By Frosty Wooldridge

September 15, 2025

You might silence one voice in America; but you cannot silence all our voices. You can kill one of us; but you can’t kill all of us.

One bullet killed Charlie Kirk, but one bullet cannot silence those of us who love our freedom of speech, our right to speak up, our energy as a free people. One slashed throat of Iryna Zarutska ended her life, but the slasher’s life will be ended behind bars or the electric table. That kid at Evergreen High School may have shot fellow classmates, and he ended his own life, but our civil society will move forward with law and order.

A 20-year-old kid nearly killed President Donald J. Trump. How and why does such a violent act begin? Another gunman killed a man and wife political team in Minnesota. Those killings continue since Sandy Hook, Columbine, John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King.

It’s our greatest challenge as to “how” to stop these killings not only of famous people, but regular people living average activities in their lives. For the love of God and all that is decent, we’ve got to discover “how” those lunatics became lunatics, and how to subdue them before they kill one of our loved ones. We’ve got to go into the inner cities of Chicago and New Orleans—-and find out “why” young minority kids shoot each other to death, week in and week out. Then, we need to promote solutions.

We’ve got to discover why mayors and governors of such states as Chicago, Illinois “WANT” the killings to continue. We need to bring the full weight of the law down on them. The sheer magnitude and incompetence of Governor Pritzker and Mayor Johnson of Chicago must be changed by the voters. If they re-elect the incompetent leaders, they suffer ongoing violent results.

We need to discover “why” violence has become THE tool to vanquish someone that a violent fanatic doesn’t like as to their religion, politics or status.

The reason our Founding Fathers placed the First Amendment to our Constitution at the top of the list illustrates the importance of the exchange of ideas, both for something or against something, as the hallmark of ALL our lives.

Instead of killing someone for their differing view, how about talking with them. Discover their side of the equation. Write a letter to the editor. Write an op-ed at your local newspaper. Speak up at city council. Don’t just kill them for their own opinion.

That’s what they do in North Korea, Russia, China and other dictatorships. They kill you for attempting to engage in free speech. In North Korea, you do not possess a single thread of free speech as to their deadly dictator, Kim Jung Un. In Russia, Putin kills anyone who disagrees with him. In China, you simply “vanish” if you disagree with Xi JinPing.

If you burned the Chinese flag in public, you would die. If you did it in Russia, you’re toast. If you did it in North Korea, they would hang you or shoot you by sundown. When you burn Old Glory, you’re literally burning your own country’s honor, integrity and Constitution. You may get away with it, but can our country survive your anger?

If we continue to follow such violence in those dictatorship-run countries, we’ve lost the core reason for our success as a society.

What can we do to bring the temperature down as to violence in America? Yes, I’ve written about the low IQ of House Member Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), but I’ve never threatened her lack of intelligence with violence. Same with AOC, Hank Johnson, Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson—and other intellectually vacant political hacks. Even with their enormous failures, and even their calls for violence, along with attacks on our U.S. ICE agents, I’m not about to do violence to them.

As a former teacher, I DO KNOW that we, as a civilization, in order to move forward, need to examine our parenting and educational systems. Additionally, we need to change our TV programming, and our violent video programming that’s turning our kids into violent criminals.

Psychologists have discovered that a young person’s mind is not fully developed until his or her 25th year. At that age, they gather enough knowledge and maturity to make reasonable decisions. Before the age of 25, they follow their emotions first without thinking. Thus, if parents allow their kids to play violent video games 7 hours and 22 minutes daily, (that’s the average in America), you can bet they suffer incredible and indelible “markings” on their brains.

Why do teens engage in violent video games? Perhaps the parents and the schools did not offer after-school activities that moved their “negative energies” into “positive activities” that developed their sense of belonging, sense of fellowship, and sense of personal success with a team sport or individual sport such as tennis, or macrame’, pottery, art…and dozens of creative activities that will engage children.

You, as a parent, you’ve seen the enormous violence in Criminals Minds, NCIS, The Punisher, Reacher….and dozens more.

There’s something primordial about violence that draws millions upon millions toward its expression. Today, we’ve got robots killing each other, killing us, and smashing everything in sight. How do we reprogram ourselves toward peaceful movies, videos and outcomes?

I’ve seen war’s violence during Vietnam. I’ve seen its sickening results in mutilated bodies, burned up bodies with Napalm, and lost limbs. You may have seen some of those bodies on “Tunnels to Towers” advertisements. You might start crying at their horrifically horribly mutilated bodies. Because I saw them in person at Fort Benning, Fort Riley and Fort Sam Houston—I abhor war because it mutilates peoples’ lives. The 58,479 boys that died in Nam, may have had it better than the thousands who came away with their emotions/brains mutilated, and bodies maimed for life. I still wish Lyndon Baines Johnson, Richard Nixon and the Military Industrial Complex corporate heads, along with Robert McNamara share the same cell in hell for all eternity for what they did to our generation: ten years of death for us, and 2.3 million Vietnamese—all for nothing, to no end, for no moral or ethical reason.

