When You See a Snake…LIke Covid

By Jeff Dover

September 10, 2023

“When you see a snake, don’t ask where it came from.” Is a quote I saw somewhere a long time ago. Just deal with the snake first. So, why are we “missing in action” where Covid-19, the so-called “pandemic” and all the abuses of our liberties and lives are concerned? We’ve been shown who has done this and why. It’s documented as well, not just one man’s opinion. In fact, he doesn’t really even offer his opinion. He only presents the facts. Here’s a link for you if you have no idea, are suspicious, clueless or haven’t yet seen it.

This link will take you to a presentation to the EU Parliament delivered by Dr. David Martin in May of 2023. It leaves nothing to the imagination. There is no ambivalence in his statements and every one of them is documented. It takes 20 minutes. You will not be bored.

As Dr. Martin states in a later interview, the psychopaths behind the pandemic and its attending atrocities, have totally condemned themselves, or so he states when noting that “fact checkers” have said that he is “reading too much into the data”. He responds that there is nothing to “read into”: it’s there in plain English for anyone to see and understand…like the Second Amendment. It’s not ambiguous.
To cherry-pick a few of his documented facts, the Covid virus was first isolated in 1965 as something interesting, a virus which could be modified to infect humans. Later, in 1990, Pfizer had found that no vaccines could be effective against the Covid virus.

As if what Martin has to say about it isn’t enough, former Pfizer Chief Scientist and Vice President, Michael Yeadon says that the vaccines are essentially poison and deliberately constructed to be toxic. He’s been saying that literally since their roll-out and has been banned pretty much everywhere. (He doesn’t need the money or the vilification. Following his years with Pfizer, he founded his own pharmaceutical company and later sold it for approx. $400,000,000.) Here’s what he has to say about what they have done.

Apart from Yeadon’s comments on the toxicity of the vaccines, he also relates a conversation which he had with one Hedley Rees, a man who had been involved, not on the research side as Yeadon had, but rather on the manufacturing side of the pharmaceutical industry for more years than Yeadon had been in research.

In their conversation, which you can hear Yeadon relate about midway through the link provided, Rees says that pharmaceuticals are like cars and planes in that, during manufacturing, they go through numerous stages of manufacture. To manufacture complex biologicals, going through the various steps assembling the components, checking the purity, reaching various stages of concentrations, takes minimally, four years. Rees says regarding the so-called “vaccines”, that he doesn’t know what’s in those glass bottles, but it’s not what people think that it is. It’s not possible to manufacture a complex molecule in a matter of a few weeks.

So, given what has been put upon us, given all that we have lost, here in the USA and in other formerly free societies, why have we failed to demand that these people be brought to justice? What will it take? If they can do this to us all and suffer no consequence, then what will we not tolerate? Can they randomly pick us up, imprison and enslave us? Can they take our children and use them as they wish? Where is the line which they will not cross and which crossing we will not tolerate?

When we had defeated Germany in 1945, we tried the leaders of their inhuman regime for the atrocities which they had committed, saying “Never again”. Well, here it is, again. Seven million, plus or minus, killed deliberately and every bit as systematically as those in the Nazi death camps.

As there was no doubt about what happened during those war years, there is no doubt about what Covid was all about and who was responsible. Does it matter that it’s so many people? After all, it took a lot of people to commit all the crimes which took place in WWII. That didn’t deter the victors. They tried those who led. Yet here, Martin has assembled all the evidence that we need to expose the crime. In the meantime, the US Open Tennis coverage features ads urging the use of more of those bogus “vaccines”! It’s as if we are comatose.

Because many of those who would have campaigned against such crimes in the distant past are presently involved in the commission of them, some hesitation on the part of the victims is understandable. However, to allow these snakes to go without accountability only guarantees the spawning of more snakes and our ultimate enslavement or worse. We must band together and act.

This .pdf file is Dr. Martin’s proposed indictment language.

It names the chief players in the creation of the bioweapon, it’s deployment and roll-out. Like the Nuremburg Trials, it’s not an indictment of all the participants. It doesn’t name the doctors who refused to look at the evidence for fear of losing their jobs or being reviled by peers. It doesn’t list the hospital administrators who demanded that their hospital cling to the treatment protocols which were killing people, prohibiting those which were effective, while they accepted money for every diagnosis and every Covid death. It doesn’t name the various figures in political authority who enforced the unconstitutional shutdowns which impoverished millions who lost their jobs and their businesses selectively. But it is a start. Let’s move.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

USA: Age of Propaganda, Disinformation and Fascism

By Jeffery Dover

June 17, 2023

This is the age of propaganda, the age of Disinformation. This is also a new age of fascism. There are no communist countries remaining, other than N. Korea. It’s fine for a man to call himself a woman, put on lipstick, wear a dress and alter himself surgically – but he remains a man nonetheless.

Likewise, because the Peoples’ Republic of China continues to call itself “communist” doesn’t make it “communist”. People there can own their own businesses, run them for profit and own property. Nothing could be further from Communism or Marxism than that. It’s capitalism, the antithesis of Marxism. Once “communists”, the Chinese of the PRC are no longer “communists”. They are fascists. Why are people still writing articles which say that we need be wary of communists and Marxists?

In Political Science 101 the student learns that Marxism supposes that the state owns everything. All property and all the means of production of anything belong to the state. They also manage it all, to the greatest extent possible. One of the main reasons that so few communist states still exist is because managing it all was pretty much NOT possible. Marxism/Leninism/Maoism were simply unable to support the people laboring under its yoke. In the USSR, the people eventually rose up to shed that yoke. In China, the government simply slid away from Marxism and amended it before the people could do it.

Fascism, one learns, is an authoritarian government composed of a single political party with government in league with huge, capitalistic, nominally private business concerns. The government and the mega-businesses each wash each other’s backs. The people can still own property and form business concerns for profit. This is essentially how the Peoples’ Republic of China is presently composed. Unfortunately, it is also how the USA is now composed.

As the PRC has strayed from is Maoist roots, so has the USA strayed from its constitutional roots and founding principles. That distance is becoming greater almost by the day to the point where we are looking like a fascist state ourselves. If it looks like a duck…you know the rest. It seems that “communist” has simply replaced “fascist” in common dialogue. In truth, the distinctions are really moot: either is synonymous with “evil” and “inhuman”.

Our democratic republic, The USA, isn’t democratic any more. As it has been with the other fascist nations in history, there is but one party here – in practice. We see that presently in the House of Representatives where there is a “revolt” among conservative GOP representatives who won’t go along with McCarthy’s Establishment plan to raise the debt limit. Eventually, the Establishment will win, however and the few principled reps (we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt) will find that the party reverts to form – Establishment globalist enablers.

That Establishment is the “permanent ruling class” as Limbaugh and others termed it, kept in place by the “donations” of extremely wealthy elites and big businesses. Of course, we know that supposedly there are the two main parties representing different views of running the nation, Republican and Democrat. However, we also know that as a matter of actual congressional and executive actions over the past thirty years and longer, there has been and remains only one party, one view: “progressive”, or more accurately, “Fascist”, which is what it really is. The GOP act as “enablers” because although in practice they support the globalists in legislation and policy, they hold our influence at bay by posing as our champions at election time. The Party won’t permit people like Trump, who would faithfully represent us, to rise within the party and gain their full support. Those few sincere politicians who manage to attain office despite the party, will never be House Speakers or Majority Leaders. The Establishment’s media refer to such candidates scornfully as “populists”, sneering at them because they intend to represent their electorate faithfully.

For additional evidence of fascism other than the uniparty feature, look at the alliances between the Dept. of Defense and the military industrial complex; the alliance with CIA and FBI with social and mainstream media; Dept. of Health and Human Services with all our hospitals; CDC/NIH/NAIAH/WHO with all our medical facilities and doctors; FDA with Big Pharma, the latter linked with the preceding government agencies as well; Dept. of Agriculture with Agribusiness; Dept. of Education and all our schools and institutions of higher learning, and etc. What about the Dept. of Defense and its involvement with the pharmaceuticals and the vaccines?

Then look at who funds our politicians for political office. It is those same linked industries who financially back these people, to whom those politicians are later beholden.

We don’t count. The American citizen isn’t a part of the equation. We are no longer in charge. If we oppose the people who the ruling establishment have chosen for the presidency, they rig the election to get their candidate elected. Trump’s (our) 2016 victory showed them what happens if they aren’t strong enough in the rigging. They were more thorough in 2020. Just Democrats? Hardly. Dedicated fascists George W. Bush, Mitt Romney and Dick Cheney openly supported Clinton in 2016. Following both the 2020 and 2022 elections, Arizona’s Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and County Recorder, all “Republicans”, were the target of voter fraud investigations.

But what about the constitution? That’s easily sidestepped by these fascist forces. Where does the constitution authorize “executive orders”? Aren’t those merely imperial decrees? There’s no way to sugar-coat that. What about the CIA? Where in the constitution is the federal government given the power to conduct clandestine operations in perpetuity without accountability for the money spent and without any accounting to the people for either its activities or results? If their missions are outside the country, then they are a matter of foreign policy. Foreign policy is very much the concern of the citizenry and we have a need to know what is being done in the conduct of our policies. The same goes for their missions inside the country, especially. Ditto the FBI. Instead, we are stonewalled. These are huge agencies with powers not given to them by the constitution.

When criminals are running the government, then criminality becomes a virtue. Our fascist government has been using its agencies in many unconstitutional and likely, criminal, acts against its political opponents, that is, those who are not criminal and who would, given the office, expose the criminals for what and who they are. It’s so out in the open now that It’s almost beyond the ability of their media to hide what they are doing. Worse, when it is the Dept. of Justice and its various branches which are behind some of the acts, supported by the president, then there is no viable timely recourse. Ex-president Trump recently referred to them correctly as “fascist thugs”.

All that the government did to ravage the USA and really, the world, concerning Covid-19 is seemingly water over the dam. Despite all the evidence of everything, ranging from government construction of the virus to its direct prevention of effective cures, it’s of no interest to the Dept. of Justice. There is no interest in the investigation of all the money which went to the big pharmaceutical companies nor any interest in the billions of dollars they took for poisonous “vaccines” while the FDA and CDC cheered them on, stonewalling all the adverse effects and hiding behind the press which aided in that concealment. There’s no investigation into what was behind the “shutdowns” which had only one effect, a seriously bad one: it killed off thousands of “Mom-and-Pop” businesses, putting millions out of work, creating government dependencies in place of independence.

The Establishment’s journalists no longer believe in “investigating”. Why? Simple – they don’t want you invested in the truth, but rather in the lies fed to them for print by the Deep State. They want you believing falsehoods and kept focused on meaningless distractions. The Dept. of Justice isn’t interested in people like Fauci, Walensky, Baric and so many more who led the charge against the world’s populations in this attack. No interest. Just a pass for them. They’re a part of “the team”.

If nothing else is evidence of fascism in the USA, the Covid-19 episode alone makes it obvious. The collusion of industrial, medical, media and government across the nation is too blatant to be missed.

So, let’s not trouble ourselves too much about “communists”. That’s not the authoritarian setup we’re being lurched into. We’re being reset up as a fascist state, with a single ruling party. Their agenda is hidden from us, in that you can’t go to any GOP or Democrat website and see a list of legislation or specific policies which either intend to pursue. (Yet media in their reporting refer to the “Republican agenda”, while never explaining it.) Those who run congress know what it is, eventually, handed to them by elites, but we find out only as it is unveiled as legislation and implemented policy. It’s set up so that, yes, we “vote”. Yet because neither party posts its agenda for us to read, we vote with no idea of what we are voting, other than a personality. But then, it doesn’t matter. We only get whatever policies that the fascist Establishment has planned for us.

We defeated the fascists in 1945, but it appears that we only sent them underground to reappear in the latter part of the last millennium and try for it all over again. We’ll eventually defeat them once again, as soon as enough of us understand what’s going on. For starters, we need a new party, led by a “populist”, to take our power and bring it to bear on the situation. We’d better get going. It’s up to us to change it…or live with the result of doing nothing.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Why Do We Talk About Communists?

By Jeffery S. Dover

May 26, 2023

Hardly a day goes by that I don’t come across some conservative talking or writing about “communists” in our government, doing this and that. Communism is dead! Where is there a communist nation? Okay, N. Korea and maybe Cuba, but where else?

Marx, Lenin, Mao and others at the forefront of that inhuman and anti-human ideology anticipated the communal (hence “commune” or “communist”) ownership of all property and the means of production. All power was reserved for the state. The idea was “to each according to his needs, from each according to his ability”.

Those ideas are mere relics of a bygone era in places like the Peoples’ Republic of China. Although that’s what they call their party, they are no more “communist” than a guy who chops off relevant anatomy is a woman. Communism is totally extinct in the Russian Federation. So, where are all these “communists” who people are seeing in our government and elsewhere? Who’s preaching Marx’s gospel? If anything, here and elsewhere, today’s reality appears to be “To each all he can steal; from each all which can be taken.”

Communism was simply another totalitarian government model, like Fascism, or somewhat more limited in scope, an autocracy or strongman dictatorship, with an economic system which could never work, and never did. That economic system flew head-on into and against human nature. It attempted to squash it.

While not conspicuously communist, however, there are many totalitarian wannabes in our government and private sector. It’s not debatable that our federal government has become more authoritarian with greater than ever control over the everyday actions of the citizen. Increasingly we are morphing into a police state where our government bureaus are existing for their own benefit, with their own agendas. What can you say about the “land of the free” when the IRS is now armed to the teeth and DHS seems to be waiting in the wings to be the new NKVD of Stalin’s 1930’s? None of them are formed to stem invasion of our borders, nor are they military for fighting foreign wars. So why all the personnel and all the armament? Who and what is it for?

The totally unnecessary CIA whose business seems to be less “intelligence” gathering than it is paramilitary, looks like a rogue, clandestine group roaming the world seeking regime change where they wish it and the installation of puppets which they then control. Ukraine is an example. Their activities likely extend to domestic politics as well, with CIA the supervisor of mainstream media political propaganda. They are certainly not accountable to the people. Though I know of no recent effort to subpoena CIA officials, I do know that the FBI now includes itself as “unaccountable to the people” with its recent refusal to obey the peoples’ subpoena, presented by U.S. Congress. They’re telling us loud and clear that “we don’t report to you nor are we subject to your laws.” For their part, other than condemning Wray’s refusal to obey, the congress seems perfectly willing to allow the condemnation to be the only recourse. Can it be that they are either powerless or afraid to proceed?

Recent revelations in the Durham Report show that the FBI has been instrumental in attempts to advance a presidential candidate and squash the candidacy of another. Claims that “Russian agents” were behind it are ridiculous. What does Russia gain? Have the Democrats, who the FBI supported in their illegal actions, shown any particular friendship for Russia? It’s entirely the opposite as the Democrats and Establishment Republicans are staunchly in favor of Ukraine. Yet the Durham report shows that the operation was done to specifically aid the Clinton campaign by damaging Trump. The “Hate Russia” campaign began with Obama’s presidency. Russia knows better than to court Democrats for anything. But then, the whole idea apparently stemmed from some Australian political figures telling an FBI agent in our embassy there that it had been “suggested” by statements made by another. As one FBI agent noted when told to proceed with the bogus investigation, “pretty thin”.

Let’s dispense with the notion of “Russian meddling” in our politics. There is no evidence of it and it furthermore makes absolutely zero sense. It looks to be a CIA-scripted narrative in an attempt to steer public opinion into still thinking of Russia as a “communist” enemy. That in turn perpetuates the nonsense that it is “communists” working in our government and that the formerly communist Russians yearn for a return to communism. They threw it out! The ruse is merely to gain acceptance of the lie that Ukraine means something to Americans so that we’ll want to support the Deep State/Globalist war against Russia. However, that’s their agenda, not the people’s agenda. Lastly on Russia, if what they tell us about Russia is so evil, why are the same people trying to imprint that upon us actively working to make the USA fit that description?

It’s not about communists in our government. Consider only what we have learned about Covid-19. We’ve seen clearly the heavy tie-in of Big Pharma and the federal government bureaus, namely NIH, CDC and FDA. That’s a hallmark of a fascist state, not a communist state.

Think “Nazis”, not “commies”. At the end of WWII, did we import communists? No. We imported Nazis in “Operation Paperclip”. During Adolf Hitler’s military build-up of Nazi Germany in the 1930’s, did president G.H.W. Bush’s father, Prescott Bush, and the Harriman’s Union Bank lend money to the Soviets for their military? No. They bankrolled Hitler in violation of the treaty ending WWI. Later, Bush even owned a factory in Poland staffed with slave labor from a concentration camp, according to Roger Stone’s book on the Bush family. Needless to say, P. Bush’s son was later both Director of Central Intelligence and president, his grandson also a U.S. president.

Then consider the collusion of CIA with mainstream media; of FBI with social media; of Dept. of Defense and enormous defense industries; the Dept. of Agriculture with Agribusinesses and etc. These are fascist relationships, not communist.

We are moving toward a very authoritarian government characterized by a congress which ignores the people and an entrenched bureaucracy with its own agenda. Nothing in it resembles a “communist” state, other than the power it wields over the people. It’s really moving into a classic Fascist organization. As it is with all totalitarian states, there are no competing political parties. Our Republican and Democrat parties, in practice, have morphed into one “uniparty”. The two and their surrogates ganged up on, blocked, libeled, slandered and finally got rid of a real opponent, Trump.

Let’s recognize that which keeps us thinking and hearing about communists: it’s to back up the globalist agenda and the Military Industrial Complex’s thirst for nonstop warfare. In continuing to paint “communists” as the bogeyman, they take us back to our memories of the “iron curtain” and the jackbooted thugs of the USSR’s secret police and Mao’s executioners. They use the term to elicit a conditioned response, to direct and project our hatred as they wish. It’s to keep us from realizing what’s happening right here at home. There are countless movies still being scripted and books still being written about those WWII and post-WWII days to keep it all alive. However, those powers which they would have us hate are really the same as what the USA is fast becoming: not communist at all, but a fascist state.

As I have written numerous times before, analysis and reporting are both very important. Of even more importance, is acting on the knowledge. What as Americans are we to do about these things and our drift into a society of slaves to our government? Should we just stand by and “hope”? What does that accomplish? Should we keep voting Republican? Again, what does that accomplish? We might be able to re-elect Trump, but that’s only four years and where are we when he’s gone? We can’t consider armed revolution. That’s too horrible to consider, but so is doing nothing. What does that leave?

How about forming a new political organization and running our candidates in it, an organization which will not permit its members of legislature and congress to act in any way in opposition to stated and specific party goals? Otherwise, there will be no change of course. Our opposition will not simply quit. It’s up to us.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Is the CIA For Us or Against Us?

By Jeffery Dover

May 11, 2023

Why does the United States have a Central Intelligence Agency? We never had one prior to WWII and we were pretty secure. What changed? Communism was a worry insofar as it might have attempted to overthrow our government from within, but there was a Federal Bureau of Investigation already long-established and in place to counter any such threat if waged illegally.

