Thank you, Mr. President, for Being “Divisive.”

Steven Neill

“Donald Trump’s behavior is the antithesis of patriotism.”

The Main Stream Media’s (MSM) reactions to President Trump’s speeches at Mt. Rushmore and Washington DC over the 4th of July weekend should trouble everyone who loves America and her continued existence as a republic. These addresses were undoubtedly some of the best since Ronald Reagan’s “Tear Down This Wall” speech in 1987. His choosing to hold his defense of the American ideal, monuments, and memorials, patriotic backgrounds, addresses on the 4th of July weekend should resonate with every American who loves This country.

So, what did Trump say to receive such venom from the press? Did he announce a new set of Jim Crow laws? Did he call for the reinstatement of slavery or the nullification of the 13^th, 14^th, and 15^th Amendments to the US Constitution? Or authorize the use of lynching to reduce crime? Did Trump outlaw masks and put people with COVID 19 in with the elderly? No? So, what triggered such backlash and fear-mongering from leftist mouthpieces like the New York Times:

“In doing so, he signaled even more clearly that he would exploit race and cultural flashpoints to stoke fear among his base of white supporters to win re-election. As he has done in the past, he resorted on Friday to exaggerated, apocalyptic language in broadly tarring the nationwide protests against entrenched racism and police brutality, saying that “angry mobs” sought to “unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities” and that those seeking to deface monuments want to “end America.”

Or CNN’s: “In a jaw-dropping speech that amounted to a culture war bonfire?”

Or Time.com’s: “President Trump dug deeper into America’s divisions?”

Or the Washington Post hit piece, “Trump got his crowd and his fireworks, and peddled his fiction?”

“Mr. Trump is leaning on culture wars to buoy his base of white supporters.” —New York Times

Could the blowback be because, for the first time since President Dwight Eisenhower warned of the danger to our country from the military-industrial complex, a sitting President advised Americans of the coup happening in our country?

Using the powerful symbols of our proud heritage as a backstop, Trump called the “racial justice” protestors what they are:

“Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our Founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities. Many of these people have no idea why they are doing this, but some know exactly what they are doing.”

“The violent mayhem we have seen in the streets of cities that are run by liberal

Democrats, in every case, is the predictable result of years of extreme indoctrination and bias in education, journalism, and other cultural institutions. Against every law of society and nature, our children are taught in school to hate their own country and to believe that the men and women who built it were not heroes, but that were villains.”

Trump’s statements implied the mobs are agents of the “Cancel Culture” and tools in the left’s war to overthrow America as we know it:

“Make no mistake: this left-wing cultural revolution is designed to overthrow the American Revolution. In so doing, they would destroy the very civilization that rescued billions from poverty, disease, violence, and hunger, and that lifted humanity to new heights of achievement, discovery, and progress.”

“To make this possible, they are determined to tear down every statue, symbol, and memory of our national heritage.”

A simple look at the issues reveals that the death of a black man at the hands of a cop and the lack of following COVID-19 protocol are not the reasons for the seething attacks on Trump’s speeches. But instead, because the left has followed the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) mantra of “the issue is never the issue the issue is always the revolution” for decades, and have pulled out all stops in their efforts to destroy Donald Trump

“If this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it,” Hawk Newsome, chairman of Black Lives Matter of Greater New York

Consider Black Lives Matter and the whole black death by cop theme. According to USA Today, there were thirteen unarmed black men killed by police officers in 2019. One is too many if the person is cooperating with the police. But, even if all thirteen were peacefully abiding by the police officers’ demands and died anyway, how does thirteen death by cop incidents compare to 2,570 homicides of black people by other black people in 2016 according to FBI statistics? How about black babies, don’t they matter? According to the CDC, the abortion rate for white women was 6.2 per 1,000 women in 2016. At the same time, the abortion rate for black women was 23.6 per 1,000 women, almost four times that of white women. Nor has there been a rise in the number of blacks killed since Trump took office. Is the issue Black Lives Matter, or is the issue the overthrow of the US?

Alternatively, is the issue not wearing masks and social distancing? According to a CNN article, 1,000 health “professionals” signed a letter encouraging the Black Lives Matter protests after the George Floyd killing implying, they have special voodoo magic protecting the participants from the germ. Further down in the article, it states that demonstrations protesting the mask policies increase the risk of contracting the disease. Yet the mayor of Miami-Dade County, FL, and the Los Angeles Police Chief are accusing the BLM protests of causing spikes in the virus in their counties. The MSM anger isn’t about the mask protocols Trump had implemented at the meetings, but rather, because they are pushing an agenda.

Since Trump’s election, there have been numerous attempts to impeach or overturn his election, all applauded and supported by the MSM. They included the Russian Collusion, firing of James Comey, Campaign Finance Violations, the Meuller Report, Syrian pullout, Ukrainian Quid Pro Quo, bribery, and extortion. When each has failed to topple Trump, another shows up supported by the same people.

Trump’s speeches are, in fact, a wake-up call that many Americans need to hear. The issues are not police shooting of black men, or social distancing, or Trump’s Russian Collusion or even statues of Confederate generals. The issue is a revolution by trained Marxists in this country.

So, for the first time in a long time, the MSM is accurate when they report Trump’s speech as divisive, not between races; however, but between those who love the Constitution and those who follow the Communist Manifesto. It’s as simple as that.

The democrats/Marxists are well funded, organized, and preparing for war, and if we do not get there immediately, the battle is already lost. Every day more and more of the BLM protestors are armed and demanding revolution as the ones did on July 4th at Stone Mountain Memorial. The time for hoping things will get back to normal or counting on the Republicans in political office is over. The left is acknowledging the divide in America; I am glad that the president is as well because: “Freedom and not servitude is the cure of anarchy; as religion, and not atheism, is the true remedy for superstition.” Edmund Burke.

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

Information:

1- IN FULL: President Trump’s Historic, Anti-Marxist Speech at Mount Rushmore

2- Trump blasts ‘left-wing cultural revolution’ in fiery Mount Rushmore speech

3- Trump tries to drag America backward on a very different July 4th

4- Trump Hits Back at Statue Destroyers by Creating a ‘National Garden of American Heroes’

5- Trump doubles down on divisive messaging in speech to honor Independence Day

6- President Trump Pushes Racial Division, Flouts Coronavirus Rules at Mt. Rushmore Speech

7- Trump got his crowd and his fireworks, and peddled his fiction

8- Dying in Darkness: Mount Rushmore Media Coverage Exemplifies ‘Enemy of the People’ Critique

9- This Week in politics

10- Tara Setmayer

11- Ultra-Liberal ‘New York Times’ Attacks Mount Rushmore

12- At Mt. Rushmore and the White House, Trump Updates ‘American Carnage’ Message for 2020

13- Trump repeats vow to defeat ‘radical Left’ in July Fourth speech

14- In Fourth of July speech, Trump slams his enemies within

15- 2016 Crime in the United States

16- Abortion in the United States

17- ALL THE WAYS THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TRIED TO GET RID OF PRESIDENT TRUMP

18- Miami-Dade County GOP Mayor Blames BLM Protests for Coronavirus Case Spike

19- LAPD coronavirus cases spike, adding to debate over role of protests in spread

20- Heavily Armed ‘Soldiers’ Demand ‘Reparations’ From White Motorists

21- Man shot dead in Bronx while walking with 6-year-old daughter

22- I was born in New York, and I’ve never seen the city so scared and uninhabitable. I fear we’re on the brink of a second civil war

23- Alan Derchhowitz: “You Have No Rigt To Refuse A Corona Vaccine.”

24- Fatal Force

25- Fact check: Police killed more unarmed Black men in 2019 than conservative activist claimed

26- Over 1,000 health professionals sign a letter saying, Don’t shut down protests using coronavirus concerns as an excuse

27- Travis Rowley: Statues of Limitation

28- The 5 Most Outrageous Things Trump Said at Mt. Rushmore

29- The 28 most outrageous lines from Donald Trump’s Mount Rushmore speech

30- S.D. governor Tweets Mount Rushmore wont be targeted on her watch

31- S.D. Governor Weighs in on Idea of Blowing Up Mount Rushmore

32- Georgia governor declares state of emergency, deploys National Guard after deadly weekend

33- Trump uses July 4 speech to defend “American heroes,” attack China and the media

34- Trump targets ‘Marxists’ in July 4th speech, boasts of coronavirus response despite record case numbers

35- BLM Leader: We’ll ‘Burn’ the System Down If U.S. Won’t Give Us What We Want

36- Founding Fathers Quotes: Our Favorite Quotes from America’s Courageous Revolutionaries

37- Black Lives Matter Storm Target: We Will Shut Your Business Down

38- DNC’s Plan to Replace Our Police with NATO Contractors – Dyncorp and Blackwater Again

Globalism’s United Front

Steven Neill

“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.” —George Orwell

It will pass. As the Black Death breakout of 1347 – 1353, Justinian’s Plague of 541 – 542, and the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918, the coronavirus will be one for the record books. [1] But have you thought about what the world will look like post-Coronavirus? If you haven’t, you should, the progressives are, and their visions of the future should scare you into action.

Since the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, it has been virtually impossible to know the truth about its origin, how virulent it is, and how many casualties there have been. The statistics have changed to fit the particular spin [2] of those talking about it. But there are things about the virus that are not in the realm of speculation, and one of the most concrete is the destination the globalists have in mind for us once the “pandemic” is over.

We can learn the globalist plan for the United States if we are willing to listen to them speak. Political, religious, business leaders, and members of the news media frequently use the same terms and phrases to disguise the truth and create a new reality that appeals to the uninformed. Just like Satan used the serpent to lie to Eve [3] about the forbidden fruit, the globalists are exaggerating the danger of the coronavirus to present a one-world government as the only solution.

Nothing speaks more forcibly of the push towards a New World Order than the coordination and pre-planning of an upcoming “crisis” to be used to further the police state. Two significant events happened, one in 2010 and the other in the Fall of 2019, that predict the coronavirus “pandemic” and the reactions to it that stretch “coincidence” beyond the breaking point. The first was the 2010 “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” [4] report, and the other was Event 201 [5] held on October 18, 2019.” “Scenarios” was produced by the Rockefeller Foundation and Futurist Peter Schwartz and contained several possible upcoming situations that could happen in the future. The name of one of those was “Lock Step,” and it involved a catastrophic pandemic that killed 20% of the population.

“The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.”

The report then records the governmental reaction to the pandemic as:

“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. To protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems —from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”

Then, last October, Event 201 was put on by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It simulated a hypothetical coronavirus pandemic that started in Brasil and spread around the world, ending in 18-months and killing over 65 million people.

The stated purpose of the simulation [6] was to initiate international discussion on methods to mitigate the virus and its global economic and societal effects. The conclusions drawn by the organizers are the need for global diplomacy leading to global governance (as stated by Timothy Evens, an event participant) under the United Nations and bodies like the World Health Organization. National governments need to provide international institutions more money for the rapid development and manufacturing of vaccines. Also, these same governments need to suppress “false information” and expand their “ability to flood media [7] with fast, accurate, and consistent information.”

