithful implementer of Allah’s dictates. Through highly effective indoctrination, the jihadist has come to believe firmly in Islam’s grand delusion. He believes that Allah is the one and only supreme creator of earth and heavens, that it is his duty and privilege to abide by Allah’s will and carry out his plans at all costs; he believes firmly in a gloriously wonderful immortal afterlife in paradise, for which a martyr’s death is the surest quickest admission. Although the dominating theme of the delusion is quasi-spiritual, the promised rewards of the afterlife awaiting the martyr are sensual and material. All the things and activities that the jihadist desires and cannot attain or practice and rejects in his earthly life will be purified and proffered to him in the paradise of the next life. Thus goes the delusion.

Understanding that the human mind can better discern objective reality is also essential. In actuality, reality is in the sense of the beholder. The outside world supplies bits and pieces of raw material that the mind combines to form reality. Depending on the type and amount of bits and pieces a given mind receives, its reality can be very different from that of another.

Nonetheless, it is time for Islam to shed its “Burqa.” The cat is out of the bag. In the age of instantaneous communication and with the rising literacy, the task of keeping this stone-age belief called Islam under cover is an impossibility.

No religious, scientific, philosophical, political, or otherwise belief system or set of ideas should be protected from open, honest criticism. It is up to the individual consumer to decide for himself, to the best of his ability, the compelling nature of the information and the value and integrity of any offering in a marketplace of free ideas.

None of the numerous contending Islamic sects is indeed the Islam Muhammad launched. That original Islam died with Muhammad, and the belief immediately started splintering and kept on splintering, with each splinter claiming to be the faithful Islam and renouncing and fighting every other splinter. This time around, the invigorated Muslims are using the immense amount of petrodollars they extract from oil-addicted non-Muslims. The sword is temporarily replaced by just as deadly a weapon, the petrodollar. Before long, the fanatical Muslims running Iran aim to add a more deadly modern version of the sword: the Islamic bomb. With the bomb in one hand and the other hand on the oil spigot, the religion of peace and brotherhood will have the power to bring the non-Muslim world to its knees.

© 2024 NWV – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

September 10, 2024

In the age of digital globalization, scams have become a widespread problem, often orchestrated from across the globe. While scam stories are far from new, the evolving nature of fraud, the countries from which they originate, and the staggering financial losses for the United States require fresh analysis.

Key Scam Originating Countries

Several nations have been linked to high levels of fraud targeting American citizens and businesses, ranging from phishing and romance fraud to business email compromise (BEC). Here’s a breakdown of the most prominent ones:

• Nigeria: Nigeria has long been associated with various forms of fraud, especially email scams, commonly known as “Nigerian Prince” scams. In recent years, sophisticated fraud networks have emerged, often involving cybercrime syndicates. These groups use social engineering tactics, romance scams, and fake business proposals to siphon billions from unsuspecting victims worldwide. The FBI estimates that Nigerian BEC scams alone result in losses of over $1.8 billion annually globally.
• India: India has seen a rise in fraudulent call centers that target American consumers. These scams often involve tech support fraud, IRS impersonation scams, or fake credit card services. Criminal networks run many operations in cities like Delhi and Mumbai, where scammers impersonate IRS or Microsoft representatives. In 2022, it was estimated that tech support fraud originating from India led to losses exceeding $347 million in the U.S.
• China: Chinese scammers are often linked to counterfeit goods, intellectual property theft, and fraudulent online marketplaces. China’s rise as a global e-commerce powerhouse has also enabled fraudsters to use platforms to sell fake products, affecting the fashion and pharmaceutical industries. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce reported that Chinese counterfeit scams cost the U.S. economy upwards of $600 billion annually.
• Russia: Russian cybercriminals have become some of the most notorious in the world. They are frequently linked to sophisticated hacking schemes and ransomware attacks. Russian crime groups target American corporations, government institutions, and critical infrastructure. The Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack in 2021, for instance, which was attributed to Russian hackers, resulted in a payout of $4.4 million in Bitcoin.
• The Philippines: Call center scams, especially related to online dating, romance fraud, and fake investments, often originate from the Philippines. Scammers build elaborate counterfeit profiles, usually targeting emotionally vulnerable Americans. In 2023 alone, the FBI reported that romance scams from the Philippines resulted in over $700 million in losses.

The Growing Threat of gift cards scams

A significant and growing portion of the fraud ecosystem revolves around gift card scams. Scammers increasingly prefer gift cards to defraud people, as they are easy to purchase, widely available, and provide minimal protection for the buyer.

According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one in four people who report losing money to fraud have fallen victim to gift card scams. Typically, these scams begin with a phone call from someone posing as a well-known – demanding the numbers on the back of gift cards to resolve a “security issue” or prevent arrest.

Popular Targets for Gift Card Scams

Target gift cards have become the most frequently reported brand for scams, followed by Google Play, Apple, eBay, and Walmart.

Scammers often instruct victims to purchase cards from retailers like Target, Walmart, Best Buy, CVS, and Walgreens, ensuring anonymity and complicating law enforcement efforts.

Scammers typically coach victims to purchase multiple gift cards across various locations and to remain on the phone with the scammer to prevent interference from store employees.

Between 2018 and 2021, gift card scams increased yearly, with total losses reaching $148 million in just the first nine months of 2021. The median loss for victims of these scams rose from $700 to $1,000 during this period, with Target gift cards accounting for a median loss of $2,500 – 30% of victims reported losing $5,000 or more on a single Target card.

If someone demands payment via gift card, it is unequivocally a scam. Gift cards should be used for gifts, not payments. Victims are encouraged to report fraud to the card issuer and file a complaint with the FTC.

Fresh Insights: Emerging Scam Hubs

While the countries above remain at the forefront, newer countries are joining the ranks of global scam hubs driven by economic inequality, weak regulatory oversight, and internet access.

• Eastern Europe: Countries like Ukraine, Romania, and Bulgaria are becoming hotbeds for digital fraud and cybercrime. These nations host many fraudulent websites, phishing networks, and money laundering operations. Losses attributed to Eastern European fraud networks are challenging to quantify, but they are believed to contribute significantly to global BEC losses, estimated to cost the U.S. $43 billion since 2016.
• Ghana: Known as “the new Nigeria” regarding online romance scams, Ghana is becoming a significant player in defrauding American citizens. Many Ghanaian scammers pose as U.S. military personnel stationed abroad, developing relationships with their targets before requesting money. In 2022, U.S. losses from romance scams tied to Ghana reached over $300 million.

Quantifying the Financial Impact

Quantifying the amount of money lost to scams is challenging, as many victims are reluctant to report their losses. However, estimates suggest that the annual cost to the United States alone is staggering. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),

The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) recorded over 800,000 complaints in 2022 alone, with reported losses exceeding $10 billion – a 60% increase from the previous year.

Yes, Americans lost billions of dollars to scams in recent years. Here’s a snapshot of the financial toll on the U.S. from scams in just the last few years:

• Business Email Compromise (BEC): $2.4 billion in 2021 losses
• Phishing schemes: $1 billion in 2022 losses
• Romance scams: $1.3 billion in 2022 losses: Victims are lured into romantic relationships with scammers who ultimately exploit them financially.
• Tech support fraud: $347 million in 2022 losses: Scammers pose as technical support representatives to gain access to victims’ computers and steal personal information.
• Investment scams: Victims are promised high returns on investments that are ultimately fraudulent.
• Phishing scams: Scammers send emails or messages to trick victims into revealing sensitive information.
• Ransomware attacks: Roughly $20 billion in global economic damages in 2022, much of it targeting U.S. institutions

Beyond the Numbers

The financial toll of scams extends far beyond monetary losses. Victims often suffer emotional distress, damaged credit, and a loss of trust in others. In some cases, the psychological impact can be severe, leading to depression and even suicide.

Why America is a Primary Target

• High Disposable Income: Scammers target the U.S. because of its vast population of individuals with higher disposable incomes. Americans are more likely to have access to credit, savings, and online banking.
• Advanced Technology Infrastructure: While the U.S. leads in technology adoption, it is more vulnerable to cyber-attacks and online scams, exploiting the systems designed to offer convenience.
• Weak International Coordination: Despite efforts, international law enforcement needs help to keep up with cybercrime’s ever-evolving nature. The lack of cohesive international regulations and jurisdictional challenges enables scammers in foreign nations to operate with impunity.

Combating the Global Scam Epidemic and the Road Ahead

Addressing the global scam epidemic requires a multifaceted approach. Governments, law enforcement agencies, and technology companies must work together to:

• Enhance law enforcement cooperation: Strengthen international collaboration to track and prosecute scammers.
• Improve consumer education: Raise awareness about common scams and provide tips on how to protect oneself.
• Strengthen cybersecurity measures: Develop and implement robust security protocols to prevent scammers from exploiting vulnerabilities.
• Support victim recovery: Offer resources and support to victims of scams.

As fraudsters continue to adapt and exploit new vulnerabilities, international coalitions must focus on intelligence sharing, cybersecurity investment, and policy enforcement. Another critical strategy is to empower consumers with better education about emerging scam tactics.

In the age of hyperconnectivity, the battle against scams has indeed become a global one. However, with innovative approaches to cybersecurity and international cooperation, there’s hope that the financial hemorrhaging from the U.S. to global scam hubs can be curtailed.

By understanding the origins of global scams and their devastating impact on individuals and communities, we can take steps to combat this growing threat and protect ourselves from becoming victims.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

September 8, 2024

The vast land of the United States was once inhabited by a relatively small number of indigenous people. These native “Indians” lived throughout the land for thousands of years and will always remain the first inhabitants of what is now the United States. These native people helped the pilgrims survive the winter. Later, European immigrants came, and the number of settlements finally outgrew the native Americans.

Then, on July 4, 1776, America declared independence from England, the old white grandfather across the sea. The miracle of America happened, and its dynamic birth rapidly changed the entire world.

America developed into thirteen colonies, then into the strong 50 states she is today. In a very short time, America grew from a log cabin settlement to the world’s largest and most technologically powerful economy. The United States is a nonpareil icon and the envy of the world. In many surprising ways, America resembles the great ancient Persian Empire. Like the Persians, who rarely regret the past, Americans always believe “the best days are ahead.” Like the ancient Persian Empire once was, the United States is the greatest country in the world. Like the ancient Persians, who were the first-world managers and the most tolerant empire-builders, America, by its constitution, is also the most tolerant and benevolent nation in the world.

Ancient Persian kings released the Jews from Babylonian captivity, financed the re-establishment of their country, and restored their national religion. (Zionists, they were!) America has done the same. In a strange sense, America is a reincarnation of Persia, an extension of the Achaemenid Empire. No wonder the immigrant Persians (Iranian-Americans) hold the United States very close to their hearts and have blossomed here in their new home. Unfortunately, tragedy reigns in the land of the old Persians. The remnants of the great Persian Empire were swallowed up by the Muslim conquerors storming out of Arabia. An oppressive version of Islam eviscerated the spiritual life of tolerant old Persia. It has taken centuries for the Persians (modern Iranians) to recover their spirit. Zoroastrianism, the original Iranian religion, was not an effective barrier against the radical, murderous version of the religion from the Arabian desert. Zoroastrianism has not rebounded with the new Persian nationalism today.

The Persian Renaissance lies in the spirit of the Iranians themselves. This spirit alone can overcome the Islamists who rule as tyrants. Unfortunately, tragedy reigns in the land of the United States today, and it is up to the people to use the American spirit and get our country back on track. Nations and empires do indeed have “life cycles.” Many historians have studied this throughout the years, and all have come to the same conclusion: a lifetime of about two centuries.

And they all seem to go through the same life cycle: “from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependence back again into bondage.” (Alexander Tyler, 1750). Where are we in this cycle? “We, too, have gone from bondage to spiritual faith; from faith to great courage which established our precious liberty, which, in turn, has given us unprecedented abundance that has made us the world’s envy. That abundance, however, has led to complacency and apathy. (If you ask the average person, What is the biggest problem in America? Is it ignorance, or is it apathy? They will probably respond, “I don’t know, and I don’t care!”

To make matters worse, a noisy clique of local leftists, “useful idiots” with a suicide wish, are doing all they can to take the country with them to the grave they so earnestly seek. On both sides of the Atlantic, these self-appointed squatters of the higher ground are riding so high on their high horse that they are blind to the realities down on earth. When events such as this come to light, it almost makes one wonder if we are merely witnessing a march toward European-style Socialism or are we witnessing a march toward a Totalitarian state.

We live in an unpredictable era. It is like watching a train wreck in slow motion, except, regrettably, we are the passengers sitting on that train. History provides ample illustrations of the disastrous consequences of the collapse of law and order. “In ancient Greece, the first disorder symptoms were a general loss of respect for tradition and the degradation of the young. Among the early symptoms was the decline of art and entertainment. The philosophers and pundits distorted the medium of communication. Rhetoric became combative and intolerant; intellectuals began to deride and attack all the traditional institutions of Hellenic society.” Ibid., 35-36.

America is still the last haven of hope where humanity can flourish. The world owes a great deal to America for inspiration and practical accomplishment. Americans have helped every other nation in the world. America’s enemies decry her greatness, yet they want to be in America and to be American. We must remember that the Constitution is the charter that lights this country’s path. I’m afraid I have to disagree with those who are more than willing to violate the Constitution and call it little more than a body of suggestions that can be disregarded when expedient. To us, the Constitution should be our nation’s most sacred document. The document binds its vastly diverse constituents as equal, loyal members. The law-abiding American people should join with heroes today and express our love for America. America is far more than a country. It is a place of greatness, where the souls and strength of our founding fathers still dwell side by side with modern heroes, and all heroes, past and present, need to unite to preserve America. Together, we can write our own history as a people and take our country back.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

Website: https://amilimani.us/

By: Amil Imani

September 2, 2024

Mental health is a critical aspect of overall well-being, particularly in the elderly population. As people age, they often face challenges such as cognitive decline, isolation, and changes in social dynamics. These factors make older people more vulnerable to mental health issues, which, in turn, can increase their susceptibility to scams. Understanding the connection between mental health and scam vulnerability is essential for protecting our elderly loved ones.

The Importance of Mental Health in Scam Prevention

Mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety, and dementia are prevalent among the elderly and can significantly impact their decision-making abilities. Depression and anxiety can lead to feelings of hopelessness or fear, making individuals more likely to respond to scams that offer a false sense of security or companionship. Dementia, conversely, impairs memory and judgment, making it difficult for individuals to recognize fraudulent activities.

Mental health professionals play a crucial role in identifying and addressing these issues. Regular mental health assessments can help detect early signs of cognitive decline or emotional distress, allowing for timely intervention. Improving mental health can enhance older adults’ ability to recognize and resist scams.

Common Scams Targeting the Older People

Scammers often target older people due to their perceived vulnerability. Some common scams include:

• Phishing Emails: Scammers send fraudulent emails that appear to be from legitimate organizations, tricking older people into revealing personal information or clicking on malicious links.
• Grandparent Scams: A scammer poses as a distressed grandchild, requesting money for an emergency. Driven by fear and concern, older adults may quickly send money without verifying the situation.
• Romance Scams: Scammers establish fake romantic relationships with lonely elderly individuals, eventually manipulating them into sending money.
• Telemarketing Fraud: Scammers use high-pressure sales tactics over the phone to convince elderly individuals to purchase unnecessary products or donate to fake charities.
• Investment Scams: Promising high returns with little risk, these scams exploit older people’s desire to secure their financial future, leading them to invest in fraudulent schemes.

These scams exploit older adults’ vulnerabilities, such as loneliness, fear, and cognitive decline, making it vital to raise awareness and provide protection.

Signs of Mental Health Decline and Scam Vulnerability

Recognizing early signs of mental health decline can help in identifying elderly individuals at risk of falling victim to scams. Some warning signs include:

• Changes in Behavior or Personality: Sudden mood swings, irritability, or confusion may indicate mental health issues.
• Difficulty Remembering Things: Frequent memory lapses, particularly concerning finances or personal details, can be red flags.
• Social Withdrawal: Isolation from family and friends may make the elderly more susceptible to scams, as they lack the support network to discuss suspicious activities.
• Increased Anxiety or Depression: Heightened feelings of anxiety or depression can cloud judgment and increase vulnerability to scams that prey on emotions.
• Unusual Spending Patterns: Sudden, unexplained transactions or investments may indicate that the older adult is being scammed.

These signs should prompt caregivers and loved ones to safeguard older people from scams proactively.

Strategies for Protecting the Elderly from Scams

Protecting older adults from scams requires a multifaceted approach that includes education, support, and vigilance. Here are some practical strategies:

• Educate Them About Common Scams: Regularly inform older people about the latest scams and how to identify them. This can be done through community programs, family discussions, or educational materials.
• Encourage Caution with Personal Information: Remind older people to be wary of sharing personal or financial information, especially over the phone or online.
• Help Develop a Support Network: Encourage older people to stay connected with friends, family, and community groups. A strong support network can provide advice and a second opinion on suspicious activities.
• Seek Professional Help for Mental Health Concerns: If there are signs of mental health decline, consult with a mental health professional for assessment and treatment.
• Monitor Financial Transactions: Regularly review financial statements for unusual transactions or patterns. This can help catch scams early and prevent further losses.

Open communication and trust between caregivers and older adults are vital to implementing these strategies effectively.

The Role of Mental Health Professionals and Attorneys

Mental health professionals and attorneys play crucial roles in protecting the elderly from scams. Mental health professionals can assess and address mental health concerns, improving the elderly’s ability to make sound decisions.

Attorneys can help safeguard older people’s assets by reviewing financial documents, providing legal advice, and, if necessary, filing for guardianship or conservatorship. This legal oversight can prevent scammers from exploiting older adults’ financial resources.

Protecting the elderly from scams is a collective responsibility that requires awareness, proactive measures, and support. Mental health awareness is vital to this effort, as it directly influences older people’s vulnerability to scams. By staying vigilant, educating our loved ones, and seeking professional help, we can safeguard older people from the growing threat of scams.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

August 24, 2024

In the digital age, scams have evolved from simple deceptions to sophisticated operations, often targeting vulnerable individuals and communities across the globe. These scams, particularly those originating from specific regions like Nigeria, have become notorious for their effectiveness in deceiving people out of their hard-earned money. Commonly known as Nigerian scams, these fraudulent schemes have caused significant financial losses and inflicted emotional damage on victims, eroding trust in online interactions. Understanding the nature of these scams, their evolution, and the strategies to protect against them is crucial in today’s interconnected world.

Understanding the Nigerian Scam

The Nigerian scam, often called the 419 scam – named after the section of the Nigerian penal code dealing with fraud – typically involves a promise of a large sum of money in exchange for a smaller upfront payment. The scammer might pose as a government official, a wealthy individual, or even a foreign prince needing help to transfer a fortune. What began as simple mail fraud has evolved, adapting to new technologies and communication methods. Scammers now use email, social media, and even messaging apps to reach potential victims across the globe. Despite the increased awareness of such scams, their persistence and adaptability make them a continuing threat.

Key Strategies for Protection

Protecting oneself from Nigerian scams requires a proactive approach. The first step is education – understanding the common signs of scams and staying informed about new tactics used by scammers. For instance, recognizing poorly written emails, unsolicited requests, and offers that seem too good to be true can help identify potential scams. Verification is another crucial strategy. Before responding to any unsolicited message, it is essential to independently verify the sender’s identity, whether through direct communication with the supposed sender or by checking official contact details. Using secure communication channels, such as encrypted messaging platforms, adds additional protection, ensuring that sensitive information remains safe from prying eyes. Reporting suspicious activity to email providers, social media platforms, and local authorities helps protect oneself and aids in the broader fight against cybercrime. Finally, enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) on accounts adds an extra layer of security, making it more difficult for scammers to gain unauthorized access.

Understanding Nigerian Scammer Tactics

Nigerian scammers employ a variety of tactics to deceive their victims. Spear phishing is one such tactic, where attackers send personalized emails that appear to be from a known or trusted source. These emails often contain malicious links or attachments designed to steal personal information. Romance scams are another standard method, where scammers build relationships with their victims over time, eventually asking for money under the guise of helping with a personal crisis. Advance fee schemes involve promising victims a large sum of money in exchange for a small initial payment, which is never returned once paid. Scammers also use impersonation, posing as government officials, bank employees, or even deceased persons to lend credibility to their requests. Over time, these scammers have become more technically sophisticated, using advanced technology and social engineering tactics to exploit their victims.

Identifying Characteristics of Nigerian Scammers

While Nigerian scammers’ tactics are varied, there are common characteristics that can help in identifying them. Poor grammar and spelling are often a telltale sign, as many scams originate from regions where English is not the first language. Scammers also tend to create a sense of urgency, pressuring victims to make quick decisions without thoroughly considering the situation. Requests for personal information, particularly financial details, are another red flag. Additionally, unsolicited contact from unknown individuals or organizations should always be treated cautiously.

Countermeasures Against Nigerian Scammers

Several countermeasures can be employed to combat the threat posed by Nigerian scammers. Verifying the identity of the individual or organization contacting you is critical; never take information at face value. Conduct thorough research on any individual or organization before engaging in financial transactions. Secure communication is also vital; use encrypted channels to protect your information. Staying informed and educating others about the latest scams and tactics fraudsters use can help prevent falling victim to these schemes. Reporting suspicious activities to law enforcement is also essential in the fight against cybercrime.

Nigerian Scammers on Instagram

In recent years, Nigerian scammers have increasingly turned to Instagram as a platform for their fraudulent activities. They often use tactics like impersonation, business email compromise (BEC) schemes, and exploiting platform features to deceive their victims. Many scammers project an image of success and legitimacy by showcasing luxury items, vacations, and other symbols of wealth. Social media platforms like Instagram play a dual role in enabling and exposing scammers, as vigilant users and automated systems sometimes uncover these fraudulent activities.

Implications for Instagram Users

Instagram users need to be aware of the risks associated with interacting with individuals displaying excessive wealth or offering unrealistic opportunities. Caution should be exercised when receiving unsolicited messages, particularly those that ask for personal information or suggest financial transactions. The allure of easy money or luxurious lifestyles can be tempting, but skepticism is essential in protecting oneself from scams.

Legal and Cultural Considerations

The legal challenges in prosecuting cross-border cybercrimes like Nigerian scams are significant. Jurisdictional issues and the anonymity provided by the internet make it difficult to track down and prosecute scammers. Additionally, cultural factors may contribute to the prevalence of these scams, with some scammers viewing their activities as a means of survival or as a form of retribution against perceived injustices.

Recommendations for Protecting Against Scams

For Instagram users and others navigating the digital landscape, practical advice includes verifying the authenticity of profiles, being skeptical of unsolicited offers, and continuously educating oneself about the latest scams and tactics. By adopting these practices, individuals can better protect themselves from falling victim to Nigerian scams and other forms of cybercrime.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

August 20, 2024

Stories of compassion and courage serve as a much-needed balm in a world often marked by headlines of tragedy and division. Such a narrative unfolds in the heart of Flower Mound, Texas, where Detective Michelle Horridge has emerged as an extraordinary champion for mental health and community well-being. Her unwavering dedication to those in crisis, coupled with her innovative approach to law enforcement, has transformed lives and redefined the role of a police officer.

Such stories highlight individuals’ positive impact on their communities, especially in roles that traditionally might not be associated with such outreach.

Detective Horridge’s approach to law enforcement, focusing on mental health and community well-being, exemplifies a growing trend toward community-oriented policing. This model emphasizes building strong relationships between police officers and community members to solve problems collaboratively. It’s a shift from traditional law enforcement methods towards a more holistic approach that addresses the root causes of community issues.

Mental and psychological health has garnered increased attention as a major public health issue. Mental health includes the traditional focus on individual therapy interactions and emerging frameworks designed to address mental health at the population health level.

Her work likely involves several innovative strategies, including but not limited to:

Mental Health Training: Ensuring that law enforcement officers are equipped with the skills to recognize and appropriately respond to individuals experiencing mental health crises.

Community Outreach Programs: Initiatives that engage community members in discussions about safety, well-being, and available support services.

Partnerships with Mental Health Professionals: Collaborating with local mental health organizations to provide immediate support and resources to individuals in crisis.

Policy Advocacy: Working within the legal system to advocate for policies that support mental health initiatives and community well-being.

Detective Horridge’s story reminds us of the potential for positive change within law enforcement and the broader community. It underscores the importance of empathy, innovation, and collaboration in addressing complex social issues. Her efforts not only help individuals in immediate crisis but also contribute to building a safer, more supportive community for everyone.

Detective Horridge’s journey to becoming a beacon of hope began with a singular act of empathy. When faced with a case transcending traditional law enforcement’s boundaries, she refused to be constrained by protocol. Instead, she saw a person in distress, not merely a suspect. Her decision to intervene, to go above and beyond the call of duty, was a testament to her profound humanity. When many attorneys refused to handle my case, she ensured that individuals like Kris received the critical mental health care needed immediately. Detective Horridge saved a life and ignited a spark of hope for countless others.

Her actions were more than a one-time gesture of kindness. They represented a profound shift in perspective, recognizing that mental health is as vital as physical health. Detective Horridge understood that her badge was not merely a symbol of authority but a responsibility to protect and serve the entire community, including those grappling with invisible wounds.

The establishment of the mental health unit within the Flower Mound Police Department is a direct result of her visionary leadership. This groundbreaking initiative is a testament to her belief that law enforcement can be a force for healing and justice. By partnering with NAMI North Texas, Detective Horridge has expanded her reach, ensuring that first responders across the region have access to the support and resources they need to cope with the immense pressures of their profession.

It is a testament to her character that Detective Horridge has garnered such widespread admiration and support. Her story has resonated with people from all walks of life, inspiring them to become agents of change in their own communities. By breaking down the stigma surrounding mental health, she has created a space where individuals feel empowered to seek help without fear of judgment.

Detective Michelle Horridge is more than just a law enforcement officer; she catalyzes positive change. Her unwavering commitment to the well-being of her community has made a profound impact, and her legacy will undoubtedly inspire generations to come. She is a shining example of compassion, courage, and hope in a world that often feels divided and uncertain.

Personally, I am eternally grateful to Detective Michelle Horridge for her unwavering compassion and dedication. Her selfless actions have not only impacted the life of my loved one, Kris, but have also inspired countless others. She is a true embodiment of what it means to serve and protect. Detective Horridge’s work in establishing the mental health unit within the Flower Mound Police Department is a testament to her visionary leadership and commitment to creating a healthier, safer community for all.

It is time to recognize the extraordinary contributions of Detective Michelle Horridge. Let us celebrate her as a true hero, a woman who has transformed the law enforcement landscape and redefined the possibilities of human connection. Detective Michelle Horridge’s extraordinary contributions to our community.

Once again, thank you and plead that you maintain your resonant voice and unshakeable resolve.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

August 3, 2024

2012

For four decades, the U.S. State Department has called the Islamic Republic of Iran the world’s “most active state sponsor of terrorism.” For forty-five years, U.S. officials claimed the Islamic Republic of Iran has continued funding, providing weapons, training terrorists, and giving sanctuary to several terrorist groups. For years, the U.S. administration has been unable to outdo the Islamic Republic’s propaganda machine. It has been unable or perhaps unwilling to help the Iranian people end the Islamic nightmares in Iran.

Former President George W. Bush, at his many annual State of the Union addresses, spoke numerous times about the plight of the Iranian people. He once said, “If the Iranian people stand for themselves, the United States will stand with them.” Throughout his presidency, the Iranians, of all people, hailed Bush as a courageous President and an angel of freedom. While his popularity surged in Iran, his approval rating at home declined. Finally, the Iranian people realized that Bush’s love affair was all about Tehran’s nuclear ambition, not their freedom and liberty for the Iranian people. Like his predecessors, it was “all hat, no cattle.”

As time went on, Bush vowed that the Islamic Republic would never be allowed to achieve its goal of developing nuclear bombs on his watch. He kept using all kinds of threats and promises to persuade the mullahs to drop the atomic project, to no avail. When a belligerent end-of-the-worlder, Holocaust-denier Ahmadinejad, became the Islamic Republic of Iran’s elected president, things started heating up greatly. Time and again, the bellicose Ahmadinejad kept vilifying the ‘Great Satan’ and its sidekick, Israel, for having the gall to demand Iran abandon its program. In contrast, his two main adversaries had their own nuclear weapons arsenal. Ahmadinejad informed the world that what the Islamic Republic does is within its national rights.

He cleverly proved his credibility by dispatching an endless series of negotiators to meetings with Europeans. He successfully stalled for time while working around the clock to reach Surge Capacity.

Iran’s desire for peaceful nuclear technology dates back to the 1950s when the Shah of Iran received technical assistance under the U.S. Atoms for Peace program. While this assistance ended with the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran, under the late Shah, launched a plan to achieve “Surge Capacity.” Surge capacity is a code word for getting all the ingredients and procedures down pat for making the bomb quickly, short of actually making it; it is a clever power play.

A saint and revered man of God, according to none other than Jimmy Carter (who considers himself another great man of God), the late Ayatollah Khomeini canceled the nuclear program with the same saintly and prompt edict that he canceled the life of thousands of Iranians for daring to disagree with his system of medieval Sharia rule. In no time at all, the vicious Mullahs gutted the Iranian armed forces and executed many of its most capable officers.

Saddam Hussein watched gleefully as the Iranian military disintegrated and found the opportunity to carry out his Pan-Arabism ambition by attacking Iran. Some eight years of barbaric butchery killed and maimed millions on both sides gutted the vibrant Iranian economy and visited misery of all sorts upon the Iranian people. After Khomeini’s demise, another more crafty and ambitious mullah, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, became the president and secretly re-activated the program. At the same time, the IAEA watchdog snoozed contentedly on the job.

Years later, the MEK ‘whistleblower’ revealed Iran was cheating and had a secret nuclear weapons research program. Finally, the world witnessed first-hand proof that the mullahs were racing tirelessly to get the ultimate weapon.

This information greatly alarmed the United States of America and Israel. The revelation bothered no European nation, the Russians, or the Chinese. Somehow, these nations figured they would let the U.S. worry about the looming menace. At the same time, they focused on the lucrative business deals they had diligently worked out with the mullahs: something reminiscent of the cozy deal the French and the Russians had with Saddam Hussein, the butcher of Baghdad.

Fast forward:

With Obama at the helm, Iran and six world powers known as the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) reached a nuclear deal on July 14, 2015, known as the ‘Iran Nuclear Deal’ that intended to limit Iran’s nuclear program and enhanced monitoring in exchange for relief from nuclear sanctions. This appeared to benefit the Islamic Republic while leaving the door open for Iran secretly to continue with its nuclear ambition.

On May 2018, President Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and restated a crippling sanction on Iran.

The best predictor of the future is the past. The Mullahs are proven vicious mass killers. The religious fanatic mullahs’ record is one of deception, dissimulation, treachery, violence, and much more. These Quran-trained and directed agents of a wrathful Allah can never be trusted. They are master schemers. They have been in the business of scheming for centuries. They have perfected the art of deception, double talk, double-dealing, and treachery. Prudence demands better proofs, much better proofs. History will prove that President Trump did the right thing.

This raw, despicable regime represents the inevitable result of Islam, and its calling card of terrorism is now marching from the Iranian focal point to all parts of the globe. For the past forty years, people in the West, especially in the United States, have been on the receiving end of a very sophisticated and convoluted campaign of disinformation and propaganda dished out by the Islamic Republic’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) and its lobbyist organizations in the U.S. MOIS, learned its methodology directly from the Soviet KGB and many of the Islamists who supported Khomeini were trained in the old Soviet Union.

I advise the current administration to keep its guard up and ensure that no one lulls you into the deadly trap of complacency.

Yet, if the mullahs get their hands on the bomb, they will make use of it in numerous ways. They will use it for blackmail, they will use it in small packages through untraceable proxies, and they might even launch it with their missiles in a homicide-suicide fashion, which is their trademark.

In short, the U.S. has, in secular Iranians, its best friends in the entire Islamic world. The U.S. must help.

Inline image
These Iranians to dislodge the vicious doomsday Mullahs, not as an act of altruism but as a prudent measure of enlightened self-interest.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

July 20, 2024

In a brazen and shocking attack, US President Donald Trump was shot at during a public rally in what can be described as an apparent plot to neutralize the man who has worked day and night to put the nation back on the path to greatness. The bullet, which grazed Trump’s ear, left the crowd in turmoil, with several supporters behind him suffering severe injuries and fatalities.

This attack at a rally for President Trump raises serious concerns about the adequacy of security measures at such political events. An Associated Press analysis of more than a dozen videos and photos taken at the rally, along with satellite imagery of the site, reveals that the shooter was able to get astonishingly close to the stage where Trump was speaking. This analysis highlights significant lapses in security protocols and raises broader questions about protecting high-profile political rallies led by Trump.

Footage from the rally captured the moment Trump went down, clutching his ear. Later broadcasts showed his ear bleeding as security personnel swiftly escorted him away. Yet, even in the face of such adversity, Trump remained resolute and undeterred, a testament to his unwavering commitment to the American people.

Joe Biden has faced intense scrutiny following the attack. Just days prior, Biden remarked that Trump should be “put in the bull’s eye,” a comment that has fueled widespread speculation about his potential involvement. This incident has amplified the already fraught political climate, with the undeniable reality of election fraud and deceit still fresh from the previous election cycle in which Trump was unjustly unseated.

Trump’s defeat in the last election was mired in controversy, with undeniable evidence of fraud and deceit overshadowing the process. Trump and his supporters have consistently demonstrated that the election was stolen from him, citing numerous irregularities and manipulations. This reality has kept tensions high and has significantly influenced the political discourse leading up to the next election, where Trump is poised to reclaim his rightful place and continue his mission to make the nation great again. This fraudulent removal has only strengthened Trump’s resolve and his supporters’ resolve to expose corruption and restore integrity to the electoral process.

The atmosphere at the rally hinted at an underlying tension, with video evidence revealing security personnel attempting to clear the area behind Trump just moments before the shooting. Eyewitnesses reported warnings from bystanders about a man seen with a gun, underscoring the chaotic and potentially premeditated nature of the attack.

The fact that the shooter managed to get so close to the former president is alarming. Political rallies, particularly those involving Donald Trump, are inherently high-risk events. The primary responsibility of security teams at such events is to create and maintain a secure perimeter around the stage and the speaker. In this instance, the failure to do so suggests a breakdown in planning, execution, or both.

Law enforcement identified the suspect as Thomas Matthew Crooks, who was subsequently killed by officers on the scene. The swift response from law enforcement has not quelled the outcry for a thorough investigation into the incident. Many view this as a possible inside conspiracy, considering the highly charged political environment and Trump’s anticipated strong showing in the next election. Satellite imagery indicates that the venue’s design allowed for multiple points of entry, making it difficult to monitor all access points effectively.

The deep state and its entry points, now an open secret and hardened reality, is a shadowy coalition of bureaucrats and political operatives deeply entrenched within the government. This cabal is widely believed to be involved in the attempt on Trump’s life. The theory is bolstered by the suspicious activities of security personnel and the timing of the attack, which seems too coincidental to be merely random. The deep state’s influence and reach have long been known to Trump and his supporters, and this brazen attempt on his life only underscores the lengths to which this clandestine group will go to maintain its grip on power. As more details emerge, the involvement of the deep state appears increasingly evident, highlighting the urgent need to expose and dismantle this insidious network to restore true democracy and justice.

Suspicions arise due to the shooter’s proximity to the stage, and this raises questions about the thoroughness of pre-event security sweeps and the sheer lack of ongoing surveillance during the rally. Standard protocol for securing such events typically includes comprehensive checks of the venue for any potential threats and continuous monitoring of the crowd. The ability of the shooter to evade these measures is a clear indication of the outmaneuvering of the security apparatus in place, which wouldn’t be possible without insider connivance.

As investigations continue, the political ramifications of this event are likely to be significant, impacting not only the immediate players but the broader political landscape as well. The American public, already divided, watches closely as more details emerge, each new piece of information adding to the complex tapestry of this dramatic episode in modern political history.

Donald Trump remains undeterred by this attempt on his life, standing as a beacon of hope and resilience. His commitment to saving this nation from the clutches of the deep state and fulfilling his vision of greatness is stronger than ever. This incident, far from weakening his resolve, has only solidified his determination to fight for the American people and restore the country to its former glory.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

July 15, 2024

No President in the history of the United States has achieved as much in his first three years in his first term in office as President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, no President in the history of America has been subjected to such incessant vile and unjustified attacks as President Trump.

We are making America stronger, prouder, and greater than ever before.” President Donald J. Trump

Why? Because he believes in American exceptionalism, not globalism.

“Make America Great Again.” Just a slogan, the people of failure shout back. The Obama/Biden team had failed us for eight years in every aspect of our lives. To the leftists, failure is not only typical; it is expected. Since Donald Trump announced his candidacy, the Democrats have launched one failed hoax after another in an attempt to end his political career.

The list of their failures for the previous administration is so long and glaring that I hardly need to repeat all of them here. Under the previous administration, once well-paid manufacturing jobs disappeared, they were relocated to other countries. President Trump managed to reverse this trend and brought back many manufacturing jobs. Before President Trump was at the helm, vast swaths of this nation, from northern New York to the great states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and many others, previously vibrant manufacturing regions, looked like ghost towns but now have come back and people are optimistic about the future of this country.

“During a PBS town hall, Obama referenced Trump’s promise to bring back jobs to the United States when talking about manufacturing.

“Well, how exactly are you going to do that? What exactly are you going to do? There’s no answer to it,” Obama said.

“He just said, ‘Well, I’m going to negotiate a better deal.’ Well, what, how exactly are you going to negotiate that? What magic wand do you have?”

If I may, on President Trump’s behalf, allow me to respond to the former President:

“Mr. Obama, I wake up every morning and see a winner. Every day of my life, a winner has looked back at me from the mirror with a smile, encouraging me to go out there and have another winning day.

“And I do that. And I am doing the same thing for our country. My wand is made of people. I can lead people to do miraculous feats. I’ve done it all my life, and after three years in office, I have done it again, and that’s just the beginning. Before America hired me, I had built some of the most magnificent buildings in the world through the combined efforts of tens of thousands of talented people. These men and women each brought their skill and energy to their jobs. They worked for living wages, that’s for sure. But they didn’t go through the motions only to get a paycheck. They worked their best and hardest because they contributed to building something beautiful. These men and women felt the priceless joy of working for something that no money can buy, the pride of being in a team of winners accomplishing greatly challenging tasks.”

“Now, the winner who looked at me in the mirror and asked me to do the same exact thing for our country. This time, with a team of millions of competent men and women lining up to build a better America while seeking a better life for themselves and their children. This is how I have accomplished and brought back so many businesses and manufacturing jobs to our country. Something you failed to do.”

President Trump won against them. Why? The American people want a leader who believes in them and believes in America, a leader who is willing and able to end the corrupt decay of Washington, D. C. The American people are sick and tired of letting a band of losers give away the store and what’s left of it.

Although the Obama/Biden and Biden/ Kamala Harris team made a wreck of our country, they have done very well for themselves personally, and I mean hugely well.

Strange as it may seem, the above paragraphs may tell us something important about Donald Trump’s motivation to “Make America Great Again.” His monumental egotism should be viewed with these ideas in mind. This would have been readily understood by Alexander Hamilton, whose founding of the First National Bank and his famous “Report on Manufactures” established him as the father of American capitalism.

Despite the fact that Trump’s White House and government were stacked with progressive liberals/Obama holdovers/Muslim apologists, and Muslim brotherhood career workers, President Trump still managed to reverse the disastrous course of Obama/ Biden and has made America great for every man, woman, and child of every race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, and all other variations.

Unfortunately, in a shocking turn of events that had left the nation reeling, the American people were robbed of their rightful choice for leadership. Trump’s impressive victory was a reward for his tireless commitment to serving the American people. It was also the crowning achievement of an unprecedented campaign whose brilliance and high tone demonstrated the vitality of our Constitutional Republic to the entire world while keeping them spellbound.

Our responsibility as Americans to keep America Great is to reelect President Trump, who selflessly sacrificed his comfortable life for the sake of America and the American people.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

June 16, 2011

Disguised as religion, Islam has penetrated democracies intending to replace civility and liberty with the barbarism of 7th-century Islamic theocracy and Sharia law. Islam’s multi-pronged attack aims to destroy all that liberty offers.

America, with a long tradition of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is deciding what constitutes a religion and who will make that call. We must remember that to be a loyal and faithful Muslim, a Muslim must adhere to and perform many obligatory acts, as specified in the Quran by Allah and the Hadith/Sunna, during his entire life.

The mosque serves as a house where Muslim devotees gather together for salat (prayer) and worship Allah and his messenger, the prophet Muhammad. Aside from worshiping Allah, a mosque is used for a variety of reasons. These meeting places are perfect warehouses of not only indoctrination but future terrorists, who are made to read and understand the principles of Jihad, martyrdom, and Dar ul Harb (“land of war”—any place not Islamacized.) Mosques cost money, and the money for these warehouses of intolerance is coming straight from Saudi Arabia, the number one terrorist state in the world.

These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabism. If you have to ask where the Saudis are getting their money, you are not paying attention…it’s coming from you. Not to mention, the current U.S. administration, in its continuous war against the American people, is doing everything it can to accommodate the “Cordoba Initiative” project at taxpayers’ expense “that is spearheading plans to build a $100 million Islamic center at Ground Zero, the site where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed by jihadists on 9/11.” A CNN Poll shows that 68% of American voters oppose the Ground Zero Mosque.

Those useful idiots-non-Muslims who support the building of the mosque near the 9/11 site or anywhere else by invoking the ideal of religious freedom are empowering a creed that is devoted to stamping out freedom of religion or any other form of freedom.

In this relentless campaign, the Islamists have a vast cadre of “experts,” “talking heads,” and for-purchase politicians who keep endlessly broadcasting the false mantra that Islam is a religion of peace. This latter bunch is criminally complicit in making the populace complacent and furthering the work of the Islamists.

When mosques are built, imams, mullahs, or mosque elders tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission: Make Islamic religion, laws, and life supreme within the United States or any other host country, using any and all tactics necessary. Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they began to use their revolting practices and wild sermonizing to force the genteel Americans to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities, as is the case in England and other European countries.

They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Sharia law. Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah. Already, in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability. Proposals for Sharia are being taken seriously by many Western countries.

“According to early Muslim historians, towns that surrendered without resistance and made treaties with the Muslims permitted the Muslims to take their churches and synagogues. One of the earliest examples of these kinds of conversions was in Damascus, Syria, where in 705 AD, Umayyad caliph Al-Walid I bought the church of St. John from the Christians and had it rebuilt as a mosque in exchange for building a number of new churches for the Christians in Damascus. Overall, Abd al-Malik (Al-Waleed’s father) is said to have transformed ten churches in Damascus into mosques.”

“Turning churches into mosques was especially intensive in the villages where most inhabitants converted to Islam. The Abbasid caliph al-Ma’mun turned many churches into mosques. Ottoman Turks converted nearly all churches, monasteries, and chapels in Constantinople, including the famous Hagia Sophia, into mosques immediately after capturing the city in 1453. In some instances mosques have been established on the places of Jewish or Christian sanctuaries associated with Biblical personalities who Islam also recognized.”

Again, Muslims first make their mark by establishing mosques in as many towns and cities as possible. These mosques range from the ostentatious, such as the one in Washington D.C., to the academically cloaked university Islamic centers, to the innocuous storefront types and even prison chapels. One and all have the same aims: Hold the faithful in line, recruit as many new adherents by any and all means, and indoctrinate one and all in the imperative of Islamic conquest.

It is in these Islamic places that the impressionable young and the fanatical adults are drilled with the duty to carry out Jihad against the Dar ul Harb (“land of war”—any place not completely under the rule of Islam.)

Operating this vast network of Islamism requires significant financing. Saudi Arabia has spent over $80 billion on these operations since 1970. The other Persian Gulf States, with their treasuries, flush with oil money, have done and continue to do their share of financing.

Not to be outdone by the virulent Wahhabism of the Saudis and their co-sectist Sunnis, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been bankrolling its own array of clientele in the Middle East, much of Africa, and as far away as Southeast Asia and Latin America in a push for Shiism. The non-Muslim world is literally caught in a pincer of the two rabid Islamic forces.

Some still delude themselves by preferring to believe that Islam has not made as many inroads into the United States as it has in other parts of the world, such as Europe. Facts prove otherwise.

According to a National Portrait survey released in April 2001, there were at least 1,209 mosques in the US. According to the latest report, this number has skyrocketed to as many as 6,000 mosques in 2008.

“The official Saudi website reported a donation of $6 million in 1995 for a mosque in Cincinnati, Ohio. The website further stated, in 2000, “In the United States, the Kingdom has contributed to the establishment of the Islamic Center in Washington DC; the Omer Bin Al-Khattab Mosque in western Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Islamic Center, and the Fresno Mosque in California; the Islamic Center in Denver, Colorado; the Islamic center in Harrison, PA, New York City; and the Islamic Center in Northern Virginia.”

This entire guesstimate aside, a recent report from the FBI estimates that of the 2000 mosques in the United States, 10% preach Jihad. Welcome to the religion of peace as it is invading the land of the free to make it the land of submission. This is not some Islam-hating crackpot group reporting. It is the FBI.