I suppose that during the years of the Cold War, roughly 1945 to 1989, intelligence organs outside of the US were useful in detecting and analyzing strategic military situations regarding the USSR. Even so, intelligence gained from submarine tapping of Soviet undersea communications cables revealed that whatever the makeup of the Soviet strategic nuclear forces, they had no intention of ever launching a ”first strike”. That intelligence brought us to the understanding that the USSR viewed strategic nuclear weapons as only insurance against a first strike launched against them by the USA and NATO forces.

While it’s good to know what your potential enemies are up to, did it really require a separate and huge “intelligence agency”, even then, in order to know it? What about the various military intelligence units in those days? How about military attache’s attached to embassies? Was it a case of Allen Dulles and others in the USA seeing how the USSR’s various internal spy organizations controlled the people and how effective Nazi Germany’s Gestapo had been in that regard, that they thought that, for reasons of the control of domestic power, a clandestine service was necessary in the USA? Whatever the ultimate truth about any such need for a separate, ad hoc clandestine organization, the Cold War has been over for more than thirty years.

What is the CIA’s mission today? What do they do which our military intelligence and FBI are incapable of providing in terms of intelligence? Could it be that “intelligence” per se isn’t necessarily their mission?

What if their mission was involving themselves in domestic politics in alliance with some shadowy group in politics, business and industry? After all, do they report to us? We don’t know what they do, unless they tell us via media or congress after they have done it. What the members of congressional intelligence committees and the president learn, are only what the CIA chooses to tell them.

What anyone in our government outside the agency learn about the CIA’s activities, is doled out on a “need to know” basis.

Who, in the United States of America, has a greater “need to know” than the president, the congress and the people who grant them their office? Who are those persons in intelligence to tell us what we can and what we cannot know of their activities and their goals? The Republican Party doesn’t even post specific goals for its voters to see! Are they a branch of the CIA? Joking of course, but really…

In Roger Stone’s excellent book, “The Bush Crime Family” he writes this of the Reagan White House during the Iran/Contra episode: “Rather than the president making foreign policy decisions with his advisors, it now seemed that the advisors, being CIA, steered policy toward CIA goals. In doing so, CIA goals became the president’s goals.”

CIA “policy” goals? Policy goals are not the province of CIA or any other cabinet or agency concern. Those agencies are the tools used to implement, not determine policy. Foreign policy is for the president to enunciate and for the Dept. of State and others as necessary to carry out and administer. Domestic policy is for our elected officials only. That a clandestine agency, unaccountable to the people, would have its own policy goals is a chilling prospect. I have come to think that it may well account for many of the difficulties confronting Americans today in preserving the form and promise of our republic.

We know that the CIA have assassins. Stone writes of one, Felix Rodriguez, whose mission was to kill and behead local villagers in Vietnam to demoralize the Viet Cong. According to Stone, Rodriguez later reported directly to George G.H.W. Bush at the time of the assassination attempt on president Reagan when the former was the Vice President. Yet another documentary, “Dark Legacy”, puts CIA man Bush as central in the CIA assassination of president John F. Kennedy. We know from Seymour Hersch that they blew up Russia’s NordStream Pipeline.

Why does the USA need professional assassins in the federal government? Should every town and state also have them as they seem to have in Mexico?

Are the CIA in fact, in charge of foreign policy, dictating to chosen members of congress, or the president, who they have compromised? Do they run politicians as they run spies in the various nations? After all, most CIA agents in the Cold War days were like sales managers. They didn’t so much spy. What they did was cultivate indigenous nationals who were willing for one reason or another to divulge the secrets of their country, and then run them, directing their actions and debriefing them. Is it possible that they have much dirt on key domestic political figures who, rather than risk the CIA “leaking” the material which would destroy them, instead do what they are told to do?

What if their mission was to destabilize foreign governments? It would seem that it is, given that in January of 2022 they were behind an attempted coup d’etat in the Russian border nation Kazakhstan. We know that they had already established puppets in Ukraine, Zelensky the latest. Back in the ‘70’s there was the famous episode in Chile, where they set up the assassination of president Salvador Allende. Presently, using Ukraine as a base, they’ve been working for years to destabilize Russia’s government and effect “regime change” there. The recent attempt to assassinate Russian president Putin with a drone was said to be an action of Ukraine. Zelensky denied that Ukraine launched the attack. My guess is that he’s right, that it was the CIA who launched it. And what about 9/11 and everything involved in the Middle East? Benghazi?

Given that they are involved in such activities abroad, is it unreasonable to suspect that they could involve themselves in “regime change” here in the USA? Their involvement in American mainstream media outlets, well-known since at least the Church senate investigations of the late 1970’s, could well account for all the propaganda and disinformation most recently cited in Tucker Carlson’s recent speech in Alabama. How else could such propaganda be so coordinated in content, timing and distribution if not from a single, authoritarian source?

The American people need to wake up. Serious opposition to our way of life is waging a winning conflict today in the United States. We need to create our own issues and cease to allow them to be defined by the media and by corrupt, entrenched politicians and bureaucrats. A great start would be to form a new political party which would represent those issues, our issues, and populate it with men and women sworn to carry out the mission that Trump began: Draining the Swamp.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Does the Republican Party Stand For Anything?

By Jeffery Dover

May 2, 2023

It seems that whenever I see a news article about a Republican member of congress, it ends up being about that person’s attack on some Democrat or other personality. And when there are plenty among their own ranks deserving of condemnation, their silence in that regard makes the attack on the Democrat or other figure more unseemly.

Is that why we send these people to Washington? Is that what we want? Do we send those delegates to congress to engage in playground recriminations? “Are so!”, “Am not!” Blah, blah blah…

What is the GOP’s mission?

What do they stand for? We hear talk of Republican “leaders” and “leadership”. To be a “leader”, one must have a mission. The leader or leaders of that mission should be engaged in organizing, implementing and managing the charge to complete that mission successfully.

As a Republican voter, I should be able to go to the GOP website and see that mission printed for all to read. I should be able to find a detailed list of specific legislative and policy objectives. However, going to any of their websites, national, state or local, no such list is found. One only finds watery statements of “we believe…” or “Americans should…” or “Americans need common sense governance and …” and etc. Just vague statements.

There is no specific list of things the party wants to be accomplished. Neither is there a list of past achievements to be used at election time, such as “In the last two years the GOP has caused to be enacted…” bullet points of achievements.

Without a specific list of goals, how can there be any orchestrated drive to achieve anything? Is everyone just floating around, drinking, noshing, entertaining sponsors and showing up to vote on whatever happens to come up by one person or other’s decision?

So how can there be a “leader”, anywhere in the party? What are they “leading” their troops to accomplish? Whatever they separately happen to think of or dream up at any given moment? It appears that there are no “leaders”. Instead, what we find are “bosses”. The Speaker and Majority/Minority leaders. It must then be that they shoot from the hip, with the rest of the delegation not knowing from one day to the next what the next charge will be until they are told. Knee Jerk. So, who instructs those “bosses” on where to go and what to do?

That begs another serious question: If there’s no specific, itemized list of legislation and policy for each session, available for all the voters to see, what do Republicans stand for as a party? I think we know the answer: apparently, nothing. What serves to guide the actions of the rank-and-file reps and senators? Anything that they stand for is only what we, the voters, imagine that they stand for, which usually boils down to what we stand for personally – not the reality of the Party’s actions as a whole. Given that there is no detailed written agenda for us to see, how could it be otherwise? They are a ship without a rudder. That is, they are rudderless unless one examines where we continue to go as a nation. Then one finally sees the plan: destruction of the nation as founded and its founding principles.

So then, what difference does the party make? Why does it exist? Is it only there for purposes of illusion, there to shine us on while an entirely different agenda is in play? If there is no agreement in the party on a set of specific policy goals and there are members of the legislature and congress who would oppose those goals and fail to vote for them if there was a list, what is the point of the party itself?

How different would our nation be if, for example, the Republican Party put out a statement proclaiming what they intend to get passed – or repeal, or block – over a given period. What if they issued a list as follows:

“With the election of Donald Trump to office, the party intends to pass and its delegates to congress are instructed to vote for the following:

Funding of a border wall to be completed by 2025.
End DACA
Elimination of the Department of Education
Legislation requiring a zero-based budget to be presented each year by every federal agency and department.
Cessation of funding to Planned Parenthood
Elections to be held and voting to happen on one day only.

And etc. Prior to the elections, they could post these as goals. The winner of the presidential primary would be required to support each one of them. Upon gaining a majority in congress, the process of getting the measures passed would begin in earnest.

Presented this way, there are now targets guiding congressional action. Equally important and totally related and relevant, the voters know what those are. Now they need not merely trust some ego-driven pompous blowhard on his or her pedestal, finger in the air, proclaiming “I believe…!” They either deliver or they disappear.

Let’s demand that the GOP immediately adopts this formula. Should they fail, then let’s create their replacement, a party which does in fact stand for something, a group of dedicated American people who intend to represent and deliver every agenda item of it’s detailed, website posted plan.

We’ve got nothing to lose but our freedom and our nation.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Time For The Pundits to Explain the Big Ruse

By Jeffery Dover

April 26, 2023

Day in and day out, we are inundated with articles and video about what is “wrong” in our country. Ground breaker in talk radio, Rush Limbaugh made millions telling us about it. Presumably it’s equally lucrative for people like Hannity and Levin – not to mention many others. Is it just for the money? Are they being honest with us? I don’t think so. Otherwise, they would make sure we all understood the Big Ruse.

What are conservative pundits really about? Are they really about solutions? When one has a plumbing problem, does one merely say “Oh, looks like the toilet is overflowing. Yes, it certainly is overflowing. Look! Now there’s water on the floor. Um, and it’s getting deep. Looks like it could go into the living room. Yes, it has reached the living room and it’s soaking that Persian rug…” and so on? Or does one say “The toilet’s overflowing. Quick, close the supply valve!”? Isn’t the latter more likely the response? Our pundits go on and on and on about what’s wrong in America…but does one ever hear them saying what to do about it? It seems that they’re perfectly willing to let the water run and merely converse about it, explaining everything it is doing but making no suggestions as to how to stop it.

Shouldn’t “what to do about it” be obvious by now? Let’s look at those things which we have done, as conservatives, to effect a comeback to our nation’s founding principles and ideals which absolutely has not worked:

We have believed in and voted Republican time and time again. Each time we tell ourselves that “this time they won’t pull away the football!”

It is “solutions” which are lacking, not analysis. Prior to Limbaugh, we had only the few tepid views of “conservatism” which the liberal media would allow to be aired while literally everything else was wrapped in strong Leftist bias. That was more than thirty years ago. Today is a much different time. We now know beyond any reasonable doubt what is wrong. It’s past time for solutions.

The GOP congress squashed Trump’s agenda, their own voters’ agenda. With no support in any of his agenda items from the GOP-controlled congress, the president nonetheless managed to keep the United States out of the Paris Accord and its statutory assault on American sovereignty. His refusal of the Trans Pacific Partnership killed that attack on US sovereignty and industry as well. Americans, wanting the return to the nation’s roots, had seen president Trump as a vehicle for that return, passing over the usual GOP suspects in the primary. Completely ignoring that fact, the GOP congress went on to defeat both the president and their own voters. They not only pulled away the football, leaving us on our backs, but they threw the ball away as well.

What is it that the pundits don’t get about all this? For all their powers of observation, for all their calls for “conservatism” and “patriotism”, for all their leads into the halls of power whence comes their information, what do they not understand about “solutions”? It’s as plain as day that “voting Republican” isn’t a solution. Yet, if anything, that’s what the pundits preach or suggest, if not straight forwardly.

Are the pundits blind to the fact that there has been no movement whatever away from those things which they decry? Are they ignorant of the fact that there has been no movement toward anything resembling founding ideals? Are they really motivated by turning the country around or are they only there for the money and the fame?

Do pundits ever wonder why the GOP members of congress who appear to be honest don’t publicly call out those who demonstrably are not ? Why don’t the pundits call for those members of congress to tell their voters who those dishonest types are and what they are doing? Journalist and book author Peter Schweizer knows, as many others do too. If he knows, then those sitting in congress know.

Why aren’t our reps telling us “I really wanted XYZ bill introduced and passed, but the House Speaker said that ABCD Corp. and Joe Blow Elite opposed it and they spend $20 million a year with us, so no dice.” Voters do not get the information they need from members of congress. When one writes to their representative about a policy question, one only gets a bland, form letter and usually no response which directly addresses the question posed. Why aren’t the pundits telling us these things, using their pulpits to demand that those in congress answer us?

That pundits now need to offer solutions is not meant to say that analysis should be totally abandoned in favor of chasing remedies. There’s room for both – and we need both, as circumstances are always evolving. However, we need for people to recognize that the GOP is not the answer we are looking for. It cannot be that answer, for if it was, our return would already be well underway if not complete.

In previous articles I’ve spoken of the need for a fighting force for our side in congress. Because we have none, and no one can claim with any credibility that we do, why is there such reluctance to create it? Where is it even being discussed in any meaningful numbers?

Why aren’t the pundits telling us that the GOP has proven beyond doubt that we don’t need them? Who created the party anyway? It was people like us! What makes us think that we have to be stuck with and live by their rules? Let’s create our own organization, as they created theirs. Let’s run it by our rules, very different rules, not by their rules. Why aren’t the pundits who make millions from our patronage, urging us that way? Are they unable to think outside the box?

The realization that we are without effective representation is no secret — yet our answer it seems, is to keep doing the same thing while the country descends into some dystopia. That’s redolent of a familiar definition of insanity. Bearing in mind that “hope” is not a strategy, isn’t it time for action instead? Isn’t it time to take a different action?

Of course, when we finally come to that decision, the naysayers will be front and center. They are never absent, never on vacation, alert 24/7 and always ready to say “you can’t do that”, “It will never happen” or “you’re doomed to failure”. They’ll trot out any number of “reasons” to support their negativity, their “can’t do” spirit. I like to call such people “sessile”, a marine biology term meaning “attached to the bottom” or just “permanently attached” to a base. History usually proves such people, devoid of imagination and ignorant of history, to be wrong. They are the same as those who insisted that the earth was flat, that the sun and the universe revolved around Earth or those who said that the Colonies would never defeat England. Then there are those whose only purpose is to defend the status quo. It’s not that they fear that we will fail. They fear that we will succeed!

Our defeat of the British in the American Revolution illustrates the fact that you don’t even have to be especially good to win! However, to win, you must make the attempt. You’ve got to put yourself out there. You must also have a formula which will work when you do win. The patriots of 1776 put themselves out there and got lucky. They also had a winning formula to implement following their unlikely victory.

We don’t have to go to war first to put together a winning formula! It’s time to reject the Republican Party which has failed to work for its voters. Because its very structure permits our opposition to work within it, it will always fail for us. That they intend to represent us faithfully is merely a now tired ruse, which has played out for a long time. It’s also time for the pundits to explain to their audiences why a new party is needed and how it should be formed to prevent deviation from the goals which must be achieved to put the United States back on a winning, totally sovereign track where the individual and individual prerogatives are once again free from excessive control by a federal machine. By all means, vote for Republicans while it’s being built, but be sure to build the new force!

C’mon Tucker, Levin, Hannity, Savage, Bongino, Ingraham and the rest of you guys! Start working on the solution! The GOP isn’t it. One of its own senators, Hawley, said as much. Then watch those who actually follow through suddenly get screams to stop from the neocons and the globalist Left. Those Leftists/Laissez Faire types will suddenly begin to preach, in effect, “Save the GOP!” They know very well that a new party will completely destroy their ruse, their means of control…and there, friends, will be the last bit of proof of that Big Ruse which keeps us heading into dystopia.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

What’s More Important Than Power?

By Jeffery Dover

April 23, 2023

Conservatives, GOP and Independent voters, have many, many areas of concern. Just to name a few, consider the following list:

Abortion
Schools
Illegal Immigration
Drugs
Human trafficking
Taxes
Ukraine or other military involvement without threat to vital American interests
Federal Government scope and overreach
Racism/Woke
Crime/shootings/gun freedom
Health/Medical Industrial Complex
Election Integrity
American Sovereignty
Transgender
Climate Change
Government and media lies
True representation in state and federal government
Spending
Two-Tiered Justice System
Rogue Intelligence/Investigative Agencies/Secrecy

There are most likely numerous others which I have failed to mention, either independent of this list, or derivative from it. It’s a big, BIG list. They are very serious issues.

What is at stake in the resolution – or not — of these issues? I would submit that nothing less than the very existence of the United States as a free, sovereign nation with justice and liberty for all its people is what is at stake.

Why are all these issues on the table? It seems clear that they exist because powerful forces in business here and abroad, in linkage with extremely wealthy persons, the politicians who they support, and the federal and state agencies run by those politicians are putting our nation, it’s people and our founding principles under siege. They appear to want to remake us into a people under an authoritarian, international rule. Creating these “issues” and perverting the government agency powers are both fronts and tools for those people who seek to divide and conquer. They keep us distracted, partitioned and off balance making it difficult for us to unite and go after the root cause.

Their method has been and continues to be to first fracture the societies, not only of the USA, but of the other, major, free powers in the world, in order to more easily pick up the pieces and remold those societies. They can achieve those ends by destroying the ability of the people to support themselves and their families and by incrementally whittling away at a governing consensus, creating “classes” and then pitting them against each other. Illegal immigration of non-indigenous cultures is one of their tactics. Sound familiar?

The various government entities are little by little, usurping the rights of the people to determine their own way. Control by some government authority appears at nearly every level of daily activities. Political parties no longer represent the interests of those who vote for their candidates. They rule seemingly autonomously, in favor of international elites and corporations, constantly growing their own powers to control us all. No amount of common sense can be brought to bear if it doesn’t suit their ends.

There is one issue and one issue only, which tops them all, individually and collectively: POWER. Our minority opposition has it. We, the people, do not…or rather, we have not recognized that we have it. We just haven’t solidified and deployed it. We outnumber them vastly and united, we can even outspend them if need be, when unified.

We cannot hope to rectify those things which must be rectified unless we first have the power to change them. As long as we are focused on all their distractions, away from the organization of our power, they win. They win, and we descend into whatever dystopian mire they are planning for us. “You will own nothing and you will be happy.”, says Hitlerian Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum. Right. And the moon is made of green cheese… (Ever read or see the movie “The Time Machine”? Our opposition want to transform us into H.G. Well’s Eloi race.)

Along with the Council for Foreign Relations, the UN, the Trilateral Commission and global financial elites, Schwab’s WEF are behind this destruction. People like Biden, Obama, Bush family and their acolytes are their tools.

If we are to prevail, we must create our own power structure. Very simply, we do not have one. No, it is not the Republican Party and certainly not the other. There is NO EVIDENCE that the Republican Party represents us or will ever do so. None, nada, zip. Senator Hawley recognized that fact after the 2020 election when he said, belatedly, that the party is dead and that it’s time to form a new one.

As I mentioned in a previous article, the GOP is owned by the RINOs. More than sixty years (!) of trying to work within it has resulted in us ending up exactly where we are: powerless. To say “vote out the RINOs” is tantamount to saying “Let’s vote out the Pope and his cardinals and replace them with some Protestants!”. The two are their clubs, played by their rules. The disconnect between the party and its voters is both stark and obvious.