Just as the coronavirus pandemic has closely followed the model set in “Scenarios” and Event 201, so has the words and actions of the leading globalists followed the policies and recommendations set in those events. From the beginning of the year, numerous top globalists have used a unified narrative to use this “pandemic” to move the United States into global governance, create a tax for the United Nations, require mandatory vaccines, and the suppressing of “fake news.” Here, in their own words, are just a few examples:

The Talking Heads and their Unified Narrative

John Hopkins University has a long history of sewer level ethics and questionable connections since it opened in 1916 with Rockefeller Foundation money. Hopkins University faculty were involved in both the Tuskegee [8] and the Terre Haute syphilis [9] experiments. On 1/27/20, John Hopkins University [10] released a press report on the coronavirus.

Professor Ho-Fung Hung conducted research and found that the “anti-globalist” response by many nations characterized the disease (coronavirus) as an “oriental plague” and attempted to contain the outbreak by “curbing the trans-border flow of travelers,” turned out to be “counter-productive.”

Whereas the “globalist response orchestrated by international and national institutions such as the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proved to be widely successful.”

Since “Turning back the clock and reversing the process [of globalization] is not realistic, the only viable way out, as suggested by our experience in the battle against SARS, is to minimize the risks of globalization through more global cooperation as well as through the empowerment of the global institutions that facilitate that cooperation.”

So obviously, the answer to foreigners bringing new diseases and viruses into one’s country is to open up the door and let in even more foreigners. Well, according to Hopkins University anyway.

On 3/31/20, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres released a report [11] on the socio-economic impact of coronavirus: His document falls right in line with the recommendations of the Event 201 panel:

According to Guterres, “the world is facing an unprecedented test.” Further, “the magnitude of the response must match the scale of the crisis — large-scale, coordinated, and comprehensive, with the country and international responses being guided by the World Health Organization.” “The message of the report we are issuing today is clear: shared responsibility and a global solidarity call to action in response to the impacts of COVID-19.”

“First, for an immediate coordinated health response, a response that delivers universal access to treatment and vaccines, when they are ready. What is needed is a large-scale, coordinated, and comprehensive multilateral response amounting to at least 10 percent of global GDP. Finally, when we get past this crisis — which we will — we will face a choice.”

“We can go back to the world as it was before or deal decisively with those issues that make us all unnecessarily vulnerable to crises.Our roadmap is the 2030 Agenda and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The recovery from the COVID-19 crisis must lead to a different economy”.

From a Guterres speech on 3/23/2020: “Open precious windows for diplomacy to bring hope to the most vulnerable,calls for double-digit GDP support from the developed world to create financial systems in the developing world to sustain themselves in the crisis.” [12]

Pope Francis, [13] the most openly globalist Pope, supported the globalist cause in his 3/29/20 speech from the Vatican:

“It is time to put the armed conflict on lock-down and focus together on the true fight of our lives. The common effort against the pandemic may bring everyone to recognize our need to strengthen the fraternal bonds as members of the one human family.”

He expressed the hope that this “global emergency may inspire the leaders of nations and armed groups to overcome rivalries.”

He called on leaders to “facilitate the creation of humanitarian corridors for aid, to open avenues of diplomacy, and to attend to those who find themselves in situations of great vulnerability.”

On 3/26/20, the globalist mouthpiece, Council on Foreign Relations, released an article called “The Multilateral System Still Cannot Get Its Act Together on COVID-19,” [14] that followed in the same pattern:

“The assembled governments proclaimed their desire to bolster the mandate and capabilities of the WHO, assess gaps in global pandemic preparedness and response, accelerate research and development on vaccines and the production of essential medical equipment, and to strengthen global safety nets. Beyond these generalities, the document was devoid of specific commitments. The leaders did not address the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) request that G20 nations double their resources to $2 trillion.”

“To address their plight, on Wednesday morning United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres launched a $2 billion appeal to member states to support a coordinated Global Humanitarian Response Plan to fight COVID-19. The scheme’s purpose is to ensure that the world’s most vulnerable populations are not abandoned to face the pandemic alone.”

“It is now time for wealthy donor nations, including the United States, which is poised to approve a $2.2 trillion domestic rescue package, to step up their global game. Though its performance to date has failed to match previous U.S. crisis stewardship, there is still time for it to lead an effective response to this multi-pronged threat.”

Bilderberg Group, Tri-Lateral Commission, and Council on Foreign Relations member Henry Kissinger possess more credentials and influence in international politics than anyone living today. In his April 03, 2020, Op-Ed article “The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order,” [15] in the Wall Street Journal, he stated that to meet the challenge of coronavirus, we need to replace our national government with a global one.

“Now, in a divided country, efficient and farsighted government is necessary to overcome obstacles unprecedented in magnitude and global scope. Sustaining public trust is crucial to social solidarity, to the relation of societies with each other,and international peace and stability.”

“We need to develop new techniques and technologies for infection control and commensurate vaccines across large populations.”

“The coronavirus has struck with unprecedented scale and ferocity.”

“The crisis effort, however vast and necessary, must not crowd out the urgent task of launching a parallel enterprise for the transition to the post-coronavirus order.”

“Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders. While the assault on human health will — hopefully — be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations. No country, not even the U.S., can, in a purely national effort,overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program.”

“Programs should also seek to ameliorate the effects of impending chaos on the world’s most vulnerable populations.”

“Safeguard the principles of the liberal world order.”

“Yet this millennial issue of legitimacy and power cannot be settled simultaneously with the effort to overcome the COVID-19plague. Restraint is necessary on all sides — in both domestic politics and international diplomacy. Priorities must be established.”

On 3/26/20, a group of 160 current and former world leaders released an open letter to the governments of the G-20 nations. [16] Among the signers were previous British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and globalist extraordinaire George Soros. It had this to say about the Coronavirus crisis:

“$1 billion this year urgently needed by the WHO: This would enable the WHO to carry out its critically important mandate in full. While it has launched a public appeal – 200,000 individuals and organizations have generously donated more than $100 million – it cannot be expected to depend on charitable donations.”

“$3 billion for vaccines: The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) is coordinating the global research effort to develop and scale-up effective COVID-19 vaccines.”

“A further $35 billion will be required, as highlighted by the WHO, to support countries with weaker health systems and especially vulnerable populations.”

“We agree with African and developing country leaders that given the existential threat to their economies, that at least $150 billion of overall support will be needed for health, social safety nets, and other urgent help.”

“The longer-term solution is a radical rethink of global public health and a refashioning – together with proper resourcing – of the global health and financial architecture. The United Nations, the governments of the G20 nations, and interested partners should work together to coordinate further action.”

The Guardian, [17] a British news outlet also cited Gordon Brown as saying:

“Gordon Brown has urged world leaders to create a temporary form of global government to tackle the twin medical and economic crises caused by the coronavirus pandemic.”

“The former Labour prime minister said there was a need for a task force involving world leaders, health experts, and the heads of the international organizations that would have executive powers to coordinate the response.”

“This is not something that can be dealt with in one country,” he said. “There has to be a coordinated global response.”

Brown said his proposed global task-force would fight the crisis on two fronts. There would need to be a coordinated effort to find a vaccine, and to organize production, purchasing and prevent profiteering.

“We need some sort of working executive,” Brown said.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau [18] said the following at a press conference on 4/09/20. “We are going to continue to lose people across this country in the coming weeks, and we will not be coming back to our former normal situation; we can’t do that until we have developed a vaccine, and that could take 12 to 18 months.”

Governor Democrat Gavin Newsome [19] was asked in a news conference on 4/1/20 by reporter Jeff Taylor if he sees the coronavirus pandemic crisis as “potential” for a “new progressive era?”

Newsom answered, “And so yes, forgive me for being long-winded, but absolutely we see this as an opportunity to reshape the way we do business and how we govern. And that shouldn’t put shivers up the spines of one party or the other. I think it’s an opportunity, a new for both parties, to come together and meet this moment and really start to think more systemically, not situation ally, not just about getting out of this moment, but more sustainably and systemically to consider where we can go together this historic moment if we meet it at a national level and a state and sub national level. So, the answer is yes.”

The quotes listed above are from some of the most influential people in the world and only reflect a few of the times they have promoted a globalist agenda. In my upcoming article, I will present Bill Gates, along with a few others, as those going full-on Borg and are determined to use the coronavirus as a cover for pushing us into being assimilated into the globalist collective.

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

Footnotes:

[1] Outbreak: 10 of the Worst Pandemics in History
[2] China Pushes Viral Messages to Shape Coronavirus Narrative
[3] How Do We Understand the Serpent in the Garden of Eden?
[4] Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
[5] The COVID-19 ‘Conspiracy Theory’
[6] Event 201 About
[7] Event 201 Conclusions
[8] United States Government Study in Guatemala
[9] Johns Hopkins, Bristol-Myers must face $1 billion syphilis infections suit
[10] ADVISORY: Expert Available to Discuss How China’s Politics Affect Coronavirus Response
[11] “The recovery from the COVID-19 crisis must lead to a different economy.”
[12] Transcript of the Secretary-General’s virtual press encounter on the appeal for a global ceasefire
[13] Pope Francis calls for a global ceasefire, attention to overcrowded prisons in response to coronavirus
[14] The Multilateral System Still Cannot Get Its Act Together on COVID-19
[15] The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order
[16] A letter to G-20 Nations
[17] Gordon Brown Calls for Global Government to Tackle Coronavirus
[18] Canada’s Jobless Rate Surges to 40%
[19] California Governor Gavin Newsom COVID-19 Briefing Transcript April 1: Will Not Reopen Schools This Academic Year

Killing With Kindness, The Spokane Library And The Michael Jackson Effect

Whether you liked him or not, when Michael Jackson stepped out onto the stage and the first notes of ‘Billy Jean’ came out to greet the audience, its magic was only enhanced when he did his famous “moonwalk” later in the song. Jackson was a superstar and while controversy dogged him surrounding his “sleepovers” at Neverland, his death in 2009 stunned the world. Especially when it was revealed that he died of an overdose of Propofol, injected into him by his own doctor, Conrad Murray.

Jackson suffered from severe insomnia so Dr. Murray administered the Propofol to help Jackson relax and sleep. Only Propofol is an extremely dangerous drug requiring careful monitoring of the patient after it is administered, something Murray did not do. Murray would serve two years in prison for criminal negligence over Jackson’s death yet still maintained his innocence of any wrongdoing.

The list of musicians who have died because of doctor prescribed medications is long and heart-rending and includes Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis and Mathew Roberts. Both Prince and Tom Petty died by fentanyl overdose. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is 50 to 100 times more powerful than heroin and often prescribed to patients with chronic pain. While the majority of doctors would never knowingly aid an addict, numerous unscrupulous doctors have been convicted for writing prescriptions for highly dangerous drugs. Doctors, friends, family and coworkers all have a crucial role in identifying and getting professional help for people trapped in opioid addiction. So, why is it that many of these same people ignore, maybe encourage or even enable other activities that are just as destructive while some even militantly defend them as a human right?