In addition to the mosques already built in the land of the free, Islam is advanced by a large cadre of auxiliaries. Dr. Paul Williams (former FBI consultant, best-selling author, and investigative journalist) reports that many Muslim businesses around the country conduct their regular business during the day and turn their stores into Islamic gathering places in the evening. There are several thousands of these makeshift “Taqqyehs.”

If only the masses of Muslims arise and carry out the orders of Allah, then we would have the promised paradise of Islam on earth as exemplified by such rules as that of the Taliban, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Somalia, and, of course, the Shiite nirvana of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In these model Islamic societies, freedom of expression, worship, and assembly are taken away. Women are treated as chattel. Young girls are subjected to barbaric genital mutilation to make them sex slaves and birth channels without the ability to enjoy intercourse. Minors are executed, adulterers are stoned to death, thieves have their limbs amputated, and much much more. Isn’t that everyone’s idea of paradise?

What a travesty and how ironic indeed to have as many mosques as we already have in the U.S., yet we intend to help the Islamists, building more training camps for future suicide bombers and endangering the safety of the American people and generations to come. With the average citizen, and not the devious and for-purchase politicians, rests the solemn obligation to act and act now to compel our government to stem the tide of Islamism before it is too late.

It is tragic indeed that while our courageous service members are losing life and limb in far and away places fighting Islamofascism, useful idiots and servile politicians of the highest rank at home bend over backward to accommodate, even promote, Islamism.

There is a glimmer of hope that the American people are finally waking up to the deceit and the menace of the creed called Islam. Their opposition to the building of the mosque shows that the creeping Islamization of America is indeed something to stand against and prevent before it is too late.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

June 2, 2024

In the annals of American history, moments of undeniable momentum and change are marked by a singular certainty: Nothing can stop what is coming. Such is the case as we stand on the precipice of a transformative period in our nation’s journey. The echoes of past struggles and triumphs resonate through the corridors of power, yet the future beckons with a promise of renewal and rebirth.

Let us venture bravely into the heart of the storm, wading into the forces that are shaping our destiny, and a big salute to the indomitable spirit that fuels the march towards a brighter tomorrow. Amidst all these clashes and cacophony, one truth emerges clear and unyielding: The momentum of progress cannot be halted.

Let’s face it: In the face of adversity, Donald J. Trump stands tall, unyielding in the face of a rigged political witch hunt. This false conviction on charges stemming from an unjust trial marks a pivotal moment in American history, one that is more than a raging debate within the nation. Amidst the turmoil, Trump’s resilience and unwavering commitment to his principles shine through for the millions of Americans who share his vision for the future.

The trial that has led to Trump’s conviction has been met with skepticism and controversy all around, with a big question mark on its fairness and impartiality. It is beyond mere assertion that the proceedings were part of a larger political witch hunt, and the entire ordeal is nothing short of a politically motivated attempt to silence him. The raids on his home, the arrest, and the subsequent conviction all lead to outrage and disbelief, fueling fears of a two-tiered justice system where the powerful are exempt from the laws they enforce upon others.

Amidst the chaos, Trump’s call to action is clear and compelling. We all have to rally behind him to push back against an unprecedented attack on the freedoms of countless Americans. His words are a rallying cry, a clarion call to unite and fight for the values that he believes define America’s greatness. Once again, with the White House within reach, Trump is asking us to stand shoulder to shoulder with him to ensure that Biden understands the strength and resolve of those who oppose him.

Trump’s vision for America is one of unity, strength, and prosperity. He promises to lead the charge against what he perceives as the forces seeking to undermine the nation’s very fabric. By uniting under his banner, Trump believes that his supporters can turn the tide, ensuring that Joe Biden’s chances of securing a second term come to an abrupt end. This is not merely a battle for the presidency; it is a struggle for the soul of America to ensure that the country remains true to its founding principles.

The choice before us is clear as we stand on the brink of a historic moment. Will we allow the voices of dissent and division to drown out the calls for unity and strength? Or will we rise to the occasion, standing firm with Donald J. Trump as he fights to reclaim the White House and restore America to its rightful place as a beacon of hope and opportunity for the world?

This is our moment. This is our chance to make history. With Trump at the helm, leading the charge against injustice and for the preservation of American ideals, we have the opportunity to ensure that Joe Biden regrets ever challenging the will of the people. Together, we can make America great again.

The spirit of the American people shines brightest. As we approach the critical moment of truth on November 5th, the real power lies not in the halls of justice or the chambers of Congress but in the hands of every voter nationwide. Joe Biden and the Democrats may seek to manipulate the narrative and use trial outcomes as tools to sway public opinion. Still, the true measure of a leader—and the fate of our nation—will be determined by the will of the people at the ballot box.

This election is not just another vote but a referendum on the essence of what America stands for. It tests whether we will allow the political elite to dictate our destiny or if we, the citizens, will take control of our future. The choice before us is stark: continue down the path of division and mistrust or unite behind a leader who promises to restore the pillars of strength, freedom, and prosperity that made America great.

Donald Trump has stood firm against the challenges thrown at him, refusing to be silenced or deterred from his mission to Make America Great Again. Now, it falls to us – the voters – to echo his call to action. On November 5th, let us send a resounding message to Washington: We will not be swayed by sham trials or manipulated by political games. Our verdict will be cast in ballots, and we will choose our path forward together.

Vote Trump. Stand with him. Let our collective voice be heard, loud and clear, as we reaffirm our commitment to the principles that bind us as Americans. This is our moment to seize, our chance to shape the future. United, we can ensure that Joe Biden and the Democrats understand that America’s true power resides with its people and that on November 5th, we will make our voices heard.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

May 24, 2024

The life-saving promise of organ transplants is marred by a disturbing reality: international organ trafficking rings. This lucrative criminal enterprise preys on the desperate and fuels a black market catering to wealthy recipients, often oligarchs, seeking a quick fix.

Iran, under a criminal regime, has emerged as a suspected hub in this illicit trade. Accusations point to a system where Iranian citizens, burdened by economic hardship, are coerced into selling their organs to foreign recipients.  While the extent of the practice remains unclear, reports suggest a disturbing trend.

Here’s why this alleged Iran regime-oligarch connection is particularly concerning:

Oligarchs and Unethical Practices

With their immense wealth, Western, Arab, and other oligarchs are willing to pay exorbitant sums to bypass waitlists and legal channels for organ transplants.

Desperation in Iran under the Mullahs

The Iranian economy is in shamble due to the tyrannical regime, creating a breeding ground for exploitation. Individuals facing financial ruin become easy targets for traffickers, promising a way out of poverty and fueling a cycle of abuse.

This raises a troubling question: are helpless people in Iran essentially being turned into human spare parts for the wealthy elite?

Preying on the Vulnerable

Iran, under the rule of mullahs, is just one piece of this global puzzle. International trafficking rings exploit vulnerable people from many countries.  Agents operating within these countries act as the initial point of contact, befriending or manipulating those struggling financially.  They dangle the promise of immense sums of money in exchange for an organ, often a vital organ like a kidney.  The desperation of poverty clouds judgment, making the offer seem like a lifeline.

Deception and Exploitation

The deception goes a step further. Victims are misled about the legality and risks associated with the surgery.  They are promised anonymity and exceptional medical care, but the reality is far from rosy.  These individuals are often transported to Iran or other countries with weaker regulations for the surgery.  The agent pockets a large commission, while the donor receives a fraction of the promised money.  Often, they lack access to proper post-operative care, jeopardizing their long-term health.

Veil of Secrecy

Iran, under the Islamic terrorist regime and with a possible unregulated or poorly regulated transplant system, becomes an attractive destination.  The oligarchs’ main objective of keeping Iran away from international media scrutiny fuels this clandestine trade.  A shroud of secrecy allows the trafficking ring to operate with impunity.

The international community must act to dismantle these trafficking rings. Here are some possible steps:

Investigate and Crack Down

International law enforcement agencies must collaborate on investigations to expose the networks, apprehend the perpetrators, and target the agents operating in different countries.

Financial Disincentives

Sanctions targeting individuals or entities involved in organ trafficking could disrupt their financial operations.

Support for Vulnerable People

Bolstering economies and social safety nets in countries with high poverty rates can reduce the desperation that makes people vulnerable to traffickers.

Combatting Media Blackouts

Shining a light on the Iranian regime’s criminal role in this trade and pressuring for transparency can make it a less attractive destination for oligarchs seeking organs.

Raising Awareness is a Key

The fight against organ trafficking requires a multi-pronged approach.  Raising awareness is crucial – educating potential victims and highlighting the ethical implications for those seeking organs through illicit channels.

Organ transplants should offer a chance at a new life, not fuel a despicable trade. By holding those responsible accountable and ensuring ethical practices, we can ensure organ transplants remain a symbol of hope, not exploitation.

Do we understand that the international community, including various heads of government, is complicit in this scam? Their silence and inaction raise serious questions. They must prove otherwise by taking concrete steps to dismantle this tyrannical regime. They must stand with the people who yearn for freedom and democracy.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

May 14, 2024

The circumstances surrounding Israel’s rebirth were anything but easy. Regrettably, Israel’s journey from her early beginning to the present has been fraught with great suffering. It is a tribute to the indomitable spirit of the Jewish people that they persisted in their valiant struggle to re-gather again in the land of their birth. Some even go as far as saying that Israel’s renaissance — after 4,000 years or so– was nothing short of miraculous.

The re-birth of Israel, in reality, is a culmination of thousands of years of gestation during which the Jewish people, dispersed throughout much of the world, endured immense degrees and varieties of suffering. The Nazi murderers and their collaborators capped the crimes committed against the Jewish people by brutally slaughtering six million innocent men, women and children.

We can hardly find countries that have gone out of existence for as long as 4,000 years and then reappeared and been reborn. Thus, the rebirth of this magnificent culture, people, and land was truly a miracle.

In ancient times, a noble and just Persian king, Cyrus the Great, rescued tens of thousands of Jewish people from captivity in a foreign land, empowering them to return home and build their sacred temple. By his action of freeing an entire people from captivity and restoring their rightful dignity, Cyrus the Great, the author of the first code of Human Rights, cemented a bond of friendship between the Jews and the Persians. It was the Just King’s way of setting the world on a course of freedom, equality, and justice for all people, irrespective of any considerations.

Israel has welcomed many Jews across the world, including the Iranian Jews who could no longer tolerate the rule of the oppressive venomous mullahs. These mullahs are indeed traitors to the lofty, long-standing tradition and values championed by Cyrus the Great and revered by Persians throughout the ages. Israel also must be commended for affording millions of Israeli Arabs opportunities denied to them in many other lands.

Regrettably, the sworn enemy of the Iranian people and the Persian heritage (the Islamic Republic) also supports terrorism abroad. The Islamic regime has increased its support for groups that seek the destruction of Israel. These include the Lebanese Hezbollah and such Palestinian groups as Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command. Israel has the right to defend herself from these brewing factions who want nothing short of obliteration of the Jewish state.

We should consider the rebirth of the Jewish State to be a blessing for the Muslims. Israel has provided the opportunity to show the world the results of the Jewish state of mind in action…a mind that yearns to be free and a mind that longs to see that all humanity enjoys life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, said Tashbih Sayyed.

Israel’s fair treatment of the Iranian Baha’is in Israel is praiseworthy. This further demonstrates their ability and willingness to live in harmony with others. In Iran, the birthplace of the Baha’i faith, Baha’is are ruthlessly subjected to a form of gradual genocide by the cruel mullahs. Some Baha’is are executed for their faith, Baha’i children are denied university studies, Baha’i holy places are destroyed, and even their cemeteries are bulldozed, to cite a few examples. By contrast, Israel has provided the Baha’is freedom to care for their holy places, which were established in the Holy Land during the 19th century, long before Israel’s rebirth.

The Jewish community of Iran is one of the oldest in the Diaspora, and its historical roots reach back to the 6th century B.C.E., the time of the First Temple. Their history in the pre-Islamic period is intertwined with that of the Jews of neighboring Babylon. The Jewish colonies were scattered from centers in Babylon to Persian provinces and cities such as Hamadan and Susa. The books of Esther, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Daniel give a favorable description of the relationship of the Jews to the court of the Achaemids at Susa.

To this day, traditional Jews pray three times a day for the Temple’s restoration. During the centuries, the Muslims controlled Palestine, and two mosques were built on the site of the Jewish Temple. (This was no coincidence; it is a common Islamic custom to build mosques on the sites of other people’s holy places.) Since any attempt to level these mosques would lead to an international Muslim holy war (jihad) against Israel, the Temple cannot be rebuilt in the foreseeable future.

“Next year in Jerusalem being the wish of Diaspora Jews, dispersed from their homeland yet acknowledging their spiritual and historical home is Israel, specifically, Jerusalem. Psalm 137 is referred to as the well-known lament of the Babylonian Jews who wept ‘by the rivers of Babylon’ and declared, ‘If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand wither.”

The perennial prayer, “Next Year in Jerusalem,” has finally been answered. We, the spiritual children of Cyrus the Great, pray that Israel succeeds in taking the steps necessary to make the New Jerusalem a place of hope and lasting safety for the Jewish people, people of all religions, and those with no religion at all.

Although Israel was reborn in 1948, the Israelis were unable to settle down for long in their own homeland, to worship their God as they wished, and to live in peace. They were assaulted once again by the forces of destruction that sent them scurrying for the relative safety of other lands. These challenges continue to this day.

Now, Israel is a sovereign state but hardly safe. She is surrounded by nations and peoples who are bent on her destruction. Tragically, she and her neighbors have been unable to find an equitable way of living side-by-side with mutual respect and peace. I earnestly hope that ways can be found to resolve this destructive impasse peacefully.

A thorny issue of great concern to Israel is the Mullahs’ gallop to join the nuclear club and use the bomb as a club over the head of any nation, near or far, that stands in their way or does not accede to their demands. And it is here that some advocated a pre-emptive action by Israel, the U.S., or both to postpone, if not prevent, the Mullahs from achieving their objective.

For example, attacking the Bushehr nuclear facility alone would be a nightmare, releasing radiation into the atmosphere. To attack Iran’s nuclear facilities will not only provoke unnecessary war, but it could also unleash clouds of radiation far beyond the targets and the borders of Iran. In addition, it is almost a certainty that the Islamic Republic would retaliate by hitting Israel’s Dimona nuclear complex. Everyone loses.

The best strategy with the greatest chance of success and the least risk of starting a cataclysmic chain reaction is for a “coalition of the willing,” to borrow a phrase, to rally behind the Iranian opposition. Democracy-seeking secular Iranians are thoroughly capable of dislodging the tyrannical Mullahs.

We should also remember that Iran sits on many large, active fault lines. Of the major earthquakes that do occur in Iran, many are stronger than magnitude six on the Richter scale. Should, say, the Bushehr plant be hit by an earthquake, it would be catastrophic, not only to the entire region but beyond.

Today, Israel has reunited Jerusalem and provided unrestricted freedom of religion. Access of all faiths to the Holy Places in the unified City of Peace is assured. The story of Israel’s rebirth is indeed a miracle, yet challenges have remained, threatening the existence of this tiny ancient country filled with a rich culture.

As we watch, we pray for Israel and the Jewish people for everlasting peace and prosperity.

By: Amil Imani

April 20, 2024

This isn’t the Iranian people’s war, it’s Ali Khamenei’s war: —Reza Pahlavi

Recent tensions between the Islamic Republic and Israel have once again thrust the Middle Eastern region into the spotlight. However, it is crucial to delve deeper into the intricate dynamics at play beyond geopolitical maneuvering and saber-rattling. One key distinction often overlooked is the differentiation between the Islamic Republic and the Iranian people. Iran means the land of Aryans.

The first step in supporting Iranians is to recognize and understand the distinction between the Iranian people and the Islamic Republic. It is essential to acknowledge that the Iranian people are distinct from the regime that governs them. This understanding can help prevent the conflation of the actions of the regime with the desires and aspirations of the Iranian populace.

Iran is NOT the Islamic Republic.  Period.

The Ayatollah Khomeini went as far as stating:

“We do not worship Iran; we worship Allah,” he declared in a speech in 1980 in Qom. “For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.”

The frustration felt by Iranians due to the world conflating them with the regime cannot be overstated. It is imperative to recognize that Iran has a rich historical and cultural identity that predates the establishment of the Islamic Republic. Once referred to as Persia, it was the land of the Aryans. A civilization renowned for its contributions to art, science, and literature. The Iranian people, contrary to the regime’s actions, yearn for peace and stability in their homeland.

It is clearly the Mullahs vs. the People. Discontent with the Islamic Republic runs deep within the Iranian populace. Activists and ordinary citizens alike have voiced their opposition to the regime, often at great personal risk. The simmering ethnic tensions between the regime and segments of the Iranian population further underscore the internal strife that plagues the country.

Let’s filter out the misinformation and know the Untold Story. Iranians face a daunting challenge in amplifying their voices amidst the cacophony of misinformation that surrounds them. “Crazy narratives” and “mass disinformation” about Iran often cloud the true aspirations and struggles of its people. The advent of social media, while a potential tool for activism, also presents its own set of challenges in a landscape dominated by state-controlled narratives.

This is a Call for Clarity. It is essential to advocate for the use of precise language when discussing Iran. By distinguishing between “Iran” and the “Islamic Republic,” observers can better understand the situation. This differentiation is crucial in acknowledging the Iranian people’s desire to be recognized as a peace-loving society distinct from the actions and policies of the Islamic regime.

We can begin the process by discoursing Iranian voices. The world can better support Iranians by providing platforms for their voices to be heard. This can be done through international media coverage, support for independent journalism within Iran, and facilitating opportunities for Iranian activists and advocates to share their perspectives on the global stage. By doing this, the Iranian voices and the world can better understand the sentiments and aspirations of Iranian citizens.

Only then can we move on to the “Diplomatic Engagement” stage because diplomatic efforts that prioritize the well-being and aspirations of the Iranian people are the only significant form of support. This involves fostering constructive dialogue with Iranian civil society, human rights organizations, and representatives of diverse Iranian communities and diasporas.

Diplomatic engagement should aim to empower Iranians and address their concerns, thereby demonstrating solidarity with the Iranian people.

Advocacy for human rights in Iran is crucial for supporting Iranians. The world can advocate for the protection of fundamental rights, freedom of expression, and the release of political prisoners in Iran. By standing up for the human rights of Iranians, the global community sends a powerful message of solidarity and support for those striving for a more just and free society within Iran.

The final stage of recognition of the Iranian people is cultural exchange and collaboration. Promoting cultural exchange and collaboration with Iranian artists, intellectuals, and civil society members can foster mutual understanding and solidarity. Encouraging educational and artistic exchanges and collaborations in science, technology, and academia can build bridges between the Iranian people and the international community.

Therefore, it is imperative to recognize the complexities underlying the relationship between the Iranian people and the Islamic Republic. A more nuanced understanding that separates the people from the regime is crucial and respectful of the desires and struggles of the Iranian populace.

The time for a change has arrived.  The majority of the Iranian people refuse to be fooled and intimidated any longer. They refuse to obey orders from the beasts of Allah currently ruling Iran. Iranians have recognized the fundamental weaknesses of their oppressors. With a little help here and a little help there, they can be transformed overnight from seemingly subdued and helpless sheep into mighty lions.

It is time for the Iranians to strike, gather forces, organize, and especially demonstrate in the streets in increasing numbers, even in the face of massive, gruesome, bloody repression by the Islamic rulers, who still have a powerful armed apparatus at their disposal. It is time to unleash the wrath of the Iranian people on the Islamic zealots. It is time to become even more defiant and end the barbaric theocratic regime by massive participation in a freedom revolution to end this primitive Islamic nightmare.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 17, 2024

I have repeatedly said that the mullahs ruling Iran are not Iranians. They truly despise Iran and its glorious past. Genetically, they are mostly Arabs. They even hate its name. There were never any questions about the Islamists denigrating Iran and exalting Muhammad. These creatures owe their very livelihood to the lucrative business that Muhammad launched for their parasitic, shameful existence. It is vital for these leeches to continue trumpeting the sainthood of the founder of their business and driving all the competition out of business.

Just recently, Sayyid Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami became a senior Iranian cleric, as well as a senior member of the Assembly of Experts, also Tehran’s Friday prayer leader. He once proved me right. Give this worm credit for paying homage to the source of his shameful livelihood.

“How dare the people of Iran even think of having a revolution or a referendum!! This government belongs to Imam Zaman (The Lord of the Age), and if anyone considers himself an Iranian, he needs to get the hell out of here. This soil belongs to us, the followers of Imam Zaman and his tribe. Iran’s name was created by ignorant people, and incidentally, this name is very provocative. This ignorant name (Iran) must be changed to something like “Velayat” lest it provoke our enemies (Iranian people).”

The battle against these inhuman (subhuman) oppressors in Iran has been arduous and long. It is the battle of Iran’s true sons and daughters and the rest of mankind. It remains our duty to work our hardest to remove these leeches from power.

We recognize that the dysfunctional Islamic software is deeply ingrained in the minds of many Muslims, who opt to remain in mental bondage rather than purge their minds of this software and join the rest of the human family with a new emancipating program for life: liberty.

Islamic clergy, the parasitic prime beneficiaries of Islam, are master practitioners of the carrot-and-stick strategy. By drawing heavily from the Quran and the Hadith, the conniving mullahs and imams have assembled a potent arsenal of threats and promises to keep the faithful in line. They had little trouble in so doing since Islamic scripture is replete with descriptions of the graphic horrific punishment awaiting the wayward and the unbelievers, while the rewards for the obedient and docile if they are male, are described as an endless variety of sensual pleasures. Anyone daring to leave the corral of Islam is apostate and automatically condemned to death. And that’s just for starters. The punishment awaiting the ungrateful deserter of the one and only true path, Islam, is horrific eternal torment in Allah’s hell.

The Islamic Republic of Iran, which holds in great contempt any non-Islamic belief or heritage, has embarked on destroying many pre-Islamic archeological sites in Iran, such as Pasargad and Persepolis — some of humanity’s most prized cultural heritage — on the pretext of building a dam. The heinous destruction of the two Bamiyan Buddha statues by Afghanistan’s Taliban pales in comparison to the present barbaric designs of the Islamic Republic. Pasargad and Persepolis are more than a mere collection of ancient structures. They are an embodiment of humanity’s historical respect for liberty and tolerance of diversity.

But the high clergy of Iran is not exactly living up to its brand. The mullah Mafia has a great scam going. They promise the ignorant Islamic devotees the phony “paradise” of the afterlife while they themselves enjoy their paradise of women, wealth, and wine on this earth. They are unrivaled in duplicity and heartlessness. So, in nearly perfect emulation of Muhammad and his leadership 1400 years ago, the pious mullahs go about plotting earthly destruction as they enrich themselves and enjoy earthly pleasures on the backs of their people.

Many Iranians are praying that help is on its way and that the ongoing protests now will not result in a repeat of 2009, when Obama threw a lifeline to the mullahs’ regime by not supporting the Iranian people, in effect siding with the genocidal mullahs. The turbaned thugs were taking their final breath, being completely broke, and the good old USA came to the rescue, releasing billions of dollars and easing other sanctions. I will never understand this.

My aspiration for my motherland is to see it freed from the evil that has been visited upon it ever since our people bought into a most depraved version of Islam. Whether people become Baha’is, Zoroastrians, or Christians, this should be a free choice for each person. Even if a person insists on remaining Muslim, that is his or her prerogative. Yet imposing the suffocating intolerance of Islam on an entire nation is something that neither I nor any person who lives in Iran can accept. Our beloved Iran deserves to be a country where, once again, we take pride in being its children instead of the present, when we often do all we can to conceal our nation of birth when visiting abroad.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 12, 2024

Let us be clear—Consuming insect-based foods comes with potential health risks. These risks are primarily related to food safety and the presence of allergens or toxins in some insects.

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has highlighted several food safety issues associated with edible insects. These concerns include:

Pathogens: Insects can harbor bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which can risk human health if not properly handled or cooked.

Allergens: Some insects contain allergens that can cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.

Toxins: Certain insects may contain toxins that can be harmful if consumed in large amounts.

Insects can contain allergens that may trigger allergic reactions in some individuals. These reactions can range from mild to severe, depending on the individual’s sensitivity and the amount of insect consumed. Allergic reactions can manifest as skin rashes, itching, swelling, and, in severe cases, anaphylaxis, which requires immediate medical attention.

Moreover, some insects are known to contain toxins that can be harmful to human health. These toxins can affect various systems in the body, including the nervous, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems. Symptoms of toxin exposure can include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and, in severe cases, coma or death.

Now, enter billionaires with sinister motives.  At the forefront is none other than Bill Gates, who is relentlessly plotting to manipulate the world’s food supply, pushing for the consumption of insects and alternative proteins while buying large amounts of American farmland.

Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and a prominent figure in the so-called philanthropic sector, advocates for a diet of insects and, through his foundation and investments, works towards a future where traditional livestock is replaced by insect-based foods. All these can be traced back to Gates’s foundation’s investment in All Things Bugs, LLC, a company aiming to develop nutritionally dense food using insect species.

Bill Gates’s agenda-driven interest in sustainable food solutions is not limited to insects. He has also invested in cultured meat, a lab-grown alternative to traditional beef, which has received $50 million in funding. Gates’s investments and advocacy for his so-called sustainable food solutions are part of a sinister effort disguised as global challenges, including climate change and food security. His property acquisitions, including farmland in North Dakota and Texas, have only added fuel to speculations about his intentions, and these actions are likely part of a larger strategy to take our food away and make us eat insects.

Then we have Klaus Schwab and his “The Great Reset” plot to intending to destroy capitalism and enact a one-world government under the cover of COVID-19 and other agendas. Schwab founded the WEF with the help of Henry Kissinger and is actively supported by Prince Charles. Schwab likely established his ties with other influential American advocates of globalization through Kissinger’s International Seminar, which the CIA funded with $135,000. The global elite led by Schwab used the “pandemic” opportunity to roll out radical policies, such as forced vaccination, digital ID cards, and the renunciation of private property. The sinister agenda of the World Economic Forum (WEF) becomes evident from the fact that the unelected Schwab has served as the WEF’s chairman since its inception, and he continues to hold the position of Founder and Executive Chairman today.

In the meantime, we hear about billionaires buying bunkers and islands as if prepping for an apocalypse. The truth is that land acquisitions in Hawaii by billionaires displace local communities, raising concerns about mirroring a modern twist on feudalism. Ultimately, these billionaires aren’t just waiting for the apocalypse but actively shaping their own self-sufficient, controlled environments while we can survive on the insect food they produce.

I rest my case with a summary of the points regarding the risks of eating insects:

Allergic Reactions: Some people may have allergic reactions to insects, similar to allergies to shellfish or shrimp, due to the presence of chitin in their exoskeletons. This can lead to symptoms ranging from mild to severe.

Microorganisms and Pathogens: Insects can harbor pathogens on their surface, in their gut, and as part of their reproductive cycle. The full scope of the microbiota of edible insects is unknown, and whether these extrinsic pathogens may be harmful if eaten. Cooking may not kill them, either.

Biological and Chemical Contaminants: Insects grown on agricultural waste may be exposed to mycotoxins, pesticides, and other chemical hazards like toxic metals and dioxins. High lead levels have been found in dried grasshoppers, leading to elevated blood lead levels in humans.

Processing Risks: When heated or cooked, the chemical-thermal reactions with the toxins on their shells or within their guts can release toxic compounds that accumulate in the protein meal.

The future of food is definitely at stake, and billionaires and their vast wealth continue to influence food systems in concerning ways.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

April 8, 2024

Texas shares approximately half of the 1,954-mile U.S.-Mexican border, making it a primary entry point for illegal immigrants. In 2011, the U.S. border patrol apprehended 125,821 illegal immigrants in Texas alone. This high volume of illegal immigration presents significant challenges to Texas and the entire U.S., including economic, social, and security concerns.

Economic Impact: The influx of undocumented immigrants can strain public resources and social services, leading to potential economic challenges. It is essential to find a balance between humanitarian concerns and fiscal responsibility. Economically, illegal immigrants impose a significant burden on the state’s resources. They account for about 14% of the students in Texas public schools when U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants are included, costing the state around $3.75 billion annually. Furthermore, illegal immigrants are more likely to live in poverty, with about 58% taking advantage of welfare programs, which cost the state an additional $803.3 million annually.

National Security Threat: Open borders can be exploited by criminal organizations, smugglers, and potential terrorists. Ensuring national security becomes a formidable task in such a scenario. From a security perspective, the long Texas-Mexico border requires significant resources to secure, including workforce, equipment, technology, and infrastructure. The overall budget for all agencies and operating costs in 2011 was $56.3 billion. Despite these efforts, illegal immigration continues to be a significant issue.

Rule of Law: The rule of law is fundamental to the stability and functioning of any society. Ignoring illegal immigration can undermine the integrity of legal immigration processes and overall societal trust. The open border policy rewards those who break the law by entering the country illegally, undermining the efforts of those who seek to immigrate legally. Moreover, it threatens national security, as it may allow criminals and potentially dangerous individuals to enter the country undetected.

Public Health: Health concerns, especially during pandemics, are exacerbated by unchecked immigration. It is vital to have measures to ensure the health and safety of the incoming immigrants and the resident population.

Social Cohesion: Large-scale, unregulated immigration can strain social cohesion, as it may lead to cultural clashes and increased polarization within society. Socially, the rapid growth of the Latino population in Texas, primarily due to illegal immigration, threatens to influence state politics and immigration policies. This demographic shift could lead to policies enabling unlawful immigration, exacerbating its associated issues.

Addressing illegals

Immigration and open border issues require a multifaceted approach. It involves ensuring border security, reforming immigration laws, and creating stricter laws for immigrants to enter the country. Maintaining border security is essential to prevent criminal activities and ensure national security. Investment in advanced technology and personnel can be part of the solution.

It should be different from what the Biden administration has done. For instance, it has expanded the Title 42 policy that allows for increased expulsion of migrants while also granting humanitarian parole to 30,000 people from each country monthly, as long as they apply for asylum legally. Under President Trump, the plan required adult asylum seekers to use an app to book a meeting with U.S. officials or first claim asylum in another country before reaching the U.S. Failure to comply would make migrants ineligible if they subsequently go the border.

The issue of illegal immigration and open borders in Texas and the United States has become challenging. Under President Trump, there was a simple solution: Close the Borders!

The circumstances of their arrival are intriguing in that unlike other illegal aliens, most OTMs  (other than Mexicans) promptly turned themselves in. Why is it not known for sure? There can be no doubt, however, that the scheme has given Mexican drug cartels and—potentially—terrorists a promising opportunity to simply step over the invisible line that is our border undetected by border tax adjustments or BTAs because the agents processing the new arrivals could not handle their posts.

To most Americans, the perception has long been that most of those illegally crossing our southern border are Mexicans, people coming here in search of work, looking to join family or a gang. While that may have been the case, it is no longer supported by the latest immigration numbers today. According to a study done by Pew Research, detention of illegal Mexican aliens is at an all-time low. The primary reasons cited for the reversal are current mixed economic conditions, fewer job opportunities in the U.S., increases in deportations, and better border enforcement.  However, the number of illegal aliens has not diminished. As Mexicans have opted to stay home, children from Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras have quickly filled the vacuum. Numerous sources indicate that President Obama’s and President Biden’s executive actions have helped spur these children to make the dangerous journey through Mexico and ultimately up to our border.

The question should be asked is if their parents are poor, how can they come up with as much as $10,000 to have coyotes (people paid by cartels to smuggle drugs and humans across borders) or others bring their child up to the Rio Grande, the natural boundary flowing between Mexico from the U.S. No sources could be found to suggest that terror groups are funding the trips, but one must wonder who is.

That would be understandable if they were arriving in a group of five. But they are coming in droves and in the same timeframe. There is no question that the children are diverting BPAs from covering their guard posts so illegal border crossers, in particular members of the Mexican drug cartels, their “mules” (people hired to smuggle drugs into the U.S.), as well as gang members and Special Interest Aliens (SIA) can cross the border far more quickly. SIAs are of considerable concern to our intelligence and law enforcement agencies for obvious reasons. Stories are appearing with greater frequency on various news websites and blogs about how radical Islamists are being stopped as they try to enter the country.

In short:  active cells could attack critical electric-grid substations, the failure of which could compromise or cripple our entire electric infrastructure. Other obvious threats are car bombs, improvised explosive devices (IEDs) placed on busy highways or train tracks, and other devastating attacks. We must close our borders now.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 2, 2024

The prevailing perceptions are wrong, and the truth is frightening. The U.S. immigration system isn’t simply broken. It’s an unmitigated train wreck, all cars off the rails spewing poison into the nation’s atmosphere, but not by the people or for the reasons most people think.

The Democrats’ unrelenting focus on immigration, particularly the issue of uncontrolled immigration, is cause for concern that goes beyond mere debate and speculation. Beneath the surface, posturing lies a deception that extends beyond the mere games of representation and power in the United States.

The Democrats’ emphasis on immigration is not a mere coincidence or a short-term political maneuver. Rather, it is deeply rooted in their long-term vision of reshaping the demographic and political landscape of the United States. By advocating for more inclusive immigration policies, the Democrats aim to solidify their support base and gain a strategic advantage in future elections.

Shaping the Electorate: The Democrats recognize that the changing demographics of the United States will profoundly impact its electoral landscape. By supporting policies that are perceived as welcoming to immigrants, the party aims to cultivate support among minority communities who are more likely to vote Democrat. Additionally, the party seeks to appeal to younger voters who are generally more open to immigration and diversity.

Expanding Political Influence: The Democrats’ immigration strategy is also intricately linked to increasing their political influence. By advocating for pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, the party aims to tap into a potential pool of future voters who may be more inclined to support Democrat candidates in gratitude for their efforts toward legalization. This strategy could have significant implications in swing states with substantial immigrant populations.

Addressing Social Justice Concerns: The Democrats’ emphasis on immigration is not solely driven by electoral considerations; it also aligns with their commitment to social justice and human rights. The party champions the idea of America as a nation built on immigration, where diversity and inclusivity are celebrated. By championing comprehensive immigration reform, the Democrats aim to address the plight of undocumented immigrants, promote family reunification, and provide opportunities for economic mobility.

Countering Republican Narratives: The Democrats’ focus on immigration also serves as a counter-narrative to the Republican party’s stance on the issue. By presenting themselves as advocates for immigrant rights, the Democrats aim to differentiate themselves from their conservative counterparts and appeal to moderate voters who may have concerns about the Republican party’s strict immigration policies.

The upcoming census, slated for 2030, looms large in the political landscape. This decennial event isn’t just a tally of citizens; it encompasses every individual residing within the country’s borders, irrespective of legal status. Here lies the crux of the Democrats’ strategic calculus.

Illegal immigrants, who often gravitate towards urban centers, play a pivotal role in this strategy. As they settle predominantly in cities, they significantly influence the population count in these areas. The ramifications of this extend far beyond mere statistics.

At the heart of the matter is the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives. Representation in the House is determined by population size, as derived from the census. By bolstering the urban population through immigration, particularly illegal immigration, Democrats strategically tilt the scales in their favor.

The consequence? Cities, which traditionally lean Democrat, gain disproportionate representation in Congress. Even if surrounding rural areas maintain conservative leanings, their voices are diluted by the overwhelming weight of urban populations.

This grand strategy isn’t solely about the present moment but has implications for years to come. By strategically harnessing immigration, Democrats aim to solidify their political stronghold in key urban centers, thereby exerting significant influence on national politics.

However, every strategy has its counterplay. The specter of mass deportations emerges as the flip side of the immigration coin. Mass deportations, if implemented over the next five years, could potentially disrupt this carefully constructed strategy.

Yet, the Democrats’ focus remains resolute. They recognize the long-term implications of immigration on political power dynamics and are keenly positioning themselves to leverage this demographic shift to their advantage.

By prioritizing immigration and advocating for more inclusive policies, the Democrats aim to shape or rather reshape the electorate. Therefore, it’s crucial to understand the underlying motivations and strategies at play. For the Democrats, the focus on uncontrolled immigration isn’t merely about humanitarian concerns or ideological stances – it’s a calculated move in a larger game of political chess, one that seeks to shape the very landscape of American governance for years to come.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

March 19, 2024

Have you ever wondered how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the world of politics? The topic is as fascinating as it is potentially concerning. AI influences political campaigns in many ways, from analyzing voter sentiment to tracking campaign costs and conducting opposition research.

AI’s impact on politics is far-reaching. Imagine understanding voter preferences and outreach strategies in real-time, thanks to AI’s ability to analyze social media trends and sentiment. By examining influencers, trends, and public sentiment, campaigns can better tailor their messages to connect with voters. It’s like having a real-time pulse on the electorate.

Not only can AI help campaigns understand voters, but it can also assist in measuring the effectiveness of various campaign activities. AI can track everything from advertising to canvassing and events, providing insights into what’s working and what’s not. Campaigns can make data-driven decisions to optimize their strategies and maximize their impact.

But that’s not all. AI isn’t just about understanding voters; it’s also about understanding the money. It can track campaign spending by identifying discrepancies and patterns in politicians’ spending habits. This is crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability in the political process. AI-powered auditing tools can streamline the financial oversight process, making it more efficient and accurate.

Let’s remember the advantage it gives political parties in opposition research. AI can dig deep into opponents’ voting records and past statements, providing valuable insights to gain a competitive edge.

However, there’s a darker side to AI in politics. Privacy and ethical concerns loom large. For instance, using AI to gather and analyze personal voter data raises serious privacy and data protection issues. We’re talking about your personal information, and the potential for misusing it should not be underestimated.

Moreover, there’s the unsettling prospect of AI making political campaigns more deceptive. AI can be used to create fake images and audio. I am sure you know about deepfakes, which are synthetic media that appear to be real but are actually manipulated. Such powerful methods can be employed to launch misleading campaign ads targeting other candidates. AI can be used to spread disinformation and propaganda. Governments and powerful elites can use AI to standardize, control, or repress political discourse, undermining the fairness and quality of political discourse.

AI algorithms can inadvertently perpetuate existing biases. For instance, if the data used to train the AI is biased, the AI’s outputs can also be unfair. This can lead to unjust targeting of specific demographics or communities. Indeed, it’s a digital battleground where authenticity can be blurred, and the line between fact and fiction becomes hazy.

But then, AI can bring several benefits to political campaigns beyond tracking costs and conducting opposition research. Here are some potential benefits:

Enhancing Communication: AI can improve communication by providing personalized messages to voters. It can analyze the preferences and behaviors of individual voters and tailor the communication accordingly. This can lead to more effective campaigns and better engagement with voters.

Improving Campaign Strategy: AI can analyze large amounts of data to identify trends and patterns that can inform campaign strategy. This can help campaigns anticipate potential challenges and develop effective responses.

Facilitating Transparency: AI can help campaigns maintain transparency by objectively analyzing their activities. This can help campaigns manage their reputation and respond to criticisms effectively.

Generating Political Messaging: AI can generate political messaging based on public discourse, campaign rhetoric, and political reporting. This can help campaigns develop effective messaging strategies and reach a wider audience.

Creating Political Parties: AI could be used to develop political parties with their platforms, attracting human candidates who win elections. This could revolutionize the political landscape by creating new political parties based on AI-generated platforms.

Fundraising: AI is capable of fundraising for political campaigns. It could take a seed investment from a human controlling the AI and invest it to yield a return. It could start a business that generates revenue or political messaging to convince humans to spend their own money on a defined campaign or cause.

It’s intriguing, isn’t it? The world of AI in politics is both a boon and a minefield. It can empower campaigns and voters but also carries risks of manipulation and deception. As we continue to explore the vast landscape of AI in politics, it’s crucial to tread carefully, adhere to ethical guidelines, and protect personal data from unauthorized access.

So, the next time you follow a political campaign, remember that behind the scenes, AI might be at work, shaping the discourse, analyzing voter sentiment, and, in some cases, creating an illusion of reality. How AI and politics interact is a complex and evolving story, and it’s up to all of us to stay informed, vigilant, and engaged in this digital age of politics. The journey is far from over, and the questions are still unfolding. What will we discover next?

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

by Amil Imani

March 16, 2024

Senator John Cornyn is a former Texas Supreme Court judge and State Attorney General. He has been a close ally of Mitch McConnell. Even with good credentials and background, he is mostly referred to in Texas as a RINO or an establishment Republican who needs to be removed from office. But no serious contenders have come forward to challenge him in the primaries. For the most part, he was reelected without major challenges despite being one of the most unpopular men in Texas. John Cornyn has done nothing substantial for Texas. He has been out of touch with the people of Texas for decades. He is a Washington insider.  Like other establishment Republicans, Cornyn is a warmonger and supports sending unlimited American Taxpayers’ money to an utterly corrupt country, Ukraine.

John Cornyn’s announcement to run for the leadership of the US Senate, following Mitch McConnell’s decision to step down, is news, especially in Texas. The spin is that as the first senator to declare his intention to run for Senate Republican leader, Cornyn’s candidacy is notable for his “experience and leadership background” and “how his aim is to restore the Senate to its essential role in the constitutional republic” and a lot more about his “electoral strategy and external support.”

However, as of today, Cornyn is unsuitable for leadership for two main reasons. For one, he did not back Attorney General Ken Paxton during his impeachment by the Texas State House. He is also anti-Trump and anti-gun, as AG Paxton has already pointed out.

“It will be difficult for @JohnCornyn to be an effective leader since he is anti-Trump, anti-gun, and will be focused on his highly competitive primary campaign in 2026. Republicans deserve better in their next leader, and Texans deserve another conservative Senator. https://t.co/IKJYcoXzat
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) February 29, 2024

It is worth noting that after the fake impeachment by the “Deep State” Republicans in the Texas House (known as the UniParty) and his final acquittal in the State Senate, Attorney General Ken Paxton has become an icon, the only man left blocking Biden and his cronies from making Texas as blue and lawless as California. His popularity has soared.

Cornyn played a significant role in negotiating the first major anti-gun bill in decades following the Robb Elementary shooting in Uvalde. The Second Amendment clearly states. Anyone going against the spirit of the 2nd Amendment doesn’t have the commitment to understanding its historical context and purpose.

Cornyn has also been involved in efforts to support the migrant influx at the U.S.-Mexico border, and he has introduced bills aimed at making this influx easy, including measures to rapidly process migrant invasion and speed up the processing of asylum seekers. His approach has completely exposed him, and for one, to put it mildly, it reeks of an agenda-driven policy detrimental to the well-being of the state of Texas.  For one, rapidly processing illegal aliens raises concerns about sacrificing thorough vetting procedures, potentially undermining national security, and also resulting in overlooking legitimate asylum claims.

His current abilities as a leader are under a cloud, as it is clear that Cornyn’s involvement in supporting measures to ease the illegal alien flood is driven more by political expediency and the New World Order (NWO) agenda.

On the other hand, we have Senator Ted Cruz. Cruz has consistently advocated against gun regulation, arguing that such policies are ineffective and do not prevent crime. This stance reflects a commitment to uphold the Second Amendment and the belief that the focus should be on enhancing law enforcement and security measures rather than on restricting gun ownership. For those who prioritize individual rights and the belief in the efficacy of law enforcement over gun control, Cruz’s position is to be seen as more aligned with their values.

In fact, Cruz was chiefly instrumental in introducing a rival bill that would increase school security funding, showcasing his willingness to propose alternative solutions to address the issue of gun violence. This action exemplifies Cruz’s abilities as a leader as he offers a comprehensive approach to safety beyond just gun control, which is more in keeping with broader strategies to prevent violence. “Cruz says $8B in economic aid to Ukraine is “crap”: “A lot of that is almost certain to go to waste.”

Moreover, Ted Cruz’s support for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton during the impeachment effort highlights his commitment to the principles of due process and conservative governance. Cruz very openly supports Paxton for his efforts to combat the abuses of the Biden administration, emphasizing his effectiveness in battling these issues. Cruz’s defense of Paxton contrasts with the position of John Cornyn, the senior senator from Texas who found the investigation into Paxton’s alleged wrongdoing “deeply troubling.”

In short, Texas has two Republican Senators. One is pro-Texas, and one is in tune with the Washington “Deep State.” Cornyn’s overall approval rating hovers around 24 percent, and this represents a dramatic reversal from previous years when a majority of Texans were not even aware of Cornyn’s daily activities.

Conclusion

Senator Ted Cruz emerges as a more suitable choice for Texas and the nation as a whole. Cornyn’s past actions, including his stance on key issues such as gun confiscation and illegal immigration, raise concerns about his commitment to upholding fundamental principles and addressing complex challenges effectively. In contrast, Cruz has consistently advocated for preserving individual rights, upholding due process, and proposing comprehensive solutions to issues like gun violence. His support for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton during the impeachment effort demonstrates a commitment to conservative governance and principles.

Moreover, Cruz’s approach resonates with a broader base of Texans, as evidenced by his higher approval ratings and continued support. In a political landscape where leadership and integrity are paramount, Senator Ted Cruz stands out over John Cornyn for representing the values and interests of Texas. Texans overwhelmingly favor Cornyn to retire.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

March 5, 2024

The human spirit yearns for a singular, defining element, a force that separates mere existence from vibrant being. This element, this lifeblood of the soul, is the coveted and enigmatic quality known as free will. It is not simply the freedom to choose but the transcendent freedom to choose who we become, a symphony of possibility conducted by the unyielding maestro of our consciousness.  It is the divine gift bestowed upon us, granting the ability to chart our own course, carve our destiny, and sculpt our reality according to the dictates of our deepest desires and aspirations.