Calls for unity require a flag under which to unify. Unifying under the aegis of the Republican Party is useless. It’s out. So, we must create the new party under which to unify. We will create the new party with our rules, not the old rules, the rules our opposition has used to hamstring us.

The new party, unlike the GOP, will not permit our opposition to work within it! Neither will it be structured such that powerful financial entities can corrupt our members. In fact, it will be structured specifically to make such influence among our elected members impossible, for that corruption and preemption is at the very root of our national dilemma.

At this point of our national existence, gaining power is the first and only issue. Without it, nothing else is going to happen. I would submit that using your energy to work on those distracting issues is just what our opposition wants. There are also plenty of pundits who seem to want to keep you involved with such things. They write about and regurgitate all the things which we need to remedy, but never offer a solution. Voting Republican, we have seen, is not a solution. Because that cannot be the solution, there has to be another. As it is, our people are fragmented, working at disparate goals which won’t be realized, kept away from that which our opposition most fears: our unification under a true political force for the preservation and continuance of the America we love.

Organizing the requisite force necessary to propel us forward, must be our first priority. So, without further ado, go to Founderspartyofamerica.org and see an outline for the new party. Then organize with like-minded people to see how it can be used to unify us all and win that which we so desperately need to win.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

When Will the Republican Party Get A Backbone?

By Jeffery S. Dover

April 15, 2023

Who among conservatives still believes that our answers can be found working with the Republican Party? Oh…there are some of you out there? Okay, then please present some evidence that that will work for us.

There isn’t any you say? You say that even though conservatives have striven for GOP leadership since Barry Goldwater, that just because their efforts have failed for the past sixty-one years, that doesn’t mean that it can’t work? All we have to do is just vote out the RINOs?

I see…like the stock market: all you have to do is buy low and sell high. The only difference between the two is that, with the stock market, oftentimes it’s actually successful!

The Republican Party began its life as a third party. Imagine that! A third party, which became dominant! How could that have been? Third parties are supposed to lose, always and irrevocably! Well, maybe it was like this: the people then didn’t know that third parties always lose (how utterly naive of them!).

What Whig voters knew was that, despite being told otherwise by the voters, their Whig Party leadership and congressional delegates wanted to keep slavery lawful. So did the Democrat Party. Whig voters also knew that slavery was inhuman, intolerable and had to end. If their party wouldn’t end it, then they, the Whig voters, would form a new party dedicated to ending it. Thus, they formed the Republican Party. In four years, they had a party member, Abraham Lincoln, in the White House. Slavery was abolished and the Whig Party disappeared.

Today we face a different set of circumstances, of at least equal importance as abolition: the very salvation of our nation, its sovereignty and our freedom. As it was in the mid-1850’s when Whig voters proved to be the majority, so it is today also. Those citizens who wanted a return to America First and American founding principles were the majority in 2016 when, despite the GOP’s efforts to prevent his candidacy, the people gave president Trump a landslide victory.

Trump’s 2016 victory was a proxy “third party” win. In the primary of that year, he bested 16 other of the usual bland GOP offerings, political careerists for the most part, devoid of imagination or credibility. The GOP would have preferred any of those primary candidates to Trump, whether or not they stood a chance of defeating Hillary Clinton in the general election. There’s a clue there, is there not?

That the people voted for Trump instead reveals for all, the total disconnect between the GOP and its voters. Nonetheless, ignoring the voters entirely, following that victory those in the party blocked president Trump in everything that he, and we, wanted to get done. They failed to even repeal Obamacare when they had the clear power to do it.

It’s clear that the party, it’s leadership and those who maintain it in the states are in opposition to the will of their voters. It’s not just the congress. We see it in the governors’ mansions and in the state houses: the GOP always has a stopper in place, in key states, to block significant conservative legislation. Vote out the RINO in Arizona and we get one in Texas. Vote out the RINO in Alabama and we get another in Alaska…etc.

It’s now 2023 and following yet another suspicious “election” in 2020, nothing has changed. Once again safely out of office, the GOP excels in blaming the Democrats for everything, conducting “investigations” leading nowhere and all the theater we are so accustomed to seeing from them. It’s a con, folks. It’s totally obvious today that they hold us in contempt.

The GOP’s reasons for opposing us are really immaterial. What is material is their refusal to perform for their electorate as a party. Because RINOs run the party unshakably, conservatives never occupy the positions of power. Never Speaker, never Majority Leader. Only RINO hacks in those positions.

The party also makes certain that they have just enough “stoppers” in place. That’s all that they need to squash sensible law and sensible policy actions of the few which any RINO Speaker is compelled by circumstance, against his will, to bring to a vote. It only takes a few stoppers in the right places. Having performed those stopping votes – as Senators McCain, Murkowski and Collins did in voting with Democrats to keep Obamacare for example – they are welcomed back to the party, no problem! How can that be? They had just blown up the wishes of millions and millions of GOP voters, not to mention in doing so perpetuated the material damage to the nation of the Act itself – but that was okay with the party! That’s what matters. What matters is what they do as a party. TRM: True Representation Matters.

The people of the United States in the mid 1850’s saw a better way than the way their two parties were taking them. They did something about it and as a result, they got what they wanted. Were those in congress then as corrupt and beholden to money as those of congress are today? We can only guess. There was something holding them away from abolition, though it was clear that their electorate wanted that. Whatever that “something” was, it was stronger than the logic of slavery as abhorrent. The voters recognized that reality. Rather than continue to cry about the same old thing over and over again without effect, they formed a power to work for them.

“Yes We Can!” Thanks, Obama! He was right about that, if only that. Yes, we can form a political fighting force to represent us faithfully and begin the transition back, from a nation going downhill and into some sort of feudal serfdom, to our founding principles. And, by the way, how is it that with a minority, Obama and his people can prevail, taking us in their direction and yet with our majority voters, we are unable to stem that evil tide? Mustn’t there be something on “our side” terribly in the way?

We must back away from the GOP, forming a new party to take up our policy and legislative agenda and win it. A format for such a party structure can be found at FoundersPartyofAmerica.org. However, it’s only a framework. The new party could be anything but must feature several currently missing rules:

1.The Party, not members of congress/legislature decide the detailed legislative agenda, posting it for all voters to see prior to all elections.

2.Members of the Party sitting in congress or legislature or candidates for same, having taken an oath to support every agenda item, will take voting instructions from the party, only.

3.Failing to vote as instructed by the Party, they are summarily expelled from the Party.

4.Party leadership will be appointed, not voted. There’s no room for “personalities” in the new party, but only dedication to achievement of a known political end and the demonstrated ability to bring it about.

At a minimum, these are vital measures to ensure the fiduciary to the voters. They will effectively eliminate the corrupting influences currently taking our country down. Engage your imagination, don’t listen to the inevitable naysayers with no solutions, and let’s show the shades of those in our nation’s mid-1800’s that we too can act in our own interests!

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

We Have to Stop Kidding Ourselves

By Jeffery Dover

April 7, 2023

“Third Parties Always Lose!” “You’ll Split the Vote and the Democrat Will Win!”

So go two of the stock deprecating statements of those who want no solution to the dire straits America and Americans find themselves in today. They who are in league with that Establishment responsible for the current state of affairs or who are perhaps merely weak, lacking vision, play on our trepidation when attempting anything out of the ordinary. Their statements are redolent of TV sportscasters saying at a critical moment “no one in the past thirty years has done thus and such and succeeded…” and then the guy goes and makes it happen. He didn’t care about what had happened in the preceding thirty years, if he even knew. That was then, not now; it was them, not him. He knew he was right and was determined to make it happen. To fail was to lose. Determined to win, not to lose, he pressed on. We’ve seen similar situations countless times.

Those two hysterical responses to creation of a political fighting force to regain our country and its founding principles, are patently false. Yet it’s undeniable: we who champion America’s founding precepts and values have no true representation in US Congress or the White House, nor have we had any anywhere in Washington since Reagan and Trump occupied the White House. But those two excellent men couldn’t get it done alone. Reagan had nothing but Democrat congressional majorities for his two terms. Then, Trump’s own party, the GOP with the congressional majority we gave the Republicans, left him totally alone. Worse, many of them were also stabbing him in the back, hampering his ability to even accomplish that which he had no need of congress to accomplish. That GOP congressional majority supported none of the policies for which we elected the president in a landslide, blocking them at every turn. In so doing, the larger Republican Party belied once more their refusal to work for their electorate, while continuing instead to serve the interests of global elites and corporations.

Inevitably however, anytime someone brings up “new party” the naysayers come piling out. Some of them come at you with derision and others adopt learned tones, explaining at length in terms of “conventional wisdom” why such a movement is doomed to failure from the start. Challenged to explain what the Republican Party has done to answer the needs and wants of its voters in the past thirty years however, one is met with silence. The reason is simple: the GOP done absolutely nothing to advance any single one of our goals. There is nothing for them to point to. Instead, we get the same, monotonous, nowhere exhortation: “Vote the RINOs out.”

RINOs are the Party! They run it, they choose who gets money and who gets press. They decide who will be the state’s chairman. They decide who becomes Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader, and they, in turn, decide what comes up for a vote in congress, in what form it comes up and when it comes up. They also decide what will not be voted on.

Question: how do Americans vote out RINOs in a party which the RINOs own? It’s their club! They decide who advances within it in the states and nationally. How does Mitt Romney’s niece become the Party chairman? To exclaim “Vote out the RINOs!” one might just as well say “Let’s vote out the Pope and his cardinals and replace them with some Protestants!”

So what is the solution? How do we take our majority to a new party, a party dedicated to returning all those things lost in our country now? For starters, we must create the form, a party structure within which people can work to bring things aright. It can’t be modelled after the existing form, or the same conditions will once again come to prevail.

The new party cannot be run like a social club. It must instead be run like a corporation dedicated to the production and distribution of a product. The “product” will be the policy goals and agenda. “Popularity” must not be the prime reason for installing persons in high party office either nationally or in the states. Such appointments should not be solely based on one’s financial or social prominence. They must have ideological prominence. Competence and demonstrated, single-minded dedication to bringing the party’s goals to reality must be the prime characteristics sought for party leadership. There is no room in the new party for “personalities”.

The Party’s goals cannot be watery. If one goes to the GOP website one finds no defined, detailed set of legislative objectives. There is no agenda or strategy for achieving the few watery statements which do appear there. All must be there for the voter to see. Why is it the practice that no specific goals or policies are available to be seen? The result is that there is no true leadership in the party where it counts. There are only those who get elected running around with their own agenda without open direction from the larger party.

The new party must put detailed legislative objectives on its website for all to see. They can be goals set out to be achieved within given timelines, including goals for the acquisition of new congressional seats from the various states.

There can be no deviation from the achievement of the stated goals among any party members who are voted to congress. What is the point of having members of a party, sent to Washington, DC, who do not believe in every one of the larger party’s policy goals and legislative agenda? Given that the party’s goals will all be published prior to any election, one can assume that those who vote for members of the new party are in agreement with most of those goals. So, how can it be that any member of congress sent there by those voters is free to vote against one of the party’s goals – or by failing to appear for the vote, do so by proxy? Such treachery from a party member will not be tolerated in the new party. Those who violate their fiduciary to the voters will be summarily expelled from the new party.

How does the party remove the influence of money in congress? Voting decisions must be removed from the members of congress. We’re all aware of lobbies and the influence of money in Washington. In one way or another, there’s no denying its influence. Its influence is how we got to where we are. The only way to eliminate its effect is to take voting decisions out of the hands of the individual members of congress in the new party. That means as well, that should the new party find one of its members of congress to be House Speaker or Senate Majority Leader, that decisions of votes, timing and content would also be taken outside that person’s authority.

An unelected body of persons within the party structure would supply the decisions on a vote of any question before congress. There could be any number of forms for such a body, but it would seem reasonable that two party members from each state would meet with all the others to decide on questions and them relay their decisions to the party’s sitting members of congress. Those persons would then cast their votes as directed by the party, not by or due to any outside private influence of the many forms that could take. Lobbying no longer matters with the new party. Only the voters matter.

A potential framework for such a party exists at FounderspartyofAmerica.org. It’s just that: only a framework waiting for some visionaries with energy and clean hands to run with the concept and take our people out of the swamp the corrupt people we have sent to Washington, DC have put us into up to our necks.

That corrupt body is now seeking to cement its corruption as the norm with the indictment of former President Trump. Meanwhile consider the kinds of people who currently occupy the halls of our government!

Is there any time to lose? Isn’t it past time to stop kidding ourselves, thinking that “voting out the RINOs” is a useful strategy? As for “hope”, that’s just an excuse to do nothing. “Hope” is not a strategy. How about closing our ears to the naysayers and pressing on with a real strategy based on a new method? As Missouri senator Hawley-(R) tweeted following the 2022 elections, “The old party is dead. Time to bury it. Time to build something new.”

Let’s get started!

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Why Do We Stay With The GOP?

By Jeffery Dover

April 1, 2023

By now it should be very apparent to Republican voters and conservatives, a growing number of which are migrating to “independent”, that the Republican Party as it is manifested in congress and elsewhere in the federal government, does not represent our interests. They have had more than twenty years to get some of our interests passed into law. To date their score is ZERO. There has been nothing from them but obscene spending, a larger, stronger, more grasping federal government and twenty years of non-stop war with no winning, no WMD’s found and no vital national interests threatened.

At present, with their propaganda capital apparently spent in the Middle East, there’s been a narrative shift to more fertile ground in Ukraine. Even more obvious than it was in the Middle East, there is no vital US national interest at stake in Ukraine. Where is the GOP opposition to our involvement there? Who among them is declaring our billions in aid and equipment to be wrong? Even Trump supports the globalists in this regional conflict, a battle without meaning for the US citizen.

But then, the GOP has a long history of such involvements. Why Vietnam for instance? To prevent the “spread of communism”? Well, billions and billions of dollars later, with nearly twenty years of battle, fifty thousand of our military sons and daughters, brothers and sisters dead, a million of their people dead and Vietnam is today a communist country.

How has Vietnam’s communism hurt Americans? I see that one of my shirts was made there. Have they launched nukes at us or something that I missed? It has been communist since 1975. Why were we there?

Back in the day, I had one Political Science professor tell me with a straight face that it was about protecting the Straits of Malacca, so that there would be no interference with the shipping of oil to Japan. Whaaaat??? But then, why should I have been surprised? With the advent of age, I understand now that whereas his father was in the Dept. of State and the prof had been Air Force intelligence before donning collegiate raiment, he was bound to sing their narrative. Clearly though, that war was about something else. “Preventing the spread of communism” had to have been an excuse for something else. Yet, whereas older and wiser we can see the folly now, why was it that those in congress at the time, presumably older and wiser, were seemingly unable to see that folly? What inducement was there for them to support it all?

Is “Going along to get along” any kind of valid excuse for not delivering what your constituents expect? “Oh, senator so and so is a great guy, a really nice person. He just doesn’t want to rock the boat.” Another nice sounding, understandable, “you know how it is…”, excuse? Not! It’s baloney.

If you went to congress committed to honesty and the American way of life and you saw that others around you in positions of responsibility were liars, thieves, traitors and perverts, would you just shut up and “go along”? After you had told thousands or millions of people you stood for something entirely different, would you stay quiet about such persons in places of power when they stood in the way of everything you purported to represent?

No. You’d want to blow the whistle one way or another and get them out! Sadly, that’s not happening, yet we know that liars, thieves, traitors and perverts populate congress, the White House and the government bureaus. There are probably some murderers among them as well. Why don’t we ever hear our reps telling us what’s going on? Is it that they don’t know? Everyone else knows, but they do not? Is that credible? Is it only writers like Roger Stone or Peter Schweizer and independent news sources who know, but no one in congress has a clue? We can’t believe that. So, what are we left to believe?

In a recent Epoch Times editorial, Victor Davis Hanson wrote in his article comparing the present-day USA to the defeated Byzantine Empire, that “Left and right seem to hate each other more than they do their common enemies”. While I think that Hanson was referring to China as the enemy, he did use the word as a plural, “enemies”. Given the context of the rest of the article, could it be he referred to our government as well? We’ve become used to pundits skirting the elephant in the room gingerly, fearful of losing their syndication.

I would posit that our common enemy are the members of congress and the two parties of which it is comprised. How else is it that we can have a man like President Trump apparently set to be arrested and indicted and yet people like the Clintons, Bidens and Bushs go blithely along without consequence? It can only be because everything is upside down: when criminals comprise and run the government, installing all their like at the top of powerful bureaus, the innocent become the “guilty”. Way down the ladder many rungs, it’s how the FBI comes to refer to persons unhappy with their local school board in Virginia as “domestic terrorists”.

Sure, GOP congressional figures have denounced Trump’s intended prosecution, calling it a “witch hunt”, as the former president himself has done, but it was they, the GOP, who handed us Biden/Harris. It was they who denied us every single one of the policy initiatives for which we voted in President Trump. Supposedly “conservative” and nominally “Republican” people in his cabinet and advisory positions, all careerists, cut his legs off at the knees at every turn throughout his presidency. These people can now safely cry “foul!” when it’s outside their ability to change it. It makes for good theater. The voters seem to eat it up: “Yeah, it’s for sure that so and so has my vote next time around!” Did so and so make any difference?

Going back a few years when Bush was president and national healthcare was an issue, recall how the GOP wanted a national healthcare plan of their own, claiming that the Democrat version would be ruinous. Whatever the form or plan, it was clear that GOP leaders wanted one. When Bush’s terms ended, who but the powerful and well-known Senator John McCain ran for the office against a virtual unknown, Barak Obama. There were so many questions about Obama that it’s still difficult to believe that he was elected to the office. For his part, McCain refused to hit him on those questions, claiming that he didn’t want to be called a “racist”.

I don’t believe that. I don’t think McCain wanted the office. I think that those controlling the party wanted national healthcare and Obama was their ticket. So, they put up McCain to run a losing campaign. Following Obama’s election, we got the ACA. Given the power to repeal it in 2016, the GOP retained it. Since then, there has been no talk of a “Republican” national healthcare version. Why not? They could have repealed it and then voted in their own. (hint: they had already achieved what they wanted).

McCain’s sham was followed by Romney’s, apparently accepting the same losing role, although there was now even more to put Obama into question. Obama mysteriously won again, serving to advance Hillary Clinton’s career and further exacerbate the war in the Middle East. Just like the war in Vietnam, this seemingly endless war featured no winning, no vital American interests threatened, no WMD’s found and lots and lots of money made – blood money. Hundreds of thousands were killed and displaced. What did we, the American people, gain? Personally, I can’t think of anything. How about you?

During the Obama years, in all but his first two years, the GOP controlled congress. If they were not complicit with it all, where were they?