One example would be abortion. According to Planned Parenthood (PP) and the Democrat Party, not only is abortion a right to kill for, it is a safe event to be celebrated. But that is not an accurate picture. Someone always dies in each and every “successful” abortion. The statistics that PP use are so skewed as to be totally falsified. In a Finnish study of 9,192 death certificates over a seven year period, a woman who has an abortion is 3.5 times more likely to die over the next year than women who have their child. A CA study showed a 2.0 times greater risk of death over two years and a 1.6 times greater chance over an eight year period. Another Finnish study conducted over a seven year period showed an overall suicide rate in Finnish women was 11.3 for 100,000 women. The suicide rate for women who delivered their baby was almost half of that at 5.9 per 100,000 women. Women who had suffered a miscarriage were at 18.1 while 34.7 per 100,000 women who have had an abortion would commit suicide. Another commonly falsified statistic is the link between abortions and breast cancer, several major studies showed a 30% – 79% increased risk of breast cancer following an abortion. One statistic that is impossible to find is how many women die from abortions every year as the majority of those deaths are falsely attributed to other causes. If abortion is really about women’s rights, why are so many facts buried that prevents women from making an educated decision on getting one? Maybe it’s not about women’s rights at all but instead women are simply tools being used to further an agenda.

Following closely on the heels of the left’s sacrificing children to Moloch is their determination to turn public schools into Temples of Ashtoreth by normalizing and even glorifying LGBT behavior. The recent and most disturbing of which is the demand that transgender “rights” supersede biological science. Over the last few years there have been countless males “identifying” as females who enter female sports events, locker rooms, changing rooms and bath rooms with predictable results. Now, the same folks who remained silent over the 11-year boy dancing provocatively at a gay bar and the YouTube video of drag queen RuPaul giving dance routine advice to an 8-year boy are telling us to trust them with our children at the library.

It seems that social engineers that double as Spokane Public Library staff have awarded an opportunity for the San Francisco based “Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH)” to give two, hour long sessions here in Spokane. One will be at the South Hill Library on 6/15/19 at 2PM and the Downtown branch on 6/22/19 also at 2PM. The SPL site asks us to “Join us for a special sparkly edition of storytime! We will share stories of identity and inclusion and celebrate creativity with a craft.” How quaint.

DQSH touts: “Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) is just what it sounds like—drag queens reading stories to children in libraries, schools, and bookstores. DQSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models. In spaces like this, kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where people can present as they wish, where dress up is real.”

Maybe they think we did not get the memo from drag queen Dylan Pontiff, when he boasted to the Lafayette City-Parish Council in Louisiana that drag queens at these story hours “are trying to groom the next generation.”

As a grandparent of six children, I am not enthused by the thought of my tax dollars paying for the “grooming” of children for whatever their purposes are. Others must not be either as a protest group called “500 Mom Strong” was created to oppose the events. Reading the comments on their Facebook page is a trip to Bizzaro World. Any posted opposition to the reading is slammed as hate speech and worse. It is obvious that most of the live and let live crowd on the left only view the 1^st Amendment as an opportunity to crush any opposition to their agenda. The SPL has set up a discussion panel composed of community leaders and “experts” to discuss the topic on 6/8/19.

Buried in the debate on these events are the tragic statistics behind the transgender movement.

In every meaningful way the pretend world DQSH is promoting is little more than a paved road to Dante’s inferno. According to transgender friendly STDcheck.com/blog, sex crimes and violence are rampant in the trans community. Transgender women have a 49 times higher risk of contracting HIV than non-transgendered people. Statistically, black/Afro-American trans women have the highest rates of HIV in America. 19% of the world’s transgender people population has HIV compared to 1% in the general population; 73% of transgender women do not know they have HIV; 44% of transgender people are involved in voluntary or forced sex work.

Transgenders suffer from increased risk of homelessness and incarceration. Due to the increased anxiety they suffer from rejection (from self and other’s) and discrimination, they have higher instances of alcohol and drug abuse.

The hormones they use can cause erectile dysfunction, permanent sterility, liver disease, heart disease, possibly a greater risk of cancer, especially cervical cancer. There is an increased risk of the blood thickening causing higher risk of strokes, heart attacks as well as diabetes, high cholesterol, kidney and liver problems. And all these problems as well as others have been discovered with absolutely zero long term studies on the effects these drugs have on someone using them for the remainder of their lives. The good news is that we have been assured by the same companies that created Vioxx and OxyContin that these drugs are safe for children to use.

Along with the preceding perks to being transgender are the alarmingly high rates of suicide. A recent study revealed that 50.8% of the biological females that identify as males will attempt suicide; those who identified as neither male/female are at 41.8%; males identifying as females are at 29.9% and those who just didn’t know are at 27.9%. Compare that to normal girls at 17.6% and boys at 9.8%.

Michelle Cretella M.D. (Executive Director of American College of Pediatricians) has pointed out that the above statistics are being used to bully parents (and the general population) to affirm the choices of these sexually confused children or lose them to suicide, your choice.

But like most things emanating from today’s left, agenda has long replaced truth. For the most thorough study ever conducted followed participants for 30 years after their transition showed the suicide rates of the adults was 19 times higher than non-transgender people.

So, DQSH may “capture the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.” They are deceptive beyond all words. There is nothing “glamorous” about being physically or sexually abused. There is not much imagination required in homelessness, alcoholism or drug addiction. Certainly the amount of “play” will be limited with all the physical conditions caused by the hormone treatments and HIV.

If the people who promote the transgender agenda truly cared about the gender confused like they say, they wouldn’t be trying to normalize and glamorize a lifestyle often filled with disease, torment and loneliness. They would be offering options to overcome it and examples of those that did.

It is not “hate” to point out these sad statistics, but keeping them buried sure is. Perhaps if someone who truly loved Jackson or the others had protested their drug use, maybe some of those entertainers might still be alive. Maybe this is our chance to help someone avoid a similar fate.

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

References:

The Democratic Party: A History Of Anarchy, Part 4

Embracing The Inner Democrat

Whether it was the Southern Democrats donning the white hoods to intimidate minorities and enforce Jim Crow laws or turning a blind eye on union violence, the Democratic Party has not been shy about embracing violence to get what they want.

In the 1960’s, the majority of the Democratic Party’s leadership were still determined to stop the spread of communism, as demonstrated by the Cuban Missile Crisis under JFK and the escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam under LBJ. However, many young democrats had been influenced by the Cultural Marxist teachings of the Frankfurt School at Columbia University and adopted the radical ideas of communists, anarchists, and socialists. They would soon morph into the “New Left.” The two sides would violently clash during the 1968 Democratic Convention, while the “Old Left” would win the skirmish, they would ultimately lose the war.

One of the college outreaches of the “New Left” was the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Their first meeting was attended by fewer than 100 people in 1962, but by 1968 they numbered over 50,000 activists. They initially demonstrated on a wide range of leftist causes ranging from feminism to the US participation on Vietnam while using mainly non-violent methods. The SDS would break apart because of internal fighting due to the escalation of the war in Vietnam in 1969.

The more radical SDS members formed terrorist cells of 3-4 members, changed their name to the Weathermen, and in October, 1969, began a series of bombings, robberies, and riots that would rack the nation. Their reign of terror began with the October, 1969 bombing of the Chicago memorial for the police officers killed in the Haymarket bombing of 1886. A few days later, hundreds of members gathered in Chicago to riot in what would be later called the ‘Days of Rage’. The riots would last for three days leaving dozens of demonstrators and police injured, 287 Weathermen arrested and cost the city $183,000 in damages and wages. When this demonstration failed to generate the revolution the Weathermen expected, the now fugitive group went underground to “bring the (Vietnam) war home”

1970 would start out with a bang in February with the bombing of the Park Police Station in San Francisco which killed Sgt. Brian McDonnell. There is extensive evidence implicating Weathermen Bernardine Dohrn and Howard Machtinger as the main organizers of the attack. In March 1970 three Weathermen were killed when the nail bomb they were planning to use at a at a Fort Dix military base dance detonated prematurely. Six months later, one of the Weathermen cells robbed the National Guard armory in Newburyport, Massachusetts steeling weapons and ammunition then setting the building on fire causing some $125,000 in damages. Three days later, the same thugs used the stolen weapons to rob a bank and kill a guard.

Over the course of the next 12 years, the Weathermen would commit numerous acts of terrorism including the Brinks armored car robbery in Nyack, New York which led to a shootout with police, killing two police officers and one Brinks guard. Over-all they would kill at least four but probably five people and cause millions of dollars in damage. Few members would spend time in prison for their crimes because of police bungling, President Jimmy Carter’s amnesty for draft dodgers, the statute of limitations having run out on the majority of their crimes and lack of concern by their fellow liberals.

“In a revolution, some people have to die.” Bill Ayers

At the 1968 SDS Convention, Naomi Jaffe claimed to have shot down an American plane flying over Vietnam and assisted in the capture of an American pilot by the North Vietnamese.

At the Weather Underground National War Council on Dec. 4^th, 1969, the following statements were recorded:

“It’s a wonderful feeling to hit a pig. “It must be a really wonderful feeling to kill a pig or blow up a building.” Mark Rudd

“We’re against everything that’s good and decent in honky America. We will burn
and loot and destroy. We are the incubation of your mother’s nightmare.” Jeff Jones

“Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home; kill your parent, that’s where it’s really at.” Bill Ayers

“Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon.” Bill Ayers

“The only path to the final defeat of imperialism and the building of socialism is revolutionary war.” Bill Ayers

“Killing a cop just because he’s a cop, that’ll happen. And that should happen. And there’s nothing inhuman about it at all. It’s survival. It’s the most human thing in the world.” Bernadine Dohrn

“Dig it: Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room. Far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.” Bernadine Dohrn

“It’s absurd to brand someone as “a violent terrorist” simply for throwing a little Molotov cocktail through the window of a bank that doesn’t hurt a fly.” Laura Whitehorn

”When you feel you have right on your side, you can do some pretty horrific things.” Brian Flanagan

Many of the Weathermen would become college professors, popular speakers, writers, heroes to today’s left and also, completely un-repentant for their actions. While Ayers, Dohrn and other former Weathermen have both claimed they never hurt anyone, the evidence, completely repudiates their lies:

According to Harvey Klehr, the Andrew W. Mellon professor of politics and history at Emory University in Atlanta: “the only reason they Dohrn and Ayers) were not guilty of mass murder was mere incompetence. I don’t know what sort of defense that is.”

Larry Grathwohl, an FBI informant planted in the Weather Underground, also exposes Ayers and Dohrn as would-be cold blooded murderers who were thwarted in their attack on a crowded Detroit police station by a timely call to Grathwohl’s FBI contact. In planning the attack on the police station, Ayers would say” We blast the [expletive deleted] building to hell. And we do it when the place is crowded. We wait for them to have a meeting, or a social event. Then we strike.”

“Guilty as hell, free as a bird—America is a great country.” Bill Ayers

”I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.” Bill Ayers

October, 1981, David Gilbert, Kathy Boudin, and two other Weathermen along with six Black Liberation Army extremists robbed a Brinks armored car in Nyack, New York. The thieves seized $1.6 million in cash while killing one Brinks guard and two police officers (including one officer being killed in execution style) while seriously wounding several others. David Gilbert was sentenced to seventy-five five years to life and Kathy Boudin pled guilty to one count of murder and robbery making her eligible for parole in 2003.