Free will is the defiant flicker of individuality against the relentless backdrop of determinism. The sculptor carves purpose from the raw marble of circumstance, weaving a unique narrative from the threads of experience. It is the alchemist, transforming the base metals of circumstance into the gleaming gold of personal destiny. Free Will is the beacon of light that illuminates the path of our existence. It is the essence of our sovereignty as sentient beings, empowering us to navigate the labyrinth of life with courage, conviction, and unwavering resolve.

This potent cocktail of choice and consequence is the crucible in which the human spirit is forged. It is the canvas upon which we paint the strokes of our character, the chisel that shapes the contours of our personality. Free Will is the catalyst for transformation, the catalyst for evolution, and the catalyst for growth. Through the exercise of free will, we become not only the subjects of our lives but also the authors, etching an indelible mark on the fabric of existence.

But free will is not a solo performance. It thrives in the vibrant interplay of individual choices and the collective symphony of humanity. Our choices, whether grand gestures or seemingly minute decisions, ripple outwards, impacting the lives of those around us. This interconnectedness fosters a sense of responsibility, reminding us that our freedom is inextricably linked to the choices of others. It compels us to consider the potential consequences of our actions, not just on ourselves but on the intricate dance of life unfolding around us.

However, the power of free will is not without its shadow. With freedom comes great responsibility, and the burden of choice can be heavy. Navigating the maze of possibilities, confronting the uncertainty of the unknown, and accepting the consequences of our decisions can be daunting. This is where the delicate balance between freedom and responsibility lies.

The responsibility is to wield our power wisely, make choices that align with our highest good, and honor the sacred trust bestowed upon us by the universe. It is a solemn duty, a sacred obligation, and a sacred duty; for great power comes great responsibility.

Free will does not absolve us of the impact of external forces, nor does it promise a world devoid of hardship. It grants us the power to acknowledge these forces and choose how we respond. It empowers us to rise above the limitations imposed by circumstance and become architects of our own destiny.

The true power of free will, however, lies not solely in shaping our individual lives but in its collective potential. When individuals, empowered by free will, unite in a shared vision, mountains can be moved. From dismantling oppressive regimes to pursuing scientific breakthroughs, the collective exercise of free will has propelled humanity towards progress and betterment.

Yet, the very essence of free will also presents a potential pitfall. Unbridled individualism can morph into unbridled self-interest, undermining the very fabric of a collective society. Recognizing this, it becomes imperative to cultivate a sense of shared responsibility, where individual freedom finds its true expression in contributing to the greater good.

Ultimately, free will is not a static state but a dynamic process. It is a journey of self-discovery, a continuous wrestling with the complexities of existence, and a relentless pursuit of personal evolution. It is the fire within, the insatiable thirst for knowledge, the relentless pursuit of growth. It is the essence of what makes us human – the unique ability to choose, evolve, and forge our path in the grand tapestry of existence.

Free will is a gift, and it is a responsibility, too. It demands courage, resilience, and an unwavering commitment to shaping our individual lives and the collective song of humanity. It is a journey, not a destination, a continuous pursuit of becoming, not merely being. As we celebrate the power of free will, let us remember the responsibility it embodies and strive to use it not just for personal gain but for the betterment of society and for the flourishing of life itself.

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

February 26, 2024

“The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, we must think and act anew.” ~Abraham Lincoln

America, the land of liberty, has long been a beacon of hope and opportunity for people worldwide. Its founding principles – liberty, freedom, and justice – have shaped its identity. This foundation, laid by the framers, has come to be known as American Exceptionalism.

However, in the face of evolving challenges, it is imperative that we not only understand the concept but actively work to preserve and strengthen it for future generations.

When asked what kind of government the delegates had created, Benjamin Franklin famously replied, “A republic if you can keep it.” These words hold even greater significance as we confront a crucial juncture in our country’s history.

The slogan “Make America Great Again” is not merely a catchphrase; it embodies a call to action, a commitment to uphold the values that have made America exceptional. In recent years, however, these values have come under attack. The Obama/Biden administration failed to deliver its promises, leaving many Americans disillusioned and disheartened. To the leftists, failure is not only acceptable but expected.

Since Donald Trump announced his candidacy, the Democrats have launched one failed hoax after another in an attempt to derail his presidency. Their efforts, driven by fraudulent claims and partisan agendas, have only sought to erode the genuine efforts of a president with good intentions.

But now is not the time for despair. Our highest priority must be the preservation of our nation’s freedom. We have faced challenges before and emerged more robust, and we must do so again.

The threats we face today are manifold: encroaching Islamism, socialism, Marxism. These ideologies seek to undermine the very foundations of our society, threatening our individual liberty and prosperity. But we cannot afford to succumb to fear or complacency.

To combat these threats, it is crucial to articulate clear policy proposals that uphold American values. This includes:

♦ It is strengthening educational programs that promote an understanding of American history, values, and the principles of democracy.
♦ We are advocating for policies that support the free market and individual freedoms, thereby countering the collectivist ideologies that seek to undermine these principles.
♦ Promoting international cooperation and alliances that support the spread of democracy and the rule of law, thereby countering the global reach of authoritarian ideologies.

Freedom, in all its forms, is our greatest legacy. Throughout history, brave men and women have fought and died to protect it. From the battlefields of Europe to the jungles of the Far East, Americans have made countless sacrifices to safeguard our way of life.

In the not-too-distant past, we confronted and defeated the forces of Nazism, Fascism, and Communism. We stood firm against tyranny and oppression, refusing to waver in adversity. And now, we must once again rise to meet the challenges of our time.

The insidious threat of leftism, socialism, Islamism, and Marxism looms large, but we cannot afford to shrink from the fight. We must meet these challenges head-on, with courage and determination.

Now is the time to stand up and be counted. We cannot give up or give in. We must be willing to do whatever it takes to preserve our nation’s freedom and ensure a bright future for generations to come.

This will require unity, resolve, and a steadfast commitment to our core principles. We must be willing to defend our freedoms against all who seek to undermine them, whether foreign or domestic.

But we cannot do it alone. We need the support of every patriotic American who believes in the principles that make this country great. Together, we can overcome any challenge and emerge stronger than ever before.

For those who are concerned about the direction of the country, there are practical actions that can be taken to support the preservation of American values:

♦ Vote in elections, and this is a must.
♦ Participate in local community activities and public discourse to influence policy and public opinion.
♦ Educate yourself and others about the principles of American exceptionalism and the importance of defending these values.

Defending America against all enemies is not just a slogan but a solemn duty that falls on everyone. We must be willing to stand up for what is right, defend our freedoms, and ensure that America remains a shining beacon of liberty for the world to see.

Now is the time to rise to the occasion, embrace the challenges before us, and reaffirm our commitment to the principles that have made America the greatest nation on earth. United, we will prevail.

These profound words from John F. Kennedy still resonate deeply: “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.”

© 2024 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

February 6, 2024

Iran has been under the rule of Islam since 1979. The Iranian people have attempted on several occasions to end the practice of these barbarians. Still, each time, they were faced with the ruthless Islamic regime, and many of them were massacred while the world watched and did nothing.

This non-Iranian regime, via its mismanagement and incompetence, has turned Iran into a warehouse. In four decades of its existence, the Islamic Republic has managed, notably, to produce more hunger, more anger, more frustration, prostitution at a record pace, drug addiction beyond control, child execution without any regard for international human rights, and much more. There are many reports regarding cases of child sexual abuse and molestation reaching epidemic proportions. Prosecution and imprisonment of the innocent and the systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, and hundreds of gruesome acts of torture and rape in the prisons skyrocketed. Meanwhile, the United Nations stands by and does not blink.

Along with many acts of terror, this genocidal regime has been on a mission to wipe out the Baha’is in Iran completely. Since its arrival, the Islamic government has condoned and promoted every measure of oppression against a minority religious group called the Baha’is. The Islamic regime doesn’t even spare the dead. They bulldoze and even uproot the trees in Baha’is cemeteries.

Harassment of other religious minorities is also prevalent. They routinely hang dissidents and amputate their limbs for petty theft. They are responsible for the unmitigated poverty in an oil-rich country, sex slaves in the Persian Gulf region, and the rape of children as young as two years of age.

The US and its allies are aware that the Islamic Republic years ago started a nuclear program, not for peaceful purposes, as they claim, but only to strengthen its position in the region and prolong its existence long enough to get its hands on the bloody bomb so that they can feel invincible.

What is the likelihood that the ruling Mullahs will use their new toy? If they remain in power long enough to have it, they are very likely to use it in one form or another. At the very least, they will use the bomb for blackmail and intimidation in the region. Not even an all-out nuclear exchange can be ruled out. Islam is a religion centered on death, with faithful eyes fixed on the afterlife and its promised eternal pleasures. If the faithful kills, he goes to Allah’s paradise; if he gets killed, he goes to Allah’s paradise. An urgent warning to the people of the world: stop the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program now, or face eradication from the face of the earth, and this is not a joke.

When the regime is cornered, they will immediately use their propaganda machine to cover up their crimes against humanity. They create chaos and crisis. In other words, they create smoke and mirrors and then push the dust under the rug again, as they did when the Islamists took the American diplomats as hostages for 444 days. During the Iran and Iraq war, the IRI used their proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas, to attack Israelis to escape retaliation. They are masters in the business of distracting the world from their nuclear intentions, as they did during the Gaza crisis. They took the attention away from their nuclear program.

Since 1979, the regime has stigmatized, victimized, and murdered people without any due process of law. After 40 years in power, this regime still fears its own shadow. On the slightest suspicion, they will arrest, convict, and execute innocent people.

The Mullahs presently ruling Iran are faced with monumental threats. Internally, the great majority of the populace is against their misrule. Every segment of the Iranian population, including student groups, religious and ethnic minorities, journalists, and many others, has suffered and continues to suffer inordinate hardship under the heavy-handed Mullahs and their leads. After 44 years, they are using the slogans “Death to America” and Death to Israel” for interior consumption. It must be noted that not a single Persian has ever used the Islamic phrase of “Death to America.”

Externally, they are still engaged in brinksmanship with the United States and Israel as they try to wrestle the mantle of Islamic leadership from the Sunni Saudis and their Wahhabi cabal.

Many non-turbaned creatures are working as the mullahs’ agent frontmen and pawns all over the world — including their powerful lobbyists in Washington, DC.

They have hired non-Iranians, including disenfranchised Afghanis, Houthies, Iraqis, and Palestinians, as their proxies.

Going back to GWB’s era. For eight years, President Bush promised the Iranian people that America would support them in their struggle for freedom, but did he? The Iranian people stood up firmly only to be hanged by the Islamic Republic executioners, and President Trump only cheered and supported the Iranian people without any meaningful help. But everyone in the US administration rushed to help the Ukerainas—while Iran has been occupied for more than 44 years–a double standard.

Iranians also ask the community of nations to act, teach, and show some muscle in solidarity with them and to implement maximum pressure against this illegitimate government in occupied Iran.

There must not be, however, any compromise, any negotiation, or any deals with the Islamists in Iran before making sure that the Iranian people are part of the equation. The era of mass politics, propaganda, nebulous sloganeering, and magical solutions is over. It’s a do-or-die scenario for the Iranian people and perhaps for the people of the world.

The people of Iran wish nothing less than a complete regime change through the democratic process of a free referendum. They believe it is the surest, safest, and fastest way to achieve a democratic Iran and end the world’s nightmare of nuclear holocaust that is currently facing us all.

Iranians are no longer hopeful that America will help them; on the contrary, they believe America is in bed with the regime and has extended its life by supporting the Mullahs. After all, it was Jimmy Carter who installed Ayatollah Khomeini.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

February 4, 2024

Suzanne Harp, a formidable Texas’ 3rd Congressional District candidate, has been making waves with her dynamic and multi-faceted campaign strategy. From community engagement to fundraising events, Harp is leaving no stone unturned in her pursuit to represent the interests of her constituents.

In the face of an increasingly spendthrift Congress and concerns about corrupt leaders, Harp is prepared to use her experience to fight for the country. Her dedication to reclaiming the Republican Party is palpable, promising a fresh voice that blends business acumen with a commitment to constitutional principles.

Suzanne Harp opposes several government mandates, particularly those related to personal freedoms and public education:

Mask and Vaccine Mandates: Harp strongly opposes government mandates regarding using masks or proof of vaccination. She believes the government should refrain from requiring individuals to adhere to these regulations. She also criticizes using private entities to enforce these policies, such as the OSHA regulation proposed by Joe Biden in late 2021.

Parental Choice in Education: Harp supports a policy of “Parental Choice in Education with Funding Following the Student,” allowing parents to choose their child’s educational path, including public, private, or charter schools. This policy would allocate education funding based on the student, allowing parents to direct resources to their chosen educational institution.

Vocational Skills Training: Harp supports expanding vocational skills training in schools to prepare students for the rapidly evolving job market demands. She believes that this initiative not only addresses the skills gap but also enhances workforce readiness.

Woke Indoctrination: Harp supports common sense policies that counteract the influence of the “woke” movement within schools and defunds ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ (DEI) initiatives. She believes that the survival of the democratic republic hinges upon vigilance against the “woke” agenda.

Abortion Laws: Harp supports states having the right to enact laws reflecting the value of life, including laws on late-term abortions. She opposes the House of Representatives passing of H.R. 3755, which abolishes state laws on late-term abortions.

Harp’s candidacy comes at a critical time, addressing several pressing issues. Her constituents appreciate her principled conservatism, recognizing that this very foundation has made the United States a standard-bearer for democracy and freedom.

Suzanne Harp’s involvement in the political landscape of Collin County has been evident in her recent campaign events. One noteworthy event was her attendance at the Collin County GOP Executive Committee Meeting on January 16, 2024. The open session allowed the public to hear brief speeches from elected officials and candidates, providing a platform for Harp to share her vision for the district.

Suzanne Harp recognized that fundraising plays a crucial role in any political campaign. Some events serve as a linchpin for campaign activities, enabling candidates to garner financial support for their initiatives and reach a broader audience. Collin County residents must do their civic duty by helping Suzanne financially to run her campaign.

In addition to the formal gatherings, Harp took a personal approach to connect with her supporters. Organizing a “Meet and Greet” event with her family allowed constituents to interact with her on a personal level, fostering a stronger bond between the candidate and the community.

The initiation of early voting on February 20th marked a pivotal phase in Harp’s campaign. It allowed her to engage with voters directly, discussing the pressing issues that matter to the people of Texas’ 3rd Congressional District.

Suzanne Harp’s campaign message revolves around defending Texas from what she perceives as threats from the Radical Left and RINO Republicans. Her advocacy includes fighting for religious liberties, ensuring election integrity, strengthening border security, combating human trafficking, addressing runaway spending, and opposing unconstitutional mandates.

A significant milestone in Harp’s campaign was the release of a political advertisement funded by the Suzanne Victory Fund. This joint fundraising committee, which includes Suzanne for Congress and Harp PAC, spotlighted her campaign and the key issues she champions.

Harp’s campaign strategy is well-coordinated, incorporating various elements to connect with voters and promote her political agenda.

Suzanne Harp prioritizes personal connections with voters through frequent campaign events and meet-and-greets. This approach allows her to understand constituents’ concerns, building trust and rapport within the community.

Harp uses her platform to articulate her political views and campaign promises. Defending 2nd Amendment rights, protecting American children, securing the border, promoting election integrity, and addressing various issues are integral to her political agenda.

Recognizing the power of social media, Harp actively utilizes these platforms to reach a broader audience. In addition, her encouragement of volunteers to contribute to social media efforts demonstrates a commitment to modern campaign techniques.

A dedicated team of volunteers supports Harp in various campaign activities, from distributing yard signs to door-knocking and making calls. This collaborative effort amplifies her campaign’s reach and impact.

Harp distinguishes herself as a Washington outsider, emphasizing a fresh perspective and a unique approach to addressing the country’s challenges. This positioning aligns with a growing sentiment among voters for change and a break from traditional political norms.

Political advertisements funded by the Suzanne Victory Fund visually represent Harp’s campaign and the issues she stands for. These advertisements play a crucial role in reaching voters across various platforms.

A comprehensive and dynamic strategy characterizes Suzanne Harp’s campaign for Texas’ 3rd Congressional District. Her engagement with the community, emphasis on fundraising, promotion of critical issues, use of social media, reliance on volunteers, and positioning as a Washington outsider collectively contribute to a campaign that resonates with voters.

While specific challenges Harp faced during her campaign are not explicitly outlined, the absence of such information does not diminish the significance of her efforts—the success of any campaign hinges on effective communication, community engagement, and a well-executed strategy. Suzanne Harp appears to be actively pursuing these goals, presenting herself as a formidable candidate in the upcoming elections.

Suzanne Harp stands out as a beacon of moral conservatism. It is time for wise and patriotic voters to rise and stand behind her, for Suzanne Harp is the congresswoman Texas needs—a true embodiment of the principles that have made this nation great.

Voting for Suzanne is voting for America to survive.

© 2023 NWV – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

January 13, 2024

Suzanne Harp is Texas’s 3rd Congressional District candidate for the United States Congress. Suzanne’s decision to enter the political arena, rooted in a profound sense of duty, aims to address pressing issues such as religious liberties, election integrity, border security, counter-human trafficking, runaway spending, and unconstitutional mandates. As a Washington outsider, Suzanne brings a unique perspective to the nation’s challenges.

What sets Suzanne’s campaign apart is her keen understanding of the cultural war that has enveloped the nation.

In her recent interview with Dr. Rich Swier, Harp delves into the nuances of this war in Ukraine and the necessity of active citizenry to safeguard the very fabric of democracy. Suzanne outlines the Biden administration’s weaponization of the Department of Justice against parents in school board meetings. She identifies this as a critical battleground, emphasizing that the cultural war extends beyond traditional political lines.

Suzanne passionately argues that the campaign must focus on winning the social war. From her perspective, it is an intrinsic battle influencing other critical issues such as the economy, border security, and international relations. As she articulates the challenges the younger generation faces, Suzanne highlights the influence of social media and its role in perpetuating the cultural divide.

Drawing from her father’s experiences in Athens during World War II, Suzanne provides a historical perspective on the consequences of socialist-communist movements. Her father’s childhood encounters with Nazi soldiers and the subsequent communist regime serve as a stark reminder of the perils of ideologies that seek to separate children from their parents.

The parallels Suzanne draws between historical events and the contemporary cultural war underscore the urgency of “defending American values.” She emphasizes the need for the current generation to learn parallel lessons about survival, character development, and the consequences of embracing ideologies that erode the fabric of a nation.

Harp highlights the significance of self-education, encouraging individuals to become patriots by understanding the principles laid out by the Founding Fathers. The essence of liberty, she asserts, lies in grasping the true meaning behind the words of those who shaped the nation.

As Suzanne Harp embarks on her congressional campaign, she stands at the intersection of history and the present, ready to confront the challenges that define this critical moment in American politics. Her commitment to defending the Constitution, prioritizing the cultural war, and preserving the people’s voice reflects a leadership style that transcends party lines.

Suzanne observes a “palpable hunger” for understanding what freedom truly means. This hunger, she believes, is an opportunity for citizens to delve into the roots of American values and to reclaim a shared understanding of freedom.

To illustrate the gravity of the situation, Harp shares insights from contributors who were once citizens of the former Soviet Union. Having escaped a culture of oppression, these individuals recognize ominous signs in the current political climate. One contributor, Simona Pico, a defense attorney persecuted for her faith, provides a firsthand account of the struggles against a regime that sought to silence dissent.

Building on the wisdom that educating a woman educates a generation, Suzanne applauds the efforts to educate the populace. She, in turn, is singled out by the interviewee, who, seeing her potential as a future member of Congress with the correct values, congratulates her heartily and considers her a beacon in the cultural war between decency and decadence.

Then, the conversation changes as Suzanne acknowledges the audacity of evil in the current political climate. A culture war is not merely a battle between Democrats and Republicans but a struggle between good and evil. Suzanne expresses concern about the blatant challenges, including egregious behavior that demands immediate attention.

In response to the exasperation felt by many, Suzanne issues a call to action. She urges individuals to “press in” to actively engage, testify, and educate their circles of influence. Her plea is for citizens to be the salt and light, offering a positive alternative in the face of arrogance.

Suzanne emphasizes the need for citizens to know their Congress members intimately. She advocates for being slow to hire and quick to fire representatives, asserting that term limits, while valuable, are not a standalone solution. The key, she believes, is for the people to press in, educate themselves, and use the primary election process to cleanse and weed out those who do not serve the nation’s best interests.

Drawing from her personal experience, Suzanne shares insights into her focus on election integrity issues. She narrates the meticulous process of working on legislation, meeting with officials, and testifying before committees. Despite setbacks, Suzanne’s journey underscores the importance of active citizen participation in shaping the political landscape.

Refreshingly, Suzanne Harp emerges as a unifying force – a patriot navigating the cultural war for America’s future. Her story is not just about politics; it is a narrative of resilience, family values, and an unwavering belief in the principles that make America exceptional. The journey she undertakes is not merely a campaign; it is a pursuit of a vision where the enduring spirit of freedom prevails.

Why Suzanne Harp? Because she will be a loyal congressional representative for her constituents. Because she is a fighter and believer in American exceptionalism. Because she stands tall and strong to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States for you, me, and all Americans.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

January 1, 2024

Oh, Love! The eternal rhythm, a symphony echoing through existence’s core! Is love a mere sentiment? Far from it, it’s the relentless beat in the human heart. Love, a master weaver, stitches reality’s fabric with intricate artistry, painting the world with hues of compassion, understanding, and boundless connection.

Love transcends time and breaks mortality’s shackles, granting glimpses into the infinite. It is the flame dancing with joy in newborn eyes, glowing with possibilities. Unbound by birth or death, love lingers like celestial fragrance, outlasting mortal limitations in the vast expanse.

If life’s a theatre, then love and only love take the lead, breathing life into the mundane, transforming the ordinary into the extraordinary, and guiding creativity’s flame. Love is a guiding star for art, poetry, patriotism, and philosophers’ pursuits, and love fuels unwavering fervor and unravels existence’s profound roots.

Love inspires, provokes emotions, and is an undisputed sovereign, ruling hearts with benevolence and poise. Love is the alchemy that transmutes despair into joy. Love is like the magician wielding its wand with divine precision and turning the commonplace into the extraordinary with regal decision.

Love, the sacred fire, warms the coldest corners, turning dwellings into havens, and is a foundation for homes and the mortar binding families in unbreakable bonds. Lit by love’s flames, hearths bring hope, dispelling shadows and illuminating unity’s path.

Love conducts the symphony as life’s music plays, melodies of shared moments.

What molds existence’s disparate elements into a masterpiece? Love, the sculptor – beyond mere attractive features, a synergy of souls connecting, creating profound beauty. An artisan of aesthetics, love illuminates gestures and smiles, crafting a beauty radiating from within, authentic and combined.

In the grand ballet of existence, love pirouettes with grace and passion. Without it, we’re spectators in a monochrome world devoid of vibrancy. With love, life transforms into a kaleidoscope, with emotions vividly painted, transcending challenges and bringing joy and fulfillment.

In love’s divine embrace, Earth becomes a celestial haven, mere mortals ascend to god-like stature, embraced by a timeless force.

Not a fleeting emotion but an eternal flame echoing through eternity, love is all we need – the alpha and omega guiding us to heaven on Earth.

And yet, even amidst the anguish and heartache, love’s essence remains eternal. It is a force that cannot be extinguished, for it resides in the deepest recesses of our souls. Though my heart may bear the scars of betrayal, I know that love has the power to heal and mend. Through the depths of our pain, we discover our resilience and capacity to rise above the ironies of life and find solace in the light of forgiveness. Love, with all its complexities and contradictions, remains the guiding force that leads us through the darkest nights towards the promise of a new dawn.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 29, 2023

Suzanne Harp, an America First candidate in Texas’ Third Congressional District, is one voice that emerges as a beacon of traditional values and unwavering patriotism – a voice urging self-education, vigilance, and a return to the foundational values that define America.

In a recent interview, Harp passionately outlined her vision for America, addressing pressing issues such as the cultural war, the role of faith, accountability in politics, and the potential challenges in the 2024 election. Harp is not just a politician; she represents the enduring spirit of American exceptionalism.

At the heart of Suzanne’s message is a call for citizens to go “beyond party affiliations” and actively engage in the political process.

According to her, the real test lies not in political clubs or online discussions but in physically testifying in front of hearings in Austin, Texas. She believes this is where the rubber meets the road, where citizens can make a tangible impact on decision-making.

The conversation unfolds into a broader discussion about generational education and its pivotal role in winning the cultural war. Harp emphasizes the need to educate the next generation about how the political system works and how to use their voices effectively. To her, this education is not just about civic studies; it’s about empowering the youth to “be active participants” in shaping the nation’s future.

Accountability in politics becomes a focal point as Suzanne urges citizens to stay in communication with their elected representatives. According to Harp, knowing your congressperson intimately and holding them accountable for their decisions is an essential aspect of ensuring responsible governance. This approach aligns with her belief that citizens should have direct access to their representatives, knowing them personally.

A notable aspect of Harp’s vision is the advocacy for “hiring patriots” over politicians. Drawing attention to the effectiveness of business-minded individuals, she cites the impact of Donald Trump, asserting that hiring patriots can lead to more efficient problem-solving. The idea is to shift from the conventional approach of electing career politicians to embracing individuals deeply committed to the nation’s well-being.

The interview takes a deeper dive into the ongoing cultural war, positioning it as a battle between a constitutional republic and the potential threat of a socialist, Marxist dictatorship. Suzanne echoes the sentiments of the Founding Fathers, emphasizing the importance of faith, family, and freedom. In her view, these foundational values are under threat, and citizens must actively engage in preserving them.

Foreign policy, particularly the involvement in the Ukraine conflict, becomes a point of scrutiny for Harp. She questions the alignment with leaders like Zelensky and raises concerns about the motives behind such decisions. Harp advocates for a careful and prudent approach to international relations, stressing that decisions should be aligned with the nation’s best interests.

As the conversation shifts towards potential challenges in the 2024 election, Suzanne emphasizes the need for citizens to equip themselves with the right information. This includes understanding global challenges and ensuring fair and transparent elections. The call is for an informed electorate that can counteract any attempts to undermine the democratic process.

One of the recurring themes in Suzanne’s vision is the “crucial role of faith and morality” in political leadership. She cautions against supporting candidates who shy away from discussing their faith, asserting that a moral compass is essential for effective governance. This aligns with the historical notion that a constitutional republic is only sustainable with a moral and religious citizenry.

Suzanne Harp also addresses America’s global challenges, emphasizing the need for citizens to understand the enemy. She calls for a united effort to win in such great numbers that the groundswell is undeniable in any state. This strategic approach involves educating oneself about the global cabal challenging American values.

While expressing frustration and anger among Americans, Suzanne urges caution against rushing into civil unrest. She acknowledges the challenges but emphasizes a careful and informed approach, including holding those involved in treasonous acts accountable. Her message resonates with a call for responsible action rather than impulsive reactions.

The conversation concludes with Suzanne drawing inspiration from historical figures like Dietrich Bonhoeffer, highlighting the importance of speaking out against evil. She commends the courage of mothers who speak out against issues in classrooms and boardrooms, emphasizing the need for collective action in safeguarding the nation’s values.

In essence, Suzanne Harp’s vision revolves around active citizenship, informed engagement, and a strategic shift in leadership. Her call for hiring patriots, ensuring accountability, and preserving foundational values reflects a commitment to a vibrant and resilient America. For citizens unwittingly caught amid this cultural war, Suzanne’s vision provides a roadmap for shaping the nation’s future.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 26, 2023

By: Amil Imani

December 9, 2023

We are talking about fairness and consistency in the treatment of elected officials. The question we should be asking is – Should an elected official face additional barriers in claiming rightful compensation, and is there room for a more compassionate approach in the face of legal intricacies?

“After being acquitted on impeachment charges, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton now says he wants back pay for the suspended period while awaiting trial. Paxton’s office claims Comptroller Glenn Hegar infringed state law and the Texas Constitution by unlawfully withholding Paxton’s income.”

In this labyrinth, a troubling narrative unfolds – one that questions fairness and consistency. The crux revolves around whether an elected official should face additional barriers in claiming rightful compensation and if a more compassionate approach is warranted in the face of legal complexities. Yet, it appears that Comptroller Glenn Hegar, Texas, remains unyielding in his stance. And pray, what is his premise?

The question is, why is he playing hardball? Many speculations are flying around as to why Hagar is denying Paxton’s salary. In a letter obtained by The Texas Tribune, Paxton’s office charges that the comptroller violated state law and the Texas Constitution “by refusing to issue salary payments to a duly elected statewide officeholder.”

Some have suggested Hegar illegally took it away to help the House. He is aware that Paxton will sue him in Austin. Austin courts are all Democrats who would not side with Paxton. Glenn Hegar knows that and wants Paxton to sue him. Paxton most likely has to spend thousands of dollars on attorney’s fees, perhaps more than the money they owe him. It appears Hegar conspired with the House and has an ulterior motive.

Hegar’s actions might also be politically motivated, possibly in collaboration with the Texas House. Indeed, this is a significant angle – Hegar’s own political aspirations may play a role in this unfolding drama. His actions could be part of a broader political strategy. We are left speculating on what political dynamics or alliances could influence Hegar’s decision.

The crux of Hegar’s argument lies in two state laws supposedly guiding his decision. These laws, modified by the Legislature, allow certain state employees to enjoy paid leave under specific circumstances. However, Hegar explicitly states that these laws do not apply to state officeholders, which is false. In this case, the selective application of laws raises eyebrows, prompting us to ponder whether justice is truly blind to elected officials or whether Hager has personal issues with Paxton.

Moreover, the comptroller’s office contends that back pay for a suspended state employee hinges on a pre-existing agreement – a notion that, without prior clarity, retroactive payment might be construed as an employment benefit. This begs the question: Should an elected official be subject to a different set of rules regarding compensation, and is a nuanced approach being overlooked?

Paxton’s office contends it violates the Texas Constitution. Drawing on the precedent of allowing agency heads to grant leave without pay deduction, Paxton’s team asserts that this principle should be extended to Paxton during his suspension, which seems reasonable.

However, Glenn Hegar, curiously enough, stands by the decision to halt Paxton’s $153,750 annual salary. Hegar’s legal counsel recommends seeking a “definitive ruling” from the Texas Supreme Court, implying that the law is so clear-cut that only the highest legal authority can provide unequivocal guidance – raising the question, is the law truly that unambiguous?

The case of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton stands out as a mystery – an innocent public servant wrongly suspended from duty and denied his financial salary. On the other hand, Hegar attempts to paint a picture of fidelity to an unambiguous law bolstered by a call for a “definitive ruling” from the highest legal authority.

One cannot help but wonder: Is there room for a nuanced perspective that upholds the principles of justice without compromising the integrity of the law? Does justice honestly wear a blindfold, or do the subtle nuances of legal interpretation sway it?

As the Texas Supreme Court looms on the horizon, the potential for a definitive ruling beckons. Will it unravel the complexities or further entangle us in the intricate legal intricacies? Only time will reveal the twists and turns in this unfolding saga, leaving us to ponder the elusive nature of justice in legal complexities.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December

The latest data on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reveals contrasting trends, raising questions about the effectiveness of recent Federal Reserve actions and the potential impact on everyday Americans. As of October 2023, the annual CPI rose 3.2%, primarily due to the “fortuitous plunge” in energy prices. However, a deeper dive into the numbers exposes an inflation rate curtailed by falling energy costs. The core CPI, which sidesteps the volatility of food and energy, remained resilient, clocking in at 4.0%.

The divergence between headline and core inflation rates underscores the interplay of economic factors.

The Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes were expected to quell inflationary pressures. Yet, the core CPI’s stubborn rise suggests a more tempered impact on the segments excluded from the headline index. Why?

Firstly, the interest rate hikes have inadvertently tilted the playing field against renewable energy technologies. As interest rates climbed, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for renewables soared, jeopardizing their competitiveness vis-à-vis fossil fuels. It is a cautionary tale, reminding us that monetary policy can have unintended consequences on our pursuit of a greener future.

Higher interest rates shouldn’t impede progress toward sustainable energy – yet here we are, grappling with the repercussions on our journey towards a low-carbon economy.

The elevated interest rates provided legacy oil and gas producers a lifeline. Shielded from the onslaught of low-carbon alternatives, these traditional energy giants could maximize revenues from their aging assets. A dichotomy emerges – the Fed’s pursuit of economic stability inadvertently bolsters sectors that contribute to environmental concerns.

Are we inadvertently sacrificing our environmental goals in the pursuit of economic stability?

Moreover, the core inflation rate is not a monolithic entity; it responds to a myriad of influences. Rising shelter prices, a crucial component, witnessed a slowdown in growth due to falling hotel prices, not reductions in rent or homeowners’ equivalent rent.

It’s not just about energy and food but also the intricacies of housing costs that shape the economic narrative.

As we contemplate the repercussions of interest rate hikes, we must recognize the tangible impacts on individuals and businesses. Homeowners with mortgages face increased monthly repayments, potentially inducing financial stress. Simultaneously, enterprises grappling with higher borrowing costs might curtail investments, a potential drag on economic growth.

How are these interest rate hikes affecting you? Is your monthly budget feeling the strain, or is your business reassessing growth plans?

Furthermore, the indirect effects on the economy are equally profound. Higher interest rates could set off a wage-price spiral – a cycle of rising wages leading to higher prices, fueling further wage increases. This self-fulfilling prophecy can spawn an inflationary loop that is challenging to break.

Are we on the brink of a wage-price spiral? The interconnectivity of wages and prices can have cascading effects on our economy.

Beyond these direct and indirect impacts, such hikes can reshape expectations about future inflation and interest rates. If core inflation remains high despite rate hikes, it could dampen investment sentiments, potentially slowing economic growth.

It’s imperative to question the unintended consequences of policy decisions and their ripple effects on our collective pursuit of a prosperous and sustainable future.

The 3.2% annual increase in the US Consumer Price Index (CPI) has profound implications for the economy and individual households. Let’s dissect the potential fallouts of this uptick:

As a measure of the average price change for a basket of goods and services, the CPI signifies an augmented cost of living. This escalation strains household budgets, particularly those reliant on fixed or low incomes. The 3.2% CPI increase amplifies the financial challenges faced by everyday consumers, raising pertinent questions about the adequacy of income levels in the face of rising prices.

How does the increased cost of living impact your household budget? Are you making ends meet with the recent price surge more challenging?

Historically, the Federal Reserve responds to mounting inflation by raising interest rates. While this strategy proves effective, it concurrently amplifies the cost of borrowing, potentially slowing economic growth. The ripple effect extends to the stock market, where higher interest rates render bonds more attractive than stocks, influencing investment decisions and market dynamics.

How are you adjusting your investment strategy in response to potential shifts in interest rates? Are higher borrowing costs affecting your financial decisions?

If wages fail to keep pace with inflation, workers’ real purchasing power diminishes, culminating in a decline in the standard of living. This scenario poses challenges for individual households and introduces the specter of social unrest and heightened pressure on employers to reassess wage structures.

Have you noticed a stagnation or decline in your real purchasing power? Are calls for wage increases becoming more pronounced in your workplace or community?

The interplay between businesses passing on higher costs to consumers and anticipating prolonged high inflation can set the stage for a self-sustaining cycle known as ‘sticky’ inflation. If left unchecked, this phenomenon poses a formidable challenge for central banks as breaking the cycle becomes increasingly complex.

Do you perceive a sustained trend of rising prices, and how does this impact your expectations for future economic conditions?

The upward push of inflation can translate into elevated costs for servicing government debt, particularly if it leads to higher interest rates. This potential uptick in government expenditure on debt servicing could exert budgetary pressures, prompting government service cutbacks or tax increases.

Are you concerned about the potential repercussions of increased government debt servicing costs on public services and taxes?

While a 3.2% increase in the CPI may not be deemed excessively high by historical standards, its repercussions resonate significantly throughout, and the role of interest rates cannot be underestimated. Their direct and indirect impact is felt across various sectors and individual lives, shaping the contours of our economic reality.

How confident are you in the economic outlook? Are you adjusting your investment strategy based on expectations of future inflation?

So, are we treading the right path, or do we need to recalibrate our economic strategies?

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 6, 2023

The policies of the Obama and Biden administrations have been frequently compared due to their shared history. As Vice President under Obama and now President through a stolen election, Joe Biden’s policies often seem to mirror his predecessor. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of critical comparisons between the two administrations, specifically regarding border control, economic performance, Middle Eastern policy, relations with Russia, the Department of Justice, and American national pride.

Border Control

Under the Obama administration, there was no border control with an “open border” policy, which let in droves of illegal immigrants across the US-Mexico border—Ditto under the Biden administration.

The Biden administration even went several steps ahead with plans to boost refugee admissions, preserve deportation relief for unauthorized immigrants, and not enforce the “public charge” rule that denies green cards to immigrants who might use public benefits like Medicaid.

Economic Performance

Both the Obama and Biden administrations created a stagnant economy. Period.

Middle Eastern Policy with Terrorist Organizations Under both administrations, Iran’s regime was covertly and overtly empowered. The Obama-era policy of engagement with Iran (the Iran Nuclear Deal or the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) continues under the Biden administration. However, seemingly on paper, Biden recently vowed to “hold Iran accountable” for its alliance with Russia and its support of anti-Israeli militants such as Hamas, creating a mirage of a change in policy direction.

Both administrations failed in their handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with groups like Hamas getting well-funded under their watch.

Relations with Russia and Ukraine Under both the Obama and Biden administrations, Russia has taken aggressive actions, including the annexation of Crimea and the invasion of Ukraine. Both administrations failed to deter Russian aggression adequately. Biden, who was in charge of Ukraine policy under Obama, bears a heavy responsibility for Washington’s inaction and its consequences.

Department of Justice

The Obama and Biden administrations weaponized the Department of Justice (DOJ). They were also guilty of various DOJ actions, such as handling the Fast and Furious operation and issues related to whistleblowers. The DOJ remains a critical institution in upholding the rule of law. The Biden administration has faced its share of dubious decisions about investigations and prosecutions.

American Pride

Finally, both administrations have attacked American pride through various factors, including political, economic, and social dynamics.

Therefore, it is evident that Obama is “still running the show” without any doubt.

The scariest thing is that Biden’s story is being blocked on social media and is nowhere in the NY Times, the L.A. Times, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and CBS, and is minimally covered in the WSJ.

Let us keep in mind that there are not many differences between the D.C. Beltway elitist class politicians of either party.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 5, 2023

“The art of manipulation is only successful when the manipulator remains undetected” ~ Robert Greene

In a world drowning in information, I always find myself at the crossroads of truth and deceit, only hoping to get a front-row seat to a sinister ballet orchestrated by the unseen puppeteers of the deep state. This should not be labeled as the stuff of conspiracy theories. Still, it is a collection of tales spun from the threads of our own experiences, where we understand how deep connections with the media can birth monstrous offspring –fake news, lies, and propaganda.

From the trenches of my insider vantage point, I witness how the web of relationships between the deep state and media personnel paves the way for manufacturing distorted realities. It isn’t just about sowing seeds of disinformation; it is a meticulously crafted symphony conducted by puppet masters interested in manipulating public perception.

Behind the curtains of newsrooms, “deep connections” aren’t mere networking; they are lifelines of influence. Top media personnel become conduits, willingly or unknowingly, for disseminating propaganda. Imagine a world where news isn’t a mirror reflecting reality but a canvas painted with the hues of hidden agendas.

As an unsuspecting and mostly gullible audience, navigating a landscape fraught with half-truths and calculated deception is difficult.

“Repeating a lie a thousand times gives it a veneer of truth” – is a maxim that has become the mantra of every clandestine operation. As the whisper of deception echoes through the corridors of power, it gains strength, morphing into a shrill noise that drowns dissenting voices. How many lies, I wondered, have been thus engraved in the collective consciousness, shielded by the armor of repetition?

The process always begins with creating the lie that suits the narrative of the agenda to be unleashed, which could be a false news story, a misleading statement, or a distorted fact. This lie is then spread through various channels, such as social media, blogs, and traditional media outlets. The more times the lie is repeated, the more likely it is to be believed, especially if it aligns with a person’s pre-existing beliefs or biases.

The lie is often crafted to be as plausible as possible, using techniques such as sensationalism, fear-mongering, and appeals to emotion. It may also be presented as a fact or a widely accepted truth, making it seem more credible. Once the lie has been spread, it is often difficult to disprove, especially if it aligns with a person’s beliefs or biases. This is because people tend to ignore or downplay information that contradicts their beliefs, a phenomenon known as confirmation bias. Ask yourself the question – how did this bias enter into the head in the first place? It is through a long chain of trickery that you become a player.

The news ecosystem, that intricate web connecting publishers, information, and users, becomes the battleground. “Fake news” isn’t just a buzzword but a weapon meticulously wielded to sway public opinion. The manufactured narratives don’t merely stay confined within the traditional news outlets; they permeate every corner of the digital realm, finding refuge in blogs and social media platforms.

But how does this web of deception ensnare the unwitting masses? The answer lies in the interconnectedness of it all. The relationships, the influence, the repetition—it was a carefully orchestrated dance where each step led the audience deeper into the labyrinth of falsehoods. Have you ever questioned the news you consume, wondering if it’s a reflection of reality or a distorted mirage?

The power dynamics at play are both subtle and insidious. The relationships between the deep state and media personnel are the glue that holds this elaborate facade together. But who are these puppet masters, and what is their endgame? The answers may seem elusive, hidden behind secrecy and plausible deniability. But ask yourself, what is it they want? Simply put – they want it all for themselves – a few greedy at the top of the pyramid, with dumbed-down masses at the bottom. You know it all but want to look the other way or are ghastly callous, not thinking of the damage it is already doing to you and future generations.

As I navigate the delicate balance between revealing the truth and protecting my identity, I implore you to question the narratives presented to you. Are you a mere spectator in this dance, or are you an active participant, discerning the moves with a critical eye?

In the end, this isn’t just my story; it’s a cautionary tale for those who dare to peel back the layers of the media landscape. The web of deception is intricately spun, but with awareness and scrutiny, we can unravel its threads and reclaim the narrative that is rightfully ours.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 3, 2023

I urge the Governor of New York,  Kathy Hochul, to take action to address this issue of rampant shoplifting and organized theft. I have heard the governor vetoed a proposed bill to establish a task force to combat organized theft. This decision has left the Retail Council of New York State, which represents retailers in the state, thoroughly disappointed.

The New York Police Department reported that 327 individuals were responsible for over a third of the retail thefts in 2022. These individuals were arrested a total of 6,000 times! What does this mean? They are arrested after the crime and then let off so they can return to their merry ways again! Isn’t it pedestrian common sense to ensure that repeat criminals are held accountable?

The National Retail Federation also reported national shrinkage losses of $112 billion in 2022, indicating a widespread problem across the retail industry.

Retailers are now taking preventative measures to combat this issue. For example, Dollar Tree has said it plans to remove goods from its stores like men’s underwear, an item most prone to retail theft. Retailers are also ramping up prevention methods, with 34% of respondents increasing internal payroll to support risks related to retail crime and 46% increasing the use of third-party security personnel, among other methods.

Since there is no other go, I suggest that they also take these measures to prevent shoplifting and organized theft:

Surveillance and Security Measures: Increase their surveillance capabilities to monitor their stores and deter shoplifters. This includes installing security cameras throughout the store and parking lot to detect and prevent criminal activity. They should also consider using electronic locks and other technologies to secure their stores.

Inventory Management: Retailers need to optimize their inventory management to identify discrepancies that may indicate high-theft items. This involves completing frequent physical counts to verify the information.

Policy Collaboration: Retailers also need to extensively collaborate with policing and government bodies to tackle the rise in shoplifting. This should include sharing intelligence with policing, understanding the tactics used by organized retail crime gangs, and identifying more offenders.

Customer Engagement: This is a must. Increase the visibility of high-theft items and acknowledge all customers to deter potential theft. It is better to create a single entry point and exit for the self-check area and staff it with a customer service monitor to enhance transaction monitoring.

Technological Solutions: The cost will be ultimately justified, so the retailers need to start using digital signage to display real-time video of customers as they shop, acting as a deterrent. They should also consider using cloud-based digital signage to mount small profile Smart TV screens adjacent to high ticket items and electronics.

Staffing and Training: This is the core of all preventive measures. Staff self-checkout areas with customer service monitors to indicate to potential thieves that they are being watched. Train your employees to handle self-checkout areas and monitor transactions.

One might also consider using low-tech measures, such as public-facing video monitors, giving front-end staff walkie-talkies, and installing a mirror on the kiosk to curb shoplifting at self-checkout lanes. Rather than stand-alone, this would help to complement more expensive high-tech ones to reduce inventory losses. Resource-rich companies like Walmart already use AI-powered cameras to recognize items and human behavior. The system alerts nearby employees of accidentally missed or intentionally skipped merchandise scans.

Given the apathy of our lawmakers, retailers should go for a multi-faceted approach to tackle the rise in shoplifting and organized theft. No single measure can eliminate theft; only a combination of strategies can effectively deter potential thieves.

