Surviving the Digital Garden of Eden

By David Masters

September 24, 2023

In the dawn of creation, as whispered in the sacred verses of Genesis 2:9, the divine hand of the LORD God fashioned the Garden of Eden—a realm of unparalleled beauty and profound significance. Within its hallowed grounds, every tree that was pleasing to the eye and nourishing to the body flourished, offering sustenance and delight. Two trees, in particular, held the secrets of existence: the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

This biblical narrative, ancient and laden with allegorical depth, has traversed the annals of time to find new resonance in the age of technology and interconnectedness. The Digital Garden of Eden, a metaphorical haven seeded within the vast expanse of cyberspace, bears witness to the remarkable power of human ingenuity, curiosity, and ambition. Just as the LORD God nurtured the Earthly Eden, mankind’s endeavors have led to the cultivation of a new landscape—a realm not of soil and flora, but of code and data.

The proliferation of digital platforms, virtual spaces, and boundless information mirrors the abundance of trees that once adorned the sacred garden. Yet, amidst this digital foliage, stand two towering archetypes: the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. The Tree of Life, both literal and symbolic, represents the essence of vitality, perpetuity,
and renewal.

It parallels the interconnected networks that sustain our modern existence, enabling the flow of information, commerce, and communication. In the digital realm, this tree extends its branches as the conduit through which our lives unfold, fostering global connections that transcend boundaries. Conversely, the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil encapsulates the power of choice and consequence—an eternal reminder that knowledge, when pursued without discernment can yield both illumination and destruction. Our digital Eden teems with information, ideas, and perspectives, all of which beckon us to partake. But in this virtual sanctuary, as in the biblical garden, the quest for wisdom carries the burden of ethical considerations and unforeseen ramifications.

© 2023 David Masters – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail David Masters: snowman4848@gmail.com




Alien Deception vs Human Superiority and the Resurrected Superbeing

by David Masters

September 16, 2023

The question of human superiority in the context of potential alien races has long fascinated the human imagination. When contemplating this complex topic, it is clear that humans are inherently superior due to a unique aspect of their belief system: the concept of a resurrected superbeing. The idea that humans’ belief in a resurrected figure places them at the forefront of superiority among all potential extraterrestrial species as opposed to technological superiority in alien culture. Christ alone establishes humans as the preeminent species.

The Resurrected Superbeing as a Central Tenet

At the heart of many religious traditions, particularly Christianity lies the belief in a resurrected superbeing. In Christianity, this figure is Jesus Christ, whose resurrection signifies not only a historical event but also a profound theological cornerstone. The belief in Christ’s resurrection holds immense significance for Christians worldwide, as it embodies the promise of redemption, eternal life, and divine guidance.

One can argue that this belief sets humans apart from potential alien races. While actual and hypothetical alien civilizations may have their own belief systems, the presence of a resurrected figure is a unique feature in many human cultures. This belief grants humans a sense of purpose, hope, and moral framework that necessarily distinguishes them as a preeminent species.

The Immortal Ruler

Unlike technological achievements, which can be replicated and surpassed, the concept of a resurrected superbeing offers humankind immortality. A resurrected figure, such as Jesus Christ, is perceived as an eternal ruler who transcends time and space. This divine figure cannot be artificially manufactured or replaced through technological means. The belief in such an immortal ruler endows humans with a sense of spiritual connection and stability that may be absent in other cultures, including hypothetical alien civilizations.

Technological Superiority vs. Spiritual Depth

While technological superiority has its advantages, particularly in the realm of warfare and material progress, it does not necessarily equate to overall superiority. Technological achievements are often contingent on a specific point in time and can be eclipsed by future developments or rival civilizations. Furthermore, technological prowess can lead to both positive and negative consequences, such as environmental degradation and warfare.

In contrast, the belief in a resurrected superbeing offers a deeper dimension to human existence—one that transcends material success. It provides a moral and ethical compass, fostering compassion, forgiveness, and a sense of community. This spiritual depth adds another layer to human existence that cannot be solely measured by technological achievements.

The belief scientifically proven by the shroud of Turin, in a resurrected superbeing is a defining feature of many human cultures, particularly in the context of Christianity.

While it may not be a universal belief, it distinguishes humans from potential alien races in a unique way. The concept of an immortal ruler who offers redemption and eternal life cannot be replicated through technological means, sets humans apart, and establishes our ultimate superiority in the grand tapestry of the cosmos.

1 Corinthians 15:17, is a biblical passage from the New Testament that holds significant theological importance in the context of Christianity. It reads as follows in the New International Version (NIV):

“And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins.”

This verse is part of a larger passage in 1 Corinthians 15 where the apostle Paul addresses the resurrection of Jesus Christ and its significance for the Christian faith. In this passage, Paul explains the central role of the resurrection in Christian theology.

An overview of the verse and its theological implications:

  • The Resurrection of Christ: In this verse, Paul emphasizes the fundamental belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. According to Christian doctrine, Jesus’ resurrection is a pivotal event in the faith. It is not only a historical fact but also a theological cornerstone, demonstrating Christ’s victory over sin and death.
  • The Significance of the Resurrection: Paul is making a strong point that if Christ had not been raised from the dead, the entire Christian faith would be meaningless or “worthless.” This is because the resurrection validates Jesus’ claims and work, including his role as the Savior who conquers sin and provides salvation for humanity.
  • Freedom from Sin: The latter part of the verse, “You are still in your sins,” underscores the idea that without Christ’s resurrection, humanity would remain in a state of sin and separation from God. The resurrection serves as the means through which believers can be reconciled with God and have the hope of eternal life.