Shifting gears, many GOP members of congress are attorneys. Certainly, they have read our constitution at least once. I am no attorney, but I can read and comprehend English language without “interpretation”. Nothing in the constitution grants the power of “executive orders” to the president. Zip. I would further submit that we have a congress for the express purpose of preventing “executive orders” or “mandates”, for what are they other than imperial decrees? If the president can unilaterally make law and spend without congressional authorization, why do we need congress? Why aren’t all those attorneys, if not all the rest of congress, railing against and banning the practice?

Most of those reading here can likely point to inexplicable failures to deliver on the part of the Republican Party — and, it is the larger party which is the problem. It permits our opposition to work within it. They permit just enough of those who throw us the red meat to remain credible, as long as one doesn’t look too hard at their reality as a party.

What do we do about it? How do we win? Those who want the status quo to remain in place tell us “we have to vote out the RINOs!” Well, that’s been going on since Barry Goldwater. That’s been the stock recommendation. How’s it working out? Please…

We saw in 2015-16 how the voters threw the stock GOP presidential candidates under the bus and voted for Trump, who the GOP tried to prevent from running and then refused to support following his GOP primary victory. That makes one thing crystal clear: those running the party in the states and at the national level are RINOs. The people they want are far different from those who the voters want. Yet they ran the party then and they continue to run it, deciding who gets support and press and, quietly, who doesn’t. Later, they decide who gets to be House Speaker and Senate Majority/minority leader.

So, how do we break in? We don’t. They won’t permit it. It’s their club. Despite decades of trying to win sway, it’s all failed.

That leaves us with two options: continue to permit them to take us down, into international rule, destitution and totalitarian government – or – create a political fighting force of our own.

As it is with so many things in life, all the obstacles one imagines tend to evaporate when one finally puts the fear aside, stops listening to those ever-present sluggards telling you “it can’t be done” and begins to go after the goal. The obstacles are much larger in our imaginations than they are in reality and there are many ways other than the conventional to achieve great things.

We all know people who feel about things the same way that we do and for their part, they too know people who feel the way that they do. We have the people, we have the right, so, for heaven’s sake, let’s get started! Let’s create a new political party, a party with rules which will not allow opposition to work within it, to replace the faithless GOP and begin to win back the USA!

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

DeSantis Had It Right

By Jeffery Dover

March 21, 2023

When Ron DeSantis said that the Russia/Ukraine conflict was a regional conflict and nothing more, in my opinion he was mostly correct. For the first time, I found myself wondering if he wasn’t really the better presidential candidate.

Russia’s history is Ukraine’s history and vice versa. They have been the same nation since Russia’s founding in Kiev back in the 12^th century. When strongmen took Ukraine and split off from Russia following the breakup of the USSR, it was the same as if California broke off from the USA. The same applies to Georgia.

To say that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the same as Hitler’s annexations as a part of the ultimate world-domination aspirations of his “Aryan Race”, is simply incorrect, an attempt to justify US participation in a battle with zero implications for the US citizen.

As a Canadian minister recently admitted, the US/NATO involvement in the fight is to seek regime change in Russia. However, that has been in progress for at least ten years, beginning with Obama’s presidency. The New World Order/Great Reset, which Obama, Biden and so many other anti-American domestic political figures support, if not by name, needs to have all the world’s major military, that is, nuclear powers in agreement with their one-world government aims.

Since Obama, the CIA has been waging destabilization ops against Russia using Ukraine as a base. It was also they who set up the ouster of Russia-friendly Ukraine president Yanukovych, who had promised a referendum on rejoining the Russian Federation. Following his ouster, the CIA installed a succession of puppets, Zelensky the most recent. Installation of such puppets is their aim in Russia. They want a government installed which will take the Russian people into the one-world, totalitarian setup as outlined by Klaus Schwab’s “Great Reset”, aka, “The New World Order”.

The CIA wanted another border front from which to work on Russia and chose Kazakhstan. In January of 2022 they set up a coup d’etat attempt in that nation. It failed. It was shortly thereafter that Russia attacked Ukraine. Is it any wonder why they might have done so?

Russia’s attack must have been a last resort, however. Most Ukrainians also speak Russian. Many wanted to rejoin the Federation, enough so that the CIA thought that it would be successful and in 2014 took out the man who was set to make it happen. Though Russia no longer wanted a neighbor as a base from which its enemies sought to undermine its government, neither could they be very enthusiastic about bringing war, and death, to people they sought to make Russian citizens once again. It had to have been forced by self-preservation.

The contrast of the opposing forces in the Ukraine situation, Russia and the USA/NATO is interesting. At a time when the western developed nations are seeing their freedoms trashed, seemingly on a daily basis, and their governments becoming more and more autonymous and authoritarian, Russians are enjoying freedoms which until the demise of the USSR, they had never enjoyed as a people.

Under the Tsars, the Russian people were almost entirely illiterate serfs, beholden to whichever noble owned the vast lands on which they lived. Other than the serfs and the nobility, there was a tiny mercantile class which lived more or less freely, subject to the whims of the Tsar.

Under the Communists, things didn’t change much, except that the nobility was replaced by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Only 5% of the population were party members and only they had limited access to decent food, clothing and housing as well as other privileges. There was no private property as the state owned all land and all means of production. No American first amendment rights were allowed.

Today, Russia is a capitalistic, democratic republic. The president, Vladimir Putin, sits at the pleasure of the Duma and the Senate, who elect him to the office. The people own property, including their homes. Free enterprise is the economic base. The press is no longer owned exclusively by the government and most facets of life there feature much the same freedoms formerly known and guaranteed in the Western developed nations. Those freedoms include freedom of religion. Putin is a practicing catholic.

With more freedom than Russian people have ever known, they have no intention of giving that up or ceding their sovereignty to an international governing body. That is why the New World Order/Great Reset people of the USA and EU want regime change in Russia. That is what, ultimately, Ukraine is all about.

To say that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the equivalent of Hitler’s takeovers, with the same meaning, is simply incorrect. Our mainstream media and MSM writers trade on our memories of the USSR and its expansionist communism. They attempt to portray today’s Russian Federation as merely the next iteration of the USSR, when the fact is that it is the antithesis of the USSR. Neither is it in any way like Nazi Germany. With the territories it has regained, the populations have pretty much wanted the repatriation. It’s the strongmen who took over and separated from Russia following the ending of the USSR, who oppose the repatriation.

Russia, ranking 11^th among the world’s economies can’t afford a battle with NATO forces much less could they think of winning that fight. There’s no Prescott Bush or his Union Bank to underwrite the cost of the necessary arms buildup, as he did for Hitler, even if that was Russia’s intention, which it obviously is not. To suggest that Russia’s aim is world domination, as was Hitler’s, simply makes no sense.

And why, when Russia is emerging as free nation, coming to grips with property ownership and free enterprise, would it want to antagonize far more powerful nations and the most likely trade partners for its budding industries? Neither does that make any sense. They have no ideology they espouse as “superior” which they seek to impose, unlike the USSR and their former communism.

In my opinion, DeSantis had it right, other than his failure to mention the actions of the CIA and its service to the New World Order.

As for Khruschev’s assertion that they will “bury us”, that does seem to be happening. However, it has to do with yet another maniacal “plan for humanity”, the Great Reset, not Marxist or communist per se, put forward by a bunch of self-righteous elites and would-be monarchs here in the USA and EU. They no doubt see themselves as Plato’s “philosopher king”.

The young Russian nation wants nothing to do with their plans. The crooks running the USA are the bad guys in this. The USA needs to disconnect from Ukraine. Our people have no dog in that fight.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Conspiracy Theorists Rock

By Jeffery Dover

March 18, 2023

When trust is lost in human relationships, it’s a difficult thing to regain. Our federal government in so many critically important ways has proved to be so untrustworthy, that often one’s first inclination is to look for the lie or evidence of conspiracy in any news. A combination of concern for the nation’s founding ideals, a solid education and the ability to think through and approach information critically without concern for what is discovered, is the hallmark of such a person. To be called a “conspiracy theorist” is today at once a badge of honor and proof positive that one has not been taken in by the global propaganda machine.

Are there some wackos out there? Certainly, but wackos and their wackiness run to all persuasions and walks of life. The old saying ”Just because I’m paranoid doesn’t mean I don’t have enemies” could well be paraphrased about conspiracy theorists. But then, if not for purposes of blanket condemnation as a preemptive strike against exposure, why even the term?

What conspiracy? The short answer is that there are and have been a lot of relatively minor ones which appear to support one major one. First, a little history you’ll most likely recall.

Conspiracies in places of great power have occurred and shaped the political landscape throughout history, to the point of being a cliche′. Julius Caesar’s assassination, the murders of the Knights Templar, Mary Queen of Scots’ plots, Guy Fawkes’ plot to blow up English Parliament, Richard III’s murder of the little princes, Lincoln’s assassination, Sergei Kirov’s assassination by Stalin cohorts, Hitler’s assassination of Roehm and the Brown Shirts, former Sec’y of Defense James Forrestal, MLK/JFK/RFK/JFK, Jr., Ronald Reagan’s assassination attempt, the false flag Fast & Furious – conspiracies all. Vince Foster, 9/11, Seth Rich, Jeffrey Epstein? Very likely as well. However, they are merely a few which one may have read about. There have been so many more.

The point is that it is more reasonable to suspect a conspiracy, than it is to brush off such events as simply random acts with little extended meaning, especially when readily available evidence upsets the official explanations or media reports. That’s where critical thinking comes into play. When the story doesn’t add up with the evidence seeming to make no sense, one needs to examine such events in a larger context.

It’s far easier today for powerful forces to hide conspiracies than it was in past centuries. Government personnel can simply “classify” information to protect it from exposure, a vehicle unavailable to the private sector. An allied press protects its owners and government benefactors with outright lies and half-truths or by simply failing to report or to investigate. Knowing of the CIA’s involvement with the press, it’s not difficult to believe that they may well be the source of so many false narratives which a monolithic press then run with in lockstep, “Russian Collusion” for example. With enormous wealth concentrated in the hands of relatively few elites in and out of government, control of information has been fairly easy for those powers.[1]

Today’s developed western world is increasingly characterized by a classical fascist co-dependency of governments and huge multi-national businesses and industries. Players in this incestuous game move back and forth between government and the big industries. Where the rank-and-file citizen relations with their government is distant, relations between these huge businesses and government is cozy: the FDA and Big Pharma, CIA and media, or Military/Industrial complex and DOD for a few examples. Former members of congress often take positions as “consultants” with these private sector entities.

Recently, it has become obvious that control of the vote has also come within their grasp and that they have become so powerful that, in this, they don’t seem to care how obvious the fraud. The money behind them is apparently their assurance that nothing will be done about it.

So many contradictions and sometimes outright impossibilities attend numerous “official explanations” and investigations that its difficult not to suspect a cover-up.

9/11 is an example. First, one has to believe that Jihadis from another part of the world, who know only how to take off in a jetliner, not land one, can penetrate Washington, DC airspace with no transponder and attack the Pentagon. Absurd… But then, one must also believe that kerosene (jet fuel) can melt steel and that, having done so, massive towers will collapse neatly into their own footprint, including one 47-story tower which wasn’t hit.

Forgetting even the chemistry, physics and logistics of the attacks, eyewitness and first-responder testimonies refute the official story. In New York, firemen told of explosions as the squibs (planted explosives used in planned demolitions) detonated in the collapse sequences.

Eyewitnesses at the Pentagon told of what they took to be a drone, smaller than a 757 and not painted in United Airlines livery, hitting the building at a location away from the site of the most damage. People who were inside, told of the explosion creating the big hole we all saw, as coming from within, not without. Where the alleged jetliner was said to have struck, there were no seats or luggage found nor were there any furrows in the ground which would have been made by engines hanging below the wing, a fact evident in photos.

There are many entirely credible video documentaries on the subject. “9/11:Anatomy of a Great Deception” is one. Re. the Pentagon, these are of interest: web.archive.org

Forensic Facts of The 9/11 Pentagon Attack, pdf

Then, there were the nanothermite traces found in the WTC rubble. This is a weapons grade incendiary which burns at temperatures far above the temperature needed to melt steel. It is made at only a few places on Earth and would have been unobtainable for the perps in the planes. Remember how the rubble burned for weeks after the incident?

But why? Perhaps the New World Order/Great Reset, or “NWO” (I use the terms interchangeably) provides some context.

A few of the direct results include the enormously unconstitutional “Patriot Act”, a huge power grab by federal authorities. Let’s not forget that, fairly unique among the world’s nations, the US population is an armed population. Those who might be seeking absolute power would necessarily have to move slowly here. They might find a domestic armed force apart from the Dept. of Defense and not controlled by state governors useful at some point.

9/11 caused national intelligence agencies to be consolidated under a single figure, the Director of National Intelligence. Now only one figure was responsible for intelligence briefings whereas before, many were. Great power was thereby concentrated in fewer hands. The huge Department of Homeland Security (Homeland? Really…?) was formed, including the shakedowns at our airports, the TSA, and the various DHS prison camps around the country, one located near where I live in Arizona.

With the collapse of Bldg. 7, huge amounts of evidence in the Enron investigation was destroyed, including much more of both IRS corporate tax fraud cases and Secret Service cases.[2]

Last and definitely not least, it started more than 20 years of non-stop war in the Middle East, featuring no winning, no WMD’s found – hugely profitable for many and dovetailing with a New World Order goal of global societal disruption. Millions departed what little was left of their lives, not that they had much to begin with, to go to the EU where they don’t work and don’ assimilate. Another of the NWO goals is “depopulation”. There was plenty of death to go around in those twenty years.

An excellent video documentary of the JFK assassination, “Dark Legacy”, does an excellent job of explaining his murder. They make a case difficult to refute which puts G.H.W. Bush as central to the plot, carried out by CIA figures. They also explain how the wound the president took from the “grassy knoll” shooter was handled and Oswald made the patsy. Numerous other high political figures, present at the time, were said to have had foreknowledge of the murder. Apparently, those behind it feared Kennedy would pursue disarmament with the USSR. No arms race, no more Cold War; no Vietnam, billions and billions of dollars not spent or profited?

When Bush family acquaintance John Hinckley shot President Ronald Reagan, a TV news correspondent on the scene, Judy Woodruff, said that at least one shot came from a hotel window. Indeed, footage at the time showed a figure at one of the windows. Previously the Director of Central Intelligence, now Vice President G.H.W. Bush had a few days prior been put in charge of crisis management. Roger Stone’s book on the Bush’s says that any subsequent depictions have cropped out the figure in the window.[3]

The FBI claimed that TWA Flight 800 was downed by a fuel tank explosion. However, residue from chemicals used in missile explosives was found on seats recovered from the disaster and many eyewitnesses saw a missile rise from the sea prior to the explosion. Later thinking is that a Navy vessel in the area shot it down, believing it to be a drone in a military exercise. Conspiracy or accident? Probably the latter. The conspiracy was in the FBI lying about the accident.

Given their performances in the episodes of the Branch Davidian slaughter and that of Ruby Ridge, followed later by their interference in the 2016 presidential election, what’s new? Then, we were recently treated to them labelling concerned parents who were unhappy with their school board “domestic terrorists”. It’s also come out, nowhere more chillingly than in the “Twitter Files”, that they linked with social media giants to direct them in censorship of news and commentary critical of Biden leading up to the 2016 election. Ditto the 2020 election and Covid episode. The CIA and DHS figured into these travesties as well.

Clearly those in power have no problem using the agencies badly and illegally, nor do those in the agencies seem to mind carrying out their instructions. “We were only following orders.” Haven’t we heard that before somewhere?

Then there was 1/6/21. Let’s look at that event in the context of Great Reset goals as well. President Trump’s election and term in office was about “Make America (not the world) Great Again” and “America First”. The two political initiatives and the huge popularity of the thrust, flew smack into the face of the powerful, globalist Great Reset crowd and their aims.

Among other of their devices to weaken US sovereignty, Trump denied the globalists both US entanglement in the Paris Accord and Trans Pacific Partnership. Given another term, and wiser about choosing staff as well as newly apprised of the workings of the Deep State, he was set to tear down much more of the globalist construction in the USA, thirty years or more in the making.

One theory has it that Deep State plants were embedded in the crowd outside the Capitol Building that day. There appears to be some evidence to support that claim. At a point just prior to a House motion by two representatives to delay the certification was set to happen – a motion which, had it been made, would have provided a basis for a Supreme Court examination of the election – the alarm was sounded of the demonstrators entering the building. Pence and Pelosi et al were ushered out of the chamber. The delay was all they needed; the motion never happened. Pence had given us his gift, Biden/Harris.

Is there anything to this idea? Given everything else leading up to the certification and following, including what increasingly appear to be kangaroo court trials of demonstration participants, who’s to say there isn’t? Yet whatever the truth, another huge obstacle to the Great Reset and their forces, Trump, had been removed. NWO mission accomplished?

Lastly, we come to Covid-19. There is much here at all sorts of levels. Perhaps let’s first examine “gain-of-function” work on otherwise innocuous viruses. Why would any organization seek to make a virus deadly to humanity? The explanation given by enthusiasts is that they can then be used to pre-emptively develop vaccines against the advent of some related contagion. But why any military, DOD involvement? Unlike chemical weapons which can be contained in a tactical area, contagion from viruses can’t be contained. Loosed, it spreads over enormous, even global areas as we witnessed. Given that it can’t be contained, then it’s purpose could also be to attack everyone. We saw first-hand how the official justification worked out. What aims then are served by universal illness and depopulation?

It’s plain to see who profits from such contagion: The big pharmaceutical companies. Who else? New World Order/Great Reset proponents and their goals of depopulation are certainly served, especially when the products falsely termed “vaccines” were mandated for all and then went on to cause fertility problems in women.

Others who write here have gone into far more detail on the subject so I won’t belabor the many other issues involved from which the nasty smell of systemic corruption is emanating. It must be noted, however, that a principal beneficiary of the entire disease span was the federal government’s power over the individual. John Tamny correctly notes that because viruses have been with us since the dawn of mankind, the origin of Covid was irrelevant. What was relevant for Tamny was how the government used it to destroy freedom. It continues that effort with the Biden administration seeking legal means by which to use a 1944 law concerning rubbish and sanitation to demand that all wear masks.

People were frightened and compelled to wear the hideous, uncomfortable masks which blocked no viruses. They were similarly compelled to be injected with unsafe and toxic materials which did not prevent their infection with the Covid virus. Most believed it to be a good idea. After all, while actively censoring and suppressing any contradictions to their narratives, the government, media and a well-hushed world medical establishment told the people that the stuff was both safe and effective. The Vax did, though, cause many thousands of deaths and permanent, disabling and incurable autoimmune diseases. Physicians are reporting a huge uptick since 2020 in the recurrence of cancers in those vaxxed who had been in remission.

With the government causing small businesses, those they selectively deemed “nonessential”, to be closed because of the virus, millions of people lost their jobs, savings and businesses. Small business, not big businesses, are the largest employers in the USA.

NWO goals feature global, one-world government. President Biden has recently concluded an agreement with the UN’s World Health Organization, putting it in charge of determining for Americans what is and what is not a “pandemic” as well as how the population will be directed to behave.