The overall results might be somewhat mixed, but taking measures to safeguard your business is better than doing nothing and letting your stores get looted in broad daylight.

However, I understand that the effectiveness of these measures can vary depending on the specific context and implementation. Therefore, it should be the number one priority for the voters to urge the governor to take immediate action!

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

November 17, 2023

The issue of voter fraud and election integrity dominated much of Trump’s presidency, with many of his supporters raising concerns about the credibility of the electoral system. Well, voter fraud appears to have metastasized and is now out of control.   We saw that in Arizona’s gubernatorial race, and we see it all across America.

In recent years, concerns about voter fraud have grown significantly, with many individuals asserting that there are systemic issues within the American electoral system.

One striking example cited by those raising concerns about voter fraud is the Kentucky gubernatorial election, which looked like a close race, with the Democratic nominee, Andy Beshear, defeating Republican incumbent Matt Bevin by just over 5,000 votes, or 0.37%. This made it the closest gubernatorial election in Kentucky since 1899 by votes and the closest ever by percentage.

The discrepancy in the voting patterns in this election raises eyebrows and sparks suspicions among those alleging voter fraud. While Kentucky Republicans voted overwhelmingly for their party’s candidates for other statewide offices, such as Attorney General and Secretary of State, they simultaneously chose a Democrat for the governor’s position. This divergent behavior among voters, especially within the same party, can appear perplexing and contradictory.

The core argument here is that when voters consistently support one political party across multiple offices, they are expected to do the same for the gubernatorial race. However, the outcome of the Kentucky gubernatorial election needed to align with this pattern, raising concerns about the integrity of the voting process. Such inconsistencies in voting behavior could indicate manipulation or irregularities in the election system, as it is unusual for voters to exhibit such discrepancies in their choices.

The assertion that elections are rigged is rooted in a belief that nefarious forces may be at play and that a coordinated effort could be behind the inconsistent voting outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to consider the possibility that allegations of rigged elections could have a basis in reality, thus warranting a thorough investigation.

The close relationships between prominent politicians, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat parties in Kentucky suggest a hidden agenda. Even if we take it for granted that political alliances are common in politics, it is not unreasonable to wonder if such connections could influence election outcomes. A closer look at these alliances and their impact on elections is justified.

This alignment or collaboration between high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat Parties suggests that they might be working together with shared interests rather than representing distinct political ideologies. The “hidden agenda” here is that these politicians, despite belonging to different parties, are collaborating behind the scenes to achieve specific goals.

Claims of suspect voting machine issues in Kentucky are not new. They have persisted for years, fueling suspicions that the electoral system may be compromised. The essence of these suspicions lies in the potential vulnerabilities or issues related to the use of voting machines and how they can be rigged to favor “certain results.” Therefore, we need to assert more that there is this need for comprehensive scrutiny and an impartial investigation to determine the integrity of the voting process. The concern here is that if these machines can be rigged, they are turning the “accuracy and fairness of elections” into a farce drama.

The practice of split-ticket voting, where individuals choose candidates from different parties for different offices, may be more complex than it seems. Moreover, the nature of these splits, where voters make different choices for various offices, is a sign of manipulation within the electoral process and doesn’t reflect the diverse political opinions of the electorate. The varying outcomes in other races may be more indicative of foul play than genuine voter choices.

The Heritage Foundation has posted a long list of election fraud cases in the US.

Allegations of systemic voter fraud in America, exemplified by cases such as the Kentucky elections, deserve serious consideration. While some may dismiss these concerns, it is essential to recognize that the electoral system’s rectitude is paramount. Investigating these claims and addressing potential issues will help safeguard the democratic process and ensure the public’s trust in elections remains intact. By taking these concerns seriously, we can work to protect the sanctity of our democratic institutions.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

November 11, 2023

“There are a host of heroes to whom this country owes a debt it can never repay. Allen Clark lost both his legs while serving his country in Vietnam. When he came home, his body was broken, but his spirit never faltered. He went back to school. He earned his master’s degree in business administration. He served his state in a high government post and is now a successful businessman. He’s an inspiration to all who know him.”  —President Ronald Reagan

It is a distinct honor to recognize my dear friend, a West Point graduate who received a Silver Star for Gallantry and heroism in Action, a Purple Heart for his wounds, an Air Medal, and a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, the Honorable Captain  Allen Clark.

His service as a Special Forces officer in the heart of Vietnam marked the beginning of an intense transformation. Allen served as a U.S. Army Special Forces captain in Vietnam when he was wounded. He lost both his legs to a mortar shell. On his encampment, he exhibited incredible bravery, even as he endured severe injuries and the loss of friends and fellow officers. His life was saved by the heroic actions of a young medic, and from that moment on, Allen’s path took an unexpected turn.

Allen authored several books, an autobiography, Wounded Soldier, Healing Warrior, “Foreword by Ross Perot. Valor in Vietnam, “Foreword by LTG Dave Palmer, former Superintendent U.S. Military Academy at West Point.” Soldiers, Blood and Bloodied Money Wars, and the Ruling Elites, Foreword by LTC Allen West. Chronicles of Honor, Courage, and Sacrifice (http://www.valorinvietnam.com, (http://www.woundedsoldierhealingwarrior.com)

“Allen’s passionate commitment to public service and to helping veterans began with an appointment in 1979 as the Special Assistant for Administration to Texas Governor William P. Clements, Jr.  In 1981, Allen was President Ronald Reagan’s selection to be Deputy Administrator for the Veterans Administration (now the Department of Veterans Affairs).  However, he chose to remain in Texas, where in 1982, he received the Texas Republican Party’s nomination to run for State Treasurer in a race that former Texas State Governor Ann Richards won.  In 1989, he was nominated by President George H.W. Bush and confirmed by the U.S. Senate as Assistant Secretary for Veterans Liaison and Program Coordination at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.  In 1991, he received his second VA confirmation as Director of the National Cemetery System. He served until the end of the President George H. W. Bush administration.”

In a distant time and a distant land, a war was fought that forever altered the course of many lives. Allen’s story, both then and now, is about duty, honor, integrity, and love of country. It is also a story of valor, endurance, and faith. Allen has faced immense challenges and overcome them with unwavering determination, and his journey from wounded soldier to healing warrior is nothing short of inspiring.  Allen often speaks of his profound faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.

Multiple surgeries and months of physical and psychological therapy followed, and he found himself grappling with the profound emotional depths of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. But he didn’t give up. He persevered through these challenging times, seeking healing and recovery with unyielding resolve.

His journey from a healthy, self-assured officer to a man with a broken body is a testament to his strength and resilience. He faced worries about whether he would ever walk again and confronted the consequences of the choices he made to serve his country in Vietnam.

Despite the adversity Allen faced, he discovered a deeper well of strength and courage within himself, and he found a new purpose in life. He achieved success in both the realms of public service and business, earning the admiration and respect of internationally respected political, business, and journalistic leaders.

Allen founded his lay ministry Combat Faith, where he visited Warrior Transition Battalions at all the major Army bases. He shares his healing story and mentors individual veterans and active military members. His own healing process is a testament to his enduring commitment to those who serve. Allen’s ministry offers hope and guidance to those struggling with the scars of war, giving them the tools to find peace and personal victory.

Allen is a devout Christian and a staunch follower of Lord Jesus Christ. Allen often speaks about the importance of traditional values in America, which resonates with many Americans who value these principles as essential to the nation’s moral fabric.

Allen shares his insights through his books, offering guidance and support to others who face extraordinary life challenges. Through his experience, he has developed a unique perspective on addressing unhealed hurts, unmet needs, and unresolved issues. His approach is a beacon of hope for those who carry the weight of past traumas and seek a path toward healing.

His book, “Wounded Soldier, Healing Warrior,” is a tribute to his remarkable journey, inspiring and guiding others on their recovery paths. Allen’s public speaking and sharing his story of victory over adversity has touched the hearts of countless audiences.

Allen’s dedication to helping veterans and his unwavering support for those who have served their country is truly commendable. His beautiful wife, Linda, is a living example of the resilience of the human spirit and the ability to overcome even the most challenging obstacles.

While we honor him, let us thank him for his service, sacrifices, and commitment to making his beloved America and the world a better place for all. He is a hero in every sense of the word, and his legacy will continue to inspire future generations. I am honored to call him my friend.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

November 6, 2023

Election fraud is making headlines in three Democratic states – Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. In Connecticut, the situation took a dramatic turn as allegations of fraud led to a court-ordered new primary election. Bridgeport Superior Court Judge William Clark decided to overturn the results of a Democratic mayoral primary due to claims of absentee ballot abuse. What prompted this decision? Well, it all began when a video surfaced online, seemingly showing a supporter of the incumbent Democrat Mayor Joe Ganim, stuffing stacks of papers into a ballot drop box.

Meanwhile, over in Massachusetts, a Democratic mayoral candidate is facing accusations of bribing residents to vote. City officials in Springfield claim they witnessed voters being brought to City Hall for early voting, with some expecting cash in return for voting for Democratic candidate Justin Hurst.

New Jersey has its share of election fraud cases as well. State Attorney General Matthew Platkin’s office announced state election fraud charges related to mail-in ballots and voter registrations in the 2020 and 2021 elections. Paterson City Council President Alex Mendez (D) faces additional charges in a 2020 election fraud case. Allegations suggest that Mendez’s campaign collected unsealed ballots, inspected them to determine if they were cast for him, and replaced those that weren’t. These replacement ballots allegedly came from voters’ mailboxes, painting a concerning picture of voter manipulation.

Mendez’s response to the charges has been one of defense, claiming that the accusations are unjust and only brought because previous charges weren’t progressing as expected.

Another Democratic candidate in New Jersey and a former candidate for Plainfield mayor in 2021, Dr. Henrilynn Ibezim, found himself charged with “election fraud and other crimes.” According to the state’s Attorney General, Ibezim instructed his associates to complete blank voter registration applications and deliver nearly 1,000 of them to a post office.

Dr. Henrilynn Ibezim has been charged with several crimes related to election fraud. These include:

• Election fraud is a second-degree crime.
• Criminal attempt to commit false registration or transfer, a third-degree crime.
• Tampering with public records is a third-degree crime.
• Forgery is a third-degree crime.
• Hindering apprehension or prosecution, a third-degree crime.
• Falsifying or tampering with records is a fourth-degree crime.

These charges stem from an Office of Public Integrity and Accountability’s (OPIA) Corruption Bureau investigation. Ibezim allegedly directed associates and campaign volunteers to complete blank voter registration applications based on forms with voter information he provided to the group. He then allegedly brought a large white garbage bag filled with nearly 1,000 of these fake voter registration applications to the post office to mail to the Union County Commissioner of Registration.

The investigation into Dr. Henrilynn Ibezim’s alleged election fraud and other related crimes fits into the larger context of election fraud in New Jersey in several ways:

• The election fraud cases in New Jersey, including those involving mail-in voting, are relatively rare and often easy to detect. This is demonstrated by the fact that the Paterson scandal, which involved allegations of mail-in voting fraud, was not the norm but rather an exception.
• The investigation into Ibezim’s alleged crimes is part of a broader effort to uphold the integrity of the democratic process in New Jersey. The Attorney General’s office has proactively addressed these allegations, as seen in the case of Alex Mendez and other politicians.
• The allegations of election fraud in New Jersey have been a topic of national discussion, with President Donald Trump using the Paterson scandal to argue against mail-in voting. This has highlighted the importance of maintaining the integrity of the voting process.
• The election fraud cases in New Jersey, including those involving mail-in voting, have shown that even when such incidents occur, they are typically easy to detect and prosecute. This suggests that while the threat of election fraud exists, the safeguards in place to prevent it are effective.
• The allegations of election fraud in New Jersey have also highlighted the importance of voter registration and the process of voting. In the case of Ibezim, the alleged crime involved submitting voter registration applications for people who were not eligible to vote.

The incident involving absentee ballot abuse in Connecticut is an unusual case specific to Bridgeport, a working-class city known for its history of voting irregularities. This activity is often called “ballot harvesting,” where campaign workers or volunteers visit potential voters, encourage them to fill out absentee ballots, and then collect and submit them on their behalf. However, this kind of collection effort is banned in Connecticut, raising concerns about the integrity of the election process.

To provide some context, these election-related criminal cases aren’t isolated incidents. There have been at least three such cases nationwide, with two involving this year’s elections and two related to prior elections. As for the future, a new primary date is yet to be set in Connecticut. Judge Clark has given lawyers a 10-day window to work with city and state election officials to determine a potential date for the new election.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

November 3, 2023

“No bank was affected. No bank was hurt” ~ Donald J Trump.

New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Trump, his sons, and Trump Organization executives of engaging in a decade-long scheme to defraud lenders by inflating Trump’s net worth. However, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that these charges are baseless and appear politically motivated. Let us explore key reasons why these allegations lack substance and highlight the potential for their use as a tool to smear Trump’s reputation.

One of the central allegations in this trial is that Trump and his associates used “false and misleading” financial statements to secure more favorable loan terms. However, it is crucial to distinguish between aggressive business practices and fraudulent intent. Trump’s alleged inflated valuations of assets can be attributed to his shrewd business acumen. Real estate values often vary and are subject to interpretation, making differing valuations familiar in the industry. The prosecution must demonstrate that Trump and his associates deliberately misled lenders and not simply that they had different assessments of asset values.

It is essential to emphasize that the charges against Trump and The Trump Organization are civil, not criminal. In a civil trial, the burden of proof is considerably lower than in a criminal case. The prosecution merely needs to show that specific actions occurred and that they were fraudulent without having to prove malicious intent. This lower standard for evidence makes it easier for allegations to be brought forward but does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing.

It is challenging to overlook the political context of these charges. Attorney General Letitia James campaigned on a “get Trump” platform, openly expressing her intentions to target the former president.

Accusations against a former president should be grounded in solid evidence and not serve to settle political scores.

However, it is heartening to note that, led by the experienced tax attorney Sheri Dillon, this legal team has been vigorously challenging the charges, relentlessly emphasizing contradictions in key witness Michael Cohen’s testimony and pushing for a verdict to end the case. So far. The defense team has been excellently fighting these allegations despite the challenges they face and the controversy surrounding Judge Arthur Engoron’s decision to deny the request for dismissal.

Cohen’s testimony, where he claimed to have manipulated the values of Trump’s real estate properties to match what Trump told him, has been a critical point of contention. The defense team has astutely highlighted the inconsistencies in Cohen’s statements, raising questions about the reliability of his testimony. These contradictions cast doubt on the credibility of a pivotal witness and underscore the importance of a thorough and unbiased examination of the evidence.

The defense team’s request for a verdict to “end this case once and for all” reflects their determination to expedite the trial and resolve it. This strategy aims to minimize the prolonged legal battle, which can be financially and emotionally draining. It also signals their confidence in dismantling the allegations and lack of concrete evidence against Trump and his organization.

Judge Arthur Engoron’s decision to deny the request for dismissal has drawn criticism from Trump’s defense team. They argue that the judge’s decision suggests bias against Trump.

The real impact of this trial is on the Democrat Party. Continuing to pursue these allegations, they are only digging deeper into their corruption and hypocrisy.

From the Mueller investigation to multiple impeachment trials and the constant scrutiny of Trump’s actions, these ongoing legal battles and quests against Donald Trump have become emblematic of the unyielding focus on the actual president by his political adversaries.

The American people have witnessed an unending series of investigations and trials against Donald Trump and have grown weary of the relentless political battles. They see this trial as another politically motivated attack on a popular president among a substantial segment of the electorate. They see this only as an extension of the broader “deep state” conspiracy, which asserts that powerful forces are working against Trump.

The history of American politics reveals that adversarial attacks against a political figure can often galvanize their supporters. In the case of Donald Trump, the civil fraud trial may further cement the loyalty of his base. His ability to withstand several investigations and problems during his presidency has made many perceive him as a resilient and unwavering leader.

At a time when the world is in torment and uncertain, the American people—true to the values that have always been at the core of America’s identity—firmly put their faith in President Trump.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

October 29, 2023

I have always been an ardent believer in democracy–The dictionary defines democracy as the rule of the people. Even at its best, “democracy is the worst form of government except for all the rest,” according to Winston Churchill. Is democracy a terrible form of government? Does it hold the threat of destroying humanity’s most precious right – liberty?

In the so-called democratic societies, a semblance of democracy hobbles along with fits and starts, always on the verge of complete subversion and collapse. For instance, Western democracies are representative democracies where ordinary citizens do not rule. A representative democracy is, in effect, a plutocracy where money, people, and powerful interest groups lead.

The society’s rulers form a pyramid. At the base of the pyramid, we have the closest thing to democracy. The individual citizen has some sway over the locally elected officials such as the sheriff, the mayor, the city councilman, and the like. As we go up the pyramid, the voice of the individual citizen diminishes while the influence of money and power groups expands. It is a fact that, without funds, one cannot even run for the city’s animal control officer. At the very least, the aspiring candidate needs money for posters or handbills to make himself known to the electorate and argue why they should elect him, not his opponent.

The point is that it takes enormous amounts of money to become a part of the pyramid. And not everyone is a billionaire with a bottomless pocket and the willingness to tap it. Bottom line: If you aspire to become a part of the ruling pyramid, you require funds commensurate with the position you seek.

The US Constitution does not use the term “democracy. The United States is a representative republic. A republic if we can keep it, said Benjamin Franklin. It is a republic in which the people do not openly elect the president.

But as the recent events unfolded, I couldn’t help but feel like the system I had once held in such high regard was crumbling around me. The naked truth is that many politicians are paid agents, dancing to the tune of lobbyists and special interest groups. It is a harsh realization, and I am disillusioned and annoyed.

Democracy is the guardian of liberty. Embedded in a democracy are provisions that can make it implode from within. Democracy also has its guardian: A resolutely vigilant, proactive, and ethical citizenry.

Money’s influence in politics was deeply entrenched, and it would take years of continued effort to root out corruption and restore our democracy to its proper form.

Reflecting on my journey, I realized that being an ordinary citizen did not mean I was powerless. I learned that I could make a difference by shining a light on the dark corners of our political landscape and supporting those willing to stand up for the people.

Ultimately, the naked truth was that our democracy was a fragile and imperfect system, but it was also a resilient one. It could withstand the onslaught of corruption and greed if enough of us were willing to fight for it. I hoped that others would join the cause and that more ordinary citizens would rise and hold their representatives accountable.

So, I leave you with a call to action. If you, like me, are disillusioned with the state of our democracy, don’t despair. Get involved in politics, demand transparency, and hold your representatives accountable. The power to shape our nation’s future lies in the people’s hands, and it’s time we took it back from the puppeteers of democracy.

What can be done? Is there a way of resisting and reversing the imminent assault on our most cherished right of liberty? Here are some suggestions.

• Become an active worker of liberty instead of passive, non-caring devil-may-care nihilists.
• Use the political process, while it is still responsive to the demands and wishes of freedom-loving people, by supporting laws that guard freedom and reject those that infringe on liberty.
• Actively support political candidates who are deeply committed to the tenets of freedom.
• Run for office, any office. Please encourage your friends and other liberty advocates to pitch in and help in any way they can.
• Hold to account those politicians who sell themselves to lobbyists and special interest groups.
• Be an active educator by informing others about the creeping danger of Marxism.
• Resist any and all WOKE philosophy in schools and the workplace.
• Contribute money, small or large amounts, to causes and individuals who are fighting to preserve liberty. As the old saying goes, freedom is not free.

In short, liberty is our most prized possession, and democracy is the shield that protects it. Yet, this shield of democracy is vulnerable and needs to be repaired and strengthened regularly. I am calling on you, the individual freedom-loving person, to play your part in the defense of freedom, not only for your own sake but also for mine and all others who cherish this precious blessing of life and generations to come.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

October 27, 2023

Congratulations to Rep Mike Johnson. He will be a great “SPEAKER.” MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! ~ Donald J Trump

Representative Mike Johnson of Louisiana, a staunch conservative figure in American politics, was elected as the 56th Speaker of the House on October 25, 2023, following the ouster of Kevin McCarthy from the speakership. He is the first speaker to have been elected from Louisiana and the shortest-tenured representative to be elected Speaker since John G. Carlisle in 1883. He has demonstrated his conservatism through his voting record, earning a lifetime rating of 92% from the American Conservative Union and 90% from Heritage Action.

Johnson is an ally of the House Freedom Caucus, known for its conservative views. Representative Andy Biggs proposed Johnson as a possible compromise candidate for Speaker of the House after members of the House Freedom Caucus opposed McCarthy’s bid for the speakership. He is also closely associated with Jim Jordan, a prominent figure in the Freedom Caucus.

Rep. Mike Johnson’s support for former President Donald Trump was unwavering, particularly during the impeachment trials. During both impeachment trials, Johnson served on Trump’s legal defense team, faithfully defending the actions of the former president. This move demonstrated Johnson’s alignment with Trump’s policies and America First and Make America Great Again (MAGA) ideologies, further cementing his standing as a Trump ally.

Trump lent support to Johnson in the speaker’s race, highlighting Johnson’s strong ties to the former president.

Regarding funding, Johnson’s campaign contributions predominantly come from grassroots supporters in his district. This is markedly different from many other politicians who rely on large donations from K Street, the hub of lobbying in Washington, D.C. Johnson’s grassroots funding is a testament to his connection with his constituents and his commitment to representing their interests.

Johnson’s election as Speaker of the House has caused quite a stir in Washington D.C., notably among lobbyists on K Street. His conservative solid stance and alignment with Trump’s policies have created a sense of unease among those who oppose these ideologies. This reaction clearly indicates the significant impact Johnson’s election is expected to have on the political landscape.

Johnson has a notable voting record against all Ukraine spending after the initial bill. He supports ending American military aid to Ukraine in its war with Russia. This stance has earned him an F rating from ‘Republicans for Ukraine.’

In terms of the 2020 election, Johnson was among 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the election results, a clear objection to certifying them and declaring it as an election fraud.

Johnson has also shown his willingness to challenge the political establishment. For instance, he called for the arrest of Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House at the time, after she tore up the State of the Union.

Rep. Mike Johnson’s unyielding support for Trump, his grassroots funding, and the ripple effects of his election as Speaker of the House underscores his significant role in current American politics. His actions and policies have shown that he is a firm conservative, committed to upholding the principles he believes in.

Indeed, Representative Mike Johnson is a figure who embodies the values of America First. His conservative voting record, legal defense of Trump, objection to Ukraine spending, and willingness to challenge the political establishment make him a prominent figure in the push to “take back OUR HOUSE.”

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

October 20, 2023

My message to you is unmistakable: Wake up, America! ~ Michael T. Flynn

General Michael Flynn, a distinguished retired three-star general with over three decades of military service, is a celebrated hero among patriotic Americans. His outstanding service to the nation, military expertise, and staunch advocacy for conservative values have earned him a revered place in the hearts of many who appreciate his dedication to America.

General Flynn’s distinguished military career spans over thirty years, and his devotion to the country is unquestionable—his long-standing service in the U.S. military sparks patriotism and selflessness. Flynn has not only served but also spoken out about threats to national security, which shows his concern for the country’s safety.

His military expertise includes the development of counterinsurgency strategies, which played a crucial role in countering insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan. These strategies saved American lives and enhanced national security. Flynn’s dedication to the military and their sacrifices for the country highlight the selfless service of our armed forces.

In response to a recent interview with Dave from X22, Flynn reasserts a critical point regarding the role of the U.S. military. He underscores that the military cannot act independently, as might be seen in a banana republic; instead, it must operate within the framework of the Constitution and follow the orders of the duly elected leadership. This statement aims to clarify any misconceptions or unrealistic expectations that may have arisen among Q and Anon followers. Many Americans have often seen General Flynn as a victim of persecution by the “deep state” and media bias. He has become a symbol of resistance to the corrupt “Deep State” and elites. Flynn has been vocal about his belief that the 2020 election was stolen and that Trump’s political enemies unfairly targeted him. He has also been a strong advocate for election audits and recounts, which many conservative Americans see as necessary to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.

While expressing his belief that a fair election did not occur, General Flynn acknowledges that the current occupant of the White House is there due to a constitutional process. This recognition underscores his commitment to the democratic principles that underpin the American political system.

Flynn’s vocal support for former President Donald Trump and his policies has endeared him to Trump’s supporters. Even after his presidency ended, his loyalty to Trump reinforced his status as a hero among these Americans.

General Flynn was unfairly targeted for his beliefs and actions. He believes in standing up for what he sees as just and proper. Flynn’s leadership inspires others to take action, challenge the status quo, and speak truth to power. He is seen as a role model for soldiers and former soldiers who share his values. He consistently emphasizes the need for justice to triumph over corruption and abuse. This message aligns with Americans who hold these tenets. Flynn has spoken out against abuse and fraud, emphasizing the importance of fairness and honesty in American society.

General Flynn’s efforts to energize local conservative activists resonate with those who value the influence of Christian beliefs in the public square. General Flynn recently released a statement expressing his views on the Q and Anon conspiracy theory. In his statement, General Flynn referred to Q Anon as a “major psyop” or psychological operation. He believed this conspiracy theory has created a passive attitude among its followers, who eagerly await unspecified events rather than taking concrete local actions. Flynn did not hold back in labeling the notion that Trump is still the president and that the military will come to the rescue as “nonsense.” Despite his criticism of the current state of affairs, General Flynn encourages people not to give up hope. He urges individuals to seek “silver linings” even in challenging times. Flynn expresses his appreciation for his support and calls for continued support from his followers, emphasizing the importance of staying engaged and not succumbing to disillusionment.

General Michael Flynn: “We have an army of digital soldiers and citizen journalists to combat an insurgency of irregular warfare run by the media who’ve done themselves a disservice more than the country by displaying an unprecedented arrogance, forcing the American people to decide to take over the idea of information through the likes of social media.”

In the eyes of many patriotic Americans, General Michael Flynn embodies the values of service, integrity, and justice. Flynn positions himself as a defender of the American people against what he perceives as a corrupt “deep state.” This stance solidifies his status as a hero and resonates with patriotic Americans suspicious of elite institutions and their influence on politics.

Flynn’s journey from a decorated military career to a prominent advocate for election integrity and traditional standards showcases his dedication to preserving the ideals upon which the nation was founded. General Flynn’s resolute commitment to America inspires many who share his viewpoints in an era of division and uncertainty.

In short, General Flynn’s courageous stance for America is commendable. His dedication to this land while holding the best interests of the United States is extraordinary. His support for our military and veterans is praiseworthy. His love for our country, America, is unparalleled. His vision and leadership have inspired millions of Americans who share his passion for restoring our nation’s greatness, and Americans are immensely grateful for his service to his country. Let us honor him.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

October 16, 2023

In response to the audacious assault by Hamas, Israel acted swiftly to address the situation and protect its citizens. The immediate response included a series of airstrikes on the Gaza Strip to target Hamas militants and infrastructure while minimizing harm to Palestinian civilians. These airstrikes were a defensive measure to neutralize the threat posed by Hamas and underscored Israel’s commitment to protecting its citizens.

However, conducting military operations in densely populated areas posed a complex challenge – the risk of collateral damage was high. This presented a delicate balance for Israel, where the need for self-defense had to be reconciled with the obligation to minimize civilian harm.

Recognizing the situation’s urgency, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) established a situation room. This dedicated command center was crucial in facilitating communication, intelligence gathering, and decision-making. It demonstrated Israel’s commitment to securing the release of its citizens and ensuring their safety. The situation room reflected the importance of real-time information and communication in responding to crises, enabling Israel to assess the situation, formulate strategies, and negotiate if necessary.

The capture of Israeli civilians and soldiers, including festival goers, children, women, the elderly, and people with disabilities, raised grave concerns and heightened the urgency of securing their release. Hamas’s claim of capturing senior Israeli officers, including Maj Gen Nimrod Aloni, added complexity to the situation. The hostages’ safety and well-being were paramount, making their release a top priority for Israel. The nation grappled with the emotional toll and the challenging decisions it might face in negotiating for its freedom.

The scale and precision of the Hamas attack led to questions about a potential intelligence failure within Israel. The surprise assault caught the nation off-guard, revealing vulnerabilities in their intelligence and security apparatus. This event prompted introspection and a reassessment of Israel’s preparedness. Experts and analysts were puzzled by the audacious attack, leading to debates about Israeli intelligence and security.

Hamas’s attack, encompassing land, sea, and air operations, demonstrated a level of sophistication and coordination not seen before. The attackers managed to breach Israel’s defenses on multiple fronts, catching the nation off-guard. This audacious maneuver involved a surprise assault that overwhelmed Israel’s security measures, raising questions about the effectiveness of their intelligence apparatus.

One of the most alarming aspects of the attack was the bulldozer incident at the Gaza border. Hamas exploited a vulnerability in Israel’s defenses when a bulldozer was used to breach the border fence, allowing many fighters to infiltrate Israel. The timing of the attack, strategically launched during a Jewish holiday when many military personnel were off duty, further exposed Israel’s vulnerabilities. The element of surprise was a key factor in Hamas’s success, revealing a lapse in Israel’s ability to anticipate and prevent such a large-scale operation.

Moreover, reports suggested that Israel’s highly regarded Iron Dome missile defense system was not operational when the Hamas rocket barrage began. If these reports were accurate, it would signify a significant lapse in Israel’s defense infrastructure.

In the wake of this attack, Israeli authorities and security experts initiated a process of introspection and reassessment of their nation’s preparedness. The Israeli government faced the challenge of addressing immediate security concerns while shoring up its intelligence and defense capabilities to prevent future surprises. Israel needed to learn from this event, identify gaps in their intelligence network, and take corrective measures to enhance national security.

The Hamas attack and the potential intelligence failure had broader implications for regional stability. The security of the Middle East was a matter of global concern, and Israel’s ability to defend itself against threats was pivotal to the region’s stability.

Hamas, a Palestinian militant organization, had a well-documented history of using extreme violence against Israeli civilians as a means to achieve its objectives. This history included suicide bombings, rocket attacks, and other acts of terror, earning the group a designation as a terrorist organization by several countries and international bodies.

The scale and precision of the recent attack indicated a level of planning and coordination that went beyond a simple act of retaliation. This operation involved land, sea, and air operations, revealing a high degree of sophistication in its execution. The timing of the attack during a Jewish holiday, when many Israelis were off guard and military personnel were on leave, suggesting a level of strategic planning to maximize the element of surprise.

While the immediate goal may have been to inflict damage and capture hostages, the broader aim might be to shift the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Furthermore, this incident served as a reminder of the dynamic and evolving nature of conflicts in the Middle East, emphasizing the importance of continuous adaptation and readiness in the face of emerging threats.

The audacity of this attack stunned Israel and garnered international attention, leading to an escalation of hostilities, with Israel launching airstrikes on Gaza in response. The situation remained highly volatile, with the potential for further violence and instability in the region.

The international community closely watched these developments, with leaders from various countries condemning Hamas’s actions and expressing concern for the safety of Israeli civilians. They emphasized the need to de-escalate the conflict and find a path towards a peaceful resolution. Truth be told, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not about land and will not be solved by the two-state solution. It is and has always been about pushing the Jews into the sea. The Hamas attack only underscores the urgency of addressing this reality.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

October 14, 2023

The latest announcement from Steve Scalise has opened up the way for Jim Jordan. This decision that he has withdrawn from the race for the House Presidency was announced during a Republican conference meeting on Thursday night. Scalise had previously clinched the nomination for the post after narrowly beating Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, following a vote by the Republican conference on Wednesday.

The race for the next Speaker of the House had been underway following the unanticipated removal of Kevin McCarthy. Two candidates had emerged as frontrunners: Steve Scalise and Jim Jordan. While Scalise had secured the initial nomination in a secret ballot, it did not guarantee his ascension to the Speaker’s chair. He had to garner still sufficient support to win a total chamber vote.

Moreover, Scalise’s victory in the closed-door session, with a vote tally of 113-99, has sparked outrage among many conservatives. Much like McCarthy, some members see Scalise as a part of the “uniparty” establishment, a continuation of the status quo. This led many conservatives to rally behind Jim Jordan, a figure they see as representing their values and ideals.

Jim Jordan is not just another politician but a beacon of hope for conservatives. His candidacy is supported by none other than former President Donald Trump, a fact that bolsters his appeal among hardcore conservatives. Yet, despite this endorsement, the final decision rests in the hands of the House of Representatives members.

Interestingly, Jim Jordan had offered to nominate Steve Scalise for speaker on the House floor, which speaks volumes about his dedication to party unity. Despite narrowly losing the nomination, Jordan reminded his colleagues that the ultimate goal is to secure at least 217 votes on the floor, which is needed to officially elect the Speaker of the House. However, this was far from an endorsement of Scalise.

The reasons provided by Scalise were “the deep divisions within the Republican Party” and, therefore, “the inability to secure the necessary votes.” Despite being formally nominated by the House Republican conference, Scalise felt that the meeting still had not come together and was not united.

Moreover, concerns were raised over Scalise’s health, as he is battling blood cancer. While this was not the main reason for his withdrawal, it did add to the uncertainty surrounding his bid for speaker.

All the while, Jordan’s emphasis was not on ‘personal victory’ but on ensuring that the party presented a united front. This was evident in his decision to offer Scalise his support and attempt to persuade his colleagues to do the same. However, the deep fractures within the House Republican conference made it difficult for Scalise to secure the necessary votes to win the gavel.

Many had vehemently argued that such a process as a secret ballot conducted in Congress lacked transparency. In retort, Scalise accused conservative holdouts in the speaker’s race of having their own “agenda” and stated that he believed they needed to put their agendas aside and focus on what the country needed. Indeed, it was the belief of many conservatives that all votes put forth in the name of constituents should be transparent, allowing those constituents to monitor the actions of their representatives.

The GOP Congress’s decision to go behind closed doors and choose Scalise over Jordan has been seen as yet another instance of the party disregarding the desires of its voters. Despite the overwhelming support for Jordan among Republican voters, the party opted for Scalise, a decision met with widespread disappointment and frustration.

In a political landscape where big money donors and lobbyists often dictate the course of action, it is no surprise that they favor Scalise for Speaker. This influence is often seen in campaign finance, where wealthy donors can pour unlimited amounts of money into campaigns through Super PACs, drowning out the voices of ordinary Americans. However, it is the voters who want Jordan as Speaker, a sentiment that appears to be largely ignored by the Republican Congress.

The actions of our elected representatives have made it clear that they are not working for us; they are working for themselves. This is a wake-up call for us to hold them accountable and demand that they act in the best interest of our republic and not just their own.

To this effect, the Republican Accountability Project has launched an initiative to hold Republican members of Congress accountable for their votes, including by helping credible primary challengers against them. While it may be challenging to reduce the influence of big money donors and lobbyists on American politics, there are efforts to limit campaign finance, increase transparency, and enforce fair and effective election laws.

So, despite Jordan’s efforts to rally support for Scalise, it was clear that the race for the Speaker position was far from over. Some members of the House, including several of Jordan’s supporters, have indicated that they will still be voting for Jordan. This suggests that while Jordan may prioritize party unity, his supporters still see him as the best candidate for the Speaker position.

It is now clear where the hearts of true conservatives lie. They lie with Jim Jordan, a man they perceive as representing their values and ideals. Their support for Jordan is his political stance and their desire for transparency, accountability, and a government that genuinely represents the people it serves. As the final decision looms, one thing is sure: the voice of the people and true conservatives demands to be heard.

As the latest development of Scalise dropping out of the Speaker’s race unfolds, Jordan should have a clear path to victory, that is, if Republicans can come together and unite the party.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

October 11, 2023

It is said that it is a crime to remain silent in the face of evil, deceit, and deception. Robert Spencer, one of the foremost authorities of Islamic law, has succinctly spoken unwelcome and little-recognized truths in his new fact-based book: The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process. Spencer has painstakingly separated fact from fiction.

The Israeli-Palestinian Arab conflict is one of the world’s longest and most tragic conflicts, without any end in sight. It should be noted that hundreds, if not thousands, of books and articles have been written about this willful tragedy of enormous historical and human misunderstanding and errors. Spencer has penned a book that is both timely and highly educational.

From Chapter One, “How Israel came to be,” to the book’s final chapter, “What is to be done?,” Spencer has backed up his reports with highly credible sources that leave no doubt in the mind of the reader about Israel’s right to exist. He answers solid questions like: Why don’t the Palestinians have their own country? Is it the fault of Israel? Of the Palestinians? Of both parties?

Spencer’s book connects the past events with the present. He is an Islamic scholar and understands better than anyone that the teaching of Islamic scripture is feeding this hatred of Jews in the hearts and minds of Palestinians. Spencer has masterfully marshaled the anti-Jewish Quranic commands in order to illustrate where this immense hatred toward the Jews came from:

Allah transforms disobedient Jews into apes and pigs (2:63–66, 5:59–60, 7:166). While the Qur’an says that Muslims are the “best of people” (3:110), the unbelievers are “like livestock” (7:179). “Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not believe” (8:55).

The Jews also “strive to do mischief on earth” — that is, fasaad, for which the punishment is specified in Qur’an 5:33: “they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land.”

Spencer brings to bear historical facts to expose the Palestinians’ gross misconceptions and misrepresentations regarding the “land of Zion” (2 Samuel 5:7–5:7) and those of misguided Europeans and the United Nations. He shows just how delusional these groups are.

Moreover, the Jews had a country of their own long before the currently invented Arab countries or even European countries existed. Israel did not seize a country known as “Palestine.” Spencer shows that when the Romans captured Judea and demolished the Jewish Temple in 70 A.D., and particularly after the Bar Kokhba revolt in 134 A.D., they forced the Jews out of their land. Furthermore, they renamed the land of Judea “Felestin,” or Palestine, which was thereafter the name of a region, not of a people or a nation.

Spencer briskly traces the post-biblical history of the Jews in the Holy Land, showing that while Jews were dispersed from their original land of Israel to other regions of the world beginning in the second century A.D., many Jews never left. The land known as Israel today always had a Jewish presence.

Unfortunately, the Jewish people have been used as scapegoats for many centuries by various non-Jews. Muslims, for their part, have adopted scapegoating as an article of faith. Muslims to this day blame the Jews for all kinds of heinous things, dating back to the time of Muhammad himself.

Truth be told, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not about land and will not be solved by the two-state solution. Spencer explains how the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip proved that. Also, he shows how Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s “generous offer” of 2000 was refused, and again, Arabs rejected the 1947 United Nations partition plan. This conflict will never be solved by a treaty that allows Israel to exist as a Jewish state. It is about pushing the Jews into the sea.

Israel’s die-hard enemy, Islam, has been hard at work for over 1,400 years to complete the work of finishing off the Jews that the Prophet Muhammad himself had started. Waves of Muslim ill-wishers have, over the centuries, unleashed their unjustified wrath upon the Jews. Despite suffering huge losses at the hands of their enemies, the Jewish people remained resilient and outlived their tormentors. The pogroms in Russia, the ghettoization in much of Europe, and even genocidal Nazism failed to wipe out the Jews. But as this book demonstrates, the return and rebirth of the Jews to and in the Promised Land in 1948 did not mark the end of their ordeal.

I highly recommend Spencer’s new book to anyone interested in learning more about this tragic and unnecessary conflict.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

October 6, 2023

China’s rise as a global superpower has been accompanied by intrusive and skewed activities that profoundly impact nations worldwide. From environmental degradation and human rights abuses to trade disputes and territorial aggression, China’s actions are leaving a lasting imprint on the global stage. It is crucial to shed light on these concerning issues and the detrimental consequences they pose for the world.

Environmental Impact: A Toxic Legacy

China’s relentless pursuit of industrialization has had significant environmental consequences. The country’s status as the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide is just one part of the equation. Rampant industrial pollution and lax regulations have led to severe air and water pollution, posing risks to public health and ecosystems. Additionally, deforestation in China has reached alarming levels, resulting in habitat loss and soil erosion. These environmental challenges require urgent attention and action.

Human Rights: Trampled Liberties

China’s abysmal human rights record is a stain on the global community. Freedom of speech is severely curtailed, with censorship and state control over media stifling dissenting voices. Religious freedom is suppressed, with religious minorities, particularly Uighur Muslims, facing persecution and forced assimilation. Political dissidents are systematically silenced, highlighting China’s disregard for fundamental human rights and the rule of law.

Global Trade Practices: Playing Unfair

China’s trade practices have long been a cause for concern. Intellectual property theft by Chinese companies is rampant, costing other nations billions of dollars annually. The forced technology transfer policies imposed on foreign companies operating in China undermine fair competition and stifle innovation. China’s unfair subsidies to domestic industries distort global markets, putting businesses in other countries at a disadvantage. These practices have resulted in numerous conflicts in trade policies and fueled tensions between China and its trading partners.

South China Sea Dispute: A Brewing Storm

China’s aggressive territorial claims in the South China Sea threaten regional stability. China aims to assert control and expand its influence by constructing artificial islands and militarizing the region. This has sparked disputes with neighboring countries over fishing rights, maritime boundaries, and sovereignty, heightening tensions and risking potential conflicts in one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Geopolitical Ambitions Unveiled

China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has raised concerns about debt trap diplomacy and geopolitical influence. While touted as an infrastructure development project, the BRI often leaves developing countries burdened with unsustainable debt and vulnerable to China’s economic and political leverage. The opaque nature of these projects and China’s increased geopolitical clout raise questions about the true intentions behind the initiative.

Cyber Security and Espionage: Digital Threats

China’s cyber espionage activities pose a significant risk to global security. State-sponsored hacking campaigns and intellectual property theft by Chinese actors have targeted governments, corporations, and research institutions worldwide. These cyber-attacks compromise sensitive data, undermine trust in digital systems, and disrupt international relations.

Influence Operations: Shaping Narratives

China’s extensive influence operations aim to shape narratives and control information flow. Confucius Institutes, funded by the Chinese government, have faced controversy for promoting censorship and stifling academic freedom in universities worldwide. China’s media influence and manipulation of international organizations have further expanded its soft power, enabling it to push its agenda and silence dissenting voices.

Rare Earth Minerals: A Monopoly Threat

China’s dominance in rare earth minerals production poses economic and environmental concerns. As the primary supplier of these critical resources, China holds significant leverage over industries reliant on them. However, the environmental impact of rare earth mining in China is severe, causing extensive pollution and ecological damage.

Hong Kong and Taiwan: Autonomy at Stake

China’s tightening grip on Hong Kong and Taiwan raises alarm bells about the erosion of autonomy and democratic principles. The imposition of the controversial national security law in Hong Kong has severely curtailed freedom of expression and undermined the city’s liberation. Protests demanding democracy and respect for human rights have been met with repression and crackdowns, illustrating China’s determination to suppress dissent.

In the case of Taiwan, China’s aggressive military threats and rhetoric directly challenge the island nation’s sovereignty. China refuses to recognize Taiwan as an independent state and attempts to isolate it diplomatically, threatening its stability as a nation. The increasing militarization of the Taiwan Strait raises the specter of a potential military conflict with far-reaching global consequences.

China’s Espionage Threat: Very Grave for the US

China’s counterintelligence and economic espionage pose a grave threat to the US. The FBI prioritizes confronting this threat, emphasizing that it’s not against the Chinese people. China employs tactics to influence policies and aims to become a global superpower through predatory practices. A comprehensive response from the government and private sector is necessary to counter these efforts.

In recent developments, the United States tracked a suspected Chinese high-altitude surveillance balloon over the continental US. The balloon, under observation for several days, maintained a flight path above commercial air traffic and posed no real military or physical threat to individuals on the ground. Thus, China also displayed its true nature through its reckless and blatant disregard for international norms and escalating tensions with other nations.

A Call for International Vigilance

Domestically and abroad, China’s highly discriminatory policies have far-reaching implications for the global community. The environmental impact of China’s industrialization threatens the planet’s health and exacerbates climate change. Chinese human rights violations highlight the disregard for individual liberties and the rule of law. Unfair trade practices create an unlevel playing field, undermining global economic stability. Aggressive territorial expansion policies and influence operations raise concerns about regional security and the erosion of democratic values.

The international community must remain vigilant and address these issues collectively. Nations must hold China accountable for its actions, demand transparency, and uphold human rights, environmental preservation, fair trade practices, and territorial integrity. Cooperation among nations is vital to counterbalance China’s influence.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

October 2, 2023

An Unprecedented Political Shift

The Republican Party of Texas has spoken with a resounding voice! Voting 52-2 in favor of a resolution that calls for the resignation of Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan is genuinely massive.

The resolution itself has a robust set of reasons. One of the primary concerns voiced is Speaker Phelan’s controversial appointment of Democrats to chair crucial legislative committees. This decision, which was a direct challenge to voters’ wishes, has raised concerns about the direction of the state’s legislative agenda.

The appointment of Democrats to such influential positions within the House suggests a willingness to compromise on core conservative values. This prospect does not sit well with many in the Republican Party. It raises questions about the direction of Texas politics and whether these appointments will result in legislation that aligns with the state’s conservative base.

Furthermore, Speaker Phelan’s tenure has been marked by what many see as an unsettling pattern of undermining the GOP’s core priorities. Key among these is the issue of border security and election integrity, both of which hold paramount importance for the party. Phelan’s failure to prioritize legislation addressing these concerns has left many feeling disillusioned and disconnected from the leadership of the House.