It’s important to note that the theological significance of this verse within Christianity is focused on matters of faith, salvation, and the nature of Jesus as the divine Savior. I am interpreting Christ in a singular and unique comparison between humans and potential alien races.

The idea of humans being superior to alien races based on the belief in a resurrected superbeing supersedes other evolutionary and technological concepts that fall outside the theological context of 1 Corinthians 15:17

The Alien Deception and Technological Fraud: A Reflection on Matthew 24:24

The intersection of religious prophecy, modern technology, and the possibility of contact with extraterrestrial life has sparked intriguing discussions about the potential for deception and fraud in our increasingly interconnected world. Matthew 24:24, a verse from the New Testament, has been cited as a cautionary message regarding the rise of false prophets and the potential for deception through great signs and wonders. This essay explores the implications of this biblical verse in the context of the alien deception and technological fraud, emphasizing the need for discernment and critical thinking in an age of advanced technology and heightened expectations of contact with alien civilizations.

Matthew 24:24 – False Prophets and Deception

The biblical passage Matthew 24:24, as stated in the New International Version (NIV), reads: “For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders that would deceive even the elect if that were possible. See, I have told you in advance.” This verse is part of Jesus’ discourse on the signs of the end times, cautioning his disciples and believers about the rise of deceptive figures who would attempt to mislead even the most faithful through extraordinary feats.

The Alien Deception Hypothesis

In the modern context, some individuals and groups have raised concerns about the potential for deception related to alien encounters or sightings. The hypothesis posits that advanced technology could be used to simulate extraterrestrial contact, causing widespread panic and confusion. This deception, according to proponents of the theory, may be orchestrated by powerful entities with various motives, including control, manipulation, or diversion of public attention.

Technological Fraud and Misdirection

Modern technology has reached levels where it is possible to create highly convincing simulations and hoaxes. Advanced visual effects, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence have the potential to fabricate seemingly authentic alien encounters. Such fraudulent acts could exploit people’s fascination with the unknown and their desire for contact with otherworldly beings. In an era of deepfakes and virtual reality, discerning genuine phenomena from sophisticated illusions becomes increasingly challenging.

The Importance of Discernment and Critical Thinking

Matthew 24:24 serves as a timeless reminder of the importance of discernment and critical thinking, especially in an age where technological capabilities blur the line between reality and simulation. It encourages individuals to approach extraordinary claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and to rely on evidence and reason to evaluate their veracity.

The convergence of biblical prophecy, technological advancements, and the possibility of alien contact has led to discussions about potential deception and fraud. Matthew 24:24’s warning about false prophets and great signs and wonders serves as a cautionary message in today’s world. While the existence of extraterrestrial life remains an open question, it is crucial for individuals to exercise discernment, critical thinking, and a commitment to both faith and evidence-based evaluation when confronted with extraordinary claims. In an era where technology can be used to manipulate perception, a cautious and informed approach is essential to distinguish between reality and deception, whether related to matters of faith or the search for otherworldly encounters.

© 2023 David Masters – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail David Masters: snowman4848@gmail.com




The Devil’s in the Details

By David Masters

May 19, 2023

Consider a hypothetical scenario where the Devil is running for political office, in this context, it’s reasonable to assume that the Devil would employ manipulative tactics to appeal to people’s vulnerabilities and desires. However, the specific strategies or messages the Devil might use would depend on the political climate, cultural context, and the audience being targeted especially those that have been “Primed” over several generations to be susceptible to suggestion…

To be “primed” can have different meanings depending on the context. Here are a few common interpretations:

  • Psychological Priming: In psychology, priming refers to the unconscious influence that a stimulus has on subsequent thoughts or behavior. When someone is primed, it means that they have been exposed to certain stimuli or cues that influence their perceptions, attitudes, or responses to subsequent stimuli. For example, if someone is primed with positive words before being shown a neutral image, they might perceive the image more positively compared to someone who was not primed.
  • Marketing and Sales Priming: In marketing and sales, priming refers to the deliberate process of influencing a consumer’s perception or behavior before they encounter a product or service. This can involve creating positive associations, setting expectations, or providing subtle cues that predispose the consumer to respond in a particular way when they encounter the actual product or service.
  • Cognitive Priming: In cognitive science, priming refers to the activation of specific concepts or ideas in memory, which can influence subsequent cognitive processes or judgments. This can occur through exposure to related words, images, or ideas that activate associated concepts, making them more accessible and likely to influence subsequent thoughts or decisions.

Overall, being “primed” typically implies the activation or preparation of certain mental or cognitive processes, either consciously or unconsciously, to influence subsequent behavior, perception, or performance.