Why a UN organization to direct Americans? Are no American organizations fit to determine what Americans should do? The legal questions of such a cession of our sovereignty aside, are we ready to have the UN dictate our laws to us? Are the bio labs in Ukraine, owned by the US, preparing the next pandemic? Is that why Biden is so intent on spending billions on Ukraine to keep Russia out, while paying almost no attention to the poor folks in E. Palestine, Ohio? (The Ukraine involvement is another NWO front, which I’ve dealt with elsewhere so won’t pursue again here.)

When one looks over the people occupying the seats of power in Washington, in the context of the past twenty-three years of US history, is there any reason not to look for or suspect conspiracies? And who, other than those defending the guilty, would coin the term and deride “conspiracy theorists”?

Why do we tolerate this accelerating perfidy in our government and the persons we place in positions of trust who permit it? Really, is there any reason now not to know that they are one big conspiracy and demand that the perps be rooted out and brought to justice? Certainly, to sit in the halls of congress is to know these things. Why aren’t they talking to us? One thing is clear, however: they’re making the people who see conspiracies look really good.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Footnotes:

[1] https://www.webfx.com/blog/internet/the-6-companies-that-own-

[2] https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_documents_lost.html

[3] The Bush Crime Family: The Inside Story of a Family Dynasty

Is Washington DC Ruling For or Against Americans?

By Jeffery Dover

February 21, 2023

Seymour Hersh has recently reported that it was the CIA which carried out the attack to blow up Russia’s Nordstream Pipeline. Not surprising. After all, who believed the CIA’s media when they suggested that it was Russia itself behind the attack? That was an out and out LOL! Russia had absolutely no motive for such an act and every reason to never consider such abject stupidity.

When one understood in advance that everything about Ukraine and US involvement there, with EU support, was about the New World Order agenda, it wasn’t difficult to ferret out the lie. It had to be the CIA who was behind the attack. Remember…if it doesn’t make sense, it’s not likely to be true. The idea that Russia might have been the perpetrator made no sense. Contrarily, that the CIA in aid of the New World Order would seek to destroy this source of revenue for Russia while claiming that it was an assault on the EU economy was very plausible.

Interestingly, it was Hersh who reported back in the late 1970’s and into the ‘80’s that US submarines – Halibut, Sea Wolf and Parche – had planted listening devices on underwater Soviet communications cables in the Seas of Okhotsk and Barents. Forty some years later, with the Cold War long gone and technology far advanced, to take out an undersea pipeline would be comparatively simple for US forces. A submarine-deployed ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle) would plant the explosives. Most of the crew, however, would have been in the dark as to the mission and even the area in which they were operating.

Does it make sense that the USA would commit so much money and material to Ukraine? As an American, how does that expenditure make your life better? Does it make sense that the US would also fund the construction and work of dozens of bioweapons labs in Ukraine? Why couldn’t such labs be constructed in the USA if our powers thought it was beneficial to the nation to have them? Who pays for whatever it is that they produce? What does Ukraine give the USA in return? What is our trade basis with that nation? Why has the CIA been operating there for more than ten years, installing first one then another puppet president?

We know that whatever the reason, it is not because Russia poses any kind of a threat to the people of the United States. Even during the Cold War years, with intelligence discovered by the recording devices planted on Soviet undersea communications cables, the US learned that Soviet military intentions were completely defensive, that is, that they sought no “first-strike” capability. Their only imperative was that they possessed a second-strike ability as a deterrent to any first-strike.[1] We know that the 2016 “Russian Collusion/Election Interference” was a total lie. Ditto the phony “pee pee dossier”, the entire fiction said to have taken place in – guess where – Russia, freshly prepared in the UK and then dutifully transported to the USA by Senator John McCain.

So, what is the animus against Russia within the halls of US power? Whatever that animus might be, it’s clear that Washington has one. It’s equally clear that their media don’t want the American people to know what it is. All we get are the lies. Russia has no designs on the EU, other than in trade nor do they pose a military threat there. In the meantime, neither has Russia acted in any way against the United States nor, on the other hand, does Ukraine mean anything to the America citizen. Is all the lying and falsehood designed to thereby justify NATO, thirty years down the road an organization with no longer any valid reason to exist with regard to its stated mission? Does it exist only to keep the billions of our dollars flowing to the EU and its banks?

Russia is a nation with a population that, until the early 1990’s had no experience whatever of property ownership or free enterprise. Prior to the 1917 revolution, all land was owned by a small group of nobility. The rest of the many millions of people were mostly illiterate serfs bound to the nobility, save for a tiny mercantile class of free people. Late in the 19^th century the serfs were freed by decree of Tsar Alexander II, though they still owned no property and remained illiterate.

Following the revolution, not much changed for the people. Only the five percent who belonged to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union lived well and had access to luxuries. There was no private property and no free enterprise. The party’s power was absolute. The communist party members simply replaced the nobility of tsarist times, the rest of the people still essentially serfs to the party.

Today thirty or so years after totalitarian rule, Russia is a nation of people grappling with free enterprise and the novelty of owning property. Americans take private property and free enterprise for granted, our population having centuries of that experience. Not so Russians. With much of the nation’s people lacking indoor plumbing, that they manage to occupy 11^th place among the world’s economies is fairly amazing. However, as a nation, they have much to do in order to reach a standard of living for their population which equals that of the western developed nations of the EU and USA. War is not one of those things. It’s trade which they seek. That’s what makes sense, not destruction and the attendant waste of valuable resources in terms of people and materials.

Putin is characterized in the media and by some politicians as some evil KGB agent of Stalin’s era, running around with needles to poison people or torturing them in the cellars of the Lubyanka. In fact, he wasn’t that sort at all, but rather a diplomatic agent. Far from seeking a return to atheistic communism – a thing few Russians would ever want, which is why they toppled the old regime – Putin has returned Russia to its Christian roots. Does Fox News ever speak of that? The New York Times?

Why aren’t we Americans being told these things, other than the nonsense they feed us? Is there something else going on? Are the Russians the bad guys or have the tables turned and now that’s our role? Well…not us, those of us reading here, but those in Washington who no longer represent us but nonetheless occupy elected (?) office and bureaucracies? The bad guys being not most of the crew of the submarine which planted the pipeline explosive, but rather those few aboard who knew the mission and carried it out?

Now we read that congress got a “classified” briefing on the recent Chinese balloon overflight. Why “classified”? Are they trying to keep it secret so that the Chinese won’t find out why their own balloon traversed the United States? That’s another big “LOL”. Or, are they telling congress what was going on, and what lies they plan to feed to the media so that the congress and the media are all on the same page when the people begin asking questions? It’s clear that it’s us, the US citizens, who they want to keep in the dark, not foreign powers.

February 15, 2023

The above was written a few days ago. Today we learn that they weren’t Chinese “spy balloons” after all! According to the Pentagon, now they are claiming that the objects were likely “private”.[2] Speculation has it that all the baloney about “Chinese Spy Balloons” was a ruse to keep the revelation that it was the CIA who blew up the Nordstream pipeline out of the headlines…but then, how could you really have believed that it was anyone else who did that? Equally amazing, how could we believe that the Chinese would use something as archaic and easily discovered as a balloon to spy on us? That’s even more absurd. Those observations aside, is this a new ruse? Is the Pentagon telling us that “private” balloons such as these routinely traverse N. American airspace and that we have no idea whose they are or what their purpose? I smell yet another total lie!It should be amusing to see how their media will spin it now.

Is anyone in Washington being honest with American citizens? What if the people learned that 9/11 and Covid were both inside jobs? There is plenty of reason to believe that they were. We’re told that “you can’t handle the truth.” Rubbish. It’s the perps who can’t handle the truth being known. Truth is the bane of all those seeking total power, which is why all such regimes also have powerful propaganda tools to drum the truth away and silence critics who dare to bring it to light. Haven’t we seen that in spades with Covid-19? Doctors and scientists who spoke out against the treatment protocols and vaccination narratives were threatened with loss of employment and/or licensure, their pronouncements censored to the greatest extent possible.

Project Veritas has recently recorded a senior Pfizer executive discussing ways in which they might make the Covid virus more potent so that they could invent more vaccines.[3] Former Pfizer V. President and Chief Scientist Michael Yeadon and others say the vaccine productions were colluded between the pharmaceutical companies and were toxic by design, that is, on purpose. [4], [5] If Project Veritas can uncover this, so can the CIA, FBI or any other intelligence group ostensibly looking out for our welfare. If that’s not bad enough, the so-called “vaccines” don’t prevent Covid infection yet do in fact cause a host of other adverse reactions, including sudden death. Knowing these facts, our government officials continue to maintain the absolute fiction that they are “safe”.

Just who are our elected representatives and bureaucracies working for? We elected a president in a landslide in 2016 in order that he lead the nation in the reversal of so much which the people oppose. In response, his party in the congress who we relied on to back him up in our wishes, destroyed him, denying us all those wishes. Instead, they doubled down with the Biden installment continuing on a course set to upset and destroy American founding principles.

Apart from those political powers in Washington in which we have misplaced our trust, what groups approve of Washington’s direction? A few of them are the EU, the Council for Foreign Relations, the World Economic Forum and the United Nations as well as associated and powerful elites. Our direction as a nation in terms of government and control of the actions of our population dovetail nicely with the stated aims of those groups and persons. It is those groups for which it appears that our government is ruling, not the people. It is squarely up to the people to change that. At present, Washington is as much as saying “So what if we lie? So what if we brazenly work against your interests and welfare? What are you going to do about it?”

Let’s create an organization of our own and show them.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Footnotes:

[1] “Blind Man’s Bluff”, Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew

[2] Political/sudden-narrative-shift-pentagon-admits-mystery-objects-probably-private-craft-not-tied?

[3] pfizer-executive-mutate-covid-via-directed-evolution-for-company-to-continue

[4] mike-yeadon-covid-injections-are-toxic/

[5] Toxic-by-design-with-Michael-Yeadon-phd

Only The Cabal Matters

By Jeffery Dover

February 11, 2023

The US federal government no longer represents nor exists for the people or the sovereign United States. It is instead part of a Cabal, run by and for global elites. The people – you, me and everyone other than those elites – are merely their beasts of burden whose role, as they see it, is to support those elites. They pay us to keep us quiet while they work against us all. Their NFL Football with its “social justice” messaging and anti-allegiance demonstrations helps to keep us quiet, among their media’s other “professional sports”, the latter day Roman “bread and circus”. We’ll refer to them as “The Cabal” hereafter.

At present powerful members of The Cabal – the president of the United States and US Congress – are getting the country deeper and deeper into the Ukraine conflict. Having already spent more than $40 billion that we know about, and who knows how much more that we don’t know about, we’re now sending Ukraine 30 Abrams tanks.

Ukraine means nothing to American citizens. They are a corrupt, second world nation which is the worse for the meddling in their politics by the US and British intelligence services for at least the past decade. Those agents first ousted a legitimate president and then installed puppet Ukraine presidents who would support them in their anti-Russia program.

Why the anti-Russia program? Because Russia opposes the New World Order (NWO henceforth) agenda of the World Economic Forum, the Council for Foreign Relations and the UN, all members of The Cabal. (Note that Trump also opposed the NWO with America First and MAGA. We saw what happened to Trump.)

US and NATO involvement in Ukraine is about one thing and one thing only: the New World Order. This is to advance the elites with their drive to global government, the success of which depends on the initial support of the world’s major nations and powers. Having achieved the installation and maintenance of complicit governments in the USA and EU, Russia is the last holdout of those major nations. Thus, The Cabal seeks regime change and the installation of a complicit puppet government in Russia. The cost and possibly the risk to the citizens of the United States and EU mean nothing to them.

US support of Ukraine has nothing to do with the welfare, upkeep or security of the American citizen or even those of the EU, not that the EU’s welfare is the responsibility of the US citizen. Neither Ukraine nor Russia — the latter if unprovoked — pose any threat to the USA. Everything about the US and Ukraine is about the NWO. If not for that, the present conflict probably would never have occurred. Ukraine would most likely have peacefully rejoined the Russian Federation a few years ago. We, the people of the USA are no consideration in any of this involvement. We do not count.

Neither will the media inform the public of the truth of matters, for the simple reason that The Cabal owns the media, here and abroad. The Cabal tells the media what we are to believe. Their media then disseminates that information, trying as well as they are able, to squelch other media which actually intend to properly inform the populace. As a second line of defense against honest news and commentary sources, The Cabal has put “fact checkers” in place as a bulwark against exposure of their lies. They use “polls” to open topics of new disinformation.

The Rubachovs of the country believe these people, the media and their phony “fact checkers”. Anyone who read Arthur Koestler’s “Darkness at Noon” will remember Rubachov, sent to prison by Stalin and awaiting execution, believing that “if only Stalin knew he was there” that he would be exonerated of the false charges and spared. Stalin not only knew; he sent him there! The Rubachovs never get it until it’s too late, if ever. Let’s not be Rubachovs.

We’re recently familiar with how The Cabal’s FBI colluded with social media to censor information and commentary which opposed The Cabal and its members. In addition to falsehoods, half-truths and other obfuscation of important events, the media ramps up fear, to make the population easier to dupe. At present, it’s fear of nuclear war which they tout due to the Ukraine situation. A year or two ago, it was Covid. Before that, it was “terrorism”. They always have some “fear narrative” on tap for us as a control measure.

One of the NWO’s objectives is population reduction and control. What could be obstacles to those goals? Nursing homes? Medical care for the elderly? Human fertility? With the recent Covid experience, a virus which was surely manmade, who did it affect primarily? The elderly. Nursing home inmates were held virtually captive inside what amounted to an infection chamber. Gene therapy experiments, called “vaccines” only because the CDC hurriedly changed the definition to include them, are known to cause fertility problems in women among other, perhaps more serious problems including sudden death. They do not prevent infection of the Covid virus.

The Cabal made sure that inexpensive, widely tested medications effective in the successful treatment of the virus were denied. Additionally, hospitalization of patients wasn’t permitted until a patient was already in serious trouble with the illness. Then treatment which was exorbitantly expensive and at best, not particularly effective was prescribed. At worst, it was lethal. Many thousands of people who would likely have been cured with the cheap, known medications died with the “authorized and prescribed” treatments, including the toxic kidney-destroyer “Remdesivir” and/or ventilators.

There was good news for the hospitals, however as The Cabal paid them a lot of money for covid diagnoses, treatments and even deaths. Perhaps most alarmingly of all, doctors were threatened with loss of their hospital jobs and even their licenses to practice if they preached or treated outside The Cabal’s official regimen and Covid narrative. Dissenting voices all were censored on social media, while California has since enacted a law which causes a “review” of a physician’s license to practice if that person should prescribe or preach other than the government’s prescribed Covid doctrine.

On additional fronts, The Cabal “mandated” the business shutdowns. It ruined countless small businesses across the nation and indeed, across the western developed nations with the business closures of what were termed “non-essential” businesses. Is it a coincidence that a NWO goal is to reduce competition for monopolistic big businesses? Of course, those in Washington know that collectively, small businesses are the nation’s largest employers. The plight of all those millions newly out of work was somewhat mollified by the inflationary response of The Cabal’s “Covid Relief” bills passed – in the billions and billions of dollars.

Did the people ask for any of this? Are they clamoring for the NWO, it’s reduction of the USA and others to global totalitarian rule in a socialistic economic setup? That’s where Washington is taking us. Are the people asking for higher taxes so the United States can send money to African dictators? Why are bills brought before the congress thousands of pages long? The media doesn’t cover them other than to give them some innocuous-sounding title, “Covid Relief”, “Omnibus Spending”, or other, when hundreds of line items having nothing to do with Covid are included. Instead, they describe the theatrical “give and take” among the congressional factions prior to the inevitable passage of the bill. It’s all a show. It’s not about us. It’s about The Cabal.

That The Cabal wants the people in the dark about what they are doing is why one cannot go to a government website and see a plainly detailed, item-by-item list of expenditures in any bill, either prior to or after passage. Yet one can go to any corporate website, pull up their financial reports and see those items. Why doesn’t the federal government use its massive workforce to provide this basic information to the population which they ostensibly represent? That’s a rhetorical question.

Neither did The Cabal want people to know that “Russian Collusion” in the 2016 election was pure fabrication. Their fabrication. Edward Snowden made it clear that the NSA spies on us all. (The Cabal really wants him “brought to justice”, though so far, he has escaped the “Seth Rich treatment”, residing in Russia.) Of course, the CIA and the other intelligence agencies certainly keep tabs on bad actors. Or do they? Maybe they are the bad actors. How is it that neither of those agencies would not know of the “Russian Collusion” fraud? How could they be ignorant of “Hamilton 68”, the phony RussiaGate tracker which informed all the media of that lie?[1]Note that those involved with that site are all Democrat operatives and Neocon William Kristol. Cabal members all.

Are the people asking for illegal aliens to invade the country, taxing the infrastructure and creating a massive social problem? The Cabal is supplying it for us nonetheless. (Mayorkas smuggled 100000 job seeking migrants through parole pathway) But is this new? Is this only about the Biden administration? Did the GOP congressional majority support president Trump and his landslide voters in funding and building the wall with unanimous support? No. They refused to fund, or otherwise enable or give their assent to the wall. Neither did their Deep State employ necessary measures to prevent the invasion without the wall. As we see in the link above, the Deep State enables the invasion, though neither is that news. The GOP and the Deep State are Cabal members. They are not there to represent the will of the people.

The Cabal tells the people that electric cars are the future and that soon all will be required to run them. Yet, they also tell us that we must curtail mining and oil/gas/coal production. The cars must all be charged at electric charging stations. Yet, fossil fuels account for more than 60% of all electric energy production in the United States.[2] The Cabal tells us that we must curtail mining operations. Yet the lithium which the car batteries require must be mined. The copper for the motors must be mined, though The Cabal throws barriers at every opportunity to prevent additional copper extraction. This is accomplished via their expedient of “permitting”. It’s been going on for at least ten years with Arizona’s Resolution Copper mining operation.[3]

Behind it all, is the specter of the “climate change” agenda, dear to the NWO and The Cabal. It is based on the nonsense that mankind is causing damaging “climate change” and moreover, is in a position to reverse it.

To believe such rubbish, one has to ignore the fact that there was once an Ice Age, with glaciers covering most of N. America. With so much ice around the globe, what must seawater levels have been at the time? Mankind did not create the Ice Age nor did they have anything to do with its reversal. The “Global Warming” took place without any human assistance. It’s simply what the Earth does. The Cabal members who own worldwide propaganda organs see “climate change” and attendant lies as a path to their ends of the NWO and their power. Huge populations taught to abandon critical thinking and lulled into a state of catatonic absorption of such false information, are a vehicle for the The Cabal’s power.

So, what to do about it all? There’s so much more, beyond the scope of this writing. Along with the writing of others, Kelleigh Nelson, Devvy Kidd and many more on NWV, the picture comes together. How do we respond?

Two things are very clear. One, we have no credible fighting force for the retention of US sovereignty and a return to our founding principles of limited government, individual responsibility, equality under the law and freedom.