These issues have been at the forefront of party concerns in recent years, and the failure to address them effectively has raised eyebrows among party members. For many, border security is not just a policy matter; it’s a matter of fundamental security and sovereignty. Texas, with its extensive border with Mexico, is pivotal in safeguarding its borders. The failure to prioritize legislation addressing border security raises alarm about the state’s ability to protect its citizens and the integrity of the immigration system.

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a prominent figure within the Texas GOP, minced no words when he declared that Phelan is “undeserving of his leadership position.”

Adding fuel to the fire is Phelan’s controversial support for the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton. While Paxton was ultimately acquitted, the fact that Phelan endorsed such a move has led to internal strife within the Party in Texas. Paxton asserted that Phelan “pressured other House members to vote for the impeachment … and continues to defend his action despite the weakness of the case.”

The resolution itself is a clear message from the Texas GOP that a change in leadership is needed. It reflects the party’s apprehension that members have been coerced into acting and voting against the platform and principles cherished by the party and its voters. The call for change becomes even more urgent as Texas braces for a special session.

It remains to be seen whether Speaker Phelan will heed the call for his resignation or if he will dig in his heels and attempt to weather the storm. Political pundits, constituents, and party members will closely watch the political drama unfolding in the coming days and weeks.

The outcome remains uncertain as Speaker Phelan’s response and the subsequent political developments unfold.

Harris County GOP Chairman Cindy Siegel weighed in on the growing discontent with Speaker Phelan, emphasizing the significance of county parties across the state expressing their displeasure. She stated:

“The growing number of county parties across Texas voicing their displeasure with Speaker Phelan should not be taken with a grain of salt. Like our own, the voting members of these parties are the Grassroots — They’re the backbone and the beating heart of the Republican party.”

As the Lone Star State navigates this tumultuous chapter in its political history, one thing is clear: the eyes of the nation are firmly fixed on Texas, watching to see how this pivotal moment unfolds.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

September 30, 2023

A Principled Conservative’s Triumph

The recent acquittal of Ken Paxton on all 16 articles of impeachment is a testament to the resilience of a principled conservative who refused to be swayed by political adversaries driven solely by their agendas rather than principles. The impeachment trial, initiated by Democrats and Republicans in Name Only (RINOs), was nothing short of a politically motivated attack on Paxton, a close ally of former President Donald Trump. His acquittal represents a personal triumph and a blow to those who harbored personal interests in his removal from office.

Motives Behind the Impeachment

Paxton embarked on a thorny path that ultimately led to the impeachment trial, driven by an unyielding commitment to justice in the shadow of formidable, entrenched interests. Fearlessly, he delved into the activities of such titans as Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, spotlighting their roles in gain-of-function research and their potential manipulation of public perception. His pledge to root out corruption extended to pharmaceutical manufacturer Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, where he took action against inflated drug prices that harmed the Texas Medicaid program.

But Paxton’s principled stance did not end there. He vocally opposed vaccine and mask mandates, setting himself apart in a political climate fraught with divisive rhetoric. The investigations into the use of puberty blockers were seen as targeting trans-Texans by some. Still, Paxton saw it as a necessary step in ensuring transparency and safeguarding the well-being of young individuals.

However, as the events leading to the trial unequivocally demonstrated, Paxton’s support for former President Donald Trump and his steadfast adherence to conservative tenets made him a target for Democrats and GOP establishment members alike. Paxton’s adversaries perceived him as a potent challenge to their firmly entrenched power structures. Their shared concern stemmed from a deep-seated fear that Paxton’s unwavering dedication to conservative principles could unravel their nefarious designs. Paxton’s steadfastness in upholding these ideals was seen as a direct insult to the intricate web of interests that had, over time, become entangled in the state’s political machinery.

The Impeachment Trial: A Politically Motivated Attack

The impeachment trial, a stark and public display of political maneuvering, was a calculated assault on Paxton’s character and deeply held principles. This theatrical spectacle siphoned precious taxpayer resources and offered little beyond a futile endeavor to besmirch his reputation. Orchestrated by those with vested interests, the trial aimed to erode Paxton’s credibility and undercut the foundations upon which he steadfastly stood, which revolved around a commitment to the rule of law and unwavering principles.

Paxton’s Promise of Retribution

Ken Paxton, a man of conviction, made it clear that he would not let these attacks go unanswered. In a recent interview, he vowed retribution against his political enemies, singling out individuals and groups that had played a role in his tribulations. Karl Rove, a Republican pundit and fundraiser, found himself in Paxton’s crosshairs, facing the consequences of his actions. Additionally, Texans for Lawsuit Reform (TLR), a group that had funded one of Paxton’s 2022 primary challengers, became a target of Paxton’s ire. He accused TLR of having a hand in a Wall Street Journal op-ed by former Gov. Rick Perry, urging senators to proceed with the impeachment trial. Paxton’s determination to hold those responsible accountable revealed his commitment to justice.

Not stopping there, Paxton did not hesitate to criticize fellow Republicans he perceived as having betrayed him and the party. House Speaker Dade Phelan, U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, and even the all-Republican Court of Criminal Appeals faced Paxton’s disapproval. His readiness to confront those within his party illustrated his dedication to upholding conservative values, even when it meant challenging his allies.

A Principled Conservative’s Victory

Therefore, Paxton’s recent exoneration vividly illustrates his unyielding fidelity to Texan values. Paxton’s relentless pursuit of truth emerges as a beacon that vividly describes a political landscape marred by turbulence of agendas and the resulting polarization. His unwavering stance against powerful entities such as Big Pharma, Big Tech, and election fraud concerns demonstrates a commitment deeply rooted in the hearts of Texan voters.

This event reaffirms his position as a prominent figure, championing the causes that resonate with the Lone Star State. It underscores the enduring influence of his convictions and signifies his continued role as a stalwart defender of justice and the sanctity of the rule of law in Texas.

It is a beacon of hope for those who believe in the resilience of true conservative morals.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

September 19, 2023

President Donald Trump’s political tenure was marked by fervent support and vehement opposition. However, beneath the surface of political disagreements, it becomes evident that he exposed adversaries lurking within the government and media who now actively conspire to sideline him. These adversaries, threatened by Trump’s policies and America-first commitment, are tirelessly working to diminish his influence and thwart his legacy.

During and after the Trump administration, some individuals and groups could be labeled as “enemies within” of the President. They represented political opponents and potential threats to President Trump’s vision for America. Their actions included vocal criticism of the President’s decisions, alleged leaks of sensitive information to the media, and behind-the-scenes maneuvers aimed at obstructing or undermining his policy agenda.

President Trump pointed fingers at those he perceived as threats to his administration. Among these adversaries were the “deep state,” influential figures in the media, and Democrats in Congress. They formed part of a vast network determined to dismantle his America-first agenda.

The “deep state,” often synonymous with entrenched bureaucrats and officials, became a recurrent target of President Trump’s relentless pursuit of transparency and accountability. This shadowy network sought to undermine his authority, thwart his policy initiatives, and hinder his promise to prioritize American interests over global agreements and conventions.

His America-first approach, characterized by stricter immigration policies and tax reforms, faced unwavering opposition from lawmakers across the aisle. This resistance only reinforced the belief that enemies conspired to eliminate Trump’s influence on national policy.

During his presidency, Trump oversaw a remarkable economic boom, groundbreaking criminal justice reform, and staunch efforts to safeguard Second Amendment rights. His administration’s economic policies led to record-low unemployment rates and substantial stock market gains. Criminal justice reform, an issue that long languished on the sidelines, saw unprecedented progress under Trump, earning him bipartisan acclaim. His pledge to protect Second Amendment rights resonated deeply with millions of Americans.

A group of career bureaucrats and former Obama administration officials were accused of conspiring to undermine President Trump. The House Intelligence Committee’s release of declassified transcripts related to the Trump-Russia collusion investigation revealed a lack of concrete evidence to support the collusion claim. This raised questions about the credibility of the accusations and fueled suspicions that some members of the “Deep State cabal” had been saying one thing behind closed doors while making wild and often contradictory claims in public.

Trump’s enemies within the political landscape may be overlooking his resilience and ability to rally his supporters. The left-wing media’s anti-Trump fervor, rather than weakening him, has, in the eyes of his supporters, only served to make him stronger.

The left’s steadfast refusal to acknowledge any successes or achievements of the Trump administration underscores a bias that fuels the perception of a hostile media environment. Trump’s opponents are aware that he has the potential to stage a remarkable political resurgence, underscoring the enduring political influence of Donald Trump.

One of the most enduring legacies of President Trump’s time in office is his role in exposing an alarming level of rot and corruption within the American political system. He shed light on the extent to which ruling class elements were willing to undermine a president who challenged the established order. The relentless efforts to destroy him, differing standards in the courts, and the use of hatred as a proxy for destruction all exemplified the determination of some to protect their interests, even at the expense of democratic norms and institutions.

Even after leaving office, President Trump remains at the epicenter of an unrelenting battle. High-profile events like the Georgia subversion trial and ongoing disputes over the 2020 election results underscore the enduring impact of his presidency on American politics.

The Georgia subversion trial showcases the enduring legal challenges surrounding the 2020 election, serving as a testament to President Trump’s dedication to ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.

The looming threat of impeachment in Texas is a calculated move by political opponents who seek to undermine individuals like Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and the values and ideologies they represent. It’s seen as part of a broader pattern where individuals perceived as Trump loyalists are targeted for their commitment to conservative principles, traditional values, and support for the former President.

President Trump’s presidency exposed enemies within the government and media who now actively conspire to diminish his influence and impede his legacy. Regardless of one’s political affiliation, it is crucial to recognize the significance of such power struggles and their potential consequences for individuals and society as a whole.

While the fight continues, it is important to remember the substantial accomplishments of the Trump administration and the ongoing commitment to America-first policies, which remain a cornerstone of political discourse. President Trump’s legacy, whether lauded or criticized, undeniably left an indelible mark on the American political landscape, inspiring passionate support for the principles he championed.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

September 13, 2023

I come from a land called Persia
To the land of the free called America
Currently, under the credo of wokeness
A noble land dislodged by voter fraud.

Time to regain our dignity
And let America be America again
Where every man and woman is free.
We can do it

None will remain hidden from the concealed!
Fellow Americans
Let us be together!
Let the tenderness of our hands,
Overflow with pride and joy,
Let us merge our eyes,
In each other’s eyes
Let us do it

Nothing will be hidden from the concealed!
Nothing will grow from absurd values!
Let us eradicate madly,
The roots of divisiveness!
And stir the bowl of Love,
Instantly!

Let me say this:
Nothing stays constant,
Nothing will last till eternity,
And for wisdom to soar,
Our eyes,
Tremble for one small minute!
Let me say this:
Blandishment is not my style,
Let me say this:
I conquered the garden,
Without your knowledge!
Let me share it with you!
Let us make a flower happy,
In our exclusive hands!

Let us be a bird,
With two open, shining eyes,
Looking at the world!
Let us have faith in purity!
Let us flee away from impurity.
Let me fill the cradle of my poetry,
With freedom.

Let America once again.
Be a land where Liberty rules.
Let us surrender to each other,
And understand each other’s pain and suffering
Let us do it!
Let us make America great again!
Let us promise a better future,
And a loftier!
Let us turn to light!
And awaken a nation!
Let us take back America.
The land of the free
And the home of the brave.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

September 10, 2023

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s state Senate impeachment trial is underway in the heart of Texas, and the prosecution’s case appears to be crumbling before our eyes. While media outlets have long portrayed Paxton as a controversial figure, the trial’s proceedings reveal a different story – one of weak evidence and a politically motivated agenda.

The central accusation against Paxton revolves around allegations that he abused his office to benefit a friend and donor, Nate Paul, an Austin real estate investor. However, a closer look at the prosecution’s case reveals a glaring lack of concrete evidence to support these claims.

The witnesses called by the prosecution have yet to provide any solid testimony pointing to Paxton’s wrongdoing. Instead, they have consistently stated that they did not witness Paxton engage in illegal activities. Furthermore, the documents presented as evidence are circumstantial, failing to establish a clear link between Paxton’s actions and any criminal intent.

One notable piece of evidence the prosecution presents is a text message from Paxton to Paul, where Paxton says, “I’m here for you.” While the message may raise eyebrows, it fails to provide any context or specifics regarding Paxton’s actions. It is plausible that Paxton was merely offering moral support to a needy friend rather than engaging in corrupt activities.

According to The Federalist:

During the impeachment trial of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, former employees admitted that they reported Paxton to the FBI without any evidence.

That’s right…

“We had no evidence…”

The prosecution’s attempts to paint Paxton as a corrupt politician in the pocket of special interests also need to be revised. Contrary to their claims, Paxton has a well-documented history of championing the interests of ordinary Texans. He has sued the federal government, challenging immigration policies, environmental regulations, and healthcare laws. Additionally, he has fiercely defended Texans’ Second Amendment rights.

The defense team’s effective dismantling of the prosecution’s case further highlights its weaknesses. They have proficiently noted inconsistencies in witness testimony and the lack of substantial evidence. Furthermore, they have raised questions about the motivations driving the prosecutors, alleging that politics may be a driving force behind the impeachment proceedings.

Two-thirds of the Senate must agree to convict Paxton and remove him from office. With 31 senators, Paxton needs only 10 votes for his acquittal. During pretrial motions, Paxton’s defense garnered significant support, with six senators voting in his favor and two more frequently siding with him. These numbers indicate that Paxton already has six out of the ten needed votes, with the possibility of gaining two more.

Moreover, on specific motions to dismiss individual articles of impeachment, Paxton secured as many as nine votes and even reached the threshold of 10 votes in one instance. While these votes did not lead to the dismissal of any articles, they signal a significant possibility of acquittal for Paxton.

In contrast to the prosecution’s struggles, Paxton’s defense team has come prepared and determined to win. Attorneys Tony Buzbee and Dan Cogdel have confidently asserted that many of the allegations presented in the press will be debunked during the trial. They have meticulously reviewed the articles of impeachment, highlighting exculpatory information that supports Paxton’s innocence.

Buzbee, in particular, emphasized Paxton’s outstanding record in advancing conservative causes and defending Texas against federal overreach. The defense has framed the impeachment as a partisan attempt by establishment Republicans and Democrats to remove an effective attorney general from office. Senators have noticed, actively engaging with the defense’s arguments and taking notes during the proceedings.

On the other hand, the chief impeachment manager, Rep. Andrew Murr, offered a lackluster opening statement that failed to resonate with the audience. The defense appears to have seized the narrative and is making a compelling case for Paxton’s innocence.

As the trial unfolds over the coming weeks, we can expect to witness hours of testimony and intense legal arguments. However, the numbers speak for themselves – out of 31 Senators, Ken Paxton only needs to persuade 10 senators to secure his acquittal. The Senate itself is controlled by Republicans 19-12.

The impeachment trial against Paxton may be the product of political maneuvering, but it ultimately comes down to the facts and evidence presented. Thus far, the prosecutors still need to provide a solid foundation for a conviction. While the media may have eagerly anticipated Paxton’s downfall, the truth is far from certain. The Texas Attorney General’s path to victory is becoming clearer by the day.

In a state that values democracy, the will of the voters must prevail. Paxton’s attorney, Dan Cogdell, aptly questioned, “Is it up to the voters, or is it up to the politicians to see who stays in office?” We are witnessing the unfolding of a historic trial that will ultimately determine whether a handful of legislators can overturn the votes of over four million citizens.

Amid this politically charged trial, one thing is evident: the case against Ken Paxton is falling apart, and the facts reveal a different story than the one painted by his detractors. As the legal battle rages on, we can only hope that justice will prevail and that the actual facts will lead to Paxton’s acquittal.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

September 2, 2023

In the turbulent landscape of American politics, the battle for justice often gets lost in a sea of partisan rhetoric. In a glaring example of this, the impeachment trial of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has taken a disturbing turn, with three Democratic senators at the heart of a contentious debate. While Paxton’s lawyers have called for these senators to recuse themselves, their unwavering bias remains a troubling impediment to a fair trial.

Senators Nathan Johnson of Dallas, Roland Gutierrez of San Antonio, and José Menéndez of San Antonio stand accused of blatant partiality in the Paxton impeachment trial. Their public statements have left little doubt about their preconceived notions regarding the case. But what makes this situation all the more absurd is that while these three Democrats continue to assert their influence, they refuse to allow Senator Angela Paxton, the attorney general’s wife, to exercise her right to vote in the same trial. The glaring hypocrisy is impossible to ignore.

The Accused Trio’s Troubling Statements

The crux lies in the unabashed bias exhibited by Senators Johnson, Gutierrez, and Menéndez. Paxton’s legal team has meticulously collected a series of damning statements made by these senators that demonstrate their discriminatory stance against the attorney general.

For instance, Senator Roland Gutierrez’s appearance on MSNBC, where he boldly claimed that the evidence against Paxton was irrefutable, raises questions about his impartiality. In the realm of justice, it is essential for senators acting as jurors to approach a case with an open mind, willing to consider all evidence before making a judgment. Gutierrez’s public proclamation has undermined the very essence of a fair trial.

On the other hand, Senator Nathan Johnson has used his social media platform to air his bias. A tweet reacting to a political action committee’s donation to Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick not only violated a gag order issued by Patrick but also further demonstrated Johnson’s predisposition against Paxton.

These senators’ actions fly in the face of their constitutional duty as jurors in this impeachment trial. The foundation of democracy rests upon a fair and unbiased judicial process, and the actions of these senators threaten to undermine that foundation.

Double Standards: Allowing Bias While Denying Rights

The refusal to allow Senator Angela Paxton to participate in the trial makes the situation even more baffling. While Paxton’s legal team has demanded the recusal of three Democratic senators due to their blatant bias, they simultaneously argue that if Angela Paxton is required to step aside, those who have displayed bias against the attorney general should also be disqualified. The logic behind this plea is clear: if impartiality is the standard, it must apply to all parties equally.

Yet, the Democratic senators have not extended the same courtesy to Senator Angela Paxton. Her disqualification from voting in the trial due to a perceived conflict of interest was a decision that was not only swift but also one that has been met with little resistance from her Democratic colleagues.

This glaring double standard raises questions about the true intentions of these senators. Are they genuinely interested in upholding the principles of justice and fairness, or are they simply using their power to push a partisan agenda?

The Bigger Picture: Paxton’s Impeachment

Amidst this circus of bias and double standards, the real issue is the impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The charges against Paxton center on allegations that he abused his position to benefit a wealthy Austin businessman and campaign donor, Nate Paul. This case deserves a fair and impartial trial, free from political posturing and partisan biases.
The Senate’s previous disqualification of Senator Angela Paxton due to a conflict of interest has already raised concerns about the fairness of this trial. But the refusal to reciprocate this gesture by disqualifying senators who have openly demonstrated bias only deepens those concerns.

A Battle for Justice

The battle for justice in the Paxton impeachment trial is not just about one individual’s fate but the integrity of the American justice system. Fairness, impartiality, and due process must be upheld at all costs. Senators Nathan Johnson, Roland Gutierrez, and José Menéndez must take a long, hard look in the mirror and consider whether they are truly fit to serve as jurors in this case.

Their actions have cast a dark shadow over this trial, and it is incumbent upon them to act responsibly and recuse themselves in the interest of justice. It is not a sign of weakness to admit bias; it is a testament to the strength of our democracy when individuals step aside to ensure a fair and just process.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

August 30, 2023

Ayatollah Khamenei has repeatedly stated that he will never follow the path of the late Shah of Iran and leave the country peacefully. Instead, he has insinuated that he would stay and massacre the enemies of Islam: the Iranian people.

According to a 1989 leaked video, Khamenei was selected to a one-year caretaker period as supreme leader. The 20-minute footage, posted on social media by exiled Iranian journalist Shahed Alavi, reveals that Khamenei said he was not qualified enough for the post.

The illegitimate mullahs presently ruling Iran have been blatantly violating the sacred covenant of human rights by attacking large numbers of peaceful demonstrators demanding nothing more than their God-given right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The mullahs and their mercenaries are wasting precious human life to maintain themselves in power while terrorizing the Iranian population and giving away the nation’s wealth to numerous terrorist organizations. According to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Iran’s regime spends $16 billion annually to support terrorists and rogue regimes.

It goes without saying that our hearts bleed to watch how brutally the government agents attack, assault, and beat up peaceful demonstrators. Regretfully, the ruling regime sees these actions as part of their sacred duty. They see any defiance directed at the supreme leader as defiance to Allah. After all, Ayatollah Khamenei sees himself as the representative of the Hidden Imam, al-Mahdi, hence the custodian over the people.

Iran’s rulers have turned a wealthy country with a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, chaos, and terrorism.

Mullahs Are Panicking

Now the mullahs are in a state of panic. They know the current protests across Iran differ greatly from the 2009 Green Movement. The current protests show the working-class and lower-middle-class Iranians in small towns and medium-sized cities within Iran calling for the overthrow of the Islamic Republic and chanting in support of the monarchy and the exiled Prince Pahlavi. For many demonstrators, the wretched state of the Iranian economy and corruption provided the perfect vehicle for pent-up expressions of Persian nationalism.

Iran has been a driver of change for centuries: “Where Iran goes, so goes the region.” The 1979 Iranian revolution ushered in a period of intense sectarian conflict and unrest in the area. But most Iranians are tired of Khomeini-style Islam. Younger Iranians are embracing and reasserting their Persian national identity, almost in reaction to the regime, and in ways that will impact the region for decades to come. We can confidently assert that the post-1979 chapter in regional history has ended, and a new chapter has begun. If present trends continue, I see Iran heading for a major change toward a Western way of life.

The current protests by millions throughout Iran clearly signal that the Islamic theocracy is in irreversible decline. The overwhelming majority of the people are no longer willing to settle for a vote recount or reformists’ deception and a less repressive Islamic rule. They are determined to establish a fully secular democracy with complete separation of mosque and state. They demand regime change.

Moreover, deep cracks are popping up in the system and among the contending factions. Realistically speaking, 10-15 percent of the population still supports the clerical system to various degrees. Many in this group are government employees, mullahs, and hired elements such as Basiji. Also, the regime has some backers from its proxies’ elements from several regional countries, such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria.

The best strategy with the greatest chance of success and the least risk of starting a cataclysmic chain reaction is for a “coalition of the willing,” to borrow a phrase, to rally behind Prince Reza Pahlavi and the Iranian people. The democracy-seeking secular Iranians are thoroughly capable of dislodging the tyrannical mullahs.

Unlike Obama, President Trump, some Cabinet members and U.S. lawmakers have resoundingly answered the opposition’s call. The recent protests are just the beginning of the end for the Iranian rulers. It may take several months, but the main concern now is ensuring a smooth transition from Islamic radicalism to a secular democracy.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

August 23, 2023

In the ever-shifting landscape of American politics, the call for unity among conservatives remains a timeless truth. Recent events in Texas, however, have cast a shadow of doubt and disheartenment among staunch Republicans. The impeachment of Ken Paxton, a long-standing pillar of conservative values, by some members of his party, has sparked division within the Texas Republican ranks. This article delves into why this impeachment not only seems ill-conceived but, more significantly, how it stands as a betrayal of the principles that should firmly unite all Republicans.

Ken Paxton: A Resounding Conservative Voice

Ken Paxton has etched his name as a steadfast conservative voice in Texas politics, defending the values and principles cherished by Republicans. From his unwavering advocacy of Second Amendment rights to his robust defense of religious liberty, Paxton has consistently demonstrated his commitment to the conservative cause.

The Unfounded Impeachment

The decision by a faction of Texas Republicans to back the impeachment of Ken Paxton has left conservatives bewildered. The charges against him appear flimsy at best, and the timing of this impeachment raises concerns of political opportunism. The Republican Party must safeguard its integrity by ensuring that impeachment proceedings are rooted in genuine concerns rather than partisan maneuvering.

Intra-Party Division

Perhaps the most disheartening consequence of this impeachment is its deep division within the Texas Republican Party. At a juncture when conservatives should be rallying together to safeguard their principles, internal strife weakens the party’s ability to confront the left’s policies effectively. Unity is the cornerstone of achieving conservative goals, and this impeachment threatens to erode that unity.

The Peril of Playing into the Left’s Hands

Amid these challenges, it is critical to acknowledge the gravity of these truths:

The Fragile State of Conservatism: Texas, as a bulwark of traditional conservative values, stands at the forefront of preserving these ideals in an era under national scrutiny.

Unity Amidst Opposition: Conserving unity is paramount, particularly with the left poised to exploit divisions within the conservative movement.

Aiding the Opposition: The impeachment of Ken Paxton provides the left with a potent narrative to depict the Republican Party as fractured, bolstering their efforts to discredit conservatism.

Long-term Ramifications: Beyond immediate political consequences, the left seeks to weaken conservatism’s foundation. If this impeachment is portrayed as an internal crisis, it could undermine the credibility of conservative values.

The Power of Perception: Recognizing the potency of optics in shaping public opinion is crucial. The left will wield this impeachment as a narrative to portray conservatism as waning, attracting wavering voters and galvanizing their base.

Strength in Conservative Unity: Texas Republicans must understand that unity is their greatest strength. They can effectively counter the left’s advances by presenting a united front and resolutely upholding conservative values.

Broad Implications: The wider consequences of their actions must be grasped by Texas Republicans. Mishandling this impeachment could inadvertently bolster the left’s efforts to weaken conservatism’s foundation in the state.

The Consequences of Abandoning Ken Paxton

Ken Paxton’s unwavering commitment to defending conservative principles is undeniable. Whether in legal battles over immigration policy or preserving religious liberty, his record speaks volumes. Abandoning him amid what many perceive as unfounded charges sends a disheartening message to conservative leaders across Texas. It tells them that even their most ardent efforts to advance the conservative cause may not be enough to shield them from internal political turmoil, potentially jeopardizing their positions in office.

As the dust settles from these internal struggles, conservatives risk division and priming themselves for potential removal from office. It is crucial, then, that Texas Republicans carefully consider the implications of their choices on the stability and future of conservative leadership in the state. They betrayed their constituents.

Period. And it would do well for them to go over these obvious points once again:
Undermining Trust in Leadership: Paxton’s record in defending conservative values is unblemished. Abandoning him in the face of questionable charges raises doubts about the party’s commitment to its own, potentially eroding trust in its leadership.

Implications for Future Leadership: Leaders often serve as inspirations for emerging politicians. Abandoning Paxton may deter aspiring conservative leaders, who fear their dedication to the conservative cause won’t shield them from internal turmoil.

Diminished Advocacy Effectiveness: Unity and determination are the lifeblood of the conservative movement. The abandonment of a prominent figure like Paxton may hinder advocacy efforts, creating a leadership void that impedes traditional policy objectives.

Potential Loss of Conservative Votes: If conservative voters perceive their elected officials as failing to support staunch conservatives like Paxton, disillusionment may lead to decreased voter turnout, affecting electoral prospects.

Sending a Message to Opponents: Abandoning a prominent conservative figure inadvertently communicates to opponents that the conservative movement is susceptible to internal divisions, potentially encouraging them.

Impact on Conservative Agenda: A unified front is essential with the left’s growing challenges. Impeaching Paxton may divert resources from this effort, jeopardizing the achievement of conservative policy goals.

In the face of mounting challenges from the left, Texas Republicans must stand united and unwavering in their commitment to conservative values. The impeachment of Ken Paxton, seemingly founded on shaky grounds, threatens to weaken the conservative movement and hinder their ability to effectively oppose the left’s policies. Now, more than ever, Texas Republicans must put aside internal divisions and focus on the shared principles that should bind them together. Ken Paxton deserves the steadfast support of his fellow Republicans, for the future of conservatism in Texas depends on it.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

August 12, 2023

If one visualizes the establishment of the first (small) society, as Enlightenment thinkers did (ca. 1690-1800), one must suspect that it was founded on the mutual agreement of–a social contract among–the first members. It seems unlikely that it could not have lasted very long if any society had been fashioned on disagreement. Given that agreement was at the foundation of the community, the only thing that could break the club apart would be the introduction of disagreers into its midst.

Of course, disagreers might have been expected to come from outside the society, if only because they could not have been party to the agreement in the social contract. But disagreers might also have been expected to come from inside the society if the children of the members needed to be schooled in the necessity to continue the agreement made by their parent, guardian, and ancestors. Such “schooling” arose at first within every family’s lodgings (and duties). As the generation succeeded generation, the survival of society depended upon the effectiveness of family schooling. Successful schooling and transmission of social commitment to the agreement eventually led to establishing a culture with rules, laws, and (sometimes) a constitution.

Anyway, somewhere along the line, in many (if not all) growing societies, these two types of problems arose. External problems arose as people from outside the club occasionally attempted (usually by engaging in armed conflict) to take over the community and impose a new and different agreement system. Thus, the threat of external attack by disagreers–aka enemies–made it necessary to devise an externally oriented (military) self-defense force.

(2) Internal problems arose, as people (parents) on the inside, for whatever reason, failed to properly school their children properly, opening the way for the rise of rebellious disagreers in the midst the society, who would attempt (usually by engaging in law-breaking behaviors) to take action against one or more (law-abiding) members of the community. The threat of internal attack by disagreers–aka criminals–made it necessary to devise an internally oriented (police) self-defense force. The problem faced by every society has been what to do with disagreers, especially with those who were actually citizens by birth but technically non-citizens by disagreement–non-citizens by rebellious choice–against the very social contract in which they had been nourished to adulthood.

For thousands of years, the accepted way to deal with external enemies was to defeat them on the field of battle, and the accepted way to deal with internal criminals was to capture and punish them with lashing, torture, incarceration, exile, and execution.

But, today, we style ourselves as having reached Kantian (enlightened) maturity, no longer (completely) accepting such methods, if only because we think those methods are inhumane. Furthermore, our (U.S.) system of government not only permits disagreement, it has come to encourage it. It has created a (tacitly legal, at least) second category of citizen disagreers who are not considered criminals.

This second category of citizens who disagree with the social contract has a variety of euphemistic labels: progressives, liberals, mainstream media, change agents, innovators, visionaries, special interest groups, etc. Hence society is destined to be in constant turmoil as waves of new children (encouraged to question authority and to think there isn’t even supposed to be a box) rush onto the agreement stage with ideas of how to change it from whatever it was before, even if it’s for no good reason at all.

Drug users and the drug industry want drugs legalized the same way alcohol was because there is a market for getting stoned. Thieves want robbery legalized because they are poor. Criminals wish to have prisons abolished because they are oppressed. Illegal immigrants want citizenship rights even if they are not citizens. Even if they displace American jobs, businesses want to have international business ties for labor. Snoops wish to increase surveillance capabilities and rights with less hostility from privacy advocates because they think they can save the nation. Technologists wish to have more customers with less work. Governments want more power with less disclosure. Employers wish to lower wages for more work. Employees expect to pay higher wages for less work. Bullies don’t like bullying criminalized. Stock brokers want insider trading legalized. Women’s liberation leaders want to end the biological definition of womanhood and erase it from social memory. The salacious want sexting legalized, just like “adult” literature.

Muslims want to build mosques legally like churches have been lawfully made. Atheists want all public evidence and acknowledgment of Christianity and all religion removed from the public square. The NRA wants to keep Second Amendment rights free of surveillance. The anti-gun advocates wish to have every gun and owner tracked in detail. Etc. All these things are pleas and petitions about the social contract.

No society can survive for long in such persistent bickering and turmoil. And when we overlay all this with the “fact” that there are terrorists behind every tree, under every rock, and in every social setting, who can be confident that anything they say or do will not mark them for some watch list? After all, everyone is watching everyone for signs of anti-social behavior. But what is anti-social behavior in this turmoil? Who is appropriately defending his human rights? Who is not entitled to display violence to make their point in a society drowning in messages of change? How else can the message gain precious national television and news media coverage?

I advocate for stopping the encouragement for change, if only because it affects the stability and future survival of this Great Nation that many of us have worked and died to establish. Not everything done or settled in the past is wrong and needs change, simply because the sweep hand passed the twelve on the clock and someone has succumbed to the media mantra for change. The fact is that every society must have a stable constitution, laws, and rules. And it is not much harder to adjust to the government to have no premarital sex than it is to accept the current calls for no sexual harassment.

Societies have adapted to the former quite well. It is time to think about establishing certain sections of the country where all those who disagree with the current constitution and laws are separated from those who accept them. Perhaps there should be sections of the country where all the gun advocates can live; areas of the country where all the free-sex people can live together; sections of the country where all the married men and women, who want to live happily with each other and raise their children together by the social contract, can live together; or sections of the country where all the disagreers with the social contract can sit around disagreeing all day long if they want to.

According to the United Nations, self-defense is legal and a human right. But, in my view, no one has the right to violence and destruction of property for a political cause contrary to the law, no matter how much the change might be desired. Violations of the law must (should) be met with policing force to end them and punish the offenders, lest more illegalities be encouraged the next time someone has a problem with authority. If one does the crime, one should do the time.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

August 7, 2023

In 2016, Donald J. Trump, a political outsider, and successful businessman, captured the hearts of millions of Americans with his promise to “Make America Great Again.” Against all odds, he secured a remarkable victory in the 2020 election, reflecting the aspirations of the American people for change, openness, and optimism.

Throughout his presidency, Trump’s unconventional approach resonated with many who sought a break from the status quo. He tapped into a sense of frustration among the electorate, promising to shake up the system and put the interests of the American people first.

In this article, it is, therefore, my striving to delve into the policies and actions taken by the Trump administration that aimed to fulfill its commitment to “Make America Great Again.” Trump’s presidency marked a significant shift in American politics from tackling corruption and preserving American values to safeguarding electoral integrity and confronting global adversaries.

One of Trump’s central promises was to drain the swamp of corruption in Washington, D.C. He called out the cozy relationships between politicians, lobbyists, and bureaucrats, vowing to hold those in power accountable.

Trump’s administration faced an uphill battle against perceptions of corruption within critical institutions like the military, FBI, CIA, and Justice Department. Critics accused him of undermining these institutions, but his supporters argued that he was taking a stand against the deep-rooted establishment.

Trump’s strategy to fight the establishment involved challenging the status quo, promoting transparency, and appointing individuals who shared his vision. Although met with resistance, his efforts sought to break the grip of the entrenched elite on American politics.

Many Americans felt that traditional values were under attack during Trump’s tenure, with growing concerns about cultural shifts and ideological divides. Trump presented himself as a defender of these values, promising to preserve the American way of life.

Trump’s vision to preserve American identity included prioritizing national unity, promoting patriotism, and upholding the rule of law. His supporters saw him as a champion of American exceptionalism, standing firm against the rise of progressive ideologies. Trump’s opposition to socialist ideologies struck a chord with conservatives who feared the erosion of capitalism and individual liberties. He staunchly opposed policies that, in his view, would lead the country down a dangerous path of government overreach.

The issue of voter fraud and election integrity dominated much of Trump’s presidency, with many of his supporters raising concerns about the credibility of the electoral system. Trump’s relentless pursuit of allegations of voter fraud aimed to ensure that the people’s will was accurately represented. However, this pursuit was met with criticism and legal challenges.

While some critics argued that Trump’s claims were baseless, his supporters saw his efforts as a necessary step to protect the sanctity of American democracy and voters’ confidence.

Trump took a tough foreign policy stance, confronting global adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. He also prioritized combating terrorism to safeguard American interests and national security.

Trump’s emphasis on “America First” sought to protect the country’s economic and security interests, signaling a departure from previous administrations’ approach to international relations. While critics criticized Trump’s direct approach, his supporters argued that his strategies aimed to promote peace through strength and protect American sovereignty.

Trump’s leadership style prioritized bilateral relationships and direct diplomacy, which some saw as refreshing, while others criticized it as unconventional. Trump’s skepticism of globalism and multinational agreements reflected his belief in prioritizing American interests over international entanglements.

By renegotiating trade deals and pushing for fairer agreements, Trump sought to protect American industries and workers, challenging the conventional approach to international trade. Some of Trump’s supporters believed that powerful global elites sought to undermine his administration and its America-first policies, leading to allegations of an international plot against him.

Throughout his presidency, Trump accused the mainstream media of biased reporting and silencing conservative voices. He also criticized social media platforms for alleged censorship. Trump’s supporters praised his transparency, but critics argued that his adversarial relationship with the media undermined the free press and the public’s right to information. Trump’s battle for free speech and media neutrality aimed to protect the voices of everyday Americans and ensure diverse perspectives were heard. Many Americans felt the federal government needed more responsive to their needs.

Trump promised to shrink the size of government, reduce regulations, and empower citizens to take charge of their lives. Trump’s efforts to reform the government faced successes and challenges, with his supporters lauding his commitment to a smaller, more efficient establishment. Throughout his presidency, Trump spoke passionately about reversing what he saw as America’s decline in influence and prosperity.

Trump’s vision for national renewal focused on revitalizing industries, investing in infrastructure, and empowering American businesses and workers. Trump’s supporters believed his policies would lay the foundation for a stronger, more prosperous America, ready to face future challenges.

Watching President Trump being wrongly charged by special counsel Jack Smith is a travesty of true justice. In an apparent attempt to undermine the transformative ‘Make America Great Again’ (MAGA) movement, former President Donald Trump has been shamefully indicted in a baseless federal probe. These charges, filled with politically motivated allegations, accuse President Trump of conspiracies to defraud the United States, obstructing official proceedings, and more. It is outrageous that they have gone as far as implicating six unnamed co-conspirators, seemingly to cast a wide net and smear the President’s reputation. We know that President Trump has always fought for truth and justice, and any claims of wrongdoing are the disinformation his opponents spread.

These phony indictments are nothing but a witch hunt designed to tarnish the legacy of a President who truly put America first and restored prosperity to our great nation.

Donald Trump’s presidency left a lasting impact on the nation, igniting fervent debates on both sides of the political spectrum. Regardless of one’s views on Trump, his presidency reshaped American politics and highlighted the deep divisions within the country. As the nation moves forward, the pursuit of making America great again continues, shaped by the enduring impact of the 45th President of the United States.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

August 3, 2023

In the heart of Texas, where the sun’s rays shine strongly, is a man whose loyalty to Collin County residents and conservative values is unwavering – Wayne Richard. He intends to challenge the incumbent state Representative Matt Shaheen in the upcoming GOP primary, fuelled by Shaheen’s vote to impeach Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton – an utter act of betrayal of all we Texans stand for.

Attorney General Ken Paxton’s figure in Texas politics shines brightly as a beacon of service and honor. His solid commitment to the state and its people has left an indelible mark, earning him the respect and admiration of countless Texans—those who dare to go against such an esteemed figure risk the unyielding judgment of the electorate.

Wayne Richard is deeply connected to our community. As a successful Plano businessman, he understands the struggles hardworking Texans face. But what truly sets him apart is his unwavering dedication to the principles that have defined the great state of Texas for generations – conservatism at its core. And more than anything, Wayne Richard recognizes the significance of Paxton’s legacy and stands firmly aligned with those who champion his cause, vowing to defend General Paxton.

With a heart full of love for his constituents and Texas, Wayne aspires to represent the 66th district in the Texas House of Representatives, putting America First, just like former President Trump. Wayne’s commitment to conservative values has made him a prominent figure in Collin County, where Republicans rally behind him to challenge Shaheen in the GOP primary.

So why is Wayne taking this step now? He believes Shaheen’s vote to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton betrayed our conservative principles. Ken Paxton has been a staunch defender of traditional values and a steadfast advocate for Texas. For Wayne Richard and countless others in Collin County, Shaheen’s vote goes against everything they hold dear.

In the eyes of many conservatives, Paxton’s impeachment was seen as a betrayal of the State’s core values. It has shaken the unity and trust that Shaheen had established with his constituents. They put their trust in him to be their voice in the political arena, fight for their principles, and uphold their great state’s integrity. But his vote left them feeling let down.

Wayne Richard is a fervent supporter of Paxton and his conservative agenda. His potential campaign isn’t just about Shaheen’s vote; it’s about ensuring that the GOP remains faithful to its conservative doctrines, undeterred by outside pressures.

Wayne Richard stands firm for what is right, so he’s considering running in the GOP primary. He understands the importance of having a genuine conservative leader who will never waver in defending Texan values. While Wayne’s campaign will address Shaheen’s impeachment vote, his platform will encompass many other traditional issues. From securing our borders to protecting religious liberties and safeguarding our Second Amendment rights, Wayne aims to rally the Republican base behind a vision that echoes the principles resonating with many Texans during Trump’s time in office.

As fervent supporters of Wayne Richard, we are filled with hope and excitement for the journey ahead. His potential challenge represents a call to arms for all conservatives in Collin County. Together, we can send a powerful message – that we stand united in our firm support to keep Collin County conservative again.

As mentioned, the implications of this challenge reach far beyond the primary. Wayne Richard’s leadership can showcase Collin County’s unyielding commitment to conservatism and set the course for the future of the Republican Party in our state.

Wayne Richard does so with utmost care and consideration as he studies the merits of a potential campaign. He understands the weight of this decision, and his utmost desire is to serve the people of Collin County with honor and integrity.

So, my fellow conservatives, let’s rally together and stand firmly behind Wayne Richard as he embarks on his new endeavor. Together, we will shape the future of our district, our state, and our great nation. Wayne’s journey has just begun, and we must proudly stand by his side every step of the way. As Texas Republicans, we eagerly await the outcome, supporting Wayne as he leads the charge to reshape the GOP in the image of Trump’s conservatism.

© 2023 NWV – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

July 28, 2023

Cultural heritage serves as a testament to humanity’s shared history and identity. Unfortunately, the intentional destruction of cultural heritage has plagued societies throughout history. One such regime, the Islamic Republic of Iran, has a long and troubling history of cultural vandalism and deliberate targeting of historical antiquities, some of which date back millennia. This article explores the significance of cultural heritage, examines Iran’s destructive actions, compares them to other groups like ISIS and the Taliban, and highlights the severe impacts on communities.

Iran’s Regime and Cultural Vandalism

The Iranian regime has left a trail of destruction across the country, mainly targeting historical sites. One recent example is the Jobji historical site in Ramez, north of Ahwaz, which dates back to the Elamite era (3500 BC – 500 BC). Despite its historical importance, the regime demolished the site, erasing a significant piece of human history. Furthermore, in Ahwaz, the government has systematically destroyed numerous Elamite, Islamic, and contemporary sites, including castles, palaces, ancient homes, places of worship, bridges, markets, and cemeteries. This widespread destruction has resulted in a significant loss of cultural heritage.

Comparisons with Other Destructive Groups

While Iran’s regime has engaged in cultural vandalism, it is essential to recognize that it is not an isolated case. The Islamic State (ISIS) has infamously conducted deliberate destruction and theft of cultural heritage in Iraq, Syria, and Libya. Places of worship and ancient historical artifacts have been targeted, leaving irreversible damage to these regions. Similarly, the Taliban’s destruction of cultural heritage sites in Afghanistan, such as the Bamiyan Buddhas in 2001, showcases their disregard for history and cultural significance.

Motivations for Cultural Heritage Destruction

Throughout history, various motivations have driven the intentional destruction of cultural heritage. Economic factors, often linked to profit, have played a role. However, political causes were most prominent in ancient times, serving to assert dominance and erase rival cultures. In contemporary contexts, ideological differences and conflicts have fueled the destruction. Furthermore, strengthening bonds between groups with common enemies, as seen in Iran’s past collaboration with the Taliban despite ideological differences, can perpetuate destructive actions.

Impacts of Cultural Heritage Destruction

The destruction of cultural heritage has far-reaching and severe impacts on communities, particularly minority communities for whom these sites hold special significance. When cultural heritage is lost, communities lose access to their history, traditions, and spiritual practices. It disrupts their rights and abilities to practice their culture, religion, or spirituality, leading to a loss of identity and connection to their roots. The destruction extinguishes sources of history and erases the tangible evidence of a people’s existence.

Iran’s Regime in Comparison to ISIS and the Taliban

Intentionally targeting historical antiquities is not unique to Iran’s regime; it is a tactic shared by ISIS and the Taliban. While their ideological differences may be apparent, they all share a willingness to destroy cultural heritage to further their respective goals. Iran’s regime has collaborated with the Taliban, driven by their common enemy, the Islamic State Khorasan (ISK). This relationship suggests a shared disregard for cultural heritage.

The intentional destruction of cultural heritage is a global issue that has persisted throughout history. Iran’s regime, like ISIS and the Taliban, has contributed to this destruction by deliberately targeting historical antiquities. The severe impacts of such actions on communities, particularly minority groups, cannot be overstated. Cultural heritage plays a vital role in preserving history and identity; its destruction results in the loss of tangible connections to the past. Efforts to preserve and protect cultural heritage are crucial to safeguarding our shared human legacy for future generations.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

July 24, 2023

For 45 years, the Iranian people have grappled with a complex dilemma. While the mullahs in power possess significant wealth and authority, most of the population remains impoverished and hungry, with their aspirations for freedom, justice, liberty, and equality primarily ignored. The world, too, has looked the other way, engaging in business with those responsible for oppressing innocent Iranians. However, amid these challenges, a revolution is taking shape, led by courageous women fighting fearlessly for a better future.

The Impact of the 1979 Iranian Revolution

As the Islamic Revolution completed its fourth decade, it would not be too difficult to realize the reality and the fruits of its mismanagement during its imperial and revolutionary eras. Throughout the four decades of its existence, the Islamic Republic has produced more hunger, extreme frustration, and anger, prostitution at a record pace, drug addiction beyond control, and child execution without regard to the international human rights bylaws.