In an interview from prison, David Gilbert would defend their actions: “To us it was a question of stopping the real violence,” as justified by U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.

“I wish I could take back some of the things I said and some of the things I did. But in the bigger picture, I don’t feel that it was violent and terrible. I feel like it was primarily–obviously not completely–moral, based on a vision that the government should be better, and that people could be better, and that democracy should be real.” —Bernadine Dohrn

“I just want these people to die. Simple as that. Every single one of them. And their parents.” Vulture writer Erik Abriss Tweeting about the Covington High School students

The Weathermen were part of a wave of leftist terrorism using bombings, bank robberies, murders and kidnappings in an attempt to violently overthrow the U.S. government. Other terrorist groups included the Black Panthers, Symbionese Liberation Army, Earth Liberation Front, and Armed Forces of National Liberation (FALN), but none had the sadistic appeal to democrats like the Weathermen did. They became the “rock stars” of domestic terrorists and their list of supporters includes Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and the Dark Emperor himself, George Soros.

Bill Clinton would pardon Susan L. Rosenberg and Linda Sue Evans, both members of the Nyack Brinks armored truck robbery/triple murder. Former President Barack Obama would serve with Bill Ayers on the board of directors of Woods Fund of Chicago and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and in 1995, Ayers would host Obama’s first fundraiser for State Senator. In 1997, Bill Ayers, the man Obama would call “just a guy in my neighborhood,” would receive the Chicago “Citizen of the Year” award, not bad for a domestic terrorist.

The Soros/Weathermen connection is deep and started when Michael Kennedy from the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) defended Bernadine Dohrn in 1980. Bernadine would later become the NLG’s first national student organizer. The NLG has received massive funding from the Soros “Tides Foundation.” When the NLG gave Bernadine their “Kinoy” award in 2017, they would thank her for her “steadfast and decades long commitment to the struggle for justice and global equality.” Lynne Stewart, one of the most radical NLG lawyers would also defend two of the Weathermen involved in the Nyack armored car robbery, David J Gilbert, and Kathy Boudin. Ayers is also one of Soros puppets, as shown when Ayers became the first director of the Woods Fund of Chicago which is heavily funded by the Tides Foundation. In 2017, Ayers joined with ANTIFA to form the group “Refuse Fascism, another “Tides Foundation” supported group.

In 2002, Linda Evans received a George Soros criminal justice fellowship from the Open Society Institute for her to work to restore civil rights to felons. ”I’m trying to make things better in our society,” she said in a telephone interview. ”I just feel really strongly that the policies of our government are just anti-human at every level.”

The left’s love affair with murderers and bombers is well known. One only has to look at the number of leftists who idolize Charles Manson and Oscar Lopez Rivera. But the Weathermen seem to have taken a special place in the liberal heart. Perhaps because the majority of them are so unrepentant for what they did or how much they truly hate America. But the left’s present day love affair with them and refusal to see their campaign of bombing as terrorism, not heroism, should concern us. For instance, in 2013, Robert Redford directed and starred in a film depicting a fictional account of the Weathermen. The film cast Ayers and Dohrn in a very sympathetic light which was warmly reviewed by the New York Times and other media outlets.

While never shy about embracing violence and terrorism, the Democratic Party has gone all out to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the ’68 Democratic Convention riots as these articles show here, here and here.

We’re not trying to take wealth away from capitalists who got it honestly……….. April Fools,,,,,, No capitalist got wealth honestly. Kill the Rich. Joseph “Jose” Alcoff

Almost daily there is some new violent threat to President Trump, his family, his supporters and/or conservatives in general. The following are just a few of the legion of threats and violence of today’s democrats:

April, 2012: Weathermen David Gilbert released an autobiographical training manual for up and coming terrorists. To “celebrate” such a great event, several former Weathermen got together with members of the communist “Occupy” movement. Naomi Jaffe hosted the event. To the amusement of the audience, she calls the Nyack armored car robbery by Gilbert and Co. as “expropriations”, necessary because “revolutionary work is not funded by government.” She then goes on to label the Occupy movement as “resistance to an unjust system.”
August, 2012: Floyd Lee Corkins went to the Family Research Council’s (FRC) headquarters, shot an un-armed guard three times before the guard was able to subdue him. Corkins decided to attack the FRC based on a “hate report” from the liberal hate group, Southern Poverty Law Center. Corkins would tell authorities that he planned to kill as many people as possible and then to smear some Chic – Fill – A sandwiches on their faces as a political statement.”
May, 2017, Kathy Griffin posted a self-portrait of her holding a bloody severed Donald Trump head, then defended her actions by saying: “Stop acting like my little picture is more important than talking about the actual atrocities that the president of the United States is committing.”
June 2017: James Hodgkinson, a Bernie Sanders supporting democrat, severely wounded Rep. Steve Scalise R-LA and four other people when he opened fire on republican lawmakers practicing baseball. Hodgkinson was carrying a hit list of Congressmen he was stalking at the time of the shooting. Afterwards, numerous democrats defended Hodgkinson’s actions. One email sent to Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., read: “Do you NOT expect this? When you take away ordinary peoples very lives in order to pay off the wealthiest among us, your own lives are forfeit. Certainly, your souls and morality were lost long before. Good riddance.”
Between May and June, 2017, some thirty US Congressmen had been attacked or threatened including Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who was threatened over the telephone by a man shouting: “I suggest you prepare for the battle motherf**ker, and the apocalypse.” “Because we are going to hunt your ass down, wrap a rope around your neck, and hang you from a lamppost.”
August of 2017, State Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal, D-MO, posted on Facebook that President Donald Trump should be “assassinated.”
June, 2018: Maxine Waters, D-Calif, at a press conference stated: “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Later, she would joke about how “the lying president said that I had threatened all of his constituents. I did not threaten his constituents and supporters. I do that all the time, but I didn’t do that that time.”
June, 2018: New York Times writer Hamilton Nolan wrote a chilling opinion piece on the liberal website “Splinter” that sums up the Democrat Party philosophy: “Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called by the publicis bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning.”
June, 2018, USA Today, the extremely liberal national newspaper posted an opinion piece by Glenn Harlan Reynolds entitled “Is America headed towards a new Civil War?” When one considers the support amongst the left for murderous groups like ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter, One can clearly see that the potential is extremely high.
January 18, 2019 at the Washington DC March for Life, a group of students from Covington Catholic High School were waiting for a bus when they were verbally assaulted by a group of Black Hebrew Israelites. Their crime? They were white and wearing MAGA hats. Soon, Native American activist, Nathan Phillips, walked towards the teens beating a drum and stopped in front of Nick Sandmann, a white teenager. The amount of restraint Sandmann displayed was remarkable when faced with an extremely belligerent old man pounding a drum in his face.

The event was conveniently recorded and edited before being posted on social media to make it seem like Sandmann was blocking Phillips from moving forward. The edited video had cut out the racist taunts launched at the teens from the Black Hebrew Israelites and the approach of an extremely combative Phillips. The clip would unleash the dogs of war upon Sandmann and Covington

Media, political and Hollywood figures from every direction attacked Sandmann in the most evil and unbelievable of ways: Sarah Beattie, a writer for the show Saturday Night Live, offered oral sex to anyone who would punch Sandmann in the face; Jack Morrissey Tweeted a picture of a man pushing a foot into a wood-chipper with sprays of blood shooting out with the caption #MAGAkids go screaming, hats first, into the wood-chipper; Michael Buchanan, a hip-hop producer who goes by the stage name House Shoes, Tweeted “If you are a true fan of Shoes I want you to fire on any of these red hat bitches when you see them. On sight.”

Within a day however, more videos came out showing Nathan Phillips walking up to Sandmann and deliberately trying to stare him down while beating his drum. One video captured the taunts by the Black Hebrew Israelites being aimed at the teenagers. This caused some of those who attacked the youth to backtrack on their statements but many did not. Sandmann’s family has now retained a lawyer to sue those who will not retract their statements.

Can any imagine what the media/liberal reaction would have been had any of these outrageous statements been said about Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivor David Hogg? David, unlike Nick has repeatedly sought the spotlight and has made numerous false statements to maintain his 5-minutes of fame while Nick was simply trying to diffuse a volatile situation. What we are seeing is the systematic efforts of totalitarians to stifle opposing opinions from the discussion.

“I don’t care what party you’re from — if you can’t say that it’s wrong to leave babies to die after birth, get the hell out of public office.” Senator Ben Sasse (R., Neb.)

In 2014, a Gallop poll called the Democratic Party, the “compassionate” party. Along with this supposed “compassion” we are told in the 2018 Democratic Party Platform that they are the party of “inclusion.” One only has to look back over the long history of the Democratic Party to find those they “include:” murderers, rapists, pedophiles, abusers, deviants, illegal aliens, and those that infanticide, but woe to those people who don’t swallow the blue pill.

Put simply, the Democratic Party has been the party of rebellion since Thomas Jefferson started it against the wishes of George Washington. Whether it was starting the Civil War, defying the conditions of Reconstruction, the revolt against the Civil Rights acts of the 1950’s and 1960’s, the pattern of vicious rhetoric leading to violence is part of their genetic make-up. The question now is whether history will repeat itself and this current trend of mutiny against the Donald Trump Presidency will escalate into a full blown civil war. After all, they have done it before.

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.” Saul Alinsky, introduction to “Rules for Radicals”

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

References:

The Democratic Party: A History Of Anarchy, Part 3

“The presence of Chinese and their competition with free white labor is one of the greatest evils with which any country can be afflicted” Adopted at the 1881 Federation of Labor convention

The collaboration between socialists, trade unions and the Democratic Party started slowly during the late 1800’s as several banking crisis caused businesses to close across the nation. Because of the recent emancipation of the slaves and continuous immigration from Europe and China, there was severe competition for jobs. This resulted in lower wages for white workers as other races were willing to do the same job for lower pay. This caused white laborers to join with socialists and anarchists to form labor unions. The goals of the unions were varied but the most common was higher wages and better working conditions. To do this, they would embrace violence to terrorize foreign workers and intimidate US companies. Over the next several decades, union violence would claim the lives of thousands and destroy millions of dollars of private property.

Between 1852 and 1880, some 300,000 Chinese people fled the ongoing wars in China and immigrated to the American west coast, principally San Francisco. Many would remain in America where they became the principle workers on the Central Pacific railroad’s leg of the first transcontinental railroad. The Chinese were popular with the railroad because they were willing to work for lower wages and perform more dangerous tasks than the white American workers. These traits soon put them at odds with the radical socialists and anarchists of the trade union movement.