Keeping Priming in mind, here are a few hypothetical approaches the Devil might take to win over supporters:

  • Promising Immediate Satisfaction: The Devil might appeal to people’s desires for instant gratification, promising immediate solutions to complex problems. This could involve making grandiose promises, offering shortcuts to success, or advocating for policies that prioritize short-term gains over long-term consequences.
  • Exploiting Fear and Division: The Devil might play on people’s fears and insecurities, emphasizing a narrative of “us versus them.” By scapegoating specific groups or promoting a sense of impending doom, the Devil could attempt to stoke divisions and rally support through fearmongering.
  • Manipulating Emotions: The Devil might employ emotional manipulation to tap into people’s deepest desires and frustrations. By appealing to emotions such as anger, resentment, or vengeance, the Devil could try to mobilize support and create a sense of solidarity among like-minded individuals.
  • Distorting Facts and Spreading Disinformation: The Devil might engage in misinformation campaigns, spreading false narratives or distorting facts to confuse and mislead the public. This could involve exploiting existing biases or exploiting the media to disseminate misleading information.
  • Promoting Self-Interest: The Devil might encourage a self-centered mentality, appealing to individual interests over collective well-being. This could involve promoting policies that prioritize personal wealth and power, disregarding the needs of marginalized communities or the greater good.

Without question, It is true that individuals can be influenced or manipulated in various ways that may lead them to make choices that could have negative consequences. Factors such as misinformation, propaganda, emotional appeals, and cognitive biases can all play a role in shaping people’s decision-making processes.

It’s essential to recognize that the responsibility for creating a hellscape or negative outcomes does not solely rest on the shoulders of individual voters. Societal and systemic factors, as well as the actions and decisions of elected officials and other influential actors, also contribute significantly to the state of affairs in any given region.

Moreover, people’s choices are very often made without full awareness of the potential consequences or access to accurate information. There can be complex social, economic, and historical factors that shape the choices available to individuals and influence their decision-making processes.

Historical figures like Adolf Hitler and other similar leaders have been known to employ emotional manipulation as a tool to influence and control people. These leaders often used powerful rhetoric, propaganda, and appeals to emotions to gain support and sway public opinion.

Hitler, in particular, was a skilled orator who was able to captivate audiences with his speeches and harness their emotions for his political agenda. He used fear, anger, and nationalism to mobilize support and rally people around his ideologies. By exploiting societal grievances, scapegoating specific groups, and appealing to a sense of national pride, Hitler was able to manipulate emotions and gain a significant following.

Other authoritarian leaders throughout history have also employed similar tactics, recognizing the power of emotion in shaping public opinion and controlling the narrative. They often use emotionally charged language, symbols, and imagery to cultivate a sense of unity, loyalty, and obedience among their supporters.

It is crucial to be aware of and guard against emotional manipulation in political discourse. Developing critical thinking skills, seeking diverse sources of information, and being mindful of the tactics employed by leaders can help individuals make more informed and rational decisions. Awareness of manipulation can serve as a counterbalance to the divisive and manipulative strategies used by such leaders.

The question of why people elect individuals who may have the power to negatively impact their lives, finances, or the future is a complex one with no single answer that applies universally. However, here are a few factors that can contribute to such choices:

  • Diverse Perspectives: People have different perspectives and priorities when it comes to politics. What one person considers detrimental, another may view as beneficial. Individuals often make electoral choices based on a range of issues, including their personal beliefs, values, party affiliation, or policy positions.
  • Limited Options: In some cases, people might feel that they have limited choices when it comes to electing leaders. They may perceive that all candidates are flawed, or they might have concerns about the alternatives. This can lead them to select a candidate who they believe aligns more closely with their interests, despite potential drawbacks.
  • Campaign Messaging and Promises: Political candidates often make promises or present persuasive messaging during their campaigns that resonate with voters. People may vote based on these promises, hoping for positive change or improvements, even if the actual outcomes may not align with expectations.
  • Lack of Information or Awareness: Some individuals may not be fully informed about the potential consequences or impact of their electoral choices. Limited knowledge, misinformation, or a lack of understanding about the complexities of governance and policy can influence voting decisions.
  • Party Affiliation and Loyalty: Party affiliation can play a significant role in voting patterns. People often align with a particular political party and support its candidates regardless of specific policies or individual qualities. Loyalty to a party or the desire to maintain party dominance can outweigh other concerns for many voters.

It’s important to remember that political dynamics and the consequences of governance are multifaceted, and individual experiences may vary. The idea that an entire population, such as the 40 million people living in California, are collectively experiencing a “hellscape” as a result of their electoral choices is a clear example of a mass formation of psychotics equally manipulated and herded like so many cattle to the slaughterhouse.

© 2023 David Masters – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail David Masters: snowman4848@gmail.com

Website Interview Contact: 541-660-0116




Mind Control: Conversion by Technological Means

By David Masters

May 10, 2023

Once upon a time, in a not-too-distant future, a group of scientists developed a revolutionary technology known as BrainNet. It was a multi-person brain-to-brain interface that allowed individuals to directly communicate and collaborate using only their thoughts. At first, the idea of BrainNet seemed like something straight out of a science fiction novel, but as the technology was tested and refined, it became clear that it had the potential to change the world in profound ways.

The first experiments with BrainNet were conducted with small groups of people who were fitted with electrodes that could read their brain activity. These electrodes were then used to send signals between participants, allowing them to share information and work together on tasks using only their thoughts. As the technology improved, the size of the groups that could use BrainNet grew larger and larger. Soon, entire teams of people could collaborate using the interface, sharing ideas and coordinating their actions in real-time without ever needing to speak a single word.

It wasn’t long before BrainNet was being used by researchers, educators, and even businesses. Scientists used the technology to study the way that groups of people work together and to explore new ideas in fields like neuroscience and psychology. Educators used BrainNet to teach students in new and innovative ways, allowing them to share ideas and collaborate on projects in real time. Businesses also saw the potential of BrainNet, using it to coordinate teams of employees who were spread out across the globe. With BrainNet, team members could work together as if they were all in the same room, sharing ideas and collaborating on projects in real time.

But BrainNet wasn’t just useful for work or education; it also had the potential to change the way people connected with each other on a personal level. With BrainNet, friends and family members could communicate and share their thoughts and feelings with each other in a way that was impossible before. As the years went by, BrainNet became more and more advanced, with new features and capabilities being added all the time. But even as the technology grew more complex, its underlying principle remained the same: the ability for people to communicate and collaborate with each other using only their thoughts.

And so, the world was changed forever by BrainNet, a technology that brought people closer to collective mind influence and advanced human technological domination possibilities that were once thought impossible. So, the more we find out about how the human mind works through today’s highly advanced technological research, the more power brokers and manipulators learn to control human beings. And what scares me the most is that the medium for takeover has been in place for decades.

Looking back a few decades….Tests by researcher Herbert Krugman showed that, while viewers were watching TV, right-brain activity outnumbered left-brain activity by a ratio of two to one. Put more simply, the viewers were in an altered state…in trance more often than not. They were getting their Beta-endorphin “fix.”  To measure attention spans, psycho-physiologist Thomas Mulholland of the Veterans Hospital in Bedford, Massachusetts, attached young viewers to an EEG machine that was wired to shut the TV set off whenever the children’s brains produced a majority of alpha waves. Although the children were told to concentrate, only a few could keep the set on for more than 30 seconds! Most viewers are already hypnotized to varying degrees.

To deepen the trance is easy. The commercials or suggestions presented following this alpha-inducing broadcast are much more likely to be accepted by the viewer. The high percentage of the viewing audience that has somnambulistic-depth ability could very well accept the suggestions as commands–as long as those commands did not ask the viewer to do something contrary to his morals, religion, or self-preservation. By the age of 16, children have spent around 10,000 to 15,000 hours watching television and playing video games – that is more time than they spend in school! Last time I checked the average home has the TV set on for six hours and 44 minutes per day– three times the average rate of increase during the 1970s.

It obviously isn’t getting better…we are rapidly moving into an alpha-level world–very possibly the Orwellian world of “1984”–placid, glassy-eyed, and responding obediently to instructions. A research project by Jacob Jacoby, a Purdue University psychologist, found that of 2,700 people tested, 90 percent misunderstood even such simple viewing fare as commercials.

Only minutes after watching, the typical viewer missed 23 to 36 percent of the questions about what he or she had seen. Of course, they did–they were going in and out of trance! If you go into a deep trance, you must be instructed to remember–otherwise you automatically forget. If you think that technological mind control techniques are a joke, read the following articles and decide for yourself if we have been “entranced.”

In the article, Reading Your Mind – And Injecting Smart Thoughts by Douglas Pasternak U.S. News & World Report, January 3/January 10, 2000, pp. 67, 68. The plan was laid out 15 years ago! Buck Rogers, meet John Norseen. Like the comic-strip hero, a 20th-century man stuck in the 25th century, Norseen feels he’s not quite in the right time. His brain-research ideas are simply too futuristic. And he admits his current obsession seems to have been lifted from a Rogers saga. The Lockheed Martin neuroengineer hopes to turn the “electrohypnomentalophone,” a mind-reading machine invented by one of Buck’s buddies, from science fiction into science fact. Norseen’s interest in the brain stems from a Soviet book he read in the mid-1980s, claiming that research on the mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. The former Navy pilot coined the term “BioFusion” to cover his plans to map and manipulate gray matter, leading (he hopes) to advances in medicine, national security, and entertainment.

He does not do the research but sees himself as the integrator of discoveries that will make BioFusion a reality. BioFusion would be able to convert thoughts into computer commands, predicts Norseen, by deciphering the brain’s electrical activity. Electromagnetic pulses would trigger the release of the brain’s own neurotransmitters to fight off disease, enhance learning, or alter the mind’s visual images, creating what Norseen has dubbed “synthetic reality.”The key is finding “brain prints.” “Think of your hand touching a mirror,” explains Norseen. “It leaves a fingerprint.” BioFusion would reveal the fingerprints of the brain by using mathematical models. “Just like you can find one person in a million through fingerprints,” he says, “you can find one thought in a million.”

It sounds crazy, but Uncle Sam is listening. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the Army’s National Ground Intelligence Center have all awarded small basic research contracts to Norseen, who works for Lockheed Martin’s Intelligent Systems Division. Norseen is waiting to hear if the second stage of these contracts – portions of them classified – comes through. Norseen’s theories are grounded in current science. Mapping human brain functions is now routine. By viewing a brain scan recorded by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine, scientists can tell what the person was doing at the time of the recording – say, reading or writing. Emotions from love to hate can be recognized from the brain’s electrical activity.

Thought police: So could the murderous thoughts of a terrorist, asserts Norseen, who wrote his thesis at the Naval War College on applying neuroscience research to anti-terrorism. He has submitted a research-and-development plan to the Pentagon, at its request, to identify a terrorist’s mental profile. A miniaturized brain-mapping device inside an airport metal detector would screen passengers’ brain patterns against a dictionary of brain prints. Norseen predicted profiling by brain print would be in place by 2005.