The second thing which is totally clear is that, given the first, we must create that political force to achieve those things which American citizens and indeed, humanity, need in order to live in plenty or in some instances, to merely survive. We must get behind some new ideas, closing our eyes, if necessary, to the past, moving ahead with faith. The old saw “God helps those who help themselves” is certainly true. Helping ourselves requires that sometimes we must get out of our comfort zone and venture into uncharted territory.

We must create a new political force to rally and support the millions and millions of us and our countrymen. Only then will we put ourselves in a position to project our majority into the proper operation of our governance.

Can we achieve that new construction? Of course! Back in the mid-1800’s when Whig voters wanted abolition and emancipation, they saw that the power in their political party wouldn’t support them. They didn’t get their underwear twisted, wringing their hands saying “We’ll split the vote!”, or “the Democrat will win”! Instead, they went out and formed an organization which led them to and achieved what they wanted. They called it the “Republican Party”. The Whig Party disappeared.

There’s an outline for such a new organization at Founderspartyofamerica.org. Give it a look. If the Cabal wins, as they are at present, we’re lost. It’s really that simple. We had better get started. There’s no time to lose.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Footnotes:

Time For The Pundits to Explain the Big Ruse

By Jeffery Dover

January 27, 2023

Day in and day out, we are inundated with articles and video about what is “wrong” in our country. Ground breaker in talk radio, Rush Limbaugh made millions telling us about it, why and how. Presumably so do people like Hannity and Levin – not to mention so many others. Is it just for the money? Are they really “patriots”?

Back in colonial times, a patriot was a person willing to fight the British. Later the term came to be recognized as one who supports his country. Does that mean one who supports his country no matter what the country stands for? Apparently so. Thus, those who supported Hitler in Nazi Germany would have been considered “patriots”. One could call John Kerry a “patriot” – but “patriotic” to what? American founding ideals and the continued welfare of the individual citizen? In today’s USA, is military service alone evidence of “patriotism”?

In our political parlance, shouldn’t we hold “patriot” or “patriotism” to a higher standard? When conservatives speak of patriotism, aren’t we really referring to allegiance to and a willingness to defend our country’s boundaries, its people, its founding principles of limited government and individual freedom and its right to exist as such?

With that definition in mind, what is the general character of conservative pundits in terms of what they tell us or where they seem to want to take us with their views and information? Are they really about solutions? When one has a plumbing problem, does one merely say “Oh, looks like the toilet is overflowing. Yes, it certainly is overflowing. That’s because there’s too much water and because there’s no drainage for it. Look! Now there’s water on the floor. Um, and it’s getting deep. Looks like it could go into the living room. Yes, it has reached the living room and it’s soaking that Persian rug…” and so on? Or does one say “The toilet’s overflowing. Quick, close the supply valve!”? Isn’t the latter more likely the response? Our pundits go on and on and on about what’s wrong in America…but does one ever hear them saying what to do about it? It seems that they’re perfectly willing to let the water run and merely converse about it.

Shouldn’t “what to do about it” be obvious by now? Let’s look at what we have done, as conservatives, to attempt a comeback to our nation’s founding principles and ideals. We have voted Republican time and time again. Beginning in the 1980’s following Jimmy Carter’s presidency, Republicans started to gain in terms of the presidency and in congress. Breaking a decades-long Democrat lock on congressional majorities, Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America” brought on a GOP House majority in 1994. There have been numerous such majorities since, some of them with and some of them without the senate and White House.

To date, that’s nearly thirty years. Has it brought a return or even the semblance of a return to American founding principles and ideals? No. The nation has lumbered on and is picking up speed in its drive to authoritarian government by and for global elites. Many of those elites have amassed enough money to keep that drive well in hand.

Rush Limbaugh probably assisted with that 1994 victory, having begun in the 1980’s to break the mainstream media’s stranglehold on information and commentary. Rush told Americans what was wrong and where it would lead. He called out politicians by name, a thing which previously had only been the province of mainstream media pundits and reporters. He awakened Americans to what was going on and rallied them to the party which claimed to support American founding ideals. There was then a time for such information to inform and educate the public of the truth of things. Limbaugh’s audience became massive as people thirsting for truth, ran to his trough of real information.

Prior to Limbaugh, we had only the few tepid views of “conservatism” which the liberal media would allow to be aired while literally everything else was wrapped in strong Leftist bias. That was more than thirty years ago. Today is a much different time. We now know beyond any reasonable doubt what is wrong. It’s time for solutions. It is “solutions” which are lacking, not analysis.

Back to congress and GOP majorities, what did the voters get for their votes? If one but looks at the record, one sees the Republican politicians don’t look much different from the Democrats in other than their talk. Literally no conservative legislation has been passed nor has any move toward a renewal of our founding principles taken place. The federal government’s control of the nation and citizenry has only increased enormously in both size and scope. Few areas of our lives are without federal scrutiny, with our personal data, even our physical location, available to them at a moment’s notice. In government, information is parceled out based on a “need to know”. Not so with our personal information. We have granted no “need to know” to the feds. They have simply usurped it.

In 2016 America elected Donald Trump and his “MAGA” agenda. People who opposed his bid called him a “populist”, a term used to describe a politician who intends to represent the will of the people within the confines of the US constitution. This separates the populist from the non-populist politicians who have no such intention. The GOP congress squashed Trump’s agenda, the voters’ agenda. With no support in any of his agenda items from congress, the president nonetheless managed to keep the United States out of the Paris Accord and its statutory assault on American sovereignty. His refusal of the Trans Pacific Partnership killed that attack on US sovereignty and industry as well. Americans, wanting the return to the nation’s roots, had seen president Trump as a vehicle for that return, passing over the usual GOP suspects in the primary. Completely ignoring that fact, the GOP congress went on to defeat both the president and their own voters.

So what is it that the pundits don’t get about all this? For all their powers of observation, for all their calls for “conservatism” and “patriotism”, for all their leads into the halls of power whence comes their information, what do they not understand about “solutions”? It’s as plain as day that “voting Republican” isn’t a solution. How can it be? After more than thirty years of results which clearly say otherwise, how can the GOP be the solution? Yet, if anything at all, that’s what the pundits preach or suggest if not straight forwardly.

Are the pundits blind to the fact that there has been no movement whatever away from those things which they decry? Are they ignorant as well of the fact that there has been no movement toward anything resembling founding ideals? Are they really motivated by turning the country around or are they only there for the money and the fame? Don’t they ever wonder why the GOP members of congress who appear to be honest don’t publicly call out those who demonstrably are not honest or dedicated to conservative policy? Why don’t the pundits call for those people to tell their voters how it is? Then, why aren’t our reps telling us “I really wanted XYZ bill introduced and passed, but the House Speaker said that ABCD Corp. and Joe Blow Elite opposed it and they spend $20 million a year with us, so no dice.” Voters do not get the information they need from members of congress. When one writes to their representative about a policy question, one only gets a bland, form statement and usually no response which directly addresses the question posed.

That pundits now need to offer solutions is not meant to say that analysis should be abandoned in favor of chasing remedies. Certainly, writers to NWV, among others, have provided valuable information on many aspects of life in the USA, notably recently on Covid, vaccination and a many things relating to the federal government’s ceaseless acquisition of more power over the private sector and individuals. There’s room for both – and we need both. We need for people to recognize that the GOP is not the answer we are looking for. It cannot be that answer, for if it was, our return would already be well underway. They seem to need a famous voice to tell them to form something new.

Our plight is hardly new, the realization that we are without effective representation no secret, a long-standing truth — yet our answer is to keep doing the same thing while the country descends into some dystopia? That’s redolent of a familiar definition of insanity. Bearing in mind that “hope” is not a strategy (thanks, Rush), isn’t it time for action instead? Isn’t it time to take a different action?

The naysayers are never absent, never on vacation, alert 24/7 to change and always ready to say “you can’t do that”, “It will never happen” or “you’re doomed to failure”. They’ll trot out any number of “reasons” to support their negativity, their “can’t do” spirit. I like to call such people “sessile”, a marine biology term meaning “attached to the bottom” or just “permanently attached” to a base. History usually proves such people, who are devoid of imagination and ignorant of that history, to be wrong, from those who insisted that the earth was flat to those who said the Colonies would never defeat England.

As our defeat of England illustrated, at the time the world’s greatest power, as we’ve seen time and again since in business and politics, you don’t even have to be especially good to win! However, to win, you must make the attempt. You’ve got to put yourself out there. You must also have a formula which will work when you do win. The patriots of 1776 put themselves out there and got lucky. They also had a winning formula following their unlikely victory.

It’s time to reject the Republican Party which has failed to work for its voters. Because its very structure permits our opposition to work within it, it will always fail for us. That they intend to represent us faithfully is merely a ruse which has played out for a long time. It’s also time for the pundits to tell GOP voters exactly what needs to be done, to explain this fact and how it can happen. They need to explain why the new party is needed and how it should be formed to prevent deviation from the goals conservatives agree must be achieved to put the United States back on a winning, totally sovereign track where the individual and individual prerogatives are once again free from excessive control by a federal machine. By all means, vote for Republicans while it’s being built, but be sure to build the new force!

C’mon Tucker, Levin, Hannity, Savage, Bongino, Ingraham and the rest of you guys! Start working on the solution! The GOP isn’t it. One of its own senators, Hawley, said as much. Then watch those who actually follow through suddenly get screams to stop from the neocons and the Left. Those Leftists/Laissez Faire types will suddenly begin to preach, in effect, “Save the GOP!” They know very well that a new party will completely destroy their ruse, their means of control…and there, friends, will be the last bit of proof of that Big Ruse which keeps us down.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Is The Fix In For Vice President Hillary Clinton?

By Jeffery Dover

January 20, 2023

Is this the eve of the “historic” “first” Black and Female president of the United States?

With all the “polling” which has taken place suggesting that few people want Biden to run for a second term it is likely that the Establishment wants him out of office. After all, the Establishment’s media pays for the polls, which by now we all know represent little other than a headline which the Establishment wanted out in the media. They pay for “polls” to deliver that headline, which usually seeks to answer a question which no one was asking anyway. That’s if, being media, you can believe that a poll was ever conducted. Given their other lies and distortions, what reason do we have to believe it? For that matter, how does one even reach someone to “poll” them these days, with all the cell phones, blocking, “Caller ID” and etc.?

At any rate, the media has been full of “go away Joe” stories now for months. That’s no accident, redolent of the Cold War days when, if one wanted an idea of what was happening behind the scenes in Moscow, one read Pravda. Those falling out of favor would usually first be scolded in that paper or on Vremya, the Soviet TV news station. Is our Establishment media prepping us slowly for a power shift?

Now “classified” documents have been found in unsecure places, ostensibly placed there by President Biden. Today, Attorney General Garland announced that he has appointed a “Special Prosecutor” – apparently a regular prosecutor won’t do – to investigate Biden for possession of these items.

The Dept. of Justice was notified of the documents found by Biden’s personal attorneys as they cleared out a former office used when Biden was Vice President.

Hold on…the president’s “personal attorneys” are blowing the whistle on him? The evidence found in a “former” office he used as Vice President? Has the office been vacant? Could those documents have been planted there for his personal attorneys to “discover”? Now his own Attorney General has appointed a “special prosecutor”? Something in this does not smell right at all, especially in view of the months of press and polls suggesting he’s on a banana peel for re-election.

Let’s say it all goes against Biden and he decides to resign his office. He’s old, he’ll be pardoned, he’s wealthy and now he can do whatever he likes. Kamala Harris then becomes the president. She has now to appoint a Vice President. Could it be that her choice might be Hillary Clinton?

A bet against a Hillary Clinton Vice President appointment would be a very dicey bet, especially given what we know of Clinton’s thirst for power and so much written about how the Clintons do things to get what they want, and then protect it. If that plays out pro forma, then it’s for sure that Clinton, not Harris, will run for president against whoever ends up being the GOP nominee in 2024.

As we saw in 2022, there are still substantial, serious problems with voting in US elections to the point where “mail-in balloting” is almost prima facia evidence of voter fraud. Then there are the internet-capable voting machines. Lastly, voting goes on for days, there’s ballot harvesting, and sketchy rules for voter ID depending on the state. Could a DeSantis or Trump candidate prevail against Clinton and the machine behind her? It would seem doubtful. A person with as little ability as Biden already “defeated” former president Trump.

It remains to be seen whether or not Biden will step down. Impeachment would seem unlikely, though perhaps it will be announced as a final inducement or face-saving excuse for him to bow out. At the very least, it seems clear that all is not what it seems to be in this. Democrats in power have little or no history of coming out against their own. But then, Washington, DC has in recent years become the center of the world for smoke and mirrors.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

RINO: What Does It Mean?

By Jeffery Dover

January 14, 2023

The short answer is that it means “GOP”. It means “Republican voters lose.” It means that the GOP has no intention of representing its voters. It means that given power, it will always find a way of making that power worthless to the voters.

We’ve just seen it played out yet once again. The House of Representatives had a clear opportunity to put a conservative in the position of Speaker.

But wait! What if that happened? Such a person might bring all sorts of embarrassing legislation up for a vote. They might well present bills to balance the budget or build the wall or maybe to repeal the most recent, 4,000-page, $1.7 Trillion “omnibus” spending bill meant to finish off our struggling economy. They might also suggest that government agency budgets be zero-based, presented for approval annually instead of getting automatic COLA increases every year. They might introduce a bill outlawing “mail-in” ballots or perhaps worst of all, attempt to change House rules disallowing riders to bills. What if they sought to make “executive orders” or “shutdowns” illegal? All sorts of things, unseemly to Big Wasteful Authoritarian Government, might be presented for a vote for all to see. The Establishment RINOs won’t permit any of that to happen. Their job is to “Protect and Expand” big government and its authority. They should wear blazers with “Protect and Expand” emblems sewed onto the breast. It’s better for them to have a Democrat take the Speaker seat. However, if a Republican must fill that position, it has to be a confirmed RINO…and that’s what we Americans got.

Let’s go back. G. H. W. Bush’s “read my lips — no new taxes” brought us eight years of Clintons. Whew! No chance of conservative action on the part of the GOP. All was well, until Newt Gingrich came along and brought the GOP a congressional majority. Ouch! Panic time! There was risk that they would have to perform! But not to worry, a Democrat president assured a veto of anything conservative, that is, any sensible, honest, egalitarian and proper legislation for the people and the nation. For his part, the apparently naive Gingrich, was later purged.

The year 2000 brought Republican George W. Bush to the White House. Putting his eight years in perspective, know that Bush calls Bill Clinton his “brother by another mother.”[1] Vengeful Democrats, still stinging from Clinton’s impeachment and the recent, narrow loss of the White House for Gore, planned impeachment for Bush (sound familiar?). However, 9/11 and the upsurge of support for Bush cancelled any thoughts of impeachment. For his part, Bush and his congress – mostly with a GOP majority – did nothing but further expand government and its powers with DHS and The Patriot Act. That was in addition to massive spending increases and the overheated economy leading up to the 2008 banking debacle. The porous border with Mexico remained porous. The activities of all the intelligence agencies were consolidated under the control of a single “Director of National intelligence”. That person alone controls what the White House and congress learn about what those agencies discover. That person decides what they learn — and what they do not learn.

Did the GOP candidates all campaign on more massive spending and expanding the size and scope of the federal government? Did they campaign on promising to concentrate even more power in Washington and in fewer hands?

Bush’s terms at an end, we got Obama. But how? How did this unknown senator from Illinois win the presidency over the well-known Republican senator John McCain? Perhaps it was because McCain was well known that Obama won. However, it seems more likely that McCain simply didn’t want the job. Perhaps the GOP didn’t want the job. Why not? National Healthcare Insurance had been a topic for a while. It was not a popular issue with GOP voters who saw it as financially ruinous, a system which would collapse under its own weight. Yet it seems the ruling Establishment wanted it, yet another way to take down the US, moving it toward Great Reset goals. Solution? Let the Democrats bring it (while the GOP pretends to oppose it). In that way, the party could continue to pretend that it stood with its voters, knowing the Democrat majority would win the day.

In any case, McCain waged a very lackluster campaign, refusing to take Obama and his party to task for their history of waste and dysfunction, claiming that he was afraid he would appear to be “racist”. That was a pretty shallow defense, especially given that it was a US presidential campaign. Even if people actually believed that attacking a political opponent during a campaign based on factual circumstances constituted “racism”, did McCain think that he would be alienating a huge part of the Republican voting base? Absurd! Obama got ninety-five percent of the Black vote in 2008.[2]Certainly, the GOP would have anticipated that.[2] Obama took the presidency in 2008 along with a Democrat congressional majority. In March of 2010, they passed the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare).

The 2010 mid-term election brought a GOP majority in the House which remained through Obama’s presidency. The GOP also controlled the senate for Obama’s last two years. They denied him nothing and stood by as Obama’s administration further ripped up the Middle East by destabilizing the governments of Libya, Syria and Egypt, fomenting more war, death, mass emigrations and spending approved by the GOP House, that body led by its RINO Speaker, John Boehner. Ditto Ryan, who succeeded Boehner, and the GOP senate’s McConnell.

In the 2012 presidential election, Mitt Romney ran as the GOP candidate. Just as bad as McCain’s campaign, Romney made little of all of Obama’s many faults as a president. Following his defeat, his son Tagg said that Romney never wanted the office, that he would have been thrilled if someone else had won the nomination.[3] That begs the question, again, did the GOP want to win? Romney must have told them that he didn’t want the office. Why else would he have waged a campaign when he could simply have stepped down and let another win it? It would seem that the GOP thought that another would win it, so threw support to Romney or simply recruited him to lose. Lose he did.

All the spending, all the non-essential warring and 9/11 itself, followed by successive GOP campaign failures which looked almost purposeful, cast deep suspicion on the GOP. Who is running it? How can it do the things it is doing and the things it is not doing? Then Donald Trump.

A sensible voting public, now skeptical of GOP political figures, grew increasingly enthusiastic about electing Donald Trump. He told us that Obama’s “managed decline” – a Great Reset goal for the USA – had to stop and that there was no reason for it in the first place. He substantiated what the people what they knew to be true about the media and how they lie about, distort and invent “news”. In short, Trump went against every Great Reset goal which had been put in place for more than thirty years by the “permanent ruling class” – career politicians and the Deep State leadership the rulers empowered. Big influential corporations were put on notice that they needed to repatriate their manufacturing and sourcing to the USA, that jobs were being lost to China and numerous other foreign countries with cheap and even slave labor. His rallies drew tens of thousands of people.

Trump went on to a landslide victory, although the dour Hillary Clinton claimed that she had won the “popular vote”, a specious claim seeing as her rallies drew many thousands fewer than Trump’s tens of thousands. According to The Gateway Pundit,[4] only a dozen of her rallies drew more than 1,000 people…yet she claimed that she won the “popular vote”. (Where did those votes come from? An underestimated amount of the necessary fraud prior to 2020 when they finally got the fraud right?).

Understanding that the RNC did not want Trump as the candidate, giving him scanty support even following his primary victory, did they care if Hillary Clinton won? Was Ted Cruz the stuff to beat Hillary Clinton? Carly Fiorina? Would Cruz have drawn tens of thousands to rallies? With the GOP voters so jazzed about Trump, why wasn’t the GOP just as jazzed? The obvious answer is that the GOP and its voters have very different ideas about how they want the nation governed. It looked as if the GOP would have been just as happy with a Hillary Clinton victory. Why would the Party be totally behind Romney, a bland candidate who excited no one, but shun a candidate like Trump?

The “why” appears to be what seemed to happening all along. They were fearful of having a congressional majority and a president ready to sign conservative legislation. It’s all well and good to be the majority for Republicans as long as there is a Democrat in the White House. The problem for them is that when they have both congress and the presidency, now they have to perform. The pressure is on them to prove to their voters that they stand for what they claim to stand for. However, as we saw and are seeing at present, “performing” is not what they want.

With Trump in office, they had a president ready to repeal Obamacare and secure the border. He also wanted to end DACA and the visa lottery. He wanted out of the Middle East. He wanted smaller government, curtailed spending and he wouldn’t stop attacking the fake news Establishment. His MAGA and “America First” were totally anti-globalist, anti-Great Reset. At one point he said that NATO was obsolete, which it is. Of course, the media and some Republicans claimed those things were “isolationism”. Nonsense. Because one focuses on one’s own nation and people in no way excludes bilateral relations with other nations.

As he settled into his office, his party and its members of congress denied him everything. He and his voters got nothing. Establishment forces accused him of all kinds of things he never did and never was, impeached him, and went against him in every way. He beat them all. That is, until January 6, 2021. That’s when the GOP permanent ruling class put the final nail into the coffin of his presidency, handing us Biden/Harris.

There had been reason to believe on many counts that the election was fraudulent. Much as it had been in 2016 for Clinton’s campaign, it was for Biden with few turning out for his rallies compared to Trump’s many thousands. Mere appearances aside, Trump and others had much real evidence. Following the election, Trump took his evidence to three different courts where the suits were thrown out, without the evidence ever having been presented and examined in court.

When Pence certified the vote despite his own president’s evidence, a president of his own party, Pence sidestepped the evidence, handing the office to Biden. In doing so, he claimed that it was his thinking that the Founders wouldn’t have wanted a president decided this way. With that rationale given for ignoring evidence of voter fraud, he was pre-empting the Supreme Court. Determining what the Founders would have wanted is the job of the Supreme Court, not the vice president.

Had Pence sent the votes back to the states, as in 2000 the Democrats would have filed suit. It would have gone to the Supreme Court, which would finally and necessarily have had to examine Trump’s evidence of massive voter fraud. The GOP’s ruling class power in this situation – Pence, McConnell, McCarthy, probably in league with Pelosi and Schumer[5], couldn’t take that risk. Hence, the certification, taking the Supreme Court out of the equation.

What it all seems to add up to is this: The GOP itself is a fraud. That is, that it is their job to derail us, the conservatives, the sensible. Their mission is to blunt the power of our numbers, or at least, that is what they have steadfastly done. Are they just inept? Is it mere “coincidence”? They pretend that they stand for the things we want, our vision for the country, for our lives, for individual responsibility and so forth. Yet it’s obvious at this point that their actions as a party say otherwise. Where their voters want to go is not where they intend to take us, as a nation.

Things were ok for the GOP earlier in the new century. The people believed. They swallowed 9/11. They increasingly voted Republican, expecting great things which never materialized. With what happened during Trump’s presidency and the light it shed on the ruse — the falsehood that they represent conservative interests — it’s not difficult to believe that the GOP now had to find a way to defeat the majorities they were getting. It was getting too hot for them.

View this in the context of the Great Reset/New World Order where the USA has to change. It must be made ready for international rule. Yet sensible voters, the sort who supported Trump, “MAGA” and “America First”, are the majority. Those voters would never support such a goal away from our founding principles, nor could such a goal be stated by elected members of government. Thus, for the powers driving toward that Reset to continue on their path, the power of that majority must be denied, as we have seen it denied. But those powers must also retain enough credibility to prevent the people from abandoning them, creating another party to actually represent them. In order to lose the power, the power threatening to end their drive toward Reset goals, it seems that voter fraud in both 2020 and 2022 was their chosen route.

Senator Josh Hawley seems to understand and perhaps wants something different. Could that something be a political fighting force for the American people? On November 12, 2022, following the mid-term election, Hawley tweeted “The old party is dead. Time to bury it. Build something new.” Build something new, for sure. Would rather he had included “build something true.”

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Footnotes:

[1] https://time.com/3584031/george-bush-bill-clinton/
[2] https://news.jrn.msu.edu/2012/10/obama-and-the-african-american-vote-changes-since-2008/3
[3] https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/12/mitt-romney-didnt-want-to-be-president-son-claims
[4] https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/no-joke-hillary-rarely-has-more-than-1000-at-her-events/
[5] https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pence-pelosi-share-elbow-bump-following-biden-certification-vote

What’s the Point of the GOP?

By Jeffery Dover

January 10, 2023

It begins with our expectations. When we cast a vote for a representative of some office, we vote with an expectation that the person, if elected, will follow through with what they told us they would do if elected. However, as often as not, we’ve been disappointed in that regard. Perhaps even more often than not…

Looking back to the source, we go to the party to which the candidate belongs. What does the party stand for? Is it stated, explicitly anywhere to be seen when one searches the party? GOP.com, the Republican Party website, has no statement of what the party stands for nor is there any prospective legislative or policy agenda. GOP.gov, the House Republicans website, has some bland headlines about making the economy stronger, making the nation “safe”, making sure freedom is in the future and “accountable” government under the heading “Our Commitment to America”. Under “Issues” we find a list of the stock complaints directed at Biden – as if Biden was single-handedly responsible for where the nation and Americans find themselves today. Eyeroll. Yawn.

Donald Trump’s 2016 election, for which a case can be made that it was a proxy “third party” victory, proved that conservatives, that is, common sense Americans, are the majority. He won election not because of, but in spite of the GOP. Americans were beginning, if slowly, to wake up to the fact that “winning” is not filling congressional seats and the White House with Republicans. “Winning” is only getting the passed legislation and policies that the people and the nation want and need to keep the promise of America’s founding principles and greatness intact and vibrant. Successive GOP majorities had failed to provide those things. President Trump had made clear what he stood for and, to the extent that it was possible for a totally beleaguered president to do so without any support from his own party’s congressional majority, he delivered on those things.

So why have a party? If a party is not a collection of people dedicated to a political purpose or purposes with the intent of seeing them brought to fruition, what is the point of the organization? The Democrats in congress present a formidable fighting force for their agenda, whatever it is. Republican voters on the other hand, have no fighting force. They have an effete “talking” force, which talks, postures and grandstands about things they believe that their voters want to hear – only. In the past twenty-two years, Republicans have held the White House for 12 years. They have had house majorities for 12 years and senate majorities for 10 years. Not a single piece of conservative legislation has been passed during that time. None of the watery ideals the GOP.gov website speaks of were realized. None are stated goals.

If a country fields an army and goes into combat, what happens when some of its soldiers begin firing on their own side? Rhetorical question. What happened with full repeal of Obamacare, which all Republican candidates stated that they supported during their campaigns? It failed when three GOP senators voted with the Democrats to keep it. In doing so, the three people, turning their fire on their own side, went against approximately 38.8 million GOP voters. 38.8 million people who wanted the “Affordable Care Act” abolished and who voted with the GOP to make it happen, electing a president ready to sign the repeal, were taken down – by three people, senators Collins, McCain and Murkowski. Both women remain in office as Republicans.

That history, by no means the only such act by GOP members of congress, begs the question, “What does the GOP really stand for?” A valid follow-up question is “What difference would it make if they did claim to stand for a principle or an agenda item?” If two or three members of congress as nominal “Republicans” can undo the larger party’s entire agenda, then what difference does “party” make? When those in the earlier army example fire on their own side, they are removed. The party, as a fighting force for the peoples’ will, should have immediately announced and maintained “We no longer want you in office as Republicans. We will primary you when you are up for re-election.” They did nothing of the kind. These senators with party leadership support have been re-elected, outstanding examples of Republicans! Obvious explanation: the GOP wanted the repeal measure defeated.

GOP voters have no fighting force in their corner. They have only talk. They have only the illusion of a fighting force. In 2017, Republicans could have funded a wall, not for just 200 miles, but for the entire US/Mexico border. They refused. Yet an “issue” on the House website is called the “border crisis”. It’s not a crisis. It’s a plan! What else could it be? When you pay for a hole to be dug in your back yard, you hand a worker the shovel and you pay him for the job, but no hole is dug, is it an accident? Like the hole not dug, the wall not being funded and built wasn’t because the American voters didn’t want it done. It was because “others” didn’t want it done. So what do GOP party “issues” and “commitments” mean? Mightn’t they also commit to “free ice cream and cake for all”?

GOP voters are seeing their legislative and policy wants and needs totally rejected. In the mid-1800’s there were two political parties. They were the Democrat and Whig parties. Whig voters were disgusted with slavery and wanted it abolished. However, the Whig leadership opposed abolition. Like today’s GOP, they pretty much told their voters to go “pound sand”. Unafraid in those formative days to “think outside the box”, the former Whig voters banded together to found the abolitionist Republican Party. By 1860 they had their man, Abraham Lincoln in the White House. Slavery was abolished and the Whig Party disappeared. It’s been the GOP and Democrats ever since.

Today it appears that the Whig Party is reborn as the GOP with the party refusing to deliver on their voters’ policy wishes. Following the 2022 midterm election, GOP senator Josh Hawley tweeted : ”The old party is dead. Time to bury it. Build something new.” Without going into all the things which need to be done which the GOP doesn’t even mention, isn’t it time for today’s conservatives to “think outside the box”, a very effective box constructed by those whose intention it is to rule, and continue to rule as they wish while the voters “pound sand”? Isn’t it time to build a new party, a party which is designed from the ground up to be a true fighting force for those things its voters want? Isn’t it time to create a new organization which will not tolerate or hold in good standing any of its delegates to US congress or the White House who go against the party’s clearly defined platform and legislative agenda? Isn’t it time for a party which proudly states what it stands for in explicit terms and which posts a comprehensive legislative agenda on its website for all to see? Isn’t it time for that party to demand that any who run for office under its aegis swear to never deviate from the agenda else be summarily expelled from the party?

If a “party” isn’t a legislative fighting force, then it’s useless to the people. Where the people are concerned, it has no reason to exist. As thing stand, in other than mainstream media journalistic lore, there is no “aisle”. If the common-sense Americans want to truly have a voice, they will have to think outside the box and create the vehicle to carry and execute the will of that voice. At present, such a vehicle does not exist for Republican voters.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

What’s the Point of the GOP?

By Jeffery Dover

January 7, 2023

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Put Events Into Context

By Jeffery Dover

January 4, 2023

Many events in the life of the USA, major events, seem to be isolated. That is, isolated in that they are the result of one particular cause which ends there. But are they? Could they all be related?

First, a note about “conspiracy”. We’re all familiar with the pejorative “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist”, which holds that people who consider or abide with such beliefs are somehow defective in their reasoning or other mentality.

Very much to the contrary, the history of the world in the halls of great power, is literally written in “conspiracy”. So, whether the assassination of Julius Caesar, Mary Queen of Scots and her plots, Lincoln’s assassination, plots against Hitler, Hitler’s plots against others, Sergei Kirov or JFK/RFK, MLK or so many in between and as far back as history goes, it’s difficult to count them. When there’s reason by way of evidence to believe that official explanations don’t measure up, it’s absolutely correct and sensible to suspect a conspiracy. “Conspiracy” is endemic to power.

We’ve been hearing talk of a “Great Reset” in recent months. What is it? Generally speaking, it’s an agenda to create a world of fascist states. The idea is to begin with the large, powerful developed nations – USA, EU and etc. – linking their governments with monolithic, monopolistic businesses. It also means a totalitarian government. Distinguished scholar, Michael Rechtenwald begins his excellent article describing the “reset” with this: “Is the Great Reset a conspiracy theory imagining a vast left-wing plot to establish a totalitarian one-world government? No. Despite the fact that some people may have spun conspiracy theories based on it—with some reason,(my italics) as we will see—the Great Reset is real.” (https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/what-is-the-great-reset/)

He seems to be a bit smug, however, about “conspiracy” when he claims that it isn’t about a one-world government and that there’s only “some reason”, perhaps, to suspect a conspiracy. When one reads what Schwab plans, it’s difficult to imagine that it could work unless under a single governing body or perhaps two or three of them. Perhaps Rechtenwald’s reticence in that regard is a nod to other “intellectuals” who must peremptorily deny “conspiracy” else forfeit tenure or chances of obtaining it in their strictly parochial ivory towers.

Though recently coined as “the Great Reset” in World Economic Forum chairman Klaus Schwab’s book “COVID-19: The Great Reset”, Rechtenwald says the idea really goes back to 1971 with a book Schwab published then. Schwab’s ideas are based on what he sees as the failure of the capitalist system.

As for “conspiracy”, whereas most Americans would certainly reject Schwab’s ideas, we seem definitely headed in the direction of those ideas. How can that be, when government of the people, by the people and for the people brooks the peoples’ policy wishes? It then becomes clear that our government is no longer accountable to the people. Agencies with their own, unstated agendas use the powers given to them to affect the election of the president, members of congress and perhaps governors as well. They do these things unhindered by courts or congress, merely subjected occasionally to congressional “investigations” or “inquiries”. Huge industries are linked to the military. Big Pharma is heavily linked to the FDA and HHS, the agencies themselves populated with employees who hail from those big businesses. There’s no large, American industry which is not heavily involved with some federal agency or other. Such a setup is definitely fascist, especially when that linkage is used to keep would-be competitors out of the business. As noted previously, fascism is a Great Reset goal.

Subpoenaed by members of US congress – the peoples’ representatives – the agencies stonewall, redact, classify or simply fail to comply with the subpoena. That behavior has been observed in the federal government as well as in at least one state, Arizona, when the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors ignored a subpoena by the Arizona senate to hand over all the voting machines for a forensic audit following the 2020 election. Months later, given plenty of time to “remedy” any fault in the machines, they eventually complied. As of this writing, challenges to the 2022 election in Arizona have been thrown out for both filing too early and filing too late – obvious judicial activism designed to make any challenge to elections next to impossible.[1] Note to the people: do not question us or our actions.

These are the hallmarks of an increasingly authoritarian government unaccountable to the electorate. Authoritarian government is a Great Reset goal.

But what about “conspiracy”? What about the “Reset”? President Trump was all about “Make America Great Again”. He was about “America First”. Neither is the stuff of globalism, socialism, monopolies or any sense of ceding American sovereignty to an international body. Prior to defeating the other fifteen hopefuls in the 2016 primary, the (Establishment) RNC tried several times to get him to quit the campaign. Later we learned that the FBI was involved in actively trying to destroy his campaign or to at least boost the Clinton campaign. Failed presidential candidate, Republican senator John McCain was the courier for the “pee pee dossier”, a total fabrication designed to damage the president’s campaign. Then there was “Russian Collusion”, which also proved to be false. Who dreamed that up? The CIA? What else do they do? We knew decades ago that they are very much involved with the mainstream media. (See the documentary “The Man No One Knew”, a biography of former Director of Central Intelligence, William Colby. In it you can see him as much as admitting their press linkage to the Church Committee investigating the CIA) Do these events not smell of “conspiracy”? It was certainly not “coincidence”. It was certainly not “one person acting alone”. There was a powerful force using its powers to deny American voters.

We know the rest of what the president and the nation endured with impeachment and non-stop assaults on the president in the US and international press. The GOP lost the majority in 2018, but then, what did it really matter, except that now the field was clear to impeach the president on false charges? When they had the majority, the GOP refused to fund a border wall, sealing our southern border. Neither would they repeal Obamacare, though pretty much all of them had campaigned on seeing that done. All they did was spend and spend some more. Ultimately, they ousted the president in 2020. Voter fraud, evidence of which no court would examine, is certainly the result of “conspiracy”. The repetitive refusal of judges to hear or examine such evidence further leads to such a conclusion. Technical Schmecknical: if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck… Any way one looks at it, one thing is obvious: A powerful anti-globalist, anti-socialist, anti-reset figure was deposed as a result. More than two years later they are still trying to destroy him. It fits in nicely with the goals of the Great Reset. Leaders with Trump’s vision are anathema to Great Reset goals…wherever such leaders may be found.

But what about long before Trump? What about 9/11? Did 9/11 help with reset goals? Seems to be so. As a result, the unpatriotic “Patriot Act” was enacted, giving great new powers to the feds. The Department of Homeland Security was also formed, with its TSA who make air travel a nightmare for those without their own jet. Mediocre minds in uniform yell at, insult, shuffle and herd innocent American citizens by the millions. For their part, citizens are afraid to make any comment of such behavior lest they be hauled in for more “scrutiny”, possibly missing their flight or worse, being arrested. Yet just as the Catholic Church centuries ago would absolve you of all your sins with the purchase of one of their “indulgences”, American citizens can be absolved of any possibility of ever becoming an airline terrorist by paying the feds $100 or so annually. In view of that, the value of all those little Hitlers in uniform is, what? But then the Dept. of Transportation is telling the airlines how many seats that they must have on their planes, caring not at all for the comfort of passengers. Inching closer to totalitarian government, away from free enterprise, in the name of “climate change”. Another Reset goal.

These outcomes were minor in comparison to the 20 years of war in the Middle East. It was war, sold to Americans as “The War On Terror”, where no vital US national interests were threatened. There were no WMD’s discovered. There was no winning. These are features held in common with the nearly 20 years of warring in Vietnam. Millions were killed, innocents and combatants. The landscapes of the nations involved laid waste, spurring mass migrations to the EU. Billions of dollars went to defense industry coffers.

The EU, already very socialistic, its member nations already having ceded much of their sovereignty to Brussels bureaucrats, saw an influx of another culture entirely. It weakened and continues to weaken the indigenous cultures, making governance more and more difficult. The United States has such a situation here as well, though war was only partially required. Following the Vietnam conflict, there were thousands of immigrants from there as well as Laos and Cambodia. With both parties in tacit agreement to keep our southern border open (c’mon…if they truly wanted it secure, it would have happened decades ago!) indigent, criminal and many other thousands of illegals have done the same thing to the US cultural scene as has happened in the EU.

With 9/11, reset goals of population reduction, increased government power over people, concentration of money in large businesses and the elites who own them, and social unrest which will eventually lead to even more government control, were achieved. In the process, those chosen by the governments were made even wealthier. [2]

Where was the conspiracy? 9/11 was the conspiracy! It’s not possible, unless by sheer will alone, to continue to believe that the towers fell because of the planes. Neither is it possible to believe that a jetliner, with transponder turned off, could penetrate Washington, DC airspace unchallenged. There are too many film documentaries with so many credible, named and on-the-record professionals of every stripe, as well as first responders, who totally debunk the official explanation. [3], [4]

Interestingly, globalist ally John Brennan was CIA Chief of Station in Saudi Arabia at the time. Robert Mueller of recent fame was Director of the FBI. Were the jihadis recruited by CIA? Did the CIA find out about the plot, allow it to happen and then seed the buildings to make it so much more than it would ever have been? According to witnesses, it was a drone which hit the pentagon, not a jetliner in United Airlines livery. The witnesses stated that it struck away from the “official” site of destruction. Survivors said the destruction we all saw outside was from a bomb exploding inside, not from without. No suitcases, seats or evidence of jetliner engine nacelles were found at the scene. But there’s so much more…

The point is that everything which devolved from that day served and continues to serve Great Reset goals. Mere coincidence?

Now there’s Ukraine. War against Ukraine is being perpetrated by Putin! No…that’s what the mainstream media and DC politicians want you to think. The truth is that Russia is waging the war. Its president is Vladimir Putin, but he is answerable to a Duma of 450 members and a senate of 169 members. They have the power to unseat him. However, their president, Putin, looks to be Russia’s Trump. Putin is “MRGA” and “Russia First”. He is no globalist and has no plans to cede Russian sovereignty to any international authority. Thus, Putin heading a major nuclear power, is getting the “Trump” treatment. They vilify the man in any way they can think of, most of which are simply lies. They criticize him for his relations with “oligarchs”. Did they criticize Obama for his relations with “oligarchs” such as Gates, Soros, Bloomberg and others? Are they somehow not “oligarchs”? Ultimately, with the Establishment press unified in seeking the ouster of non-globalist Putin, they seek to make western involvement in his ouster acceptable to the public.

US Congress is also working hard on that anti-Russian stance. In a recent visit which Establishment propaganda icon, CNN, termed “historic”, Ukraine’s president Zelensky, presented congress with a battle-scarred flag of Ukraine. During the obviously staged presentation, Pelosi had an American flag on hand to give to Zelensky.

Members of congress ostensibly represent their voters. However, their actions tell us that they are representing others. Does anyone recall members of congress campaigning on money and arms for Ukraine? More than $40 billion dollars gets us a flag, but not much else where American citizens are concerned. Someone, however, is getting $40 billion worth. Who? And for what?

Ukraine is widely accused of being a center of money laundering activity. There are also bio-weapons labs there. Of course, fact checkers and Establishment-owned media like USA Today, have “investigated” and told readers it’s not true, that we have no bio labs in Ukraine. However, one can search C-Span and watch/listen to Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland telling Senator Marco Rubio, under oath, that they do exist and that they are worried that Russia will get them.[5] They say that research on dangerous pathogens is happening there, but only for “peaceful purposes”. Like what? And why would we pay for labs for “peaceful” research in Ukraine? If so, why would anyone worry that Russia might get them? It seems logical to assume therefore that the pathogens have been created, and that is what has made them dangerous, that they are indeed insidious weapons. In that context, it makes sense that they would worry about someone else getting them – and exposing what they are. May they be part of the Great Reset depopulation agenda? Or are they merely the next contagion to enrich Big Pharma’s coffers while killing off a measure of the world’s population? Bombs don’t spread. Viruses, released, go everywhere. Everyone becomes a target as we saw plainly with Covid. The depopulation effect is then “global”.

Lastly for this article is Covid-19. Recent documents obtained by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas presented here in NWV in a recent Devvy Kidd article, shows that EcoHealth Alliance caused development of the virus in Wuhan with the knowledge and assent of NIH/NIAID and others in US government.[6]

What is the point of developing viruses lethal to humans? Apparently such work is in progress in Ukraine. It certainly happened in Wuhan. Can one then believe that “release” was “accidental”? What is the point of such development if not to deploy the virus? Does one just save such a pathogen for a “rainy day”? And why the need for so many, as continuing research suggests? Is it insurance as it were, against the original virus mutating into less lethal forms, such that they will always have new lethal strains to release?

In terms of Great Reset, Schwab himself said that the government shutdowns in response to the virus aided the Reset in ways they hadn’t imagined, by killing off so many small businesses. What about all the deaths? What about the phony “cures” with the government bureaus denying the effective low-cost cures while mandating the deadly, kidney-destroying Remdesivir/respirator regimen? What about all the loved ones denied access to those “receiving care”? Why all the funds to hospitals for covid death certification and additionally, for “positive” results of PCR tests? Why all the orchestrated censorship around the truth of covid and everything related to its origins, deaths, and perhaps worst of all, the phony “vaccines” and all their continuing adverse effects? ALL served Great Reset goals.

But don’t connect the dots. Don’t look at those people behind the curtain…

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Footnotes:

[1] Mark Finchem, Arizona House of Representatives District 11, email 12/31/22
[2] study-shows-wealthy-americans-and-businesses-control-politics-and-policy
[3] SF_Tesla_Society_March_9_2014_Presentation_PPT.pdf
[4] 9/11-Anatomy of a Great Deception
[5] Senator Rubio-questions-undersecretary-nuland-biolabs-Ukraine
[6] JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf

If It Doesn’t Make Sense, It’s Probably Not True: Ukraine

By Jeffery Dover

December 21, 2022

Judge Judith Sheindlin of TV court fame frequently advises her court and her viewers that “If it doesn’t make sense, it’s probably not true”. In our present world of pervasive propaganda and hidden agendas, that’s a wise phrase to keep in mind.

For a decade or more, the US media public has been inundated with invective directed at the fledgling state of Russia. “Fledgling” because although it’s been around for centuries, Russia has shed the wastrel, civilly abusive structure which was the USSR. It’s been reborn as a democratic republic with private property ownership in a capitalist economic setup. Although, according to the World Bank, the Russian Federation ranks 11^th among the world’s strongest economies, it is still a long way from settling into its new role. It is still in development.

We Americans are told that Russia meddles in our elections. Let’s see if that makes sense. Can it be that Russia’s intelligence organs believe that they can meddle in US elections and that the USA will not discover what they are doing? Does that make sense? Let’s look for a motive. What does Russia gain by meddling in US elections? Who have they wanted to win and what would they then gain if that person won the election? There doesn’t seem to be any reporting on that aspect of Russian meddling. There seems only to be the allegation that they do so.

Ranking a distant eleventh in GDP, Russia needs trade to grow and solidify its new structure, bringing prosperity to its people and the promise of more for their progeny. Does it make sense that they would seek to promote those things by antagonizing the Number One economy, the USA – or five of the others in the top ten, UK, France, Germany, Italy and Canada? Would they not instead seek to build strong trade relationships with these nations rather than antagonize them? Purposely antagonizing them doesn’t make sense.

It’s been reported and suggested many times in many places that Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, is “crazy” or “insane”. Crazy people are found doing things such as walking down the middle of an urban interstate during rush hour, cutting off an ear and mailing it to a girlfriend or eating dirt. Putin clearly isn’t crazy nor is he irrational. Moreover, if he was, his people would certainly have removed him by now. He is strong, but he is not omnipotent. He must answer to and/or satisfy the Russian Federal Assembly which can appoint or remove a president. Given that power, does it make sense that the Assembly’s 450 Duma members and 169 senators would tolerate a “crazy” person as the head of state? It’s probably not true that Putin is crazy.

The history of Ukraine is the history of Russia. The history of Russia is the history of Ukraine – until the breakup of the USSR in 1991. Russia as a nation was founded in Kiev centuries ago as “Kievan Rus”. The languages of the two are similar, though with differences. Most Ukrainians speak Russian, enough so that in 2012 Ukraine found it necessary to make Ukrainian the official language. Even so, the president refused to sign the law.

Many in Ukraine seek and desire reunification with Russia. Enough so that deposed president Yanukovych wanted (and living in Russia, still wants) a referendum on reunification. Largely because of his affinity for Russia and reunification, he was deposed in what is termed a “civil war” in 2014, though it more resembled a coup d’etat. Snipers posing as his supporters, shooting from hotel windows, murdered 50 people in Maidan Sq. It was a false flag attack by Yanukovych opposition designed to defame him. It’s said that it was the CIA and MI6 who set up the coup d’etat, replacing Yanukovych with a succession of puppet presidents, the most recent being Zelensky.

What makes Ukraine so dear to the USA and UK that the CIA and the British equivalent, MI6 would get involved in keeping it separate from Russia? In 2014 the Brookings Institution said that Americans should support them for their willingness to support them in non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and for preventing sale of necessary components for nuclear power to Iran. That seems a bit thin. It’s widely reported that Ukraine is a center for laundering dirty money from the USA. It’s also known to have biological weapon labs, according to a Bulgarian investigative journalist writing that the US paid to have them set up in Ukraine and Georgia. Why would Ukraine be interested in the creation of biological weapons? The usual Establishment media suspects were quick to label this a “conspiracy theory” – but anyone who has studied world history knows that in the halls of great power, history is literally written in “conspiracy”. “Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland later admitted under oath in a congressional hearing that there were in fact 20 to 30 bio labs in and around Ukraine.”

It’s also known that the US ruling Establishment seeks the ouster of Putin as Russian president, hence all the vilification of the man and his country, conditioning Americans to accept that he’s “evil” and that it’s proper if he’s deposed. RINO senator Graham went as far as to call for his murder. As a part of that effort, the CIA has been working on destabilization of Putin and his regime based in Ukraine. That would be handy because of its border with Russia and its population of Russian-speaking persons who could be sent to foment unrest in Russia, appearing to be Russians.

In January of 2022, there was a coup d’etat attempt launched in another Russian border country, Kazakhstan. It failed. Its president said that the coup was engineered by the CIA. Do we Americans suppose that Russian and Kazakh intelligence agencies do not know who is working against them? Does it make sense that they would not know and further, that by declaring the USA behind the coup, Kazakhstan would gratuitously create a rift with such a powerful nation? It doesn’t make sense in either case. It’s probably true that the CIA was behind it.

Not long after the Kazakhstan affair, Russia invaded Ukraine. Why? Why would they seek to alienate the people who they hope will become Russian citizens? What could compel them to destroy infrastructure in a country which they wish to become a part of their own, infrastructure which they would then have to expend billions to rebuild? Wouldn’t that necessarily have to have been a desperate solution to some problem – unless of course Russia’s president and all his Federation Council are crazy and insane. Because we’ve rejected the latter as unlikely, might it be sensible to believe that it may have been a defensive act of self-preservation, seeking to repel the forces working to destabilize the Russian government? Could the Kazakhstan action, in addition to what had been going on in Ukraine, have brought them to the conclusion that the only way to stop those seeking their downfall was to take offensive action? That makes sense. Otherwise, not much does make sense.

What has Russia done to make it such a pariah to western democratic governments? How about the New World Order? This is the term used for the establishment of a global, one-world government. The western democracies – no longer so “democratic” – are led by an Establishment which is driving the various nations in that direction, ceding sovereignty by bits using vehicles such as “climate change”, racism, inflation and dilution of native populations by those arriving illegally who won’t assimilate, as prime movers.

Consider that president Trump opposed those globalist, NWO forces. “Make American Great Again” and “America First” were decidedly and pointedly in opposition to one-world government. For that, he was denied by his own Republican congress, slandered in the media on a daily basis, impeached, investigated and later dumped by both parties and his vice president. Some of the nonsense he – and we — endured were the falsehoods of “Russian collusion” and “the Pee Pee Dossier” – both alleged to have been involved in different ways with Russia. Then we learned in the involvement of the FBI in attempting to prevent his candidacy from succeeding after the GOP powers first tried to prevent his run. It’s interesting that Russia would be chosen link by the conspirators.

Putin has experienced much the same treatment in the media, in addition to the actions being waged against his government. Putin and his Russia also oppose the New World Order. They have no intention of ceding Russian sovereignty to an international ruling body.

Why is Russia so important to the NWO? It’s speculation, but let’s try this: for the NWO’s plans of world domination to work, all the major nuclear powers would need to be in accord with the plan. The ruling Establishment of the USA and EU – with UK and France also nuclear powers – are aboard. To leave Russia out would provide a haven for other, less powerful nations which might also wish to avoid NWO domination. To attempt to bring them in forcibly would be to risk nuclear war, at which point, with no winners, there’s no longer any point to a new world order because few if any nations would remain. Thus, to avoid that situation with Russia, regime change is the chosen path to bring about the ultimate agreement of Russia with the NWO.

Whatever the ultimate goals of the western ruling Establishment and the NWO or Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum and the “Great Reset” as he styles it following the Covid attacks on the world, the reasons which we are given for Russia being a bad actor and the constant din to that effect, seem to make little sense except in a context akin to some similar global plan and rationale. As usual these powers and the elites behind them depend on the lies and propaganda of the media which they own.

For “NewsWithViews” readers, the ultimate concern is whither the USA? How does all of this affect the people of the United States? For what reasons are we to believe that Ukraine is worth billions of dollars of our money when the same powers sending it there refused to spend $5.7 billion to build a wall along our southern border? When Russia has no intention of invading Europe and could neither financially support nor win a war against them if it wanted to, let alone with the USA involved, why is NATO rattling its sword? For that matter, why does NATO still continue to exist? How does the US citizen benefit from that alliance? Is it only to “justify”, by token NATO participation, US military adventures as we go around the world destabilizing governments?

The anti-Russia narratives thrive on a public perception of the old USSR, Reagan’s “evil empire”, which was indeed an aggressive enemy of western capitalist democracies. For the past thirty-one years however, they have themselves been a capitalist democracy, not seeking world domination or domination of Europe, but trying to build their own nation to be better for its people than was ever possible as a communist country.

It’s time for Americans to see Russia in a different light. No, it’s not a population of saints – nor is that of any nation. However, neither is it the ogre which the New World Order forces of the USA, EU, British Crown and NATO make it appear to be. Far from it, Vladimir Putin appears to be like the Russian Trump, fighting for his nation’s sovereignty and right to self-rule, as Trump did for the United States. Trump paid the price for that opposition to the globalists. Will Putin succeed for Russia? It remains to be seen. However, so much that is said and reported in this dispute just doesn’t make sense, and as such, is probably not true. Learn about the New World Order, then connect the dots.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jeffd1815@gmail.com

Important Links

Think “Right” For Freedom

By Jeffery Dover

December 13, 2022

Surely the readers of NewsWithViews are aware of the way the terms “political Right” and “political Left” are used. Ditto “right wing”, “left wing”. Where do they come from? The use, or rather, the overuse of these terms in political discourse is crafted to create illusions, not to clarify anything. Americans have been taught to think of Hitler and Nazis when they are confronted with “far right”. What about “far left”? We’re conditioned to think instead of disparate small groups of some sort of zealot, but not any existing nation or authority. “Left” in general, connotes “caring about people” as we have been conditioned to believe.

The way the two are positioned means that if you are a “far right winger” you cannot also be a “far left winger”. How convenient if also obvious. That means, in turn, that those with whom the press sympathize can’t be bad or evil in most cases. They cover up for and outright support Leftist people and organizations. Yet, those on the right, are always to be regarded with suspicion if not downright fear and hatred. “Right” is frequently used to elicit visions of Nazis and dictators.

A Better Way to View Right and Left

If one must use such terms to discuss ideas and people who bear little relation to spatial locations, relative to – what? – there’s a better way to view the two. Far Left, as far to the left as possible, represents totalitarian government, that is, absolute control over a population of de facto slaves. Think the long-gone former USSR, Nazi Germany and present-day N. Korea. At the other end of the spectrum, the farthest right a group could be, is anarchy, no government at all. Thus, at one end people enjoy no freedom and at the other, they have complete freedom. With this measure, Nazi Germany and the USSR would fall into the same “far left” as N. Korea and early communist China, one being just as evil as the other. The problem this creates for our propagandists is that now, they would have to lump their “Hitler” in with their “good” socialist regimes. So for propagandists to say, for example, that Trump is a “Nazi” would be to put him in the same company as some of their heroes – Mao, Lenin, Gorbachev, Guevara, Obama! Unthinkable and not useful for misrepresentation. It would require that they find or invent (“pee pee dossier”, “Russian collusion”) some other, evidential behavior for them to use as a tool for vilification.

For an individual to be labeled a “Nazi”, for most Democrat voters doesn’t require evidence other than first being called “far right”. And who have Americans been taught to hate since childhood? Nazis. Have Americans been taught to hate communists, the media’s “left”? To only a very limited extent with most people left to find its inherent evils by dint of their own reasoning. There are few movies or documentaries about communists, yet on any day one can find on television some reference to Nazis, the holocaust and other depictions of Nazi Germany horrors and build-up. (Interesting, as the New World Order favored by many elites and the World Economic Forum seem to espouse many of the same Nazi goals: world domination and depopulation under an authoritarian one-world government. WEF chairman Klaus Schwab thinks China is a great model.

Using the more credible left-right yardstick described here, the United States would then fall somewhere near the middle, featuring a modicum of control over its population. At least that would be the nation’s founding design. As it happens and as we have seen over the past few decades, the nation has been moving leftward, toward a more authoritarian setup. The speed with which it is moving there is increasing. It’s neither accidental, nor a reflection of the peoples’ will.

Recent elections are being proven, if slowly, to have been rigged. As a part of the “rigging” it’s coming out that government agencies have been a part of that rigging. Does anyone know what the CIA does these days? Another topic entirely, but akin is that so much in today’s Washington, DC is “secret”, “classified” and etc. The CDC for example, supposedly there to keep us safe from disease, has employee classifications of “secret”, “top secret” and “beyond top secret”! What are we not supposed to know? Are they a defense operation? Or, do they create viruses for Big Pharma’s enrichment? In March of 2020 one could go to a page on the OSHA website where there was a section on “masks” describing them as ineffective barriers to viruses. A month later the same page was empty, labeled “This Page Left Intentionally Blank”. How convenient for the government overreach which demanded a “masked” population, in reality, simply an otherwise meaningless exercise of their control. Worse yet, the business shutdowns. “Social Distancing” was another such onerous exercise. Then, worst of all if not criminal – yet – were the forced vaccinations of gene altering material which was not a vaccine and which did not prevent infection.

What is termed “national security” nowadays seems to have little to do with the nation, per se, but rather instead, “bureaucratic security”, protecting those bad actors in our government agencies from public exposure of their wrongdoings. Else, why all the redactions, refusals to submit documents to congress and the like we’ve been witnessing for the past twenty years or more? The upshot is that the government is less and less accountable to the people, becoming nearly autonomous. When a government isn’t answerable to the people yet the people are answerable to the government, the people are thralls, the government “left”.

It’s ultimately about freedom.

Freedom is what people care about. An economic system of one sort or another, Capitalist (the best for the most), Fascist (where the USA seems to be heading) or Communist (few remaining and none which Marx would recognize as “communist”), is always of interest and will always appear. However, the freedom to live one’s life on one’s own with the freedom to move, to work, to create, to speak, to love and to worship of one’s own accord is of ultimate interest. It is also that interest which historically is most likely in peril. Thus, when our politics are discussed in terms of “right wing” and “left wing”, as consumers of information we must demand more clarity from those who disseminate it. We must also understand that whereas freedom, not an economic system, is what human nature most values, communism, fascism, and autocracy are all “left”, all totalitarian, all evil and inhuman. Think “right” for freedom.

E-Mail Jeffery Dover: jefdov@cox.net