The Iranian Revolution of 1979 was pivotal in the nation’s history and had far-reaching implications for the global oil market. It sparked the second oil shock in five years, causing oil prices to surge and resulting in a substantial net loss of oil supply. In response to these changes, oil producers worldwide increased investments in exploration and production to mitigate the effects of the revolution.

Unfulfilled Aspirations

Despite the upheaval caused by the 1979 revolution, the fundamental desire of more than 90 percent of Iranians is freedom. The ruling mullahs consolidated their power and wealth, leaving most of the population in dire socio-economic conditions. Dissidents struggled to unite for common goals, hindered by the oppressive regime’s tactics to suppress opposition.

Women Leading the Charge

The women of Iran are leading the first female-led revolution in the history of the world, revising what bravery means. Notably, a revolutionary movement is underway, primarily led by women who have managed to rally widespread support nationwide. These brave women are fighting relentlessly for freedom, opposing the oppressive Islamic regime that has stifled Iran’s largely secular population for over four decades. These courageous women have won almost the entire nation to their cause.

They fight fearlessly for freedom and against the terror of the Islamic regime, which has oppressed the largely secular population for 45 years. The Iranian people are aware that only they can overthrow the regime. The only thing they ask from other governments is not to deal with their killers.

The Iranian people know that their fate rests in their hands and are determined to bring about change. Women in Iran are chanting “Women, Life, Freedom” despite the threat of being shot and incarcerated by the régime. They are risking their lives. There are photographs of women raising their fists while the streets around them burn.

Understanding the Regime’s Influence

The Iranian regime exercises its influence through various means. Firstly, it maintains ties with Sunni clerics (despite the fact they are enemies) to consolidate its power base. Secondly, it provides financial aid to every proxy terrorist in the region and supports militant groups with weapons and training, further destabilizing the region. The regime’s transnational repression campaign reaches far beyond those kidnapped, killed, or detained, exerting other forms of pressure on anyone deemed a threat to the Islamic Republic.  Now the world faces wall-builders of a different kind: the Islamofascists, who have been at their shameless work for centuries. As their walls, built with superstition, discrimination, and blood, crumble, they become more intent on rebuilding new territories.

Transnational Repression Campaign

Moreover, the regime has extended its oppressive reach far beyond its borders, employing a transnational repression campaign to exert pressure on anyone perceived as threatening the Islamic Republic. This campaign includes kidnapping, killing, detaining, and other insidious tactics aimed at silencing dissent and perpetuating its control.

The Turning Point

Iran has witnessed numerous protests since 1979, but the most recent episode stands apart. The tragic death of Mahsa Amini in police custody for wearing an “improper” hijab ignited an unprecedented political upheaval marked by waves of protests predominantly led by women. This uprising has garnered extraordinary international support. Waves of protests, led primarily by women, have broken out immediately, inspiring exceptional international support.

Supporting the Iranian People

The Iranian people now need the unwavering support of the global community to amplify their plight and combat the regime’s oppression. The world must no longer remain silent about the truth of the Iranian dilemma or engage in business with those responsible for the suffering of innocent Iranians.

The ongoing Iranian revolution symbolizes the resilience and courage of a people yearning for freedom, justice, liberty, and equality. Despite facing immense adversity, the Iranian women spearheading this movement are determined to bring about change. It is incumbent upon the international community to stand with the Iranian people in their fight for a better future and ensure that their aspirations for a just and equitable society are finally realized. The world must not remain silent in reporting the truth of the Iranian dilemma and must not engage in doing business with the killers of innocent Iranians. The Iranian revolution is ongoing, and the world must stand with the Iranian people in their fight for freedom, justice, and equality.

The brave Iranian women and men are not stopping, nor will they soon. They are taking to the streets to cut their hair and burn their hijabs, indicating to the Islamic government that they will no longer stand for this totalitarian regime—time for the mullahs to pack up and leave. It is not a matter of if but when this regime falls.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

July 22, 2023

For 45 years, the Iranian people have grappled with a complex dilemma. While the mullahs in power possess significant wealth and authority, most of the population remains impoverished and hungry, with their aspirations for freedom, justice, liberty, and equality primarily ignored. The world, too, has looked the other way, engaging in business with those responsible for oppressing innocent Iranians. However, amid these challenges, a revolution is taking shape, led by courageous women fighting fearlessly for a better future.

The Impact of the 1979 Iranian Revolution

As the Islamic Revolution completed its fourth decade, it would not be too difficult to realize the reality and the fruits of its mismanagement during its imperial and revolutionary eras. Throughout the four decades of its existence, the Islamic Republic has produced more hunger, extreme frustration, and anger, prostitution at a record pace, drug addiction beyond control, and child execution without regard to the international human rights bylaws.

The Iranian Revolution of 1979 was pivotal in the nation’s history and had far-reaching implications for the global oil market. It sparked the second oil shock in five years, causing oil prices to surge and resulting in a substantial net loss of oil supply. In response to these changes, oil producers worldwide increased investments in exploration and production to mitigate the effects of the revolution.

Unfulfilled Aspirations

Despite the upheaval caused by the 1979 revolution, the fundamental desire of more than 90 percent of Iranians is freedom. The ruling mullahs consolidated their power and wealth, leaving most of the population in dire socio-economic conditions. Dissidents struggled to unite for common goals, hindered by the oppressive regime’s tactics to suppress opposition.

Women Leading the Charge

The women of Iran are leading the first female-led revolution in the history of the world, revising what bravery means. Notably, a revolutionary movement is underway, primarily led by women who have managed to rally widespread support nationwide. These brave women are fighting relentlessly for freedom, opposing the oppressive Islamic regime that has stifled Iran’s largely secular population for over four decades. These courageous women have won almost the entire nation to their cause.

They fight fearlessly for freedom and against the terror of the Islamic regime, which has oppressed the largely secular population for 45 years. The Iranian people are aware that only they can overthrow the regime. The only thing they ask from other governments is not to deal with their killers.

The Iranian people know that their fate rests in their hands and are determined to bring about change. Women in Iran are chanting “Women, Life, Freedom” despite the threat of being shot and incarcerated by the régime. They are risking their lives. There are photographs of women raising their fists while the streets around them burn.

Understanding the Regime’s Influence

The Iranian regime exercises its influence through various means. Firstly, it maintains ties with Sunni clerics (despite the fact they are enemies) to consolidate its power base. Secondly, it provides financial aid to every proxy terrorist in the region and supports militant groups with weapons and training, further destabilizing the region. The regime’s transnational repression campaign reaches far beyond those kidnapped, killed, or detained, exerting other forms of pressure on anyone deemed a threat to the Islamic Republic.  Now the world faces wall-builders of a different kind: the Islamofascists, who have been at their shameless work for centuries. As their walls, built with superstition, discrimination, and blood, crumble, they become more intent on rebuilding new territories.

Transnational Repression Campaign

Moreover, the regime has extended its oppressive reach far beyond its borders, employing a transnational repression campaign to exert pressure on anyone perceived as threatening the Islamic Republic. This campaign includes kidnapping, killing, detaining, and other insidious tactics aimed at silencing dissent and perpetuating its control.

The Turning Point

Iran has witnessed numerous protests since 1979, but the most recent episode stands apart. The tragic death of Mahsa Amini in police custody for wearing an “improper” hijab ignited an unprecedented political upheaval marked by waves of protests predominantly led by women. This uprising has garnered extraordinary international support. Waves of protests, led primarily by women, have broken out immediately, inspiring exceptional international support.

Supporting the Iranian People

The Iranian people now need the unwavering support of the global community to amplify their plight and combat the regime’s oppression. The world must no longer remain silent about the truth of the Iranian dilemma or engage in business with those responsible for the suffering of innocent Iranians.

The ongoing Iranian revolution symbolizes the resilience and courage of a people yearning for freedom, justice, liberty, and equality. Despite facing immense adversity, the Iranian women spearheading this movement are determined to bring about change. It is incumbent upon the international community to stand with the Iranian people in their fight for a better future and ensure that their aspirations for a just and equitable society are finally realized. The world must not remain silent in reporting the truth of the Iranian dilemma and must not engage in doing business with the killers of innocent Iranians. The Iranian revolution is ongoing, and the world must stand with the Iranian people in their fight for freedom, justice, and equality.

The brave Iranian women and men are not stopping, nor will they soon. They are taking to the streets to cut their hair and burn their hijabs, indicating to the Islamic government that they will no longer stand for this totalitarian regime—time for the mullahs to pack up and leave. It is not a matter of if but when this regime falls.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

July 16, 2023

What qualifies Islam as a religion? What are the criteria for deciding if an ideology is a religion? An illiterate Arab, some 1500 years ago, claimed Allah commissioned him as his emissary. What’s the proof for his claim? The Quran, the book that took him 20 years to put together and bill as the word-for-word utterances of the creator of the universe, Allah? It just so happened that he came up with a tremendously attractive proposition to the forever fighting-plundering Arabs: join me, war with me, and your winning is guaranteed: you kill our adversary, you get to keep 80% of his possessions, including his women and children. You get killed, and your destination is Allah’s glorious sensual paradise, where you will reside forever.

The offer caught like wildfire and, over time, engulfed the world.

There is no proof that Muhammad was indeed chosen and commissioned by the author of the universe for this mission called Islam. So, Islam is a religion because it has a prophet? Why not Nazism? Oh, because Adolf Hitler did not claim so? What about Marx and, Engels, Mao? No, they did not claim to be emissaries of supernatural beings.

Most religions are indeed intended to attenuate human fears. They are based on natural worries, many of which are irrational…but natural nonetheless. For example, many pagan religious practices were focused on the seasonal cycles related to the harvest. Why? Because if the harvest was poor, their entire civilization could perish or be weakened to the point where a neighboring tribe would kill them.

While they misunderstood the scientific basis for whether they created natural (yet irrational) religious beliefs about whether and harvest, in this sense, religions were psychologically helpful and inevitable in addressing natural conditions. But some religions establish for themselves fears of things that do not exist…which the religion itself invented to create and perpetuate fear, and then artificially addressed it to establish a political regime.

The political nature of Islam transcends personal spiritualism and becomes a cult of oppression. This is fraud. This is evil. This is Islam.

Islam essentially invents the idea that Christians, Jews, and pagans are abominations and offensive to Allah and that their very existence represents an attack upon the self-defined Islamic right to reign over the world. Allah thus enlists Muslim believers to eradicate by force those who offend him and, by disbelieving, prevent his rule.

True Muslim believers, therefore, become the enforcers, hitmen, and mercenaries for their God to establish a global Caliphate for their parasitic clergy. Their targets are artificially constructed, adversaries. Believers are instructed to fear the “great Satan.” They are told they are offensive to Allah and their families if they do not follow Allah’s calls to Jihad. It’s a “you’re either for me or against me” strategy. Contrast this with, say, Christian fears. Christians, too, fear offending God because they believe that God will judge their lives when their bodies die. So, their fears are reduced by atoning in personal alignment with the teachings of the Bible.

So, as a political religion, Islam creates artificial fear of alien groups and then eliminates the fear through war and coercion. Islam pleases Allah with brutality and Jihad. Islam seeks to instill a political regime to enforce its provisions. When such a political doctrine declares that “resistance is futile,” it refers to corporeal enforcement by people. Personal religions acknowledge natural fears and then use light, wisdom, and the capacity of human nobility to eliminate them through a positive, spiritual exercise.

Islam can work by brute force and by the lengths the believers will go to perpetuate it. Its theology and practices make it inherently evil and dangerous to all humanity. It has already spread and infected the world like cancer. How do you nuke it out of existence? You can’t…; they will nuke us first, I am sure it.

Warning to free men and women: remain a spectator at your peril. It is imperative that you take a stand and do your part in denouncing the fraud of Islam and do all you can to prevent the Islamic fire from devouring our civilized democratic system.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

July 11, 2023

In the annals of American politics, Karl Rove and the Bush family stand out as symbols of ruthlessness and a relentless pursuit of power. These figures, particularly Karl Rove, have employed cunning tactics and maneuverings that have left a trail of destruction in their wake. An in-depth examination of their careers and actions makes it abundantly clear that these individuals are far from the benevolent politicians they are often portrayed as.

Karl Rove: Master Manipulator and Architect of Deception

Karl Rove, known as the “Master Manipulator,” possesses a sinister talent for exploiting the political landscape to his advantage. As a tactician and advisor, Rove has perfected the art of deception and fear-mongering, employing vicious tactics to secure electoral victories. His approach revolves around fostering division, spreading misinformation, and launching relentless smear campaigns against opponents.
Throughout his career, Rove has demonstrated a disregard for ethical boundaries. He has shamelessly engaged in character assassinations, employing negative ads and engaging in dirty tricks to tarnish the reputations of his adversaries. Rove has demonstrated a willingness to sacrifice truth and integrity for political gain by defending people’s fears and exploiting wedge issues.

The Bushes: A Legacy of Self-Interest Disguised as Public Service

The Bush family’s political dynasty, spanning generations, is steeped in self-interest, cloaked in a facade of public service. From Prescott Bush to George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, their actions consistently reveal a disregard for the well-being of the American people.

George H. W. Bush, the 41st President, skilfully navigated the political landscape, but questionable decisions marred his legacy. He promised a “kinder, gentler nation” but oversaw policies that favored the wealthy elite at the expense of the middle and working classes. His administration’s involvement in scandals like the Iran-Contra affair exposed a willingness to put personal gain above national interests.

Disastrous decisions with far-reaching consequences marked George W. Bush’s presidency. From the ill-conceived invasion of Iraq based on false premises to the mishandling of Hurricane Katrina, Bush demonstrated a lack of competence and a callous disregard for human life. His administration’s policies exacerbated income inequality and weakened environmental regulations while pandering to corporate interests.

Unveiling the Viciousness

Critics of Rove and the Bushes are not misguided. Their tactics were not merely the result of political competition but deliberate acts of aggression. Rove’s relentless pursuit of power and the Bush family’s disregard for the nation’s well-being has left lasting scars on American democracy.

By highlighting the viciousness of these individuals, it becomes apparent that their actions were driven by a thirst for power and a willingness to manipulate the system to their advantage. The negative consequences of their policies and decisions cannot be understated. From the lives lost in unnecessary wars to the erosion of civil liberties, their viciousness becomes apparent when we delve beneath the surface.

Karl Rove, the Bushes, and their political legacies are riddled with deception, self-interest, and a relentless pursuit of power. Their tactics have left a lasting impact on the American political landscape, with repercussions that continue to resonate today. By shedding light on their Machiavellian strategies and destructive policies, we must remain vigilant, ensuring that such individuals are held accountable and that our democracy is safeguarded from their insidious influence. We can only strive for a more just and equitable political future through an informed and critical assessment of their actions.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

July 7, 2023

The Muslims’ killing campaign did not end with their defeat at the gates of Vienna. Jihadism never changes. The long history of violent Islam speaks for itself. It’s a significant reason that explains why Eastern European citizens do not accept mass immigration of Muslim societies with the same kind of “tolerance” demanded by the elitist governments of Western Europe. Their fury is slowly reaching a boiling point.

Their eviction from Spain was a temporary forced retreat. But now, in huge numbers, Muslims have penetrated the gates of every city and town in Europe and North America without even having to use their swords.

Worried by the Muslims’ trouble-making and killing sprees, civilized nations in Western Europe and Northern America are bending over backward to placate them to join the family of humanity by admitting hordes of immigrants and offering them all manners of hospitality and assistance. All these gestures remain in vain and to no avail. Many of the new arrivals, deeply infected by their Islamic indoctrination and ethos, find it impossible to assimilate in any host country. Instead, they strive to impose their defunct order, which is the cause of their own misery, backwardness, and inhumanity on the host nations.

The non-Muslim world is at its wits’ end. No accommodation or kindness seems to stem the tide of Islamic violence. Countless numbers of proposals have been advanced in dealing with this systemic Islamic disorder. Some feel that, in general, Muslims are law-abiding citizens of their adopted countries, and it is only a minority that is responsible for the violence and mayhem. Thinking along these lines has prompted people to say that the solution to Islamic violence rests with Islamic leaders. That is, Islamic leaders should speak up and condemn jihad and jihadists.

Western armchair theorizers and wishful thinkers need to take time and study Islamic history and its system of belief to avoid making demands on Muslim leaders–demands that will never be met because they are entirely unrealistic.

Islam presently has its stranglehold over a billion humans, posing an existential threat to all non-Muslims. When this billion and a half adhere to the pathological belief of Islam and use it as their marching orders of life, the rest of humanity ignores this threat at its peril.

Yet again, Islam has risen from the ashes and is on a campaign of conquest worldwide. Hordes of fanatical Islamic foot soldiers are striving to kill and get killed. They all want the opportunity to discharge their homicidal-suicidal impulses on their way to Allah’s promised glorious paradise. And in the background, granting the foot soldiers’ wishes, are their handlers, the puppeteers, who pull the strings and detonate these human bombs. Those who cherish life must recognize these emissaries of death — what makes them, what motivates them, and how best to defend against them.

With a long tradition of protecting religious freedom, America still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is deciding what constitutes a religion and who will make that call. There is a glimmer of hope that the American people are waking up to the deceit and the menace of the creed called Islam. Their opposition to the building of the mosque at Ground Zero and their numerous objection to building mosques reveals that the creeping Islamization of America is indeed something to stand against and prevent before it is too late.

As more and more Muslims arrive in America, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, they gather more power to undermine a severe challenge to the American system of governance—representative democracy. As for our Constitution, Muslims have no use for it at all. Muslims believe Allah’s rule must govern the world as a Caliphate—a theocracy. Making a mockery of the system of law, subverting its workings, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of governance invented by infidels.

Very few of us have been sounding the alarm for decades about the ever-increasing menace Islam poses to America and our way of life. Apathy, political correctness, and massive Islamic lobbying have successfully prevented the public from truly grasping the all-pervasive Islamic assault.

Time and again, we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We’re also told not to worry about the horrific things that are happening on the other side of the world! If Muslims act heinously toward non-Muslims, it is how things are in those countries and hardly any of our business. This is the same attitude that set the Islamization of Europe on a seemingly irreversible track. One European country, one after another, is rapidly buckling under the weight of Islamism.

With heavy assurances like this from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can relax and not worry. Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts nor any relaxation of the mind can make it go away. Islam will continue its bloody conquest.

Islam is a belief in blood. It lives and thrives on blood. It can be an animal, an enemy, or even its own blood. Unless our government sees the handwriting on the wall and deals with it accordingly, before very long, America will have to turn its deed over to the new Muslim invaders or rebel and fight block by block, city by city. That’s when There Will Be Blood.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

June 23, 2023

Never in the history of America has a group of power-hungry wolves, known as the Democrat Party, done so much damage to America. Establishment Republicans are not far behind!

Forms of Government

There are several different forms of government in the present world. One such form is Democracy. Democracy is supposed to be a form of government voted into power by the people to serve the best interests of the people. However, translating this superior ideal into reality is complicated and problematic. Yes, it is said that the voter is king in democracy. But this assertion is more of a slogan than a reality. What is left unsaid is that no country can have every voting citizen as king, only one king per country. Besides, in a true democracy, a king is only a symbolic figure with no significant executive or legislative powers.

The actual king in democracy is not the voter but the forces or powers that steer him into voting. The voter must know who he should vote for and what is in it. Potentially, there can be as many differences in vote exercises as there are voters: a recipe for chaos. To avoid confusion and partly to enhance the likelihood of attaining their objectives, like-minded people coalesce by forming interest groups such as labor unions and political parties.

Once this grouping happens, conflict is only one step behind. Different parties compete for their interests with little regard or care for other groups. It is at this point that funds begin to influence the outcome significantly.

The Golden Rule means he who has the gold makes the rule, it is said cynically, yet there is a hefty dose of truth in it.

Democracies are plutocracies—the rule of money. We all know that America is a Republic, not a Democracy. We are closest to the Founder’s intent when we refer to the form of federal government planned and inserted in our Constitution as a “representative republic.” This explains two essential parts of our federal structure: (1) the role of citizens is to vote for representatives and hold them responsible; and (2) the functions of our elected representatives – Congress and the Executive – are to legislate and govern.

Tricky Representation:

No community of any size can constitute itself in such a way that every member directly participates in every decision and action of the community. This impracticality, a lesson learned from the early New England settlers’ Town Hall meetings, necessitated electing individuals to represent those people. Money enters the fray with an even more significant impact at this juncture.

An aspirant of any elective office needs funds in proportion to the importance of the office he is seeking. For instance, a person running for a seat in a small town council may require modest funds for handbills, possible newspaper ads, etc.

In contrast, an aspirant for the office of a country’s presidency would need a war chest of hundreds of millions of dollars. And all elected officials are staffing the government from the bottom to the top. And all these people depend on funds to promote themselves and their platforms.

Often, the candidate with a bigger war chest wins the prize—and gets elected. A troubling question is where the person secured the funds and what kind of IOUs he had to issue.

Another troubling question is the person’s true aim to run for office. There must be something in it for him- whatever that may be. We want to think that he is altruistic and devoted to serving his constituents. But who are his actual constituents?
Sadly, many elected or appointed politicians are often driven by ambitions other than serving the people. Volumes can be produced in such cases in democracies. The attainment of office may be merely a means to an end, and the top end is self-serving monetarily or otherwise.

Money and Funds

It is sad that money drives politicians to power and keeps them there. Without money, they would never make it to first base. Without more money, they may languish at first base. To advance further to absolute power, politicians need large sums of money. And people who have money do not give them money without extracting payback. The higher the politician moves, the greater his IOU is to the people and the organizations that own him.

Like every transaction in life, dealing with moneyed people is a barter system. The politician becomes an employee of the funder (s). As is generally the case, the contract favors the employer—the money. The employee, the politician, often finds himself in a trap. He is, in effect, a purchased agent with little or no leeway. If he deviates in the least from his commitment, he may find himself out of work and more.

Moneyed Muslims and Muslim organizations with vast interests in promoting Islam are thoroughly familiar with the power of money to recruit people to do their bidding. That’s why many non-Muslims work at all levels of government and society to further Islam. In short: they are paid to do a job.

And it is the case that powerful institutions and organizations have the means and personnel to accomplish their objectives—whatever they may be.

We are individuals; more often than not, we are outmanned and outgunned by these group forces. Lone Rangers win only in make-believe movies. In real life, governments, institutions, and organizations are the ones who prevail. They have the funds to buy the services of the media; employ lawyers, politicians, and mercenaries of all stripes.

I have been asked to run for the US Congress and try to save our republic against the encroachment of Islamic ideology. America desperately could use a national security expert in the US Congress. As for me, I leave it up to the people to decide. In this business, you need name recognition and considerable funds.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

June 21, 2023

“I am almost finished making you, except for inserting one last gene,” says God to man.

“Yes, Lord, can’t wait to get on my way,” replies the man.

“Now, since I like you, I will give you a choice in this very important last component. Do you want the gene that automatically conducts your life—the Reflex Gene; one that would make most of your decisions for you—the Instinct Gene, or the gene that would empower you to make just about all your decisions yourself—the Liberty Gene?” asks God.

“Lord, since you are, out of your infinite kindness, giving me a choice in this vital matter, can I have the gene that would give me absolute control over my affairs? If not, I would settle for the Liberty Gene,” says the man.

“I can see you are already scheming. No, you can’t have anything absolute. All absolutes are restricted to me. All my creations, including you, are only relative,” says the Lord.

“Sure, Lord. I understand that everything about you is absolute, infinite, and perfect. But no harm in asking, is there, Lord?” says the man.

“An impudent wise jackass, aren’t you? I see that I am about to make the first mistake of my life by creating you,” the Lord says, shaking his pointer at him.

“Forgive me, Lord. I didn’t mean it the way you are taking it,” apologizes man.

“I also see that you are using your deceptive faculty on me. No dice, little fellow. Remember that I see everything that goes on in your head as well as in your heart. Don’t play games with me, ever,” says the Lord.

“Yes, Lord. For some reason, I felt that since you have given it to me, I might as well use it. Otherwise, why have it? But you are right. You are always right, and there are no exceptions. With you, I need to be absolutely forthright and honest,” the man says meekly.

“I see that you are using another one of your faculties. You are buttering me up,” says God with an amused voice.

“But Lord, why must I pray to you and thank you for everything? I can’t tell the difference. What is praying and what is buttering up?” pleads man.

“I knew all along that I would have endless trouble with you, and it is starting right now. But that’s the main reason I am creating you, anyway. It is no fun just having everything run on pre-determined programs. I need some excitement, unpredictability, and challenges to liven my life,” says the Lord.

“Lord, getting back to the offer, it thrills me to be able to make most of my own decisions. I think if some excitement, unpredictability, and challenges are good for my Lord, then they are definitely good for me too. I can’t thank you enough for offering me the Liberty Gene,” says the man.

“Right, everything that is good for me may be good for you, but not for you. Don’t you ever forget that. I am God and the only God. I am making you in my image, but I am not making you my own double. There is a big difference. You understand?” admonishes God.

“I certainly do, Lord. Thank you, Lord,” says the man.

“The Liberty Gene is a most precious possession. Many will aim to rob you of it and, by so doing, add to their own power while transforming you into a mere robot. You need be vigilant and guard it with your very life. Beware of three kinds of people: charlatans, demagogues, and politicians. And more often than not, someone who is all three of these characters wrapped into one will rise,” God says.

“Lord, that’s a great heads up. I deeply appreciate the warning. But, please tell me how I can tell a false claimant from a true one,” the man pleads.

“By their fruit shall ye know them,” God replies.

“Lord, you know that I am not smart enough to understand this metaphor. Would you spell it out for me in your infinite kindness?” says the man.

“If I spell it out for you fully, it would violate the Liberty Gene’s prerogatives. The best I can do is to give you a few pointers: Anyone who claims special privileges and status for himself, makes outlandish promises and threats, pits one person against another, and causes bloodshed among people fit the bill. The most dangerous of these malevolent is anyone falsely claiming to be my emissary,” says God.

“Lord, thank you. That’s helpful,” says the man

“Also, remember that the bargain you make with me will hold not only for you but all your descendants who will inhabit Earth. Before making your final selection, I must warn you that making a deal with me is called a ‘covenant.’ And covenants with me are irrevocable,” continues God.

“Thanks, Lord. You are so good to me. I don’t know how I can repay you for all this kindness. Obviously, I can’t since you have it all. But, I’ll worship you and pray to you in adoration if that’s pleasing to you, Lord,” Says the man.

“Praying is fine. But knowing you, you’ll use praying to butter me up and ask me for things. Nothing doing. Once you’re on your own, you’re on your own. Don’t you forget it,” says the Lord.

“Yes, Lord. All my future descendants and I will be forever grateful to your kindness and generosity for allowing us to be somewhat masters of our own destiny rather than be like some of our close relatives who are still arboreal and very hairy to boot,” says the man.

Fast Forward

It wasn’t the forbidden apple he ate that doomed man. It was his dumb decision to choose the gene with the most significant latitude since he failed to ask the Lord for a top-of-the-shelf gene for wisdom to guide him in making choices. Numerous harebrained decisions and outright malevolent ones knit a web of misery for man over time. The litany of the suffering that befell man is voluminous indeed.

In tight spots, time and again, people conveniently would ignore their covenant with God. They would turn to him as if he was their fix-it-all—their Good Man Friday. They also would forget that he could see in their heads and hearts when they submitted to him lengthy wish lists in the guise of praying to him. Before long, prayers became little more than buttering God and asking him for things and favors.

Time and again, the Lord remained faithful to his part of the covenant and ignored the people’s insistence on violating the original compact in their favor so that they could make all the stupid decisions that they wanted and let God clean up the mess in their individual and collective lives.

The Lord couldn’t be played. He wouldn’t budge. But, people continued their schemes to make the Lord violate or at least amend the covenant. Flattery, they figured, could possibly work. So, they invented prayers, a subtle subterfuge for a shopping list for the Lord. Before the advent of the Internet and E-mail, people used Gmail—sending missives to the Lord’s mailbox utilizing the Ethernet.

And this state of affairs made it ripe for the rise of the same people God warned man about, the charlatans, the demagogues, and the politicians. These frauds popped up worldwide and were presented as answers to peoples’ Gmail and solutions to their problems. And we all know how these miscreants, in the forms of individuals, groups or even governments, compounded humanity’s problems rather than solving them.

People wouldn’t give up and mend their ways. Instead, they resorted to cunning and everything they could to cajole the Lord to do things for them. They built numberless cathedrals, mosques, and temples with lavish ornaments to lure the Lord in and hear their supplications up close. Again, nothing worked.

Desperate situations spawn desperate measures. And God, not coming to the aid of the people, forced many to turn to other sources with dire results. Just a few recent cases of this tragic misstep should warn us to heed the Lord’s original advice and not be victimized in the future by fraud.

*****

From the primitive land of the Arabian Peninsula over 14 centuries ago rose Muhammad, an illiterate hired hand of a rich widow Khadija, claiming that he was the bearer of a perfect life prescription from God—the Quran. He claimed humanity could do no better than following its precepts and following Muhammad’s life example to guarantee bliss and salvation. In exchange for this, people must embrace Islam—surrender—by surrendering their Liberty to Muhammad.

Question: Why would the All-Wise Lord choose an illiterate desert-dweller of all the people in the world to be his messenger? Why choose a man who couldn’t read or write, who, over 20 years, claimed to be receiving periodic revelations from God and had to rely on others who could write to jot down his recollections? These recollections were recorded as the word-for-word literal utterances and commandments of God. Furthermore, a dozen versions of the book of Allah, the Quran, turned up, and a fallible Caliph selected one of them and had the rest burned. Burning books has ever since been a companion to Islam’s mission.

But again, those are the ways of the Lord, and no one is given the right to question them. Being the impudent person that I am, I will run the risk of asking a follow-up question.

Question: Would the same Lord who gave man the Liberty Gene unilaterally violate his covenant by sending an emissary to take away peoples’ precious gift at the point of the sword?

In no time at all, the savages of Arabia, allured by the win-win promise of Muhammad—you kill, you get the booty from your victims in this world—you get killed, and your abode will be the unimaginably glorious sensuous paradise of Allah—sword-in-hand, sallied forth to lands near and far.

***

From the “civilized” land of Germany rose a syphilitic lout who called on the German people to surrender their Liberty to him in exchange for a surefire solution to all their economic and social ills. He successfully portrayed the Jews as the main cause of the nation’s suffering. Before long, the masses of gullible, easy-solution seekers formed long lines in towns and villages of the land, tripping over each other in eagerness to surrender their Liberty to the savior Fuhrer.

The German people blindly subscribed to the Nazi’s promises of economic revival, restoration of German pride, and establishment of supremacy for the Aryan race. In a blink, hordes of rabid Brown Shirts fanned the land’s length and breadth, hunting the Jews. The fire of anti-Jew mania quickly expanded to devour Gypsies, non-Christians in general, the physically or mentally handicapped, homosexuals, and more.

The genocidal Hitler found it expedient to overlook some of the “despicable” Semitic people—the Arabs—by affording the Grand Mufti of Palestine, Haj Amin al-Husseini, a fellow Jew-hater, a most effusive welcome to Germany.

There is hardly a need to document the horrors of the Nazi episode here, where a charlatan managed to hoodwink a nation, rob the people of their liberty and cause so much death and destruction.

***

It is unthinkable that an ancient nation—Iran—with a distinguished history, allowed a high-order demagogue, Ayatollah Khomeini, to rally the people against the Shah with promises of rule for the people and justice for all. The long-suffering Iranians of all strata readily surrendered their liberty to the turbaned bigot and his gang of murdering sycophants.

In Iran, wishful-thinking people saw the “holy man of Allah” as an answer to prayer. The fanatic Muslims perceived him as the one who would revive the flagging fortunes of the faith of Muhammad and pave the way for the much-anticipated advent of the Saheb-ul-Zaman (the Lord of the Age.) The secularists hoped for freedom from the yoke of the Shah’s dictatorship. Religious and ethnic minorities dreamed of a time when unscrupulous power brokers would no longer victimize them.

Gullibility was not limited to the Iranians who swelled the ranks of the fraud. On the other side of the world, the President of the United States of America—the Lusting in the Heart Carter—saw Khomeini as a saint and a savior. Carter provided crucial support to the man whose most extraordinary claim to the rank of the Grand Ayatollah was his lengthy dissertation on sexual intercourse with animals.

No sooner had this fraud of Allah ascended to power than the Iranians of all strata began to pay the price – tens of thousands with their lives – for the folly of letting the three-in-one Ayatollah make decisions for them, the three-in-one that God warned man about.

The Iranian people have been paying for the tragedy that has befallen them for over forty-five years. And that’s not where it ends. Khomeinism is the fire that is spreading beyond the borders of Iran. Khomeinism is a recent violent version of Islam’s Shiism. Islam means surrender. Surrender to the will and dictates of Allah as revealed by Mohammad.

A true Muslim does not and cannot believe in liberty. Everything is up to Allah, so says Mohammad. Everything a Muslim does is contingent upon the will and decree of Allah. For this reason, the phrase ensha-Allah (Allah willing) always accompanies any promise or commitment that a believer makes; by embracing Muhammad as Allah’s unerring and eternal emissary, Muslim surrenders their liberty to decide for themselves.

The Muslims’ surrender of liberty is not merely a personal choice. The Muslims, having abandoned their most precious rights, are out to make all non-Muslims do so by hook or crook. It is said that misery loves company. And the type of misery that Islam has visited on the Muslims and the Islamic lands is a rapidly spreading plague that must be resisted by all who cherish their God-given Liberty.

A personal note

As for me, I am with the people who guard their Liberty even in the face of death. I am with the people of Masada who committed mass suicide rather than submit their necks to the yoke of Roman slavery. I am with kaveh Ahangar, Paul Revere,

Babak Khorramdin, Maziar, Sattar Khan, and thousands of other honorable men and women defended liberty in the face of death. I echo Patrick Henry’s cry: Give me liberty or give me death. Life without liberty is living death.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

June 16, 2023

The impeachment trial of Ken Paxton has ignited a discussion surrounding the principles of fairness, justice, and Due Process. It is imperative to approach these proceedings with an open mind, allowing for a fair evaluation of the allegations against Paxton, adhering to due process, and ensuring equal justice under the law. Engaging with State Senators and promoting rational discourse is crucial to achieving a just outcome in this trial.

The Report on the Impeachment:

Let me reiterate, Attorney General Ken Paxton is a fearless leader of our Constitutional rights and the rule of law. The fact that they went after Ken Paxton is a shot across the bow and a hint at what’s to come in 2024. The allegations against him are untrue. They are false. The impeachment process has been marred by biased actions, lack of impartiality, and disregard for due process, undermining the entire proceedings’ legitimacy. It is a sham impeachment by the UniParty.

The impeachment process has not been conducted impartially. The House has displayed clear partisanship against Ken Paxton, resulting in a predetermined outcome that does not reflect fairness or justice.

The allegations presented against Ken Paxton are not valid. They have been manufactured to tarnish his reputation and politically demolish his character.

The Proceedings:

The Texas House, in a hasty manner, rushed the article of impeachment proceedings to the Senate. This hurried approach reflects a lack of seriousness and undermines the integrity of the entire process.

Shameful conduct by the House was disgraceful. It disregarded its rules and abandoned fair and proper procedures, leading to a compromised and unfair investigation. The House attempted to pass 20 articles of impeachment against Ken Paxton in less than 72 hours. Such an accelerated timeline undercuts the thoroughness and legitimacy of the proceedings, leaving no room for proper examination of the evidence or due process.

The allegations against Ken Paxton are baseless. He should never be convicted. The lack of substantial evidence and the politically motivated nature of the accusations only weaken the credibility of the entire process.

Process matters: The legitimacy of any legal proceedings rests on adherence to a proper process. In the case of Ken Paxton’s impeachment, the process has been compromised, thereby diminishing the overall legitimacy of the impeachment proceedings.

Documental evidence: Both sides must present documental evidence to support their claims. However, in the case of Ken Paxton, the presentation of such evidence needs to be improved, raising concerns about the process’s validity and credibility.

The actions taken by the House during the impeachment proceedings do not reflect the conduct expected from a legislative body. The abandonment of proper procedure and the reliance on hearsay evidence cast doubt on the integrity and justice of the process.

Evaluation of Allegations

In any impeachment trial, it is essential to carefully evaluate the allegations against the accused, separating facts from speculation or political posturing. While holding public officials accountable for their actions is crucial, ensuring that the accusations are based on concrete evidence and verifiable facts is equally essential. The Senate can establish a fair and just foundation for the trial by thoroughly examining the allegations.

Due Process and Presumption of Innocence

One of the cornerstones of the justice system is the presumption of innocence. Like any other individual, Ken Paxton should be afforded a fair opportunity to present his defense and confront the evidence against him. There are a few genuine problems with the way the House conducted this. First of all, Attorney General Paxton had absolutely no due process whatsoever. That’s a big problem. That’s something that will matter in the Senate. Second, a statute in state law says that anything that happened in the previous election cycle cannot be considered for impeachment in the current process.

Upholding due process is a legal obligation and a moral imperative. It is through fair procedures and a balanced presentation of evidence that the truth can be discerned and justice can be served.

Ken Paxton’s Resistance Against the Political Establishment:

For the past ten years, the Deep State went against General Paxton as they went against President Trump. Their phony indictment was nothing more than a witch hunt. And so is the impeachment of Ken Paxton. Paxton’s courageous stance for Texas is commendable. His dedication to our State while holding the best interests of the United States is extraordinary. His support for our military, the Texas National Guard, Border Patrol, and veterans is praiseworthy. His love for our country, America, is unparalleled.

Paxton’s nearly flawless and proven record of standing for conservative principles has earned him tremendous support among Texas conservative leaders.

“Attorney General Ken Paxton has been bravely on the front line in the fight for Texas, and America, against the vicious and very dangerous Radical Left Democrats, and the foolish and unsuspecting RINOs that are destroying our Country,” Trump said in an email.

Why did they impeach General Paxton?

Impeachment proceedings have often been marred by partisan divisions, with politicians focusing on their political affiliations rather than the case’s merits. The Texas Senate should uphold non-partisan, rational, and constructive discourse that would transcend one-sided boundaries. Senators can foster an environment where the truth can emerge, enabling them to make informed decisions based on the evidence presented.

One month ago, as reported by Miranda Devine in the NY Post, Paxton announced his new investigation into whether Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson misled Texans on the efficacy and safety of their vaccines.

Look at the pattern; Paxton wanted to go after election fraud, and it was REPUBLICANS that blocked him and are now removing him.

Maintaining Fairness

In the impeachment trial of Ken Paxton, upholding the principles of fairness, justice, and due process is of utmost importance. Senators can ensure a fair and just outcome by approaching the proceedings with an open mind, thoroughly evaluating the allegations, and adhering to procedural processes. By upholding these principles, the impeachment trial can serve the best interests of Texas, ensuring fairness and justice will prevail.

Therefore, in light of the above few observations, it can be understood that the impeachment proceedings against Ken Paxton can only be described as an ugly smear campaign aimed at politically assassinating his character. The lack of substantial evidence, the abandonment of due process, and the discriminatory conduct of the House demonstrate a corrupt and compromised process.

The people of Texas will see through this charade and recognize the evil nature of these proceedings, leading to their ultimate failure. The allegations against Ken Paxton are hearsay, double hearsay, and even triple hearsay, which would not hold in any court of law. The denial of the defendant’s right to speak and the rejection of a representative’s evidence further undermine the entire process’s fairness and legitimacy. Furthermore, a formal report detailing the evidence against Ken Paxton needs to be revised to ensure the validity of the allegations.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

June 3, 2023

Nearly 1400 years ago, a large number of Muslim jihadists from across the scorching Arabian desert, motivated by the ideology of Islam, indoctrinated by Muhammad, unafraid of death, conquered Iran (Persia), one of the greatest, strongest and most tolerant empires known throughout the history of man. The invasion of Persia was completed five years after the death of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad, though Persian resistance continued for centuries up to and including the present time. (Most Iranians consider the current Islamic regime as the continuation of 1400 years of Islamic tyranny and oppression).

The Bedouin Arabs who toppled the Sassanid Empire were propelled not only by a desire for conquest and to steal Persian jewels and treasures, but also to enslave Iranian women and children, while imposing their barbaric ideology upon the entire population. With that, they almost wiped out one of the most benevolent and ancient religions, Zoroastrianism, which is often called the mother of all revealed religions.

The political nature of Islam demanded that a conquered people not only convert to Islam but also regard its past history as a time of darkness before the light of Islam came. Today the Islamic Republic of Iran is busy purging Pre-Islamic Persian history from children’s textbooks. Islam required conquered people to scorn their own past and love their Islamic Arab conquerors by striving to imitate them. According to Islam, all history before Islam was an era of “darkness” and should be discarded. Islam is a brutal, hyper-masculine, barbarian, tribal warrior cult that glories in murder, mutilation, rape, genocide, terrorism, destruction, and anarchy.

When Arabs, a collection of backward, nomadic warrior tribes who did not even have a fully developed scripted language, conquered sophisticated cultures such as Egypt, Syria, Persia, and the Byzantine Empire, they took control over some of the world’s largest centers of accumulated knowledge. To claim that there was an “Islamic Golden Age” is like saying a group of savages storming into the world’s largest libraries, murdering all the librarians, and then claiming to have written all the books there, gives credit to this myth. Islam’s much-vaunted “Golden Age” was in fact just the twilight of conquered pre-Islamic cultures, an echo of times past. In all honesty, Islam’s trophy to human civilization is and always has been, Islamic terrorism.

The prophet of Islam motivated his rapidly growing body of followers to rally around him by proclaiming: if they are victorious, they will have the treasures of the infidels as well as their women and children as slaves to hold or sell; if the faithful kill the infidels in doing the work of Allah, a further reward awaits them in paradise; and, in the unlikely event that they are killed, they find themselves in Allah’s glorious paradise for an eternal life of joy and bliss.

The Persians underestimated the power and dedication of this newly formed Islamic ideology of hate and violence by desert dwellers. An unexpected unorthodox attack on the Persian army caused it to fall into the hands of the butchers of Islam and eventually, the culture of death prevailed and the era of Islamic terrorism began. Americans need to learn from the Persian experience and become more vigilant.

Americans must understand the history of Islam if they want to avoid the Persian experience. However, 1400 years later, a few Islamic terrorist States, flushed with petrodollars, are seeking and working hard for Islamic world domination through worldwide Islamic terrorism. They are determined to destroy everything America and the free world stand for and intend to replace it with the most barbaric ideology known as Sharia. Islam sees Christian America as a formidable enemy standing in its path of world domination. Hence, it has waged stealth jihad on Christian America. It is time to wake up and wake up fast.

In many surprising ways, America resembles the great ancient Persia. Like the ancient Persians who were the first-world managers and the most tolerant empire-builders, America, by its constitution, is also the most tolerant and benevolent nation in the world. Let us hope that America’s destiny will not end up like Persia’s.

Regretfully, reading about the Islamic religiously mandated horrific acts and even seeing them on television or the Internet may momentarily repulse, but does not terribly concern many Americans. After all, those things still are happening on the other side of the world and away from their homes, we are safe in Fortress America, so goes the thinking.

“Fortress America” is a delusion that even the events of 9/11 and the Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan massacre seems to have failed to dispel. Many prefer to believe that the assault of 9/11 was an aberration, since nothing as it has happened since, and it is unlikely that anything of the sort will ever happen again, so goes the wishful thinking. Reality portrays a vastly different picture. America is far from a fortress, given its vast wide-open borders. It is a nation of laws where all forms of freedom are enshrined in its constitution; where Americans live by a humane ethos diametrically different from those of Islamist savageries. Sadly, these differences confer great advantages to the Islamists and place America in imminent danger.

The breach of “Fortress America” from the air on 9/11 is only the first installment of many more forthcoming heinous assaults, about which we have been repeatedly warned by Muslim thugs living in caves. Unless we abandon our way of thinking, we will suffer the consequences of a dangerous complacency. We need to stop relying on the invincibility of the law-enforcement people and willingly make the sacrifices that would protect our way of life.

I have never claimed that the reported 1.5 billion Muslims are all jihadists aiming to destroy civilization and establish Muhammad’s Ummah over all of us. I certainly know that the active jihadists are a small minority. Yet, it takes a blind eye to ignore militant minorities. Did Hitler become the Chancellor of Germany because he and his gang got the majority vote in Germany? More than 65% of Germans were not supporters of Hitler and his party and viewed the Nazis as louts and worthless. Yet, we all know what this little minority did while being ignored.

What about forest fires? You cannot ignore a little smoldering fire here, a little smoldering fire there because the rest of the forest is not on fire. Only a fool will ignore these fires because they will eventually devour the forest.

The recent migration of Muslims to non-Islamic lands began as a seemingly harmless, even useful; trickle of desirable cheap needed labor. Before long, greater and greater numbers of Muslims deluged the new territories, and as they gained in numbers—by high birth rate as well as new arrivals—Muslims began reverting to their intolerant ways by, for instance, demanding legal status for Sharia (Islamic laws), the type of draconian laws that for the most part resemble those of man’s barbaric past.

Just a sobering note; mild Islamism is already here. As an example, there was the Muslim cab driver of the Minneapolis Airport and his refusal to ferry passengers with alcohol or even those with seeing-eye dogs; Muslim inmates demanding to be served only halal food, Kentucky Fried Chicken opens first halal restaurant in New York City, honor killing, Muslim students badgering universities for special facilities for their meetings, and, for the first time ever two Muslim Congressmen assuming the office by swearing on the Quran and not the Bible.