Yes, I know we must maintain our fighting forces…and at the same time, I pray for, I write for and I give energy toward peaceful resolution. Yes, Trump needed to take out Iran’s nuclear threat. Yes, we must remain militarily strong. Yes, take out those drug boats speeding toward us to kill our kids with fentanyl.

Can we as a free society…stop killing our Iryna’s or Charlie Kirk’s or kids praying at church, or watching a movie in Denver, or going to school at Columbine, Uvalde or Sandy Hook? Can’t we stop the endless killings in Chicago, LA, Memphis, New Orleans and Detroit?

Maybe we should ask ourselves why we’re spending billions/trillions in Foreign Aid to countries that don’t like us, or billions of dollars for space travel that will not improve our lives—-when we’re rotting our inner cities to death, watching and doing nothing to solve our 773,000 homeless Americans, half our kids cannot read at grade level, lack of jobs training for 40 million Americans on food stamps, our incredible obesity levels affecting our kids and parents…what’s with that kind of neglect?

Thank you to all of you who wrote me with solutions from the last column. I am compiling them. Whether you’re a liberal, libertarian, conservative, or just don’t care—-this is our society. We need to improve it, love it, take care of our people, and move toward solutions. Perhaps an annual national conference of top leaders from each state to define our problems, and come up with solutions. We gotta’ do something. We can’t keep traveling down our current path.

© 2025 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Frosty: frostyw@juno.com

content goes here

By Greg Holt

The unvarnished truth about the Democrats and what they actually stand for (value).  It ain’t pretty, but it’s true.

This kind of stuff just can’t be made up.  The Democrats and their lamestream allies are absolute masters of deception, spin, dishonesty, misdirection, and outright lies couched as truth.

Our schools are nothing less than Democrat indoctrination centers according to Michael Snyder and I agree 100% – hencethe attitude and the ideals of the younger generation, if they can even be called such. The younger generations are taught (socialism) to see America as the enemy, the flag as a symbol of evil, and the military as oppressors.  Government is supposed to function as the giver of gifts: “free” money, college, insurance etc. – but no law enforcement.

The Democrat socialists have taught them well, and the media has deceived We the People like Hitler deceived Germany until it was far too late to stop him.  It’s almost too late for America to stop the Democrats.

Just look at what America has become in large part, all due to the guidance of the Democrats.

• Riots that have destroyed whole sections of cities, looting, burning, etc.
• Groups (Antifa, Black Lives Matter) that do not hesitate to use extreme violence
• Right is wrong, and wrong is right
• Morals are a thing of the past
• God is steadily being removed from society
• Schools do not allow teaching on Jesus, but do allow teaching on Islam, homosexuality, masturbation, America as the enemy, whites are bad because they are white etc.
• Extreme corruption to the point that almost all major cities (Democrat managed) are severely economically depressed and crime rates are high and rising
• Police are seen as the enemy and Democrats are calling for them to be defunded and eliminated

Alyssa Milano is a Democrat because she believes in love.  Cue up violent gagging and barfing here…

Seriously, both sides of the isle have contributed to our problems.  That being said, the Dems are the definitive cheerleaders of what ails this country the most; violence, killings, corruption, theft (including via government), anything goes (as long as Dems approve of it), abortion, and weaponizing the government.

Let’s not forget that it was Democrats that allowed police to be thrown out of areas, or told them to stand down while cities or parts thereof were demolished during the “mostly peaceful” riots, oh right! that was supposed to be “protests,” my bad.  To add insult to injury, these fools then wanted President Trump to approve funding to clean up the mess they chose to allow!

This video by James Woods is the most honest and truthful representation of the Democrats out there – seriously.

What do you think?

© 2020 Greg Holt – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Greg Holt: admin@trueconservativepundit.com

Read my three most recent articles:

Anyone Stupid Enough to Vote for a Democrat Gets What They Deserve – Voting Democrat is a Vote to Give Away ALL of Your Rights & Safety

A Biden Presidency Would be Bad – His VP ‘Picks’ as President Would be Worse

Politically Correct Lies – the Big Bang Theory, Evolution, and There is NO God

Subscribe to my daily newsletter, and Don’t forget to follow TCP News on Parler, USA Life, Gab, Spreely, Facebook, and Twitter

Let’s all continue to fight political correctness, indoctrination, Leftist propaganda, liberalism, and keep sharing the truth – knowledge is power.  Until next time…

Cliff Kincaid

In his 1968 non-fiction blockbuster, The Biological Time Bomb, Gordon Rattray Taylor wrote about the prospect of germ warfare in the context of “undeclared war.” He explained, “In current thinking the best way to wage war is to wage it without your enemy even being aware that it is happening.” He was predicting the use of infectious diseases to cripple a nation.

