“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” —Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England in his political book, “Coningsby,” 1844

What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil. —Christian Science Monitor Editorial, June 19, 1920

Leftist Thought Process

We have neighbors with whom we are friendly, who happen to be die hard Democratic socialists and Hillary supporters, and I’m always astounded with their total stupidity.

Let me give you a few examples. Recently the husband said to me, “Do you really think people care about Hillary’s email problems?” Unfortunately, there are two answers to that question. The dumbed down Americans who listen only to the MSM probably don’t care. However, those of us who do any research absolutely believe she is not only corrupt to the core, but the murderess of Benghazi. I answered him with the scandal of General Petraeus who got the axe for far less than Hillary.

Another time I was walking with the wife and she said to me, “What would we do without China making all our goods?” I was floored. I said to her, “Well, we would have American people with jobs, we wouldn’t have an over trillion-dollar debt to China, and we wouldn’t have much of our tax dollars going to families who had lost everything and now were counting on government funds to support them.” 

Truly, there is no end to the idiocy. Just yesterday this neighbor told me that Donald Trump hates women. I asked her how she knew that…she said she’d done her homework. I asked her if she knew how many women were employed and promoted at Trump companies. She said very few. Again, I had to argue with her on that one.

From the Daily Caller:

Appearing on “CNN’s New Day” with Chris Cuomo, Michael Cohen, Trump’s general counsel and an executive vice president at Trump Organization, said that while the billionaire’s companies employ 57 percent men and 43 percent women, “there are more female executives at the Trump Organization than there are male.”

“And women who are similarly situated in positions similar to that of their male counterparts, are actually paid more,” Cohen said.

Of course she told me that was all lies. 

But let’s get back to Cruz and Carly, two peas in a pod, and both far more globalist leftists than people understand.

Cruz and Carly

Now she’s joining with him and lauding his character and trustworthiness. In fact, she broke into song when it was announced that she would be his vice-president.

I really think these people have lost their minds, but then I knew what they were a long time ago, and have written about it over and over again. Crazy Glenn Beck who wants to knife Donald Trump, and Dominionist David Barton who believes Sharia Law and the Constitution are compatible, and all of them joining together to push a Constitutional Convention. These are Cruz’s closest friends and supporters.

And top it off with John Boehner calling Ted Cruz “Lucifer in the flesh,” and a “crazy SOB.” [Link] Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, they’re really two of a kind, albeit Cruz is far creepier.

Then there’s the lesser known tale of Ted Cruz actually trying to uphold a ban on dildos. Does it get even more weird than this? You bet it does. His former Princeton roommate says that the women would continually ask him to keep creepy Cruz out of their hallway. [Link]

an extremely creepy individual.”

And of course Ted has called the Council on Foreign Relations a “nest of vipers,” but his wife worked there for five years helping to write the North American Community. As well, his mentor at Princeton was none other than Robert George, CFR and UNESCO. Hmmm….if CFR is a “nest of vipers,” why has Cruz accepted George’s endorsement and his wife’s five year tenure at CFR?

Revisiting Carly Fiorina

Readers might want to revisit my two articles on Carly, her devastating destruction of Hewlett Packard, and how many in California still detest the woman. (Surely choosing Carly Fiorina for VP will help Donald Trump win big in California.) [Link], [Link]

Fiorina has openly admitted that she uses the Marxist Hegelian Dialectic every day, and lauds Islam as “the greatest civilization in the world.” 

Link], [Link]

Achieve Inc. (architects of the Common Core standards), hosted a private fundraiser for Carly Fiorina in AZ on 9/10/15, according to the Maricopa County Republican Committee (MCRC) Briefs.

Carly on Abortion

Daily Caller reported that Fiorina joined Revolution Health Group, (RHG) when it was founded in 2005, along with Colin Powell, as an investor and board member. RHG was a website which promoted abortion benefits and directed users to Planned Parenthood, National Abortion Federation, and NARAL for more information. Women were urged to “think through” their “choices,” but a pro-life perspective was not offered.

While campaigning for John McCain, Fiorina assured pro-choice folks that McCain “has never signed on to efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade.”Why would a pro-lifer regard this as a positive attribute to be touted? Why would a pro-lifer sign on as a surrogate for that sort of candidate?

And why…when Ted Cruz claims he’s a conservative would he join with someone like Carly Fiorina?

Destroying Hard Drives

Prior to Fiorina’s takeover of the board of Hewlett Packard, she had an employee take a hammer to five of her hard drives. One has to wonder what she wanted destroyed. Sure sounds a lot like Hillary Clinton antics. She and Cruz make a good pair.

Cruz and his infamous campaign manager, Jeff Roe, have run the dirtiest campaign I’ve seen in a long time. He lied about Carson in Iowa, Rubio in Hawaii, and now with Kasich, [Link], and add in all the lies he’s told about Trump. Even CNN corrected many of the lies Cruz spouted during the debates. Top all this off with the stealing of delegates, and the GOPe helping Cruz to receive delegates in states where votes weren’t even cast. 

Carly on Amnesty

The DREAM Act (acronym for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) is an American legislative proposal for a multi-phase process for undocumented immigrants in the United States that would first grant conditional residency, and upon meeting further qualifications, permanent residency.

The bill was first introduced in the Senate on August 1, 2001, S. 1291 by Dick Durbin and Orrin Hatch, and has since been reintroduced several times (see legislative history) but has failed to pass.

Link] So, what is the difference? She also added she is open to immigration reforms that would give citizenship to children of illegal aliens. If that’s the case, she might as well give every illegal alien citizenship. They are not “undocumented immigrants.” They have broken the law and invaded our country. 

Ted’s wife believes in building a North American Community with Canada and Mexico, and eliminating our borders, thus making us one big North American Union, just like the European Union. Needless to say, he and Carly have much more in common than most people understand. 

Guess who is running all the negative ads in Indiana against Trump? None other than Club for Growth, who originally spent $3.3 million on negative ads against Trump and is now funding even more. Wonder why? Because Club for Growth is pro-amnesty, and they know Cruz and Fiorina are too, whereas Donald Trump will close the borders and build that wall!

Conclusion

Cruz and Fiorina have much in common, both are consummate globalists, and both have flip-flopped on so many issues, all of course, to fool the American electorate.

Remember too, it was Fiorina at Cruz’s side when the National Enquirer story broke the story about his affairs with five women. It was Fiorina who answered the questions from the press, not Cruz, and certainly not Heidi Cruz, who disappeared for several weeks. Funny too that Ted never did sue the National Enquirer.

Both of these globalists need to be strongly rejected by the voters. I’ve often said that today’s Christians have very little discernment, but maybe they’re finally waking up to the real Ted Cruz. Let’s hope so!

In Robert Dilley’s 1962 book, MESSAGE FOR AMERICA, he said the inroads into America are so great that our country has been transformed from a nation of rugged individualists to a nation of whiners demanding something for nothing. Benefits which to a large degree you never asked for and often do not want. The reason these benefits are being forced upon you is that the intellectual “know it alls” in our federal government believe that you are too stupid to spend your own money. Since this is the case they feel that they must take your money and buy for you the programs that you don’t have sense enough to buy for yourself. And they are so determined to get these benefits for you that they are willing to spend every last cent of your money to do it. America, once the land of the free and the home of the brave, is today the land of the Free Loader and the Brave Taxpayers. Although many of these entitlements began under Democrat presidents Wilson and FDR, the Republicans have done nothing to try to eliminate any of them.

THE ENTITLEMENT TIME BOMB

And it’s not always the Democrats like socialist presidential candidate Bernie Sanders who proposes taxing the rich and giving every child a college education entitlement. Mathew 19:24 says it easier for camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into Heaven.

Just remember, the “right” also went “wrong” back in 2004 when President George W. Bush passed the largest entitlement program since Democrat LBJ: a $400 billion prescription drug benefit program under Medicare. Within months of passage, the cost of the new entitlement was refigured and raised to $540 billion. Yet even this bait-and-switch tactic was deceptive because independent groups estimated the true cost of Medicare bill would be one trillion over ten years. And later Viagra and similar drugs were covered. So – is Bush eligible for a Heaven entitlement?

PERKS FOR THE KLEPTOCRACY

I won’t dwell long on the trappings of power and their privileges such as the presidential and congressional perks, but the April Judicial Watch newsletters said that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s use of luxury Air Force jets to travel between her congressional district in California and Washington, D.C. exposed her abuse of this travel perk. Judicial watch uncovered Pelosi’s military travel cost to the U.S. Air Force at $2,100,744.59 during one two-year period – $101,429.14 of which was for in-flight expenses, including food and alcohol. Is former Miss 1955 Luke Rack Pelosi entitled to Heaven?

And more recently there is the October 2015 profligate Columbus Day getaway when the Obama family left on an October 11 on a flight from Los Angeles, where the scallywag had attended three high-dollar fundraisers, to San Diego and then from San Diego back to Washington October 12 that required a total of 4.7 hours of flying time at $206,337 per hour. That brought the total flight cost to taxpayers to $969,783.90. The records do not include the flight time to travel from Washington, D.C. to Los Angeles (through Oregon, Seattle and San Francisco), nor the Secret Service costs or other expenses. Previously released documents show the flight time from Washington Los Angeles to be five hours, which safely adds $1,031,685 and brings the known total expense to $2, 001,468.90.

And then Michelle took her girls to London for Fish and Chips in a Boeing 757 requiring a fleet of armored cars for Michelle’s sight -seeing tour in June 2009. This is what the Obama’s call “change.” But maybe the First Lady is entitled for Heaven when she was given press coverage as she volunteered at a Food Bank in her $600 sneakers.

BELIEF IN GOD

Gallup reported in June 2011 that more than 9 in 10 Americans continued to claim to believe in God which includes Pelosi, Obama and Bush. Despite the many abominable cultural changes that have been rippling through American society since November 1944 when the question was asked and 96% said “yes.” Belief in God remained high and relatively stable

DISREGARD GOD AND MAKE YOUR OWN DECISION

And when speaking to a group of young people in Argentina, Barack Obama was asked by one young person how to create social change? He replied, “A sharp division between capitalists and communists or socialists were starting to blur and this generation should be practical and just choose what works.”

The father of our nation, George Washington implored America to always remain a society that maintained her good standing with God but since the Sixties, we find America rejecting Christianity more and more.

THE TURBULENT SIXTIES

Some were calling for a revolution during those turbulent sixties and then went on to become college professors indoctrinating our children in those institutions to believe America was no longer exceptional. We saw in the sixties how the Baby Boomers were sacrificing the family side of their existence in order to maintain the material side. They were subjected to more social experimentation than any demographic group in history and stress became the normal. One of those revolutionists, now college professor Bill Ayers who was almost certainly involved in the San Francisco bombing on 2/16/1970 that murdered Police Officer Brian V. McDonnell. Because of prosecutorial errors, Ayers went free boasting, “Guilty as hell, free as a bird.” And guess who was seen and interviewed at a Donald Trump rally wearing a Black Lives Matter T-shirt.

WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS, READ THE INSTRUCTIONS

If you have ever taken the time to ponder upon the state of education in America, perhaps you may consider the process that was taken to eliminate the influence of the Christian Bible. Remember Madeline O’Hare? She got God out of school and the guns came in to the schools and she and one of her sons and a granddaughter died a horrific death.

And then we had progressive sex education, values clarification ending up with single parents, abortion and alcohol resulting in a lot of psychological stress and the “self help books” – you know “I’m Ok, you’re OK” which will make some people believe Heaven is an entitlement while ignoring the admonishment in John 3:3 that says “ye must be born again.”

National greatness begins with the fear of the Lord. Christians should by now realize the futility of “bringing heaven to earth, “ whether by false “revivals” or spreading “democracy,” or just neglecting the word of God such as Matthew 7:14…narrow is the gate. True democracy (51) percent is mob rule and that clearly explains the spoiling of our republic through corruption, collusion, and what some foresee as a second American revolution.

When people neglect the word of God, the Almighty turns a nation over to Satan. Strange weather, earthquakes, tornadoes, fires, invasion by unbelievers, immorality running amok and the feminist agenda coming to fulfill Jeremiah 9:17 about “cunning women” and in 2016 we found the first “cunning” woman running for the presidency, and a self-proclaimed Socialist named Bernie Sanders promising such entitlements as college for everyone by taxing the wealthy.

THE COMING IMPLOSION

Employers often complain they cannot find workers who can do what they want done. But does that college degree mean much in the workplace where an apprenticeship could accomplish the same amount of education in most professions without the cost and Marxist indoctrination? Colleges and universities have become havens for illiteracy.

GOD OR A UNIVERSAL SPIRIT

So now it’s back to Gallup. In 1976, Gallup began using a slightly different question format to measure belief in a deity – “Do you believe in God or a universal spirit?” Bill O’Reilly, author of Killing Reagan, wrote early on that both Ronald Reagan and Nancy believed in astrology. Astrologist Joan Quigly in San Francisco had a direct phone line to Nancy as they managed Reagan’s daily calendar. Reagan’s Chief of Staff, Donald Regan was constantly fighting issues that Nancy and her astrologer created. Regan likened his job to that of a “shovel brigade following a parade down Main Street.” Nancy’s determination to control the president’s schedule and her reliance on an astronomer to chart her husband’s every move struck Regan as madness. But she had the president’s full backing. Don eventually was dismissed.

However, in the “Last Word” chapter O’Reilly writes that on May 16, 1988, Reagan finally let loose in a private letter (now owned by O’Reilly) to his friend and adviser John Koehler, ” that the hardest things to bear in all of this are the outright falsehoods and Nancy certainly didn’t fire Don. Truth is, he’d told me several months earlier he wanted to get back to private life, and I left it to him to name the day, and, of course, we haven’t been charting our course by the stars.”

YOUNG AMERICANS, LIBERALS, EASTERNERS LEAST LIKELY TO BELIEVE IN GOD

Responses to the two slightly different question formats from Gallups’ May 5-8 survey were combined to provide a larger sample for subgroup analysis. The results showed that belief in God appears to be generally high across most subgroups of the American population. Belief in God dropped below 90% among younger Americans, liberals, those living in the East, those with postgraduate educations, and political independents. However, believe in God seems nearly universal among Republicans and conservatives and, to a slightly lesser degree, in the south.

Other indicators of religiosity in America have shown more dramatic changes in recent decades, most significantly Americans’ self-identification with a religion. At some points in the 1950s, almost all Americans identified themselves with a particular religion. In recent years, more than 1 in 10 Americans tell survey interviewers they have no formal religious identify.

Those under 30 are significantly less likely than older Americans to say they believe in God. It remains to be seen whether these young Americans will move toward a belief in God as they age, or instead stick with their current beliefs. Regionally, the data confirms the religious potency of the “Bible Belt,” with Southerners 10 points more likely than easterners to say they believe in God.

The 2011 survey described the different methods used to ask the question among the different ages , ethnicity, education, locations etc. but in a May 2015 Gallup study found that 61% of respondents said it is morally acceptable to have children outside of marriage. On March 28, 2016 a Salem, Oregon couple got married at the hospital because the baby came before the wedding.

Are we keeping the faith? As apostasy abounds in the so-called church” the death of the Son of God and His resurrection has become minimized but the latest I heard on this subject of Heaven is that the younger folks no longer believe in God but they do believe in Heaven as though Heaven is an entitlement without putting in the time and effort in the Word of God which states in the Living Bible -Matthew 7:13-14: Heaven can be entered only through the narrow gate! The highway to hell is broad, and its gate is wide enough for all the multitudes who choose its easy way But the Gateway to Life is small, and the road is narrow, and only a few ever find it and Luke 13:3 says except he repent , ye shall all likewise perish. Once a TV evangelist was asked if someone who doesn’t believe in God will get into Heaven, he replied, “That’s a management decision. I’m just in sales.”

Allow me to close with the final way to Heaven for children. “An exasperated mother, whose son was always getting into mischief, finally asked him, “How do you expect to get into Heaven?” The boy thought it over and said, “Well, I’ll run in and out and in an out and keep slamming the door until St. Peter says, “For Heaven’s sake, Dylan, come in or stay out!” And that too is your choice.

© 2016 Betty Freauf – All Rights Reserved

This is the uppermost concern in the minds of millions of Americans at the present time…what’s in store going forward?

I will attempt, through a few different scenarios, to shed a little light on what we could possibly be confronted with as we proceed down the road into 2017 and beyond.

First case scenario would be for Hillary to be elected president. If that were to happen everything would continue on as it has throughout the Obama regime.
However, it is practically a given that there would be a concerted, (coupled with a completely coordinated effort to accelerate the pace, i.e.), attempt to speed up the process. All presidents, in our life time, have been participants in bringing to fruition the agenda for the New World Order, or total World Government.

All of this is already planned by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR); which will continue to keep the administration coordinated and focused on the objective.

Also the vacancy on the Supreme Court will most likely be filled with a liberal progressive. Hillary will be able to accomplish this with the help of the so-called conservatives on the Republican side of the aisle, meaning, of course, that the leftist dominance of the court will be strengthened and solidified.

Then, too, if she is in the Oval Office, we can expect more of a takeover of our domestic lives by the United Nations. This is already being planned to come to fruition by 2030.

Now, for the second case scenario, which we might call the worst case, although it is hard to imagine one that would be worse than the one noted above.

In view of what is happening with the Republicans in their attempt to select a nominee to represent them in the 2016 presidential election, it is beginning to appear that the Establishment, i.e., the Agenda, or Conspiracy for World Government, has put together a scenario that practically assures them that proceedings to bring to fruition the culmination of their agenda, will remain on track.

To bring this about they had to somehow stop, or at least slow down the Trump advance. The first sign to surface was the line pushed by the media that the two leaders, Trump and Cruz, were both “Outsiders,” and conservative. This resulted in Cruz beginning to receive more of the conservative vote. This was a false flag for the simple reason that Cruz is not an outsider. He has been in the establishment from the beginning of his public life. To confirm this, you only have to look at his history and who he started working with.

Remember, Cruz’s mentor at Princeton was none other than Robert George. Cruz supporter, Glenn Beck, introduced George on his program on Fox News as, “one of the biggest brains in America,” or on one broadcast, “Superman of the earth.” One must remember that George is a long time member of the CFR, and he also is a long time member of UNESCO.

However, since Cruz is perceived to be conservative, and an “Outsider,” this no doubt resulted in some conservatives, who were not too enamored with Trump, to choose Cruz because he presented himself more to their liking. Then there were those like Rush Limbaugh, who maintained that Cruz was the real Conservative – not Trump. Of course, esoterically speaking, Limbaugh’s claim that Cruz was a real Conservative, was true; simply for the reason that he, Cruz, is committed to keeping the Establishment’s agenda on track. This means that he is in support of Obama’s so-called “Free Trade”, which would reduce our sovereignty to almost nothing. This includes open borders along with support for the invasion of our nation and giving aid and comfort to the invaders.

In addition, Senator Sessions, of Alabama has revealed that there is a provision in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that states that there are certain provisions in the agreement that will not be revealed for at least four years after it goes into effect. Also embedded in it is the authority to add other provisions in the future as needed. Remember, Cruz voted to give fast tracking of this TPP to Obama. Do you know what that does?

Here’s what Sen. Jeff Sessions says about Fast Track and the TPP. According to Sessions: “The predictable and surely desired result of the TPP is to put greater distance between the governed and those who govern. It puts those who make the rules out of reach of those who live under them, empowering unelected regulators who cannot be recalled or voted out of office. In turn, it diminishes the power of the people’s bulwark: their constitutionally-formed Congress.” Shocking, this is what this phony Christian (Cruz) supports. [Link]

From Breitbart comes this:

“TPA eliminates Congress’ ability to amend or debate trade implementing legislation and guarantees an up-or-down vote on a far-reaching international agreement before that agreement has received any public review,” Sessions writes. “Not only will Congress have given up the 67-vote threshold for a treaty and the 60-vote threshold for important legislation, but will have even given up the opportunity for amendment and the committee review process that both ensure member participation. Crucially, this applies not only to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) but all international trade agreements during the life of the TPA.

“There is no real check on the expiration of fast-track authority: if Congress does not affirmatively refuse to reauthorize TPA at the end of the defined authorization (2018), the authority is automatically renewed for an additional three years so long as the President requests the extension.

“And if a trade deal (not just TPP but any trade deal) is submitted to Congress that members believe does not fulfill, or that directly violates, the TPA recommendations—or any laws of the United States—it is exceptionally difficult for lawmakers to seek legislative redress or remove it from the fast track, as the exit ramp is under the exclusive control of the revenue and Rules committees.”

In addition to those concerns about how the deal would not in fact empower Congress—it would instead weaken Congress—Sessions notes that Obama or any future president could redact or classify information from a report the president would be required submit to Congress to get fast-track trade approval if TPA is adopted.

“Moreover, while the President is required to submit a report to Congress on the terms of a trade agreement at least 60 days before submitting implementing legislation, the President can classify or otherwise redact information from this report, limiting its value to Congress,” Sessions writes. “Is TPA designed to protect congressional responsibilities, or to limit Congress’ ability to do its duty?”

The second major point in the Sessions document details how passing TPA through Congress would result in “increased trade deficits.”

“Barclays estimates that during the first quarter of this year, the overall U.S. trade deficit will reduce economic growth by .2 percent,” Sessions writes. “History suggests that trade deals set into motion under the 6-year life of TPA could exacerbate our trade imbalance, acting as an impediment to both GDP and wage growth. Labor economist Clyde Prestowitz attributes 60 percent of the U.S.’ 5.7 million manufacturing jobs lost over the last decade to import-driven trade imbalances.”

Sessions also cites former AT&T CEO Leo Hindery, Jr., who wrote in a recent column for Reuters that since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and South Korea free trade agreements were passed and implemented, “U.S. trade deficits, which drag down economic growth, have soared more than 430 percent with our free-trade partners.”

“In the same period, they’ve declined 11 percent with countries that are not free-trade partners,” Hindery wrote, in the part where Sessions cites him, adding: “Obama’s 2011 trade deal with South Korea, which serves as the template for the new Trans-Pacific Partnership, has resulted in a 50 percent jump in the U.S. trade deficit with South Korea in its first two years. This equates to 50,000 U.S. jobs lost. “

All of the above is practically a given with any of the contenders becoming successful in attaining the office of President, other than Trump. This does not mean that Trump would be able to prevent it from happening, simply for the reason that the leadership in both the House and the Senate, along with the total control apparatus of the left, is committed to the plan, the plan of the Insider hierarchy, claimed by Obama as his plan to Fundamentally Transform America. However, it (The Plan) has been in the works long before he came into existence, he is only the baton carrier for the current segment of its fruition.

All of the above, in my opinion, is what we could look forward to if Cruz is elected. However, even if he is successful in preventing Trump from getting the required 1237 delegates that would result in a brokered convention, the Establishment is, most likely, not going to choose him as the nominee. Why? Simply because, even though it has supported him in his battle with Trump, he is not their main choice, but he is their only choice to possibly stop Trump. So, he is being used by the establishment hierarchy.

I know what many people think, and would say any of the candidates to be chosen out of a brokered convention would most likely mean victory for Hillary. That, however, doesn’t bother the Establishment for it sets up a win-win situation for it, the same as it has for decades. Either way – they win.

What we have to understand is this: The Establishment is comprised of more than the GOP, it also consists of the Democrats along with all the leftist elements connected to their party. We have heard the expression, “THE DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN PARTIES ARE LIKE TWO LEGS ON THE SAME BUG – ONE GETS THERE BEFORE THE OTHER – BUT BOTH OF THEM GET THERE.

In order to understand this one needs to read “SHADOWS OF POWER,” by James Perloff. He chronicles the advent of the Establishment for about a hundred years, and it’s all well documented. Upon reading it one will never see today’s events the same again.

© 2016 J.W. Bryan – All Rights Reserved

“Immigration is a form of war in which the violence is delayed.” ~ Martin Van Crevald

But it’s coming as surely as the dawn!

Today in America, in excess of 1.2 million legal immigrants land on our shores annually. Another 400,000 to 700,000 depending on estimates by the U.S. Border Patrol violate our borders annually.

Within 30 years, their numbers will exceed 100,000,000 (million) added people to the USA to top 438 million people from our current overload of 322 million. Yet, the Main Stream Media utilizes trickery, obfuscation and outright ignoring of the most profound consequences facing the United States of America.

“Mass migration from the developing world (euphemism for the third world that isn’t developing at all) to Europe cannot be stopped, it argues, so it should be taken out of the hands of the illegal people-trafficking industry, legalized and facilitated, in order to “harness the positive effects of people movement.” Quote from German papers

The report seeks to “replace the illusion of control with the concept of flow management.” In reality, Europe faces Africa’s desperate hordes that multiple beyond feeding, water or sustaining.

Nothing can cover up the rapes, cultural conflict, violence, shoplifting, and bombings like Brussels, Paris and Charlie Hebdo. Nothing can stop the loss of the rule of law or loss of civil society by Muslim immigrants that only understand their kind of society: total mayhem through violence.

A failure of vision

One paper said, “The desire to regularize, and thus sanction, irregular immigration is founded on four assumptions. First, that mass immigration is a normal part of human life; second, that it cannot be controlled; third, that almost all immigration is beneficial to the host society; and fourth, that immigration is a right not a privilege and that the host society has no right to choose who can live amongst it.”

Do the leaders of Europe possess the right to commit their countries to sociological, linguistic and religious suicide? Good grief: Germany, the size of New Mexico, houses 82 million people. Does anyone think they can keep adding millions from Africa? Can they survive it? Answer: not a chance as a snowball in hell.

Those leaders fail to understand the bottom line: it’s not working. We face the same stupidities in America. One particular immigrant groups stands behind and advocates Islamic Sharia Law as the final answer to our country’s future. Muslims think like this:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” Omar Ahmed, director of Council on American Islamic Relations.

The active promotion of mass immigration solves nothing. On the contrary, by fuelling the brain drain from the third world to the developed world, it increases the former’s dependency on the latter. It intensifies a world of flux, divided families, splintered communities, cultural alienation and ethnic resentments.

In America, we haven’t seen anything yet! Ferguson, Missouri or San Bernardino, California or the Boston Marathon—merely harbingers of bigger and greater terror events. Hillary wants another 75,000 Syrian terrorists injected into communities across our country. Muslim Obama loves ‘seeding’ our country with his Islamic terror groups under the guise of ‘refugees’.

The illusions of immigration

At no time in the history of the world has immigration been allowed on the scale seen today. It can only end poorly and harshly for receiver nations and immigrants combined.

Thomas Chittum wrote a book: Civil War II—The Coming Breakup of America. He describes exactly what’s happening to Europe and the United States. The book sickened me because I see it manifesting and growing in the USA by each new violent event.

We’re taking in over 1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants annually. But Hillary wants to bring in more. My own intellectually challenged U.S. Senator Michael Bennet attempted to give mass amnesty and jumped legal immigration to 2,000,000 (million) annually in his insane bill S.B. 744 in 2013.

Immigration, especially of an ‘invasive’ sort, found resistance by wars as people sacrificed their lives to defend their way of life. Arabs conquered their way across North Africa; Moghuls invaded India; Romans, Vikings and Normans invaded Britain, killing or driving away those who stood in the way of their migration.

People from China and Korea moved to Japan, taking land from the indigenous Ainu.

Over a 200-year period, 55 million Europeans migrated to North America and Australia to commit genocide against the Native Americans and aborigines of Australia.

But even unaided by war and genocide, what is currently happening stands as abnormal. A hundred years ago, most people in the west rarely moved even to the next village; now whole villages from Bangladesh relocate to northern England. Over 100,000 Somalian bush people relocated to Minneapolis, Minnesota. It’s now called “Somaliland.”

And Americans don’t visit for fear of the lives! Minneapolis, New York, Miami, Los Angeles and Detroit devolved into foreign countries within the USA.

As I write this, and as I have written for 30 years, we remain on course to add 100 million more immigrants within 30 years. Do you think your kids will survive the sociological chaos, linguistic mayhem or the cultural-religious conflict headed toward America?

Then, take action to stop it!

If you don’t want a Paris, France or San Bernardino event in your community, it’s time to call for a total “Immigration Shutdown Now.”

Call your senators and House rep: 1 202 224 3121. Demand a stop to all immigration and stop to any Syrian immigration.

Definition of slogan: “Immigration Shutdown Now means the American people want a total shutdown on all legal and illegal immigration. That means we want all illegal immigration stopped by arresting, prosecuting and jailing employers of illegal aliens. We deport all illegal aliens by taking their jobs away and as we catch them. We want English mandated as our national language. We demand a cessation of Muslim immigration in order to protect our culture, language and way of life. We can’t save the world but we can destroy our civilization. We demand a stable population that allows everyone to live, work and thrive into the 21st century. Especially our children.” FHW

That’s why you need to take action. Send this series to everyone in your network. Educate them. Urge them to take action by joining these websites to become faxers of prewritten letters and phone callers. We must force Congress into an “Immigration Shutdown Now!

Share these videos all over America:

www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacity.org ; www.thesocialcontract.com

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation. Take five minutes to see for yourself.

“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart” by Roy Beck
This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future generations: in a few words, “Mind boggling!” www.NumbersUSA.org

America: www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacityNetwork.org
Canada: www.immigrationwatchcanada.org
United Kingdom: www.populationmatters.org
Australia: www.population.org.au Sustainable Population Australia

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

“It’s past time for GOP leaders to get with it, abandon asinine internal conflicts, support Trump, and concentrate on smashing Hillary and other Democratic candidates in November, just a little over six months from now,” gun dean John M. Snyder said on Thursday.

“A united Republican Party behind presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump can accomplish great things this year,” Snyder added. “Trump’s success in primary elections, in adding millions of voters to party rolls, and in rising to a statistical tie with Clinton in the most recent Battleground presidential preference poll indicates this.

“What we are witnessing now is a sea-change in American politics, probably more historic than anything since the campaign of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, or at least the campaign of Theodore Roosevelt in 1904. A short while ago, few would have thought that a candidate who had never held political office or military command could be approaching the chair behind the desk in the Oval Office.”

Snyder said that, “If the hot dogs in the Republican Party can get over their shock at what’s happening and unite behind Trump, the GOP in this election could take the White House, throw out a number of Democrat incumbents, and lay claim to an untold number of gubernatorial, senatorial, congressional and state legislative seats as well.

“It’s really sad to see some Republicans persist in their opposition to Trump. Their diehard opposition to him makes one think of the anti-Christian, anti-western, anti-Jewish hatred of Muslim suicide bombing jihadists out to destroy themselves along with their opponents.”

“Unfortunately,” Snyder noted, “a number of Republicans would rather blow up the GOP and themselves along with it than see Donald Trump elected President. Some even have said they would rather see probable Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton elected.

“They can’t stand Trump because they can’t control him. The blue collar billionaire is not part of the ‘club.’ However, he enjoys the support of average American voters. With their ‘anybody but Trump’ attitude, the hate Trump Republican insiders are putting themselves before party and country. What arrogant insolence!”

Snyder said, “The statesmanlike thing for Trump’s primary opponents to do would be to propose his nomination by acclamation.

“Second Amendment champion Trump can beat gun prohibitionist Clinton this year. Trump has the pulse of the nation.”

Snyder said, “People favor Trump over Clinton because of their disgust with Clinton’s support for NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China, amnesty and citizenship for illegal immigrants, and the Iraq and Libyan failures. To the people, Trump’s correct on these and other matters. They think he will reverse policies that led to the destruction of American manufacturing, the loss of millions of factory jobs, the lowering of wages, the massive influx of illegal immigrants, and domestic radical Muslim extremist activity.

“As the Republican presidential nominee, Trump could excoriate Clinton like nobody else, smash her campaign, and assist any number of down-ballot GOP candidates.”

Snyder said, “Some may not prefer Trump for a number of personal reasons, but his financial independence, stated positions on a number of issues, in-your-face campaign style, unique persona and identity with voters make him the best available presidential GOP candidate this election cycle.

“On the other hand, the Democrats appear ready to put up a promoter of gun prohibition, abortion on demand, same-sex marriage and the LGBT agenda as their nominee. Republicans have got to save the nation from a malignant entity. With Trump as their standard bearer, they can do it. That is their destiny.”

“Trump haters fear the people and their significance. They nitpick with distracting issues in an attempt to get people to pay more attention to these matters than to the central ones. Trump wants to dump trade and immigration policies that undermine our middle class. Elitists want to keep these policies and to keep the people down. By supporting Trump, voters can smash them.”

Snyder said, “Republicans should stop their ridiculous infighting. They should unite behind front-runner Donald Trump. They should concentrate their time, energy and resources on defeating presumptive Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Snyder said, “Republicans have a golden opportunity this year to defeat the Democrats. Unfortunately, their nonsensical, idiotic and hateful anti-Trump elements could blow it for them. Hopefully, these elements will come to their senses. If they don’t straighten up and fly right they will be remembered for wrecking their country’s future.

“Second Amendment champion Trump can beat gun prohibitionist Clinton this year. Trump’s turning out new potential GOP supporters by the millions in primaries and rallies, far more than his Republican opponents. Trump has the pulse of the nation. Pessimists who cite polls to support their hesitancy should remember that Ronald Reagan was way behind Jimmy Carter in polls at the beginning of the 1980 campaign. He won in a landslide and became one of our greatest presidents.”

Snyder said, “People favor Trump over Clinton because of their disgust with Clinton’s support for NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China, amnesty and citizenship for illegal immigrants, and the Iraq and Libyan failures. To the people, Trump’s in the right on these and other matters. They think he will reverse policies that led to the destruction of American manufacturing, the loss of millions of factory jobs, the lowering of wages, and the massive influx of illegal immigrants, including radical Islamist terrorist sleepers.

“As the Republican presidential nominee, Trump could excoriate Clinton like nobody else, smash her campaign, and assist any number of down-ballot GOP candidates.”

© 2016 NWV – All Rights Reserved

The other morning when I accessed NewsWithViews.com my malware-blockers again blasted prominent warnings — for the fourth or fifth time. The problem appears solved. I never believed there was malware on the NewsWithViews.com site, of course, even before receiving a communique that the site had been hacked.

[Note: The editor says the NWV has not been hacked and there is NO Malware. Google is doing this to stop people from reading pro-Trump articles. A lawsuit against Google is in the works. If readers are using Google Chrome browsers here is what people can do to remedy the problem. Click on the 3 bars on the upper right side of your browser, Then click on SETTINGS, Go to bottom of the page and click on SHOW ADVANCED SETTINGS, Scroll down to PRIVACY then Un-Check PROTECT YOU AND YOUR DEVICE FROM DANGEROUS SITES]

It comes down to the support for Donald Trump found here. And to the fact that powerful people, the GOP elites — its so-called corporate donor class — and the globalists behind them, have never been this worried. Trump, whose political obituary media shills for the elites have been writing over and over again for eight months now, has proven to be the power elite’s ultimate black swan.

Nuisance harassment is the least of our worries, however. Trump’s candidacy is under attack by Soros-funded groups such as Black Lives Matter with protests that could turn violent when convention time comes, as well as from within his own party where one “clarification of the rules” after another makes it clear: a determined attempt will be made to deny Trump the GOP nomination, even if he has won the requisite 1,237 delegates.

I don’t make predictions. I only develop scenarios. A scenario works like this: if X happens, one set of events may ensue. If Y happens instead, a somewhat different set of events is likely.

While it’s not impossible, of course, I cannot come up with a credible scenario in which Trump is assassinated, e.g., by a “lone gunman.” That would be too obvious, especially given the low credibility now assigned certain previous “lone gunman” narratives of assassinations of former presidents, candidates, and others. Given the present tense state of affairs, moreover, something like that could provoke deadly retaliation against whoever got blamed for it — including GOP elites who could find themselves having to wear bulletproof vests in public. They’re not stupid. I’m sure they’ve figured this out.

Sticking with more likely scenarios, either Trump wins 1,237 delegates prior to the July convention, or he falls short. If he wins the delegates, an effort will ensue to deny him some of them, enough to pull him back under the line. As we know, the rules for delegate selection differ from state to state. Some states are winner-take-all; others are not. Some states allow open primaries; others do not. All these facts can be used against an undesirable nominee. Many of the rules are (one suspects purposefully) confusing. Efforts to exploit these facts are already underway. One result has already enabled Ted Cruz to take more delegates in Louisiana than Trump although Trump won more votes in the state. Another enabled Cruz to take Colorado’s delegates without evidence of anyone voting at all. One wonders what shenanigans will transpire in the remaining states, now that Trump won New York so commandingly as to leave no doubt where Republican voters stand.

If Trump does not win 1,237 delegates, we will see what is now being called a contested convention (the term used to be brokered convention). The chances of Cruz catching Trump on delegates is mathematically negligible at this point, so we can safely assume Trump will have the majority of delegates going into the convention even if he hasn’t reached 1,237. Presumably he will have attempted to cut deals with Marco Rubio and John Kasich to obtain their delegates.

Patrick J. Buchanan has argued reasonably that either Trump wins on the first vote, or he doesn’t get the nomination. The attempt to commandeer delegates on the second vote will succeed. The elites will also have made deals. In this case, the nomination will go to an elite-vetted insider (Cruz, remember, is disliked by the elites almost as much as Trump, although he’s proven a useful tool in the effort to deny Trump 1,237 delegates). The elite choice will be someone who supports the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other corporatist trade deals under negotiation behind closed doors. It will be someone who supports open borders. It will be someone motivated exclusively by support for corporatist economics, with no interest in social or cultural issues, or in education.

Should this happen, voters will infer reasonably that Trump was right about the contest being rigged and that those (including Bernie Sanders, whatever else he gets wrong) alleging that the U.S. is an plutocratic oligarchy, not a republic or a democracy, are also right. They will have seen the power-playing first-hand. Arguably, we saw this four years ago when the GOP elites changed the convention rules at the last minute to block Ron Paul’s influence.

Voters will abandon the GOP in droves, handing Hillary Clinton the presidency assuming she remains the presumptive Democratic Party nominee.

Trump can attempt a “third party” run, although so-called sore loser laws as well as complicated ballot-access procedures could be significant barriers. I did a little research on the former before writing this article and learned that such laws are not typically applied to presidential candidates. But with party elites operative at the state level as well as the national level, and practically making up rules as they go along to ensure that they stay in power, who can say that sore loser laws won’t be invoked to keep Trump’s name off state ballots?

Such an effort, in any event, would siphon votes from the elite-anointed Republican and again give Hillary the presidency. I doubt Trump could emerge victorious running as an independent, given the deep pockets that would be employed both within whatever is left of the GOP and from outside (think George Soros again) to destroy what remains of his candidacy.

Now suppose all the shenanigans fail, and Trump wins the GOP nomination. The scenario question then changes to: will GOP elites at both the national and state levels get behind him and work to defeat Hillary Clinton in November, or not? If they get behind him and mount the right kind of strategy, they could conceivably draw some of those who supported Bernie Sanders away from Hillary, increasing the likelihood that Donald Trump will become the next President of the United States.

If they refuse to get behind him, either deciding to run an elite-sponsored candidate on a “third party” ticket, or simply supporting Hillary instead, they will instead again ensure her victory.

This may be the starkest choice GOP elites have ever faced, the choice they’ve been trying to avoid at all costs. Support Trump, and work with him to build a national campaign able to defeat Hillary Clinton, or withhold support from the unambiguous choice of the party’s voting base and put Hillary in the White House. One of the things that got the GOP elites into their present mess was losing touch with voters and their values. Supporting Hillary instead of their own nominee will destroy their credibility for good.

For let’s not kid ourselves: Hillary Clinton in the White House would make Americans wish they had Obama back! One reason Bernie Sanders has been able to mount a credible campaign is because so-called progressive Democrats trust her about as much as the GOP base trusts its elites. The fact that she was invited to Goldman Sachs several times and paid over half a million per speech tells you all you need to know about her deep connections to the power elite. In positions of power herself, moreover, her track record of one negligence and recklessness. She singlehandedly oversaw the destruction of a sovereign nation — Libya — where one of our Ambassadors, J. Christopher Stephens, died following what may have been six hours of brutal torture, along with three other Americans (Benghazi). “We came, we saw, he died,” she chuckled cynically referring to Moammar Qaddafi. Qaddafi was a secular ruler, hardly a saint but no longer an enemy. Today, Libya is controlled by Muslim radicals of the sort who behead Christians and their own apostates. More recently, Hillary supported the overthrow of a democratically elected government in Honduras, now the most dangerous place in Central America. She continues to support the push for “regime change” in Syria and the casual saber-rattling against Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

She is the first presumptive nominee of a major party that I know of to be under investigation for having committed felonies. No one thinks she will be prosecuted, because Goldman Sachs is higher on the national pecking order than either the FBI or the DOJ.

If the choice in November is between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, and GOP elites either support Hillary or nominate one of their empty suits, reasonable conservatives will conclude that the Republican Party does not deserve to survive.

They should immediately begin creating an American Party that reflects their values and priorities, not those of power-hungry (and money-hungry) elites. Such a party would be the absolute last chance for the country’s survival as a sovereign nation able to hold itself together. Even then there would be no guarantees. The combination of changing demographics, political correctness / identity politics, and lower educational levels (all products of 50 years of policies that have aimed at just this result), are working against us even as I write.

There is nothing to do, however, but try. An American Party could field a candidate with grassroots support in 2020, if not Trump again then someone with a similar outlook whom Trump could use his nonnegligible resources to support. If the organization Trump has surrounded himself with moved on this, they could conceivably field state and local candidates as soon as 2018 to establish credibility.

After all, just two years of Hillary (not to mention four) could leave the U.S. and the world at large in such chaos that the grassroots clamor for change will be magnitudes louder than it is now, and it will hardly be limited to whites who tend to vote Republican. Add to this whatever probability exists that the bubble economy, after a decade of quick fixes and doctored statistics, will have burst, wreaking further havoc with working and former middle classes of all groups, as well as former students swimming in debt who cannot find jobs. The time will have come for a political party that can draw in a large swath of voters who have had it with elite control — if the movement galvanized by Donald Trump is willing and able to build it.

© 2016 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice shows that more than half of all of the murder increases in the United States were centered in just three cities: Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois; and Washington, D.C. That’s an incredible statistic when you stop and think about it. Over half of U.S. murder increases came from just three cities.

During 2015, there were 344 homicides in Baltimore, 465 in Chicago, and 162 in D.C.

Of course, the Brennan Center report mostly blames “economic factors” for the increase in murders in these cities: “These serious increases seem to be localized, rather than part of a national pandemic, suggesting that community conditions remain the major factor. Notably, these three cities all seem to have falling populations, higher poverty rates, and higher unemployment than the national average. This implies that economic deterioration of these cities could be a contributor to murder increases.”

The report confirms that “crime rates remain at historic lows nationally, despite recent upticks in a handful of cities.”

See the report.

In other words, take out the huge spike in crime in America’s major cities, especially Baltimore, Chicago, and D.C., and the national crime rate would barely be a proverbial “blip” on the radar screen.

Besides falling populations, higher poverty rates, and higher unemployment, what else do these three cities have in common? You know the answer: STRICT GUN CONTROL.

Baltimore has an “assault weapons” ban, as does the entire State of Maryland. Chicago and the District of Columbia do too.

Writing for Breitbart.com, AWR Hawkins notes, “Chicago has a ‘violence tax’ that raises the price of every gun sold at retail in the city, and DC has a registration program which is broken down into six steps and requires more than a full page of explanation from the Metropolitan Police Department. The steps include multiple paragraph explanations for satisfying gun safety requirements, certifying that you are not legally blind, and paying a total of $94 to the DC Treasurer, none of which will impact or hinder criminals in the least.

“So the gun control in all three cities continue, even though the extra murders there were so high in 2015 that they represent more than half the overall increase in murders in the U.S.”

Overall, the gun-control laws in these three cities are among the strictest in the nation. Obviously, the criminals in those cities paid those laws no heed. DUH!

The unreported part of this story is the fact that nationwide (with the exception of a handful of radical anti-gun states such as Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, California, etc.) more and more states are recognizing a citizen’s right to keep AND BEAR arms, which is the primary reason why the national crime rate is falling like a rock.

More Americans are armed in their everyday lives today than at any time in modern memory. And that trend is increasing exponentially. 2015 set an all-time record (previous record being set in 2014, and the record before that being set in 2013, etc.) in gun sales nationwide. Gun ownership in America is skyrocketing. And more importantly, the numbers of Americans BEARING arms is skyrocketing.

On April 15 of this year, Mississippi became the tenth State to enact a “Constitutional-Carry” law enabling citizens to carry a concealed handgun without having to obtain a permit. The other nine states allowing for “Constitutional Carry” are Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

See the report here.

The editors of the above report add: “Over 99% of Montana also enjoys Constitutional Carry.” That’s because 99% of the State of Montana is rural, in which case State law allows for Constitutional Carry. CCW permits are only required for incorporated cities in Montana. (The Montana House and Senate passed a Statewide Constitutional Carry bill during the last legislative session, but it was vetoed by Democratic Governor Steve Bullock. We aim to correct that problem at the polls this November.)

Readers might be surprised to learn that one in twenty adults have a CCW permit in this country. And, again, there is no question whatsoever that this fact is directly proportional to the decrease in crime nationally.

See the report.

The Gun Owners of America has also documented the fact that “Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year–or about 6,850 times a day. This means that each year, firearms are used more than 60 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.

“Of the 2.5 million self-defense cases, as many as 200,000 are by women defending themselves against sexual abuse.”

See the report here.

The surge in both gun purchases and Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) applications can be largely attributed to women arming themselves. Pistol-packers are no longer just males. More women in America are armed today than at any time in our nation’s history. And as a warning to would-be attackers of women, ladies seem to be more naturally accurate with a handgun than most men. And if you think for a second that a mother would hesitate to defend herself or her children with a deadly weapon, you are dumber than a box of rocks.

Sadly, one of the biggest pro-gun-control blocs across the country is America’s pastors and churches. Not all, thankfully, but far, far too many pastors and churches across America have bought into the gun-control agenda hook, line, and sinker. This is especially true among the country’s megachurches, most of which are located in major cities, of course.

Back in 2013, when President Obama and Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced their nationwide “assault weapons” ban, a host of pastors were telling their parishioners that they had no need to own an “assault weapon” (or any other firearm, for that matter) and that the Bible instructed them to disarm if civil law required it. These pastors repeatedly used verses such as “Thou shalt not kill,” “They that take the sword shall perish with the sword,” etc., to push the gun-control agenda to their congregations. And the vast majority of pastors who were not vocally supporting Obama’s gun-control agenda were absolutely SILENT on the subject.

Thankfully, pro-Second Amendment Republicans AND Democrats rallied against Obama and Feinstein’s bill and it didn’t even make it out of the then Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate. No thanks, however, to a host of pastors and churches.

It was at that point that my constitutional attorney son and I wrote what I believe is a classic treatise on the Biblical Natural Law right and DUTY of men and women to be willing and able to defend themselves. I say it plainly: the right of self-defense is not just a right (as in the Second Amendment); it is a God-ordained DUTY. We have a God-ordained duty to defend ourselves with or without the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment merely recognizes the duty given to us by our Creator.

The title of our book is “To Keep Or Not To Keep: Why Christians Should Not Give Up Their Guns.”

As the title suggests, the book is written primarily to people who call themselves Christians. It is not so much of a constitutional analysis (which, thankfully, has already been accomplished with countless research) but of a Biblical analysis. Frankly, I am sick and tired of hearing my fellow pastors use the Scriptures (such as the ones referenced above) as justification for gun control or even disarmament. The Bible teaches nothing of the sort.

Therefore, our book is a SCRIPTURAL refutation of gun control and a theological affirmation of man’s Natural and divine right of self-defense. In the book, we take the combined body of scriptural evidence and categorically prove that self-defense is a Natural right given mankind at Creation and a moral duty given mankind by Revealed Law.

For any Christian who is confused about the scriptural teaching on the subject of lawful self-defense or who goes to a church where this issue is not addressed and clarified or who has Christian friends who do not understand the Scripture’s approbation of armed self-defense, this book is MUST-READING (if I do say so myself).

To order our book, “To Keep Or Not To Keep: Why Christians Should Not Give Up Their Guns,” click here.

Nationwide, America’s crime rate is at historic lows because so many more people (including ladies) are arming themselves. Crime rates in America’s major cities are still much higher than in average-sized or smaller communities. And in virtual “gun-free” cities such as Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington, D.C., the increase of crime (especially homicide) is at historic highs. Again, HALF of the nation’s homicide rate increase in 2015 came from THESE THREE CITIES.

If anything, these three cities prove the lunacy of gun control and the wisdom of America’s Founding Fathers to encapsulate our Creator’s Natural Law principle of self-defense into our Bill of Rights.

P.S. People who are relatively new to firearms often ask for my personal preferences regarding which firearms I like and why. I have put these preferences on a distinct web link, which can be viewed here.

Mind you, I am not a firearms expert, and these are merely my personal preferences and suggestions in order to help people get a head start in understanding the distinctions and nuances of the wide assortment of firearms that are available to the American people today. If anything I suggest is helpful, great. If not, that’s great too. There really is no “best” or “right” choice. Like beauty, the right or best firearm is in the eyes of the beholder. And please remember: no matter what choice you make, you must practice. Whatever firearm you choose is no better or worse than your ability to handle it. I also STRONGLY suggest that people receive training from a professional firearms instructor.

© 2016 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

problems when you become successful is that jealousy and envy inevitably follow. There are people — I categorize them as life’s losers — who get their sense of accomplishment and achievement from trying to stop others. As far as I’m concerned, if they had any real ability, they wouldn’t be fighting me, they’d be doing something constructive themselves.” —Donald J. Trump

The GOPe, DNC, and MSM are all working to derail the peoples’ choice for GOP presidential nominee, Donald J. Trump. His campaign staff is working diligently to keep the many delegates he’s won, and add hundreds more. With Paul Manafort at the helm, Roger Stone says they will be successful, but we know the globalists won’t give up.

As a matter of fact, John Kasich is suspending his campaign in Indiana to give his votes to Cruz, hoping to derail another win for Mr. Trump. [Link] According to a source close to the campaign, in exchange for suspending the Indiana campaign, Cruz will cease operations in New Mexico and Oregon, thus allowing both candidates to maximize their resources in areas where they can best be used. [Link] The globalist insiders continue their efforts to upset the choice of the American people, Donald J. Trump.

To top it off, the Obama administration is funding a blitz with our tax dollars, to naturalize anti-Trump voters. This is part of an organized effort aimed at converting green-card holders into U.S. citizens in order to vote against Donald Trump, a Daily Caller investigation reveals. 

Through an initiative called Networks for Integrating New Americans, which the White House formed in April 2014, the administration has partnered with the National Partnership for New Americans (NPNA), an immigration rights umbrella organization that has denounced Trump’s “hateful rhetoric.” Of course Trump’s rhetoric is all about protecting American citizens, and Trump supporters know that.

The 2016 GOP Convention

The 2016 Republican National Convention will be held in Cleveland, Ohio at the Quicken Loans Arena July 18-21, 2016.

The RNC convention will host approximately 2,470 delegates and 2,302 alternate delegates from all 50 states, the District of Columbia and five territories.

Roger Stone, author, political consultant, lobbyist and Republican strategist, would like Trump supporters to gather at the convention in Cleveland, Ohio on Monday, the 18th of July. Trump supporters from all over the country need to be there, especially the first day. There will undoubtedly be Soros funded groups present and agitating for violence. Mr. Stone has stated that the Trump campaign wants absolutely NO VIOLENCE, and should never throw the first punch, no matter what the Soros protestors do. We are to gather together, and maintain the dignity expected of Donald J. Trump supporters and his campaign.

Delegate Theft and Bribes

Mr. Stone told me that despite the anger American voters feel, and despite the corruption in the GOPe, the “theft” of delegates by Cruz supporters is not illegal. Likewise, the replacement of Trump delegates with GOP establishment delegates by state GOP leaders, is also not illegal. 

There is a recent story regarding Cruz bribing delegates to vote for him. Trump actually tweeted, “I win a state in votes and then get non-representative delegates because they are offered all sorts of goodies by Cruz campaign. Bad system!”

Here’s a video of what looks like a monetary bribe. Nevertheless, again, this is not illegal. He could take them to lunch and talk to them about voting for him, and it’s not illegal. Watch the video of what looks like Cruz bribing a delegate.

Mr. Stone stated that some of Cruz’s super PACs haven’t spent any money, and may be saving up for payoffs or expenses for delegates.

There is also evidence that GOP establishment money is funding Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, and Erick Erickson to attack Trump. Also, not illegal, just rotten and corrupt.

Cruz and Eagle Forum

Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum just barely survived a coup takeover by a number of high powered women in the organization who wished to promote Cruz for president over founder, Phyllis Schlafly’s endorsement of Donald J. Trump. [Link] Mr. Stone and I agreed, that behind this attempt was none other than Ted Cruz himself, and destroying Eagle Forum means nothing if he gets both their endorsement (deceitfully or not) and mega dollars from the 501(c)4 division of Eagle Forum.

Previous Battles for Nomination

This is not the first time we’ve seen a contentious battle for the nomination, but I believe it is still the worst in history.

In 1952, there was a hard fought delegate battle between conservative Howard Taft and Dwight Eisenhower in the primary GOP nomination. This was truly the end of the old right with the nomination of Eisenhower. [Link] (You can read about Ike’s treasonous actions in The Politician by Robert Welch.)

The 1964 Republican campaign was much the same. Senator Barry Goldwater was the staunch conservative and his rivals were liberal New York Governor, Nelson Rockefeller and moderate George Romney. [Link] Governor Rockefeller was placed in nomination to keep delegates from Oregon and other states, committed to him, from swinging to the Goldwater camp. [Link]

Vice Presidential Choices

I asked Mr. Stone if Trump would choose a politician or a businessman for vice-president. Roger stated that there was another option, a military man, one who is well-versed in foreign policy. On the CNN interview with the Trump family, Mr. Trump was asked about adding any of the other candidates to his administration. He stated that although he likes many of the other candidates, he has not said he would ask them to be vice president. Roger Stone said basically the same thing, that it would be highly unlikely for Trump to join with Cruz, Rubio or Kasich.

Cruz and the North American Union

In discussing Heidi Cruz’s many years at the Council on Foreign Relations helping to write the North American Union (NAU) which would eliminate our sovereignty and our borders, I mentioned that Ted Cruz, his staunch supporters, David Barton and Glenn Beck, are all for a Constitutional Convention which would be needed to pass the NAU. Mr. Stone stated that Donald J. Trump is firmly against a Constitutional Convention.

Google and Fake Malware Attacks

Mr. Stone mentioned that this was happening to any number of websites who are supporting Mr. Trump or exposing Ted Cruz. There really is no malware even when the malware warning pops up when trying to open an article or enter a website. It is because the website has been put into Google’s list of “attack” websites, even though they do not have malware. Simply click the button to proceed, and you’ll get to the website or article. All of this started when Mr. Trump tweeted one of my articles on Jeb Bush’s eminent domain usage in Florida. 

Link]

Cruz on Common Core and Fast Tracking TPP

What about commercials regarding Ted Cruz’s stances on Common Core, Cruz’s TPA fast tracking vote on the TPP trade deal, and Heidi Cruz’s five years at the Council on Foreign Relations writing the North American Community document which eliminates American borders and sovereignty? Roger Stone said there would probably be radio ads, and asked if I’d send information on two of the above two topics. I will discuss them in full in an upcoming article.

Cruz Lies on Common Core

Ted Cruz tells his supporters he is against Common Core, and supports home-schooling. But his co-sponsorship of S306, “Enhancing Educational Opportunities for all Students Act” (ESEA), tells a very different story than what Cruz tells his supporters.

How Ted Cruz is Sneaking Common Core on Homeschoolers.

Cruz Voted for TPA Fast Tracking of TPP

Here is the video of Cruz stating he’s for fast tracking for the TPP

Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala), who has been the leading principled opponent of Fast Track in the Congress, provided many more reasons why his colleagues should vote against handing TPA/Fast Track to President Obama. In a speech on the Senate floor, Sessions pointed out that the main objection to TPA is that it will almost guarantee passage of three major Obama Trade packages that threaten our national sovereignty: the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA).

Among the many crucial arguments Sen. Sessions makes are:

living agreements” that will continue to evolve, meaning they will mutate into whatever the trade architects (or future leaders) want them to be;
• The TPP/TTIP/TiSA subject the United States to rulings of international tribunals;
• TiSA could be used to undermine our immigration laws by forcing the U.S. to issue more temporary worker visas; (Cruz once proposed an immediate increase in the base H-1B cap from 65,000 to 325,000. Cruz offered the H-1B increase as an amendment in 2013 to the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill.)

• President Obama is “breaking arms and heads” not to increase trade, but to get the political “trans-national union,” with international law that can be used against America’s interests.

According to Senator Sessions: “The predictable and surely desired result of the TPP is to put greater distance between the governed and those who govern. It puts those who make the rules out of reach of those who live under them, empowering unelected regulators who cannot be recalled or voted out of office. In turn, it diminishes the power of the people’s bulwark: their constitutionally-formed Congress.” 

(Remember that regionalism, which is gradually becoming the accepted method of unelected governance in the United States (unelected councils, regulators, and task forces, participatory democracy, public-private partnerships, etc.) is the form of government used in democratic socialist and communist countries.)

Conclusion

Donald Trump is truly the choice of our electorate for GOP nominee. He is the man who can put our nation back on the winning track, the man who cares about America’s people, America’s jobs, America’s borders, America’s veterans, America’s debt, America’s Second Amendment rights, enforcing America’s Constitution, and ultimately America’s survival. We need him in our White House.

A special thank you to Roger Stone for taking the time in his busy day to answer a few questions regarding the Trump campaign. Hopefully, we’ll be able to speak again as the convention draws closer.

The “Environmental editor” at the Times in London, England said, “There are two ways to tackle serious problems: evading them by linguistic trickery, or confronting them openly and honestly. One is easy, though it merely postpones the day of reckoning. The other is difficult, but it alone holds out the promise of a solution.”

Last week, Earth Day, April 22, 2016—passed without much fanfare. Most Americans give short shrift to its origins and less concern to its meaninglessness to most humans on the planet. Since its inception 46 years ago, humanity paid no attention whatsoever to the exponentially increasing destruction to this planet’s land, water and air.

At the time, I didn’t understand the implications of a single species destroying the very “host” it devoured. Like cancer cells, humans invaded the planet until they commanded every stretch of land on this marvelous green globe in the ink-black of space.

On their ultimate death march of their own species, humans created 70,000 chemicals that they inject into the air, water and land 24/7. Those chemicals betray and slay Mother Nature’s plant and animal creatures on a sickening scale. They killed around 50 other species daily in 1970, but doubled that to over 100 species sent to extinction daily in 2016. (Source: Norman Myers, “Extinction rates worldwide” Oxford University) Humans’ metal and plastic trash desecrates every corner of the globe and every square mile of Earth’s oceans—both on the surface and below the surface. Humans’ rivers, loaded with endless poisons exhaust into the oceans relentlessly 24/7. Humans’ carbon exhaust usurps the weather patterns daily, causing “catastrophic climate destabilization” that will be the final undoing of our food supplies.

And now, amoral super-stars like Monsanto and ADM poison, alter and destroy the very DNA that drives the natural world.

In 1970, as a college senior, I bicycled along chalk-filled sidewalks of the Red Cedar River on Michigan State University’s campus. Peace signs became the prevalent display of the day. While we marched against the Vietnam War throughout the late sixties, a whole new understanding of man’s “War on Nature” erupted around us.

Red-breasted robins dropped out of trees because of grounds keepers spraying DDT, a deadly poison used to control mosquitoes. Soon, bald eagles fell out of their nests while their eggs disintegrated from the affects of DDT. Bioaccumulation worked its way into streams to kill fish.

Rachel Carson’s book, Silent Spring, exposed pesticides as the most deadly weapons used against Mother Nature and thus, all life on this planet. As can be imagined, chemical companies pulled out all the stops to discredit and humiliate her scientific discoveries. The USDA Agricultural Research Service created a propaganda campaign to defame her as a quack.

In the interim, more scientists supported her findings with their discoveries that DDT and other pesticides created carcinogens that killed birds, bees and other mammals. They corroborated Carson’s findings, which, in time led to the modern-day environmental movement.

Earth Day made its debut across college campuses on April 22, 1970. Coincidentally, during the 60s, Dustin Hoffman starred in a movie: The Graduate. In it, as a college student, one of his mentors told him, “Get into plastics. They are the money-making wave of the future.”

As a young scuba diver, I never forgot that line in the movie. During the sixties, I scuba-dived in pristine Michigan lakes as well as the Gulf of Mexico and John Pennekamp Park in the Florida Keys. Breathing beneath the surface opened a whole new world to my young eyes. I watched in rapped amazement at the incredible wonders of sea life below the surface. Turtles, sharks, manta rays, flounder, reefs, sea horses and every kind of creature dominated my vision. Since that time, I dove in all the oceans of the world.

But something happened with Hoffman’s mentor’s encouragements to “Get into plastics.”

Since 1970, the human race exploded from 3.5 billion to its current 7.3 billion—more than doubling its impact on the natural world.

Today, you read about the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” that floats 100,000,000 (million) tons of plastics in an area the size of Texas between ocean gyres 1,000 miles off the coast of San Francisco. Worse, millions upon millions of tons of plastic sink below the oceans in the form of drift nets, tooth brushes, baby diapers and more—to usurp natural systems into death camps on a scale as large as the seven seas.

When Oprah exposed the magnitude of that “human plastic dump”, I thought the world’s leaders would call a conference and create a 25-cent deposit-return on all plastic. Instead, nothing done! As a scuba diver, I felt sick to my stomach. Millions of marine creatures die in the plastic-net covering our oceans. So, not only do we kill ourselves, we take down tens of thousands of other species with us. It makes me sick to my stomach daily to see what humanity does to Mother Nature’s miracles.

Additionally, the Ganges, Yangtze, Mississippi and most major rivers running into the oceans carry horrifying loads of chemicals, sewage, waste, plastic and other poisons to create 20,000 square mile “dead zones” at their mouths. And nobody will stop it or change it or clean it up. Our oceans face pollution beyond comprehension. If you look at the radio active waste from Japan’s Fukushima Nuclear disaster—how can anyone eat a single marine animal out of the oceans without radiating themselves to some degree?

To add more insult, Monsanto, a bioengineering company, created genetically modified organisms that replaced DNA with artificial strains of cellular disruptions that unload on the natural world. Their “Frankensteinized” plants carry chemicals that disrupt pollinators to the point of massive “bee colony collapses” around the globe. Their fish carry bastardized DNA strands that nature cannot understand.

While we reverently celebrate Earth Day, powerful chemical companies like Monsanto override Mother Nature with insidious poisons that carry no “end date” to their destructive abilities.

We continue our enormous “carbon footprint” on the biosphere with added coal burning, fossil fuel burning and nuclear energy waste. Some misname it “global warming” and scoff at it, but with over 94 million barrels of oil burned every 24 hours, day in and day out, along with billions of tons of coal, natural gas and wood—I can tell you that we won’t get away with this abuse much longer. The 21st century will be the era of reckoning for the human species. If you want to see what’s coming, watch the four videos at: Dr. Jack Alpert, www.SKIL.org

Some of the aspects that fry my mind: we need a 25-cent deposit return law on every plastic, metal and glass container purchased out of every store in the world. Only six states give 5 cents and Michigan gives 10 cents per containers. The remaining states could care less. We need to stop production of all plastic bags. We face the end of oil reserves in this century, but America fails to enact any kind of conservation.

We’re at the end of our water resources in America, but we expect to add another 138,000,000 (million) more people within 34 years—but you won’t hear a word about it in the press. Once that 138 million lands on our shores, we’re toast as to water, energy and resources. Not to mention arable land, viable climate and balanced environment. Take a guess at the air and traffic gridlock with an added 138 million people! Any talk about human overpopulation remains censored by ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, CNN, FOX NEWS, Sierra Club, Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund and the rest.

Guilty of censorship: Leslie Stahl, David Muir, Robert Seigal, Matt Lauer, Terry Gross, Steve Inskeep, Charlie Rose, Brit Hume, Bill O’Reilly, Megyn Kelly, Shepard Smith, Steve Croft, Lester Holt, George Stephanopoulos, Diane Sawyer, Scott Pelley and more and more.

Renewable energy stands as a joke because none of it can or will replace oil, gas and coal. Nonetheless, you hear so many cheerful advertisements telling us that Shell Oil will provide “energy for the future.” It makes me want to vomit.

None of our children will escape what’s coming. We created a Faustian Bargain to give future generations a Hobson’s Choice. It’s already manifested in China, India, Mexico, Indochina, most of Africa and Bangladesh.

Once this human population “perfect storm” hits the United States of America like Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Sandy and another 50 of them combined—no amount of hope, praying or faith will answer any of our pleas for mercy. Which leads me to one single understanding. The human race became the most arrogant, clever and dumbest of all species. But, not to worry; Mother Nature will take care of us brutally and without mercy. Remember this: she always bats last.

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

“When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, this you may not read, this you cannot say, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy or worthy the motives.” -Slightly revised from a quote by Robert A. Heinlein, a well-known science fiction author

The inviolate duty of the American federal government is to protect the American citizens from all enemies, foreign and domestic and to preserve, protect and defend each citizen’s individual, unalienable rights, that is, if the American federal government complied with the mandates of the U. S. Constitution and the battle cry of the Declaration of Independence.

Well let’s just say that on protecting the American citizen from all foreign enemies the federal government has done a half-assed job of it in the last 60 years or so. The battle against the ugly rise of radical Islam has been half-hearted, half-baked and lacking any real commitment to defeat them.

We don’t win wars any more we putter at them. Korea, Vietnam, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya are wars we did not win. We let Putin rub our collective noses in it while he laughs on the back of a horse with his shirt off, displaying his invincible pectorals. We’ve let Iran run all over us.

Radical Islam continues to be an imminent danger to every American and the federal government is derelict in its prime duty to protect us from that danger by crushing that danger at its source.

As far as preserving, protecting and defending the American citizen’s individual, unalienable rights, government has failed miserably. What’s even worse, the federal government and many state and local governments have become the ENEMY of the people. (See “Why Government Is Your Enemy”) Government has passed so many laws, local, state and federal, you can’t open a cupboard door without violating one or more of them.

It follows then, that if government passes a law, government has to have a means to enforce the law. This gives rise to an explosion of code and law enforcement personnel to enforce millions of laws, about which the average citizen knows nothing. These government-employed code enforcement people fan out across the land looking for violations of their precious codes, regulations, restrictions and ordinances. Besides local code enforcement personnel, we have OSHA, ATF, FBI, IRS, Fish and Wildlife, BLM, EPA, Army Corps of Engineers and a whole host of other local, state and federal bureaucracies all having a say in how you live and what you do. We have arrived at a police state.

With so many laws, the people have turned into snitches if their neighbor should be doing something they don’t like. Rather than approaching the neighbor and resolving the issue in person, they turn the neighbor into your favorite Heinz 57 variety code enforcement officer, state or federal, who then comes out and harasses you, even if the alleged infraction doesn’t exist.

These taxpayer-paid code enforcement officers show up un-announced, trespass on your land, question your kids to get free information, take pictures for their file and can generally make your life miserable. Fail to respond to their notices of violations and they will get a court order to force you to comply and then fine the hell out of you. It makes no difference how inane or insane the regulation or ordinance might be. But when they do visit you, they seem to always find an infraction for which to fine you in their never-ending quest for more of your money. You have to prove your innocence at great expense. And if you want to confront your accuser, which supposedly is every American’s right, code enforcement won’t reveal the snitch. We know because we have tried.

This has led to almost every American citizen being deathly afraid of their government. Rather than rising up and confronting the bully, like Americans used to do, they now either lay low, or hide in the shadows, hoping they won’t be the next victim of an abusive, all-powerful, government employee, who is itching to fine them or throw them in jail.

One of our Louisiana readers told us about an event that happened to him while he was restoring a couple of old cars in his carport. The local jurisdiction passed a law that no property owner could have an inoperable vehicle on his or her property. Our reader received a notice from that jurisdiction that he would have to get rid of his two in-operable cars. The complaint probably came from a neighborhood snitch. He thought that the notice was ridiculous and did not comply. The local jurisdiction sent out two tow trucks and hauled his two cars away, without a warrant, or a by your leave.

We get about one of these stories at least once a week from individuals from all over America who find themselves up against an intransigent, corrupt government.

So what would you do if one of your neighbors is “picked off” by the government and fined or sent to jail? Do you say to your self, “I should go help that guy and defend him against our common enemy?” Or, do you say to your self, “thank God it wasn’t me?” Most do the latter.

Government raided the Gibson guitar company with a fully armed swat team from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Agency and forced them to pay up for a violation they say they didn’t commit. But paying up was cheaper than fighting the government in court. Nevertheless, paying up amounted to a $250,000 settlement, a $50,000 payoff to environmental groups, (what!!??) over $2,000,000 in legal fees, plus the cost of the factory shut down from the raid. Oh, did we forget to mention that Gibson is not a union shop but their competitors are? Did we also fail to mention that the owner of Gibson guitars has donated more heavily to Republicans than to Democrats? Who was president at the time of the raid, Barack Obama? Who was U. S. Attorney General at the time, Eric Holder? Gibson isn’t the first company that this pair has targeted, using a federal agency, you know, like the IRS. Gibson had the money to pay off the government ransom because Gibson is a profitable company. Do you have the money to pay a government ransom, or will you end up in the poor house, or in jail?

Very few American citizens have the resources to fight the all-powerful government through the administrative route at an appeals hearing, or in court. And further, the court system is rigged in favor of the government. Just ask those that find themselves in the sights of the IRS. It is no wonder that people lay low, or shake in their boots when government comes calling.

Government constantly conspires against citizens to get what they want, usually to placate a certain constituency group for their votes. Blacks, Latinos, Indians, Muslims, women, or the LGBT community, drive many new laws.

In fact, a battle is raging in several states right now over bathroom laws in legislative efforts by those states to stop any bio anatomical man claiming to be an LGBT from entering the women’s (or girl’s) bathroom or shower, an open invitation to male perverts and rapists. Hug your wives and daughters extra hard every single day for they are in danger. Can you protect them? Your government isn’t protecting them in order to placate 3.8% of the general population that claim to be one of the LGBT community. (Source: Gallup)

The general population mostly has no say in new laws or regulations, unless they show up in droves at public hearings demanding to be heard. Most citizens don’t show up. Federal bureaucracies pass regulations that no one ever hears about and Congress does nothing to oversee the bureaucracies.

Social justice, radical environmentalism, irrational compassion, special interest groups and international influences are the reasons behind most of these old and new laws. Then you have the collusion between government and business (crony capitalism) wherein they collude to pass laws in favor of the business that gives the government more tax revenue, or to promote a government agenda. The government uses propaganda, new regulations, zoning, or eminent domain to get their way. If the people object, they just wait the people out since government has nothing but time and your money to do whatever they want, when they want.

That government evolves into tyranny is not a new phenomenon. It comes about over time when the people are not paying attention to that evolution, or when the people decide that it is easier to be dependent on government rather than being dependent on their own resources. A society, or a nation built on dependency, is a society doomed to fail and doomed to slavery. Dependency obligates the dependent person on the giver. In the government’s case, the price is usually the dependent person’s vote.

But the people don’t have to lie down and play dead for government. We have found in our own experiences when the people strenuously object, the government tends to back down.

Government expects you to be docile and compliant. After all government has spent several decades and trillions of your dollars in producing docile, compliant, tolerant citizens through the public school system and our liberal colleges. Our institutions breed docility and compliancy. Don’t raise your voice. Be calm all the time, even if the other side is egregiously and maybe even criminally wrong. Don’t confront and get angry with the bully, debate him ….. or her, whether it is Iran, some minority group, or an insane person. Debating a bully is either ideological, or self-induced suicide.

Let’s face it. The government wants you to be afraid of them! You are easier to control and manage that way. But if you are afraid of government, they own you. You are a slave by any definition.

Good Lord ladies and gentlemen aren’t you just a little tired of being afraid of government? Is this the America we have become, cowering in the corner and uncontrollably shivering in fear like a scared rabbit? Aren’t you just a little tired of being pushed around by out-of-control, rogue government agencies that many times invent the law, owns the court system, is arrogant and has become the master, rather than the servant? Do you want to regain your self-respect and feel like you are controlling your own destiny instead of capitulating to government fear and intimidation?

Would you like to GET EVEN without hiring a high-paid lawyer that is part of the corrupt system you are up against? An attorney is an officer of the court. The court is just another part of the system that works against your individual, unalienable rights.

Do you have the courage our Founding Fathers had to push back against a vicious bully that has become the American government, at every level? If so, then you are going to find our next article very important, especially if government has knocked on your door. When government comes calling we will show you how to slow them down, hold them at bay, confuse the hell out of them, or stop them in their tracks, legally, local, state, or federal ….. without hiring an attorney who will take your savings and bleed you dry whether you win or lose.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“If you would know who controls you see who you may not criticize.” -Tacitus

It has been a week of weeks concerning the assaults on the American people coming from this administration and their communist allies within and without. They are becoming more emboldened, ruthless and obvious as to who is responsible for the crimes committed against the American people, especially those involving the sodomite community. Yet, you are told to believe that the homosexual manifesto is just satire. Let me make my point.

Barack Hussein Obama the “First Gay President” and his controllers appoint 225 radical lesbians, homosexuals, and transgender to governmental positions only to be used as a political battering ram to upend American sovereignty. Yet, the American people were told that Gay Manifesto was just satire.

On October 28, 2009, Barrack Hussein Obama signed into law (It is not law) the Matthew Shepard hate crime legislation, which was based on a lie. America was told that Shepard was a victim of a hate crime (All crime is motivated by hate). The bill was named after Shephard and James Byrd Jr. Through fabrication and omitted facts, the sodomites took advantage of the situation and attempted to equate their sin to the color of the black man’s skin.

Yet, we can highlight a plethora of self-inflicted crimes by these homosexuals who attempt to lay the blame for their crimes upon the innocent. However, the American people were told that Gay Manifesto was just a satire.

On May 10, 2010, Barrack Hussein Obama further assaults the American people by adding Elena Kagan, a woman who never judged a case a day in her life, to the Supreme Court. Elena is responsible for attempting to radicalize Harvard by “queerifying” the institution.

Then, on September 20, 2011, the administration removes “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” so that the United States military will have to accept sodomites to serve openly in the military. Of course, this is only to weaken our defenses.

Throughout the current administration’s incumbency, the narrative, with the help of the CIA controlled media which now has a 6% approval rating, is to attack anyone and everyone that would speak out against the abominable and illegal acts of sodomites (Lev. 18:22; Rom. 1:24).

Again, the American people were told that Gay Manifesto was just satire.
Remember, they were doing all of this while tearing away at the Defense of Marriage Act by declaring Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional in 2013.

Now to the children…

Remember ICE investigation at the Pentagon, which exposed over 5,000 employees downloading child pornography? Instead of the guilty being prosecuted for their felony offenses, the DOJ, under Eric Holder, conveniently stated they didn’t have enough manpower to bring prosecutions.

This leads me to Sgt. 1st Class Charles Martland, a Green Beret, who learned from a 12-year-old Afghan boy’s mother that an Afghan police commander had chained her son to his bed to repeatedly abuse him. Martland intervened and because he protected the child and his mother against an admitted rapist, Sgt. Martland was ordered involuntarily discharged from the military.

Just last week, it was uncoverd that former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert molested 4 boys while he was a high school wrestling coach, but he won’t be charged.

But again, you are told to believe that the Gay Manifesto is only a satire.

Just so you understand where this is going, remember that Obama appointed Kevin Jennings as his safe school czar. Kevin wrote a forward to a book called “Queering the Elementary.” Kevin’s icon was none other than Harry Hay from the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBALA), where the motto is “Sex before eight before it is too late.”

Just a satire though, America!

Now, we see that this criminal in the people’s house threatens the state of North Carolina to withhold billions over a bathroom privacy act. Where are those billions come from America?

This is not American government friends, this is criminal! This is opening up the innocent to the abominable in every way. But again, it is only a satire, right?

It was reported that Bruce Springsteen was going to cancel concerts in North Carolina along with Bryan Adams and Pearl Jam.

Apparently, there was a black out when these immoral agents made their decision to cancel. Chad Severance is leading the charge. Chad Sevearance is a convicted sex offender.

In 1998, Sevearance worked as a youth minister and in that capacity allegedly lured younger men to his apartment to spend the night where Severance showed them pornography and tried to talk them into sex. One boy testified that he woke up to find Severance “fondling him.” Severance was convicted on one charge of sexual molestation of a minor.

As a result of his 2000 conviction, Sevearance must register with the police on a regular basis for a minimum of ten years. [Link]

Barney Frank, former member of Congress and known homosexual pedophile, said concerning the sodomite communities “For those that are worried about the radical homosexual agenda, let me put them on notice, 2 down, two to go!” (Jude 1:12-13)

Nothing to worry about though America, it is only satire!

© 2016 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

In ancient Greece and Rome, the education of children was voluntary and parent-directed. This two-thousand-year-old tradition came to America in the 1650s when colonists from England set up free-market schools in the Massachusetts Bay and Jamestown, Virginia colonies. The education system in each colony varied. There were many small, private non-religious grammar schools and colleges, Quaker and Lutheran schools, fundamentalist and liberal Protestant schools, schools that taught the classics, and technical schools that taught children a trade. It was a vibrant and voluntary free-market education system that catered to children’s needs and abilities, and to parents’ budgets.

Many towns had one-room schoolhouses that local residents or church members voluntarily paid for. Also, most colonial parents taught their children reading, arithmetic, and Bible studies at home. Throughout the thirteen colonies, parents controlled and paid for their children’s education, and formal schooling in a town or church-sponsored school was voluntary.

Many children also learned a trade through apprenticeship, a respected tradition that had been around for hundreds of years. Parents often apprenticed their boys (girls mostly stayed at home) to a local tradesman or professional, like a clerk, blacksmith, or lawyer. The boy would work only for room and board, and the tradesman would teach the child his trade. George Washington learned his surveying skills as an apprentice. John Adams, our second president, apprenticed with a practicing lawyer in Boston. Apprenticing was a common way for an ambitious young man to learn a trade or profession in colonial times. Sadly, this unique and valuable learning method has almost disappeared today.

Benjamin Franklin, a brilliant writer, businessman, diplomat, and scientist, was a self-made man and mostly self-taught. Although Franklin’s father was a candlemaker, he was intelligent and well-read. He taught Ben and his other children how to read, a skill that Ben quickly learned. Young Benjamin attended a local grammar school at age eight but stayed there hardly a year. His father sent him to another “writing and arithmetic” school, but Ben failed in arithmetic there. As a result, his father then removed him from this “formal” school, and at ten years old, Ben went to work for his father.

However, Benjamin didn’t like the candle-making business, so his father introduced him to other trades to see if he liked any of them, which he didn’t. At age twelve, Franklin’s father apprenticed him to his older brother James, a printer in Boston. Unfortunately, Ben didn’t get along with his brother, so at age sixteen Ben left Boston and walked to Philadelphia to seek his fortune. In Philadelphia, he eventually opened his own printing business and became successful.

Franklin loved books and read voraciously, studied arithmetic, and even taught himself French, all from books his father gave him. He read contemporary and near-contemporary authors, such as John Bunyan, Cotton Mather, and Daniel Defoe, as well as Plutarch and other classical writers that most college students today find difficult reading.

Franklin’s education by poor but literate parents, as well as his later self-education, was not the exception at this time—it was the norm. George Washington went to sschool briefly at eleven years old. He didn’t like school much—he preferred to spend his time dancing and horseback riding. His grammar school, where he learned geometry, trigonometry, and surveying, required young Washington to know how to read, write, and do basic arithmetic before it admitted him.

George attended school for exactly two years. During this time, he taught himself practical skills he could use when he started to work, such as how to write legal forms for commerce, including leases, patents, bills of exchange, and tobacco receipts. He also studied geography and astronomy on his own, and by eighteen years old had devoured novels by Henry Fielding, Tobias Smollett, Daniel Defoe, and classical Roman works like Seneca’s Morals, Julius Caesar’s Commentaries, and the Histories of Tacitus.

These are difficult books most college students today have never heard of, much less read. Years later, after serving as military commander-in-chief in the Revolutionary War, Washington became a self-taught architect and designed his magnificent home at Mount Vernon. Yet, many historians consider Washington the least well-read among the Founding Fathers.

Like most of the other Founding Fathers, including Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, most average colonial Americans spent few years, if any, in formal grammar schools of the day, yet they knew how to read and write very well. Most local grammar schools expected parents to teach their children to read and write before they started school. Most colonial parents apparently had no trouble teaching their children these skills at home.

At least ten of our presidents were home-schooled. James Madison’s mother taught him to read and write. John Quincy Adams was educated at home until he was twelve years old. At age fourteen, he entered Harvard. Abraham Lincoln, except for fifty weeks in a grammar school, learned at home from books he borrowed. He learned law by reading law books, and became an apprentice to a practicing lawyer in Illinois.

Other great Americans were similarly educated. John Rutledge, a chief justice of the Supreme Court, was taught at home by his father until he was eleven years old. Patrick Henry, one our great Founding Fathers and the governor of colonial Virginia, learned English grammar, the Bible, history, French, Latin, Greek, and the classics from his father.

Abigail Adams, Martha Washington, and Florence Nightingale were all taught at home by their mothers or fathers. John Jay was one of the authors of the Federalist Papers, a chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and a governor of New York. His mother taught him reading, grammar, and Latin before he was eight years old. John Marshall, our first Supreme Court Chief Justice, was home-schooled by his father until age fourteen. Robert E. Lee, Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, George Patton, and Douglas MacArthur were also educated at home. Booker T. Washington, helped by his mother, taught himself to read by using Noah Webster’s Blue Back Speller.

Thomas Edison’s public school expelled him at age seven because his teacher thought he was feeble-minded. Edison, one of our greatest inventors, had only three months of formal schooling. After Thomas left school, his mother taught him the basics at home over the next three years. Under his mother’s care and instruction, young Edison thrived. If Thomas Edison were alive today as that child of seven, school authorities would probably stick him in special-education classes and claim he had a mental ‘disease’ like ADHD. Poor Thomas would have wasted his brilliant mind and be bored to death until they released him from his public-school education prison at age sixteen.

Many of our greatest writers and artists, such as Mark Twain, Agatha Christie, Pearl S. Buck, Charles Dickens, and George Bernard Shaw, were also home-schooled or self-taught. Irving Berlin quit school in the second grade and taught himself to be a musician. Photographer Ansel Adams and architect Frank Lloyd Wright’s parents taught them the basics at home. Joseph Pulitzer, the great newspaper publisher who created the Pulitzer Prize, was home-schooled.

This is only a partial list of great Americans who were home-schooled or never saw the inside of a public school. Most of the famous and accomplished Americans that children read about in their history books were either educated by their parents or mostly self-taught. These famous Americans’ achievements prove that to succeed in life, a child does not have to attend a compulsory, government-controlled public school.

In contrast, the appallingly-low literacy rates of our children today is a direct result of the government take-over of our children’s education since the 1890’s. That is when government-controlled public-schools became compulsory for all children.

The obvious question to ask, is why not scrap our government-run public schools and go back to a totally free-market education system? Common sense tells us that a free-market education system would work superbly in America, just as it did for almost 150 years before government usurped our children’s education.

Yet, today, government has increased its stranglehold over our children’s minds, education, and future to a horrifying degree. Why have we let government bureaucrats get away with this? To answer that question in gruesome detail, I refer you to my book, “Public Schools, Public Menace.”

© 2016 Joel Turtel – All Rights Reserved

Given the outcome of primaries in New York and the rest of the Northeast, a vote for either Cruz or Kasich is a vote for defeat in November. With neither one able to capture the popular vote, and with a clear majority supporting Trump going into the convention, any effort to keep Trump from the nomination will cause a mass exodus from the party of its new heart and soul, the millions of previously disaffected voters who are drawn by Trump’s anti-establishment message. It is now time for sober realism: If Trump is not the Republican nominee, it is highly unlikely that a Republican will be elected President. The effort to stop Trump is worse than futile, it is self-destructive.

Unable to win a majority of their own party, Cruz and Kasich cannot hope to create that party unity necessary to assure victory in the Fall. Instead of investing in an effort to derail the popular favorite through some sort of authoritarian ouster at the convention, party leaders should mend fences with Trump and provide assurance that they will support him as the popular favorite. Doing so will pay dividends, as they will have a greater chance of achieving party unity needed to win in the general election and a more receptive audience in a Trump white house.

Gone are the days preceding the early Twentieth Century when backroom deals could upset popular will at the nominating conventions and those responsible not be made to account. Instantaneous news brings with it immediate information on the machinations underway and will provide convincing evidence that the Republican Party has betrayed its electorate if Trump is not chosen. That would be a major mistake with lasting consequences for the GOP.

The differences party leaders have with Trump are in truth not based on policy. These same leaders have embraced liberal positions by past Republican standard bearers without uttering a peep of dissent. Richard Nixon advocated wage and price controls, a draconian measure offensive to everyone who favors a free market. George Bush advocated Medicare Part D, one of the largest expansions of Medicare in the nation’s history. Mitt Romney authored the precursor to Obamacare in Massachusetts. Despite all of those gross deviations from conservative ideology, none suffered rebuke from party leaders. Indeed, all were embraced. The key difference with Trump is that he cannot be controlled and is averse to the exercise of influence at the expense of free enterprise and the American people.

That means Trump will not be persuaded to pressure the bureaucracy and Congress to maintain or adopt new anti-competitive measures beneficial from one industry over another. The inside line many depend upon, that justifies the employment of so many K Street lobbyists, is not available with Trump. Indeed, he has condemned that inside line and has no interest in being anyone’s patsy. He cannot be bought. It is that, rather than a supposed lack of ideological purity, that is ultimately behind all efforts to thwart democracy and engineer a convention coup to take from Trump the mantle he has earned in popular votes.

If instead of working feverishly and devoting millions of dollars to accomplish the undoing of Trump and thereby make Republican defeat in November a sure thing (a quest that is worse than futile, a quest that is self-destructive), party leaders should swallow their pride, make amends with Trump, and offer all the help they can to support his candidacy and defeat his opponent.

Sadly, certain Republican leaders aligned against Trump may actually prefer Clinton over him, precisely because Clinton has a long history of fraternization with industry and a strong desire to line her political pockets with money from special interests, facts exploited to his advantage by Bernie Sanders. Despite her far left rhetoric, Clinton does indeed have an affinity for politically concocted financial deals, deals that benefit her, her family, and those who lobby her. But betting on Hillary is a very risky option even for those who embrace greed at the expense of principle and the nation. Hillary will likely be indicted before the November elections, leaving open the prospect for another, perhaps Sanders, perhaps Biden, perhaps someone else.

Lest they forget, while Trump will not sell out the country for the sake of one pol or another, he will forge open new markets and protect America’s financial interests around the world. Although those who have depended on easy wealth from barriers to competition may dislike the new, pro-competitive approach, it promises to help stem the movement toward national insolvency, unfetter free enterprise, and rebuild an opportunity economy. That will lift all boats.

While regulatory barriers to competition, heavy taxation, and redistribution of wealth bring down what is above; breaking down barriers to competition, lowering taxation, and allowing greater wealth accumulation raise up what is below, as history teaches.

On balance, therefore, rather than commit political suicide, or form a pact with the devil in the form of Hillary Clinton, Republican leaders should accept the will of the majority, embrace Trump as the standard bearer, and get to work uniting the party behind him and electing him president.

© 2016 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

As stated in a previous article, Trump is a pragmatist. As such, he always thinks in common sense terms when he answers a question. Thus the answer he recently gave about the transgender bathroom issue was what I would have probably said, because running into a transgender in a public facility is highly unlikely.

Here in Knoxville, we have one transgender in our neighborhood. He was previously married and has children. He was even a radio host. There was an article in the local newspaper about him years ago. I haven’t seen him for a while, but he was going to go through with the hormonal changes and surgery to change his looks from male to female. When I’d see him, he would be wearing a long blond wig, have on short shorts and tight tops over some well-developed fake breasts. I don’t know what’s happened to him, but I do know that the surgeries performed to change gender identities have not worked out well as far as helping the person become more well-adjusted.

military is told to accept transgendered.

There’s a lot the sex change industry doesn’t tell you. Here’s a prime example from Charisma News. The picture is of Nancy Verhelst, a 44-year-old woman disappointed by her female-to-male surgery, who decided to die by euthanasia.

Link] But studies repeatedly show that “transgender” people who seek to become the opposite sex are in fact not happy or fulfilled. In fact, a life-or-death internal war is continually going on within, to the degree that many, if not most, seek to end their lives. 

Trump on Transgender Bathrooms

Trump was asked, in an interview on CBS News, about North Carolina’s controversial bathroom law, HB2, which, by stopping local governments from passing anti-discrimination rules, effectively requires so-called “transgender” people to use bathrooms assigned to their biological sex at birth. 

In the interview, Trump said North Carolina should “leave it the way it is” because before HB2, “there have been very few problems. There have been very few complaints the way it is. People go. They use the bathroom they feel is appropriate. There has been so little trouble. And the problem with what happened in North Carolina is the strife and the economic — I mean the economic punishment that they’re taking.” HB2 is negatively affecting North Carolina’s economy. [Link]

Of course, the pressure from the politically correct crowd is astronomical. Perhaps, NC is right, but there are problems either way. Yet, the chances of meeting up with a transgender are still minimal, and the cost to the state from the PC crowd is huge. (Would you like Cher’s daughter Chastity, who is now Chaz, to show up in a woman’s bathroom? Chaz now looks so obviously like a male.)

Trump is, of course, absolutely right. In the 1960s, I lived on the near north side of Chicago, the State and Rush Street area, where all the nightlife happened. Even back then there was a particular club on Rush Street where you knew that inside were men dressed as women doing imitations of famous people. Chicago’s near north is where the action happened, and we didn’t pay much attention to the club. I do know however, that many of these men, when made up, were absolutely beautiful looking women. At that time, and in that area, there was never a problem with public facilities and transgender men or women. 

America’s Transgender Population

The best estimates I could find of the number of transgenders in America’s population, were 700,000 or .1 to .3% of the population. In reality this is quite miniscule. The chances of running into a transgender in a public facility with numerous stalls, is still miniscule. Thus the reason for Mr. Trump’s statement. As well, transgenders have higher than average crimes committed against them. 

I cannot see a male, dressed as a woman, going into a male restroom. Other males would immediately react negatively. Neither can I see a male dressed as a woman going into a woman’s restroom without most women leaving immediately. Of course, there are those transgender men who truly look like women and vice versa. Needless to say, the population is still so insignificant, that running into someone in a public facility who is a transgender is extremely microscopic.

Trump Expounds on His Original Remark

A day later, faced with backlash from conservatives, Trump explained his initial remark. In an interview on Fox News tonight, Trump told host Sean Hannity:

“I love North Carolina, and they have a law, and it’s a law that, you know, unfortunately is causing them some problems. And I fully understand that they want to go through, but they are losing business, and they are having people come out against it. I think that local communities and states should make the decision. And I feel very strongly about that. The federal government should not be involved.” [Link]

The Politically Correct Crowd and Reality

Realistically, Mr. Trump is absolutely right. Prior to the politically correct brouhaha of transgenders and bathrooms, there was little chance anyone would run into a male or female transgender in a public restroom. Knowing that many restrooms only have one facility for male and female, and that facility has only one stall and the door locks, there is no problem. However, facilities with numerous stalls could ultimately cause concern.

Now that this potty problem has been forced to the front of daily discussions, we will be hearing and probably seeing more and more transgenders purposely using facilities that do not match their birth gender. Still the risks are minimal.

I would agree with the pragmatist statement made by Mr. Trump…and why is it even a question in today’s presidential campaign when we have so many huge problems that totally outweigh the question of what potty the gender-undecided actually uses.

Where on the scale of importance does this issue sit when we have Islamic Syrians invading our country, when we have a $21 Trillion-dollar debt, when our military is spread all over the world, when trade agreements have destroyed the jobs of this country, when our borders are like sieves? 

The Other Side of This Issue

Now that the PC crowd has made such an issue of the potty problem for those who are gender challenged, there will surely be bathroom confrontations that would not have occurred had this not been the number one topic of social and main stream media.

Allowing transgenders to openly use the toilets of their sexual choice is going to result in other problems, much more profound than running into a man who wants to be a woman.

Take the case of a man in Toronto claiming to be a transgender to gain access to and prey on women in two shelters. Under the name “Jessica,” he was able to get into the women’s shelters, where he sexually assaulted several women in 2012, the Toronto Sun reports.

In Kailey Triller’s article, A Rape Victim Speaks Out About Transgender Bathrooms, she is appalled that locker rooms in schools, gyms, and businesses are actually allowing transgender people to use the facilities of the sex they identify with, regardless of their anatomy. Kailey is not saying that transgenders are predators, and statistically, they are not. However, there are enough predators in today’s world who will likely make good use of the situation and “pretend” to be a transgender person to gain access to the people they wish to exploit, namely women and children. Just Google Jason Pomares, Norwood Smith Burnes, or Taylor Buehler, for starters.
Kailey Triller goes on to say:

Do they know that more than 99 percent of single-victim incidents are committed by males? That they are experts in rationalization who minimize their number of victims? Don’t they know that insurance companies highlight locker rooms as a high-risk area for abuse that should be carefully monitored and protected?

Don’t they know that one out of every four little girls will be sexually abused during childhood, and that’s without giving predators free access to them while they shower? Don’t they know that, for women who have experienced sexual trauma, finding the courage to use a locker room at all is a freaking badge of honor? That many of these women view life through a kaleidoscope of shame and suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, dissociation, poor body image, eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, difficulty with intimacy, and worse? 

Why would people knowingly invite further exploitation by creating policies with no safeguards in place to protect them from injury? With zero screening options to ensure that biological males who enter locker rooms actually identify as female, how could a woman be sure the person staring at her wasn’t exploiting her? Why is it okay to make her wonder?

Who Is Responsible

Once again, we have the politically correct crowd pushing a new social order, an order that relegates a miniscule minority above the majority. As constraints on behavior increasingly are loosened, the social fabric increasingly becomes frayed, resulting in increasing chaos and disorder. But a society cannot function under such circumstances, so citizens increasingly turn to the state as a solution, thereby expanding the powers of an already corrupt government.

Numbers 26 and 40 of the 1963 Communist Goals For America, which was entered into the Congressional Record (Appendix, pp. A34-A35) on January 10, 1963, states:

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

Conclusion

Realistically, it is not the transgender folks who are the problem, but the predators who will use the restrooms, locker rooms, showers, etc. for their own deviant purposes, masquerading as a transgender. It is nothing short of negligent to instate policies that elevate the emotional comfort of a relative few over the physical safety of a large group of vulnerable people.

So, yes, I agree with Mr. Trump. Had this not even been a topic of conversation promoted by the PC crowd and the media, we most likely would not have problems. Now that these entities have made this a huge topic of discussion, we could end up with the problems Kailey Triller presents in her excellent article.

Trump always answers these “gotcha” questions with pragmatist answers…and every time, he’s been right.

The nauseating accolades bestowed upon Comrade Clinton for her failed and unlawful stint as Secretary of State is simply more propaganda fed to ignorant sycophants who haven’t a clue about world events. I say unlawful because Hillary Rodham Clinton usurped the office of Secretary of State. Prior to her confirmation, members (both parties) of the joke called the Senate Judiciary Committee were told by Judicial Watch a lawsuit would be filed to stop Comrade Clinton from holding that office because it violated the emolument clause of the U.S. Constitution. What is that?

Judicial Watch, November 1, 2011. Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides:

“No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time.”

“This provision, known as the “Emoluments” or “Ineligibility” clause is an absolute prohibition and does not allow for any exceptions. The “Ineligibility Clause” is interpreted by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption and ensure the separation of powers among the three branches of government. On January 29, 2009, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against newly confirmed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on the ground that she is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State under the Ineligibility Clause.

“The “emoluments” or salary of the U.S. Secretary of State increased at least three times during Mrs. Clinton’s most recent U.S. Senate term. That term, which began on January 4, 2007, does not expire until January 2013, regardless of Mrs. Clinton’s recent resignation. Judicial Watch’s lawsuit is on behalf of Foreign Service Officer and State Department employee David Rodearmel, a retired Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corp. The lawsuit maintains that Mr. Rodearmel cannot serve under Secretary of State Clinton as it would force him to violate an oath he took as a Foreign Service Officer in 1991 to “support and defend” and “bear true faith and allegiance” to the Constitution of the United States.

” For more information on Mr. Rodearmel, see below. In December 2008, Congress attempted to evade the clear prohibition of the Ineligibility Clause with a so-called “Saxbe fix,” reducing the Secretary of State’s salary to the level in effect on January 1, 2007. This maneuver, first used in the Taft Administration, has been more frequently used in recent years by both parties, most notably allowing Republican Senator William Saxbe to become U.S. Attorney General in 1973 and Democratic Senator Lloyd Bentsen to become Treasury Secretary in 1993. A similar “fix” has been enacted for Senator Ken Salazar to join the Obama Cabinet as Secretary of the Interior. These attempted “fixes,” however, are insufficient, as they cannot alter the historical fact that — as in Mrs. Clinton’s case — salaries increased during the terms for which these officials were elected, thereby violating the Ineligibility Clause.

“The lawsuit was reviewed on an expedited basis by a special three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia who held that Mr. Rodearmel did not have standing and did not comment on the constitutional questions. Judicial Watch filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 7, 2010, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case “for want of jurisdiction”, essentially upholding the lower court’s ruling that Mr. Rodearmel did not have standing for the lawsuit.”

This is a written statement by David Rodearmel regarding his filing against Comrade Hillary.

The gutless cowards (both parties) on the Senate Judiciary Committee thumbed their noses at the U.S. Constitution once again with disastrous results. There’s no question at that time, Senator Patrick “Leaky” Leahy [D] knew and plowed forward getting her through. And, what did Republicans on the Senate Judiciary at the time do? Why, nothing, of course – the same as the entire CON-gress to accommodate the ineligible con artist in the White House. Here is this massive legal question hanging, a lawsuit by Judicial Watch and Republicans, as usual, allowed yet another individual to usurp a high office.

The two who opposed her nomination were Republican Senators Jim DeMint (retired) of South Carolina and David Vitter of Louisiana. I wasn’t surprised the jackass who ‘represents me’, Sen. John Cornyn, voted to confirm her. Then Republicans bitched, moaned and groaned when she did something they didn’t like.

A major focus during this presidential preference primary season will be what accomplishments can Mrs. Clinton claim as U.S. Senator? None, but she is a committed Marxist for “social justice” and the completely debunked ‘global warming’ aka ‘climate change’ scam. How about as Secretary of State? None, just the opposite: think Benghazi.

Hillary the Hun, like Lyin’ Ted Cruz, simply used the same tactics as the criminal impostor in the White House: she bluffed her way into the office of Secretary of State. She committed fraud and will never lose a second of sleep over it. Barry Soetoro aka Obama has unlawfully held the office of president since January 2009. Hildebeast aka Hillary, constitutionally never held the office of Secretary of State. ANY current member of the U.S. Senate who was in office during the time of her confirmation should never, ever say they support the Constitution again because it’s a lie. They confirmed another usurper.

Hillary’s supporters don’t give a tinker’s damn because they are as morally and ethically bankrupt as she is from career food stamp recipients to lawyers and friends in high places, she can do no wrong. Most under the age of 30 have no idea the havoc that slut Hillary’s married to did to this country while he defiled the White House. Bill Clinton is well loved by Democrats who are either too stupid to understand what a dirty traitor he is (selling our most sensitive secrets to the COMMUNIST Chinese) or they simply don’t care.

The illusion called Bill & Hillary Clinton as some sort of champions of the down trodden is just that. Both of them, like Barry Soetoro aka Obama, are malignant liars and narcissists. They care nothing for those they claim to care about. They are as ruthless as the mafia, make no mistake about that. The quintessential criminal enterprise who have gotten away with fooling Americans for decades because Congress, compromised judges and the corrupt [In]Justice Department have turned a blind eye all these years.

Hillary said there’s no way she would ever wear handcuffs. It’s the way she said it and a look that tells the story. The Clinton duo is a machine that plays dirtier than any politicians in my lifetime and I’m no spring chicken. They are famous for digging up dirt on opponents and inventing when necessary. If anyone thinks that woman is going to go quietly into the night underestimates just how rotten and corrupt Hillary Clinton is and to what lengths she will go to protect herself. Hell, it wouldn’t surprise me if one day she decides to throw Bill under the bus if it means saving herself.

Another travesty to protect the Clinton’s while the cattle who support Comrade Hillary graze out there in America:

Judge appointed by Clinton tosses case against … Clinton – RICO allegations dismissed without evidence being presented, August 11, 2015 (Of course not. Evidence would put Bill & Hill in a federal prison where they belong.)

We shall see in the not too distant future whether or not that vile female will finally be held accountable through an indictment as a result of the FBI investigation into her emails endangering national security.

Read:

1 – ME Gov – Cruz Camp ‘Stabbed Us In The Back’, Betrayed Us
2 – The Marxist Influence – Bill & Hill’s ties to terrorist organizations
3 – Exclusive: Birth, Death Certificates Raise Questions as to Evolving Life Narrative of Ted Cruz and Parents
4 – Pennsylvania, Maryland, and the RNC– Clinton’s War Machine Will Sue and Destroy Ted Cruz in November

© 2016 – NewsWithViews.com and Devvy – All Rights Reserved

Anyone objectively viewing the moral landscape of America for the past five decades cannot help but remark at the disaster that has befallen our land. This moral degradation of America is called by the left “liberty and justice” – it is anything but that. It is sexual anarchy. Webster’s 1828 defines anarchy as “Want of government; a state of society, when there is no law or supreme power, or when the laws are not efficient, and individuals do what they please with impunity; political confusion.”

Anarchy is what has overtaken our land not liberty. Our founders understood that liberty is the freedom to obey God’s law not violate God’s law. Look at the issues being argued in many State Legislatures today – so called bath room bills. Some States are protecting citizens from perverts who want to go into the bathroom of the opposite sex – that is they are people who have rejected the identity God gave them at conception. But the agenda is much wider than that, it encompasses a propaganda scheme aimed at vulnerable children.

Linda Harvey writes, “evil leftists as the power-brokers [are] looking to separate children from something essential … to sever American children from their God-designed, biological genders.

The Human Rights Campaign, the ACLU and the National Education Association want schools to become “gender expansive.” These deviants are sucking the life out of young humans, persuading them to embrace delusions and become surgically mutilated at the earliest opportunity… Radicals take the wrecking ball to everything, including human design. But it’s not simply a fight against gender distinctions. It’s a fight against modesty and decency, and the presumption that these are unnecessary is the basis of the pressure to open school restrooms and showers to both sexes.”[1]

All these are but a smoke screen for the real agenda – sexual anarchy, overthrowing God’s Law regarding all aspects of sexual morality. It is apparent from the mile high point of view that this agenda of sexual anarchy is insatiable. At first only small demands were made but then more and more and greater and greater then even more expansive demands are made to the point that it becomes more evident every day that there is no end to their demands that all of us surrender to their agenda.

Now we are told we may not merely tolerate it but that we must be forced to honor and celebrate their perversion. And we must not be permitted to just say that their perversion is okay, or even call it normal, now we must be forced to even say that it as holy and sacred as God’s institution of Holy Matrimony.

Compared to other sins there is something remarkable here. I don’t know of any union of kleptomaniacs who demand they we allow them to freely steal from us all and then relabel their theft as a Holy Sacrament. Nor is there an organization of serial killers insisting that we relabel their crime as Holy, Sacred and good. But it appears that sexual immorality is a sin that is insatiable; enough is never enough for them.

One of the many attributes of human beings which distinguish us from all other creatures on earth is the dissatisfaction that occurs even when all of our physical needs are fully met. This condition is universal among people regardless of age, race, or wealth. People are not satisfied even when they have all the food, clothing and shelter they need to exist. For the human being there is a longing for something more, a desire that transcends any physical biological stimulus. An objective examination of human beings leads to the conclusion that we are spiritual creatures who long for spiritual satisfaction with as much as, or perhaps even more passion than for physical satisfaction.

Jesus understands our human heart perfectly. That is why what He said 2000 years ago is still relevant today, it still speaks to the longings and yearnings of the human heart.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2016 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

One of the biggest problems we have in our society today is thinking because we “know” something that it is “knowledge.” That is what makes it possible for so many psychopaths to publish a plethora of lies on the Internet that is believed by so many people.

This is the information age. Never have people had access to so much information – and it can be accessed while sitting in the comfort of your own living room… on your Smart TV or your laptop.

But information is not knowledge. It is just information… possibly true, possibly false; possibly meaningful, possibly not; possibly helpful, possibly destructive or otherwise worthless.

How does information become knowledge? Experience!

You only KNOW information is accurate when it has been tested. If people understood this there would be far fewer divorces and far fewer wars.

I often ask people for their definition of truth and most have to think before they give a response. They often reply “factual.” Here is my definition: Truth is that which does not change. There is only one thing that never changes. It is God, the only entity that is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow. Jesus Christ told us He is “the way, the truth and the life.”

There is a difference between factual and truthful. One can change; the other cannot. When truth changes it goes without saying that what we thought was the truth before it changed was, indeed, not the truth – so how reliable is updated “truth”? One thing you can always count on in worldly matters is change.

We understand when presented with a list of facts surrounding a specific topic that as we investigate we will find more facts and some will conflict with others. As we learn more, our understanding of the facts changes. To verify that statement, we can look at the numerous scientific opinions put forth about global warming – all based on scientific facts (or opinions about facts that are presented to the public as facts rather than opinions). When we get conflicting facts, those who seek knowledge dig more to determine which ones are accurate, which are not. Those who are satisfied with information — those to whom knowledge is unimportant — stop seeking when their comfort level is reached.

The point is, facts may change. Truth does not. We once thought the earth was flat, for example. Our facts were erroneous. Today we believe it to be round, but as we learn more about our universe who knows what facts we may find?

The lesson to be learned? Information is just information, not knowledge. It may or may not be factual. Before making important decisions in your life, it is important to understand that.

Knowledge is information with which you have experience. You have tested it. It, too, may not be factual, however. Look how many people sincerely believe that something for nothing is a good idea – for them, for society.

Bernie Sanders has generated a following of many millions of Americans who think free education and free medical care are really free. They do not understand that they are coveting – putting their hands in their neighbors’ pockets and stealing from them money their neighbors worked hard to earn. They are incapable of digging deeply enough to learn that socialism has failed everywhere it has been tried.

One reason socialism fails is because when the productive are told they must support those who choose to be non-productive they become less productive. Why? Maybe it’s because they have no motivation to pay for your education or that of your children. Perhaps they resent having the quality of their medical care go down so people who prefer to be unemployed rather than employed can get free care. Those who are truly unable to work need free medical care, but those who prefer the “freedom” of being unemployed? Please!

When people become less productive, government tax revenue goes down because fewer people are employed and fewer people can afford to buy things… from homes to clothing to cars. Taxes realized by government as a result of lost income tax from jobs and sales tax from purchases go down. Because college is free, more students attend and the quality of instructors goes down and so does the quality of education… college becomes (as it is today) advanced high school.

There are a lot of people who use information to escape rather than find reality.

Those seeking facts are totally different from security-motivated people who manipulate their life experiences so they hear what they want to hear, learn what they want to learn, and confirm the facts they want to confirm so they can keep their heads firmly buried in the sand – or wherever. You may ask: “If they are confirming facts, aren’t they seeking reality?”

Many people stop seeking facts when they reach a point that confirms what they want to believe. They seek no additional facts that may take them into areas of discomfort. That is what we call cognitive dissonance.

Let’s look at the sources we use to gain information today. Let me begin with this quote from Proverbs 26 (24-25): “A malicious man disguises himself with his lips, but in his heart he harbors deceit! Though his speech is charming, believe him not, for seven abominations fill his heart.”

First we have the media. It is hard to believe that people who consider themselves intelligent rely on the mainstream media for information, but they do.

How do we know the mainstream media is not reliable? We know because there is no bigger purveyor of political correctness. We know the primary victim of political correctness is facts.

When an entity that portrays itself to be the provider of news embraces political correctness, you often get opinions rather than facts and the facts that are presented are very selectively chosen. The people instinctively understand this (which accounts for the popularity of presidential candidate Donald Trump who consistently makes politically incorrect statements; people may dislike his personality but like him for the facts he provides).

We know people who believe political correctness has value are those who have an agenda. Often, they are being paid for pushing a particular agenda… the Food and Drug Administration is a good example of that as are politicians. These people think in terms of “the collective good,” a socialist concept. Or perhaps they think of payoffs. Their agendas cannot be supported with facts.

Second, we have social media.

While in college, a computer programmer, Mark Zuckerberg, decided people needed a computer program that would enable them to communicate with others, stay in touch with family and friends, and create new friends via a Web page reflective of their opinions. In 2016, Facebook, Zuckerberg’s creation, has 1.1 billion unique visitors monthly. That is close to 1/6th of the world’s population every month.

Born May 14, 1984, Zuckerberg’s Facebook has created him a net worth estimated by Forbes to be $46 billion.

Twitter has 310 million unique visitors monthly and LinkedIn has 255 million. There are many social media outlets. These three merely provide insight into how heavily the social media is used in modern life.

What has social media contributed to our society?

Unfortunately, the result has been to de-personalize communication with family and friends. Rather than a phone call or a personal visit with Mom and Dad on a Sunday afternoon, kids today tell their parents to visit their Facebook page for the latest pictures of the grandkids. We have an entire generation of people who while walking down the street or driving a car are Tweeting others and reading messages (both of which are dangerous). It has placed libelous material in the marketplace, put there by people who get their jollies by misleading others.

Though the large majority of postings to Facebook are made by normal, healthy and happy people, the social media also provides a reflection of human arrogance and stupidity… the posting of offensive and ugly parts of society including confessions of personal behavior that will stay with the person who posted it for a lifetime… or with a person about whom someone posted libelous information.

Facebook and other imitative social media have become heaven on earth for psychopaths. These mal-wired, usually angry people can say anything they want about anyone, including themselves.

Because mentally ill people often get their jollies by lying, their postings are often designed to be destructive to someone they either envy or hate. ISIS uses social media to attract young men to join their cause and blow themselves and others up. They recruit young women to become wives to ISIS warriors. Old men who portray themselves as young, dynamic young men entrap girls into relationships which have morphed into personal (and destructive) meetings.

I had an interesting experience last week with one of these degenerates.

This sick person’s Facebook identity will remain anonymous. I try to direct people to factual data and avoid promoting those with sick ideas.

Thanks to Mark Zuckerberg’s creative energy, this man told the world that I was being paid a fee whenever a child is sold to a child trafficking ring. I was appalled to see those words publicly stated in writing. Could there be any worse thing to say about a person?

Does Mr. Zuckerberg monitor Facebook for accuracy or give innocent victims who avoid taking part in his social media experiment a place to complain about this kind of abuse? How can I find out who this person is so I can take him to court? Do I have the opportunity to say “this is a lie and this person is sick and should not have access to the public marketplace of ideas”? Evidently Mr. Zuckerberg overlooked the need for such an alternative.

Understand that I realize anyone who knows me is as shocked by hearing it as I am. I also realize there are far more people in the world who do not know me than who do. It is a comment for which I have absolutely no responsibility and about which I can do nothing. If I had a Facebook account, I could “un-friend” this sick-o.

The Bible tells us there is one unforgivable sin: to blaspheme the Holy Spirit. I believe that anyone who abuses a child blasphemes that child’s Holy Spirit. I believe pedophilia to be a more serious crime than murder because by traumatizing their spirit it kills in childhood the person God intended someone to become. They are forced to live with the outcome… a fate far worse than death. I know people who were sexually abused as children and they carry the scar of that trauma with them throughout their lives.

Those are just a few of the dangers of Facebook and other social media. The people who read the madness pass it on… it gives them a sense of empowerment. They think they know something no one else does and that makes them appear better informed than they are. In fairness to Facebook, this happens as a result of telephone conversations, too. People read or hear something, don’t check it out, and pass it on as if it’s a fact… and that’s called gossip, not information – and certainly not knowledge.

When you pass on information about someone with no corroborating evidence (evidence goes beyond “I know this person well and he/she would never lie to me”) you may be defaming someone and may be libeling them. If we don’t take time to verify what’s being said about another person we have no business passing it on.

We as Americans need to ask ourselves some questions. One of them is: Has the quality of life gone up or down since the technology revolution? I also think when we give ourselves an honest answer to that question we need to understand it is what we have done with technology that creates problems rather than the technology, itself.

As for Facebook, please consider yourself “un-friended” (what a stupid expression!).

© 2016 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

I John 3:4: “Whoever committeth sin transgresseth (disobeys God’s laws) also the law; for sin is the transgression of the law.”

This article will most likely not impress or influence anyone who is not a “true” believer in the Sovereign Creator of all, who governs in the affairs of men, and who metes out righteous judgment according to man’s obedience or disobedience to HIS LAWS! His laws are immutable, unchangeable and eternal, and His judgment is just and certain! Now that you know where I am coming from, let’s continue!

Gal. 6:7 clearly states that God is not mocked! We will reap what we sow! Life or death! Deut. 30:19 It is our choice. “The soul that sinneth it shall die.” Eze. 18:4 and the nation that “tolerates” sin shall be destroyed! Ps. 9:17 And because of the ignorance, apathy, and cowardliness of the CHURCH, our nation is damned! THE CHURCH does not have the spiritual fortitude, because of the effeminate (womanish) men behind the pulpit who are damned to Hell –( ICor. 6:9) to stand and call evil what it is! SIN! Self-Indulgent Narcissism! Ignorant , apathetic, cowardly “Christians” who whisper about the evil all around us, do you not know that your indifference and fear is damning you to Hell, as well as the worker of lawlessness! (Eze. 33:4-5, Prov. 24:11-12) We have destroyed our children’s futures, and perhaps even sent their souls to Hell because we have forgotten, become ignorant of, the laws of God! (Hos. 4:6)

We have lost the power and authority of have Godly men in our midst that will not cower and squirm in the presence of evil no matter what the source. Godly men who will stand in the face of evil no matter the danger to themselves or others for the glory of God and call sin S I N! Men who will say “to Hell with the political correctness of our society and church! Men who will demand righteous judgment on evildoers, including the death penalty for capital crimes like murder, rape, kidnappers, adulterers, fornicators, sodomites and lesbians, and will not spare nor pity them because of their sins! (Deut. 7:16, 13:8, 19:13, 21, 25:12, Jer.13:14, Eze. 5:11, 7:4,9, 8:18, 9:5,10). God Himself damns unrepentant souls to an eternal damnation without pity!

The worldly effeminate men that fill the pulpits of America today do not have the Holy courage to condemn and pronounce judgment on unrighteousness! They desire the praise and accolades of men more than they desire the righteousness of God or His laws! Therefore they preach a gospel of complacency, compromise and cowardliness! They preach a perverted man-centered love! Not the righteous love that our God ordained that demands righteous justice and judgment on evildoers!

So there you have it! It’s not the real fault of a woman who murders her unborn child! She is worthy of death, but the church is afraid to demand righteous judgment, so 60,000,000 murdered babies blood is crying out to a Holy God for retribution against America, and more specifically the lukewarm church in America! Christ will spew (vomit) it out in judgment! Rev. 3:16 We could name many more instances of compromise and cowardliness from the pulpit today, but enough for this article.

In Christ’s Service,

Feel free to contact Pastor Butch with any questions or concerns. Tune in to our broadcast Monday-Friday at 9:00 PM Est. on your S.W. ATTENTION! 7.520 & 3.215! Also on your computer on www.gcnlive.com. Check out our website www.pastorbutch.net for all other stations we’re broadcasted on.

Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.

© 2016 Pastor Butch Paugh – All Rights Reserved

Most Black, White and Brown Americans may nod their heads in agreement to this exclusive interview with Canadian writer, Tim Murray. He presents a compelling “third eye” view of America’s racial predicament. With such forthright understanding, hopefully all Americans may move toward respect for other races rather than rancor.

Truly, if we hope to move beyond Ferguson, Baltimore and New York City’s racial caldrons, citizens must practice patience, understanding and respect.

Mr. Murray, please give us your thoughts on the racial unrest in America:

“Television may be a wasteland,” said Murray. “But it can at least offer a bellwether for things to come. Case in point. I saw a PBS music special that took place in Seattle. It was about the folk music explosion in the sixties, and was hosted by one of the more favorite bands of that era. Several of the most famous figures were introduced, and of course, many of the most iconic songs of this genre were sung that night. For a ‘folkie” like me, it was a trip down memory lane.

“Three things struck me about the presentation. One was that the direct connection between folk music and the civil rights, and anti-Vietnam war movement, as betrayed by the lyrics. Almost all of the songs were inspirational protest songs that pressed all the right—or shall I say—“left” emotional buttons. Second was the fact that the songs were composed and sung by white people. And thirdly, everyone in the packed audience was white—as far as I could see—and while the overwhelming number were pathetic boomers like myself, there were several young faces who obviously represent the new generation of Social Justice Crusaders, ready no doubt to pick up and carry the torch. Again, their pigmentation was white.

“All of this made me realize something that I did not appreciate at the time. The 1960’s folk music was the voice of ascendant Cultural Marxism of “alienated” young whites who for the most part were raised in comfortable middle-class environments. They were struggling to find their identity. So what better way to make a statement than to attach themselves to a cause that identified with The Other?

“A cause that offered itself as a critique of the lifestyle and the background that afforded them the leisure to strum a guitar and call out against social injustice. But folk music did not give voice to the mood of black people. That mood was not one of sweetness and self-righteousness, but of anger and rage that presaged the ugly and nasty character of rap music. The 1960’s folk music was a white phenomenon.

“It was decidedly not a black thing. Having come to this realization, I turned the channel to an NHL hockey game played in Los Angeles, the home of white Hollywood liberals. Once again, I found the images of the spectators more interesting than the game itself. When the cameras panned the audience, all I saw was a sea of white faces, some of them belonging to celebrities. So like folk music, ice hockey is an expression of white culture. Almost without exception, it is a game played by whites and watched by whites.

“All of which suggests that even after 50 years of social engineering, grassroots America remains segregated. [Country music remains dominated by whites, also.] This is not the America that the media likes to portray. No, this America is the America that resembles Paul McCartney’s keyboard, where black and white live in “perfect harmony”. It is the world of biracial newscasters and sports panels and Hollywood movies, where black and white folks are seen to work together, like Mel Gibson and Danny Glover did in their cop movies.

“It is a fake world created with deliberate intent. TV shows like Star Trek and “I Spy” with Robert Culp and Bill Cosby led the way in modeling such a future. A future which went beyond civil rights for blacks to a future where racial differences go completely unnoticed.

“But here we are in 2016, a half century later, and we have yet to live in this future. Why? The Progressive party line is that “we have made progress” but “a lot remains to be done” and will be done. “We shall overcome some day”. ??Those who challenge this view have another answer. We have not made substantial progress because it cannot and will not be done. Not on the ground. Not among ordinary people.

“The white fantasy of the folk music culture was based on many presumptions, most central of which is that black people really want to “hang” with white people. They want to embrace our way of life, our culture—or what remains of it. They want to dress and sing and speak like whites, and live next door to whites in affluent white middle class enclaves.

“The Huxtable family on the Cosby Show presented the perfect articulation of this alleged ambition. It is not about blacks simply wanting “a piece of the action”, a fair share of material prosperity, but of wanting to be like and with white Americans. Really? If anything, it seems that more white Americans favor integration than blacks. If they don’t want to live alongside them, many want to mimic them.

“White youth have embraced the culture of the black American ‘lumpen-proletariat’. Their music, their lingo, and their affectations. They wear baseball caps with the brim facing backwards, and baggy pants and sneakers. They generate their own rap music and mouth black slang like “bro”. And they practice the sexual morality practiced in black ghettoes, now gone viral. It is all part of what Charles Murray called “The Coming Apart of White America”.

“It is a society that cannot be fixed by fair taxation, economic equality, full employment or more social programs alone. The problem runs much deeper than that. Meanwhile, many white women, sensing where the wind is blowing, have decided to jump ship and abandon the ‘White Star’ line. Some of them seek out millionaire black athletes and celebrities, or the apparent strong masculinity that feminized white male culture no longer represents. Others, like Rachel Dolezal, even attempt to become black. That should tell you something, but some don’t want to hear what it is.

“That is what was so amusing about the bewilderment of black TV commentators who could not understand why anyone like Rachel Dolezal would want to become a member of a downtrodden minority that still suffers from persecution, discrimination, racial profiling and police violence. These black observers do not get it. The Rachel Dolezals of White America understand what they do not: the ‘downtrodden’ minority is on the way up, while the white majority is manifestly on its way down. But they are not the only observers who don’t get it. White politicians don’t get it either—or pretend not to get it. Acknowledging politically inconvenient truths can get you unelected in a hurry.

“Recently, presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton—among the most consummate and cynical opportunists of them all– playing up to her ‘African-American’ constituency, spoke about African-American mothers who were afraid for their sons’ safety on the streets, with the obvious implication that bigoted white cops presented the only menace, rather than the more prevalent violence from other black youth. [Black on black murders average 6,000 annually in the United States.]But most tellingly, she did not talk about the fear that many white parents feel about the safety of their sons- and daughters—on the streets from African-Americans.

“Black spokesmen cannot see through the fog of their own mythology and propaganda, the fog of “White Privilege” and “Black Lives Matter”. When presented with the ubiquitous policies of reverse discrimination, hiring quotas, imposed ‘diversity’, and the failure of a great many blacks to advance up the ladder without ‘affirmative’ action, they fall back on “the legacy of slavery”, and the persistent need for remedial favoritism.

“It’s a narrative that white liberals are eager to parrot, for they too know where the wind is blowing. They covet social status, hoping to earn or keep a place in the new multicultural hierarchy. No wonder they dare not consider the statistics of black-on-white crime vs. white-on-black crime. Facts that if mentioned, would not only be incendiary, but definitely fatal to their careers. The folk music of white boomers is a spent force, long obsolete. The social injustice they sung about is now a two way street.

“In other words, social ‘injustice cuts both ways’. At this rate, however, it will soon cut only one way. Soon White Lives won’t ‘Matter’ at all—and Peter, Paul and Mary will be consigned to a museum to reside alongside the Confederate Battle Flag.

“Something to sing about, this Land of “Ours”.”

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

”I’d rather die than let you Christian bigots win,” the butch-haired, plumpy woman screeched at me. “Women have fought too long and hard to gain our rights and we will not remain silent as you Neanderthals try and drag women back into the dark ages.”

She held a sign that read Keep Your Laws Out Of My Vagina as if that particular body part was of interest to anyone. One of the many things that you quickly come to understand is that lesbians are the biggest proponents of “reproductive” rights even though the “right” really had no bearing at all upon their own lives.

It is simply a living parable of their rebellion against “the natural use of the woman” being forsaken by those who are living in defiance of the Word of God. Misery loves company and I always assumed that women who couldn’t naturally reproduce wanted to get as many women as possible to join them in their barren lifestyle. Sad but true.

But I appreciated her tenacity. As we left that day I mentioned to my wife that it was too bad that Christian women weren’t as committed to life as these lost women were to death. More women are active in their support of death than those who claim to be in support of life.

Life or death? Make a choice. Can anyone explain to me when or why death would ever be the right answer to that question? Proverbs tell us, that “all who hate me love death.” That explains the pro-abort position. Can someone help me explain the pro-life position? Why won’t “pro-life” women fight for life?

Why do those who support death fight so hard to get their way while those who love live fight so little to preserve it?

“Let’s face it Honey,” my wife opined as we climbed into our PT Cruiser for the ride home from Planned Parenthood. “No body cares. Most of the churches claim to be pro-life but they really don’t care. That lesbian is committed to her cause. Most Christians couldn’t care less. It is hard to win when no one will fight.”

Why won’t we fight? Why won’t Christians stand up and push back against the wanton evil that is cascading down the gutters of Main Street America? How can there be so many churches and so little push back? Why is the anti-Christ agenda of the God-haters winning the day?

Let me use another conversation I had last week to contrast the debate I had with the cropped-hair lesbian. My wife and I were talking to a friend about the latest revelations of body-part merchant Planned Parenthood. Try as we might we could not get our dear friend to get worked up about the slaughter of innocents taking place at the death camps.

“I’m with you guys,” she told us. “But I don’t really get all worked up over abortion. There really isn’t much I can do about it and I’d rather think on happier things than abortion. The way I see it, Jesus is in control and it will all work out in the end.”

I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.

But that is the typical response we hear. Try as I might I can’t find one verse where the Bible tells us that apathy is the best philosophy. In fact, I think the Bible teaches just the opposite. How has the church missed it so badly?

Why are the Devil’s kids never apathetic? Why is it that they spend their time, effort, and finances to advance their death-loving agenda? What can we do to get “our side” to get more actively engaged in the culture?

Perverted men are winning court decisions all across the nation for their right to be able to use the ladies room.

God-fearing ranchers are being shot dead in cold blood for simply standing up against the thievery of their land by a tyrannical government.

Small business owners are being financially crushed for simply living out what the Bible teaches them.

Children are being taught in our schools that all sex is equal and that all types of fornication are perfectly normal.

Last month I had a friend of mine accompany me to the abortion clinic for the first time. The steady line of cars pulling into the parking lot was more than he could handle. The reality of young college-aged women willfully leading their child to slaughter touched him deeply. Out of the corner of my eyes I saw him drop to his knees and quietly begin to weep.

“Coach, if we could get 100 men here this would stop! Somebody has to do something about this. I had no idea what went on here. We can’t let this slaughter continue.”

That was a month ago. He hasn’t been back since.

My mind often returns to the abortion clinic and the commitment and conviction of the pro-murder lesbian. She was willing to die for her right to kill. As much as I hate to admit it, her side is winning.

Why are we so calloused? Why does no body care?

But as our Christian friends love to assure us, we really shouldn’t get so worked up about the child killing. Jesus is in control and it will all work out in the end…

Watch this short video!! Here is where they learned such a wretched philosophy.

© 2016 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Res

A Quinnipiac University survey recently found 57 percent of Americans agreed the country “has lost its identity,” 57 percent felt they were “falling further and further behind economically,” and 76 percent believed “public officials don’t care much what people like me think.”
Gallup reported in March, meanwhile, that 71 percent of Americans were dissatisfied with the “way things in the United States were going at this time,” the same number who responded to the identical poll question a month earlier.
What’s up with all the angst?
“Many American voters, especially Republicans, are dissatisfied with their own status and the status of the country, but by far the most dissatisfied are Donald Trump’s supporters, who strongly feel that they themselves and the country are under attack,” said Quinnipiac University poll director Douglas Schwartz, in a statement.
Well, that is the theme of Trump’s campaign, to make America great again – and it’s one that’s resonating big tiime with voters across the country.
But thinking Mr. Trump, or Sen. Ted Cruz – or, God forbid, the self-declared socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders – can solve what aiils America is flawed thinking. First off, Americans have been complaining about the country for years. In July 2015, Fortune blasted forth the headline: “12 Signs America is on the Decline.” In April 2014, Salon warned: “Global rankings study: America in warp-speed decline.” In October 2013, the New Yorker offered: “Measuring America’s Decline, in Three Charts.” In March 2012, the Atlantic posed: “The Decline of the West: Why America Must Prepare for the End of Dominance.” In 2011, it was the American Spectator, with the title, “Is America in Decline?”
The demise of America, it seems, has been a long-running go-to topic for the press, the pundits and the pollsters. So long, in fact, it leads one to wonder: Do elections really bring change?
Not so much. Not in any long-lasting, meaningful way, at least. Which brings up this second point: It’s not about the “R” versus “D.”
Looking at politicians to provide for the needs and concerns of America seems a cycle of insanity – a red herring, even. But thiis story, from Raphael Cruz, a Christian pastor who spent his growing and formative years in Cuba, under the watchful eyes of an oppressive regime? This story is the elephant in the room.
Jerry Newcombe wrote for the Christian Post: “Rafael Cruz tells a story where the soldiers of Castro would teach the children to not believe in God, but instead to believe in Fidel. Soldiers would come into a kindergarten class and tell the children, ‘Okay now, close your eyes and pray to God for some candy’. The children would comply, but there was no candy. Then they would say, ‘Close your eyes and pray for candy to Fidel Castro’. The children would close their eyes and pray accordingly, as the soldiers quietly placed candy on the desks.”
What a horrific example of leading children astray, and simultaneously, a tremendous warning of what is really rotting America: the turn from God as leader and toward government as provider.
Inserting fresh faces into the government, whether Trump or Cruz or Clinton or Candidate X, is a temporary fix, at best. America’s government is only a microcosm of America at-large. And there will never be a single politician, or even grouping of politicians, that actually make America great. They can’t; the country’s greatness doesn’t flow that way.

America’s greatness comes from this: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

America’s greatness is from the bold idea that rights stem from God, not government – that it’s the individual with grreatest worth, not the collective. And until we win back a country where that sentiment is intuitively felt and instinctively enacted upon, where “in God we trust” is the lesson being taught the coming generations, not “on government we depend,” then the changing faces of politicians will be just that – new look, neww messaging, but bringing the same dissatisfying results.

© 2016 Cheryl Chumley – All Rights Reserved

According to numerous readers of the award-winning conservative Internet news and commentary web site, NewsWithViews.com, readers are being lied to: a popular web browser, Google Chrome, falsely tells NWV readers that “malware” exists on the web site. When you Google our previous news article “Giuliani supporting Trump in NY primary despite GOP attempts to derail campaign” then click on the link, the following warning pops up “Warning — visiting this web site may harm your computer!” You may want to consider using an alternate search engine for the time being such as ‘StartPage.com, Yahoo.com, and there are plenty others, Etc.

This is allegedly seen with news stories that address political and social issues from a conservative or libertarian perspective especially positive stories and comments that are favorable to GOP front-runner Donald Trump , according to several writers and the editor at NWV, Paul Walter.

Readers attempting to access NWV content are often met with warnings that falsely state that “malware,” which is hazardous to personal computers, exists NewsWithViews.com web set. An unusual number of emails were received by writers and the NWV editor complaining about the problem. Web site subscribers and visitors wrote that they were fearful of damaging their desktop or laptop computers by accessing news stories and opinion columns on NWV, as well as other web sites such as Breitbart.com, ConservativeTreehouse.com and ConservativeBase.com.

One of NWV’s most popular columnists, Kelleigh Nelson, who frequently writes on political issues, had problems with readers not being able to access her opinion pieces appearing on NWV. Kelleigh is 101% pro Trump. “A number of my readers [had] emailed me that when they tried to access my archived articles, a malware warning would always pop up. All of them were using Google Chrome when this happened,” said Nelson. “I immediately alerted Paul Walter, Senior Editor of NewsWithViews.com, and he did a malware check. Nothing showed as being malware within any of my archived articles.”

Ms. Nelson believes that “Google Chrome covertly putting these malware warnings on every article they politically disagree with, and she believes that NewsWithViews.com is not the only target. There are other websites being targeted, including The Marshall Report, and The Conservative Tree House. “If you want the truth in these and other articles, then use any other search engine and the articles and websites will come up, just not with Google Chrome,” said Kelleigh Nelson.

NWV’s editor, Paul Walter, conducted his own investigation and confirmed that the “malware alerts” were the product of only one web browser: Google Chrome. All of the complaints regarding “malware alerts” were generated by readers who were Chrome browser users. Those readers using the other popular Internet browsers were not experiencing this suspected form of censorship.

When NWV editor Paul Walter received complaints from both readers and some columnists about the suspected malware hoax, he contacted his web hosting company in Los Angeles and N.J. for a complete examination of the NewsWithViews.com web site and its dedicated server.

The company reported “conducting full scans and exams of NWV and found no evidence of there being any type of malware or anything harmful within the system.” NWV was given a clean-bill-of-health by the hosting company and yet, the complaints kept pouring in from all over the country about the malwere problem that didn’t exist. Walter said, “I’m almost 100% certain that you won’t be able to find this news article on the Google search engine.” “A Lawsuit is being considered which will get NWV national media attention and millions of new hits. It may be the silver lining in this dark cloud, sort of like David against Goliath.” added Walter

The Conservative Base’s webmaster, Ben Thole, also conducted virus scans and the like and also found there were no problems with the web site or the server. Thole is an experienced web site designer and webmaster who has worked for the Republican Party, celebrities and companies that require first-rate Internet coverage.

NewsWithViews.com columnist, Ron Ewart, President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, when he discovered the activities of Google, launched his own action against the media giant. “Few Silicon Valley companies have ever embraced a political party as passionately as Google has. Its executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, has been described as a “kind of guru” to President Obama’s campaign manager, and Google employees emerged as the No. 2 donor to the Democratic National Committee in the last election,” stated Ewart.

Ewart also mentioned during the telephone interview with a NWV reporter that the Google Chrome Malware Alerts suddenly appeared on conservative articles right after Donald Trump, during a televised rally with 20-thousand cheering supporters, held up an article from the NewsWithViews.com website that verified his assertion about media bias and the NWV website received an astounding 1,000,000 hits in just one day.

Efforts by NWV to contact Google and discuss these serious allegations met with negative results. The person who only gave the name “Heather” said the Google browser is not involved in politics.

However, Ron Ewart wrote a thorough letter to the Google executives Larry Page and Eric Schmidt, which he plans to publish on NewsWithViews.com.

“I hope conservatives will start to take action,” said Ewart. “The whole political system is corrupted and people must awaken and take action before ‘malware alerts’ will be the least of their problems,” he added.

© 2016 NWV – All Rights Reserved

In the Democrat’s plan for victory in November’s presidential election, they have all but admitted they need to assemble a coalition of a number of voting blocs by pandering to immigrants — illegal or legal — and other so called constituencies, a Washington, D.C. insider stated on Friday.

For example, a Muslim coalition rally for the Democratic Party’s flawed front-runner Hillary Clinton is designed with the help of her news media supporters to remind Muslims and their leftist supporters about the GOP’s Donald Trump and his commonsense proposal for a crackdown on the enormous influx of Islamist immigrants, police adviser and self-defense lobbyist John M. Snyder said on Friday.

According to press reports, the Coalition of American Muslims for Hillary is slated to hold a rally on Sunday, April 24 at 3 p.m. at The Universities of Shady Grove in Rockville, Maryland. Among the people slated to attend the rally are the keynote speakers Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland) and longtime Clinton minion John Podesta, who chairs Hillary for America. The organizers claim they’ll attract upwards or 1,200 attendees.

“Rep. Cummings makes no apologies for being involved in a rally for Clinton, even though he is supposed to be investigating her as part of the Benghazi Select Committee. While Rep. Trey Gowdy and others are trying to get to the bottom of the Battle of Benghazi, Cummings has been blocking efforts, denigrating investigators and openly campaigning for the subject of his probe. He should be investigated for a number of questionable actions,” said former police detective, Sid Franes, who is African American.

“When will Americans wake up and see that the entire system has been corrupted by the likes of the Clinton family, President Barack Obama and his crowd, and the majority of Democratic Party bigwigs?” asked Franes.

Sultan Chowdhury is an organizer and member of the Coalition of American Muslims for Hillary and says the event is an opportunity for the Muslim community to engage in the political process. He is noted for his setting up the Islamic Bank of Britain’s Head Office Operations and Branch Network.

“We want to show that there’s [a] significant population of Muslims in the Washington D.C. metro area,” Chowdhury said. “Our political participation has [not been as] prominent, so we thought it’s time for us [through this] general election process to invite the candidates and show our perspective on the political process as well as support the causes so they can take notice of us as well,” he said.

But Trump maintains that “Islam hates us,” that it is “at war with the West,” that “we can’t allow people coming into this country who have this hatred of the United States,” and that there should be a “complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the country.

Snyder noted: “Scholarly research and analysis of Islam indicates that violent, even brutal murderous throat cutting attacks by Muslims on non-Muslims actually are considered acts of piety rather than acts of terrorism by Islamists. This comports with seminal Islamist texts and practice.”

(For an in-depth treatment of this subject, see an article on Realism and Islam by Rev. James V. Schall, S.J.)

“Believers in violence and murder as pious acts are enemies of civilized society and must be treated as such. The presence in our midst of such characters underscores the advisability of constitutional gun carry for self-defense. It shows also that America needs anti-terrorist Second Amendment supporter Trump as president. It needs to defeat Islamist supporting gun prohibitionist Hillary Clinton,” said Snyder, who serves on the advisory boards of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and the American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens. Snyder is the former editor for the National Rifle Association (NRA) magazines and a scholar in constitutional law.

DIA documents also confirm the suspicions that the U.S. government was aware of military-grade arms being transported from the terrorist hotbed of Benghazi to war-torn Syria for use by rebel forces against the Al-Assad regime. In addition, the report contains an August 2012 analysis of intelligence that predicted “the meteoric rise of al-Qaida in Iraq terrorists” who morphed into the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), arguably the cruelest, violent and deadly terrorist group in the world.

“Besides the cover-up of the true motive for the attack, Hillary Clinton and her lackeys wanted to keep the Muslim Brotherhood’s role in planning the attack and selecting the target under wraps. She was on record telling Americans – as did President Barack Obama – that the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate group,” said former police counterterrorism unit member, Joseph Larzenby. In fact, Clinton and Obama both openly supported Egyptian President Morsi, who was connected to the radical Islamist group, the Muslim Brotherhood. The group had been placed on the terrorist watch lists of a number of countries, but not the U.S. State Department’s terrorist designation list.

“So while we now have proof that Hillary Clinton knowingly lied about the reason for the attack in blaming a pathetic, obscure video for the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other brave Americans, we still haven’t gotten to the bottom of this cover-up,” stated former U.S. Navy SEAL Scott Taylor, the current president of Special Operations Speaks.

The documents also contend that the terrorists intended to attack the sparsely protected U.S. diplomatic mission in order to kill as many American officials as possible. The motive for the attack was believed to have been revenge for the U.S. counterterrorism operation credited with killing of Abu Yahya al-Libi, a high-level al-Qaida terrorist killed by U.S. drone strikes in North Waziristan.

© 2016 NWV – All Rights Reserved

[NOTE: This article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers. NWV’s supports the state of Israel, and the Jewish peoples’ right to their Biblical homeland.]

The Matriarch of the pro-life, pro-family, Christian Right movement is the elegant stateswoman Phyllis Schlafly. She has no peer; there is no close second. At age 91, she remains the icon of America’s pro-life community.

Phyllis received her B.A. from Washington University, her J.D. from Washington University Law School, and she received her Master’s in Government from Harvard University. She worked her way through college on the night shift at the St. Louis Ordnance Plant testing .30 and .50 caliber ammunition by firing rifles and machine guns and as a laboratory technician investigating misfires and photographing tracer bullets in flight.

Mrs. Schlafly is an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Illinois, Missouri, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Supreme Court. She and her late husband are the parents of 6 children and the grandparents of 14 grandchildren. Phyllis personally taught all of her children to read before they started school.

It is no exaggeration to say that Phyllis is the single person most responsible for defeating the Equal Rights Amendment and has been one of the most influential personalities in politics over the last half-century. She founded her Eagle Forum organization in 1972, and today over 80,000 people claim membership.

One would think that the pedigree, accomplishments, and lifetime efforts of Mrs. Schlafly would speak so loudly and clearly that no one–not even her political adversaries–could question her sterling character and steadfast convictions. At age 91, and after all of her hard work, Phyllis should be enjoying the most happy fruits of her labor and the most heartfelt appreciation and respect of everyone who knows her–and especially of the Christian conservative community throughout this country.

Guess again.

As we speak, Phyllis Schlafly is the target of a hostile takeover by people within her own organization, including by her own daughter. They want Phyllis OUT. They want to throw her into the garbage bag like an old dishrag. After all of these years, after all she has done, after a lifetime of Herculean effort, they want Phyllis Schlafly GONE.

What, you ask, could be the awful sin, the horrific iniquity, the egregious act of malfeasance Phyllis could have committed to warrant such an attack? Answer: she endorsed Donald Trump for president.

Mind you, these attacks are not coming from the ACLU or the SPLC. They are coming from Christian conservatives within Eagle Forum. And from a political perspective, the people who want to destroy Mrs. Schlafly are, guess who: the Ted Cruz supporters, that’s who.

See this report here.

Ted Cruz’s base of support is comprised mostly of Israel-First evangelical Christians. Prophecy preachers from all over America have declared Ted to be God’s “anointed” presidential candidate. These end-time evangelicals see Ted Cruz as their Elijah or John the Baptist to usher in the Millennial Kingdom. However, the fact that Cruz’s supporters are attacking Mrs. Schlafly in such a vile and vicious manner, shows that hell, not heaven, is in their hearts.

I am reminded of the words of King David: “I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.” (Psalms 120:7 KJV)

Whether people agree with Schlafly’s decision to endorse Donald Trump is NOT the issue. To target Phyllis as an “enemy” because of her endorsement is the grossest and most vile attempt at character assassination that I can possibly imagine. Agree with her or not, Phyllis Schlafly is a paragon of integrity.

This leads to a very serious and all-too-common current reality: a sizeable percentage of our so-called “Christian” community is filled with a heart of hatred and war. They like to talk about peace and love, but what they are really about is war and hate.

I can’t keep from saying “I told you so” at this point.

When G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney began their propaganda war against Iraq and Afghanistan, I told my radio audience, “Because G.W. Bush professes to be a Christian, and because he has so much support from within the Christian community, Bush is going to change the definition and character of the word ‘Christian’ in this country forever.” And that is EXACTLY what has happened. Ted Cruz is picking up right where G.W. Bush left off.

The Christian standard used to be “Blessed are the peacemakers.” Today the standard is “Blessed are the warmongers.” These Bush/Cruz, Israel-First cultists are prepared to not only blow up the Arab world, they are prepared to blow up Eagle Forum or any other organization or personality that does not subscribe to their brand of Israel-First obsession. Believe me, if these divisive, hate-filled “Christians” could get away with it, they would be as bloodthirsty and violent as any Muslim terrorist. But since they are unable to behead people such as Phyllis Schlafly or Chuck Baldwin, however, they set out with all malice to destroy our work and reputations. Yes, I am dealing with many of these same hate-filled “Christians,” too.

And I know that many of my brethren will recoil when they hear me say what I’m going to say, but I have analyzed and studied this phenomenon for many years now, and there is a DEFINITE common denominator.

I’m talking about decades of church splits; pastors being savagely and mercilessly attacked from inside the church; pastors’ families being destroyed by members of their own congregations; and the most bitter, divisive, backstabbing, meddlesome, tale-bearing, discordant, mean-spirited actions and attitudes on the planet. All in the name of Christianity. All in the name of love. All in the name of Bible doctrine. All in the name of Jesus Christ. All in the name of truth.

What is the common denominator? Almost without exception these haters and destroyers are Israel-First, end-time prophecy zealots.

I cannot imagine another presidential candidate’s supporters attacking someone such as Phyllis Schlafly like the Cruz supporters are now doing. It is Ted Cruz’s supporters who are engaging in this attempted destruction of America’s First Lady of The Pro-Life Movement, Phyllis Schlafly. And again, Ted Cruz is Mr. Christian Zionist. Cruz is to politics what John Hagee is to religion.

Ted Cruz claims to be pro-life, but he is allowing his supporters to crucify the most influential pro-life American of the last half-century, Phyllis Schlafly.

Remember, Ted Cruz is the one who is promising to “make the sand glow” in the Arab states–except not in Saudi Arabia, of course. Meaning he wants the United States to launch nuclear missiles against millions of innocent men, women, and children throughout the Middle East. Again, all in the name of Christian love. No, that’s not exactly true: all in the name of ISRAEL and all in the name of Bible prophecy. And if he’s elected president, I’m sure he would make good on his promise.

After over 40 years of labor and leadership in the liberty and Christian movements, and having personally witnessed the massive amount of death and destruction inflicted upon untold thousands of good and honorable men and women at the hands of these calloused and calculating beasts of prey, it is now (finally) becoming apparent what is behind all of this devastation. It is the same enemy that is trying to destroy Phyllis Schlafly.

When the spirit of hatred and war take over the heart, no one is safe. Not even friends.

Please pray for Phyllis Schlafly.

P.S. Once again, I invite readers to obtain my four message series entitled “The Church And Israel.” It is available on ONE DVD. Titles include:

* The Presentation And Rejection of The King
* “An High Priest For Ever After The Order of Melchisedec”
* Jesus: The Seed of David, The Seed of Abraham
* Christ’s Last Words To Israel

This series of messages will help people understand why the modern Zionist state of Israel can hold no claim to the promise given to Abraham in Genesis 12:3 and why the “Israel-First” theology of John Hagee and so many others is egregious Biblical error. And readers should also understand that I came to these conclusions after being trained in “Israel-First” theology and believing and preaching it for most of my life. But the longer I preached it, the more dissatisfied I became with it. I knew something wasn’t right. And the more I studied the matter, the more I came to repudiate what I now know is patently false doctrine.

Order my DVD, “The Church And Israel.”

© 2016 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

According to a study conducted in late April, 2015 by the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute of Literacy, over 32 million adults in the U.S. can’t read. That’s 14 percent of the population. Also, 21 percent, or about 60 million adults in the U.S. read below a 5th grade level, and 19 percent of high school graduates can’t read at all. Many of these adults can’t write their names on Social Security cards or fill in height, weight, and birth dates on application forms.

The current literacy rate isn’t any better than it was 20 years ago. According to the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (completed most recently in 2003, and before that, in 1992), 14 percent of adult Americans demonstrated a “below basic” literacy level in 2003, and 29 percent exhibited a “basic” reading level.

Only about 3.5 percent of a 26,000-member sample demonstrated literacy skills adequate to do traditional college study, a level reached by 30 percent of secondary students in 1940 and by 30 percent of secondary students in other developed countries today.

Fifty million Americans can’t recognize printed words on a fourth or fifth-grade reading level. Consequently, they can’t write simple messages or letters.

These are grim statistics for our children in 21st century America.

Parents, your child’s life and future can literally depend on his or her ability to read well. College, a good job, economic security, access to health care, and the ability to actively participate in civic life all depend on your child’s ability to read.

According to the Department of Justice, “The link between academic failure and delinquency, violence, and crime is welded to reading failure.” The stats back up this claim: 85 percent of all juveniles who interface with the juvenile court system are functionally illiterate, and over 70 percent of inmates in America’s prisons cannot read above a fourth grade level, according to the website, www.BeginToRead.com.

Yet, per-student costs and taxes for public schools have almost tripled in the last 40 years. Now what other industry do you know of where the product’s cost triples, yet the product stinks, and remains a dismal failure?

It is only because public schools are a government-run monopoly that their incompetence is ingrained and beyond repair. Public schools do not have to improve, ever, nor does teacher competence have to improve, because these schools get compulsory tax funding to stay in business, and teachers get tenure. These public-school’s existence don’t depend on the voluntary payments of parents, as private schools do. All Americans are forced to pay real-estate and/or income taxes to “support” these schools, no matter how incompetent they are. Public schools can thumb their nose at parents, no matter how bad they are, because taxes keep them afloat, like the Post Office.

Public schools also get their customers, your children by force, through compulsory attendance laws. That is, public schools are like education prisons where the inmates are forced to “attend” for 10 years, before they are “released” when they reach 16-years old.

Most parents think that education has to be run by government, because that’s the way it’s been done for the last 100 years, and because they, the parents also went to public school. That is not the case. The education free-market in America provides a wide choice of superb private kindergartens, religious primary schools, private colleges, and private tutors. Our education free-market also gives us the incredible resources of the internet, tons of home-schooling education materials, and thousands of software programs to teach your children to read and do math at an early age.

There are now also dozens of low-cost K-12 internet private schools that you can enroll your child in. These schools are like brick-and-mortar private schools, but cost much less. They assign a special teacher to each child, have an excellent well-rounded curriculum, constant testing of your child’s progress, and help you get your child into the college of his/her choice.

Parents, if you are disgusted with your local public school, you have good reason to be. Do you want to condemn your child to a lifetime of illiteracy, low-paying jobs, and dismal future? If not, please consider walking away from these government-education prisons called public schools, and trying the life-giving breath of the education free market. I describe many more low-cost education options for your children in my book, “Public Schools, Public Menace.”

© 2016 Joel Turtel – All Rights Reserved

As Thomas Jefferson asserted in the Declaration of Independence, we are “endowed by [our] Creator with certain inalienable rights” which were eventually spelled out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

But the nations of the West, having turned away from their Creator, find now that their rights are no longer inalienable.

For those educated in public school, “inalienable” means it can’t be sold, given away, or taken away. (We allow 60 seconds for sardonic laughter.) Our rights seem to be getting less inalienable by the day.

Perhaps we ought to expect this to be going on in Europe. What do they know of free speech or any other God-given right?

In Germany, for instance, the government has decided to prosecute a popular TV comedian for the crime of making fun of the president of Turkey, Bongo (or whatever his name is: who cares?) Erdogan, who saw the TV show and complained.

Germany has no First Amendment protecting free speech or anything else. What Germany does have is an old Kaiser Wilhelm-era law that makes it a jailing offense to disparage or make fun of a foreign head of state. If you’ve ever seen how German funsters make mincemeat of Obama, especially in the Obama floats they design for some of their parades, you may well wonder where that law has been for all this time. But never mind. Current German politics dictates appeasement of Middle Eastern despots, so probably the comic goes to jail. And so much for free speech in Germany.

Here in America, where we have a First Amendment to protect free speech, we now see a growing push by “liberals”—well, Democrats, to say it plainly—to outlaw speech and thought that doesn’t jibe with left-wing politics.

Just this month, first we had Bill Nye the Science Guy, promoted from kid TV star to sage and oracle, recommending criminal prosecution for those who dissent from “Climate Change” orthodoxy. He has a lot of company. Unable to win their argument by mustering facts to support their position, now they seek to crush dissent by criminalizing it.

Almost immediately afterward, we learned of Democrat state attorneys general—no Republicans were involved—secretly huddling to see if they could actually do this. Well, hey, they gotta Save the Planet from the imaginary threat of man-made Global Warming: can’t let a little thing like the First Amendment get in the way. How else can they herd the people into crummy, cramped Agenda 21 housing, take away their cars and air conditioners, and impose all kinds of climate taxes, if they’ve got those pesky dissenters calling it a hoax?

Oops! Did I just break the law? Probably.

Their political theory is essentially satanic—atheistic, at best. They reject the concept of God-given rights, even as they reject the whole idea of God. Who is God, to tell them what they can or cannot do? They’re our leaders, our bosses, our lords. They can do anything they please.

For decades they’ve been chopping away at God’s moral laws; and no one cared, because, after all, those were only outmoded cultural conventions defining marriage, gender, and all that other stuff that no one in the whoopee crowd believes in anymore.

In doing so, they created a climate of lawlessness in which they can easily go from overthrowing God’s laws to overthrowing man’s—like, for instance, the First Amendment to the Constitution.

We’ve brought this on ourselves, by feebly defending, or not defending at all, God’s laws. Our current leaders are our punishment.

So enjoy your freedom of speech while you still have it. If our leaders get their way, we won’t have it for much longer.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2016 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

Our last two articles, “An Establishment Always Evolves Into An All-powerful Oligarchy” and “Men In Dark Suits, Blue Smoke and Backroom Deals”, ripped the hide off of powerful, wealthy, ambitious men and for good reason. Still, having done so, it must be abundantly obvious to anyone with half an intellect that the huddled masses and the poor don’t build anything. So if it wasn’t for those same powerful, wealthy, ambitious men, steel wouldn’t have been made, skyscrapers, bridges, locomotives and ships would have not been built, oil would not have been refined into gasoline, fuel oil, paints, resins and nylon stockings, and a largely untamed land would have not been tamed. And if it weren’t for the bold financiers who took the huge risks to fund those ventures, none of it would have been possible.

The days of the railroad and land barons of the latter half of the 1800’s and into the early 1900’s was a picture of good and evil working together to build a nation. America grew at an unprecedented rate during this time under the flag of freedom. It seems that no matter what a man could dream up, he could bring it to fruition in this great land, if he was bold, brave, ambitious, a little greedy and sometimes ruthless.

Railroads crisscrossed the land from the Atlantic to the Pacific and to all points on the compass, built out of the steel Andrew Carnegie created in his smelters, smelters fired by the almost un-limited coal that lay under the ground for anyone with the courage to dig it up. The railroad and the “Iron Horse” became the conduit to passenger people and freight all over America, on a ribbon of steel rails and crossties. Nevertheless, it was no easy task. The railroad builders battled Indians, the weather, landowners and the land itself. Routes for the railroad right-of-way became political battles between states, towns and townships. If these powerful men didn’t border on ruthless, the railroad would have never been built.

John D. Rockefeller turned crude oil into the fuel to power our early cars, ships and light our lamps. Westinghouse gave us alternating current generators, created by the genius inventor, Nikola Tesla. Westinghouse and Tesla gave us light at night from light bulbs created by the prolific inventor, Thomas Edison. Charles Goodyear, a self-taught indigent chemist, gave us vulcanized rubber. Samuel Morse gave us the telegraph and his assistant, Alfred Vail, developed the Morse Code. Ford gave us the assembly line and the car and expanded our freedom to reach out across the land at faster and faster speeds. The horse and horse-drawn buggy, wagon and stagecoach became the victim of the railroad and the car. J. P. Morgan, as ruthless as he was, provided the funds for many of these risky ventures. At one point Morgan even bailed out the federal government.

America needed these powerful men to take it from a wilderness, agrarian society to a civilized nation, all the while increasing the standard of living of every American. Our wealth allowed us to become the most powerful nation on earth. Our wealth and our growing standard of living were the envy of every other nation on earth and still are today.

But with the good, came the evil. Workers were viciously exploited, leading to unions. Landowners were run over as if they weren’t there. Suppliers were ripped off. The land was raped. To stop the railroad and land barons, violence broke out in the form of land wars, riots, robbery and sabotage.

Miners and loggers took the resources from the land and left it scarred and ruined. Hydraulic mining tore the land to pieces and sluiced it down into streams, rivers and lakes, poisoning them. Loggers took the giant trees and left the forest floor littered with branches and smaller trees that were in the way when the big ones came crashing down. After a dry summer, the forest floor turned into tinder dry fuel for out-of-control, explosive forest fires.

To stem the tide of these no-rules, free-for-all industrial and land barons, mining companies and loggers, government was forced to pass laws. Now we are not a fan of laws and regulations but when a group of people harm other people and the land on a grand scale, laws become necessary. To slow the industrial barons down, anti-trust laws were passed and monopoly corporations were broken up. Even so, powerful, wealthy and ambitious men find ways around laws and nothing has changed. It has just gotten more subtle and secretive.

In one of our articles a while back we wrote: “When your vision is clouded by an irrational obsession, the first things to leave your soul are honor, morality and virtue.” If powerful, wealthy, ambitious men are obsessed with being powerful, wealthy and ambitious, in most cases their honor, morality and virtue are crowded out of their soul, if they had any in the first place.

And so it was with the railroad and land barons of yesteryear and so it is today with the men and women of the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, every politician and every powerful, wealthy and ambitious man or woman who seek only wealth and power for wealth and power’s sake. If nothing stands in their way, as was the case during the industrial revolution and just as much as it does today, then the powerful get their way. Our representatives can blunt the power of these three groups but only if the people put pressure on those representatives to do so. The problem arises from the fact that so many of our representatives are card-carrying members of these three groups.

The only thing with enough power to stop them is the people themselves. If the people fear the powerful and wealthy industrialist, banker, politician, or bureaucrat, or they don’t care what the powerful do, then the people can get kings, dictators, oligarchies, corruption and slavery in return. In that event, the people get what they deserve.

The hard truth is, without honor in the people, in businessmen and women, or in politicians, a nation is doomed to burn to the ground from the fuel of its own corruption. We stand on the precipice of that failure today.

What has happened to America and our Constitutional Republic? What catalyst or disease transformed politicians into men and women who have become ruthless and devoid of honor? No, not all men are devoid of honor, but way too many of them are. Why have the principles of freedom and liberty become passé, out-of-date, or just plain irrelevant? How is it we have morphed into the false loyalty of “my party, right or wrong, my party.” That’s Nazi stuff, not American. What on earth possessed us to “spit” on the foundation of our liberties, in favor of what …… Security? Comfort? Entertainment? Have we lost our collective minds?

Why do so many Americans think it is perfectly OK to cheat on auto, fire, or medical claims to insurance companies? And we wonder why insurance premiums are so high! Why do we lie on employment or loan applications? Why do we engage in the consumption of illegal drugs that get people killed on both sides of our southern border? It is Americans consuming illegal drugs that drive the violent drug wars, corruption and the killings in Mexico and America.

The reason for all these things is that many of us have lost our honor. A large segment of our American population has lost it by succumbing to the siren call of a “free” lunch from government, in exchange for their votes, when we all know the “lunch” isn’t free. The politicians have lost honor because, in a representative government, politicians are a reflection of the people who vote them into office.

If we do not value honor, integrity and honesty in ourselves, we will not value those very same qualities in our leaders. In today’s world, those men and women without honor, integrity and honesty continue to be elected to public office. Therefore, by our own choice, we allow dishonor and dishonesty to perpetuate itself. Along those same lines we allow powerful, wealthy and ambitious men to deceive us and run all over us and herd us into pens like cattle and sheep. We are cajoled and manipulated by the media, academia, the public schools and our institutions of government that collude with powerful, wealthy and ambitious men.

Have we become a nation of sheep that does not think for themselves and cannot recognize a wolf when they see it? Have we become so numb to reality by drowning in a glutinous diet of entertainment and self-gratification? Does liberty mean so little that we would sacrifice it out of fear and intimidation of those with power over us? Are we so afraid of the bully that we would let him rule us with deception, propaganda, distortions, lies and sometimes force?

Ladies and gentlemen, we cannot expect our politicians, businessmen, or union members to be free of corruption if the American people themselves are corrupt, or hopelessly apathetic. If the American people are without honor, it is quite likely that those they elect to office will also be without honor. It is folly, if not just plain stupid, to expect our representatives to be more perfect than those that put them in office.

Nevertheless, having said all that, a nation still needs powerful, wealthy and ambitious men and women to create, finance, invest, invent, market and build things. The trick is to keep their power, their wealth and their ambition in check. Laws can’t do that alone. Only honorable people who care about their freedom can do that. After over two centuries of trying, we are failing miserably. As a result, our identity as a free nation and a people and our very sovereignty are in grave peril.

Over the last 10 years we have written over 500 articles on freedom, liberty and property rights through our weekly column. Many of those articles touched on honor, morality and virtue and how they are irreplaceable elements to a free society and maintaining liberty, not in a religious context but from a purely pragmatic viewpoint. You can find those articles on our website by title and date HERE, that is of course, if you care about such things as freedom, liberty, property rights, honor, morality and virtue.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“How can the act be apart from the actor?” (cf. Psalm 7:8-17)

Hillary Clinton calling law abiding gun owners “terrorists” comes to the surface once again. During a 2014 townhall meeting, she went on to lie in an attempt to belittle, polarize and isolate gun owners by saying that gun owners are a minority in this country (Proverbs 19:5). I wonder if she was in defenseless and plundered Europe when she made that idiotic untrue comment.

According to the Geneva-based Small Arms Survey – the leading source of international public information about firearms – the U.S. has the best-armed civilian population in the world, with an estimated 270 million total guns. That’s an average of 89 firearms for every 100 residents.

America, these “terrorists” (Terrorism was originally defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as “Government by intimidation”) attack the gun owners, who would obstruct their way from violating constitutional law. That is why the real terrorists, like Hillary Clinton, are attacking law-abiding citizens. Why do Americans put up with this?

Americans have been taught to “praise the wicked” because they have forsaken the Law.

Furthermore, Americans have been taught to magnify the crimes instead of magnifying the laws against the criminals (Proverbs 28:4).

Let me give you a parable (1 Corinthians 2:14).

“Did you hear about the AK-47 that was used recently to kill 50 people? 50 people were slaughtered this week with the use of an AK-47… I said, 50 people were killed with an AK-47.

Specifications and highlighting of the weapon used…

Did you know that the AK-47 was originated In the Soviet Union?

Did you know that the designer of the AK-47 was Machail Kulascunoph? And designed in 1946 to 1948?

Did you know that the service history of the AK-47 has been since 1949 to the present?”

Clintons conspire with known criminal

Russians Grigori Loutchansky, linked by Interpol to the Russian mafia, money laundering, drug trafficking, nuclear smuggling across the Baltics, and international arms trading, attended a Democrat Party White House dinner in October of 1993. Loutchansky got a private two-minute meeting and a picture with Mr. Clinton. (The Washington Times, 2/11/97; The Detroit News, 2/16/97; New York Post, 11/1/96; Time, 7/8/96) Loutchansky was invited back to a second DNC dinner in July 1995. A year before, Canada had blocked Loutchansky from entering Canada because he had failed a background check. Canadian officials also had questions about the source of Loutchansky’s Nordex company’s assets. (The Washington Times, 3/1/97) Both of Clinton’s CIA Directors James Woolsey and John Deutch described Loutchansky’s Nordex company as an “organization associated with Russian criminal activity.”

“But did you hear about the AK-47 that was used to kill 50 people friends? 50 people were slaughtered this week with the use of an AK-47? I said, 50 people were killed with an AK-47 this week.

Specifications and highlights of the weapon used…

The AK-47 was manufactured by Ismash and various other including Norenco and produced in 1949 to 1959. The number of AK-47’s built, 75 million to 100 million.

Now, the length of the AK-47 with a fixed wooden stock is 880 mm which is 35 inches. 875 mm that is with the folding stock extended. The barrels length of the AK-47 is 415 mm which is 16.3 inches.”

Clinton Conspires with known criminal – Bad Trie, Bad Fruit

Chinese Yah Lin “Charlie” Trie, President Clinton’s longtime friend and a Democratic fund-raiser, was at the center of the 1996 campaign finance controversy and eventually plead guilty to two charges in his Arkansas trial (May 21, 1999). Trie pled guilty to a felony charge of causing false statements and a misdemeanor count of making political contributions in the names of others.

It was Charlie Trie who arranged for international Chinese weapons dealer, Wang Jun, chairman of CITIC, the chief investment arm of the PRC, and Poly Technologies (a “front company for the PRC military”) to meet with Mr. Clinton at a Democrat Party event at the White House on Feb. 6, 1996. CITIC Ka Wah Bank includes 28 branches in Hong Kong, a branch in Macau, a branch in Shanghai and its PRC-incorporated wholly-owned subsidiary, CITIC Ka Wah Bank (China) Limited, which is headquartered in Shenzhen with branches in Shanghai and Beijing. The Bank also has branches in New York and Los Angeles.

At the time Clinton met with Wang, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the Customs Service were wrapping up an investigation which caught Wang’s company smuggling at least $4 million worth of 2,000 illegal AK-47 assault weapons destined for gang members in California. President Clinton later admitted Wang’s attendance at the White House was “clearly inappropriate.”

And then there is Eric Wynn, Roger Tamraz, Russ Barakat, Norman Hsu, Chung Lo, Jorge Cabrera, etc…

Some might be asking the question, “Bradlee, what is your point?” Well, the point is obvious.

American’s have been so conditioned and diverted as to highlight the specifications and the weapons used in the crime, that they are simply overlooking the very ones that are making the choice to commit the crime by pulling the trigger (Romans 6:16)

Deal with those who are pulling the trigger, namely the politician “terrorists” who are committing the crimes (Romans 3:20).
“Justice the Guardian of Liberty”

Our resolve must be to impeach, indict then to incarcerate (Article 2, Sections 4; Article 3; Section 3 of the United States Constitution).

© 2016 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

Please understand that I am not a “tub-thumper”, an enthusiast, or an apologist for Donald Trump. But his electrifying emergence on the scene represents a sea-change in American politics far more consequential than his own pyrotechnic personality, bold campaign-style, and receipt of popular enthusiasm suggest. He is, as it were, the surfer who—perhaps by accident, perhaps by insight, but in any event in a timely fashion—has caught the first of the really big waves rolling towards shore. The significant aspect of the present situation is not the surfer, however, but the wave: namely, the upsurge of popular disgust for the “two”-party political vessel in which this country is sailing on a collision-course into the rocks of despair. This first big wave threatens all of the ships riding at anchor in the Establishment’s harbor. So the Establishment needs to throw up a breakwater, in a manner both fast and furious.

As anyone with 20-20 political vision can see, America’s domestic enemies have taken off their velvet gloves to reveal the iron fists underneath, by employing against Trump directly, and America ultimately, the modern Bolshevistic strategy of socio-political destabilization through so-called “non-violent direct action”, “weathermen” tactics, and “color revolutions”—all in line with the old Leninist/Stalinist slogan, “there are no fortresses which Bolsheviks cannot storm”. Please refrain from chiding me that the contemporary Establishment is not, to one degree or another, made up largely of Bolsheviks. The opposite is obviously true. Some are retreaded Trotskyites (who call themselves “neoconservatives”). Others are watered-down Mensheviks (who call themselves “social democrats” or “moderate socialists”). Others are the equivalent of NEP-men (better known here as “corporate socialists”, because they rely on governmental intervention in the economy to guarantee profits for themselves, while offloading losses onto the backs of the general public). And all of them are doctrinaire Leninists, inasmuch as they subscribe to his notion that “[t]he scientific term ‘dictatorship’ means nothing more nor less than authority untrammeled by any laws, absolutely unrestricted by any rules whatever, and based directly on force”. Vladimir I. Lenin, “A Contribution to the History of the Question of the Dictatorship, A Note” [1920], in Collected Works (Moscow, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Progress Publishers, 4th English Edition, 1966), Volume 31, at 353. None of these people gives a tinker’s dam for the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution—indeed, they believe themselves to be “untrammeled by any laws”. And all of them enthusiastically promote the present-day global “war on terrorism”, under color of which a para-militarized police-state apparatus, “absolutely unrestricted by any rules whatever, and based directly on force”, is being built up within this country in order to wage a domestic “war of terrorism” against the American people. See my book By Tyranny Out of Necessity: The Bastardy of “Martial Law” for the particulars on this.

If I may base my appreciation of the present situation upon an historical parallel drawn from Germany’s dolorous experience under the Weimar government in the 1920s and 1930s (which is probably familiar to most readers of this commentary), the advent of these bare-knuckled mass assaults on this country amounts to our own home-grown Bolsheviks’ declaration of ein Kampf um die Macht auf Leben und Tod (a struggle for power to the death). They will employ their Rotfrontkämpferbund (Red Front fighters’ league) to try to derail Trump’s nomination, through die Herrschaft des Pöbels auf der Straße (mobocracy in the street). If he is nominated, they will use der Bund to try to deny him election. If he is elected notwithstanding all of their efforts before November, they will then turn der Bund loose to stifle any major reforms which he attempts to put through after his inauguration, whether with or especially without Congress, the Judiciary, and the bureaucracy behind him. And please spare me the innuendo that, by drawing upon this parallel, I am somehow suggesting that Trump is a modern American “Hitler” figure. Rather, my intuition tells me that Trump is the sort of individual, perhaps rough-hewn but basically honest, who might have saved Germany from Hitlerism, as well as from Bolshevism, had the good Germans who came forward in der Wiederstand (the resistance-movement) after 1933 been more prescient and better organized before then.

One may ask why America’s Bolsheviks have decided to come out of the closet to exhibit their true coloration by unleashing mobocracy in the street, when they can (and surely will) employ every kind of old-fashioned fraud familiar in American politics to steal the election. The answer is that they anticipate their inability to put into practice Stalin’s apperçu that who votes is less important than who counts the votes, and are prudently preparing for the worst possible eventuality—namely, that in these unsettled times even widespread electoral fraud may not deprive Trump of victory if the polling-places are inundated by a true “revolt of the masses”. Moreover, even the most effective techniques of electoral fraud will be useless after the election. No further elections of consequence will be held during the first two years in which Trump holds “the Office of President”. If he cannot be stifled during that period, perhaps “the Trump phenomenon” will prove its worth in successful Presidential actions, and then will demonstrate its longevity and strength in the next elections—with the Bolsheviks suffering defeat after defeat. Between elections, the Bolsheviks will not be able to rely exclusively upon their co-conspirators, fellow travelers, dupes, useful idiots, and assorted fools in Congress, the Judiciary, and the bureaucracy to stand up to Trump. For the righteous anger of legions of patriotic Americans lined up behind him will give all of them pause. To put iron in their cronies’ backbones, the Bolsheviks will need to provide them with muscle in the streets: namely, hordes of well-funded, well-drilled “protesters” and “dissenters” deployed to shout down, or violently shut down, every popular manifestation of support for Trump.

So, as President, Trump—and all of the patriotic Americans in his camp—will desperately need the Militia:

(i) to awaken, energize, authorize, mobilize, organize, equip, train, and deploy on his behalf those whom the Declaration of Independence styles “the good People”;

(ii) to protect Trump himself—because no part of the present governmental apparatus at any level of the federal system can be trusted to do so;
(iii) to put through fundamental reforms that can be accomplished by the President alone (“to execute the Laws of the Union”, including both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, perforce of Article I, § 8, cl. 15 and such statutes as 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f); 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333; and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242), in particular against entrenched, recalcitrant, hostile, and disloyal bureaucrats and subversive private factions and other NGOs and special-interest groups; and especially
(iv) to leave puissant governmental institutions for “the good People” to use on their own at the State and Local levels in the event of an unavoidable and utterly destabilizing national crisis, probably centered in banking and haute finance, which breaks out during his Presidency.
With respect to points (ii) and (iii) in particular, one might recall the wisdom of General William Tecumseh Sherman who, when importuned to make himself a candidate for the White House, replied that “I would account myself a fool, a madman, an ass, to embark anew, at sixty-five years of age, in a career that may, at any moment, become tempest-tossed by the perfidy, the defalcation, the dishonesty or neglect of any of a hundred thousand subordinates utterly unknown to the President of the United States.” Quoted in Burke Davis, Sherman’s March (New York, New York: Vantage Books, 1988), at 298.

Inasmuch as der Rotfrontkämpferbund is now being deployed, a counterrevolutionary “white” force must be mobilized to oppose and defeat it. If loyal Americans want to avoid witnessing the rise of some extreme “right-wing” (actually, “right-socialistic”) “brown” force such as die Sturmabteilung (by default the main counterweight to the Communist street-gangs in Weimar Germany during her time of troubles)—which many desperate Americans will demand, and not a few will surely join, if they are offered no other powerful alternative—something else must be provided for them. This force must be raised from among “the good People”, there being no other source with the necessary loyalty, legal authority, self-interest, and sheer numbers requisite for the task at hand. Especially, it must be a force with explicit and unequivocal authority under the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, an establishment within the government, not a force the provenance of which can be traced only to some private political party, movement, or group.

Therefore, if Trump actually intends to be a constitutional “Commander in Chief” in the fullest sense in both law and fact—and, Heaven knows, if he does not intend as much then he should emulate General Sherman by not seeking “the Office of President” at all—he needs to promote the exercise of that high authority against America’s domestic enemies, through exhortation for and mobilization of what the Constitution itself declares to be uniquely “necessary to the security of a free State”, and to which it explicitly assigns the authority and responsibility “to execute the Laws of the Union”—and he must do this, in both words and deeds, immediately if not sooner. This is no time to play for time; for, as the old saying has it, time brings all things, bad as well as good. During his campaign, he must advocate revitalization of the Militia; and, after his election, he must take every action necessary and proper to that end. I suspect that, if he does grasp that nettle, he will be able to say of the contemporary Establishment what General Sherman said of the old Confederacy: “pierce the shell, and it’s all hollow inside”.

On the other hand, if—Heaven forfend!—Hillary Clinton should seize “the Office of President”, either by her own devices or (more likely) with the aid of anti-Trump back-stabbers in the Republican Party or some third-party “spoiler” candidate (from such as the Libertarian Party, which disastrously split the conservative vote in favor of a dyed-in-the-wool Clintonite in the last gubernatorial election in Virginia), she and the Bolsheviks behind her will not sit on their hands. Instead, emboldened by their triumph in scotching Trump, they will turn out der Rotfrontkämpferbund to advance their revolutionary agenda by deploying das Faustrecht (mob rule by the fist) against all of the “constitutionalist”, “patriotic”, “conservative”, “traditionalist”, and other politically, economically, and culturally “right-wing” groups in the country: First, to intimidate them and anyone who even tangentially supports them. Second, to turn the undecided citizenry against them when they try to defend themselves (denouncing even their verbal self-defense as “incitement to violence”). And third, to unleash para-militarized police-state oppression, some species of “martial law” jury-rigged under color of “emergency powers”, Vyshinsky-type prosecutors, and the kangaroo courts to suppress whichever Americans try to stand up for their natural and constitutional rights. This, the Bolsheviks expect, will bring about die Endlösung (the final solution) of the problems of popular sovereignty and popular self-government which so vex all totalitarians.

Be forewarned. One need not be a dabbler in the occult to foretell the future in this respect. Neither need one be much of a student of modern history to fear the accuracy in these times of the old adages that “no one learns anything from history other than that no one ever learns anything from history”, and that “we grow too soon old and too late smart”. (Personally, too, I appreciate the wisdom of the observation that “no man is ever taken for a prophet in his own country”. For I have long been struggling to educate Americans about the Militia—and, most recently, about the utter illegality of “martial law”—with about as much success as if I had been trying to sell a twelve-step program in humility and reticence to the Kardashians.)

Nonetheless, I believe that Mao Tse-tung was correct (albeit perhaps only accidentally or hypocritically so) when he wrote that “[t]he people, and the people alone, are the motive force in the making of world history”, that “[t]he masses have boundless creative power”, and that

[a]ll reactionaries are paper tigers. In appearance, the reactionaries are terrifying, but in reality they are not so powerful. From a long-term point of view, it is not the reactionaries but the people who are really powerful.
Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung (Peking, China: Foreign Languages Press, 1966), at 118, 118, and 72. Thus, to turn the Bolsheviks’ own slogan to the purpose of America’s salvation: “There are no fortresses which ‘the good People’ cannot storm.”

In the final analysis, it is critically important that Trump should turn to “the good People”, trust “the good People”, empower “the good People”, and rely upon “the good People”. Not only for his own sake (which in the great scheme of things amounts to little), but also for their sake first and foremost (which amounts to everything). As modern Presidential campaigns illustrate, this country is steeped in its own bastard version of das Führerprinzip (the leader principle). As early as 1933, America had her “Chief” (Roosevelt), just as Germany had her Führer (Hitler), Italy her Duce (Mussolini), and Russia her Vozhd’ (Stalin), to be followed not long afterwards by Red China with her “Great Helmsman” (Mao). Today, all too many Americans view a President as someone whose purpose is to advance the agenda of their political party or special-interest group, not someone who should act unselfishly with and through WE THE PEOPLE so that THE PEOPLE themselves can become permanently the masters of their own destiny. Such approval of, or at least acquiescence in, rule from “the top down” must in short order prove fatal to popular self-government.

In principle, it denies the precept of the Declaration that “Governments * * * instituted among Men[ ] deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed”—not from acceptance by “the governed” of “the leader’s” mere assertions of authority. In practice, it generates increasingly uncritical support for “the leader’s” program, then increasingly blind obedience to his dictates. Until society arrives at the terminal stage of suicidal political regimentation: Führer befehl, wir folgen (leader command, we follow).

Just as the strength of any pyramid resides at its base, not at its apex, so, too, with popular sovereignty—and with the Power of the Sword in WE THE PEOPLE’S hands for the purpose of “execut[ing] the Laws of the Union” through the Militia. In a constitutional republic, true authority and legitimate power never descend from “the top down”, but always arise—indeed, can be generated and exercised only—from “the bottom up”. Trump’s greatest achievement (were he capable of any truly great achievement) would be to put this truth into action. By one segment of the population he will be damned if he does; and, by another segment, damned if he does not; so he may as well be taken for a goat rather than a sheep. That goes for the rest of us, too.

© 2016 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

Part 1: Americans being poisoned to death, drugs, GMO foods

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard

In the past two years, eight of my friends died of different forms of cancer. One friend holds on for dear life as you read this column. Another dear friend lived because he took a different path away from the standard operating procedure of the American Medical Association. He opted away from chemotherapy and radiation. Today, he thrives because he rejected the senselessness of injecting chemicals into his body. A doctor cut cancer out of me 26 years ago. It changed how I ate, what I ate, how I exercised, how I detoxed my body, and how I looked at the world.

At this point in history, cancer leads the list in America for early deaths. Ironically, the American Cancer Society continues, “looking” for a cure, but none surfaces. In 2016, experts project 1.6 million new cancer diagnoses and 600,000 deaths.

Cancer affects one in three Americans, and soon to affect one out of every two men.

Incongruously, the American Medical Association dominates every insurance therapy in this country. It pushes three solutions: surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. It does not allow alternative therapies, whatsoever. Cancer patients and their insurance agencies pay $100,000,000,000 (billion) annually in the United States.

Out of that, over half of cancer patients still die while the ones that survive the brutality of the drug—live with altered minds, destroyed livers and reoccurrence of the disease.

But none of the big pharmaceutical companies ever mention nor do they promote any research on what’s causing cancer. Whether you watch television, radio or magazine advertisements, “Big Pharma” sells every kind of chemical drug to “mask” or “crush” the symptoms facing a victim. If you suffer a headache, Aleve, Motrin or Tylenol will set your mind free. If you face stomach problems, Larry the “Cable Guy” comedian drives a jet ski through a burning hoop to solve your problems with Prilosec—a dangerous chemical that David Muir reported on Friday, April 15, 2016.

Five years ago, all top networks reported on the liver damage of Aleve, Motrin and Tylenol. Nonetheless, their advertising executives created even more compelling ads to deflect any facts or consequences. If you look at Coca-Cola, Mountain Dew and Pepsi—you think those drinks bring vitality to your body. But, once again, all major networks showed that those soda pops cause heart problems, cavities, diabetes and obesity.

Pop a Bayer aspirin daily to solve your heart disease. They never tell you that aspirin poisoning and aspirin-caused bleeding ulcers from the drug, affect tens of thousands of Americans.

As to gobbling all those poisons, the public doesn’t blink! It keeps inhaling those products. It pops those pills. It suffers the consequences. I personally witness mothers feeding their babies Coca-Cola via bottles while shopping in grocery stores. Schools promote Coke, Mountain Dew and Pepsi caffeine addiction by offering dispensing machines in the halls. Why? Financial gain! Students: collateral damage.

Each year, with the auspices of the Federal Drug Administration, medical doctors prescribe thousands of chemical cocktails to patients. Each year, 100,000 Americans die from adverse reactions to those drugs. Does the FDA stop the poisoning of the public? Not a chance! Why? Profit for shareholders at Bayer, BASF and other big pharmaceutical companies.

In the past week, my wife and I watched the first five episodes out of nine of Ty Bollinger’s: The Truth About Cancer—A Global Quest. As a researcher and a former Cardiac Medical Tech, my jaw dropped. My wife Sandi, an RN, sat in her chair incensed at what she heard in Episode 1 through 5 of the series. The people at Bayer, BASF and others set the benchmark for “amoral” behaviors. Immoral makes them unethical, but “amoral” means they lack a heart, soul and any concept of morality or ethics. Money—their only god.

Episode 1: The True History of Chemotherapy; The Pharmaceutical Monopoly

By watching it, you face the realization that “Big Pharma” doesn’t have any intention of curing cancer. “Walk or run for the Cure” equates to a meaningless waste of time. You will see how vaccines include mercury. You will see how genetically modified organisms in our foods do not get labeled so you and your children ingest chemicals like “Roundup” and other insidious poisons blanketing the foods we eat.

For every cancer victim, you’re invited to watch the entire series. For anyone reading this column that knows of family or friends with cancer, share the entire nine part series with them. Give them a chance to live.

The fact remains, our government won’t stop “Big Pharma” because too much money passes into the hands of many of those 535 scoundrels in Congress. In the final analysis, you, the individual citizen must take your own family’s life and health into your own hands. This series will guide toward your highest and best health.

It means you demand Monsanto stop its GMOs being fed into our food chain. It means you must shop at natural food markets like Natural Grocers, Alfalfas and Whole Foods. Or, push Kroger’s, Publix, King Soopers and Safeways to offer organic food and produce. You command the marketplace with your dollars.

Millions Against Monsanto – Organic Consumers…

You need to join advocacy groups like www.JustLabelIt.org to ensure that grocers label GMOs so you know what you’re putting into your body and your kids’ bodies.

If we allow “Big Pharma” to swindle us down the path of chemotherapy, radiation and drugs—we all pay a horrific price in our health and the health of our families.

Part 2: The atrocious eating patterns of Americans, how we generate cancers within our bodies by the synthetic foods we eat.

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

A false witness shall not be unpunished, and [he that] speaketh lies shall perish. —Proverbs 19:9

Remember the grammar school taunting rhyme, “Liar, Liar, pants on fire, nose is longer than a telephone wire?” It was taken from the Pinocchio story where when he lied, his nose grew longer. Well, it’s the same thing with Senator Ted Cruz, and I cannot even begin to cover all the lies this man has told since his political career started. We’ll only cover a few.

As Cruz has quickly climbed the political ladder, he has left a long line of associates who complain, without much prompting, that he is an insufferable schmuck, and this includes his fellow senators.

Mother Jones Magazine printed an article entitled, Is Ted Cruz Really an Awful, Terrible Jerk? Yes, I know Mojo is a leftist magazine, but I also know they do their homework on both the left and the right, and they’ve never been sued. However, in this article, they list the left leaning neo-con Trotskyite Republicans who all detest Trump, i.e., McCain, Boehner, Dole, George W. Bush, Rep. Peter King, Sen. Lindsey Graham, etc. The reality is this, no one who gets close to him, likes Cruz. It is not because he’s not “one of them,” but because he’s insufferable, and people simply do not like the man. Nevertheless, they’re using him to try to destroy Trump, then they’ll dump Cruz, hoping to install one of their own choosing.

From the Mojo article comes this insightful piece:

Isn’t that telling? No one really wants to be around Ted Cruz because of his personality. Yet, he has deceived millions of Christians into believing he is a Constitutional conservative. Obviously, these Christians have absolutely no discernment and are listening only to his words, not checking his actions. We are, after all, to judge them by their fruits. Lies and deception seem to be the core of Ted Cruz’s campaign.

A Few of the Lies and Deceptions of Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz is gaining quite the reputation for saying one thing to his supporters, and doing quite a different thing. Ted Cruz lies. He talks very eloquently about conservatism, while his establishment agenda is hidden by deceptive lawyer tricks.

• Senator Cruz appeared on Fox News (full video here) and was caught in several lies to add to his abysmal record.

One of the more egregious claims was when Cruz stated he immediately denounced the Melania Trump attack ads (mailers in Utah) put forth by a Pro-Cruz Super-PAC. No such denouncement, prior to the Utah election, ever took place.

• Ted is so anti-gay that he proposed overturning gay rights in D.C. and is 100% against gay marriage. 

However, in April, Ted was hosted at a dinner by the gay Manhattan hotel tycoons Mati Weiderpass and Ian Reisner, owners of the city’s gay Out Hotel and accepted a $2,700 donation from Resiner. [Link] He is shown below with Mati Weiderpass in a photo posted on Weiderpass’s Facebook page.

Ted’s wife, Heidi, is a managing director at Goldman Sachs (currently on leave), which took a $10 billion government bailout! Cruz earned a million bucks a year from his law firm, and the Cruz’s took low-interest loans from Goldman Sachs and Citibank that he failed to report. [Link], [Link]

• Cruz told a CPAC crowd that Democrats issued an ominous threat to the Catholic Church: “Change your religious beliefs or we’ll use our power in the federal government to shut down your charities and your hospitals.” Politifact naturally deemed this “both incorrect and ridiculous.”

• Cruz said ISIS is “right now crucifying Christians in Iraq, literally nailing Christians to trees.” It wasn’t, and Cruz wasn’t able to offer any evidence. (Not to say ISIS isn’t committing other atrocities.)

• Cruz described a “strong bipartisan majority” in the House that voted to repeal Obamacare. Two Democrats joined the Republicans, that’s not strong bipartisanship.

• In recent weeks, Cruz has been using some variation of this line: “There are 110,000 agents at the IRS. We need to put a padlock on that building and take every one of those 110,000 agents and put them on our southern border.” The IRS doesn’t have 110,000 employees. (There are 14,000). 

I want all our military brought home and put on our borders…not IRS agents.

 

leadership team, told the Washington Examiner he could not stay silent about the falsehoods repeatedly uttered by the senator on the campaign trail. Specifically, Tucker takes issue with Cruz’s comments about Donald Trump’s ideas on healthcare. [Link]

false.” 

• Ted Cruz tells his supporters he is against Common Core, and supports home-schooling. But his co-sponsorship of S306, “Enhancing Educational Opportunities for all Students Act” (ESEA), tells a very different story than what Cruz tells his supporters.

Ted Cruz sneaked an amendment into the bill. Cruz quietly attached: Section I, Title I Portability under ESEA. Cruz’s amendment is a tricky proposal for state standards and state testing. Ted Cruz’s misleading amendment really means that any Title I child who accepts funds to implement a federal education program is considered a recipient of federal financial assistance. Unfortunately, this also means that Ted Cruz’s amendment essentially mandates Common Core to any school who accepts the enrollment detailed in his sneaky amendment. [Link]

How Ted Cruz is Sneaking Common Core on Homeschoolers.

• Politifact has found only 8 of 47 (or 17 percent) of Ted Cruz’s statements to be deemed either “True” or “Mostly True.” The lone “True” statement pertained to toilet seats. Only 4 of the 7 “Mostly True” statements checked by Politifact happened since he became a senator. Of those 4, three of them, while technically factual based on his wording, were contextually inaccurate. To put it another way, Ted Cruz is one of the most dishonest politicians this country has ever seen.

Cruz is so effective at misleading voters one cannot tell when, if ever, he is being sincere. If he can lie with such ease and “reframe” his views so readily, how will Congress and the American people trust him? 

Cruz’s Constant Flip-Flops

Watch the following video, Who Is the Real Ted Cruz? It discusses Teds flip-flopping, on government surveillance, Syrian refugees, background checks, amnesty, H-1B visas, birthright citizenship, whistleblowers, ethanol subsidies, Obama Trade, Iran deal, the TSA. All of these, and more, are issues Cruz has flipped on.

Ted’s Campaign Donors

Cruz says, “I will never get, nor do I want money from the DC lobbyists or the special interest billionaires.

Really Ted? How about the millions you’ve gotten from New York hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, Texas natural gas billionaires Farris and Dan Wilks, and private-equity partner Toby Neugebauer? I guess they don’t count and don’t have “special interests.” [Link]

The below Contributor chart shows that pro-amnesty Club for Growth really likes Ted as does Goldman Sachs.

Conclusion

Cruz’s top surrogate supporter, Glenn Beck, repeatedly compared Donald Trump’s supporters to Hitler’s notorious paramilitary group known as the “Brown shirts.” [Link]

On the Christian Broadcasting Network, Cruz said, “Listen, Donald does well with voters who have relatively low information, who are not that engaged and who are angry.” Cruz is saying, “Trump voters are stupid, lazy Neanderthals who don’t know what they’re doing while the Cruz supporters are intelligent, involved and worthy of a relationship with Reverend Ted.

After what we’ve seen with the Eagle Forum attempted coup, I would say the “brown shirt” statement might more readily apply to the Cruz supporters. As for Trump’s supporters being low information, it is just the opposite. Folks who support Donald Trump know more about what has happened to America the last 100 years than the rest of the electorate. Trump truly has awakened the silent majority.

Donald Trump will arrive at the Republican National Convention with the most delegates of any candidate. He will have won the overwhelming majority of the state contests. Were democracy the rule, Trump would be the Republican nominee, but Ted Cruz, John Kasich, and several leading figures in the Republican Party approve of democracy only if they win. Having no chance to win a majority, they instead want to overthrow the democratic will of the people. If successful, that strategy will demoralize and alienate a very large number of Republican voters, and it will decrease the prospects for success of the Republican nominee in November. As Pat Buchanan has observed, if Trump is not the nominee many will stay at home rather than vote in November, but also many will vote for Trump as an Independent candidate rather than acquiesce in the loss of their vote, thereby splitting what would otherwise be votes for the Republican standard bearer and reducing the size, scope, and influence of the Republican Party in the years to come.

Ted Cruz’s operatives are working feverishly to obtain delegates through non-democratic means. That pursuit bespeaks a contempt for representative democracy, very unbecoming for a candidate who proclaims himself the only true guardian of the Constitution. For example, in Louisiana, although Trump won the election, Cruz’s behind the scenes machinations have enabled him to come away with a majority of Louisiana’s delegates. And in Colorado, the Republican Party bosses decided not to allow Coloradans to vote, giving all of the state’s delegates to Cruz, who granted favors to pull resistant delegates to his side. Wherever Cruz has lost democratically, he has worked behind the scenes to overturn the will of the voters, obtaining delegates through influence peddling (jockeying to put in place delegates whose real loyalty is to him rather than to the voters’ choice). Do those who support Ted Cruz endorse this approach? Do they really want authoritarians to cause losing candidates to win through cloak room maneuvers? Do they think those tactics consistent with constitutional conservatism? So much for Ted Cruz’s insistence that he is the true constitutional conservative.

John Kasich clings to a romantic notion that the democratic will of the people can be thwarted at the convention by party bosses apoplectic over Trump who have nowhere else to turn, enabling him to be the party’s nominee. He dreams of the unlikely scenario where no single candidate will reach the magic number of 1,237 on a first, second, or third ballot and where most will turn to him as the party savior. He too favors authoritarianism over democracy if it means he can be declared the winner.

Trump should benefit greatly from focusing on these anti-democratic positions of his opponents, which essentially ask that the majority’s votes be rendered meaningless. Trump’s opponents may campaign. They may call for votes, but in the end they don’t respect any vote except one for them, because they hope and plan to thwart the will of the majority on the convention floor, to achieve victory based on an overthrow of the democratic process.

The best way for voters to reveal their contempt for the anti-democratic subversion of their votes is to vote overwhelmingly against the candidates calling for it in every remaining primary. Any who truly believe in democratic elections must vote against those who seek to derail democracy.

Both the Cruz approach (delegate vote obtained through behind the scenes manipulation) and the Kasich approach (delegate vote obtained through miraculous convention conversion) are based on a contempt for the election process, on a zealous willingness to overturn the democratically elected. In short, they see nothing wrong with making a mockery of the democratic process if doing so gets them the nomination. By hook or by crook, they want the nomination, and they do not care that most voters oppose them. If they cannot win an election honestly, by the votes, they will win it dishonestly, by subversion, and they expect Americans to do nothing in response and thereby be complicit in the destruction of their votes.

The Cruz and Kasich quest for an undemocratic takeover of the election process should offend all Americans. It threatens to make apathy the rule, by undermining fundamentally representative democracy.

Cruz and Kasich are, however, painfully short-sighted. Do either of them really want a Republican nomination against the will of the voters? Are they naïve enough to believe that if party bosses proclaim either one of them the nominee the millions of Trump supporters will accept the overthrow of democracy as permissible gamesmanship and back them in the general election?

I suppose they count upon Republicans voting for them because they would be the primary party opposition to Hillary Clinton. This is not that election year, however. Unlike Cruz and Kasich supporters, Trump’s following is devout and steadfast. Undoubtedly Trump supporters will demand that Trump run as an Independent rather than have their will thwarted by party bosses. Consequently, even if Cruz or Kasich obtain the nomination by contrivance, neither will have the popular backing needed to win the general election. Rather, the Trump majority, which now forms the activist heart and soul of the Republican Party, will reject the party, stay at home, or vote Independent rather than vote for Cruz or Kasich.

That exodus from Republican ranks, involving many who did not vote or did not align themselves with the Republican Party before Trump, will ensure into the foreseeable future that the Republican Party will be an anemic one. Many will not soon forget that the party they entrusted with their vote overturned the will of the majority; that party bosses turned the primaries in the states into farces where voters were led to believe their vote counted, when in fact it did not.

In the end, we should expose and denounce the authoritarian hedonism that drives Cruz and Kasich to favor upsetting the will of the majority. Despite loss after loss in the primaries, they each have a self-love that is greater than their respect for democracy. Each arrogantly presumes that overturning democratic process is fair play because neither has the humility and grace to withdraw when defeated.

It must be obvious to Cruz and Kasich that bullying their way to the nomination offends the very principles they say they believe in (achievement by merit, representative democracy, and accountability to the electorate), yet neither is willing to abide by those principles if it means suffering a personal loss. That willingness to part with principle for personal gain is precisely the primary characteristic of the establishment enemy that voters detest in this election cycle.

It is that kind of anti-democratic politics that Obama used to justify executive actions to amend the law without following the Article I command that Congress approve of the change first; that brought us Obamacare; that brought us thousands of industry stifling regulations from unelected bureaucrats; that brought us corruption to advance the will of industry leaders at the expense of everyone; and that brought us a deal with Iran in circumvention of the Constitution’s Treaty Clause and the requirement of Senate consent.

One would hope that at the convention the delegates would come to appreciate the solemn duty they have to uphold the democratic will of the electorate, that the candidate wanted by the majority must be nominated by the party. If they do not, their undemocratically chosen candidate, having acquired the nomination without merit, will run in the general election without the support needed to win, and will be a figure whose nomination will long alienate those who voted Republican for the first time from ever voting Republican again.

In all likelihood if the majority vote is thwarted that will mean the Republican nominee will not be elected president. Rather, those whose votes were rendered nullities by machinations at the Republican convention will either not vote at all or will vote for Trump as an Independent.

© 2016 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

While the charlatan media in America, cable, print and electronic, virtually ignores eligibility challenges to constitutionally ineligible, Ted Cruz, (unless it’s a ruling against the Constitution which they all seem to support) it is getting a lot of coverage on the Internet by independent media who believe the U.S. Constitution matters.

As I covered in my column last week, Ted Cruz Not On NJ Ballot – Will Hearing Today Finally Expose His Con Game?, an eligibility hearing was held April 11, 2016 in New Jersey. For the back story and details, please see my column here.

When the decision came down April 12, 2016 from an individual we all thought was an Administrative Law Judge named Masin, I damn near blew a gasket. I could not believe what I was reading. Masin is not new to this issue. I highly encourage you to read this interview:

Exclusive: Atty. Mario Apuzzo on New Jersey Ballot Challenge Hearing

“Administrative Law Judge Jeffrey Masin presided, who Apuzzo noted was the same judge who heard his ballot challenge to Barack Hussein Obama four years ago nearly to the day. “This is a different case from Obama’s case,” Apuzzo told us. “In the other case, the judge said that Obama did not have the burden of proof. They conceded that there was no evidence of who Obama was or where he was born. Then the judge came out with his famous line that ‘Mickey Mouse could run for president.’ It was just unbelievable.”

At this point in time there is ZERO evidence Lyin’ Ted Cruz is even a U.S. citizen. Since he renounced his FULL Canadian citizenship, I ask again: Just what country goes Cruz claim citizenship under?

Let me give you a few examples from Masin’s decision that burned me up to no end:

“The Constitution neither defines nor elaborates upon the phrase, “natural born Citizen.” The document contains no “Definitions” section. The meaning was never a subject of discussion at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.”

“The meaning was never a subject of discussion at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.” Really?

Is Being a Born Citizen of the United States Sufficient Citizenship Status to be President? The Founders and Framers Emphatically Decided It Was Not!

“During the process of developing a new U.S. Constitution Alexander Hamilton submitted a suggested draft for a Constitution on June 18, 1787. He also submitted to the framers a proposal for the qualification requirements in Article II as to the necessary Citizenship status for the office of President and Commander in Chief of the Military.

“Alexander Hamilton’s suggested presidential eligibility clause:

“No person shall be eligible to the office of President of the United States unless he be now a Citizen of one of the States, or hereafter be born a Citizen of the United States.”

“Many of the founders and framers had a fear of foreign influence on the person who would in the future be President of the United States since this particular office was singularly and uniquely powerful under the proposed new Constitution. The President was also to be the Commander in Chief of the military. This fear of foreign influence on a future President and Commander in Chief was particularly strongly felt by John Jay, who later became the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. He felt so strongly about the issue of potential foreign influence that he took it upon himself to draft a letter to General George Washington, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention, recommending/hinting that the framers should strengthen the Citizenship requirements.

“John Jay was an avid reader and proponent of natural law and particularly Vattel’s codification of natural law and the Law of Nations. In his letter to Washington he said that the Citizenship requirement for the office of the commander of our armies should contain a “strong check” against foreign influence and he recommended to Washington that the command of the military be open only to a “natural born Citizen”. Thus Jay did not agree that simply being a “born Citizen” was sufficient enough protection from foreign influence in the singular most powerful office in the new form of government. He wanted another adjective added to the eligibility clause, i.e., ‘natural’. And that word natural goes to the Citizenship status of one’s parents via natural law.

“The below is the relevant proposed change language from Jay’s letter which he proposed to strengthen the citizenship requirements in Article II and to require more than just being a “born Citizen” of the United States to serve as a future Commander in Chief and President…..

“Hamilton’s suggested presidential citizenship eligibility requirement was that a Citizen simply had to be ‘born a Citizen’ of the USA, i.e., a Citizen by Birth. But that citizenship status was rejected by the framers as insufficient. Instead of allowing any person “born a citizen” to be President and Commander of the military, the framers chose to adopt the more stringent requirement recommended by John Jay, i.e., requiring the Citizen to be a “natural born Citizen”, to block any chance of the person with foreign allegiances or claims on their allegiance at birth from becoming President and Commander of the Military. No person having any foreign influence or claim of allegiance on them at birth could serve as a future President. The person must be a “natural born citizen” with unity of citizenship and sole allegiance to the United States at birth.”

And, pay attention, Masin: Ted Cruz: Neither a Natural Born Citizen Nor “TrusTed”

Petitioner, a law professor, Victor Williams, correctly stated “It is simply a physical impossibility for him to be both a natural-born Canadian and a natural-born American.”

In his BS decision, Masin relied on the 1898 Supreme Court case Wong Kim Ark using the Fourteenth Amendment. Either Masin can’t read English or he used deception by design because he flat out doesn’t have a clue about that case.

Leo Donofrio, as regular readers of my columns know, filed the first eligibility challenge in December 2008 against the criminal impostor in the White House. Leo covered this 14th Amendment issue:

Scroll down until you see THE FRAMERS OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT in big blue letters:

“Despite popular belief, the 14th Amendment does not convey the status of “natural born Citizen” in its text. It just conveys the status of “Citizen”. And it’s very clear that in the pre-amendment Constitution, the Framers made a distinction between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen”. The requirement to be a Senator or Representative is “Citizen”, but the requirement to be President is “natural born Citizen”.

“From the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. But even as to this conveyance of citizenship, those who were responsible for drafting the 14th Amendment made it clear that – to them – the meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant subject only to the jurisdiction thereof. Dr. John Fonte, Senior Fellow of The Hudson Institute had this to say about the issue at a Congressional hearing on dual citizenship from September 29, 2005:

“The authors in the legislative history, the authors of that language, Senator Lyman Trumbull said, ”When we talk about ’subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ it means complete jurisdiction, not owing allegiance to anybody else.” Senator Jacob Howard said that it’s ”a full and complete jurisdiction.”

“This illustrates that Congress recently discussed the issue, and they can’t claim they were unaware. But we don’t have to take Dr. Fonte’s word for it. The following discussion by the various 14th Amendment Framers took place on the Senate floor. I took it from P.A. Madison’s research at http://www.14thamendment.us:

“It is clear the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment had no intention of freely giving away American citizenship to just anyone simply because they may have been born on American soil. Again, we are fortunate enough to have on the record the highest authority tell us, Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee… and the one who inserted the phrase:

“[T]he provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ’subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

“Then Madison quotes Sen. Howard, another Framer, concurring with Trumbull:

“Sen. Howard concurs with Trumbull’s construction:” (Read rest at link above)

Constitutional attorney, Mario Apuzzo, was at the hearing and gave oral arguments also covered what Masin doesn’t seem to understand: Neither the 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 nor the Wong Kim Ark decision in 1898 makes Any Person a “natural born Citizen”. Those acts and laws create “Citizens of the U.S.” but NOT “natural born Citizens of the U.S.”

Masin further showed his ignorance:

“Masin relied heavily on the 1790 Naturalization Act in which Congress stated natural born citizens may be born outside the United States, while acknowledging the law was repealed and replaced by a 1795 law that omitted the phrase “natural-born.”

“Masin wrote: The 1790 Act provided that at birth, a child of a citizen of the United States, even if born outside the limits of the United States, was a “natural-born” citizen of the United States. No process was necessary for them to obtain this citizenship. No barrier stood in their way. Just as a child born within the limits of the United States, these children were “natural-born” citizens.”

For a full, comprehensive and accurate historical analysis on the 190 Naturalization Act, please read here but let me give you just a small quote:

“Cruz and his supporters proclaim that the Framers would have accepted Cruz as a true natural born citizen because of how the First Congress treated persons such as him in the Naturalization Act of 1790.[12] First, Congress does not have the constitutional power to make anyone a natural born citizen. In matters of citizenship, the Constitution at Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 gives to Congress only the power [t]o establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization . . . throughout the United States.” This naturalization power does not include the power to make anyone a natural born citizen, who does not need any naturalization Act of Congress or any other law to be a citizen. Congress was not given any powers to bestow citizenship upon anyone through any process other than naturalization. Hence, if Congress made those foreign-born children citizens of the United States, it did so only through its naturalization powers. For part two click below.

© 2016 – NewsWithViews.com and Devvy – All Rights Reserved

“Second, that Act is a naturalization Act of Congress and surely a natural born citizen does not need a naturalization Act of Congress to be a “natural” born citizen.” Rest at link above.

And, finally, Masin’s granddaddy:

“As demonstrated above and in the thoughtful examinations of the scholars whose materials are mentioned herein, it must be acknowledged that the arguments against finding a child born outside the United States to a non-diplomat or non-military citizen of the United States are not facetious and the issue can never be entirely free of doubt, at least barring a definitive ruling of the United States Supreme Court. While absolute certainty as to this issue is only available to those who actually sat in Philadelphia and themselves thought on the issue, having weighed the arguments as they are presented by those trying to understand the Framers’ intent, I CONCLUDE that the more persuasive legal analysis is that such a child, born of a citizen-father, citizen-mother, or both, is indeed a “natural born Citizen” within the contemplation of the Constitution. As such I CONCLUDE that Senator Cruz meets the Article II, Section I qualifications and is eligible to be nominated for President. His name may therefore appear on the New Jersey Republican primary ballot.”

What Masin and all of Cruz’s cheerleaders skip over is the word parents. Not parent, but parents. Masin’s statement that a child born of either citizen parent or both, a free for all, is natural born.

MINOR V. HAPPERSETT IS BINDING PRECEDENT AS TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by Leo Donofrio

“Since my last report, many people have asked why the definition in Minor v. Happersett of a “natural-born citizen” (as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens) is binding legal precedent. The answer is in the Court’s holding that Virginia Minor was a US citizen…because she was born in the US to parents who were citizens. That part of the actual holding is listed in the official syallbus of the case.”

Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162. The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

Words have meaning – especially in the law. Chief Justice Waite said parents, not parent.

Thoughtful scholars? Bull. Masin cherry picked a few articles off the Internet which would provide the basis for his decision. Now, he says: “It must be acknowledged that the arguments against finding a child born outside the United States to a non-diplomat or non-military citizen of the United States are not facetious and the issue can never be entirely free of doubt, at least barring a definitive ruling of the United States Supreme Court” but goes on to rule Cruz is eligible!

If the issue can never be entirely free of doubt barring a definitive ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, just how is it, Masin, you just decided to MAKE LAW with your ruling? Because that’s exactly what he did. If he truly meant free of doubt barring a definitive ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court then why make any decision? Well, I think we all know the answer to that one.

Now, either Judge Masin is stunningly ignorant or he was deliberately deceptive ignoring historical facts and court cases to rule for political expediency. In my mind there’s no question it was political expediency. But one thing for sure, his decision is rot and will be used against Prof. Williams in his challenges in eight other states unless he’s successful with an appeal. Masin has green-lighted Ted Cruz to continue with his fraud against we the people and staying in the race. As for Masin, he is a disgrace to the very robe he wears and the oath he took, but then again, this pretty much sums up individuals like Masin: “Is there anything more shameful than the man who lacks the courage to be a coward?” -Peter Blaunder

Objectors file exceptions after New Jersey ALJ declares Cruz eligible

Guess what? Remember what I said above – we all thought Jeff Masin was a judge? Turns out he is not a judge:

Citing Ethical Concerns, Williams Protests the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law’s Irregular Decision to “Recall” and Specially Appoint “Judge” Masin in Cruz Eligibility Contest.

On April 13, 2016 (at 11:30 am) Victor Williams filed an “Exception” (protest) with the New Jersey Secretary of State to respectfully but strongly disagree with the “Initial Decision” of administrative hearing officer/judge Jeff Masin.

(The media has uniformly misreported that Masin was a Judge– he is not — Masin is a hearing officer not a member of the New Jersey judiciary.)

“In addition to detailing the substantive errors in Mr. Masin’s determination, Williams raised serious ethical and procedural concerns regarding how the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law had “recalled” Mr. Masin in a special appointment to hear the Cruz dispute rather than follow regular order in the random appointment of an existing OAL hearing officer/judge.

“On April 13, 2016 (at 6:45 pm), Lt Governor/Secretary of State Kim Guadagno indolently rubber-stamped this hearing officer’s possibly-predetermined and certainly-flawed decision.

“First. Williams strongly protests the irregularity of the Office of Administrative Law’s “recall” of Jeff Masin to conduct the hearing rather than following a regular order of a random assignment of the case to a neutral officer. Mr. Masin began the hearing acknowledging that he had “been recalled” and appointed to the case because of his past experience with the natural-born citizen issue. It appears that rather than following regular order in the assignment of a neutral, objective hearing judge, the Office of Administrative Law “recalled” Mr. Masin. Any administrative economy achieved by recalling and assigning an officer because of his specific knowledge of and history with the subject/issue is of no consequence when considering the heavy costs (if only in perception) of his prejudgment. It destroys any confidence or reliability in the resulting recommendation/initial decision. To state, as some are doing, that Mr. Masin was “cherry-picked” for this case would not capture the ethical concern presented. Mr. Masin’s special appointment raises a broader concern as to the future role of the Office of Administrative Law as a component part of the Lt. Governor/Secretary of State’s internal deliberative processes in Election administration and particularly in maintaining New Jersey’s ballot integrity.

“Second. It was telling that Masin also stated at the beginnings of the hearings that he had not read the parties’ briefs (which had been due and submitted for several days before the hearing); rather Mr. Masin spent the days before the hearing reading a variety of secondary sources. Mr. Masin’s incredible accomplishment in producing a 26-page, quite-detailed recommendation in a one-day time period deserves related note . It is now clear Jeff Masin had not changed his established opinions on this issue from his time overseeing a prior natural born citizen challenge in years past. It is more than just unfortunate that the Office of Administrative Law would have irregularly “recalled” Jeff Masin for this hearing in terms of fairness and the perception of objectivity. No public confidence can be had in the resulting recommendation. ”

Exactly what happened in my Seventeenth Amendment lawsuit I filed in Austin, TX. A former judge was brought out of retirement to hear my case. He looked like Santa Claus and I bet under that robe were jeans and suspenders. He was given my case 15 minutes before court time and was totally unprepared to hear it. More than 250 documents from the Library of Congress, a CD which contained 3,000 pages and other evidence (not speculation) which the judge simply ignored and in about 20 minutes it was all over. Judge Strauss ruled fraud was just fine with him and the State of Texas. (Texas judges’ misdeeds often kept secret by oversight commission)

It is beyond reprehensible what has gone on in allowing ineligible presidential candidates on state ballots for the past three presidential election cycles. Equally as nauseating is the shenanigans and games to deny Donald Trump delegates to be the nominee before the GOP convention in July. Below are items I believe you’ll find of interest. Don’t need to read them all at once ; hit a couple over lunch and work your way through.

• Rafael “TED” Cruz’s eligibility – The whole sordid affair
• The Complete History of Ted Cruz’s Questionable Citizenship
• Supreme Court has ruled that at the time of his birth, Senator Cruz is a NATURALIZED citizen.
• Ted Cruz, Rafael Edward Cruz, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, father, family tree, ancestry, genealogy, dates, birth certificates
• Rafael Cruz, A Pro-Batista, CIA Connected Cuban In Exile? Really Ted?
• Ted Cruz’s Dad’s Connected to Lee Harvey Oswald, New Orleans “Hands Off Cuba” Sham & Dallas 1963

Trump Supporters Walk Out of Georgia Delegate Fight After Party Picks Cruz Supporter…’Uproar in the Hall’: “Donald Trump supporters walked out of a delegate election in Georgia Saturday to protest a vote that robbed Trump of all of his slated delegates from a district that he won in the primary. A Cruz-Rubio alliance at the district convention in Buford, Georgia helped to knock Trump supporters out of the district’s national delegation altogether. Cruz supporters implied that Trump’s people would “embarrass” the district at the convention in Cleveland. Then things got heated.”

• Fraud Ted Cruz continues to rack up delegates in another voter-less win – no election in Wyoming
• Trump Supporters Protest at the Colorado State Capitol: ‘Misprinted Ballots, Lost Paperwork’
• EXCLUSIVE: Colorado Volunteers: Ballot Errors Hurt Trump Delegate Candidates, Could Have Violated State Rules
• Trump Could Lose Delegates in States That Have Yet to Vote

• Reince Priebus blasted for ‘major breach of trust’ by top RNC officials
• Priebus to Trump: “Delegates And Voters Choose The Nominee”; People Don’t “Give A Darn” About Colorado
• Cruz: ‘We’ll take money from anyone’ (That’s what prostitutes say)
• Cruz PACs Paid Talk Radio Insider $8 Million Dollars – Was Money Illegally Used To Buy Talk Host Endorsements?
• Trump beats Cruz by 30% in VA district — but Cruz gets the delegates
• Election fraud: Why are voter registrations changing?

Come on, Ted. Tell us another joke like the one you told in 2013: “I am secretly a citizen of Ethiopia.” You learned well from Saul Alinsky and Barry Soetoro aka Obama.

As I write this, I have not seen anything about the release of files from J.B. Williams and is group. Hopefully, it will be soon as Cruz continues to rack up delegates:

Law Center Issues Threat to Cruz: Quit by the 17th & Admit You’re a Fraud – Or We will Expose You as One – April 9, 2016

“The North American Law Center has issued an ultimatum to the Ted Cruz campaign: “If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics. J. B. Williams, the co-founder of The North American Law Center said on April 3, 2016, “We’re talking about American citizens (who) think a guy who’s Canadian-born is eligible to be a U.S. president – without any documentation whatsoever. If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics… If we have to stop this guy from defrauding this nation, then we are going to do that.”

© 2016 – NewsWithViews.com and Devvy – All Rights Reserved

The totalitarian attitude on campus hit me in a very personal way on March 30 as I was sitting on an airplane at Reagan National Airport on my way to Albany, New York. I was informed that a campus debate I was scheduled to participate in later that day had been cancelled. I was told to get off the plane and go home.

I believe this is the first time on a college or university campus that a left-right debate has been cancelled because of objections to one side of the debate.

It appears the totalitarian left is so determined to crush the conservative point of view that it had to be suppressed even when a leftist was on the same panel.

My debate opponent, Jeff Cohen, the founder of Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), was taken aback. It was as if the far-left censors on the campus of the State University of New York (SUNY) at New Paltz didn’t think he could hold up his end of the debate.

The topic was media coverage of the presidential campaign. Jeff and I have participated in such debates many times in the past, always getting a good reception and generating many questions. The contracts had been signed. New Paltz cancelled the morning of the debate.

The student paper said the event was cancelled after a sociology professor who helps teach women’s studies had caused a controversy over my appearance. She apparently had Googled my name, turning up a denunciation of my views from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC reportedly said I had made “controversial statements in the past about Muslims, climate change and homosexuals,” and that I was “an unrepentant propagandist for extremist right-wing causes.”

I was not allowed to respond to the charges before the decision was made to prevent me from appearing.

Digging into the fiasco, the student paper said, “In a discussion that originated on the faculty email system and subsequently obtained by The New Paltz Oracle, Anne R. Roschelle, Ph.D., a sociology professor, voiced her objections to Kincaid’s involvement in the debate. However, Roschelle made clear to note that she did not seek to bar Kincaid from speaking.”

That was quite interesting. She had “voiced her objections” to my involvement in the debate but did not “seek to bar Kincaid from speaking.” Whatever the meaning of this double-talk, it appears that a faculty member had decided what students should be exposed to on campus.

She was quoted as saying that she was “not advocating he be uninvited or that people disrupt his talk.” But Roschelle said, “What I am suggesting is that for people who do go to his talk to ask critical questions and make your alternative voices heard. We are an open-minded campus.”

Yes, and that’s the purpose of a debate. A debate by definition is where different voices are heard.

It couldn’t be that she was concerned that different voices were not going to be heard. That was the whole purpose of the event. Her concern was that MY voice was going to be heard.

Of course, this isn’t the first time a conservative has been kept off campus. In this case, however, the event was a debate involving a left-wing media critic who happens to be a professor at Ithaca College. In other words, both sides were going to be represented. Still, the mere fact that I was going to be part of the debate was enough to get the event cancelled. I think this is unprecedented. It demonstrates the kind of atmosphere that exists at New Paltz.

This is the kind of “educational atmosphere” that Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), the socialist running for president, wants to subsidize with more taxpayer dollars.

This incident and others have convinced me that the old brick-and-mortar universities have run their course and need to be defunded. It’s time to replace them with true centers of learning that offer real academic freedom, and courses that teach marketable skills at a reduced cost. The kind of “political revolution” we need in this country is not of the Bernie Sanders variety. Rather, it’s a way forward that offers real learning through alternative educational institutions that provide online opportunities and career-advancement to students where they live and work.

The taxpayers who pay the bill for these Marxist re-education camps we call colleges and universities have to revolt against the socialism that rules higher education in America. Sanders wants to perpetuate that mind-set because he knows that, under the guidance of faculty from sociology, women’s and queer studies, students are being mind-controlled and groomed for jobs that don’t exist. Hence, they become more cannon-fodder for the revolution.

Perhaps the taxpayers who help fund New Paltz might want to know how such things happen in an atmosphere that is supposed to assure freedom of speech on campus. I certainly want to know.

Indeed, I am attempting to get to the bottom of the reasons for the cancellation of the event through a Freedom of Information request using a state law meant to assure transparency in state government and state-funded institutions. Let’s see if the university administration will follow the law and give me the names.

I want to determine who on the campus was part of the process to deny students the right to hear a left-right debate on coverage of the campaign.

New Paltz declares on its website: “Creativity permeates campus life at New Paltz. The learning atmosphere has an air of imaginative inquiry that bridges all academic endeavors. The faculty encourages students to question, experiment, and discover in ways that lead to innovative thinking.”

But not in this case.

The website also declares that a New Paltz education is “one that retains lifelong relevance through what is required to achieve it: broad and specific knowledge, exposure to differing perspectives, open-minded inquiry, and a spirit of inventiveness.”

But not in this case.

Parents who consider New Paltz for their students are being given a big dose of false advertising.

I informed University President Donald P. Christian in a letter:

“I was very disappointed for the lost opportunity to share my ideas with young college students. I had thought that a college campus was the perfect place for an exchange of ideas. I have had two of my sons go through college, and my youngest, who is turning 17, is on a tour of college campuses.

• “What should I tell him about New Paltz being open to different ideas and freedom of speech and expression?
• “Why should any student or parent consider New Paltz as an option for those who engage in free thinking, rational thought, and open debate and discussion?
• “Why has this happened at New Paltz, alone among many different colleges and universities?”

Later that day, after receiving my letter, the administration reversed itself, saying they wanted to reschedule and bring the debate to campus after all. Unfortunately, my schedule wouldn’t permit such an event until the fall. I look forward to going back, with adequate security and police protection.

By then, I should have the answers to why, in an unprecedented development, a debate was cancelled on a university campus.

What we know so far is that “diversity” on campus doesn’t apply to diversity in thought and opinion. These institutions of “higher education” are bankrupt financially and morally.

© 2016 Cliff Kincaid – All Rights Reserved

If you have ever read George Orwell’s novel “1984” you know it paints a very dark but all too prescient picture of a totalitarian government. A civil government which rules its citizens with an iron fist. The deceptive use of language was the critical element for the government system of bondage by which it enslaved the people. It worked tirelessly to lie to the people.

“In Orwell’s thriller, electronic surveillance conducted by the omnipresent “Big Brother” was a major factor, as was the development and implementation of a language, Newspeak, that was devised to control thought over time by eliminating words from the vernacular. When words were eliminated, thoughts and concepts those words represented would be eliminated.

Furthermore, terms to describe government agencies were often the opposite of what their respective missions were… The omnipresent Party understood that “who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

The world in which the residents of 1984 resided was a world of deception and lies where “up” was “down” and “right” was “wrong.” In 1984 the use of conflicting terms were designed to be disorienting and intimidating to better gain total control over the masses.”[1]

Don’t we see that fulfilled in our land today? 2016 is 1984. A Federal government spending billions to spy on us and everything we do, supposedly for our security. That statement is a clear example of the Newspeak Orwell spoke of. They claim they have to break the Law, specifically the 4th Amendment, for our own good. Sounds like an excuse a burglar might make as he breaks into your house – “I’m really doing this for your own good, just trust me on that.”

There are multitudes of examples of Newspeak we could expose. I saw another example on a bumper sticker this week. It was simple; “Legalize Love.” What would that have meant 50 years ago? Decriminalize fornication. How about 40 years ago? Decriminalize adultery. Even ten years ago it would probably have meant decriminalize sodomy. By the way just spilling ink on paper does not change the laws of the universe, these are still crimes even though the civil government has claimed to change them. And the laws of the universe still bring to bear the Creator’s punishments for violating His law. Also we must note, none of those things supposedly “legalized” are love. They are sin, and to be sure, sins driven by powerful lusts; but lust is not love. So what what could that bumper sticker possibly mean today? With fornication, adultery and sodomy and even sodomite unmarriage now supposedly legalized, what’s next? Rape, Pedophilia, beastiality or what other unspeakable perversion? I don’t know the answer because the bumper sticker didn’t say, but I thought to myself there is another illustration of the Newspeak so prevalent in our land.

Well the biggest lie being promulgated by Newspeak is this (it is so subtle that you may not clearly detect it without some careful thought) that lie is this – government is God. That it is a being who has unlimited powers, unending resources, it can (if you are a compliant obedient subject) provide for you from cradle to grave, it will fulfill your most important needs in life.

It will educate you, provide a job for you, give you an income in your older years when you can no longer work, it will provide for all of your health care needs and even your wants. Want a sex change operation, the government is there for you, gave birth to children without a husband, well you don’t need one, the government will do nearly everything for you a husband would do. The government is your ever present companion, watching you every moment listening in on most of your conversations. You never need worry about safety or security because the government is there to protect you from all harm. In short who needs God when you have the government on your side. It claims omniscience, omnipresence and omnipotence, knowing all, being everywhere, and all powerful. That is a claim to deity, a blasphemous demand for worship.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2016 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

During a recent talk at Brooklyn Law School, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed, “It is important that we have greater diversity on the Supreme Court” and, “I, for one, do think there is a disadvantage from having (five) Catholics, three Jews, every one from an Ivy League school.”

Sotomayor is both a Catholic and an Ivy League school graduate. With regards to her reference of the popularized concept of multiculturalism, I wonder, could this perceivably be a good thing for American Government?

You might not realize it, but this is a very important question.

The current “politically correct” viewpoint argues that pluralism – the acceptance and celebration of differing religions, philosophies and ideologies — contributes to the strength of America. Though diversity of culture and backgrounds is the beauty of America, antagonism towards our Christian foundation is not.

You can see this “modern pluralism” at work in the widespread attempt to sanitize schools, courts and courthouses, and public buildings and places, of any reference to God, Christ and the Bible.

This agenda is based on the notion that we are a more stable, prosperous society because we embrace diversity, toleration and acceptance of anything and everything.

But is this true? Those who founded and fought for our American culture and our American form of government didn’t think so. In fact they had a very different view.

You are probably familiar with the name of Samuel F. B. Morse. He was the inventor who developed the Morse Code.

But his father, Jedidiah Morse was a pretty famous person as well. A Yale graduate, he was an educator who is still known as the “Father of American Geography”.

Here’s what he said about the importance of Christianity to the culture and the administration of government:

“To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness which mankind now enjoys. In proportion as the genuine effects of Christianity are diminished in any nation, either through unbelief, or the corruption of its doctrines, or the neglect of its institutions; in the same proportion will the people of that nation recede from the blessings of genuine freedom, and approximate the miseries of complete despotism.”

Was Jedidiah Morse right about this?

Asked another way, how is this multiculturalism working out for our culture?

As we see the role of Christianity diminished in our country — as we see our institutions abandon or corrupt its doctrine — are things getting better or worse for us?

When we eliminate biblical standards – When paganism or immoral philosophies of other religions are considered protected, do we have greater freedom?

If Morse was right, America is in trouble.

Our Founding generation fought and died for something. If we now believe that there is nothing that is wrong, then what did they fight against and what did they die for?

Or did they know something we have forgotten?

Psalm 33:12 reminds us, as it informed them, “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord”.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2016 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved

Bernie Sanders, a draft-dodging self-proclaimed “Socialist” who evaded service in the Vietnam War by seeking “conscientious objector” status as an alleged “pacifist opposed to all war,” now seeks to be elected Democrat President and Commander-in-Chief, empowered to send other Americans to war although he refused to serve himself. His perfidy in the Vietnam War, if not perjury, disqualifies him from being elected to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief now.

Oddly enough, although television anchors “moderating” the 2016 presidential campaign debates refer to Sanders as “authentic,” they have failed to question him about, or investigate, his evasion of military service in Vietnam by claiming to be a “pacifist” opposed to all wars as required for conscientious objector status. He wasn’t believed then– he was denied c.o. status — and the excuses he offers now for his non-service should not be believed.

Indeed, the excuses offered by Sanders and his campaign for his claim of being a committed “pacifist” opposed to all war in order to evade the draft just cannot withstand scrutiny.

First, he claims that while he is still a sincere Socialist, as he was then as a college radical, he is no longer a “pacifist” as he was then. How does one stop being a committed “pacifist,” if it is a “sincerely held belief,” as he claimed in order to evade military service and have someone else serve in his place in Vietnam? Did he stop being a “pacifist opposed to all war” when the Vietnam War or Draft ended and he was safe from service?

His campaign admits that Sanders sought conscientious objector status when his Draft number came up. They also admit that his claim of being a “pacifist” was rejected as a back then and he was denied c.o. status. But, they explain, he appealed the ruling against him, and the process dragged out so long that he became “too old” to be drafted.

How does that work? Sanders doesn’t say when he received his draft notice to which he responded by claiming c.o. status as a “pacifist.” But he had to receive draft notice, as otherwise there is no reason to file for c.o. status.

Sanders was born in 1941, and the draft age cutoff was “35,” in the Vietnam era. He would not have been age 35 until 1976 — three years after all troops came home. So, the excuse that he was “too old” to be drafted by the time he was drafted appears as false as his “pacifist” claim.

Significantly, Sanders doesn’t claim he had a college deferment. He graduated from college in 1964, when he was 23. In 1966, he married his first wife, “Honeymooning” in the Soviet Union. Both Jews, they lived in a kibbutz in Israel for a time. As far as is known, Sanders did not volunteer to serve in the kibbutz in Israel on condition that, as a pacifist, he would not fight to defend the kibbutz if it was was attacked, as many were, or if Israel was again invaded.

So, how is it that Sanders was young enough and healthy enough to volunteer to serve on a kibbutz in Israel and potentially have to defend it if attacked, but not young enough to volunteer for, or be drafted into, military service to defend his own country during the Vietnam War?

Many, many, Vietnam-era Americans were opposed to the Vietnam War. Many people drafted were opposed to that war–but they served when the country called, not being so arrogant as to believe that someone else should serve in their place because they disagreed with the particular war to which they were called to serve.

Many others opposed to the war agreed to perform alternative service. Many fled the country, most heading to Socialist sanctuaries like Sweden. (One of former Democrat President Jimmy Carter’s first acts was to issue an Executive Order granting all such draft dodgers them immunity from prosecution, regardless of the impact on those who did serve.) Others opposed to the Vietnam War went to jail rather than serve. Many simply lied to evade service.

The most well-known of those Vietnam War draft-dodgers proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied to avoid service when their draft number came up is, of course: Bill Jefferson (“BJ”) Clinton, later Democrat President, sexual satyr and seducer of 21-year-old intern Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office, and husband of Hillary Clinton, Sanders’ Democrat opponent for the 2016 Democrat Nomination for President.

Regarding Hillary Clinton, as Bernie Sanders’ acts claiming to be a “pacifist opposed to all war” in Vietnam to avoid the Draft should disqualify him, Hillary Clinton, too, should be disqualified as Commander-in-Chief by her actions, non-actions, and utter lies in the Bengazi, Libya, scandal. Indeed, the blood of the American Ambassador and three other Americans murdered in Benghazi by Islamic terrorists is on Hillary Clinton’s hands, and the hands of Barack Obama. (See, e.g., “13 Hours In Benghazi: The Inside Account Of What Really Happened” by Mitchell Zuckoff and the members of the Annex Security Team who survived the Islamic terrorist attack of 9-11-2012, fighting terrorists for 13 hours waiting for help that never came due to Hillary and Obama. See also the movie based on the book, “13 Hours.”)

Was Sanders one of those, like Bill Clinton, who lied his way out of service? Was Sanders really a “pacifist,” who was “sincerely” opposed to all wars? Or was Sanders merely one of the many who opposed the Vietnam War, but not all wars, and evaded service and caused others to serve in their place?

Sanders may have had a “sincere belief” that the Vietnam War was wrong, as did so many others. But opposition to a particular war does not give Sanders, or anyone else, a license to claim to be a “pacifist” opposed to all war — a claim of Sanders which was not believed then by Selective Service as other than phony — while another American was drafted to serve in his place.

If Sanders did what he did because of his opposition to the war, then he should have had the integrity to pay the price that his lifelong hero, Eugene Debs, Socialist and Pacifist, did. Debs went to jail, as did other socialists, communists, and pacifists in Debs’ era in WWI.

Sanders did not declare his opposition to the Vietnam War, as Debs declared his opposition to WWI, and go to jail for refusal to serve in that war. Instead, he apparently lied, on a phony claim that he was a pacifist, opposed to all war. He had to claim to be a pacifist opposed to all war in order to try evade the Draft because, as far as is known, no court has ever found that “sincere” opposition to a particular war, rather than all war, provides a basis for conscientious objector status.

Why did Sanders do what he did? What are all the facts, including about the manifest fiction that he was “too old” to be drafted? Those are questions which he has not answered and which the media has neglected to probe, while advising and assuring Americans that Sanders is “authentic” in his claims. Really?

When Sanders’ draft number came up and he lied his way out of service on a claim being a “pacifist opposed all war,” was that “authentic”? When Sanders did what he did, the draft number of next American on the draft list came up. That American was drafted to serve in the Vietnam War because “authentic” Bernie Sanders filed a phony claim of being a sincere “pacifist opposed to all war”? Did the draftee who served because Sander’s didn’t survive the war? Was he wounded? What was the impact on the life the person who was drafted because Sanders was not? How does this evidence “authenticity” in Bernie Sanders?

Seven per cent of Americans of Sanders’ generation served in Vietnam, whether or not they believed in the Vietnam War. Fifty-eight thousand of those Americans who served when called died. Several hundred thousand were wounded. As veterans say, “All gave some; some gave all.” Not Bernie Sanders, who lied his way out of service, and caused someone else to serve in his place. What is “authentic” about that?

Sanders today dodges questions about his draft-dodging in the Vietnam War on his claim of being a sincerely believing “pacifist” opposed to all war. Instead, he assures Americans that he is no longer a “pacifist” (“His thinking has evolved,” his campaign claims, without explanation.” Sanders, notwithstanding prior “pacifist” claims, now claims he is ready, willing, able to wage war if necessary as Commander-in-Chief, if elected in what he says is his “history making campaign” to become “the first Jewish President,” not to mention “first Socialist” and “first (allegedly former) pacifist” President. Is Sanders’ dodging of questions about his draft-dodging in Vietnam, his obviously false excuse that he became “too old” to be drafted as his c.o. appeal dragged on, evidence that Sanders is “authentic”? If so, an “authentic” what?

It must be asked: If Sanders’ claim of being a “sincere” pacifist in the Vietnam War was true, then how was he able to so easily betray and abandon his alleged “sincere belief” as a “pacifist opposed to all war”? If Sanders could betray his alleged “sincere” belief in pacifism, how is it that he can be trusted not to betray his “sincere” representations now that he is not a pacifist and will wage war, including all-out war, if necessary, as Commander-in-Chief?

I respectfully propose that anyone who claims to a true “pacifist” in one war, is forever disqualified to be President and Commander-in-Chief.

This is especially true now, when we are at war with fanatical Islamic terrorism bent on conquering America, and the world, for Islamic rule under the Muslim Caliphate and Sharia Law. Islam is a religion, but it is also a political ideology, and that ideology is a form of totalitarian fascism. Islamofascism, because it is also a religion, is no less a totalitarian threat to American freedom today than was Adolph Hitler’s National Socialist fascism in WWII. The Commander-in-Chief must be prepared to wage war against Islamic terrorists who are waging war on “the Great Satan,” us, the United States, not appease it by pretending it is other than what it is and refusing to name it for what it is, i.e., Islamic terrorism. No pacifist can wage that war if necessary.

Therefore, anyone who evades military service by claiming to be a “pacifist” in one war should be disqualified to serve later as Commander-in-Chief. Period.

In sum, If any candidate’s claim to be a “pacifist is true, then he or she must be disqualified because sincerely held pacifism means opposition to all war, and would prevent that candidate from taking the military action necessary to protect the American people as Commander-in-Chief, the chief duty of the President being the defense of America and Americans.

If a candidate’s claim to be a “pacifist” in a former war turns out not to have been true but a dodge to evade military service, then that candidate should be disqualified to be Commander-in-Chief for lack of integrity and trustworthiness, a person capable of changing core principles like changing clothes, a liar about supposed core values.

Therefore, Bernie Sanders should be disqualified on either ground. Further, Sanders’ candidacy to be President and Commander-in-Chief is an insult to all who did serve in the Vietnam War era when called to defend American freedom.

© 2016 Rees Lloyd – All Rights Reserved

“The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest.” —Thomas Jefferson

In my last article regarding the attempted coup within Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum, I explained how this attempted takeover by six Eagle Forum leaders was done basically because they disagreed with Phyllis’s endorsement of Donald Trump, who she called, “America’s last hope,” but there is more. 

It’s All About Money

In a recent radio interview, Phyllis stated their real goal was to take control of the organization and get their hands on the assets and the lists. Why would they want to do that, and why did they come out last January and state that Eagle Forum was endorsing Ted Cruz?

The answer lies in the fact that there are two organizations within Eagle Forum. Phyllis’s son, John Schlafly, explained that last Monday’s vote was regarding the 501(c)3, educationally oriented non-profit organization of Eagle Forum, not the 501(c)4 organization that allows it to support political issue campaigns.

“The two organizations have different boards,” John explained, “and those opposing Phyllis only have a majority in the 501(c)4.” This is where the money lies, and money that can be given to candidates. A 501(c)4 allows endorsements of candidates. The 501(c)3 allows tax free status as a charitable foundation by the IRS, but endorsements of candidates are prohibited.

The problem is that the 501(c)4 controls the name Eagle Forum, meaning the future of the organization will be uncertain if the 501(c)4 leaders succeed in ousting Phyllis Schlafly as its chairperson and CEO. So far they have failed in this attempt.

The six women involved in this attempted takeover were backing Ted Cruz as well as many of them backing a Constitutional Convention which Phyllis has always taken a stance against. If they could take over, then the assets in the 501(c)4 would be theirs to use as they wished. 

Take Note: Donald J. Trump does not want or need private monies for his campaign and has refused all but minor donations from American citizens who support him. Ted Cruz’s campaign has accepted monies from people he will be beholden to in the event he is elected, and these entities are corporate, banking, political, and religious. 

It appears the intended goal of these women was to take control of the assets of Eagle Forum in order to put these monies behind the candidate of their choice, Ted Cruz.

Eagle Forum Responses

I received a huge number of responses to my previous article, the majority of which were from Eagle Forum members who agreed with what I stated in the article, and were outraged over what was done. Here is a letter to me from Jim Schindler of Colorado Eagle Forum:

Your article is accurate for the most part. However, the reference to Cruz hailing Eagle Forum’s endorsement from 20 state leaders is from back in January of this year.

We regret adding our names to the list endorsing him and have subsequently withdrawn our support of him, as have others. I can confirm our retraction as well as one other. Jayne Schindler and Jim Schindler of Colorado Eagle Forum, and Susan Ellsworth of Arizona Eagle Forum.

Those who have engulfed on this hostile takeover of Eagle Forum are receiving many communications outwardly criticizing this coup attempt, so I would imagine that there will be more confirmations of withdrawals from the list of Cruz supporters offered back in January 2016!

Phyllis Schlafly has earned, and is receiving support from around the country. This is truly an American tragedy!

Sincerely,
Jim Schindler

I wrote back to Mr. Schindler and thanked him for writing to me, and asked if he would allow me to use his statements. He then sent me another email which made it clear that many of the Eagle Forum members and officers were very angry at the attempted coup. He sent me the following letter from Joan F. Langenberg, Former President of Missouri Eagle Forum, and Mr. Schindler’s comments follow.

Dear Group of 6,

I and many others are appalled at your meeting this past Monday, and the actions decided upon. Your attempt at a hostile takeover of Eagle Forum is truly unconscionable. I am particularly shocked at the actions of Anne Cori. For a daughter to treat her mother in such an egregious and disrespectful way is unspeakable. And to present your betrayal of Phyllis and Eagle Forum as a noble action is beyond hypocrisy. Everyone knows that this deceptive action to take control is because of Phyllis’s endorsement of Trump and your opposition to Ed Martin. Why didn’t your group have the honesty and courage to state these things in your press release? It’s incredible to me that you would be willing to destroy a person, tear a family apart, and betray an organization over the endorsement of a Republican candidate that many conservative leaders have endorsed. And to demand the resignation of Ed Martin, who has been an excellent leader and a loyal friend to Phyllis, is outrageous. 

If you were that upset with the Trump endorsement and Ed Martin’s leadership – the proper and right action would be to resign – not to maneuver an illegal takeover and demand resignations. It’s very noteworthy that all of Phyllis’s 5 other children are solidly behind her. Finally, to betray Phyllis with false rumors and to take these despicable actions against Eagle Forum is antithetical to the moral values upon which Eagle Forum’s foundation is built.

All of you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Sincerely,
Joan F. Langenberg Former President of Missouri Eagle Forum

I believe Ms. Langenberg’s letter is really quite telling of how the majority of Eagle Forum member and officers truly feel. Here is the response to Ms. Langenberg by Mr. Schindler:

Dear Joan, 

You have eloquently stated all of our exact feelings about this tragic action by a select few who have obviously combined both motive and opportunity to move on their personal biases.

It is truly shameful, and we support Phyllis, Ed, John and Andy and the rest of the Schlafly family who will stand true to this most wonderful leader.

Blessings,
Jayne and Jim Schindler, Colorado Eagle Forum Co-directors

Conclusion

Phyllis Schlafly’s April 10th letter regarding this attempted takeover, she stated, in part, the following:

In recent days, you may have heard about some issues we are having at Eagle Forum. I am grateful for your concern for me and our work. 

For reasons that are not entirely clear to me, some people have been working to attack me and Eagle Forum. My disappointment is compounded by the fact that these are people with whom I have worked closely in the past. I have asked them to resign from the Board immediately so that we may continue our important work. 

Phyllis also stated in radio interviews that Eagle Forum members could, of course, support and vote for anyone they wished. However, Eagle Forum is run by Phyllis Schlafly, and Schlafly has endorsed Donald J. Trump.

Once again we see the disastrous results of involvement with the likes of Ted Cruz who will take advantage of any source to gain both endorsements and campaign funds.

Like the majority of Eagle Forum members and leaders, I too am appalled at the actions of these six women. At the age of 91, Phyllis Schlafly surely didn’t need to go through this stressful attack. My worries are what will happen to the organization once Phyllis is no longer with us. I pray they have put protections in place that will disable any future attempts to destroy Eagle Forum.

I recently received this email. It made me think.

You GOTTA LOVE this COUNTRY

My Dogs

This morning I went to sign my dogs up for welfare. At first the lady said, “Dogs are not eligible to draw welfare.” So I explained to her that my dogs are mixed in color, unemployed, lazy, can’t speak English and have no frigging
clue who their Daddies are. They expect me to feed them and provide them with housing and medical care.

So the welfare clerk looked in her policy book to see what it takes to qualify for welfare. My dogs get their first checks Friday.

Darn, this is a great country.

*******

My liberal friends would label this commentary as racist and then ignore the reality of people taking advantage of government (taxpayer) largesse. My conservative friends would label this commentary as truthful and then ignore the racist undertones. I understand the human desire to help those in need. I also understand that any taxpayer support must be short term with strict oversight or we get what we’ve gotten, a permanent welfare class supported by a burgeoning bureaucracy and a growing police state. Without checks, there is no balance.

Questions we can ask liberals and conservatives.

1. For Liberals: Why won’t liberals confront the reality that there are many people taking advantage of taxpayer largesse and advocate for systems that have limits and real oversight?
2. For Liberals: What should taxpayers think when people demand unending services but refuse to educate and upgrade themselves and their life situation?
3. For Liberals: Why do you automatically think it is understandable and forgivable for “poor” people to take improper advantage of middleclass taxpayers?
4. For Liberals: Why do you automatically think it is “fascist,” “typical,” uncharitable, not proper, etc. for taxpayers to want to weed out those scamming “the system” and restrict payments to those in genuine need?
5. For Liberals: Why do you not back efforts at real welfare reform, which examine Waste, Fraud, and Abuse within the Welfare systems?
6. For Liberals: How is it proper for young adults to refuse to educate themselves and to then expect the “right” to live on welfare for the rest of their lives and going forward for generations, as their parents have, going back several generations?
7. For Conservatives: When and why does an emphasis on maintaining standards become legitimately racist, mean spirited and wrongheaded?
8. For Conservatives: Does it matter if your opinion is racist, mean spirited or wrongheaded if you stop welfare cheats?
9. For Conservatives: Should we always allow people to wallow in their own lack of foresight, or should taxpayers provide long term support, or support only in emergencies, or should we not provide any taxpayer support at all?
10. For Conservatives: Should we go back to the old system of letting the churches and private institutions provide the help for the poor or has the situation gotten so out of hand that taxpayer support is necessary?
11. For Conservatives: Are there racial, class and other economic realities which conservatives ignore and should taxpayers be required to pay for them?
12. For Conservatives: Is it OK for people to go to churches and private institutions for help or is it too demeaning and therefore, public support is necessary to provide help?

13. For Conservatives: Why do conservatives feel a welfare program should be eliminated versus being well and properly controlled?
14. For Conservatives: Do you like receiving some of the government sponsored benefits being paid by taxpayers? Which ones would you give up?
15. For Liberals: When does help in an emergency cross over to being dependent care?
16. For Liberals: Why do liberals think it OK to steal the sustenance from the productive in order to give it to the non-productive?
17. For Liberals: Why do liberals get so exercised by symbolism and ignore realities, i.e. labeling “non-productive” as a racist term but never holding non-productive persons accountable?
18. For Liberals: Why do liberals think that theft via taxation for a supposed social good is not really theft?
19. For Both: How is society benefited when the number of individuals receiving taxpayer subsidies and the high amount of those subsidies relentlessly limit the upward mobility of the taxpayers because the taxpayer must take a second job to pay the bills instead of using that time to get further education?
20. For Both: How is society benefited when corporations receiving taxpayer subsidies relentlessly limit the upward mobility of regular taxpayers?
21. For Both: How is society benefited when corporations are allowed to become so large that they squeeze out lesser competition, and with the connivance of government, become monopolies and the dictators of policy?
22. For Both: What is worse; people surviving at a low level with lots of government help and little potential to rise because of overwhelming government control, or because of little government control, people surviving at a low level but with the real potential of rising?
23. For Liberals: Is mere subsistence existence the desired end or is it the obligation of the lucky (providers) to forever provide for the unlucky (takers)?
24. For Liberals: Why and how is it a good thing for the government to transfer wealth from those who have it to those who do not?
25. For Conservatives: Why is allowing the unlimited size of a corporation seen as good and a right, rather than being seen as bad and a monopoly or oligopoly or part of a cartel?
26. For both: Why do we continue to believe the same, unending promises of “change” made by those seeking power?
27. For both: Why do those, having gained power, never, ever live up to the promises they made?
28. For Both: What is it about the human race that it will continually suffer the indignities perpetrated by those wishing to retain power?
29. For Liberals: In each socialistic society large business entities still operate. Why do liberals not see that liberal leaders merely want to transfer the power from Crony Capitalists to themselves?
30. For Liberals: The little understood but actual definition of Socialism should be, “A marketing system intended to keep those at the top in control over those at the bottom.” After seeing that no Socialistic society has benefited mankind, you still cleave to Socialism and its fellow travelers, Fascism, Communism, Egalitarianism, Fabianism, etc. Why do you believe The Freedom Philosophy does not move men forward?
31. For Conservatives: Why don’t you believe in The Freedom Philosophy enough to help move it forward?
32. For All: The US Constitution set up a negative form of government, i.e. government that is required to defend a person’s natural rights to their life, liberty and property, acting as a sheriff to right a wrong after it has been committed. The Constitution IS the republic. Why won’t you defend “the republic” as you have pledged your allegiance to do?
33. For All: Why have you not come to study and understand how the concept of positive government, i.e. government creating rules to protect a person, gives government power while it deprives Americans of responsibility and freedom of action. Government gets the power to make and administer the rules and the power to enforce its rules against the people.

Negative versus Positive Government

The argument for positive government is that it is supposed to prevent law breaking. However, persons of good will, and that is most of us, consistently perform good behavior. We don’t break the rules, especially the unwritten rules. Positive government only gives government power and takes it away from citizens. Those disposed to breaking the rules don’t care if rules exist, that’s why some are criminals. Therefore, it is axiomatic that the positive government rules are in existence merely to enable power to exist, i.e. to allow the powerful to control those who would do correct behavior even if the rules were not in place.

If government were not in place, the Natural Law of Self Defense enables each person to hold accountable those who steal or harm, hence, the idea of Citizen’s Arrest. Because it is not convenient or possible for all of us to chase criminals, we hire a sheriff and entitle his office with the power of the people’s rights to arrest so as to defend US. The sheriff has no more power than each of US.

Every time I hear someone say that the Constitution is a “living” document, I immediately ask what is meant by that. I’m always told that, “the Constitution can change with the times;” that, “the Constitution was written for an agrarian society.” Some say this view is dangerous.

I ask them to compare the Constitution to the Ten Commandments. The ideas in the Ten Commandments are truths that endure, truths upon which an entire society can be based and prosper. I ask, “Would you do away with ‘Thou shalt not steal.’? “Of course not,” they say. “Why not?” I ask. “The Ten Commandments are very old and were given during an agrarian economy – that seems to be your criteria.”

People sort of shrug, realizing that their ideas are not fully formed but they don’t change their minds because they have been brainwashed to think that positive government “is a good thing.”

People see a problem and human nature requires a solution. Because government has become the be all and end all, they endorse some government solution which usually makes things worse; which of course, requires more government “solutions.”

I have never understood why people do not take seriously the lessons learned from their own experience or from the experience of others? Why do we not make the clear connection between: 1. someone advocating a government solution, 2. the idea that it is the government that then has the power and 3. that despite overwhelming evidence, the belief that a government bureaucrat will not exercise power for his own benefit, which usually equates to the detriment of the people.

People are naïve believing that lawmakers and bureaucrats are going to make rules that will “fix” the problem. Lawmakers, under the spell of lobbyists, make law to assuage the public demand. Bureaucrats, who someday hope to be lobbyists, make sets of rules which set standards, but allow for lots of loophole exceptions. The lawmakers only speak about the high standards – but within the industry regulated, they instruct how to invoke the loopholes.

The Answer

The answer to all the madness in society is Tort Law. This is the law of negligence. People, having been hurt by some action, are able to get compensated for the harm done. However, legal, corporate and other systems have been purposefully devised to evade legal and moral responsibility and personal and corporate liability. If the Common Law attitudes of responsibility and adherence to standards were followed, much negative in society would dissolve.

Examples of Negligence: Ralph Nader, in “Unsafe At Any Speed” outlined how the Chevy Corvair and other American cars were purposefully not designed to reflect safety needs. Lee Iacocca at Ford, who stated, “safety doesn’t sell,” was an icon of the economic appraisal of human life ideal. Iacocca signed the memo foregoing the retrofit to the Pinto because the analysis showed it would cost less to pay the monetary damages than to fix the car. The analysis showed Ford would benefit monetarily more if it allowed more victims to burn when the Pinto burst into flames from a rear collision than to fix the car. This was cost-benefit analysis run amuck. Yet, Portfolio named Iacocca the 18th-greatest American CEO of all time.

Example of a Tort Law solution: Instead of being absolved by corporate cover, just imagine if Iacocca had been held personally responsible for his Pinto decision. Along with the monetary damages, imagine that charges of Conspiracy to Commit Murder had been leveled at Iacocca and the rest of the upper management at Ford and the Ford Board of Directors? Imagine further that they had been found guilty of this malicious conduct. Imagine if the assets of these individuals had been taken to compensate victims and to pay for court costs.

Result: For their good decision making, corporate management and Directors get well compensated and receive bonuses. Were corporate managements and Boards of Directors to be held personally responsible for a bad decision, then self-preservation requires that all businesses in all industries would self-regulate. The idea that business would stop is silly. People do business all the time without the benefit of legal “protections.”

Result: Trial lawyers would need to seek other areas of law to work. If high level managers were being held responsible for their actions, I expect nuisance lawsuits would disappear, freeing up the courts, because juries would then also hold regular individuals to a higher standard and not pay out for spilling hot water on themselves when driving, as in the famous McDonald’s case. Much government regulation would not be seen as necessary, therefore lobbyists would need other employment, lawmakers could restrict themselves to making law within the bounds set by the Constitution, government could be reduced, taxpayers could keep their monies and citizens and residents, legal or not, could live, work and prosper in an America that embodied the vision of the Founders.

Freedom Requires Responsibility. This idea applies to all areas of our lives.

G-d Bless US –

© 2016 Mitchell Goldstein – All Rights Reserved

At this point in time, Barack Obama works feverishly to inject as many Muslims into America to seed our country with that religion. It likes to call itself “The religion of peace.” However, it’s continued onslaught of Western countries shows it to be the “The religion of pieces.” Muslim martyrs blow themselves to pieces while they blow us all to pieces, i.e., 9/11, Paris, France; Charlie Hebdo massacre; Brussels, Belgium, Fort Hood; Boston Marathon bombers; Times Square bomber; beheadings on the streets of London, England and honor killings of daughters and wives at 10,000 annually. (Source: United Nations, Honor killings annually.)

Safe to say, Islam proves itself violent and a religion of pieces of body parts from detonations worldwide.

You must ask yourself why you continue electing senators and presidents who create wars in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Why do you accept trillions of dollars of your tax money to pay for them or go into debt for them? Why did you allow $19 for our national debt by electing people who created that debt? Why do you accept 15-year wars in barbaric countries like Afghanistan?

To give you a down to earth idea of what actually occurs in Afghanistan, here is an interview by a U.S. Recon Marine who asked that his name be kept private. He speaks from what he calls, “The Sandpit.”

“It’s freezing here,” he said. “I’m sitting on hard cold dirt between rocks and shrubs at the base of the Hindu Kush Mountains, along the Dar’yoi Pamir River, watching a hole that leads to a tunnel that leads to a cave. Stake out, my friend, and no pizza delivery for thousands of miles.

“I also glance at the area around my ass every ten to fifteen seconds to avoid another scorpion sting. I’ve actually given up battling the chiggers and sand fleas, but the scorpions give a jolt like a cattle prod. Hurts like a bastard. The antidote tastes like transmission fluid, but God bless the Marine Corps for the five vials of it in my pack. The one truth the Taliban cannot escape is that, believe it or not, they are human beings, which means they have to eat food and drink water. That requires couriers and that’s where an old bounty hunter like me comes in handy.

“I track the couriers, locate the tunnel entrances and storage facilities, type the info into the hand held, and shoot the coordinates up to the satellite link that tells the air commanders where to drop the hardware. We bash some heads for a while, and then I track and record the new movement. It’s all about intelligence. We haven’t even brought in the snipers yet. These scurrying rats have no idea what they’re in for. We are but days away from cutting off supply lines and allowing the eradication to begin. But you know me; I’m a romantic. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: This country blows, man. It’s not even a country. There are no roads, there’s no infrastructure, there’s no government.

“This is an inhospitable, rock-pit shit-hole ruled by 7th century warring tribes. There are no jobs here like we know jobs. Afghanistan offers only two ways for a man to support his family, join the opium trade or join the army. That’s it. Those are your options. Oh, I forgot, you can also live in a refugee camp and eat plum-sweetened, crushed beetle paste and squirt mud like a goose with stomach flu, if that’s your idea of a party. But the smell alone of those ‘tent cities of the walking dead’ is enough to hurl you into the poppy fields to cheerfully scrape bulbs for eighteen hours a day.

“I’ve been living with these Tajiks and Uzbeks, and Turkmen and even a couple of Pashtu’s, for over a month-and-a-half now, and this much I can say for sure: These guys, are Huns, actual, living Huns. They LIVE to fight. It’s what they do. It’s ALL they do. They have no respect for anything; not for themselves, their families, or for each other. They claw at one another as a way of life. They play polo with dead calves and force their five-year-old sons into human cockfights to defend the family honor. Just Huns, roaming packs of savage, heartless beasts that feed on each other’s barbarism. Cavemen with AK-47’s. Then again, maybe I’m just a cranky young bastard.

“I’m freezing my ass off on this stupid hill because my lap warmer is running out of juice, and I can’t recharge it until the sun comes up in a few hours. Oh yeah! You like to write letters, right? Do me a favor, Bizarre. Write a letter to CNN and tell Wolf and Anderson and that awful, sneering, pompous Aaron Brown to stop calling the Taliban “smart”. They are not smart. I suggest CNN invest in a dictionary because the word they are looking for is “cunning”. The Taliban are cunning, like jackals, hyenas, and wolverines. They are sneaky and ruthless, and when confronted, they are cowardly. They are hateful, malevolent parasites who create nothing and destroy everything else.

“Smart? Bullshit! Yeah, they’re real smart: most can’t read, but they’ve spent their entire lives listening to Imams telling them about only one book (Qur’an and not a very good one, as books go). They consider hygiene and indoor plumbing to be products of the devil. They’re still trying to figuring out how to work a Bic lighter. Talking to a Taliban warrior about improving his quality of life is like trying to teach an ape how to hold a pen. Eventually he just gets frustrated and sticks you in the eye with it.

“Snuffle will be up soon, so I have to get back to my hole. Covering my tracks in the snow takes a lot of practice, but I’m good at it.

“Please, I tell you and my fellow Americans to turn off the TV sets and move on with your lives. The story line you are getting from CNN and other news agencies is utter bullshit and designed not to deliver truth but rather to keep you glued to the screen so you will watch the next commercial. We’ve got this one under control. The worst thing you guys can do right now is sit around analyzing what we’re doing over here. You have no idea what we’re doing, and you really don’t want to know. We are your military, and we are only doing what you sent us here to do.”

“Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps is paying most of your share.”

As you can see from this Marine’s report from the Sandpit, we pay for a 15 year war that accomplishes nothing—except death to our soldiers, horrible trillion dollar debt, PTSD, wasted lives and endless money flow into the big bankers’ pockets, the Military Industrial Complex’s bank accounts and the munitions makers.

Worse, we continue importing Muslim refugees that will do the same thing, and already bombed us for the past 15 years from 9/11 to San Bernardino.

If you the American citizen votes in Hillary Clinton or Ted Cruz of the corrupt establishment, we will see a continuation of wars for profit, open borders and Muslim terrorism in America. We need to vote for an American president and honest men and women for Congress.

If you don’t want a Paris, France or San Bernardino event in your community, it’s time to call for a total “Immigration Shutdown Now.”

Call your senators and House rep: 1 202 224 3121. Demand a stop to all immigration and stop to any Syrian immigration.

Definition of slogan: “Immigration Shutdown Now means the American people want a total shutdown on all legal and illegal immigration. That means we want all illegal immigration stopped by arresting, prosecuting and jailing employers of illegal aliens. We deport all illegal aliens by taking their jobs away and as we catch them. We want English mandated as our national language. We demand a cessation of Muslim immigration in order to protect our culture, language and way of life. We can’t save the world but we can destroy our civilization. We demand a stable population that allows everyone to live, work and thrive into the 21st century. Especially our children.” FHW

That’s why you need to take action. Send this series to everyone in your network. Educate them. Urge them to take action by joining these websites to become faxers of prewritten letters and phone callers. We must force Congress into an “Immigration Shutdown Now!

Share these videos all over America:

www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacity.org ; www.thesocialcontract.com

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation. Take five minutes to see for yourself.

“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart” by Roy Beck
This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future generations: in a few words, “Mind boggling!” www.NumbersUSA.org

America: www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacityNetwork.org
Canada: www.immigrationwatchcanada.org
United Kingdom: www.populationmatters.org
Australia: www.population.org.au Sustainable Population Australia

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

“Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani deserves thanks and applause from tens of millions of Americans for declaring he’ll cast his vote for Donald Trump next week in the Empire State’s GOP presidential primary,” John M. Snyder police gun policy adviser said Monday.

Both the Washington Post and New York Times have named Snyder the dean of gun lobbyists. The Trace recently designated him a power broker.

“I support Trump,” said Giuliani. “I’m gonna vote for Trump.” He said Trump opponent Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas “can’t win” in November’s general election. “Ted Cruz is straight fastball down the middle of the plate for the Democratic Party, which they are expert at hitting out of the ballpark…If it’s Donald, there is no ballpark.”

Snyder said, “Giuliani hardly could have put it more succinctly and directly. As a candidate, Trump stands head and shoulders over others. It’s truly amazing that midget-minded Republicans in New York and elsewhere can’t see this. It seems Trump opponents just don’t get it, or do, and fear the disruption of their preeminence a Trump presidency could cause them.

“Trump haters fear the people and their significance. They nit pick with distracting issues in an attempt to get people to pay more attention to these matters than to the central ones. Trump wants to dump trade and immigration policies that undermine our middle class. Elitists want to keep these policies and to keep the people down. By supporting Trump, voters can smash them.”

Snyder said, “Republicans should stop their ridiculous infighting. They should unite behind front-runner Donald Trump. They should concentrate their time, energy and resources on defeating presumptive Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Snyder said, “Republicans have a golden opportunity this year to defeat the Democrats. Unfortunately, their nonsensical, idiotic and hateful anti-Trump elements could blow it for them. Hopefully, these elements will come to their senses. If they don’t straighten up and fly right they will be remembered for wrecking their country’s future.

“Second Amendment champion Trump can beat gun prohibitionist Clinton this year. Trump’s turning out new potential GOP supporters by the millions in primaries and rallies, far more than his Republican opponents. Trump has the pulse of the nation. Pessimists who cite polls to support their hesitancy should remember that Ronald Reagan was way behind Jimmy Carter in polls at the beginning of the 1980 campaign. He won in a landslide and became one of our greatest presidents.”

Snyder said, “People favor Trump over Clinton because of their disgust with Clinton’s support for NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China, amnesty and citizenship for illegal immigrants, and the Iraq and Libyan failures. To the people, Trump’s in the right on these and other matters. They think he will reverse policies that led to the destruction of American manufacturing, the loss of millions of factory jobs, the lowering of wages, and the massive influx of illegal immigrants, including radical Islamist terrorist sleepers.

“As the Republican presidential nominee, Trump could excoriate Clinton like nobody else, smash her campaign, and assist any number of down-ballot GOP candidates.”

Snyder noted, “A number of so-called Republicans would rather blow up the GOP and themselves along with it than see Donald Trump elected President. Some even have said they would rather see probable Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton elected.

“They can’t stand Trump because they can’t control him. The blue collar billionaire is not part of the ‘club.’ However, he enjoys the support of average American voters. With their ‘anybody but Trump’ attitude, the hate Trump Republican insiders are putting themselves before party and country. What arrogant insolence!”

“Second Amendment champion Trump can beat gun prohibitionist Clinton this year. Trump’s turning out new potential GOP supporters by the millions in primaries and rallies, far more than his Republican opponents. Trump has the pulse of the nation.”

Snyder said, “Some may not prefer Trump for a number of personal reasons, but his financial independence, stated positions on a number of issues, in-your-face campaign style, unique persona and identity with voters make him the best available presidential GOP candidate this election cycle.

“On the other hand, the Democrats appear ready to put up a promoter of gun prohibition, abortion, same-sex marriage and the LGBT agenda as their nominee. Republicans have got to save the nation from the malignant Democrat entity. With Trump as their nominee, they can do it. That is their destiny.”

© 2016 NWV – All Rights Reserved

[NOTE: This article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers. NWV’s supports the state of Israel, and the Jewish peoples’ right to their Biblical homeland.]

Let me begin with a cold, hard (albeit unpopular) fact:

1. The Neocons in Washington, D.C., are not only America’s greatest threat; they are the world’s greatest threat.

Compared to the threat that Neocons pose to world peace and the sheer numbers of people killed by Neocon-generated wars (numbering into the millions of people), militant Muslims are like children playing with squirt guns in a sand box. And forget the left-right, conservative-liberal paradigm you’ve always been taught. All of that is only for electioneering. The real battle is between Americanism and Globalism, and Neocons are ALL about Globalism.

Please read my column “What is A Neocon?”

Of course, Neocons can count success all the way back to the days of Richard Nixon and even back to Woodrow Wilson. But it was George H.W. Bush who snuck in the Neocon Trojan Horse while the American people were sound asleep. And his successors Bill Clinton, G.W. Bush, and Barack Obama have given Neocons almost total run of the place ever since. The political parties these men represent mean nothing. The real people they represent are the Neocons.

The reason we have been at war ever since Bush I invaded Kuwait and Bush II invaded Afghanistan and Iraq has nothing to do with those countries posing any imminent threat to the United States or anything of the kind. The reason we have been at war–and will stay at war–is because the Neocons want us at war. They enrich and empower themselves through war, and they fulfill their economic/political/cultural/tribal agendas through war. And this is the same reason the Neocons have set up ISIS, Al Nusra, et al. as proxy armies to take the war into Syria and eventually Iran.

I encourage readers to watch this excellent explanation of the whole Neocon/Muslim War issue in this video presentation by former congressman Ron Paul.

Recently, Paul Craig Roberts (Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan) bluntly wrote, “The remaining danger is the crazed American neoconservatives. I know many of them. They are completely insane ideologues. This inhuman filth has controlled the foreign policy of every US government since Clinton’s second term. They are a danger to all life on earth. Look at the destruction they have wreaked in the former Yugoslavia, in Ukraine, in Georgia and South Ossetia, in Africa, in Afghanistan and the Middle East. The American people were too brainwashed by lies and by political impotence to do anything about it, and Washington’s vassals in Europe, UK, Canada, Australia, and Japan had to pretend that this policy of international murder was ‘bringing freedom and democracy.’

“The crazed filth that controls US foreign policy is capable of defending US hegemony with nuclear weapons. The neoconservatives must be removed from power, arrested, and put on international trial for their horrendous war crimes before they defend their hegemony with Armageddon.

“Neoconservatives and their allies in the military/security complex make audacious use of false flag attacks. These evil people are capable of orchestrating a false flag attack that propels the US and Russia to war.”

See Roberts’ column here.

Make no mistake about it: the Neocons control both major political parties in D.C. We have heard Ted Cruz promise if he’s elected to make “the sand glow” in the Arab nations. Meaning, he wants to launch nuclear missiles against Syria and Iran (but not Saudi Arabia, of course). And the rest of the Republican field has made similar promises. But Democrat Hillary Clinton has said much the same thing.

In a speech last year at Dartmouth College, Hillary said, “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m president, we will attack Iran…we would be able to totally obliterate them.”

See the report here.

Did Hillary make such a promise because Iran poses an imminent danger to the safety and security of the United States? No, but because in her mind, Iran poses an “existential threat to Israel.” That is exactly the same thing that Ted Cruz and the other Neocons in the Republican Party are saying. “War for Israel” is the cry of the Neocons.

This leads me to the second cold, hard (and VERY unpopular) fact:

2. The agenda of the Neocons and the agenda of the Zionists are one and the same.

It might be even safe to say that the Zionists are the ones pushing most, if not all, of the Neocon agenda. But the saddest part of this whole sordid affair is that it is America’s pastors and Christians that are most responsible for facilitating it all.

All over America, pastors such as John Hagee are egregiously misinterpreting God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:3 that says, “And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed” (KJV), and applying it to the modern Zionist state of Israel. They completely ignore Galatians 3 that clearly and emphatically explains that the promise to Abraham was fulfilled in Jesus Christ and in those who have faith in Him. The promise to Abraham has absolutely nothing to do with the modern Zionist state of Israel. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

So, what has happened to the United States since 1948, when the United Nations created modern Israel? Has America been “blessed” by becoming little more than a vassal state of and war machine for Israel? What has been the result of allowing the Zionist/Neocons to assume control over so much of America? What have the John Hagees of the Christian world accomplished by brainwashing millions of America’s Christians with their “Israel-First” heresy?

Are our families better off since 1948? What about education? How are we doing in that department since 1948? What about U.S. jobs? What about our public and private debt? What about our social mores? What about crime? What about substance addiction? What about child molestation? What about aberrant sexual behavior? What about teen suicides and even veteran suicides? What about general honesty and integrity? How do all of these compare to 1948? Is the United States of America more blessed now than it was in 1948? Answer that in your own heart.

Take Hollywood

I love a good movie as much as anyone. I really do. But it is not even controversial to say that Hollywood has become the biggest polluter of our culture to ever exist. The lewdness, vulgarity, indecency, and blasphemy that emanates out of Hollywood has turned American culture upside down. Hollywood has made the perverse, the profane, and the vulgar vogue in our country. And network television is doing its best to keep up.

It is not uncommon today to hear small children (even children that go to church) using the “f” word and the Lord’s name in vain. Many church “services” more closely resemble movie productions, complete with scantily dressed women parading and dancing onstage. Hollywood has turned our society (and many of our churches) into a garbage dump.

So, who runs Hollywood?

My friend, movie producer James Jaeger, recently said, “Some of us remember when Marlon Brando was on LARRY KING and said the following: ‘Hollywood is run by Jews. It’s owned by Jews and they should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are suffering.’”

Jaeger went on to confirm and update extensive research done by author and entertainment-securities attorney, John W. Cones, by stating that:

“As much as 60% of the top executive positions–especially the current CEOs of the MPAA studio/distributors, TV networks and their parent conglomerates–are held by individuals that happen to be Jewish.”

To further substantiate the research, Jaeger reports that, “Ben Stein said in EOnline magazine, ‘First, it is extremely clear to anyone in Hollywood that Jews are, so to speak, “in charge” in Hollywood in a way that is not duplicated in any other large business … Hollywood, in many ways the most successful cultural enterprise of all time and the most potent messenger of American values of all time, is changing, but it is still largely Jewish.’”

Jaeger further reports that, “Michael Medved said in Moment magazine: ‘It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.’”

And lastly, Jaeger confirms that, “Joel Stein said in the LA Times ‘As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between The 700 Club and Davey and Goliath on TV all day.’”

Take the Warfare State

Think of this: the United States has not fought a single constitutional war since 1948. And it has not won a single war since, either. But in waging all of these unconstitutional wars, the American war machine has taken the lives of millions of innocent men, women, and children–especially in the Middle East.

Why is the United States killing so many people? Ted Cruz and Hillary have plainly told us. We are killing them on behalf of Israel. And Christians all over America are cheering it all on.

The following is taken from The UNZ Review:

From the Clinton era through the George W. Bush and Obama regimes, the US engaged in a series of wars against predominantly secular governments in Muslim countries, which had been opposed to Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine.

Key policymakers in the design and execution of US war policy were prominent Jews bristling with diplomas from the most prestigious universities.

These ’scholars’, the ‘cream’ of US academe, blatantly falsified the pretexts for the US’ disastrous thirteen-year war (and counting) in Iraq, the lost (15-plus year) war in Afghanistan, the invasion and destruction of Libya and Syria. Their brilliant plans have led directly to the rise of ISIS throughout the region and the displacement of tens of millions of civilians in the Middle East, West Asia and North Africa.
Standing out among the principal architects of these foreign policy disasters is [Zionist] Elliott Abrams, BA and Doctor of Jurisprudence, Harvard University. Abrams had been officially censored for lying directly to the US Congress about his role in the Iran-Contra scandal under President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. The new millennium wiped clean his tawdry slate of crimes against humanity and he was appointed a leading National Security Advisor under President George W. Bush 2002-2009. In this role, he fabricated ‘evidence’ linking the secular government of Iraq to the fundamentalist Al Qaeda and he served as a transmission belt channeling false Israeli ‘intelligence’ that Iraq possessed banned weapons of mass destruction. No weapons were ever found–a ‘mere detail of history’, according to his partner, [Zionist] Paul Wolfowitz. These blatant lies pushed to Bush Administration to invade and destroy Iraq.

While Elliot Abrams was strategically placed in the Bush/Cheney White House, his partners in deception, Paul Wolfowitz and [Zionist] Douglas Feith controlled Middle East policy at the Pentagon.

This dream team of Abrams, Wolfowitz and Feith formed the powerful Israel-First Troika responsible for the military policies which systematically destroyed Iraq’s state apparatus, decimating its civil society, fragmenting the country and precipitating gruesome ethno-religious wars and the rise of ISIS. This ‘Troika’ has never been held responsible for the deaths of over one million Iraqis.

Dr. Paul Wolfowitz received his BA from Cornell and PhD from the University of Chicago. In the 1980’s, early in his government career he temporarily lost security clearance for having passed confidential documents to Israeli agents. Despite this ‘youthful indiscretion’ (or act of treason), Wolfowitz became Deputy Defense Secretary under President George W. Bush (2001-2005). In this position, he was one of the earliest and most forceful advocates for military interventions against Iraq, Syria, Iran, Lebanon and Libya. He persuaded the American Congress and the Bush Administration that the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq would be short and self-financing. He glowingly predicted that the wars would ‘pay for themselves’ in terms of looted natural resources and ‘re-construction’ contracts. In fact, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost tens of thousands of US military casualties, over a trillion dollars in military expenditures and they continue over 13 years (Iraq), and 15 years (Afghanistan) with no end in sight but completely devastated societies spewing millions of refugees and thousands of terrorists.

Equally luminous in academic credentials, the third of the ‘Israel-First Troika’, Douglas Feith received his BA from Harvard (magna cum laude), and JD (magna cum laude). He worked closely with Israeli intelligence officials fabricating out of whole cloth the myth of Saddam’s quest for ‘yellow cake’ uranium to construct Iraqi nuclear weapons of mass destruction pushing the US into war against Iraq.
Take the Supreme Court

Most of us are deeply chagrined at the constant anti-Christian, anti-freedom, anti-family U.S. Supreme Court decisions. As much as Hollywood or Congress or the White House or any other entity, the Supreme Court has all but eviscerated whatever vestiges of Washington and Jefferson’s America that were left.

If President Obama’s appointment of Merrick Garland is confirmed to the Supreme Court, it will mean that Jews will comprise 45% of the Court, even though they comprise but approximately 2% of the country’s population. And you can be sure that the Jewish members of the Court will vote as one in trying to outlaw our right to keep and bear arms. The other 55% are Roman Catholics, which comprise about 30% of the population. Protestants (historically the authors and signers of America’s founding documents) will be totally absent from the U.S. Supreme Court.

Take the Federal Reserve and Treasury Departments (Bush I-Obama)

Again, from The UNZ Review:

The Federal Reserve chairman, [Zionist] Alan Greenspan’s, and his deregulatory policies, led to the greatest financial crash since the Great Depression and his successor, [Zionist] Benjamin Bernanke, who presided over the trillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street banks while millions of Americans lost their homes.

[Zionist] Stuart Levey was the first Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence within the US Treasury Department (a position created by AIPAC and tailored specifically for Levey). While Stu Levey was racing around the US and the rest of the world enforcing the economic sanctions against Iran (which he authored in line with Israeli directives), narco-terrorists from Mexico, Central America, Colombia and Peru were freely washing hundreds of billions of dollars a year in US banks. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabian officials who funded jihadi terrorists were never prosecuted or sanctioned–even after attacks within the US.

Levey’s successor, [Zionist] David Cohen (who else!) followed the same policy. Multinational banks and corporations, which had corrupted officials, swindled investors, evaded taxes and laundered illicit funds were never investigated, let alone charged. Cohen devoted his time and effort, at Israel’s behest, enforcing sanctions against Iran and endeavoring to sabotage any US-Iran nuclear negotiations.
Take Israeli operations within the U.S. government

Again, I borrow from The UNZ Review:

Feith set up a cozy nest at the Pentagon, the ‘Office of Special Plans’ (OSP), which served as a base of operations for Israeli operatives.

Hovering on the periphery of the ‘Troika’ was the ‘mysterious’, veteran manipulator, [Zionist] Richard Perle. With his BA from the University of Southern California and MA from Princeton (and no military experience), Perle was qualified to push for serial US wars on Israel’s behalf, starting with Iraq and moving on to all other countries which had traditionally supported the rights of the Palestinian people.

He was a key member of the US Defense Policy Board under the Bush Administration and the front ideologue for invading Iraq. His second ‘job’ was strategic adviser to Israeli Prime Ministers Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu. Perle pushed for US military intervention to effect ‘regime change’ in Syria and Iran as well as Libya.
Take Israel Political Action Committees

From The UNZ Review again:

Beyond the warrior ‘troika’ and shadowy Mr. Perle, there is [Zionist] Dr. Dennis Ross who received his BA and PhD from UCLA and taught at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Ross and fellow uber-Zionist, Martin Indyk, founded the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) the most influential lobby on Middle East policy and a virtual ‘king-maker’ in Washington. He was President Bill Clinton’s ‘Middle East Coordinator’, ensuring that Israel’s land grabs in the occupied territories were unimpeded, and indeed justified and funded by the US taxpayer. His notoriety in promoting the brutal and illegal confiscation of Palestinian property earned him the title as ‘Israel’s lawyer’ even among his most pro-Israel colleagues.

Ross made sure that Israel would not be bound to the Camp David agreements even as President Clinton claimed the negotiations as his landmark achievement in diplomacy. AIPAC, under Ross and Indyk, lobbied long and hard for the US invasion of Iraq; it backed Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and justified the expansion of apartheid style ‘Jews only’ colonial settlements in the occupied Palestinian West Bank.

During the Obama Presidency, Ross served as Special Adviser for the Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In this capacity, he actively opposed diplomatic negotiations with the government of Iran or the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Take U.S. economic policies and “free trade” agreements

Yes, taking from The UNZ Review again:

[Zionist] Jack Lew, Secretary of the Treasury (2013-2016) heads an ethno-Chauvinist quintet dictating US foreign and domestic economic policy (with [Zionist] Michael Froman, Chief Trade Negotiator; [Zionist] ‘Penny’ Pritzer, Secretary of Commerce; [Zionist] Lawrence Summers, Director of National Economic Council and [Zionist] Janet Yellen, head of the Federal Reserve Bank). Lew pushed policies favoring the wealthiest 1% along with his co-religionist Michael Froman, while millions of Americans were plunged into poverty and stagnation. Their policies include Free Trade Agreements in Europe, Asia and Latin America which have led to the relocation of US MNC overseas, massive job losses at home, further deepening inequalities and degrading work conditions and wages.

Recently, in his stellar public career, Jack Lew was investigated for lying to the US Congress about the national debt, the size and growth of which he deliberately understated. Thanks to his ‘backers,’ he was never charged . . . Of course.

The UNZ Review summarizes:

After examining the performance of top officials in foreign policy, we find that their ‘assumptions’ (often blatant manipulations and misrepresentations) about Iraq were completely wrong; their pursuit of war was disastrous and criminal; their ‘occupation blueprint’ led to prolonged conflict and the rise of terrorism; their pretext for war was a fabrication derived from their close ties to Israeli intelligence in opposition to the findings US intelligence. Their sanctions policy toward Iran has cost the US economy many billions while their pro-Israel policy cost the US Treasury (and taxpayers) over $110 billion over the last 30 years. Their one-sided ‘Israel-First’ policy has sabotaged any a ‘two-state’ resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and has left millions of Palestinians in abject misery. Meanwhile, the disproportionate number of high officials who have been accused of giving secret US documents to Israel (Wolfowitz, Feith, Indyke and Polland etc.) exposes what really constitutes the badge of “merit” in this critical area of US security policy.

The gulf between academic credentials and actual performance extends to economic policy. Neo-liberal policies favoring Wall Street speculators were adopted by such strategic policymakers as Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke and Lawrence Summers.

Their ‘leadership’ rendered the country vulnerable to the biggest economic crash since the Great Depression with millions of Americans losing employment and homes. Despite their role in creating the conditions for the crisis, their ’solution’ compounded the disaster by transferring over a trillion dollars from the US Treasury to the investment banks, as a taxpayer-funded bailout of Wall Street. Under their economic leadership, class inequalities have deepened; the financial elite has grown many times richer.
Meanwhile, wars in the Middle East have drained the US Treasury of funds, which should have been used to serve the social needs of Americans and finance an economic recovery program through massive domestic investments and repair of our collapsing infrastructure.

The trade policies under the leadership of this ‘meritocratic’ elite–formerly called the ‘Chosen People’–have been an unmitigated disaster for the majority of industrial workers, resulting in huge trade deficits and the deskilling of low paid service employment–with profound implications for future generations of American workers. It is no longer a secret that an entire generation of working class Americans has descended into poverty with no prospects of escape–except through narcotics and other degradation. On the ‘flip side’ of the ‘winners and losers’, US finance capital has expanded overseas with acquisition and merger fees enriching the 0.1% and the meritocratic officials happily rotating from their Washington offices to Wall Street and back again.

See The UNZ Review report here

Clearly, the Neocons are the political creation of Christian and Jewish Zionists. Until true Christians, conservatives, and patriots come to grips with the fact that Zionists and their political patsies, the Neocons, are the mortal enemies of liberty, our beloved country, America, and even the Christian faith, we will have no success in stopping their pernicious attempts to create a global, socialist “meritocratic” state. You cannot win a war without knowing who the real enemy is.

While the John Hagees and Ted Cruzes of the world might believe that their “Israel-First” theology is taking America and the whole earth into The Millennium, what it’s really doing is taking America and the whole earth into Armageddon.

P.S. I invite readers to obtain my four message series entitled “The Church And Israel.” It is available on ONE DVD. Titles include:

• The Presentation And Rejection of The King
• “An High Priest For Ever After The Order of Melchisedec”
• Jesus: The Seed of David, The Seed of Abraham
• Christ’s Last Words To Israel

This series of messages will help people understand why the modern Zionist state of Israel can hold no claim to the promise given to Abraham in Genesis 12:3 and why the “Israel-First” theology of John Hagee and so many others is egregious Biblical error. And readers should also understand that I came to these conclusions after being trained in “Israel-First” theology and believing and preaching it for most of my life. But the longer I preached it, the more dissatisfied I became with it. I knew something wasn’t right. And the more I studied the matter, the more I came to repudiate what I now know is patently false doctrine.

Order my DVD, “The Church And Israel.”

© 2016 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

“Sometimes the people you’d take a bullet for are the ones behind the trigger.”—Taylor Swift

After Phyllis Schlafly’s endorsement of Donald J. Trump, a rift started in her organization, Eagle Forum (EF). The coup, which has emerged, is over Phyllis’s endorsement of Donald Trump, and her battle against a Constitutional Convention. 

pro-familyand reports membership of 80,000. 

In March, Schlafly introduced and endorsed Donald Trump at a rally in St. Louis, two months after many state and local Eagle Forum leaders had announced their support for Ted Cruz. She felt Trump was a strong conservative who really would make America great again. Here is the video of that endorsement.

In August of 2015, Schlafly named Ed Martin to take over her day-to-day duties as president of Eagle Forum, and she became chairperson and CEO of the organization. 

Here’s a portion of what he said and the women behind this coup:

On Thursday, we received a tip from a longtime EF member in South Carolina that the Con-Con people are pursuing a scheme to push Phyllis Schlafly out of Eagle Forum.

Six directors of Eagle Forum are holding a rogue meeting in violation of the Bylaws unless they are stopped. The rogue group members have a hidden agenda, and most refused to return phone calls personally made to them by Phyllis to ask what their concerns are.

They are being guided by a big, liberal law firm that they refuse to identify, but the press has identified. They also refuse to say who is funding the high paid liberal lawyers.

Here are the six directors of this Gang of 6:

Eunie Smith – allowed Alabama to be one of the first states to pass Con-Con, in May, 2015.

Carolyn McLarty – owes Reince Priebus of the RNC for her special committee position on the RNC from Oklahoma.

Ann Cori (Phyllis’s daughter) – did nothing to stop the Con-Con as it sailed to passage in Missouri last year, until national Eagle Forum intervened.

Rosina Kovar – does not return calls to her by Phyllis and has mentioned to someone else that her ringleader told her not to talk to anyone.

Shirley Curry – does not return calls to her by Phyllis.

Cathie Adams – disparaged and insulted Phyllis in a publicly quoted interview in Dallas, phoned Phyllis to apologize, but has not retracted her statements.

Last night we found out that Cathie gave a new on-the-record press interview about this and is trying to push her agenda. Thanks to Cathie, we are now seeing this terrible betrayal of Phyllis play out in the media.

The Eagle board endorsed Ed Martin, but would not allow Ed Martin to attend the private meeting they had called. Schlafly stated that “The six board members calling the telephone meeting won’t tell me what the meeting is about, but I think it’s an attempt to vote me out. It’s disloyal and terribly shocking, and I’m completely depressed about it.”

Dissidents are pro Constitutional Convention and Cruz Supporters

These six women are against Schlafly’s opposition to a new push for a Constitutional Convention via Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) as well as the Convention of States. Schlafly has always fought a Con-Con, and was at our side in the early 80s to defeat the call then when the same ruse of a BBA was used. 

As of January, 27 states had passed resolutions calling for a constitutional convention, most relying on model legislation drafted by the American Legislative Exchange Council and the Convention of States, a little-known group founded by Michael Farris.

Five of these six women are also Cruz supporters, and Cruz is all for a Constitutional Convention. He needs a Convention in order to pass the North American Union which his wife, Heidi, so diligently worked on at the CFR for five years. Supporter Glenn Beck, and David Barton who heads up the Keep-the-Promise Cruz PAC, are both pushing a Con-Con. 

Facebook page and wrote, “Mark’s book sparks an important discussion about how to fix the problems that face our Republic.” As well, check out Ted’s article in the National Review where he promotes a Convention.

In a conversation with Bob Menges, the South Carolina director for the Convention of States (COS) Project, Cruz reiterated his support for the movement

Cathie Adams, gave an interview to the Dallas Morning News, critical of Schlafly’s endorsement of Trump. I fully believe Cathie Adams and Ann Cori have spearheaded this entire takeover of Eagle Forum, the ousting of Ed Martin, as well as eliminating founder, Phyllis Schlafly. Phyllis rescinded her endorsement of Cathie Adams to be vice chair of the Texas GOP after Adams’ interview with the Dallas Morning News.

Here is the letter Phyllis wrote after this phone meeting was finished:

I have just released the following statement to the press and our members: 

Ed Martin stated, “When people don’t return your phone calls or give you a straight answer about what they’re doing, Phyllis knows enough to recognize that’s pretty hostile.” Martin also cited an instance where an EF member who was also working for Ted Cruz, took a membership list and gave it to the Cruz campaign for marketing. “The Cruz campaign backed off using the list,” he said, “But we have a few incidents and the EF members who have endorsed Cruz are not happy with Phyllis’s endorsement of Trump.”

The End Result

Ed Martin was fired, even though he was Phyllis’s choice for President of EF. Eunie Smith, one of the six dissidents is now acting President until a new president can be elected. Cruz has now claimed the endorsement of Eagle Forum. It looks as though the Cruz and Con-Con supporters in Eagle Forum have turned their backs on their founder and her endorsements and Constitutional stances.

I have finally decided to come clean. I suspect that many of you have realized it for years. In fact, my inbox usually fills up very quickly after I write one of my stinging commentaries.

“You are a hater!” goes the usual template. The writer then goes off on a litany of accusations which supposedly prove that I am a hater.

In the earlier stages of my somewhat “public” life as a “conservative” commentator I used to spend valuable time trying to convince the email trolls of my virtue and the fact that they are mischaracterizing my character.

Eventually I grew tired of the rather boring ad nauseam, semi conjunctive apology for a trait that I didn’t possess. I finally figured out that trying to convince haters that I was not a hater was a waste of valuable time. After a bit of introspection I decided it was time to come clean and admit what all those who don’t know me had concluded they know about me.

I am a hater. I finally admit it. I am a hater. And a proud one, I might add.

I hate what homosexuality does to people. I hate the destructive nature of that debaucherous behavior and the impact it has on the individual. I hate the pain that it causes to innocent parents and siblings. I hate that it is taught to our children as normal behavior.

I hate abortion. I hate the fact that precious little babies created in the image of God never get the chance to have their pictures appear on a refrigerator. I hate that unsuspecting grandparents are having their grandchildren murdered without their knowledge. I hate that most women live a life of regret after they have killed their unborn child. I hate that Planned Parenthood which makes millions of dollars off of killing the innocent, is viewed as honorable. I hate that our government forces us to pay taxes to fund the slaughter. I hate that most Christians don’t do a darn thing to stop it.

I hate that my government lies to me. I hate that they spend money that they have no right to spend. I hate that the control of our money lies in the hands of a privately owned bank and that the people have no control over how the value of the money is regulated. I hate that the government sends our young people to fight and die in meaningless wars. I hate that they live by a different set of rules. I hate that the elections are pretty much rigged. I hate that I am forced to “voluntarily” pay an income tax for which I will be punished if I fail to “voluntarily” comply. I hate that crime has become big business for a corrupt injustice system.

I hate our “public” education system. I hate that the schools do not teach the values of the public but, instead, teach the values they want the public to hold. I hate the National Education Association and their endorsement of candidates who support child-killing. I hate the fact that millions of inner city students are trapped in prison-like neighborhood schools where their chance of advancement in society is blocked by those same money-grubbing unions and the sold out political candidates that they support. I hate that our children are taught lies. I hate that Christian parents continue to send their children into those Humanistic indoctrination centers. I hate that every church in America doesn’t have a means by which they can provide a Christian education to ever child in their flock. I hate that a Godless education is no education at all and that our pastors continue to be complicit in propping up such an anti-Christ system.

I hate that so many people believe so much that isn’t true. I hate that the media lies so blatantly in their coverage of what is really happening in America. I hate that they cover up so much of what is real news and cover so little of what really is. I hate that news is now considered fair and balanced rather than just…well…news. I hate the fact that you have to have blond hair and wear short skirts to make it on some of our favorite news channels. I hate their hidden agendas.

I hate that mothers have to put their children in daycare. I hate that many women miss the precious early years of their children’s life…time that can never be recaptured…because they have to work in order to pay the overbearing and odious tax bill that the fraudulent IRS holds over their heads. I hate that women value career over childbearing. I hate that our economic system forces many mothers to choose between full time work and full time Mommy.

I hate adultery. I hate what the shack-up culture is doing to American society. I hate that 70% of babies born in the black community are born into a home where there is no father. I hate the fact that men no longer take the responsibility of being fathers because the women have lost the value of their virtue. I hate that chivalry is no longer honored. I hate that at our current rate of reproduction the White European Christian Population that built our great nation will soon see their grandchildren become slaves on the continent that they formed. I hate that motherhood and fatherhood are so cheaply valued. I hate that young people can’t see that parenthood is the most noble job they will ever have in their entire life. I hate the sissification of men.

I hate that more people don’t hate. I hate that we have been trained to love things that are repulsive. I hate that we are forced to tolerate things that we shouldn’t tolerate. I hate that most people so easily give-in to social pressure. I hate that pastors have invited worldliness into the church and that they have become so comfortable with it that they can’t even recognize it. I hate it that no one judges anything anymore.

I hate that we have become such poor witnesses for the God we claim to serve. I hate that we have rejected the Christian values that our fathers’ generation fought and died for. I hate that we don’t value their sacrifice. I hate that we laugh at their values. I hate that we love the things that they hated.

I hate what America has become. I hate that we have rejected God. I hate that nobody seems to care about that anymore. I hate that our nation no longer serves or honors the precepts of the Christian God. I hate that not enough of us hate the right things. I hate that most Americans don’t know that God also hates.

People I love…sin I hate. I hate that I am hated for boldly pointing that out.

© 2016 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

Something seems to be wrong with our modern, global, secular humanist civilization.

I’m not one of the many people who believe there’s a plot afoot to depopulate the earth, save only for an elite remnant of gazillionaires, feminists, intellectuals, and celebrities. This scheme is commonly attributed to the likes of George Soros, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, and Beelzebub.

To me it doesn’t make much sense. Where’s the fun in being a tyrant, if there’s no one there to tyrannize? Even Nero, crazy as a bedbug, understood that he had to have subjects if he was going to be an emperor.

But it’s not hard to understand why someone might believe the elites want to wipe out the rest of us. These days, who could be more anti-human than a humanist? They certainly act like they hate us and want to be rid of us. They even seem to be preparing to do just that.

Take the push for self-driving cars, for instance. A bunch of experts recently told the National Highway Safety Administration that driverless, computer-guided cars are very far from being ready for prime time. They pleaded with the government to slow down.

They might have saved their breath. Ever since Henry Ford, with his mass-produced automobiles at popular prices, created the American middle class, progressive thinkers—God save us!—have been looking for ways to undo this. We’ve seen them try forced car-pooling, high-occupancy vehicle lanes (remember the HOV?), high gas taxes, blocking the Keystone Pipeline, mileage taxes, and whatnot. They would like us to be car-less peasants riding atop a rickety bus with a few crates full of squawking chickens, as is usual in their beloved Third World countries. We make less of a carbon footprint that way, don’t you know.

So now they’ve got the hots for driverless cars, which offer them the exciting possibility of hooking all the cars’ computers into a few government computers that would be able to control your car’s speed, its hours of permitted use, or even whether it’ll go anywhere at all. Too many people on the road? No longer a problem—your car won’t even start unless Big Brother says it can.

But that’s nothing, compared to a recent innovation in Japan—a country that really does seem intent on depopulating itself.

They’re not having babies, they’re not getting married, they aren’t even dating. And so, to make up for it, they’ve invented a full-body Virtual Reality Sex Suit, which lets the wearer experience a pathetic and degrading form of “sex” without the hassle of getting together with another human being. It works in conjunction with pornography. Oh, boy.

It reminds me of a little song my mother used to sing: “I love me, I think I’m grand,/ when I go to the movies, I hold my hand./I put my arm around my waist;/ if I get fresh, I slap my face.” It was a joke when she first learned it. But it isn’t anymore.

With liberals and intellectuals it’s hard to tell whether they’re purposely trying to deceive us or if they really are as loopy as the things they say and do. As a glaring example of this, they propose to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Can they really not know how asinine an idea that is? Who will be able, or willing, to pay $15 an hour to some teenager to sweep the parking lot as a summer job? And if the minimum wage is hiked to $15, what will happen to the other wages—to say nothing of the cost of any good or service involving low-skill labor?

The starter jobs, the summer jobs, will simply price themselves out of existence, and people who used to hold them will be replaced by robots—if the business owner can afford it.

But hey—as they used to say among the Occupy Wall Street crowd, “Work blows.” Who needs work, if everyone can be on welfare?

Yeah, sure, that’ll work just fine.

If our secular humanist movers and shakers aren’t trying to depopulate the earth, they’re certainly doing a brilliant imitation of it.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2016 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

On April 5, one of my subscribers sent me the following email:

Dr Ed, I’m very sad that Donald Trump lost tonight in Wisconsin. Is this the end to him winning? Can my family still have hope and support him? We just feel very sad and feel like no one is treating him right! How can this be allowed?

Actually, my family stopped watching anything on the news channels…just depressing and mean how they treat Donald Trump!! We hope things still end up with him winning and becoming our next PRESIDENT!!

Do we still have hope? Or is this going to be controlled by the GOP!! We feel very distraught and need you to give us some hope!!!

Thank you,

Dear Subscriber,

We are in a “Star Wars” battle. Trump’s supporters are faithful to Trump and Trump will defeat the Darth Vader GOP Establishment.

Let’s look at the new delegates. Here’s where the race for the nomination stands today:

The blue shows the delegates won. The orange shows the delegates needed to get 1237.

We use RealClearPolitics data as of April 12. Trump needs 482 more delegates or 58% of the remaining delegates. Cruz needs 692 more delegates or 83% of the remaining delegates.

Let’s estimate the delegate count after New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island vote. We use the projected delegate wins estimated by Nelson Hultberg.

Of course, no projection can be exact. Voter fraud happens. Polls error by a few percent.

But poll data indicates the delegate chart will look like this after April 26:

Trump will have about 929 delegates. He will need only 308 more or 55% of the remaining delegates to get 1237.

Cruz will have about 638 delegates. He will need 599 delegates to get 1237 or 106% of the remaining delegates. Therefore, Cruz will be out of the race for 1237. But he will remain in the race to help the GOP establishment try to stop Trump from getting 1237 delegates.

Let’s look at the full list of the states yet to vote. We showed the data in this list through April in the above chart. Here is the rest of the projected data using Hultberg’s estimated delegates. We assume Cruz gets the delegates that Trump does not win. Maybe Kasich will get some of the votes we have assigned to Cruz.

In this scenario, Trump ends up with 1226 total delegates, only 11 shy of 1237.

Presently, Trump polls 60 percent in New York. If Trump wins over 50 percent in New York then his total will go up by 40 to 1266. Then, even if Trump loses Montana, he will still have 1239 delegates.

After April 26, Cruz lovers who passed high school math may realize Cruz can’t get 106 percent of the remaining votes. Then they may find their next best choice is Trump. That may help Trump get more delegates.

It Trump wins he will control the GOP. We sure need to replace those who have fought Trump all the way, and who would like to replace Trump with a candidate like Paul Ryan. Ryan would lose about half of the Republican voters and lose to Hillary or Bernie.

More good news is businessman Paul Nehlen is running against Paul Ryan in Wisconsin. What an upset it would be for Nehlen to remove the Speaker of the House when Trump becomes president.

Does Trump have a Plan B?

Yes. If Trump falls short of delegates he will make a deal with either Kasich or Rubio. He will choose one of them as his VP in return for their delegates to nominate him.

If both Kasich and Rubio accept similar offers, I think Trump will choose Kasich. Kasich has more executive experience, more name recognition, less in bed with GOP’s elite, and he can assure Trump would win Ohio. Kasich can at least help Trump. Trump would have to babysit Rubio.

I think the reason Kasich has remained in the race is he is running for VP. If Trump needs Plan B, I predict a Trump-Kasich ticket.

Meanwhile, let’s do our best to help Trump so he does not need Plan B.

Will Trump pull the eligibility card on Cruz?

Probably not, at least not until after the June 7 elections and only then if necessary. Doing so might set a negative tone to his campaign.

Meanwhile, there are eligibility lawsuits filed against Cruz in some states. Victor Williams for President has filed an eligibility lawsuit against Cruz. It includes the Amicus Curiae by Professor Elhauge.

The lawsuits that have the best chance to be heard and win are the ones where Harvard Law Professor Einer Elhauge has filed his Amicus Curiae.

Elhauge’s Statement of Interest of Amicus reads in part:

The amicus is a Harvard Law professor who has researched and written on the natural born citizen clause and other issues of constitutional and statutory interpretation. Because of his research and expertise, he can help identify law or arguments that may not be presented by the parties or that might otherwise escape the Court’s consideration, and he can otherwise assist the Court with an objective assessment of the legal issues.

Elhauge’s Conclusion is:

For the reasons set forth herein, the issue of whether Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen is justiciable and should be resolved in the negative.

Elhauge shows how Cruz’s legal arguments fail. Elhauge discusses many legal documents. His review of Wong Kim Ark is conclusive:

The fourteenth amendment of the constitution, in the declaration that ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside,’ contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two only,—birth and naturalization.

Citizenship by naturalization can only be acquired by naturalization under the authority and in the forms of law. But citizenship by birth is established by the mere fact of birth under the circumstances defined in the constitution. Every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States, and needs no naturalization.

A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts.

Voter Fraud in Wisconsin

Wisconsin Trump voter Jeremy Rogers said,

“It was the strangest thing. The machine literally would not let me vote for Trump. I have heard the same from several others coming out of the voting booth.”

If you don’t think the GOP can and does rig voting machines to get the result they want, then you must watch this 121-minute documentary video:

The documentary video shows how good people who wanted fair elections worked to reveal the truth about voting machines. The video shows how easy it is for the manufacturer to remotely reset voting totals, and to even set local voting machines to change votes.

Expert programmers were able to find backdoors where manufacturers can set their machines to produce desired results. They demonstrate how they can edit the database and how they can change the memory cards.

After a software expert demonstrated how to easily change voting results, a state voting official stated:

“If I had not known what was behind this I would have certified this election as a true count of a vote.

The video shows a check from a GOP establishment to the machine manufacturer. Why would the GOP send a check to the manufacturer? To request the manufacturer to set the results of an election. The manufacturer can remotely program the machines to produce the desired result.

The Darth Vader GOP Establishment not only fixed the Wisconsin election but threatens to do the same in New York. DJ Lewis reported on Twitter,

“I was 5 feet from Priebus when he said ‘Use the Diebold program in New York to keep Trump under 50 percent.'”

Wisconsin is littered with voting machines, most of them Diabold. Wisconsin voters reported voting machine problems in 2014.

Here is a map of Wisconsin counties that Trump and Cruz won.

Here is a list of the voting machines in Wisconsin. You can match the counties with no or few voting machines with the counties Trump and Cruz won. Trump won every county that did not use voting machines.

What is other evidence of vote fraud?

Compare the final results with the good polls. Ignore the bad polls like WSJ because they are purposely biased because Murdoch hates Trump.

The final vote results should not be more than ten percent different from the good polls. In the states that Cruz won, his votes were up to four times his poll data. The probability of this happening is about the same as winning a lottery. This happened in Wisconsin.

Why do states buy voting machines with hidden software?

Here is a rule: Never buy a voting machine with hidden software. Only buy source software. Every state has universities, colleges, and private industry with expert software people. The state should hire these people to review, test, and approve the software in every voting machine.

Even better, let your experts design the software. Keep it open source so experts in all states can benefit from each other.

The video shows the voting machine software was written in Microsoft Visual Basic with an Access database. I am an expert in Microsoft Visual Basic and Access. One year I won Microsoft’s “People’s Choice Award” at Microsoft’s Windows World Open and Computerworld’s Custom Application Contest.

So you can believe me when I tell you, you don’t need a voting machine. Voting machines are a scam! Having said that, it’s time to move away from Visual Basic and Access.

The best way would be to write voting software to run in Google’s Chrome browser. Then people can vote with a touch-screen PC, Apple, or smart phone.

Compare the browser-based, very secure software used for stock trading. By comparison, counting votes is very simple.

Properly done, it is possible to let people vote from their own computer or smart phone. That is the future. Imagine, our military personnel would be able to vote from anywhere. States to have a way for the few who can’t use a computer to still vote.

© 2016 Edwin X Berry, PhD – All Rights Reserved

NOTE: The following article was designed to be Part 2 to our last article entitled “An ‘Establishment’ Always Evolves Into An All-Powerful Oligarchy.”

I had a dream the other night. I dreamt that, as a well-known writer, (I said it was a dream) I was invited to one of the secret meetings of the Bilderberg Group, (or Bilderberg Club as they are sometimes called)

In my rather vivid dream, as I was about to take my seat at the conference table where the future of the world was to be discussed, a very official looking fellow with white gloves came up to me and shoved an envelope in my hand. I started to open the envelope as I sat down. As I unfolded the paper, the heading at the top, in big bold, gold letters, read: “The Bilderberg Club”. The letter started out:

Dear Mr. Ewart:

“As you know, this group meets in secret every year. What is discussed here must never leave this room. Should you decide to publicly report on anything that takes place here, you will be discredited from the highest level of government, business and banking. Your books, articles and essays will be black listed in every single venue, worldwide, your family will be hounded, you will never be able to open a bank account or borrow money again and your life will be in constant danger for as long as you live.”

“As strict as these covenants are, we sincerely hope that your attending this conference will be enlightening and we wish to extend to you every courtesy. We trust your experience will be a memorable event in your life.”

Sincerely,

Bla-Bla-Bla,

A memorable event, indeed! I wondered in my dream, could they have this much power? Probably!

I suddenly awoke from the dream in a sweat and started to think about these events. Why would central bankers, defense experts, mass-media press barons, government ministers, prime ministers, royalty, international financiers and political leaders from Europe and North America want to meet in the first place? Why in secret? What would they be discussing?

It turns out that there are highly suspicious connections between these types of groups, like the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and the Council on Foreign Relations. They have overlapping memberships and similar goals. Two of the groups, the Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations, have very strong ties to the Rockefeller Family. Remember. There was another secret meeting of the titans of finance and industry that met on Jekyll Island in 1907 that became the catalyst for the 16th Amendment (1913), ushering in the Federal Reserve and the Internal Revenue Service. The incestuous relationships in the banking industry, specifically Chase Bank and Goldman Sachs, is well documented. David D. Rockefeller, now over 100 years old, was chairman of J P. Morgan Chase Bank for many years. J. P. Morgan was so rich he helped bail out the U. S. Government in the crash of 1895.

NOTE: During Hoover’s Administration, at the request of the President, the Rockefeller Foundation funded a study by the University of Illinois and Harvard University on how to manipulate people through their subconscious minds. Why would government do this in a free nation?

THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Towards the end of World War I, a working fellowship of about 150 scholars called “The Inquiry” was tasked to brief President Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar world when Germany was defeated. This academic band, including Wilson’s closest adviser and long-time friend “Colonel” Edward M. House, as well as noted journalist Walter Lippmann, met to assemble the strategy for the postwar world. “The Inquiry” group later became the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In the late 1930s, the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation began contributing large amounts of money to the Council on Foreign Relations. CFR’s impact on U. S. foreign policy, for right or wrong, is legendary and has been and still is, almost immeasurable. Thousands of politicians, big-bank CEO’s and captains of industry are members of this elite club.

THE BILDERBER GROUP: The Group is an annual private conference of 120 to 150 people of the European and North American political elite, experts from industry, finance, academia, and the media, established in 1954. The group’s original goal was promoting Atlanticism, strengthening US-European relations and preventing another world war. (Wasn’t the UN supposed to do that?) Their theme is to “bolster a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe”. It all sounds so noble and worthy, except that in 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and, a CFR steering committee member for 30 years, said: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”

Daniel Estulin’s 2006 book “The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club”, describes the Group as a “sinister clique, manipulating the public to install a world government that knows no borders and is not accountable to anyone but itself.”

THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION: The Trilateral Commission is purported to be a non-governmental, non-partisan discussion group founded by David Rockefeller in July 1973, to foster closer cooperation among North America, Western Europe, and Japan. Zbigniew Brzezinski, United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981, a professor at Columbia University, and a Rockefeller advisor who was a specialist on international affairs, left his post to organize the group.

(Source for the three groups: Wikipedia)

Please take note of the Rockefeller connection in these groups.

We happen to know a little bit about human nature and what We know about men of wealth and power does not bode well for anyone below the top of the food chain. As we mentioned in our previous article, the three vices of powerful men are lust, lust and lust; lust for sex, lust for money and lust for power, in no particular order, or gender identity. Examples of all three lusts have “painted” 5,000 years of our alleged civilized history, in living and sometimes unprintable color.

In most cases, once an individual has reached the pinnacle of immense wealth, they usually don’t want to stop there. They either want to increase their wealth even further, or they aspire to power, political power, power over people and power over the masses. It is true that some wealthy, powerful men do give back generously through philanthropy, probably to assuage their feelings of guilt for being so rich.

Nevertheless, wealth and power provide the opportunity to satisfy their lust for sex, which is also characterized by clandestine meetings where the participants are sworn to secrecy on threat of bodily harm.

Unfortunately, history is filled with rich, over-sexed, powerful and sometimes crazy men, exercising dictatorial power over groups, societies, cultures and nations. When men of wealth and political power meet, especially in secret, can the outcome be good for individual freedom, liberty, property rights, or sovereignty of any country? Using any means of inductive or deductive reasoning, the answer has to be a resounding NO!

The fact is, bigness, concentration of top-down power and out-of-control entities has buried WE THE PEOPLE in frustration, confusion and the feeling of helplessness, if not becoming abject debt slaves. America’s Founding Fathers were very concerned about who had control in the federal government and that is why they established the separation of powers doctrine between the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Unfortunately, the separation of powers doctrine has been seriously blurred and now it is abundantly apparent that each branch of government supports the other two branches, against the consent of the governed.

From the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,”

But as government got “bigger,” Jefferson’s “consent of the governed” phrase became essentially meaningless, as our representatives and senators assumed more and more power and turned government service into a lifetime career. In response to government bigness and power, business and labor had to get bigger and more powerful in order to have influence with big government. World Central Banks merged into a colluding consortium to protect their own interests.

Then big government started handing off some of their power and authority to bureaucracies, who then got bigger and assumed more power and authority than was ever dreamed of by the Founding Fathers. Since the “consent of the governed” was perceived to be powerless, special interest groups (socialists. radical environmentalists and one-world-order types) began getting bigger and more powerful in order to have more influence on big government and government policy. As government, bureaucracies, business, unions and special interest groups got larger and more powerful, they began to lose control, became arrogant and careless with their processes, personnel and finances and careless with constitutional limits. They are so out of control now that we hear never-ending reports of ineptness, gross negligence, waste, fraud, abuse and corruption.

So when bankers, industrialists, the press, ministers, prime ministers, royalty, international financiers and politicians get together for a big secret meeting, what would a normal, reasonable and prudent person conclude about what would be discussed? Two specific items come instantly to mind: 1) concentration of their power and 2) manipulation of the masses for profit, behavioral control and for social and environmental agendas that run contrary to the idea of God-given, unalienable, individual freedom. Social justice, environmental protection and man-caused global warming studies, reports and policies are nothing more than smoke screens to the real agenda, control over the money, the property and the freedom of the world’s masses, for the benefit of the conference attendees. To look for altruistic motives in the secret meetings of these persons of influence, is an affront to a rational person’s intellect.

The point that we are trying very hard to make here is that the ultimate power and control is still inherent in WE THE PEOPLE, if the PEOPLE are of one mind and that one mind is based on a solid foundation of the fundamentals of liberty. But we are so fragmented. divided and diverse, becoming of one mind is problematic. Until we are of one mind, bigness, concentration of power in oligarchies and out-of-control entities will be our undoing and our enslavement.

Men in dark suits, blue smoke and backroom deals, as in members of the Bilderberg Club, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations will, in the end, work against WE THE PEOPLE and eventually erode freedom and liberty, or erase it all together. The war we face in keeping wealthy, powerful and lustful men from dominating and controlling the lives of all individuals is eternal. It is WE THE PEOPLE who allowed bigness and the concentration of financial, political and economic power to become our enemy, by not paying attention and by not fully exercising our right and duty as “the consent of the governed”.

President Woodrow Wilson said in 1919: “We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” The small group of dominant men is called an oligarchy.

This small group of influential, lustful, dominant men will have their way with us, if we refuse to challenge them and dedicate our lives to keeping their three vices under reasonable control.

Here are two relevant quotes from groups of men who meet in secret and plot control of the free world, in their attempts to implement the new-world-order.

“The new world order will be built as an end run on national sovereignty. Eroding it, piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” Council on Foreign Relations Journal 1974, pg. 558

“We will have world government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” Paul Warburg, CFR & Architect of the Federal Reserve System in an address to the U.S. Senate 2/17/1950

It’s coming unless WE THE PEOPLE stop it.

Please let us know if you LIKED this article. Constructive comments are always welcome.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“Where the Law Ends, Tyranny begins! –John Locke

It was reported on April 6, 2016, that the California Attorney General raided David Daleiden’s home and confiscated all his undercover video footage of harvesting and sale of aborted babies organs and tissue (Proverbs 6:17) by Planned Parenthood, an organization that America’s representatives refuse to defund.

The office of Kamala Harris (Outlaw), who was elected with tens of thousands of dollars from taxpayer-funded Planned Parenthood, is set on using the law against the law by attacking and intimidating Mr. Daleiden in hopes of incarcerating for exposing this organization’s crimes against humanity.

Just this last week, we found that the United States government has been targeting and illegally revoking the gun rights of over 260,000 American veterans since December 2015.

It’s interesting to note that it good enough for these politicians (Outlaws) to send forth America’s finest to fight unconstitutional wars abroad. Yet, when they come home, they are denied the very rights that they were fighting to uphold and maintain.

Are these that are to serve “We the people” arming themselves against Americans? Of course, they are. They’re armed to protect themselves from those they are to serve. As a matter of fact, it was several of these outlaws in government that just killed Lavoy Fincium in Oregon for standing up against those who were selling uranium ore to the Russians while stealing away the lands from underneath the ranchers.

The answer to dealing with these outlaws is to remove the injustice (Article 2, Sections 4 of The United States Constitution; Psalm 94:16-20)!

This flies in the face of everything that we are and what we are about. As the Second Amendment clearly states:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Last week, a federal judge in Mississippi illegally ruled to force Mississippi to allow sodomite (Leviticus 18:22-20:13; Romans 1:24) couples to adopt children. Is it not telling that the sodomites went from poor victim status (accusing everyone and anyone that rejects their abominable lifestyles as the “bully”) to their end aim, which has always been to get at the children (Exodus 22:22-24; Luke 17:12)?

It is the North American Man Boy Love Association’s motto: “Sex before eight before it is too late.” This can be seen and heard at your local “gay pride” parade.

The answer for dealing with this is to remove the injustice (Article 3, Section 1 of The United States Constitution; Psalm 97:10; Hebrews 1:9)!

Here is the tip of the iceberg concerning the crimes of these outlaws, which we call politicians. Keep in mind, these are the ones that have been caught.

Capitol Hill Blue did some research on Congress, and here is what they found:

• 111 members of the House and Senate have run at least two businesses that went bankrupt, often leaving business partners and creditors holding the bag.
• 79 of them have credit reports so bad that they can’t get an American Express card on their own (but as members of Congress, they get a government-issued American Express card without a credit check).
• 64 have personal and financial problems so serious that they would be denied security clearances by the Department of Defense or the Department of Energy if they had to apply through normal channels (but, again, as members of Congress they get such clearances simply because they fooled enough people to get elected).
• 31 members of Congress have been accused of spousal abuse in either criminal or civil proceedings.
• 33 have driving-while-intoxicated arrests on their driving records (34, if you include President George W. Bush, but he never served in Congress).
• 24 are or have been defendants in various lawsuits, ranging from bad debts, disputes with business partners or other civil matters.
• Nine members of Congress have been accused of writing bad checks, even after the scandal several years ago, which resulted in closure of the informal House bank that routinely allowed members to overdraw their accounts without penalty.
• 17 have drug-related arrests in their backgrounds, six for shoplifting, five for fraud, four for assault and one for criminal trespass.
• These that are appointed to magnify the law are the one’s guilty of breaking the law! Defined: Outlaws!

John Adams stated that “when the legislature is corrupted, the people are undone. “

It is a prime opportunity to prove the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Psalm 14:5)!

“If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do? The Lord is in his holy temple, the Lord’s throne is in heaven: his eyes behold, his eyelids try, the children of men. The Lord trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth. Upon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and brimstone, and a horrible tempest: this shall be the portion of their cup. For the righteous Lord loveth righteousness; his countenance doth behold the upright.” -Psalm 11:3-7

Furthermore, as E. M. Bounds points out:

“Gods church is a militant host. Its warfare is with unseen forces of evil. (Ephesians 6:12) God’s people compose an army fighting to establish His kingdom in this earth. (Matthew 6:10) Their aim is to destroy the kingdom of Satan and to erect the kingdom of God over its ruins, which is “righteousness,” and “Peace,” and “Joy,” in the Holy Ghost (Romans 14:7). This militant army is composed of individual soldiers of the cross (2 Timothy 2:3). The armour of God is its defense, and prayer is the added power that crowns it all.”

Nowhere can you find God the Father, in Jesus’, fail a faithful man or woman of God! America, deal with it.

© 2016 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

The liberal media want us to believe that Donald J. Trump is the most notorious political demagogue to arrive on the American political scene in decades. But Trump is a piker compared to socialist Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who has gotten millions of young people into a revolutionary frenzy and fervor over the idea of a taxpayer bailout for colleges that provide useless degrees in such areas as women’s studies and queer studies.

Consider the Sanders proposal to “make college tuition free and debt free” for young people. My oldest son Clifford has studied this issue, and has taken many online courses through accredited institutions of higher education. He has written an article noting that the Sanders proposal would funnel students “into an expensive and inefficient system that is largely failing today’s graduates.” He adds, “By doing nothing to address the underlying cost increases of education, the American taxpayer could be looking at a new Medicare, with no horizon in sight for the ever-increasing costs of the program.”

“Why should the American taxpayer and government continue to subsidize a failing university system?” he asks. “The costs of textbooks, tuition, and fees have all increased many multiples against inflation. Textbook prices alone have increased over 1,000 percent since 1977. Many college professors now demand that their students buy the book that they wrote. Not only this, but a new edition is released almost yearly. Even if a student wanted to get by using last year’s edition, new textbooks often have an ‘online key’ that can only be used once, making the purchase of a new textbook essential in order to do the mandatory homework that can only be accessed online using this key.”

The state schools that Sanders wants to subsidize usually include these exorbitant textbook requirements. By contrast, “other new and innovative online schools like the online American College of Education (ACE) require no textbook,” he points out. “Rather, they assign readings and coursework using academic journal articles. The advantages of such an approach are two-fold for the student: they eliminate expensive textbooks and provide information that is much more up-to-date than a textbook can provide. Not only are expensive textbooks a thing of the past at ACE but so is expensive tuition—ACE offers numerous master’s degrees in education for around $7,000.”

Indeed, he notes that “in recent years there has been a proliferation of low and reasonable cost options for schooling, especially online. Lest there be any confusion, these are not online diploma mills. Rather, many of these are regionally-accredited, respectable institutions that offer bachelor’s degrees, master’s and even doctoral degrees for very reasonable costs.” He cites Western Governors University as an example of an affordable, accredited university. It was founded by 19 governors of Western states in 1995 to offer affordable tuition by taking advantage of online learning technologies.

My son concludes his article by saying, “Forget a bachelor’s in basket weaving; this university offers coursework in highly marketable areas like information technology, nursing, education, and business. Coursework for many of these programs can be completed entirely online. The programs with required field experiences can be conveniently completed in or near one’s own hometown.”

He notes that the major flaw in the Sanders proposal is that many universities “are failing to prepare today’s students for tomorrow’s jobs.” He explains, “Last year, 260,000 bachelor’s degree holders were making the federal minimum wage. Add in the 200,000 associate degree holders making the minimum wage, and we’re left with just short of half a million college degree holders getting a very poor return on their college investment, which includes not only tuition dollars but also two to four years of their time and associated lost wages.”

What Sanders is proposing is to funnel more tax dollars into an educational system that is already wasting money and failing. He will saddle the taxpayers with more debt in the name of relieving the debt being paid by students who end up with either no jobs—or bad jobs. If this is not demagoguery, then what is?

My son’s admonition to forget about a bachelor’s in basket weaving at your local college, and to take a look instead at what’s being offered by accredited online universities, brings up another excellent point. The Sanders proposal does nothing to fix the proliferation of useless courses being offered by traditional brick-and-mortar universities. You cannot walk through a tour of most colleges without getting lectured about the need for “diversity” and the prevalence of women’s and even queer studies.

My youngest son and I took a tour of Columbia University in New York City recently and were told that the contributions of the great Western thinkers to our civilization would be “updated” in various classes with reference to the involvement of feminists and homosexuals. There is even a “Queer House” or “Q House” on campus. A 28-page guide is available on “Resources and Programs at Columbia University related to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) Issues.”

A tour of the University of Virginia, supposedly more conservative, found fliers on bulletin boards advertising “Pride Week 2016” with “Safe Space Training” and a “Pronouns Workshop.” The sponsors included the Virginia Department of Health, the Queer Student Union, the LGBTQ Center, the Student Council, and the Office of the Vice President and Chief Officer for Diversity and Equity at the University of Virginia. What jobs does this produce for young people?

Dr. Tina Trent, who writes about problems in academia, says that non-ideological and technologically-oriented students are increasingly being drawn to online learning opportunities that prepare them for the real world. Many students, she notes, just can’t afford to “mess around for four years” in areas that offer nothing practical or marketable. Still, she notes, “the big money is behind the brick and mortar perversity circus.”

That big money is what Sanders is promising more of. He says he wants to pay for free college tuition through a Wall Street tax. “The cost of this $75 billion a year plan is fully paid for by imposing a tax of a fraction of a percent on Wall Street speculators who nearly destroyed the economy seven years ago,” he says. But a so-called Wall Street tax would also affect the 55 percent of Americans who report having money invested in stocks. This category of Americans includes parents trying to save enough money to send their children to college.

While he is now claiming that his free college tuition plan is “fully paid for by imposing a tax on Wall Street speculators,” that is not true. A “College for All Act” he proposed in the Senate depended on the states to provide at least one-third of the costs. When pressed on this, he admits that many states can’t, or won’t, pay for that one-third. Sanders has deliberately obscured the details in order to deceive young people and get them enlisted in the “political revolution” that he claims to be leading.

Even with all of the problems in academia these days, it doesn’t take much of an education to conclude that Sanders is lying about the cost of his plan, and misrepresenting how it would be paid for. He is a demagogue of the worst order, manipulating the hopes and fears of millions of young Americans. Even worse, he is leaving them with no hope—or hope in socialism, which is a dead end.

What we really need is a revolution in education, away from the brick-and-mortar institutions of the past to modern institutions that provide less expensive but more relevant courses that lead to real jobs. But this kind of revolution would not serve the political purposes of the socialists working desperately to capture the minds of the next generation.

Our media should start telling the truth: Bernie Sanders is a demagogue and his proposals are fraudulent.

© 2016 Cliff Kincaid – All Rights Reserved

“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor” 9th Commandment 

“Thou shalt not steal” 8th Commandment

Cruz Actions Belie His Christianity

Ted Cruz calls himself a Christian, but he has broken the above commandments over and over again, and the latest example of this is what has happened in Colorado. “Thou shalt not steal” obviously means nothing to Cruz. It is theft, and a slap in the face to the voters of Colorado. 

Ted blew what could have been a great PR opportunity for his campaign. If he had made a public statement saying, “It is against my principles of justice to be the recipient of delegates that have not been awarded to me honestly through the process of caucus and elections,” those words would have given him Christian standing. 

However, the egocentric basturd (yes, I spelled it that way on purpose) is blinded by his incompetence to assess opportunity. He didn’t say a word. He just chalked up one more victory covertly awarded to him by his venomous campaign shenanigans, the GOP elitists, and his filthy manager, Jeff Roe.

The only people who have the right to decide to whom their delegates are awarded, are the voters from the great State of Colorado.

Ted Cruz can’t win enough delegates at the voting box to win the Republican nomination. So his campaign, led by Jeff Roe, is pushing supporters to steal delegates from states Donald Trump won.

The Gateway Pundit reports that Colorado Trump Delegates were scratched from ballots at the GOP Convention – and the Cruzers Listed TWICE! There was actually a resolution passed around at the convention that instructed Colorado Republicans to not vote for Trump. The resolution was created by Colorado Republicans for Liberty – apparently a Cruz offshoot group.

Colorado Trump Delegate Reacts

Lindsey said, “I’ve been a Republican all of my life. And this corrupt bunch of thieves is not even worth fighting for. I’ll find another party that believes more like I do. I’ve had it with them. But Jan Morgan you’re not going to get away with this. I’ll find somebody to listen to me. I’ll find some way to hold you accountable for this.”

Never Trump Twitter Backlash

ClashDaily.com Greenwood Village, CO. – The Colorado GOP is getting some backlash after someone with access to the party’s Twitter account posted, and quickly deleted, the following message: “We did it. #NeverTrump.”

The tweet came minutes after Ted Cruz swept through all 34 delegates during the GOP assembly in Colorado Springs on Saturday. The party deleted the tweet within minutes, saying the message was posted by someone “with unauthorized access to our account.”

Trump’s Reaction

“I’ve gotten millions … of more votes than [Sen. Ted] Cruz, and I’ve gotten hundreds of delegates more, and we keep fighting, fighting, fighting, and then you have a Colorado where they just get all of these delegates, and it’s not [even] a system,” Trump said, during the Fox News broadcast. “There was no voting. I didn’t go out there to make a speech or anything. There’s no voting.”

“They offer them trips — they offer them all sorts of things, and you’re allowed to do that,” Trump said of the method by which some woo delegates. “I mean, you’re allowed to offer trips, and you can buy all these votes. What kind of a system is this? Now, I’m an outsider, and I came into the system and I’m winning the votes by millions of votes. But the system is rigged. It’s crooked.”

Link]

GOPe Corruption

Conclusion

Donald Trump is a brilliant experienced businessman, but he is a novice when it comes to understanding the corruption and deception of the GOPe. As a pragmatist, he spoke to the people, saw them rally to his stated positions, and in a Constitutional Republic, this would easily result in his winning the nomination. Unfortunately, he did not realize the hypocrisy of the Republican party, or the criminal element willing to destroy the party to keep Trump from the nomination.

In 1964, Barry Goldwater battled the underhanded tactics of his own party, including George Romney, and his Democratic opponent was Lyndon Johnson. We have a parallel situation today. Trump is battling his own party and the underhanded tactics of establishment insider, Ted Cruz.

For the first time in 53 years we actually have a candidate who loves our country and is not part of the globalist cabal, neither is he beholden to any interest, corporate or otherwise.

We are at war people, and it is time to fight your state GOP establishment and legislators who want to deprive the American voters of the candidate we’ve chosen. Get out of your easy chair and get to work. It’s up to us to save our country.

Many of us old time education/political researchers assume the average American understands what is going on in our country since we, in the trenches for so long, understand the situation 100%.
My recent feeling is that the average good American really doesn’t have a clue about what is really taking place in our nation due to:
(1) The gradual imposition, starting in the early part of the 20th century, of a Marxist anti-American dumbed down curriculum starting in kindergarten and continuing through university level.
(I recall a 1975 U.S. News and World Report cover story entitled “Marxism in the Universities” which underscored my unpopular statement above.)
ABCs of DumbDown: Guilty for Being Privileged
and
(2) 100% Internationalist/Rockefeller et al-controlled TV, newspaper, and partial internet media blackout of the truth, from the international to the national to the state to the local level, certainly since 1945.
It is my belief and hope that if we can get “in their (citizens’) faces” with the truth, they will, if for no reason other than their concern for their children’s futures, get on board with the Action Plan outlined in this article.
Charlotte Interviews Anita Hoge May 6th 2014 – YouTube
” Anita, herself, considers this interview to be her most comprehensive, easy-to-understand interview regarding the terribly serious and complicated mess which includes Communist Core, Assessment, values measurement and remediation, technology, invasion of privacy, FERPA, dollars follow the child, school to work, national/international curriculum, and Trojan Horse: tax-funded school choice and charter schools w/unelected boards (taxation without representation). I sure agree.”
Watch Hoge video; listen to it over and over again; pass it onto everyone you know: family; public and private school teachers; private, religious and home schoolers; local colleges, Maine Street businesses, pastors, priests, rabbis, doctors, dentists, veterinarians, civil rights groups, ALL state and local elected officials, including Governors, etc.
Post video on Facebook, Twitter, all social media.
SEND VIDEO TO ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES with request they view it, respond immediately, and at least acknowledge receipt.
If you don’t have time right now to listen to it straight through, at least listen starting at 29.00 minutes. And then go back and listen straight through…over and over again. The You Tube viewer comments will explain to you that this video is a BOMB.
Don’t allow election hype, important as is any presidential election, to divert you from what is going on behind the scenes to kill the America you know “in the name of education”.
EDUCATION IS THE ENORMOUS ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM AND IF WE DON’T DEAL WITH IT IMMEDIATELY, IT WON’T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WHO WE ELECT AS PRESIDENT.
EDUCATION AND OBAMA’S HUD (Housing and Urban Development) REDISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION RULING ARE HUGE AND CRITICAL PARTS OF COMMUNIST UN AGENDA 2030. [Link]
ABCs of DumbDown: Speak Out!
PASSAGE OF THE EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS ACT (ESSA) DECEMBER 2015 WAS THE NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF FREEDOM IN THE USA. [Link]
Anita Hoge was never allowed to testify before the House or Senate Committees which passed the ESSA. What does THAT tell you?
THE FOLLOWING #1-4 IS WHAT ALL AMERICANS ARE LOOKING AT, IF WE DON’T STOP EDUCATION AGENDA:
(1) Every school, repeat “every”, will become a corporate/government school geared to communist/fascist lifelong global workforce training, NOT academics for the upward mobility of your children.

(2) Post-secondary (college/university) will be tied into elementary and secondary schools for smooth transition to this totalitarian lifelong workforce training system.
(3) All, repeat “all” services womb-to-tomb will be included in this birth to death government school. ABCs of DumbDown: WOMB TO TOMB
(4) There will be no locally-elected school boards. Property tax funding of schools will be moved to the state level. Agenda for local education will be crafted and dictated at the state level. Local schools will be “managed” by teachers trained in transition from academics to workforce training, behavior modification, and change agent skills. We will have a national school board, to which local and state levels will report, made up of carefully selected community, corporate and education leaders, et al, hooked into UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) and OECD (Office of Economic Cooperation and Development), Paris, France, and elsewhere.
If you want to know first hand what this kind of education/workforce training is, take a trip to Cuba. Less expensive than going to Europe, China, or elsewhere.
ACTION PLAN:
I have racked my brain to figure out how to get Anita Hoge’s impeccable research to the public in order to stop UN Agenda 2030 in its tracks. Agenda 2030 cannot proceed as planned without brainwashing/assessment component and use of tax-funded school choice/charters, with unelected boards, all of which are covered in Anita’s presentation.
THROW A BOULDER IN THEIR PLANS!
Here’s a suggestion:
Contact the following groups and request they invite you to speak and to present Anita’s video at their next meeting: local school board, home school groups, private and religious schools, churches, Women’s Club, Garden Club, Kiwanis, Rotary, et al.
When and if you do get an invitation, be sure announcement of your talk and showing of this video is published in local papers and advertised on local radio/TV well in advance. Be sure to confirm press coverage in advance of your meeting.
Be sure, after the showing, to follow up with the above groups to make sure they are on board with you, and to plan future activities to STOP this anti-American, anti-child, anti-academic teacher agenda.

You can continue your effort to expose this communist agenda at follow-up meetings, taking advantage of all the free Internet resources listed at the bottom of this article, especially the Exposing the Global Road to Ruin through Education 8-dvd/cd disc set which is also a free download here.
Take a look at the Trailer: Global Road to Ruin Through Education- Preview

Submit letters to the editor regarding Anita’s You Tube video and your plan to get the video into the hands of all your town’s taxpayers and residents, and local, state, and national elected officials.
The United States, as we have all known it, is on borrowed time.
No President, no matter how good, will be able to change things for the better without help from the American people at the local level. Legislation repealing unconstitutional laws, especially related to education and regional government, MUST be crafted and passed at the state level.
Pray hard for our children and our nation.
BUT ALSO, PLEASE, PLEASE, ‘ACT’ ON THIS REQUEST.
© 2016 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved

(1) Because they have been, over the past two-plus generations, subjected to a Marxist education, emanating from the U.S. Department of Education.
(2) Because Bernie is “up front” about his socialist philosophy; while the other candidates, from both parties, with possible exception of Donald Trump, hide (lie about their globalist/socialist views and philosophy behind red, white, and blue words). The young people appreciate Bernie’s honesty?
(3) Because President Ronald Reagan, who wanted to meet with Charlotte Iserbyt in 1982, was kept from doing so by his White House Chief of Staff, “conservative” Republican, Edwin Meese III. Had this meeting taken place it is quite possible the Department of Education, which has been funding and spewing out Marxist curriculum and teacher training for 34 years, would have been abolished.
ABCs of DumbDown: Patriots Or Manchurian Candidates?
Had the Department been abolished and communist T.H. Bell, Secretary of Education, fired, the United States might have retained its basically academic education system which educated our children for upward mobility, not to be pawns in the hands of the international/corporate education system, as serfs, lifelong, to spin off profits for the global elite.

No presidential election will change what I have just outlined in the paragraph above unless each presidential candidate is required to publicly, in a major televised speech, promise the American people that he/she will participate in an immediate “tear down” of the communist education system/agenda being implemented at the state and local level as I write.
That means that each candidate must publicly call for repeal of the recently passed, with a huge Republican majority, reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act: The Every Student Succeeds Act, a communist piece of legislation if ever there was one.
ABCs of DumbDown: CARNEGIE’S COMMUNIST MANIFESTO FOR AMERICA

© 2016 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved

Hillary Clinton lives a very dishonest life. From the time she enjoyed “first lady” status as the wife of Governor Bill Clinton in Arkansas, to her time as the president’s wife in the White House—all the way to Secretary of State of our nation—Hillary Rodham Clinton told-tells so many lies—she thinks lying equates to normality.

Beyond her slinging “F-words” toward her servants in Arkansas to raging “F-bombs” at Secret Service agents in the White House as documented in a half dozen books, she tolerated-condoned her husband who broke every moral code of marriage and ethics during his tenure of power.

She continued(s) her deceptive-dishonest life in order to gain and maintain power at the highest levels of government.

Lord Acton, 1834-1901, said, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” (The same can be said for such women as Hillary Clinton.)

No woman with any moral or ethical fiber within her being would tolerate her husband lying repeatedly over the years, cheating on her over the decades and having sex with 21 year old intern Monica Lewinski in the Oval Office of the White House.

At one point as a young lawyer in the Watergate proceedings, she faced discipline for lying and malfeasance, which Jerry Zeifman, a democrat—fired her.

This quote comes from FoxNation February 25, 2014:

“As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.

“The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

“Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.”

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” (Several fact checks contest the proceedings, but cannot definitely vanquish this event.)

Have you noticed that Chelsea Clinton does not look like Bill or Hillary Clinton?

This quote came from Robert Morrow: “Hillary also had affairs with Webb Hubbell (Experts think Chelsea is the offspring of Webb Hubbell) and Vince Foster was her emotional husband.”

In the book Passion & Betrayal by Jennifer Flowers, the blond model described her 12-year affair with Bill Clinton descriptively and compellingly. Historians may read the book for a clearer understanding of the ‘real’ Bill Clinton. He shared the same dishonest and deceitful life as his wife Hillary.

During her time as Secretary of State, she utilized Muslim Brotherhood female aide Huma Abedin to counsel Hillary and push Abedin’s Islamic influence into the White House. Today, no less than 13 Muslims aide and direct Barack Hussein Obama including the head of the CIA, John O. Brennan, who converted to Islam.

While Secretary of State, she illegally used outside and insecure email servers to carry on our nation’s highest top secrets of classified information. That’s a direct violation of our laws and punishable by prison.

Additionally, in 2012, she ignored calls from Ambassador Stevens as to the dangers facing him and his staff in Libya. She failed to send in Special Forces in the area to protect Stevens’ life and that of embassy staff. Four perished.

She later explained and gave excuses, “What difference did it make?”

Four good men lost their lives as well as the anguish of their families. Hillary Clinton, like all bureaucrats enjoys 24/7 protection from harm. Additionally, she created a story that a video against Islam caused the attack, which proved totally false.

After leaving the White House, she complained about being broke, when in fact, a retiring president commands in excess of $200,000.00 a year for the rest of his life.

Right now, investigators could indict her for her lies as to the emails, Benghazi and many of her activities with overseas money known as the “Panama Papers.” Because she enjoys insider power, many others cover up for her and she covers for them. We may never know the truth about Benghazi, just as we may never know the truth about how, where and the ‘who’ of Barack Obama’s origins.

Today, Hillary steps in front of adoring crowds with her anticipating to become the first female U.S. president. Most don’t know about her past, don’t care about her lies or her vindictive personal behavior. They expect to vote along party lines with their emotions.

She told reporters that America needs to inject more than 75,000 Syrian refugees, as if none of them will instigate the next Brussels, Belgium or Paris, France terrorist attacks in America. She neglects to mention that African-Americans struggle horribly in today’s economy. She neglects the 1.5 million homeless Americans as well as 14 million unemployed, but expects to place all those refugees on welfare. She forgets that America suffocates under a $19 trillion debt. She fails to comprehend that America imports 1.2 million legal immigrants annually with 91 percent of them subsisting on welfare paid for by struggling Americans. She promises amnesty for 20 to 30 million illegal aliens violating our nation’s borders. She refuses to secure America’s borders.

If a life of deception and dishonesty propels Hillary Rodham Clinton into the White House again, the utter moral, ethical and reasoned foundation of the U.S. Constitution and the American people will flush into the toilet of history. While she dresses nicely, speaks eloquently and dances her dance—she cannot out talk, out run or out last her exceptionally dishonest life.

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

Donald Trump’s recent foibles in discussing abortion create a media opportunity for him that he ought not miss: the opportunity to burst the liberal myth that political issues may be divided based on race, gender, and wealth. In the case of gender, liberals presume that women have issues unique to them and uniquely understandable by them when in point of fact women’s concerns are men’s as well. There is no issue which would beget public policy or a political viewpoint that is not fair for both genders. The need to emphasize that point is accentuated by virtue of the fact that Hillary Clinton plans to run a sexist campaign where she presumes her gender gives her a uniquely valid perspective, superior to any man. So much for equality between the sexes, Hillary, at least when it comes to her own point of view, wherein she asserts a gender based superiority that is no less repulsive than Adolf Hitler’s race based superiority. That sexism is indeed identical to racism, and Donald Trump should call it out. He can deflate Hillary’s sexist balloon in short order by calling it for what it is, sexism, and revealing it to be the product of simple mindedness because in fact issues that beget public policy are not the unique province of any one gender.

Men and women are concerned about protecting the lives of the innocent, including the unborn; protecting the nation against foreign aggressors, including ISIS; and ensuring that the economic opportunity is restored to America for men and women. There is no room in America for gender based or racial based preferences in education, government, the military, or the private sector. Ours should be a meritocracy and that, indeed, appears to be Trump’s view. Hillary, on the other hand, believes in dividing the nation along racial and gender lines and saddling those who are not racial minorities or women with economic and regulatory burdens designed to advance the wealth or status of a preferred race or gender ahead of those not of that preferred race or gender.

That race based and gender based system of government preferences is akin to the racism of Nazi Germany. It is repulsive precisely because it offends fundamentally the notion well-articulated by Martin Luther King, Jr. that all Americans are to be judged by the content of our characters not by the color of our skin or, for that matter, our gender.

The opportunity society Trump wishes to resurrect in America is predicated not on government selection of winners and losers but on the action of free markets where excellence is celebrated and complimented with riches, regardless of race, creed, color, or gender, whether the titan of industry is Bill Gates or Oprah Winfrey, Robert Johnson or Doris Fisher. We should prize and protect an opportunity society driven by free markets not by government mandates.

Hillary Clinton, by contrast, wants to continue the heavy overlay of government that characterizes the failed Obama Administration, where government issues grants to, coerces, and cajoles companies into advancing the kinds of product offerings it thinks best, and urges the kind of racial and gender characteristics it prefers. That has proven a total disaster because merit as determined by market demand which is the ultimate source of free market success has been supplanted by political preference as determined by who has the governmental authority to decide. Planned markets have always failed. It is impossible for government bureaucrats to predict the preferences of individuals in the market, and it is equally impossible for them to decide for each of us what we should buy or sell, when each of us has a different idea.

While in America there can be no legal protection for racism or sexism, there must also be no legal protection for select corporations or industries; rather there must be equal legal protection for all private property against the incursions of government. No matter how great a design some bureaucrat in Washington may envision (e.g., the disastrous Obamacare), it is not government, President Obama, who “built that;” rather, it is private initiative, unbounded by the constraints of those in power, that built all things great in America.

If we are ever to reclaim upward mobility as a people and a nation, we must reject the failed notion that central government planners know better than private citizens how best to satisfy private interests.

Trump grasps that fundamentally. He must now articulate the message against all-comers. When asked what he will do for women, he must turn that around and say he will do for women as he will do for all people, regardless of race, gender, or ethnicity; he will get government out of our way, eliminate barriers to competition, and free the market to allow women, men, and all Americans to invent, compete, and succeed, as is the great American tradition.

He must assure us that the wayward course (that of government protectionism and socialism) always brings down what is above, replaces exceptionalism with mediocrity, and deprives individual Americans of that freedom which is essential to economic achievement and progress.

© 2016 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

“I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often.” —Chris Matthews

The reason I added the above definition of pragmatist is because that is exactly what Trump is and how he responds. He takes a practical, common sense approach to most subjects. Caught off guard by the continual jabbering and interruptions of Chris Matthews, he answered quickly with the pragmatist’s mind set. In retrospect, he rescinded his original statement, and he was right to do so.

Trump is a Strong GOP Pro-Life Candidate

Who in Trump’s campaign told him to do the Chris Matthews Hardball show? Why should Trump reward the bad behavior of someone who believes the Marxist Muslim in our White House is a wonderful president. Obviously, the hypothetical questions asked by Matthews were skewed and purposely asked to put Trump in an awkward position. 

Not once would Chris Matthews shut up long enough for Trump to speak a full sentence. Like many who interview, they are more interested in what they have to say than what their guest has to say. Here’s the video.

And here’s a portion of what transpired: 

A woman in the audience asked Mr. Trump about a woman’s right to choose her own reproductive health. Of course Donald Trump answered that he was pro-life, with the three exceptions. Matthews interrupts and asks, “What should the law be on abortion?” Trump answers that the law will depend upon who gets elected, especially with the loss of pro-life Supreme Court Judge, Scalia.

Matthews then says, “I’ve never understood the pro-life position. What crime is it?”

Trump answers, “Well, it’s human life!”

Matthews continues, “Should a woman be punished for having an abortion? Should abortion be punished?” Matthews then interrupts Trump and says, “This is not something you can dodge.”

Trump answers, “People in certain parts of the Republican party say yes they should be. I would say that it’s a very serious problem that we have to decide on. Are you going to say ‘Put them in jail.’”

Matthews says, “No, that’s what I’m asking you because you say you want to ban it.”

Trump says, “I am pro-life and I am against it.”

Matthews says, “How do you ban abortion, how do you actually do it?”
Trump states, “They’ll go back to a position like they used to have, where some may go to illegal places, but you have to ban it.” 

Trump then asks Matthews, “Are you Catholic, then how do you feel about the Catholic church’s position?”

Matthews answers, “Well, I accept the teaching of my church on moral issues.”
“And do you concur with their position?” asks Trump.
“I concur with their moral position,” states Matthews
“But what do you say about your church?” asks Trump.

Matthews answers, “But the churches make their moral judgments, but you running for president of the United States will be Chief Executive of the United States. Do you believe in punishment for abortion? Yes, or no as a principle.”

“The answer is that there has to be some form of punishment,” answers Trump.
“For the woman?” says Matthews
“Yes, there has to be some form of punishment.”
“Ten years?” says Matthews.
“I don’t know. That I don’t know.”
“Why not, you take positions on everything else.”
“Trump says, “Because it’s a very complicated issue. I’m pro-life.”

Matthews interrupts which he’s very good at doing, and then Trump says, “But the Catholic Church is pro-life.”

Matthews says, “We’re not talking about my religion.”

Trump answers, “But we are talking about your religion. You say you’re a very good Catholic.”

Matthews says, “I never said I was a very good Catholic.”

Matthews continues to press Trump, who states he’s not going to play that game, and it continues to disintegrate into back and forth with Matthews continually talking over Trump. 

The Reality of Abortion

Is there punishment for the woman who kills her unborn child? For anyone other than a cold hearted Hillary supporter, yes, there is punishment, maybe not immediately, but often times later on there is pain from what they’ve done, and from the loss. They’ve not only deprived their own child of life, but they’ve deprived the grandparents, siblings, father, cousins, etc. of a child they should have known. Abortion causes two things, death to one, and pain and loss to the other, and the pain the woman struggles with later can be very devastating.

Is there punishment in our society for murder of the unborn? Remember Scott Peterson? He was the husband who killed his wife, Lacey, and their unborn child, Connor. He was convicted and sentenced to death for the first degree murder of Lacey and the second degree murder of Connor. The unborn child was murdered, and Peterson is sentenced to death.

What about when a drunk driver hits and kills a pregnant woman? Many states will charge the drunk driver with two manslaughter homicides. Some will not, depending on their laws. However, in many cases, there is punishment for the murder of an unborn child.

The argument on murdering your own unborn child will never end, but the result is always the same, a dead baby and a mother who may later feel deep regret and sadness. That alone is the punishment.

Trump and Pro-Life

In Moonies for Cruz, by Ann Coulter, she was writing about Ted Cruz’s constant lies about Trump’s pro-life stance:

Sometime in the intervening 16 years, Trump became fully pro-life. 

Conclusion

The following is from a delightfully well-spoken cyber buddy in New York.

Politicians can’t keep it in their pants.
They are stupid on purpose, because they have an agenda.
They pander to their donors, not the people.
Most of them give these lofty speeches, but it’s all lies.

They will use a war record as an excuse to get elected, and then milk it while they live off our taxes, and retire with millions from lobbyists.

Professional politicians are lawyers who want to steal from ‘We the People’ rather than actually working a job like we do. I’m not so sure many lawyers actually work, but maybe a couple perform some valuable service to somebody somewhere.

So it was great to see Trump on Long Island.

Wisconsin reminds us how many truly stupid people there are in this country. It is a shame they made it to adulthood with their heads up their own asses.

Savage just had a guy on who pointed out that it may have been democrats voting for Cruz that cost Trump the Wisconsin election, that and voter fraud.

Democrats do not have to vote in the democratic primary since that’s all been fixed for Hillary. They can jump in and screw up the GOP’s. So, Go Trump!

And I second these words. Go Trump! We desperately need you to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

In December 2008, atorney Leo Donofrio filed a challenge in New Jsersey to keep a pair of con men off the ballot for presidential preference: John McCain, Barry Soetoro aka Obama. Leo was not denied because of standing. Not to rehash years of litigation, but Leo ended up petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court who hid behind their dirty black robes. The ‘high’ court refused to hear one of the most important legal issues of our time: presidential eligibility.

Shenanigans by clerks at the U.S. Supreme Court should have prompted an investigation by Congress, but of course, that never happened. Justice Clarence Thomas disgraced himself when he stated during a congressional subcommittee hearing regarding presidential eligibility: “We’re evading that one.” Everyone, including Thomas, all laughed. Ha, ha.

Over 90 lawsuits were brought to stop the criminal impostor in the White House from running for president because Barry Soetoro aka Obama and other known aliases is clearly not a natural born citizen. Despite the massive amount of legal research based on court cases and historical documents defining natural born citizen, buffoons in the media, print and electronic, as well as boob tube experts, talk show biggies and the corrupt machines called the RNC and DNC continue to distort the truth by declaring only one parent must be a U.S. citizen. Wrong. BOTH parents must be U.S. citizens at the time the child is born.

Not one of those lawsuits was ever decided on the merits of the law. All were dismissed for political expediency. At this time there’s no proof Ted Cruz is even a naturalized U.S. Citizen so I ask again: Just what country does he claim citizenship under?

Several lawsuits and requests for hearings to stop Ted Cruz have already been thrown out on technical grounds or simply because of the ‘we are not going to deal with this’ syndrome by lower judges or election officials.

Montgomery Blair Sibley was a close friend and attorney for Deborah Jeane Palfrey aka the DC Madame silenced by suicide. In January 2012, Mongtomery announced he was running for president as a write in candidate; see history here. His goal was to try one more time to keep the lying Marxist in the White House off the ballot. The powers that be who control our elections made sure that never happened.

Now in April 2016, we have come full circle back to the State of New Jersey and a write in candidate for president by the name of Victor Williams who has quite a resumé:

“Victor Williams is a clinical assistant professor in the Lawyering Skills Program. He teaches Law and Economics and Lawyering Skills. Victor earned three law degrees: an LL.M. (specializing in Law and Economics) from George Mason University School of Law in 2005; an LL.M. from Columbia University’s School of Law in 1994; and a J.D. from the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law in 1990. While in law school, he was an articles editor of the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Victor also served as a student editor of American Review of International Arbitration while completing his graduate law study at Columbia.

“Victor served as a federal judicial law clerk with U.S. District Court Judge W. B. Hand from 1990-1992. Victor also worked as a federal judicial extern for U.S. Court of Appeals Judge G.B. Tjoflat of the Eleventh Circuit and for U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Joseph Sneed of the Ninth Circuit. Additionally, he interned with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, working on enforcement issues at the SEC’s regional office in Los Angeles. Prior to affiliating with The Columbus School of Law, Victor Williams held a tenured appointment as an associate professor of Law with the City University of New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice. At CUNY, he taught a variety of law and policy courses at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.

“His academic writings include articles and essays published by the law journals of Michigan, William & Mary, Columbia, George Mason, Kentucky, Marquette, Seton Hall and Loyola. His practice-oriented articles and essays have been published by the Banking Law Journal, Commercial Law Journal, Administrative Law Journal, American Journal of Comparative Law, Trial, Judicature and Federal Lawyer. Additionally, Victor has published commentaries and op-eds in The American Lawyer, Christian Science Monitor, National Law Journal, Connecticut Law Tribune, Jurist.org, Legal Times, New Jersey Law Journal, Fulton County Daily Report, Miami Business Daily, and the Recorder. Victor’s present research interests include law and economics, the federal appointment process, ethics, administrative law, constitutional law and intellectual property.”

Williams is challenging Cruz’s eligibility:

Why Ted “Canadian” Ted Cruz Is NOT Eligible to Run for President (except maybe for Prez of Goldman Sachs)

“Rafael Edward Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. But there was no need to for journalists to search for the birth certificate — Lawyer Cruz has admitted that he is a natural-born Canadian. Few would doubt the raw intelligence of Ted Cruz. He is renowned as a Princeton man, a Harvard-trained lawyer, and U.S. Supreme Court advocate who preaches a textualist, strict-constructionist message. Nor should his raw ambition (that over-leaps itself) be denied. Behind closed doors, Mr. Cruz finagled a series of huge (undisclosed) loans from Goldman Sachs to fuel that ambition. But these facts only go to prove the nature of the ballot con that is being perpetrated by Ted Cruz.

“Indeed, Mr. Cruz knew (and knows) that he is not a “natural born” American citizen. His statements made to obtain ballot access for each state’s primary (including those states where Williams is bringing challenges as a competitor candidate), were (are) nothing less than fraudulent. Some may find it kinder just to call his actions part of a “good old” fashioned Alberta long-con, eh….Ted Cruz fails this “Jus Soli” (law of the soil) test. The requirement of “Jus Soli” citizenship was, and is, antithetical to any statutory conferring of citizenship on children born abroad of American parents. And Mr. Cruz knows that he fails the test yet he continues with his fraudulent campaign.”

I encourage readers to go to the link above and read Williams’ full analysis which is the basis for his ballot challenge. Cruz filed and signed the required documentation on the drop dead date to appear on the ballot, but he’s not on the ballot yet.

Williams discovered he could be a write in candidate in nine states. Right now it’s New Jersey:

Ted Cruz Risks Immediate Primary Disqualification in New Jersey with Secretary of State Formal Hearing Scheduled

“A primary ballot disqualification hearing is scheduled by the Secretary of State for Monday, April 11 at 9:00 a.m. in Mercerville, New Jersey. Washington D.C. Law Professor Victor Williams charges that Ted Cruz fraudulently certified his constitutional eligibility for office to gain ballot access.

“Williams’ fraud charges had quick effect in New Jersey. Rather than accepting Cruz’s ballot petition when filed last week, the Secretary of State (Kim Guadagno) scheduled the unusual Administrative Law hearing for April 11. The Canadian-born Cruz must prove that he did not falsely certify his eligibility for office. Cruz’s ballot eligibility is also being challenged in California, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington.”

Williams feels he can avoid the judicial hallucination called ‘standing’ because he is a write in candidate just like Montgomery Blair Sibley was back in 2012. We’ll see if he is successful in keeping conniving liar, Ted Cruz, off the ballot in New Jersey which would cause a political earthquake like nothing we’ve ever seen.

For Ted Cruz to remain on the ballot is just another gigantic fraud against we the people facilitated by the gutless cowards in the Republican Party who have allowed not one constitutionally ineligible candidate to usurp the office of president, Obama, but have again allowed Ted Cruz to remain in the race stealing votes and delegates he has no legal right to during the primary process:

Cruz Outmuscles Trump in 34-Delegate Colorado Sweep – No primary, no caucus

Trump’s getting trounced in Indiana – The state hasn’t even voted and convention delegates are already lined up against the front-runner. What happened to the vote of we the people? Why even bother with a primary or caucus from this point on if an ineligible candidate is going to be allowed to steal delegates the way we’re seeing?

State party tweeted: ‘We did it. #NeverTrump’

Trump Delegates Scratched From Ballots at GOP Convention: “Ted Cruz supporters took all 13 of the delegates up for grabs at the Colorado GOP Convention on Saturday to complete a clean sweep of the state. But it was not without controversy. The Cruz camp and GOP establishment leaders strong-armed their way to a sweep by banning Trump delegates and omitting them from the ballots… and listing Cruz delegates TWICE! ” See link for the rest.

If you aren’t on my free email alert list, here is the last update regarding the DC Madame’s John’s list:

April 6, 2016

Greetings:

“As you asked me to keep you in the loop, here is the latest on the D.C. Madam’s records:

“Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to remove the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing the D.C. Madam’s Escort Service Records I believe relevant to the Presidential Election. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, I am now renewing that Application to Justice Thomas ­ a procedural second bite at the apple so to speak. I will wait upon his decision ­ which in the normal course should come by the middle of next week before taking any further action regarding those Records. The Renewed Application can be found on my blog.

“I am scheduled to appear by telephone on the Alex Jones Show ­ Jeane Palfrey’s favorite radio show­ this Friday at 1:00 p.m. (Central Time. ) I have reviewed the putative D.C. Madam records released on-line and can state they are not the Records I seek to release. Instead, they appear to be those that I released publicly in 2007 and which were organized into a searchable database by the Brandeis Boys.

“Respectfully, I have sought to answer all your questions, so now I am going to ask you a few of my own: With the Wisconsin Primary now in the books and more Primaries on the horizon:

1. Will the Press begin to “press” Chief Justice Roberts as to why he denied my Application in Supreme Court Case No. 15A1016? Is he a Caesar at the Coliseum turning his thumb up or down as the whim strikes him or does he have to account-through-legal-analysis for his decision to allow my First Amendment Political Speech to be muzzled by explicitly approving the refusal of the lower courts in his administrative jurisdiction to allow me to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order? (I trust you know for time sensitive or urgent questions, Reporters can contact the Supreme Court Public Information Office at 202-479-3211, press 1).

2. When will the Press begin to “press” D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland as to why his Court has refused ­ since March 9, 2016 ­ to address my Petition which seeks an order directing the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order. Notably, in Case No.: 16-3007, I requested Expedited Consideration which the Circuit Court also has refused to grant or deny creating in effect a judicial pocket veto without explanation and thus denying me the ability to appeal such a decision. (Such an inquiry can be directed to: Tracy Hauser Scarrow, (202-216-7460) Special Assistant to Chief Judge Garland).

“Needless to say, there will be more to follow.” Signed, Montgomery Sibley

Law Center Issues Threat to Cruz: Quit by the 17th & Admit You’re a Fraud – Or We will Expose You as One – April 9, 2016

“The North American Law Center has issued an ultimatum to the Ted Cruz campaign: “If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics.

“J. B. Williams, the co-founder of The North American Law Center said on April 3, 2016, “We’re talking about American citizens (who) think a guy who’s Canadian-born is eligible to be a U.S. president – without any documentation whatsoever. If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics… If we have to stop this guy from defrauding this nation, then we are going to do that.”

“Consider that the only documents we have actually been privy to are the documents that Mr. Cruz has provided, namely his birth certificate and his revocation of Canadian citizenship, which did not occur until mid-2014. That’s it. In fact, according to the NALC, “…there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and not any U.S. citizenship records.”

“At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access,” Williams added. “All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies. As a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims that Ted Cruz is either a ‘natural born’ or ‘naturalized’ citizen of the United States.” (Emphasis mine)

“Without any form of U.S. Citizenship documentation, and proof of Canadian citizenship at birth in 1970 and holding that legal status until May 2014 when he renounced his birth citizenship to Canada, there is no way for Ted Cruz to prove that he is either ‘natural born’ and eligible for the Oval Office, or ‘naturalized’ prior to 2012, when he sought and accepted a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal citizen of Canada,” Williams concluded.”

Like the author of the piece above, I’m wondering what is it they have but we haven’t seen? According to J.B. they have files they intend to release if Cruz doesn’t quit the race by April 17th. From his lips to God’s ears. We all know the ambitious Ted thinks he can bluff his way into the White House just like the current Manchurian Candidate did – twice. I guess we’ll see on the 17th what information the North American Law Center has and if any heavies in the compromised, agenda driven media outlets, ‘conservative’ talk radio, FOX News Network or any of them cover this story.

There’s a lot of talk about who can win the national election. We’ve already seen vote fraud in several states against Donald Trump that favor Ted Cruz. FOX and other media outlets on the stupid tube as well as the Internet and newspapers all say Trump cannot beat a criminal like Hillary Clinton in a general election. Funny thing though because the same was said about Ronnie Reagan in 1980. Despite Latest Media Smear Trump’s Favorable Rating Rivals Reagan’s in 1980: “Back in March 1980 the establishment said the same thing about Ronald Reagan. They said he could never defeat Jimmy Carter. He was too divisive. Reagan trailed Carter by 15 points in February-March 1980.”

Jimmy Carter, Democratic/Communist Party USA, was a monumental failure just like the Marxist in the White House, Barry Soetoro aka Obama. Reagan was a Republican. Election outcome: Reagan trounced Carter in a landslide taking 44 states. Of course, Reagan didn’t have to deal with an opponent who has no legal right to be on any state’s ballot along with the sophisticated electronic vote fraud we’re seeing.

Millions of us are praying Hillary the Hun gets indicted because her and the serial adulterer she’s married to have been a successful criminal enterprise for almost three decades. However, should she go up against Trump there’s no question in my mind he will beat her soundly unless vote fraud carries that hag as it did Obama – twice. As vote fraud absolutely put Bush, Jr. into the White House in 2004; no question Kerry actually won Ohio.

Dishonest Ted likes to say the eligibility issue has already been settled by the courts so buzz off. Yes, Ted, it has only you choose to ignore the cases which prove you are not eligible:

4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen”

Neither the 14th Amendment nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen

Ted Cruz Misrepresents the Law and His Being a Natural Born Citizen at Town Hall Meeting

I’m sure many of you saw the disgusting fake front page the Boston Globe put out over the weekend: Boston Globe rips Trump with fake front page. I have but one thing to say to the editorial board of that rag: Your proctologist called. He found your head. Now, I didn’t come up with that one; the woman who used it on line remains anonymous. But, it is so spot on when it comes to fools in the media working so hard to destroy this country, their own lives and families.

Well, we’re in the waiting game now. The release of Ms. Palfrey’s records, what files the North American Law Center has and the outcome of Prof. Victor Williams ballot challenge hearing today in New Jersey.

[Just a short note about 9/11 and Smart Electric Meeters. The cost of America’s undeclared “war” (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars – massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The Anatomy of a Great Deception. Just released: New Expanded Global Edition. For full disclosure I receive no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or give a copy as a present. I’ve purchased half a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It’s very powerful simply because it’s one ‘ordinary’ man’s story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in this film that many have never heard about but everyone should. Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend. Also, must see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take Back Your Power.]

© 2016 – NewsWithViews.com and Devvy – All Rights Reserved

If you’ve ever read Alice in Wonderland or Lewis Carrol’s follow-up, Through the Looking Glass, you’ll recall Alice was confronted by a world of irrationality, every thing upside down, inside out and simply stupid. In one scene she has a conversation with the Red Queen who is claiming rationality. Alice finally objects to the Queen’s irrationality.

“No, I shouldn’t,” said Alice, surprised into contradicting her at last: “a hill can’t be a valley, you know. That would be nonsense–

The Red Queen shook her head. “You may call it ‘nonsense’ if you like,” she said, “but I’ve heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary!”[1]

America, it appears to me, is now through the looking glass.

In Georgia’s Legislature a law titled “An Act to Protect Religious Freedoms” was brought forward on March 16 and passed in speedy time by both Republican-controlled sides of the general assembly. This aroused a firestorm of threats to the state of Georgia from major media companies such Disney and sports leagues namely the NFL.

They demanded the governor reject the bill or face economic sanctions. Georgia has a growing film industry and new football and baseball stadiums under construction. Georgia would stand to lose major film production opportunities as well as future Super Bowls.

The legislation literally states:

(1) “No minister of the gospel or cleric or religious practitioner ordained or authorized to solemnize marriages according to the usages of the denomination, when acting in his or her official religious capacity, shall be required to solemnize any marriage in violation of his or her right to free exercise of religion under the Constitution of this state or of the United States.”
(2) “No business or industry shall be required by ordinance or resolution of any county,
municipality, or consolidated government to operate on either of the two rest days Saturday or Sunday.”
(3) “No religious organization shall be required to rent, lease or otherwise grant permission for property to be used by another person for purposes which are objectionable to such religious organization.”

What’s so egregious about saying preachers can’t be required by law to disobey God’s Law? Should Hobby Lobby be forced to open on Sundays? Should churches, Christian schools and missionary organizations be forced to allow use their facilities for activities they believe are contrary to the tenants of the faith”?

Should preachers be forced to bless homosexual marriage ceremonies?

Should Christian schools have a right to deny groups that hate them the ability to rent their facilities? So anti Christian organizations, some call them anti-Christian corporate bigots, such as the ESPN, Disney, Marvel, Apple, Time Warner (which owns CNN, coincidentally), Intel, Salesforce, Dell, the AMC Networks, which films its hit show “The Walking Dead” in the state of Georgia, Coca-Cola, the NFL, which by the way said if the governor didn’t veto the bill Georgia would never host a Super Bowl, have all ganged up to threaten and coerce the governor to veto the bill.[2]

Imagine the reaction of the NFL if Christian Americans quit watching NFL football (on television or at games). What if Christians decided to stop using the products of these attackers and quit watching ESPN, especially its NFL football games?[3]

Our world has gone through the looking glass where the really insane people, those who think like the Red Queen, are in control of all these businesses as well as ultimately control of what the whole country is being perverted by, but not everywhere. In contrast to the wimp in Georgia who vetoed that bill is the State of Mississippi.

Mississippi’s House Bill 1523 says, among other things, that public employees, businesses and social workers cannot be punished for denying services based on the belief that marriage is strictly between a man and a woman. Same goes for people who act on the belief that “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage” and that gender is determined at birth. It says the government can’t prevent businesses from firing a transgender employee, clerks from refusing to license a same-sex marriage, or adoption agencies from refusing to place a child with a couple who they believe may be committing fornication. As of Wednesday, HB 1523 has passed Mississippi’s House and Senate. And the Governor is likely to sign it.[4]

The Bible has a specific word for what we see happening, the word is lawlessness – (1 John 3:4) “Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.” Sin is more than law breaking; it is standing in rebellion against God and pledging allegiance to the forces of evil that seek to destroy the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2016 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

Though the Republican National Committee may think it is going to survive the nightmare of what Donald Trump could do to the established power base of both political parties if he became President of the United States, the nightmare may be just beginning.

With the shortsightedness for which politicians and bureaucrats are known, Reince Priebus and the rest of the power-based Republican establishment have only begun to feel the anger from abused constituents they were either elected or appointed to serve. Rather than serving, they have ruled… or tried.

What might the future hold?

If Donald Trump loses the Republican presidential nomination because of rules changes at the 2016 convention, the Republicans will lose the election. Period. Zero chance of it being otherwise. Why? Because voters around the country who, as good citizens voted in primaries and caucuses, have learned that their votes are meaningless. They have now been told by the Republican Party that it, not the people, chooses the Republican candidate for President.

Keep this in mind in the future. We don’t have to take our valuable time to let the RNC and DNC continue their soap opera scripting designed to gain political contributions and voter support for “the big November election” wherein a company owned by George Soros counts the votes. The RNC and DNC control who will be their nominees and do not need our votes.

I just watched a Sean Hannity Fox News segment. Two women were discussing how the rules that govern the Republican presidential nomination will be determined at the 2016 Convention and they will be determined by the delegates. One woman repeated at least twice that a majority of the delegates voting on the rules for the 2016 Convention will be Trump and Cruz delegates because they have the largest percentage of votes via the caucus and primary process. She is wrong… she probably knew she was wrong as the words passed her lips.

Delegates are chosen by state and national Republican committees and those selected will very likely support a candidate favored by the party – and that is not Trump or Cruz. Their first ballot votes taken at the Cleveland Convention must reflect the number of delegates earned by each of the candidates in each state via primaries and caucuses. I wrote an article two months ago explaining how the party puts the fix in to achieve whatever candidate result the party wants.

That’s why there were 17 candidates when the race began: Fiorina to pull the woman’s vote away from any populist candidate (which the RNC thought would be Ted Cruz, not Donald Trump). Dr. Ben Carson was there to attract the Black vote (and the vote of the faithful – Carson is known as a strong Christian and was a much stronger candidate than the RNC thought he would be). Governor Mike Huckabee is a former Pastor and has a television following (and would make the best vice president). Former Senator Rick Santorum was supposed to attract the Catholic vote; Kasich who positions himself as part of the Reagan team is in reality part of the Bush neo-conservative cabal (according the news articles during April’s first week, perhaps Kasich appeals to gay voters, too – he lived with an openly gay man for over a year when he was a Congressman and his campaign manager is openly gay… which is a plus for him in NYC and California).

The delegates selected by various Republican committees (county and state) are committed to vote on the first ballot for the candidate who won a specific number of delegates in a particular primary or caucus election, but the delegates are hand-picked by the State Republican parties (which is dependent for financial support on the RNC). They may be selected because they oppose either Trump or Cruz. Some delegates will have to vote for Trump and Cruz on the first ballot because they won the right to those delegate votes. But if no candidate gains the required 1,237 votes on the first ballot, delegates can vote for anyone they (or the RNC) choose.

Without the conservative vote, the Republicans cannot win any election against any Democrat. The Party really doesn’t care because the elitist political establishment from both parties has only one objective: Power. They could care less about political philosophy and principles that flow from the philosophy. As you read the rest of this article, keep that in mind.

Should there be shenanigans at the Cleveland Convention that deprive Trump and/or Cruz from becoming the nominee, we will likely have a Democrat President. When we know the Republicans will lose the Presidency to Democrats, it becomes critically important for conservatives not voting for the Republican nominee for President to vote for Republican Senators and Congressmen.

No, Republicans are not much better than Democrats when it comes to budgeting or passing common sense legislation that benefits the people and a sovereign nation. But a Republican Congress would have never passed Obamacare. They will maintain some control over whom gets seated on the Supreme Court… and four or five Justices will likely be named by the 2016-2020 President. The Republican establishment intends to hold those very important Supreme Court appointments over the heads of conservative voters to keep them from withholding their votes from the Republican candidate if it isn’t Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. In the RNC view, pending appointments to the Supreme Court will force conservatives to vote for their presidential choice. It is their trump card… or, better said, their non-Trump card.

It is extremely important that conservatives vote this year. Eliminate voting for President if you want. If Trump gets “unliked” by the RNC at the Convention, I will. But make sure Republican Senators and Congressman are elected so there is a wall of protection built between a Democrat President and the Congress. It won’t be much of a wall, but it will be a wall.

Most conservatives will throw yet another surprise to Priebus and his elitist Sheriff of Nottingham associates. Conservatives realize that our nation has already been sold out and that Donald Trump represents the only chance the people have to restore our Republic. Many of us don’t like his personality but we understand he is the only candidate who can save our nation. We the People know the Republican Party is as firmly committed to a New World Order – a world government – as the Democrats. It was, after all, neo-conservative Republican President George H.W. Bush who first used the words “new world order.”

Thus, it really doesn’t matter who appoints Supreme Court Justices. It was George W. Bush who gave us Chief Justice Roberts, the guy whose vote forced Obamacare on the nation.

While the RNC has Trump nightmares, I have dreams. My dream of what will happen is this:

Donald Trump does not run as a third party candidate. It would tear the nation apart and after seven years of Obama we are already pretty badly damaged. And, it would harm his status as a Patriot, too. Instead, Trump behaves like the Patriot he is and he waits until after the election to do what his wife Melania says he does when he is hit unfairly by an opponent: He hits back ten times harder than he was hit.

Donald Trump, if a brokered convention removes him from the top spot he’s earned and he is not chosen to be the Republican nominee, will on the day after the November election make an announcement that he is establishing a third political party… let’s call it the Politically Incorrect Common Sense Party (PICS) for the moment. He will publish a list of cities he will visit in each state and the dates he will be there for a Town Hall Meeting to enroll members into PICS. He will have to rent football stadiums to hold the numbers of people who will want to attend. In a full page newspaper ad in papers across the nation, he will particularly invite Libertarians and Independents and Democrats who oppose socialism to join with Conservatives to make our nation great again.

All it will take to fill the stadiums will be a full-page ad inviting people to attend. All of those tweet and email addresses will also be available to receive invitations. Press releases should be sent to every newspaper in the nation. It is news, after all.

In Colorado, he would visit Denver, Colorado Springs and, on the West Slope, Grand Junction., all on the same day. Attendees will receive an Elections Commission form to fill out so it can be filed with their local authorities. Zap! A new political party is born.

What that effectively does is destroy the establishment Republican Party. It will cost them at least one-third of registered voters. Reince Priebus and his establishment pack rat elitists will be a thing of the past. That, in and of itself, will fulfill Melania’s prediction that when unfairly attacked Donald Trump hits back ten times harder than he was hit.

After all 50 states have established a solid base for the PICS political party the party must immediately identify good, solid, honest candidates to run for Congress and the State Legislatures must quickly be identified. All candidates agree to attend a PICS school that teaches a course on the Constitution. Experts like Michael Badrnarik, Krisanne Hall and Michael Gaddy, known for their writings and classes on constitutional law, will teach the classes. Members of the media will be invited to attend the classes free of charge. New members of the new political party can attend, too.

The objective will be to get enough pro-constitution PICS candidates elected to office that they will provide a back-up to the few truly conservative members of Congress in getting legislation either passed or defeated. That can be achieved by the 2018 elections.

By 2020, there should be a sufficient number of New Republic Political Party members relative to the Republican and Democrat parties to put forth a presidential candidate… Donald J. Trump. And this time he would be treated fairly as a legitimate presidential candidate.

That is the nightmare the Republican Party should be planning to avoid… but they are not. They are too arrogant to even perceive such a catastrophe might overtake them. I can only pray for it and ask you to join with me. It’s just a dream at the moment, but who knows what the future holds?

If you would volunteer to help plan and coordinate PICS Town Hall meetings in your state, drop me an email (address at bottom of article) and should such a miracle occur I will make sure your name is given to Mr. Trump. Send me your suggestions for a good name for the party, too – but first make sure there is currently no political party by the same name already in existence.

Has Mr. Trump given any indication that such plans for a third party are in the hopper? Not that I know of but surely the thought of a third party has occurred to him. I will volunteer to write the PICS Party platform and philosophy statement. It will begin with a statement opposing the existence of any government corporations and a return to constitutional law in our courts.

Truthfully, this would give the nation an even better chance to beat the socialists and communists who are shoving one world government down our throats than electing Donald Trump to be President in 2016. If elected this year, he will be standing alone in a pit of vipers and corrupt puppets who ask “how high?” when George Soros and the other new world order minions say “jump!”

If Donald Trump truly wants to save a capitalist nation called America, I think this may be an even better way to achieve it than becoming President in 2016.

© 2016 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

• “The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.” -Albert Einstein

• “Never open the door to a lesser evil, for other and greater ones invariably slink in after it.” -Baltasar Graciin

• “Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.” -Thomas Mann
I am guilty of living under a so-called awareness of danger. When I see men congregating on the street, I cross to the other side of the road. When evening comes, I tightly deadlock my doors. And where once, I would take an evening stroll to the shops, I now only drive. But I have found out I am not alone. Other people, and especially the women I know, are now exercising the same sort of excessive caution. There is a strange silent curfew sweeping over this once pleasant land.

In the same vein that fathers would meet their children, when the nights drew dark and they were late coming home; many husbands, boyfriends and fathers are also stepping up their watch.

And despite the re-assurance that our safety is of paramount importance, extra CCTV cameras just aren’t cutting it for the sensibly minded. They are not personally there. They watch from a distance, cruelly recording and playing back the horror and the nightmare of the atrocities being carried out on the street against the unarmed, and the unprotected victim.

Travelling alone, public transport, gap years for student children, are all becoming very cautious and careful considerations if you are travelling to and from a city. These are the secret comments that I recently listened to, expressed by old and younger women alike. You could literally watch the seeds of resentment growing.

Are we the victims of an agenda of perpetrated fear mongering or is our so called awareness of our so-called terror, based on reality?

There is most definitely a lot of confusion which is most certainly being perpetuated by the mainstream media.

The recent suicide bombings in Brussels Zaventem Airport and Maalbeck metro station, which some say may possibly have been planned to coincide with the Easter holidays, were consistently reported and emphasized as being carried out by a ‘so-called’ Islamic state. What did they mean?

Were the terrorists connected to Islam or weren’t they?

Demonstrations which later transpired on the streets of Brussels were un-hesitatingly labelled as being carried out by far-right protestors and hooligans, dressed in black, wearing masks, and making Nazi salutes.

From the photographs printed, you can see the odd mask being worn were those replicating the mask used in the film V for Vendetta. You can watch the revolutionary speech from the film here.

Were some of the demonstrators objecting to the actions of a government who they believe have allowed the crimes of fear, terrorism and displacement to infiltrate their country? It is reported the crowd were also shouting anti-migrant slogans.

It is the writer’s thoughts that there was certainly a frustration between watching the peaceful solidarity shown in the unity of races, exhibited outside the Bourse in Brussels, and the unity expressed after the Charlie Hebdo demonstration in Paris; which did nothing to stop a further attack which was later carried out on the Bataclan concert hall in Paris.

The political correctness which also demands a silent obedient consent may also be at the root cause of a frustrated crowd who are now being used to almost distract attention away from the real perpetrators of a much more sinister evilness.

1 – Brussels attacks: Police move against protesters
2 – Brussels Attacks Weren’t Unexpected, Security Flaws Long Known
3 – Germany after the sex attacks: fences are going up and the mood is ugly

Terrorism and Assaults in the UK

Of course terrorism and assaults have always occurred in the UK. The 1975 IRA bombings on the Rotunda building in the city centre of Birmingham, England, awoke my particular generation to an era of bomb threats, bag searching, and regular evacuations from both schools and shopping centres. There was a time it was common place to hear of the ‘troubles’ as we called them. It was acknowledged and spoken about openly. The terror from across the sea in Ireland had come closer to home.

The UK also has a very bad history of hooliganism within the sport of football. Saturday’s in major towns and cities were once dangerous no-go areas. If you wanted trouble, you could always expect a punch-up on a football day. Elton John even sang a song about Saturdays. ‘Saturday Nights all right for Fighting’.

These days football is more about the offence created by ‘name calling’.

Rough and deprived areas have also always existed in every suburb of a city, where you know your level of awareness usually signals some extra ‘caution’. But no-one has ever been so blind as to know that abuse and violence can, and do happen anywhere. Alongside terrorism there is a growing culture of out of control alcoholism and drug addiction out there.

However, we now face a different type of assault. You cannot fail to sense and see it spreading – everywhere. It is not predominantly confined to football stadiums, late night city nightclubs, or the seedy side of town.

People are very afraid of Islam, and they are highly suspicious of strangers until they know them. They do not know who is who in the towns and the cities. They are afraid of the increased attacks that they now see being carried out by some of the migrants they are helping, and they are also tired and frustrated with the cultural acceptance which they feel forced to adhere to.

Should they be the ones to be made to feel guilty, or are they just exercising common sense.

Individually, people hover between the friendship and the peace they would want, against the scale and the intensity of the atrocities we hear about and now physically see and experience on a daily basis.

Germany after the sex attacks: fences are going up and the mood is ugly

Live and Let Live!

Perhaps some of the most challenging misconceptions that we ever have to deal with are the thoughts that many people have on co-existence. There are many emotionally charged ideals being circulated on how we should love and care for each other. Some of these are being promoted through religion and some through humanism. They are not exercising common sense. We do not live in an ideal world and evil does not play by the same rules.

And when humanists point out that religion is the cause of all wars it is sometimes good to also point out that world wide atrocities which have killed millions, have been carried out by communist regimes and dictatorships. This also does not account for those who have died believing that you can live a healthy life with no moral values. How millions of people die under the freedom of doing what they choose is a whole different story.

Responding with Light

So, by chance I was travelling within an area known as the Wye Valley on Good Friday and happened to stop at a small village. It was just a little bit off the beaten track. Tucked away, it had about four shops, and three inns. It was one of those quaint quintessential niches in England, which I love to find and the type of place where everyone knows each other. I daresay though it still had its own problems behind the closed doors.

As with all British villages there was also the local church, in this case it was the 12th century church of St. Casians.

For a short while I sat in the porch of the church, as though sitting in the parlour, waiting, the door ajar looking out over the green fields dotted with clusters of daffodils.

Just behind me I realized there was a huge cross. It was painted with red marks, indicating blood and sacrifice, and there were blood stained ropes tied to the wooden arms.

Next to it was another huge cross, this time adorned with flowers.
The crosses were obviously being used in an enactment of the crucifixion and the resurrection for the Easter weekend.

But everyone had gone home now, it was late afternoon and the crosses just stood there, waiting. Did I exercise some caution of my aloneness in this seemingly peaceful place. Yes I did.

I thought about how Christ had stood alone amidst the brutality of the day knowing what was coming. How the crowds had been emotionally manipulated and swayed to vote for Barabbas, and how the truth would be crucified.

My own discovery has been that Christ never made friends or accepted that which was wrong or evil. He never compromised himself or acted weak and in submission to abuse. He knew who was who, what was what.

When death comes, believers and non believers all lay flowers and light candles to bring back light and beauty into dark places. They act as tokens of remembrance to someone we have lost……

A strong wind blew through the porch of St Casian’s, the door was still ajar; it had gone chilly outside and the skies were turning grey.

Will the UK and the rest of Europe find light, which is the truth, in this darkness amidst all its fears?

Sources:

Brussels attacks: Police move against protesters
2 – Brussels Attacks Weren’t Unexpected, Security Flaws Long Known
3 – Germany after the sex attacks: fences are going up and the mood is ugly
4 – Germany after the sex attacks: fences are going up and the mood is ugly

[These are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and spirit of my country has changed over 50 years. Why the country does not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.]

© 2016 Shirley Edwards – All Rights Reserve

Be Careful What You Wish For

Industrial Age America’s unprecedented economic revolution is fast fading under a new revolution—that of global socialism.[1] Then again, it’s not so new. On 17 August 1945, an English writer Eric Arthur Blair, commonly known as George Orwell, published Animal Farm[2] whereupon he painted a utopian vision inspired by German economist Karl Marx.[3] An allegory about life in the Soviet Union, Orwell’s narration tells the story of disgruntled Manor Farm animals owned by the Jones and mobilized by a pig called Old Major, whose dream of a future world featured freedom and equality for all.

There’s no mistaking it. It’s a big idea: restructuring into a new order, or paradigm, whereby animals are drawn together in common cause as one animal family, one farm community with a common destiny founded on universal rights, justice, and a culture of peace.[4] Can someone shout, “Amen!”?

Broadly bantered about today, the word “socialism” remains ever elusive.[5] To quote Hillary Clinton, “Part of diplomacy is to open different definitions of self-interest.”[6] To that end, Old Major would agree, “It’s necessary to take things away for the common good.” Whereas increasing numbers of Americans outwardly embrace the ideology, others scoff at the notion that U.S. policies under progressive policies smack of raw socialism.

Alexis de Tocqueville explained that democracy and socialism have one word in common—equality. Whereas democracies seek equality in liberty, socialism seeks it in level-the-field restraint and servitude.[7] Arguably, Orwell’s farm allegory speaks of the latter every bit as directly to America’s political landscape today as it did to the Soviet Union of Orwell’s day.

Culture of Victimization

Visionary pig Old Major narrowed the root of all the animals’ problems—namely, greedy humans who alone bear blame for meager rations and paltry stalls. Whereas toiling animals are producers, the businessman, investor, administrator, and/or owner are but parasites that siphon off the system by oppressing workers. Major’s charge was to wage a moral and political war of sorts against policies of greed enacted, in today’s terms, by billionaires and corporate leaders on Wall Street.[8] Toward ensuring dignity in an egalitarian super-status for the mass proletariat, Major advanced Animalism, distinguished by unity in thought and reflected in the collective.

Culture of Entitlement

Without listening to a word of what Major was saying, the cat purred contentedly throughout the rousing speech. It was noticed that, when work was to be done, the cat couldn’t be found—not until mealtime, that is. In Orwell’s world, whether weak or strong, clever or simple, all farm animals were brothers. Despite voting both sides of an issue, the well-fed cat convinced fellows of his good intentions by purring affectionately for the milk and cream due him.[9]

To protect the simpleminded from being led astray by pesky facts, strong, clever community organizers arose among the farm animals. The hard work of leadership fell naturally upon the cleverest of animals, the pigs. Comrade Pig Napoleon (aka Protector of the Sheep Fold) rallied animals for a better future on the heels of change they could believe in. Toward fundamental change, hope, and transformation, animals united with one voice, together chanting, “Yes, we can! Yes, we can!”

Culture of Intimidation

The “have-nots” became cannon fodder in what, over time, appeared to be a damaging collectivist experiment, but no worries. A self-appointed cadre of experts determined what was real, right, and true; then, codified principles of self-rule into non-negotiable, science-by-consensus precepts. Had they found the right arguments, several comrades might have protested. But then, why bother? Unfashionable opinions were seldom given fair hearings.[10]

“Settled science” was settled, no questions asked,[11] and “animal lives matter.” Period.[12] Each comrade increasingly surrendered personal freedom of thought and speech for some inexplicit construct heralding the common good. Any vague sense of uneasiness was smoothed over by spontaneous, swelling chants—i.e., “Animal lives matter!” “Main Street, not Wall Street!” “Yes, we can!”

Culture of Nepotism [13]

Once human masters were overcome, leaders of the revolution changed so drastically that they amended foundational commandments to make life easier, not for all animals, but for the executive family of pigs whose elevated service justified protecting their self-interest. Were they not, after all, superior? Before very long the key commandment—namely, “all animals are equal”—was adjusted to, “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”[14]

By redistributing farm resources,[15] pigs concentrated wealth and, therefore, power into their own hands. It became apparent that the farm had grown wealthier without making the animals other than pigs and dogs any richer. In providing milk and apples for themselves, pigs defended need for that privilege: Brainwork on behalf of comrades warranted enriched nutrition.

In joining the revolution, the farm animals’ expectation had been a society set free from hunger and the whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity, the strong protecting the weak. In the race to obliterate power-without-controls over the human-centric farming enterprise, animals failed to understand that their efforts were destined to become steppingstones for bureaucratic burdens and regulations, coupled with invasion of privacy and wealth confiscation. Bravely, Snowball (himself a pig) refused to compromise animal equality for the sake of self-interest and greed. When Snowball courageously stood for sacrificial principles of Animalism, Napoleon criminalized and, then, eliminated him—for the common good, of course.

Culture of Liberal Monism [16]

There was no part of the farm irrelevant to the collective anymore. Fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, thus discouraging comrades from speaking their minds. Some clever animals secretly mused that this was not what they had hoped and toiled for, but none harbored thoughts of rebellion or disobedience in that skilled thought police discerned even a hint of rebellion through a look in the eyes, an inflection of the voice, or an occasional whispered word.[17]

Working-class horses, Boxer and Clover, suspected something funny was going on with the pigs, but naïve trust in Napoleon’s good intentions blinded them to ways they were being exploited. As sheep blindly followed, so did they. Each committed to accept the leadership of President Napoleon and to remain faithful, work hard, and carry out orders. Compliant comrades rationalized that they were far better off than they had been in the previous administration. “We shall overcome” became the state-approved message of their collective march.

All embraced the central slogan, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”[18] Despite hardship, animals dreamed of Sugar-candy Mountain, where in the sweet by-and-by they would rest forever from all labor. Until then, each existed solely to serve the collective good. While work was strictly voluntary, any animal absenting himself from it—except, purr-haps, the cat—would find his rations reduced by half.[19] Together, farm animals sang Beasts of England three times over–very tunefully, but slowly and mournfully.

Downside of Championing the Coming Political Revolution

At long last, while huddling together, amazed and terrified, the animals observed a world turned upside-down at the hands of their cleverest of comrades, now majestically upright, casting haughty glances from side-to-side.[20] With authentic equality traded in for an elitist ruling class, demanding of the masses harder labors and worse pay, the utopian dream had, for them, morphed into a nightmare. Just at that moment comrades might have uttered some word of protest, familiar chants commenced and escalated for five full minutes without stopping. By the time the sheep had quieted down, the chance to utter any protest had passed; and the Pig-in-Chief had marched commandingly into his big, white house.

Creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but it was impossible to say which was which. The oppressed and the oppressor were one and the same. Alas, to make a long story short, the masses turned against each other and inevitably forfeited the better future for which they once fought collectively.[21]

Moral of the Story

There emerges always an “Old Major” whose dreams and vision ultimately fashion an elitist leader to be obeyed, even feared. As Old Major, Bernie Sanders champions “A Coming Political Revolution”; and, in tandem, Hillary Napoleon Clinton barks, “Everyday Americans need a champion. I want to be that champion.”

Especially in an election year rife with stirring campaign slogans, we best remember that, when righteous leaders are in authority, the people rejoice; otherwise, they mourn.[22] In 1832, Noah Webster published his history of the United States in which he warned, if citizens neglect their duty by allowing unprincipled rulers, public revenues will be squandered on unworthy men and women; and the rights of citizens will be violated or disregarded. “If a republican government fails to secure public prosperity and happiness,” Webster added, it must be because its citizens have neglected the divine commands. Moreover, they’ve failed to apply the plumb line of truth.

The moral of our story (and Orwell’s) is simple: Be careful what you wish for.[23]

© 2016 Debra Rae – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. When global super-capitalism is mated with communism, the result is a world socialist government called “commonism.” By transforming private intellectual assets and nationally controlled natural resources into the global commons, commonism effectively weds the bourgeoisie and the working proletariat—allegedly, for the greater good. The power elite that emerges works to synthesize capitalism and communism into a world socialist government, called democratic transnationalism.
2. George Orwell. Animal Farm (1945): (Accessed 25 February 2016)
3. Marx, Karl (1818-1883) – German philosopher, economist, and social theorist whose account of change through conflict is known as historical, or dialectical, materialism. His philosophical work owes much to the writings of Hegel, whose idealism Marx rejected. Das Capital is the fundamental text on class struggle, history, and the importance of economic factors in politics. With Friedrich Engels, Marx developed his philosophy demonstrating the material basis of all human activity. Together they formed the German League’s program, the Communist Manifesto.
4. “It’s a big idea: a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause … Only the United States has both the moral standing and the means to back it up,” President George H. W. Bush in his State of the Union Address, February 18, 1991.
5. A socialist believes that the way to achieve good things is to have government do it, but a government expected to provide everything one needs is able to take away everything he has. Concerned with “the common good”(utilitarianism), progressives advance an agenda for equal distribution of wealth and work. Proponents demand that everyone has the right to assured income and affordable housing. Note: Our Bill of Rights guarantees neither. Minus America’s signature middle class, two classes remain—namely, the oppressed and their oppressors. Every communist experiment that has ever been enacted, without exception, has caused unspeakable levels of the poverty, despite bogus claims to the contrary. Technically speaking, communism is the final phase and goal of socialism (i.e., big government). Under a progressive administration, this is the “real change” Americans can count on.
6. Hillary Clinton (Accessed 25 February 2016)
7. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/topics/topic_equality.html (Accessed 25 February 2016)
8. http://www.brainyquote.com/search_results.html (Accessed 25 February 2016)
9. Confiscation of the fruits of success to one who did nothing to earn the reward is by definition an act of greed, not to mention acts of thievery and piracy (Chuck Morse)
10. Touted as “tolerance,” political correctness is higher-order critical thinking often called holistic, systems, or integrated. The PC political agenda supersedes all other considerations. “At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question.” Indeed, “anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness” (George Orwell, Animal Farm).
11. The phrase, “settled science,” is an oxymoron. A scientist accepts that “correlation does not necessarily imply causation,” and he must control for all possible causes of his results. For real scientists, the debate is never over—about anything. To eliminate possible error in data or logic, scientists are open to peer review. Without exception, all scientific knowledge is open to challenge. To the contrary, the Wildlands Project provides an example of politically driven “science.” Vice Chairman Harvey Ruvin (ICLEI) insisted, “Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.”
12. While 72% of Americans are Caucasian, it’s deemed “racist” to suggest that “white lives matter” (even when agreeing that “black lives matter,” too). In truth, “all lives matter”—unless, it would seem, that declaration fails to support progressive political and/or social agendas.
13. Nepotism (favoritism) speaks to an oligarchy, government by a ruling elite. In contrast, God opposes those who are “partial in themselves” having become self-appointed “judges of evil thoughts.” With no God and no objective reality, communism looks to a powerful figurehead to serve the so-called greater good (Chuck Morse).
14. Egalitarianism is a specious buzzword for nepotism (or favoritism). It’s naked socialism demonstrated in affirmative action’s styling of reverse discrimination and its prevailing culture of entitlement. God pairs true equity with righteousness, viewing a just weight as “His delight” and a false balance as “abomination” (Proverbs 2:9:11:1). Because it’s not right to do wrongly that good may come, reverse discrimination cannot possibly be a godly solution for the offense of bigotry (Gal. 3:28; Ps. 34:14; Acts 10:28).
15. Those who own most of the top one percent of the wealth in the world are largely on the political left. Historically many of these same establishment conspirators were supporters of the two great political conspiracies of the 20th Century, those being Communism and Nazism; and that support included providing finance, media, propaganda, agitation, and other in-kind services (Chuck Morse).
16. Coined by Jean Bethke Elshtain of the University of Chicago, Liberal Monism is a philosophy denying reality that there are many separate beings in the universe. All ideas are connected together in the one highest ideal—i.e., that which is embodied in liberal/progressive thought, practical core values of which include federal deficit spending, high taxes, feminism (choice), gender and racial affirmative action/mandated quotas, secular education, gay liberation, judicial activism, and the like.
17. With Draconian fervor, Brown Coats (storm troopers of the SA), Black Coats (SS), and Blue Coats (police) dominated Nazi Germany. Theirs morphed into a culture of surveillance whereby squads of police hunted down all evidence of resistance. Due process fell by the wayside, as did basic freedoms of press and speech. Elections became farces; mail was intercepted, books burned. Never having been formally charged, many were arrested under protective custody.
Swelling military presence and mass shootings backed threats that “whoever lifts his hand against the State must die for it.” All were compelled to “self-coordinate” in line with National Socialism’s guiding slogan: “The public will transcends interests of the individual.” Within a violent culture of death, rabid national unity took on dark religious overtones, yet the German populace at large failed to push back, even on the Night of the Long Knives, otherwise known as Hitler’s Purge.
18. To commonists, “greedy” Americans are a cancer whose market-directed economies wreak chaos and instability. In their view, for the sake of “social justice,” producers must provide for non-producers—from each according to ability, to each according to his work and/or need. Commonism could possibly bring about a more productive society were there no greed, jealousy, or laziness; but (problem is) all three exist.
19. The phrase, mandatory volunteerism, is an oxymoron, which mirrors Planks 8 and 10 of the Communist Manifesto. It was reflected in Bill Clinton’s national “volunteer” program for America’s youth. Viewed as human resources, students are fitted to the work-force needs. Their “free” education privilege compels them to “volunteer” their services. As life-long learners, participating in cradle-to-grave indoctrination, and also as role models for youth, adults likewise are compelled to serve, often in the environmental arena.
20. Isaiah 5:20—“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
21. Considered an ancient utopia (literally, “no place”), Atlantis was an ancient city (or island) said to contain elements of democracy. In reality, “Except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it” (Ps. 127:1).
22. Proverb 29:2-4
23. In 1921, leading American socialist Norman Thomas gave voice to this scheme: “Under the name of liberalism,” he explained, the American people will “adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing how it happened.” Punishing the middle class, expanding racial justice to favor minorities, trumping the U.S. Constitution with international “soft law,” and demanding justice for the planet (ostensibly worthy of human apology and even worship) all hasten Norman Thomas’ premonition.

The 18th century statesman Edmund Burke wisely reminded us, “Those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.”

Whoopi Goldberg intimated that if Donald Trump became president, she would leave the country. Barack Obama’s 20 year pastor, Jeremiah Wright, scorched the air eight years ago with his, “God da*n America!”

Race-baiter Al Sharpton decreed his intentions of leaving America if Hillary isn’t elected. Funny man Jon Stewart proclaimed his departure should Trump become president.

Right now, Muslim leaders in Detroit, Michigan as well as other Islamic strongholds in the United States expect to register their male and female followers to defeat Trump. It’s ironic because Muslims treat their women worse than their dogs. The reason: they want an endless line of Muslims injected into America in order to ultimately invoke Sharia Law.

If you look at Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and southern California, an estimated 8 to 10 million illegal aliens feel great anxiety over Trump’s march to the White House. They remain in America in violation of our laws, which have not been enforced by the last five presidents.

Not to be outdone, U.S. employers of 10 million illegal aliens see their cheap labor constituents facing engagement of immigration laws by Trump.

Even China, Mexico and India feel the pinch of reality with Donald Trump rewriting the trade laws in favor of Americans rather than trade partners—in the greatest scam against America in the 21st century: free trade. Trump promises to bring back “fair trade” in order to balance the books.

At the top of the financial food chain, long corrupt and long in control, America’s corporate elites gnash their teeth at the prospect that Trump guarantees to level the playing field. They’ve been in absolute power for so long, they think their corruption: normal. It’s standard operating procedure.

One look at the majority of corrupt, career politicians in our U.S. Congress finds more than a few nervous senators about their futures. If a new president audited the Federal Reserve, more than a few of the higher-ups face jail time. Hillary Clinton, among them.

President George Washington said that government always works against the people. It harnesses its power to take absolute control. The founding fathers wrestled with their own compulsion to become rulers in the colonies.

President Thomas Jefferson said, “The two enemies of the people are criminals and the government. So let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.”

But in the past 30 years, the American people watched the elite grab power, usurp laws and gain horrendous money profits from their illegally declared wars and the Federal Reserve’s fraudulent activities.

No question, Donald Trump proves better than Alka-Seltzer, Castor Oil and Ex-Lax.

Along his path, Amerophobes scream their hate for America such as Black Lives Matter, Megyn Kelly and Louis Farrakhan the preeminent Islamic leader in America who has called for killings of the white race in America.

If you look at 42 million foreign born immigrants in this country, millions upon millions of them relay on welfare handouts. They enjoy the ‘milk and honey’ of the life of leisure in America on the backs of working Americans.

Finally, the biggest Amerophobe finds his days numbered: Barack Obama. For the past seven years, he bowed to Saudi Muslim Kings, apologized to everyone within earshot for America’s transgressions and he oversaw the greatest racial divide explode in America since the 1960s. Additionally, he does everything in his power to ‘seed’ our country with Muslims of every stripe and terrorist tendency.

Meanwhile, most Americans that love this country—-sit back, watch, wait and feel helpless. For the most part, they do nothing. Half of them don’t vote in national elections. They watch their schools turn into Islamic test grounds. They watch English being subverted in their schools and communities. They watch Old Glory being stomped on by immigrants, angry Blacks and illegal Mexicans. They watch TV shows and movies based on sexual violence, totally lacking in moral standards and based on everything abhorrent to sensible human beings.

With the addition 100,000,000 (million) legal immigrants in the next 30 years from over 190 countries—featuring 190 different cultures, ethos and languages—we most certainly expect Brussels, Belgium, Paris, France and San Bernardino to become a normal part of the American news reports.

We have met the enemy: it’s our apathy, despair and tolerance tied to inaction. George Washington created this nation with his courage. Thomas Jefferson wrote it into being. Donald Trump may be its last hope of this nation’s survival.

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

The media are once again going nuts over the fact that a state legislature has acted to protect Christians and their churches and businesses from the demands of various sexual minorities. As we have noted before, the power of the real one percent has enormous influence in the major media. The real one percent consists of the open and closeted homosexuals and their allies in positions of power in the major media, academia and the corporate world.

When they want to make an example of Indiana, North Carolina and now Mississippi, they can do so. It is something to behold. They have the ability to make an entire state look like a hotbed of homophobia and hate. The special rights of homosexuals and even “transgendered” people suddenly take precedence over the constitutional rights of religious believers.

What is being demanded is nothing less than the “right” of a man to dress up as a woman and invade the privacy of real women and girls in a ladies’ restroom. That is one of the “rights” that is at stake in what is happening in Mississippi. The legislature and the governor have rejected what is clearly perverted behavior and have affirmed the rights and privacy of those of who understand the science of DNA and biological differences.

Before Mississippi took center stage as the most villainous state, North Carolina was under attack because its legislature passed—and its governor signed—a bill known as the North Carolina Public Facilities and Security Act. It will prohibit men from using women’s restrooms, locker rooms and shower rooms.

Liberty Counsel, which is offering to defend the law in court, points out, “The North Carolina law was passed to maintain statewide uniformity and prevents abuse, such as has happened in other states. Recently, a 51-year-old cross-dressing male in Georgia entered the women’s restroom and exposed himself to women who were shocked and offended. In Minneapolis, a 15-year-old boy entered the girls’ locker room where five girls were in various stages of undress as they prepared for a basketball game. The boy looked around and disrobed in front of the frightened girls. When the girls and the parents complained, school authorities said they could not prevent boys from using the girls’ locker room because of the so-called ‘transgender’ policy.”

You don’t have to have a journalism degree to know that there’s something wrong with the journalism business, and understand that it’s dominated by special interest groups. One of the most powerful is the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association, financed by all of the Big Media corporations.

In the past, our main worry as media critics was the influence of liberals and left-wing Democrats. Now we see a concerted push by sexual minorities, including men who dress like women, to assert their rights in the newsroom. They are already exercising influence over news coverage, but now want even more leverage over how the “news” is reported, and by whom.

The idea of concentrating on such elementary questions as who, what, when, where, why and how, is now considered old-fashioned journalism. Instead, the focus is on who reports the news, as they define it, and whether they are members of protected groups. Being white is not a protected class of people. White people are the villains, unless they identify as a member of a protected group. That leaves white heterosexuals as people who have to be demoted or dismissed.

Indeed, several so-called “journalism groups” have now gotten together to issue a joint statement urging newsrooms to “close the race and gender salary gaps.” I’ve read their statement and I am still at a loss to explain how skin color or one’s gender or sexual preference is critical to journalistic skills.

But one thing is certain: whiteness is considered a cancer in the newsroom.

“As representatives of more than 7,000 journalists of color across America, we are pleased that The Wall Street Journal and its parent company Dow Jones have pledged to close the race and gender salary gaps among their employees, as reported by the Washington Post on March 25,” they say in their statement. “But we will remain vigilant until those inequities are remedied—not just at The Journal, but in all newsrooms.”

Indeed, whiteness is such a cancer in the newsroom that a “remedy” is needed. These white people have to be put in their place. They must be cut down to size.

The story in the Post cited union data as having “revealed that white men make significantly more money than everyone else at publications owned by Dow Jones & Co.” The assumption seems to be that these white men do not deserve more money. Do they? Have they been there longer? Are they more productive? Are they better writers and editors?

All that I see is a conclusion that because they are white, they are not entitled to higher wages.

It appears that these white men are guilty of discrimination as charged, simply because they are white. That sounds like discrimination to me.

The groups protesting the position of the white male in journalism include:

• Asian American Journalists Association
• Native American Journalists Association
• National Association of Black Journalists
• National Association of Hispanic Journalists
• National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association
• Journalists for Diversity

Don’t get the impression that because the name of the last group includes the word “diversity” that diversity of thought and opinion is important to these people. They are talking about “diversity” of appearance or behavior. None of this has anything to do with how you do your job as a journalist.

In their statement, they say, “We urge all news organizations to conduct their own inquiries about pay and ensure that hard working journalists are being paid fairly and equitably, regardless of color or gender.” Perhaps they should have conducted this research before spouting off. Where is the evidence that hard work is not paying off? Where is the evidence that journalists are being denied opportunities because they are black or gay?

It doesn’t really matter what the evidence shows. The evidence is irrelevant. What matters is your color or sexual orientation. This is what journalism has become.

Hence, the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA) just held a national fundraiser in New York City sponsored by Fox News, NBC, CNN, CBS News and ABC News, among others.

You may have thought these news organizations were in competition with one another. That’s what they want you to believe. But when it comes to promoting the homosexual agenda, including the “rights” of transgenders, they are on the same page. That’s why the coverage of these sexual issues by so many news organizations that seem to differ in their ideological orientation is in fact similar in bias and approach. The real one percent is in charge and growing stronger by the day. They are now determined to expel normal, white heterosexuals from the newsroom.

© 2016 Cliff Kincaid – All Rights Reserved

“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God! Therefore, non-resistance to tyrants is obedience to Satan.”

As I have preached for 20 years now, God is going to get your attention one way or another (Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28).

Americans have to their own shameless apathetic and tolerant ways have not yet learned that those “that preach tolerance, only mean to dominate, then they try to silence the good.” Even when the writing is on the wall, for some reason or another, Americans feel that it still does not apply to them. How is this?

• The war against God
• The war against the truth
• The war against America’s Christian heritage
• The war against the United States Constitution
• The war against The Bill of Rights
• The war against God given rights
• The war against the veterans
• The war against Patriots
• The war against “We the people.”
• The war against life
• The war against morality
• The war against family
• The war against woman
• The war against the children
• The war on freedom
• The war on unity
• The war on peace
• The war on guns
• The war on health

This is the fruit of this present administration (Matthew 7:16).

America’s present state proves whom they are willing to submit to, and that non-resistance to tyrants is obedience to Satan.

Is this the history of what our forefathers left you America?

By looking at the history of our founding forefathers, and by judging as to how they responded to the tyrant King George 4,417 miles across the pond, we can see that they had come to the point where they not only said “enough is enough,” but they acted as well by throwing off his ungodly rule (Psalm 94:20).

Thomas Jefferson, who was the chief architect of the Declaration of Independence said,

“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.” Benjamin Franklin added, “Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God.”

John Adams, Robert Livingston and Roger Sherman all echoed these sentiments.

In 1776, a short time after the Declaration of Independence was adopted, the same committee who were assigned to draft the text of the Declaration – Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Benjamin Franklin – were also assigned to design an official seal for the United States of America. Benjamin Franklin’s proposal is preserved in a note in his own handwriting:

Moses standing on the Shore, and extending his Hand over the Sea, thereby causing the same to overwhelm Pharaoh, who is sitting in an open Chariot, a Crown on his Head and a Sword in his Hand. Rays from a Pillar of Fire in the Clouds reaching to Moses, to express that he acts by Command of the Deity. The Motto inscribed on the Seal was “Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God” (First Committee’s Design for the Great Seal).

John Adams later described Jefferson’s depiction of the Great Seal:

Mr. Jefferson proposed: The children of Israel in the wilderness, led by a pillar of cloud by day, and a pillar of fire by night, and on the other side Hengist and Horsa, the Saxon chiefs, from whom we claim the honour of being descended and whose political principles and form of government we have assumed.

We can see clearly that King George was not ruled by God in his role as the King and because of that, the founders threw him off.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused….

This is where it starts, and then everyone else falls in close pursuit to impending judgment because they submit to the wrong authority (Roman 12:21). We are to overcome evil with good, not the other way around.

The history of men: Men depart from God, the people yield themselves over to the state at the dictates of the tyrant, wars are commenced, populations are murdered and countries are destroyed. The tyrant is dealt with, then they return to the God from whom they should have not departed. Whom do you submit to?

© 2016 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

[NOTE: This article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

Several friends and supporters around the country have recently asked me the question, “Where do we go from here?” These are people who love and fear God, who love their country, who love freedom, who see the burgeoning abridgments of our liberties by an overbearing and ever-intrusive federal government, and who, frankly, see little reason to believe that either political party will do much of anything to change things–regardless of who is elected. And, frankly, I share their frustration.

For the most part, the two major parties are controlled by the same big-government, Police State-loving, war-mongering, power-hungry, egotistical elitist clubmen whose only aim is to satisfy their insatiable appetite for personal gain. Anyone, and I mean anyone, who isn’t willing to lick the boots and kiss the rings of the establishment elite will unleash the wrath of the fire-breathing dragons in both parties–not to mention their toadies in the propaganda media.

Normally, there will be but one anti-establishment candidate capable of upsetting the establishment applecart in a given presidential race. During the last half-century or so, that means men such as Barry Goldwater, George Wallace, John Anderson, Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, and Ron Paul. These men are summarily run over by the combined force of the political and media establishments–or in the case of Wallace, shot–thus ensuring that no matter which major party candidate wins, the establishment wins.

This is why no matter which party controls the White House and Congress, the beat goes on for the establishment elite: more and more government growth and spending; more and more intrusions into our personal lives; more and more jobs shipped overseas; more and more illegal immigration; more and more foreign wars; more and more federal usurpation of State sovereignty; more and more power to overbearing federal agencies such as the BLM and EPA; and more and more economic hardship on the middle class.

The problem for the establishment this year is that there is not one, but two anti-establishment candidates in the hunt: one in each party. The combined candidacies of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are making life a veritable hell for the establishment elite. The fact that so many millions of people from both the left and the right are supporting these two men is definite cause for the establishment to be concerned. The anger and frustration of the American people with the establishment are VERY real.

In addition, millions of people have completely given up on the ballot box. The testimonies of computer hackers claiming to have rigged voting machines or to being eyewitnesses to vote fraud, the overt manipulation of party delegates, rules and procedures, and the track record of nothing changing no matter who is elected (as referenced above) have caused millions of people to give up voting altogether. There are more people who believe that voting is a complete waste of time today than at any time in our nation’s history. This does not bode well for our future. Feelings of hopelessness and desperation are usually the things that revolutions are made of.

So, where do we go from here?

Let’s begin here: it is absolutely certain that, while Washington, D.C., is a major part of our problem, it is NOT our solution. As the comic strip character Pogo said, “We have found the enemy, and it is us.” And the “us” in this equation is mostly those who profess to be “Christians” and those who profess to be “Patriots.”

“Christians”

Most Christians are familiar with the Scripture that says “judgment must begin at the house of God.” (I Peter 4:17) The problem with Old Testament Israel was NOT the Canaanites or the Moabites or the Girgashites or the Ammonites or the Midianites, ad infinitum. The problem with Old Testament Israel was Old Testament Israel. God’s people brought judgment upon themselves. So it is today.

Christians love to curse the sins (mostly the sins of the flesh) of actors, entertainers, celebrities, and even one another. But the greater and more predominate sins of the church are totally and completely ignored. And in the pulpit, the most notable sin is the sin of silence.

Christians are content to sit in front of pulpits that are totally silent on the salient issues facing our country. Oh, some may complain about their pastors not speaking out on the issues, but they continue to support these pastors with their attendance and offerings nonetheless. As long as Christians continue to give aid and comfort to these pandering pulpits, NOTHING will change in this country–no matter who is elected to public office.

Beyond that, the church itself is filled with the things that God hates. When naming the particular sins that He hates, God included:

• Pride
• Lying
• Hands that shed innocent blood
• A heart that devises wicked imaginations
• Feet that are swift to run into mischief
• A false witness that speaks lies
• People that sow discord among brethren (See Proverbs 6:16-19)

I submit that our churches are literally immersed in the sins listed above. Pride, arrogance, stubbornness, rebelliousness, deceit, backbiting, gossip, slander, character assassination, selfish ambition, insubordination, lying, false testimony, discord, discontent, malcontent, and troublemaking fill our churches. People such as these don’t want God’s men in the pulpit to be prophets; they want them to be glorified babysitters: coddling and pampering spoiled spiritual babies.

God said he HATES this kind of stuff. Until these kinds of sins (amounting to nothing more than spiritual idolatry or the idolization of self) are judged in the church, God will continue to give us over to our enemies as surely as He did to Old Testament Israel for their idolatry.

“Patriots”

A sizeable percentage of the professing patriot community today is doing more to cause their own enslavement than they are to prevent it. They create self-fulfilling prophecies and then refuse to take any responsibility for it.

The Internet is awash in half-truths, rumors, hearsay, baseless accusations, and downright lies. In the name of God, so-called prophecy “experts” repeatedly predict divine pronouncements that never come true. And without retraction or apology, they continue to spew forth more and ever-exaggerated predictions. False reports are regurgitated ubiquitously. And even worse, there is an element within the patriot community that has NO desire to be objective and honest; there is no room in their minds for critical thinking. If the truth doesn’t fit their preconceived agenda, they make up a lie that will.

If we are going to make any progress toward the restoration and reclamation of constitutional government in this country, the patriot community must start being honest with itself. Hyperbole, sensationalism, self-aggrandizement, and pandering only serve to accommodate oppression. They do nothing to further the cause of liberty.

Many patriot Internet bloggers and radio talk show hosts seem to pander as much to their audience as politicians in Washington, D.C., do to theirs. Rather than facing issues objectively and honestly, they slant or spin the story to fit what the audience wants to hear. It’s the same thing the SPLC and the politically correct establishment do–only in reverse.

The dark side of government and the media spin stories to fit their agendas. Many patriots do the exact same thing.

Big Government toadies love to lump all patriots (those could include Ron Paul supporters, Donald Trump supporters, pro-life people, conservative Christians, military veterans, people who believe in the Constitution, creationists, Second Amendment advocates, ad infinitum) into one big “anti-government” group. And many self-serving patriots love to lump all policemen, federal agents, and public servants into one big “tyrant” group.

And please remember, many of these so-called “patriots” who are continually promoting their own particular brand of hatred for government are in reality agent provocateurs who are attempting to incite people with strong emotions and weak minds into doing something criminal so as to further categorize all of us as “anti-government extremists.” And far, far too many of us are far, far too easily manipulated.

The problem in the patriot community, as I see it, is the same as it is in the big-government community: a herd mentality. It seems that almost no one is willing to distance him or herself from the crowd. Whatever my peers expect me to be, I will be. Whatever they expect me to do, I will do. Whatever they expect me to say, I will say. This is a problem on both sides of the aisle.

Too many good people in government are not willing to stand against the tide of popular opinion among their peers. Even when they recognize that the popular opinion of their peers is wrong, they sheepishly surrender to it. Many professing patriots do the exact same thing. They are unwilling to stand against the tide of popular opinion among their own peers. Even when they recognize that the popular opinion of their peers is wrong, they sheepishly surrender to it. So, who is worse?

Until we who call ourselves patriots are willing to be honest and objective with ourselves and have the personal courage and integrity to truthfully follow that honesty and objectivity wherever it leads us, and until we stop sheepishly acquiescing to the tide of popular opinion of our peers for the purpose of self-aggrandizement and personal profit, we only contribute to the advancement of our own enslavement.

We also need to become much smarter in the way we present ourselves to our uninformed neighbors and fellow citizens in our local communities. Hot-headed, knee-jerk, overly emotional outbursts and tantrums are NOT helping the cause. In the world of marketing and salesmanship, for example, bad breath and body order are NOT assets. A lot of what goes on in the name of the patriot community is tantamount to bad breath and body order. IT STINKS!

Our Founding Fathers convinced the Body Politic of Colonial America (in great part because of the preaching of the Colonial pastors) as to the legitimacy and righteousness of independence from Great Britain. When those delegates voted for the Declaration of Independence, they acted as duly elected representatives of the Body Politic within the thirteen colonies. They were not a mob leading an insurrection; they were statesmen representing the will of “We the People.” That could not have happened without decades of intelligent and indefatigable reasoning that ultimately convinced enough of the citizenry to support the cause of independence.

Of course, King George and the British Crown regarded our secession from England as treasonous, but that was irrelevant. Our founders were on the right side of the higher law of Nature and Heaven. And it was to the laws of Nature and Nature’s God to which they appealed their cause. So must we.

I recently delivered a lengthy message outlining the principles of Natural Law. I quickly found that those principles are as distasteful to many so-called “patriots” today as the Gospel is to many unrepentant sinners. We will reject the principles that Heaven has enshrined in Natural Law to our own political destruction as surely as men who reject the Gospel message will do to the destruction of their own souls.

The message is entitled “The Right of Revolution As Justified In Natural And Revealed Law.” Find it here.

As with most of America’s founders, Thomas Jefferson thoroughly understood the principles of Natural Law. He and the other founders were disciples of men such as Baron Charles de Montesquieu, Sir William Blackstone, and John Locke. In fact, Jefferson borrowed heavily from John Locke’s “Second Treatise of Government” when he penned the Declaration of Independence.

I personally believe Locke’s “Second Treatise of Government” to be the most succinct explanation of Natural Law ever written. Find it here.

I further believe that God will always preserve to Himself a remnant that He will protect, bless, and prosper. That was true when the entire idolatrous nations of Israel and Judah went into captivity and bondage. Even then, God revived a remnant. And amazingly, this revived remnant owed their liberty to a good-hearted, pagan Persian king named Cyrus. The leaders of Israel were so corrupt, God used a Persian king to restore liberty and peace to His remnant. Throughout history, in the worst of times, God always preserved a remnant.

Last Sunday, I delivered a message on this very subject taken from the Book of Ezra. Watch it here.

So, where do we go from here?

• We need to recognize the importance of America’s patriot pulpit and start supporting it wherever and however we can.

• We need to recognize the importance of repenting of the sins that God hates within the church and for which He will judge His people.

• We need to recognize the importance of being honest and objective in the way we analyze and judge the actions of people and stop pandering our opinions to the herd–including OUR herd.

• We need to recognize the importance of Natural Law: learn these principles and do our best to teach them to as many people as we can–including our local and State representatives.

• We need to stop gullibly buying into the half-truths, wild accusations, innuendos, exaggerations, duplicity, and downright falsehoods that are regurgitated on the Internet, on many talk shows, and in many periodicals–remembering that many of these falsehoods and hysterical overreactions are actually the work of our enemies posing as our friends.

• We need to recognize the importance of convincing the Body Politic within our states and local communities of the principles of liberty and independence in a reasoned, rational, and righteous manner that well represents the honor and majesty of the principles themselves.

• We need to recognize that God always preserves a remnant to Himself, and we should seek to be part of that remnant.

© 2016 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

“My grace is sufficient for thee, for my strength is made perfect in weakness”2 Corinthians 12:9

Imperfect people are all God has ever had to work with. That must be terribly frustrating to Him, but he deals with it. So should we. —Jeffrey R. Holland

Before you even begin reading this article, please know that I am NOT SAYING that Donald Trump is a Biblical hero, neither am I saying he is perfect. I do not agree with everything that Donald J. Trump says, neither do I agree with all of his positions. As true Constitutionalists, and there are many of us, it is rare when we fully agree even with others who are like-minded.

Nevertheless, Trump has struck gold with the American people. His supporters have been called low-informed by Ted Cruz, ignorant and backward by media, racist and Nazis by the Soros radicalized communist left, and even uneducated by various pundits.

In reality, we are Americans who have not seen a candidate who has echoed our thoughts and our concerns in many decades. Oh sure, they all talk a good game, but then when we elect them, they turn around and do exactly what the rest of the globalists do. Point in fact, the twice elected Tea Party candidates of 2010 and 2014 have not stopped one thing Obama has done, not even a judicial nominee.

So when Trump rails on the loss of working class jobs due to horrid trade agreements, and the unfair competition for those jobs – along with security threats – due to the flood of illegal immigrants pouring across unsecured borders, it resonates with those who have suffered so many losses.

The losses aren’t just in jobs, but in personal losses like Kathryn Steinle, a 32-year-old resident of San Francisco who was gunned down in broad daylight near Fisherman’s Wharf on the San Francisco waterfront in front of dozens of witnesses by an illegal alien. Francisco Sanchez, a 45-year-old with a last known address in Texas where he was on probation for felony assault has been deported on numerous occasions to Mexico, and was back in the US again illegally.

Years ago I read an FBI report and it stated that nearly 10,000 American citizens die every year at the hands of illegal aliens. That really is an astronomical figure. If we don’t have secured borders, we don’t have national sovereignty, and neither do we have a protected populace. When he says, “Build the wall,” we say, “Yes!”

Trump reminds me and many others of General Patton who used to say, “Americans play to win all the time.” What does Trump say? “We will have so much winning if I get elected.” Then he says, “You’ll never get bored with winning. You’ll never get bored!”

Trump’s Style

People tell me they’re voting for Trump, but they’re not fond of his style. I guess they prefer the sing-song hypnotic generalities from the globalist politicians. You know, the same kind of rhetoric you get in their letters when they tell you they’ll keep your thoughts in mind when they vote. We all know this is hogwash.

Jon Rappoport describes Trump’s style perfectly when he says, 

On top of all this, Trump is delivering messages that are beyond the pale, according to current standards of political correctness. Another jolt.

None of Us Are Perfect

Link]

Well, if there is a supernatural power behind Trump, it is God himself who has heard the prayers of the American people, prayers of repentance and pleading, prayers to save our beloved country. These are not prayers asking for the destruction of evil ones, but prayers asking God to help us restore our country. I believe Trump is the answer to those prayers, but it’s still up to us. Mark Twain said, “You’re never wrong to do the right thing,” and I believe that’s what God has laid on Mr. Trump.

Our Biblical Heroes were Imperfect

Truly, the only perfect person in God’s Word, was God himself! All the other heroes of the Bible were far less than perfect, basically just old sinners like the rest of us. 

Noah got drunk. Abraham was very old, and his wife Sara very impatient. Jacob was a cheater. King David was an adulterer and murderer. Solomon had many concubines who influenced his belief in God. Moses was a murderer, a doubter, had anger issues, and he stuttered. Aaron decided a golden calf was worth worshipping. Jonah ran from God (remember Nineveh?). Gideon was terribly insecure. Miriam was a gossip. Elijah was moody. Paul was a murderer. Peter was a liar and denier. Thomas was a doubter. And on and on with the heroes we know were God’s chosen to do His work. Not a one of these heroes were perfect, but they were chosen of God for His purposes.

Many folks question Mr. Trump’s Christianity. He is private about his faith, but he has shown it in so many other ways. He is fervent about attending church, and yes, I know going to church doesn’t make you a Christian. Yet, actions speak so much louder than words, and Trump never talks about his generosity to others, the recipients do! The Bible doesn’t call very many folks “good men,” but I believe this man, Donald J. Trump, is truly a good man.

The Generosity of Donald Trump

Trump showed kindness with a large check for little Megan who has a terrible bone disease. She was on the Maury Povich show with her mother, and Donald Trump called in to speak to her when Maury gave her the check to help with her medical expenses.

• Veteran asks Trump for job, what Trump does next is awesome. 
Video here.

Video Here.

Jerry Falwell, Jr. told of other charitable acts by Donald Trump that the media never speaks about. The media probably doesn’t even know because Trump keeps his generosity quiet…

“Right after he visited here last time, I called him about a large Christian ministry in another state that needed some help,” Falwell explained. “I learned within a day or two he had donated 100,000 dollars of his own money.”

Falwell also recounted the story of an inner inner city basketball tournament Trump rescued from financial disaster.

“He learned about Clyde Frazier Jr. who ran the Harlem Hoops tournament in the inner city and was killed in the 9/11 attacks,” Falwell said. “He searched down the family and donated the money to keep that tournament going.”

Falwell also recalled how three local Maytag dealers were about to go out of business when Trump stepped in and purchased products for his hotels from them and saved their businesses. 

Trump also helped a Domino’s Pizza out by giving them money to buy cheese and bread so they could stay in business!

Link]

Donald Trump quietly helped out Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi, who was left to rot in a Mexican prison for 214 days, and who Obama ignored. A source told Top Right Newsthat the “money” Trump sent Tahmoreesi was “very substantial,” ($25,000) and included paying all of the family’s legal bills, financial needs while he was held prisoner for nearly a year, and cash to get him back on his feet. 

There are so many cases of Trump’s generosity, that there are too many to list, and probably thousands we’ll never know about.

Conclusion

God chooses whom He will use..and we have found someone who sees a problem and knows how to fix it. We’ve found someone who says the same things to us that we’ve been saying to each other for years. We’ve found someone who listens to the American people. We’ve found someone who wants to right the wrongs. We’ve found someone who wants to unite us all as Americans again! We’ve found someone who actually tells us he loves us. We’ve found someone who is a gentleman to others. 

We’ve found someone who has a giving nature. We’ve found someone who cares about this country as much as we do. We’ve found someone who isn’t beholden to any interests. We’ve found a mature, capable, and brilliant businessman who wants to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

No, you’re not ever going to find a perfect person on earth, nor a perfect candidate for president. God chooses imperfect men and women to carry out His work, He has from the beginning of time, and He will continue to do so. Donald Trump is our new General Patton. He tells it like he sees it, and consequences be damned…because the truth is more important to him than political correctness.

Pray for Mr. Trump, his family, and our country.

This commentary is NOT about politics, although many of you will think it is. If you are anything like me you are suffering from campaign overload. It is as if the only news in the world is Trump/Cruz, or Hillary/Bernie. Twenty-four / seven the cable news programs force-feed us propaganda regarding the fake horse-race known as the Presidential primaries.

If you think that the political system is honest and that the will of the people has any place in the decision making process this article is not for you. The system is rigged folks. The evidence is everywhere you look. The Presidential primaries are the biggest con going and it is Big Bu$$ine$$ for those who report on it.

The once-independent media is controlled. We no longer get the “news” but instead are fed a flavored version of events designed to control the masses. Yep, even your favorite talk-radio host is in on the gig. Talk-radio is major-moolah and you can bet your last dollar that every one of these guys is in the tank for somebody.

Some are out in the open…Beck, Levin…others give the appearance of neutrality…Rush, Hannity, but make no mistake all of the major talkers know exactly where their bread is buttered. How do you think that they got to where they are? Why is there so little agreement in the “conservative” press?

Controlled media. That is what someone once labeled them. But it is not so much that they are controlled but that their real job is to control you and me. If we, the great unwashed, were ever given the opportunity to know the truth this nation would be in all out revolt.

We live in a captured nation and the “conservative” media is playing the role of prison guard. Their job is to keep the prisoners fat and sassy. At the end of the day, they are responsible for making sure that you feel secure because Rush or Sean or Mark or Glenn is on the job.

I travel a lot. I don’t say that to sound important but rather, to make a point. Sometimes I fly, but often I drive. Long lonely trips across the fruited plain give me the opportunity to ride in silence as I listen to my ever-present companions…Glenn, Rush, Sean, and Mark.

That is the order that they come on. I don’t care what state you are in or what time-zone you are traversing, America’s airwaves are blasting out the conservative opinions of these “conservative” voices. Beck in the morning, Rush at noon, Hannity in the afternoon, and Levin to sing you to sleep at night. Every city, every state, every day. Republican good-Democrat bad, conservative good-liberal/progressive-bad, Cruz good-Hillary bad.

Remember, they are looking out for us!! Yeah right. They’re looking out for us, alright. They are doing an awesome job of keeping the sheep herded and in the Republican pen.

Big media controls the news by controlling the voices. Who arranged this cozy set-up? Why is it that, for the most part, local talk radio, except for morning and evening drive-time, is almost non-existent on America’s airwaves? Why do all of the “Big talk” stations in every community have nearly the exact same lineup? They decide, you report. We are sheep heading for a great shearing.

Rush started the re-birth of AM radio with his talk show in the mid 1980’s and to some degree he changed the way American’s viewed the news. But after nearly three decades of conservative talk-radio can you tell me ANYTHING the talkers have actually accomplished? Has the size of government shrunk? Have individual liberties increased? Has “conservative radio” changed the moral landscape in any way? Have the BIG $ Talkers slowed down the spread of the godless agenda in any way, shape or form?

Is America more or less evil than it was 30 years ago? What good has the controlled (and controlling) conservative talk media done for the advancement of Christian values?

Nothing. The programs weren’t designed to advance Christian values. They were designed to advance “conservatism. “ As I tried to warn folks back in 2006, Conservatism is Counterfeit Salt. It looks like salt, it sounds like salt, but it is a poor substitute for Christianity.

America’s problems are spiritual and there is no political solution to a spiritual problem. Conservative talk radio does not offer a Biblical, Christian solution.

So today I would like to offer you an option. Turn off your favorite talk-radio station and connect online. The internet is FULL of “talk-radio” programs that boldly reveal the truth behind the news and are guaranteed to open your eyes to a world that the “men behind the curtain” do not want you to see. Find programs that present the Truth and offer Biblical solutions to the problems facing us. Not preachy-pastor sermons…but hard-hitting issue based shows with Biblical solutions.

Christian radio has, for the most part, dropped the ball. Their daily program schedule is filled with preaching, financial shows, and health-related programs. Just like the local churches, most Christian media is full of happy talk while the world around us descends into chaos.

May I suggest a few? I know I will leave out some good ones, bit at least this is a start. Visit The Hagmann and Hagmann Report, The Common Sense Show, Caravan to Midnight, Info-Wars, The Manning Report, The Weekend Vigilante, Sons of Liberty.

Without seeming to be self-promotional, I too, have a daily live internet program that is archived for downloading later. We air weekdays at 7 am EDT www.newswithviews.tv. Get out of the box the media has locked you in. My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge!!

When all hell breaks loose people will be looking for a heavenly solution. Now is the time to build an ark.

© 2016 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

These days you never know what’s going to be against the law from day to day. Microaggression, mis-gendering, “humanizing the fetus”—libs are just waiting to pounce on you for committing any kind of act that violates their safe space or foments “hate,” etc. You don’t even have to do it on purpose.

But what they really want is something they can actually put you in jail for. With this in mind, our beloved Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently told Democrat senators that she was looking into the possibility of prosecuting persons guilty of Climate Change Denial. She thought they might be able to do it by invoking the RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)—since they aren’t using it to go after, say, the Clinton Foundation.

“It’s looking more and more doable every day,” said Deputy Attorney General Mao Tse-tung. “The RICO Act is more flexible than we thought. Once you get the knack of bending it this way or that, you can come after anyone for anything.”

Once the Climate Change deniers are safely locked away, said Mao, “Our next target will be those hate-filled, biggited individuals who refuse to recognize it when someone has his or her gender changed, refuse to celebrate it, and just won’t hop on board. These will be prosecuted for Gender Change Denial.”

With presidential candidate Hillary Clinton already promising to promote “transgender rights” for all she’s worth–and given the money that pours into the Clinton Foundation, she’s worth a lot—“She will have to be given the tool to do the job,” said Mao. “She must be given the power to prosecute anyone who attempts Gender Change Denial.”

What about First Amendment issues?

“Don’t make me laugh!” said Mao. “We polished off the First Amendment the first time we prosecuted a Christian baker for not creating a cake for a lesbian wedding! Why anyone should still think you can just say anything you want without suffering legal consequences, beats me. You’d think that’s the one thing we have made perfectly clear, over the past seven years—watch your mouth. And while you’re at it, watch what you write, too. Whether it’s a letter to the editor, or a paragraph on Facebook, or even just a little bitty tweet on Twitter, we’re watching you! And even if we can’t toss you into jail, we can always destroy your livelihood.”

Eventually, Mao continued, the Justice Department will be able to prosecute “all undesirable speech, all undesirable writings, and all undesirable thought.” This, of course, will require that the Justice Department be “fantastically expanded—probably to five or six times its present size and budget,” he said. “It’ll mean some pretty hefty tax increases, but that’s an insignificant price to pay for a government that’s able to abolish hate. Imagine a world without hate! Why quibble about the cost?”

Won’t these new waves of prosecutions fall very heavily, disproportionately so, on Christians and conservatives?

“Well, of course they will!” said Mao. “I mean, these people are criminals, aren’t they? Christians commit 90 percent of all the thought crimes in America!

“Religious freedom does not mean what they think it means. What America needs is a state-sponsored church which promotes no beliefs, no opinions, that could possibly offend any of our cherished minorities.”

But doesn’t the Constitution explicitly forbid the government from establishing a state religion?

“No, it does not,” Mao said. “It only says that Congress can’t make a law establishing religion. It doesn’t say anything about the president doing it with an executive order! Gee, I thought that was the other thing we’ve made perfectly clear, these past seven years. Well, no problem—it’ll be clear as glass, when we get done.”

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2016 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

“When Sulla died in the year 676, the oligarchy, which he had restored, ruled with absolute sway over the Roman state; but, as it had been established by force, it still needed force to maintain its ground against its numerous secret and open foes.” —Theodor Mommsen, Rome Historian 1817 to 1903

It must be made clear from the start that we do not endorse or take sides in the current Republican Presidential race for the White House. We have been less than enchanted with the whole lot of the original 17 candidates who raised their heads above the water to seek the highest office in the land. Nevertheless, we hold a particular loathing of “The Establishment” in either party and fear them more than any one candidate. That “The Establishment” would do everything in its power to derail the will of the people is beyond contempt but quite representative of what politics in America has become today and maybe always was.

Powerful, rich men (and some women) have but one remaining goal in life before they die, seeking power over the masses. Political power is an elixir and is equally, if not more addictive than drugs, sex, or video games. In fact, many of man’s vices seem to appear together in powerful personalities who find themselves hopelessly in search of, or lust after, power, sex, drugs and money, not necessarily in that order. Alabama Governor, Robert Bentley, is up for a recall for an affair with his top advisor. Two recent Oregon governors have fallen to sexual affairs. General David Petraeus, with a long, celebrated career, fell from grace because of an affair and the mishandling of classified information. Bill Clinton lost his law license for lying about sex and was publicly humiliated over his sexual exploits. The list of these political miscreants that have trouble keeping their sexual emotions in check, grows longer by the day. God help some of them if the infamous Manhattan Madam’s (Kristin M. Davis) list of clients is ever made public.

Many politicians use their position of power to obtain sexual favors of one kind or another. Many more use their office in the quest for large sums of money. Politics seems to magnify all of the obsessions, addictions, proclivities and vices of the human male and probably the human female.

An oligarchy is “a small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution.” That powerful men band together in oligarchies is not a new phenomenon. It dates back to antiquity when the Sumerians invented money and learned they could loan it out at interest. The lender always rules over the borrower. The Sumerians were one of the earliest urban societies to emerge in the world in Southern Mesopotamia more than 5,000 years ago. Today it’s the Trilateral Commission, or the Bilderbergers, or maybe even the Council on Foreign Relations.

Since then, men have been banding together to form tight nit groups that wield political and monetary power over the people of every nation on earth, from the most backward tribes to the most advanced civilizations. There is only one other entity that is more dangerous than an oligarchy and that is a brutal King who invents his own law and administers it with fear, intimidation, hunger and the threat of death, or death itself. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, or Mao come to mind.

It is an axiom of political power that representative government always morphs into an oligarchy, where a group of men (and women) seek to control all power within their sphere of influence, while at the same time insulating themselves from any accountability. For the last 100 years or more, both dominate political parties in America have done just that. Notice how they always exempt themselves from the laws they pass.

The glue of money-for-favors holds “The Establishment” together and gives it immense power. But be an outsider, dare to be different, or step out of line and the oligarchy will come crashing down upon you like a pride of lions on a gazelle.

An oligarchy is no different than a violent street gang. It just uses different weapons but for the same reasons ….. control. The guns of the street gang are replaced with the political power the oligarch’s wield through the passing of laws and the enforcement of those laws. The laws they pass are in many cases tied directly to their drug of choice, money. The money and lots of it, comes from those who demand favors of the oligarchs. In short, the oligarchy eventually becomes just as corrupt as the street gang and can become just as violent, taking the oligarchy to the extreme of a Soviet Politburo.

“The Establishment”, of either party, is by any definition, an oligarchy. What “The Establishment” fears most is a potential or new politician rising from out of nowhere with the support of the people ….. a man or woman who has no master and cannot be bought. Trump, right or wrong, is just such a man.

With Trump’s rise in popularity, the fear in the ranks of “The Establishment” was so great it could be cut with a knife. They oozed with Trump loathing. “The Establishment” immediately began to close ranks around a plan to prevent Trump from ever getting anywhere near the nomination. The wagons circled and the pocket books opened up to the tune of millions of dollars for super pacs and national ad campaigns attacking Trump. Some in “The Establishment” even endorsed Ted Cruz just to stop Trump, while holding their collective noses.

Many in “The Establishment” are hoping that the Republican Convention in July will turn into a free for all, where Trump and Cruz will most likely lose on the first ballot. In the place of Trump and Cruz, they will advance a candidate that belongs to “The Establishment” and gerrymander the delegate votes to control the outcome. The millions of people who voted for Trump and Cruz in the primaries and caucuses will be thrown to the wolves. What’s left of the Republican Party after the Convention and the November election won’t be worth salvaging. It’s as if the Republican Party has a death wish, split between those oligarchs who want desperately to remain in power, no matter who wins the presidency and those who still believe in the principles for which the Republican Party used to stand.

The Democrats have been so successful in moving America to the left by buying votes that the Republicans felt they had no choice but to follow the trend. But by so doing, they were forced to forsake their principles. Sadly, a politician once in office cares not about principles. He or she only cares about preserving the power and percs of their alleged elected office. They feign concern for their constituents in order to secure votes, but it is all a ruse.

To maintain their lifestyle of the rich and famous, they band together in caucuses to support each other in the pursuit of perpetual power, no matter what the label might be next to their name on the ballot, or the color of their skin. They trade favors and money in that pursuit. “R”, “D”, “I”, “S”, or “C”, it makes no difference.

Those in “The Establishment” exclude and drive out those that won’t play ball. “The Establishment” quickly surrounds new politicians where the rules are explained to them. The explanation comes with a warning to never break the rules, or be banished from the “club.” Although a new politician may start out with an altruistic mindset for the good of the country, that mindset is quickly expelled once the “rules” have been explained to them and they have established their credentials as an “Establishment” club member.

The average voter is under the illusion that their vote counts. It is just that, an illusion. The oligarchy controls the outcome of any election. The Party controls the rules and maneuvers the delegates to get the outcome they want. Just ask Ron Paul. If a politician is a threat to the oligarchy, as they believe Trump is, (and Ron Paul was) he or she will be immediately shunned or tarnished beyond repair, never to seek public office again.

So why is Trump a threat to the Republican oligarchy? He is a monkey wrench in the smooth running gears of the oligarchy. He plays by his own rules, not the rigid rules designed to protect the party’s power. He says what he believes even though he says it like a truck driver in a beer hall. He is not afraid to pull the tiger’s tail and throws political correctness to the winds. He’s refreshing, even if he leans towards the crass and unrefined side. He stirs the pot and makes the party uneasy and worried that he will lose the election because he ticks off so many constituency groups ….. who vote.

Time will tell whether Trump is done in by the Republican oligarchy, shoots himself in the foot one too many times, or becomes President in spite of it all. But what Trump has done is to expose “The Establishment” for what it is, an all-powerful oligarchy that will do everything and anything to maintain its power and the status quo. “The Establishment” cares not one whit about who will be president, just so long as “The Establishment” survives in tack at the end of any election.

“The Establishment”, Democrat or Republican, is part of a corrupt system that has grown more corrupt over the last 100 years. They are the oligarchy. Can the “System” (the oligarchy) be taken apart and defeated? Yes! We describe the “System” and how to defeat it in one of our articles from late last year. In the article we wrote:

The “system” is an intertwined entanglement of interlocking national and international interests of commerce, finance and trade, accompanied by government enablers of the “system” in the executive, judicial and legislative branches. The tentacles of one interest are inextricably interwoven into the tentacles of all the other interests. Finding out what drives one, leads to a complex maze of closed doors, backrooms, deep subterranean caverns and secret meetings. All the sources are purposely hidden and camouflaged. Traces to find the truth go down dead end paths, or are blocked by impenetrable obstacles. Sources of the “system’s” power are elusive and they are anything but constitutional. The “system” exists because of citizen apathy and survives, thrives and grows on the people’s money and special interests.

The “system” can be defeated, just not all at once. It has to be taken apart in small chunks. A small group of dedicated individuals could take on a city hall or the county commissioners. A larger group of dedicated individuals could take on the state. These individuals would have to be prepared to unravel the system in their area through research and study, expose what is going on very publicly and get the people outraged enough to demand common sense changes. These individuals would have to fight to overcome media bias (the “system”), which means they would have to push their message until the media could no longer ignore the “story.”

You can read our full article at this link: “The ‘System’ – Impenetrable, Inflexible and Un-yielding.”

But don’t be fooled. No one man can defeat the “System.” The “System” will not just vanish in the night because some people will it so. It will take the combined efforts of millions of Americans who are of one mind and committed to restoring the true vision of America, no matter what it takes. The time for that to happen has not appeared on the horizon as yet but it will. We only hope it isn’t too late when it does appear.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

The GOP elite have already chosen their GOP Presidential nominee and it is House Speaker Paul Ryan. They just have to figure out how to make it happen!

This past Sunday on Fox News Sunday, Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus predicted that one of the three candidates remaining in the race will be the ultimate GOP nominee, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz or John Kasich. Not exactly a clairvoyant Nostradamus moment, since generally speaking, the only people who could win the nomination are those in the race…

But during the same interview, Priebus also hinted that it was possible someone not in the race at all might become the party nominee, contradicting his own prediction…

In many statements over the past few weeks, Priebus has floated the idea that the Republican Convention in Cleveland is likely to be an “open convention,” which until the last week or so, was always referred to as a “contested” of “brokered” convention.

I suppose the term “open” sounds much less offensive to GOP voters who thought they were choosing the GOP nominee in the voting booth.

Although Ted Cruz supporters are frustrated by John Kasich remaining in the race, having won only his home state of Ohio and in their minds, playing spoiler for the Cruz Campaign, they were quite supportive of the idea that the GOP elites were going to wrangle delegates from Trump and deny him the nomination… until they figured out that the GOP elites intend to deny Cruz the nomination as well.

Cruz supporters are right when they say GOP establishment elites hate Ted, they do… But not because Ted isn’t one of them. They hate Ted because since becoming a freshman Senator, Ted has been nothing but a do-nothing grandstanding thorn in their side, often pretending to filibuster for the camera while otherwise accomplishing nothing.

But Trump is someone the establishment is truly scared of… not because he is the wild-eyed ego-maniac they claim, but because he is truly an establishment outsider who threatens the status quo in the Republican Party and Washington DC. They can’t control him… and they don’t like anyone they can’t control.

Democratic Party strategist Pat Caddell who gained fame all the way back in the Jimmy Carter upset of the DNC establishment has stated he believes the GOP Establishment is “using Cruz as a cats-paw.”

“Look, you don’t really think that Jeb Bush, and Lindsay Graham, and some of those who have endorsed Sen. Marco Rubio … you don’t really think they want Ted Cruz, do you?” Caddell asked. “They’re using him to stop Trump.”
No one is worried about John Kasich. He has only won his home state and even if he did win, he is a long-time GOP RINO insider no different than Jeb Bush or Paul Ryan. No one is worried about Canadian Ted Cruz either, easily taken down by releasing proof that he is not even a legal US citizen, much less a natural born Citizen eligible for the Oval office.

The threat is Donald Trump… a self-made billionaire political outsider capturing the imagination and anger of millions of conservative GOP voters, but also independents and even many pro-American blue dog democrats. Unlike Cruz and Kasich, both of whom are career taxpayer employees, Trump is a total wild card… He is somewhat predictable, but totally uncontrollable.

Priebus isn’t alone… the Fox News group is clearly pro-Cruz, despite his obvious lack of constitutional eligibility, or his habitual lying. As reported CDJ News, “The Fix is in” as far as the GOP elite are concerned. Kasich knows he is playing spoiler to Trump and Cruz, but Cruz still actually thinks the GOP elites will allow him to become the nominee after they destroy Trump.

Libertarian Wayne Allen Root explains exactly why everyone in DC fears Trump in this short video… which is why GOP establishment shill publication Newsmax is predicting House Speaker will be the GOP nominee, even though no one in America will have voted for Paul Ryan.

According to some reports, “Since March 22nd, there hasn’t been any GOP primaries, but because both the Republican and Democrat establishments have teamed up with the mainstream news media to attack Donald Trump 24/7 – futures market odds of Trump becoming the Republican nominee have crashed from 71% down to 43% vs. odds of a brokered GOP convention soaring from 40% up to 71%.”

Most “experts” on FOX News and CNN are saying that “if Trump loses the Wisconsin primary today, he will have no chance of securing the 1,237 delegates necessary to secure the Republican nomination on the first ballot.” But the truth is, Trump doesn’t need to win Wisconsin to secure the 1,237 majority of delegates needed to win the nomination outright…

For decades, voters ignored primaries and then complained about their choices in the general elections. This time, the people are setting their own course in the primaries and the party elites do not like it. Now the people can see that the primaries are far more important than the general election!

If Trump happens to lose Wisconsin today, there are no more primaries for two weeks, which will allow the mainstream media to report endlessly that Trump’s supporters have abandoned him with his Wisconsin loss marking the beginning of the end for Trump, several reports have claimed.

After Wisconsin, the next GOP primary on April 19th will be in New York, where 95 delegates are up for grabs. New York has a “backdoor Winner Take All” threshold of 50%. If Trump receives over 50% of the popular vote in his home state of NY, he will receive all 95 NY state delegates making it all but impossible for anyone else to become the GOP nominee no matter what happens in Wisconsin!

However, in the end, it might be Michigan ultra conservative rocker Ted Nugent who says it best though, in this radio interview leading up to the Wisconsin primaries… No matter who the GOP elites want as a nominee, millions of rightfully angry conservative voters have already made their choice. The GOP is going to have to live with it, or lose their party altogether.

At this point, either outcome will be better than where we are today.

© 2016 JB Williams – All Rights Reserved

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday morning. During the interview, host Chuck Todd pressed Clinton on the topic of abortion.

“When, or if, does an unborn child have constitutional rights?” Todd asked.

The aspiring presidential candidate said that the rights outlined in the U.S. Constitution are not applicable to unborn children. Was Hillary invoking the Constitution, Bill of Rights, or any United States law?

NOPE. The go-to reason of her injudiciousness and faintheartedness was Roe v. Wade, the ruling that has since been renounced by its former victorious plaintiff Norma McCorvey – A.K.A. Jane Roe. Here is Mrs. Clinton’s statement:

“Well, under our laws currently, that is not something that exists. The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights.” [Emphasis added]

While Clinton acknowledges the created unborn person, in contradiction she does not believe that person has unalienable rights to life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness.

Agreeing with God, our American framers authorized and established that we are created, not born, equal with unalienable rights – and that according to the Fifth Amendment, no person, government, or court ruling can “deprive us” of life, liberty, or property without “due process of law”. In other words, you must be convicted of a crime to forfeit your rights.

To operate, condone or practice otherwise is to criminally break American Law, and the consequences are fatal!

Let me explain with the following analogy.

After the release of superhero movies in theatres, many young people have an insatiable desire to fly. That’s right…fly.

In an attempt to satisfy young people’s desire to fly, a group of progressives move to make the “law of gravity” illegal.

“What? Why? That’s nonsense,” you say.

Well, you see, gravity is a law that is discriminatory. It won’t let anyone with the genuine desire to fly fulfill his or her passion! A movement begins, the media covers it nonstop, and soon after the legislature passes it, and the president signs and enforces it. The law of gravity no longer exists! Or so they think…

Trusting their government knows best and that there is no fear of harm, the next morning people all over America tragically start jumping off buildings, some equipped with capes, some without.

People find out quickly that, in fact, you don’t break the law; the law breaks you.

Please understand what Hillary, the Supreme Court, and even what we want does not change the consequence of violating a Law of Nature that God created.

“You shall not murder” is as pertinent today as it was when God created us with the right to life. He created this law as a protection, and violation of His law means self-destruction.

This destruction is now in plain sight. Youth are finding out that 1/3 or their brothers and sisters, classmates and friends have been murdered in the womb.

Victims of this mind-twist philosophy called pro-choice are finding out that 31% of those having abortions report suffering physical health complications, 10% potentially life-threatening. Sixty-five percent of women suffer symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with suicide rates six times higher than those who give birth.

When we abandon God’s Word we abandon all rationality. We instead have to prop up an abstract morality full of contradictions and deceit.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2016 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved

In the 21st century, terrorists and terrorism visit the United States like never in the history of our country. Previous to 9/11, we enjoyed tens of thousands of miles separating us from vagaries of the communist and Islamic worlds. While we fought wars in Korea and Vietnam, we never met an enemy that would “bring war” to us. That changed on September 9, 2001.

In this ongoing series with former U.S. Army officer, 1st Calvary, George A. Phelps, you may garner an up close and realistic view from a commander in the field.

Today, most Americans feel totally vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Congress and our last five presidents refused to secure our borders. Governors allow illegal aliens to gain driver’s licenses, as was the case with Mohammed Atta and his cronies as they flew planes into the World Trade Towers.

In this exclusive interview, Mr. Phelps gives you an idea of what we face:

“We have had several ‘wake up’ calls that seem to have been forgotten or ignored,” said Phelps. “We were attacked by Muslims on September 11, 2001 and the World Trade Center was demolished killing some 2997 individuals and wounding several hundred more including NYPD and NYFD responders. That number includes the Pentagon and Pennsylvania casualties as well as the airline passengers and crew of the Airliners that hit the two buildings. A Muslim ‘doctor/psychiatrist’ killed 13 soldiers at Fort Hood plus wounding some 30 others. In 1993, Muslims bombed the World Trade Center killing six and wounding many others. In 2013 Muslim bombers killed several people during the Boston Marathon wounding several others. Many of the victims of this terrorism have been crippled for life.

“We have been at war in the Middle East for many years now, fighting off Muslim terrorists who were wreaking havoc in Iraq and Afghanistan. Thousands of young Americans have been killed and severely wounded during these wars. We also sent troops in to drive Iraq army soldiers out of Kuwait/the Gulf War and then cleaned up the damage done to the oil fields by Iraq.

“Does any of this smell like war? The answer is YES! On January 7th, 2015 Muslims killed 12 French citizens at a Magazine’s office building in Paris. The next day 1 female officer was shot and killed and her partner wounded, again in France. At this time the Muslim perpetrators have not yet been caught although one has surrendered [there were 3 perpetrators]. *2 days ago, November 13, 2015, ISIL terrorists attacked 2 venues in Paris, one a concert and the other was a soccer game. 127 were killed and 393 were severely injured, at last count. The French President shut down the borders to prevent the entry of more of these terrorists who enter with immigrants running from the warfare going on in the Middle Eastern countries, primarily Syria.

“Australia has been attacked by Muslims who were immigrants in their country. And we have many Muslims living in this country, the estimates range from almost 3 million to ~7 million at last count. The 7 million figure comes from one of the prominent Muslim organizations in this county. There are 2,100 Mosques in this country and more are being built. My opinion is that they may very well be safe houses for radical Muslims and the ammunition and other supplies needed to eventually attack pre-selected targets within our country].

“The writing is on the wall and our government is ignoring it. And the American citizens remain unaware, uninformed and passive as to this threat.

“We had better wake up. The guy in the White house has Muslim advisers on his White House staff, including a couple who are his national security advisors!

“Our Constitution and our own mental attitudes allow freedom of religion and welcome the diversity of religions into this country. However, when any group, including religious groups, threaten our security, culture and liberty they lose any rights they may have under the Constitution which by the way IS the law of our land! This leads me to say that we are at war with Islam and they should be treated as the enemy of our country. The following is a quote from a politician and philosopher of the 19th century.”

“That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859).

“And the Muslims intend harm to us, our freedom, liberty, and our nation,” said Phelps. “Therefore, they must be removed from our country and our Government, to assure our safety, freedom, liberty and rights as citizens are maintained.

“The sitting President of the United States has appointed Muslims to his staff and I believe he is a Muslim. He is the enemy within.

They are our Trojan Horse.

“Islam is NOT a religion, rather; it is a THEOCRACY, i.e., a complete Life’s System, meaning a total mixture of religion, economic system and politics, with 100% divine authority over ALL. (Author unknown.)

“Political correctness is killing us. We must be vigilant and unafraid to identify those who are acting and looking suspicious. If our government won’t protect this country, we citizens must!

“And lastly, a small city in Illinois has just elected 4 Muslims to their city council. The council has 6 members 4 of which are Muslims! I believe it’s part of their invasion plan!”

If you don’t want a Paris, France or San Bernardino event in your community, it’s time to call for a total “Immigration Shutdown Now.”

Call your senators and House rep: 1 202 224 3121. Demand a stop to all immigration and stop to any Syrian immigration.

Definition of slogan: “Immigration Shutdown Now means the American people want a total shutdown on all legal and illegal immigration. That means we want all illegal immigration stopped by arresting, prosecuting and jailing employers of illegal aliens. We deport all illegal aliens by taking their jobs away and as we catch them. We want English mandated as our national language. We demand a cessation of Muslim immigration in order to protect our culture, language and way of life. We can’t save the world but we can destroy our civilization. We demand a stable population that allows everyone to live, work and thrive into the 21st century. Especially our children.” FHW

That’s why you need to take action. Send this series to everyone in your network. Educate them. Urge them to take action by joining these websites to become faxers of prewritten letters and phone callers. We must force Congress into an “Immigration Shutdown Now!

Share these videos all over America:

www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacity.org ; www.thesocialcontract.com

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation. Take five minutes to see for yourself.

“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart” by Roy Beck
This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future generations: in a few words, “Mind boggling!” www.NumbersUSA.org

America: www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacityNetwork.org
Canada: www.immigrationwatchcanada.org
United Kingdom: www.populationmatters.org
Australia: www.population.org.au Sustainable Population Australia

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

Donald Trump is at a critical juncture in his campaign. His words and deeds from this point forward will determine as never before whether he will amass enough delegates to win on a first or second vote at the Republican National Convention. To win, Trump must become more specific and bold in addressing the key policy topics of:

(1) restoring economic growth, upward mobility and productivity to America;
(2) reducing the power of the bureaucracy to liberate industry from the control of lobbyists who help establish anti-competitive regulation;
(3) destroying ISIS and related terror groups;
(4) establishing strong border protection;
(5) defending and advancing American interests around the world; and
(6) eliminating Obamacare in favor of a free market in health care and health care insurance.
Donald Trump’s viability as a candidate and appeal to a broader base is dependent on his strength of conviction and his anti-establishment credentials. Voters have formed a movement around him convinced that his blunt talk, strong persona, and status as a Washington outsider will shake things up in Washington and allow for a return to limited government, the rule of law, a strong national defense, and a flourishing free market. He stands to lose support if people come to doubt he can deliver on the details. Consequently, he needs to articulate the details boldly and confirm his commitment to bring about true reform.

In particular, he needs to reemphasize the gist of his tax plan that would lower tax rates and create a more hospitable environment for corporate America to remain in America. He needs to explain how tax relief, combined with regulatory relief, can revitalize the economy such that upward mobility, now stagnant, can be restored, re-establishing the lost American dream.

He needs to call for downsizing the federal bureaucracy by eliminating every regulation that has caused or will cause the loss of American jobs, private property without just compensation, or impose a cost greater than any provable benefit. If a regulation costs American jobs, sacrifices private property, or is more costly than beneficial, it should be eliminated.

He needs to call for a quadrupling of American special forces and a commitment to use whatever force is necessary to ensure the prompt and complete obliteration of ISIS and related terrorist groups and all who support ISIS and related terrorist groups. He should make clear that as President he will engage the American military in a relentless day and night campaign of assault to kill all ISIS operatives and all who support them, assuring a substantial increase in the use of American force to bring about the most expeditious and thorough demise of radical Islamic terrorism.

He has made his position on border security clear, and needs to keep that message among those he communicates in all of the remaining states. It is the centerpiece of his campaign. He needs to tie that message more to the threat of terrorists entering the United States and explain that border security is essential to avoid the planned onslaught of terrorists into the United States via our Southern and Northern borders.

He needs to make clear not only that he will end American support for the disgraceful deal entered into by the United States with Iran but that he will back Israel unwaveringly by supporting economic sanctions and, if necessary, military intervention to prevent Iran from developing and deploying nuclear weapons. He should state clearly that by its words and deeds Iran is an enemy of the United States, condemn Obama for allying the nation with its enemy, and assure that under his administration the United States will oppose every effort by Iran to expand radical Islamic terror around the world. He should state clearly that the hostile acts of North Korea will not be tolerated in his administration and that the United States will impose the most stringent economic sanctions on that country, will expand alliances with South Korea and Japan against North Korean acts of aggression, and will intervene to interdict any launch of a ballistic missile by North Korea if accompanied by a threat from North Korea that it will strike the United States. He should state clearly that neither China nor Russia will be permitted to use acts of intimidation or occupation of foreign states or territories if those actions threaten the security or economic vitality of the United States and its allies but that the United States will respond boldly, will increase the presence of its military forces in Eastern Europe, and will make clear it will oppose any effort to topple a country allied to the United States.

He needs to explain the failings of Obamacare and attack its fundamental premise, that the United States has a rightful power to compel everyone to buy health insurance and to force those who pay to subsidize those who do not. He needs to condemn the Obamacare mandate, pledge to eliminate it as a first act of his administration, and commit to taking steps to establish a market economy in health care and health insurance.

He needs to make these positions known at every opportunity and communicate the message with conviction and rebut all who challenge his position. He has that natural ability. It is a major part of his attraction to voters. Now he is being challenged by those who are alleging that his call to make America great again is vacuous. Proof of the contrary proposition requires that he supply the details mentioned above and defend them vigorously. Doing so will define his candidacy.

A burgeoning majority of Americans find the strength of Donald Trump appealing; they now ask if he can deliver. The Teflon he has enjoyed is wearing thin, as vigorous efforts are undertaken by establishment Republicans and liberal Democrats to make Trump out to be a phony conservative, a man devoid of substance, and a bigot.

In the end, nothing matters more to the American people than that they are assured of safety by replacing a weak President, Obama, with a strong one. Nothing matters more to the American people than that they are assured of restoration of a dynamic free market by replacing the vast regulatory state created by President Obama with a government winnowed down such that a free market may flourish and economic opportunity can be restored. Nothing matters more to the American people than that the United States, now the source of ridicule and comedic relief for our nation’s enemies, may be restored to the position of a super power where its enemies fear it, where its friends embrace it, and where it unyieldingly stands as a bastion of freedom.

© 2016 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

With the extraordinary Cruz vs Trump battle for the GOP presidential nomination sucking up all of the political oxygen, it is easy to miss that awesome conservative retired Air Force Col Rob Maness is running for the U.S. Senate in Louisiana.

Folks, please allow me to cut to the chase. Our country is going to hell in a hand basket fueled by GOP cowardice and an entire Democrat party hijacked by anti-American zealots. The only way we stop the horrific effects of Obama’s insanity and corruption in both parties is to send rock-solid conservatives we can trust to Washington; candidates with backbones-of-steel who refuse to go-a-long to get-a-long.

Speaking of backbone, Maness’s military awards and combat decorations include the Legion of Merit, the Bronze Star and Air Medal. I am pretty sure Maness will not be intimidated by RINOs, metro-sexual democrats or Obama bureaucratic henchmen in DC. Maness is like an oak tree firmly and deeply rooted in the rich fertile soil of his Christian faith.

When you cut through all the political deceptions, lies and broken promises, it always comes down to sending character-driven representatives to Washington. Rob Maness’ record proves he fits the bill. In plain language, Maness is one of us folks; a real family, God and country good guy.

I was extremely impressed when I met Rob during his 2014 run for the senate; strong conservative fighter, highly respected community leader, served 32 years in the military, husband, father of five and grandpa of four.

It is not surprising that national conservative heavyweights and organizations are united in endorsing Rob Maness for U.S. Senate, Louisiana. Those supporting Maness include Dr Ben Carson, Sarah Palin, Dr James Dobson, Lt. Governor Billy Nungesser, Conservative Campaign Committee, Tea Party of Louisiana, Tea Party Nation, Tea Party Forward, the National Association for Gun Rights and Special Operations Speaks.

Rather than listing all of Rob’s leadership roles and achievements, I will say he has proven his competence at the local, state, and federal levels of government; an effective steward of citizen’s tax dollars. Please visit his website for details.

Like any conservative Republican who faithfully advocates for We the People, the GOP establishment is often displeased and threatened by Maness. Rob wears their discomfort with him as a badge of honor.

There is a down-to-earth every-man quality about Rob, driving his pickup truck around Louisiana – spreading the good news of traditional American principles and values; God, family, country and the Constitution. Please enjoy this entertaining 30 second TV ad in which Rob promises to wrestle the gators in DC.

Here is an example of Maness’s strong decisive leadership regarding our national security. In response to the Jihadi attacks in Brussels, Maness advises Congress to fulfill its constitutional duty and finally declare war against the Islamic State. Maness says, “…until we formally declare war, our enemies and objectives will continue to be unclear and the American people will continue to be divided.”

C’mon folks, admit it. Isn’t Maness’s manly stand-up for America leadership a refreshing contrast to Obama and Kerry’s apologize-for-our-very-existence and give-our-enemies-everything-they-want approach?

By the way, the Islamic terrorist attacks in Brussels hit a little too close to home for the Maness family. The night before the attacks, Rob and Candy’s son flew out of Europe on military leave on an American Airline flight.

According to a new Pew Research report, our country is undergoing a scary demographic shift. Decades of allowing liberals to brainwash our kids and not encouraging immigrants to assimilate is taking America down a different path far away from the country envisioned by our Founding Fathers.

The only way to ensure that the America we grew up with will be there for a our grand-kids and great grand-kids is to consistently send rock-solid conservatives who espouse traditional American principles and values to Washington. In that regard, America desperately needs Col. Rob Maness in the U.S. Senate. Please, lets help him folks. God bless.

You can learn more about Rob Maness at his website

Be sure to LIKE Rob’s Facebook page here

And you can follow Rob Maness on Twitter

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2016 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

Media attention focuses on the internecine battle to gain control of the Republican Party’s nominating convention, to the neglect of a far greater story affecting the Democratic Party’s nomination of a presidential candidate. That media coverage is a form of tunnel vision, because it is virtually certain that the Democratic Party will experience an implosion this election cycle, while it is but a possibility that a floor fight will occur at the Republican National Convention.

The FBI is trying to schedule interviews with Hillary Clinton and her top aides, as the probe into Hillary et al.’s violations of the Espionage Act and the public corruption laws reaches its zenith. Based solely on the information publicly revealed to date, the evidence of unlawful conduct is overwhelming. It is hard to imagine either FBI Director James Comey or Attorney General Loretta Lynch not proceeding with a bill for indictment before a federal grand jury within the next several months. The Democratic National Convention will take place July 25 to 28. The issue is increasingly not whether Hillary and her top aides will be indicted but when. Will it occur before she gets her party’s nomination or after?

With over 150 FBI agents completing their evaluation of Clinton’s emails and of the association between her actions as Secretary of State and the receipt of foreign funds by the Clinton Foundation, it is likely that recommendations for the indictment of Clinton and her aides will soon be given by the FBI to the Attorney General. Interviews with those who are the targets of the investigation, including Clinton and her aides, is a necessary prelude to completion of that investigation. In those interviews, Hillary Clinton will be obliged to tell the truth and avoid withholding material information or face additional charges of false statements. She must either take the Fifth or answer, so too must her aides. If she answers in a way consistent with her public pronouncements, she will violate the False Statements Act and that crime will be added to the list of crimes for which she can be indicted.

It appears increasingly unlikely that Attorney General Lynch will stand in the way of a bill for indictment of Hillary Clinton. Lynch’s reputation for faithful adherence to the rule of law is considerable; moreover, her assurances to Congress that politics would not sway her actions make any move in the other direction one that would likely destroy her reputation on the Hill, in the Department, and with the FBI. To refuse to allow a bill of indictment to proceed to the Grand Jury, Lynch would have to be willing to sacrifice her future for the sake of a Clinton presidency. Moreover, if she were to refuse to indict Hillary, she would also likely have to refuse to indict all of Hillary’s aides who likewise violated the Espionage Act. The original error would thereby be compounded, and immediate calls for congressional investigation and an obstruction of justice probe would reach a fever pitch. Suddenly Lynch would be just as much a focus of congressional and public acrimony and attention as Clinton. A refusal to permit a bill of indictment to proceed to the Grand Jury would also likely cause several top level, career FBI agents and Justice Department lawyers with high integrity not only to protest loudly but to resign rather than be associated with the obstruction of justice. Word of the failure of Lynch to indict and resulting conflicts with the FBI and among Justice Department attorneys would reach the media, and even if the indictment failed to proceed, Hillary Clinton would soon become an enormous liability, a candidate not electable.

If the charges go to Justice before Hillary is nominated, word of those charges may well cause the nomination to go to Sanders (with Clinton supporters and super delegates jumping ship). While the mainstream media avoids that hypothetical, it is really the only way Sanders can win, and it is a very real prospect, one no doubt Sanders privately counts on as a path to secure the nomination. It certainly makes it inadvisable in the extreme for Sanders to drop out of the race. Rather, he should go through the entire convention, even if the charges are not brought before it concludes, and he should not concede thereafter but could well run as an independent (remember, Sanders was elected to the U.S. Senate as an Independent from Vermont). If the charges are not brought before Hillary wins the nomination, they most certainly will be brought during the general election (and therein lies the hope for Sanders).

If Hillary becomes the Democratic Party nominee and is indicted during the general election, the temptation for the Democratic Party to schedule a second nominating convention and discharge Hillary and endorse Sanders or Biden will be great. Moreover, even if that does not happen, Hillary financial supporters will likely bolt from her and promise support for a third party run by either Sanders or Biden. If Biden is pulled out of the wings and agrees to jump in, Sanders and Biden will split the vote, making neither electable.

If Sanders runs as an Independent against Hillary and the Republican nominee, there will still be die hards who will vote for Clinton but most will shift to Sanders, yet the split in Democratic vote will likely prevent either Sanders or Clinton from winning the election.

In short, the notion that Hillary Clinton will be our next President is premature in the extreme. Beyond beating the ultimate Republican nominee, she has an insurmountable problem confronting her: per se violations of the Espionage Act and possible violations of the public corruption laws that are about to come to a head. Whether indicted before or after the Democratic National Convention, Hillary Clinton will likely never become President of the United States, regardless of which Republican challenger she faces. Only a minority of Democrats will vote for Hillary Clinton rather than Sanders or Biden, if Hillary has the prospect of becoming a felon convicted under the Espionage Act or the public corruption laws during her first term in office, both unquestionably High Crimes for which impeachment would likely follow.

So, the most likely outcome is for a Republican to be elected President, because the prospect of indictment now hanging over Hillary Clinton like the sword of Damocles will likely fall before November 2016 and will fracture the Democratic Party in ways that prevent its chosen candidate from ever winning the White House.

© 2016 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

When the National Enquirer story broke about Ted Cruz being a serial adulterer I was out of the state listening to talk radio while driving. My first thought was the ‘DC Madame’ scandal back in 2007. Deborah Jeane Palfrey ran a successful and very large Washington, DC prostitution business. Ms. Palfrey was indicted in 2008: two counts for using U.S. mail for illegal activities, racketeering and money laundering. This is a lengthy but full back story for those unfamiliar with the case.

Casualties were numerous when the names of some of her clients were released according to the Vanity Fair article linked above: Former deputy secretary of state Randall Tobias; Pentagon adviser and author Harlan K. Ullman, a top military strategist who advised the Bush Administration and U.S. senator David Vitter, a Republican from Louisiana. Here is a list of John’s but by no means all of them.

Ms. Palfrey was found hanged in her mother’s shed. Her death ruled a suicide despite the fact that she had publicly stated she would never kill herself. Deborah Jeane Palfrey was murdered. Of that I have no doubt. She played a very risky game in a town drowning in filth, corruption and yes, murder when it threatens those who carry out the agenda of the Masters of the Game, global world elites. Evil in human form most Americans simply cannot acknowledge because to do so would crumble their security blanket and bring them into a stark reality they can’t handle.

At the time, Ms. Palfrey was represented by an attorney named Montgomery Blair Sibley. It was after that crime was pushed under the rug I became aware of Montgomery in his efforts to expose the criminal impostor in the White House for usurping the office of president of these united States of America. Montgomery went the extra mile in 2012 by attempting to run for president only to hit the iron wall called federal courts filled with cowards hiding behind their black robes.

Anytime a sex scandal involving politicians from both parties pops up it’s a difficult issue to pursue because there’s usually a spouse and children involved. Former NY Governor Eliot Spitzer and former SC Governor Mark Sanford were both caught cheating. Spitzer with whores from an ‘escort’ service, Sanford with a woman he met in Argentina. Both destroyed their marriages; I’m betting their children needed counseling. Spitzer went on to get a tv gig with CNN which was eventually canceled because no one watched it. Voters in SC rewarded Sanford and all his lies by electing him to Congress. When Sanford was done using his ‘paramour’ he drop kicked her via Facebook. But, perhaps there is a happy ending after all as the two lovebirds reunited in 2015.

There’s no doubt because I have made myself clear in many columns I believe Ted Cruz is a conniving liar. He knows he’s not eligible to run for president but he’s not going to let that interfere with his personal ambitions. After all, wasn’t it Glen Beck who announced Cruz was the ‘anointed one for this time’? Know when I absolutely knew Cruz knew he was constitutionally ineligible to be on the ballot? When he said this on August 22, 2013 at an appearance: “I am secretly a citizen of Ethiopia.”

The crowd got a big laugh out of that one right along with Ted the liar. What he did was copy the fraud in the White House with his born in Kenya jokes. Right out of Saul Alinsky’s play book: Mock your enemies openly to distract from the subject at hand and keep doing it so eventually people will believe it.

The Republican Party has allowed three ineligible candidates to run for president this year: Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. Why? Because of their complicity in allowing Barry Soetoro aka Obama to usurp the office of president. No way are they going to open that can of toxic worms. Rotten. They’re all rotten to the core and Americans by the millions so far have continued to vote for their incumbents in the GOP controlled Congress who have allowed that massive fraud to stand.

On the day before I arrived back in W. Texas I was tuned into Sean Hannity’s radio show just to see what was being spoon fed to his audience. Hannity did not use Montgomery’s name while talking about the DC Madame and the National Enquirer piece which I haven’t read. You know, that publication who printed the truth about JFK’s affair with Mary Pinchot Meyer (who was murdered), John Edwards, Tiger Woods and so many others. Anyway, Hannity mocked Montgomery and proclaimed there was no truth to Cruz being one of Palfrey’s John’s.

Hannity scoffed when telling his audience Montgomery had posted all the information on 815 of Palfrey’s Johns and phone records of 40 other similar operations in the Washington area on four servers around the globe and that if anything happened to him the information would be immediately released. One has to remember that Montgomery was restrained by the court from releasing what he has and when you threaten powerful people or ones that know where the bodies are buried (former Commerce Secretary Ron Brown and Vince Foster, Deputy White House Counsel for serial adulterer Bill Clinton; both murdered) you are risking your life. Shallow Sean can laugh all he wants but I find him to be a pitiful example of someone who claims to be a truth seeker.

Cruz went ballistic when ask ‘Have you ever been unfaithful to your wife’? He refused to answer. Instead, Cruz used his campaign chair, Chad Sweet to deny he had extramarital affairs although I wouldn’t really classify hiring whores as your usual run of the mill affair.

Cruz is a lawyer, a smart one and very savvy. He refuses to issue a personal denial but instead uses a surrogate. Right out of John Edwards play book. The disgraced former senator and presidential candidate denied he was the father of a child born to his paramour, Rielle Hunter, for a couple of years. Instead, his former aide, Andrew Young claimed he was the father. Well, long after the fact, Edwards came clean and owned up to being daddy. But, I always give credit where credit is due and from all appearances, Edwards takes care of his daughter financially and he and his children have a pretty good relationship with the little girl. That does not excuse all his lying, of course. Edwards romance with Hunter has long expired.

When I arrived back home I started looking at what was on the Internet. Many might remember the 2015 blow up when the disgusting cheating web site, Ashley Madison, was hacked:

“Warren Rojas reports for Roll Call, March 28, 2016, that approximately 15,000 email addresses of Ashley Madison’s subscribers have the “.mil” or “.gov” designation assigned to the armed forces and federal agencies, respectively.

“Among those are:

Nearly four dozen people who work at the White House.
The Capitol Police.
Seven individuals with ties to House offices.
The email address of Ted Cruz’s senate office: press@cruz.senate.gov.

“A Cruz aide insists that although “The email address in question is press@cruz.senate.gov,” that doesn’t mean anyone in Cruz’s senate office was an Ashley Madison subscriber because the address is “a publicly and widely available forwarding address that is often entered into web contact forms by people with no connection to our office.”

“The aide is being disingenuous because s/he would have us believe that a subscriber to Ashley Madison would use an email address with no connection to the subscriber. How would anyone interested in an adulterous “hookup” contact the subscriber then?”

Deny, deny and lie. But, since Ted Cruz is very well connected (one must read Kelleigh Nelson’s amazing research on Ted Cruz) the National Enquirer and the allegations they published was simply pushed aside in favor of the next juicy attack on Donald Trump.

I don’t think Mrs. Cruz was taking all this too well because she immediately suspended her campaign activities. Heidi Cruz Cancels New Jersey Campaign Stops This Week: “This comes after The National Enquirer accused Texas Senator Ted Cruz of multiple extramarital affairs last week.” There is a story out there in cyber land claiming a memo was sent by Mrs. Cruz that she knew Teddy was dipping his wick in someone else’s honey pot, but I have yet to see proof so I consider that to be just another rumor.

Last year Montgomery put out a request for donations. He wanted to head back to court to get the restraining order lifted on all the records he has that belonged to Ms. Palfrey. Montgomery said what he has could impact this presidential election. Well, I thought. One of the candidates, Democrat or Republican must have cheated on their spouse. At that time there were 17 candidates on the GOP side and Clinton, Sanders and a couple other losers for the Democratic/Communist Party USA.

The fact that Montgomery filed a petition with the U.S. Circuit Court last month tells me that one of the remaining candidates wins the grand prize since the race is now down to Kasich, ineligible Cruz and Donald Trump. I didn’t think it could be Kasich, but one never knows. Like Chief Justice John Roberts who is spoken of in Washington, DC circles as being homosexual, perhaps there is some truth to this: Kasich Bombshell! – Said To Be Longtime Homosexual

Donald Trump allegedly had an affair while married to his first wife which led to a divorce. At that time he was not running for the office of president. By all appearances Donald Trump and his wife, Melania, seem to have a solid marriage. Palfrey was murdered in 2008; Trump married Melania in 2005. I think Palfrey’s records go back to before Trump married Melania.

That leaves Ted Cruz on the GOP side. Of course, it could be Hillary Clinton having an affair with her shadow tied at their hips, Huma Abedin. It’s certainly no secret in Washington, DC that Bill Clinton is not the father of Chelsea. That honor goes to Web Hubbell, Hillary the Hun’s old law firm business partner. No? A picture is worth a thousand words. Clinton Issues Pardons, Clearing Deutch and McDougal, but Not Milken or Hubbell. Wisely, Hubbell has kept his mouth shut.

Sadly, Chelsea Clinton was ask that very question recently at an event which must have been very humiliating for her. She didn’t reply to the question about Hubbell being her father. Why hasn’t the puppet media ask Hillary the Hun: Is Web Hubbell Chelsea’s father? You cannot deny she looks exactly like Web Hubbell and absolutely zero resemblance to Bill Clinton who has a reputation for shooting blanks his whole life.

I truly doubt it’s the 74 year old bum, Bernie Sanders.

While I was on the road, Montgomery was busy:

Monday, March 28, 2016: And now to the Supreme Court . . .

“After waiting for two weeks for the U.S. Circuit Court to rule upon my Petition to (i) order the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order that prevents me from releasing the D.C. Madam’s client list and (ii) direct that I receive an expedited hearing on that Motion, I am — as I previously announced — waiting no more.

“Today I have filed at the U.S. Supreme Court my Application for a Stay of Restraining Order directed to the Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr. , Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Notably, in that Application, I unequivocally stated the following:

” To be clear, if Sibley is not allowed to file his Motion to Modify the Restraining Order and thereafter does not promptly receive a fair and impartial hearing on that Motion, he will justifiably consider the Restraining Order void as a result of being denied such a hearing by the District Court, Circuit Court and now this Court. In that event, Sibley will simply release publicly the Verizon Wireless Subpoena Return records containing the names and addresses of eight hundred fifteen (815) Washington D.C. clients of the D.C. Madam’s escort service.

“Not a threat, but a promise. And, to date, I have been a man of my word.”

Montgomery has stated several times that time is of the essence since voters have been casting their votes and the deciding states as far as delegates are upcoming. Voters have the right to know the truth before they cast their vote.

(Incidentally, the judge who turned down Sibley’s petition is Judge Richard Roberts of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. On March 16, 2016, the same Judge Roberts resigned. The 63 year-old is being sued by a woman who claims Roberts sexually assaulted her when she was 16 years old; Roberts was 27. Roberts says the relationship was mutual consent (a 27-year old with a 16 year old teen) and that the sexual assault allegations are “categorically false”. The usual denials just like former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dennis Hastert, cutting a deal last October in the hush money cover up over allegations he sexually molested a young boy when Hastert was a high school coach. Hastert’s sentencing has been postponed due to health issues.)

On April 1, 2016, a web site posted a page allegedly from Ms. Palfrey’s ATT phone records. Montgomery states he wants to release Palfrey’s records from Verizon Wireless, not ATT. He was her lawyer and has all her records so where did the ATT come from on April Fool’s Day? You can view the alleged one page ATT phone records here. Seven phone numbers are highlighted in yellow. All 1-2 minutes with the exception of one call lasting 7 minutes but it’s to an 800 number. What can you say in one – 2 minutes? Your name as a client and which whore you want for the night? Something hinkey there.

The numbers highlighted are purported to be Ted Cruz’s private phone numbers. I emailed Montgomery and ask if that page came from him and he responded, “Wasn’t me”. I have every faith Montgomery is and has been telling the truth all along. What he knows the American people have the right to see, too – before they vote. Montgomery also believes that: “Time is of the essence because people are casting votes in primaries and caucuses,” he says. “I believe this information is relevant to that political discourse.” IF the allegations are true and a big primary is coming up tomorrow – Wisconsin with a large number of delegates – voters have a right to know the truth. IF the allegations are true how many delegates will be awarded before Ted decides to drop out of the race for whatever excuse he thinks he can sell?

I don’t think Ted Cruz supporters understand or can appreciate the risk Montgomery is taking if he defies a court order not to mention what’s happened to others who represent a threat to the guttersnipes in high places in Washington, DC. Think Deborah Jeane Palfrey and her client list.

The hacking group called Anonymous also threatened to expose Cruz if he doesn’t drop out of the race immediately. It looks like they’re trying to take credit for the ATT page cited above.

While most find this distasteful and supporters of Ted Cruz loudly object because they can’t bear the thought that their holier-than-thou candidate is a serial adulterer, Cruz is doing himself no favor by using a surrogate to deny cheating. We all know the old saying, where there’s smoke there’s fire. Well, the room is filling up with smoke while Cruz can’t seem to utter the words ‘I have never been unfaithful to my wife’. But, like I said he’s a lawyer and things have a way of coming back to bite spouses in nasty divorces.

Washington Times Fires Writer for Confirming Ted Cruz Scandal, Claimed At Least Two Mistresses Accurate. “When Johnson “came clean” on Twitter it wasn’t long before a series of Twitter users began bombarding the writer with questions about his sources and the publications who passed on the story. In response, Drew Johnson says that there were lots of rumors, and that at least one of media outlets knew the whole story but decided it was not in their interest to run it.”

And why would it not be in the best interest to run a story they (media outlet above) know to be true? Isn’t the truth in everyone’s best interest?

But what do experts say about Cruz’s denial?

Experts: Ted Cruz Appears Deceptive in His Response to Sex Scandal Story, March 27, 2016

“Phil Houston is CEO of QVerity, a training and consulting company specializing in detecting deception by employing a model he developed while at the Central Intelligence Agency. He has conducted thousands of interviews and interrogations for the CIA and other federal agencies….

“We should note that these two statements constitute the only material that we currently have at our disposal to analyze, which is far from ideal. Obviously, the more material available for analysis, the greater our confidence in our findings. With that said, however, we were struck by the volume of deceptive behavior that we identified in these statements.

“Behaviorally, when the facts are the ally of an individual, he or she almost always tends to focus on the facts of the matter at hand. In this case, if the key fact was that he had not had these affairs, Cruz would almost certainly have been much more strongly focused on the denial. That is, he very likely would have made a point of explicitly stating something along the lines of, “I did not have these affairs.”

“Yet at no point in either statement did Cruz say that. He implied it by saying the allegations are false, and that they’re lies, but behaviorally, such statements are not equivalent to saying he never had the affairs. Even if we were to overlook that fact and consider his statements to be a denial, there is an overwhelmingly higher proportion of attack behavior compared to the effort expended at denial. This type of lopsided attack-to-denial ratio is very consistent with what we have historically seen with deceptive people when allegations are levied against them.”

Not only has Ted refused to set the record straight (Old memories: Bill Clinton shaking his finger at the tv cameras stating he did not have sex with than woman and it depends on what the definition of is is) he hides behind Carly Fiorina’s skirt. But, why is the ‘strong, independent’ Fiorina stumping and covering for Teddy? Why did Ted Cruz’s PAC give half a million to Carly Fiorina’s? Oct. 1, 2015.

“The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has asked a Ted Cruz super PAC to explain why it gave $500,000 to another super PAC supporting one of his Republican rivals. According to financial disclosures from June, Keep the Promise I – one of four separate committees backing Cruz – gave half a million dollars to CARLY for America, the political action committee supporting Carly Fiorina.

“Super PACs are legally allowed to give money to other super PACs – they are only prohibited from donating directly to any political campaign. But it’s unusual for one of these groups to give money to an opponent, especially when the candidate it supports is still in the race.”

Now, if you were running for a high public office would you give a half million bux to a super PAC supporting your opponent? Teddy said it was because Fiorina had important things to say. I guess he didn’t but really, Ted, that’s the best you can come up with?

Movie stars and other famous people sue publications like the National Enquirer all the time. Blake Shelton Is Suing InTouch For Saying He’s A Drunk Mess Who Once Peed On A Mailbox, March 18, 2016. John Edwards didn’t sue the National Enquirer nor did Tiger Woods, the ‘Reverend’ Jesse Jackson (love child) or Senator Gary Hart (dipped into the honey pot while candidate for president) because the stories were true. Eventually the smoke in their cases became full blown bonfires.

I have seen or heard nothing about Ted Cruz stating he is going to sue the National Enquirer. If it were me, damn straight I would IF the allegations were lies – wouldn’t you?

Ted Cruz, if innocent of the allegations should sue but we know what that means – the genie jumping out of the bottle or one might say a bimbo eruption. That is why I believe Cruz will not sue the National Enquirer or any other publication or web site that accuses him of using high paid prostitutes to scratch his itch. Oh, he can say he doesn’t want to give the National Enquirer any credibility or that he’s too busy on the campaign trail, but you and I didn’t fall off the turnip truck yesterday. If any more questions come up he can just rely on his old standard they’re lies, blah, blah, blah. The National Enquirer has been wrong a few times. Maybe they are this time.

Donald Trump has said he hopes it isn’t true and as much as I dislike Ted Cruz, I also hope for the sake of his wife, children and the large number of Americans who have voted for him that it’s not. Glen Beck has said he would forgive Cruz for one affair but not two or more: “Beck said he could forgive one incident but not a pattern of adultery.” Beck said Cruz didn’t have “enough game” to be jumping the bones of multiple women; at least I think that’s what he meant. Beck said if the allegations were true he would drop Cruz like a hot potato. If I were Glen Beck I might consider buying those big barbeque mitts.

But, those of us who believe the allegations against Cruz could all be wrong. We are going to find out soon because I take Montgomery at his word that he will release what he has and then we’ll all know the truth. If Ted Cruz’s name and phone number(s) are in Ms. Palfrey’s records his political career and likely his marriage is over. Toast.

Because those allegations have pretty much been brushed aside by heavies like Sean Hannity and Glen Beck, Cruz doesn’t look very stressed. I caught a clip of him a couple nights ago on FOX. He was the grand poobah at the North Dakota State Republican Convention. But, we all know how cool Barry Soetoro aka Obama has been the last eight years while being dogged about his ineligibility. Cruz is a slick, practiced politician. For now he can continue acting as if he’s won the National Enquirer debate.

Cruz can keep laughing on stage, but will he have the last laugh?

[Just a short note about 9/11 and Smart Electric Meeters. The cost of America’s undeclared “war” (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars – massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The Anatomy of a Great Deception. Just released: New Expanded Global Edition. For full disclosure I receive no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or give a copy as a present. I’ve purchased half a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It’s very powerful simply because it’s one ‘ordinary’ man’s story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in this film that many have never heard about but everyone should. Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend. Also, must see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take Back Your Power.]

© 2016 – NewsWithViews.com and Devvy – All Rights Reserved

How Can Donald Trump Crush Ted Cruz In Wisconsin?

Senator Cruz’s EDUCATION Bill S 306 expands Common Core to private, religious, and homeschools.

Ted’s promise to do away with Common Core is a LIE!

We already know about Common Core and the terrible impact it is making on America. It has been said that this generation of students will not surpass their parents in wealth and stability. “In this country, the expectation is that every generation does better than the previous generation,” said Caroline Ratcliffe, an author of the Urban Institute study. “This is no longer the case. This generation might have less.” The authors said the situation facing young Americans might be unprecedented. (Source:)

What will be the future of the next generation and how does education fit into this perception of our American youth?

Ted Cruz is NOT the person who will protect our children, our teachers, and our schools from Common Core. HE HAS LIED ABOUT ABOLISHING THE DEPARTMENT OF ED. HE HAS LIED ABOUT DOING AWAY WITH COMMON CORE.

Ted Cruz claims he will do away with Common Core. But he supports an amendment to the federal education legislation, ESSA, which forces Common Core on ALL private, religious and homeschools. Understanding the background of Common Core gives you the documentation needed to prove Senator Ted Cruz is a complete globalist and how his agenda will tear the Republic apart. (See my two previous articles “Senator Cruz Kills the American Dream,” and also see this)

Is Donald Trump the only candidate who can erase the damage of Common Core instituted by establishment Republicans and Democrats? Yes! Here is why…

The Facts about SENATOR TED CRUZ and COMMON CORE FOR ALL

Senator Ted Cruz did NOT VOTE in December for the final passage of the federal education bill ESSA, The Every Student Succeeds Act. He could have voted no, but he didn’t vote when this piece of federal legislation solidified Common Core in every state. This contradicts that he wants to get rid of Common Core — because in the end he did nothing to prevent it from happening.

I also did not hear Senator Cruz debate the parts in the legislation that removed states’ rights. As a “Constitutional” Attorney Senator Cruz did not say ONE WORD about the loss of 10th Amendment State Sovereignty Rights. The ESSA law removes and dissolves legislative states rights through this federal education legislation. The legislation requires that when a state puts the ESSA federal legislation into their budget, state legislatures must completely abide by the federal Common Core mandates. This creates a constitutional crisis. Senator Cruz did NOT mention this vital section in the bill. Not once.

Senator Cruz’s proposed S 306 which he sponsored with Senator Mike Lee (UT-R), forces Common Core onto ALL private and religious schools through federal CHOICE. Senator Cruz’s proposed bill is an amendment to ESSA. Cruz’s S 306 uses federal money (TITLE I PORTABILITY) and attaches this federal money to the student which “follows the child” into any private or religious school. The vehicle for this money to travel to another school is an education savings account, ESA. These children are Title I federal identified children, and their federal money and your local tax money is combined in a voucher which has Common Core and Common Core interventions branded all over the funding. Private and religious schools will only be government schools when they are forced to accept this voucher that identified this Common Core federal child. The Civil Rights issue that Senator Cruz explains on his website is actually the lawsuits that will be filed against private and religious schools to be forced to succumb to the federal Common Core mandates and accept this Title I federal child. Private schools and religious schools beware. Cruz’s CHOICE is a trap!

To make matters worse, Senator CRUZ’s S 306, redefines homeschool as a private school, thus snaring homeschoolers into Common Core. They will open an ESA to put their Title I portability federal money in this financial vehicle, just like the public, private, and religious schools. Senator Cruz is no friend to homeschools with federal “CHOICE”. Homeschoolers, beware!

So, Senator Cruz who says he will do away with Common Core, actually puts COMMON CORE in place for ALL CHILDREN IN EVERY SCHOOL with federal Title I money. This is the same plan as Obama’s Equity plan. Senator Ted Cruz manipulates parents’ consciences by telling them they can escape Common Core by using federal so-called “CHOICE” funds. This is the CHOICE TRAP where he actually takes a parent’s true freedom of CHOICE away. Senator Cruz has said a lot of things he will supposedly do. But doing away with Common Core is NOT going to happen with Sen. Ted Cruz’s S 306.

Senator Cruz has also said he will abolish the U.S. Department of Education. In reality, abolishing the U.S. Department of Education will make absolutely NO DIFFERENCE IN COMMON CORE. Why? Because the federal legislation, ESSA, is forcing Common Core on every child, every school, every teacher, and every principal in the United States, not the U.S. Department of Education.

Under the ESSA the state departments of education — not the elected representatives in your state’s legislature — have been given the power to implement Common Core in the federal legislation ESSA. This is the power that was originally given to the state departments of education in every state when implementing the Flexibility Waivers under the Obama/Duncan plan. (Remember the state sovereignty section of ESSA THAT REMOVES STATES RIGHTS.) State legislatures have been stripped of power, which means that citizens have no recourse through representative government. Worse, it means that your locally elected school boards have no local control. The state legislatures have been neutered into non-action. Locally elected boards have their hands tied, plus they will have to divvy out local tax money to children going to private and religious schools. So Sen. Ted Cruz idealized a plan that will actually break the bank of the local neighborhood school. Traditional public schools will eventually be forced to close, with the exodus of students selecting other schools. Take note: this is not true freedom of choice. Charter, private, religious, and homeschools will be forced to teach Common Core. There is no escape!

Also note: The U.S Department of Education will be taking a backseat to Health and Human Services, HHS. This is because HHS will have more power over schools under health and mental health through Obamacare. Promise Neighborhoods, initially funded by ObamaCare, are funded to turn your neighborhood school into school-based clinics. Federal health and mental health goals for your children coincide with Common Core subjective/non-academic standards. Essentially, schools become part of a “medical model.”

Background Documentation: Why is Common Core Bad for America?

The Republican Senate and the Republican House of Representatives sold out parents and teachers and gave President Obama his wish this past December when Congress nationalized Common Core across this great country by passing the Every Student Succeeds Act, ESSA. This bill nationalized schoolchildren’s curriculum, putting it under federal control, thus further continuing the dumbing down process of our children. Common Core has been accepted by 45+ states and the other 5 states have aligned their standards to Common Core tests, which means all 50 states are implementing Common Core.

ESSA is now the law of the land. Shockingly, no one debated the real issues. Scandalously, no one knew what was in the bill because Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan (R-WI), rammed the legislation through without debate. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) did the same in the Senate. We now have a monster bill, just as big as ObamaCare, with regulations that are being written as we speak. The establishment Republicans have BETRAYED America. And so, the terrible trend continues, “We have to pass a bill to see what’s it in,” a quote from the establishment Democrat Nancy Pelosi.

There are many illegal and strangling mandates for local public schools, their teachers, and our children with the heavy yoke of Common Core around their necks. States first grabbed Recovery dollars in exchange for Standards. This was Obama’s baby to nationalize education. Common Core standards were benchmarked and researched by ACT, American College Testing. The format for these standards were developed by the Department of Labor in the SCANS REPORT, Secretaries Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills,1992. ACT benchmarked Common Core which were then copyrighted, not by the federal government, but by the National Governors Association and each state secretary of education officers’ club, called the Chief State School Officers, CCSSO.

States took the plunge to get the money and signed a contract (memorandum) saying they will use Common Core and not change 85% of the standards. When you hear of Governors doing away with Common Core, don’t believe it. They merely changed the name or changed the 15% allowable under the contract… not the standards.

The Common Core process was stoked again with the illegal Obama/Duncan ESEA Flexibility Waivers which waived No Child Left Behind federal law and began the full court Common Core process. Punishment became the flavor of the day. Over-testing was thrust down the throats of our kids. Common Core evaluations punished the students, punished the teachers, punished the schools, and punished the principals when students could not attain Common Core standards. Traditional teachers were fired. The Common Core motto is… wrestle away local control, force the teachers to teach Common Core, and evaluate the kids, not on their potential, but on how they will meet federal Common Core dumbed-down standards.

State departments of education identified hundreds of schools for state takeover and called them turnaround schools, thereby forcing Common Core on each and every one. Governors were part of this takeover plan, including Kasich, Walker, Bush, Synder and Jindal. And then the Republicans in the House and Senate made the flexibility waivers law with ESSA which passed in December. In fact, former Governor Jeb Bush and Governor John Kasich are each called Mr. Common Core in their respective states of Florida and Ohio. Notably Governor Scott Walker totally supports Common Core and this is why he recently endorsed Ted Cruz for president.

Academics cannot be found anywhere. Math is taught by breaking apart easily calculated math questions into a nightmare of processes that do not make sense. (See examples.) Traditional subjects are limited to “functional literacy.” History has been revised to implicate the United States as wrong, ruthless, racist, and fumbling… not the shining light on the hill. Common Core Advanced Placement in US History even got the Second Amendment WRONG stating, “The people have a right to keep and bear arms in a state militia.” [Emphasis added] It is no wonder the future of our country is in serious trouble!

Common Core’s Push for Psychobabble.

There are many specific teaching techniques mandated by federal law with INTERVENTIONS carried out by IDEA, Special Education funding, that put our children in danger. These psychological and conditioning techniques named in the legislation force teachers to pose as therapists and implement mental health interventions on normal children. These techniques are normally applied to children who are physically or mentally handicapped, and they should not be implemented to every child in the classroom. But the mandated techniques that were validated for helping autistic children function in the world are being used on every child in the classroom. This is called Applied Behavior Analysis. This psychological technique goes by several alias names to make them palatable to parents: grit; positive behavior intervention and supports; response to interventions; multi-tiered system of supports; school-wide tiered system of supports; and early intervening services.

These deceptive names suggest harmless teaching. In fact, they are rigorous behavior changing techniques that can cause serious harm, trauma, depression, and anxiety in normal children. Yet they remain in the legislation and are carried out daily in the classrooms of America. Many parents question why their active children have become sullen, stressed, and depressed. Common Core is purposely administered to change the attitudes, values, and dispositions of our American children. So the unfortunate result on children is the induced stress caused by Common Core.

Many parents are oblivious to these techniques and have either signed compacts or agreed to have their children assessed for problems based on subjective and invasive assessments and observations. The government wants to be partners because they do not want parents to have the ultimate authority over their own children. Partnerships are defined as equal ownership. Assessment is defined as the valuation of property — your children’s worth to the economy.

“Parent Engagement” is a term used to con parents into agreeing with the school that their child is in trouble. Little do parents realize that “trouble” means your child is not meeting Common Core subjective behavioral requirements. Little do parents realize their child is being taught collectivist indoctrination via B.F. Skinner’s reward and punishment and conditioning techniques. This method is used to squelch any remaining individuality that your may child exhibit. It’s all about the group. Your children are in danger. (Source:)

[NOTE: Wisconsin has been a model state (including Ohio, New York, Maine, West Virginia, and Kentucky) in the experimental Innovation Lab Network that used students to research and document experimental Common Core non-academic psychological processes. (Source:)]

Which brings us to the Presidential candidate, Senator Ted Cruz, and his position on federal CHOICE and the Constitutional issues in the federal legislation ESSA that he did NOT fight for.

This is Ted Cruz’s federal “CHOICE.” But that was his global plan all along. Nationalizing/federalizing education, holding hands with President Obama all the while he is smiling. Ted Cruz is lying about the impact of FEDERAL CHOICE and abolishing the Department of Education. Obama’s plan is idealized.

Other points in ESSA conveniently not mentioned by Cruz:

COMMON CORE IS DUMBING DOWN OUR KIDS. (Source:)

PSYCHOBABBLE HAS TAKEN THE PLACE OF ACADEMICS.

COMMON CORE FOR BABIES IS LEGISLATED AT BIRTH IN THE FEDERAL LAW.

COMMON CORE HAS DESTROYED THE TEACHING PROFESSION.

COMMON CORE DEVELOPS PSYCHOMETRIC DOSSIERS ON OUR CHILDREN. DATA MINING CONTINUES TO BE SHARED WITH THIRD PARTY CONTRACTORS BECAUSE OF PRESIDENT OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE ORDER 12866.

And then along comes Romney.

These psych techniques and interventions (explained above) are funded and carried out by IDEA, which are Special Education funds. It is most interesting that former Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who embarrassed himself last month for his scathing remarks about Mr Trump, had the exact same education plan that had been resurrected in the Ted Cruz proposed Choice Plan. S 306 is the plan to totally control all children in every school in the United States by using Title I and IDEA for federal school CHOICE.

And it is the same exact plan in the Obama/Duncan Flexibility Waiver Plan. (See Senator Cruz’s federal CHOICE in S 306 explained above.)

Perhaps this is why Mitt decided to challenge ‘The Donald’ — because he likes the Cruz Plan, which explains why he is part of the establishment’s global agenda. Senator Cruz and Mitt have a lot in common, you know? Common Core. Go home, Mitt. (Source:)

Our kids are not a commodity. Senator Cruz has not been vigilant to protect our children nor help parents across this nation. He has not supported our teachers or our public schools. His only answer to education is to allow kids to get money from the federal government to go to another school, which is HIS federal “CHOICE”, WHICH IS COMMON CORE FOR ALL. When he states he will get rid of Common Core, his Title I and IDEA money straps Common Core to the backs of those kids in his proposed S 306 legislation. He is betraying private schools, religious schools, and homeschools by forcing Common Core down their throats. He is killing the American Dream.

His silence is deafening on many of the Constitutional issues within the ESSA federal legislation. Senator Cruz is helping the greedy corporations. His plan will cause the collapse of the traditional school system that has produced the most creative, most educated, and most prosperous people in the entire world.

Senator Cruz IS an establishment insider.

We support Donald Trump to do the job that Cruz didn’t do. Cruz did not have the guts to stand up to the establishment and their goals, because he is one of them.

Do Not TrusTed with your children.

© 2016 Anita Hoge – All Rights Reserved

Even critics and opponents of GOP presidential hopeful Donald Trump admit that from the very beginning he moved the issue of illegal immigration and border security to center stage, thereby proving what he has said many times: the media are deceitful.

A recent case of one that the Trump campaign has pointed to proves his point: a convicted human trafficker, or Mexican “coyote,” who had been arrested 24 times dating back to the Clinton Administration, was sentenced to federal prison this week for the first time. U.S. Border Patrol agents had nabbed the suspect with smuggling illegal immigrants into the United States 23 times in less than 17 years, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California. But this time arrest number 24 finally resulted in a conviction and prison sentence.

Alien smuggler Efrain Delgado-Rosales was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Cathy A. Bencivengo for smuggling four illegal aliens into the United States and then abandoning three of them in the Otay Mountains region once they were across United States border from Mexico.

The 35-year-old human smuggler was sentenced to five years in prison by a federal judge in San Diego for bringing an illegal alien into the U.S. for a large fee. He had been arrested by Border Patrol agents 24 times dating back to July 19, 1999. Only once was he apprehended alone. Every other time, he was apprehended with at least two and up to 46 other undocumented individuals. Once, on September 14, 2003, he was apprehended in a load house in Los Angeles with 61 other undocumented individuals.

“In the August 2014 event, one of the smuggled men, Jose de Jesus Hernandez-Adono, died. His mummified body was found by Border Patrol and Homeland Security Investigations Agents in late September 2014. A witness was located, who had been smuggled in with Hernandez-Adono. The witness identified Delgado-Rosales as the foot guide,” the prosecutors said in a statement.

According to the witness, Hernandez-Adono died, and the other three barely survived the trek. “Why the prosecution didn’t charge Delgado-Rosales with at least manslaughter to me sounds like a political decision. It’s evidence of hardworking law enforcement officers [in the Border Patrol] doing their jobs but the decision-makers dropping the ball. I suspect some of the bad decision making is intentional as part of the President Barack Obama unilateral amnesty,” said Peter Rosario, a former narcotics officer who worked at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Efforts to discover why this convicted human trafficker was able to elude punishment for a number of felonies met with promises of an internal investigation. “The fact that you have a man who managed to avoid incarceration 23 times says more about our law enforcement capabilities especially in this era of rampant Islamist terrorism and human trafficking. Where are the lawmakers now?” asked former police sergeant Manny Rosario.

“After almost a day of hiking through the mountains, Border Patrol was alerted to the men’s whereabouts. Border Patrol agents responded to the location –about one mile north of the U.S.-Mexico border and three miles east of the closest checkpoint at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry- to find Delgado-Rosales and the four men. All five men were arrested for being illegally in the United States,” according to the U.S. Attorney’s prosecutors.

“All four men identified Delgado-Rosales as their foot guide and explained that they and their families each promised to pay others $5,000 to get them each into the United States, for a total of $20,000,” they said.

The location of the arrests matters, because Delgado-Rosales was implicated in another smuggling operation in the Otay Mountains, further east in more rugged and desert-like terrain.

The facts detailed in the August 2014 smuggling event mirror those detailed by the men in this case. As in this case, the men in August 2014 were housed at a stash house in Tijuana while waiting to be smuggled into the United States. Delgado-Rosales required that the men buy and wear drab, brown clothing during the crossing to hide from Border Patrol. The group again consisted of four men and again Delgado-Rosales had them cross over the Otay Mountains. The smuggling fee was the same, $5,000, and Delgado-Rosales again appeared to lack any concern for the welfare of his charges.

U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy said, “This case serves as an example of the extreme dangers associated with crossing illegally into the United States. Smuggling activities are run by criminal organizations that have little concern over the welfare of their charges. Our office will aggressively prosecute those who smuggle illegal aliens into the United States for financial gain, place those in their company in grave danger and needlessly cause deaths.”

Chief Border Patrol Agent Richard A. Barlow added, “The sentence of Delgado-Rosales sends a stern message to those who use dangerous means to smuggle individuals into this country for profit. I would like to acknowledge the U.S. Attorney’s Office for their efforts in this case.”

‘In most sane societies, the government…and their extension of law enforcement…is set in place to protect the citizenry. This is the least a people can expect from their government. But a bizarre and baffling situation is arising in the West. The governments that the people have elected to protect their national security, have now reversed their purpose and mission and are now protecting the perps,” said talk show host and columnist Audrey Russo.

President Obama is making the lives of citizens worse, not better, along Arizona’s border with Mexico, Pinal County, Arizona, Sheriff Paul Babeu said Tuesday. Sheriff Babeu is not the only lawman to complain about the Obama Administration’s handling of border security and overall crimefighting. He’s joined by Milwaukee’s Sheriff David Clarke and the membership of the U.S. Border Patrol’s union.

© 2016 NWV – All Rights Reserved

One thing we have seen over the last seven and a half years is that our Department of Justice is anything but a department of justice. Eric Holder decided that he would only enforce the laws he felt were important. Even though he was the nation’s top cop there were many laws that he simply ignored because the ones that broke those laws were black. Take for instance the black lady that complained that she only got to vote for Obama twice in 2012. That is a federal offense but Holder wouldn’t prosecute because she was black. Then there is the case of the Black Panther King Samir Shabazz who advocates the killing of whites: “King Samir Shabazz, the National Field Marshal for the New Black Panther Party, called for violence against white people on his national radio program.

“I love black people, and I hate the g*****n white man, woman, and child, grandma, aunt, uncle, Pappa Billy Bob, and whoever else,” he said. “Redneck Tom and Blueneck Robert, and whoever else you wanna name. I hate the white man. I hate the very look of white people. I hate the sound of white people. G******it, I hate the smell of white people. I hate the oppression of white people, I hate the murder and the rape and the torture and the taking away of our names, our culture, our God, our music and damn, I hate this cracker for everything he has done to us.” Shabazz, however, was just getting warmed up.

“You should be thankful we’re not running around here hanging crackers by nooses and all that kind of stuff, yet, yet, yet,” he said.

“Some of us, some of y’all – are even scared to have a wet dream about killing the g*****n cracker,” he added.

He also spoke of taking neighborhoods over and terrorizing white people.
“And we‘ll really show this cracker a project that’s behind never wish he would have started. Turn them projects out, because a black power project and no crackers allowed up in here,” he said.

“So much to the point that then their developer will be scared to come in here; we’re taking it. Just like we took our land for our garden, G******it, the projects is next. We’re taking it back, block by block, house by house, street by street, hood by hood, town by town, city by city, state by state.”[1]

This is an outright threat of racist violence. He was also the one at a Philadelphia polling station in 2008 standing outside with a club threatening voters that they had better be voting for Obama. Bush’s DOJ found him guilty of voter intimidation but it was right at the end of Bush’s term and Holder refused to enforce the court ruling.

We have to understand that if our laws are not enforced then our sovereignty is in name only. States are required by federal laws to keep their voter rolls up to date but every State that tried to do that, removing names of people that had died and that moved out of State, was opposed by Holders DOJ from doing so. In a check by True The Vote they found that almost seven million people were registered in two or more states! “Some 6.9 million Americans are registered to vote in two or more states, according to a report from an election-watch group.

“Our nation’s voter rolls are a mess,” says Catherine Engelbrecht, True The Vote president. “Sensible approaches to roll maintenance are fought tooth and nail by radical special interests who can use the duplicity in the system to their advantage.”

The latest interstate voter cross check tallied 6,951,484 overlapping voter registrations, and they’re just the tip of the iceberg.

The cross-check program involves only 28 states and does not include the three largest: California, Texas and Florida.

“Duplicate registration is an open invitation to voting fraud,” said Clara Belle Wheeler, a member of the Election Board in Albemarle County, Va. “This ability to vote more than once dilutes the legal votes and changes the results of elections.”

Virginia Voter Registration Headache: 308,000 Also Registered in Other States

The interstate cross-check program matches first and last names and dates of birth to identify multiple registrations. But the data are not routinely used to purge duplicates.

“Increasingly lax standards in our election process produce increasingly unreliable results,” Engelbrecht asserted.

“The few conversations that are had about how to shore up these weaknesses are immediately seized on by certain politicians and special-interest groups as fuel to further divide American voters based on trumped-up race and class-based narratives,” she said.”[2]

Many states passed voter ID laws and every State that did were taken to court by Holder. He claimed that needing a ID to vote was a unnecessary burden on the poor and minorities even though you need ID for cashing welfare checks, buy alcohol, cigarettes, applying for food stamps, opening a bank account, renting a house, applying for welfare, renting a car, buying a gun, buying an Obama phone not to mention a dozen other every day activities. Unions opposed voter ID laws as well even though to vote in a union election you have to show an ID . . . go figure.

Just recently our new Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a Holder minnie me, announced a new program of ‘cooperation’ with the UN to help ‘fight terrorism’. It’s called Strong Cities Network. In an article on OathKeepers.org we see that AG Lynch appears to be trying to allow the UN to govern how our individual cities respond to terrorism. “Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Department of Justice are joining with an international law enforcement coalition for the claimed purpose of “strengthen[ing] community resilience against violent extremism,” a Sept. 28 release from the DOJ’s Office of Public Affairs announced.

“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” Lynch proclaimed for the United Nations SCN launch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”

Curious, that she deliberately chose the word “collaboration.” And as for “best practices,” we have them already, in the Constitution, with its Bill of Rights that she swore an oath to uphold. And that’s just the start of the flags this globalist venture ought to be raising.

To paraphrase another miserable oath-breaker, Bill Clinton, it depends on what the meaning of the word “extremism” is. As Oath Keepers and other Constitutionalist/traditional values groups have seen time and again, the Feds are more than happy to embrace the Southern Poverty Law Center’s politically-motivated insinuations. Speaking out in defense of traditional marriage or opposing “progressive” usurpation of powers results in being conflated with truly violent and racist groups, being smeared with the label of “hater,” and being held up as examples for law enforcement fusion centers to be on the lookout for.

So it’s no wonder that the “American” cities that are prominent SCN members are also all members of Michael Bloomberg’s mayor’s coalition … uh … collaboration, beginning with New York City, headed by socialist revolutionary Bill De Blasio. And it’s no wonder that the remainder includes no shortage of degenerate kleptocracies, third-rate tyrannies, and cartel/terror havens, many meriting State Department travel warnings (which in a rational world would begin with “Are you nuts?”).

I’m sure there are plenty of “best practices” Lynch et al. could pick up from “strong cities” like Medellin or Tunis. And I’m equally sure the “welcoming” support given by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, will help with the SNC mantra “that violent extremism and prevention efforts should not be associated with any particular religion, nationality or ethnic group.”[3] To read Lynch’s whole speech on this click here.

We have not had an administration that enforces our laws or defends the American people for the last seven years. That creates a perfect environment for tyranny. And that tyranny birthed in the Democrat Party has been trying to get a foothold here for the last seven years. We cannot stop opposing its advancement if we intend to leave our kids with a better nation than what our parents left us. We are going to have to do a lot of work just to get America back to where it was when we got let alone make it better.

2016 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. New black panthers King Samir Shabazz advocates violence against whites.
2. Nearly 7 million americans registered to vote in more than one state.
3. Strong cities network should raise alarms for liberty advocates.

“Among a people generally corrupt, liberty cannot long exist.” —Edmund Burke

The American electorate has been voting for the wrong people for so long, and now we’re being screwed out of the candidate we really want by those same people. 

In the State of Tennessee

The Tennessean the Trump campaign, and Tennessee Republican Party chairman Ryan Haynes, had agreed Wednesday, March 30th, on the names of seven of the 14 at-large delegates that, under party rules, are to be appointed by the state party. Delegates will ultimately decide the party’s nominee at the Republican National Convention this summer.

Morris said two of the pro-Trump at-large delegates supported by the campaign, but now taken off the list, are Republican state Sen. Bill Ketron, R-Murfreesboro, and Mark Winslow, former chief of staff of the Tennessee Republican Party. Both men were delegate candidates in the March 1 primary. Morris said Ketron is now slated to be an alternate delegate and that Winslow is no longer even on the list.

Trump Won Tennessee’s Primary

A handful of Trump/Cruz operatives were allowed in. Trump supporters left outside the room were reportedly banging on windows to attract the attention of those inside.

For video click here.

Cat Hughes reportedwhat happened in Nashville where the GOP was holding this meeting to appoint the remaining delegates. 

Congresswoman Diane Black, (she was one of our representatives that attended the outed meeting to get rid of Trump on a Georgia island resort). Presumptively, this type of meeting is taking place at all state GOP headquarters. There were no objections allowed for anyone specifically on the slate. It was all on the slate or none on the slate.

Rocky Top Politics Reports

The fix is in. Ryan Haynes and GOP establishment force through their slate which contains numerous phony delegates posing as Trump or Cruz supporters.

Want to know why voters are so upset with the Republican party? Look no further than the 44 slime balls who voted for themselves and their cronies while flipping off the voters and presidential candidates who actually earned their standing at the ballot box.

Trump and Cruz Delegates Now Working Together

Breitbart’s latest is that Trump and Cruz delegates are forming a grassroots alliance pledging support for anti-establishment candidates. 

“I am concerned about the future of our country, and I believe a brokered convention will only mean that Hillary will win,” State Senator Mae Beavers (R-Mt. Juliet) an at-large Trump delegate told Breitbart News. “It’s time we all honor our commitment to the process and to the people who elected us. I will do whatever I can to work with all delegates to make sure that is done,” Beavers added.

Conclusion

Trump has been maligned by the GOPe, the DNC, and the MSM for everything under the sun. He has been lied about over and over again by the national media who claims he hates women, when he hires and supports promoting women in his organization. [Link]

Donald Trump has been accused of inciting violence, when in fact, the violence has been from communist George Soros and his paid lackeys. [Link], [Link]

The American people have chosen Donald J. Trump as their candidate, but the establishment GOP wants both Trump and Cruz gone. Their goal is for neither of them to be the candidate. They want a brokered convention where they can stick us with Jeb Bush or John Kasich, two hardcore establishment globalist republicans. Then we’ll end up with Hillary Clinton in our White House again. This is the goal of our false friends in the Republican party. Don’t let it happen!

P.S. Special hat tip to my friend in Nashville, and to Knoxville’s former sheriff and delegate for Donald Trump.

On Tuesday last week death arrived in the subway, death came to the airport in Brussels Belgium, in the very heart of political Europe. In fact, the subway bomb was not far from the NATO headquarters in Brussels.

One European based commentator stated,

“Once the dust begins to settle in Brussels, it’s almost 100% certain that a whole new raft of Europe-wide (and possible western-worldwide) security measures will now be rushed into place as a reaction to this latest incident. These will likely include, but are [not] limited to, new police powers of search, seizure and detention, biometric ID systems and other ‘enhanced screening’ measures. Also expect some privacy debate to ensue regarding personal device encryption, or unfettered police access to personal information.”[1]
I would agree with that analysis. What we can predict is a further loss of freedom and liberty not only in Europe but probably here in our own land. The reports are that more than 30 people died in these bomb blasts, two were Americans. One moment they were focused on getting to the destination for which they began their journey.

No doubt they had each prepared for the journey they were on whether just across town or boarding an airplane to cross the ocean and were likely not thinking about the end of their own life here on earth. But on Tuesday prepared or not, they reached the end of their earthly journey. And unless the Lord Jesus Christ returns in our lifetime, we each will also cross that same threshold. Our death may come at any time even at a time we do not expect. For those who are true followers of Jesus the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the grave we celebrate today is the ultimate game changer.

First the resurrection means that Jesus Christ has conquered sin and death. Next that resurrection assures us that the payment for our sins which was fully made at the cross, was then fully accepted by God the Father. In addition His resurrection confirms that the Kingdom of Christ will ultimately triumph – the defeat of sin, of death and of Satan himself has been accomplished. We are simply living through the mopping up phase of the complete victory of Jesus Christ. Then the Resurrection of Jesus Christ assures us there is more beyond the grave. We do not have a chart to guide us, save Jesus Christ; details are sketchy, but our destination is certain. Yes the resurrection of Jesus Christ was the ultimate game changer, game over, Jesus Christ wins.

Now for each disciple of Jesus Christ there is an even deeper and more profound implication of the resurrection of our Lord and Savior. Turn to Philippians 3:20-21 “For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body that it may be conformed to His glorious body….” That glorious body is the resurrected body of our Lord and Savior.

Think of the incredible promise we are given here in God’s Word – we will have a resurrection body like that in which Jesus Christ rose from the dead. I don’t know about you, but this gets me excited, standing on tip toe, peering over the edge of eternity, eagerly looking towards that glorious hope that blessed hope of our Great Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, at whose appearing in His second Advent, we will receive this glorious resurrection body promised in God’s Word.

In fact if you know the medical path of the human body, it is a sad downward cycle of decay and corruption. If our hope were only in this world with an ultimate slide into the grave, life would be a most despairing experience. I often wonder how the atheist, the materialist, the rationalist, how they grow old and maintain any hope at all. You see if you look at the facts of the decline leading to death it is a pretty gloomy prospect, but not for the Christian. Turn to 1 Corinthians 15 where Paul speaks of death with the imagery of planting seeds in the ground.

Today I’d like to take a look at the nature of that glorious body of our resurrected Lord Jesus to just get a sneak preview of that which is prepared for us. Turn to Luke 24:36. You’ll recall the context here; the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, where Jesus appeared and walked and talked with them.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2016 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

When I was 11 years old – that would be 1948 – it was an election year. In those days, caucuses were held in private residences.

I lived on South Sherman Street in Denver and a house across the street was the polling place for the Democrat caucus. I was curious and asked my Mother what a “polling place” for the District number shown on the sign outside of the house meant. I asked if she and my Father would be attending. I was one of those kids who constantly asked questions.

I didn’t know Democrats from Republicans in those days. I must admit, I don’t see much difference between the two parties today, either. They are both run by the same globalists who manipulate power back and forth for their own benefit and to the detriment of the people of America. In my view, both political parties are totally corrupt.

Back to 1948: My Mother informed me that I had to be in the house by dark and that I could not go outside that night… we usually played hide and go seek, Simon Says, or kick the can after dinner. “None of that tonight,” she told me. When I asked why, she informed me that there would be numerous strangers coming and going from my neighbor’s house that evening and Democrats were people whose moral standards were “different from ours.” When I asked what that meant she explained that Democrats were the kind of people who might abuse little girls.

We didn’t say the word sex in the good old days and so Mom’s explanation was lacking in details, but she said enough to give me the idea that I might be stolen by someone who was part of a political party different from that of my parents and they might be inclined to do things that would ruin a child’s life.

My Mother was raised on a small farm that bordered the city limits of Indianapolis, IN. There were many times during her childhood when there was insufficient food for her and her five brothers and sisters. She was born in 1909 and was a child when the Great Depression began. They grew much of their own food. She told my brother, sister and I about cooking turnips in a large pot over the fireplace. One night someone shouted that the water in which the turnips were being cooked was gone and they would burn. Her brother, Paul, jumped up and spit in the pot to keep the turnips from burning… they didn’t have indoor water, and had to get it from a pump outside the kitchen door which took a couple of minutes.

How Mom ended up a Republican, I’ll never know. She came from a poverty-based background which today would automatically make her a Democrat… or a socialist or a communist.

I remember when, during WWII, FDR went to meet with Stalin and Winston Churchill at Yalta, Mom said “That old bastard gave America away at Yalta!” I didn’t know Yalta from Malta and so didn’t pay much attention but she was so vehement when she made the statement, it stayed with me. When I became politically aware, I found she was right. Mom had to quit school after the 8th grade which, from personal observation, is about the same as an undergraduate degree from colleges and universities these days. I do not believe most teachers or professors could pass the test she had to take to graduate 8th grade.

Over the years, there have been many things to remember about both political parties. Interestingly, the thing that stands out most in my mind is the $200,000 in valued property that was stolen from the White House in 2000 by Bill and Hillary Clinton when they moved out and George W. Bush moved in. They were forced to return the stolen goods and unless I’m mistaken had to pay for some of the damages their White House staffers did.

I remember how those who worked for them destroyed the computer room, stole laptops, etc. In my mind, that somehow was a far worse offense – stealing from the people of the country who paid their salary and gave them respect neither was due – than all of the other things attributed to the Clintons.

It totally puzzles me that anyone would vote for someone who has stolen from them… or, who attempted to steal from them and would have had they not been caught in the act. To vote to put them in a position where they can steal you blind is, in my outdated view, unthinkable.

Mother’s assessment of Democrat moral values, it seems, was as accurate in the 1940s as it is in 2016. Here’s a reminder of the days we all enjoyed when the Clintons last called the White House home:

• President Clinton gave Hillary authority to handle health care reform. The program she created was so messed up that even a Democrat-controlled Congress wouldn’t vote for it.

• President Clinton gave Hillary authority to select a female attorney general and she submitted the names of Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood. Both were forced to withdraw their names because of their backgrounds. Hillary next recommended what Bill Clinton later called his “biggest mistake:” Janet Reno. Those who remember the Koresh killings in Waco, TX and Vicki Weaver/FBI sniper at Ruby Ridge, ID will quickly see the kind of people Mrs. Clinton tends to respect and appoint to office.

• President Clinton then requested Hillary to recommend the new head of the Civil Rights Commission. She put forth the name of Lani Guanier – whose radical views forced a withdrawal of her name.

• President Clinton asked Hillary for more recommendations. She provided these names: Web Hubbel (of Whitewater fame) for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for White House staff, and William Kennedy for Treasury. As you probably know, Hubbel went to prison, Foster committed suicide (then drove himself to Ft. Marcy Park to hide his body), and Kennedy was forced to resign.

• Then we had “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted her friend, Harry Thomason, to provide travel tickets, circumventing the White House Travel Office. The Travel Office refused to comply and it cost them their jobs when Hillary made false charges against them to the FBI and got them fired. A guy named Billy Dale was charged with mixing personal and White House funds and it took a jury less than two hours to find him innocent.

• Hillary recommended her friend Craig Livingstone to be Director of White House security. Remember the 900 missing FBI files – the files that provided classified information on enemies of the Clintons? The material also dealt with widespread use of drugs by White House staff… at which point, both Hillary and Bill denied even knowing Livingstone. As a result, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office (which had served seven Presidents). It was during this time frame Republican elected officials stopped representing the interests of the people who elected them and began doing the bidding of the Democrat Party. Do you see a possible connection to those stolen FBI files… stolen by a Clinton appointee recommended by Hillary?

• When the allegations of Bill’s sexual appetite came to the fore, Hillary was put in charge of the “Bimbo Eruption” team. In case you’ve forgotten, Hillary recommended non-settlement in the Paula Jones lawsuit – which, after the Ken Starr investigation, was quietly settled (costing American taxpayers millions of dollars). Anyone who thinks it is pro-feminist to be an enabler for a male abuser of women (even if the abuser is your husband) has a different definition of pro-feminism than most thinking women. Women who support this woman for President are not feminists. They are traitors to women and to women’s causes.

• Hillary refused to release the Whitewater documents. As a result, Ken Starr was appointed Special Prosecutor. It cost taxpayers $80 million to find out about Bill Clinton’s sperm on Monica Lewinski’s blue dress. Bill was caught lying about his affairs which he later admitted to… but lost his license to practice law (thank you, Lord) for lying under oath to a grand jury.

• Hillary avoided being indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice by using the words “I do not recall,” or “I have no recollection” and “I don’t know” 56 times during her interrogation.

• And then we have Benghazi, destroying Department of State emails and using a personal server which threatened and still threatens our national security and the lives of intelligence agents (plus the possible trading of government favors for contributions to the Clinton Foundation).

How can the Democrats make their candidate for the Presidency someone who doesn’t appear to be the brightest candle on the cake (she flunked her Bar exam at least once or twice and passed it only after Bill was in office in Arkansas), whose associates haven’t heard of a law they didn’t want to break, who has a record of dishonesty, has bad judgment, and, according to the Secret Service, has an absolutely foul mouth?

None of the above includes the list of dead bodies which are linked to the Clintons or the drugs and laundered CIA drug money at Mena Airport while Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas.

Still, being forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that was listed as “stolen” defines Hillary Clinton’s character to me… or, more accurately stated, defines her complete lack of character and moral values. It’s not that the other things don’t disgust me… they disgust me beyond belief.

Then there is her record as Secretary of State. What record, you may ask? And there, as Mr. Shakespeare might say, “is the rub.” Even those who support her cannot think of anything she actually accomplished.

Only one Democrat, Hillary Clinton, did all of those things listed above, but all Democrats appear to accept them. See how insightful my Mother was in 1948? Clinton, a woman who supports women’s causes she says, supports late-term abortion and crunching unborn baby parts while in the womb so a healthy liver or pancreas can be harvested from a helpless unborn body so it can be sold; she’s the one who did the lying about the email server and Benghazi but is supported by a majority of Democrats and will win that party’s nomination to be the President of the United States (if the FBI doesn’t get her first). That should tell you something about your Democrat friends and businesses you support.

And we wonder why the world has no respect for our country?

There is no cure for stupid.

© 2016 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

GOP presidential candidate Donald J. Trump is taking a beating from the press over his flip-flops on abortion. But the leading Democrat candidate for president, Hillary Clinton, has escaped serious scrutiny over her extreme position that would seem to prohibit any restrictions on the procedure.

Trump regularly compares his flip-flops to how Ronald Reagan changed on the issue. Of course, Reagan changed in a much more dramatic and thoughtful way. He actually authored a major essay, 3,600 words in length, which was made into a small book, “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation.”

Trump has posted an eloquent 600-word statement that notes that he did not always hold the pro-life position, “but I had a significant personal experience that brought the precious gift of life into perspective for me.” He previously had said that “what happened is friends of mine years ago were going to have a child, and it was going to be aborted. And it wasn’t aborted. And that child today is a total superstar, a great, great child.”

Reagan’s essay, which was published 10 years after the Supreme Court legalized abortion on demand, drew upon moral considerations but also medical and scientific evidence. He noted that 1981 Senate hearings on the beginning of human life brought out the basic issue more clearly than ever before. “The many medical and scientific witnesses who testified disagreed on many things, but not on the scientific evidence that the unborn child is alive, is a distinct individual, or is a member of the human species,” he said.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has exploited Trump’s flip-flop on abortion. Christina Reynolds, Deputy Communications Director for Hillary for America, sent out an email asking for financial support to protest Trump’s position on “the health care decisions” of women, neglecting the rights of the unborn child.

It’s Mrs. Clinton who should be subjected to tough questioning over the issue to see whether her pro-abortion advocacy can hold up under pressure.

Some of the pressure is coming from fellow Democrats who object to the cult-like devotion to abortion on demand.

The group, Democrats for Life of America, says, “We, as Democrats, can no longer advocate for a radical abortion agenda.” The group is drawing attention to a former abortionist who is using medical animations to depict the violent reality of what actually happens to a baby and her mother during an abortion. The video features Dr. Anthony Levatino, a board certified obstetrician-gynecologist with 40 years of medical experience who performed over 1,200 abortions in the first and second trimesters.

Democrats for Life is sponsoring an “Open the Big Tent” rally at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in July. The title of the event is an attempt to draw attention to the Democratic Party’s embrace of the pro-abortion mentality and exclusion of pro-lifers. “Over 23 million Democrats in the United States are pro-life. Nonetheless, their voices are not being heard inside our own party. Those voices are being shut out of party discussions and inadequately represented in our party,” the group says.

So while Donald Trump is being castigated by the media for being inarticulate on the issue of abortion, Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party are being given a free ride by the press for a policy that suppresses the scientific and medical evidence of the humanity of the unborn child.

But the media’s pro-abortion bias goes far beyond ignoring the activities of pro-life Democrats.

Kirsten Powers, a liberal Fox News political analyst, had complained publicly about the scant coverage given by the so-called “mainstream media” to the 2013 murder trial of millionaire abortionist doctor Kermit Gosnell, who was subsequently convicted on murder charges and sentenced to life in prison. He is called America’s biggest serial killer in a forthcoming movie about the case. He slit the spinal cords of babies he deliberately aborted and killed them outside the womb.

At the time, Mollie Hemingway quoted Sarah Kliff of The Washington Post as saying she didn’t cover the trial because it was a “local crime.” Eventually, the paper did cover it. Kliff apologized, saying that when she described the Gosnell case as a local crime story, she was wrong. “The egregious and horrifying crimes committed in the physician’s West Philadelphia abortion clinic have become a matter of national attention,” she said.

Indeed, Gosnell operated his “clinic” in Philadelphia, where the Democratic Party convention is taking place.

Another film, “3801 Lancaster: An American Tragedy,” has already been released. It tells the story of “violence, greed, and a cover-up that shook the nation” in the Gosnell case. The title refers to the specific address of his Women’s Medical Society abortion clinic.

During an interview with Chuck Todd of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Mrs. Clinton, who is a grandmother, was asked, “Are there reasonable restrictions that you would ever support on abortion?” She seemed to reply that she supported no limits to abortion up until the moment of birth. She replied, “I’ve said that there were. And that’s under, that’s under Roe v. Wade, that there can be, uh, restrictions in the very end, uh, of, uh, you know, the third trimester.”

The “very end” of the third trimester is, of course, birth.

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), the other Democratic presidential candidate, shares the view of no restrictions or regulations of abortion on demand. “Can you name a single circumstance at any point in a pregnancy in which you would be okay with abortion being illegal?” Bret Baier of Fox News asked. Sanders replied, “It is wrong for the government to be telling a woman what to do with her own body.”

Mrs. Clinton’s response was, “I have been on record in favor of a late pregnancy regulation that would have exceptions for the life and health of the mother.” But a late pregnancy regulation with these exceptions would also seem like justification of abortion on demand.

The exchanges with Clinton and Sanders at a Fox News-sponsored Town Hall meant that seven Democratic debates or forums had passed without a single question on abortion. The media want to protect the Democrats from being exposed for their extreme positions and lucrative funding from Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby.

It’s also clear the liberal media are using the issue to bash Republicans for being “anti-woman.”

Reagan had turned the tables on the pro-abortionists in his famous essay, quoting the American founders and the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

“Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves,” Reagan said. “Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide. My Administration is dedicated to the preservation of America as a free land, and there is no cause more important for preserving that freedom than affirming the transcendent right to life of all human beings, the right without which no other rights have any meaning.”

In this context, pro-life groups are vigorously opposing Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the U.S. Supreme Court. “A Justice Garland replacing Justice Scalia would move the Court dramatically to the pro-abortion position,” they said in a statement. “How do we know? Because President Obama and the abortion lobby wouldn’t have it any other way. Anyone he nominates will join the voting bloc on the Court that consistently upholds abortion on demand.”

They back this statement up by quoting the liberal New York Times as saying that “A Supreme Court with Merrick Garland Would Be the Most Liberal in Decades.”

© 2016 Cliff Kincaid – All Rights Reserved

“We can forgive [them] for killing our children. We cannot forgive them from forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with [them] when they love their children more than they hate us” –Golda Meir, former Prime Minister of Israel
Two recent terrorist attacks in Israel have shined a light on the purposes and patterns of Muslim terror, revealing the usual beliefs about such terror to be myths.
Last month an American student was murdered by a terrorist in Tel Aviv, Israel, while on a graduate school trip from Vanderbilt University. He had served in the US Military, surviving tours in Afghanistan and Iraq. Israelis are very saddened by his death, and very angry at the tremendous loss to his family, friends and nation at the hands of yet another despicable Arab Muslim with a knife.
In addition to adding to the sorrow and frustration Israelis feel by the continued attacks by Arabs, the tragic death of Taylor Force and other recent attacks, reveal important trends in the Muslim war against civilians in Israel.
For one thing, the victim was a tourist, not a Jew living in Israel. Most victims have been Jews, though some were Arabs and a couple have been non-Jewish workers or visitors from abroad. It seems this Tel Aviv beach terrorist went wild, randomly slashing anyone he could reach. On a Tel Aviv beach on any given day, there’s a good chance a random person present is a non-Jewish tourist. Probably for this reason, tourists haven’t had to be concerned about potential attacks.
The second anomaly is the location, as Tel Aviv is not nor has it ever been in a region contested by Palestinians to be their fantasized “homeland”. It is not near Gaza nor is it near the Judea and Samaria regions – mistakenly called the “West Bank” by the media. The terrorist did not live in the city, but illegally entered Israel from his Palestinian village in the disputed territory. Thus, he did not act out of a so-called “resistance” to occupation or some wacko need to protect his Palestinian home. He came to Tel Aviv to murder apparently anyone, most likely as a way to demonize Israel and its tourist economy.
In addition to this attack, my own town of Maale Adumim was recently rocked by a gruesome violent attack. A night security guard at the local mall was violently and horrifically attacked by an ax-wielding Arab during the early morning hours. This attempted murder puts an end to other widely-held myths about Arab-on-Jewish Israeli terror. (At this moment, following weeks in a coma, the guard is conscious and undergoing rehabilitation at the hospital.)
The terrorist, who has been arrested, has no defense, as the entire attack was captured on security video camera. He was an employee by a deli in the mall, having worked there for some time serving Jewish residents from behind the counter without any indication of any animosity toward his Jewish customers. He often stayed late to clean up the deli and to share a cup of coffee with the security guard. They were very friendly with each other. It’s obvious that the victim had no fear of his friend, as his back was to him when the ax suddenly came down on his head.
Palestinian Arab workers in the city, and in other East Jerusalem neighborhoods, are quite common, often working in restaurants, retail, construction, and even in the local health center. They deliver groceries to residents, work on road crews, and are just about everywhere during the day, though they don’t live in town. To do this, they must meet certain qualifications to obtain a work permit, which allows them to get through the checkpoints at all city entrances.
When the terrorist’s photo was finally shown in the media, I did recognize him as the friendly deli counter person I had frequently laughed and joked with while buying the delicious hummus, chopped liver, and salads such as avocado and mixed fruits. It felt good to have camaraderie with “the other”, one of our cousins, rather than feeling animosity or the need to keep a distance. How could this smiling face, who laughed good-naturedly at my attempts at Hebrew, pick up an ax and repeatedly strike an unarmed “friend” who had never done him any harm?

Of course, the continuing story is in the media and on everyone’s minds, day after day. How does one live with the knowledge that their good intentions and love for fellow man is not enough to make peace? This terrorist did not attempt murder because he was unemployed and destitute. In fact, it was the very employment and opportunity enjoyed by him that gave him access to the friend who became his victim. How do we understand this? How do we live with this?
Prior to these two terrorist attacks, I had felt secure in believing that as long as I stayed away from the Arab section of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Gush Etzion bus stop, plus a few other places, I could avoid attacks.
With the realization and proof that Arab terrorists are targeting all Israelis, even other Arabs, and just about anyone else they come into contact with, killing indiscriminately, it’s hard to feel safe anywhere. Not only that, but it’s impossible to even consider making friends with Arabs. If they will attack their friend, suddenly and viciously, why befriend them? There is no trust.
In fact, at least temporarily, many Palestinian Arabs have lost their jobs. More businesses are putting out the word that they have job openings and want to hire Jews. We now lock our doors, even when we’re home.
Dog trainers are offering classes on training our dogs in the arts of guarding and attacking on command. But do we really want our pets to learn to be aggressive? My Canaani is scary enough just by her size, exuberance and friendliness, along with a terrible shrill aboriginal bark. We’re trying to teach her NOT to bite, which she does in play, not to hurt, just like other puppies.
Krav Maga (self defense) classes for women fill up and new ones are added. More people are getting their gun licenses and guns. People are angry, fed up, tired of our leaders failing to do what needs to be done to secure our land and our safety.
We don’t want to be told we have to give land for peace. This is impossible with people who don’t want peace, but who want to destroy us. We don’t want to hear that we need to provide jobs, education etc. for our enemies and give them more money. Some of the homes the Palestinian Arab people live in are much nicer than those in which many of us Jewish residents of Ju-dea (get that, Jew-dea?) live. And what an affront that the Arab car-ramming murderers are targeting bus riders, because they can afford cars while the bus riders cannot.
Why can’t we afford cars? One major reason is the high cost of insurance; I’ve been told that most accidents on the roads are caused by Arabs, but I can’t prove it. Rates are high also due to the high rate of theft of cars, again, largely by Arabs. Recovery is made more difficult because when a Palestinian steals a car, he can drive it straight to his village and the jurisdiction of the Palestinian police. Sometimes these police cooperate with Israel, and sometimes not.

Yet we tried to love our Muslim neighbors and employ them, but it has often been the employed ones who did the terror. There’s no excuse, no explanation other than the incitement they’re taught from the time they can walk, finally explodes when they have a weapon in their hands.

How can I look at another Muslim Arab again, without having my hand on a weapon? I hate that they’re taking not only our lives, but our joy, peace and good feelings toward our fellow man. It’s like Golda Meir said – the worst of their sins is to make us kill them, even if it is in self-defense.
The Muslim Arabs are robbing us of some of our goodness. My faith remains strong but it’s the hatred that creeps in that I don’t like. It depresses me. A reader of my emails remarked that I’d changed, after he read what I wrote about no longer trusting Arabs. I prefer to think that I haven’t changed, but just gotten smarter.

© 2015 Cathy Sherman – All Rights Reserved

Muslims prove themselves terrorists every week of the year. Their Qur’an mandates killing all people who fail to accept the prophet’s violent mandates. (Chapter) Sura 9:123—“Convert or kill all non-believers.”

The Qur’an contains 109 verses that call Muslims to war with non-believers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some prove graphic, with commands to “chop off their heads and fingers, and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.”

Sura 9: 191– “And kill disbelievers wherever you find them.”

The burning question of the 21st century: why are Western countries importing millions of Muslim refugees that turn their countries into third world terror camps?

Sweden deformed itself from one of the most successful and peaceful countries on Earth into a Muslim quagmire. An astounding 91 percent of Muslim immigrants live on cyclical welfare—never to contribute to Swedish society.

Swedish women fear for their lives on the streets of Malmö and Stockholm. They face rapes, beatings and molestation at every juncture of their days.

Norway, once as neat, clean and peaceful as Sweden, now houses 400,000 Muslims that suck the life out of Norwegian society. Women fear for their lives in Bergen, Oslo and Trondheim.

In London, England, with 2.5 million Muslims, you see two different cities in one. The Islamic side of London and the British side of London. British fear treading into the “Sharia Law” no-go zones of London.

The same holds true for Belgium, Holland, France, Austria, Italy and Germany.

One German I interviewed named Wolfgang S. said, “We are not allowed our opinions anymore in our country. Angie Merkel controls the conversation.”

Whether it’s the Charlie Hebdo massacre or the Paris, France slaughter or the Brussels, Belgium carnage—why haven’t the leaders of those countries shut down all Muslim immigration? Instead, they keep taking on refugees by the hundreds of thousands. In fact, Germany absorbed 2,000,000 refugees in 2015 alone.

France faces horrific consequences in its already Islamic lawless society. Over 70 ‘no-go zones’ manifest in Muslim ghetto pockets all over France. Police dare not enter. Muslims’ sadistic Sharia Law allows Muslims to continue their barbarism against women, children and animals in such Islamic strongholds.

Europe faces civil war at some point. Why not avoid it by deporting all Muslims? Send them back to their own Sharia Law dominated societies. The Middle East offers endless land to house them.

The same holds for Canada and America! Why on God’s green Earth would Congress allow that Muslim Barack Obama to continue importing millions of Muslims into America? Does Congress enjoy a death wish for America?

Weren’t 9/11, Fort Hood, Boston Marathon, Chattanooga, Fort Dix, Shoe Bomber, Underwear bomber, Times Square Bomber and San Bernardino enough lessons for all of us? Virtually 9 out of 10 Muslims in Detroit, Michigan live on welfare. They manage four wives, on your tax dollars, known as extended family. They practice arranged marriages for their 10-year-old girls. We now experience honor killings and female genital mutilation in America. How many more lessons do we need? (Source: Ann Curry at NBC News)

Notice you will not hear a peep out of any U.S. Muslim imams after any bombings like San Bernardino.

Muslims cannot in any way become Americans. The Koran forbids it. Their entire context of religious-political Sharia Law demands subjugation to their religion with no allegiance to the U.S. Constitution. The Koran forbids women’s rights, marital choice, free speech, gay rights and religious rights. Our way of life remains completely out of bounds to Islam. This 4-minute video explains our plight.

In 2015 there were 2,860 attacks by members of the religion of peace in 53 countries with 27, 596 killed and 26,145 injured. (Source: www.religionofpeace.com) This website documents Muslim killings all over the world. It’s pretty sickening.

Why the Islamic conquest of the peaceful country of Belgium?

“The European Union has no official capital, and no plans to declare one, but Brussels hosts the official seats of the European Commission, Council of the European Union, and European Council, as well as a seat of the European Parliament.”

Why do Europeans allow Islamic ‘no-go’ zones where terrorists live and plan their next event?

“These ghettos, which are in fact large areas of Brussels, are considered off-limits to Europeans and radical Muslims will likely comprise the majority of the population within 20 years. ‘I think we have to sensitize people, make them understand the advantages to having Islamic people and Islamic laws, and then it will be completely natural to have Islamic laws and we will become an Islamic state,’ a Muslim politician from Brussels, Redouane Ahrouch, said to a reporter in 2012. “’In Belgium, of course! I am for the Sharia. Islamic law, I am for it. It is a long-term struggle that will take decades or a century, but the movement has been launched.’” (Source: Right Side News, March 28, 2016)

We know Islam’s final intention: to conquer and dominate all other religions and countries—to install Sharia Law worldwide. We know it’s barbaric, sadistic, cruel and stands against all human decency as well as civil society.

So why the silence and inaction? Why doesn’t anyone stand up and speak out? Geert Wilders speaks in Holland. Ms. Marine La Pen speaks in France. Robert Spencer speaks in America at www.jihadwatch.org and Pam Geller www.nakedislam.com speaks out in New York.

But the rest of America acts like a bunch of sheep being led to the slaughter.

If you don’t speak out, your kids face a religious war or a civil war in America just like Europe. Muslims don’t mess around. They yearn for death as a martyr. You need to join the organizations I suggest below in order to give yourself power to change the course of history. If not, you will become a victim of history whether it’s Brussels or Paris or San Bernardino. We know they’re coming, so we must stop Muslim immigration if we expect to save our country. Remember: there are no peaceful Muslims because as their numbers grow, they fall in line with the Qur’an and it’s eternal violence against non-believers.

If you want to get a piece of what we face with Islam in America, this is best video on the subject: it’s titled ‘The United States of Islam.”

If you don’t want a Paris, France or San Bernardino event in your community, it’s time to call for a total “Immigration Shutdown Now.”

Call your senators and House rep: 1 202 224 3121. Demand a stop to all immigration and stop to any Syrian immigration.

Definition of slogan: “Immigration Shutdown Now means the American people want a total shutdown on all legal and illegal immigration. That means we want all illegal immigration stopped by arresting, prosecuting and jailing employers of illegal aliens. We deport all illegal aliens by taking their jobs away and as we catch them. We want English mandated as our national language. We demand a cessation of Muslim immigration in order to protect our culture, language and way of life. We can’t save the world but we can destroy our civilization. We demand a stable population that allows everyone to live, work and thrive into the 21st century. Especially our children.” FHW

That’s why you need to take action. Send this series to everyone in your network. Educate them. Urge them to take action by joining these websites to become faxers of prewritten letters and phone callers. We must force Congress into an “Immigration Shutdown Now!

Share these videos all over America:

www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacity.org ; www.thesocialcontract.com

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation. Take five minutes to see for yourself.

“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart” by Roy Beck
This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future generations: in a few words, “Mind boggling!” www.NumbersUSA.org

America: www.CapsWeb.org ; www.NumbersUSA.org ; www.Fairus.org ; www.CarryingCapacityNetwork.org
Canada: www.immigrationwatchcanada.org
United Kingdom: www.populationmatters.org
Australia: www.population.org.au Sustainable Population Australia

© 2016 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

Donald Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski may be facing assault charges for allegedly grabbing at the arm of former Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields – but when it comes to shoving aside members of the media, it’s the Democratic Party that’s shielding the real offenders.
There are enough examples for a creative YouTuber to make a snarky video of Dems’ attacks through the years. Suggestion? Set it to the aptly titled Olivia Newton-John’s “Let’s Get Physical” pop hit. It may be obvious, but it’s still funny.
But until – the written word will have to suffice.
First up: February, 2009. That’s when Gawker reported how a man who was escorting Leon Panetta, who was President Obama’s pick for CIA director, outright grabbed at a CongressDaily reporter, Chris Strohm, during a hearing. Strohm described to Politico how he “felt this hand grab my right arm and push me aside,” that he responded by saying, “please don’t touch me,” over and over again. Another at the scene, Tim Starks, a Congressional Quarterly reporter, confirmed Strohm’s version of events to Politico, telling the news organization how he saw the Panetta escort “grabbing him by the arm and moving him away.”
Lawsuit?
Nope – life moved on for both Strohm and Panetta henchman. The scarier thing, Gawker wrote, was “no one seem[ed] to know who Panetta’s escort [was] or what he does.”
Fast-forward to January, 2010, when a staffer for Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Martha Coakley made national headlines for roughing up a Weekly Standard journalist, John McCormack – and then, outrageously enough, pretending to be said reporter’s knight in shining armor.
Rush Limbaugh actually gave a priceless description of how the assault went down during his January 13 broadcast: “You know, this is amazing, folks. I don’t know if you know this or not, but last night, Martha Coakley, the Democrat candidate in Massachusetts, was in Washington for a fundraiser … [and] came out of a restaurant … followed by a reporter named John McCormack. He is from the Weekly Standard. He tried to ask her a question, and somebody came and shoved him to the sidewalk into a metal railing, and he fell down on the sidewalk, and then this same person … Then [this] same person goes up and says, ‘Oh, my God, somebody fell!’ He goes down, helps the person up and then kept bumping the guy, the reporter, so he couldn’t get close to Coakley.”
The perpetrator?
“The video shows it. It was Michael Meehan, a Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee guy,” Limbaugh said then, pointing out that Coakley, an attorney general, “stood there and watched this whole thing take place and didn’t do anything about it.”
Again, no criminal charges – just aa lame apology from Meehan.
And who can forget just a few weeks ago when Hillary Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, was captured on camera physically shoving a woman during a brief interaction?

As Gateway Pundit recounted: “When the woman tried to hug Huma, she pushed the woman away and moved on. No charges were filed.”

Sometimes, Democrats take a more subtle approach. In August, 2008, ABC producer Asa Eslocker was arrested while standing on a sidewalk, trying to take pictures of Democratic senators and bigwig party donors gathered at the Brown Palace Hotel in Denver. Police couldn’t immediately tell ABC executives what his charges were, or explain video of the scene that showed “a cigar-smoking Denver police sergeant, accompanied by a team of five other officers, [putting] his hands on Eslocker’s neck, then twist[ing] the producer’s arm behind him to put on handcuffs,” ABC reported at the time. Later, after they had time to think, police said he was guilty of trespassing, interference and failing to follow a lawful order, and that the complaint came from someone within the hotel – a known”central location for Democratic officials,” ABC reported.
Seriously, somebody cue Olivia. Lewandowski may have his little misdemeanor arm tap, but when it comes to silencing the press, Republicans can’t hold a candle to Democrats.

© 2016 Cheryl Chumley – All Rights Reserved

Donald Trump has dominated much of the Republican Primary over the past few months and has carved out for himself a wide popular appeal with the American voter.

Despite his historic run, there are still conservatives and Evangelicals who strongly oppose his candidacy. The two reasons for their opposition are an insufficient conservative ideology and issues of moral character.

In order to determine the legitimacy of these concerns, it would be helpful to compare Trump to a true standard of American conservatism. Instead of using the comparison of contemporary Republicans like Cruz, Rubio and Bush, this study would be best served if Trump was held to a much higher standard, that being the conservative icon, Ronald Reagan.

We often hear Ronald Reagan invoked in speech after speech as the true representative of American Conservatism for the last half of the twentieth century. For conservatives, Reagan is THE standard for conservative politics. He is the standard in character, the standard in conservative ideology and the standard in his conduct as President.

This brief comparison of Trump vs. Reagan will range from areas of personal faith, morality to political policies.

PERSONAL FAITH

TRUMP: Trump was a Presbyterian from his upbringing with his Scottish-born mother.

Gwenda Blair in an October 6, 2015 article for Politico writes of Trump’s parents’ religion, Trump’s religious upbringing, and the influence of their NY Presbyterian pastor Norman Vincent Peale:

His parents, Fred and Mary, felt an immediate affinity for Peale’s teachings. On Sundays, they drove into Manhattan to worship at Marble Collegiate Church, where Peale was the head pastor. Donald and both his sisters were married there, and funeral services for both Fred and Mary took place in the main sanctuary.

“I still remember [Peale’s] sermons,” Trump told the Iowa Family Leadership Summit in July. “You could listen to him all day long. And when you left the church, you were disappointed it was over…”

In his adult years there is not an indication that he was a regular churchgoer. However, Trump remains a strong advocate of Christianity.

REAGAN: Reagan also was raised Presbyterian by his mother in Illinois. He attended church as a youth, but there is not much of a record of his church attendance when he moved to Hollywood at 26. He was never noted as a consistent church attendee. He joined Bel-Air Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles and was a member from 1988 until his death in 2004.

Reagan, like Trump, was never outspoken about his faith, but he was a strong supporter of the Christian faith.

MORAL BACKGROUND OF TRUMP AND REAGAN

TRUMP: Trump’s colorful strong outspoken personality offends some Evangelicals. Evangelical leaders complain that his moral shortcomings disqualify him from public office.

REAGAN: Ronald Reagan had two very different lives: one in Hollywood and one in politics. When Reagan came to Hollywood he became a relentless womanizer. Some of the women associated sexually with Reagan were Lana Turner, Betty Grable, Susan Hayworth, Ava Gardner, Patricia Roc, Piper Laurie and Marilyn Monroe. His recent biographers report up to 50 women with whom he was sexually involved. His promiscuity continued between his first and second marriages. It seems with his second marriage to Nancy Davis he, to his credit, amended his lifestyle and became a stable husband and father, and he and Nancy were blessed with 52 years of marriage.

MARRIAGE / DIVORCE

TRUMP: Trump has been married three times.

• First: Ivana Zelnícková (1977–1991)
• Second: Marla Maples (1993–1999)
• Current: Melania Knauss (m. 2005)

REAGAN: Reagan was married twice.

• First: Jane Wyman (1940–1949)
• Second: Nancy Davis (1952–2004)

Christian Right leaders constantly vilify Trump for his three marriages but never mention Reagan’s two. Is there a new religious standard where two marriages is okay, but three is over the limit? Are two marriages acceptable but the third becomes a great moral defect?

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATIONS

TRUMP: Most of his life he has been registered as a Democrat. In 2012 he switched back to the Republican Party and remains there today.

Republican: 1987–99, 2009–11, 2012–Present
Independent: 2011–2012
Democratic: before 1987, 2001–2009
Reform: 1999–2001

REAGAN: He grew up in Illinois as a Democrat and remained so for much of his life including most of his time in Hollywood. In 1962, at the age of 51, he changed party affiliation to Republican.

[Bear in mind that the Democratic party of the past is not the same as the Democratic party of today. The Democratic party of today has embraced much if not all of the Communist platform and ideology.]

POLITICAL ENDORSEMENTS

TRUMP: The record of who Trump gave campaign money to is discussed often by his opponents. Some of the high-profile Democrats Trump gave campaign funds to are the Clintons, Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel, Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy and Charlie Crist. In fairness to Trump, he gave this as a businessman, not as a politician. He also endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012.

REAGAN: It would be difficult to follow Reagan’s trail of campaign donations, but his endorsements are clear. Here are some of them:

• WWII-era: Endorsement of FDR
• 1948 Election: Endorsement of Democrat Harry Truman over Republican Thomas Dewey
• 1948 Senate: Endorsement of Democrat Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota
• Other: He also was a strong advocate of radical union leader Walter Reuther.

In fairness to Reagan, he made these endorsements before his political career.

REAGAN ON POLITICAL POLICY

GUN CONTROL:

• In California, he signed a Mulford Act which prohibited the carrying of firearms on one’s person in public buildings, in the street and in one’s auto.
• As President in 1986, he signed the Firearm Owner’s Protection Act, which banned any fully automatic rifle that was not already registered by the date of the bill.
• He supported the Brady Bill.

TAXES:

• In California, he raised taxes 7 out of the 8 years he was in office.
• As President, he pushed through a $3.3 billion fuel and gas tax.
• Social Security tax increased $165 billion over the 7 years of his presidency.
• He raised corporate taxes by $120 billion over 5 years and closed loopholes for another $300 billion in the same period.

AMNESTY:

• He granted amnesty to 3 million illegal immigrants in 1986 bypassing Congress.

HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS:

• In California he strongly opposed the Briggs Initiative to ban homosexuals from teaching in the California public schools.

FEDERAL SPENDING AND DEBT:

• He stated pre-election that he was going to eliminate the Departments of Energy, Education and Veteran Affairs. They were never eliminated. Instead they were given significant budget increases during his presidency.
• Presidents Ford and Carter grew the federal government by 1.4%; Reagan by 3%. The national debt under Reagan tripled from $900 billion to $2.7 trillion.
• Federal entitlements went from $197.1 billion in 1981 to $477 billion in 1987.

FOREIGN AID:

• Foreign aid rose in Reagan’s presidency from $10 billion to $22 billion. He also increased America’s contribution to the International Monetary Fund by $8.4 billion.

These numbers can be confirmed by Sheldon L. Richman’s article, “The Sad Legacy of Ronald Reagan.”

TRUMP ON POLITICAL POLICY

Trump has strong positions against gun control, federal taxation and illegal immigration. He has stated that as President he wants to eliminate the Department of Education and have education handled locally. Trump is also adamant on drastically reducing foreign aid.

Is it possible that Trump is actually more politically conservative than Reagan? I will leave that question to the reader to answer.

REAGAN ON SOCIAL ISSUES

NO-FAULT DIVORCE:

On September 5, 1969, as governor of California, Reagan signed the nation’s first no-fault divorce bill. After California’s lead, by 1973, 25 more states penned no-fault divorce legislation. No-fault divorce proved to be one of the most destructive laws for the break-up of the American family. Because of the unprecedented destruction of the American family, spawning many of today’s politically active “pro-family” activist and lobby groups — thanks in no small part to Reagan.

ABORTION:

Six months into his governorship, on June 14, 1967, Reagan signed the Therapeutic Abortion Act. North Carolina, Hawaii and California were the first three states to legalize abortion. Abortions in California went from an average of 518 a year to over 100,000.

Reagan’s cabinet secretary and de facto chief of staff, Bill Clark, who was a strong Catholic, gave Reagan mountains of anti-abortion material to consider. Reagan still signed the bill.

Later, Reagan greatly regretted signing the bill and subsequently became a strong pro-life defender.

TRUMP ON SOCIAL ISSUES

Trump, like Reagan (and the Bushes), has moved from a pro-abortion position to anti-abortion.

CONCLUSION

Within the American conservative and Christian Right leadership there seems to be an accepted double standard: one in which everything Trump has said or done in his pre-political days as a businessman can and will be used against him; conversely, whatever Ronald Reagan did or said before or during his presidency is forgivable.

I ask, why does Reagan get a free ride on personal morality and political policies, yet Trump’s every move is scrutinized, critiqued and vilified? It is obvious Reagan is given a pass on all of his issues, and Trump’s issues, which are fewer, are vilified to the heavens. Why the double standard?

What I would say to the conservative and Christian Right leadership is to be consistent in their candidate evaluation process. Do not single out one candidate for wrath while you pass on the others. You owe it to the Republican and Evangelical voter to be consistent.

Furthermore, I cannot imagine anything Trump could say or do morally or politically that could put him in a more damning place than Reagan’s two signatures on those terrible no-fault divorce and abortion bills. Yet, American conservatives who know of these two dreadful pieces of legislation also knew of Reagan’s remorse for what he did and responded with leniency and grace, forgiving Reagan.

Should not that same grace be available to other political candidates guilty of lesser sins?

© 2016 Thomas Ertl – All Rights Reserved