Islam need not even literally destroy the civilized world. All it needs is to gain enough power to impose its worse-than-death Sharia on everyone. If you are not up to speed with the horrors that Muslim governments and their jihadist foot soldiers commit on a daily basis, you need to open your eyes and deal with this deadly threat of Islam with much more realism.

Ignoring the smoldering fire and relying on a few local “firefighters” to keep the fires from spreading is either naive or outright criminal, but it is certainly the easiest thing to do. That’s why I have chosen to fight the fire and I am calling for help to put out Islam, the source that raises arsonists — the minority that they may be. It takes one arsonist to set a fire that a thousand firefighters will have difficulty putting out. The few Muslims who are brave enough to advocate reform of their religion are tossed out of mosques or, very likely labeled as apostates with a death warrant.

When our leaders, for instance, call Islam a great religion, they are appeasing, if not lying outright. We the people, elect our leaders and we hold them accountable to be honorable. When they are using their voice to call Islam a great religion, the most deadly threat to everything we cherish, not only do they legitimize Islamofascism, but also they infuse the rest of us with a false belief.

While people like former President Obama glorify Islam, the barbarians have made it inside our fortress. They have infiltrated our system of government. This time around, the people of the sword have their collaborator, Useful Idiots, inside busily doing all they can to dismantle our republic and replace it with worse death Islamic ideology by appeasing the enemy.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

May 31, 2023

The recent impeachment proceedings against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton have raised concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the process. This analysis aims to shed light on the allegations and underscore the potential bias and political motivations behind the impeachment effort. Examining the facts and considering the broader context before rushing to judgment is essential.

Questionable Testimony and Misinformation

The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) released a comprehensive report that refutes the incorrect testimony presented during the impeachment proceedings. This report directly challenges the basis of the allegations and highlights the inaccuracies, falsehoods, and misstatements made against Paxton. It is concerning that such flawed testimony formed the basis for the impeachment charges, casting doubt on the legitimacy of the process. [Listen to Attorney General Paxton’s full remarks]

Politically Motivated Investigation

The General Investigating Committee’s investigation appears to have been politically motivated. The allegations against Paxton have been long-disproven and are rooted in hearsay and gossip. A thorough examination by the OAG itself refuted each of the former employees’ claims. Despite these findings, the decision to proceed with impeachment suggests an ulterior motive to tarnish Paxton’s reputation rather than pursue justice.

Exhaustive Report and Outside Investigation

The OAG’s exhaustive report released in August 2021 meticulously addressed the allegations made by former employees. Additionally, an outside law firm was retained to conduct further investigation into retaliation claims. This independent investigation resulted in a report documenting legitimate, non-retaliatory grounds for terminating the individuals involved. Acknowledging that this exonerating information was readily available but seemingly ignored by the committee investigators, indicating a lack of interest in the truth, is crucial.

Ignored Offer to Testify

Despite an official from the OAG being present at a hearing and offering to testify, the House General Investigating Committee deliberately chose to overlook this opportunity. This disregard for essential information and refusal to engage with the facts further reinforces the notion that the committee focused more on a predetermined outcome than on seeking the truth. This approach undermines the integrity of the entire impeachment process.

Political Retribution

Ken Paxton characterizes the impeachment as political retribution and such claims cannot be dismissed lightly. Paxton has been a solid conservative voice and an unwavering advocate for Texas voters. The timing and circumstances surrounding his impeachment raise questions about whether the motivation was to undermine conservative principles and silence a staunch opponent of the Biden administration’s policies.

Call for Judicial Review

Renowned Texas Senator Ted Cruz has highlighted the need for the courts to sort out the legal controversies surrounding Ken Paxton. Allowing the judicial system to play its rightful role ensures fairness and due process prevail. Rather than hastily jumping to conclusions, it is essential to let the legal system assess the validity of the allegations leveled against Paxton.

Conclusion

The impeachment proceedings against Ken Paxton have been fraught with questionable testimonies, a politically motivated investigation, ignored exonerating evidence, and a potential agenda of political retribution. It is crucial to consider these factors before passing judgment. The courts should play a vital role in evaluating the legal controversies surrounding Paxton, ensuring fairness and justice prevail. It is imperative to preserve the principles of due process and uphold the rights of all individuals, regardless of their political affiliations.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

May 27, 2023

The world is presently at its most wicked. It is beyond human help. It requires only a nudge to implode and prepare for the divine ruler, the Saheb-ul-Zaman (the Mahdi, the Lord of the Age) to come and set it aright. It is the sacred duty and privilege of every Muslim to do all he can to hasten the death of the old world and the birth of the global Islamic Ummah. Thus goes the thinking of Iran’s ruling mullahs and their hand-picked presidents.

It seems like the old millennialism thinking. The belief in supernatural intervention to set the world aright is scriptural to major religions, including Islam. The Jews have been earnestly supplicating the Lord for the Messiah to come, the Christians are impatiently awaiting the second coming of Christ, and, the Zoroastrians are convinced that Saoshayant is the one who shall come, defeat the trouble-making Ahriman — Satan — and make the creatures again pure. But this time around, a group of believers with tremendous resources are intent on forcing the issue, making the conditions so dire that they leave the reluctant Saheb-ul-Zaman no choice but to appear and assume his universal reign.

Up to this point, millennialism was a belief and a hope. No one ever aspired to or had the means of making the anticipated events come about. The matter was in the hands of God. The Muslims’ perennial prayer recited every day, posted in mosques and even on bumpers of vehicles has been, “O, Saheb-ul-Zaman, hasten your coming.” The prayer for the advent, thus far, has been limited to passive supplications of the faithful.

It is a well-established fact that beliefs are the potent impetus to action. If you believe your home is about to be burglarized, you secure the house and take other precautions. If you, under the influence of drugs, believe that a bug is burrowing into your skin, you may take a knife to your own body and try to dig the imaginary bug out.

Hence, it is shortsighted to dismiss the mullahs as a bunch of lunatics who are out of touch with reality and that they have no intention of doing catastrophic mischief to compel the Mahdi’s coming — maybe some arming of the Iraqi Shiites, a little support for Hezb’allah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine — but no, no major idiocy. After all, they are rational people and in touch with reality. Any large-scale trouble making spells their doom as well. Thus goes rationalization — the greatest risky tranquilizer of the mind.

Rationalization, compounded by complacency and denial, can be deadly, particularly when adversaries have different realities. To the fanatic mullahs ruling Iran, Sahaeb-ul-Zaman is an absolute reality, and his promised advent is irrevocably ordained. This is their reality and their belief and they have every intention of leading their life according to them.

It is foolish for non-Muslims to dismiss the mullahs and the likes of the Taliban as a bunch of fringe lunatics who are going to go away simply by wishing for it. The Islamist reality is that non-Muslims are the ones who deserve to be done away with, they are the ones who have refused to submit to the summons of Allah for much too long, and, it is time for the faithful to get rid of them. This makes for a lopsided contest. The non-Muslims are passively wishing that the nightmarish surge of Islamism is only a temporary fringe phenomenon doomed to die on its own, while the other side is marshaling its huge destructive power to accomplish its aim by eradicating non-Muslims.

The cabal of fanatical mullahs ruling Iran has lost its patience, not only with the unbelievers but also with the Mahdi as well. They aim to force his arrival. The mullahs believe they have the means to make it impossible for the Mahdi to tarry any longer by causing unprecedented death and destruction — conditions deemed essential for his coming. The world must hit the very bottom before the savior of the world comes to the rescue, so they firmly believe.

The question is: What does prudence demand? Wishing the problem to go away is not a very effective solution in the same way that wishing for the Saheb-ul-Zaman to come has not been. Reasoning and negotiating with the mullahs and their ilk hold very little if any, lasting promise. There are always easy ways of denial and appeasement. We are very good at both practices. No, the Muslims have been around for ages. They make some trouble from time to time. But they are not all that bad and dangerous. We’ll get along. If we have to, we’ll even let them live by the Sharia — their stone-age laws — in our midst. We’ll be reasonable and they will come around. We’ll just have to get along. So goes the line.

One problem: The other side doesn’t think this way. The Islamofascists don’t believe in the notion of live and let live.” They believe that the earth is Allah’s and it has been sullied by the heathens, the unbelievers, and the kafir for far too long. Now that they have the means, they aim to make the world to their design and bring about the final solution — a nasty reminder of not too long ago Nazism.

Is this alarmist, or even hatemongering? You don’t believe Muslims can be that intolerant and hostile toward non-Muslims and that they’ll never go to the extremes? Do you know Muslims personally in your neighborhood or your workplace and they are nice people? The nice Muslims you know are presently small minorities in alien lands. They have to be nice, and they may indeed be nice. Yet, when the main force of Islam surges forward, these nice folks will either have to join it or be swept aside like the rest of the resisters.

The concern is not with individual Muslims who live as solid citizens in democratic societies. They may have developed a taste for the freedom democracy bestows or have simply learned to tolerate it. Our concern is with the gathering Islamic storm from the heart of Islamdom. To truly appreciate Islam, you must experience firsthand Islam in power. Take a quick trip to the lands of the Muslims and find out for yourself how horribly they treat the non-Muslims, even the “People of the book,” Jews and Christians. Try to have a Bible study group or build a church in Saudi Arabia and discover the benevolence of Islamic rule.

I urgently call on US politicians to redirect U.S. foreign policy in line with our nation’s lofty ideals and principles. I urge the Administration to proclaim its unequivocal support for the Iranian people and back that claim with concrete effective peaceful actions. It is the best investment that the U.S. can make to attract the powerful nation of Iran as a vital ally and concurrently refrain from foolishly undermining its present sole friend, Israel. Recall that it was the Iranian people’s massive magnificent movement against the re-election of the fraud Ahmadinejad that inspired the so-called “Arab Spring.” That movement has not stopped. It is ongoing.

The world is a laboratory where the experiment with Islam shows irrefutable results. To the extent that Islam rules any society, that society is stagnant, backward thinking, repressive and violent. The Islamic Republic of Iran represents the cutting edge for the newly petrodollar-invigorated Islam. It is determined to complete its task of ending the world of “Dar-ul-Harb” — the non-Muslim world to be warred upon — and establishing the “Dar-ul-Solh,” or “Dar-ul-Salam” — the Muslim world of the Ummah under the rule of the Mahdi. If achieving this aim hinges on the conflagration of a cataclysmic nuclear World War, the mullahs are happy to make it happen.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

May 15, 2023

Self-defense is the right of every individual, group, or nation. The inveterate belligerent Hamas cannot expect Israel to refrain from retaliation when it lobs barrage after barrage of rockets at Israeli populations. Hamas and Islamic Jihad thrive on violence. And violence begets violence.

Hamas is in a state of hostility even with its own kindred, the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank. It is time for Hamas to mend its ways, realize the futility of its strategy, and live in peace with others. It is time for the people in Gaza to demand that their leaders cease exploiting them and have them extend a hand of genuine peace for the betterment of all.

Decades of bloodletting by the Hamas extremists have inflicted unnecessary and unacceptable suffering on all sides. Israel, justifiably, is compelled to do what it must to defend itself and its people. In stark contrast to Hamas, Israel’s response is measured and does not intentionally target innocent civilians.

Those who support and fund Hamas in its belligerence have their own vested interest and not that of the Palestinians. The Palestinian people need to realize the futility of the present hostility and demand that their leaders work for a peaceful solution.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

May 12, 2023

Ads are popping up in newspapers and magazines proclaiming the magnificence of Islam and aiming to refute the “false allegations” of Islam’s ill-wishers.

Huge billboards are festooning major highways, such as the one along Highway 101 and Tully Road in San Jose, California, with crafty messages. Bold letters on the billboard proclaim Islam You Deserve to Know. A toll-free number, 1-877-WhyIslam, and a website, Why Islam.org beckon the public to get the real scoop about the religion of peace.

The billboard sneakily reminds the viewers about their kinship with Muslims. “Islam: The message of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad.”

Well folks—Christians and Jews—the overwhelming majority of the people in the United States, you need to relax about Islam. Muslims are family. They are your kindred through your shared progenitor, Abraham.

Having Abraham as an ancestor would demand that the “children” be loving siblings. That’s the message the American Muslims try to convey. And that’s the way they aim to keep us in the deadly slumber of complacency and the delusion of multiculturalism.

For one, multiculturalism and multi-religionism are not interchangeable and are not one and the same. Muslims and their frequently well-paid apologists use the multiculturalism umbrella only in non-Islamic lands to shield themselves from the torrent of legitimate criticisms that those who know Islam better shower on this cult of violence peddled as the religion of peace.

Don’t listen to me and don’t listen to these conniving dissimulators. Find out for yourself. See if the euphemism of multiculturalism is ever even mentioned by any Islamic leader, ever printed in the Islamic press, or ever appears in any form anywhere in Muslim countries. This multiculturalism gambit is Islam-manufactured wool to pull over the eyes of the non-Muslims while the Muslims carry on with their unrelenting campaign of eradicating anything or anyone non-Islamic anywhere in the world.

Those of us, through reason and tremendous acts of will, who have freed ourselves from the enslaving yoke of Islam placed around our necks from birth, know about all the heinous inside dirt of this plague of humanity. We hardly need to call a toll-free number to hear a phony canned message of deceptions and lies.

We have experienced Islam first-hand and up close from the inside. We have studied the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna. We have seen Islam in action where it wields sway. Some of us even tried desperately to cling to this security blanket that was wrapped around us from birth. Yet, the more we studied and the more we experienced Islam, the more our effort to remain in the fold became untenable.

We broke away from Islamic slavery and found it to be our solemn duty to expose this fraud of a religion, help other Muslims to free themselves from it, and warn the good-hearted and gullible non-Muslims against falling prey to it.

The Muslim organizations in America, generously financed by the oil-rich Muslim government and sheiks, are directed to sell Islam Lite for long enough until the cult runs deep roots and the Real Islam is introduced. One can see how the scheme played out in Europe. Much of Europe is already past the stage of Islam Lite and knee-deep into the quagmire of Real Islam. And that’s exactly where things are headed in America.

For a starter, remember the Somali Muslim cabbies of the Minneapolis airport and their refusal of blind fares with seeing-eye dogs, because dogs are unclean according to their belief? The same cabbies that had a virtual monopoly at the airport also rejected passengers who had alcoholic beverages in their possession. And the recent campaign of Muslims in New York to force the city to officially recognize Islamic holidays. These chosen people of Allah have more holidays than working days. No wonder they are among the most backward and unproductive in the world.

These “annoyances” aside, one has to be more than daft not to see for himself and not be sickened by the horrors Muslims in power and Muslim governments commit, wherever they reign in the world. Their barbaric acts are not isolated behaviors of some deranged individuals that one can find within any group. They are, in fact, mandated by the authoritative teachings of Islam and those who practice them proudly proclaim their actions as an implementation of Islamic teachings.

And they are correct in this claim. Let’s just see a sampling of the Islamic teachings that mandate the beastly treatment of women, human slaves, and all non-Muslims, including those that the Islamic Softsell in the West aims to bunch itself with as kin—Jews and Christians.

Quran 4.34 Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to others and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you take no further action against them. Allah is high, supreme.

Q uran16.75 Allah sets forth a parable: (consider) a slave, the property of another, (who) has no power over anything, and one whom We have granted from ourselves goodly sustenance so he spends from it secretly and openly; are the two alike? (All) praise is due to Allah!

Quran 5:51 O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust.

You may say that you know Muslims and you find them to be decent people, family people, hard-working people who are no different than any other group of people. However, these people are Bad Muslims. Why so? Because they do not live the life the Quran commands them to lead. It is the Good Muslims that you don’t ever want to meet. These are the diehard jihadists, the terrible killers who spare no torture on infidels before decapitating them or hanging them while intoning Allah’s praise. These are the ones that don’t show the slightest mercy to their very own people who fail to toe the line.

These Real Muslims viciously and repeatedly rape women, and even men, arrested without even arrest warrants. One “lucky” victim who managed to escape the claws of these evils is Maryam Sabri (and so many others) arrested on phony charges and repeatedly raped in Iran’s Evin prison.

Acts of horrors committed in Islamic lands aside, it is disturbing to see Muslims dissimulate, sweet-talk, and use any and all means in free non-Islamic societies to convert people to their cult. Yet, if a Muslim, on his own free will decides to leave Islam he is condemned as apostate and automatically sentenced to death. And right here in America, the suffocating tentacles of Islamic bigotry are beginning to reach out to people. Just the other day, for instance, a teenage girl had to run away from her Muslim family fearing being killed by her own father for having become Christian.

This Islamic Softsell is a replay of Muhammad’s own life example. He was peaceful and humble in Mecca among his powerful detractors. Once in Medina and with power, Muhammad slaughtered the Jews of Medina as easily as if they were sheep, plundered their belongings, and took the “sellable” women and children as slaves.

It is said that truthfulness is the foundation of all virtues. Islam not only condones, it encourages, lying and dissimulation— taqiyya in dealing with non-Muslims. Hence the ads, the billboards, and the claims of these liars are little more than packs of crafty propaganda.

No, there is no misunderstanding. No, it is not the Zionists and fundamentalist Christians who are misrepresenting Islam. It is Muslims and Muslim organizations who are guilty of dissimulation and fraud. Muslims act meekly when they lack sufficient power. Once in power, Real Islam emerges from its shell of dissimulation and puts free people and their way of life to the sword.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

May 1, 2023

December 2022 was my 45th anniversary since I made it to this blessed land, America. A land that I fell in love with.  Like many of my fellow Iranian compatriots, I never imagined extending my stay in the US beyond 4 years at the university. Let me remind you that Iranians are not beggars. We don’t ask for charity. We are extremely proud people. Most of us never expect anything from the host country or demand any special privileges. Most of us have assimilated nicely. A major reason for the Iranian assimilation and success in the U.S. is the U.S. itself which provides an ambiance conducive to self-advancement, be it in science, business, or any other field of endeavor. Another reason is that Iranians inherently share and cherish the same values that America’s founding fathers enshrined in this nation’s charter of life.

Although the Islamic Revolution forced the removal of the Shah of Iran and the war with Iraq was imposed on our motherland, I was still determined to go back home. What deterred me from returning was my family.

Mother kept telling me that this is not the same Iran you left. This is a different Iran. She also warned me if I went back, the Islamic regime would immediately recruit me and send me to the front lines – the same war zone that took the lives of many of my high school friends. It was a terrifying feeling. The adrenalin was rushing through my veins and fighting an enemy was all I could think of. I said, Mom, my friends lost their lives to defend their country. I find it my duty to come home and do the same. Please say no more. To no avail, she kept begging me not to come back and wait until the war ended. She continued, Khomeini’s regime doesn’t care about Iran or the lives of Iranians. In fact, he despises Iran. She convinced me that I could do more for Iran in a free US than in a war zone where I would most likely not survive. I listened to her motherly advice and stayed while continuing with my higher education.

Fast Forward

Forty-four years have passed and the Islamic Republic is still doing what it did forty-four years ago. Iran has been under the rule of Islam since 1979. The Iranian people have attempted numerous times to end the rule of the backward Islamic regime, but each time they were faced with the ruthless regime’s apparatus, and many of them were slaughtered while the world watched and did nothing.

In four decades of its existence, the Islamic Republic has managed, notably, to produce more hunger, anger, frustration, prostitution at a record pace, drug addiction beyond control, child executions without any regard for international human rights, and much more. There are many reports regarding cases of child sexual abuse and molestation reaching epidemic proportions.

Prosecution and imprisonment of the innocent and the systematic and illegal abuse of detainees and hundreds of gruesome acts of torture and rape in the prisons have skyrocketed. Meanwhile, the United Nations did not even blink while European countries continued to expand their businesses with the Islamic regime.

On Sep 16, 2022, Mahsa Jina Amini a 22-year-old Iranian Kurdish girl was taken into custody and killed by “morality” police for her “unacceptable” hijab.”  This was a spark that lead to massive nationwide protests across Iran. Iran’s protests may well be the first time in history that women have been both the spark and engine for an attempted counter-revolution.  Anne O’Donnell, a Russia historian at New York University, said: Iran’s protests have been unique because, she said, “this is not just an upheaval involving women, it is an upheaval about women and women’s freedom, and that makes it very special.”

Although Mahsa Amini’s death sparked massive and widespread protests. These protests did not transpire spontaneously. They are a symptom of deep-seated and festering dissent. The list of grievances is sorely long.

The current movement – led and inspired by women – has united Iranians across generations, in what is shaping up to be the biggest threat the regime has faced to date. As for the international community, it is now a crucially important time to show support to the brave Iranian protesters. Simultaneously, they need to recognize and support Prince Reza Pahlavi as the only alternative who is able to secure the people’s confidence to establish calm, and peace during the transition.

Support for Pahlavi isn’t limited to Iranians living abroad. Videos published on social media show Iranians in cities, such as Tehran and Izeh in southwestern Iran, shouting slogans like “Pahlavi, you are our representative” and “Pahlavi is our choice, the leader of our revolution.”

The brave Iranian women not stopping, nor will they any time soon. They are taking to the streets to cut their hair and burn their hijabs, indicating to the Islamic government that they will not stand for this totalitarian regime anymore. Mullahs must pack and leave. It is a do-or-die scenario. Nothing less than a subversion of this regime and recapture of Iran will stop these warriors.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 28, 2023

First published in 2007

Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are disaffected and young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.

With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racists, and alarmist hatemongers. Who is right?

Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way, that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick, and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time-saving devices.

Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us. Let us look at some of the facts.

* Not every Muslim wears an explosive vest ready to detonate in the midst of a crowd of innocent civilians, yet there are more volunteers for the mission than there are explosive vests. The Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, hasn’t even officially joined this form of jihad. Yet, by its own admission, it has over 10,000 volunteers trained and ready to be deployed, and thousands more queuing to join in. This time around, the jihadists heading for Allah’s heaven might come fitted with nice little suitcases of dirty bombs instead of the bulky explosive vests. Recall that it took only 19 of these killers to launch the aerial mass murder of 9/11 that killed 3,000 people, shattered our open trusting way of life, and cost us billions of dollars.

* The jihadists are not confined to a minority of disaffected Muslim youth. How young are Bin Laden, his deputy doctor of death Al Zawahiri, Mullah Omar of the Taliban, Khamenei, and Rafsanjani of Iran, just to name a few? How disaffected are they? Muhammad Ata, leader of the 19 airborne thugs and the decapitator of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl was somewhat younger, yet well-healed and Western-educated.

* Just coin some terms such as the “Melting Pot,” or “Multiculturalism” and you have the problem solved? Roll out the red carpet for the immigrant Muslims, treat them as you would your own citizens, give them stipends, medical care, and free education and they will integrate seamlessly into society. No such thing at all. The idea of a Melting Pot may work with people who come from different lands to make the new country their home. The Islamists, on the other hand, come with the belief that they already own the place and want to make it part of the Ummah. Some forty percent of second and third-generation Muslim Britons reject British democracy, express their allegiance to Islam, and want to live under Sharia. So much for the Melting Pot comfort pill.

* The new Islamist arrivals take advantage of the provisions of the most benign system known to humanity, democracy, to implode it from within. Muslims, by sheer numbers, will soon be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They are already doing that in bits and pieces. They are imposing many of their values, in a number of societies, even while they are in the minority. Politicians, hungry for votes and devoted to the practice of political correctness bend backward to accede to Islamists’ demands.

* As for Multiculturalism, it is even more of a delusion than the Melting Pot myth. It is a second-generation Comfort Pill. Since the Melting Pot proved to be worse than a placebo, the politically correct gave us the new pill. A glance at Europe shows how Multiculturalism in fact has served as the incubator of Islamism in no time at all. Europe’s Multiculturalism is rapidly birthing a Uniculturalism, if the Islamists’ medieval way of life can be dignified as a culture.

* Respect for diversity, separation of religion and state, and freedom of belief and expression, are pillars of democracy, yet anathema to Islam. In no Islamic land do you find an ecumenical organization? It is only in non-Islamic countries that the shameless duplicitous Muslim, be he an imam, a mullah, or a regular run-of-the-mill faithful of Allah, meekly participates in ecumenical feel-good gatherings.

* To Muslims, no other religion is deemed worthy of recognition, much less accommodation. There is no church, synagogue, or Buddhist temple in all of Saudi Arabia. They are barred. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s raft of genocidal pogroms includes the heinous practice of bulldozing even the cemeteries of its Baha’i religious minority. The Islamic tyranny of the mullahs imprisons Christian Iranians for celebrating Christmas. Egypt denies its own citizens’ identity cards for refusing to lie and fake their religious beliefs or disbelief. The ID cards are required for education, securing work, receiving medical care, and just about every right of citizenship. Without it, a citizen is literally subjected to a slow death.

* In Islam only Muslim men, and, to a lesser extent, Muslim women, are entitled to certain rights. All non-Muslims, including the so-called people of the book, namely Christians and Jews, are at best second-class subjects, subjects who must pay the back-breaking Jizya, poll tax, for their “sin” of not converting to Islam. So, as Islam makes its inroads in new lands, as its membership swells through explosive birth and conversion, secular democracies will be inevitably replaced by Islamism with its stone-age Sharia laws. The best offer that Islam will make is to spare the non-Muslim’s life if he puts on the heavy yoke of Jizya for the rest of his living days.

* Not to worry about the horrific things that are happening on the other side of the world? If Muslims act heinously toward non-Muslims, it is just how things are in those countries and is hardly any of our business. This is the same attitude that set the Islamization of Europe on a seemingly irreversible track. One European country after another is rapidly buckling under the weight of Islamism.

* Most importantly, not to worry about the Islamization of our country? After all, Muslims are about 6-7 million in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason? That even a smaller number of these Muslims are hothead radicals, while the majority is just like everyone else? But small minorities can overwhelm the majority by use of coercion and deadly force. Islamists are notorious for their dedication to the use of force for achieving their aims. The Taliban were a very small minority in Afghanistan, the Islamists were a tiny faction in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran. Both overwhelmed the masses and imposed their reign of terror. The terrorist Hamas is also a “minority” in number, yet it rules the Palestinian Territory. Hezbollah of Lebanon is a minority, yet it has taken the country to the verge of destruction.

* Islamists are Islam’s locomotive that takes the wrecking-ball Islamic train on its demolition course. Islam and democracy are incompatible. As democracies practice their magnificent accommodating belief, they knowingly or unknowingly lay the track for the advancing wrecking train of Islam. We, in the United States of America, must resist Islam while it is still gathering momentum unless we wish to end up in the same fix as the Europeans.

* We, in the United States, further need to embark on a comprehensive legal, educational, and social campaign to eradicate the deadly plague of Islam. By effective action, we even save those peaceful Muslims from their own affliction. I am not hatemongering. I would love to see all Muslims become ex-Muslims and full-fledged members of a diverse tolerant democratic society. It is a statement of fact about what Islam is. Islam is a highly communicable pandemic-violent disease that demands urgent and serious containment.

Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and our children’s lives at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 24, 2023

This is the best of times and the worst of times, as the saying goes. Humanity is struggling on the one hand to free itself from the vestiges of its barbaric past while embarking on an exhilarating new way of life. It is the same story. The old is doggedly fighting the new on many fronts. And the new in this case is a huge paradigm shift of ideas and beliefs that demands total eradication of all. This has kept mankind in a quagmire of wars, injustice, and misery. In this realm of ideas, religions play pivotal roles, and the old and the new clash, often violently. Ideas and beliefs are the software that determines how we behave. And the software of the past is no longer working because it is out of phase with the needs of the time as well as infected with destructive viruses.

Even a cursory look is enough to show that the software of Islam, over time, is so greatly manipulated by numberless sects, sub-sects, and schools that it can hardly be considered a unitary belief system. And people are their ideas. Any assault on beliefs and ideas provokes the assailed to action.

This clash of beliefs is the reason for Islamists to unleash their power against the upstart iconoclastic Baha’i faith. In fact, the Baha’is revere Islam and respect all other religions. Baha’i faith has many teachings in common with Islam, so much so that some call it “Islam light,” because, while it retains some of Islam’s principles, it also abrogates a number of outdated and counterproductive Islamic laws and practices. Baha’is say their faith is not a wrecking ball that aims to demolish the schoolhouse of God called religion: a badly divided schoolhouse where everyone claims to worship the same God, yet keeps oppressing, fighting, and killing each other in the name of the same God.

Baha’is have a very rosy and possibly unrealistic view of humanity. They say that their goal is for every human being, irrespective of any and all considerations, to be granted all his God-given rights and be allowed to worship his creator the way he sees fit. They have a sort of lovey-dovey vision of the world where everyone will live as a valued member of the larger human family. Apparently, they have hit a responsive enough cord with some 6-7 million people of the world from every ethnic, religious, and national stratum. This vision may not convert the remaining 6-7 billion people any time soon, but it sure beats hands down the Islamists’ idea to force the world under their so-called Ummah with its stone-age Shariah law.

Baha’is believe that God sends his teachers to his school, from time to time with new lessons, to help advance the people to a higher and higher level of humanness. Trouble is, they believe, that people cling to the old school-work and the old teacher and doggedly resist accepting the new teacher and his teachings. Baha’is think of God’s prophets as renovators who come from time to time to tear down walls of separation and to bring God’s children together in an open-air general classroom out of their own foolishly walled-in dungeons of exclusivity and ignorance.

Below are some of the Baha’i teachings that clash heads on with Islam’s and provoke the Islamists to do all they can to destroy the new religion:

* The people of God. Muslims believe that they are the chosen people of Allah and recognize no other system of belief as legitimate. Baha’is believe that all people are the chosen people of God: that there is only one God, one religion of God, and one people of God, the entire human race.

* Pearls on a string. Muslims contend that Muhammad is the seal of the Prophets; that God sent his best and final messenger to mankind, and that any other claimant is an imposter worthy of death. Baha’is believe that God has always sent his teachers with new and updated lessons to educate humanity and shall do so in the future. There have been numberless divine teachers in the course of human history who have appeared to various people. They say that these teachers are like pearls on a string and that Baha’u’llah is the latest, but not the last pearl.

* Independent thinking. Blind imitation is anathema to Baha’is. Baha’is believe that the human mind and the gift of reason should guide the person in making decisions about all matters. To this end, they place a premium on education and independent investigation of truth.

Baha’is consider the education of women as important as that of men since women are the early teachers of children and can play their valuable part by being themselves educated. By contrast, Muslims look to religious authorities for guidance and often deprive women of education and independent thinking.

In recognition of the importance of independent thinking, no one is born Baha’i. Once one is born to a Muslim, he is considered Muslim for life. If he decides to leave Islam, he is labeled apostate and, apostates are automatically condemned to death. By contrast, every child born in a Baha’i family is required to make his own independent decision regarding whether or not he wishes to be a Baha’i. Freedom to choose and independent thinking are cherished values of the Baha’is, in stark contrast to that of the closed-minded Islamists.

* Religion or science. Baha’is believe that truth transcends all boundaries. Scientific and religious truth emanates from the same universal source. They are like the two sides of the same coin. To Baha’is, science and religion are like two wings of a bird that enable humanity’s flight toward the summit of its potential; any religious belief that contradicts science is superstition. Muslims believe that their religious scripture and dogma, irrespective of their proven falsehood, are superior to that of science.

* Gender equality. Muslims hold the view, expressly stated in the Qur’an, that men are rulers over women. Baha’is reject this notion and subscribe to the unconditional equality of rights for the two sexes. This Baha’i principle emancipates one-half of humanity from the status of subservient domestic to that of a fully participating and self-actualized human. It aims to put an end to the heartless exploitation of women and demands that women be treated with all due respect under the law.

* Participatory decision-making. Islam, by its very nature, is patriarchal and authoritarian. Baha’is believe in the value of decision-making through the practice of consultation; a process where everyone, irrespective of any and all considerations, has a voice in making decisions. This participatory decision-making principle abrogates a major prerogative of Islamic clergy who have been dictating matters to their liking and advantage. Also, at all levels of society, including the family, all affected members have the opportunity, even the responsibility, to make their views known without fear. Baha’i teachings clearly emphasize this commitment to democratic decision-making in their scripture, “The shining spark of truth cometh forth only after the clash of differing opinions.”

* World-embracing outlook. Baha’is love their native countries, yet extend that same love to the entire planet and its people. Baha’is believe that love has no limit and need not have limits. One can love his country and love the world at the same time. This love of the world is frequently used as a pretense by the Islamists to accuse the Baha’is of Iran as traitors to their own homeland. It is for this reason that the present mullahs ruling Iran falsely claim that the Baha’is are agents of Zionist Israel and its American sponsor.

* Eradication of prejudice. Prejudice of any type is alien to the Baha’i faith and severely undermines its pivotal principle of the oneness of humanity. Muslims are notorious when it comes to prejudice. Prejudice against others is thoroughly exploited by Islamists. In contrast, Baha’i scriptures say, “…again, as to religious, racial, national and political bias: all these prejudices strike at the very root of human life; one and all they beget bloodshed, and the ruination of the world. So long as these prejudices survive, there will be continuous and fearsome wars.”

* Abolition of the priesthood. A major point of conflict involves the abolition of the clergy. Baha’is believe that humanity has matured enough that it no longer needs a cast of professional clergy to serve peoples’ religious needs. With one stroke, this Baha’i teaching puts hundreds of thousands of mullahs and imams out of business and arouses the powerful cast of the do-nothing clergy to fight to retain their highly privileged parasitic positions.

It is imperative for the free people of the world to defend freedom of conscience, including freedom of religion, irrespective of one’s own personal belief. It is for this reason that as a person who is not a Baha’i, I find it my solemn duty to speak up on behalf of a peaceful people, severely-persecuted by the savage Islamists.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 13, 2023

Whereas the practice of slavery enslaves the body, the dogma of apostasy ensnares the mind. Whereas slavery is a shameful practice of the past, some shameless religionists still use the doctrine of apostasy to intimidate and severely punish people who elect to choose their own beliefs.

Islam is extremely possessive of its subjects. It is a religion that admits anyone into its fold by the person simply uttering a one-sentence statement of faith, shahada: I bear witness that there is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah’s messenger. By so saying, one becomes Muslim for life and surrenders the right of ever leaving it. Anyone who leaves the Islamic fold is murtad (revert), apostate.

The notion of apostasy is best understood within the overall Islamic dogma. Islam forms a binding covenant with the believer. Once a person is Muslim, he and his issues are considered Muslim forever. In this covenant, Islam promises to bestow its beneficence on the faithful conditional on the person’s total and unquestioned surrender to it in all matters. Some of the rewards offered by Islam to the truly obedient believer, particularly the privileged males, are of this world as well as a great deal more promised to him in the next. If a Muslim faithful does not reap the rewards of his devotion in this world, Islam assures him of his inestimably cherished and limitless compounded rewards in the next world.

Islam demands the subjugation of the individual’s will to that of Allah and permeates the thinking, actions, and speech of Muslims by prefacing commitments they make contingent on the will of God (inshallah)

This total surrender and submission to the will and decree of Allah also absolve the individual from taking full responsibility for his conduct or honoring commitments he may make. For it is Allah who has the unquestioned authority to consummate or contravene any action or promise made by a faithful.

Within this overall framework of complete acceptance of Islam as the perfect living charter for the believer, the rules pertaining to apostasy can be better understood. Islam considers an apostate as a person who unilaterally breaks the covenant he has made with the faith. An apostate is condemned as guilty of turning his back on Allah’s immutable eternal religion. Anyone born to Muslim parents and leaving Islam is stigmatized as murtad fitri (natural apostate) because he was born genetically Muslim and rejected his gift of birth. And anyone who converts to Islam and later leaves it is condemned as murtad milli (a person who has turned his back to the Ummah).

The severe stricture against leaving Islam is consistent with other main principle beliefs of the religion. Islam is a faith of surrender and not that of free will. A Muslim is to surrender his freedom of thoughts and actions to the will and dictates of Allah. The very principle of freedom is alien to the Islamic belief system.

With regard to apostasy, the two main branches of Islam, the Sunni, and the Shiite, are in considerable agreement. The great majority of Muslim scholars of both major camps agree that the Quran stipulates death for the apostate.

Islam, by its very nature, is an all-encompassing belief system that proscribes and prescribes every detail of the person’s and society’s conduct. The Sharia law, a comprehensive code of Islamic jurisprudence, purportedly is based on the Quran, and the Hadith (the reported enunciation of Muhammad and his conduct.)

Furthermore, Islamic societies rule by the Islamic laws of Sharia. Any new societal legislation must be harmonious with those of the Sharia which are conclusively anti-democratic. Sharia law is in explicit contradiction and violation of the foundation of democracy. Sharia law places Allah’s dictates and rules over the people’s sovereignty. It discriminates against non-Muslims to the extreme of disenfranchising them from their rights of citizenship of Baha’is barring them from jobs, higher education, worship, etc., not only in Iran but Saudi Arabia, and even Egypt. It is blatantly discriminatory against women, Muslim or not. Men have a greater claim to the inheritance, their testimony in the court of law is worth twice that of women and they may marry multiple women at the same time. It stipulates even different rules and privileges governing free Muslim men as opposed to slave Muslims, implicitly condoning slavery. Saudi Arabia, the flagship of Islam, was finally forced by the free world to abandon slavery, I believe, only in late 1960, but it has been reported that it has not been completely abandoned.

Apostasy is defined both in the Quran as well as the Sharia and its punishment is clearly stipulated.

“Those who blasphemed and back away from the ways of Allah and die as blasphemers, Allah shall not forgive them.” [Qur’an 4:48]

Islamic law does not allow the freedom to choose one’s religion.

“Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Clearly the Right Path (i.e. Islam) is distinct from the crooked path.” [Qur’an 2:256]

The Quran also specifically addresses the issue of murtad milli:

“But those who reject faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of faith, never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have (of set purpose) gone astray.” [Qur’an 3:90]

The Hadith further restates the provision of the Quran regarding the punishment of the apostate.

The Sharia law stipulates that any Muslim who turns his back on Islam should be given a chance to revert to the religion. For an un-repenting male apostate, death is the punishment, and life imprisonment for a female apostate.

“Kill whoever changes his religion.” —Sahih al-Bukhari 9:84:57

“The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshiped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims.” —Sahih al-Bukhari 9:83:17

At present, apostasy is illegal in most Islamic countries. Although execution of the apostate is not common, it does take place from time to time by frequently buttressing the “crime” with additional charges. The Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, often adds the charge of mohareb (one who wars with God) to further legitimize its execution of apostates. A case in point pertains to the treatment of the religious minority Baha’is by the Islamic Republic. A number of Baha’is have been charged as apostates and mohareb, executed and some secretly buried in unmarked graves.

The late Ayatollah Khomeini in his Tahrir al-Wassilah adjudicates how a person’s apostasy is established: “Apostasy is proven in two ways: First, the person himself confesses to his apostasy twice. Second, two just and truthful men bear witness to the person’s apostasy. But women’s testimonies do not prove apostasy in any case; either they bear witness individually, in a group, or beside a man.”

The misogynistic nature of Islam is once again evident in Ayatollah Khomeini’s blanket disqualification of women’s testimony solely on the basis of gender.

“Apostasy — or the formal renunciation of religion — is already punishable in Iran with death. But now, Iran wants to make the death penalty for apostasy part of the penal code. The European Union is concerned and has asked Iran to reconsider.” Who is an apostate according to the legislation? Anyone in the world, not just Iranians, born to a Muslim parent; also, any convert to Islam who leaves it. Only one parent needs to be a Muslim at the time of conception for Islam to own that child for life. Islam is Ummahist. Islam doesn’t recognize nationalities and national boundaries. And these Islamist zealots are very serious and have no sense of humor. Some say they have no sense at all, and they may be right. They certainly have a thirst for blood, particularly for the blood of infidels and apostates.

It is noteworthy that Islam considers the world as its Ummah and overarches national boundaries. Hence, Islamic clerics feel free to issue fatwa and other adjudications regarding any person, group, or nation anywhere in the world. A celebrated case of this practice was the fatwa of Ayatollah Khomeini against the British author Salman Rushdie for his book The Satanic Verses. Hence, individual Muslims anywhere in the world take it upon themselves to carry out fatwa issued by Islamic high divines. In another high-profile case, the killing of Theo van Gough, a Dutch film director, and the recent attack on the Danish cartoonist, Kurt Westergaard, clearly demonstrates this primitive practice that runs counter to the civilized world’s due process and has a seriously intimidating impact on the freedom of expression.

Free people and nations should not sacrifice their God-given liberty to please the Islamists by muzzling dissenters and even endangering their safety and their lives.

The concept and practice of apostasy are a shameful stain on the conscience of humanity. It is despicable for any belief system to stubbornly cling to the dehumanizing anachronism of apostasy while its counterpart, slavery, is already buried in mankind’s graveyard of past infamy.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 10, 2023

Over the past forty-four years, many of us have seen various Iranian opposition groups and TV channels pop up, one after another, but none united or supported their competitors. Each group had its own agenda. A typical Iranian dilemma: “Too many chiefs, not enough Indians.” This has been our dilemma until the new generation of Iranian women rose up and said no more.

Protests are not a new event in Iran. They’ve erupted over the years — over election fraud, economic malaise, and civil liberties. But this time is different — an unprecedented revolution led by women and the support from men. What’s fascinating about this revolution is the first time in history that women have been both the spark and engine of the revolution.

Although Mahsa Amini’s death sparked massive and widespread protests. These protests did not transpire spontaneously. They are a symptom of deep-seated and festering dissent. The list of grievances is sorely long. Decades of excessive corruption and widespread maladministration have tattered the economy. The middle class is virtually nonexistent, and the working class has sunk into desolation.

Unity

Iran’s Prince Reza Pahlavi says the Charter of Solidarity and Freedom of Iran creates the basis of cooperation among opposition forces to oust the Islamic Republic. Prince Reza Pahlavi is right. If Iranians remain divided, there won’t be a chance against the powerful Islamic regime with the vast and destructive power apparatus that has no problem using it against its own population as it did during the  2009 Green Movement.

Sadly, Iranians are inherently too stubborn to work within a group like the Japanese are.  A Japanese proverb says “A single arrow is easily broken, but not ten in a bundle.” This means that ten arrows are stronger than a single arrow. If you change the arrows to people, you will understand more about why the Japanese are so group-oriented.

If my assessment is accurate, we are in it for the long haul.

After forty-four long and draining years since the arrival of Ayatollah Khomeini, I am puzzled as to why our political activists or groups have never compromised or found common ground to work with one another for the sake of Iran in order rescue her from further drift into the abyss.

The MEK

It is no secret that our wealthy competitor, known as “Mujahedeen Khalgh” or just MEK, is a Marxist Iranian opposition group that claims to be the government in exile. It is known as the cult of Rajavi and feels it has the upper hand with the unlimited support of many current and former US and European officials and funds, but with zero support of the Iranian people from the inside.

Personal note

The Iranian opposition groups abroad have one thing in common, they agree that the situation in Iran is dire indeed. Anyone who believes that sane rational people on both sides are engaged in brinkmanship to secure the best advantage, but would eventually work out a compromise, is deluding himself. In some cases, time works as a healer and even as a solution to thorny problems. Yet, this problem will not go away, and time would only make the cataclysmic clash more likely and deadly.

Iranians, by tradition and temperaments, are activists in the true sense of the word. We have always taken an active interest in any community in which we live. You can observe that in the United States as well where Iranian-Americans run for office and participate actively at all levels of civic and political life. We are not inclined to be spectators of life since we had to be active participants in order to survive in the hostile environment of our neighborhood.

I never had the privilege of meeting Prince Pahlavi in person, but after forty-four years of crusading, his maturity, knowledge, charisma and full understanding of the current events in Iran are quite impressive and noticeable. He has become quite articulate politician. Whether we like it or not, Prince Pahlavi is the only asset that can unite Iranians in order to topple the Islamic Republic from power.

Undeniably, Prince Pahlavi is very popular among the Iranian people (young and old), and recent protesters on numerous occasions have been chanting his name to return home and “Make Iran Great Again.”

Prince Pahlavi’s calm temperament and demeanor make him an ideal catalyst among different opposition groups.

Question to opposition groups: What are you afraid of? It is either now or never. It is freedom and democracy-seeking secular Iranians who are thoroughly capable of dislodging the tyrannical Mullahs. They will eventually accomplish this task with or without any help from the outside, yet, it would be expedient to give these valiant fighters a hand so that future generations can recall this generation of expatriate Iranians as trailblazers who had the courage to break from the bleak past and launch a bright future.

Conclusion 

Great opportunities don’t come every day — recognize and seize them with every chance you get. If we fail to take action with this golden opportunity now, future historians will ask: how could the entire group have seen it coming and done nothing about it? What kind of drugs were these people on?

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

April 3, 2023

All of Islam has the potential for ensuring a violent result because it is an inherent quality of the belief. I refuse to call it a religious faith…that would be a far kinder treatment than it actually deserves. It is essentially a death cult…a political/cultural and social ideology based on the violence of the Qur’an…it shares much in common with Nazism and in fact, these two beliefs have a dual history in which they connected almost eighty years ago prior to World War II…their anti-Semitism is a common thread that ties them together and resulted in the Nazi death camps of the Holocaust ..their actions to deny this and turn it around on those who disagree with them is profoundly telling. It remains rather conclusive of Muslims’ identification with extreme liberal/progressive elements of the political class within the United States. Sadly, We are not only fighting the Islamic ideology. We are fighting its co-conspirators, the Democrats.