Hatred of the Chinese immigrant was the basis of the first collaboration between the Democratic Party and the trade union movement in San Francisco. Baptist Reverend Isaack Kalloch (a Democrat) joined with radical union organizer Denis Kearney to get Kalloch elected as mayor, and enlarge the Workingman’s Party. Their goal was to launch a movement to forcibly evict the Chinese from San Francisco. Denis Kearney was a young Irish immigrant who first gained notoriety by denouncing the Chinese immigrants, then participating in the socialist “Workingman’s Party” riot which killed 4 Chinese and did over $100,000 damage to Chinese owned buildings. Below is a speech made by Kalloch:

“If the men of capital and resources in this city continue to show such criminal indifference, as many of them have, to the suffering of the people; if corporations and large firms continue to take the bread from their children’s mouths and give It to the Chinese dogs, if, in fact, it becomes apparent that there is no hope for American labor, then there will be trouble; then there will be conflagrations; then there will be bloodshed. I say, and I will say it a hundred times more if necessary, that there will be trouble and bloodshed over the Chinese question,”

Joining Kalloch and Kearney in their campaign to expel the Chinese from America was American Federation of Labor president (AFL), Samuel Gompers. Gompers would famously say of the Chinese “the superior whites had to exclude the inferior Asiatics, by law, or if necessary, by force of arms.” Their collaboration was instrumental in the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 which outlawed Chinese immigration to the US and limited the rights of the Chinese already living here.

Further anti-Chinese labor riots were common all over the US but two of the most violent were led by the Democratic Party in Denver CO. during 1880, while the Seattle, WA riot of 1886 was led by the Knights of Labor union.

During the Presidential election of 1880, a staunchly democratic newspaper began running a series of articles calling the Chinese the “Pest of the Pacific” and warned that “if more Chinese invaded Colorado, white men would starve and white women would be forced into prostitution.” These anti-Chinese articles would be used to justify the mob attack on Denver’s Chinatown, killing one Chinese laundryman and causing some $53,000 in property damage.

The Seattle anti-Chinese riot was also caused by intense labor competition and the anti-Chinese attitude of the growing union movement in the United States. There were several union ringleaders that instigated it but the name most attached to the actual violence of the riot was Daniel Cronin. He was from California and had strong ties to Denis Kearney’s “International Workingman’s Union.” He, like Denis, was an outspoken critic of the Chinese, and the companies that hired them, often stating “there will be riot and bloodshed this winter” if the Chinese did not leave Seattle. True to his word, in February, 1885, he was able to start a riot which left dozens of people injured as the mob literally threw hundreds of Chinese onto boats and trains to evict them from town before burning Chinatown to the ground.

“A Black Skin was a Death Sentence” —Carlos F. Hurd

Union violence converged with democratic racism in East St. Louis during 1917. St. Louis, at the turn of the century was a bustling industrial town with a decidedly white democratic population. With many American companies gearing up for entering into WWI, the demand for workers increased at the same time European immigration stopped. The AFL and other unions seized upon this opportunity to increase the unionizing of American manufacturing by calling numerous strikes all over the nation and particularly in East St. Louis.

To combat these practices, companies began to recruit African-American strikebreakers from the south, bringing them in as replacement workers and helping them settle in. This threatened white worker jobs, and the Democratic Party’s hold over the area.

The St. Louis based Aluminum Ore Co employed thousands of workers and was determined to remain a non-union shop. When the AFL called a strike, the company brought in the African-American strikebreakers that would ultimately crush the union’s power. As the strike lines thinned and more of the white workers crossed the picket lines, the union began to spread rumors of incoming trainloads of African-Americans to colonize East St. Louis which would oust white workers from their jobs and dominate local politics. As confrontation seemed inevitable, both sides began to arm themselves.

Alexander Flannigan, a local lawyer and politician stated at a labor meeting in late June, that “East St Louis must remain a white town” and that “there is no law against mob violence.”

The violence erupted on July 1, 1917, when a group of plain clothed policemen were fired upon as they went through the African-American part of town. The shots killed two officers. In retaliation, a group of whites began to actively beat and/or kill African-Americans and burn down their homes and businesses. By the time the Governor of Illinois had called in the National Guard to stop the violence, the mob had killed between 100 to 200 people and torched over 300 buildings leaving over 6,000 people homeless. A few perpetrators faced justice before the incident was overshadowed by America’s entry into WWI.

“I couldn’t have thrown the bomb. I was at home making bombs.” —Louis Lingg

Beatings, shootings, mob violence and lynchings soon took a back seat as anarchists/socialists introduced a new gruesome weapon in what the New York Times labeled as the “dispensation of dynamite.” There had been bombings prior to the Chicago union strike of 1886, but the Haymarket Square bombing shocked the nation when seven police officers were killed by an unknown assailant throwing dynamite at them. In the aftermath that followed eight anarchists were brought to trial for murder. When in the course of the trials it was determined that none of the defendants had actually thrown the bomb, the police changed the charge to “conspiracy to murder” because in the words of prosecuting attorney Francis Walker: “the eight defendants were part of a vast labor conspiracy to launch a revolution–a conspiracy that cost the lives of dedicated public servants such as patrolman Mathias Degan.” Before the bombing had taken place, one of the defendants, August Spies, had joked with a reporter by saying; “take it to your boss and tell him we have 9,000 more like it,” as he tossed him a casing for a bomb. The democratic Mayor, Harrison Carter, had befriended and defended the socialists and anarchists before and during the trial.

The results of the trial were that seven of the eight were condemned to be hung while the eighth was given a fifteen year prison sentence. When four of the defendants were hung, there was a nationwide outcry, resulting in the remaining three being pardoned after serving six years in prison. Haymarket would turn the defendants into martyrs and become a rallying point for the Weather Underground in 1969 to start another terrorist war on America.

Haymarket marked the beginning of a reign of terror that lasted for decades that included the 1892 bombings of the Bunker Hill mine in Coeur d’Alene, and the Los Angeles Times in 1910, which killed twenty-one people and injured dozens more. The LA Times trial would be labeled as the trial of the century when Clearance Darrow, the famous defense lawyer defended the two McNamara brothers charged with placing the bomb. When the evidence against the brothers became irrefutable, Darrow arranged a plea bargain which sentenced John McNamara to fifteen years and his brother James to life in prison. As he left the courtroom, James yelled out to a reporter; “You see? I was right and you were wrong. The whole damn world believes in dynamite.”

“We will dynamite you,” became the rallying cry of anarchist publications as the wave of bombings peaked in the years 1919 and 1920. In April of 1919, a group of anarchists nicknamed the Galleanists, tried to spark a revolution in the U.S. by sending 36 bombs through the US mail to politicians, bankers, judges and other “enemies” on “May Day.” The majority of the bombs were caught at various Post Offices around the country but one succeeded in blowing the hands off of a maid of US Senator Thomas Hardwick.

The final anarchist strike of the early 20^th century was the 1920 bombing of the headquarters of J.P. Morgan and Co., which killed 38 and injured over 200 people, making it one of the most deadly acts of terrorism in U.S. history. The bomber was never caught but was believed to have been Italian anarchist Mario Buda, a Galleanists and a close associate of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, the Italian anarchists convicted of murdering two bank employees. The Sacco and Vanzetti case is still enshrined by democrats and other left leaning groups as a major case of legal in-justice. In 1977 Democratic Governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis exonerated Sacco and Vanzetti as heroes and martyrs. Considering the strong ties Sacco and Vanzetti had with the Galleanists, one would suspect the 38 killed and hundreds wounded by the bombing of the JP Morgan Building might not have agreed with Dukakis.

A note found in 2005 which had been authored by Upton Sinclair (socialist writer of the novel “The Jungle”) would state that he (Sinclair) met with Sacco’s and Vanzetti’s lawyer, Fred Moore, to discuss the case. Moore would confide to him that Sacco and Vanzetti were both guilty of the crime. Later Sinclair would talk to other anarchists who also confirmed that Sacco and Vanzetti were guilty. In the end, Sinclair asked the note to be hidden.

Following the bombing of the JP Morgan building, the Galleanists, faded into obscurity as many of them were deported back to Europe while the remaining members went into hiding or were jailed.

“ In the city of Boston I cannot stop a jackrabbit, but here in Chicago I can put you out of business and I will if you don’t do what I tell you to” Cornelius P. Shea

During the 1920’s the unions allied with mobsters, labor unions, democrats and communists:

Mob influence in the New York City Democratic Party started in 1931 when mobster Lucky Luciano used armed gunmen to place one of his stooges in a New York City political office. The mob’s control over various construction unions would help finance such powerful political organizations as the Thomas Jefferson Democratic Club of Canarsie, in Brooklyn which was instrumental in the careers of both current NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio and Harold Ickes, Deputy Chief of Staff under Bill Clinton.
Perhaps no other labor union represents violence, the Democratic Party, corruption, the mob and communism better than the Teamsters:

“Sure, we loaned money to build hotels and casinos in Las Vegas. So what? Las Vegas borrowers were good customers.” —Jimmy Hoffa

Organizing in 1903 under Cornelius Shea, the Teamsters would grow into one of the most powerful unions in the country. Shea’s use of strikes in Chicago helped the union to grow but his personal corruption would almost destroy it before he had been ousted as union president in 1907. Once expelled, Shea became one of Al Capone’s enforcers, specializing in planting bombs to kill and intimidate people, head an extortion ring, and stab his mistress 27 times.

His successor, Daniel J Tobin, would lead the Teamsters from 1907 until 1952. He was closely aligned with FDR and even though he himself was never accused of criminal activities, he most certainly was aware of the strong Teamster ties with the mob in Kansas City, NYC and Chicago. Five of the next six Teamster Presidents would all be convicted of major crimes with the one standout, Frank Fitzsimons, who died before being investigated. All had ties with the mob, including providing loans from union member’s pensions plans to fund hotels in Las Vegas. The Teamsters ties with organized crime and internal corruption are rampant even today and numerous Teamster pension plans are nearly bankrupt because of mismanagement.

Even though Tobin was anti-communist, the most important strike for the Teamsters was orchestrated by the members of the Minneapolis Teamsters Local 574 which was run by members of the Trotskyist Communist Party. The violent 1934 strike would run on and off for months, resulting in four deaths and wounding dozens. After the successful strike was over, the Trotskyist led local would organize some 250,000 Midwest truckers, becoming the Central Conference of Teamsters.

The Teamsters Local 574 strike was used by FDR to help pass the pro-union National Labor Relations Act, or the “Wagner Act.” Union membership would reach its peak after the “Wagner Act” was passed and created close ties between Northern Democrats and the labor unions.

In, 1986, a conflagration burned through the DuPont Plaza Hotel, San Juan, Puerto Rico leaving 97 dead and 140 injured. Within weeks, three Teamster Union members were arrested for starting the fire in a pile of furniture stored in the ballroom. On the day of the fire, the hotel had offered the Teamsters employees a new contract which the union members rejected and then voted to go out on strike. The arsonists were each sentenced to 99 years in prison for setting the second most deadly fire in U.S. history.

Under Ron Carey, Teamster President from 1991 – 1998, the Teamsters became involved in several money laundering schemes with the Clinton Whitehouse, Carey’s plea bargain with the Department of Justice acquitted him of perjury charges but barred him from re-election. Carey’s political director William Hamilton, Jr. would eventually be convicted of misappropriating $885,000 in Teamsters treasury funds and giving them to liberal groups.

Union membership in the private sector has declined from 26 percent in 1979 to today’s 10.7 while union membership in the public sector has actually increased. The decline of union membership along with a change in their long term strategies has caused the Democratic Party to slowly abandon the once mighty alliance they had the craft unions.

In order to uncover fraud and embezzlement committed by union officials, President George Bush Jr encouraged Congress to pass the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). The LMRDA reforms had revealed over $93 million in stolen union member dues during Bush’s administration. One of President Obama’s first acts was to reverse those reforms as a “thank you” for union money for his election campaign, displaying once again, how little the rank and file manufacturing union member means to the democrats.

By failing to pass the extreme “Employee Free Choice Act,” or rein in the Right to Work Laws established under the Taft-Hartley Act when they controlled both houses of Congress and the White House, the Democratic Party has shown how little they value the craft unions. In fact it was Democrat Bill Clinton that hastened the demise of U.S. manufacturing by signing NAFTA. While the union leadership has remained Democratic Party lapdogs, many union members supported Donald Trump in 2016. This is because the democrats have sacrificed union jobs on the altar of environmentalism and unlimited immigration.

“As the number of legal Hispanics increases, the number of Democratic votes increases as well” Unnamed Democratic “insiders” National Journal Insiders Poll, April 14, 2007

The disastrous Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965 was championed by the three Kennedy brothers, John, Robert and Edward and it can be said to be the real Kennedy legacy. This Act ended the national origins quota system began under the Johnson-Reed Immigration Act of 1924 which had installed racial quotas. The Hart-Celler Act doubled the immigration cap to 170,000 people from the eastern hemisphere and 120,000 people from the western hemisphere. The increase in immigration has not proven to be as problematic as the “unintended” consequence of chain migration. Chain Migration allows a US resident to bring family members from foreign countries, who in turn can bring others, none of which are counted towards the immigrant cap.

Whether the democrats foresaw the demographic transformation of the country produced by the Hart-Celler Act or not, embracing that change has become a winning policy for them. In 1965, just four percent of the US population was foreign born; by 2015 it stands at eighteen percent. Seven out of eight immigrants were from Europe in 1960, today, nine out of ten are from Latin America and Asia, with the majority of them being Asian. By 2045, the US Census Bureau projects that whites will become a minority of the US population.

Four US states along with the District of Columbia, are now minority-majority, they are California, Hawaii, New Mexico, and Texas. Since the majority of these immigrants come from socialist nations, they notice little change when they vote for the democrats which have turned California into a one party state. There is not a single Republican elected to a state office today. Immigration has not only allowed the Democrats to seize control over California, they have increased the number of seats California has in the U.S. Congress. For every 770,000 people in a sanctuary city or a state, the democrats will take a Congressional seat from a less populated and generally more conservative state. Unless the immigration policy is immediately changed, the United States will become a one party nation.

The prospect of the immigration policy actually changing however is not very likely as numerous “republican” leaders, lawmakers and “right” leaning think-tanks/lobbying groups such the Brookings Institute and the US Chamber of Commerce all hold pro-immigration views. This at a time when the Democratic Party has been pushing through a program to fundamentally and permanently change the US into a socialist nation and they have been open about it for years:

“Top Democratic leaders and activists see Hispanic migration as a long-term opportunity for the party. The arrival of additional immigrant workers is “bad for blue-collars,” but immigrants can help elect Democratic majorities, and if [a Democratic Congress] were to significantly strengthen unions, then you would offset the negative effect on the income of workers.”

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., former chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, told National Journal in 2006.

“To get a citizenship bill through Congress, President Bush and the Democrats probably need to convert a large bloc of anti-immigration Republican members, perhaps 40 in the House and 20 in the Senate. Somehow, we have to convince them that voting for comprehensive reform does not amount to ‘enfranchising their defeat. Our problem, is that we are hoping that the legislation will build the Democratic electorate.”

Unnamed Democratic Lawmaker; “Border Politics,” National Journal, Feb. 10, 2007

“So I think there’s two things that matter for the progressive community.”

“Number one, if we are to expand this electorate to win, the progressive community needs to solidly be on the side of immigrants, that we’ll expand and solidify the progressive coalition for the future…” When you are in the middle of a fight for your life you will remember who was there with you. And immigrants count on progressives to be able to do that.”

“Number two: “We reform the immigration laws; it puts 12 million people on the path to citizenship and eventually voters”. Can you imagine if we have, even the same ratio, two out of three? If we have eight million new voters who care about …… and will be voting. We will be creating a governing coalition for the long term, not just for an election cycle.”

SEIU International Executive Vice President Eliseo Medina, 2009

“I am not going to Pennsylvania to recruit back the Trump voters … I am going to Pennsylvania to create new voters.” U.S. Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) When asked why he was rallying Hispanic voters with an initial a focus on Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida, with a large Puerto Rican population. 6/24/18

“If @realDonaldTrump declares a “national emergency” to pay for his border wall, we’ll fight him in Congress, in the courts, and in the streets.” — Mike Levin (@MikeLevinCA) January 10, 2019

It is clear that the democrats are not in an all-out war with President Trump over the border wall for their love of America, they are doing it for the same reason Thomas Jefferson may have been willing to spill blood over the 1800 election; the lust for power.

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

References:

Additional Sources:

The Democratic Party: A History Of Anarchy, Part 2

Today’s Democrats: Slavery is the Greatest Blessing for Master and Slave

“I want Cuba, I want Tamaulipas, Potosi, and one or two other Mexican States; and I want them all for the same reason – for the planting and spreading of slavery.” – Senator Albert Gallatin Brown of Mississippi

Following 1800 election, the issue of slavery would drive a wedge in the country not seen since the American Revolution. As their power waned, the Southern Democrats began to threaten violence and secession from the union as non-slave states threatened their “particular institution.” While slavery was not the only issue the Southern Democrat was willing to go to war over, it was certainly the most prominent.

Several petitions were delivered to the U.S. House of Representatives in February, 1836 from residents of Massachusetts stating that they were praying for the abolishment of slavery. Debate arose as to whether or not to allow the petitions into the Congressional Record. Democratic South Carolina Senator James Henry Hammond responded: “What, sir, does the south ask next? She asks, and this at least she has a right to demand, that these petitions be not received here and recorded on your journals. Is this demanding anything unreasonable, unjust or unkind? Sir, we cannot endure it. If these things are permitted here, you drive us from your councils. Let the consequences be upon you.”

“But, Mr. Speaker, even if this House should refuse these petitions, I am not one to trust that this conflict will be at an end. No sir, we shall have to meet it elsewhere. Our State Legislatures have to pass laws regulating our police with a stricter hand. They will have to pass and enforce laws prohibiting the circulation of incendiary pamphlets through the mail within their limits. We may have to adopt an entire non-intercourse with the Free States and finally sir, we may have to dissolve this Union. From none of these measures will we shrink as circumstances may make them necessary. Our last thought will be to give up our Institutions (slavery). We were born and bred under them, and will maintain them or die in their defense. And I warn the Abolitionists, ignorant infuriated barbarians as they are that if chance shall throw any of them into our hands, they may expect a FELON’S DEATH. No human law, no human influence can arrest their fate. The superhuman instinct of self-preservation, the indignant feelings of an outraged people, to whose hearth-stones they are seeking to carry death and desolation, pronounce their doom, and if we failed to accord it to them, we are unworthy of the beings whom it is our duty to protect, and we should merit and expect the indignation of an offended Heaven. “

The answer to the petitions by Senator Hammond clearly shows the pattern for Democratic Party behavior; censorship, boycotting, and violence to those with opposing points of views.

Democratic South Carolina Senator John C. Calhoun said the following in an 1837 speech: “But I take higher ground. I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good–a positive good. I hold then, that there never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other.”

The 1852 Democratic Party platform stated: “That Congress has no power under the constitution to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States, and that such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their own affairs not prohibited by the constitution; that all efforts of the abolitionists or others made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery, or to take incipient steps in relation thereto, are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.”

In 1856, Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner gave a speech before the Senate that caused US Congressman Preston S. Brooks of South Caroline to nearly beat him to death:

“Mr. Sumner, I have read your speech with great care, and with as much impartiality as I am capable of, and I feel it my duty to say to you that you have published a libel on my State, and uttered a slander upon a relative, who is aged and absent, and I am come to punish you.”

The increasingly bitter partisanship crept closer to open war as Jefferson Davis (the eventual president of the Confederacy) threatened secession by the State of Mississippi should a republican be elected as US President: “I say to you here as I have said to the Democracy of New York, if it should ever come to pass that the Constitution shall be perverted to the destruction of our rights so that we shall have the mere right as a feeble minority unprotected by the barrier of the Constitution to give an ineffectual negative vote in the Halls of Congress, we shall then bear to the federal government the relation our colonial fathers did to the British crown, and if we are worthy of our lineage we will in that event redeem our rights even if it be through the process of revolution.”

The reaction to the election of Abraham Lincoln was immediate as stated by Democratic Louisiana Senator Judah P. Benjamin in a 1860 Senate speech right before the South seceded from the union: “It is a revolution; a revolution of the most intense character; in which belief in the justice, prudence, and wisdom of secession is blended with the keenest sense of wrong and outrage, and it can no more be checked by human effort for the time than a prairie fire by a gardener’s watering pot.”

Was this sentiment not clearly displayed before the entire world on January 20, 2017 as thousands of democrats and leftists destroyed property and spread violence in Washington DC? Then the following day millions assembled to hold “Women’s Marches” all over the US. Though these would remain peaceful, the message was the same as the previous day as fading when pop star Madonna mused about blowing up the White House and called for revolution.

“Boys, I want you to go ahead and kill every damned one of the ni**er race and burn up the cradle.” Democrat Memphis City Judge John C. Creighton

Following their defeat in the Civil War, Democrats in the South simply shifted their priorities from defending slavery to the suppression of Republicans and African-Americans, by forming the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist groups. The KKK operated as a loosely structured group of political and social terrorists. Their goal was the political defeat of the southern Republicans and the complete domination of the newly liberated African-Americans.

In order to do this, the KKK used lynchings, beatings, shootings and intimidation to keep the African-Americans and Republicans from voting and being elected into office. Started by former Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest in 1866, the KKK was so successful in dominating the southern African-Americans that the southern states would remain a Democratic stronghold until the late 1960’s.

In an interview with a Cincinnati Commercial correspondent, General Nathan Bedford Forrest said of the KKK in 1868: “It is a political military organization, it was found that political matters and interests could best be promoted within it, and it was then made a political organization, giving it’s support, of course, to the Democratic Party.” So the lynchings, shootings and other terror tactics were done to promote the Democratic Party.

In 1871 Shaffer Bowens, a white former KKK member gave testimony in court about the goals and activities of the KKK. “My understanding was, to advance the Democratic Party and put down the radical party. … By killing, and whipping, and crowding out men from the ballot-boxes. “

Wilmington, North Caroline in 1898 was a prosperous town with a largely African-American population and led by a predominantly Republican leadership that supported their rights. The former democratic heads of the city however were determined to retake the city in the upcoming election.

Prominent Democratic leader Daniel Schenck, warned: “It will be the meanest, vilest, dirtiest campaign since 1876. The slogan of the Democratic Party from the mountains to the sea will be but one word … Ni**er.”