The current war, however, is out in the open.

Looking at the economic damage being inflicted on the United States and the world, one cannot dismiss the possibility that the rapidly-spreading coronavirus is China’s revenge on America for President Trump’s trade war. The virus has the potential impact to cause a major economic recession and sabotage President Trump’s reelection effort. Health emergencies are being declared around the country as the number of coronavirus cases increase. The interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve is an indication of desperation.

“Whether the agent comes from a deliberate biologic warfare attack, or the natural emergence of a novel virus, the results could be devastating,” notes the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness in a commentary on potential mass casualty events.

Politically, Trump and the Republicans could be the casualties.

Looking at modern warfare, Gordon Rattray Taylor had also predicted, “Some minor human epidemics might help. Even the common cold keeps people away from work. It might be ten years or more before it dawned on the health authorities that they were really being too unlucky with minor illnesses.”

China is admittedly the source of this deadly disease, also known as COVID-19. However, the regime claims that attributing the virus to a biological weapons lab in the region is a “conspiracy theory” spread by “anti-China forces.” It is going after independent journalists and whistleblowers who dispute the regime’s version of events. Globally, the high-tech social media companies such as Facebook are playing into China’s hands by censoring content that the virus is a bioweapon.

Also called by some the Xi virus, named after the Chinese dictator, the communist Chinese regime claims it somehow came out of a food market. Typical is the claim that the virus is thought to have originated from wild animals, probably bats.

However, some counter-claims are getting out. National Taiwan University public health researcher Fang Chi-tai reportedly thinks it’s possible that China’s scientists were working on a virus more difficult to contain than SARS and that the likely source of the virus is the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The latest “official” information from the U.N.’s World Health Organization is that the coronavirus mortality rate has jumped to 3.4%, as compared to a mortality rate of less than 1% for the flu. SARS, another virus from China, had a mortality rate of 9.6 percent in 2003, but COVID-19 is believed to be far more contagious than SARS.

By all accounts, the Communist regime has engaged in economic and military warfare against the United States. The United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission was established “to review the national security implications of trade and economic ties between the United States and the People’s Republic of China.” One of the witnesses back in 2017 was Edward H. You, Supervisory Special Agent in the FBI’s Biological Countermeasures Unit in the Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate. His job was described in one story as following “fast-moving developments in labs” and making sure “they don’t lead to a bio-attack.”

But American scientist Dr. Steven Hatfill was one of the innocent victims of the FBI’s post-9/11 anthrax letters investigation, known officially as “Amerithrax.” The FBI had tried to blame Hatfill for the anthrax mailings before exonerating and paying him $6 million in financial damages.   There was never any evidence indicating that Hatfill was anything other than a patriot who tried to help America prepare for the terrorist attacks that were blamed on him. A foreign connection, involving al Qaeda, was never seriously investigated by the FBI. The FBI eventually blamed the attack on another scientist.

Robert S.Mueller, Russia-gate special counsel, was in charge of the FBI at the time.

The threat today is so great that the Trump White House is working with Congress to get billions of more dollars for battling COVID-19 and other public health threats. But throwing more money at the Centers for Disease Control — the “professionals” who failed to quickly develop a reliable coronavirus test — is a smokescreen.  Where are the hearings into the source of this virus and whether it had been weaponized by a Chinese lab? Is the FBI on the job, again?

Unrestricted Warfare, a book on military strategy written in 1999 by two colonels in the People’s Liberation Army, refers to the “new concepts of weapons,” including biological weapons. The book referred to financial attacks on nations by billionaire hedge fund operators such as George Soros, the 1995 gas attack on the Tokyo subway by the disciples of the doomsday cult AumShinriKyo, and attacks by Islamic terrorists such as Osama bin Laden.

To accentuate the current economic downturn, our media have played a familiar role. CNBC featured a “top economist” by the name of Mark Zandiof Moody’s Analytics saying a coronavirus pandemic could spark a deep recession and pose a “significant threat’’ to Trump’s reelection. What CNBC did not disclose is that Zandi is a Democrat who contributed to Hillary Clinton and said Trump’s election in 2016 would itself cause a recession.

Zandi’s June 17, 2016, report had claimed, “…the economy will be significantly weaker if Mr. Trump’s economic proposals are adopted” and that “Under the scenario in which all his stated policies become law in the manner proposed, the economy suffers a lengthy recession and is smaller at the end of his four-year term than when he took office.”

Last October, however, he reversed himself, saying that Trump was a strong favorite to win a second term based on positive economic trends. But with a 10 percent correction in stock prices, “the picture changes dramatically and Democrats win under a typical turnout scenario,” he said. That has happened as a result of panic over the coronavirus. Trump’s reelection is now in question and Democratic Senate challengers are surging in the polls, threatening to take back the majority from the Republicans. Republican Senators in Colorado (Cory Gardner), Arizona (Martha McSally) and North Carolina (Thom Tillis) are all in serious trouble.

Without Senate control, a reelected Trump would not be able to get his conservative judges approved.

The stakes are high as the White House pursues a “Coronavirus Plan of Action.” Does that plan include moving to a war footing with the communist regime in Beijing? The National Defense Strategy already recognizes China as a major threat to U.S. security and prosperity.

*Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org

© 2020 Cliff Kincaid – All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Cliff Kincaid: kincaid@comcast.net

Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee revealed him to be a man of great integrity, above the political aspersions cast by Senate Democrats who refuse to drop the false narrative that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to rig the elections, despite the absence of any evidence.

Sessions’ history is one typified by honor and love of country.  For those aware of that history, the notion that he would collude with any foreign government, let alone a country he regards as an arch enemy of the United States, is preposterous.  Sessions is an American patriot.  He would die for his country if called to do so.  He has served his nation faithfully, well, and with honor for his entire career.  He underwent a grueling confirmation hearing at which no stone was left unturned and from that effort a character assassination his opponents found precious little with which to do battle.

The contrast between the Sessions’ testimony and the Comey testimony could not have been greater.  In Sessions you will never find a man who would dare leak the confidences of the President to the media.  Indeed, repeatedly in his testimony, General Sessions refused to reveal the private discussions he had with the President.  By contrast, Comey presumed not only to relay select parts of his private conversations with the President but also to interpret the meaning of those conversations in ways that cast doubt on his superiors, President Trump and General Sessions alike.  That is dishonorable.

A further contrast is warranted.  While the Trump Russia story has no legs (there simply are no facts supportive of the false assertion that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians), the Watergate story did have legs.  Caught in a legal and ethical dilemma, White House Counsel John Dean respectfully and accurately recited in his congressional testimony the facts that added to the foundation of evidence against President Nixon.  President Richard Nixon was engaged in a cover up and an obstruction of justice, endeavoring to withhold evidence that revealed the complicity of the White House, including his top aides, in the clandestine use of Committee to Re-Elect the President funds and former Cuban CIA operatives to bring about a break in at the Watergate offices of the Democratic National Committee and a theft of documents from those offices.  Watergate is thus a direct example of illegal activity during a presidential election campaign.

There is thus no comparison between the evidence rich environment that existed in Watergate and the evidence deficient environment of the Trump Russia story.  John Dean faced a legal dilemma (he must either reveal the crime he knew to exist or become guilty himself of perjury and obstruction of justice; he chose the former).   There is no John Dean in the Trump Russia story because there is no illegality.

The repeated assertion that there is a basis for the charge of collusion with the Russians is itself not only dishonorable but also a dangerous diversion from what should be the central issue.  While it is not true that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the outcome of the last presidential election, it is true that the Russians have endeavored to interfere with the electoral process.  Evidence reveals that the Russians hacked into 39 states’ voting systems during the 2016 elections.  Although unsuccessful this time in creating chaos and disrupting the vote tally or altering any votes, unless the full extent of this hacking is investigated and barriers and countermeasures are put in place to stop the hacking, we will inevitably see instances of successful tampering in future elections.

While the Democratic leadership exerts relentless effort to find any scrap of circumstantial evidence that can be interpreted to suggest a tie between the Trump campaign and the Russians, spending millions of tax dollars on this errant venture, they are ignoring a direct threat to the democratic process.  If the hysteria among Democratic leaders over the loss of the election quelled, it might be possible to proceed in a bi-partisan manner to investigate and act against the Russian electoral machinations, but there appears to be no end to the hysteria.

The ultimate solution lies with the electorate, but given the extent of obfuscation present, it is difficult to predict how votes will be cast.  In the mid-term elections, will enough voters cast ballots to remove the obstructionists or will they return them to office and fuel the current hysteria which blocks progress?

© 2017 Jonathan Emord – All Rights Reserved