So Madison warns that we better stick with the original understanding; and not interpret the clause to mean that the federal government has the same broad power over interstate commerce that it has over commerce with the foreign Nations and with the Indian Tribes.
But I suggest, dear Reader, that we must purge our thinking of the assumption that we can’t have a moral and constitutional government unless Five Judges on the Supreme Court say we can have it. Since it is clear that federal courts have no constitutional authority over abortion, why do we go along with the pretense that they do?
On November 30, 2018, President Trump, along with the Prime [...]
Central to the silly arguments made by the “Convention of [...]
One of the silliest of the many unsupported claims made [...]
1. Summary The federal government is usurping the powers of [...]
Whether States should ask Congress to call a convention under [...]
The supremacy clause at Article VI, clause 2, US Constitution, [...]
Foundational Knowledge Our Constitution delegates only a handful of powers [...]
"The politician that undertakes to improve a Constitution with as [...]
In a case now pending before the US District Court [...]
The danger of an Article V convention (which made James [...]
“If the central government has the authority to tell a [...]
“…of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, [...]
May, 13, 2017 What’s the real problem with our federal [...]
Do you remember the public discussions which went on for [...]
The BBA Made Simple Say you want your Butler to [...]
Does our existing Constitution permit the federal government to spend [...]
Treason, Cowardice, and the Islamic Invasion: Why States Must Revitalize [...]