Human-potential re-education is an ideal environment to observe first-hand what is technically called Stockholm Syndrome. This is a situation in which those who are intimidated, controlled, or made to suffer, begin to love, admire, and even sometimes sexually desire their controllers or captors. But be warned: If you think you can attend such gatherings and not be affected, you are probably wrong. A perfect example is the story of a woman who went to Haiti on a Guggenheim Fellowship to study Haitian Voodoo.

In her report, she related how the music eventually induced uncontrollable bodily movement and an altered state of consciousness. Although she intellectually understood the process and thought herself immune to it, when she began to feel herself become vulnerable to the music, she attempted to fight it and turned away. Anger or resistance almost always assures conversion. A few moments later she was possessed by the music and began dancing in a trance around the Voodoo meeting house. An “altered state” had been induced by the music and excitement, and she awoke feeling reborn.

True Believers

I believe that at perhaps two-thirds of the population is what Eric Hoffer calls true believers. They are joiners and followers… people who want to give away their power. They look for answers, meaning, and enlightenment outside themselves. Hoffer, who wrote The True Believer a classic on mass movements, says; true believers are not intent on bolstering and advancing a cherished self, but are those craving to be rid of unwanted self. They are followers, not because of a desire for self-advancement, but because it can satisfy their passion for self-renunciation! Hoffer also says that true believers; are eternally incomplete and eternally insecure!

They are friends, family members, leaders and the wandering “homeless” with catatonic stares. You have run into them time and time again. Some can be awakened; others will sleep through their entire lives because they do not want to live their own lives. But why? Because once converted, the victim’s previous life is virtually erased, in essence, they have no identity but the one installed by their “re-programmers.” For these, all you can do is attempt to show them that the only thing to seek is the true self within. Their personal answers are to be found there and there alone.

They must desire to return to the basics of a truly authentic life of spirituality: self-responsibility and self-actualization. Unfortunately, most of the true believers will just tell you that they are not spiritual and go on their merry way looking for someone who will give them the validation, dogma or structure they now need and desire in order to function. Never underestimate the potential danger of these people. They can easily be molded into fanatics (useful idiots) who will gladly work and die for their cause. Their false loyalty to others is a substitute for their lost faith in themselves and they offer themselves to the “world” to substitute for the loss of their own individual hope and faith.

The political left is made up of true believers. All cults are composed of true believers. You’ll find them in politics, churches, businesses, and all sorts of social cause groups. Mass Movements will usually have a charismatic leader. Followers will want to convert others to their way of living or impose a new way of life–if necessary, by legislating laws forcing others to accept their social or moral views, as evidenced by the activities of the ACLU. A common hatred, enemy, or perceived evil is essential to the success of a mass movement. Some fanatical religions (Taliban and al-Queda) have god himself appointing them to cleanse the world of “unbelievers.”

In revolutions, the devil himself is usually the ruling power or aristocracy. Some human-potential movements are far too clever to ask their graduates to join anything, thus labeling themselves as a cult–but, if you look closely, you’ll find that their devil is anyone and everyone who hasn’t taken their training. True Believers are mentally unbalanced or insecure people, or those without hope or true friends. People don’t look for allies when they love, but they do when they hate or become obsessed with a cause. And those who desire a new life and a new order feel the old ways must be eliminated before the new order can be built.

Conversion by Technological Means

The more we find out about how the human mind works through today’s highly advanced technological research, the more power brokers and manipulators learn to control human beings. And what scares me the most is that the medium for takeover is already in place. The television set in your living room and bedroom is doing a lot more than just entertaining you. Before I continue, let me point out something else about an altered state of consciousness.

When you go into an altered state, you transfer into right brain, which results in the internal release of the body’s own opiates: enkephalins and Beta-endorphins, chemically almost identical to opium. In other words, it feels good…and you want to come back for more. Tests by researcher Herbert Krugman showed that, while viewers were watching TV, right-brain activity outnumbered left-brain activity by a ratio of two to one. Put more simply, the viewers were in an altered state…in trance more often than not.

The Trance of Modern Mind Control: Unveiling Technological Influence

In this era dominated by advanced technology and rapid information flow, our minds are constantly bombarded with various stimuli, leading to a state of perpetual distraction and susceptibility to external influences. Modern mind control techniques have evolved, leveraging our deep reliance on technology, to subtly shape our thoughts, behaviors, and even our beliefs. This essay delves into the pervasive nature of technologically induced trances, shedding light on how these techniques have become an integral part of our daily lives.

The Rise of Technological Mind Control: With the advent of smartphones, social media, and ubiquitous connectivity, we find ourselves immersed in a digital realm that manipulates our attention and cognition. Apps, algorithms, and online platforms are designed to capture and retain our focus, fostering a constant state of distraction and dependence. In this age of information overload, the battle for our attention has become increasingly fierce, and as a consequence, our ability to concentrate and think critically has diminished.

Social Media: A Powerful Influencer: Social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, have revolutionized the way we communicate and consume information. These platforms utilize algorithms that tailor content to our preferences and interests, creating personalized echo chambers. By reinforcing our existing beliefs and filtering out dissenting opinions, social media can subtly mold our perspectives, exacerbating societal polarization and limiting our exposure to diverse viewpoints.

Notifications and Dopamine Addiction: The pervasive use of notifications and instant gratification mechanisms on our devices contributes to our susceptibility to mind control techniques. The constant barrage of notifications triggers the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and reward. The anticipation of these notifications compels us to remain in a constant state of checking our devices, reinforcing addictive behaviors and weakening our ability to resist the allure of technological distractions.

Data Collection and Manipulation: Massive amounts of data are collected about our online behaviors, preferences, and even our emotions. This data is utilized by corporations, governments, and other entities to create personalized advertising, tailored content, and targeted messaging. Through these techniques, our decisions and beliefs can be subtly influenced without our conscious awareness, leading to a more controlled and malleable society.

Technologically Induced Trance: The cumulative effect of these mind control techniques is a state of technologically induced trance. We often find ourselves mindlessly scrolling through social media feeds, consuming endless streams of content without critical evaluation. Our attention span has been shortened, making it harder to engage in deep, focused thinking. This trance-like state renders us more susceptible to manipulation, whether it be through persuasive marketing tactics, political propaganda, or even fake news.

Reclaiming Control and Critical Thinking: Awareness of these modern mind control techniques is crucial for reclaiming control over our own minds. By actively monitoring and managing our technology usage, we can resist the allure of distraction and regain focus. Developing critical thinking skills and seeking out diverse perspectives can help break the cycle of echo chambers and broaden our understanding of complex issues. Additionally, supporting ethical design practices and advocating for responsible data usage can promote a healthier relationship with technology.

In an increasingly interconnected world, we must acknowledge the power of modern mind control techniques and the potential consequences they carry. Recognizing the influence of social media, notifications, data collection, and other technological advancements is essential for maintaining autonomy over our own thoughts and actions. By cultivating mindfulness, as taught by my late father Roy Masters, critical thinking, and responsible technology usage, we can navigate the digital landscape more consciously and resist the pervasive trance induced by modern mind control techniques.

© 2023 David Masters – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail David Masters: snowman4848@gmail.com




Looking Forward to the New ‘New World Order’ Tomorrow

By David Masters

May 4, 2023

Looking forward to the new tomorrow… in the coming NOW World Order the survival of the FINEST (the moral and most authentically virtuous) will determine and guide the destiny of humanity. I want all of you in this equation to deeply grasp that you are superior in every respect for holding and continuing to embrace your connection to God. We have our own unique multi-level culture that is based on the unifying principles that have existed for all of human history and will continue to exist forever. We are the Psalm 46 “be still and Know” NOW World Order generation.  Zechariah 2:13  Be silent before the LORD, all people, for He has roused Himself from His holy dwelling.”

As stated in Revelation 20: 1-8:

1 Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven with the key to the Abyss, holding in his hand a great chain. 2 He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years. 3 And he threw him into the Abyss, shut it, and sealed it over him, so that he could not deceive the nations until the thousand years were complete. After that, he must be released for a brief period of time.

4 Then I saw the thrones, and those seated on them had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or its image, and had not received its mark on their foreheads or hands. And they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. 5 The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were complete. This is the first resurrection.

6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection! The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and will reign with Him for a thousand years. 7 When the thousand years are complete, Satan will be released from his prison, 8 and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth—Gog and Magog—to assemble them for battle. Their number is like the sand of the seashore.

In the Newly revived ancient evil World Order of today, differentiating good from evil can be a complex task as it often depends on the MK Ultra/satanically manipulated trajectory of one’s personal beliefs, values, and culture. However, there are some general principles that can guide one in determining what is good and what is evil. The following ideas are as old as time itself and have only recently been systematically eradicated from modern/popular culture:

  • Consider the consequences:One way to differentiate between good and evil is to evaluate the potential outcomes of a particular action or decision. An action that has positive consequences for oneself and others is generally considered good, while an action that has negative consequences is generally considered evil.
  • Consider the intentions:Another way to differentiate between good and evil is to look at the intentions behind a particular action or decision. An action that is motivated by compassion, love, and empathy is generally considered good, while an action that is motivated by greed, selfishness, or malice is generally considered evil.
  • Consider the moral principles: Every culture has a set of moral principles that guide their behavior. For example, the Golden Rule – treat others as you would like to be treated – is a universal moral principle that guides behavior in many cultures. When faced with a difficult decision, it can be helpful to consider these moral principles to determine what is good and what is evil.
  • Consider the long-term effects:Sometimes, what may seem like a good decision in the short term may have negative consequences in the long term. It is important to consider the long-term effects of an action or decision when evaluating whether it is good or evil.

Epictetus was a Greek Stoic philosopher. He was born into slavery at Hierapolis, Phrygia and lived in Rome until his banishment, when he went to Nicopolis in northwestern Greece for the rest of his life. His teachings were written down and published by his pupil Arrian in his Discourses and Enchiridion. Born:c. AD 50, Hierapolis, Phrygia, (presumed), (now Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey) Died:c. 135 (aged c. 85), Nicopolis, Epirus, (now Preveza, Epirus, Greece)

  • So, when something happens, the only thing in your power is your attitude toward it. It is not the things that disturb us, but our interpretation of their significance. Things and people are not what we wish them to be nor are they what they seem to be. They are what they are. – Epictetus
  • Happiness and freedom begin with a clear understanding of one principle: Some things are within our control, and some things are not. It is only after you have faced up to this fundamental rule and learned to distinguish between what you can and can’t control that inner tranquility and outer effectiveness become possible. – Epictetus
  • Be careful whom you associate with. It is human to imitate the habits of those with whom we interact. We inadvertently adopt their interests, their opinions, their values, and their habit of interpreting events. –Epictetus
  • Don’t be concerned with other people’s impressions of you. They are dazzled and deluded by appearances. Stick with your purpose. This alone will strengthen your will and give your life coherence. – Epictetus

Ultimately, determining what is good and what is evil t is important to be mindful of our actions and decisions and strive to do what we believe is right and just. Religious and conservative believers have a culture of life that emphasizes the sanctity of human life and the importance of protecting it from conception to natural death. This culture of life is rooted in the belief that all human beings are created in the image and likeness of God and have inherent dignity and worth. As such, we view life as a sacred gift that should be cherished and protected at all costs.

We believe that life begins at conception and that every human being, regardless of age, race, gender, or social status, has an inherent right to life. We also believe that life should be protected from conception to natural death and that euthanasia, abortion, and most often capital punishment are all violations of this fundamental right. This belief is based on the idea that human life is a gift from God and that it is our responsibility to protect and cherish this gift.

In addition to the belief in the sanctity of human life, religious and conservative believers also emphasize the importance of family, community, and personal responsibility. They believe that the family is the foundation of society and that it is the responsibility of parents to raise their children in a loving and nurturing environment. They also believe that individuals have a responsibility to contribute to their communities and to society as a whole and that this responsibility extends to protecting the lives of others.

The culture of life embraced by religious and conservative believers is also reflected in their views on social and political issues. For example, they are generally opposed to euthanasia, abortion, and capital punishment, and are supportive of policies that promote the protection of life, such as laws against assisted suicide and laws that protect the rights of the unborn.

Despite the many challenges and controversies surrounding issues related to the culture of life, religious and conservative believers remain committed to protecting the sanctity of human life and promoting the values of family, community, and personal responsibility. While there may be disagreements and debates about specific policies and approaches, the core belief in the sanctity of human life remains a unifying principle for religious and conservative believers around the world.

The culture of life embraced by religious and conservative believers is rooted in their belief in the sanctity of human life and the importance of protecting it from conception to natural death is a powerful unifying principle for religious and conservative believers. In contrast, abortionists practice and defend an inhuman and barbaric “culture of shame.” This kind of evil can be understood as a concept that refers to actions or behaviors that are morally reprehensible, harmful, or destructive in nature.

Essentially abortionists are in a “Death Cult” where infanticide or murder is the core principle. Murder is the act of intentionally killing another human being, and it is universally recognized as a heinous crime. The evil of murder lies not only in the taking of someone’s life but also in the fact that it violates the most basic human right—the right to life. It causes immeasurable pain and suffering to the victim’s family and loved ones, as well as to society as a whole.

The impact of murder is not limited to the immediate victim and their loved ones. It can also create a climate of fear and insecurity within a community, as people worry about their own safety and the safety of their loved ones. Furthermore, the act of murder often leads to a cycle of revenge and retaliation, perpetuating the cycle of violence.

From a moral standpoint, murder is universally considered wrong because it involves the intentional taking of life, which is a fundamental violation of the sanctity of life. In most cultures and religions, murder is considered a sin or a crime punishable by death or life imprisonment. Overall, the evil of murder is profound and far-reaching, affecting not only the immediate victim and their loved ones but also the wider community and society as a whole. It is a crime that should be condemned in the strongest possible terms, and efforts should be made to prevent it from occurring in the first place.

Evil can take many forms, from intentional harm to others, (unborn) to actions motivated by greed, selfishness, or a desire for power or control. It can be perpetrated by individuals, groups, or entire societies, and can manifest in various ways such as violence, cruelty, oppression, and injustice. The definition of evil is often influenced by cultural, social, and religious beliefs, as well as by personal values and experiences.

Some people may view certain acts as evil, while others may not, depending on their moral and ethical framework. Ultimately, the concept of evil is a deeply philosophical and moral one that has been debated for centuries. Overall, the abortion culture varies widely across different societies and can be influenced by factors such as religion, politics, and the media. Again,  in the coming NOW World Order the survival of the FINEST (the moral and most authentically virtuous) will determine and guide the destiny of humanity. Zephaniah 1:7 Be silent in the presence of the Lord GOD, for the Day of the LORD is near. Indeed, the LORD has prepared a sacrifice; He has consecrated His guests.

© 2023 David Masters – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail David Masters: snowman4848@gmail.com

https://fhudavid.wixsite.com/mind-prison




Woke and Communist Kissing Cousins!

by David Masters

April 29, 2023

How To Escape The Prison For Your Mind

The political ideology of communism has been a topic of discussion for a century. With its roots in the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, communism advocates for the abolition of private property and the establishment of a classless society in which the means of production are collectively owned and managed. One of the most contentious debates regarding communism is the question of whether the left-wing actually wants to destroy the current system and replace it with communism. While some on the left do indeed advocate for a complete overhaul of the current economic and political systems, not all of them support the implementation of communism.

For those on the left who do support communism, their argument is that the current system is inherently flawed and perpetuates inequality and oppression. They argue that capitalism, which is based on the accumulation of wealth by individuals and private companies, results in the exploitation of workers and the perpetuation of poverty for many. According to these leftists, communism provides a viable alternative to the current system by advocating for the collective ownership and management of the means of production. This, they argue, would eliminate the profit motive that drives capitalism and would allow for resources to be allocated in a more equitable and efficient manner.

Woke ideology is a term that has gained increasing prominence in recent years. It refers to a movement that focuses on issues of social justice, such as racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia. The term “woke” originally emerged in African American Vernacular English as a term for being aware of the social and political issues that affect marginalized communities. However, its meaning has since expanded to include a wider range of issues.

The woke ideology is rooted in the belief that society is riddled with systemic oppression and that individuals and institutions have a responsibility to address this oppression. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and acknowledging privilege and how it impacts one’s worldview and experiences. It also recognizes the importance of intersectionality, or the idea that different forms of oppression are interconnected and intersect with one another.

One of the key aspects of woke ideology is the emphasis on language and the power dynamics that are embedded within it. Advocates of the movement believe that the way we talk about things can reinforce harmful stereotypes and perpetuate oppression. As a result, there is a push to use more inclusive language that reflects the diversity of people’s experiences and identities.

Another key aspect of woke ideology is the call for action. Advocates believe that it is not enough to simply acknowledge and discuss issues of oppression. Rather, they believe that individuals and institutions have a responsibility to take concrete steps to address these issues. This can include things like donating to organizations that support marginalized communities, participating in protests and demonstrations, and advocating for policy changes.

Critics of woke ideology argue that it can be divisive and that it promotes a victim mentality. They argue that it focuses too much on individual identity and ignores the importance of common values and goals. They also argue that the movement can be intolerant of differing opinions and perspectives.

Despite these criticisms, the woke ideology has had a significant impact on social and political discourse in recent years. It has spurred conversations and debates about issues of social justice and has led to concrete changes in some areas, such as corporate diversity and inclusion initiatives. “Woke” and communist ideologies are both political movements that advocate for social and economic equality. However, there are some key differences between the two.

Firstly, “woke” ideology is a relatively new term that refers to a set of beliefs and values related to social justice and anti-oppression. It focuses on issues such as race, gender, sexuality, and other forms of identity-based discrimination. In contrast, communism seeks to create a classless society where the means of production are owned and controlled by the community as a whole.

Secondly, “woke” ideology tends to be more decentralized and focused on individual action and consciousness-raising. It emphasizes the importance of individual experiences and personal identity, whereas communism tends to prioritize collective action and the needs of the community as a whole. Additionally, “woke” ideology is often associated with liberal or progressive politics, whereas communism is often associated with more radical leftist politics. While there are some similarities between “woke” and communist ideologies, there are also important differences in terms of their historical context, priorities, and political strategies.

However, opponents of communism argue that it is a failed ideology that has led to the suppression of individual freedoms and the violation of human rights in the countries where it has been implemented. They point to the authoritarian regimes in countries like the Soviet Union and China as evidence of the dangers of communism.

Moreover, critics argue that communism ignores the realities of human nature and the inherent desire for individual autonomy and self-determination. They argue that the collectivization of resources and the elimination of private property would lead to a loss of personal freedom and choice, and would ultimately result in the erosion of individual rights and liberties.

The erosion of individual rights and liberties is a serious issue that can have significant negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole. This can occur through a variety of means, such as government policies or actions, cultural attitudes, technological advancements, or societal changes.

Some examples of erosion of individual rights and liberties include:

Government surveillance: Governments may conduct surveillance on their citizens without their consent or knowledge, which can infringe upon their right to privacy and freedom of speech.

Censorship: Governments or other entities may restrict or censor certain types of speech, which can limit individuals’ freedom of expression and access to information.

Discrimination: Discrimination against certain groups of individuals based on characteristics such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or religion can limit their opportunities and access to resources.

Restrictions on movement: Governments may impose restrictions on the movement of individuals, such as through curfews or border control, which can limit their freedom of movement.

Economic inequality: Economic inequality can limit individuals’ access to resources and opportunities, which can impact their ability to exercise their rights and liberties.

Atheists may have a variety of beliefs regarding the existence of evil, just like people with religious beliefs. However, the belief in the existence of evil is not necessarily tied to the belief in the existence of a deity or religion.

Some atheists may believe that evil is a subjective human construct, created to describe actions or behaviors that are considered harmful or immoral by society. Others may believe that evil is a real and objective force in the world, but do not attribute it to a supernatural source or deity. Ultimately, whether or not an atheist believes in the existence of evil may depend on their personal beliefs and worldview.

It is generally not in the interest of any group or individual to seek an economic collapse, as it would result in widespread suffering and chaos. However, some extreme anarchist or anti-capitalist groups do seek to destabilize or overthrow the current economic and political system, which they view as exploitative and oppressive. They may engage in acts of sabotage, protest, or other disruptive activities aimed at disrupting the functioning of the economy.

[BIO: “David, as a talk radio host and counselor, combines the wisdom of Judeo-Christian spirituality with the insights of modern depth psychology. With clarity, sensitivity, skill and powers of discernment, he brings callers to their own awareness and the healing powers that lie within the human soul. His wise practical counsel combined with the observation exercise bring much help to a wounded world. I count this gifted healer among the most talented of our time. He brings to clients a rare combination of depth and skill guided by the qualities of presence, understanding, strength and love flowing from the center of his own being. I am honored to have him as a colleague in the healing professions.” – Robert Contadino, M.A,, Ph.D. Rehabilitation Counseling and Clinical Psychology]

© 2023 David Masters – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail David Masters: snowman4848@gmail.com

Website: “How To Escape The Prison For Your Mind