The day before the election, U.S. Congressman Alfred Moore Waddell spoke to his fellow Democrats: “You are Anglo-Saxons. You are armed and prepared, and you will do your duty. Be ready at a moment’s notice. Go to the polls tomorrow, and if you find the Negroes out voting, tell him to leave the polls and if he refuses kill shoot him down in his tracks. We shall win tomorrow if we have to do it with guns” In the same speech he also stated: “that they should, if necessary, “choke the Cape Fear with carcasses.”

Following the election, Waddell formed a mob of over 2,000 people to terrorize every African-American and Republican they could find, eventually killing somewhere between 25 – 300 people (no accurate count has been established), banishing hundreds and burning down a large section of the town. Not content with the murders and destruction, Waddell would oust the mayor and all Republican’s City office holders in what was really a coup d’état.

In the aftermath, thousands of African-Americans and Republicans left the area giving control of the city back to the Democrats. The Democrats then altered the voting requirements in the state preventing African-Americans from voting again until the passing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Alfred Waddell became the new mayor of Wilmington, a position he held until 1905.

Democrat Governor of Georgia, Hugh M. Dorsey wrote a letter to the NAACP in 1918 defending the lynchings of Hayes Turner and his eight month pregnant wife, Mary. Writing: “I believe that if the Negroes would exert their ultimate influence with the criminal element of their race and stop rapes that it would go a long way towards stopping lynchings.”

Today’s Democrats have not changed their willingness to use censorship; intimidation and violence to silence a foe, the only thang that has changed are the targets. They moved from African-Americans (supposedly) over to Christians, males, whites, heterosexuals and conservatives.

“Oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get from being cruel to old white men.” Sarah Jeong

1962: US Supreme Court case, Engel v. Vitale determined that the New York Board of Regents had violated the First Amendment by constituting an establishment of religion when the group authorized a prayer in schools. Five of the six deciding justices were Democrats.
1963: US Supreme Court case, Abington School District v. Schempp determined that reading the Bible in public schools violated the first amendment. Seven of the nine deciding justices were Democrats.
1973: US Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade gave legal protection for the murdering of unborn babies. Five of the seven deciding justices were Democrats.
1995: Democrat Bill Clinton vetoed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act
2003: US District Court Judge Myron Thompson (a democrat) ordered the removal of the granite Ten Commandments monument in the Alabama Capitol stating it violated the U.S. Constitution’s principle of separation of religion and government.
2008: “And it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations,” Barack Obama
January 2009 – Obama reverses the Mexico City Policy which protected the American taxpayer from being forced to pay for abortions in foreign countries.
February 2009 – Military officials created more stringent restrictions on proselytizing at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs after the football coach there posted a locker room banner for “Team Jesus.” Officials met with militant atheist Mickey Weinstein for his opinion on the new rules.
February 2011 – Obama directs the Justice Department to stop defending the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
March 2011 – Obama announces plans to rewrite the Bush era Conscience Clause to force health care providers to offer contraceptives, including the morning after pill, even in violation of their religious beliefs.
April 2011 – President Obama urges the passage of ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act) which would eliminate hiring protections for businesses and religious organizations with 15 or more employees from discriminating based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
September 2011 – The Pentagon authorizes military chaplains to perform same-sex marriages at military facilities in violation of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
October 2011 – The Obama administration eliminates federal grants to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for their extensive programs aiding victims of human trafficking because the Catholic Church is anti-abortion.
July 2012, same-sex couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, sue Jack Philips, the Christian owner of Masterpiece Cake-shop in Lakewood Colorado over his refusal to make them a wedding cake on religious grounds. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission practically railroaded Philips all the way up to the US Supreme Court. The court sides with Philips but only because the Commission was so draconian in the way they handled the lawsuit leaving the door open for another lawsuit to force Christians to conform to political correctness.
August 2012: On August 15, 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins entered the Family Research Council’s (FRC) building in downtown Washington D.C., pulled out a pistol and shot the guard, Leo Johnson, at the front desk shouting, “I don’t like your politics.” Though wounded, Johnson acted quickly and subdued Corkins before anyone was killed. Later, Corkins would admit to the FBI that he targeted FRC because the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) had labeled them as an anti-gay hate group.
2012: Democratic Party removes the word “God” from its party platform.
February 2012: The tragic meeting between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin that would leave Trayvon dead and Zimmerman one of the most hated men in America. The event would prove just how far the Main Stream Media (MSM) would deviate from the truth to push their narrative.

The MSM would create a new race by calling Zimmerman a “white Hispanic;” edited the 911 call Zimmerman made so as to appear he attacked Travon based on race; deliberately used a mug shot of Zimmerman making him appear as a criminal; and then label his acquittal as an act of “white supremacy.”

The MSM was just as deceitful with their treatment of Travon. The picture they used was several years old showing him as a young boy, not the strapping teenager he actually was; Trayvon was portrayed as a boy with a sweet tooth because he was carrying a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea. The media lied then and now about the tea which was in fact Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail that when combined with Skittles and codeine based cough syrup forms a popular drug called “lean.”

The MSM reported that Zimmerman gunned Travon down in spite of the physical evidence supporting Zimmerman’s testimony that he was defending himself against Trayvon. The MSM received help in their smearing of Zimmerman from the Great Divider, President Barack Obama, who said at a press conference “My main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

With the help of George Soros and the MSM, Obama would get a “son” with Trayvon as one of its many faces. This “son” would help Obama widen the racial divide in America and when Obama publicly supported it, he would be the first President since fellow Democrat Woodrow Wilson endorsing the KKK, to support a domestic terrorist organization, the Klan with a tan, Black Lives Matter (BLM).

April 2013 Military Religious Freedom Foundation founder Mikey Weinstein (the man who famously labeled fundamentalist Christians as “monsters,’ and compared Christian proselytizing to “spiritual rape),” was included by the Obama Administration in a Pentagon meeting to discuss religious issues and the role of the ‘chaplain’ in today’s military.
June 2013 – The Obama Administration overrides the religious conscience of employers by including in the mandates for Obamacare, that all employers must provide abortion causing drugs for their employees as part of Obamacare insurance. Some 70 organizations sue the government to overturn the directive and in October of 2017, the Trump administration settles the lawsuits by allowing the organizations to opt out of providing contraceptives.

April 2013 – The Obama Administration began using US Tax dollars funneled through the United States Agency for Internal Development (USAID), to begin training homosexual activists to help overturn the laws against sodomy and supportive of traditional marriage in countries with strong Catholic backgrounds
October, 2014 – Ultra liberal Joe Bernstein of Buzzfeed posts on Twitter “Kill a straight, white man on your war to work tomorrow”.
2013 – Black Lives Matter was started by Marxist activists Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi and funded by left wing donors including Soros Funds, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations. Alicia, Patrisse and Opal all cite Assata Shakur, a Black Identity Movement advocate and police murdering hardline communist as the inspiration for the BLM movement.
August 2014 – Unarmed 18 year old African-American Michael Brown is stopped by the white police officer, Darren Wilson in Ferguson, MO. The encounter turned violent leaving Brown dead after being shot 6-times. The next night looters claiming to be “protestors” vandalize and pillage over a dozen businesses. Soon, Michael Brown’s parents hire the same lawyer that represented Trayvon Martin’s parents, and the race baiting agitator Al Sharpton arrives in Ferguson to demand justice for Michael and pose for cameras as he called Wilson a murderer of the “Gentle Giant” Michael Brown.

Black Lives Matter thugs burned down, vandalized and looted dozens of businesses costing the local/state governments some $26 million and leaving a town that will never recover. The myth of police officers racial bias against black males became deeply rooted, and escalating violence became the new norm for BLM. In an effort to defend the violence, Time Magazine wrote: “Riots are a necessary part of the evolution of society”

April 2015: Police arrested Freddie Gray, a 25 year old African-American male for possession of an illegal switchblade knife and locked him into the back of a police van wearing handcuffs but no seatbelt. When Gray left the van, it was on a stretcher and in a coma. He died a week later with three fractured vertebrae and a crushed voice box.

Within a few days, hundreds of protestors resort to violence, torch cars, burn buildings and loot businesses (and in a special effort to relieve their angst over the death of Freddie Gray, the thugs pillage over a third of Baltimore’s pharmacies of prescription drugs). As if on que, the MSM would roll out its support of the rioters with this article by Salon.

Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake gave a press conference while the riots were ongoing in which she tried to explain why so many police officers in full riot gear were unable to control the mob destroying Baltimore:

“I’ve made it very clear that I work with the police and instructed them to do everything they could to make sure that the protesters were able to exercise their right to free speech.”

“It’s a very delicate balancing act because while we try to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well, and we work very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to de-escalate”

While Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake would deny giving the “stand down” order, she was soon refuted by several police officers. The rioters damaged or destroyed more than 380 businesses and over 100 cars, injured over 100 police officers and cost the city over $50 million. Just like in the aftermath of the Ferguson, MO riots, the Obama administration would use the public outcry to federalize the Baltimore Police Department. One of the consequences of federalizing the police department was the local police just stopped noticing lawbreaking happening, this caused skyrocketing crime and the tripling of the homicide rates since 2015.

Peter Moskos, a John Jay College of Criminal Justice professor and former Baltimore officer, said of the situation: “The cops are being less proactive at the same time violence is going up. Cops are doing as requested: lessening racial disparity, lessening complaints, lessening police-involved shootings. All those numbers are just great right now, and if those are your metrics of success, we’re winning. The message has clearly gotten out to not commit unnecessary policing.”

August 2015: “Far too many women are still denied critical access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth. All the laws we’ve passed don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton argued. “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” Hillary Clinton
September 2014: In keeping with its tradition of supporting terrorists, the Democratic National Committee endorsed BLM.
September 2015: BLM held a march at a St. Paul Minnesota State Fair in which the members payed homage to the group’s role model, Assata Shakur then chanted “treat police like ‘pigs in a blanket fry ’em like bacon’. In this, they were very successful for between 2014 and 2016 BLM members and/or supporters shot 20 police officers killing 11 of them in ambushes and the murder of police officers has increased 37% since 2015.
October 2016. Democrats hire paid agitators to disrupt Donald Trump rallies. One of the perpetrators, Scott Foval, was bragging on hidden camera that the democrat protestors at a Trump rally were actually paid rioters. “It’s a very easy thing for Republicans to say, ‘Well, they’re busing people in.’ … We’ve been busing people in to deal with you f—–‘ a——- for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way to do it.
Numerous signatories including; scholar Cornel West; author Alice Walker; Chase Iron Eyes of the Standing Rock Sioux; educator Bill Ayers; poet Saul Williams; CNN‘s Marc Lamont Hill; Carl Dix of the Communist Party USA; and others took out a full page ad in the New York Times bemoaning the election of Donald Trump. Part of the ad stated: “He has assembled a cabinet of Christian fundamentalist fanatics, war mongers, racists, science deniers. NO! His regime must not be allowed to consolidate. We REFUSE to accept a Fascist America!”
January 2017: Massive riots happen all around the country as Donald Trump was sworn in as President.
2018: Hillary Clinton being interviewed by CNN’s Christiane Amanpour: “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.”
Oct 2018: “Michelle [Obama] always says that when they go low, we go high. No. No. When they go low, we kick them. That’s what this new Democratic Party is about.” Eric Holder said to a delighted crowd of Georgia Democrats

If the above incidents are not enough to convince the average American that the Democratic Party has returned to their pre-Civil War roots, than nothing will. In fact, if you really want to see how far the Democrat attitudes towards African-Americans have evolved, just look at their reaction to Kanye West’s meeting with President Trump.

A guest on CNN’s Tonight show commented on the meeting:

“Kanye West is what happens when Negroes don’t read.”

Another guest commented “Listen, black folks are about to trade Kanye West in the racial draft, okay? They’ve had it with him; he’s an attention whore like the president.”

“He’s the token Negro of the Trump Administration.”

“No one should be taking Kanye West seriously; he clearly has issues; he’s already been hospitalized …”

Another attacker of Kanye was African-American “intellectual” Michael Eric Dyson said of Kanye on the MSNBC show ‘The Beat,’ “This is white supremacy by ventriloquism, a black mouth is moving, but white racist ideals are flowing from Kanye’s mouth.”

As with all things Democrat, the shackle does not fall far from the stock nor does their willingness to subjugate people to their delusions of grandeur ever lessen. Based on the events in Baltimore and Ferguson, we are seeing the start of Bleeding Kansas all over the nation, this coming election could spread that violence like a wildfire.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. —Edmund Burke

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

References:

The Democratic Party: A History Of Anarchy, Part 1

Today’s Democrats: The more things change, the more they stay the same

“This is how we’re going to kill your wife.”

Since the election of Donald Trump, the vitriolic attacks on Trump, his family, cabinet, and conservatives in America today are non-stop. Almost daily there are outrageous attacks by the left on people they do not agree with which is promptly glossed over by the main stream media (MSM) as a justified reaction to Trump. To be fair, there have been and continue to be those on the right with a violent and/murderous bent in them. People like John Brown, Michael Fredrick Griffin, shooter of abortion provider Dr. David Gunn, Timothy McVeigh and the Sovereign Citizen movement are all questionably labeled as “right wing.” Also some of the violent attacks attributed to the left are people with serious mental issues just like some of those from the right.

The methodology used by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to create the list of “right wing terrorism” is also highly dubious as they often falsely label a violent attack as one done by a “right winger” and simply ignore left wing and Muslim violence. Many are not even acts of terrorism, and/or are given more infamy than acts of the same magnitude done by Islamic and left wing terrorists. However, there is substantial evidence that points to McVeigh as not being a “right-winger” at all but possibly a stooge working for Hussain Al-Hussaini, an Iraqi Republican Guardsman. Other reputable sources conclude that McVeigh had no links to the militias he was supposedly in league with, plus he never supported a “limited” government, but rather an all-powerful racist state.

While not all of the verbal abuse and increasingly violent physical attacks are by members of the Democratic Party, the majority of the perpetrators lean to the left. This violence is certainly not going unnoticed by the majority of Americans as a June, 2018 poll done by Rasmussen revealed that 59% of American voters are concerned that those who oppose Trump’s policies will resort to violence to stop them and 31% now believe that a new civil war will happen in America within the next five years.

The history of the democrats and their left wing comrades certainly give solid support to the results of this poll. From its creation by Thomas Jefferson, the Democratic Party has a long history of embracing violence to achieve their goals. From the bloody French Revolution, preservation of slavery, suppression of African-Americans, advancement of labor unions, and the 1960’s radical “New-Left” movement to the escalating mayhem of a national party attempting a coup of President Trump, no one explains the democratic love of violence better than the democrats themselves.

We are not to expect to be translated from despotism to liberty, in a feather-bed. Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson, master craftsman of the Declaration of Independence; started both, the University of Virginia and the Library of Congress; launched the Lewis & Clark Expedition; made the Louisiana Purchase; wrote the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom and is widely held as one of the most intelligent men to occupy the office of President.

Thomas Jefferson was also a deeply flawed man. He is the man who famously penned that “all men are created equal” while owning hundreds of slaves. Alexander Hamilton wrote of him: “I admit that his politics are tinctured with fanaticism, that he is too much in earnest in his democracy, that he has been a mischievous enemy to the principle measures of our past administration, that he is crafty & persevering in his objects, that he is not scrupulous about the means of success, nor very mindful of truth, and that he is a contemptible hypocrite.”

For Thomas Jefferson had also clandestinely started the first political party in the US, the Democratic – Republican Party. He did this while acting as George Washington’s Secretary of State and against Washington’s stated wishes. He started the party to coalesce opposition to the policies being introduced by Washington’s Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton.

Jefferson strongly supported the principle that the power of the government should be limited and rest in the hands of the states which were then controlled by property-owning Americans. This Jefferson felt, would keep the personal liberty and virtue of the republic in the hands of the yeoman farmer. Jefferson also saw the French Revolution, with its class leveling effects, as the next step in republicanism. Hamilton however, supported a stronger federal government supporting a flourishing merchant economy which meant trade with their former enemy, Great Britain. Those two views came to loggerheads when France executed French King Louis XVI and started of the “Reign of Terror.”

Jefferson’s enthusiasm for the French Revolution was not diminished as it descended into a bloodbath; in fact, he openly plotted to help France by pushing the US into war with Great Britain. Jefferson provided government funds and James Madison wrote anonymously to a newspaper, the National Gazette to promote the French Revolution, attacking Britain’s mercantile policy, Hamilton and even his old friend, George Washington.

William Short, US Minister to the Netherlands and a friend of Jefferson, had also supported the French Revolution. But when it plunged into chaos, Short wrote to Jefferson to in an attempt to end Jefferson’s infatuation with the French Revolution. Jefferson’s responding letter to Short revealed his total commitment to the atrocities being committed in the name of liberty: “the tone of your letters had for some time given me pain, on account of the extreme warmth with which they censured the proceedings of the Jacobins of France. I consider that sect the same with the Republican patriots.”

Jefferson then went on to call the Jacobins “virtuous republicans who had realized the failures of constitutional monarchy and agitated for reform with the best interests of the people in mind and the will of the nation behind them.”

“In the struggle which was necessary, many guilty persons fell without the forms of trial, and with them some innocent. These I deplore as much as anybody, and shall deplore some of them to the day of my death. But I deplore them as I should have done had they fallen in battle … The liberty of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood? My own affections have been deeply wounded by some of the martyrs to this cause, but rather than it should have failed, I would have seen half the earth desolated. Were there but an Adam and an Eve left in every country, and left free, it would be better than as it now is. I have expressed to you my sentiments because they are really those of 99 in an hundred of our citizens.”

In short, the man who wrote one of the most important documents in human history that guaranteed “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” was willing to see half the planet burned to the ground to protect his vision of the American Republic. He completely agreed with the modern democratic philosophy of “the ends justifying the means” no matter how much blood was shed.

The 1800 election between Federalist John Adams and Democratic – Republican Thomas Jefferson was one of the most turbulent in US history. There were even militias from both parties practicing with their firearms in case they were called into service. In the end, Jefferson won the election and the Democratic – Republican Party would occupy the White House for almost thirty years. There are many historians who wonder what Jefferson would have done had he lost the election. His unquestionable support of the violence in the French Revolution does raise the specter of civil war, especially when combined with a letter Jefferson wrote to his friend Joseph Priestly. The letter contained a paragraph that simply stated that should Jefferson have lost the election, within eight weeks; the democratic – republicans in Congress would have “repaired” the Constitution where it was defective. He cannot have imagined the Federalist would sit idly by while the democrats rewrote the Constitution for their own benefit. How far the democratic – republicans would have gone to protect their election results will never be known, but the threat of toppling the US government would also transform from a democratic talking point into a very real civil war.

We don’t need proof to execute a man. We only need proof that it’s necessary to execute him. Che Guevara

As the following examples clearly show, the Democratic Party is attempting one of the most brazen power grabs in US history by attempting the overthrow duly elected President Donald Trump.

Immediately following the election, Hillary Clinton, the press and the Deep State began to undermine and sabotage Trump’s presidency through a concocted tale of collusion with Russia to win the 2016 election. Using a play out of Joseph Goebbels playbook, accusing others of that which you are doing, and using deep state lackeys in the FBI, CIA, and Department of Justice, the democrats have been able to create an FBI investigation into the non-existent conspiracy. Millions of dollars and thousands of hours of investigation later, the only results so far show that the Russian collusion was done between Russia and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama along with other democrats, not Donald Trump. But never letting facts get in the way of seizing power, the democrats weaponized US intelligence agencies to spy on candidate Trump, planted at least one mole to entrap a Trump aid in collusion with Russia and knowingly used a fake dossier to obtain a FISA warrant on Trump’s Campaign. Following the failure to impeach Trump for what is now called “Russiagate,” Democratic Congressman, Steve Cohen openly called for a military coup against Donald Trump “Where are our military folks? The Commander in Chief is in the hands of our enemy!” While former FBI Director and Weasel In Charge of the Russiagate investigation, James Comey, also called for a coup against Trump: “This was the day an American president stood on foreign soil next to a murderous lying thug and refused to back his own country,” adding “Patriots need to stand up and reject the behavior of this president.” The scope of the lawlessness being displayed by the Democratic Party today clearly shows they are engaged in an all-out war to rule over America.
One of the most important principles in Western Civilization history has been the presumption of innocence principle. First written in the sixth century ‘Digest of Justinian’ and established as United States law with the 1895 Supreme Court case “Coffin United States.” The presumption of innocence principle is one of the major protections given US citizens against false arrest and today, in a fully televised bloodbath, we are watching the democrats kill it.

The nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court has for all intents and purposes, turned into a carefully planned and well-funded character assassination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Having undergone six FBI investigations and served some twenty-five years in the public arena, it was not until his nomination for the Supreme Court that a woman, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, found herself compelled to accuse him of attempted rape, thirty-six years previously.

Ford has no witnesses, no collaborating evidence, she never mentioned Kavanaugh’s name before, but now, she is being used by Democratic operatives to not only destroy Kavanaugh’s good name, but to smash one of the pillars that American freedom rests upon, presumption of innocence.

While character assassination is as old as mankind itself, the Democratic Party has excelled in it over the years with notable examples of Thomas Jefferson hiring James T. Callender to smear John Adams and Lyndon B. Johnson destroying Barry Goldwater in the 1964 Presidential campaign. But their new tactics are not intended to only destroy a person or a candidate, but also to create a standard of guilty unless proven innocent. The legal ramifications for this is staggering and goes well with the Purge being done on conservative web sites by Google, YouTube, Facebook, etc. What we are witnessing today is nothing less than the full implementation of Orwell’s “1984” with the Democratic Party acting as the Ministry of Truth. Should the Democratic Party gain a majority in Congress during the mid-term elections, what is being done to Kavanaugh will be a small skirmish as they bring total war on America by impeaching President Trump.

E-Mail Steven Neill: scneill@msn.com

Resources:

The Democratic Party: A History Of Anarchy, Part 2

Today’s Democrats: Slavery is the Greatest Blessing for Master and Slave

“I want Cuba, I want Tamaulipas, Potosi, and one or two other Mexican States; and I want them all for the same reason – for the planting and spreading of slavery.” —Senator Albert Gallatin Brown of Mississippi