With each passing day, the death of Western Civilization – specifically, the death of Europe, will not have been a suicide, but a cold-blooded, premeditated murder, carried out by the western ruling oligarchy. This tragedy is happening in the United States. Muslim organizations have been busy working “stealthily” changing America in what is called “Soft Jihad,” or “Cultural Jihad,” or Stealth Jihad” in the United States. Soft Jihad is practiced where the sword of jihad is not advisable, where Muslims are not strong enough to unsheathe their sword, where the true nature of Islam is exposed, and when the public would likely stamp them out.

A critical tool of soft jihad, involves penetration of the American educational system, by use of means such as Da’wa-a religious duty of each Muslim to convert non-Muslims in order to strengthen the Islamic Ummah.

This is alarming. But regrettably, too few Americans are aware of all this.

We see examples of creeping Sharia (the canons of Islamic law) throughout the country and we are doomed if these specific actions are not stopped and our Constitution is not upheld as the law of the land. Adopting parts of Sharia in this country is both a lunatic move and unconstitutional and should be shut down now.

Will Muslims abandon Islam?

Let me be clear, there are many many good people who consider themselves Muslims. And indeed, they are as good as any other good people. Yet, by sticking with Islam, knowingly or unknowingly, they play into the hands of criminal Islamists. So, it is good to do what we can to invite these Cultural Muslims to sever their ties with Islam altogether.

Let me use a metaphor to help in understating this enigma. Islam is a type of dependence-inducing “potion.” In the same way that, let us say, alcohol is. Millions and perhaps billions imbibe alcohol. A great majority of these consumers qualify as moderate and social drinkers. Drinking alcohol may do them some psychological good and may exact some physical health and monetary price. Yet, this vast number finds enough “comfort” to put up with the monetary, health, relationships, and other costs of their drinking. A certain number are heavy drinkers who are severely dependent and reliant on the drug. And there are those who are infrequent drinkers. They may have some wine at Xmas or on their birthday. And finally, there are those who are teetotalers. They never touch the stuff. So, you have a kind of what statisticians call a normal curve in that people distribute themselves along the drinking dimension as a bell-shaped function. Some on one extreme, some on the other, and the great majority between the two extremes.

The same applies to Muslims. Islam is habit-forming. Just like alcohol. How strongly is habit forming? It depends on the person and his circumstances. Is Islam “beneficial” to the person? Apparently yes it is. For some, it is life itself, just like the skid-row alcoholic, to others it means something, and yet to others, it is something to be avoided altogether.

Short answer. In the same way that people need to go through detoxification programs to free themselves from physical dependencies, they also must undergo detoxification programs to wean themselves from Islam.

What to do? Expand the re-education effort greatly by writing in translating into numerous languages, and other Muslim nations’ languages. Radio and television programs are also vital. It is a long process. Yet, the bottom line is that the problem is this blind dependency on Islam that hooks the masses to its greatly enticing promises and provides easy answers for much of humanity’s underclass.

Unfortunately,  it is going to be a slow process. Much slower and much more difficult than we would like it to be. This Islam thing is a long-term deep dependency of many attractions to many. It is going to take a great deal of work and perseverance to free Muslims from its grip, in it. As sad as it is, that’s the way this world is. Far, far from perfect. Not even close. So, that’s my take.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

January 27, 2023

The world’s most notorious state exponent of anti-Semitism, the Islamic Republic of Iran, is on a path to uproot, not only all that is perceived as civilized but to annihilate the greatest threat to its existence, the Iranian people. The mullahs and their mercenaries are wasting precious human life in order to maintain their power by terrorizing the population.

The Iranian people are simply hopeless and helpless. Even the UN does not come to their rescue. From its past performance, rather than its absence of performance, we know that the UN watchdog is a true disgrace to dogs since all it does is eat, sleep and look the other way. Furthermore, the dog has no teeth. The vet had to pull all its teeth before the dog became acceptable to the crafty cats that constitute the UN itself.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is a unique creature—it is best described as a Theocratic Aristocracy. The “divinely ordained” rulers maintain power through an elaborate patronage system. Lucrative positions, contracts, and valued privileges are distributed by patronage. The result is that the ruling Mullahs enjoy a significant number of supporters in all strata of society—the civil service, the military, the powerful Revolutionary Guards, (IRGC), and the hooligans and thugs who are ready to unleash their vicious attacks on anyone or group that dares to challenge the in-charge men of Allah. The illegitimate government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a quisling entity that has betrayed its people, its tradition, and its glorious pre-Islamic achievements, and is incessantly working against Iran’s national interest. Under the stranglehold and machinations of the Mullahs, Iran has been transformed, in less than three decades, to the lead perpetrator of all that is abhorrent to humanity.

The supreme leader of the Islamic Republic, Ali Khamenei, like his predecessor, Ayatollah Khomeini, whose callous disregard for human life was matched only by his consuming paranoia, allegedly has issued a decree to hang Iranian dissidents publicly in all the towns and villages with a population that exceeds 1000 people. For Ayatollah Khamenei, the dissident viewpoints represent an unacceptable threat. Anyone found questioning the Sharia Law — and many hundreds of thousands were — had to be “weeded out.” The Islamic Republic is on a mission to end human life in Iran. Mass public hangings, as well as secret executions in prisons, are routine in the tyrannical Islamic Republic of Iran.

Recently Majid Kavousifar, 28, and his nephew, Hossein Kavousifar, 24, were hanged for the alleged murder of a hard-line judge, Hassan Moghaddas, who also was a deputy prosecutor and head of the “guidance” court in Tehran and notorious for jailing and condemning to death political dissidents. The victims were hanged from cranes and hoisted high above one of Tehran’s busiest thoroughfares. This “judge” had repeatedly bragged publicly that he often issued a death verdict without even examining the charges against the individual. The Islamic Republic of Iran has the dubious distinction of executing more children, those under the age of 18, than any other country in the world. Such is the plight of the Iranian people.

Iran’s ruling Mullahs are clustered around major factions such as the conservatives, the moderates, and the so-called reformists. Yet, the differences among these factions are tactical rather than strategic. One and all share the same overarching goal of defeating the “Crusader-Zionists” by any and all methods possible, bringing about the “end of the world” Armageddon, and thereby creating the requisite conditions for the appearance of the Hidden Imam, the Mahdi, to assume his rule of the world. What is the likelihood that the ruling Mullahs will actually use the bomb, you may ask? If they remain in power long enough to have it, they are very likely to use it, in one form or another, you are told. At the very least, they will use the bomb for blackmail and intimidation in the region. How can you help to prevent this catastrophe from happening, you may ask?

Support the Iranian people’s struggle for freedom, by at least petitioning, you are told. [As for Majid and Hossein Kavousifar, they left Iran for Abu Dhabi following the assassination of the murderous judge, Hassan Moghaddas, and apparently, they both took refuge in the US Embassy where they had applied for US asylum. We have no information as to why they were handed over to the Islamic Republic authorities when they were aware that they would definitely be facing execution. We hope that the US State Department can give us more information. In order to achieve total control, the Islamic Republic and its lackeys spawned a series of immense internal purges — beginning in 1988 and known as the “Massacre of Political Prisoners of 1988”– and have intensified their domestic terror in recent months and weeks. A society that is intense in its struggle for change has a flip side to its idealism: intolerance.

This totalitarian regime sees enemies everywhere, enemies who want to destroy the Islamic Revolution and diminish the results of its hard work of creating an Islamic utopia in the land of Cyrus the Great. The regime seems to be panicking with hyper-suspiciousness. They have installed watchdogs in schools, universities, factories, and all offices across the country, and are urged to be vigilant against sabotage, against those who crave freedom and democracy. Many innocent Iranians are being victimized, and the saying has gone around that “when you chop wood, the chips fly.” As with Khamenei, it was believed that some who were innocent would have to be victimized if all of the guilty were to be apprehended. In fact, they stigmatize, victimize and murder people without any due process of law. On the slightest suspicion, they arrest, convict, and execute.

Few people would deny any longer that Islam and its variants mean, in practice, bloody terrorism, deadly purges, lethal actions, forced ‘hijabs”, fatal deportations, extrajudicial executions, show trials, and genocide. It is a widespread plague upon humanity, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. Today, the Islamic Republic of Iran is one of the greatest threats to the stability of the civilized world and humanity at large. It continues to impose this horrendous ideology called Islam on the Iranian population.

Petition Online – Petition Online has been retired

1988 executions of Iranian political prisoners – Wikipedia

The world must file legal charges against the leaders of the Islamic Republic’s wanton violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: for their crimes against humanity and genocidal actions against religious and political groups; for support of international terrorism; for demolition of sacred sites and cemeteries; for rape, torture, and summary executions of prisoners of conscience; for forgery of documents; for acts of blackmail and fraud; and for much more. To those misguided advocates of negotiation with the mullahs, beware.

The mullahs are on an Allah-mandated mission. They are intoxicated with petrodollars and aim to settle for nothing less than complete domination of the world under the Islamic Ummah. It is precisely for this reason that they consider America and the West as “Ofooli,” setting-dying system, while they believe their Islamism is “Tolooi,” rising-living order. They are in no mood to negotiate for anything less than the total surrender of democracy, the very anathema to Islamism. This is only one reason, but perhaps, one of the greatest reasons, for fostering democracy.

In short, we have an excellent opportunity to topple these parasitic terrorists once and for all. History will judge us all. At Munich, Chamberlain got an international agreement that Hitler should have the Sudetenland in exchange for Germany making no further demands for land in Europe. Chamberlain said it was ‘Peace for our time’. Hitler said he had ‘No more territorial demands to make in Europe. Neville Chamberlain, appeasement (1938) Hitler, our European allies, and the United States, are doing the same with the ayatollahs. [I really like to know how these people become National Security Advisors)?

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By Amil Imani

January 23, 2023

Bewildered by what fanatic Muslims do, some conclude that Muslims are brainwashed. Otherwise, how can their totally illogical belief system and barbaric behavior be explained? But the notion of “brainwashing” that is bandied about is the stuff of science fiction and Hollywood movies such as the Manchurian Candidate.

The human person arrives in this world with his brain already washed in the sense of being what John Lock called tabula rasa, a clean slate—ready for an experience to imprint its script on it. John Lock was only partly correct. The brain also arrives with numerous predispositions already in place. It is a combination of life’s influences and a person’s own decisions that determine which of these dispositions develop and which ones fail. It is through this process that a unique human being is formed.

Many animals come with already in-place programs that automatically run much of their lives. Birds’ migration, mating courtship, and thousands of other complex behaviors are instances of this type of specific programming. A catchword for this type of behavior is “instinct.” As a general rule, the higher the organism the less is its rigid pre-programs and the greater its latitude to exercise choices.

Making choices depends on what there is to choose from and to what extent a given choice appeals to the person. And the human newborn enters the arena of life without the means of being other than a passive recipient of “things” already chosen for him.

It is like the old joke by Henry Ford who reportedly told his customers that they could have the choice of color for their car as long as it is black. Things are almost as bleak for the new arrival. He didn’t have a say in choosing his parents, his socio-economic condition, his environment of birth, and much more. All are already in place and he is to start in life from the context of his birth.

The development of a newborn in any family is influenced by many factors, among them how hands-on the parents are; how religious they are, and how severely they micromanage him in an attempt to make him not only a good person but also a person better-one than they themselves.

Parents tend to live vicariously through their children by programming them, the best they can so that they become or achieve much of what they had failed to become or accomplish. This attitude covers all areas of life such as giving the child the education they didn’t have, helping him with fame and fortune, nurturing him to become a top-notch athlete, and so forth.

It is a fact that early influences play a cardinal role in shaping a person. For this reason, for instance, the overwhelming majority of Muslims have been born into Muslim families, Catholics into Catholic families, Hindus into Hindu families, and so on. It is also a fact that the degree of religiosity ranges from mild to strong, with most people falling somewhere between the two extremes.

Interestingly, two siblings raised by the same set of parents under the same influences may end up at the opposite extremes in their religious views and practices. Here, the human dynamic of freedom of choice comes into play and steers one to one extreme and the other to the other extreme. Occasional extreme deviations notwithstanding, the great majority of siblings of a given family end up with various degrees of that family’s overall religious and other values. The same general principle of subscribing to a set of common values exists in all human groupings, in some cases with broad flexibility and inclusiveness while in others with rigidity and exclusivity.

In order to enjoy the privileges of belonging to a group, the person must also pay his dues of membership.

The very young human faces, beginning with the minute he can make some sense of the world, a bewildering array of mysteries, challenges, and enticements. There are questions at every step, fears, and hopes entangled with the need to survive and possibly thrive.

Who am I? What is this world all about? What’s the purpose? What am I supposed to do and how? Where am I headed? People die. Where do they go? And on and on and on. The information booths available to him in the fairground of life provide him with answers that may help relieve his innate existentialistic anxiety. And it is here that religion plays a critical role and holds a great appeal. Religion provides a surefire answer to those who are willing to take it on faith.

And Islam is a powerful magnet for the masses that are unable to deal with the uncertainties of life and death on their own. It is from this population, many already thoroughly indoctrinated from birth, that the majority of diehard jihadists emerge.
It is the bargain the jihadist makes. He surrenders totally to the religion of surrender in exchange for blanket security. Islam gives him all the answers he really seeks for dealing with this world and promises him a lush and eternal paradise of Allah once he leaves it. And leaving this world in perfect submission as the foot-soldier of the paradise’s creator gives the faithful unimaginably glorious sensual eternal reward in his next life. It’s a bargain that some buy in whole, some in part, and some refuse and seek other means of dealing with their questions and the unrelenting existentialistic anxiety.

The great majority of jihadists emanate from the ranks of those born into the religion of Islam, simply because they are the ones who are most thoroughly indoctrinated and influenced by the Islamic dogma in their most receptive early years. Yet, there are others who embrace Islam in adulthood, on their own and enlist themselves as devoted jihadists for the same rewards that Islam offers them.

Islam has a great advantage of the first call on the new arrival. It is an omnipresent system with masses of believers, mosques, madrasahs, and a host of other social and economic organizations that overpower the person and steer him into the same fold; it is a sea of people who seem to know what they are all about, what life and death are all about, and what one must also do.

Within this sea of surging humanity composed of some 1.5 billion Muslims, each individual believer—a drop—through a combination of choice and forces beyond his control, ends up in one of its many waves. It is the jihadist wave that is highly attractive to the deeply indoctrinated and poorly adjusted in dealing rationally and independently with life. Here, he finds the iron-clad perfect solution to his anxieties and perplexities.

To a jihadist, death is nothing more than casting off a shell of the worthless earthly existence and donning the suit for winging joyously to the life of bliss promised by none other than Allah’s beloved final emissary, Muhammad.
The eradication of jihadism is a daunting task since Islam is a virulent persistent pandemic disease. Massive education efforts, combined with a resolute confrontation of all sources and people that support and promote this deadly philosophy, hold the best promise of dealing effectively with this affliction of humanity.

In addition to the family, places such as mosques and madrasahs, Islamic associations and charitable organizations, prisons, and the like are incubators for jihadists. Massive efforts are required, on the one hand, to drain the breeding swamps of the Islamic virus, while on the other hand helping Muslims adopt an alternative perspective of life that addresses their perplexities and offers a degree of comfort that religions dispense without pitting one segment of humanity against another.

In the monumental task of dealing with jihadism, every individual, group, and government must combine their resources and energies to prevail. The destiny of civilized life hangs in the balance. It is an unpardonable act of shirking responsibility for anyone to adopt the attitude of “let George do it.” George is you. George is I. George is every enlightened human being and organization that values human liberty and dignity.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

January 21, 2023

The women of Iran are leading the first female-led revolution in the history of the world, revising what bravery means. These women deserved to be named Time Magazine’s people of the year.

“The Iranian people’s nationwide protests erupted on September 16, 2022, after the death of a young Kurdish woman, Mahsa Jina Amin while in the custody of the Islamic morality Police.

How did we get here?

The upheavals of 1979 shattered the existing order and a turbaned charlatan that Jimmy Carter called a saint, Ayatollah Khomeini, skillfully steered the forces of change to promote his brand of totalitarian rule — a rule aimed at taking Iran backward to a primitive, violent, and misogynistic society.

In no time at all, Carter’s saint turned out to be the true devil he was. Khomeini’s mob started killing Americans, took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran with Americans as hostages, and launched a most virulent anti-American campaign that is bleeding America to this very day.

Carter made a bone-headed decision some forty-five years ago. Both Iranians and Americans paid dearly and continue to pay.

Islamic theocracy

Many Iranians sensed the catastrophic tragedy of Islamism and really began doing what they could to prevent it from destroying Iran’s nascent civil democratic system. Before long, Khomeini and his gangs capitalized on the frustrations of the masses, promising them everything under the sun while simultaneously murdering thousands of Iran’s best children who opposed them and their system of rule.

2009 Green Revolution

The world witnessed a massive anti-regime movement in 2009 by millions of Iranians, subsequent to the fraudulent re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The regime’s response to those protesting people was a set of dastardly measures typical of dictatorships. People were severely beaten, huge numbers arrested and herded like cattle into makeshift prisons, some were shot in the streets as they marched; others were raped and killed in Iran’s prisons. And the world simply watched. Now it was Obama’s turn. He too was hood-winked by the same Machiavellian Shi’a gang that took Carter on a ride of infamy.

The Obama Administration not only failed to voice its support for the people, but it also implied that what was happening in Iran was a kind of family squabble best left to be settled by Iranians themselves. A family feud indeed. One side of the “family” with legions of savages armed to the teeth, the Revolutionary Guard  (IRGC) and their hired thugs, and the other side of the “family” defenseless civilians using their voices to plead their case. The Islamic rulers spared no heinous means in mercilessly silencing the voices of the people.

No nation provided even moral support for the Iranian people while the savage mullahs and their thugs consolidated their rule of terror with impunity. The same scenario is recurring and the silence of the world is deafening while we are engaged in the Ukraine war.

2022 Iran revolution and the world reaction

The world leaders as usual were indifferent. The sanctions decided by the EU are finally toothless figurative politics. Only after weeks of protests did the EU adopt very limited entry injunctions and freeze assets.

By the way, did you watch the deafening sound of silence at the Golden Globes bash this past Sunday where the horde of self-righteous champions of women’s rights busily applauded each other without bothering to say a single word (except for Sean Penn) in support of the valiant Iranian women presently risking everything battling the women-oppressing Islamist rule?

Indeed it is times like this when principled freedom fighters are separated, by their words and deeds, from the frauds.

These young martyrs and so many others remain as eternal testaments to the depravity of the 7th-century primitive system and the horrors it has visited on innocent people. And these young victims of Islamic tyranny are by no means isolated cases. Tragically, women as a gender bear the brunt of Islamic misogyny. Women are systematically exploited, maltreated, and disenfranchised from their God-given rights.

When circumstances call upon us, society generates heroes. Heroes are those extraordinary people who make sacrifices and become agents of historical and social change. We sometimes speak of other forces that rule the world. The women and girls of Iran have shaken the core of the Islamic regime. Indeed, they are the true heroes of our time.

We should also salute Masih Ali Nejad, Nazanin Boniadi and Nazanin-Afshin Jam MacKay and many others who have risen to the occasion and have set themselves apart from the shameful gang of self-serving liberal women loudmouths who find themselves suddenly tongue-tied when speaking up do not serve their myopic and parochial agenda.

Women in Iran are chanting the phrase “Women, Life, Freedom” despite the threat of being shot and incarcerated by the régime. They are risking their lives. There are photographs of women raising their fists while the streets around them burn.

The decent humans of the world stood and mourned in solidarity with Iranian women’s freedom aspiration while their lives were cut short from the loving bosom of their families into the eternal embrace of Mother Iran.

They mourned their death, yet they all honored their call and summons: A call and summons to follow in their footsteps with iron resolve. A call and summons for the complete emancipation of millions of women, as well as men, who are suffering under the yoke of Islamic tyranny.

The brave women of Iran will shine forever as beacons of hope and a source of inspiration to those across the world who struggle for justice, equality, and liberty. This is the final scene. This is do-or-die. Nothing less than a subversion of this regime and recapture of Iran will stop these warriors. And it has been heard among people in Europe and the United States and all over the world. This time we see that these heroic people are determined to overthrow the rule of the mullahs.

The brave Iranian women are not stopping, nor will they any time soon. They are taking to the streets to cut their hair and burn their hijabs, indicating to the Islamic government that they will not stand for this totalitarian regime anymore. Time for the mullahs to pack up and leave.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

January 17, 2023

Historical precedent aside, present Shiite Iran is home to over 300,000 Mullahs. The most descriptive term for “Mullah” is “parasite.” A Mullah begins his career as a parasite, lives as a parasite, and dies as a parasite, simply because he contributes absolutely nothing to the necessities of life, yet gobbles disproportionately more of whatever resources he can grab.

As a true parasite, a Mullah’s very survival depends on others. It is critical for a Mullah to procure and maintain a docile, obedient host. A flock of gullible ignorant fanatics makes excellent hosts and the Mullahs’ main task is to keep the sheep in their pen by hook or crook. They scare the flock with horror stories of hell and entice them with the promise of unimaginable glorious paradise – if and only if they behave and keep on supplying them with milk, wool, and meat.

The ruthless mullahs of Iran are plenty evil without the bomb. With the bomb, the end is truly at hand. Some influential pundits pontificate that we can live with nuclear Islamists in Iran if it comes to that. They argue that the Islamists would never use the bomb. Because the mullahs, the fanatic zanies as they may be, are not going to risk Iran becoming a radioactive parking lot by the massive U.S. retaliation. Wrong. Civilized people cherish and celebrate life. The Islamists relish death as stated in their ideology and practiced daily.

Once again, these well-heeled know-it-all pundits are seeing things through their own spectacles. The mullahs have no compunctions about killing tens of thousands of their own people. They have set up a “Special Court of the Clergy” to try and imprison any of their own clerics who dare to oppose their doomsday designs. They even arrest and torture the ordinarily untouchable ayatollahs for speaking up for the rule of law and tolerance.

The time is ripe and the time is now. History will record this. The Western world must rid itself of the “happy talk” as we tranquilize ourselves by reasoning that these doddering old-world religious fools may be mischievous, but they could never do real harm. Oh, sure, they might be arming some Iraqi Shiites, killing a few US soldiers, providing a little support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas terrorists in Palestine, building several bases in South America and Africa, murdering Iranian people, and calling for the eradication of Israel—but they have no global destructive capacity. After all, we pacify ourselves that we’re not exactly talking about criminal masterminds like Hitler, or are we?

Islamic clergy, the parasitic prime beneficiaries of Islam, are master practitioners of the carrot-and-stick strategy. By drawing heavily from the Quran and the Hadith, the conniving mullahs and imams have assembled a potent arsenal of threats and promises to keep the faithful in line. They have little trouble in so doing, by shooting at peaceful demonstrators, killing a large number of unarmed people, and arresting tens of thousands of protesters for the past 5 months.

I REPEAT: The U.S. and its allies have, in secular Iranians, their best friends in the entire world. It is imperative for the U.S. to help these Iranians to dislodge the vicious doomsday Mullahs, not as an act of altruism, but as a prudent measure of enlightened self-interest.

© 2023 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 31, 2022

Introduction

According to Wikipedia: “A provisional government, also called an interim government, an emergency government, or a transitional government, is an emergency governmental authority set up to manage a political transition generally in the cases of a newly formed state or following the collapse of the previous governing administration.”

“Interim governance arrangements are an institutional framework established to create a ‘bridge’ from political or violent crisis often situated in an authoritarian past, towards a more peaceful, inclusive and democratic government.

Dr. Iman Foroutan as an Interim Executive

Foroutan is an Iranian patriot who for decades has selflessly dedicated his life to his beloved homeland Iran in order to save the suffering Iranians from the hands of the tyrannical Mullahs of Iran.

For the past twenty-three years, each day, Iman has labored tirelessly, with utmost courage, and integrity in the defense of liberty, freedom, and the rights of Iranians inside Iran. Prince “Reza Pahlavi truly believes in Democracy and believes monarchy should be left to people to decide. yet is ready to do whatever he can to help his compatriot. He also reiterated that he “will not seek power or a political office” and in future elections, he “will not support any party, organization or form of government over another.”

Foroutan’s vast knowledge, involvement in Iran’s affairs, and decades of executive experience would make him an ideal candidate to lead and be part of the interim government of diverse Iranians.

They say history repeats itself. “It was the first government established in Iran after the Iranian Revolution. The regime was headed by Mehdi Bazargan, one of the members of the Freedom Movement of Iran, and formed on the order of Ruhollah Khomeini (known as Ayatollah Khomeini) on 4 February 1979. Mehdi Bazargan was the prime minister of the interim government and introduced a seven-member cabinet on 14 February 1979. Ebrahim Yazdi was elected as the Foreign Minister.”

We are back to square one. The Islamic Republic turned out to be a bad experience. The time has come for change.

Islamic tyranny, regardless of its form, recognizes no borders. It does not confine itself to any geographic area. It is by nature aggressively expansive and invasive. The US misguided administration’s appeasement policy has indeed emboldened the Islamic Republic in its wanton behavior.

The Islamic Republic is at its last breath. Knowing the seriousness and determination of Iran’s regime in demolishing Iranian culture and heritage, Iman singlehandedly went to work and created an invaluable patented software tool that is capable of connecting all Iranians. The New Iran (“TNI”), aka “Nahade Mardomi” which in Persian translates to People’s Foundation, a not-for-profit grassroots organization birthed by Dr. Iman Foroutan has become a powerful political organization to unite Iranians around the world for over a decade.

Anticipating the events of the last few months in Iran, Iman started working on his latest creation, SOS IRAN, a first-ever project-based eco-system for organizing and collaboration of IRI opposition worldwide.

As an Iranian-American, Iman deeply loves his country of birth and the country that has given him a home of freedom. Hundreds of thousands of Iranian-Americans feel the same way.  

Are we witnessing the end of the Islamic Republic?

There is no question about that. It is only a matter of time, and not a very long one. The Islamic regime is in deep trouble. Masses of Iranians are irreparably alienated from the corrupt oppressive Islamic rule. The rule of the Islamic Republic in Iran (IRI) is crumbling. The previously solid edifice is showing many cracks that keep growing. Too many fault lines to list here.

My Iranian colleagues and I have indeed done, and continue to do, what we can to help our compatriots in Iran, who are on the front line fighting the Islamic Regime. It is regrettable that we do not have enough material support since most of us must work for a living and are not able to substantially contribute to equipping the resistance with further means of communication and information distribution.

In my honest opinion, Dr. Iman Foroutan is the best person and candidate at this crucial time to lead the interim government in exile. For those who have not heard of this brave son of Iran, it is time for you to get to know him. He has the support of many Iranians both in Iran and abroad.

Dr. Foroutan upholds and defends the ideals of human rights. Like many past heroes of Persian history, this inestimable man also has risen to the occasion in the defense of his beloved homeland and her people.

Iman has a proven record and is a true friend of freedom. He has always stood with the people of Iran in their life-and-death struggles.

It is understood, that the Iranian people themselves can set up their own secular democratic system. Recall that Iran was the first democratic nation in the Middle East when it established a constitutional monarchy which was later subverted by Reza Shah. We are thoroughly capable of establishing our own democracy. Certainly, it would not be a panacea overnight. Certainly, there will be some rough spots. Yet, the Iranian people hardly need supervision by anyone or anybody to do the job.

Allow me to reiterate, as the Islamic Republic nears its fall and it will fall, it requires an interim government in exile. A government-in-exile consists of an individual or a group of individuals residing in a foreign State. A government-in-exile may comprise a person or a group of people based on the structure of the government that has the legitimacy of the law.

Perhaps, the efficiency of a government in exile depends mainly on the expanse of support it can obtain, either from foreign governments or from the population of its own country. I am confident that Dr. Iman Foroutan will receive both support from the Iranian people and from democratic foreign nations. I have known Iman for decades and have no doubt he will be an instrumental part of a “factionally diverse interim government.” Time is of the essence.

© 2022 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

December 29, 2022

It is worse than appeasement to negotiate a “deal” with the Islamic theocrats in occupied Iran because any deal struck with these mullahs is only another ruse for them to further their plans. The UN resolutions are nothing more than pieces of paper good for burning, they can pass them all they want, the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei proclaims belligerently.

These Islamists go by their 1400-year-old charter of Allah, the Qur’an, the same charter that they hold in one hand while slashing the throat of an innocent infidel and yelling joyously “Allah is the greatest” the whole time.

To the misguided “Supreme Guide,” mullah Ali Khamenei of Iran, a few words are in order.

The civilized Iranians, descendants of Cyrus the Great, find you, mullah Ali Khamenei, and your cabal of Islamists guilty of heinous crimes. A partial list of charges is given below.

Domestically

♦ You do not represent the Iranian people.

♦ You are an Islamist terrorist.

♦ You are a usurper of power.

♦ You are guilty of transforming a noble nation into a world pariah.

• You are denying and violating a long-suffering people all its human rights.
• You are guilty of beating, imprisoning, torturing and murdering women who braved participating in a peaceful demonstration and pleading for equal family rights, and a compulsory Hijab.
• You systematically beat, rape, imprison, and torture all manner of citizens, from school teachers to students to union workers, for daring to raise their voices against the plight to which you have subjected them.

♦ You savagely beat and haul to your dungeons of torture and death over tens of thousands of teachers who had gathered in front of the parliament requesting nothing more than their back pay and living wages.

♦ In late 2009 and 2022, you ordered the Basij forces, revolutionary guards, plain-clothed and government forces to massacre thousands of innocent people in a mass popular uprising.

♦ You direct systematic genocidal measures against all non-Shi’a religious minorities in Kurdistan and the Baha’is as a prime target, and genocidal actions against political groups; support of international terrorism; demolition of religious sites and cemeteries; for rape, torture, and summary execution of prisoners of conscience; forgery of documents, acts of blackmail and fraud, and much more.

♦ You arrest some Christians; even your Quran calls “People of the Book,” for observing Christmas.

♦ You implement barbaric practices of stoning, hanging and amputations for those who are convicted of crimes in your kangaroo courts without due process. You even imprison those few lawyers who rise in the defense of the innocent.

♦ You plunder, mismanage and dole out Iran’s national wealth with the result that the great majority of the people are living in poverty. Iranian women are forced into prostitution to survive or simply sold as sex slaves in Persian Gulf states.

♦ Your fascist misrule of nearly three decades has driven millions of Iran’s best children to the four corners of the world. Hundreds of thousands of educated Iranians are compelled to continue the exodus, depriving Iran of sorely needed talents at home.

♦ You spend a fortune on the nuclear program that you claim is only aimed for peaceful purposes, while turning Iran into little more than a gas station nation, with its precious oil wealth squandered and its facilities on the verge of collapse through neglect.

♦ You have created a suffocating social atmosphere that has driven masses of people to the use of hard drugs as a way of numbing their pain.

Internationally

♦ You look far and wide to support any and all terrorists. Your delusional theology mandates the creation of horrific conditions in the world so that your Hidden Imam is compelled to appear and establish his rule.

♦ You spare no efforts at sabotaging any settlement between the Palestinians and Israelis.

♦ You arm and train all Palestinian factions such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and any and all that come.

♦ You direct similar criminal schemes on your eastern flank, in Afghanistan. You consider any democratic system as the enemy of Islamofascism, and rightfully so.

♦ You work ceaselessly, expand Iran’s stolen funds, and do all you can in support of your Shi’a co-fascists Hezbollah in Lebanon.

♦ Your hands are dripping with the blood of thousands of Iraqis, victims of your bloodthirsty kin mercenaries aiming to kill a budding democracy in Iraq next door.

♦ You supplied your mercenaries with armor-piercing projectiles for killing and maiming the coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Your cowardly killing by proxy, using these roadside-planted bombs, has taken the lives of hundreds of Americans.

♦ You interpreted the highly-subdued reactions of the coalition to your savage actions as indications of weakness. So, you found it in yourself to venture into direct confrontation by capturing lightly armed British sailors and marines in Iraqi waters.

♦ You are responsible for helping Syrian forces slaughter seekers of freedom.

♦ You directly orchestrated an attack on the British embassy in Tehran last month and called the action of your “thugs,” “student protests.”

♦ You plotted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador, Adel al-Jubeir, on US soil.

Time is of the essence; the clock is ticking and the window is closing on the Iranian people. Diplomacy cannot be open-ended.

To misguided advocates of negotiation with the devil (mullahs), beware. The mullahs are on an Allah-mandated mission. They are intoxicated with petrodollars and aim to settle for nothing less than complete domination of the world under the Islamic Ummah. The pressure, led by the vanguard of freedom, university students and notable women are gathering more force. The rule of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) is crumbling. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei must be held accountable and tried in the international court for crimes against humanity.

© 2022 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

July 4, 2022

This is the time of the year that the air is filled with joy and recognition of America’s Independence Day and the formation of one of the greatest nations on Earth. There is something for everyone: spectacular fireworks, family and friends’ gatherings, concerts, patriotic music, parades, and traditional BBQ.

It puts most of us in a reflective mood, particularly when we celebrate America’s birthday. Freedom, individual liberty, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution. All prodigiously good reasons to celebrate on America’s 246th birthday.

Yet, I am also disappointed to see the reality of the world as it is, particularly with what the current Democrat Party is doing to this nation of all nations. For decades, the Democrat Party has shown by both words and deeds that they despise the U.S. Constitution while they bend over backward to embrace Islamists, illegal aliens, and anyone who hates America and feels entitled. The left is interested only in power, control, and nothing else — even if it means sacrificing our safety and national security.

Creeping socialism, communism, liberalism, progressivism, New World Order (NWO) Globalists, and the American ‘Democrat Party’ are riding on a fast train to erode much of the foundation of this nation. A nation that is the best hope of all free people. Tragically, a terrible course was set in motion during Obama’s presidency. We have already seen the devastating impact of Obama’s redistributionist government. The Biden Administration continues Obama’s ‘Fundamental Transformation of America.

“A global pandemic and the Biden administration has given Obama & Co. the opportunity to undo the prosperity of the Trump years and move forward with their plans to remake the U.S. into a “green” socialist Utopia, the damage to actual Americans’ lives and businesses be damned”

I would like to join all of you in the celebration of the birth of this great nation. Yet, deep in my soul, I find it also my solemn duty to keep sounding the alarm about the fire of Marxism and communism even at this poignant moment during our 4th of July celebrations.

As Ronald Reagan once said: Let the Fourth of July always be a reminder that here in this land, for the first time, it was decided that man is born with certain God-given rights; that government is only a convenience created and managed by the people, with no powers of its own except those voluntarily granted to it by the people.”

I am for unity under just one banner: freedom. Any idea or action that separates people into warring camps and builds walls of separation is abhorrent to me. Marxist Democrats have degenerated into a force for oppression, segregation, and tyranny and I find it necessary to expose the harm it inflicts on fellow Americans.

This Democrat Party no longer hides its agenda. They now openly encourage millions of illegal aliens to violate our laws and break into our country, and they want to sign them up for free welfare, free health care, free education, and the right to vote — with the help of their ace in the hole, the “Fake News” media and RINO’s (Republicans In Name Only). It is obvious that the Democrat Party is at war with America, and is not interested in stopping any time soon.

As for politics, there are really no saints in this line of work — Democrats, republicans, or whatever. It is sad, but a fact that politics is dirty, parochial, and divisive. I am asking you not to make any decisions based on emotion. We must remain united and win this battle peacefully and wisely.

In 1776, our Founders stood up, put their lives and fortunes on the line and declared their freedom and independence from the chains and shackles of the King of England. I hope all Americans, once again, unite for the love of freedom and are willing to stand up and declare their Freedom and Independence, not from England, but from the chains and shackles of our own government and its lackeys.

In short, Americans have an illegitimate President and a federal government that has revealed itself to be punitive to its citizens; taking unconstitutional measures and issuing orders that amount to nothing short of federally mandated self-destruction. Nonetheless, first things first. Our highest priority is the preservation of this nation of the free. We have done what it took in the past and we must do what it takes now and into the future to safeguard our precious liberty. America is not perfect. Yet, it is the very best hope for a humanity struggling to find its humanness. We must promote the work of the good by unifying our fellow Americans to save America from fading away. America is worth defending.

Happy Independence Day.

© 2022 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

January 24, 2022

For decades, I have argued that the enemy is Islam without adjectives, Islam “pure and simple.” Adjectives such as “extremist,” “radical,” “moderate,” “fundamentalist,” “moderate,” “political,”  “Islamist,” etc. simply mislead the blind, the ignorant, the naive, and wishful thinking humanists, liberals, as well as soft-headed Jews, Christians, and idiotic atheists to succumb to their own fears and previous follies regarding the savagery intrinsic in Islamic scriptures and history, which have been recognized by former Muslims who have somehow overcome their previous misconceptions about the most vicious and dangerous enemy of civilization and mankind.

A revealing book on the subject is Robert Reilly, “The Closing of the Islamic Mind.”  This purely scholarly work should be supplemented by the work of theologian George Weigel, “Faith, Reason, and the War against Jihadism.”

Terms such as “Political Islam,” “Radical Islam, “or Militant Islam are the contributions of Useful Idiots. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam, simply because they are redundant. Islam, by its very nature and according to its charter—the Quran—is a radical political movement. It is the Useful Idiot who sanitizes Islam and misguides the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate.

Regrettably, a large segment of the population goes along with these nonsensical euphemisms depicting Islam because it prefers to believe them. It is less threatening to believe that only a hijacked small segment of Islam is radical or politically driven and that the main body of Islam is indeed moderate and non-political.

Islam is not a religion. It is a political ideology. In Islam, the mosque and State are the same—the mosque is the State. This arrangement goes back to the days of Muhammad himself. Islam is also radical in the extreme. Even “moderate” Islam is radical in its beliefs as well as its deeds. Muslims believe that all non-Muslims, bar none, are hellfire bound and well-deserve being maltreated compared to believers.

Many people wonder why Islam is blossoming in the US! They are bewildered as to why Democrats back Islamic ideology, honor their holidays and customs, and promote it as the religion of peace, knowing that Islam is not a religion of peace. In fact, it is an ideology of war. The answer is quite simple:  The Democrat Party stands with anyone who hates America and the Republican party.  History has proven that once Muslims have the majority, they institute sharia law and adopt their own legal system.  A government within a government.

The Democrat Party has shown by both words and actions that they despise the U.S. Constitution.  When it comes to the support of Muslims, they will not hesitate to hold the Bill of Rights over anyone who dares to accuse Islam and Muslims of wrongdoing.  While crime and threats skyrocket, Islamized citizens will ignore the wrongdoing.  They will look the other way for fear of retribution, honor killings, and punishments from those who uphold the Islamic requirement to seek revenge on anyone who dishonors or disagrees with Islam.

The Democrat Party has descended into nihilism, which describes the present state of America.  This is a logical consequence of America’s abandonment of its Declaration of Independence, which she never really understood, and which, unknown even to eminent scholars, represent a synthesis of classical and modern political science–which is elaborated in my masterwork “A Judeo-Scientific Guide for the Perplexed.”

The primary target of the Left is the Bible of Israel. The Bible says that God creates nations, as well as individuals, and the Left is opposed to both nationalism and individualism.  Do you fathom this?  This does not require a lengthy discourse.

“By each passing day, the death of Western Civilization – specifically, the death of Europe, will not have been a suicide, but a cold-blooded, premeditated murder, carried out by the western ruling oligarchy.”

In plain language, western Europe has been betrayed by the very people entrusted with its protection and stewardship – its political leaders and their enablers. People like former EU President Jean-Claude Juncker, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Emmanuel Macron, and many others.

When the wolf gets into the fold and begins terrorizing the sheep and preying upon them, who is most at fault – the wolf or the shepherd who was supposed to guard the flock? The wolf, although his fangs, may be bloody, is only being what he is – a predator. The shepherd, on the other hand, has failed in his duty to protect the flock.

In the case of Europe, the “shepherds” have done much, much worse than simply fail through negligence. They have actively aided and abetted the enemy and let them into the heart of Europe to prey upon its native peoples.

The Muslims who now terrorize Europe must be dealt with like the rabid dogs that they are – but a great evil has been done and the job will not be done until the traitorous leaders of old Europe have been brought to justice and pay the price for their enormous betrayal. They literally have the blood of innocents on their hands – men, women and children alike.

In the Germany of the 1930s, for instance, very few people were Nazis, and most Germans dismissed them as a bunch of hotheaded fools. Before long, the hotheaded few cowed the dismissive masses, and as a result, millions lost their lives.

America Stay Awake. It has started to happen here too. Time is of the essence.

© 2022 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

By: Amil Imani

The insidious similarity between the 2020 rigged US presidential election and the 2009 Islamic Republic of Iran sham election, is striking and quite mindboggling. How could America, the beacon of freedom, the leader and the envy of the free world have an election resembling the most repressive country in the world? Allow me to explain.

The Islamic Republic President Ahmadinejad, a veteran of the Islamic Republic’s repressive Revolutionary Guard, took office on August 3, 2005, after an unexpected win in a sham presidential election — there are no democratic elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran. All candidates are prescreened by the Guardian Council before they can run for office.  In practice, a president of Iran is already chosen through a farce process of giving the voters a chance to elect one of the men hand-picked from the regime’s functionaries, as was the case with President Ahmadinejad.

During the previous “election,” only a small percentage of the voters bothered to vote, since voting under the pre-screening and undemocratic system of the mullahs is more like selection than election. The result of staying away from the polls materialized in the person of the fascist Ahmadinejad. The votes, more than anything else, are protest ballots cast against the entire system, rather than indications of support for the so-called conservative-moderate coalition. It took less than 4 years for Iranians to realize that boycotting the so-called elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran can only bring to power an even worse bunch of Islamofascists.

On June 12, 2009, the Iranian people went to the polls, challenging not only the incumbent president Ahmadinejad, but the entire establishment of the Islamic regime. Iran’s elections are considered extremely unfair and the Islamist government does not allow international monitors to be present. The ruling clerics put their stamp on the elections from the very beginning by deciding who can run. It is really a joke.

More than 470 people sought to join the presidential race, but only Ahmadinejad and three rivals were cleared. However, the turnout was massive, a near record high 85 percent of Iran’s 49.2 million eligible voters. Based on the information from Mousavi’s website, a group of Interior Ministry employees have leaked out the following results which seem to be closer to reality than the one released by the establishment: Total eligible: 49.2 million participated in the election. Mir Hussein Mousavi was the front runner and received 45% of the votes. Mehdi Karoobi, 33%, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 13%, Mohsen Rezai 9%. Cancelled votes: 3%.  It was clear that Mr. Mir Hussein Mousavi won the election by a large margin. Ahmadinejad came out third. But on Friday June 12, 2009, in the Islamic election (selection) something happened. Something beyond what anyone could have ever imagined. A daylight coup d’état by the elements of the establishment, particularly, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

An Iranian journalist said, “The important event that took place in Iran is that it wasn’t an election; it was a coup d’état. [They] stole 24 million votes of the nation and took them away for themselves.”

The political chief of the powerful Revolutionary Guard warned it would crush revolution against the Islamic system by Mousavi’s “green movement” — the signature color of his campaign.

Briefly, the 25 million votes for Mir Hussein Mousavi was removed and placed in Ahmadinejad’s ballot box. Just like that.

History is full of ironies. What we witnessed in the Islamic Republic was repeated in the United States. On November 3^rd, 2020, over seventy-four million (perhaps a great many more) Americans cast their votes to re-elect President Trump for his second term.

The Democrats, under the pretense of Chinese virus hysteria, implemented a national, orchestrated drive to relax accountability in the voting process, and allowed massive mail-in ballots to pour in, which they evidently exploited with massive voter fraud that enabled them to flip a lopsided presidential election.

“The Navarro Report, assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage. “

“The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.”

The release of a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems Software in Antrim County, Michigan has shown that the voting machines are “intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.” There is also an undeniable mathematical evidence the election was stolen.

In his recent rally in Georgia, President Trump said: “The people that are questioning the votes aren’t interested in the people that committed the voter fraud, they’re only interested in me and others because I bring voter fraud to the forefront in order to save our nation from corrupt elections and to make sure that this never, ever happens again.”

The 2020 election was stolen by longtime planning and a concerted effort by the previous administration, high tech companies, corrupt media, the “Deep State” and other actors. They exploited the coronavirus pandemic to purge laws that were put in place over the course of decades to preserve the integrity of the ballot box. The reason Obama never left Washington D.C. as all former presidents do, is because Biden for him is his third term. He worked hard behind the scenes with his friends in the CIA, FBI and other agencies to undermine President Trump first term and to enable this enormous election fraud.

This was a déjà vu for me, a reminiscent of a rigged election in Iran. President Trump won the election in a landslide. No question about it. The legislatures and courts ignored the evidence of fraud and the judiciary refused to even hear it. Like the Islamic Republic election, this one was also an orchestrated coup attempt to remove President Trump from office. Each of us will need to come to terms with the fact that 2020 presidential election was rigged in a massive scale. None of us can hide any longer from this fact and each of us will need to consider the ramifications to our children of the immorality of this action.

© 2021 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved