Every day something new comes to my in-box that shows why God became so angry at the sins and cruelties of man that He flooded the entire earth to get rid of them all except for one righteous man, Noah, and his family.

As civilization re-grew and advanced, so did the seemingly inventive cruelties that man has devised against his fellow man and other creatures. They are not content to cause people and animals to suffer, but they have carried that sin over to little babies about to be born. Tiny babies who are inconvenient for the parents who want no responsibility in life to tie them down when they could be out partying.

What is even more horrific, these immoral misfits, who keep Planned Parenthood in business, join lines to abort their babies whose little hearts start beating before six-weeks in the womb. In other words they are not only live babies, but they have a nervous system and feel pain the same as we do. Ultrasound has PROVED this.

Yet, these little lives are such a burden to unintentional parents that they don’t care how they get rid of the baby…just do it! And how do they get rid of them? A “doctor” goes inside the womb with a sharp scissor-like instrument that literally snips and tears the limbs off the baby….a live baby being dismembered who feels horrific agony and reacts by twisting while silently screaming. This doesn’t matter to the accidental parent who simply wants to be free from responsibilities.

Frankly this columnist believes that the only reason God has not destroyed the earth again by flooding, or even more apropos, by fire (since the sins of today are even greater than in the days of Noah), is because the coming of Jesus is now eminent and all evil will soon be cast into the lake of fire.

My keyboard is stained with the tears I’ve shed while reading and writing some of my columns. This latest story about the elephant that cried opened the floodgates. Animals were all created by God. They all have their individual personalities and have the same kind of feelings we do….feelings of fear, pain, love, joy, grief and anxiety.

This columnist has been friends with dogs, cats, lions, tigers, rhinos, elephants, virtually all kinds of God’s special creatures. How I pity someone who has never had the privilege of knowing an elephant. These magnificent beasts are intelligent, loyal, caring and very social animals. Yet they have been especially targeted by evil people for profit, killing elephants or disabling them so their tusks can be sawed off to sell–or simply killing them in order to display their heads in a family room.

This latest story tells of an elephant in India named, Raju, orphaned as a baby after his parents were killed by poachers. The baby was kept, immediately put into captivity and shackled in spiked chains that dug into his body and his legs. And that is how he lived for almost 50 years of his life. Every move he made was painful, indeed, agonizing. This very same thing recently happened to a big bear that was used in a roadside wild animal attraction.

If that was not bad enough, Raju was bought and sold several times, forced to become a ‘riding’ elephant for tourists from daylight to sundown, with every step he took being torturous because of the spiked chains that bound and punctured his legs. Plus his cruel owners would beat him.

Raju was in those chains 24 hours a day. Not even a moment of comfort was afforded him. Every time he was sold, the new handler would beat Raju for no reason but to show him who was ‘boss.” This is what this gentle giant endured for 50 years, a creature that had done no wrong to anyone.

When discovered, Raju was in pathetic condition. He hadn’t been fed properly for months. He had started eating scraps of plastic and paper in a desperate bid to survive. The word properly got out and a daring nighttime raid by a team of rescuers from Wildlife SOS along with 20 Forestry Commission officers and two policemen, swooped in to release Raju from his confinement and found him so tightly bound by those spiked chains that he could hardly move.

A team of 10 veterinarians also were with the group. The rescue was completed on July 4th, which marks America’s Independence Day, which had special significance for this particular rescue.

The owner of Raju, who lived in the Uttar Pradesh region of India, tried to stop the raid by attempting a standoff. The team secured the property and began to free Raju from the painful spike chains. Any activity in the area of the chain wounds was painful to the slightest touch. Raju made little beeping sounds, not from any pain, but in gratitude. This elephant knew he was being rescued and would be set free for the first time.

The team came with fruit and spoke softly to the pachyderm to put him at ease and to let him know they were there to free him. As the last chains were cut off him, Raju, began to cry…yes…cry with big tears rolling from his eyes. It was a very emotional moment for all involved. They gave him a sedative so they could load him into a truck to take him to a sanctuary.

And yes, animals do cry with big tears. I remember an elephant that had a little dog as his best friend for years. When that dog died, the elephant trumpeted in grief and yes, this columnist saw the tears come from his eyes. I have seen dogs cry with tears running down their faces when their owner died. I would often be called when someone dies and then prepare to do the funeral. That is when I saw this as fact, that yes, animals grieve like we do.

Raju was taken 350 miles to an elephant compound; The Wildlife SOS’s Elephant Conservation and Care Center Refuge in Mathura. Five female pachyderms excitedly flapped their ears, trumpeted greetings and touched Raju with their trunks, all signs of joy. Raju is experiencing happiness and comfort for the first time in his life. Elephants live to 70 or 80 years.

What Can Be Done to Prevent Animal Cruelty?

This columnist plans to work with a U.S. Senator to craft a bill to add a unit to Law Enforcement specifically to protect animals. The new officers’ unit would be: Law Enforcement for Animals–LEFA. These units would be actual police officers who have gone through the Academy, are armed and can make arrests.

LEFA can forcibly enter an area where animals are being tortured and arrest those responsible as well as seize their property to pay veterinarian bills and other costs. Many animal rescue organizations do undercover videos to record the horrors being perpetrated against animals, and that includes slaughter houses. They do not just kill the animals; they fully torture the innocent victims before the actual kill.

There is nothing humane about that process. I have seen some photos which have kept me up at nights. Those working undercover should be able to stop such a process and arrest the person involved. I could never understand how someone could simply film something so horrific without jumping into action to stop the torture of an animal.

The savages who do this must be arrested on the spot, and they can be, under this new unit. Those who are secretly video-taping can have a concealed weapon and take immediate action.

There can be special courts established to handle any case involving animals. This can all be set up, and it will be. I worked with one very famous U.S. Senator to craft and sponsor a bill making the import and export of ivory a criminal offense since elephants are viciously killed for their tusks. That bill was crafted, presented on the floor, and passed.

This one will be as well. But I need your help to back me…..not financial, but those of you–and that includes those who are retired–can help by sending letters, emails, signing petitions and making phone calls to officials as this bill is crafted. You will know exactly what is going on through my columns.

Indeed, please get a note off to me through the news site this column appears on to let me know I can count on you. One goal of this is to close all factory farms, shut down any and all roadside wildlife exhibitions, and to do frequent inspections wherever there are animals, including zoos.

Oh yes, there are those who will state that The Bible says; “Man shall have dominion over the animals.” The proper translation of that word, ‘dominion’ is: RESPECT–COOPERATE WITH the animals. So don’t try to use that Scripture verse to justify mistreating or torturing an animal. That is NOT what the Holy Scriptures implies. We must respect animals and cooperate and work with them since we all share this one planet.

Closing Thought: The death of babies keep Planned Parenthood alive….and prosperous…the love and protection of animals keeps man’s soul alive.

Photo 1 Caption: Raju in His New Home Welcomed by the Girls-Note the Puncture in His Leg

Photo 2 Caption: Raju Being Rescued with Wounds Being Treated.

Our thanks to Huffington Post for some of the details given for this story. Check out this link to the rescue compound that freed Raju.

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reser

Even though an incorrect decision may be the so-called “law of the case” as to the parties actually before the Supreme Court in a particular instance (and unchallengeable by them because no means of appeal is available), it can never constitute infallible legal dogma as to everyone else in all future instances. After all, Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that “[t]his Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land”—with no mention of decisions of the Supreme Court (or any other judicial tribunal) as being included within “the supreme Law”. Obviously, no such decision can ever qualify as “[t]his Constitution”, one of “the Laws of the United States”, or a “Treat[y] made * * * under the Authority of the United States”. For the Supreme Court itself is a mere creature of and subordinate to “[t]his Constitution”, not its creator or its superior. See U.S. Const. art. III, § 1. The Court’s decisions are not “Laws of the United States”, because “[a]ll legislative Powers * * * granted [by the Constitution] shall be vested in a Congress of the United States”, not in any judicial tribunal. See U.S. Const. art, I, § 1. And all “Treaties” derive exclusively from the President’s “Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur”, not from any part of the “[t]he Judicial Power of the United States * * * vested in [the] supreme Court”. Contrast U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2 with art. III, § 1.

So far, this commentary has focused on Mrs. Clinton’s catalogue of alleged misbehavior, because her shady affairs have received an overwhelming amount of perfervid attention in the domestic and even international media. Yet, in the long run, Mr. Trump must deal with several even more pressing concerns if America is to accept his “Oath or Affirmation” as genuine:

First, on various occasions he has demonstrated a willingness to question what actually happened on 9/11. This indicates his suspicion—which every thinking American shares—that the real culprits have not yet been identified, or if identified not yet brought to justice. See, e.g., Kevin Robert Ryan, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects (Microbloom, 2013). In light of the horrendous harms to persons and property perpetrated on 9/11—and especially the consequences of those crimes with respect to the elaboration of a national para-military police-state apparatus in this country, the systematic curtailment of Americans’ basic civil liberties, and the launching of highly questionable military adventures overseas during the Bush Administration and Mr. Obama’s residence in the White House, all in patent defiance of the Constitution—a refusal by Mr. Trump to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” through an honest and thoroughgoing investigation of the 9/11 Event would provide compelling evidence that he never intended to “take the * * * Oath or Affirmation” of the President truthfully as to that matter, either.

Second, prior to his inauguration Mr. Trump put himself on record as promising that, in his Administration, “[w]e [namely, the government of the United States] will stop looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments”. See [Link] (01 December 2016). This evidenced his belief—again, in which every thinking American along with the rest of the civilized world concurs—that rogue officials within the Bush Administration and among Mr. Obama’s entourage have engaged in such willful, wanton, and reckless aggression on more than one occasion. Again, in patent defiance of the Constitution, as everyone knows or ought to know that “the genius and character of our institutions are peaceful, and the power to declare war was not conferred upon Congress”—or anyone else—“for purposes of aggression or aggrandizement”. Fleming v. Page, 50 U.S. (9 Howard) 603, 614 (1850). In addition, everyone conversant with these matters knows that the CIA and the Pentagon should be the first rocks Mr. Trump ought to turn over in a search for the chief culprits. So if Mr. Trump now refuses to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” by allowing the miscreants who have been involved in “toppl[ing] regimes and overthrow[ing] governments” to escape justice, it would hardly be amiss to conclude that he never intended to “take the * * * Oath or Affirmation” of the President truthfully as to that matter, as well.

Moreover, Mr. Trump’s failure to take appropriate action as to this particular would demonstrate such imprudence as to draw into question, not only his personal capability (as opposed to his legal eligibility) to serve, but also his likelihood to survive, as President. For, rather than risk the frustration of their complots, the rogue officials who have engaged in “toppl[ing foreign] regimes and overthrow[ing foreign] governments” in the past and who undoubtedly intend to persevere in like endeavors in the future would hardly shrink from “toppl[ing]” and “overthrow[ing]” the Trump Administration—if not in the dramatic fashion their predecessors cut short President Kennedy’s tenure then in some other, but no less effective, manner—if Mr. Trump refused to give them the criminal leeway they desired. See, e.g., JFK and the Unspeakable. Why He Died and Why It Matters (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 2008; reprinted, New York, New York: Touchstone, 2010).

Indeed, they have already set out on this nefarious course, by floating in the media the fantastic assertions that “Russian hacking” exerted a decisive improper influence in favor of Mr. Trump’s election, that Mr. Trump himself is subject to blackmail by Russia, and that he is even a “dupe” or “useful idiot” working (albeit perhaps unconsciously) in Russia’s interests—by means of those canards casting a pall over the legitimacy of his Administration at its very inception. Although some observers fear that these and like tar brushes may have painted Mr. Trump into a corner, in reality they have provided him with an uniquely propitious opportunity to sweep out the responsible agencies with an iron broom. For if such charges are actually nothing more than “old grey mares”—that is, false narratives concocted by rogue operatives in “the intelligence community”—then the officials responsible for propagating them are arguably engaged in an attempt to overthrow the legitimate government of the United States through a coup d’état to be waged by Mr. Trump’s enemies in Congress and the bureaucracy, in the ever-hostile “mainstream media”, and in a gaggle of subversive NGOs intent upon applying within the United States their extensive experience in rigging “régime change” in various foreign countries. Inasmuch as the plotters of this coup must be aware that it could never be brought to completion absent the application of force at some stage (for instance, through the fomentation of violent civil disturbances on a massive scale), and therefore must already have included such operations in their plans, they have exposed themselves to serious charges. See 18 U.S.C. § 2384. Mr. Trump certainly enjoys both the authority and the ability to turn the tables on these conspirators. See 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333. But whether he can muster the gumption to do so remains to be seen.

Third, prior to his election, Mr. Trump expressed skepticism—also embraced by millions of Americans whose heads are not buried in the sand—as to whether Barack Obama was ever actually “eligible to the Office of President” as “a natural born Citizen”. See U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 4. Mr. Trump knew or should have known then, and knows or should know now, that inter alia:

(i) No report of an official, full-scale inquiry into Mr. Obama’s purported eligibility has ever been made public (or perhaps even conducted behind closed doors)—whether by Congress when it had the opportunities to do so, as I first explained in my NewsWithViews commentary “In the Shadow of Nemesis” (8 December 2008); or by law-enforcement agencies such as the FBI; or by the courts of either the United States or any State.

(ii) Mr. Obama’s parentage and the place of his birth, and their effects on his citizenship, continue to be the subjects of controversy.

(iii) The provenance and authenticity of Mr. Obama’s “birth certificate” (or whatever name should be attached to the document his minions caused to be publicized with his apparent approval) have been impugned through the research commissioned by former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, without adequate rebuttal from Mr. Obama’s camp.

(iv) Mr. Obama’s status as a citizen of Indonesia, resulting from his mother’s reported second marriage to an Indonesian and his subsequent translation to and sojourn in that land as a child, is still opaque.

(v) Whether, upon his return to the United States from Indonesia, Mr. Obama took the steps required at the time to reassert or to secure American citizenship has yet to be established in any public forum.

(vi) Whether, during Mr. Obama’s years in colleges and law school in this country, he claimed benefits or otherwise identified himself as a “foreign” student remains undetermined, because he has refused to release the relevant records.

(vii) Challenges have been leveled against the authenticity of both Mr. Obama’s purported registration with the Selective Service and his supposed Social Security card. And

(viii) Widely publicized statements emanating from Mr. Obama himself, from Michelle Obama, and from certain of Mr. Obama’s relatives over the years have cast doubts upon his citizenship.

The necessity for Mr. Trump to pry open this can of worms cannot be overstated—

(a) Although America has finally awakened from the long national nightmare of Mr. Obama’s residence in the White House, his “legacy” will continue to fester. If unmasked as ineligible for the office he pretended to hold, however, every measure he inflicted on this country while impersonating “the President” could and should be set aside as void ab initio. This would not unavoidably result in an hopelessly chaotic situation, if (for example) in good time and in a systematic fashion certain of the “Bills which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” during the period of Mr. Obama’s imposture Congress saw fit to “be presented [anew] to [Mr. Trump as] the [real] President of the United States” for him to “sign” or to “return * * * with his Objections”. See U.S. Const. art. I, § 7, cl. 2. Also, equivalent corrective steps could be taken to deal with those of Mr. Obama’s purported “executive” actions which Mr. Trump did not desire to adopt anew under his own authority; as well as with many judicial decisions predicated upon Mr. Obama’s unconstitutional handiwork, through (say) the Trump Administration’s invocation of the doctrine of Hazel-Atlas Glass Company v. Hartford-Empire Company, 322 U.S. 238 (1944). And if these measures did raise problems both complex and costly to resolve, the blame would not lie on Mr. Trump, but instead on the parties in official positions who refused to address the question of Mr. Obama’s ineligibility when it first arose.

(b) Exposure of Mr. Obama’s imposture (if such it was) would strike a crippling blow at the neo-Bolshevik “color revolution” now being organized by the Marxist intelligentsia in the suites of NGOs funded by renegade billionaires for the purpose of defaming, frustrating, sabotaging, and finally demolishing the Trump Administration. Deprived of Mr. Obama as its figurehead, neo-Bolshevism in this country would collapse in the confusion of internal struggles for power which would render it an impotent political force for years to come, if not destroy it altogether. Most important,

(c) Proof of Mr. Obama’s ineligibility would preserve the United States from the “precedent” of once having acquiesced in an usurper’s seizure of the White House. To be sure, purported “precedents” which violate the Constitution de facto do not change the Constitution de jure. For the Constitution of the United States is not cut from the same ill-woven cloth as the “constitution” of England, which throughout history has been altered by one successful “precedent” after another (even though many of them were patent usurpations). Nonetheless, it is one thing to suffer a thoroughly corrupt political figure (such as Mrs. Clinton is alleged to be) to escape prosecution—for that does not set a “precedent” which can immunize all such individuals in the future. It is one thing to cover up a “false flag” operation in which rogue officials in some “intelligence agencies” have participated (such as many Americans believe the 9/11 Event to have been)—for that, too, does not set a “precedent” which can exonerate all such miscreants in years to come. And it is even only one thing to countenance wars of aggression fomented by renegades within America’s “military-industrial complex” and “national-security” apparatus (such as this country’s on-going military adventures in the Middle East)—for that does not set a “precedent” capable of overruling the fundamental principle of the Nuremberg Tribunal. See Office of United States Chief of Counsel for Prosecution of Axis Criminality, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1946), Volume 1, Article 6, at 5. But usurpation of “the Office of President” for eight years by someone not eligible for that office in the first place, while almost everyone else in public life looked the other way and worked hand-in-glove with the usurper, is another thing altogether.

For if that is taken as an effectively binding “precedent” because it remains uncorrected when the evidence cries out for its correction, then Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution becomes a dead letter. And with it the Constitution as a whole—because, his tenure in the White House being utterly lawless in its inception, a faux “President” labors under no duty to, and surely will not, “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”, the Constitution first and foremost among them.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
In sum, as President Mr. Trump is not free simply to ignore these matters, if “the Deplorables” (and all other sensible Americans, for that matter) are to take his “Oath or Affirmation” seriously. Should he fail in this regard, then rather than becoming “great again” this country will soon find that its condition warrants the lugubrious prognosis put forward as a general rule of civilizational devolution by Oswald Spengler in his study Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Although this title is usually translated as The Decline of the West, the German noun Untergang can also be rendered, more ominously, as “downfall”, “ruin”, or “destruction”—which in this country’s case will be a fitting epitaph.

© 2017 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

According to seemingly reliable reports in the media, President Trump may have determined that his Administration will not conduct a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton (and presumably of the Clinton Foundation and those associated with it as well).

The reasons that were bruted for this decision prior to Mr. Trump’s inauguration should give one pause. First, various pundits contended that investigation of Mrs. Clinton would run afoul of some supposed “political tradition” in this country which discountenances prosecution of the loser of an election by the winner—when in fact Mrs. Clinton would be investigated, not because she lost the Presidential election, or even because of her dangerously aberrant political views, but instead because she has allegedly engaged in serious misbehavior, quite unconnected to the election, for which any other such perpetrator would surely be prosecuted sine die. Second, one of Mr. Trump’s aides mouthed the psychobabble that foregoing prosecution of Mrs. Clinton could “help her heal”—when “escape” would be the more accurate verb. Third, Mr. Trump himself announced: (i) that “I don’t think we have to delve back in the past”—notwithstanding that every criminal investigation does so; (ii) that prosecution of Mrs. Clinton “would be very, very divisive for the country”—as if affording her immunity from prosecution would not be; and (iii) that “I don’t want to hurt them [i.e., the Clintons]…they’re good people”—leaving to worrisome conjecture what Mr. Trump’s definition of “good people” might be. And most recently, when asked by a reporter whether no further investigations of Mrs. Clinton would be conducted, President Trump responded, “I certainly hope so”.

The most obviously justified criticism of Mr. Trump’s apparent willingness to allow Mrs. Clinton and others associated with her “to skate”, unscathed by honest and competent inquiries into their shadowy dealings, is that it proves once again how in the contemporary United States one body of law (or absence of law) specially privileges and protects the super-rich, the politically well-connected, and other big wheels, top noises, and string-pullers, while a quite different body of law bears down on everyone else. Any constitutionalist should be concerned, though, that something far more serious is involved here.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 7 of the Constitution provides that “[b]efore he [i.e., the President-elect] enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.’” The text of this “Oath or Affirmation”sets out, not a possibly inaccurate prediction cast in terms of the simple futurity of temporal sequence (“I shall”), but instead a strict promise of fidelity cast in terms of the emphatic futurity of a solemn assurance (“I will”). Moreover, “taking the * * * Oath or Affirmation” is the condition precedent sine qua non to “enter[ing] on the Execution of [the] Office [of President]”. Self-evidently, if it is not “take[n]” at all, a President-elect cannot “enter on the Execution of [that] Office”. No less plain is that a President-elect cannot “enter on the Execution of [that] Office” if he “take[s] the * * * Oath or Affirmation” falsely. For a false “Oath or Affirmation” is, by definition, fraudulent. And fraud vitiates and renders inoperative any and every act which it has facilitated. To be sure, the falsity of a representation as to the “Oath or Affirmation” might not be evident when it was uttered, because a rogue President-elect would be careful to engage in fraudulent concealment of his true state of mind when he deceitfully “t[ook] the * * * Oath or Affirmation”. That, however, is not the situation here.

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution sets forth the chief duty of the President, that “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”. Observe that the phrase “faithfully executed” in this provision echoes the phrase “faithfully execute” in the “Oath or Affirmation”. Thus, his “Oath or Affirmation” requires the President, “to the best of [his] Ability, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” by fulfilling the duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”, without any exception (because the Constitution allows for none).

It requires no extended argument to establish that, now installed in “the Office of President”, Mr. Trump disposes of every right and power necessary, sufficient, and convenient to ensure that “the Laws [shall] be faithfully executed” with respect to Mrs. Clinton and her associates. And no airy notion that she were in some sense and to some degree a “good person” could relieve Mr. Trump of the duty “faithfully [to] execute[ ]” “the Laws” as to her. (Indeed, as a “good person”, Mrs. Clinton herself should welcome the opportunity in an official forum to be absolved of the malodorous charges her record of “public service” seems to substantiate in many Americans’ estimation.)

To be sure, as is every American, Mrs. Clinton and her associates are entitled to the presumption of innocence. But, based upon what is already known about their behavior, this country is entitled to see them properly investigated, indicted, and prosecuted, in order to test that presumption in the crucible of a public trial, before a jury of their peers, pursuant to Article II, Section 2, Clause 3 and Amendments Five and Six of the Constitution surely, and Article III, Clause 1 possibly. Mr. Trump has, however, left the world with the distinct impression that he does not intend to press for investigations into Mrs. Clinton’s questionable affairs. As a matter of constitutional law (as well as common sense), the reasons he has advanced for this disinclination are unconvincing, if not patently specious. Therefore, if before his inauguration he actually did not, and following his inauguration still does not, intend under color of “the Office of President” to “take Care that the [applicable] Laws be faithfully executed” as to her, then he did not “take the * * * Oath or Affirmation” truthfully—and as a result did not “enter on the Execution of [the] Office [of President]” at all. If so, America finds herself confronted with yet another Presidency constitutionally questionable from its supposed inception.

Admittedly, this concern rests upon something of a fine legal point—although not one so fine as to be indiscernible on the face of the Constitution. In any event, the Constitution is festooned with fine points intended to impede and even impale rogue public officials in their malicious course. These points can serve their purposes, however, only if they are forcefully driven home, without any compunction, whenever suitable occasions arise. Few crimes are worse than the systematic prostitution, perversion, and betrayal of public office for private political and financial gain. But surely one of them is for someone to attempt to “enter on the Execution of [the] Office [of President]” knowingly and willfully intent upon allowing anyone who has notoriously engaged in such misbehavior to escape punishment.

Unfortunately, the running of various statutes of limitations might preclude prosecution of Mrs. Clinton and her associates with respect to some of their alleged misbehavior—although statutes of limitations can be removed or extended by legislation. See, e.g., Chase Securities Corporation v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 (1945); Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 (1885). Where statutes of limitations would impose a bar, though, it would still behoove the Trump Administration to investigate these matters thoroughly and report its findings completely to the public. See Lee Duigon’s recent NewsWithViews commentary “A Speech Mr. Trump Ought To Make” (17 November 2016).

As a complicating factor, it is not inconceivable that Mr. Trump might seek to finesse this apparently distasteful political situation in a legalistic fashion by purporting to extend some sort of blanket “pardon” to Mrs. Clinton and her associates. Any such “pardon” which issued before indictments had specified the crimes the members of the Clinton cabal had allegedly committed would be constitutionally problematic, however.

The nature and extent of the “Power” of the President under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution “to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment” is not defined in the Constitution—and therefore the specifics as to those matters must be derived from the similar power of the King in pre-constitutional Anglo-American law. “As this power has been exercised, from time immemorial, by the executive of that nation whose language is our language, and to whose judicial institutions ours bear a close relationship; we adopt their principles respecting the operation and effect of a pardon”. United States v. Wilson, 32 U.S. (7 Peters) 150, 160 (1833). Under the laws of England applicable to the Colonies prior to the Declaration of Independence—

* * * What is required to make a good Pardon of Felony in general: It seems to be laid down as a general Rule in many Books, that where-ever it may be reasonably intended that the King, when he granted such Pardon, was not fully apprised both of the Heinousness of the Crime, and also how far the Party stands convicted thereof upon Record, the Pardon is void, as being gained by Imposition upon the King. * * *
* * * It hath been holden, That anciently a Pardon of all Felonies, included all Treasons, as well as Felonies whatsoever, and might be pleaded to an Indictment for them: And it seems to be taken for granted, in many Books, that a Pardon of all Felonies in general, without describing any one particular Felony, may even at this Day, if the Party be neither attainted nor indicted, be pleaded in Bar of any Felony whatsoever, coming within the general Limitations of the Pardon, except Murder or Rape, and that the only Reason why it cannot also be pleaded to Murder of Rape, is because [a] Statute * * * requires an express Mention of them. But I find this point no where solemnly debated; neither doth it seem easy to reconcile it with the general Rules concerning Pardons, agreed to be good in other Cases; for if a Felony cannot be well pardoned where it may be reasonably intended that the King, when he granted the Pardon was not fully apprised of the State of the Case, much less doth it seem reasonable that it should be pardoned where it may well be intended that he was not apprised of it at all. And if a Felony whereof a Person be attainted cannot be well pardoned, even tho’ it appear that the King was informed of all the Circumstances of the Fact, unless it also appear that he was informed of the Attainder, mu ch less doth it seem reasonable that a Felony should be well pardoned where it doth not appear that he knew any Thing of it: For by this Means, where the King in Truth intends only to pardon one Felony, which may be very proper for his Mercy, he may by Consequence pardon the greatest Number of the most heinous Crimes, the least of which, had he been apprised of it, he would not have pardoned. And for these Reasons, as I suppose, general Pardons are commonly made by Act of Parliament; and have been of late Years very rarely granted by the Crown, without a particular Description of the Offence intended to be pardoned. * * * And therefore where the Books speak of Pardons of all Felonies in general as good, perhaps it may be reasonable for the most part to intend that they either speak of a Pardon by Parliament, or that they suppose that the particular Crime is mentioned in the Pardon, tho’ they do not express it.

William Hawkins, A Treatise of The Pleas of the Crown (London, England: E. and R. Nutt, and R. Gosling, Third Edition, 1739), Book II, Chapter 37, §§ 8 and 9, at 382-384 (marginal notes omitted). It should be kept in mind that, in contradistinction to Parliament, Congress has no power to issue “general Pardons” (or even any “Pardon” whatsoever), or to delegate such a nonexistent power to the President.

So, inasmuch as the details of much of Mrs. Clinton’s own alleged wrongdoing, let alone the suspected wrongdoing of numerous others associated with her, will remain shrouded in mystery until proper investigations have been conducted, it passes understanding how Mr. Trump could, with constitutional propriety, issue “general Pardons” to any members of the Clinton cabal.

To be sure, some decisions of the Supreme Court have seemingly expanded the Presidential “Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons” beyond the boundaries outlined above. The mere existence of such decisions, though, poses no insurmountable bar to the analysis presented here. For a decision of the Supreme Court on a point of constitutional law is not necessarily valid simply because the Court has handed it down. First, as was self-evident in principle well before the Constitution was even first imagined, “the law, and the opinion of the judge are not always convertible terms, or one and the same thing; since it sometimes may happen that the judge will mistake the law”. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: American Edition, Robert Bell, 1771), Volume 1, at 71. Second, in practice under the Constitution the Supreme Court itself has admitted that it has often erred in its constructions of that document. See Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 828-830 & note 1 (1991).

Therefore, no decision of the Supreme Court can be taken at face value as an infallible authority as to what the Constitution means.

Rather, the Constitution determines whether a decision of the Supreme Court is correct or incorrect. And in the final analysis only WE THE PEOPLE can render the Constitution’s meaning certain, because WE THE PEOPLE “ordain[ed] and establish[ed] th[e] Constitution” in the first place; and (as the Supreme Court itself has admitted) “[t]he power to enact carries with it final authority to declare the meaning of the legislation”. Compare the Preamble to the Constitution with Propper v. Clark, 337 U.S. 472, 484 (1949). For part two click below.

© 2017 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

No nation, empire, corporation, small business owner, or even a family can thrive if they are infiltrated by those who are spying on them and leaking out important or detrimental information. That also applies to the Trump administration that is seemingly more infiltrated with enemies from within than any other administration in United States history. Unfortunately, the federal government is filled to the brim with loyalists to the previous Obama regime, George Soros, illegal immigrants, etc. The goals of Obama, the NSA and the CIA still include the fulfilment of the Saul Alynski inspired and George Soros funded elimination of our constitutionally limited form of government.

Soros, like Obama believes that either big government or Islam should dominate over you and I. If it were not for decades of government school indoctrination throughout the republic, nether Obama, Soros or the legions of dirty leakers would be in position carry out their dastardly mission to destroy America from within. Because of the progressive government schools, about half of those born in this country are brainwashed into believing that it is racist, xenophobic and Islamophobic to simply seek to protect and guard our national borders like Mexicans do with their southern border.

Recently, Saudi Arabia expelled 40,000 Muslims who they deemed more extreme than they are from their country. Yet not a single complaint from the dingbats who start riots or block traffic because 600 criminal illegal immigrants were rounded up in America. That is more evidence that the education/indoctrination process in the United States is in serious need of a major overhaul. It is a crying shame that Yale University officials entertained the idea of honoring the criminal oriented Black Panthers. It is a violent organization full of progressive members who hate America. Those gumps have also brutalize Black Americans who refuse to live in their “tolerant bubble of hate.” I have yet to learn of the Black Panther socialists supporting one single idea that is good for Americans, Black, White or whatever.
Government school brainwashed American foot soldiers of intolerance in places like Minneapolis, Minnesota support Muslim refugees who have threatened to venture into prosperous neighborhoods to conduct violent acts against sovereign American citizens and their property. Then there are others from the progressive ranks who are training throughout the country on how to punch Americans in the face who support president Donald Trump.

But back to the leakers in government and the fact they need and deserve to be rounded up and punished. “We the People” must be willing to pull up our sleeves and work diligently to wipe out the pervasive atmosphere that contributes to the mentality that lends itself to such activities as leaking sensitive information to undermine a sitting president. It is pure evil insanity for leakers like those possibly in the bowels of the CIA or NSA to participate in the effort to prevent president Trump from rescuing our nation from those who quite honestly hate the strong pro-American posture of the president.

If I were President Trump along with ferreting out the leakers I would check out and probably get rid of the new phone and communication system former president Obama had installed just before leaving office. That is according to www.trunews.com. It is unfortunate the leakers do not understand or care that their mission of destruction can harm them as well as the administration of Donald Trump. In other words, without a strong emphasis on defeating those who are trying to harm America from within the government or the ranks of refugees and terrorists our way of life will only deteriorate beyond recognition.

Political opposition on genuine issues and principles is healthy for the country. But for dragon media elites on a mission of undermining for the sake of undermining through false stories and glomming onto illegal leaks in hopes of harming Trump is both unprofessional and potentially dangerous.

Certain leaks could prevent the ability to have needed honest conversations with allied leaders from around the world. Many of whom president Trump is trying to reassure that the United States is recommitted to being a strong leader of the free world, or what remains of it.

I am all for a full investigation. Not on retired General Mike Flynn, but on the Obama/Alysnki inspired mole leakers who are acting like the criminally insane progressive enemies from within that they are. Hang in there my fellow Americans it is going to get better and by God’s grace, America will be great again. It won’t be easy, but it will be worth the effort to make it happen. God bless you, God bless America and may America bless God. The Edwards Notebook, simply the best commentary in broadcasting can now be enjoyed during the Andrea Hawes talk show heard worldwide emanating from www.aweradio.org Saturdays 2:00 to 5:00 PM EST.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

The story of Montana’s Last Indian Water Compact reveals, like no other true story, the nature of the split in the Republican Party.

This story needs to be told, and I may be the only one who will ever tell it. To understand politics, you must understand this story.

You can get the Amazon Kindle version FREE from February 15 to 19

“Montana’s Last Indian Water Compact: The Truth about the Compact and the Republican Party” is available in paperback or Kindle on Amazon.

Montana’s CSKT Water Compact

Montana’s Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Water Compact in 2015 may have been the most important and controversial issue in Montana’s history.

Its ratification would resolve all Montana’s Indian water-rights issues forever. Its rejection would subject Montanans to a generation of the most-costly legal battles in Montana’s history.

Most Montana’s farmers and ranchers, city managers and business leaders supported the Compact. Democrat legislators supported the Compact.

Before November 2014, I opposed the Compact. But, as a physicist, I realized I should study the Compact. So, I read and organized the arguments on both sides.

By December 2014, I realized my original conclusion was wrong. The arguments against the Compact clearly failed and facts proved the Compact was necessary for Montana.

My book explains the well-documented four faces of the Republican Party and how one face opposed the Compact.

The Republican split

The Republican split occurs because the three faces that compose 80 percent of Republicans regularly support the Republican nominee, while the one face that composes 20 percent of the Republican Party regularly opposes the Republican nominee.

The source of the split is major ideological difference between the 80 percent and the 20 percent. Therefore, Republicans cannot resolve the split by compromise because these diverse ideologies cannot compromise. Only the 20 percent can resolve the split when they realize their ideology is factually and morally wrong. Don’t hold your breath.

The split over the Water Compact matched the split in the Republican Party. The 80 percent supported the Compact and the 20 percent opposed the Compact.

We call the 20-percent face of the Republican Party, VCEs. My book describes this designation in detail. They represent only 10 percent of all voters. Percentages differ somewhat in different states but the general pattern is consistent in all states.

Democrats and Republicans differ on partisan bills. However, the Compact was a bipartisan bill that all parties should have decided on facts and logic. But the VCEs disagreed.

Aristotle’s Golden Mean

Nelson Hultberg describes Aristotle’s Golden Mean in his book “The Golden Mean: Libertarian Politics, Conservative Values.” Aristotle concluded the middle 60 to 80 percent are much more likely to be correct than the radical 10 percent on each end of the political spectrum.

In the political spectrum, VCEs are to the right of 1.4 standard deviations from the mean. They are the last 10 percent on the right. They are the radical right.

VCEs were wrong about the Compact.

Compact proponents based their arguments on facts and logic.

Compact opponents based their arguments on delusions. They opposed the Compact because they believed it was an Agenda 21 government conspiracy to steal Montana’s water. The fact is Compact rejection would have caused Montana to lose control of its water. VCEs had their “facts” backwards.

VCEs are so convinced they are right, that they reject evidence that proves they are wrong. Their radical ideology led them to oppose the CSKT Water Compact and to reject all arguments that proved their claims were wrong.

They voted their conscience rather than their intelligence. They let their fears drive their decisions.

They opposed the Compact because their political religion dictated opposition. Their opposition to the Compact proves their political religion is wrong.

Why the split matters.

You might ask, why should the split matter because the Republican 80 percent can outvote the 20 percent?

The split matters because the 20 percent VCEs are much more politically active than the other 80 percent of Republicans. Neither Republican nor Democrat voters understand the difference between the Republican 80 percent and the radical VCEs 20 percent. Therefore, unaware voters elected VCEs to 80 percent of the Republican seats in Montana’s 2015 House.

Because the VCEs dominated the Republicans in Montana’s House and Republicans outnumbered the Democrats, Montana’s House ratified the Compact by only ONE vote.

The Compact was not an inconsequential bill that would have minor effect on Montana whether approved or rejected. The Compact was a significant bill that would have a dramatic effect on Montana’s economy, forever. Compact ratification would save Montana’s water rights and Compact rejection would lose Montana’s water rights, forever, plus cost Montana a whole lot of money.

Radical VCEs almost destroyed Montana. They still don’t get it. They don’t care to learn facts and logic. They have their political religion to guide them.

VCEs make bad political decisions. Montana’s Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Water Compact is a case in point.

Perfection or Rejection

As a group, VCEs have unique characteristics. They have a perfection obsession. They believe if something or someone is not perfect by their definition, they must vote to condemn the something or the someone to hell.
VCEs view the world as black and white with no gray scale. To them, it’s perfection or rejection.

VCEs demand Godly perfection of candidates and bills. Yet, they are far from Godly perfection themselves. Godly perfection does not exist in our real world. VCEs live in a dream world.

VCEs thought if they could find one imperfection in the Compact, that was a reason to reject the Compact. After 12 years of work funded by our taxpayers, VCEs decided the Compact was not good enough for them to send to heaven, so they voted to send the Compact to hell.

Negative Voting Mantra

Another unique characteristic is their negativity. Their preachers are negative. Compared to other Republicans, VCE’s see the cup as half empty whereas other Republicans see the cup as half full.

VCEs follow the Negative Voting Mantra: “A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.”

They use their Negative Voting Mantra to justify their votes against Republican nominees who are “not good enough” for them. They vote for third-party candidates who can’t win.

VCEs remove votes from the better candidate among candidates who can win. They achieve the exact opposite of their political goal. The Negative Voting Mantra achieves the greater evil and is immoral.

Positive Voting Principle

The alternative to the Negative Voting Mantra is the Positive Voting Principle. Aristotle’s Positive Voting Principle is:

Our moral duty is to vote to achieve the most possible good, which eliminates voting for candidates who cannot win, and eliminates mandatory conditions.

Stated simply, the Positive Voting Principle is:

Always vote and act to achieve the greatest possible good.

Historically, some very qualified philosophers have weighed in on the Positive Voting Principle and the Negative Voting Mantra. The Catholic Church and the six major Protestant churches support the Positive Voting Principle and reject the Negative Voting Mantra.

America’s Founding Fathers used the Positive Voting Principle. They voted for the greater good. If each Founding Father rejected what he thought was imperfect, they would not have approved our Constitution.

VCEs call themselves “Constitutionalists” but they reject the Positive Voting Principle that was necessary to produce our Constitution. The VCEs who opposed the CSKT Water Compact would have opposed our Constitution because it was not perfect.

Mandatory Conditions

VCE claim a candidate must meet certain “mandatory” conditions to get their vote. They think their mandatory conditions show they hold high moral standards. In fact, their mandatory condition show they do not understand morals and logic.

For example, some VCEs told me before the 2014 election, “I can’t vote for Ryan Zinke” because his prolife position “is not good enough” for me.

I replied that Ryan Zinke scored 90 percent on a prolife evaluation and his Democratic opponent scored zero. This did not matter to these VCEs. Zinke’s 90-percent score on a prolife test was “not good enough” for them. They required a score of 100 percent. They required perfection.

These VCEs believed it would have been a sin for them to vote for Zinke because he was not perfect. Yet they believe it was no sin to help the Democrat to win. They are not only illogical, they are immoral.

Their VCE mandatory conditions eliminated Ryan Zinke who was clearly the “greater good” candidate from their own VCE perspective.

Here how VCEs think:

Suppose you can vote for Candidate A, whose abortion policies will kill 10 million babies, or Candidate B, whose policies will kill 1 million babies. Who will you vote for?

All normal Christians will vote for Candidate B so they can save 9 million babies.

VCEs won’t vote to save 9 million babies because Candidate B is not perfect enough for them.

VCEs don’t understand bipartisan issues

VCEs believe all issues are partisan. They do not believe in bipartisan bills where Republicans should vote the same as Democrats, like paving our highways.

Compact opponents claimed Republicans should always vote the opposite of Democrats. They call Republicans who vote the same as Democrats, “RINOs.” They don’t understand that “RINO” applies only to partisan issues, not to bipartisan issues.

Therefore, they concluded, since the Democrats supported the Compact, all Republicans must oppose the Compact.

VCEs don’t understand Bible admonition on “works”

VCE they VCEs don’t understand the definition of the word “works.” They think their actions are works. They do not understand that works are the results of actions, not the actions themselves.

VCEs think they do good works if they vote their feelings or “conscience,” as VCE Ted Cruz told his audience to do at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

VCEs define “good” by how their actions make them “feel,” regardless of the consequences.

VCEs who opposed the CSKT Water Compact, voted their “conscience.”

VCEs claim they have a moral compass. But their compass points in the wrong direction.

It takes intelligence to predict results of our actions. We must use our intelligence to choose the action the brings the desired result.

VCEs elected Democrat US Senator Tester in 2012.

The VCEs voted Libertarian rather than for Republican Congressman Denny Rehberg for US Senate. The VCEs’ Libertarian votes were substantially more than Tester’s win over Rehberg. So, the VCEs elected Democrat Tester to the US Senate for six more years.

Now you know why the dominantly conservative State of Montana elects Democrats to key positions in Montana and Congress. It is because VCEs throw childish temper tantrums when Republican voters nominate non-VCE candidates.

Ryan Zinke won decisively in 2014 and 2016

VCEs would not support Ryan Zinke for Congress. But Ryan Zinke won the Republican primary election and the Republican nomination without their help.

Zinke proved Republican candidates do better when they get more votes in the middle of the political spectrum even if they lose votes from the radical VCEs

The Montana 2016 election results prove the VCEs have little influence in the outcome of major elections. VCEs simply do not have enough votes to change elections in their favor. The only effect they can have is to vote Libertarian to try to deprive a Republican candidate of a victory.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
Thanks to Republican voters in Montana, Ryan Zinke will be your next Secretary of Interior.

Voter wake-up call

The CSKT Water Compact is an example of how the far-right VCE Republicans make bad decisions.

All voters everywhere should realize the danger to themselves when they elect too many VCEs.

To read the full story and better understand Republican politics, get my book for FREE on Amazon from February 15 to 19.

© 2017 Edwin X Berry, Ph.D – All Rights Reserved

I’ve heard that making sausage is a pretty messy, ugly and unpleasant process to witness. Well so is implementing real change in Washington DC. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I believe God gave us Trump because I do not believe a pro-politician could pull off dismantling so many Leftist sacred cow strongholds at the lighting speed at which Trump is moving.

I remember Bahamian actor Sidney Poitier saying when he came to America he simply pursued his dream, undeterred by supposed limits for blacks. Consequently in 1964, Poitier became the first black to win an Academy Award for Best Actor.

Political outsider Trump is cleaning up the mess, undeterred by corrupt DC establishment procedures designed to continue the status quo. Consequently, we have Scott Pruitt fixing the overreaching anti-business tyranny of the EPA. We have Jeff Sessions who will implement equal justice for all Americans, unlike Obama’s attorneys general. One said he would not prosecuted fellow blacks. The other supports Black Lives Matter’s infamous lie that cops are racist. Leftists’ heads are exploding because new Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos vows to ensure that every child receives a quality education.

While some of the rude, crude and violent illegal actions of Leftist anti-Trump protesters is organic, the vast majority of it is paid for by America hating billionaire, George Soros. From the airport protests to the Women’s March to Black Lives Matter murdering cops and numerous other incidents of chaos in our streets, Soros is the money man behind the curtain. Soros is also tied to the Left’s campaign to impeach Trump.

Even before Trump took his oath of office, the Left launched their immoral, unethical and lawless 1,460-day (four-year) plan to destroy Trump. The Left intends to block Trump from implementing everything we elected him to do.

Despite Leftists cautioning their side to tone down their over-the-top hysteria, the Left’s rabid opposition to Trump continues to escalate to absurd levels. It’s a bright sunny day. If Trump comments about it, the Left will try to convince the public that it is raining, and Trump lied about the sun.

I submit that the Left can not tone down their brain-dead emotion-driven foot-stomping temper tantrums because it is who they are. It is like the old joke, “I helped you because you promised not to bite me. Why did you bite me?” The snake replied, “I’m a snake. It’s what I do.”

When Education Secretary Betsy DeVos showed up for work, she was attacked by protesters. One jerk even stood in front of DeVos’ car when she tried to leave. Folks, the Left is going to pull this crap every day for the next 4 years. When Leftists push free speech to breaking the law and destroying public and private property, I say lock their derrieres up! Thank God. Finally, a Republican administration that is doing just that.

The Left’s goal is to cement their lie that a majority of Americans regret voting for Trump and hate his agenda. In other words, they hope to “Bush” Trump. Relentless unchallenged distortions and lies about President George W. Bush caused his approval to plummet to 33% when he left office. Clearly, the Left has begun their triple-the-intensity campaign to do even worse damage to Trump’s approval.

All seeking to see America made great again (patriots) must pull out all the stops, using their creativity and every tool at their disposal to counter the Left’s tsunami of anti-Trump and anti-Trump agenda lies.

The Left relentlessly and creatively sold us their far-left-radical Trojan Horse disguised in the form of an articulate black man. From Greek columns in the background when he spoke, extra reverb on his microphone to kindergartners mandated to sing of his greatness, the Left practically branded Obama a deity. As part of Black History Month indoctrination, kindergartners were taught to sing, “Barack Obama is the man” and “He’s our man, yes we can!”

In celebration of capitalism and the entrepreneur spirit, it would be fun to see kids start Trump Lemonade stands.

Folks, the Left still does not get it. They do not understand the Trump Revolution. I realized something was amiss during the campaign. I witnessed thousands of Americans of all stripes from well-dressed white seniors to black bikers covered in tattoos waiting in line, enduring 85 degree Florida heat and sun, hoping to get into the Trump rally at Daytona Beach Convention Center.

If we are relentless in expressing our support for Trump implementing his 100 day plan, the Left’s efforts to “Bush” Trump via chaos in our streets, fake news and violence with fail.

Oh, one last point. I’ve heard concerns that the Left will react violently if we resume Trump rallies. Well, I am sorry folks, but freedom “ain’t” free. As a matter of fact, God has designed life in such a way that anything worth having requires backbone and risks.

Are you guys ready? Great! Let’s roll!

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

Before the campaign and election of Donald Trump, the left-right paradigm was on life support. People were as sick of Republicans such as Jeb Bush as they were of Democrats such as Hillary Clinton. But the election of Donald Trump has resurrected the left-right paradigm BIG TIME.

Ever since Trump won the Republican nomination–and even more so since he won the general election–it seems we are right back to the old Republican vs. Democrat, left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative mentality that got us into this mess in the first place. It is to the point that major “patriot” radio talk show hosts are sounding more and more like Republican hacks such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. And so-called patriot websites seem to have lost their constitutional objectivity as well when it comes to Trump.

As a national radio talk show host and columnist, I went through this with G.W. Bush. And as Yogi Berra used to say, “It’s deja vu all over again.” So, where exactly does that leave honest, objective truth-tellers? We catch it from all directions.

Just a few days ago, an ultra left-wing propaganda website did a hatchet job on yours truly and the good folks at Liberty Fellowship. A reporter (or should I say saboteur) snuck into one of our services and wrote up a hit piece that Joseph Goebbels (and the SPLC) would be proud of. At the same time, so-called conservative, patriot websites and columnists are attacking me with equal ferocity. What should that tell you? It should tell you that neither side is interested in truth; both sides only want to report that which furthers their own political agenda.

Truth is dead; objectivity is dead; honest journalism is dead. Truly, “fake news” is found on both ends of the political spectrum.

The fact is, Donald Trump has made and is making many decisions that should deeply concern constitutionalists, conservatives, and patriots. For all intents and purposes, the “law and order” agenda he is publicly promoting eviscerates the Fourth Amendment along with several others.

For example, Trump recently threatened to ruin the career of a Texas State Senator who dared to introduce legislation that would require a criminal conviction before law enforcement authorities can seize a person’s assets. The way the laws are written right now, the government can seize any citizen’s personal assets without having to charge the person with any illegal activity or wrongdoing. Mere suspicion is all that is necessary. Do Trump’s supporters really support THAT? If they do, they have no right to call themselves a “constitutionalist,” that’s for sure.

See the report: Trump Casually Offers To ‘Destroy’ Texas Senator Who Dared To Suggest Law Amendment (VIDEO)

With President Trump’s public rhetoric promoting police “stop and frisk” laws and similar bullying tactics, 157 people have been killed by police officers in just the first six weeks of 2017. That is almost a 10% increase over 2016’s banner year of police killings at this point on the calendar. And we are not yet two months into the new year. Does this make you feel “patriotic”? Do you really think this is what it means to “drain the swamp”?

Over Barack Obama’s eight years in office, he appointed twenty-one members of the globalist CFR to his administration. In just the beginning stages of Trump’s administration, he has already appointed four individual CFR members (Elaine Chao, Robert Lighthizer, K.T. McFarland, Robert Wood Johnson IV). Then count the companies that are CFR affiliates and the appointees from these companies that Trump has selected, including Rex Tillerson and Robert Harward, and that adds 15 additional CFR globalists to his administration. So, in reality, Trump has already appointed 19 CFR globalists to his administration–and he is only a few weeks into his presidency. At this rate, Trump is on a pace to far exceed Obama’s CFR appointments. Is that what you call putting “America first”?

Donald Trump’s CIA chief, Michael Pompeo, wants no interference or prohibition upon the federal government’s collecting “metadata” information on the American people. He wants to ignore or eliminate the USA Freedom Act that limits such data collection and resume the government’s collection of personal data on the American citizenry unimpeded. In other words, Pompeo wants the federal government to have complete freedom to spy on every American citizen, no exceptions and no limitations. Does that sound pro-constitution and pro-freedom to you?

Speaking of Pompeo and the CIA, Trump’s CIA chief just awarded Saudi Arabia Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef the George Tenet award for his work in “fighting terrorism.” I kid you not. Look it up for yourself.

Without a doubt, Saudi Arabia is the biggest exporter of terrorism in the entire Middle East. The Saudi government’s fingerprints are all over Al Qaeda, ISIS, and even the 9/11 attacks here in the United States. And Trump gives the Saudi deputy premier and interior minister an “anti-terrorism” award? Are you kidding me?

And talk about conflict of interest: here are the Zionists that Donald Trump has appointed to his administration so far: Jared Kushner, David Friedman, Jason Greenblatt, Steven Mnuchin, Stephen Miller, Carl Icahn, Gary Cohn, Boris Epshteyn, David Shulkin, Reed Cordish, and Avrahm Berkowitz. Try to find that many people of virtually any other single persuasion that Trump has appointed. But appointing this many Zionists to his cabinet is not supposed to concern us?

And did I tell you that Trump’s choice for Secretary of the Interior, Montana’s Ryan Zinke, was one of the most liberal Republican State legislators in the entire State of Montana? Well, he was. Oh, and did I tell you that Trump’s Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin, wants to INCREASE the size and scope of the Internal Revenue Service? Well, he does. And did I tell you that Trump’s choice for Labor Secretary, Andy Puzder, is a disciple of Jeb Bush and Eric Cantor and that he has made a living out of hiring cheap labor and immigrant employees and that he has promoted illegal immigration during his entire career? Well, he is and he has.

Plus, as we speak, the Trump administration is already making excuses as to why Obamacare won’t be able to be rescinded or replaced “any time soon.” And, of course, after saying that NAFTA needed to be shredded on the campaign trail, President Trump is now saying it needs to be reworked. But it’s uncertain at this point how or even if that will be accomplished. (Thankfully, Trump did put the whammy on TPP.) Oh, and the promise to put Hillary Clinton in jail: forget it. Trump has made it clear that the Clintons are “wonderful” people and that he has great “respect” for both of them.

And speaking of putting people in jail, you know that Donald Trump wants to put people who burn the American flag in jail for at least a year or take away their U.S. citizenship, right? What’s next? Will he propose shooting them?

Do I support burning the American flag? Absolutely not! I find it disgusting and revolting. Neither did I support those NFL players who refused to stand during our National Anthem during this past football season. I found those players to be equally repugnant. And the American viewing public had every right to register their displeasure of Kaepernick and Company by not watching NFL games–and a host of them did just that. But this is America. People have the right to protest, whether the rest of us find the protest disgusting or not. Freedom says, “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll fight for your right to say it.” Apparently, Donald Trump doesn’t believe that. As a private citizen, that’s no big deal; but as President of the United States of America, that IS a very big deal.

By this time, people may have gotten an entirely wrong perception of what I’m saying. Believe it or not, I’m NOT anti-Trump. I actually concur with many things Trump has said and done so far (not the things mentioned above, of course). What I am is chagrined and saddened at the lack of principled objectivity being demonstrated by many so-called conservatives.
The left has been guilty of this for years. And now with the election of Donald Trump, the right is proving itself equally guilty. That makes the right no better than the left–which takes us back to the beginning of how our country got in this shape to begin with. As writers and columnists, why can’t we stand foursquare on the principles of liberty and constitutional government, call a spade a spade, and just let the chips fall where they may? Is that really so hard to do? For many people, I guess it is.

It’s the same old story: people love me when I’m taking Democrats and liberals to task for the violation of freedom principles but hate me when I take Republicans and conservatives to task for the exact same things. And the truth is, at this point, Donald Trump is sending so many mixed signals it’s impossible to know exactly what he believes or what he intends to do. I’m not sure he even knows what he believes or what he intends to do.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
But that’s not the point. Our job as independent, honest, and objective columnists, writers, reporters, journalists, etc., is to remain loyal to the principles of truth, liberty, and constitutional government–no matter who is in the White House or what party controls Congress. Anything less is just more unprincipled partisan politics. In other words, more SWAMP.

What seems clear is that whatever else Donald Trump has accomplished by this election–whether wittingly or unwittingly–he has definitely brought back the destructive and distracting left-right paradigm. But that’s not his fault–it’s ours.

[NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers. NWV supports President Donald Trump and the Jewish State of Israel.]

© 2017 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

Everywhere you look, just now, it’s riots, protests, celebrities and Democrats asserting that President Donald Trump is mentally ill and mentally unfit to lead the country, yelling, cursing, name-calling, and, of course, violence. One tumor on the Internet remarked, “Donald Trump wants to burn the world so he can make a profit.” I’d like to know how anybody makes a profit by burning the world. But then to liberals “profit” is a dirty word.

I don’t put much stock in conspiracy theories; but to me, today’s crop of current events looks like a concerted effort, by Democrats, to create the illusion that no one in America wants Donald Trump to be president and that his election was an aberration, a thing that should not be. As another clown remarked, “Everyone in the whole world hates him!”

How does all this look like something that’s being done on purpose?

Look at all the professionally printed signs carried by the protesters. Who paid for that? And the fact that there always seems to be plenty of transportation on hand to get them on time to whatever it is they’re protesting—well, that suggests organization. And money. Can you say “George Soros”?

The organization was already in place, provided by teachers’ unions, universities, Democrat Party funds and special operations—as revealed by assorted videos released during the election campaign—left-wing advocacy groups, and other reliable sources. All they had to do was pump a little more money into it. And there’s always the nooze media, solidly in the bag for the Democrat Party, to magnify it with selected coverage.

The fact that Trump won the election anyhow, in spite of all this, indicates that the American people really did want him for their president, and that they really, truly don’t want to be bossed around anymore by liberals. The electoral map, showing results by county nationwide, is a sea of red marred by a few small stains of blue.

But the most dramatic proof that “Everybody hates Trump” is an illusion was provided a few nights ago—at the Grammy Awards.

A singer named Joy Villa showed up wearing a dress emblazoned with Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again.” Within hours of her appearance on TV, sales of her album increased by more than 18 million percent. Her album’s sales ranking on amazon.com went from 543,202… to three!

Whoa! Hold on, wait a minute! That’s not supposed to happen! I mean, everybody hates this—right? That’s what they’re telling us. How in the world could that have happened?

Hmmm… The Russians hacked the Grammys? Trump himself bought all those albums? It must’ve been racists! Or Climate Change deniers. Or maybe it didn’t happen at all: Steve Bannon and Fox News just cooked up that story. Oh, for a double wad of Play-Doh!

Liberals have a gift for saying things that are patently untrue, and then believing them after they’ve said them. It’s called lying, and it has served them well. They are also good at denying things that clearly are true. One liberal, on the telephone, declared to me that a certain book did not exist. “But it does,” I answered. “I have it right here on the table, right in front of me.” He still insisted to me that it did not exist. He also believes in Man-Made Global Warming.

So… they’ve tried everything, and now must fall back on a whopping great lie because everything else they’ve tried has failed. The nooze media has failed them. Hollywood has failed them. Left-wing billionaire money has failed them. Even the riots have come up short. So there’s nothing left to do but lie.

Sorry, liberals—but Joy Villa has well and truly kicked your butts.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

“Life is a fight, a fight to stay alive and a fight to keep others and government from taking your life or your liberty from you. Acknowledge that fact and you might just survive as a free man. Those awash in self-pity and think of themselves as victims will never be free and they will be a heavy burden on the rest of society.” —Ron Ewart

In the year 1620 and beyond, they crossed the Atlantic in sailing ships to get to America and freedom. The journey could take anywhere from six to 12 weeks to make the crossing, depending on the winds. Life aboard ship was primitive at best. Firsthand accounts speak of illness, cramped quarters, food and water rations. They had to endure scurvy, diphtheria, dysentery and seasickness. They were at the mercy of the captain, ship owners ….. and the sea. Many of them died during the passage. Because the journey was so long, when passengers died, their bodies were thrown overboard because there was no way to store them on the ship. The bones of thousands of Pilgrims are held forever in the bosom of the Atlantic Ocean, on their failed journey to freedom.

There was no government to protect the Pilgrims, pay their fare to the new land, or provide a handout if they got sick or destitute. Those who could not pay were required to remain on board the ship until they were sold into indentured servitude and forced to work to pay for their voyage.

When the surviving Pilgrims landed on the shores of America, they were faced with life in the wilderness and attacks by local Indian tribes. Health care and doctors were almost non-existent. You either survived because of your wits and plain dumb luck, or died from the elements, starvation, disease, or an Indian arrow.

They crossed the plains in covered wagons to reach some dream they had of owning land in the territories, or striking it rich in the gold fields. They built up little towns and roads, bridges, businesses and schools. Then the trains came and they could expand their travel and markets exponentially. The only thing the government did was to provide the land for the railroad companies and land grants to eager settlers, under the Homestead Act of 1862. If the settler worked and improved his land for five years, it was his land to keep for free and he will have earned it many times over.

But other than that, there was no government farming subsidies. There were no food stamps, rent assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, welfare, much less free college tuition. These hardy people built a nation and they did it with little help from government and even less government interference. They persevered by main strength and awkwardness. Many times they lost, but got up again and pressed forward. Their strength was built on adversity. They didn’t “cry”, “moan”, “groan”, or “complain” to government when the going got tough. They just worked harder or found a way to “fix” whatever they faced at the time. They didn’t win all the time but nevertheless, most never gave up. That beginning environment of adversity forged the strength of a nation and was the foundation of a strong, prosperous and exceptional America.

When the wave of European immigrants passed through Ellis Island (1892 to 1954) eager to come to the land of the free and the home of the brave, government provided little to no assistance. In fact, the government went to great lengths to see that the arriving immigrants could support themselves and had enough money to get started in their new land. The government even initiated a “head tax” for arriving immigrants. They were screened for disease and other maladies. Up to 20% of the arriving immigrants were returned to their native country for one reason or another.

Not so today. Illegal immigrants that evade the Border Patrol receive no screening for disease or the ability to sustain themselves. There is little effort to round them up and deport them for breaking our immigration laws, once “lost” in the general population. Instead, they are molly coddled, pampered, paid and protected by sanctuary jurisdictions and immigration advocates.

Legal and illegal immigrants and refugees arriving in America receive all kinds of government assistance, a monumental burden on the American taxpayer, a huge drag on the economy and a giant magnet to attract more of them. It is no wonder that America is broke and deep in debt.

But let’s get back to the “Poor Me” whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America that inhabit our colleges, ghettos and immigrant enclaves. Millions of Americans and legal and illegal immigrants have become the “poor me” generation, most of them subscribing to the left side of politics. Their forbearers of colonial and pioneer days are rolling in their graves to see how their descendants turned out. More than half of them wouldn’t survive under the conditions our forefathers and mothers had to endure. If they suddenly found themselves in the wilderness, most of them wouldn’t have the slightest idea on how to survive, because they haven’t been taught.

They haven’t been taught about self-reliance, personal responsibility and individual freedom. They haven’t been trained to survive when the going gets tough. Adversity builds strength and character. The easy life, where there is no discipline and where everything is provided for them, leads to personal weakness, low self-esteem and the desire to indulge in pleasures of the flesh. Instead of looking to them selves to solve their own problems, they have been taught to look to government and government is only too eager to “help” them, but with a string attached. The string comes at the voting booth where those receiving the government “help” are obliged to vote for those providing the “help.”

We all know which Party is offering the “help”, with money from the Public Treasury to which none in the Party own any piece thereof. Under law, they call this robbing-the-till for personal gain what it is, grand theft, punishable by fines and imprisonment. Unfortunately, the “help” this Party offered to its “Poor Me” groupies turned out to be a very expensive, slowly evaporating mirage on a distant horizon. That “help” just converted otherwise potentially strong individuals, into crybabies and bowls of quivering yellow jelly and made them helpless cripples.

What we do know is that those reading this column are probably not members of the “Poor Me” generation.

Ever since the government-triggered Great Depression and the rapid rise of socialism under FDR, America has been headed downhill, away from individual freedom, self-reliance and personal responsibility and towards collectivism, dependency and government control of everything. The passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913, which created the Federal Reserve and the IRS, was no coincidence. It was no coincidence that the government, in the late 1920’s, retained the University of Illinois and Harvard University to study how to control people through their subconscious minds. It was no coincidence that the U. S. economy suddenly collapsed in 1929. It was no coincidence that socialism rose rapidly under FDR during the 1930’s and beyond. It was no coincidence that the gold standard was abolished in 1933. America was bankrupt, threatened by Communism and headed for Hell. Socialism and top-down control of the masses was government’s and the central bankers’ answer.

We just received a response to one of our recent articles where the person described, in one paragraph, what happened to America since the 1930’s. He wrote:

“The ‘Master Plan’ for the USA has always been to reduce the USA to a third world feudal state by diluting the gene and intelligence pool, degrading education, attacking tradition and culture, abolishing the nuclear family, promoting sexual perversion and abnormality and hybrid relationships, debasing the currency, eliminating the middle class, dissolving Christianity, ignoring the Constitution, weakening and removing personal liberty and base freedoms, and importing as many impoverished and uneducated persons from around the globe to economically and socially drain as much life from the US as possible ….. Marxism masquerading as immigration. The US has been in the crosshairs for decades because to take down the ‘Crown Jewel’ of the Western world is to send a message to all other countries that they can also be co-opted. ‘Front end’ rationale for any action taken by this government is not ever the reason for the action. Ponder no longer on the matter. The destruction of western civilization is the goal.”
When you throw back the curtain and expose the politicians, central bankers and industrialist “Wizards” calling the shots, this gentleman cannot be too far off the mark. The whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America are the result of actions of the “Wizards” pulling the strings of international money, commerce, trade, wars and politics. The “Wizards” have bought off the people with a few pieces of silver and filled their “Little Black Boxes” with hogwash, mush and propaganda.

These same “Wizards” (mostly Progressives) have convinced the “Poor Me” generation that because they are poor, sick, out of work, an illegal immigrant, refugee, Black, Latino, gay, transgender, or just plain lazy, they have an irrevocable claim to everyone else’s money and sweat labor, or special treatment from government. To pay for their alleged irrevocable claim, or special treatment, the government collects that money in an act of forced charity ….. at the point of a gun. Charity should have never become the purview of government and was never authorized by the Constitution. Charity, to be true charity, must be voluntary, not mandatory. Mandatory charity is slavery by any other name.

Sadly, the weakest among us have sold their souls and given away their freedom for so little because their parents did not teach them critical thinking, personal responsibility, to question everything, how to recognize a fraud and to never trust government.

Everything you think you know is probably a government, media, or academia created illusion with the sole intent of controlling the masses. The international environmental movement and social justice were designed to that end and to re-distribute the wealth of western nations. Economy destroying, expensive legislative actions to limit alleged man-caused global warming, are just one of the elements of the international environmental plan of control.

Americans have been hoodwinked by “100+ Years of Progressive Rule” that champion a collectivist culture, social justice, radical environmentalism, appeasement of our enemies, a massive welfare state, illegal immigrants, sanctuary cities, open borders and mindless compliant citizens. Progressives have created multiples of a “Poor Me” generation, awash in self-pity, low self-esteem and rabid self-indulgence, requiring that their only salvation is being dependent on Mother government when things go wrong in their lives and things are always going wrong in their lives.

With over half of the American people steeped in this “dependent” culture, planted there by decades of constant Progressive indoctrination and brainwashing, the fate of America is pre-ordained unless President Trump and those that support him can trigger a massive flashback to the time of self-reliance, independence, personal responsibility and individual freedom. As we stated in our last article: “A successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.”

But like the fighter pilot says after consuming over half of his fuel, “we have passed the point of no return ….. without midair refueling.” We had better hope that midair refueling happens soon ….. very soon, or Progressivism, collectivism and socialism will have won and individual freedom will have been thrown on the trash heap of forgotten Republics.

If you LIKED this article, let us know. Constructive comments welcome.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.” – Vincenzo Vinciguerra

Throughout the duration of Barack Obama’s criminal administration (Bushes and Clintons as well) you have seen these administrations aid and abet the enemies only to advance a global agenda through the use of terrorism (Article 3, Section 3 of the United States Constitution).

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.” – Adolph Hitler

Barack Hussein Obama told the American people on August 21, 2010.

“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”

To answer Barack’s statement, let me help things along so you can understand more clearly as to what is going on today.

George Soros stated that the “main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.”

Furthermore, Paul Warburg said, “We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”

So, we can clearly see that America is still under threat of terrorism, both within and without.

“And if ye shall despise my statutes, or if your soul abhor my judgments, so that ye will not do all my commandments, but that ye break my covenant: I also will do this unto you; I will even appoint over you terror…” —Leviticus 26:16

The question that we need to answer here is, who are the terrorists?

First, those who have been given a free hand to do what they will because the people have left off God’s commandments when it comes to despising His statutes and abhorring His judgments. These are the real terrorists, who are committing the crimes like that of the past and proceeding administrations in America.

You would think that now Donald Trump is the president, he would have the intelligence to expose the guilty parties. It does not get more obvious than Bush, Clinton and Obama!

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.” ? Friedrich Nietzsche

We have learned from the annals of history that there are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack, and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

This is nothing new (Ecclesiastes 1:9).

In the following 42 instances, officials in the government, which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack), admit to it either orally or in writing:

1. Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident.” The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army….”

2. A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

3. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

4. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

5. The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and falsely blame it on the Nazis.

6. The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings.

7. Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed).

8. The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950’s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

9. The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

10. The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

11. The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

12. In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

13. Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

14. As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.

15. In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

16. The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

17. The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

18. A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

19. A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

20. The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

21. A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist transmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

22. The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

23. An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

24. An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

25. Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

26. According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

27. The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

28. As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

29. Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

30. Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

31. Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by amemo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers).

32. Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

33. United Press International reported in June 2005: U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

34. Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

35. Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers.

36. At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plainclothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

37. Egyptian politicians admitted that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

38. A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

39. The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

40. High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

41. The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

42. Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

In addition, two-thirds of the City of Rome burned down in a huge fire on July 19, 64 A.D. The Roman people blamed the Emperor Nero for starting the fire. Some top Roman leaders – including the Roman consul Cassius Dio, as well as historians like Suetonius – agreed that Nero started the fire (based largely on the fact that the Roman Senate had just rejected Nero’s application to clear 300 acres in Rome so that he could build a palatial complex, and that the fire allowed him to build his complex). Regardless of who actually started the fire, Nero – in the face of public opinion accusing him of arson – falsely blamed the Christians for starting the fire. He then rounded up and brutally tortured and murdered scores of Christians for something they likely didn’t do.

We didn’t include this in the list above, because if Nero did start the fire on purpose, he did it for his own reasons (to build his palatial complex), and not for geopolitical reasons benefiting his nation.

The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. These are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Representatives throughout history have acknowledged false flags and the danger of false flags:

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” – Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”. – Josef Stalin

Now that President Donald Trump has taken office, a majority of those who were fed up with the likes of the foreign criminal Barack Hussein Obama have now fallen asleep.

Donald is there now to take care of us, say so many in this country. “No need to worry over anything, at least not for the next 4-8 more years,” they say (Ephesians 5:14). Really?

Regardless, if you want to see things for what they are or not is irrelevant! Judgment is going to continuously rain (Genesis 7:12) on this country until Americans realize that their sins are before God (Number 32:23).

America, you cannot advocate what God condemns (regardless of what any president advocates) and prosper. Sodomy (Leviticus 18:22), abortion (Proverbs 6:17), corruption in the church and in the government, etc. are all things the Lord abhors (Proverbs 14:34).

Furthermore, it is time for bring forth fruits of repentance by cleaning house (Matthew 3:8). Now is that time.

[NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

While the Democrats and so-called moderate Republicans yell and scream over U.S. President Donald Trump’s efforts to stop the influx of Muslims from seven nations known to be hotbeds of radical Islam terrorists, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel under intense pressure by the German people is now seeking the deportation of the same refugees she originally welcomed with opened arms.

Merkel announced her 180-degree turn in her nation’s refugee policy and says she will unveil plans this week to increase deportations of immigrants especially those suspected of being involved in anti-West terrorism or materially-supporting radical groups.

“Instead of looking more closely at the experiences of other nations who allowed tens of thousands of unvetted immigrants from nations in the midst of battling against unbridled Muslim barbarity, the American leftists and globalists continue their deceptive immigration agenda especially those ‘citizens-of-the-world’ news purveyors,” said former police captain and political science instructor Laura Manza-McCarthy.

“While American politicians and activists fight the Trump administration on behalf of illegal immigration, German, Italian and other European Union countries can’t deport them fast enough,” she added.

Merkel’s German plan will tighten up the nation’s well-intentioned but flawed asylum system. Merkel, as a liberal politician, will use her plan to quell the outrage of critics on the right and the center of Germany’s political spectrum. As in the United States there is a majority who claim her refugee policy is — and has been since the beginning –too liberal and potentially dangerous.

When the Muslim refugee crisis emerged, France, Italy, Germany and other European countries opened the floodgates and took in millions of Muslims from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen and other countries involved in the global jihad.

Merkel is expected to announce a number of changes to the immigration processing of Muslims this week. For example, the Germans will build immigrant centers near airports for those deemed suspicious asylum seekers. This will allow the police to hold on to people thought to be a security threat. The actual mass deportations are to be handled not by police but by a newly created department charged with coordinating the large number of deportations expected.

Immigration, especially immigrants from war-zones in the Middle East and North Africa, has been a hot-button political issue in Germany since the summer of 2015, when Merkel adopted a welcoming stance towards refugees fleeing Syria and other war-torn nations.

According to the German news media, of the 280,000 Muslims that arrived last year, 80,000 have been deported. More than 50,000 of them volunteered to be deported. However, according to David Knudsen, a former immigration cop, the reason for so many volunteering is that they are given free transportation plus close to $2,500.00 (U.S.) if they return to their countries without incident.

As with Germany, Italy’s government is said to be ready for immigrant deportations. In 2016, Italy received more than 180,000 immigrants traveling by watercraft from Libya alone. At first, only 4,000 Muslims were deported by Italian authorities. But now it appears the Italian citizenry is not happy with the results of liberal “compassion” and they want fewer asylum seekers from Muslim communities in North Africa.

German authorities at first directed their police forces to follow their new rules: “When reporting on criminal offenses, details about the religious, ethnic or other background information of the suspects or perpetrators is to be mentioned only if it is absolutely necessary to understand the reported event. Remember that such references could foment prejudices against minorities.”

Actual Translation: We want to sell the German public on this Muslim migrant inundation. So don’t tell the people that Muslim migrants are involved in sexual assaults and rapes on a near-daily basis.

This is treason, as it is leading Germany to national disaster, and the German Press Council should be prosecuted. But who would initiate such a prosecution? Angela Merkel?

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

Winning against a determined enemy requires a willingness to clearly define the threat and to work very hard to understand their passions, fears and beliefs. —The Field of Fight Lt. General Michael T. Flynn

Michael T. Flynn knows more about Islamic terrorism than anyone in Trump’s cabinet. It is why we need him for our NSA Chief! The left knows it, and it is why they will use every tactic they can to derail his nomination, including the bogus claim that he promised a lifting of sanctions against Russia when he spoke with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian Ambassador to the U.S. 

General Flynn spent more than 33 years as an intelligence officer, and that will serve us well. He served as the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Senior Military Intelligence Officer in the Department of Defense. Of all the military men in our President’s new administration, General Flynn knows more about the cunning and ability-to-adapt of the Islamic enemies of freedom than anyone else in Trump’s administration. His book, The Field of Fight, should be read by every patriotic American. Get it, and read it, only 180 high powered packed intel pages! It is why we desperately need this man.

The Bogus Attack Against Flynn

At issue is whether or not Flynn discussed the lifting of sanctions against Russia with Sergey Kislyak before Trump’s inauguration. U.S. intelligence services routinely intercept and monitor diplomats. According to transcripts of the conversation, they show that General Flynn did discuss sanctions with the ambassador. What they don’t show is that the General made any sort of promise to lift the sanctions once Mr. Trump took office. Rather, they show Flynn making general comments about relations between the two countries improving under President Trump. 

Had the General promised a lifting of sanctions, he would have violated a law that prohibits private citizens from engaging in foreign policy, the Logan Act. Flynn has stated that he really doesn’t remember the entire conversation, but the transcripts actually show he made no sort of promise, so reality is, the left is scared to death of Flynn and want him gone.

Personally, I can’t remember what I said on the telephone yesterday, let alone weeks or months ago, but the transcripts verify that Flynn did not break the law. Nevertheless, you have Pelosi tweeting, “Gen. Flynn should be suspended and have his intelligence clearance revoked.” Of course, you have Lindsey Graham joining with leftist Sheldon Whitehouse, both of whom lead the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subpanel on crime and terrorism, launching an investigation of Russia’s efforts to influence the U.S. election. Insanity reigns in our Congress.

We need Flynn, he has amazing intelligence regarding radical Islam, and he is probably the finest choice in Trump’s administration to carry out the duties of NSA Chief. 

CIA Hatred of Trump Spills Over

CIA Director Pompeo, recently rejected a request for an elite security clearance for Senior Director for Africa, Robin Townley, required for service on the National Security Council. Townley is a long-time associate of Gen. Michael Flynn, and a former Marine intelligence officer who had long maintained a top secret-level security clearance. 

Apparently, Flynn is justifiably angry over this rejection, and this escalates the friction between Flynn and this agency, one I’ve considered rogue for many decades. Townley had spent most of his adult life with high level clearances, so it is difficult to take this as anything but the war the CIA declared on Trump right after the election. The CIA actually had granted the same kind of clearance to Obama’s appointee, Ben Rhodes, despite Rhodes having been declined the same kind of clearance by the FBI because of his obsequious attachment to Iran.

Apparently, Flynn and his allies believe it was motivated by Townley’s skepticism of the intelligence community’s techniques — sentiments shared by Flynn, and many knowledgeable Americans. 

The CIA and others in the intelligence community seem threatened by Flynn and his allies. Why? Because this 33-year Army intelligence veteran knows more about the dangers facing America than anyone. Marine Robin Townley doesn’t believe the CIA runs the world, and his closeness to his boss was probably what made him a target.

The CIA needs a massive cleanout, but meanwhile, Pompeo apparently believes his sandbagging of Townley is a small price to pay if it helps him avoid the Porter Goss treatment.

Flynn’s Plan to Beat Radical Islam

General Flynn not only wants to stop Islamic terrorists, but he wants to fight their radical ideology. He wants to combat it more broadly, using informational warfare. “We can’t possibly have an effective campaign against Radical Islamic ideology without the cooperation of the likes of Google, Facebook and Twitter.

“But first,” he writes, “the government has to overcome the political taboo of tying Islamic violence to the religion of Islam, including its sacred texts, which he says the enemy is using as a manual of warfare.”

“It’s long past time for us to denounce the many evils of Radical Islam,” he writes, while highlighting the many defeats of ISIS and al Qaeda to show potential recruits that “the Almighty has changed sides in the holy war.”
Advance details of the plan can be gleaned from Flynn’s book. In it, the Army veteran proposes discrediting the “evil (religious) doctrines” motivating jihadists — namely the Islamic rewards for martyrdom (or suicidal terrorism) and the totalitarian tenets of Sharia law — using psy-ops and counter-propaganda, not just through federal government channels but also through “our schools, media and social networks.”

“If we can’t tackle enemy doctrines that call for our domination or extinction,” Flynn writes, “we aren’t going to destroy their jihadis.”

Fired by former President Barack Obama from the Defense Intelligence Agency for taking such stands, Flynn vows to reverse the longstanding government practice of whitewashing the violent nature of the enemy’s faith through pleasant platitudes like, “The terrorists are hijacking a religion of peace” and other apologia. He calls such policies “Islamophilia,” and complains they border on appeasement, which, in my estimation, they do.

Nazis and Islamists

Donald Trump has been compared to Adolf Hitler by the leftists in America, by political adversaries who disagree with him vehemently and with vitriol. Professors, political commentators, irate comedians, Hollywood entertainers, and especially some of the leaders from our black communities have engaged in the purposeful promotion of this comparison. Their political demonizing is done for a purpose, but certainly not one that is helpful to America, and if you’ll notice, it also extends to Trump’s nominees.

Marion Ingeborg Andrews, (Inge) was born in Dusseldorf, Germany, in 1940 during Hitler’s reign. She is infuriated that people compare President Trump to Hitler and has said, 

General Flynn’s book echoes Inge’s fears when he states, “Religious fanatics and secular tyrants work quite well together, transcending even deep ideological divides. The most dramatic example comes from the infamous case of the grand mufti of Jerusalem in the 1930s and 1940s, Amin al-Husseini, and his efforts to forge an operational relationship between Nazi Germany and his own Muslim Brotherhood.” Chuck Morse’s book, The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism spells it out clearly.

“Like the leaders of other fascist states, the mullahs who have ruled the Islamic Republic have claimed universal authority in the name of their doctrine, not of their country. And they say they are prepared to die—along with their followers—to accomplish their mission. As Khomeini put it shortly after the occupation of the American embassy in Tehran in 1979: “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah…For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.” General Flynn – The Field of Fight.

The General makes this clear on page 103 of his dynamic book when he states, “Keep your eyes on that word, ‘totalitarian.” That is the key concept.” 

“This also helps clarify the nature of the global alliance we face. The countries and movements that are trying to destroy us have worldviews that may seem to be in violent conflict with one another. But they are united by their hatred of the democratic West and their conviction that dictatorship is superior. So, while it may appear that, say, there is little in common between Communist North Korea, and radical Shi’ite Iran, or between the leaders of the radical Sunni Islamic State’s ‘caliphate’ and the Iranians, in fact it is no more difficult for them to cooperate in the war against us than it was for Hitler and the grand mufti to cooperate in the 1930s and 1940s.”

General Flynn knows that Iran is the core of terrorism training, and this is another reason that President Trump has said, “Iran’s nuclear deal is inconceivable and a disaster for Israel.” [Link]

Our President has stated many times, “Make America Safe Again.” Our president knows that some of the refugees and illegal aliens are of the criminal element, and his job as our President is to keep this sovereign nation’s people protected.

Conclusion

Trump and his nominees are real men, not men that have been feminized, and that’s why they hate real men like Trump, General Flynn, advisor Stephen Miller, and his other nominees. [See Stephen Miller on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace] also [See Stephen Miller shellac George Stephanopoulos on ABC] and [See Stephen Miller Destroy Chuck Todd on Meet The Press]

What’s good for the goose…So how about these leftists apply the same tactics towards their Hollywood and sports figures like they’re applying with the attacks on all of Trump’s nominees, but especially on General Flynn?!

Link]

Sean Penn is another one. In 2008, the actor flew to Cuba to interview Castro. In what was a seven-hour conversation with Castro, Penn described the hardliner as having the “agility of a young man” who “exercises every day, his eyes are bright and his voice is strong.”

Add to this fawning of the Communist Dictator, these other Hollywood actors, Jack Nicholson, Ted Turner, Danny Glover, Kevin Costner, Chevy Chase, and Harry Belafonte. Where is the Logan Act with them? Excuse me, why weren’t their conversations recorded??? [Link]

 

And what about George Clooney’s visit to Angela Merkel? Muslim migrants have now flooded into a massive camp next to George Clooney’s $10 million Italian villa. So, how about it George…maybe you could take in about 50 of them and feed and house them?!

The number of the White house comment line is (202) 456-1111, and the number of the house switchboard (202)225-3121. Call the White House, and then your senators and tell them we need General Michael T. Flynn as our National Security Advisor. No one else will do, we need Flynn!

Would U.S. Judge James Robart stop President Trump’s executive order if those refugees landed in his town to go to school with his kids?

The crux of the refugee problem: nameless federal officials and religious organizations like the Lutheran Church and Catholic Charities force refugees into hapless cities—without any concern for American citizens of those communities.

Whether you look at the destruction of Lewiston, Maine 10 years ago by Somali refugees who shredded that town with cultural chaos or Somaliland in Minneapolis, Minnesota with 100,000 Somali refugees living on welfare with zero ability to become contributing members of American society—the people at the top remain untouched by the consequences.

The rest of us pay our taxes, which pay for those refugees to live for free for the rest of their lives. And, that’s what’s happening.

But in the case of terror, we American citizens suffer the Boston Marathon bombings to the Christmas killings in San Bernardino to the massacre at Orlando. And, another dozen terror events in between! Anyone can spit them off the end of their tongues as to beheadings in Moore, Oklahoma; stabbings at the mall in Washington State, stabbings in St. Cloud mall, Minneapolis; Muslim terrorists in Garland, Texas; honor killing in Rocky River, Ohio; stabbings at Ohio State University and on and on and on.

This may come as a sobering shock to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Robart who justified overturning Trump’s “extreme vetting” executive order covering seven mostly Muslim countries by claiming there is “no evidence” those countries have produced a terrorist.

The Center for Immigration Studies, www.cis.org, compiled a list of 72 U.S. residents from those seven countries who were convicted of terror-related charges.

The United States has admitted terrorists from all of the seven dangerous countries:

Somalia: 20
Yemen: 19
Iraq: 19
Syria: 7
Iran: 4
Libya: 2
Sudan: 1
Total: 72

The report showed 17 individuals entered as refugees from these terror-prone countries. Three came in on student visas and one arrived on a diplomatic visa.

“At least 25 of these immigrants eventually became citizens. Ten were lawful permanent residents, and four were illegal aliens,” said a CIS spokesperson. “These immigrant terrorists lived in at least 16 different states, with the largest number from the terror-associated countries living in New York (10), Minnesota (8), California (8), and Michigan (6). Ironically, Minnesota was one of the states suing to block Trump’s order to pause entries from the terror-associated countries, claiming it harmed the state. At least two of the terrorists were living in Washington, which joined with Minnesota in the lawsuit to block the order.”

The question grows large in the national mirror reflecting the insanity of our immigration system: what in the devil are we doing to ourselves as a nation? What causes our leaders to commit us to national suicide? How many more terrorist events do we need to suffer to finally shut down our borders to all immigration? Why are we the dumping ground for everybody else’s problems worldwide?

Whether you look at the destructive sociological impacts such as parallel societies being created in Dearbornistan, Michigan or Somaliland, Minnesota or “Everybody else’s city” New York City or the religious Muslim terrorism of female genital mutilation, women as property and arranged marriages to honor killings or the current fragmentation of our society as shown by the violent demonstrations—where do you think we’re going to end up Judge Robart?

The jelly bean metaphor: if someone gave you a bag of 10,000 jelly beans, but warned you that 10 of the jelly beans were poisoned—would you let your kids eat from the bag of jelly beans?

Well, would you Judge Robart? You see, parents and friends are still living in pain over the loss of loved ones at 9/11, San Bernardino, Boston Marathon, Orlando, Chattanooga and countless other terrorist events in America via Islamic terrorists.

It’s been said, “Radical Muslims are snakes; moderate Muslims are the grass they slither around in.”

Fact: Islam promotes a social-economic-religious mandate of violence right out of the 6th century. It hasn’t changed in 1,400 years. It’s not going to change any more than a snake can change its fangs.

Only reasonable solution: shut down all Muslim immigration into the USA and all Western countries.

© 2017 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

The American people must hear the truth about the nature of Islamic doctrine continually until they are totally aware of its threat to their way of life and the US Constitution. Sadly, our Churches and other religious institutions dare not speak up for fear of being accused of intolerance toward another religion. Our academia, the university teachers and professors, left or right, dare not, because, most likely, they would be expelled and lose their income. Our elected officials and politicians dare not because they are mostly master practitioners of euphemism, hedging, doubletalk, and outright deception, and they need your votes as well as your money. Many media contributors and editors dare not because they could lose subscribers and be shut down. Countless entrepreneurs and businessmen dare not because they might lose customers and clientele. Even ordinary workers dare not because they might be fired or called bigots and racists. So, I thought I would tell you!

America is faced with a formidable adversary. This adversary has a name: Islam, not radical Islam or political Islam, just Islam. Muslims don’t call it radical Islam, why should we? I think it is time to revisit the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and see if Islam is qualified as a religion. Is this an outlandishly absurd proposal? Not at all, serious problems require equally serious solutions. The call for evaluation of the First Amendment may be seen as an attempt to curb Islam or other militant cults. The truth is: it is. It is truly a matter of survival of the United States and the free world.

It is long past time to take a stand and shift the debate to orthodox Islam. There is no need to exhaustingly investigate every other religion on the planet in order to compare them or offer an opinion about their relative “goodness” in declaring that on the whole, Islam perpetuates malevolence and violence. Let others devolve into religious disagreements. But for the press and some commentators who would further question: “OK great, so now what? You claim Islam is malevolent. How do we combat that?” Your response is already clear: Through the spread of truth, not deceit. Through voluntary social sanctions and laws in every civilized country that forbid evil practices like Sharia, coercion and violence against women, threats against those who disagree, honor killings, apostasy and other hate crimes. Let the world know the truth and decide for itself. Let Muslims who come to their senses, opt out.

Religion and Islam

America, with a long history of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call. The dictionary supplies a sociologically useless definition for religion: “The expression of man’s belief in and reverence for a superhuman power recognized as the Creator and Governor of the universe.” Just about anyone or any group under this definition can start a religion, and indeed they do—and some do so at significant costs to others.

Muslims, under the banner of religion, are infringing blatantly on the rights of others, not only in Islamic countries, but also in much of the non-Muslim world. By their acts of dogmatic barbarity, Muslims are slowly awakening non-Muslim democracies to the imminent threat of Islamic terrorism keen on destroying their free secular and free societies.

As more and more Muslims arrive in America, as they reproduce with great fertility, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power and become a serious challenge to the American system of governance—representative democracy. As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use for it whatsoever. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form of a Caliphate. Making a mockery of democracy, subverting its workings, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of government, invented by the infidels.

Quran 5:50 “Do they then seek the legislation of (the Days of) Ignorance? And who is better in legislating than Allah for a people who have Faith.”

Quran 5:45 “And whoever rules not by what Allah has revealed, those are the wrongdoers.”

Quran 12:40 “The rule is only for Allah.”

We must begin to declare Islam evil, not from a sectarian perspective, but from a universal, humanist one. Every encroachment of Islam as a religion must be rejected, harassed and discouraged by all people everywhere. Any leftist attempts to give aid and comfort to this religion of hate must be denounced and frustrated at every turn.

Christianity

Unlike some peaceful religions such as Baha’i, Buddhism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism and Christianity which advocate universally understood principles of good within their Holy books, and perhaps other religious doctrines (with which I am not personally familiar), Islam cannot be reformed. An example, when the Roman Catholic church was reformed, it was the church that was found to be in violation of Biblical teachings. It had in many ways become anti-Christian.

Reform restored orthodoxy to the plain and well-understood concepts revealed by Christ and the disciples (one of the reasons it took so long was the church forbade lay-people from reading the bible or translating it from the obsolete language of Latin…so Europeans were largely ignorant except for what they were told…see the story of Martin Luther). Some evolutionary ideas such as the abolition of slavery were not addressed in the Bible (in part because Christ was after souls not bodies), but the other teachings such as compassion, forgiveness, non-violence, and brotherly love are and were always incompatible with slavery. Therefore, it should be no surprise that eventually Christians in Europe and America led the abolitionist movement (they were scripturally correct). If a Christian bombs an abortion clinic, there is no scriptural commandment supporting this. It is unchristian (however, it is not unchristian to denounce abortion and seek to make it illegal and thus prevent abortionists from practicing their craft).

It is sad when the counter-argument to this definition of Christianity is lame references to Old Testament violence. Old Testament stories are taught in Christianity as historical fact, not prescriptions based on Christian ethics. If to a Christian, God is sanctioned a violent act, it is 100% irrelevant to the New Covenant that is taught by Jesus. So, to say…yeah but the Bible has violence in it too is insultingly banal, simplistic and misleading.

If some Christians abused their doctrine and hid behind the Cross to justify their personal desire to kill, enslave, and conquer, then they are and always were sinners and they are wrong; and this is why Christianity has taken the natural form it has today…as a religion of peace and compassion (even if many supposed Christians continue to sin). This is not to say that Christians are unable to defend themselves, or intervene to stop injustice. Christians are taught to hate the sin and love the sinner…period! The decision to become aggressive is always a burden on the Christian conscience.

In comparison, Islam does not tolerate revisionism in its beliefs or practices over time. Reform is not at play, because one cannot point to Jihadists or terrorists and say Muhammad did not advocate it. He most certainly did, and delighted in his evil thoughts. Islam is a literal religion, taking unabrogated scripture as eternal and absolute. Moreover, there are no calls in Islam for compassion, forgiveness, non-violence, and brotherly love. Instead there are specific prescriptions to retain evil with evil, eternal warfare, religious hegemony, slavery, killing Jews, taxing nonbelievers, stoning, promulgating terror, establishing a caste social system, and perpetuating discrimination against women. The only way to reform Islam is to discard Sharia, but also to purge the Quran itself of its enormous Suras that are not only patently false, but totally repugnant to a civilized humanity. This line of thinking, to sanitize Islam is explicitly forbidden in the Quran:

Quran 2:85: “Do you, then, believe in some parts of the divine writ and deny the truth of other parts? What, then, could be the reward of those among you who do such things but ignominy in the life of this world and, on the Day of Resurrection; they will be consigned to most grievous suffering? For God is not unmindful of what you do.”

Radical Islam

There is no such thing as “radical Islam.” I have refused to accept several organizations that seek to combat or expose the antics of “radical” or “extreme” Islam, because I know that it is not extremism that is causing the violence…it’s mainstream, typical, normal, traditional, specified, canonical Islam.

There are those who with a wink and a nod understand this but continue to work as revisionists because they are afraid of starting a religious war, even as they feel compelled to do something. They tell me, “You can’t openly accuse an entire religion of being evil! That would just incite them and make them hate us even more.” My response: the war started in the 7th century, and if in the 21st century we still refuse to accept that reality, then there is perhaps no hope at all for civilization. Nothing good can come from self-deception.

I argue that any belief system that licenses murder in the name of Jihad and the conquering and subduing of the world of the infidels by the Umma, should be outlawed. The prophet Mohammad brewed up a militant, radical and extremely irrational imperialistic cult that sought world dominance. My fellow travelers, let us make one thing clear; Islam is no more a religion deserving our respect or legal recognition than is cannibalism.

And those who take a “liberal” view of Islam should be forced to back up their nouveau interpretation with unabrogated scriptural facts. Unless such “reformists” can denounce fascist Islam with scripture, they are the true radicals, which is why we never see them pointing to scriptural arguments against jihad…they cannot because they are lying. Islamic terrorists are doing exactly what the prophet Muhammad demanded. And his demands were not suggestions and were not ephemeral. They were “perfect,” eternal ultimata. Islamic terrorists are faithful and true to what is written in the book of Quran.

Islam Enablers

A consortium composed of pandering politicians, left and right, blinded by short-term self-interest and egotism, attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiots, are the witting or unwitting promoters of Umma-ism.

Recall how many times former President George W. Bush praised Islam? Recall President George Bush’s love affairs with the Shaikh Abdullah of Saudi Arabia?

Didn’t President Obama go around the Muslim heartland and sing the praises of Islam at every stop? Didn’t he bow with great deference to the King of Islam in Saudi Arabia? Didn’t he proudly proclaim Islam as the faith of his near and dear kindred? Didn’t he, time and again, tell us that Islam is indeed the religion of peace? Didn’t he with his captivating oratory skills cite passages from the Quran to show how reverent he was toward this religion? Didn’t he appoint a raft of “devoted” Muslims to sensitive and high posts in government? Didn’t the Obama administration pull back all training materials used for law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive?

Here are some statements from both Presidents Bush and Obama:

1. “Ours is a war not against a religion, not against the Muslim faith. But ours is a war against individuals who absolutely hate what America stands for.” GWB
2. “They’re terrorists. And we are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam.” BHO
3. “Our war is not against Islam, or against faith practiced by the Muslim people. Our war is a war against evil.” GWB
4. “Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.” GWB
5. “The terrorists do not speak for over a billion Muslims who reject their hateful ideology.” BHO

6. “There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion.” GWB
7. “This great religion in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted to justify violence.” BHO

It is long past time for Americans to call upon the lawmakers of the United States of America to immediately create a safety board and commissioner to study and examine the dangers of Islamic doctrine in our society. Islam today is dysfunctional, to say the least. As a matter of fact, Islam went astray from the very beginning and inflicted a great deal of suffering on both its followers and those who resisted its advance.

In the monumental task of dealing with Islam, every individual, group and government must combine their resources and energies to prevail. The destiny of the civilized world hangs in the balance. Shirking this responsibility is an unpardonable act of every enlightened human being and organization that values individual freedom, liberty and dignity.

© 2017 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

Recently I published “Why the Left Has No Credibility.” Sadly, things have gotten worse just in the short time since that appeared. There’s truth to the adage that just when you think things can’t get worse, they do.

Presumably all have heard about the riot at University of California at Berkeley, in response to a planned appearance by Breitbart.com writer Milo Yiannopoulos. A peaceful demonstration, which by itself fell within what the First Amendment protects and wouldn’t have led to the cancellation of the speech, turned violent when around 150 people showed up wearing masks. They started breaking windows, setting fires, and physically attacking anyone within reach. Naturally the University had to cancel the event out of legitimate public safety concerns.

The First Amendment, it should go without saying, doesn’t protect violence!
These people, who were very well organized, were clearly not students. Robert Reich, formerly Bill Clinton’s labor secretary and now a professor out there, suggested (without producing any substantive evidence) that Yiannopoulos and Breitbart.com orchestrated the riots themselves, to lend support to an idea Donald Trump tweeted the next day, that federal funds should be pulled from universities where conservative speakers get shut down by violent protests.

Reich was alleging that the “alt-right” had perpetuated a false flag, in other words.

This is what passes for serious punditry by Established (i.e., paid) columnists these days.

I could have spent 50 years and not come up with a whopper like that! Small wonder these folks have lost control of the national narrative and have to draw on silly memes like “alternative facts.”

Later, we learned of the usual George Soros connection. This group was the recipient of a $50,000 grant from a Soros-funded organization.

Has anyone kept track of how much trouble this one globalist billionaire has caused in his life?

A similar occurrence took place the next night at New York University. The speaker was British-born Canadian author Gavin McInnes, whose commentary routinely appears here. Invited by the College Republicans, he lasted something like 20 minutes in the face of constant heckling and disruptions. Outside, police had to intervene as a near-riot broke out. You can watch the spectacle here — if you’ve a strong stomach. How interesting that so few people involved in these protests can speak a single sentence without torrents of obscenities pouring out. Note, too, the arrangement of balloons into a stuffed animal shape mounted on one guy’s head as he meanders about lecturing anyone who will listen about “white supremacy.”

I’d like someone to tell me how many rights “white supremacists” have taken from anyone this year.

The real fun begins at around 10:15, with a leftie meltdown of volcanic proportions. It makes the one I linked to last week look tame by comparison. She’s screaming at the top of her lungs at police, and then, at 11:06, she drops the real bombshell.

She says she’s a professor. The way she introduces it, is supposed to give her a badge of credibility.

Her name is Rebecca Goyette, and she portrays herself elsewhere as some kind of artist — look at her public Facebook page.

She’s not a real professor, as it turns out (age restricted: again, strong stomachs only!). Maybe, in her delusional leftie-pervert universe, she thinks she’s a professor. Who knows?

Some of the onlookers, having heard her say she’s a professor and taking her at her word (how interesting, that they would do that), are clearly as bemused as I am (“she’s a professor,” says someone, presumably scratching his head).

What she is, is a complete nutjob!

What seems clear is that an increasingly violent and deranged Left appears more determined than ever to shut down all conservative presence on campuses — completely. Their favorite words are now fascist, Nazi, neo-Nazi, and white supremacist.

I guess racism, sexism and homophobia are losing their force. Too many people now see through those.

Richard Spencer, credited with coining the phrase alt-right, was doing an interview in Washington on Inauguration weekend when someone lurched out of the crowd and sucker-punched him in the face — on video, no less!

And again, a loudmouthed celebrity, covered by mainstream media, calls for what would amount to a military coup against the Trump administration — not exclusively in response to Donald Trump’s attempt to protect America’s borders. One need only reflect on the irony: the Left went ballistic when, late in the final Presidential Debate, Trump hesitated to say he would automatically accept the results of a Hillary Clinton victory.

The Left is refusing to accept the Trump victory, and its militancy is getting increasingly dangerous. A journalist and writer I once respected, Chris Hedges, author of the very good War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning (2002), now goes into a weekly torrent of hysterics. In his latest, he calls for resistance to make America ungovernable. He calls for nonviolence, as if not realizing either that the Left already crossed that bridge, or that protesters don’t have to engage in open violence to endanger innocent people’s lives when, e.g., they are obstructing highways as they’ve done for the past year now.

Now I’d be the first to admit that Trump’s executive order of Friday, January 27, could have been planned better, e.g., written to exempt green card holders, employees of the U.S. government traveling with passports from the affected nations, and others with permanent residency in the U.S. whom, one can presume, have gone through a rigorous vetting process. Had I been Trump, I would have issued a preliminary statement that the order was coming and given as many people as possible it would likely affect sufficient time to get their ducks in a row. But that’s just me. I think executive orders are, at best, blunt instruments. Trump hardly invented the executive order as a means of governing. I’m not sure a more nuanced and careful approach would have made the slightest difference to the angry, violent Left, though.

I’ve mentioned survivalist writer Brandon Smith’s view that Left and Right are being orchestrated into a head-on violent confrontation. He writes, “Instead of admitting that their ideology is a failure in every respect, [the Left is] doubling down. When this evolution is complete, the Left WILL resort to direct violent action on a larger scale, and they will do so with a clear conscience because, in their minds, they are fighting fascism. Ironically, it will be this behavior by leftists that may actually push conservatives towards a fascist model. Conservatives may decide to fight crazy with more crazy.” As if to confirm Smith’s fears, some idiot Social Justice Warrior threatened this. If he or his buddies actually went through with it, President Trump might see little choice except to send in Homeland Security to deal with the problem. I doubt they would hesitate to use deadly force.

Trump would then be playing into the hands of the globalists just as the Left has been doing. Smith continues, “If under Trump conservatives fall to temptation and exploit the ‘ring of power’ that is government to exert dominance in the name of stopping the Left, then they will ultimately be destroyed as well. In this case history will not remember conservatives as freedom fighters rebelling against globalist machinations, but as evil ‘populists’ that caused global economic collapse and the re-establishment of the institution of fascism. The globalists can swoop in after the dust has settled and use the American collapse fable as a story to tell children for the next century. A reminder that nationalism and sovereignty are harbingers of war and death.”

You see, not all of us are sure about all that Trump is doing. Smith believes he was the globalists’ choice all along. His reasoning is not implausible. Is he “draining the swamp”? Nomi Prins, former banking analyst and strategist turned author of It Takes a Pillage: Behind the Bonuses, Bailouts, and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street (2009) and All the President’s Bankers (2014), believes the number of Goldman Sachs people in Trump’s administration is more than a mere cause for concern. Prins advocates something Trump has not to my knowledge mentioned: reinstating Glass-Steagall, which would restore the separation between commercial and investment banking. Others on Trump’s cabinet such as billionaire Rex Tillerson (former Exxon/Mobil CEO) are accustomed to getting what they want through top-down decrees. Someone better tell him, what might have kept his employees in line won’t work with the Chinese, and that he needs to not treat them like adolescent school boys needing to be told how to behave.

There may be the need, that is, for a credible critical stance — a credible “Trumpism” other than Donald Trump and his administration: critical of globalism, favorable towards sensible border security, but better thought-out and articulated, and taking note of the things Trump is ignoring or deeming unimportant. I attempted a possible beginning for such a project here (though I must credit the writer who called himself Publius Decius Mus and essays such as this for inspiration).

I stated in my earlier article that Trump’s number one enemies are the globalists, not the Left. The present-day Left, in the U.S. at least, couldn’t tie its collective shoelaces without Soros money or cushy academic positions.

The U.S. national debt, as I write, is $19.97 trillion. Total U.S. indebtedness including unfunded liabilities is, according to some estimates, over ten times that. To the best of my knowledge, Trump has said nothing about this looming debt bomb. He can’t possibly not know about it. I am sure Steve Bannon knows about it. He strikes me as a bright guy. If you factor in the even larger derivatives bubble (larger still; its the exact size appears to depend on whom you consult), we are literally sitting atop the largest set of asset bubbles in world history. Much of what even Trump is planning presupposes that the bubble will last. The problem is, they never do. They always pop sooner or later. Or are popped, when the truly powerful prick them. Something they are quite capable of, as soon as more “populists” are elected (Brandon Smith again).

Marine Le Pen in France who has launched her campaign for the Presidency there as an attack on globalization, radical Islamism, and on calling for a referendum on France’s remaining in the EU. I think she will win. So, I believe, will Geert Wilder, her counterpart in the Netherlands.

The real question: are “populists” being set up to take the fall when the superelite pops the bubble they created?

There is more than a ghost of a chance that we will know before the end of this year! That we will know within four years is probably a given!

The Left is completely unaware of this, of course. Like five-year-olds having temper tantrums when their parents won’t let them play in the street, they have no sense of the real danger. What they have is visibility, due to money, popularity, and the sort of sensationalism that wins visibility these days.

Those of us who are aware of the danger are consigned to Facebook (where we are at the mercy of “algorithms” that weed out unwanted information, so that it simply never appears in newsfeeds), blogs, and sites like this one that may get some Web traffic but ultimately not enough to make a difference. Sad. Truly sad.

© 2017 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

SALLY YATES’ MISTAKE
There is an honorable way to dissent from the President’s directives and a dishonorable way. The former Acting Attorney General, Sally Yates, chose the dishonorable way. In addition, she professed an erroneous legal opinion as the basis for her action.

On January 30, President Donald Trump fired Acting Attorney General Yates after she publicly and loudly condemned his Executive Order on immigration, explained that she would not defend the order in Court, and invited other Justice Department attorneys to follow her example.

There is another way to handle dissent from the President when you are in the employ of the Executive Branch. That way involves honor. It is the route pursued by former Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus on October 20, 1973, when then President Richard Nixon ordered Attorney General Richardson and then Deputy Attorney General Ruckelshaus to fire the Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox. Nixon acted to keep from disclosure evidence that he had engaged in a cover-up of the Watergate break-in. Faced with a directive from the President that Richardson and Ruckelshaus could not in good conscience and law follow, they resigned one after the other.

Were Yates possessed of comparable honor, she would have voiced her dissent in private to the President and then offered her resignation. Instead, she chose to become a political opponent of the President and attempt a revolt within the Justice Department to the President’s immigration Executive Order. That is reprehensible for an officer of the law. Her proper resort was to resign, not hold her position and subvert the will of the President.

The comparison with Watergate falls apart when the focus turns to the merits of the two situations. Watergate was at root a petty burglary for political ends. It was outrageous, to be sure, because it involved illegal conduct authorized by the President’s men and operatives hired by them with campaign funds and because it involved a cover-up of illegality by the President himself, which could well — in its manifestations of obstruction of justice and subornation of perjury — fall within the impeachable “high crimes and misdemeanors” of Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. But Nixon resigned before he could be tried, and President Ford famously pardoned him.

President Trump’s Executive Order on immigration is, however, far from an unprecedented or illegal act. Since at least the Alien Act of 1798, the President of the United States has imposed country specific bans on immigration and has compelled the deportation of foreign citizens. Indeed, use of country specific immigration bans to protect national security is far more common than the howls of protests from the Left would lead you to believe.

The plenary powers of the President in field of foreign affairs under Article II are well recognized. As part of his authority as Commander-in-Chief, the President may identify countries of the world containing individuals who pose a threat to the lives, liberties, and properties of Americans. He can then use a ban on immigration and on imports from those countries as a means to protect American interests.

In the present case, President Trump determined (based on civil and military intelligence obtained by the prior Administration) that citizens of seven countries could not be adequately vetted to determine whether they were, or were aligned with, those who are intent on killing Americans. He found that information hopelessly deficient in the case of Syria and, so, instituted a permanent ban on emigration from that country. He found six others to warrant a 90 day ban on emigration to the United States, including Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Given the amount of radical Islamic terrorist activity arising in and exported from those countries, the decision was prudent. The duration of the ban provides a short window within which the Administration can improve the vetting of citizens from those countries. In short, the action was reasonable given the circumstances.

Undoubtedly exceptions arise (as in the case of those citizens of the restricted countries who are dedicated servants of the American military and intelligence services) and, so, there will need to be case by case exceptions. It is as to these exceptions, which are on the periphery of the Executive Order, that the order, like all orders of this kind, requires case by case evaluation.

But the need for tinkering at the edges through careful vetting to see if individual exceptions are warranted does not diminish the overall national security importance of the measure or in any way diminish the necessity of taking broad protective measures to guard against radical Islamic terrorists reaching the United States.

Former Attorney General Yates’ response, like that of Senator Charles Schumer and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, is one of over-reaction, entailing both misrepresentation of the order and exaggeration of its nature and effects. That overreaction is grossly irresponsible because it invites elimination of an Executive Order that provides protection for the American people. To his great credit, President Trump shows not the slightest interest in altering the order to accommodate the loud complaints from his Democratic opponents or from disconcerted Republicans.

Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.

© 2017 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, you know, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to getting the thing to pass. —Jonathan Gruber, an architect of the Affordable Care Act, on the passage of Obamacare.

In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. —Voltaire (1764)

This article is about escaping the horrid results of Obamacare, and the pain it has already caused, and is still causing. It is also an inside look of just what has happened to families like mine because of government control of the medical industry. The cost of healthcare has increased exponentially in 2017, especially for middle America, while the availability has decreased at the same rate.

Obamacare has given us deductibles that are impossible to reach! Was the goal to rid the country of the baby boomers by destroying their ability to afford healthcare? One wonders because of the obvious wealth redistribution.

It is why we need your help President Trump, and we need it now.

Destroying Free Market Healthcare

In my previous article on Obamacare, I went back to the core of how this entire rotten takeover of healthcare was initiated by our own government starting in 1910. The powers that be knew that with the first “black president” in our White House, the takeover of 20% of our economy could easily happen, and it did. The Republicans all voted against it, which they tout every time it’s mentioned, but what they don’t tell you is that when they had an opportunity to defund it, they refused. All the political promises of repealing this albatross went by the wayside once they were re-elected. 

Thus, what Americans now have is the world’s most expensive, most bureaucratic, and arguably least functional health care system. This system cannot be “reformed.” It can only be escaped from, until its dysfunction in the face of superior alternatives (i.e. the free market system of a representative Republic) collapses it.

It will require a paradigm shift of major proportions, especially in this age of entitlements, dependences, and a population that can’t think without a book of rules to follow because they’ve been so dumbed down for the last 50 years. We cannot simply “repeal and replace” Obamacare. We need a different way of thinking about public health, and it has to be under the heading of free enterprise, allowing the market to dictate rather than the government.

The fact that our President wishes to replace it makes me crazy. Why replace it? Health care is not a right. Progressives have pushed these so-called positive rights on all Americans, and they do not exist in our founding documents. These positive rights are enumerated by none other than the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights which claims that everyone has a right to health care. Horse hockey! Our nation was once one of personal and individual responsibility, not this communal leveling of the playing field where everyone is equally poor except for the ruling elite.

Of course, there’s no such thing as free health care. The government has no money of its own which means that it cannot “give” anyone health care without first taking away something from someone else, and that’s us, the working and now shrinking middleclass taxpayer! We pay, and we pay, and we pay.

Social Security and Medicare

Are Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid sanctioned by our Constitution? Not on your life! Again, it is government control of segments of the population. However, let’s make something crystal clear. When the politicos of DC and our state legislators talk about entitlements and include Social Security and Medicare, they are wrong! Neither are entitlements! We have paid into both all our working lives. 

Roosevelt gave us Social Security in August of 1935, and everyone who worked after that date has paid into it all their lives. In July 1965, under the leadership of President Lyndon Johnson, Congress enacted Medicare under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide health insurance to people age 65 and older, regardless of income or medical history, and since then, we’ve paid into it!

This isn’t government aid, this is money we gave the government, and they should give back. Why do you think there have been no increases in Social Security for four years? Because we’re supporting more than 20% of the population, legal and illegal in true welfare programs. Let’s look at what they are without including the boondoggle of Obamacare costs to the middleclass taxpayer.

Real Entitlements

participation in six major welfare programs from 2009 to 2012, which were:

Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) better known as food stamps, Housing Assistance, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance to Needy Family’s (TANF) which is cash benefits, and general assistance. 

Their report however, doesn’t discuss other kinds of support that people might receive, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit, free school lunches, the Women, Infants, Children Nutrition (WIC program), Head Start, energy assistance programs, and Pell Grants. While it doesn’t capture the full spectrum of welfare in the U.S., the results still provide a clearer picture of who is receiving public assistance, and it sure isn’t the middleclass.

Check out the cost of welfare for immigrant and native householdsby the Center for Immigration Studies.

Ours is a system that’s rife with abuse and which discourages people from making responsible decisions. Whatever your take on welfare, there’s no denying that these programs to help the poor cost a lot of money, and are riddled with fraud and corruption. I’m not against helping the truly needy, but I want to stop all those who are gaming the system, and I believe our new President understands that.

The Middleclass Cheated Again

Socialists like Obama and Hillary think only of the masses, not an individual’s personal rights. Their beliefs are anathema to the freedoms granted by God in our Constitution’s representative republic. Yes, we’re a republic, not a democracy, and there’s a big difference! These elitists think only of the votes they garner from their welfare recipients, not those of us who are the grassroots and backbone of America’s middleclass society.

As an adult, I have always been part of the middleclass. I have worked since I was 12 years old. After marrying, I worked a full-time job and often had a part-time job on the side. Many of my readers will echo the same story. We were taught to work to attain the needs for our family, and our work ethic was top of the line. 

As a young woman, I received healthcare in all my jobs, and rarely used any of it other than for my daughter and our yearly checkups. However, the costs back in the early 70s were negligible. The employers paid nearly everything, and rarely do young people even think about healthcare, much less use it. This is the reason so many chose to pay the fines rather than the higher fees for Obamacare.

Changes in Healthcare

When my husband and I moved to Knoxville in 1987, his company insurance was pretty much fully funded. Our deductible was $250.00 a person and prescriptions were three to five dollars. Insurance back then paid nearly the entire cost of care, unlike today where they pay only 70% after you’ve met the huge deductible.

What a difference 30 years makes, especially with Obamacare. As costs rose, first came the Flexible Spending Arrangement or Flex Plan (part of Government Cafeteria plans). This was adopted where tax free monies could be put aside from an employee’s paycheck to cover costs not covered by insurance, up to $5,500 at the employer’s discretion, with a carryover into the next year for a short period of time. We took the full $4,000 per year the company allowed, and it worked well for several years. A portion was deducted from each paycheck to cover the Flex Plan. 

With the inception of Obamacare, the law changed the allowable Flex Plan to a maximum $2,500. This meant that we paid more out of taxable monies for healthcare costs not covered by insurance, but our healthcare still wasn’t too bad, as the deductible was $1,000 per person, and the payout 70/30 after that.

Big Changes in 2017

We all knew from research that in 2017, after Obama left office, the rules of the Affordable Health Care Act (what an oxymoron) would drastically change, affecting higher costs not only to individuals but to employers, and especially to middleclass Americans. This is another reason Donald J. Trump was elected. 

This year for us, the deductible through employer is $4,000 per person for in-network and $6,000 deductible for out-of-network. Flex Plans would not cover the deductible, so an HSA is a better choice. HSA is a Health Savings Account, and is also tax free monies like the Flex Plan. Anyone can put monies into the HSA, and employers may fully fund it for their employees, if they’re flush enough to afford it. Between my husband’s employer and us, we were allowed to put in $7,750 for 2016. We were forced to take an insurance payout of $6,500 that would have been taxable, so we dumped it into the HSA to cover the deductible, otherwise there would only be the $1,250 employer donation in our HSA.

The entire problem with high deductibles at our ages is that you must have the funds to put into an HSA in order to have the tax-free cash to pay the costs until you meet the deductible. Many folks are on fixed incomes, and everything increases yearly except their incomes. For four years, Social Security recipients haven’t had an increase despite costs rising. Yet, our congress critters get a 10% raise every year, unless…get this…they vote against it. Nice how they make these laws for themselves, isn’t it. And remember, they are exempt from Obamacare and have the Cadillac of healthcare plans.

In order to plan for next year, not only has the cost of healthcare through my husband’s company risen, which is deducted from the paycheck, but we have to take an additional $250.00 per paycheck to put into savings for next year’s HSA which will hopefully cover deductible, that’s if the deductible doesn’t go up again.

Obamacare has not only hurt American workers, but the strain on employers to cover these rapidly increasing costs and still insure their employees is another knife in the back of small businesses. 

Wealth Redistribution

There are many in America, including illegal aliens who are receiving many benefits from our government, paid for by taxpayer’s dollars. Yet, those of us who have worked all our lives are stretched to the limit trying to afford health care in our later years.

The Republicans in Congress claimed they had a plan ready to repeal Obamacare, and still give options to those who signed up for it. Yet, now we hear it may take longer. For us, this means we will basically have no health care because of the cost and deductibles.

The real end result is the fact that working middleclass Americans are getting royally screwed once again. Monies which could have been spent on vacations and purchases which would have helped the economy, are now being held back because we need it for medical costs. At this time in our lives we expected to have more to spend, but our government has seen to it that we have less.

Mr. President, repeal Obamacare now. Let the free market work. Remember, healthcare is not a right. Wealth redistribution is the name of this entire game. We are paying more, and receiving less, while welfare recipients and illegals get their care free, and our representative republic is ignoring us.

President Trump, we’re counting on you!

“Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.” —James 5:1-2 (KJV)

Those of us who are of a Judeo-Christian upbringing have had our eyes opened as to what is happening in our world. We have been called all kinds of names for our efforts in research to show the world the truth.

The men and women responsible for all the turmoil, division and pure ugliness in our world today want the total power that was once given to God. Not the God of Muhammad who states through the Quran that all should die who do not believe as they do, but our God of forgiveness who has never asked his followers to murder anyone just because they don’t believe in him.

Our world is now filled with those who worship Satan/Lucifer believing that is the way to the power and the control they so crave. Their largest target in this has been our children through education. I can show you document after document that clearly states that fact and no I am not going to once again provide you the links to those documents – stop being lazy and go find them yourselves.

I am tired of pandering to the lazy, self-absorbed people who rely on others to do their work for them and then if it doesn’t fit neatly into their pocket, they call us names and defy what has been presented.

Parents today are the laziest – especially with kids having kids. The family structure is broken down and as long as someone else is willing to take care of your kids – you’re happy. Meanwhile, Satan lurks in the corners providing the sins of the world and telling them it is ok.

If you needed proof of what I am saying, the recent Women’s March on Inauguration Day should give it to you.

We have satanic prayers being said at city and county council meeting because they are afraid they will be sued. Why would they be sued, Satanism has never been recognized as a religion and why aren’t you willing to stand up for your rights? You continue to give them away and then wonder why the world is walking all over you.

Now we have after school Satanic based clubs put on by Satanic men and women asking to be allowed to form in your schools. We have leaders of the Satanic Temple in Salem, Mass of all places gathering in a Victorian mansion plotting to bring their message to our kids in public schools around the country. Giving a hint as to their true focus and foe, they are aiming at the schools which host evangelical “Good News Clubs” once again using “separation of church and state” as their legal grounds when there is no such thing.

Doug Mesner, who goes by the professional name Lucien Greaves, is co-founder and spokesman for the Satanic Temple. They point out that Christian evangelical groups already have infiltrated the lives of America’s children through after-school religious programming in public schools, and they appear determined to give young students a choice: Jesus or Satan.

Mesner stated, “It’s critical that children understand that there are multiple perspectives on all issues, and that they have a choice in how they think. Really? WHERE ARE THE PARENTS?

All this because of a 2001 ruling by the Supreme Court stating that “excluding an after school program of religious views amounted to a violation of free-speech rights”. Given it was the Liberty Council which led the law suit, Mesner “thanks the Liberty Council for opening the doors to the After School Satan Clubs through their dedication to religious liberty”.

I would like to remind Mr. Mesner that Satanism has never been addressed or considered as a religion, but a philosophy or mindset having claimed they “don’t” worship Satan but are actually atheists. But now Mr. Mesner is going to refer to his clubs purpose as religious to be in line with the Supreme Court ruling.

I don’t know about you but in my world a young child does not have any choice in these matters except between right and wrong and it is the parents place to teach that – not a Satan worshipping group or a change agent teacher. This goal of separating our children from the family structure is destroying this country and the world.

I was always under the impression that as long as you lived under the roof of your parents who were feeding and clothing you, you followed their rules. Once you are on your own, then you have the right and choice to make your own decisions – those of right and wrong.

Once again they are bringing “separation of church and state” one of the most emotional and controversial subjects of our land into the discussion and I defy them to find that wording in the Constitution or any other founding documents.

The Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” and it gives 2 very clear statements.

The control or destruction of Judeo-Christian beliefs has been around for a long time and has taken on a stronger force with the increased push for a liberal world of “everything and anything goes” even if it goes against your beliefs and rights because “YOU” don’t count.

Since our schools and courts have decided to follow the 45 goals of the Communist Manifesto we are now traveling a road our Founders never intended to follow. But those choosing to follow Satan have already laid out the plans in the Manifesto for the destruction of our world to create theirs.

There is to be no coexistence – it is to be total control.

But you see, this helps them endorse their premise the “constitution is outdated, antiquated and the groundwork laid out by our founding fathers is to no longer apply”. Really! The Founders groundwork has carried this country for over 200 years until the very larger than life “money men” who follow no religion but the Lucifer of money have decided they want it their way.

Prophecy has predicted it; the Founders warned of it; the money hungry monsters of the world are doing it and middle and lower income Americans are in their way.

“Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.” James 5:3 (KJV)

Our Founders knew tyranny – they had lived it and when they came to this country in the name of religious liberty and freedom they established charter government’s and these charters were to make sure they were never prevented from practicing their religion again. Also put in place were “test acts’ which are the “oaths” a person is expected to take before taking any office in government.

Look up the Baptist minister John Leland who met with Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and explained his fear that the protection of religious liberty was not being properly addressed. This was in regard to all religions. Leland struck a deal with the two men that he would represent Virginia at the Constitutional Convention if they would make sure the religious liberties were protected and they did – in the Bill of Rights.

At times Americans question taxation and the right of the government to tax. At this same time some of the founders wanted to pass a bill establishing taxation to pay for Christian teachers. Jefferson and Madison were adamantly opposed to this measure stating they felt “taxation” was a direct assault on the religious liberty they had fought so hard to protect.

Our founders knew that whatever in government they taxed they would have an obligation to regulate it. As with the example of the Christian teachers, if they taxed them they would have become employees of the government and what the government employs it also dictates to.

And here we are – with plenty of taxes and the laws regulating them.

This is the best example I can give you as to the danger behind vouchers begin used for religious schools. Once a religious school of any kind takes one penny from the Federal government they are no longer private and will be under regulation of the government.

Are we now to give that liberty over to God’s bad angel Satan who has never followed the rules, but wanted his own and he now wishes to rein over our children with no protection?

The “After School Satan Club” they say will be actually presenting a “curriculum” emphasizing the development of reasoning and social skills. The group says meetings will include a healthful snack, literature lesson, creative learning activities, a science lesson, puzzle solving and an art project. Every child will receive a membership card and must have a signed parental­ permission slip to attend.

I am not as concerned as to the curriculum they state they are going to be presenting by their flyers, but what is going to be coming from their forked tongues.

And now we have come full circle and are back to the parents. What is the duty of a parent remembering that our children are a gift from God and they are his possession given over to us as a “loan” so to speak? We have been given the task of raising them up from a state of complete dependence to a state of complete independence so that we can release them to God by the time they reach maturity.

The fault of our children to not have the Lord in their lives and family in their heart falls squarely on the parents. It is not stated any better than in Proverbs 22:6 – “Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”

Many parents have so disconnected from their children’s lives as to allow them, as directed by the government, to be in the hands of strangers 9 ½ months of the year, five days a week for 6-7 hours a day knowing absolutely nothing about the people feeding their minds.

Why have parents allowed their schools to become United Nations schools using United Nations curriculums? To be placed in International Baccalaurate schools? Gulen Charter schools – why would you put your child in a Muslim school if you aren’t Muslim?

What do you know about these schools, the people running them or the actual curriculum being taught? Why have we allowed our elected school boards to go along with the indoctrination of our children and for what – a pay check? Power? Control?

Do I have to once again remind you of the speech the former General Counsel Bob Chanin of the NEA gave when speaking at their convention? He stated, “In my opinion, the NEA and its affiliates are such effective advocates. Despite what some among us might like to believe, it is NOT because of our creative ideas; it is NOT because of the merit of our positions; it is NOT because we care about children; and it is NOT because of a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have POWER and we have POWER because there are more than 3.2M people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them. The unions that can best protect the rights and advance their interests as education employees.” [YouTube Video]

Parents, unless you are willing to turn all responsibility to whom your children are to become over to strangers, it is certainly the time to know fully what is happening within the school your child attends. Better still home school or form a home school coalition and you will have a much better handle on who and what is bringing your child up and molding his/her mind for the rest of their lives.

When there is a will there is a way!

© 2017 Diane Kepus – All Rights Reserved

She is an ordinary looking woman who would not stand out in a crowd. She is unassuming, quiet and goes about her business without flair. Yet strangers who never met her will approach her on the street to reveal their innermost thoughts. Indeed they feel they MUST talk to her…a woman they had never met, nor did they even know her name.

It is not her beauty even though she is attractive, nor the way she dresses which is simple but tasteful. She does have something within her that cannot escape the attention of everyone who gets even just a glimpse of her….or even sees her in the distance.

Priscilla Martinez is a devoted Christian who carries the earned title, Chaplain. Her love of God is so resilient that it radiates from her, and like a magnet pulls people to her. Here is an extraordinary case of someone being so genuinely filled with The Holy Spirit that people MUST come to her.

There is a reason for this as explained in John 12:32: Jesus said, “If you lift me up, I will draw all men to myself,” or as some translations say, “I will draw all people toward me.” If any individual lifts up Jesus in their lives, he will draw all people toward Him, meaning that when He resides in those who lift him up people will be drawn to that person.

That Scripture has also been interpreted to say, “If you lift me up, I will draw all men unto thee.” In any translation this shows that people will be drawn toward those who lift up Jesus in their hearts and in their lives. And so it is with Chaplain Priscilla Martinez.

One example happened not long ago on a street in Brentwood, California. While walking down the sidewalk a woman crossed to her side of the walk and told her about a friend of hers who was at that moment dying in a hospital (Kaiser-Antioch). Her friend was in the emergency room and asked Chaplain Priscilla (the other woman did not know she was a chaplain) if she would go to see her.

Again, this woman knew nothing about her but felt compelled to go to her on that street. Chaplain Priscilla said, “I will go immediately.” And that she did. She went straight to the emergency room, went inside and could hear the woman screaming as she flailed uncontrollably in her bed. Her distressed family was in the room with her.

When Chaplain Priscilla went in they asked who she was. She told them. Then they asked her why she was there. “To pray with your mother,” she answered. A son in the family arrogantly got in Priscilla’s face and said, “And what is that going to do? First of all, we are atheists.” “I was asked to come,” the chaplain stated firmly. The family walked out of the room to the waiting room, leaving Chaplain Priscilla alone with their mother, who was still screaming and flailing.

As this anointed woman of God began to pray for this very ill and agitated patient, she gradually stopped screaming, came to her senses and suddenly was at peace. Chaplain Priscilla stayed only a few more minutes, then took her leave.

Going to the elevator she saw the family in the glassed in waiting room and nodded her head that she was leaving. They immediately got up to go to their mother’s room and to their astonishment, found her comfortable and peaceful.

While Chaplain Priscilla was still waiting for the elevator (God’s timing) the son rushed back out of the room and said to Priscilla, “What shot did they give her?”

“Oh they didn’t give her any shot.”

“Then what happened to her?”

“She got prayed for,” Chaplain Priscilla answered calmly just as the elevator door opened, she got in, the door closed and she was on her way. This certainly gave that atheist family something to think about.

Seeing her success, some would think her life was working out for her because she was raised with privileges without any of the life struggles that most of them encounter. Indeed many non-achievers who have experienced rejection and other difficulties believe this about anyone who is successful. How wrong they are. Chaplain Priscilla has dealt with struggles like everyone else including the worst kind of heart ache and health problems, probably more than most.

She once had been a very successful real estate agent with high-end properties and had accumulated a sizable nest egg. Her health began to decline, and then, the most heart wrenching of all, her husband committed suicide. Another member of her family had earlier been put on suicide watch. Her savings dwindled to practically nothing. She was devastated.

She began attending a church where I was on the pastoral staff and she gave herself totally to God, became very active in the church and began teaching Bible classes. Something radiated throughout her indicating that she had been set apart for God’s service.

She felt strengthened by the church and enrolled in my chaplain’s training program. After several weeks of course work and joining me on the spur of a moment to take part in crisis situations, the final exercise before being certified was to take place at a military Stand Down. Homeless veterans are bused in to a makeshift army camp set up on a fairgrounds for four days where counseling is provided by the chaplains in training.

She was loved by the veterans and especially related to the women vets. She was limping. When asked about it she fluffed it off saying she would be seeing a doctor when the Stand Down was over. That foot appeared to be very painful during that last day, yet she would go nowhere until that requirement had been fulfilled completely. Then, I would learn later, the next day after the stand down ended, she had surgery on her foot. She is a fiercely dedicated woman.

She became a chaplain for Shepherd’s Gate, a shelter for battered women. She even went to court with them when they were to confront the husband who had mistreated them. Most were terrified of having to face the brutal man they had married. Chaplain Priscilla was right there with each woman and brought such calm to the entire court room that one official stated to her, “We need more people like you in this courtroom.”

When I left California, I put her in charge of the chaplain’s training program. She became a member of His Presence Church in Brentwood (Pastor Felix Golden) where she trained her first chaplains. Her first graduating class brought us 21 new chaplains. I was there to speak and present the certificates. All of her chaplains have full time chaplaincies. One colorful African young woman became the chaplain of…now get this…the wives and families of the Golden State Warriors. They all have been placed.

It took a long time for her to get over the unexpected death of her husband but would much later meet and marry Hector Martinez, a very good man who is so proud of her, watches her fulfill her ministry including weddings, dedications and funerals along with speaking engagements. He supports her totally and watches her in awe as she carries out her duties.

There is so much more to the story of this remarkable woman whom you will never forget from the moment you first meet her. She has expanded the chaplaincy program and added to the curriculum. She is constantly on the go to minister to those who need her. What a blessing she is to everyone she encounters. She is truly a gift from God.

Photo Caption: Chaplain Priscilla Martinez
Photo Credit: Private Photo

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reserved

=We live in a day when God’s Law is Considered a Strange Thing—Hosea 8:12 “I have written for him the great things of My Law, But they are considered a strange thing.” As I was reading Hosea this verse jumped out at me as descriptive of our day. God’s Law is great, in fact it is the supreme Law of the Universe and He has given it to us in writing. But today when you speak of the great things of God’s Law many people including many who say they are Christians consider God’s Law a strange thing. Indeed it is as if the world is turned upside down and every thing God identifies in His Word as right is now considered wrong and what is wrong is now considered right.

Think for example what God’s law states is the purpose of civil govern-ment in Romans 13:4 “For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.”

Does the civil government actually do this? 86,000 illegal aliens who have committed crimes and then been convicted of those crimes in America were released on the streets of our land. Thousands of those went on to commit additional crimes. In 2015, 196 of these criminals were convicted of homicide, and ICE released them back on the streets rather than deporting them. In that same year ICE released 19,723 aliens with a combined 64,197 convictions, 934 sex offenses and 804 robberies, 216 kidnapping and 196 homicide related offenses.[1]

These are people who broke the law breaking into our country, proceeded to commit and be convicted of some very serious crimes but then the government released these criminals back on the the streets of America to commit more crimes. In other words our government did the opposite of what God’s Law tells us that civil government is supposed to do. Could we call it lawlessness? Government lawlessness?

Then along comes President Trump who establishes a temporary restric-tion on people coming into our land. The reaction has been interesting to watch – protests, violent demonstrations and the whole leftist media-academia screaming that Trump is breaking the law with his executive order regarding immigration. Now it is true that the President has no ability to make law, his job is only to see that the laws are faithfully enforced as our Constitution clearly states. So was Trump making law from the Oval Office?

I did a bit of digging to see the existing immigration law in America. There are elements of the McCarren – Walters Act of 1952 that were not amended by the 1965 Act or other subsequent Acts, and therefore are still the law of the land. Specifically the McCarren – Walters Act “allowed the government to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in subversive activities and also allowed the barring of suspected subversives from entering the country. It was used to bar members and former members and “fellow travelers” of the Communist Party from entry into the United States, even those who had not been associated with the party for decades.”[2]

This is the basis it seems that Carter used against the Iranians during the Iranian hostage crisis when he deported nearly 15,000 and banned others from entry into the country. If we under-stand that Mohammedans from those seven countries pose this same type of threat today, the Executive Order appears to me to be simply enforcing this aspect of the McCarren – Walters Act which is still the law of the land today. And that law comports with God’s Law which is the supreme law of the universe. What we see clearly is that God’s standard, His perfect Law is rejected by the “wise of this world.”

True leadership in any area of life is leadership which walks in accordance with God’s Law. The kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ is the only everlasting Kingdom which exists. It will conquer all.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

One of the things that our politicians have bought into is that our planet is over populated. The only way I can look at this is I don’t believe that God created something that was going to careen out of control and put every living beings life in jeopardy. That’s not the God I serve. So when some foolish scientist or politician tells me we have to cut back the population of the world I have to give him//her the look of what planet are you from.

Many people believe that planet Earth can only sustain a population of about 500,000. Really? That’s less than 200,000 more that the population of the United States! This kind of insane talk has been around for almost 90 years. But in the third field that Keynes proposed, state regulation remains as taboo today as it was 87 years ago. “The time has already come,” he wrote, “when each country needs a considered national policy about what size of population, whether larger or smaller than at present or the same, is most expedient.”

Keynes merely asserted his point. Professors Emmott and Dorling make their cases in more detail, and in doing so they exemplify the two approaches to the population question that have dominated this debate for centuries.

Emmott takes the natural scientists’ approach—the perspective of biologists, chemists, and physicists (though one that originated, ironically enough, with Robert Malthus—one of the fathers of modern economics). It sees the growth of human population, like that of other living things, as being constrained by the carrying capacity of the ecosystem: A physical limit defined by the scarce availability of natural resources.

Dorling, on the other hand, takes the social scientists’ approach—the way of geographers, economists, and anthropologists. This sees population growth as determined by political, social, and economic factors, rather than physical conditions.

At one level, the natural scientists’ approach is correct. There must be some physical limit to the number of human beings that can be sustained by the earth. In practice, however, the social scientists’ approach is the more relevant one. Human beings live in society and for many millennia now the binding constraints on population growth have been not physical but social and political. Famines, as Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen demonstrated, are generally the result of political failures, not natural causes.[1]

The disgusting thing about this is the only way to reach the goals they have set is to eliminate people! All this is part of Agenda 21 or what they have renamed 2030. Sustainability, population control in other words, control everything that we do, eat, what medications we can have, how we can live, where we can live and so on. Understand this, All of earth’s population will fit in Texas with the density of Paris.! We are in no way even beginning to over populate this planet. What they are attempting is nothing more than total control of every man, woman and child on the Earth.

Bill Gates has dumped hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccines because he believes that it is the best way to help control population. In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, “probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero.”

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number — P (for People) — might be reduced. He says:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”[2] Believe me he is not talking about extending lives with the vaccines nor is he talking about keeping people healthy for reproducing. His plan is as sinister as it gets. He was a seemingly nice guy in the first half of his life. An average American who made his fortune by selling hardware and software worth of billions, becoming a worldwide icon and a living example of the American Dream.

But, in the second half of his life, he teamed up with the world’s “elite” in an attempt to reduce the world’s population by billions… and he means business!

He soon became one of the most infamous depopulation activists, lecturing on genocidal vaccines, conducting vaccination campaigns that crippled and killed countless people in the third world countries, designing GMO mosquitoes that could carry and inject deadly viruses, and he’s constantly finding new methods of achieving his sick plans.[3]

Gates is not the only one with this mindset: Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing. – David Brower (Sierra Club)

A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion. At a more frugal European standard of living two to three billion would be possible. – United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment. This is just scratching the surface of the elites attempt to depopulate planet Earth.

Another thing the elites and our politicians have bought into is that the free market system is unsustainable, unfair and must be stopped in order to sustain life on the planet. Now you can understand all the new regulations Obama initiated, an astounding 65 a day everyday he was in office, stifling small businesses and raising the cost of operating a business so that it is not.
Keep in mind that virtually all Democrats in Congress are globalists, 70 of them are card carrying members of the Communist Party USA. Private industry is not something that they approve of because it is too hard to control. On May 22, 2008 Maxine Waters let it slip that “This Liberal Would

Be All About Taking Over The Oil Companies”[4] Why did she say that?
They refused to allow Congress to control them in the manner that Democrats wanted that control. Obama tried to nationalize the health industry, he put the government in charge of ‘rebuilding’ the auto industry and they have done their level best to attain complete control of the energy industry. Can you see now why they are so upset at Donald Trump? He will dismantle almost all of their infrastructure and they will have to start all over again. Hillary would have sealed the deal and destroyed America as we know it. Redistribution of wealth is behind every policy that comes out of the UN. The EPA is the attack dog to shut down entire industries such as the coal industry.

Difficult to operate a manufacturing business in US, impossible to start a new one. “0” economic growth advocated at 2012 Economic Summit. Rebuilding of roads and other infrastructure discouraged so as to not ‘ disrupt the well ordered society”. We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects.

We must reclaim the roads and plowed lands, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land. – David Foreman (earth First) They’ve done this in California and it has made the drought they are in worse.

Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of morality control. – Professor Maurice King (Population Control Advocate)

We believe planning should be a tool for allocating resources . . . and eliminating the greatest inequalities of wealth and power in our society . . . because the free market has proven itself incapable of doing this. – Plannersnetwork.org Statement of Principles. The American Planning Association is a member and supporter of these principles.[5]

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. Too Many people and Population Control.
2. Bill Gates on Vaccines.
3. Bill Gates Foundation.
4. Maxine Water this liberal would be all about taking over the oil companies.
5. [YouTube Video]. 

Being Iranian is defined by a state of mind, not by a place of residence. The barbaric Islamist mullahs and their mercenaries presently ruling Iran are not Iranians. They are Islamofascists who have betrayed their magnificent heritage and have enlisted themselves in the service of a most oppressive, discriminating, and demeaning ideology.

Iranians are proud spiritual descendants of King Cyrus the Great, the author of the first charter of human rights. Some of Cyrus’ children live in the patch of land called Iran. The overwhelming majority—free humans with human beliefs—live in every country, city, and village of the earth.

These world-wide people, one and all, irrespective of nationality, color, or creed are Iranians because they all adhere to the Cyrus Charter; they practice and defend its lofty tenets; and, transfer this precious humanity’s treasure to the next generation.

Unequivocal genetic findings have clearly established that biologically there is only one human race; that the genetic variation within a single troop of chimpanzees, for instance, is greater than that of any two human groupings, no matter how different they may appear physically.

What makes people different is not their biology, but the “software” that runs them. There is ample proof to support the above assertion. A case in point is the present menace posed by the people whose life is programmed by the software of Islam: an ideology anathema to the Cyrus Charter. And the results are self-evident. Hate, superstition, violence, and a raft of other inhuman beliefs drives these religious fascists. These captive followers of the primitive Islamic Charter are both the perpetrators and the victims of much suffering. The result is backward Islamic societies that are intent at dragging the rest of the world into the same sorry state. Misery likes company, it is said.

We recognize that the dysfunctional Islamic software is deeply engrained in the minds of many Muslims who opt to remain in mental bondage rather than purge their minds of the Islamic software and join the rest of the human family with a new emancipating program for life—liberty.

Islamic clergy, the parasitic prime beneficiaries of Islam, are master practitioners of the carrot and stick strategy. By drawing heavily from the Quran and the Hadith, the conniving mullahs and imams have assembled a potent arsenal of threats and promises to keep the faithful in line. They had little trouble in so doing, since Islamic scripture is replete with graphic horrific punishment awaiting the wayward and the unbelievers, while the rewards for the obedient docile, if he is male, are described as endless variety of sensual pleasures. Anyone daring to leave the corral of Islam is apostate and automatically condemned to death. And that’s just for starters. The punishment awaiting the ungrateful deserter of the one and only true path, Islam threatens, is a raft of horrific eternal torment in Allah’s hell.

And for the true faithful—the mindless robot—the promised rewards, all physical pleasures, are infinite and eternal.

In spite of these horrid threats and empty promises, more and more people are beginning to recognize Islam for what it is. It is difficult, but not impossible to leave the fraudulent Islam’s captivity. Hundreds of thousands have done so successfully and have enjoyed the blessings of liberty.

A great threat facing free people is the recently petrodollar energized Islam embarking on a campaign of recruiting more people under its dark banner. Millions of disenfranchised underclasses in the non-Islamic world, and millions more mentally under-developed may flock to Islam, deluded by its empty promises.

Islam is no longer in its own self-made cage. It has broken out and has established powerful presence in much of the non-Islamic world. Islam is a charter of submission. It is a sworn enemy of freedom and views the Cyrus Charter as heresy. Freedom and tyranny are incompatible. Free people must do all they can to preserve their birthright of liberty and assist others to break from the bondage of Islamic captivity.

The interdependent world community faces great challenges that demand a united effort, uncompromisingly based on justice, to meet the various ills it faces. We can no longer be complacent about events in distant world affecting alien people. Distances are bridged and alien people are now diverse members of the human family.

We honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for proclaiming from a Birmingham jail, “Injustice anywhere is threat to justice everywhere.” To demand justice for others, he risked his life, left his native Georgia, and ended in jail of the-then-bigoted south—Birmingham, Alabama. We “Iranians” of the world—free humans—must do no less. We must demand justice for our belief-kin who are suffering under the yoke of Islamofascism in Iran or anywhere in the world.

We also do well to recall the example of an Irish-American President—John F. Kennedy—looking at the Communists’ Wall of Shame in Berlin, proclaiming, “Ich bin ein Berliner”— “I am a Berliner.” By so claiming, he helped rally free people of the world that brought down the wall and created a momentum that eventually swept the totalitarian Communist wall-builders into the dustbin of history.

Now the world is facing wall-builders of a different kind: the Islamofascists who have been at their shameless work for centuries. As their walls built with superstition, discrimination and blood are crumbling; they are intent at building walls in new territories.

But once again, human decency is rising to the challenge. This time in the voice and actions of billions of free people who proclaim: we are also children of Iran in the spirit of Cyrus the Great; “we meet any challenge and pay any price” to defeat Islamofascism; and, we will not rest until humanity is completely free of the despotic rule of Islam.

We Iranians and Iranian-Americans in spirit—free people of the world–greatly cherish liberty, where the mind is imbued with enlightenment, and every individual by the virtue of being born human is afforded measured freedom. It is within the open expanse of liberty that each and every person can be at his or her best. And when the individual person is at his best, humanity is at its best.

© 2016 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

As a severely wounded Vietnam veteran, retired in 1968 as a double leg amputee, the brave men and women who have protected us on active military duty, in the intelligence community, in law enforcement and first responders, have always been uppermost in my mind for their commitment, dedication, and often their ultimate sacrifice in fulfilling a purpose and calling to protect us in our beloved America.

Over the recent past years, it is my observation that only lip service officially has been given to these loyal Americans on the front lines daily in far flung overseas field of fight and daily on the front lines combatting crime and terrorism in the homeland. In my war, Viet Nam, a vocal minority of the population protested the war and the warriors. In recent years, I have been heartened that the majority of our citizens have measurably and demonstrably honored our military. However, on the home front our police often have been vilified and murdered in the streets, witness Dallas, Texas. It has been an appalling demonstration of strife on our own turf.

This past weekend I was brought to tears of joy, often by what I observed as demonstrated by our new President, Donald J. Trump. My witness to his actions and participations in recent days at the Inaugural events have been most heartening as to where his heart and soul reside.

As a teenager in Washington, I watched as members of the Old Guard marched their paces in front of the revered site at the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery. The day before the inauguration, there was our President-elect paying his respects at this memorial. There must have been many demands on his time, yet he took the time to visit Arlington. After the luncheon in the Capitol following the official inauguration, I viewed our new Commander-in-Chief and President and Mrs. Trump and Vice President and Mrs. Pence on the bottom steps of the east Capitol side, flanking probably the Commanding General of the Military District of Washington, in their first official function relating to the military. The active military units to be marching in the Inaugural Parade passed in review. There were few spectators. The Capitol grounds were closed off for security.

Viewing the parade, it was obvious the extraordinary security placed around the President’s vehicle. When he exited, as it turns out, only shortly twice on the parade route, he was immediately “surrounded” by Secret Service, who were prepared to stop bullets if any of the protesters, who were so prevalent in the Capitol, had been so inclined to become world famous in infamy.

Then there was the parade itself. There the President was standing for most of the parade, saluting smartly, presumably each time our national colors passed him. It was especially noticeable, that, before each active military unit marched past the reviewing stand, that that service branch member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stood between the President and Vice President to honor their marchers. The family members of our military fallen in action were prominently represented as were our Disabled American Veterans and Paralyzed Veterans of America. My own service academy, West Point, was minimally represented in a small contingent of cadets, a far cry from the entire 2500-member Corps of Cadets, which marched in President Kennedy’s parade in 1961. (With pride, I marched with my fellow cadets on that bitterly cold day!)

Typically, in the past, there have been a number of balls inaugural night, but only a reduced number this time, presumably only three. One, most important and heart-warming assuredly, was the Armed Forces Ball attended by our new President Trump. How it warmed my heart to view the President and First Lady, the Pences, and the new President’s immediate family on the dance floor at the Armed Forces Ball, dancing with members of the backbone and soul of our military, our enlisted men and women!

It had been written, perhaps as “Fake News,” that our new President was to take the weekend off, following the inauguration day activities. But, not for this new and vigorous Chief Executive. On Saturday, he was at the National Cathedral for a prayer service. On the morning of the inauguration he attended a worship service at the Church of the Presidents, St. John’s Episcopal, across Lafayette Square from the White House and immediately west of the headquarters building of Veterans Affairs, where I served in the administration of President George H.W. Bush. Pastor Robert Jeffress in his sermon harkened back to the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem by Nehemiah in mid-fifth century B.C. Nehemiah, like our new President Trump, was subject to constant attacks. But Nehemiah, as will our new President, prevailed over all and accomplished his mission.

President Trump’s first agency visit was to the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley on Saturday afternoon. It certainly did not look like he took the weekend off. His leadership style was in full bloom as he called attention to the endeavors of the CIA in combatting our enemies overseas. He brought significant and appropriate attention to his new CIA chief, Mike Pompeo.

A good and great leader gets with the ‘troops” and this was a classic example of his style.

On Sunday, he continued his expression of his respect for our Americans, who are on the homeland’s front lines in serving and protecting us. He held a White House reception for law enforcement and first responders. He called an individual forward to stand between him and VP Pence and I presume it was the head of Secret Service. President Trump stated words to the effect that he felt well-protected from the beginning. In the keeping of his relaxed and humorous style he called up FBI chief James Comey and joked, “He is more famous than I.”

The most single expression of the respect to be commanded most deservedly by this new Commander-in -Chief is the story I heard about a high school senior residing in the northeast. A West Point classmate related he had been working with the senior for admission to West Point. He said he would not have entered West Point had President Trump’s opponent become president, but was more than proud under President Trump to serve his country as an officer and as a graduate of West Point and is proceeding to obtain admission to the Academy.

That is my story and I am sticking with it! God bless America, our military, intelligence community, law enforcement, and first responders. It is morning in America again!

© 2017 Allen B. Clark – All Rights Reserved

My 89 year old black preacher dad’s heart attack had Mary and me rushing from Florida to Baltimore Maryland. Dad is doing fine. Praise God.

While in town, I visited my 60 something year old cousin in the hospital suffering with diabetes. They amputated half his foot. Sadly, he is scheduled for them to amputate his leg up to his knee. What do you say to someone who is about to lose their leg? I prayed for wisdom. My visit with him was wonderful. It strengthen my resolve to seriously deal with my challenges with the disease.

Dad was out of the hospital. I dropped in at his home to discover Dad was hosting a Superbowl party. His home was filled with black seniors from his church. Dad proudly introduced me as his eldest son. They were all Democrats and Falcons fans.

The conversation turned to education. Surprisingly, a guest said she thought it was wrong for schools to allow black students to speak Ebonics rather than insisting they learn English. She said keeping blacks ill-equipped to enter the work force is a form of slavery. Excited, I chimed in, “Amen Sister! It is insulting to think blacks are too stupid to learn English.” I explained that the Left always seeks to lower standards for blacks. I continued, “Back in 1952 when dad broke the color barrier to become a Baltimore City firefighter, all he asked for was an opportunity to compete. He did not ask that they lower a single standard for him.” I said dad won Firefighter of the Year two times. Dad beamed hearing me brag on him in front of his friends.

After visiting my dad, I arrived at my brother’s home just before kickoff of the Super Bowl. A family millennial said he heard the Falcons playbook mysteriously disappeared and suddenly returned. He cited Patriots’ scandals, spy gate and deflate gate. Thus, he concluded the Patriots win because they always cheat. The truth is the Patriots win because they are a well-oiled machine, disciplined and masterfully coached.

I explained to my brother that our young relative believed what is known in politics as a false narrative. Obsessed with destroying Trump, the fake news media has launched at least 16 stories (false narratives) against Trump. The fake news media relentlessly sells the public false narratives. For example: I heard on the local news that January 2017 was a record-breaking month of Baltimore homicides, 32 in 31 days (blacks murdering blacks). Ignoring the facts, the fake news media has convinced many Baltimore blacks that police are their greatest Nemesis.

Traveling back home to Florida, we stopped in West Virginia to visit Mary’s mom and look for a home to purchase. It is time to move closer to family. West Virginia is only a few hours from my dad in Baltimore.

We bunked at Mary’s sister and her husband’s home. My brother-in-law said when they moved to West Virginia, he received his Democrat voter card immediately at the DMV when he got his West Virginia driver’s license. In took several weeks for his wife’s Republican voter card to arrive in the mail.

I said my dad taught me as a child that the democrats were for the little guy working man and the republicans were for the rich. I told my brother-in-law that lifelong Democrats like my dad and Mary’s mom do not realize that the Democratic Party has changed. It has become the party of every anti-God, anti-American and wacko group.

I told him about the Democrat supported Black Lives Matter rally at which an anti-Trump protester delivered an F-bomb filled rant against whites over the megaphone. The protester instructed the crowd, “We need to start killing people!”

I told my brother-in-law that Democrats control school curriculum. Starting in kindergarten, students are taught to not only embrace, but be “open-minded” to experimenting with homosexuality. An elementary student explained the lesson to his fellow students. “Let’s say it’s like a new kind of vegetable or something. If you’re not very open minded then you won’t try it.” Democrat judges are decreeing that parents are not permitted to opt out their children.

My brother-in-law was shocked.

A final note about the Superbowl. I watched it with my brother who has coached kids football for 30 years. He said NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell suspending Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady for 4 games over deflated footballs was nonsense. We agreed that Brady is hated for political reasons. Not only is Brady a Trump supporter, he is handsome, married to a model and a winner. Leftists are repulsed by such success, viewing it as unfair.

My brother said it would be sweet if the Patriots won the Superbowl forcing Goodell to present Brady with the championship trophy. When Goodell presented the trophy to Robert Kraft, owner of the Patriots, fans practically booed Goodell off the stage. He kept his presentation speech extremely brief. I loved it.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

I have to laugh because even the incorrigible Howard Stern has made some strong statements against Democrats, albeit this was back in 2008. Stern claims to be a libertarian, and he said, “I have vowed, I will never vote for a Democrat again. No matter who they are. I don’t care if God becomes a Democrat. These Democrats are communists. This is communism. This is gangsterism. This is crazy.”

Robart is No Laughing Matter

As Senator John Warner stated, protecting our borders is at the heart of sovereignty, and Democrat Judge James Robart’s actions are no laughing matter. He has put the kibosh on Trump’s executive order to check refugees coming in from seven different terrorist-promoting Islamic nations to make sure they do not wish to do harm to American citizens. Why would any sane person want to stop the President from protecting us? As my retired attorney friend, Joe, said to me, “That’s really it Kelleigh, they’re insane.”

What really blows my mind is the fact that not one Federal Judge in America tried to stop even one of Obama’s unconstitutional Executive Orders, but President Trump’s EO to protect America is stopped by a leftist Democrat judge. God help us! But then, in reality, they have no right to do so. This belongs to the executive branch alone.

Robart’s Nomination

On December 9, 2003, Robart was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Robart was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate on June 17, 2004. George W. Bush also nominated Gorsuch to federal court and he too was confirmed unanimously. The Senate, knowing Bush was left of center, and really pro-choice, easily confirmed this democratic lawyer to the high court, just as they confirmed Neil Gorsuch in 2006. 

Robart’s Ruling

This Democratic Liberal Judge is a full-fledged socialist. His ruling didn’t consider any opinions on the law. He believed, without legal authority, that the president wasn’t making a smart move, and he stayed it. This decision on the immigrant ban from terrorist promoting countries went to the Ninth Circuit court, the most liberal court in the nation and of course, they stayed it. Protecting America from Islamic terrorists was one of Trump’s promises, and who is delaying our safety? None other than the Democratic Socialists…again! This time of the judiciary!

But hey, Judge Robart has even praised the Black Lives Matter anarchists in a lawsuit against Seattle police! 

And Judge Michelle Friedland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, who ruled on the Trump travel order won the ACLU’s “LGBT Award.” [Link]

The Ninth Circuit has continued the stay, and now the higher court’s denial of an immediate stay means the legal battles over the ban will continue for days at least. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco asked challengers of the ban to respond to the appeal, and for the Justice Department to file a counter-response by Monday afternoon.

It could go to the Supreme Court. But what if the Senate holds up Trump’s confirmation of Judge Gorsuch? A four to four vote by the Supremes could leave us high and dry with the last decision holding. We may be overrun with terrorists from Islamic terrorist states, all because of one socialist judge.

It is NOT a “Muslim ban.” You will search the Executive Order in vain for mentions of Islam, or any other religion. Trump reminded reporters that ISIS specifically said that they would use the migration system to infiltrate the United States and other countries. The order is based on security reviews conducted by President Barack Obama’s deputies. The moratorium is temporary, and the executive order is absolutely legal, and is a security measure. [Link]

Vetting Foreigners from Terrorist States

President Trump wanted to vet foreigners arriving from Somalia, Syria, Sudan, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Yemen. Trump’s order bars citizens of the seven countries from entering the U.S. for 90 days, all refugees for 120 days and indefinitely halts refugees from Syria. Pretty simple and straightforward. 

Chuck Schumer recently stated, “There are tears running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight.” He said this in response to Trump’s EO on immigrants from these pro-terrorist states, but that is quite a change from the tweet Schumer sent out in 2015 when he said, “We must tighten loopholes in the Visa Waiver program, ensure passports can’t be faked, and stop terrorists who want to exploit the system.”

Many other presidents have implemented travel bans in the past. Jimmy Carter implemented a travel ban on citizens from Iran after the Shah was deposed and students seized the U.S. Embassy in 1979. 

And will wonders never cease, even Obama implemented a ban against refugees from Iraq in 2011. It was two Iraqi Muslims living in Kentucky who were sending weapons and cash to al-Qaida in Iraq. They were arrested, tried, convicted, and are in prison. Apparently, the Judge was unable to access this information.

State Department Whistle Blower

Mary Doetsch, a retired U.S. State Department veteran has blown the whistleon the entire refugee program by sending a letter to the Chicago Tribune. She wrote, “As a recently retired 25-year veteran of the U.S. Department of State who served almost eight years as a refugee coordinator throughout the Middle East, Africa, Russia and Cuba, I have seen first-hand the abuses and fraud that permeate the refugee program and know about the entrenched interests that fight every effort to implement much-needed reform. Despite claims of enhanced vetting, the reality is that it is virtually impossible to vet an individual who has no type of an official record, particularly in countries compromised by terrorism. U.S. immigration officials simply rely on the person’s often rehearsed and fabricated ‘testimony.’ I have personally seen this on hundreds of occasions.” 

Mary goes on to say that she is in complete agreement with President Trump’s EO, and that she doesn’t believe it goes far enough!

Robarts Inaccuracy on Arrests

Judge Robart asked DOJ attorney Michelle Bennett how many arrests of foreign nationals had come from the states in Trump’s EO.

She said she didn’t have that information, and then Robart claimed that there were none, but Breitbart reported that according to a database built by the Senate’s immigration subcommittee, the federal government has arrested and convicted at least 73 people from the seven countries of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Sudan, and Yemen. That fact alone tells us the huge inaccuracy of this judge’s rationale for imposing a “Temporary Restraining Order” ban on the president’s popular reform of the expensive refugee and immigration programs allowing untold numbers of terrorists into our nation without the vetting that has always been customary. 

Several sites have verified that these countries and even others not listed, are hotbeds of terrorism training and activities with plans against the United States. Here is a list of some of the terrorists who have committed crimes from these very countries, and here are the countries with a large terrorism presence. Somali refugees who have come to this country have even been involved in terror plots, including more than 40 of which left the country to join ISIS, al-Shabab and al-Qaida, according to the FBI.

Somalis seem to be a big problem as they are ripe for recruitment by ISIS. Minnesota’s Attorney General said, “We have a terror recruitment problem in Minnesota” involving the Somali refugee community in the state.” Obama actually had to approve grants to teach Somali youth how to avoid being recruited. But there’s more, these same refugees have carried out knife attacks in malls and on college campuses injuring a number of people. We know this judge doesn’t live in a cave, his entire stay on President Trump’s order is purely political.

Pamela Geller, editor in chief of the Geller Report and president of American Freedom Defense Initiative, said Robart’s decision, if upheld, smacks directly at the sovereignty of the United States and strips the president of his constitutional authority to protect the nation. 

Companies Suing Trump Over Ban

Apple, Google, Facebook, Spotify, Airbnb, Citrix, eBay, Etsy, Intel, Microsoft, Netflix, Snap, Twitter and Uber are just some of the high-profile companies that participated in filing the brief, the goal of which is to make clear that the technology industry and American businesses in general oppose Trump’s ban. Here is the entire list from the website.

I would urge folks not to buy Chobani yogurt inasmuch as Chobani announced the hiring of Syrian Muslims. The owner of Chobani was tied to the Clinton campaign and Clinton Global Initiative. The same now goes for Starbucks Coffee regarding their hiring. What about jobs for the American citizens?

Judge Napolitano Weighs In

Martha MacCallum interviewed Judge Andrew Napolitano on Judge Robart’s stay, and he stated clearly and unequivocally that President Trump has the power to do exactly what he’s doing. Here’s what he said in this interview with MacCallum. 

“We have a federal district court judge in Seattle who basically second-guessed the President on the wisdom and propriety of the President’s executive order. And that is absolutely not the job of federal judges in our society.”

“The law on which President Trump relied is crystal clear. A 1952 statute which says, just as John Roberts read from the government’s brief, that the president of the United States has the authority to suspend any immigration of an individual or a group or a class of people, for public health, public safety or national security. It’s not the President and the courts, it’s not the President and the Congress. It’s the President alone.”

Judicial Tyranny

Black robed tyrants are legislating from the bench. Our President is right, should someone arrive on these flights who is a terrorist and acts to kill Americans, the blame will land directly on these judicial tyrants. That a district judge would overrule the president of the United States on a matter of border security in wartime is subversive.

When politicians don black robes, and seize powers they do not have, they should be called out for what they are – usurpers and petty tyrants. It is our elected representatives who make the laws and rule the nation, not judges or justices!

Selwyn Duke made it clear in his recent article.

Does our current status quo make our Constitution a suicide pact? Thomas Jefferson certainly said as much, warning that accepting judicial supremacy would make our founding document just that, a “felo de se,” (suicide) as he put it in Latin.

No, Trump could simply ignore the court ruling suspending his ban.

Does this sound like a government of, by and for the people to you?

The Bottom Line

American citizens have seen terrorist activities on our own soil for years now. Here is a full list, starting in April of 1972. We have welcomed immigrants with open arms since the nation’s inception, but with caution to protect our people. There are many reasons most citizens want immigrants vetted, not only for the harm they might intend, but for assimilation, and disease…diseases we have not seen in decades. We do not want “no-go” zones throughout our country. And yes, I’ve seen women in full burkas in my local grocery.

I have two British friends, one who is an American citizen and one who is still in UK, who would so love to come to America and become a naturalized citizen. The UK today is overrun with so many Islamists that British citizens, women especially, are afraid to be in certain parts of the country.

My friend Stan, who has been here for decades, told me that it took him many steps to become an American citizen and all told, it was about two years. He is an absolutely wonderful addition to our citizenry. My friend Shirley should also come to the USA, she loves our country.

However, today, plane and shiploads of refugees from countries known to breed terrorists are being dumped in cities all over America. Without the vetting, it has become a breeding ground for terrorist training and terrorist activity.

Trump Senior Advisor, Steven Miller said, “The U.S. has an absolute sovereign right to determine who can and cannot enter our country.”

Laura Ingraham says our President should address the nation to make his case for the executive order, and I agree. The reality is, his action is absolutely legal, and it is being done for the safety of all Americans.

Our President needs to tell these judges to go pound sand!

It will take the passing of quite some time before many Americans can erase the image of the Senate’s new Democratic Minority Leader Charles “Chuck” Schumer being overly emotional when describing President Donald Trump’s ban on unvetted Muslims from seven terrorist-havens in the Middle East.

What most Americans believe is a common-sense policy appeared to have caused the career politician to choke back tears in his favorite place — in front of TV cameras and microphones. “Schumer — battle-hardened partisan — appeared to have a difficult time talking about Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim refugee resettlement. Schumer labeled Trump’s executive order “mean-spirited and un-American,” which sounded like a political symphony to the Trump-hating propaganda meisters covering the Schumer performance.

“This political hack really gets my goat! He’s been a member of both houses of Congress for many, many years and I’ve never seen Schumer holding tears back after thousands of Americans were killed fighting the enemy — Islamic terrorists. He never shed a single tear for the victims of the Benghazi attack. He’s a disgrace as an American not to mention a shady Senator,” says Schumer’s fellow New Yorker, Henry McGrath, a retired NYPD cop.

Schumer has also been quoted as saying, “Tears are running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight as a grand tradition of America, welcoming immigrants, that has existed since America was founded has been stomped on.”

“Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is the chief obstructionist of domestic policies and appointments of President Donald Trump,” well-known police adviser and former NRA publications editor John M. Snyder noted this week.

“Schumer opposes the civil right to keep and bear arms as well as the civil right to life itself,” Snyder added.

President Trump himself has called Schumer the “clown of clowns,” while top talk show host — and former Justice Department chief of staff — Mark Levin called him a hypocrite since Schumer is a staunch “gun-grabber” who wishes to disarm American citizens while he packs a concealed handgun and is usually surrounded by armed protection officers.

“Hopefully,” Snyder said, “there are enough patriots in the Senate Democratic Caucus to overcome Schumer’s attempts to thwart the will of voters as expressed last November in the victory they gave Trump for his America first positions.”

“Schumer plots to prevent Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominees who support the right to life and the right to keep and bear arms. He worked to derail the appointment of gun rights and life rights supporter Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) as Attorney General,” said the top spokesperson for gun rights.

Snyder said, “Sen. Schumer is a leading opponent of the right to life and of the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of life. He promotes abortion and even partial birth abortion. He promotes bans on the acquisition and use of firearms and certain types of firearms by law-abiding citizens. Citizens want them for the defense of life as well as for other legitimate purposes.”

“Schumer, the ‘clown of clowns,’ is a leading spokesman in the United States today for what St. John Paul termed the ‘culture of death.'”

Snyder pointed out that, “Clown Schumer attacks President Trump as a hard right guy. But the Senate Minority Leader himself is a ring leader of the loony left. Voters have dumped these nut cakes. Senators should approve Trump’s pick for Attorney General. They should reject Schumer’s plan to hold up approval of Supreme Court nominees.

“They also should enact legislation in support of the right to life and of the right to keep and bear arms. Among the latter is the proposed Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017, H.R. 38, by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) with 140 cosponsors.

H.R. 38 “would require states to recognize the validity of every other state’s gun carry licenses, but it would require concealed carriers to follow the specific laws of whatever state in which they are carrying,” reported the Washington Free Beacon.

The bill “ads language designed to ensure that those in Constitutional Carry states, where no permit is required to concealed carry, are protected by the legislation,” continued the Beacon.

The bill also would allow concealed carry in the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, and on lands under the authority of the Bureau of Land Management, Army Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Reclamation.

H.R. 38 has been referred to the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives.

“We need national reciprocity for concealed gun carry,” said Snyder.

“A positive state CCW or concealed carry policy enables a qualified individual to carry a particular concealed firearm within his or her state of jurisdiction if legally permitted to do so,” Snyder noted.

“With national reciprocity, a state-issued CCW permit would be honored throughout the country, similar to the way in which state-issued driving permits now are honored throughout the country,” he added.

“In a survey of United States police chiefs and sheriffs conducted last year by the National Association of Chiefs of Police, over 86 percent said they supported nationwide recognition of state issued concealed weapons permits,” Snyder.

“With President Trump now in office and with Republicans in charge of both houses of Congress, proponents of the individual Second Amendment civil right to keep and bear arms can and should advance the American freedom agenda,” Snyder said.

“In addition to fostering national reciprocity for concealed firearm carry,” he added, “Washington should slash the law enforcement funding of cities and states following policies contrary to the spirit of the Second Amendment, and repeal federal laws interfering with Second Amendment liberties.”

A practicing Catholic, Snyder has been named “the dean of Washington gun lobbyists” by the Washington Post and New York Times, “a champion of the right of self-defense” by the Washington Times, the “gun dean” by Human Events, and “the senior rights activist in Washington” by Shotgun News. The Trace designated him a power broker.

He holds AB and MA degrees in government from Georgetown University. He has been an NRA magazine editor and official of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and Second Amendment Foundation. He directs Telum Associates, LL.C, and serves on boards of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, Council for America, and American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

The election of Donald Trump for president of the United States represents the desire of many Americans to see our republic rescued from utter oblivion. Of course, “We the People” who desire America to be great again are not so naïve to think that Trump alone can improve the fortunes of the United States. However, the president is the commander in chief endowed with powers and responsibilities. Among the most important is to protect the United States from harm.

The president is commissioned to do all he can to protect America from enemies both foreign and domestic. Kit would not hurt if the judicial branch would agree.

Unfortunately, we now live in a time when a sizeable segment of society and the government are positioned to expend all their energies to stop the administration of Donald Trump from properly protecting our republic. The recent 9th Circuit court upholding a suspension of President Trump’s travel order is a perfect example. The surface level battle presented for the incurably ignorant masses is of a political nature. The progressive anti-American protection democrats and rinos verses patriotic republicans and Christians who desire America protected is connected to a deeper spiritual battle. I am basically referring to the ongoing struggle between those that desire destruction and the wiping away of our unalienable rights, personal and responsibilities against those who want a Constitution and God influenced American nation of truth self-reliance, protected borders and national sovereignty.

I have mentioned several times in the past in my radio commentary, The Edwards Notebook that the democrats are literally at war against the Christian and Constitutional influences that were major parts of the foundation of what has been great about our republic.

Among the major reasons why Chucky Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, John Lewis, Cory Booker and all progressives are hell bent on destroying Trump is their hatred of Christianity, personal responsibility and liberty . Let us not forget, the unalienable rights America used to be known for recognizing were derived from Judeo/Christian ethics or principles. They comprise the foundation of freedom from tyranny. President Trump fully understands that not only should we be free from government overreach, but also safe from those who seek to illegally invade our nation to do harm. I must say, it doesn’t matter if someone seeks to harm us or not. If they come into America illegally, they should be quickly deported, and if they commit another criminal act such as robbing or killing Americans they should be at the very least, jailed for a long, long time.

The ongoing campaign against president Trump is also being fueled by his bold stance for the right of Christians to operate freely in society. The Donald has boldly done what many “holier than thou” Christians have been either afraid or unwilling to do. He spoke out boldly against the obvious unethical, un American liberal control of every element of the government including the Appellate Court which now is endangering our nation to it’s very core by ruling against Trump’s common sense effort to vet those coming into our republic from nations where vetting is not existent.

History has plainly exhibited for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear that nations seeking to embrace firm Christian values are usually more prosperous and freer than those where such beliefs are rejected or not allowed. The progressives know this and understand that they must convince you that you need them more than the wits, rights and abilities that God gave you. This explains how most Black Americans remain stuck in the back end of the golden donkey, near the bottom of economic growth and living standards in the United States.

For progressives to succeed in their mission to permanently damage America, large percentages of the population must be kept ignorant, as bitter victims and indoctrinated against America. That is why they so energetically hate Donald Trump, Betsy Devos, Dr. Ben Carson and others who will fight to unshackle Americans from the ravages of wrong thinking and actions that derive from the poisonous indoctrinations of the political left that has infiltrated every segment of communicating in the country.

Progressives like the anti-Constitutional Ninth Circuit Judges do not appreciate our unalienable rights, which come from God. They are even against our nation’s ability to protect herself from real enemies. There is an authentic tug of war over the soul of America. I just happen to believe that the ongoing progressive war against our patriotic president will ultimately fail. This final note, let us pray for Providential guidance in president Trump’s dealing with Israel as she also fights for her unalienable right to exist. God bless you, God bless America and may America bless God.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

In 1952, Congress passed the McCarran-Walter Act that gives a sitting President the authority to restrict immigration into the United States and removal of anyone determined to be engaged in subversive activities. Carter used it and Obama used it.

With the terror attacks within our country in the past year, Trump needs to use it and expand it to Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Ethiopia and more. Those countries prove hotbeds for Muslim terrorists training for their jihad against America. Immigration via the refugee program remains their ticket to killing our citizens.

Obama revised one of his Executive Orders to kick Russian ‘diplomats’ out of the United States. McCarran-Walter, co-authors of this act were both Democrats. Harry Truman, also a Democrat, vetoed it but the Congress overrode his veto. Truman was a Democrat but also a ‘Progressive’ in the same vein as today’s Progressives.

“In fact, Presidents Truman and Teddy Roosevelt were considered founders of the Progressive movement,” said George Phelps, former U.S. Army officer. “Obama’s E.O. 13694 authorized the imposition of sanctions on individuals and entities determined to be responsible for or complicit in malicious cyber-enabled activities that result in enumerated harms that are reasonably likely to result in, or have materially contributed to, a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the United States.”

According to the law, President Trump maintains complete authority to restrict entry of immigrants from designated countries based on the McCarran—Walter Act and Obama used an Executive Order to do the same thing when he had the Russian diplomats removed from the US.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Pub.L. 82–414, 66 Stat. 163, enacted June 27, 1952), also known as the McCarran–Walter Act, restricted immigration into the U.S. and is codified under Title 8 of the United States Code (8 U.S.C. ch. 12). The Act governs primarily immigration to and citizenship in the United States. It has been in effect since December 24, 1952. Before this Act, a variety of statutes governed immigration law but were not organized within one body of text.

H.R. 5678 was named after its sponsors, Senator Pat McCarran (D-Nevada), and Congressman Francis Walter (D-Pennsylvania).

President Harry Truman, a Democrat, vetoed the Act because he regarded the bill as “un-American” and discriminatory. Truman’s veto was overridden by a vote of 278 to 113 in the House and 57 to 26 in the Senate.

Speaking in the Senate on March 2, 1953, McCarran said:

“I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions, which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. … However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. … I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.”

The Act abolished racial restrictions found in United States immigration and naturalization statutes going back to the Naturalization Act of 1790. The 1952 Act retained a quota system for nationalities and regions. Eventually, the Act established a preference system, which determined which ethnic groups were desirable immigrants and placed great importance on labor qualifications.

The Act defined three types of immigrants: immigrants with special skills or relatives of U.S. citizens who were exempt from quotas and who were to be admitted without restrictions; average immigrants whose numbers were not supposed to exceed 270,000 per year; and refugees.

The Act allowed the government to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in subversive activities and also allowed the barring of suspected subversives from entering the country. It was used to bar members and former members and “fellow travelers” of the Communist Party from entry into the United States, even those who had not been associated with the party for decades.

This video showing Muslims marching in Chicago recently that read, “Death to America”, shows you why Trump needs to enforce this precious McCarran-Walter Act.

It expanded the definition of the “United States” for nationality purposes, which already included Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, to add Guam. Persons born in these territories on or after December 24, 1952 acquire U.S. citizenship at birth on the same terms as persons born in other parts of the United States.

A 1962 guideline explained procedures under the Act:

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 requires an alien to apply for a petition for naturalization. This form may be obtained from any office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, a division of the Department of Justice, or from any court authorized to naturalize aliens.

Today, more than ever, we need to keep Muslims out of our country. That march in Chicago with the banner “Death to America” indicates the trauma of our future as to Muslim immigrants.

© 2017 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

All of the sudden the word pedophile has wriggled its way into mainstream America. Just like the diabolical double of transgenderism and homosexuality, a generation ago the mere mention of those illnesses was something whispered out of earshot of anyone under the age of eighteen.
As the book of Ephesians clearly states there were some topics that warned we “let it not be named once among you.” Even thought this spiritual wickedness has been around since the fall of man, the idea that such deviancy would ever be taught to our children was unthinkable.

Lest we forget, and before I duck for cover from the verbal grenades of the tolerance crowd, let me remind you that there was a time not so long ago when deviant sexual behavior was considered a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Association.

As history records it wasn’t until 1973, thanks to the “research” of deviant homosexual pedophile Alfred Kinsey and his pornographic book Sexual Behavior in the American Male that “scientific” research in regards to sexual behavior was reclassified. It would be safe to say that Kinsey and his gaggle of homosexualists were the first true science deniers. (Bone up…sorry for the poor choice of words… on homo-history here).

Deviant sex proponents have put on a full court press ever since. With the help of the ungodly courts and the lie of the separation between the church and the state they were successful in overturning nearly 6000 years of recorded history with the “legalization” of what God, and nearly all civil societies had deemed an abomination.

Today, talk of sexual options are as common and varied as more and more abominable sexual behaviors are thrust in front of innocent, unsuspecting children in kindergarten. It has given new meaning to asking children if they have learned their ABC’s.

What is going on in our public schools is nothing less than moral molestation.
I hate to go old fashioned on you but there was a time in America when we took seriously the crime of corruption of a minor.

The Law Dictionary defines it as “actions of an adult that convince or influence a minor to do something wrongful, criminal or immoral such as performing a sexual action.

In accordance with that there was also a crime of “improper influence” which was defined as “to attempt to convince someone to perform an act that is not proper or immoral or an offense which they would not otherwise commit had they not been influenced or convinced to do so”

Today, we just call those two crimes “public education.” They simply changed the definition of “immoral,” classified it as normal, and shoved it down the throats (sorry again) of America’s elementary school students.

When will God-fearing “normal” Americans rise up and declare that enough is enough? Engaging in personal deviant behavior is one thing. Teaching it to unsuspecting innocent children is another. The molestation of the innocent mind is spiritual rape.

Pornography is defined as printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.” Look at this picture. Is this not intended to “stimulate erotic” feelings in the viewer? Is it not designed to “influence” confused children? Is this not emotional pornography?

What is the common thread in a vast majority of the sexual deviancy we see in America? Could it be the indoctrination of young innocent minds into the acceptance of abnormal sexual behaviors in our social experiment laboratories known as American Public Schools?

The sexual anarchists are running America. The promotion of sexual deviancy has led to an epidemic of brokenheartedness in parents who lost their precious children to the mental molestation masquerading as education in our deviant driven gender bender, amoral curriculum.

You may want to stop reading right here because what I am about to say is graphic…but it goes to the heart of the argument. CONTINUE AT YOUR OWN RISK.

America’s public schools are designed to shape society. We stopped “educating” our children a long time ago. The schools spend hours trying to convince children not to smoke cigarettes because it could be hazardous to their health. Yet they encourage them to engage in homosexual sodomy which is far more dangerous than smoking.

Let’s be honest here. Would you rather your teenage son was caught smoking in the restroom or sucking on his classmate’s camel? What is wrong with us?

I rejoice that Betsy DeVoss is the new Secretary of Education. I pray she oversees the shuttering of this diabolical cabinet. In the meantime…get your kids out of the public schools.

Rape is not always sexual. If we love our children the molestation of the mind must stop.

© 2017 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the most corrupt political leaders on the planet. He is also one of the most heavily financed political leaders on the planet.

In spite of his billionaire friends and supporters, however, he is facing almost certain political destruction. His many crimes are being intensely investigated by Israeli authorities. The only reason he hasn’t been removed from office already is due to the immense political and financial support he has from bankers, casino owners, land developers, etc., from other countries–especially in the United States.

But it is doubtful that Bibi will be able to tread water much longer. It appears that his political demise is inevitable. And you haven’t heard a word about it from the controlled mainstream media in the U.S., have you? Of course not. The men who own the mainstream media are among Bibi’s largest contributors.

Neither have you heard anything about it from the so-called conservative publications, periodicals and websites. There is one common denominator that links the mainstream media with the so-called conservative media: infatuation with the modern State of Israel.

Without a doubt, Netanyahu’s plummet in popularity at home is one of the reasons (maybe the MAJOR reason) why he is pressuring Donald Trump to ratchet up a war against Iran and why he is mobilizing accelerated (illegal) Israeli settlements on private land owned by Palestinian people. War and military conflict has always been a favored tactic of embattled politicians to increase their popularity and deflect negativity. Neither does it hurt that Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and presidential adviser, is a MAJOR financial backer of the (illegal) land settlements.

One indicator that Netanyahu will be removed from office soon is longtime Bibi supporter, billionaire Sheldon Adelson, is starting to back away from the embattled Israeli Prime Minister. That’s NOT a good sign for Bibi at all.

The removal of Netanyahu from office would be a very good thing for the entire world. The problem is the State of Israel is controlled by about 20 mega-rich Zionist families. To think that these power-brokers would replace Bibi with a truly honest man is as likely as the sun rising in the west tomorrow morning.

Read this honest and objective analysis of what I am talking about here: Netanyahu Scandals Reflect Corruption At The Heart Of Israeli Society

As I often do, I tested this column by writing a brief post on this subject on my Facebook page. I wasn’t surprised when Christians came out of the woodwork in a vitriolic attack against me for what I said about Bibi. Many accused me of heresy and vowed to never read my Facebook page again.

Chuck Baldwin’s Facebook Page

Since my lengthy personal research and study into the Biblical teaching on Israel, I have come to learn this: the entire faith system of many professing Christians depends on their allegiance to the modern State of Israel. These Christian Zionists might recite a pledge of allegiance to the United States of America, but their true allegiance is to the State of Israel.

It is no hyperbole to say that for many professing Christians, the modern State of Israel is every bit as important as Jesus Christ Himself and their own personal salvation. In fact, many of these folks equate their allegiance to the State of Israel with their own personal salvation. And they are quick to condemn anyone to hell who does not share their allegiance to the State of Israel. I find this extremely perplexing. I truly wonder if this cultish infatuation with the modern faux Israel might be the great “falling away” and devilish deception of the last days. But I digress.

Faithful readers of this column and followers of my ministry know that for most of my adult life I subscribed to dispensational modern-Israel-is-the-fulfillment-of-Bible-prophecy theology. And while I would debate with people holding alternative opinions (as I hold now), I never felt that their differences of opinion on this subject somehow invalidated their Christian faith.

So, why is it that so many Christians are so dependent upon a commitment to the modern State of Israel to the point that it is part and parcel to the very core of their Christian faith? For some nineteen centuries there was no modern State of Israel, and believers were quite cemented and steadfast in the Christian faith. In fact, most Bible scholars who wrote previous to 1948 had an entirely different perspective on the subject. Try reading some of them, and see for yourself.

Today, however, anyone who challenges the scriptural validity of the modern State of Israel is cast off by many professing Christians in the meanest and most vitriolic terms. Why does the modern State of Israel hold such a strong grip on people’s faith? It’s as if their faith itself depends on the modern State of Israel, not Christ.

Christians seem oblivious to the fact that Netanyahu is not only a globalist, crook, and murderer, he is also a Talmudist. Not long ago, he promised that Talmudism would be official Israeli law. See the report: Netanyahu Promises Talmud Will Be Israeli Law

If you think the Koran is bad, try reading the Talmud. As a point of reference, the Pharisees that hated Jesus were devout disciples of the Mishnah, the oral traditions which later formed the Talmud. In other words, the Pharisees were Talmudists. And, as you probably know, Jesus strongly condemned them for their devotion to the Mishnah.

Consider, too: Tel Aviv is the international capital of homosexuality. That is no exaggeration. Also, the government of Israel pays for women to receive an abortion at any stage of the baby’s development. Plus, as seen in Cook’s article linked above, Israel is known globally as being a safe haven for all kinds of money laundering for international criminal gangs, especially from Russia. “A leaked U.S. embassy cable in 2009 warned that Israel was in danger of becoming a ‘promised land’ for organised crime.

“The Haaretz newspaper observed recently that this underground economy [from the money laundering by international criminal gangs] had become so big – with an annual turnover reaching as much $39 billion – Israel could find itself on the same list as Iran as ‘one of the leading state financiers of global terrorism.’”

Furthermore, for all intents and purposes, many (if not most) Talmudists are practicing atheists. The Lord Jesus Christ (true Israel’s Messiah) is scorned and hated as much in the modern State of Israel today as He was during the days when the Pharisees crucified Him. If you think there is religious liberty for Hebrew Christians in Israel today, you couldn’t be more wrong.

The last time I was in Israel, I spoke at two Baptist churches. One was in Jerusalem, and the other was in Bethlehem. Take a guess at the composition of the Christians in those churches. They were 99% Palestinian.

In addition, Zionist bankers, casino owners, land developers, media magnates, entertainers, movie producers, etc., are among Christianity’s biggest enemies. That is NOT a racist statement at all. That is a cold, hard fact.

You must understand that Zionism has nothing to do with race; it is a political philosophy. At its core, Zionism is communistic and atheistic. Accordingly, it is little wonder that Zionists are found among the liberal/progressive political parties in virtually every Western country. Zionists are found among all races and creeds. This is NOT a racial issue at all.

Plus, you should know that there are many Jews in and out of Israel who are just as opposed to Netanyahu, Talmudism, and Zionism as I am.

Of course, the biggest reason for this unbiblical infatuation with the modern State of Israel is the ubiquitous teaching of pastors and churches that the promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:3 is intended for the State of Israel born on May 14, 1948. And much of this teaching comes from seminaries and colleges such as Dallas Theological Seminary, Liberty University, and many other Christian schools and universities. And much of the teaching of these schools is an outgrowth of the Scofield Reference Bible and the writings of John Darby, Clarence Larkin, Tim LaHaye, John MacArthur, Hal Lindsey, et al. Also joining in this “Israel First” indoctrination is the vast majority of charismatic televangelists, such as John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Benny Hinn, Jim Bakker, Kenneth Copeland, et al.

One can barely listen to a Bible message on the radio, television, or in a local church without being barraged with the “Israel First” doctrine that Genesis 12:3 is talking about the modern State of Israel. Christians are also bombarded with the indoctrination that the State of Israel created by the Rothschilds in 1948 is prophetic Israel. I suppose that belief, by itself, wouldn’t be so bad, except for the hate, vitriol, animus, and bitterness that accompanies it.

With all of the controversial positions I have taken over my forty-plus years in the ministry, I have NEVER received the hate-filled opposition I am receiving right now because of my position that the modern State of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible or the “Israel of God.” (Galatians 6:16) That position is NOT based on racism or prejudice or anything of the kind. It is based strictly on my study and understanding of the Holy Scriptures.

One would think I had denied the deity of Christ, His virgin birth, His blood atonement, or His bodily resurrection from the dead. I dare say the opposition against me would be LESS if I had. I am NOT making it up when I say that Zionist Christians have vowed to ruin me, thoroughly discredit me, and some have even threatened (more than once) to KILL ME. Can you imagine? It’s absolutely true. I guess Muslims aren’t the only ones who know how to hate.

I also wrote this related post on my Facebook page:

For all of the good things Trump has done thus far, he has wasted no time in beating the war drums against Iran. The rhetoric of Trump and Mattis and Flynn is eerily similar to the rhetoric of Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld back in 2002 & 3.

Iran is being painted as the next Big Bad Wolf that the U.S. must attack in order to save the world. But why?

Iran is condemned because Iran-backed Houthi rebels attacked a Saudi warship and Tehran tested a missile. For this, “American lives are at risk.” Really? How so?

The Saudis have been bombing the Houthi rebels and ravaging their country, Yemen, for TWO YEARS. Saudi Arabia is apparently exempt from retaliation from wars it starts. But one act of self-defense by the Yemenis and Donald Trump puts Iran “on notice”– and generals Mattis and Flynn declare it to be America and the world’s greatest threat. Really? Trump has also foolishly reinstated sanctions against Iran. Both Russia and Iran see this as a violation of the 2015 treaty, which now allows Iran to withdraw from the agreement altogether.

Where is the evidence that Iran even had a role in the Houthis’ attack against the Saudi ship? Plus the UN resolution only forbade Iran from testing nuclear missiles, not conventional ones–which Tehran insists this test was.

Of course, the globalist warmonger Benjamin Netanyahu is cheering Trump on. Perpetual war in the Middle East is Bibi’s best friend. Right now, he’s counting on it to save his political career.

Furthermore, is it any coincidence that the Saudi king spoke with Trump on Sunday (1/29) and then suddenly the Trump administration is beating the war drums against Saudi Arabia’s mortal enemy, Iran? The Sunni Muslim government of Saudi Arabia has long salivated over conquering the Shia Muslim government of Iran.

Trump’s public rhetoric and the reinstatement of sanctions make a collision with Iran almost inevitable. Did Trump learn NOTHING from G.W. Bush and Barack Obama? An unnecessary and unprovoked war in Iraq; wars in Libya, Syria, and Yemen costing trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives; not to mention a global harvest of hatred against America that launched Al Qaeda and ISIS. Oh, yes, and there’s also the little matter that Iran and Russia are committed allies.

Trump said he wanted a less hostile relationship with Putin’s Russia. Well, going to war with Iran is not the way to do it. As this is being written, the U.S. Navy is practicing war games fifty miles off the coast of Iran. This is not good, folks.

Perhaps Trump is listening to the advice of the War Party members that he foolishly appointed to his cabinet. (I tried to warn people about these appointments when they occurred–but I didn’t think the bitter fruit of these appointments would ripen in only two weeks after his inauguration.) Convincing Trump to go to war with Iran would be a good way to make him a one-term President.

The American people didn’t put Trump in office for him to take the United States into yet another unnecessary and unprovoked Middle Eastern war. But it looks like that is exactly what he is planning to do.

Some of the above I borrowed from Pat Buchanan’s excellent analysis. Read: The Coming Clash With Iran

And what’s at the center of all of this war fever? An Israel-First foreign policy and an Israel-First “Christian” theology.

Hate me and stone me if you want to: Americans should be all about America-First, and Christians should be all about Christ-First.

In the meantime, unless a U.S.-led war against Iran can save him, it seems that Netanyahu’s crimes are starting to catch up to him. And if Christians cared anything about truth, righteousness, and justice, they would be happy to hear it. I seem to recall that God’s prophets had something to say about Old Testament Israel’s wayward kings. Speaking of which, where are God’s prophets today?

P.S. Once again, I invite readers to watch my two-DVD message series explaining my understanding of the scriptural teaching regarding Israel: past, present, and future. The series is called “The Church And Israel.”

Folks, consider: I had believed, taught, and preached dispensational, Israel-First theology for over thirty years–why would I take an opposite view NOW, after all these years? Why would I risk my ministry, my livelihood, and my family’s future? And with the hateful reaction to my position, that’s exactly what I’ve done.

Continued attacks against me for my position on websites, radio talk shows, periodicals, and newspapers make columns such as this one obligatory. Like my positions or not, I have always tried to be true to my conscience and my beliefs. And if I go to the poor house over this issue, so be it. I will be faithful to the truth as I understand it, regardless.

[NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers. NWV supports President Donald Trump and the Jewish State of Israel.]

© 2017 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

No one spends $100 million to make a movie intending it to lose a heap of money. They expect to make money. They expect a lot of people will pay to see it.

Soon to be released, “Fifty Shades Darker” is the sequel to “Fifty Shades of Grey,” a movie celebrating and promoting the perversion of “bondage and domination”—in which one partner, usually the woman, gets her jollies by being tied up and smacked around by the other. In the “Fifty Shades” franchise, it’s always the woman. Somehow this is supposed to be liberating, and feminists are too busy protesting in favor of abortion to devote any time to protesting against this. Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

According to a review by The Express, this sequel is “far kinkier than the original” and “almost pornographic at times.” Almost? What do they have to do to go beyond “almost”? Never mind, I don’t really want to know.

It used to be that, if you wanted stuff like that, you had to get it furtively, sneak it into your den somehow. Now you take your date to see it at your local nabe. Stand in line, buy a ticket. You won’t blush if anybody sees you there.

True, there is a fair to excellent chance that this turkey will bomb at the box office; but Hollywood is betting that it won’t. And they’re willing to take the risk because this is what they do: this is their own piece of the fundamental transformation of America.

At one time, to release a movie like this would have been unthinkable. But our culture has been changed, drastically, and not for the better. What with our teachers’ unions, our colleges and universities, and Democrat politicians pushing and promoting transgenderism—or “gender fluidity,” as they sometimes like to call it—as if their very lives depended on it, what was once seen as perverted and bizarre has been pushed at least into the borders of the cultural mainstream.

To cite just one example: an Italian priest is in the soup now for “holding orgies on church property” and arranging visits to “naturist swingers’ resorts.” “Naturist” means they take their clothes off. Police caught him with a briefcase full of “sex toys” and similar paraphernalia; and he also got up to other tricks which I will not mention here. They had him dead to rights, so he broke down and confessed—and not in a confessional booth, but in a police interrogation room.

The Church seems determined to boot him out of the priesthood altogether, but questions remain. What made him think he could get away with this? What made him decide to do it in the first place? They say he had upwards of “30 lovers.” Who were they, and what made them look to a priest to be their pander?

There have always been corrupt and wicked clergymen. Read Dante. Read Boccaccio. We also have schoolteachers, professional people, and public officials every bit as slimy as this single priest. Are they learning this from movies, or is Hollywood just making movies that reflect the state of our culture? Probably a bit of both.

We want prosperity. We want liberty. But in order to have those things, you also need to have the family, a free market, religious faith—and decency. We can’t wallow in sleaze and hope for stable families, a rational economy, and a personal code of behavior that allows others to trust you and expect you to treat them as you would want them to treat you. If you want to see what happens to a society when the family breaks down, the market doesn’t work, and nobody bothers to obey the law—well, that isn’t hard to see. Spend a few nights in the worst parts of Chicago.

It’s a very good thing that we won a presidential election against the party that boos God at its national convention. But our culture has a long, long way to go before it’s healthy again. Winning an election won’t help us unless we can win back our culture from the culture-killers.

They’re the moral imbeciles who educate and entertain our children; and we mustn’t let them do it anymore.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

According to the Federal Highway Administration, more than 68,000 American bridges are structurally deficient. They estimate the cost to repair and maintain those bridges at $71 Billion. The Transportation.gov website has determined that most of America’s roads are in poor condition, ranging from 19% in Georgia to 73% in Illinois.

Any good engineer will tell you that “deferred maintenance” (putting off repairs and maintenance) leads to higher costs ….. much higher costs. “Deferred maintenance” is what America has done to her roads, bridges, train tracks, tunnels, airports, water and sewer lines, natural gas and oil pipelines and electrical generation and power distribution facilities.

Most maintenance and repairs for infrastructure are put off because of the lack of money. But how can such a rich country allow its infrastructure to decay so badly. It puts American lives at risk and raises the cost of property damage, auto and truck repairs and insurance, astronomically? How can a country that boasts the highest standard of living on the planet be out of money and so deep in debt? The answer lies directly at the foot of “100+ Years of Progressive Rule.”

Like many pundits often say, “follow the money”.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION:

The most reliable estimates state that illegal immigrants cost the American taxpayer around $113 Billion per year, $84 Billion of which is shouldered by the states. These estimates are over and above any contributions made to the economy by illegal immigrants.

Obviously, these estimates do not include the huge costs of the Border Patrol ($12 Billion in 2013, currently over 20,000 agents), Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) ($5.8 Billion in FY 2011- 20,000 employees), or the cost of detainment. As an example, the federal government paid GEO Group $32,000,000 to build a containment center at the border, or $52,632 per bed. The government pays GEO Group $15,000,000 a year to operate the facility.

But the illegal immigrants detained at this one facility stay for an average of only 12 hours before most of them are released into the general population with a bond to make a court appearance. In 2010 it was reported that 715,000 of these illegal immigrants released on bond, failed to appear at the court hearings and are now living in the shadows and costing taxpayers billions of dollars every year. That number has probably doubled since 2010. Apparently, the Trump administration has stopped Obama’s “catch and release” policy and illegal immigrants will be ushered back across the border to whence they came, that is if some Democrat State Attorney general doesn’t convince some federal judge to overturn Trump’s order.

The hard truth is, Border Patrol and ICE spend the lion’s share of their time controlling border security and enforcing immigration law because of illegal immigrants. On top of that, the Border Patrol and ICE are up against open defiance from hundreds of “Sanctuary Cities.” Thus, the real cost of illegal immigration is in the billions of dollars above the $113 Billion estimate.

We are told that the compassionate thing to do is to absorb as many legal and illegal immigrants that we can. Just how many illegal immigrants, that are now costing the American taxpayer $113 Billion per year or more, can America afford? It only takes $71 Billion to fix America’s bridges.

But one of the other nagging questions is, how many non-assimilating illegal immigrants does it take to irreversibly alter the culture of a nation in the name of compassion? It is a fact! Too much multi-culturalism, with irreconcilable differences, destroys a free nation. It is destroying ours.

REFUGEES:

Very seldom do you see press reports on the cost to the American taxpayer for refugee resettlement programs. Since 1983 when the Office of Refugee Resettlements (ORR) was established pursuant to “The Refugee Act of 1980 (Section 413(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act”, well over 2,500,000 refugees, from many parts of the globe, have been admitted to the U. S. The five-year cost for each refugee has been calculated at $64,370, or over $257,000 per household. The total annual cost is well over $3 Billion but increases every year as more refugees get on the program ….. and never get off. This does not include State Department, Health and Human Services, or Department of Homeland Security costs involved in the refugee program. Further, welfare use is staggering among refugees. Officials never count refugee welfare usage as part of the cost of the program. Yet, when it is included, some estimates put the total cost of the refugee program to as much as $20 billion a year. But worse, most refugees seldom assimilate into American culture, especially Muslim refugees.

According to the “2009 HUD Report to Congress on Refugee Resettlement”, only 57.7% of refugees become self-sufficient after 5 years. Obviously then, 42.3% remain on resettlement programs, or welfare, or both. However, the definition of “self-sufficiency” has been steadily defined downward. A refugee can be considered “self-sufficient” while using all of the welfare programs available to legal Americans.

Until Trump’s recent Executive Order, the program gradually shifted towards the resettlement of refugees from Muslim countries. Yes, there are some Christians or other minorities, but most are Muslims. In the early 90’s the percentage of Muslim refugees was near zero. By 2000 the program was 44% Muslim. The Muslim component decreased after 911, but today is back up to about 40% and is likely to rise. Strangely, membership in a U.S.-registered Islamic terrorist group is not a bar to entry on the program as long as the refugee was not a “direct participant” in “terrorist” activity.

More often than not, the United Nations dictates the refugees that America must take. Even worse, thanks to Obama, America is now being forced to absorb 1,250 Muslim refugees that Australia refused entry.

To many, the refugee resettlement program is a self-perpetuating global enterprise. Staff and management of the hundreds of taxpayer supported U.S. contractors are largely refugees or immigrants themselves that want to add their extended families or friends to the refugee program. Like so many government programs, the refugee resettlement program has become an ever-expanding cash cow for charitable organizations. There is so much federal money available to charitable organizations for refugee resettlement, private capital has been driven out.

Here again, we are told that the compassionate thing to do is to absorb as many refugees as we can. But how many refugees at some $20 Billion per year, can America afford? It doesn’t seem like much in the general scheme of things, but the costs never go down. They just keep rising, year, after year, after year.

Once again, how many non-assimilating refugees does it take to permanently alter the culture of a nation in the name of compassion? Even compatible people can’t get along very well. In-compatible people start fights and wars. Too much multi-culturalism, with irreconcilable differences, destroys a free nation. It is destroying ours as it is destroying Europe.

ADDICTION AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE:

In this category we are talking about REAL money. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the total annual cost for Tobacco abuse is $295 Billion with $130 Billion going to health care. The total cost of Alcohol abuse is $224 Billion with $25 Billion going to health care. The total cost of illicit drug abuse is $193 Billion with $11 Billion going to health care. This comes to a staggering $712 Billion per year and doesn’t include the cost that addiction inflicts on human lives.

“A study funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) found that 77.4 percent of treatment in 2003 was paid for by Medicaid, Medicare, and other federal, state and local sources, up from 50.4 percent in 1986. Meanwhile, the private sector’s share of the treatment cost burden slipped from 49.6 percent in 1986 to 22.6 percent in 2003.”

If these numbers are even remotely correct and if the taxpayer is really picking up 77.4% of the cost of addiction and substance abuse, the taxpayer is footing $551 Billion of the total annual cost. You can repair a lot of roads and fix a lot of bridges for $551 Billion. America is indeed a sick, decadent and weak nation because of rampant substance abuse. Our drug addiction also feeds the brutal drug cartels and makes them powerful billionaires that kill for sport.

MEANS-TESTED WELFARE:

According to the Heritage Foundation, “The American welfare system is very complex. It involves six major federal departments that include Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, the Labor Department, Department of Treasury and Department of Education. The total estimated annual cost for state and federal welfare is $927 Billion from 79 welfare, interrelated, overlapping agencies and programs that distribute means-tested welfare. It is not unusual for a poor family to receive benefits from four different departments through as many as six or seven overlapping programs.”

The opportunities to abuse all of these programs are immense. The “Federal Safety Net” website has published statistics for welfare fraud. For fiscal year 2015, $711.4 Billion was spent on 14 welfare categories. Of that $711.4 Billion, $71.5 Billion (10.1%) was due to fraud.

How much of that $711.4 Billion goes to welfare cheats and freeloaders is almost impossible to quantify. But if all of the fraud were assigned to welfare cheats and freeloaders, that amount would repair and maintain all of America’s bridges.

The Center for Immigration Studies calculated that illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 per year, using at least one or more welfare programs. At 11,000,000 estimated illegal immigrants in America, (it is probably much higher than that) the cost to the American taxpayer for illegal immigrants using welfare programs comes to over $1.57 Billion per year.

IRRATIONAL COMPASSION:

Yes, America is a rich and prosperous nation with a deep culture of compassion for those less fortunate. But when compassion for refugees, illegal immigrants, addicts, the disabled and the poor becomes irrational, without regard to the resources necessary to sustain that compassion; when compassion starts eating into the very resources necessary to defend the nation and maintain its standard of living; when compassion becomes government-enforced charity at the point of a gun and destroys our cherished individual liberties; when compassion starts irrevocably altering the long-accepted culture of a nation; when compassion becomes a threat to our national security; when compassion is used as a tool by one party to buy votes to gain perpetual power as the Progressives have done for over 100 years; when compassion creates a debt that can never be repaid, then compassion becomes a mindless obsession for its own sake and is, in fact, the very definition of insanity. We will have become a poisonous spider stinging itself to death.

Everyone wants to come to America and share the freedoms we observe and millions don’t mind breaking our laws to get here, or overstaying their visas. Millions of Americans and non-Americans want to “partake” in America’s generosity, even if they have no right to “partake.” Many want to come here to kill us.

Seven billion people live on this planet and at least 80% of that seven Billion are living in war or poverty, or under brutal dictators. America can only absorb a tiny fraction of that 80% without drowning. If we don’t control our compassion for refugees and illegal immigrants, we will significantly reduce or eliminate our freedoms, change our culture to a point that it will be unrecognizable, get so far in debt there is no recovery and put our national security in grave peril.

Our roads, bridges, tunnels, train tracks, airports and utilities will never be repaired or properly maintained. This insane, Progressive-driven, “let ’em all in” mentality on the guise of compassion, or votes, will SWAMP our own lifeboat.

We predict that by the year 2040, nothing will remain of the Founder’s dream of liberty for all men under a Constitutional Republic, if America continues on its current path of irrational compassion.

Give us your TAKE on the issue.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“Life is a fight, a fight to stay alive and a fight to keep others and government from taking your life or your liberty from you. Acknowledge that fact and you might just survive as a free man. Those awash in self-pity and think of themselves as victims will never be free and they will be a heavy burden on the rest of society.” —Ron Ewart

In the year 1620 and beyond, they crossed the Atlantic in sailing ships to get to America and freedom. The journey could take anywhere from six to 12 weeks to make the crossing, depending on the winds. Life aboard ship was primitive at best. Firsthand accounts speak of illness, cramped quarters, food and water rations. They had to endure scurvy, diphtheria, dysentery and seasickness. They were at the mercy of the captain, ship owners ….. and the sea. Many of them died during the passage. Because the journey was so long, when passengers died, their bodies were thrown overboard because there was no way to store them on the ship. The bones of thousands of Pilgrims are held forever in the bosom of the Atlantic Ocean, on their failed journey to freedom.

There was no government to protect the Pilgrims, pay their fare to the new land, or provide a handout if they got sick or destitute. Those who could not pay were required to remain on board the ship until they were sold into indentured servitude and forced to work to pay for their voyage.

When the surviving Pilgrims landed on the shores of America, they were faced with life in the wilderness and attacks by local Indian tribes. Health care and doctors were almost non-existent. You either survived because of your wits and plain dumb luck, or died from the elements, starvation, disease, or an Indian arrow.

They crossed the plains in covered wagons to reach some dream they had of owning land in the territories, or striking it rich in the gold fields. They built up little towns and roads, bridges, businesses and schools. Then the trains came and they could expand their travel and markets exponentially. The only thing the government did was to provide the land for the railroad companies and land grants to eager settlers, under the Homestead Act of 1862. If the settler worked and improved his land for five years, it was his land to keep for free and he will have earned it many times over.

But other than that, there was no government farming subsidies. There were no food stamps, rent assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, welfare, much less free college tuition. These hardy people built a nation and they did it with little help from government and even less government interference. They persevered by main strength and awkwardness. Many times they lost, but got up again and pressed forward. Their strength was built on adversity. They didn’t “cry”, “moan”, “groan”, or “complain” to government when the going got tough. They just worked harder or found a way to “fix” whatever they faced at the time. They didn’t win all the time but nevertheless, most never gave up. That beginning environment of adversity forged the strength of a nation and was the foundation of a strong, prosperous and exceptional America.

When the wave of European immigrants passed through Ellis Island (1892 to 1954) eager to come to the land of the free and the home of the brave, government provided little to no assistance. In fact, the government went to great lengths to see that the arriving immigrants could support themselves and had enough money to get started in their new land. The government even initiated a “head tax” for arriving immigrants. They were screened for disease and other maladies. Up to 20% of the arriving immigrants were returned to their native country for one reason or another.

Not so today. Illegal immigrants that evade the Border Patrol receive no screening for disease or the ability to sustain themselves. There is little effort to round them up and deport them for breaking our immigration laws, once “lost” in the general population. Instead, they are molly coddled, pampered, paid and protected by sanctuary jurisdictions and immigration advocates.

Legal and illegal immigrants and refugees arriving in America receive all kinds of government assistance, a monumental burden on the American taxpayer, a huge drag on the economy and a giant magnet to attract more of them. It is no wonder that America is broke and deep in debt.

But let’s get back to the “Poor Me” whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America that inhabit our colleges, ghettos and immigrant enclaves. Millions of Americans and legal and illegal immigrants have become the “poor me” generation, most of them subscribing to the left side of politics. Their forbearers of colonial and pioneer days are rolling in their graves to see how their descendants turned out. More than half of them wouldn’t survive under the conditions our forefathers and mothers had to endure. If they suddenly found themselves in the wilderness, most of them wouldn’t have the slightest idea on how to survive, because they haven’t been taught.

They haven’t been taught about self-reliance, personal responsibility and individual freedom. They haven’t been trained to survive when the going gets tough. Adversity builds strength and character. The easy life, where there is no discipline and where everything is provided for them, leads to personal weakness, low self-esteem and the desire to indulge in pleasures of the flesh. Instead of looking to them selves to solve their own problems, they have been taught to look to government and government is only too eager to “help” them, but with a string attached. The string comes at the voting booth where those receiving the government “help” are obliged to vote for those providing the “help.”

We all know which Party is offering the “help”, with money from the Public Treasury to which none in the Party own any piece thereof. Under law, they call this robbing-the-till for personal gain what it is, grand theft, punishable by fines and imprisonment. Unfortunately, the “help” this Party offered to its “Poor Me” groupies turned out to be a very expensive, slowly evaporating mirage on a distant horizon. That “help” just converted otherwise potentially strong individuals, into crybabies and bowls of quivering yellow jelly and made them helpless cripples.

What we do know is that those reading this column are probably not members of the “Poor Me” generation.

Ever since the government-triggered Great Depression and the rapid rise of socialism under FDR, America has been headed downhill, away from individual freedom, self-reliance and personal responsibility and towards collectivism, dependency and government control of everything. The passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913, which created the Federal Reserve and the IRS, was no coincidence. It was no coincidence that the government, in the late 1920’s, retained the University of Illinois and Harvard University to study how to control people through their subconscious minds. It was no coincidence that the U. S. economy suddenly collapsed in 1929. It was no coincidence that socialism rose rapidly under FDR during the 1930’s and beyond. It was no coincidence that the gold standard was abolished in 1933. America was bankrupt, threatened by Communism and headed for Hell. Socialism and top-down control of the masses was government’s and the central bankers’ answer.

We just received a response to one of our recent articles where the person described, in one paragraph, what happened to America since the 1930’s. He wrote:

“The ‘Master Plan’ for the USA has always been to reduce the USA to a third world feudal state by diluting the gene and intelligence pool, degrading education, attacking tradition and culture, abolishing the nuclear family, promoting sexual perversion and abnormality and hybrid relationships, debasing the currency, eliminating the middle class, dissolving Christianity, ignoring the Constitution, weakening and removing personal liberty and base freedoms, and importing as many impoverished and uneducated persons from around the globe to economically and socially drain as much life from the US as possible ….. Marxism masquerading as immigration. The US has been in the crosshairs for decades because to take down the ‘Crown Jewel’ of the Western world is to send a message to all other countries that they can also be co-opted. ‘Front end’ rationale for any action taken by this government is not ever the reason for the action. Ponder no longer on the matter. The destruction of western civilization is the goal.”
When you throw back the curtain and expose the politicians, central bankers and industrialist “Wizards” calling the shots, this gentleman cannot be too far off the mark. The whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America are the result of actions of the “Wizards” pulling the strings of international money, commerce, trade, wars and politics. The “Wizards” have bought off the people with a few pieces of silver and filled their “Little Black Boxes” with hogwash, mush and propaganda.

These same “Wizards” (mostly Progressives) have convinced the “Poor Me” generation that because they are poor, sick, out of work, an illegal immigrant, refugee, Black, Latino, gay, transgender, or just plain lazy, they have an irrevocable claim to everyone else’s money and sweat labor, or special treatment from government. To pay for their alleged irrevocable claim, or special treatment, the government collects that money in an act of forced charity ….. at the point of a gun. Charity should have never become the purview of government and was never authorized by the Constitution. Charity, to be true charity, must be voluntary, not mandatory. Mandatory charity is slavery by any other name.

Sadly, the weakest among us have sold their souls and given away their freedom for so little because their parents did not teach them critical thinking, personal responsibility, to question everything, how to recognize a fraud and to never trust government.

Everything you think you know is probably a government, media, or academia created illusion with the sole intent of controlling the masses. The international environmental movement and social justice were designed to that end and to re-distribute the wealth of western nations. Economy destroying, expensive legislative actions to limit alleged man-caused global warming, are just one of the elements of the international environmental plan of control.

Americans have been hoodwinked by “100+ Years of Progressive Rule” that champion a collectivist culture, social justice, radical environmentalism, appeasement of our enemies, a massive welfare state, illegal immigrants, sanctuary cities, open borders and mindless compliant citizens. Progressives have created multiples of a “Poor Me” generation, awash in self-pity, low self-esteem and rabid self-indulgence, requiring that their only salvation is being dependent on Mother government when things go wrong in their lives and things are always going wrong in their lives.

With over half of the American people steeped in this “dependent” culture, planted there by decades of constant Progressive indoctrination and brainwashing, the fate of America is pre-ordained unless President Trump and those that support him can trigger a massive flashback to the time of self-reliance, independence, personal responsibility and individual freedom. As we stated in our last article: “A successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.”

But like the fighter pilot says after consuming over half of his fuel, “we have passed the point of no return ….. without midair refueling.” We had better hope that midair refueling happens soon ….. very soon, or Progressivism, collectivism and socialism will have won and individual freedom will have been thrown on the trash heap of forgotten Republics.

If you LIKED this article, let us know. Constructive comments welcome.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

Our young are so full of innocence and capabilities that are not yet known. Why would anyone want to destroy that through abortion? One of the most absurd pro-choice claims is that those who are pro-life do not like or care for the baby after he or she is born. In fact, pro-lifers find equal importance of life inside and outside of the womb. The gravity in a baby’s eyes, showing such extreme happiness for life, is one of the most beautiful things in the world. —G. K. Chesterton

I am overjoyed that Donald J. Trump is our 45th President, and I’m thrilled with 95% of his nominees. Nevertheless, unlike the sycophants who supported Obama and Hillary, when I am in doubt, I’m going to let my readers know about it.

God Said, CHOOSE LIFE

Deuteronomy to Choose Life! When those of us who hate Roe v. Wade think of the suffering of millions of little babies in their mothers’ wombs when abortion is chosen, we cry out for it to come to a screeching halt. We know too what happens to those little murdered bodies. It is why our 45th President has promised to put pro-life justices on the Supreme Court. We can thank God Hillary Clinton is not nominating a justice. 

Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1995. He has proven to be stellar on pro-life issues.

Neil Gorsuch and Antonin Scalia

When introducing Neil Gorsuch, our President said, “I took the task of this nomination very seriously. I have selected an individual whose qualities define, really, and I mean closely, define what we’re looking for. Judge Gorsuch has outstanding legal skills, a brilliant mind, tremendous discipline and has earned bipartisan support.” He added that Gorsuch’s resume was as good as he’s ever seen.

Gorsuch is better than half of those on the list who really don’t see much that can be done in stopping abortion. He does have sterling credentials, and in theory believes in the Constitution. However, no one can truly say whether or not he’d vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, which is ultimately the definition of pro-life.

Gorsuch and Scalia were friends, and obviously had enjoyed time together in Colorado as the signed photo suggests.

The insignia reads, “To Neil Gorsuch, Fond memories of a day on the Colorado. With warm regards, Antonin Scalia.

After President Trump’s announcement of Neil Gorsuch as his nominee, Gorsuch met Mrs. Scalia and chatted amiably with her and her son, Fr. Paul Scalia.

Gorsuch and Hobby Lobby

Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which came into play in the decision for Hobby Lobby from the lower court. The case was about religious freedom, not about abortion per se. Gorsuch sided with the Little Sisters of the Poor in a similar religious freedom case involving Obamacare.

According to ABC News, Gorsuch “is a defender of the ‘Free Exercise Clause,’ which says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” As such, he has also championed the rights of religious groups to display their religion in public places. And that’s a big Amen.

Gorsuch and Assisted Suicide

Gorsuch concludes his book by suggesting that the law could allow for terminally ill patients to refuse treatments that would extend their lives, while stopping short of permitting intentional killing.

In his book, The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia (2006), Gorsuch praised the pro-abortion ruling that upheld Roe v. Wade as follows: “The plurality in Casey expressly sought to provide a firmer basis for the abortion right and to shore up the reasoning behind Roe’s result.” (p. 79) This is extremely troubling, as no one who is pro-life would ever assert that there is a “firmer basis” and better “reasoning” that can support the horrifically unjust result of abortion-on-demand.

Citing the Judge’s book as proof that he is pro-life is not valid inasmuch as pro-abortion supreme court judges have ruled against physician assisted suicide in the past.

Gorsuch and Stare Decisis

Gorsuch also clings to bad precedent, and is an extreme supporter of stare decisis, both of which are excuses for upholding Roe v. Wade rather than overturning it. “Our duty to follow precedent sometimes requires us to make mistakes,” Gorsuch declared in ruling against the Second Amendment rights of a man before his court. United States v. Games-Perez, 667 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10th Cir. 2012) (Gorsuch, J. concurring).

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 US 833. The doctrine operates both horizontally and vertically. Horizontal stare decisis refers to a court adhering to its own precedent. A court engages in vertical stare decisis when it applies precedent from a higher court. Consequently, stare decisis discourages litigating established precedents.

unworkable. In addition, significant societal changes may also prompt the Court to overrule precedent; however, any decision to overrule precedent is exercised cautiously. (Cornell University Law School)

Gorsuch Nominated by George W. Bush

“Not a single Democrat opposed #NeilGorsuch’s confirmation in 2006,” tweeted Mitch McConnell on February 1st. Both Bush families stated they were pro-choice after they were out of office. It is likely the Democrat Senators knew the families were really pro-choice and thus confirmed their nominee. Here’s the list of the leftists who confirmed him.

Gorsuch and the CFR

Neil Gorsuch was a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, listed in the 2008 CFR Annual Report Membership Roster. He is not listed in the 2017 Annual Report, but is listed as a member in his 2006 nomination by President George W. Bush. (See part 8)

Aside from his stint at Harvard Law, can we conjecture that his term membership in the CFR might have influenced him with the One-World-Socialist-Police-State-under-the-United-Nations goals of the CFR? Here is a short tutorial on the CFR. You can also purchase a booklet about the CFR. 

Because of his membership, will he will be a shoe-in for the post, as he was in 2006? Other CFR Members of the Court are Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

The only way you can find out about CFR Membership rosters is to obtain the CFR Annual Reports through purchase from Amazon for a nominal fee. (Hat tip to Sue.)

Gorsuch’s Pro-Abortion Church

Neil Gorsuch and his wife attend the apostate St. John’s Episcopal Church in Boulder, Colorado, that has a woman rector, Rev. Susan Springer, who considers homosexuality as acceptable, and who believes that women have the right to kill their unborn babies. Springer also promotes climate control and gun control. [Link]

Homosexuals have had union blessing ceremonies in the church. Here is an article written by Rev. Susan Springer in 2010 supporting homosexuals and their behavior.

In 1994, as the anti-abortion movement mobilized to restrict reproductive freedom of American women, the Episcopal Church added this resolve:

“The Episcopal Church expresses its unequivocal opposition to any legislative, executive or judicial action on the part of local, state or national governments that abridges the right of a woman to reach an informed decision about the termination of pregnancy or that would limit the access of a woman to safe means of acting on her decision.”

From this article in Huffington Post, it appears Gorsuch is also pro-gay marriage, and unlikely to ever change Roe v. Wade.

Gorsuch’s membership in an Episcopal church in Boulder, Colorado, whose female senior pastor attended the Women’s March in Colorado, and has been associated with other liberal causes, gives great pause to most pro-life conservatives.

Lobbyist Influence

The influence, primarily by the pro-abortion Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation lobbyists, over the Supreme Court decision by our President was unprecedented. Why did Trump lock himself into only 21 names given by these organizations?

According to media accounts Trump considered only candidates whom the Federalist Society recommended, and no others. Florida Supreme Court Justice Charles Canady is pro-life and more qualified than Gorsuch, but apparently, Trump never even interviewed Canady. Other prominent pro-life candidates, both on and off the list, who Trump cited during his campaign, were also not seriously considered.

If this were merely the first time that a Supreme Court nominee was supposedly pro-life, but was actually pro-choice, then perhaps a “wait and see” approach might be reasonable. However, unborn children have been sacrificed time and time again by this deception. President Ronald Reagan appointed Sandra Day O’Connor, who was supposed to be pro-life but wasn’t, and then likewise for Anthony Kennedy. The first President Bush appointed David Souter, who was also supposed to be pro-life, but became stridently pro-abortion instead.

Link] They launched a digital campaign urging senators to confirm Gorsuch, and they plan to mobilize the network’s 3.2 million activists to put pressure on lawmakers.

Gorsuch on Other Issues

In an analysis by Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America, he pointed out that Gorsuch joined an opinion that adhered to the anti-gun view that “concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public.” United States v. Rodriguez, 739 F.3d 481, 490 (10th Cir. 2013).

On the transgender issue, Gorsuch joined an opinion holding that “it is unlawful to discriminate against a transgender (or any other) person because he or she does not behave in accordance with an employer’s expectations for men or women.” Kastl v. Maricopa Cty. Cmty. Coll. Dist., 325 F. App’x 492, 493 (9th Cir. 2009).

Where will Gorsuch come down on in the issue of whether men, who claim to be women, may enter women’s public bathrooms, showers and locker rooms. His opinion would affect children in public school facilities. Will he even be questioned on this issue by senators during his hearing proceedings? 

Conclusion

Unfortunately for us, Gorsuch’s views on abortion are not well defined. In his book, he wrote, “In Roe, the Court explained that, had it found the fetus to be a “person” for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment, it could not have created a right to abortion because no constitutional basis exists for preferring the mother’s liberty interests over the child’s life.”

For the sake of the unborn babies in America, I pray that Gorsuch truly is pro-life.

Like Joe Friday of Dragnet, I’m just giving you the facts, the decision is yours.

The United States Code refers to the Declaration of Independence as the “organic law” of the United States. And the Declaration clearly claims that there is an Almighty Creator God, that our rights come from Him, and that the purpose of civil government is to protect and defend the God-given rights of the people. The Declaration makes reference to the Bible, God’s Word, as the source of earthly, legal authority.

Civil government includes federal, state, and local city governments like the town of Rienzi, Mississippi, where this past weekend more than 1/3 of the town’s population showed up to a rally in defense of a Christian flag flying over their Veterans Memorial Park.

It seems the Freedom from Religion organization wrote a letter that threatened a half-million-dollar lawsuit against the small town of 300 people if the flag wasn’t taken down.

Some folks like organizer Kevin Nelms responded like Americans, declaring, “We’re not gonna let other people, or a foundation, or anybody else up in Wisconsin tell us that we can’t fly our flag! You’re gonna take one down; we’re gonna put a hundred back up.”

Unfortunately there were city government leaders showing a bit more bewilderment and naiveté. Believing that he had no choice in the matter, Rienzi Mayor Walter Williams pulled the flag down, saying, “I never dreamed that something like this would have happened in a town this small, but it happened.”

I am sure this mayor is shocked that the First Amendment, which states, “Congress shall make no Law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” would be used as a legal threat by an assailing organization that hates God.

So, the legal question I present to you is whether the city has broken the law by flying a Christian flag, among others, at a Veterans memorial? In other words, does flying a flag equate to Congress making a law, the effect of which is to establish an official United States religion?

Well, the answer seems to clearly be “NO” for at least two very simple reasons:

1. The city of Renzi is NOT “Congress”
2. A flag being hung is not a “law”

In order to find that a flag hung in Mississippi (or anywhere else) is a violation of the Establishment Clause, the first thing you have to conclude is that the city of Renzi is, in legal contemplation, the Congress of the United States.

Crazy, you say?

I agree. But this is exactly the conclusion that some maintain through a “legal fiction” the courts call the “Incorporation Doctrine.”

George Washington, our First President, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces that won the war for our independence, and the President of the Congress that gave us our Constitution and the First Amendment, insisted:

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labour to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and citizens.”

In other words, George Washington would have called dysfunctional organizations like the Freedom from Religion “un-Patriotic” and therefore “un-American”! So along with the city of Renzi, let’s be Patriots and hang our Christian flags!

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved

“I will splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the wind.” —John F. Kennedy

Why was John F. Kennedy so adamant about abolishing the Central Intelligence Agency?

History shows that shortly after he made this statement, he was assassinated on the streets of Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963.

Most Americans are also aware that after the assassination President Johnson reversed President Kennedy’s orders on Vietnam while conveniently appointing former CIA director Allen Dulles, who was fired by President John F. Kennedy for lying and manipulating when it came to the “Bay of Pigs,” as the fox in the chicken coop to the “Warren Commission” to investigate John F. Kennedy’s assassination (Jeremiah 11:9).

The rest is history. The truth fell in the streets the day (Isaiah 59:14) that the American people refused to deal with those who were responsible for the murder of their president.

LBJ’s Mistress Blows Whistle On JFK Assassination [YouTube Video]

While the truth was not acted upon that day, it did not fall dead. It has an affinity with the soul of man. The seed, however broadcast, will catch somewhere and produce a hundred fold, and it has.

One has to ask, what is the function of the CIA? Well, look it up.

“CIA’s primary mission is to collect, analyze, evaluate, and disseminate foreign intelligence to assist the President and senior US government policymakers in making decisions relating to national security.”

If you believe this, then you deserve what you have got coming.

What they say that they do and what they actually are doing are two different stories. The fruit of the CIA has been war, world destabilization, media propaganda, murder, bribery, etc. … Listen to former CIA agent John Stockwell.

“It is the function of the CIA to keep the world to keep the world unstable, and to propagandize the American people to hate, so we will let the establishment spend any amount of money on arms….”

Of course, they have been in cahoots with the military industrial complex, which President Eisenhower warned Americans about back in January 17, 1961. [YouTube Video]

The CIA has become a propaganda outlet.

We can see what former CIA director William Casey said when reinforcing what John Stockwell stated,

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American people believe is false.” -William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

Operation Mockingbird

Disinformation is exactly what they have been spewing out of the CIA for a long, long time, not only in our country, but in other countries as well.

Dr. Udo Ulfkotte came out in 2016 exposing the CIA by stating the following:

• “The entire mainstream media is totally fake!”
• “Taught to lie, to betray the people and not to tell the truth to the public.”
• “The CIA gets control over all of the majority of journalists.” [YouTube Video]

Udo Ulkotte was found dead on January 13, 2017.

Is the CIA alive and well concerning their crimes?

On February 1, 2017, the CIA popped its ugly head up once again. This time they were exposed for fake news about an assassination attempt on the Syrian leader, Bashar Assad.

When are the American people going to hold accountable not only corrupt politicians who are using the media as a cover for their crimes, but also those who are behind the crimes? (Deuteronomy 4:1)

Remember that Adolph Hitler’s third Reich was “made on propaganda,” according to Joseph Goebbels.

Who does propaganda work best on? The least intelligent (Hosea 4:6) said none other than the devil incarnate, Adolph Hitler.

“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
It has been said that not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.

Until the American people understand what they are allowing through the likes of the CIA and other bureaucracies, nothing will change.

“I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in forty-seven, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo.” –President Harry Truman.

America, it would be wisdom on our part to finish what President Kennedy intended to do with the CIA.

© 2017 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

During the Obama inauguration eight years ago, not one conservative, Republican, Libertarian, Democrat or independent violently demonstrated in the streets, burned cars, yelled obscenities or smashed windows.

U.S. Senators and Congressional House members praised the new African-Kenyan-American president as a new day for racial peace in America.

During the Trump inauguration, last month, millions demonstrated against his presidency before it began. Demonstrators fought police, burned cars, smashed windows, yelled obscenities and threatened violence toward the new president.

Singer Madonna screamed her invectives, “I’ve given a lot of thought to blowing up the White House.”

Actress Ashley Judd yelled, “I’m a nasty woman and I say Trump’s a Hitler with a toupee!”

Congressman John Lewis (D-GA), said, “I don’t look at Trump as a legitimate president.”

Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) said, “This man is questionable. And because we have suspicions — many of us — about who he is, where he came from, what his actions are, and all of his conflicts … we have to find out more about him and some of that leads to the possibility of impeachment.”

At first, I thought she spoke about how Barack Obama slipped into the White House without anyone knowing his true identity, (which, by the way, we still don’t know), but instead, she railed against Trump.

A group of students threatened to “moon” the entrance of Trump Towers in protest to the new president’s election.

Actress Sarah Silverman said, “We need a violent coup!”

One lady held a placard, “If Trump’s not Hitler, I am a moron!”

Actress Meryl Streep, much beloved lady of America, spoke against Trump at the Golden Globes while ignoring the fact that four African-American teens beat, cut and violated a Caucasian mentally disabled boy for five hours while they featured it on Facebook—that very same day.

Social media created a hash-tag, “He’s not my president” that received 180,000 likes within hours.

In the bastion of free speech, University of California at Berkley, last weekend, students threw steel racks through windows while starting fires in the streets because they refused to hear the speech of a conservative speaker.
In other words, they violently opposed our 1st Amendment rights to free speech. That kind of behavior occurs in dictatorships.

This week, I personally saw a video where Senator Schumer (D-NY) stood in front of an audience to lead a chant, “Dump Trump, Dump Trump, Dump Trump.”

Have you ever heard of a Banana Republic?

This kind of violent anti-American behavior reminds me that none of the name callers, demonstrators or hoodlums marching through our streets understands that we live in a Constitutional Republic. The person with the most Electoral College votes wins. Even with the potential for millions of illegal alien votes in her favor, Hillary Clinton lost.

Writer John Porter from Arkansas said, “I have been for quite some time honestly trying to understand why, and to make some sense of the terrible, senseless and sometimes tragic display of people in their destructive pillaging, looting, burning of automobiles and destruction of other property, including businesses and college campus structures, and of course physically attacking other fellow Americans in various cities all across this nation. I’m sure some of the participants are apparent crazed individuals still smarting and upset over the results of our presidential election. But it has now become apparent and recognized by most that a great number of these people are masked and/or hooded thugs, paid professional demonstrators, being financed by George Soros and other groups for the purpose of disrupting, not only the agenda of our new president, but more importantly and dangerously so, the very system of government we have in this country.”

Fellow American, I can tell you this: I have traveled through countries that lack the rule of law. I witnessed human misery that few Americans understand. I’ve watched human misery on a level that tears at my heart, years later. I’ve seen where brutal dictators and ruling class despots kill citizens without blinking an eye. In Saudi Arabia and that region, they ‘honor kill’ 20,000 women annually via Islamic law. They kill gays for being gay. They cut little girls. They chop peoples’ heads off and stone women to death for being a woman.

To all the women who marched in favor of Muslim immigration last week in light of Trump’s ban to secure our safety: if they understood that those same Muslims, if they gained a majority in our country, would subject them to Sharia Law, which means they would all be stoned to death or decapitated for exercising free speech. Muslim men don’t tolerate any kind of a voice by any woman.

As America Continues Endless Immigration, We All Face A Rough Ride

As fragmented and fractured as we stand today, each year, we import 1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants without pause. That continued act of Congress dooms us to this:

“Diversity within a nation destroys unity and leads to civil wars,” said social scientist Garret Hardin. “Immigration, a benefit during the youth of a nation, can act as a disease in its mature state. Too much internal diversity in large nations has led to violence and disintegration. We are now in the process of destabilizing our own country. The magic words of destabilizers are ‘diversity’ and ‘multiculturalism’.”

President Trump presents a springboard (excuse) for all the demonstrators. In reality, the majority of Americans voted for him to protect them from Islamic terror, drugs coming up from the Mexico and enforcing our borders by stopping all illegal immigration. He needs to rescind the 1965 Immigration Reform Act along with his other Executive Orders in order to save us from multicultural chaos and total breakdown of our nation.

© 2017 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

“No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” —Albert Einstein

“You never change something by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” —Buckminster Fuller

The (Un)Affordable Care Act, Barack Obama’s signature legislation, has been a disaster. I probably don’t to argue this before most readers of this site. With the start of the “Trump years,” the GOP-controlled Congress looked to have its best opportunity ever to get rid of this disaster.

Some have gotten cold feet, however. In a sense, this is understandable. As they look at the details and see that since the law went into effect, its fine-print complexities have insinuated themselves deeply into the insurance, health care and Medicare bureaucracies, changing them from the inside to fit its requirements. The idea of striking Obamacare down all at once has its appeal, but to those on the inside, doing so looks like it might risk a situation where, in a very short period of time, not just millions of people are uninsured again, but hundreds of thousands of employees in these industries are left high and dry: needing to make decisions, some medical and some financial, with no idea what the rules now are.

This is the problem when industries are placed under the thumb of massive bureaucracies. The latter make themselves “indispensable.” They expand into new areas, which become the scene of still more constantly-changing laws and regulations. This is also the problem when much of the population hasn’t been educated to think independently. Toss out the rule book, and they are at sea!

Be this last as it may, we need is to wake up and realize we are kidding ourselves if we think the present mess has a centralized “fix.” I sincerely hope “repeal and replace” doesn’t mean what it sounds like, because if it does, the GOP will replace one mess with an even bigger mess, and the GOP will own it. I am led to believe Donald Trump is working on a “fix.” I hope he doesn’t replace one form of centralization for another form of centralization. For the same reason, it won’t work, and he will end up owning the resulting mess.

Get rid of this kind of system we must! Its price tag is too high, and many of its “benefits” are illusory. The other day Simon Black (of Sovereign Man) wrote why his elderly stepfather, a Medicare patient, was dropped by his doctor. There is no summing this up:

“… [P]hysicians across the country have been firing Medicare patients; and according to a late 2015 study from the Kaiser Family Foundation, 21% of physicians are not taking new Medicare patients.

“Much of this trend is based on stiff penalties and financial disincentives from the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), and 2015’s Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization (MACRA) Act.

“MACRA in particular is completely mystifying.

“The law created a whopping 2,400 pages of regulations that Medicare physicians are expected to know and follow.

“Many of the rules are debilitating.

“For instance, MACRA changed how physicians can be reimbursed for their Medicare patients by establishing a bizarre set of standards to determine if a physician is providing “value.”

“As an example, if a patient ends up in the emergency room, his or her physician can incur a steep penalty.

“This explains why my stepdad was dropped by his doctor.

“The healthcare system has been broken to the point that physicians now have a greater incentive to fire their Medicare patients than to treat them.
“One Florida-based physician summed up the situation like this:

“I have decided to opt-out of Medicare, acknowledging that I can no longer play a game that is rigged against me; one that I can never win because of constantly changing rules, and one where the stakes include fines and even potential jail time.”

“The irony is that all these new laws and regulations were designed to “save” Medicare.”

Most people do not know it, but the medical profession has one of the highest rates of mental health disorders such as depression, substance abuse as a form of coping, and suicide. There is abundant malfeasance: absurdly long hours causing sleep-deprivation; there is bullying and abuses of power; etc. Medicine and health care have become extremely high-stress occupations. Burnout is common. A young MD suffering from depression or who has become hooked on “uppers” to stay awake during a 24-hour shift knows he needs help but fears seeking it because doing so could cost him his medical license and end his career.

Moreover, the third leading cause of preventable death is the medical profession itself (exceeded only by heart disease and cancer). Illnesses, injuries and deaths do occur in hospitals due to physician and surgeon error.

A major factor here is drowning medical professionals in thousands upon thousands of regulations they are expected to understand and comply with; penalties for not doing so range from debilitating fines to prison time.

Thus what Americans have is the world’s most expensive, most bureaucratic, and arguably least functional health care system. This system cannot be “reformed.” It can only be escaped from, until its dysfunction in the face of superior alternatives collapses it. This article is about escaping this system. It will require a paradigm shift of major proportions, especially in this age of entitlements, dependences, and a population that can’t think without a book of rules to follow. We cannot simply “repeal and replace” Obamacare. We need a different way of thinking about public health.

Two preliminaries. (1) We have to realize what disasters like Obamacare and MACRA are intended to do. Obamacare’s primary purpose was not just to insure the uninsured, although doing so, for as many as possible, did make it look good on paper. What Obamacare was intended to do was Make Money for Big Pharma and Big Insurance. Money lost from insuring preexisting conditions was more than made up for via skyrocketing premiums, and deductibles high enough to make the system unaffordable for those of modest means. It and MACRA were designed to increase the level of control over the public as well as over the medical profession. When the federal government can unconstitutionally force you to buy health insurance, and unconstitutionally sic the IRS on you with whopping $600-plus penalties if you don’t, your aren’t free. As George Carlin put it in one of his best routines (warning: language!), “You have owners! They own you!”

Obamacare may have been designed to fail, to pave the way for a single-payer system. Why is single-payer bad? It works in, say, Denmark, does it not? Perhaps. Denmark’s population is a little over 5 and a half million. Over 324 million people live in the U.S. (more, if you count illegal aliens). It is insane to think a system workable in small countries can be just as effective in a country with a population almost 60 times higher!

So what’s the answer?

Some years ago (late 1990s, to be exact), I took a series of courses in health promotion and education. It was, by most standards, an unusual program. There wasn’t a lot about health; leaving aside what I thought even then was an unhealthy obsession with sex, there was far more psychology, directed towards behavior change. I’d been thinking of a new career. I saw useful ideas in the program. But it became clear: what was good here was incompatible with top-down enforcements typical of bureaucracy. What I learned about myself (surprise, surprise): I don’t have the patience or temperament necessary to fit into a public health bureaucracy. For one thing, I tend to ask questions instead of following a book of rules blindly. After a couple of stints writing reports for a consulting group (and one collaboration journal article with one of the leaders) I abandoned the career option. But not the ideas, which I’ve used myself with some effectiveness.

They are the key to the best replacement for Obamacare.

The program called them the Three Levels of Prevention. That, as it turns out, is a misnomer. A far better phrase: the Three Levels of Health Care.

The first level is that of Primary Prevention. The second, Secondary Treatment (my term). The third, Tertiary Care (my term).

I’ve seen all three in action. The first is by far the most important if Americans, as a society, want to get control over their health care. So I’ll spend the most time on it.

Primary Prevention is everything you do to avoid getting sick, injured, etc. It draws on the adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Primary Prevention involves learning about nutrition, including how to read food labels in stores. People who do not do this, are setting themselves up for trouble later in life. I have no special diets to offer here. I know people who have gotten results with, say, the Paleo Diet. I’ve not studied specific diets such as this, though, so I cannot be either for them or against them. Since our body systems are all slightly different, as are our habits and levels of motivation, what “works” for one person may not be as effective as what “works” for another. What matters is, you absolutely need to know what you are putting in your body, and be sure it really belongs there. Remember: food corporations and grocery chains don’t care. They just want to sell you products and Make Money. It’s a buyer-beware world. It is up to us—we, the people—to educate ourselves and each other about what’s in our food, and eat the right things. Much of this is common horse sense. You cannot get enough fresh vegetables and fresh fruits. Nuts are also good. Meat is optional; it contains an abundance of protein, but you can live without meat. It is harder to digest than fruits and vegetables. What counts is getting vitamins and other necessary nutrients. I try to eat at least one orange and at least one apple per day. I also feast on broccoli. It was an acquired taste, but I can now eat it cold, with a salad. Cooking it actually robs it of some of its nutritional value.

Primary Prevention may involve learning to grow your own food. When you do, you know exactly what is in it. It involves knowledge about food preparation — what happens to food when ingredients are mixed, cooked, and so on. Primary Prevention has some don’ts. Minimize your alcohol intake. Shrink your caffeine intake. Do without if you can (the latter, alas, is a hurdle I’ve not cleared — but as a coffee drinker I rarely have more than two cups per morning). By all means reduce your intakes of white bread and sugar. Stay away from high fructose corn syrup laden soft drinks! It is common knowledge that these lead to obesity, and obesity comes with its own set of health risks. But don’t do so-called diet drinks, either, as artificial sweeteners come with additional problems. Eat less salt. Steer clear of fast food, unless it’s a salad, and other junk food. And above all, don’t smoke!

Never forget, where food is concerned you’re invariably dealing with people who have their grubby paws out, waiting for your hard-earned cash. They don’t care about your health. They care about Making Money. It is up to you to assume full ownership of your health! That’s what Primary Prevention is all about!

Primary Prevention also involves exercise, whether for weight control or other purposes. Joining a health club or gym is optional but not required. Taking long walks is a form of exercise. Primary Prevention involves stress reduction (walking on back streets or roads is again very good for this; so are deep breathing exercises), getting enough sleep at night, establishing a routine for maximum productivity, and other things that, at first glance, might not seem to have much to do with health, but in fact do if your aim is a life that is all it can be: a life of wellness, or well-being that is more than a mere absence of illness.

Lest the preceding sound “new-agish” to some readers, getting right with God and maintaining a prayerful relationship with Him is, in my humble opinion, the ultimate stress reducer and potential maximizer of personal wellness.

Primary Preventive actions strengthens your body’s systems. We all learned about the ‘germ theory of disease’ as children, but “germs” are all around us. The point is for our systems to be able to resist the ones that make us sick. That’s called building up our immune systems. Proper nutrition, including sufficient quantities of vitamins, etc., helps accomplish this. As does avoiding risky behaviors of all kinds.

Little if any of this can be had in classrooms. Never forget, too: public education is not designed to truly educate but to socialize, to transform children and adolescents into mindless consumers and obedient sheeple. You must take charge of your health education.

Ask yourself: which is easier to control: an alert and healthy populace that practices all the above? Or a sickly, overweight, lethargic sheeple who have no idea about nutrition or how to read food labels and no incentive to learn? Which group Makes more Money for corporations, e.g., those which comprise Big Food (Monsanto, Tyson) and Big Pharma (Merck, etc.)?

A healthy population, moreover, does not need as many services from doctors, clinics, hospitals, and so on. A healthy population has fewer worries over who is insured and who isn’t.

All reasons why there is little real incentive for serious health education in a society based on mass consumption and control, where Money has become a surrogate for God.

To learn Primary Prevention is to begin to secede from the present-day health care system. To communicate Primary Prevention to one’s loved ones is to inspire them to say this, and to educate others in the benefits of health self-reliance.

In that case, what about the other two Levels of Health Care. At the risk of sounding anticlimactic:

Secondary Treatment is medical care in the familiar sense of going to the doctor and getting a diagnosis you hope is correct, prescription medicine you hope will work and not have nasty side effects, etc. Its purpose is to restore your body system to its previous state (health). Always remember: most likely your doctor has been taught only which drugs are most likely to “cure” what, and may know little or nothing about nutrition and Primary Prevention for the reason already stated: they don’t Make Money! Your best bet is to minimize your need for Secondary Treatment, and we’re back to Primary Prevention. Never forget: these days, for all the reasons stated above, your doctor is under tremendous pressure, including time constraints as he/she has to cram as many patients as possible into his workday.

I believe that if the present mess continues — if we do not scrap altogether the idea of a centralized health care payment system on the Obamacare model — we will see a shortage of doctors within the next ten years. That alone will make Secondary Treatment less of an option, and not an option at all if you’re in the boonies and can’t find a doctor to treat you!

Tertiary Care tries to establish new stability after a severe disruption — such as a stroke or a heart attack. My mother was a stroke recovery patient with partial paralysis on her right side, so I saw Tertiary Care first hand. I have encountered claims that strokes can be treated at the Secondary level and their damage reduced to almost nothing if it happens fast enough (within an hour or so). I have not investigated these claims, so I cannot vouch for their authenticity, but they are interesting. Since my parents lived in a rural area, this was not an option for my mom. Her Tertiary Care treatment involved blood-thinning drugs (again, there can be side effects), physical therapy, and speech therapy. Tertiary Care also involves family members: at the time, my father and myself: counseling, patience, fall prevention, how to maneuver a partially disabled elderly person into and out of bed, etc.

Tertiary Care is no fun. Hence it behooves us all to learn what might make it necessary, and we’re back to sound nutrition and other best Primary Prevention practices, as these will reduce your risk of heart disease or stroke later in life. It is important to realize that in real health education, we are discussing processes that exact their worst effects after long period of time. Hence to appreciate the value of Primary Prevention is to become a Long Term Thinker. You cannot live exclusively in the present. Indulge today, and you’ll pay the consequences tomorrow.

Educating the Three Levels of Health Care offers the only viable way out of our present morass. Has anyone noticed: there is not a word about actual health care in the (Un)Affordable Care Act? Of course not! Again: its purpose was not health care but about how it was to be paid for, and again who Makes Money! I’ve had economics-types tell me, The problem with Primary Prevention is, it doesn’t sell. If that’s the case, we can forget about ever again having a healthy population, and about stopping the advance toward a world government that answers to global corporations—including those which profit handsomely from people being sick!

The alternative to bureaucratic, centralized systems — including anything similar that ends up intended to “replace” Obamacare — is to withdraw from them, to refuse to participate in them beyond the minimal requirements of the law. What you withdraw into are systems whose fundamental principle is self-reliance: educating one’s own and each other, as opposed to dependence on strangers with their hands out, or on the public education system.

Those who practice Primary Prevention will find their health care costs dropping to almost nothing. They won’t need insurance. They won’t need Medicare. The problems posed by our present health care nightmare can be made to go away only if the bureaucratic, centralized systems that created the nightmare are rendered obsolete!

© 2017 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

President Trump is calling for a major new investment for rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure of highways, bridges and more. There is no question that it needs to be done. However, it’s vitally important that local, state and federal government agencies avoid calls to fund this massive effort through so-called Public/Private Partnerships (PPPs). Local officials must understand that there is a vast difference between calls for a competitive biding process to select private companies for the projects verses an actual partnership with government.

During the first years of the Clinton Administration in the early 1990s, there was much fanfare about a new policy to “reinvent government.” It was sold as a way to make government more efficient and less costly. It would, said its proponents, “bring business technologies to public service.” In addition, the promise was that the new way would bring in private money to programs and projects, rather than tax dollars.

Pro-business, anti-big-government conservatives and libertarians were intrigued. The backbone of the plan was a call for “public/private partnerships.” Now that sounded like their kind of program. Government, they said, would finally tap the tremendous power of the entrepreneurial process and the force of the free market into making government more effective and efficient. It sounded so revolutionary and so American.

There are certain areas where private business contracts do jobs such as running school cafeterias through a competitive biding system. That type of arrangement certainly does serve the tax payers, encourages innovation and provides better service. That, however, is not how Public/Private Partnerships work.

Today that Clinton-led “reinvention” has revealed itself to be the policy known as Sustainable Development, which in reality is much more government operating through a top-down managed society. Sustainable Development policy calls for population control; development control; technology control and resource control. It is a direct assault on private property ownership and single family homes. It is the root of massive reorganization of American cities known as Smart Growth. It’s all tied to a specific agenda with a pre-determined outcome. To enforce the Sustainable policies proponents have worked hard to recruit private international corporations to work directly with them to promote the policies through the creation of Public/Private Partnerships.

It is little understood by the general public how Public/Private Partnerships are actually used, not as a way to diminish the size of government, but in fact, to increase government’s power. In truth, many PPPs are nothing more than government-sanctioned monopolies. These privileged few businesses are granted special favors like tax breaks, free use of eminent domain, non-compete clauses in government contracts, and specific guarantees of return on their investments. That means the companies, in partnership with the government, can fix their prices, charging beyond what the market demands. They can use their relationship with government to put competition out of business. This is not free enterprise, nor is it government controlled by the people.

A private developer, which has entered into a Public/Private Partnership with government, for example, can now obtain the power of eminent domain to build on land not open to its competitors. The fact is governments in partnership with private developers simply considers all property to be their common domain, to be used as they desire under the excuse of some undefined common good. For example a lower middle class neighborhood with a hundred small homes on quarter acre lots can be torn down and replaced with an upscale high-rise development. This gives builders, developers and the real estate industry new products to market. The new building will also generate more tax dollars for the community, thereby benefiting the “common good.” All will seem to benefit with the exception of the original property owners who were pushed out and displaced ?? all for the common good. That’s how PPP’s are sold as a positive for the community. But other citizens are losers too as voters lose control of their government.

Private companies are now systematically buying up water treatment plants in communities across the nation, in effect, gaining control of the water supply and controlling water consumption, another major goal of Sustainable policy blueprint. At an April, 2007 meeting in Calgary, Canada, as part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, then being promoted by former President George W. Bush to create a North American Union, government officials, business leaders and academics met to discuss redistributing Canada’s water to Mexico and the U.S. Southwest.

Canada has water, lots of it, and the Public/Private Partnerships of the SPP were swarming on it like locusts as they sought to drain it from Canada’s rivers and lakes and ship it to potential profit centers south of the Canadian border. Los Angeles was a prime prospective buyer.

The most popular PPPs involve the nation’s highway system. Private companies are buying control of them through PPPs with state departments of transportation. Herein lays the direct threat if PPP’s should become the driving force behind President Trump’s plan to rebuild infrastructure.

Of course, it’s not just American companies entering into PPPs with our government. Foreign companies are being met with open arms by local, state and federal officials who see a way to use private corporations and their massive bank accounts to fund projects.

As the Associated Press reported on July 15, 2006, “On a single day in June (2006) an Australian-Spanish partnership paid $3.6 billion to lease the Indiana Toll Road. An Australian company bought a 99 year lease on Virginia’s Pocahontas Parkway, and Texas officials decided to let a Spanish-American partnership build and run a toll road for 50 years.”

PPPs were the driving force behind the proposed Trans Texas Corridor that was to run from Mexico, clear through the center of the United States to Canada. A Spanish Company called Cintra was given the contract to build the TTC. There was no competitive bidding process. Cintra was the only candidate for the project.

In fact, that Spanish-American partnership in Texas and its lease with the Texas Department of Transportation to build and run the Trans Texas Corridor contained a “no-compete” clause which prohibited anyone, including the Texas government from building new highways or expanding existing ones which might run in competition with the TTC.

The highway was to provide few exit ramps. Communities that currently ran in the path of the existing state highway depended on traffic from it to provide business for restaurants, hotels and gas stations. The lack of exit ramps was done specifically to allow Cintra to build its own such services right in the middle of the TTC, eliminating the need to exit. Why was this important? Because the Cintra contract with Texas provided the company guaranteed profits.

Second, the TTC was to cut directly across 500,000 acres of prime Texas farm land. With no exit ramps farms and ranches would be cut in two. A barn might be on the opposite side of the massive highway from the rest of the farm, causing the farmer to drive as many as 50 miles to get to it. Property rights were not a consideration in the PPP contract for the highway. Communities, also, were to be cut in two, preventing police, fire, ambulances and school busses from reaching certain areas. Local rule was not a consideration in the PPP contract. That is not free enterprise.

Private companies operating in the free market lack one thing government has – the power of coercion. That’s a good thing. The free market operates with you making the decisions based on personal choice. Under Public/Private Partnerships the choices are decided for you in meetings behind closed doors.

Meanwhile, private companies that are not part of a PPP are unable to compete with those which are. They are shut out of competition from the establishment of economic development zones, which provide the chosen elite with reduced real estate taxes and financial aid. Companies, which find themselves outside of the elite status of the PPP may suddenly run into regulatory difficulties to get their own projects completed. It’s not just a coincidence? All of these things are happening through agreements between certain industries and government.

PPPs are one of the reasons many people find they can no longer fight city hall. The private companies gain the power of government to do as they please – and the governments earn the independence of the companies, no longer needing to answer to voters. It’s the perfect partnership. Their power is awesome and near absolute.

What Public/Private Partnerships are not, however, is capitalism or free enterprise, though it may have some of the trappings of such. The marketplace is still there. Its laws have not been repealed. But ultimately, corporatism does not trust the marketplace to do what the elites want.

In truth, Public/Private Partnerships are little more than a Mussolini type fascism of government and private industry organized in a near impenetrable force of power and collusion. Local and state governments interested in free market solutions and lower costs to tax payers must resist the temptation for an easy fix through the trap of the PPPs. For they only lead to higher costs and more government control.

© 2017 Tom DeWeese – All Rights Reserved

President Donald Trump has accomplished more in the first few weeks of his presidency than any other president in the modern era. He is making good on each of his campaign promises, transforming America into a nation that has secure borders, that reduces regulatory impediments that block market entry and retard free enterprise, that permits free markets to arise in health care, and that wages a relentless campaign of destruction against radical Islamic terrorists worldwide. His actions are so swift and so consequential that his opposition has difficulty capturing the news cycle. By the time they coalesce opposition against a measure, President Trump is on to the next initiative.

He is unintimidated by his opposition and dedicated with laser like precision to achieve the objectives of his Administration. To this point in history, each modern President has been preoccupied with media perception of each action. That preoccupation has rendered actions anemic and results unimpressive in case after case. By contrast, President Tump leads and lets the consequences follow. He means to make a huge difference for the benefit of his country and has no tolerance for mindless drivel and opposition based on sympathies for America’s enemies.

The politics of Washington have been the politics of indecision, inaction, and inertia. President Trump has filled Washington’s vacuum of power with bold and directed leadership. Republicans thought to be likely antagonists of the President have largely fallen into rank behind him, recognizing that President Trump proceeds like a steamroller at full throttle without regard to whether his opposition comes in the form of a Red or a Blue state representative.

For those who have long yearned for change to revitalize the American economy, defend America’s borders, and dismantle the regulatory state, President Trump comes as an answer. There is no one in Washington more dedicated to the welfare of the United States than President Trump.

He is increasingly winning over the hearts and minds of the American people. They are coming to realize that bureaucratic mountains thought to be impenetrable and permanent are the very ones he intends to bring down. The dams those mountains formed, blocking the flow of free market activity are rapidly giving way, ushering in new streams of commerce for the benefit of all Americans.

Just one month ago, the market heaved forward carrying the weight of regulation with no apparent end in sight. Many doubted that President Trump, even were they to credit his promise to deregulate, could alter decades old regulatory regimes that exercised an authoritarian strangle hold on the throat of business.

Business leaders have learned that regardless of how illogical or extreme the regulations imposed upon them, they would have to adjust because the regulators were not going to disappear and possess numerous tools to fine or destroy those who resist compulsion. Trump’s executive order on deregulation changes the direction. Now the regulatory state faces a President who means to reduce the size and scope of the regulatory state by a promised 75%. They face a President with the fortitude necessary to stand firm in the face of bureaucratic wailing and gnashing of teeth.

President Donald Trump is proving by action, not rhetoric, that he means to resurrect the American empire. The contrast with his predecessor could not be greater. The world is fast coming to realize that Donald Trump will fight tenaciously and unrelentingly to rebuild American military and economic dominance. The apology tour is over. America is back. Thank you, Mr. President.

© 2017 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

DO NOT MISS THIS BEAUTIFUL MOVIE

A Dog’s Purpose, no matter what the bogus animal protection group, PETA, claims in order to keep you from attending. Those hippie types have organized boycott petitions for this movie with 68,000 signatures while using their own fake news press releases to dissuade patrons from buying tickets to the most meaningful film that one could ever see.

Don’t fall for this. Go and see this movie without delay. It is a totally satisfying and fulfilling movie. And if you love animals, such as this columnist, you will be greatly moved. Indeed, when you go home, you will want to give extra hugs to your own pets with the feeling that you know them better after seeing this expertly crafted film that truly captures the personality and inner feelings of a dog.

It is to be noted that all of PETAs efforts to sabotage this movie, part of their shakedown for profit, is based upon lies. They LIED about an incident they claimed took place during the filming of this wonderful movie. They falsely claimed that a “terrified” German Shepherd was thrown into the rapids, and once in the water, went under, with personnel rushing in to “rescue” it.

That dog was in no danger. The “rapids” were created in a huge water tank constructed on set. The dog had rehearsed the dramatic scene several times where he rescues a kidnapped little girl who had been thrown into the rapids by her abductor. Being at the time a K-9 police dog, he jumped in to rescue her, going under water to pull her to the top, then to the shore.

The dog had rehearsed the scene, at another location at the tank, and balked at having to do this in a location he was not familiar with. PETA profited by selling a video of this supposed event to TV networks and sent releases to print newspapers, milking it for all it was worth to raise money for their organization and to shake down producers. They are an extortion racket under the guise of being an animal protection agency, which they are not.

That video they claimed was so urgent, was taped over FIFTEEN MONTHS AGO. So if PETA reps were on set, and videotaped this, why didn’t they jump in and put a stop to the production and get the dog to safety if this had really happened? They had no interest in the animal. They actually kill more animals than they “save.” While I support several animal rescue organizations I would not give PETA one penny.

It was all a ploy to gain them publicity at the opening of a movie based on an all time best-selling book. They virtually hijacked the advance publicity and anticipation in order to bring all that attention to themselves. Publicity is their motivation. How many remember when these nutty PETA woman stripped totally naked in a very public area of San Francisco to protest the wearing of fur? This alone shows what they are all about.

Plus, the carefully examined video was shown to be heavily edited to make it appear to be an event that was not. Again, PETA LIED to make a case to bring them publicity and stimulate donations at the expense of the movie company and movie goers who would be deprived of seeing an excellent film.

And it is to be added, that PETA executes animals in their shelters, not even keeping them in there for the required time mandated by law so that their owners have time to come and claim them. They even kidnap dogs and euthanize them in the van taking the innocent animal away. They should never present themselves as an animal protective organization.

But wait, don’t they do some good? They do. But remember, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

The nation-wide release of the film had good attendance for the first two days of their opening weekend, even though the PETA protests did result in lower ticket sales. Fortunately, the pickets could not be at the theater I attended with my family, since it was in a shopping center on private property. It was good that they could not perform their feigned concern there. Had they tried to block me they would have quickly learned that the laws of gravity are still intact.

Then there are those ‘reviewers’ who snickered at the film with words like, “fluff, syrupy, tearjerker, overly sentimental, schmaltzy ” and they even criticized the words the dog audibly thought, for instance, when he expressed love for Ethan’s girl friend by thinking, “I like her. She smells like cheese.” This is probably how a dog would think. Yet this misguided critic took issue with the animal’s thought, calling this “bad script writing.” That ‘reviewer’ was in full frontal attack mode.

These critics have a problem with expressing love, emotion or deep feelings. They believe in showing no emotion no matter what happens. They are hardhearted and unfeeling. They are the kind of parents who will not say the words, “I love you,” to their wives and children. As a chaplain I constantly deal with the wives and offspring of those sorry individuals. They are incapable of having deep feelings. So their “reviews” are not worth even reading. There is no honesty in them.

THE MOVIE: This film traces a dog’s life, through several lives. When he dies, he becomes another dog, but with the same knowledge and deep feelings for certain people. From the beginning the dog named Bailey is wondering what his purpose is in life. We hear his thoughts and feelings with a wonderful voice job by Josh Gad

His purpose becomes clearer and clearer with each life he lives. The film ends with the most touching and wonderful conclusion one could ever hope for as everything in his life comes together in a most remarkable way as the dog finds the answer to his purpose.

The cast is great, believable and handle their roles so realistically that the audience feels they are witnessing a real event. Ethan is a main character who comes in the story as a very young boy played by Bryce Gheisar. K.J. Apa plays him as a teenager. We see him age, played by Dennis Quaid, with a powerful final scene when he realizes the spirit of the dog he had loved and grown up with was in another dog’s body that Bailey now inhabited.

The touching ending could not be better. What great writing by the author of the book, W. Bruce Cameron. The movie was true to the book with only a couple of minor exceptions but this did not distract or alter the content of the book.

Do support this film with your attendance. The animals were NOT mistreated in the slightest. They are all absolutely charming and you can’t help but fall in love with all of them. This film gets four stars from this reviewer. PETA gets four enemas.

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reserved

The honeymoon is over already. Upon accepting the Oath of Office as POTUS 45, Donald Trump hit the ground running with a clear intent to keep every promise that garnered him the people’s trust, against all odds in 2016. The first week included a flurry of Executive actions aimed at enforcing U.S. Laws that the Obama Administration had refused to enforce for eight years. That’s all it took to ignite a full-scale mutiny from establishment stooges on both sides of the partisan aisle.

The icing on the cake was a backlash from lawmakers and federal court activists as they worked to thwart Trumps temporary ban of the continued importing of potential jihadists – from seven countries identified by Obama intelligence reports as particularly dangerous.

All Immigration and Naturalization Authority

In the enumerated powers of Congress in Article I – Section VIII of the U.S. Constitution, all legal authority and power over the matter of immigration and naturalization to the U.S. is assigned to the U.S. Congress. Not only do the states have no authority over U.S. immigration and naturalization laws, neither do the Executive or Judicial branches of the Federal government.

States and cities in the U.S. that claim or are defacto “sanctuaries” for illegal activities are operating at odds with the law on a matter that enjoys Federal Supremacy. Not all federal laws or policies enjoy legal supremacy. However, Article VI, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution is known as the Supremacy Clause. It provides that the “Constitution, and the Laws of the United States … shall be the supreme Law of the Land” when the federal government is exercising any of the powers enumerated in the Constitution. Such laws must prevail over any conflicting or inconsistent exercise of power.

All laws concerning immigration and naturalization to the U.S. as passed by Congress, are powers enumerated in the Constitution and they must prevail over any conflicting or inconsistent state, executive or judicial exercise of power.

Because no one has enforced U.S. immigration and naturalization laws since their last reform in 1986, Trumps effort to enforce those laws today is meeting with resistance from illegal actors, both illegal members of society and the politicians who need their votes.

But recent acts by the judiciary are particularly offensive and dangerous.

The States have no Standing

Because the power to regulate immigration and naturalization is the sole power of congress in Article I, the Executive and Judicial branches have the same power as the states and cities on the matter, NONE!

The constitutional authority of the Executive branch and Judicial branch is limited to the enforcement of the laws passed by congress. When either the Executive branch, as was the case with the Obama Administration, or Judicial branch, which is the case today, refuse to uphold or enforce existing immigration laws passed by congress, they are not only failing in their Oaths and assigned duties to the people, they are acting out against those laws and the people.

Such acts, whether by a sitting president, the courts, the states or cities, fall under the legal definition of sedition – “Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order.”

Certainly, anyone who has taken an Oath to uphold and enforce the U.S. Constitution and the laws of this land and then, refuses to do so, further acting out in a manner to prevent even the Commander-in-Chief from doing so, is guilty of sedition, at the very least. Maybe treason as well!

Inciting the well-organized and funded riots across the country since the election, all on the bases and with the intent of undermining U.S. laws, can easily be defined as aiding and abetting known enemies of the United States with the clear intent to overthrown the U.S. Constitutional Republican form of government… a clear and overt act of treason.

Trump’s Temporary Ban

As Commander-in-Chief with the sole responsibility of protecting the United States against foreign invasion, infiltration or threats to national security at the top of his job description, the POTUS takes an Oath to uphold and enforce the laws passed by Congress, so long as those laws are themselves “constitutional.”

Trump did exactly that upon taking office. The Trump administration announced that it would temporarily bar entry to refugees from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen due to terrorism concerns. Not only are these nations currently engaged in internal wars with known terrorist groups today, numerous terror attacks on U.S. soil over the past eight years have involved immigrants from all of these countries.

For the record, “Muslim is not a nationality.” The ban is not a ban on Muslims, it is a ban on entry to the U.S. from nations known to harbor terrorist organizations with ill intent towards the United States.

The temporary ban concerning seven countries identified by Obama era intelligence reports, is not only within the legal purview of the POTUS, it is his highest obligation under his Oath of Office.

Obama Federal Court Appointee NY

The first effort to thwart the law resulted in the immediate firing of interim Attorney General Sally Yates, who had unconstitutionally issued an order to her Department of Justice “to not enforce the law.”

Only days later, New York US Judge Ann M. Donnelly, appointed by Barack Obama and championed by Democrat Senator Chucky Schumer, issued a ruling in an attempt to block Trumps Executive action to enforce our laws.
Supported by a few establishment congressional turncoat republicans like McCain, Graham and Ryan, and of course lawless democrats, the old presumption of court authority on the matter was used to foment and incite organized and funded riots across the country. It was a pure partisan political ruling with no real authority over the subject, as Trump was acting within his authority, duties and Oath of office.

Judge Ann M. Donnelly should meet the same end as Sally Yates… as both acted outside of their authority and against the Rule of Law.

Pending Senate confirmation of Sen. Jeff Sessions as the new Attorney General, Dana Boente, US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was sworn in at 9 p.m. ET, per an administration official. A few hours later, Boente issued a statement rescinding Yates’ order, instructing DOJ lawyers to “defend the lawful orders of our President.”

DOJ errors in Appeal

Due to Senate delays in confirming Sessions as Attorney General, the DOJ is left scrambling for a clear direction on critical legal matters involving national security. The result was for the DOJ to waste time and energy engaging in the legal battle over the ban that has netted a law suit by sanctuary states Washington, New York and Massachusetts, and now an appeals court ruling from the 9th circuit, none of which have any legal authority on the subject of immigration and naturalization beyond their obligation to uphold and enforce federal laws.

Let me point out that the U.S. Constitution gives the courts NO lawmaking authority whatsoever. Not one single American ever elected even one judge on any federal court. The Constitution does not create an oligarchy of unaccountable and unelected political activists to run our country. The constitutional authority and responsibility of the judicial branch is extremely limited, despite the fact that they have become accustomed to overstepping that authority for decades.

Worst of All

While these gutless legal beagles play games with national security, Trump’s new head of the Department of Homeland Security appears to be taking orders from unelected judges instead of the Commander-in-Chief.

Federal Judge James Robart, a George W. Bush appointee who presides in Seattle, halted the enforcement of Trump’s order Friday night, effective nationwide.

Washington (CNN) “President Donald Trump’s government moved swiftly Saturday to comply with a federal judge’s order halting his travel ban — even as Trump himself denounced the judge — but readied its legal defense of the controversial executive action.

The Department of Homeland Security announced it has suspended all actions to implement the immigration order and will resume standard inspections of travelers as it did prior to the signing of the travel ban. But it said the Justice Department — which is expected to file an emergency motion to stop the order — needed to challenge the ruling “at the earliest possible time.”

“(Trump’s order) is intended to protect the homeland and the American people, and the President has no higher duty and responsibility than to do so,” acting DHS press secretary Gillian Christensen said when announcing the suspension.”

Bordering on Mutiny

General John F. Kelly is a highly-decorated career Marine with extensive leadership experience. No one knows the U.S. chain of command better than General Kelly. Kelly is the newly seated Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, appointed by President Donald Trump.

“The Department of Homeland Security has a vital mission: to secure the nation from the many threats we face. This requires the dedication of more than 240,000 employees in jobs that range from aviation and border security to emergency response, from cybersecurity analyst to chemical facility inspector. Our duties are wide-ranging, and our goal is clear – keeping America safe.”

As General Kelly well knows, this is also the primary mandate of the Commander-in-Chief, President Trump. He also knows that the order issued by Trump was both legal and necessary to the security of the United States and that the Commander-in-Chief had the full authority to issue that directive.

So, why did General Kelly allow an unelected judicial activist to overrule the Commander-in-Chief by issuing the following DHS directive? DHS Statement on Compliance with Recent Court Order.

Why is General John Kelly, new Trump Secretary of DHS taking orders from known left-wing judicial activists instead of the Commander-in-Chief? Were any of these judges elected President of the United States? Have all of them taken an oath to uphold and enforce the U.S. Constitution and U.S laws? Does the Department of Homeland Security take orders from unelected judges, or from the POTUS?

When federal courts ordered Barack Hussein Obama to cease and desist in his executive amnesty, he simply ignored those orders and continued his executive amnesty with total immunity. Obama didn’t pay any attention at all to those court opinions… despite the fact that Obama’s order was unlawful and unconstitutional on its face – an overt refusal to enforce federal laws in direct violation of his oath, placing all of America at risk.

Obama totally ignored those court orders and there was no price to pay whatsoever. The same IG who sat silent as Obama ignored court orders to stop his “illegal” executive amnesty, is now looking into Trump’s “legal” temporary vetting ban.

In the end, it all adds up to just how much swamp needs to be drained…

But it also begs the question… Is Trump really up to this task? Does he really have the backbone to fight and defeat these anti-American activists in the courts and congress in order to “drain this swamp?” Do his appointees, like General Kelly and Jeff Sessions, really have what it takes to put these illegal activists in their place and return this country to the Rule of Constitutional Law?

Or is it all just smoke and mirrors… creating the impression of draining the swamp while allowing the swamp to run roughshod over the Trump Administration and the people, until the people get so fed up that they take matters into their own hands?

Because Trump is moving at light-speed, and so are his enemies, we won’t have to wait long to see the answers to these questions.

Obama had the courage to defy the courts, even as he acted illegally. Does Trump and his team have the courage to defy these activist judges in the name of the law? We will know the answer to this question in days… not weeks.

If Trump and his cabinet is serious about draining this swamp, they must start stepping on heads right away. The political left (including people like McCain, Graham and Ryan) must be shut down. They must be stopped from using activist judges appointed by Obama to thwart Trumps attempts to secure the USA and enforce our laws… or else the notion of draining this swamp is a joke!

The people are hoping and watching. Trump was chosen to lead a Revolution! The people will give him a chance to do that, but not for long…

© 2017 JB Williams – All Rights Reserved

Gov. Greg Abbott [R-TX] has been in a highly publicized war with a rogue sheriff here in Texas who protects illegal aliens. Sheriff Hernandez is a disgrace to the uniform and oath of office she took when elected. Her territory includes Austin, a major metro area.

Sanctuary Sheriff Faces Removal From Office For Aiding Criminal Illegals

Report: Illegals Committed 600,000 Crimes in Texas in 6 Yrs

PJ Media reveals that over a span of about 6 years, illegal immigrants in the state committed over 600,000 crimes and were involved in nearly 3,000 homicides.

Despite the gargantuan burden placed on our courts here in Texas caused by illegal aliens who claim to have rights under OUR constitution, along with raping we the people to pay for her precious illegals, Hernandez has done the unthinkable:

Texas Sheriff Releases 39 Criminal Aliens in First Two Days of Sanctuary Policy

Now, two things. First, think Kathleen Steinle in San Francisco. The illegal who killed her had been deported five times and had seven felony convictions. The City of Sodom had been protecting that illegal alien from Mexico.

Guess what I learned from one of his columns?

“It was Truman who pushed the Federal Immigration and National Act of 1952 through Congress in the closing days of his administration. Under Section 8 USC 1324[a](1)(A)[iv][b](iii) any US citizen that knowingly assists an illegal alien, provides them with employment, food, water or shelter has committed a felony. City, county or State officials that declare their jurisdictions to be “Open Cities, Counties or States are subject to arrest; as are law enforcement agencies who chose not to enforce this law.

Here, go read the law for yourself.

WHAT EVERY ONE OF US MUST DO:

Dear Attorney General Sessions:

As soon as Sessions is sworn in, put a date on the letter, sign and get in the mail to: Attorney General Jeff Sessions, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20530.

Immigrant sentenced to 40 years in prison for drunken driving crash that killed family

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) faced tough questions from the mother of a boy killed by an illegal alien about sanctuary cities and the threat they pose to Americans.

Angel Mom Laura Wilkerson to Jose Antonio Vargas: There Is No ‘Grey Area’ With Illegal Immigration

excitedly demonstrating how he murdered the 100-lb. Joshua.

“Instead of getting Joshua home that day from school, we got an autopsy report,” Wilkerson testified before a Senate hearing in July 2015. “He was kicked so hard in the stomach that it sent his spleen into his spine, and sliced it in two… The medical examiner said it was torture.”

Ron Cornell, shown here with a car-hood portrait of his murdered son Joey. His son’s killer, Gonzalo Villalobos, escaped to Mexico and, like so many others, is being protected by the Mexican government’s refusal to extradite. At one point, Villalobos’ whereabouts in El Salvador were known precisely, but there is no extradition cooperation with that nation either. (After the devastation of Hurricane Mitch in 1998, the United States sent $110 million in disaster relief aid to El Salvador.) This article includes a rogues gallery of mug shots of fugitives safe in Mexico.”

Taking Politics Out of Solutions is now available. The most important issues destroying America are presented along with constitutional solutions neither the Republicans or Democrats will pursue. Get your copy now. Excellent discounts for 2 or more books, or on bulk orders.]

President Donald Trump has accomplished more in the first few weeks of his presidency than any other president in the modern era. He is making good on each of his campaign promises, transforming America into a nation that has secure borders, that reduces regulatory impediments that block market entry and retard free enterprise, that permits free markets to arise in health care, and that wages a relentless campaign of destruction against radical Islamic terrorists worldwide. His actions are so swift and so consequential that his opposition has difficulty capturing the news cycle. By the time they coalesce opposition against a measure, President Trump is on to the next initiative.

He is unintimidated by his opposition and dedicated with laser like precision to achieve the objectives of his Administration. To this point in history, each modern President has been preoccupied with media perception of each action. That preoccupation has rendered actions anemic and results unimpressive in case after case. By contrast, President Tump leads and lets the consequences follow. He means to make a huge difference for the benefit of his country and has no tolerance for mindless drivel and opposition based on sympathies for America’s enemies.

The politics of Washington have been the politics of indecision, inaction, and inertia. President Trump has filled Washington’s vacuum of power with bold and directed leadership. Republicans thought to be likely antagonists of the President have largely fallen into rank behind him, recognizing that President Trump proceeds like a steamroller at full throttle without regard to whether his opposition comes in the form of a Red or a Blue state representative.

For those who have long yearned for change to revitalize the American economy, defend America’s borders, and dismantle the regulatory state, President Trump comes as an answer. There is no one in Washington more dedicated to the welfare of the United States than President Trump.

He is increasingly winning over the hearts and minds of the American people. They are coming to realize that bureaucratic mountains thought to be impenetrable and permanent are the very ones he intends to bring down. The dams those mountains formed, blocking the flow of free market activity are rapidly giving way, ushering in new streams of commerce for the benefit of all Americans.

Just one month ago, the market heaved forward carrying the weight of regulation with no apparent end in sight. Many doubted that President Trump, even were they to credit his promise to deregulate, could alter decades old regulatory regimes that exercised an authoritarian strangle hold on the throat of business.

Business leaders have learned that regardless of how illogical or extreme the regulations imposed upon them, they would have to adjust because the regulators were not going to disappear and possess numerous tools to fine or destroy those who resist compulsion. Trump’s executive order on deregulation changes the direction. Now the regulatory state faces a President who means to reduce the size and scope of the regulatory state by a promised 75%. They face a President with the fortitude necessary to stand firm in the face of bureaucratic wailing and gnashing of teeth.

President Donald Trump is proving by action, not rhetoric, that he means to resurrect the American empire. The contrast with his predecessor could not be greater. The world is fast coming to realize that Donald Trump will fight tenaciously and unrelentingly to rebuild American military and economic dominance. The apology tour is over. America is back. Thank you, Mr. President.

© 2017 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

I would like to begin today with a few verses of Scripture that I believe you are all fa- miliar with. The first passage is from the book of Deuteronomy. For those who are un- aware, Deuteronomy contains the messages of Moses written in the final days of his life. The Israelites had wandered in the desert for a generation. Many of those who had wit- nessed God’s miracles during the Exodus had, by now, passed away, and so Moses was speaking to a new generation, one that had not witnessed God’s power, miracles or the giving of the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai. As Moses’ life was coming to an end, he was speaking to the KIDS of those who had been firsthand witnesses, giv- ing a final reminder of the most important things this new generation needed to know. He was passing down the sage advice and wisdom of an elder, as a leader, as God’s chosen man.

His listeners at the time were fearful. Moses had been their leader their entire lives. Now, Joshua was about to assume that role. The people were camped on the plains of Moab, about to enter the Promised Land. They were doubtful, afraid, facing impending war with the inhabitants of the land, and tempted to run away, yet there was nowhere to run. No direction to go but forward — led by a new leader they were not quite sure of yet. Additionally, they were about to start a whole new way of life. Rather than being wanderers, they were now to become settlers, pioneers. Finally, they would have a place to put down roots and call “home,” in the land the Lord had promised their parents and grandparents. An entirely new concept to them.

So in his old age, as Moses wrote these words, you can imagine he was careful to make sure he emphasized those things that were most vitally important. Thus, his writ- ings in Deuteronomy were his last chance to give final instructions as to how to live a Godly, righteous and pleasing life before the Lord, and thereby receive the blessings of God, raise healthy families in Godly homes, create a nation and a culture that would flourish and be pleasing before the Lord. And it was his hope that these precious words would be heeded and followed for all future generations. He didn’t just make a speech or give a sermon — he WROTE THESE WORDS DOWN — for his people then, and for all of mankind, for all time. Ancient wisdom of antiquity, yet we can still read these very words for ourselves today. Despite the fact that evil men have done their best to stamp out God’s Word from existence, from the minute it was originally written and in every gen- eration since, it simply cannot be done… praise the Lord for His loving instruction, not willing that any should be lost, or left without His divine guidance.

In Chapter 5 of Deuteronomy, Moses repeated the Law given to him by God Himself, as recorded in the book of Exodus. Then, in Chapter six, he emphasized this: “And these words that I?command you today shall be on your heart. You shall teach them dili- gently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.”

As you read the Bible and understand the history of God’s people — and perhaps more importantly, the history of the WORLD — you realize that when these words of Moses were followed, the family unit — and the culture at large — was always blessed by God.

But when the wisdom and instruction of God were abandoned, families collapsed, chil- dren ran wild and anarchy and cursing of nations resulted, every time. Today it has been more than 3400 years since Moses penned the words of Deuteronomy. Few today read them anymore at all; and when they are proclaimed in our churches, they seem to go in one ear and directly out the other. They’ve become nothing more than “nice plati- tudes” — but almost no one really takes them seriously anymore.

As a result, we see our entire WORLD in turmoil, and here at home in the United States, the word “family” has been completely redefined to be the exact OPPOSITE of God’s design. Men sodomizing other men and calling THAT a “family.” Women aban- doning their natural affections, turning instead to other women and calling THAT a “fam- ily.” And now we’ve strayed so far from God that we can’t even say for sure which gender we are…. how twisted we become when we abandon the laws of God and nature!

The basic building blocks of a Godly, righteous society have been undermined by the enemy of our souls, working through evil men and women who despise God’s author- ity. The definition of “family” has now been replaced by moral relativism, re-written to mean whatever WE want it to mean. As we go about being “wise in our own eyes,” the foundation of our families has crumbled and we no longer look to God for wisdom and rescue. Now we look to secular thinkers and government to be our saviors. How’s that been working for us? Surely abandoning the antiquated precepts of a “superstitious, Pa- triarchal religion’” would free us and bring about utopia on earth, right? Take a look around. I report, YOU decide.

Next, I would like to remind you of a verse we hear often, written by the wisest man on earth, Solomon. Proverbs 2: 6, “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old, he will not depart from it.” Paul reiterates the concept of properly raising chil- dren in Ephesians chapter 6: “bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.”

Yet what has happened to our kids today? I certainly do not mean to criticize ALL young people, because I know MANY who are stellar examples of integrity, honor, courage and Godliness. In fact, I know SOME who are more Godly, courageous, bold and honorable than most adults. But as I follow the news from our college campuses around America, I am NOT encouraged. Their worldviews and ideology are twisted and demented, their minds depraved. As I see the herds of young people after public High School and Middle School lets out for the day, walking in packs down the street, all looking down, all staring blankly, mezmerized by their smart phones, I can guaran- tee you, they’re not reading Scripture. Statistics bear out the fact that our public schools here in America are failing our kids. Despite the fact that there are many good, well- meaning teachers in these schools, the dumbing down of America, I truly believe, is in- tentional and orchestrated. This is by design.

Here are some statistics: According to the website RankingAmerica, the US ranks 24th in LITERACY, while at the same time, 2nd in IGNORANCE of moral, social and historical knowledge. We also rank 1st in all the nations of world when it comes to ANXIETY DISORDERS, 4th in the world in PORNOGRAPHY USE and 21st in over- all HAPPINESS. Meanwhile, more and more Americans are leaving church, aban- doning their faith and embracing either no faith at all, or choosing Secular Humanism and Moral Relativism; not to mention the concept of “Democratic Socialism,” which could be better described as “Mobocracy.” According to studies, a full 85% of young people leave their faith in Christ the minute they leave home and begin college. I dare say that many never had much faith to begin with, due to inadequate Christian educa- tion from their churches and a lack of consistent, Godly leadership in the home.

In the book “Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers,” authors Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton report: “The ma- jority of teenagers are incredibly inarticulate about their faith, religious beliefs and prac- tices, and its place in their lives. The de facto dominant religion among contemporary.

U.S. teenagers is what they call ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’: A God exists who cre- ated and orders the world and watches over human life on earth; God wants people to be good, nice, and fair to each other, as taught in the Bible and by most world religions; the central goal of life is to be happy and to feel good about oneself; God does not need to be particularly involved in one’s life except when God is needed to resolve a problem; and good people go to heaven when they die.”

These are the predominant beliefs of modern American teenagers; and while most attended a Christian church during their childhood, their faith and theology is absurdly shallow. So what WAS their church experience growing up? Bible STORIES in Sun- day School and “Childrens’ Church” where they heard a story, presented like a fairy tale, then colored a picture page and were given a snack and had play time. Then they returned to the secular public schools where God was never allowed, but foul cursing of His name was readily accepted in the hallways; the truth of His Word was replaced by the lies of secular science, and the radical leftist opinions of God-hating socialist in- structors formed the worldviews of our precious children. Parents did NOT keep the commands of God on their hearts, nor teach them to their children diligently in their homes, when they walked by the way, when they laid down or when they rose up. They left all that to the “Church.”

Then the kids went off to college where the instructors seem to have two main goals for incoming freshmen: 1) get them to abandon any shred of Christian faith they may have left and 2) get them to question their sexuality and experiment freely with alterna- tive lifestyles. When those children returned to their parents, their parents no longer recognized them, and wondered where they went wrong… after all, they took them to church every Sunday!

Now, it’s confession time for me. And I hope you will grant me some grace. I was raised in a Christian home. I was the first kid in my town to ever sign up to be an “AWANA clubber.” We attended a rock-solid Bible church and I learned and memorized God’s Word from my earliest childhood. But as I became a teenager, I began to drift. AWANA, for me, had ended. I was too old. Our youth group at church was not the best. I still read the Bible on my own, but the enticements of the world drew me in. I made many poor choices as a youth and many mistakes I still regret today.

I never finished college, but while I was there, I wrote for the college newspaper. Be- lieve it or not, I wrote an article advocating Jesse Jackson for president. Yes, within just a few months of attending a state-run public college, I had already sipped the liberal Kool-aide. I attended only one year, and decided it was not for me. I can’t imagine what would have happened to me had I stayed for four years or longer. Instead, I went out and learned a trade and opened my own business — a photography studio. That was the best education I could have ever obtained, because I not only taught myself a trade, but the experience also trained me up for life in the real world, and the Holy Spirit con- tinued to work within me, and guided me back to clear thinking.

It took a while to shake off the indoctrination of liberalism I had received during my time in college. I remember hearing Rush Limbaugh speak on the radio for the first time, and thought he was a real “jerk” because of his conservative stance. And it’s incredibly embarassing for me to admit today, but I also stood in line for four hours in 1990 to hear Jerry Brown, now the governor of California, speak as he campaigned for president. Then I stood for another hour afterwards to shake his hand. (Incidentally, he had the soft- est, most delicate hands I’ve ever encountered on a human being ever before, or ever since — clearly, he has never done a single day’s hard work in his life).

But I DID grow up. As the Scripture says, “when they are old, they will not depart from it.” The thing with this, though, is, it takes some people a LOT longer to grow up, and “old” is not a specified age. Yet the promise remains. But the promise includes a com- mand: “Train up a child in the way he should go.”

Our country’s culture and our world is in complete disarray today because we have multiple generations that have never done that. They have let their kids “decide for themselves” regarding any sort of faith. They have NOT trained them up. They have NOT taught them in the home and parents have NOT modeled the Christian life in front of their children.

When my wife and I got married, we determined to do life right, and to raise our children knowing Jesus. We prayed for each one from the moment they were conceived, and together as a family every day. Our kids are not perfect, but neither have they de- parted from what they know is true, or ever strayed, for very long, from the narrow road.

God’s Word lays out, clearly, to all who will hear, instructions for building the Foun- dation of the Family, which truly IS the Foundation of a Godly society, culture and na- tion. Doing life any other way will only bring calamity, which we see now, regularly, in our daily news.

On March 10th and 11th, we are hosting our annual Wisconsin Christian?News Ministry Expo and Conference titled “REVIVING THE REMNANT BY REVEALING THE TRUTH.” Julaine Appling of the Wisconsin Family Council will speak on the topic of The Foundation of the Family. During the Conference, we will also be addressing all the other most vital and urgent things that we, as Christians, need to learn about and act upon in these troubled times. Usama Dakdok will Reveal the Truth about Islam. Peter Labarbera will Reveal the Truth about the Homosexual Agenda, Coach Dave Dauben- mire will Reveal the Truth about Making the Church Great Again, Pastor Matt Trewhella will Reveal the Truth about Why Abortion Should Matter to the Church, and Pastor Terry Fischer will speak on the Revelation of Jesus Christ. This is the most powerful lineup of speakers we have ever assembled, and we will be addressing the most vital and im- portant things that we, as God’s remnant Church MUST deal with in such a time as this. Please plan now to join us. It will be the most powerful event you’ve been to in a very long time. Call me for me details.

Audio CDs and transcripts of this message are available when you call me at Wisconsin Christian News, (715) 486-8066. Or email Rob@WisconsinChristianNews.com and ask for message number 188.

© 2017 Rob Pue – All Rights Reserved

President Trump’s move to restrict people coming into our land from seven Mohammedan countries in the Middle East has sparked widespread controversy. Most Americans are well aware that our current immigration system is conducted in such a way that there is no economic benefit for most American citizens. But the President’s decision was not for purposes of economic protection for our country.

As I spoke in Saint Louis to the Educational Policy Conference 28 this past weekend on the Bible in the Constitution, there were many speakers who highlighted the history of Mohammedanism and the current dangers it presents to our Christian Constitutional Republic. Jihad is a real danger to as all, to our lives, liberties and our property.

The President is charged in Art II Sec 3 of our Constitution with “taking Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…” We know that for multiple decades now our immigration laws have not been faithfully executed by any sitting President nor by his administration. We also know from the history of immigration to our land that our Constitution absolutely permits us to restrict or to even cut off immigration from any country in the world.

Consider what was done “in 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, which, per the terms of the Angell Treaty, suspended the immigration of Chinese laborers (skilled or unskilled) for a period of 10 years. The Act also required every Chinese person traveling in or out of the country to carry a certificate identifying his or her status as a laborer, scholar, diplomat, or merchant.”[1] So our Federal government certainly can Constitutionally place broad country specific restrictions on immigration. It seems to me that President Trump is simply fulfilling his oath of office “taking Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

Jihad is for real and has serious consequences. The persecution of the church has ramped up world wide at an astonishing level. Open doors ministry has documented 1207 Christian martyrdoms world wide in 2016, and expects that number to rise this year. North Korea and nine Mohammedan countries made their top ten list of the worst persecuting countries.

Gordon Conwell’s Center for the Study of Global Christianity estimates that 900,000 Christians have been killed for their faith in the past ten years. The report noted that 30% of the martyrdoms took place at the hands of Mohammedan terrorists. The study also found that Christians are the most despised people group in the world. But there is another side to the story.

A Wind in the House of Islam by David Garrison is the story of the nine geo–cultural variants of Islam around the world – what the author calls ‘rooms in the House of Islam’ – and how the Wind of God’s Spirit is blowing through every one of them. Garrison spent three years traveling 250,000 miles through every corner of the Muslim world to investigate reports of Muslims turning to faith in Christ.

In his research he collected the stories of over 1,000 former Muslim who’ve become Christians, asking them the question: “What did God use to bring you to faith in Jesus Christ? Tell me your story.” The result is an unprecedented look into the greatest turning of Muslims to Christ in history; stories of men and women who have sacrificed everything – home, family, even their lives – to follow Jesus. His account tells of men and women from Africa to Indonesia and everywhere in between; how God is at work through answered prayers, and through dreams and visions and through technology (Internet, satellite television, video and audio tools).

What we need to see in all this is that no matter how hard Satan tries, he cannot defeat the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ; the gates of Hell shall never prevail and ultimately Christ Jesus shall rule over all as King of kings and Lord of lords.

The main takeaways are these: 1) Christianity is growing today as never before on earth; 2) There is great need for sound Biblical teaching among new converts, for syncretism and pseudo-Christianity are rampant.

Those take aways are exactly parallel to what Paul was writing to his disciple Titus regarding for the work of ministry committed to his care. We do well to learn these same principles at this juncture of history as they clearly apply in our day.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

As we continue to look at what our politicians have allowed to be done to the American people. Keep in mind that the FDA is supposed to keep everything that we consume safe yet there are way too many things that they ‘approve’ that are grave dangers to the human body. Let’s take a look at fluoride. Fluoride is a rat poison. I don’t see a real great need to be putting rat poison in my body. There are studies after studies on the negative side effects of fluoride that it baffles the mind that the FDA has given it a thumbs up.

The biggest reason to fluoridate the water is to help prevent cavities. Dentists bathe the teeth in fluoride to strengthen them. But the evidence that drinking this rat poison has the same effect is non-existant. Two-thirds of Americans drink tap water that has added fluoride. Unlike other chemicals added to water, which are intended to treat the water itself, fluoride is intended to treat the people who drink the water, whether they want the treatment or not.

As the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) puts it, “Fluoridating water supplies can thus fairly be described as a form of mass medication, which is why most European countries have rejected the practice.”

In the U.S., many people assume the fluoride in drinking water is beneficial for their teeth, an assumption that has been widely spread by public health agencies.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has partnered with the American Dental Association (ADA) in saying fluoridation is “nature’s way to prevent tooth decay” — a statement that is both misleading and inaccurate.

The Fluoride in Drinking Water Is Not Natural

The CDC and ADA state that “some communities are lucky enough to have naturally occurring optimal levels of fluoride in their water supplies.”
While it’s true that fluoride is naturally occurring in some areas, leading to high levels in certain water supplies “naturally,” naturally occurring substances are not automatically safe (think of arsenic, for instance).

When people are exposed to high levels of naturally occurring fluoride, severe disease can result. Data from India’s Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry indicate that nearly 49 million people are living in areas where fluoride levels in water are above the permissible levels.[1]

Fluoride has also been linked to diabetes and low IQ. (This could explain the mental condition of liberals!) Professor Paul Connett, Ph.D., director of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), debates professor Mike Berridge, Ph.D., of the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research in New Zealand on the topic of water fluoridation.

This debate was 12 years in the making; it’s taken that long to find someone willing to debate Connett and defend the controversial practice of water fluoridation. It’s a pressing issue in the U.S. as well as in New Zealand, one of the few countries in the world where water fluoridation is still practiced.

At present, only about 52 percent of New Zealand’s population receives fluoridated water, but proposed legislation could change this and essentially require mandatory water fluoridation for all of New Zealand.

In order to support this introduction of mandatory water fluoridation, the New Zealand Ministry of Health recently called on an expert panel to review the data surrounding water fluoridation, and the panel, not surprisingly, concluded it is safe.

However, information provided by Connett in the debate should easily undermine the fluoridation mandate, as the practice has been linked to a number of health harms, including lowered IQ.

Fluoride Proponents Make Error in Reviewing IQ Study, Inaccurately Claim Fluoridation Is Safe

In 2014 Lancet Neurology released a study, authored by a Harvard doctor, among others, that classified fluoride as a developmental neurotoxin.[2] It wasn’t the first time.

In 2012, a meta-analysis, also by Harvard researchers, clearly showed that children exposed to fluoride in drinking water had lower IQ, by an average of seven points, in areas with raised concentrations.[2]

There are thousands of articles you can search that gives both pro and con on fluoridation but the bottom line is do we really need a poison added to our drinking water?

Then we have artificial sweeteners. These can and are as deadly as any other poison they have approved for our consumption. Aspartame is the most dangerous substance that is added to our food. Aspartame is the technical name for the brand names NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, and Equal-Measure. It was discovered by accident in 1965 when James Schlatter, a chemist of G.D. Searle Company, was testing an anti-ulcer drug.

Aspartame accounts for over 75 percent of the adverse reactions to food additives reported to the FDA. Many of these reactions are very serious, including seizures and death. A few of the 90 different documented symptoms listed in the report as part of aspartame dangers are:

Headaches/migraines, Dizziness, Seizures, Weight gain, Depression, Heart palpitations, Breathing difficulties, Tinnitus[3] and a bucket full of other things. Then there are chronic illnesses can be triggered or worsened by using aspartame: Brain tumors, Multiple sclerosis, Epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, Mental retardation, Lymphoma, Birth defects, Fibromyalgia [3] and others. You have to ask if these can be activated or worsened by the use of aspartame then why is it allowed to be used? It’s like watching a commercial for a new drug and the list of side effects is worse than the disease that it is being used to fight! The use of common sense has been forgotten and lobbyists have been allowed to line politicians pockets to the detriment of the American people. This is occurring on both sides of the isle.

The subject of climate change is the result of human activity is laughable at best. When we listen to ‘scientists’ that say man is destroying the planet causing climate change you have to scratch your head when they also say that it was climate change that killed off most of the animals that lived in Australia 25 million years ago. Man wasn’t around 25 million years ago. Were the dinosaurs driving too many cars?

Remember the volcano that blew in Iceland in 2014? That shut down air travel over Europe for almost two weeks. It was reported that that eruption wiped out all the CO2 and particulate savings done by every man woman and child worldwide for the previous five years! In just three days. That volcano is still erupting putting CO2 into the air. An average volcano puts as much CO2 into the air as 250-300 million automobiles! There are over 1500 active volcanoes in the world above ground and over 30,000 on the continental ridge! Of all the greenhouse gases CO2 is only 3.62% of those gases and man’s contribution to that is only 3.4% of that![4]

Methane is another greenhouse gas but of all the gases it is only .066%. Surprisingly the biggest contributor to global warming or climate change or whatever they want to call it is . . . . water![5] Over 95% of the cause of global warming is water. I don’t think that any activity by man will effect this in any way but if you know this then the government can’t control you. They want you to think that YOU are the problem and YOU need to be controlled. Our politicians are more than willing to let that happen as long as their pockets are lined.

Just to give a little proof that global warming is phony: No matter is the science of global warming is all phony . . . climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world. (Income redistribution) – Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment)

We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy. – Tim Worth (President, UN Foundation)

It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true. – Paul Watson (Co-founder of Greenpeace)

Next week we’ll look at population control.

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. Fluoridated water less cavities?.
2. Water fluoridation and diabetes.
3. Aspartame most dangerous substance added to food.
4. Contrubution to global warming.
5. Greenhouse Data. 

Legislating From The Bench and putting America in danger

The federal judge — who on Friday issued a restraining order on President Donald Trump’s program to prevent Muslim refugees and visitors from a number of terrorist hotbeds from entering the United States until they can be vetted and certified as no threat to American citizens — is an activist who believes his job is to provide social justice rather than interpreting the U.S. Constitution. www.judicialselectionstrikeforce.org

Ironically he is the same judge who made national headlines in 2016 when he ruled that “Black Lives Matter” in a federal courtroom, thus giving a radical, violence-prone group legitimacy.

U.S. District Court Judge James Robart made his Black Lives Matter declaration while hearing a case against the Seattle (Washington) Police Department that opposed the implementation of new police procedures that city. According to Lt. Stuart Larkingwicz of the American Federation of Police, Robart’s actions and statements amounted to a federal judge officially supported the activist group from the bench.

A check of Robart’s overall career reveals he once represented Southeast Asian immigrants attempting to “jump in front of the immigration line” prior to his judicial work for the federal court system. His biggest case involved police and black citizens in Seattle:

The Seattle Police Department was accused of using excessive force against non-whites in the city. The police chief and other officials promised to make changes in order to avoid federal civil prosecution. But Robart insisted the police union had been dragging its feet implementing changes.

Robart then scolded the police officers’ union during an August 2016 hearing. “The court and the citizens of Seattle will not be held hostage for increased payments and benefits,” he said. “I’m sure the entire city of Seattle would march behind me.”

“This decision was all politics and no substance. It’s not based on anything in the U.S. Constitution, either. When Obama had a ban on Iraqis and others coming into the country, where was Judge Robart? He was on the bench then, as well. He’s a part of the RINO [Republican in name only] wing of the GOP and sees his job as being someone who will mete out ‘social justice’ to the downtrodden,” said former military officer, police commander and political strategist Michael Baker.

Also, on Saturday, veteran watchdog Larry Klayman, the founder of both Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch and a former Justice Department prosecutor, issued a statement in the wake of the what he calls an illegal decision by a federal judge in Seattle to place a temporary restraining order on the recent executive action by President Donald Trump to put a 90-day hold on immigration from 7 Middle Eastern countries, all of which harbor huge numbers of Muslim terrorists bent on harming the United States. www.freedomwatchusa.org.

Klayman had this to say:

“The ruling is regrettably not surprising, as this judge not only disobeyed and flouted the law but apparently was more intent on making a name for himself in a very leftist state, Washington, and around the nation. While he was nominated by former President George W. Bush, this means little to nothing. The Bush family and many of its Republican establishment officials, after the unsuccessful presidential campaign of Jeb Bush, not only harbor an animus against President Trump, but W.’s appointed federal judges during his failed administration were generally not strict constructionists of the Constitution, or the rule of law. In addition to this renegade Seattle judge, James Robart, who also has taken over control of the Seattle Police Department, I am reminded of another W. appointee, federal judge Murray Snow who presides in the federal court in Phoenix, Arizona, who not only also has taken control of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, but unethically persecuted former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, boasting to his wife that he was bent on destroying Arpaio while presiding over a contempt trial sparked by the ultra-leftist and itself unethical ACLU.

“The bottom line is this: Judge Robart has illegally and unconstitutionally blocked executive power to curtail immigration of non-citizens and non-permanent residents, all of which have no rights to enter this country at will. Here, there was not even a bar put in place by President Trump, but simply a temporary hold on issuing visas to allow time to put in place an extreme vetting process to weed out terrorists.

Thus, President Trump’s reaction to this outrageous grab of judicial power was mild. Judge Robart should be impeached for his blatant political act and illegal grandstanding, obviously designed to make a name for himself. www.freedomwatchusa.org.

“Finally, this underscores why Freedom Watch’s Judicial Selection Strike Force Coalition is so important an endeavor. There currently are about 100 judicial vacancies on the federal lower courts and we intend to vet and recommend judges to President Trump for appointment who adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law in general, like Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch. Currently, by and large what we have on the federal bench, with some exceptions, are ‘politicians in robes.’ This is very dangerous, as federal judges are our most important public servants, as they were intended by the framers of the Constitution to be independent and free of politics to protect We the People from the tyranny of the other two branches of government. What we see with Judge Robart’s illegal ruling ironically is ‘judicial tyranny’!”

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

Quoting Yogi Berra, “It’s like deja-vu, all over again.” Now that the Republicans are back in power the Left (democrats, Hollywood and mainstream media) have dusted off all their old rude crude tactics in an attempt to brand America a hellhole of discontentment, pain, suffering and unfairness.

Obamacare caused Cancer patients to lose their life-saving doctors. Millions of Americans lost health care plans they were happy with which Obama promised they could keep. He lied. Blacks suffered big-time under Obama, moving backwards.

Americans on food stamps skyrocketed from 31.9 million to 47.6 million under Obama. Ninety-seven million Americans left the labor force under Obama.

To seduce new future democrat voters, Obama produced TV commercials for Spanish soap operas to encourage illegals to apply for food stamps. Meanwhile, Americans struggled to make ends meet. Expanding the definition of disability shot costs to $200 billion a year while cutting assistance to real disabled Americans.

Yes, there was real pain and suffering under Obama. And yet, fake news portrayed Obama’s regime as 8 years of sweetness and light. The Left’s daily lie was if mean white racist Republicans in congress had only cooperated with him, Obama could have done so much more. The truth is congress did cooperate, fearful of opposing the first black president.

Within hours of Trump taking the oath of office, Leftists were out in full force behaving like vulgar lawless maniacs. Suddenly, Trump is an evil lord making everyone’s life miserable. Leftists began fund-raising, 40 mil thus far, to impeach Trump. Their henchmen began physically and politically beating up any and everyone they discover voted for Trump.

This headline really got my goat. “Girls Scouts Under Fire for Marching in Trump’s Inaugural Parade”

Folks, this is the kind of deplorable arrogant bullying from the Left that we have passively tolerated for far too long. C’mon, beating up on the girl scouts? Really? The Left pulls this crap because they can. My political activism began around 2008. Since then, all I have heard from experts on our side is do not push back too hard, less we make Leftists angry and we get negative press. News flash, fake news demonizes us even when we do nothing.

Remember that best-seller, “All I Really Needed to Know, I learned in Kindergarten”? I was a small kid. When bullies in our Baltimore projects confiscated my lunch money, cousin Jimmy got in their faces. The bullying ended. This is how we must deal with Leftist bullies. I love Trump’s zero-tolerance with being slandered by fake news. Trump’s Chief-of-Staff Reince Priebus proclaimed, “We’re not going to sit around and take it.”

Now, about that demeaning anti-Trump women thing in DC. Fake news claimed half a million women showed up. It was awful folks, triple X rated. Leftist media celebrated and normalized profanity, deviancy and vulgarity. With kids in the audience, Madonna repeatedly dropped F bombs and told president Trump to “suck a d***.” Ashley Judd ranted about bloody sheets and tampons. Thousands of women wore hats they described as “p**** hats” at the rally. Unbelievably, Trump’s life was boldly threatened from the podium. One protest sign read, “Black Trans Queer Lives Matter.” I thought, how many of them are there in the world? Ten?

Call me crazy, but what are these women so upset about?

For crying out loud, Leftists have branded maleness a mental illness. Fathers are disrespected and portrayed as idiots in sitcoms and movies. Women dominate college campuses because guys refuse to stomach being told what jerks they are in forced feminist “re-education” courses. Though fake news ignores it, there is an aggressive feminist War on Masculinity. Women have confided in me their discomfort watching football with the players running around wearing pink.

Leftist media glorified a lesbian couple for trying to feminize “queer” their 17 month old baby boy, forcing him to wear tutus. The parents admitted, “he hates it.” The couple says they are frustrated by their son’s male tendencies.

I ask again, what on earth was that mob of crazies in DC so angry about? Women hold 60% of personal wealth, 51% of stocks in the US and live longer. And, they own most of the shoes.

I am black. I cannot imagine waking up, looking at myself in the bathroom mirror and saying, “Hey big guy, America is really screwing you. Spend 3 grand traveling to DC to protest.”

Folks, the insane out-of-control anti-Trump protesters are a minority. Trump’s landslide electoral victory proves that. Still, we can no longer allow breaking the law and bullying people with impunity.

Cousin Jimmy went nose to nose with my Nemesis, “Leave Peanut alone!” The cowardly bullies obeyed.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil – to one who is striking at the root. — Henry David Thoreau

The American Republic is in grave danger, and we are past the time for Band Aid cures. In order to produce major changes, we need to find the true source of the problem and strike at it hard.

In the film Aliens, the spaceship’s crew under attack finally realizes that just taking out the aliens one by one is an exercise in futility and frustration, because they reproduce faster than the crew can kill them. Then a member of the crew realizes that in order to solve the problem they must begin by taking out the alien queen.

In the same fashion, taking out the CIA will not solve the problem. To eliminate the cause of evil, we most strike at the root. Unless we get rid of the Alien Queen, we will not solve the problem. The best solution to our problem is to terminate the Alien Queen with extreme prejudice.

This alien queen is the one who hatched not only the CIA, but also the Fed, the DHS, the IRS, NSC, NSA, FEMA, TSA and the rest of the aberrations working hard to destroy the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution. The Alien Queen is currently hatching dozens of eggs that will provide replacements for the new generations of Kissingers, Brzezinskis, Carters, Soroses, Strongs, Clintons and Bushes. And the evil Alien Queen’s nest is at the Harold Pratt House in Manhattan, headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations and center of the Invisible Government of the United States.

It has become evident that the people who control the Invisible Government of the United States want to destroy this country — this is basically what the New Gay World Order is all about. This is difficult to understand, because not even some of the worst dictators and tyrants the world has known wanted to destroy their own countries. Perhaps an explanation for this is that, with the exception of the Rockefellers and the Morgans, the rest of the people who constitute the Invisible Government of the United States — the Warburgs, the Rothschilds, the Schiffs, the Lehmans, the Kuhns, the Loebs, — are not even Americans and don’t care a rat’s ass about this country, its Constitution and its people

For close to a century, the CFR has been the main source of anti-American activity in the world. The main goals of this group of international bankers have been the elimination of the U.S. sovereignty, the opening of the borders and the cancellation of the Constitution, as well as the elimination of 85 percent of the planet’s population and the reduction of the survivors to pre-industrial levels of consumption in a global government under their control.

CFR members have openly spoken about their agenda in innumerable occasions.

In 1942, the chairman of the National Council of Churches and CFR founder John Foster Dulles, issued a report claiming that “a new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative,” and called for

… a world government, strong immediate limitation of national sovereignty, international control of all armies and navies, a universal system of money, world-wide freedom of immigration, progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade and a democratically controlled world bank.

In 1944, a Confidential CFR memorandum to the State Department read:

The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a superstate organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education….

In his 1945 book Modern Man is Obsolete, CFR member Norman Cousins stated:

We even debate the question of “surrendering” some of our sovereignty — as though there is still something to surrender. There is nothing left to surrender. There is something to gain. A common world sovereignty … would mean that no state could act unilaterally from the central authority as a method to achieve its aims. . . . There is no need to discuss the historical reasons pointing to and arguing for world government.

In September 1946, in an address to the UNESCO, Assistant Secretary of State William B. Benton (CFR), stated:

You are expected to help carry out the UNESCO program within the United States. … We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty.

In 1952, the 30th anniversary issue of Foreign Affairs published “Reflections on Our National Purpose,” a leading article by CFR member Kingman Brewster, Jr. In it, he expresses his idea that the U.S. national purpose should be to abolish the American nation. According to Brewster,

It is hard to see how we will engage the youth, and stand any chance of competing for the respect of mankind generally, if we continue to be more concerned with the sovereignty of nations than with the ultimate sovereignty of peoples.

The CFR’s concerted attack on the U.S. sovereignty didn’t pass unnoticed by the American people and many Americans expressed their distaste for this treacherous organization. As a result, in 1952, in response to growing concern about the illicit, conspiratorial activities of the CFR, the U.S. Congress created a Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations (commonly referred to as the Reece Committee). The final report in 1954 stated that the Committee had found that the CFR controlled most of these Foundations and it’s aim was to abolish national sovereignty and that the CFR “overly propagandizes the globalist concept.” Its two main objectives are world government and global banking.

Unfortunately, nothing came out of the Reece Committee. But, in 1956 the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) J. Edgar Hoover (not a CFR member), received hundreds of letters from concerned citizens and members of Congress, accusing the Council on Foreign Relations of treason and promoting communism through its agents infiltrated into the U.S. government. Hoover ordered an investigation but, soon after, President Eisenhower (CFR) dictated an order prohibiting the FBI from investigating federal government employees.

You don’t need to be a “conspiracy theorist” to reach the conclusion that an anti-American, internationalist organization, whose goal is the elimination of the U.S. national sovereignty and borders as a first step to create a one-world government, has infiltrated and is now in control of the U.S. government.

As an American, you should be concerned after knowing that the CFR, an organization whose members have not been elected by the American people, has successfully penetrated the three branches of the American government, particularly the executive branch. The CFR has penetrated since its creation the U.S. diplomatic corps and its intelligence services. It is now in an accelerated process of penetrating the U.S. military.

During the administration of George H. W. Bush, most Cabinet members were also CFR members. You should be even more concerned after knowing that the number of CFR members in the Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama administrations was even higher. In these four administrations, most members of the powerful National Security Council have been also CFR members. The number of CFR members in the Obama administration has broken all previous records.

Given the fact that, like horse whisperers, members of the Cabinet and the NSC are the ones who tell American presidents what to do, it happens that the list of the people who have had a cardinal role in the revolutionary changes America has experienced in the past 50 years reads like a membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations. This cannot be the product of a coincidence.

Actually, behind every act of treason to the American people, and aggression against the peoples of the world, you will find, hiding in the shadows, one or more members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

I think that one of the things President Trump should do as soon as he is sworn as President is to reopen the investigation of the CFR’s treacherous activities. If what we suspect is confirmed by the facts, this anti-American organization must be banned and its members banned to run for office or occupy government positions. The main culprits must be charged with treason and, if found guilty, sent to prison.

Also, the more than a hundred of senior members of the U.S. military who have betrayed America by joining this treacherous organization must be dishonorably discharged and tried for high treason. The ones already retired must lose their retirement benefits.

The CFR is mainly an organization of the bankers, to the bankers and for the bankers. Those bankers are the ones who own the U.S. national is rapidly reaching $20 billion. This means that every American citizen owes $61,339.00 to the bankers and every taxpayer owes them $166,773.00.

This humongous debt is unpayable. Moreover, is morally repugnant and unethical that American taxpayers need to work so hard to feed the banking leeches by paying every year the interest of this debt. Usury must end. The U.S. debt must be terminated!

So, one of the first things President Trump should do is to cancel the U.S. national debt. He can accomplish this very easily by sending, delivered by military courier, a letter to every loan shark banker who owns the Fed containing a $1.00 bill as final payment for the debt, politely reminding them that the U.S. has the most powerful military forces in the world and would not tolerate any reprisals. Next, he should end the Federal Reserve Bank and order the Treasury Department to print U.S. dollars backed by gold and silver.

Once the evil Alien Queen is deprived of her sustenance and her nest is destroyed, she will die and Americans will finally heave a huge sigh of relief.

Requiescat in Inferno!

Servando is the uthor of Psychological Warfare and the New World Order and I Dare Call It Treason, and the DVDs Treason in America and Partners in Treason, all of them available at NewsWithViews.

© 2017 Servando Gonzalez – All Rights Reserved

The ongoing battle for control of the United States of America

Surely we are living in the immediate days before Christ’s return. The signs are everywhere, and just as Christ and the prophets foretold, the mass of the people are ignorant of it. The subject in this paper is globalism vs. national sovereignty, and the ongoing battle for control of the United States of America.

America seems about as divided as it could be, perhaps equaling the days leading up to and involving the Civil War. The battle lines are not as clear, and the battle ground is muddy from propaganda, lies and half-truths. I’m going to tell it like I see it and it will be difficult for some people to receive and/or even understand. Regardless, this is my current viewpoint and understanding of what we’re facing, as 2017 kicks off with Trump at the helm and a fury of antagonists raging across our land.

Simply put, there are people who want to control the world as they see fit. Money and power go hand in hand. Money buys and corrupts power, and power takes money. It’s an epic game of rock, paper, scissors, with two of the powers trying to eliminate the third. If the third can be eliminated, really only one will remain. For the sake of this allegory we’ll call it money, power and freedom. If money and power can eliminate freedom, the battle is over because the money and power merge and there’s nothing left to overcome. If freedom can manage the money and/or power, freedom will keep things better balanced, or at least keep money and/or power at bay.

Today, January 25, 2017 in America, we have a five-day old President who at his inauguration declared war on the establishment of political power in Washington D.C. He said, and I quote,

“…today we are not merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.”

Why, oh why, did a huge percentage of Americans NOT rejoice at those words?? This is the closest thing to the American spirit that I have heard in my lifetime, and in my studies of history, I can’t recall a time so epic. (And there are some epic times in America’s history!)

This President has basically waged war on the establishment. To understand the ramifications of this, you have to have some understanding of what the “establishment” is. The establishment is not the Democratic Party and it’s not the Republican Party. It’s a small group of people who may identify with one of those parties or the other, but their agenda is the same. Their agenda is to own the wealth of the world and control its population. And they have a massive game plan to accomplish this. They don’t care which political party is in the White House. It’s irrelevant to them. They use their wealth and their power to control, intimidate, bribe, blackmail, or kill to meet their objectives. From my own studies, there hasn’t been an American President since Woodrow Wilson that was not controlled and/or run by them.

IF Trump cannot be controlled by them, America is in the best place it has been since the early 1900s. Their tentacles are far-reaching and they have agents in almost every possible sphere they can (CIA, FBI, NASA, military, House, Senate, DHS, etc.) Some of Trump’s appointments seem weak (comparatively) or controversial, but at a nominal glance I’m encouraged because they seem to be outside the establishment circle.

In a perfect world, globalism would make sense: “the belief or advocacy that political policies should take worldwide issues into account before focusing on national or state concerns”. [Encarta] If all nations and all areas of the world had the same objectives of honoring life, personal liberty, and the overall well-being of humanity, this would be somewhat simpler to do. However, this is not the case. Realistically, personal responsibility MUST take place before a corporate vision can be successful.

Our family decided to adopt a child out of the state system. We brought the child into our home. The child refused to follow our rules. The child was violent and destructive, deceptive and two-faced. The child began very damaging behaviors to our children already in the home. It was with excruciating emotional angst that we had to discuss the possibility that maybe we should NOT take this child in. We wanted to give the child a home. Our family was willing to love and support this child, but this child was unwilling to alter behavior or thoughts to be healthy in our home. We made the extremely difficult and painful choice to NOT adopt this child after all. The health of our family was at stake. The lives of other children would be so altered (was already happening) as to change their course. We simply could not do it. Globalism would have done it. That’s the difference between globalism and national sovereignty.

Had we gone ahead with the adoption, the dynamics of our family would have changed drastically and dramatically in the coming months and years, altered actually for the rest of our time on earth. Abuse was a part of this scenario, and abuse carries afflicters and victims with their varying circumstances. Our family identity would not be the same. Ever. As the head of our home, we had to decide to take care of the needs in our family first, and not damn the needs of our family for the sake of the destruction that would come simply from embracing things counter to our convictions.

Nations are nations because of cultural needs and identities. A people group that associate with one another form a nation, set up a boundary and governing laws, and then protect those boundaries in an effort to protect its citizens. That’s healthy. Boundaries are enforced and protected from those with harmful or destructive intentions. That’s healthy. The needs of my family may not be the same as the needs for yours. Am I supposed to alter my family’s needs to accommodate yours? I happen to follow the God of ancient Israel, the Creator of earth. If you follow the gods of Egypt, should I have to embrace your gods in my family? It would change the construction and fabric of our identity. Liberty tells me I should be able to worship my God and not have to worship yours. Globalism tells me I have to incorporate your beliefs into my own. And whoever is in power can then tell everyone what beliefs are to be adhered to.

Now if I decide I don’t like my current beliefs but like yours, then I can change my mind and I might want to move to become your close family friend to appease my new beliefs. That’s called changing citizenship. With personal autonomy and national sovereignty, we can do that. We have that choice. I just move to the country, state or neighborhood that aligns better with my new convictions. With globalism, that change is unnecessary and not possible because we’re put under one umbrella and must placate and acquiesce to whatever the standing rule is. There’s no protection for personal liberty in globalism. There’s no room for personal growth. The rule of thumb becomes what’s best for the community, and what’s best for the community is dictated by the ones with the power (which usually equates to those with the money).

America was the great experiment in personal liberty. And that experiment has afforded generations of Americans to exercise their rights in ways other parts of the world had never had the opportunity to do. It grew a nation of inventors and creators and scientists and authors (and the list goes on and on), and a nation that quickly rose to the top of affordable living, affluence, accessibility to needs and wants, and was dubbed the “land of opportunity” because it was founded on personal liberty. [And yes, many of those liberties were fought for, i.e. race and gender issues, etc., and yes there is much blight on our record, but our record still stands above every other nation of the world.]

Freedom is the enemy of absolute power. Period. And there is a growing group of people who want absolute power. They have diligently passed this baton on down several generations in the ultimate desire to have ultimate control for personal gain, at the expense of those they are attempting to control or govern.

As a Christian this is so easily identified in God. God is the ultimate power. He created all things and has power over all things. Yet He has given His creation freedom and chooses to not intervene with His power just to be “in control”. We are not His puppets. We are not killed or waylaid if we do not act in accordance with His character. My belief or unbelief in Him does not change His purposes or His plans. As Christ said, “He sends the rain on the just and the unjust.”

The spirit behind those who would want ultimate power and control is completely contradictory to God, who has ultimate power and control yet chooses to yield it in favor of personal liberty. (This is why Christianity is so offensive to Islam. We do not require your beliefs and we do not demand your allegiance. We give you the information we have and let you choose.) The spirit of globalism is the antithesis of freedom. It destroys individuality and creativity. Its agenda is power and control over people, but it masquerades as a “community” idea.

Globalism is the spirit of Babylon. This is Genesis 11 and Revelation 17-18. It is a people who do not want the rule of God. They want to call the shots, and they don’t want anyone to tell them their shots are in conflict with God. So they silence, contain, and/or eliminate the opposition. The American spirit and the Constitution of the U.S. give its citizens the freedom to believe as they believe and do as they are convicted, as long as their beliefs and convictions don’t harm another. The globalist spirit will dictate beliefs by dictating laws aimed at behaviors, and this works well if you’re of the same convictions as the globalists’ laws. If not, you have no liberty to do or believe differently.

Trump’s first actions were to secure national sovereignty. He removed the U.S. from TPP, which gives America sovereignty back in its trade policies, and not under the rule of a non-American entity. He is renegotiating (with the threat of removing America altogether) NAFTA to restore America’s sovereignty to dictate its own trade arrangements. He instated a temporary ban on Middle East refugees in order to vet the immigration process more diligently for the security of America. These are areas the prior POTUS and the establishment set out to strip America of its power and wealth. If America can be stripped of its power and wealth (remember the rock, paper, scissors analogy?), it can be stripped of its ability to ensure freedom and can be removed as a hindrance to the globalist agenda to rule the world.

Unfortunately, the screaming tantrum voices of an ignorant population of Americans are insistent on making this election about personal pet issues.

Obamacare was designed to ultimately fail, but not until it had stripped Americans of their wealth and the federal budget of its wealth. Trump wants to repeal Obamacare and replace it with healthcare that is not contingent solely on the federal government. He wants to enable states to meet the need of its citizens’ healthcare. We’ve mastered the art of being offended in America this past decade. We’re so busy being offended we’re unable to see what’s really going on. Obamacare was never about providing healthcare to American citizens. It was about removing autonomy from doctors, removing wealth from citizens and private sectors, and dictating mandates while stripping its citizens of their voice.

The media is owned and run by the establishment. They direct our attention where they want it to be and deliberately misinform areas they can’t completely hide or control. There is a deliberate effort to divide Americans, and depicting scenarios that trigger emotional responses to people’s pet issues (that have really just become idols) seems the easiest way to fool the people. People jump on these bandwagons with personal offenses and neglect to see they’ve played right into the establishment’s hands, like puppets on a string.

As Christians, we need to seize this opportunity before us as the Israelites did when Cyrus proclaimed Jerusalem was to rebuild the house of the Lord. The Scripture plainly says “the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus” and the people were called to respond. Not everyone responded, just those who understood the significance of the moment. While the details are different, the essence is the same. God has moved to stay the hand of the globalist agenda in America; we must respond. The spirit of globalism will prevail until our Lord’s return, but He plainly says He will bring this spirit down. (Revelation 18)

We do not need to declare America a “Christian nation”. That is unnecessary and will stir up the opposition faster than anything. We simply need to BE a nation of Christians. We need to live according to the mandates of our faith. We are to be the city on a hill, the light of the world, the salt of the earth. Then those who are lost will go to the hill, those who are blind will go to the light, and those who are tired of the drudgery of the world will go get salt.

The Scriptures are pretty clear about how this is going to go down. We’re going to be co-laboring for Christ at the same time the world is partnering with darkness. It’s all going to be going on at the same time when He returns. (Matthew 24:36-51) Christians are ambassadors of Christ. (Ephesians 6:20) We represent Him, His interests, and His Kingdom in the nation we’re a foreigner to. We don’t really have the same customs as the world we’re posited in, but we exist there anyway until Christ brings our Kingdom. God ordained the nations and gave them their boundaries (Deut 32:8, Acts 17:26), and America is ours. We are to “occupy until He [Jesus] comes” (Luke 19:13) – and “occupy” there means “to busy oneself with, i.e. to trade” (Strong’s). So we’re to be busy with our trades, our gifts and abilities, being light and salt, declaring the Kingdom of God as we know it, and representing Christ here in America.

Time is short. Let’s be about our King’s business.

© 2017 M. Smallback – All Rights Reserved

I Hope More Women Speak Out Against This Devil’s Work!

My friend Kelleigh Nelson wrote a wonderful, right on target” article about this supposed “Women’s March”. Woman like me didn’t really know anything about it, but then I am a Trump supporter and I’m sure they wouldn’t want to hear my two cents worth.

What I don’t understand is, no matter how much these women believe they have been persecuted, with one of their complaints being that Hillary Clinton didn’t win or Trump did or both – why is it these women believe they are entitled to their rights at the expense of mine and others?

Look who some of your speakers were – Madonna? A radical who believes she should have her way about everything she believes in while spewing her vile lifestyle on the rest of us and the heck with everyone else. She is vulgar and has been using Hollywood for years to get her own way and America’s money. 

“Blow Up MY White House”??? I didn’t support your last president Madonna because I saw him for what he was but I never thought about murdering him in a building that houses many other lives or anywhere else. I just wanted him to go away! Did you ever stop to think about the others in the White House? Maybe America will get lucky and they will deport you.

Ashley Judd – are you proud? What a foul mouth – no wonder you support Hillary! Judd ranted “Our pu**ies are for our pleasure, for birthing a new generations of filthy, vulgar, nasty, proud, Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Sikh, generations of nasty women.” Is that how you see all of us? I pray all those women who voted for Trump and some who didn’t open their eyes and never spend another dime on one of your movies or charities.

Ashley Judd, another Hollywood mouth piece that believes she have the right to use their money and fame to lead the direction for the rest of the women of the world.

Scarlett Johansson and her good buddy Cecile Richards – the leaders of the Legalized Murder of Unborn Babies. Oh I am sorry, I forgot you don’t consider then living, breathing human beings. Maybe your mothers should have aborted you for as much conflict as you are responsible for. And then to add insult to injury you want the American people to pay for you and others to have your free sex and legalized murder.

Can’t afford birth control and you want us to pay for that too – you’re nuts. Either keep your legs closed or get fixed! And I am NOT going to pay for that either. Your personal enjoyment is not my problem or responsibility.

“No judgment, no questions asked, Planned Parenthood provided a safe place where I could be treated with gentle guidance,” Johansson said. “Now, I may have been 15 and surprisingly self-sufficient, but I bet there isn’t one person here who has not been helped by Planned Parenthood, directly or otherwise.” I think you are wrong!

I do disagree with you since not all women look at life with such indifference and that includes the morals and values you live by. Basic healthcare is when you have a heart attack, cancer or other health issues, not the legal murder of unborn babies.

You may at times have been able to obtain birth control from one of their clinics and if they had stayed providing basic health care to young girls you could then have billed their insurance companies or Medicaid. But no, their counselors have been teaching them about different forms of sex, making deals with traffickers and pimps for money, selling babies body parts and they aren’t following the law when a young girl comes into one of those PP clinics and tells them they have been raped, because it isn’t getting reported to the police. How many kids have died because you instructed them on the “chocking” sex reminding them the need for a “safe” word?

Then you present us with a so-called woman who supports Hamas and Sharia Law. I don’t care if she is Palestinian or some other nationality. I would not support her for her support of Sharia and as a woman I am not sure how you can. Muslim Sharia men’s treatment of women far outweigh any negative treatment you seem to think you are getting in this country.

Linda Sarsour is presented to American women as someone to look up too? Are you all kidding? Just last month she was with Salah Sarsour, a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and former Hamas operative who was jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of his alleged work for the terrorist group.

Sarsour served as a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and she is one of four lead organizers for the Women’s March. Linda Sarsour has close ties to that organization, which was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) terrorism case. HLF was found to have funneled money to Hamas, which was designated a terrorist group in the 1990s.

According to a November 2001 FBI memorandum, Jamil Sarsour, brother of Salah Sarsour, was arrested in 1998 for funding Hamas and told Israeli investigators that Salah Sarsour was involved in funding Hamas through his fundraising for the Holy Land Foundation (HLF)”. 

The FBI memo stated that the Sarsours passed money in $1,000 and $2,000 increments to a Hamas operative named Adel Awadallah through their Milwaukee furniture store. Awadallah was a commander in the Qassam Brigades, a Hamas’ militant wing.

Linda Sarsour tweeted earlier this month about “all the beautiful dead Islamic State fighters under the boots of Kurdish Women.” What about all the Christian women of all ages who have been raped, tortured and murdered my Muslim Sharia torturers? She followed with “A jihadi killed by a woman is a disgrace to Allah Such women need celebrating protecting their rights. 

So now I understand – your rights are important but anyone that disagrees with you, their rights are to be ignored. You are in the wrong country lady! What is Sarsours wish for women – that Palestine rule and all citizens of Israel and those that support them are to die?

They very fact you believe you have the right to have everything your way shows that even though you were born in this country, there is nothing American about you.

Well maybe, just maybe the world would be a better place if these women’s mothers had aborted them, but I still would not support their abortion even if I knew what they were going to grow up to be – selfish, self-centered – it’s all about me – liberal whack jobs.

An article written by Karen Hua stated “with Planned Parenthood as an official partner, the march aims to raise awareness of women’s rights to reproductive healthcare, funds, and protection.” So Planned Parenthood was an official partner – did they use tax dollars from those grants they been getting from the Fed’s all these years?

You women have been indoctrinated by the very systems the rest of us are against and gave us the basis to elect Trump. You want this country to be progressive, socialist and walk the line with communism. Get out – we do not want you here. This is not what this country was founded for and obviously you want something different. Go form your own country and don’t let my door of Liberty hit you in the ass on your way out!

And take your Palestinian, Socialist voting, Sharia supporting, Hamas funding friend with you.

They are all filled with the sign of the unholy one – spewing their “666” agenda. I pray that more women and men wake up to this behavior that they are getting away with because our Constitution gives them the right to speak their minds. If gives us the right to respond.

And one final note – I see Cher, Beyonce, and some of your other female friends were some of those that stated if Trump was elected they were going to leave the U.S. What the heck are you still doing here? We don’t want you here, we don’t need you or your liberal antics or lousy of entertainment

The ending of Kelleighs article was perfect: Journalist Daniel Greenfield said it far better than I ever could, “There were those who celebrated and those who mourned the fall of the USSR. So too there are those who celebrate and those who mourn the end of Obama. The tears of leftist hipsters crying over Obama are no different than those of the old women holding up Stalin’s portrait on May Day in the Red Square.”

Last Sunday, January 29, 2017, “60 Minutes” featured Bill Whittaker reporting on a Syrian Muslim family landing in America to start a new life. The family, part of a 12,000-member family of refugees imported into America in 2016, enjoys unending welfare afforded by American taxpayers.

We’re talking millions upon millions of dollars spent to fly them over here, feeding them, housing them, educating them, giving them transportation, giving them medical care, paying for their utilities and more—with no end in sight as to welfare paid for by your tax dollars.

While their “puff” piece attempted to show our compassion, it failed to report on the enormous cost to American taxpayers in the decades to come: their birth rates, their chain-migrated relatives and their living on American welfare to the tune of billions.

All of that without report that American citizens taking a back seat to immigrants’ needs.

In fact, “60 Minutes” didn’t report on the horrific costs of saving those refugee families when our American families suffer much greater. Take these realities into consideration:

A whopping 48 million Americans subsist on food stamps and other welfare because they cannot obtain jobs. Every refugee that arrives displaces an American from a job. Every refugee that arrives costs Americans hard money out of their pockets with no return, whatsoever.

A mind numbing 60,000 to 100,000 military veterans lack jobs, lack homes and lack medical care in the United States. What about the needs of our country, our vets and our citizens?

One out of four African-Americans lacks a job at a living wage. Along with that, three out of four African-American children arrive out of wedlock and live with single mothers on welfare and entrenched in poverty. Why not “save” our citizens rather than refugees?

How about the fact that our country stands eyeball deep in $20 trillion of debt? How do you get your arms around the fact that Congress tries to save the refugees when it can’t save itself? We pay over $40 million monthly in interest of the national debt because Congress can’t and won’t act responsibly.

Do you realize that 13,000,000 (million) American children live below the poverty level with no hope of escaping the inner city projects? Is it too unreasonable to apply those moneys for refugees to our own children?

Today, Chicago stands as a killing zone for African-Americans with murders every day of the year and into the hundreds annually. Maybe we should take care of our citizens with jobs, housing, education and hope.

Why must we save the rest of the world while our own citizens suffer as much or greater than refugees?

While our cities face horrific infrastructure breakdown and our nation faces sociological breakdown and cultural displacement from endless immigration, at what point do we apply the brakes?

Now or 100,000,000 (million) more refugee immigrants by 2050? Reality check: the United Nations discovered that 100,000,000 (million) people of the world would love to immigrate to America tomorrow if they enjoyed a visa and plane ticket. Can we save the world?

Not a chance! Why are we taking in all those immigrants when we can’t take care of our own citizens’ needs? Why? Give me one reason that could stand the test of common sense for accepting and paying millions and billions for refugees. Our taxpayer dollars already pay out $113,000,000,000.00 (billion) annually for immigrants. (Source: www.SocialContract.com) When does that stop when you see our $20 trillion debt price tag?

At some point soon, we must stop all immigration. We can’t afford it and we’re deeply in debt, and it’s fracturing and fragmenting our country into ethnic group chaos, cultural suicide and environmental degradation. We can’t keep doing this to ourselves.

Write 60 Minutes and invite them to do a segment on American citizens being destroyed by refugees being imported into Americans: start with 9/11, Boston Marathon, Orlando, White Cloud, Garland, Ohio State, San Bernardino, Ft. Lauderdale, Dearborn, Miami, honor killings and more yet to come.

Email them: 60M@cbsnews.com

© 2017 Frosty Wooldridge – All Rights Reserved

A squeaky wheel is a distraction, and the longer it continues, the more irritating it becomes, until finally, oil is applied to stop the squeak.

Put on Your Armor, the Battle for America Begins

The squeaky wheel gets the oil, and in this case, the squeaky wheel is none other than Soros’s hired protestors. It is time for us to make just as loud a noise as these slugs hired by the community organizers. 

That means us! We succeeded in electing an outsider, it’s time to put on the full armor of God and get busy. We cannot be couch potatoes and let President Trump do all the work and fight the battle alone. It is up to us to send emails, to get on the phone to our Congress critters, and demand that they help the man we selected and elected as our 45th President. This means daily! Our new President needs our help in getting his nominees confirmed by the Senate.

We simply CANNOT expect that all will be okay now that we have Donald J. Trump in our White House. The left hates him and many of the neo-con Trotskyite right hate him. Why? Because he is NOT a consummate globalist politician as too many of our previous presidents have been. Trump is a successful businessman, and even though there are areas where I disagree with him, I know this man loves America and wants to bring her back to the glorious nation she once was, with happy and prosperous citizens.

The Media

Throughout Trump’s campaign, the media has proven inept at destroying him, and he used them thoroughly and unabashedly. Because he won, the media is now accelerating their attacks, but they’re using the same techniques they’ve always tried. So far, they’re beating their heads against the wall, but they won’t quit because the objective is to destroy Donald Trump. Their goal is to destroy his reputation and presidency and ultimately to impeach him. Even if he remains in office, they want him ruined in the minds of the American people. 

The Democrat Party is foaming at the mouth wanting Trump to implode, but it’s not going to happen. This businessman has dealt with tough problems and tough people for many years. We watched him throughout the campaign, and he ignored all the attacks and brutality thrown in his face and stayed the course. Trump has a steel spine and a faith in God and himself that I have never seen in any politician.

Protests, Protests, Protests

How many protests were there against Obama? There were a few, but you never saw police cars set on fire, businesses destroyed, looting, and vandalism. It didn’t happen, because we’re too busy working. 

Our President withstood some of the vilest accusations and lies, and yet he kept going. We showed up at his rallies is such numbers that he knew he was resonating with American citizens.

The pro-abort Islamic and leftist organized Women’s March was covered massively by the media, but the pro-life march received little coverage.

Protests won’t stop because billionaire George Soros will happily keep paying protestors to show up. Point in fact, protestors were sitting around in airports waiting for Trump to write his promised executive order, “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States.” 

Trump stated a year and a half ago that he would sign an EO vetting the refugees coming into America from states known for training terrorists. For days the protestors waited, and then the media portrays it as though American citizens were immediately roused to indignation. Fake news again!

The protests won’t end, and neither will the leaders of sanctuary cities stop challenging the laws our President wants to uphold. Instead, they will continue to defy federal law and to allow illegal aliens to hide within their boundaries, many of whom will commit crimes against American citizens, including murder and rape.

Watch for the next protest march. It will be scientists against President Trump’s move to halt the EPA and this false climate change agenda which is all about making the rich richer and bleeding American taxpayers. 

Short Memories

The Daily Callerreminded us that in 1975, many liberals were part of a chorus of big name Democrats who refused to accept any Vietnamese refugees when millions were trying to escape South Vietnam as it fell to the communists. This even included orphans. And guess who led this…none other than California’s Governor Jerry Brown, Senator Joe Biden, George McGovern, and New York Democratic Congresswoman, Elizabeth Holzman. They didn’t want Vietnamese who were fleeing communism to enter our country, but they applaud lawbreakers from Mexico and Islamic refugees who could well be terrorists. God help us…truly!

Does anyone remember the Montagnards? They were the Vietnamese tribesmen who fought alongside America’s Special Forces soldiers during the Vietnam war. My husband’s uncle was Special Forces in Vietnam, and he and his men at Ft. Bragg pleaded for donations to help the Montagnards who made it to America, because the American government would not help them. Thank you, Henry Kissinger!

How about the C-span video of President Clinton in the 1995 State of the Union address? Anyone remember that? Clinton said we’re disturbed by the large number of illegal aliens, they’re stealing jobs from Americans, they cost the taxpayers. Bill said he’s hiring more border guards to protect us, and deporting twice as many criminal aliens as before, and cracking down on illegal hiring, and barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens, and speeding deportation of illegals who commit crimes. Does this not sound like our new President? It wasn’t…it was 1995 and Bill Clinton! My how times change and hypocrites change their stories.

one-half minute video: 

You’re Fired!

President Donald Trump fired the Obama appointee, and acting Attorney General, Sally Yates, for refusing to enforce a legal order. Yates has been replaced with Dana Boente, US Attorney for the Eastern District of VA, who will now act as Attorney General until nominee Senator Jeff Sessions has been confirmed. Limbaugh went overboard in his monologue on the last day of January in excoriating Trump for keeping Obama’s people, but this is the gist of the entire problem, and why we need to speak up!

Senate Traitors

The Senate Democrats have boycotted the committee vote on Tom Price for HHS Secretary, and Steven Mnuchin for Treasury Secretary. Only four nominees have been confirmed after nearly two weeks.

Then you have the likes of John McCain, and Lindsey Graham joining with Socialist Democrat, Chuck Schumer. Why is it McCain and Graham still have “R’s” behind their names???

It is true, they are traitors to the Constitution, and traitors to their own party.

Trump is fighting the Islamic conquest of the West. We need to help him. 

We Are the Squeaky Wheel

Get off the couch, get on the computer, get on the phone, and call every day to your senators, and write them emails. The protestors are people without jobs being paid by George Soros and the Socialist Democrats. We are the taxpayers of America! We are those who voted for a businessman to turn our beloved America back to God and sanity.

We cannot just be the squeaky wheel, we have to be the thundering voice of protest, not a squeak, but a lion’s roar, not marching in the streets, but pressuring our senators, and yes, even the democratic senators like Schumer, to approve our President’s choices. Their actions are dishonorable, and they need to know what we think.

The Republicans did not delay Obama’s choices, even when we wanted them to. It is unconscionable they’re holding up Trump’s nominees. We need to be heard! It is fully up to us to help Donald J. Trump to do what he promised he would do! Stand up and demand these Senators approve our President’s nominees.

It’s time to be heard! Our 45th President is counting on us!

On the tenth day of the new administration of President Donald Trump, among the many issues the White House faces is the obvious corruption within the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Last year in the thick of the battle for the presidency between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Trump, Conservative lawmakers were up-in-arms over reports emanating from records obtained directly from the IRS and documents they received from watchdog groups such as Judicial Watch.

As a result of seeing overwhelming evidence corruption, misconduct and harassment aimed at President Barack Obama’s so-called “enemies list,” Republican lawmakers proposed a total revamping of the IRS from top to bottom. The GOP members of congress accused the agency of being a political arm of the Democratic Party rather than a nonpartisan, government tax collection agency, according to the House pf Representatives Oversight Committee’s report titled, “Making Sure Targeting Never Happens: Getting Politics Out of the IRS and Other Solutions.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican members, led at that time by Chairman Darrell Issa, R-California, claimed they possess overwhelming evidence that President Barack Obama’s unprecedented condemnation of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the controversial Citizens United case encouraged IRS’s upper-echelon staff members to target conservative groups such as the numerous Tea Party organizations, pro-gun owner groups, and other conservative or libertarian organizations.

The GOP’s congressional report also states that too many IRS executives were overwhelmed with kicking off the IRS’s role in the Affordable Care Act of 2010, a/k/a ObamaCare, which in essence allowed IRS officials like Lois Lerner, the former director of tax-exempt groups and the central figure in the Tea Party controversy, to have too much autonomy for a political operative in a supposedly non-political position.

Under the President Barack Obama, the IRS has become a partisan “body and full-fledged arm of the administration in power,” the Oversight report said.

One of the key changes sought by the Oversight Committee’s Republican members report is the elimination of the position of Commissioner of the IRS and the creation of a bipartisan group that could manage the agency that is responsible for handling trillions of taxpayer dollars.

Rep. Darrell Issa’s report states:

“Other operational failures within the IRS contributed to the targeting. The IRS trained its agents to identify and elevate applications that could draw media attention, even though media attention has no bearing on a group’s qualification for tax-exemption.

“As Washington employees evaluated the applications, they evaluated whether the groups’ activities were “good” nonprofit activities or merely “emotional” propaganda with “little educational value. The IRS allowed these tax-exempt applications to languish for years without action. Subsequently, as it sought to work through the backlog, the agency requested inappropriate and burdensome information from groups applying for tax-exempt status.”

But the committee member jokingly referred to as Issa’s arch-rival, Maryland Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings, condemned the new report, and took issue with the proposal to eliminate the IRS commissioner’s position.

However, during the Issa-led IRS probe, information obtained by the public-interest group, Judicial Watch, pointed to Rep. Cummings as being one of the Democrats who had complained to Lerner about the non-profit groups that opposed the overall Democratic Party political agenda.

One of the Republican proposals that angered Obama and his minions was the suggestion that the Affordable Care Act implementation be taken away from the IRS and given to a more nonpartisan group that’s free from White House manipulation. However, ACA may be a moot point since it is either imploding by itself or it will be rescinded and replaced with a more conservative approach — in other words no Democrats with their hands in the pockets of the American people.

In addition, the Senate Judiciary Committee also found evidence of conspiracy between taxpayer-supported Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates, since PPFA knew about the violations and changed oversight procedures in order to allow the violations to continue. The Judiciary Committee’s findings are available in a Majority Staff Report published this month. The IRS, although quick to investigate nonprofit groups that are pro-life and Christian, has never investigated Planned Parenthood.

If not for David Daleiden’s videos, Congress would not have initiated investigations into Planned Parenthood’s business model that includes profiting from the sale of fetal organs and tissues. We would not have seen firsthand the cavalier and callous manner in which the abortion industry discusses the dismemberment of innocent human beings.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

American Christianity has lost the killer instinct.
For most of you reading this the thought of killer instinct and Christianity do not seem to go together. In our desire to “show the love of Jesus” we have permitted the Name of the Lord to be dragged through the mud.

I always find it interesting that Christians think it glorifies the Lord to come up on the losing side of the debate. It is the FEAR of the Lord that is the beginning of wisdom. The political world no longer fears Christianity and as a result they have no fear of the Lord.

“In wrath remember mercy.” When was the last time you heard a pastor preach on the wrath of God?

The election of 2016 will go down in history as a watershed moment in the battle for Western Civilization. Against all odds the most anti-Christian Party in the history of American was jettisoned from their perch of power. The miraculous election of Donald Trump did not happen without the intervention of Almighty God.

We can argue all day as to whether his election was a blessing or a curse but no matter which side of the goal line you stand you cannot deny the Supernatural intervention. Donald Trump was God’s foot-in-the-door to the anti-Christ Clinton’s and their criminal enterprise with their machinations designed to heave the final shovel of dirt on this once Christian American Republic.

It is my belief that very few Christians understand how close we were to the criminalization of Christianity and the overthrow of Western Civilization. The fact that you think what I just said was hyperbole shows just how blind you were to the sword of Damocles swaying over our necks.

I believe in the very depths of my being that Almighty God has given us a temporary and final reprieve from the outpouring of His terrible wrath. Could it be that in His wrath he has remembered mercy?

Look my Christian friends. We are in a war. As hard as it may be for you to believe the Bible teaches us that the Devil has a team. In the past couple of months his team has come out of shadows and is in full-force rebellion against all things righteous.

The biggest mistake that an athlete can ever make is to underestimate your opponent. Our enemy plays to win. They do not take no for an answer. They are relentless in their attack and they are unrelenting in their desire to overthrow the King of Kings. We have only begun to experience the depth of wickedness to which they will descend in order to regain the lofty perch from which they have ruled.

History will record that we are embarking on the Gettysburg of this cataclysmic battle. We must win NOW or we will never have the chance to win again. Yes, my friends, it is that serious.

Why don’t Christians play to win? Why do we think it glorifies the Lord to see the enemies of the cross seize control of this nation? Why do Christians fall all over themselves in attempt to show how loving and tolerant we are? Why won’t we fight for righteousness in support of the Conquering King we claim to serve? Why are we so hell-bent on loving the Devil’s team more than we love the Lord’s?

Please don’t give me that “we win in the end” crap. It is nothing more than a cowardly excuse to keep us from engaging the enemy. Jesus came to “destroy the works of the Devil.” Why doesn’t it bother us that our enemies are ruling over us right now? When will we rise up and see His Kingdom come “in earth” as it is in Heaven?

Despite what you have been miss-taught this world does not belong to Satan. Jesus won it back at Calvary. ALL POWER IS GIVEN UNTO ME BOTH IN HEAVEN AND IN EARTH! If Jesus has ALL power…how much power is left to the Devil? What in the name of hell is Satan doing controlling this nation?

The haters of God are on the rampage. For the first time in two generations they are on the defensive. They are no longer calling the shots as God’s bulldozer is clearing the field of political correctness. It is time for those of us on God’s team to go for the kill.

Growing up I loved the story of David and Goliath and the upset victory that he pulled over the uncircumcised Philistine. David didn’t show the love of Jesus to Goliath. He didn’t reach across the aisle and reason with him. He didn’t negotiate the terms of surrender with the Giant. He didn’t share the Gospel or the Four Spiritual laws with him.

David ran towards his enemy, slung a stone at him, knocked him to the ground, cut off his head, and paraded his stinkin noggin down Main Street in Jerusalem.

I had a friend tell me one time when I was taking on a pretty imposing foe, “If you shoot the King you better make sure that you kill him.”

Somebody slung a stone and dropped the communist/progressive/anti-Christian giant masquerading as a political ideology. Christians are going to have to make a decision as to whether it is more Godly to love our enemies or crush our enemies. The giant is wounded and I think it would be wise to follow David’s example and cut off the head of the snake.

Our enemies want to destroy us…why don’t we want to destroy them?

All good coaches understand the importance of momentum. When you get the opponent on their haunches you do all that you can to crush them. Our team has finally awakened and our opponent is wounded. Now is not the time love them…now is the time to bury them.

We cannot go soft and allow them to pull victory out of the jaws of defeat. God has given us victory over our enemies. This opportunity will not come again.

“The Lord is a man of war: The Lord is His name!” Let’s follow David’s lead.

It is time to go for the jugular.

© 2017 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

It was the year 1969 when a great American story in the form of Andrea Hawes began. She grew up in rural Thomson, GA firmly ensconced in a nurturing environment. She was born to teenage sweethearts Annette Lee and Vietnam veteran Joe Nathan Hawes. Thanks to the unfaltering mercy and love of God and the devotion of both her mother and grandparents, little Andrea blossomed into a vivacious teenager full of high expectations, an inquisitive nature and high intelligence and an abundance of wisdom.

There is a Biblical scripture that reads: the wise will hear and increase their learning, and the person of understanding will acquire wise counsel and the skill to steer his course wisely and lead others to the truth. In so many ways that describes the life and times of Andrea Hawes. From her early childhood, Andrea was blessed to have a mom who gave her a bedrock Biblical foundation. It proved to be a stabilizing rudder through her adventurous years of traveling throughout America and the world as a rock musician. I can assure you as one who used to be a huge fan of rock that, Andrea’s skills as a writer and performer are superb. Two of my favorite selections from her Midnight Ritual CD are Come Inside and Believe in Me.

Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the story of Andrea Hawes is about her transformation from free- wheeling young rocker princess who demonstrated for abortion or as she dubs it “murdering babies, into a patriotic happy warrior against the massive progressive onslaught against America. Ms. Hawes is now a fully armed walking, talking, writing war machine against the ravages of the 1960s inspired cultural war against our republic that has destabilized everything from the family to even some Christian denominations.

Her sterling book, Generation X! Millennials! Run! Escape from Aquarius accurately chronicles the devastating effects of promoting drugs, sex and rock and roll over God, family and country. A major turning point in Andrea’s life occurred on the bright sunny morning of September 11th 2001. On that fateful day, she was on her way to work in lower Manhattan in New York City when Saudi Arabian pilots were slamming jets into the twin towers of the world trade center.

In her most worthy book, Ms. Hawes pointed out how a relative she contacted concerning the tragedy expressed a bit of gladness over the gruesome attacks. Because of that and numerous other events, eventually Andrea came to the realization that the thinking processes of many Americans had been ruined. One of the main culprits was the free love hippie generation of the age of Aquarius, death to America and no common sense.

I personally regard Andrea Hawes’s book “Escape from Aquarius” a high quality informative read. Not only for Generation X and Millennials, but for all Americans. You can simply go to #Amazon for your copy. I have already read it twice and will be referring to Escape from Aquarius for some time to come. In ten chapters are the formulas for success in overcoming the scourge of the 1960s-cultural revelation or debacle. To put it bluntly, “Escape from Aquarius” is a blue print on how to pinpoint societal problems and a way to overcome them as well.

Most definitely, the Biblical scripture instructing parents to train up a child in the way that he should go and he will surely not depart is exhibited in the exiting life of Andrea. It was the Biblical teachings of her mom and the commonsense encouragement of her grandfather that were the anchors that prevented her from permanently going adrift during a time of involvement in the chaos of the leftist cultural revolution. In fact, those earlier teaching are the primary influences in her life to this very day.

Andrea Hawes easily deconstructs the evil designs of those who are hell bent on destroying America morally, mentally and spiritually. In her Book “Escape from Aquarius” and during her popular weekly talk show on aweradio.org Saturdays at 2:00 to 5:00 PM EST by the grace of God, she single handedly rescues the minds of those who have been misled in government schools and by progressive leaning entertainers. Andrea Hawes’s unique approach is not only informative, concise and engaging but her brand of witty humor will have you laughing at the utter failing folly of those on the leftist wrong side of history.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

In my lifetime, the closest thing to a constitutionally principled politician that I have ever met at the national level was 12-term Congressman Ron Paul. There were a small handful of others, of course: Steve Stockman, John Hostetler, Paul Broun, Helen Chenoweth-Hage, and Jesse Helms come to mind. Ron’s son Rand could also be put in this gallant group; I might also put Congressman Thomas Massie in the mix, but I have not personally met this gentleman. There are more, of course. But their number is VERY small and shrinking further all the time. And the number of truly principled politicians I have known on the State and local levels are equally sparse. Mind you, I’m talking about a span of over four decades.

Typically, as soon as a person is elected to public office, they start thinking about how far up the political ladder they can climb. If they are a county commissioner or city councilman, they are thinking about becoming a State legislator or senator. If they are a State legislator or senator, they are thinking about becoming a U.S. congressman or senator. And if they are a U.S. congressman or senator, they are thinking about becoming President or Vice President. The vast majority of decisions these self-absorbed politicians make, votes they cast, and friends they choose are all centered on one goal: obtaining higher office.

Congressional leaders and special interest lobbyists know that most politicians are unprincipled, and they prey on this weakness. That’s why in almost no time after being elected, most politicians become pawns in the hands of the establishment. Furthermore, party labels mean absolutely nothing in this regard. Politicians can talk all day about “fighting the liberals” (if they are Republicans), or “fighting the conservatives” (if they are Democrats), etc. It means nothing. What they are really fighting is anything or anyone they perceive as a stumbling block to their political futures. Most politicians have no moral or philosophical compass and are, therefore, mushy clay in the hands of Big Money potters and party strongmen.

Sadly, the same unprincipled, anything-to-get-ahead approach to life besieges many, if not most, preachers and businessmen as well. Preachers pander to contributors and businessmen pander to investors. And, again, “liberal” or “conservative” mean nothing. Both are driven by the same desires and motivations: success, money, notoriety, etc.

I am currently watching countless numbers of “conservative” and “patriot” radio talk show hosts, website writers, editors, and publishers, as well as newspaper and magazine writers, editors, and publishers pander to whatever they think will make them money. Truth, objectivity, and honesty mean absolutely NOTHING. There are exceptions, of course. But they are just that: exceptions.

Paid lobbyists transition in and out of government positions, and politicians and government employees transition in and out of lobbying positions. Oh, and don’t forget that the mainstream media is littered with former political office holders, staffers, and lobbyists. A bunch of former congressmen and senators are even on the payroll of foreign governments. Several televangelists are too. Mostly Israel’s, of course.

With the forty-fourth anniversary of Roe v Wade still fresh in our minds, think of the hundreds and thousands of “pro-life” congressmen, senators, mayors, State legislators and senators, county commissioners, city councilmen, sheriffs, etc., who have been elected to office over the past forty-four years. Think of the millions, maybe billions, of dollars that have been raised by “pro-life” organizations over the past forty-four years. Think of the hundreds and thousands of “pro-life” lobbyists that have been hired and have now retired over the past forty-four years. And we are no closer to overturning Roe v Wade than we were forty-four years ago. (If you really think that President Trump and the GOP in Washington, D.C., or Trump’s Supreme Court appointees will overturn Roe during the next four years–even though the GOP will control the entire federal government during that time–I have this bridge I would love to sell you.)

And how is it that during the past forty-four years we haven’t had ONE of the fifty sovereign states in this country go on record as defining an unborn baby as a real, live human being? This in spite of the fact that 45 states have laws on the books that demand murder charges for anyone who kills an unborn baby. Well, anyone except the mother and doctor, of course. (I’ve never been able to figure out how the worth of an unborn baby can be determined by who decides to kill him or her.) Please tell me how someone can be brought up on murder charges without the victim being defined as a human being. Of course, the reason for this contradiction is the attempt by states to comply with the Roe decision, while at the same time trying to enforce a moral code they KNOW to be true.

In the meantime, every election year, the “pro-life” politicians tell us how much we need to elect and reelect them because they are “pro-life.” Really? What difference has electing these “pro-life” legislators made to the sixty million unborn babies who have been killed during the past forty-four years?

If you want to find out how “pro-life” your State senator or legislator is, just ask him or her to sponsor a personhood bill in your State legislature. I’m serious. Try it, and see what these “pro-life” legislators do. Most of them will vote for it only after doing everything they can to keep it from even becoming a bill that they have to vote on. Truly, most “pro-life” legislators are hoping that they never have to vote on a personhood bill. Even then, some of them will vote against it, and guess what? The “pro-life” organizations like the “right to life” and “family” groups will not even record the legislator’s “Nay” votes on his or her “pro-life” voter guides. So, even after voting “Nay” on personhood, the legislator will be touted as “pro-life” by these phony pro-life organizations. That is the reality of what we are dealing with, folks.

If a State legislator or senator was truly pro-life, they wouldn’t have to be begged or browbeat into doing everything in their power to end the legal murders of babies in their states, or if a U.S. congressman or senator, in our country. If a man or woman doesn’t have a moral compass about killing babies, he or she doesn’t have a moral compass about ANYTHING.

And that’s the problem: most politicians don’t have a moral compass about much of anything. It’s all about their success; their career; their advancement; their wealth; their notoriety; etc. So, why do the American people keep electing these creeps? It seems that the more unprincipled, self-absorbed, and pathological a politician is, the higher up the ladder he or she climbs.

Someone said cream rises to the top, but so does scum!

But, as I said, the same self-centered motivation that consumes most politicians seems to consume most preachers as well. In many ways, the best (not meant as a compliment) politicians in this country are not in congress; they are in the pulpits of our churches.

It was the compromise of core principles that caused the Religious Right to crash and burn in the late eighties and early nineties. I was there. I saw it up close and personal. I was a young preacher at the time, and at first I didn’t understand what I was witnessing. I couldn’t imagine that my mentors and heroes could actually be motivated and controlled by money and political influence. I was wrong.

There was a time in this country–at least, it seemed that way by the way my father raised me–when men esteemed truth above treasure. And it didn’t seem to matter whether the man called himself a Christian or not. Today, many people who call themselves Christians are more corrupt and dishonest than people who don’t. In fact, the word “Christian” today is absolutely without meaning–especially when it comes to politicians.

I have said repeatedly that I would rather vote for an unbeliever who will preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution than for a believer who will NOT preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. And without the principles enshrined in our Declaration of Independence–especially the principle of the right to life–our Constitution protects nothing and stands for nothing. And politicians who claim Christianity while betraying the sacred principles contained in the Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights deserve not the support of any American citizen, Christian, or otherwise.

I can honestly say that the people who have attacked me, defrauded me, stolen from me, lied against me, slandered me, attempted to ruin me, and even threatened to kill me have been almost exclusively professing Christians. And all I have ever tried to do was follow truth wherever it led me. As sincerely as I can say it, I’ve never had a personal agenda or been driven by a lust for personal gain in anything I’ve ever said or written. My quest has always been truth. Nothing more. Nothing less.

I preach more people OUT of my church or fellowship than most pastors take in. I’ve preached unpopular truths and taken unpopular positions at great personal and professional cost. Only God’s power, protection, and provision have sustained me. But the way I look at it is, if I need more than that, I’m not really God’s man to begin with. And to the dismay and chagrin of many, God has preserved me for these forty-plus years of labor.

I guess this column took on a life of its own. (Smiley face here)

Yes, Ron Paul (and a handful of others) was the closest thing to a constitutionally principled politician I ever met at the national level. I still wonder if Ron was America’s last chance for peace. His message was emphatically a message of peace, and his lifelong character was emphatically one of sterling honor and integrity. And it was mostly conservative Christians that rejected Ron Paul: his character and his message.

Should I be surprised, then, when what I mostly see from professing Christians today is a spirit of bitterness, hatred, and war? (You should read the mail and emails I receive from professing Christians.) The biggest cheerleaders for perpetual war are Christians. And without a doubt, this hatred and war fever is bringing us ever closer to a global nuclear conflict that could make the first two world wars look like boys playing army in the backyard. If that happens, the blame lies on the doorsteps of America’s churches and in the cloakrooms of America’s unprincipled politicians.

[If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.]

[I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go to Chuck Baldwin Live Store]

© 2017 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

There have been many instances during and after the election for the presidency of dem-onstrators burning or defecating on the Flag of the United States– all, or almost all, self-defined disaffected Democrats, progressive liberals, socialists, communists, or race-or-sex based political activists.

This desecration of the Flag is the result of a decision in 1989 by five lawyer-judges on the Supreme Court in Texas vs. Johnson that burning the Flag, or defecating upon it, is “speech” protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Although the people of the United States had the ability from the very founding of the country to 1989 to protect the Flag from desecration by law in their communities and States, those five lawyer-judges on the Supreme Court — the other four disagreeing — nullified all the laws that had been enacted in all of the States to protect the Flag from desecration. The American people, after 213 years, lost the ability to decide if and how to protect the Flag.

Almost immediately, American patriots, particularly veterans, acted to reverse that 5-to-4 Supreme Court decision. Congress and States, passed laws to protect the Flag. However, they we’re dead on arrival in the Supreme Court. Therefore, there is no option: The only way to pro-tect the Flag is to pass a Constitutional amendment giving Congress the authority to enact pro-tective legislation..

The Citizens Flag Alliance, involving some 140 veterans, civic, business, and fraternal organizations, was created to urge Congress to adopt a Flag Amendment stating simply: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.” The Flag Amendment does not dictate what a Congressional enactment should state; it only empowers Congress to legislate to protect the Flag from desecration.

The Citizens Flag Alliance, led by its first chairman, Maj. Gen. Patrick H. Brady, a Medal of Honor recipient (Vietnam) who is regarded as America’s most decorated living vet-eran, succeeded in convincing the House to adopt the Flag Amendment six times with each new Congress, and came within one (1) vote in the Senate of adoption in 2006, which would send the Flag Amendment to the States for ratification by vote of the people.

However, in the November elections in that same year, 2006, the Democrats regained control of the Congress, stalling the Flag Amendment effort. With the election of Barack Obama as President in 2008, the effort to pass the Flag Amendment appeared, and was, futile.

All that has been changed by the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, who has called for “consequences” for desecration of the Flag; election of a Republican majority in House and Senate; and what appears to be a renewed patriotic spirit in America.

“We are revitalizing and relaunching the Citizens Flag Alliance campaign to persuade Congress to adopt the Flag Amendment in the new 115th Congress, and send it to the States for ratification by vote of the people,” said Jill Druskis of the American Legion, president of the Citizens Flag Alliance.

Gen. Brady, who led the Citizens Flag Alliance for ten years before stepping down as chairman in 2007, has issued a call for all veterans and other patriots to join with the CFA in actively urging Congress to adopt the Flag Amendment.

“If ever there was a time to revitalize the Flag Amendment movement, it is now,” said Gen. Brady. “We need to re-energize the Citizens Flag Alliance and create a nationwide grass roots movement to convince the new 115th Congress to pass the Flag Amendment, and restore to the American people their right to decide if and how our Flag should be protected.

There are 23-million living American veterans. As one, I believe that burning the Flag, or defecating on the Flag, is an insult to every American veteran who is serving, or has served–including the 1.4-million veterans who have given their lives in war in defense of America under the Flag.

Further, as a Constitutional and Civil Rights attorney, I believe that the five lawyers on the Supreme Court who have decided that “burning” or “defecating” on the Flag is a form of “speech,” are not only wrong in a jurisprudential sense, but as a matter of common sense exer-cised by non-lawyer mere mortals. Indeed, I believe that any lawyer-judge who dictates to the nation that “defecation” is “speech” is not only guilty of judicial tyranny, but is talking out of the wrong orifice himself or herself and should be impeached for inanity if not insanity.

Does any American possessed of common sense really believe that Founding Fathers Gen. George Washington, presiding officer at the Constitutional Convention, our first American President, the Father Of Our Country, or Thomas Jefferson, Father of the Declaration of Inde-pendence, or James Madison, Father of the Constitution, or any of the Founding Fathers who established the Constitution believed that burning or “defecating” on the Flag was not only “speech” but speech the Founding Fathers, patriots all, intended to be protected in the First Amendment?

Only lawyers could reach such an absurd decision, and then impose it on the American people. However, that decision by five lawyer-judges on the Supreme Court while the other four lawyer-judges disagreed, makes burning or defecating on the Flag a “legal right,” only. It does not make it “right” to do.

Burning the Flag or defecating on the Flag is a cowardly, narcissistic, morally despicable “wrong.” The Flag must be protected from such disgraceful actions. Supreme Court decisions are not writ in stone; they are reversible by the ultimate American sovereign–“We, the People.”

Join and support the call of the Citizens Flag Alliance and of Gen. Patrick Brady to de-mand that Congress pass the Flag Amendment to protect the Flag from desecration and send it to the States for ratification so that “We, the People” may have the “right,” again, to decide whether and how the Flag should be protected from desecration.

For more information: CitizensFlagAlliance.org,

HONOR OUR FLAG —PASS THE FLAG AMENDMENT

© 2017 Rees Lloyd – All Rights Reserved

Let’s have a contest. Let’s see who’s more clueless—liberal politicians, liberal scientists… or actors. Ready? And they’re off!

Sometime soon, Democrat politicians from all over the country will be meeting in West Virginia for a “retreat.” The topic of their deliberations will be “how to talk to real Americans” who don’t live in New York, San Francisco, or Chicago and who aren’t mentally ill.

They’re convinced, you see, that they didn’t lose the last election because “real Americans” rejected their insane program, but only because they never found quite the right sales pitch for it. Oh, and also the Russians hacked them. I suspect they think all they’ve got to do is hire somebody to put on a plaid shirt and pretend he’s a real American from somewhere in the Midwest, and then he can go into his spiel for the Democrats’ DeLuxe Fun-Pack of open borders, Global Warming and a huge carbon tax, transgender bathrooms, importing lots and lots of Muslims without first checking to see they’re not jihad johnnies, massive new federal spending programs, Obamacare, and an explosive growth of government power, just to name a few.

They can’t believe we were so stupid as to reject this stuff: we really want it, but we’re too stupid to know we want it. So all they have to do is not make it look like something a bunch of liberals are trying to force down our throats. Wouldn’t you love to be a fly on the wall for one of those pow-wows? “These people! They’re so dumb, you can’t even trick them!” There has to be a way to work around our deplorable stupidity. As the smartest people on the planet, they ought to be able to find one.

Meanwhile, the European Space Agency has unveiled a plan to set up a colony on the South Pole of the Moon, a sort of Club Med for ninnies, complete with a “Lunar Temple” and “dome of contemplation.” Don’t even ask what they expect to contemplate. Says the ESA head honcho, the Moon colony will be “a fresh start, a place where there are no social conventions, no nations and no religion, somewhere where these concepts will need to be rethought from scratch.”

Wow, who can resist that? What would it be like, to live with “no social conventions”? I thought we already had a place like that: it’s called Detroit. And no religion! There’s nothing like a “temple” with “no religion” involved in it. Don’t even ask who or what they propose to worship in lieu of God. It’s a bit surprising that this John Lennon wannabe forgot to throw in “imagine no possessions,” either, while he was at it. Just think—a whole colony devoid of all those things that make us human. If that’s not clueless, what is?

And then, a few nights ago, we had the SAG Awards, another confab of back-slapping “entertainers” who, like the politicians that they serve, wouldn’t know a real American if they found one in their breadbox.

Highlighting the affair was “Laugh-In” relic Lily Tomlin, who likened our new president, Donald Trump, to “the Nazis.” I guess she saw some Nazis in a movie once.

Silly Lily was all hot to trot for the next big protest march—they think protest marches full of snarling, cursing leftids will somehow convince the rest of us to abandon everything we hold dear and sign up to be progressives—and was contemplating, without benefit of a dome, “What sign I should make for the next march: Global Warming, Standing Rock, LGBT issues, immigration—there are so many things.” If she was any more persuasive, she could make a living selling salve door-to-door.

So, my fellow deplorables—who wins the Clueless Derby? With such an embarrassment of poverty, it’s naturally very difficult to pick the winner.

I’ll understand if you vote it a three-way tie.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

I have often wondered if the major university campuses have a special course for University Women to teach them the “F” word. Females seem so proficient at that once they graduate. Call the course, “Give Me an ‘F’ and I’ll give you an ‘A’!” Have it taught by a finger-gesticulating (wink-wink) burly, short cropped PhD female, of course, to get the full effect……. But I digress….

To the point: I have witnessed many things much more horrific than the Women’s March in D.C. this past January 21st. However, I do not believe I have ever seen anything more revoltingly disgusting done in the name of women.

Ladies. Girls. The gentler sex. Peaches and cream. Sugar and spice. Mom/Mommy. Granny/Grandma. Aunt/Sister. Oh, and Pro-Life.

ALL THROWN UNDER THE BUS!!

And in the name of what? Let me just tell you “what”. And those “sisters” out there aren’t going to like it one bit, too bad.

What the whole wide world saw on display was a raging torrent of hate. At Trump, you assume? Oh sure, he was in the mix. But he was used more for venting rather than the being the full object. What actually was on display in full living pink technicolor was an unkempt force of shrieking, foul females literally and loudly hating their womanhood and all things associated with being a woman.

THAT is what we saw in that march – a bunch of females screaming about their genitalia and the functions thereof, hating themselves and their womanliness. Then crudely, vilely, viciously letting the world know all about it, – and how rough they have it in comparison to men. (Shed a tear here.)

Well, “sisters”, there are surgical options opened to you to remedy all of those complaints. Just don’t do it on my tax dollars.

And “sisters”, I’ll tell you something else you’ll like even less. Back in the day your disgusting vitriolic diatribe was called Penis Envy. Put that in your little pink bonnets, huh?

SENDING OUT THE SNOWFLAKES….

Sean Hannity had some ditsy female guest on his radio show on Friday, January 27th. She was all PRO the march; and Madonna’s threat about blowing up the White House was just artistic free speech. He asked her (several times) about partial birth abortion which she said she was good with because there is no such thing… I could not make this up. She told Sean that partial birth abortion did not create infanticide (the killing of a baby).

Apparently in her safe space no one had bothered her with the Planned Parenthood videos of selling baby body parts and suggesting different ways of performing partial birth abortions, done in the very last days of the pregnancy, ie, at or near term, so as to make better, more mature organ parts available for sale.

Clearly she had also not bothered herself with details of abortionist Kermit Gosnell, now serving time for multiple infanticides. These truly gruesome details are available in a book called “Gosnell”.

She explained to Sean Hannity – very patiently – that partial birth abortion was when the child was surgically removed by Caesarean Section. The baby was NOT killed. And if there was just more sex education then there would be less of an issue with abortion…

Wouldst that were true! It would be so easy to birth the baby and hand it over to an adoption agency. But killing the baby is just more feminine, you think?

And did you all catch Hillary when she said that the baby shouldn’t be considered a baby until it’s mother took it home? In case Mom changed her mind about having the baby? In fact if I recall correctly Hillary also mentioned that the baby shouldn’t be considered a baby for two weeks after the birth…….. I don’t believe she ever indicated what should be done with the gurgling, fist-waving little thingie there in the newborn nursery…..

SEEDS OF SHARIA

How could any good (?), progressive, sex pontificating, Me-First, pro-abortionist, wear-what-I-want (or not), LGBT-hugging, social justice, open borders, smoking/drinking/drugging angry socialist feminist ever trip into the waiting arms of Sharia Law? (Hey, it worked for Hillary & Huma!)

How in the name of Allah did they have a Brooklyn-born Palestinian Muslim female social worker as one of their Women’s March co-chairs? Linda Sarsour. The pictures I’ve seen show her in a full hijab, a nun-like head covering, though in her case they are quite gaily colored. And her eyes are heavily made up. Very Western.

Maybe that’s it: she wears makeup so she must be okay. Forget the mandates against women in the Qu-ran (Koran): rape, honor killings, beatings, mutilation, subjugation, and lots of motherhood. And I guess it would never occur to Linda Sarsour to throw some of the gay boys off a high roof.

ABORTION

Not to worry! While you’re hugging Linda Sarsour like a comfortable little pink teddy bear, Islam has it all figured out for you, dear “sisters” and snowflakes. According to the Muslim site zawaj.com they teach that the soul enters the fetus at 120 days, or 4 months. With the fewest possible exceptions it is unlawful under Islam to abort the fetus before 120 days. With absolutely no exceptions, it is also unlawful to abort the fetus on or after 120 days. Rape and incest are not reasons.

Like Climate Change/Global Warming, clearly we have settled science by consensus here… Male Muslim consensus you understand. And devout Muslim agent Linda Sarsour is a poster girl for this Women’s March? Talk about a serious disconnect.

HITLER, AND TOUPEES……

While a “NAAAA-STEEEEE” woman was bemoaning the feel of Hitler in the streets of D.C. – a moustache exchanged for a toupee – she was apparently coincidentally mindlessly embracing devout Muslim Palestinian Linda Sarsour.

I know I mentioned this before but let’s draw out a new and uncomfortable – for them – observation. In the 1940s, when Hitler’s Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, the Desert Fox, was romping victoriously with his North Afrika Korps, just who was Hitler’s talented general aligning himself with? Why, the Muslim Arabs, of course. He was going to liberate them from British rule. Hitler, Rommel, Arab Muslims. Got it? Muslims, Rommel, Hitler: Friends.

So, when we want to talk about Hitler, let’s keep it straight who was holding hands with whom.

((Speaking of the Brits, Teresa May, PM, is distressed with Trump’s temporary ban on Mid-East immigration. 80 years ago the Brits were a dominant force in North Africa. Now, the most prevalent male name for newborns inside Britain is Mohammad. (Talk about the sun setting on the empire…))

THE OTHER MARCH

I don’t have a number on the tens of thousands that Marched for Life on January 27th in Washington, D.C. How thrilling it must have been for them to have the Vice-President come and speak, how hopeful that some of this will be rolled back.

But I’ll make a bet that just like the Tea Party versus the Occupiers, the Right-to-Lifers left one heck of a lot less trash than did the sisters, snowflakes, and the beta boys. And no broken windows, torched cars, injured cops, graffiti…? Anyone want to take me up on that…?

Hey God! Thanks for your blessings!

GO TRUMP!!

PS: Given what President Trump has already done so far, what’s he going to do with the last 3½ years of this first term of his presidency?

PS2: Just in. Thanks to JT. Reba sings of God. Video. Guaranteed to make the Left crazier than they already are. Enjoy and share.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS DONALD TRUMP!
AND GOD BLESS YOU AND ALL YOUR DREAMS!

© 2017 Ronnie Herne – All Rights Reserved

The Democrats are shocked, dumbstruck, blinded-sided and apoplectic! How could a brash, untamed, crude billionaire businessman appear on the political scene and shake the very timbers of 100 plus years of Progressive rule? How dare this champion slayer of the establishment, challenge the Progressive Way that has been silently and with premeditation, infiltrated the fabric of America and lies embedded in every American institution, as well as being buried in the “Little Black Box” of at least four generations of millions of duped Americans. (See “Little Black Box Theory”)

From President Wilson’s Sixteenth Amendment, to FDR’s unconscionable perversion of the U. S. Constitution and his giant leap into socialism, to President Johnson’s Great Society failed welfare experiment and to President Obama’s delusion of hope, change and foreign policy through appeasement, America, on the flawed ideology of Progressivism, has slid so far from its roots of individual liberty and international influence and power, as to be unrecognizable. America is flat broke, deep in debt and has embarrassed itself to the rest of the world.

But for decades and to this day, much of America was and is in silent foment over Progressive rule. Taxes mounted to the point of wealth confiscation to pay for Progressive vote-buying policies. Regulations at the federal, state and local levels were growing exponentially. By the late 1960’s radical environmentalism had taken control over every human activity and added strangling regulations and huge costs to everything Americans buy, including their homes, energy and food.

From 1950 to 2016 the national debt, driven by Progressive policies, grew 20 fold from less than $1 Trillion in 1950 to almost $20 Trillion in 2016. During Obama’s 8-year term in office, the national debt doubled from $10 Trillion to almost $20 Trillion. (20,000,000,000,000 one-dollar bills laid end to end would reach almost 2 billion miles into deep space, or 247,000,000 miles past the orbit of the Planet Uranus.)

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), by 2026 the national debt is estimated to increase to $33 Trillion because of unfunded Progressive legislation. The cost burden to taxpayers for regulations, welfare, benefits to illegal aliens and government give-away programs keep increasing. (See: “The Masses Need A Course in Economics, Capital and Freedom”)

Government intrusion into our private lives has risen to the point from which revolutions are born.

Federal agencies like the Bureau of Land Management and U. S. Fish and Wildlife were and are attacking ranchers and farmers across the American West like never before, in the name of radical environmentalism. Those unwarranted attacks on private land ownership have led to seething anger and armed standoffs between ranchers and armed bureaucrats. (If you are a rural landowner, you need the information, products and services offered by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS (NARLO) to defend against these attacks.)

Businesses were and still are being overwhelmed with regulations, taxes, time-consuming paperwork and many businesses have had to endure unwarranted raids by drunk-with-power federal agencies, on trumped up charges. To escape the taxes and regulations, large businesses that could, were taking their manufacturing operations offshore. Cities, run mostly by Democrats, were being decimated and headed for bankruptcy and ruin as the manufacturing jobs dried up and the cost of welfare for the victims rose. As a result, these dying cities have become a greater drain on the federal budget.

Our foreign policy based on Obama’s weakness and appeasement, encouraged the rise of radical Islamic terrorism and Americans were dying in significant numbers, as America joined the rest of the world in frequent terror attacks.

Russia and China have taken advantage of America’s weakness and are engaging in armed incursions into other sovereign nations, or claiming possession of whole oceans and international shipping lanes.

Illegal immigration into our country from central and South America and enemy nations has become a mass illegal invasion of America from cultures that are not compatible with a free society. They have brought with them drugs, sex slaves, disease, crime, terrorism, a socialist mindset and in some cases a religion that is diametrically opposed to America’s Judeo-Christian heritage. These illegal aliens protest in the streets of “Sanctuary Cities” for “their” rights, while waving the Mexican, or some other non-American flag. The cost to taxpaying Americans is in the multi-billions of dollars every year. The federal government’s criminal mismanagement of this human invasion, borders on treason.

(See: “Sanctuary Cities Slap Every Lawful American in the Face”)

The seeds of dissent and discontent were and are boiling in undercurrents across the land. Utterances of resistance were silent no more. Talk of armed revolution danced more frequently in the minds of some reactionaries. The size of militia groups has grown larger. Open violations of law by normally law-abiding citizens were becoming more frequent. Rising regulations were making more Americans lawbreakers. America, as a free nation, appeared to be doomed.

But then a strange thing happened on the way to the 2016 presidential election. A very imperfect, un-conventional, almost guttural, outspoken, married-three-times, non-politician, billionaire businessman decided to throw his hat into the presidential ring. His chances at the start of the campaign to win the Republican nomination were slim to none. The pundits predicted his demise was just a matter of a few days, weeks, or months away at best. They were wrong.

Throughout the year and a half campaign Trump continued to throw indelicate arrows at everyone who dared to challenge his candidacy, including the press and his Republican challengers. When it wasn’t going his way, he placed the blame on the polls, or cheating by other Republican candidates. It didn’t matter. He called his Republican opponents all kinds of names. It didn’t matter. One by one his challengers dropped out, not being able to excite those people that rallied around Trump, that Hillary Clinton called a “basket of deplorables”.

Trump promised things to his followers that could only be accomplished if he was King, but the followers hung on and they grew in numbers every day. In spite of every negative torpedo the press, Democrats and establishment Republicans could throw at him, including being called a racist and sexual predator, to just about everyone’s surprise, Donald J. Trump won the Republican nomination. Meanwhile, all the soothsayers were betting on the candidacy of “Crooked Hillary”, as Trump loved to call her. They were betting on her all the way up to 11:00 PM Eastern Time on the day of the election.

During the three months from the Republican Convention, leading up to the November 6th election, Trump continued his barrage of tweets and indiscrete utterances. He would say outlandish things that couldn’t be supported by the facts. It didn’t matter. His loyalists remained steadfast. Instead of allowing minor irritants to pass, he would tweet a response that would set the media on fire and prolong the irritant. It didn’t matter.

He defied all the nay-sayers, odds-makers and prognosticators and by 11:00 PM Eastern time on the day of the election, one by one the swing states had fallen to Trump and the Electoral College was his. Trump was now President-Elect and the Democrats were dumb-founded, in disarray ….. and mad as Hell. How could this have happened when Hillary was pre-anointed by the Progressive establishment and the press for her to become the next President? The skids were greased and over a billion dollars in donations were spent, but she lost anyway. It was unfathomable, unthinkable!

Nevertheless, from the day of the election to Trump’s Inauguration on January 20th, 2017, the dissenters and detractors never gave up. The Democrats were shocked and bewildered and the press couldn’t figure out how they got it so wrong, not realizing that the 2016 election was a referendum on Progressivism. Negative press against Trump flowed like water over a falls and continues to this day and will continue for the length of his presidency.

The day after the Inauguration, millions of women marched in cities across America and across the globe, in open defiance of Trump and the anti-Progressive policies he promised to in-act. Trump was and is to these women and all other liberals, the archenemy of Progressivism.

Now we know that anyone that has been paying attention knows all of this, but how many know just how bad Progressivism has been for America. Progressivism has weakened the very fabric of America’s strength, her people and made millions of them weak, docile, compliant and hopeless dependent on government. Progressives have divided America up into constituency groups of race, age and gender (Democrat voting blocks) that constantly berate constitutional principles for and on behalf of the Democrats, while beating the political drums for a free hand out, or a special benefit, without regard to the cost.

Progressivism is a philosophy of government that has broken the back and bankrupted this once great land and stolen her individual freedom by using vote-buying, indoctrination, brainwashing, propaganda, hype, distortions and outright lies. Progressivism is why America is flat broke and deep in debt.

In sharp contrast, tens of millions of Trump supporters found him to be a needed breath of fresh air. He was the change-maker to save America from the scourge of Progressivism, collectivism and globalism. He was the slayer of all things Progressive and the drainer of the alligator and mosquito infested establishment swamp. With bravado rarely seen in a politician, he promised he would rise up America into the promise of her Founding Fathers. He would bring back the jobs and raise the poor and downtrodden out of poverty. He would re-build our roads, train tracks, tunnels and bridges. He would strengthen our military and restore America to the super power she was destined to be. He would tell our enemies their days are numbered. Many conservatives have waited decades to hear these words and promises of immediate action.

Trump even nominated powerful people to his cabinet that would get the “job” done.

With any luck, he, President Donald J. Trump, will bring back the pride of being an American and return America’s exceptionalism, economically, financially, culturally, spiritually and militarily.

Hopefully, Trump can also stop this man-caused global warming insanity being foisted upon the American people by environmentally crazed Progressives. (Three years of alleged warming is nothing compared to geologic time. The planet has warmed about every 100,000 years to today’s temperatures and higher in the last 500,000 years, prior to the industrial revolution.)

(See: “Please, Please, Democrats, Sue to Defend Climate Change”)

It’s no wonder that Democrats, liberals and Progressives are scared and shaking in their boots. Good Lord, Roe vs. Wade might be overturned. Women might lose their free contraceptives, free loaders might lose their government checks and illegal aliens could be deported. It’s no wonder they are marching in the streets in large numbers. Their world of collectivism, multi-culturalism, irrational compassion, sanctuary cities, political correctness, “free-stuff”, amnesty for illegal aliens and the one-world-order could be collapsing around them.

If Trump is even partially successful and we expect him to be in spite of his frequent gaffs, the fallacy of Progressivism will be exposed once and for all. The socialist poison they have fed to the American people for the last 100 plus years will come up against the Trump anti-dote of individual liberty, free trade, economic prosperity and national strength. Progressivism will be on trial all across America and with a little help from providence, the rule of law, freedom, liberty, the American people and the free world will be the winners.

A successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.

Throughout history, all Republics eventually evolve into socialism and oppression. After years of socialist oppression the people finally resort to the last alternative to preserve freedom ….. revolution. But we don’t have to repeat history if the American people will always maintain the mindset that freedom isn’t free and acknowledge that, “we are only one generation away from slavery.”

Under Trump, “Progressive rule may be up for grabs for now,” but it has a nasty habit of re-appearing as a lesion on the skin of humanity, if the people don’t take the difficult task of “cutting out” that lesion every now and then ….. by any means necessary.

Did you LIKE this article?

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“Accuse the other side of which you are guilty of.” – Joseph Gobbles Nazi propaganda minister

Over the last week, we have been hearing much of the DC Womens’ March. For example, the threats coming from the likes of Madonna, who spoke of “blowing up the White House,” while also shouting out vulgarities like “suck my *#@k!” (Yes you heard her right) and Ashley Judd, a self-professed Christian (Titus 1:16), making comments like “I feel Hitler in the streets,” “A mustache traded for a toupee,” “Nazis renamed.” Judd went on to make accusations concerning President Donald Trump with regard to favoring his daughter as being a “Favorite sex symbol.” She ended with “Our p#@*ies are for our pleasure and they are birthing a new generation…of nasty woman.”

Additionally, Scarlett Johansson complains about how male actors are paid more than female actors, and how when she was 15 years old she had to “use Planned Parenthood” (Proverbs 6:17).

So, what is it that we have here? Nothing but a bunch of out of control, lawless murderers, whores, hypocrites and feminists that want to lay the guilt of their choices onto the innocent in the womb, in which they themselves are guilty (1 John 3:1).

To take it a step further, look who is the leader of the DC Women’s March. It’s none other than Linda Sarsour. Sarsour is a Palestinian-American activist and executive director of the Arab American Association of New York.

Linda Sarsour is angry that US States don’t not allow Sharia Law. Oh, the Irony! Just think of this, a Muslim on the head of Hollywood’s “useful idiots,” promoting the murder of their own children so their enemies do not have to do it. Nazi feminists playing into the hands of their enemies. [YouTube Video]

Americans should pay attention to what this is breeding. To do otherwise is a disservice to yourselves and to your posterity.

It must be some sort of prerequisite that if you want to be a part of Hollywood’s club of “useful idiots,” you had better come with full allegiance to the demonic system of anti-Christ if you want a job (1 John 2:15-16; Matthew 4:9).

Americans have the audacity to call these people stars; fallen stars would be more like it.

Is it not of interest to see how Satan himself mocks and counters everything that God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, does? (Isaiah 14)

Hollywood has the walk of stars in the West, while the wise men followed the star in the East over the house where the Christ child was at (Matthew 2:2).

Hollywood has degenerated in so many ways to that which promotes and stands against America’s Christian heritage, which was founded in righteousness, goodness and truth (Ephesians 5:9).

The Mosaic institution in which America was founded and established is that which Christ fulfilled (Exodus 20; Romans 3:31).

Furthermore, if the American people knew the history of the “City of Churches” (Hollywood) and how that property was given away for free to those who would establish parishes, they would probably blush to see how far backwards things have gone in this country which they now tolerate (Isaiah 59).

This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to those that Americans are allowing to lead the way.

America, a word of admonition, know who you follow (John 14:6; 1 Timothy 2:5; 1 Corinthians 11:1).

Do not choose the blind to be your guide! (Matthew 15:14)

Ask yourself, what do those you follow stand or fall for?

Mark this: You will not go beyond those you allow to teach you. How they stand or fall is how you will stand or fall! Consider those you tolerate!

© 2017 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserve

“A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.” -Joseph Goebbels

Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Francesco Gramsci and Saul Alinsky were all malevolent masterminds of manipulating others into becoming willing puppets of the State. Lenin’s “What Is to Be Done?;” Trotsky’s “In Defense of Marxism,” Gramsci’s “Prison Notebooks” and Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” were all written to push strategy and propaganda onto the masses. All have succeeded in spreading malignant evil. But aside from Lenin, none lived to become absolute masters over every form of media and, arguably, none were as effective as Joseph Goebbels.

The Reich Minister for Propaganda and Popular Enlightenment, Goebbels, was the architect of Hitler’s rise to power in the Nazi Party and thereafter, his ascension to de facto dictator over the Third Reich. one of the most brutal empires in history. According to writer H.R. Trevor-Roper, “Goebbels was an impresario of genius, the first man to realize the full potentialities of mass media for political purposes in a dynamic totalitarian state.” He perceived early on how the masses could be easily led by skillful use of modern media and he grasped the reins of that media to propel Hitler into power and Nazi Germany into war.

We are always strongest in the offensive. -Joseph Goebbels

Born in 1897, Joseph Goebbels was rejected by the German Army in WWI due to a clubbed foot so instead, he attended Heidelberg University where he was awarded a doctorate of philosophy in 1920. His disability, slight physical stature and his resentment of the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles turned Goebbels into a very embittered man in the early 1920’s. Seeing an outlet for his anger, Goebbels joined the Nazi Party in 1924.

Goebbels was, at first, critical of another young and angry German by the name of Adolph Hitler. But in one of those cruel ironies of life, Hitler later became a friend to Goebbels. Goebbels first task was to build up Nazi support in the city of Berlin. He approached this like he approached everything in his life, by attacking it. The Nazi’s main rivals were the communists. In order to defeat them, Goebbels would often storm into their meetings and take over the microphone as his “Sturmabteilung” (SA) paramilitaries would beat dissenters into submission. Then, as would become his lifetime practice, he would accuse the communists of starting the fight.

Seeing Goebbels’ deeply rooted scorn for humanity, his ability to sow confusion and hatred, his thirst for power and his command of mass persuasion, Hitler unleashed Goebbels during the election campaigns of 1932. Goebbels was hugely responsible for Hitler’s election as Chancellor. Following the election, the German Parliament building, the Reichstag, was deliberately torched allowing Hitler to become the dictator of Germany.

Goebbels was rewarded by being made Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, a position he held until 1945. He now had complete control over all radio, cinema, newspapers and other arts. His works are still spoken of today as masterpieces of propaganda; he created the Cult of “Der Fuehrer” to turn Hitler into a messianic figure as well as using all the media in Nazi controlled areas to denounce his enemies. Films like Franz Hippler’s “Der Ewige Jude” depicting Jews as rats became the norm as the “Final Solution” took hold.

Writer Peter Bjel [11] described Goebbels use of the cinema thusly: “If the Nazis were movie-mad, then the Third Reich was movie-made, a fantasy order that in equal measure was dream machine and a death factory.”

During the first few years of the war, it was easy for Goebbels to persuade the Germans of the inevitable victory of Hitler and the Third Reich, but that all changed with the shattering defeat of the German 6th Army under General Friedrich Paulus at Stalingrad in 1943. His statement following the defeat showed the new direction Goebbels would take the Germans: “An entire Army had sacrificed itself ‘for all of us,’ and indeed, for western civilization. Goethe and Beethoven, Augustus and Pericles were being defended in the wilds of the East.” In a flash, the myth of German invincibility was smashed and the focus became the subhuman brutality and stupidity of the Soviet solder as opposed to willing sacrifice of the German hero.

In spite of the devastating defeats Germany had after Stalingrad, Goebbels propaganda machine was still able to convince the people that theirs was a righteous and glorious cause worth dying for. Die for it Goebbels did, as the Russian Army was crushing the pitiful German army in Berlin and the city lay in ruins, Goebbels poisoned his six children, shot his wife and then himself. The man who used the arts to propel one of the most evil men in history was dead, but his legacy of evil lives on.

Along the way, power hungry zealots have used Goebbels’ writings to support their own nefarious designs. Case in point: After Trump’s election victory, Nazi collaborator George Soros joined other global elites along with their mainstream media (MSM) lapdogs to do just that. In accordance with Goebbels playbook they blamed “Russian” hacking for Hillary Clinton’s loss and Donald Trump’s victory. Attacks included organized so called “grass root” riots and a campaign to intimidate members of the Electoral College into changing their votes from Trump to Clinton.

The “Russian hacking” meme was created as a cover for the Wikileaks release of thousands of damning emails which exposed collusion between the Democratic National Committee, the MSM and the Hillary Campaign to steal the Democratic Party’s nomination from Bernie Sanders. Their release showcased Hillary’s blatantly illegal disregard for US Top Secret documents and “pay to play” activities in which Hillary actively engaged while she was Secretary of State. A majority of democrats have proven themselves to be as morally corrupt as the DNC leadership by focusing concern on a scapegoat for Hillary’s loss instead of the scandals her emails exposed.

The similarity between the current attempts by George Soros to destroy what little is remaining of the American Republic and Hitler’s rise to power cannot be ignored. As Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch failed to raise Hitler to power, so did Soros’s Electoral College non-event and post-election riots fail to propel Hillary into the office of US President. But continuing to reach into his Nazi bag of tricks, Soros and company use another Goebbels strategy:

“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.” -Joseph Goebbels [1]

On January 10th, the media exploded with the scoop of a lifetime when CNN released news on the existence of a report linking President-elect Donald Trump to the “Russian” hacking scandal. Compiled by retired British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, the report claimed that Russia had gathered compromising data about the President-elect. Originally, Mr. Steele was hired by anti-Trump Republicans to dig up dirt on Trump, however, the funding continued from an anonymous Democrat donor.

Later that evening, the ultra-liberal web site “Buzz-Feed” released the entire report. Supposedly originating from Russian intelligence members, it consisted of a series of memos alleging that Russian agents have been blackmailing Trump over footage of himself with Russian prostitutes. In truth, the dossier has more holes in it than the Obama administration’s explanation of what happened at Benghazi.

For example, months before CNN and Buzz-Feed published the report; it had been passed over as fake news. NBC sources deny CNN reports that Trump had been given a two page briefing about the dossier. Moreover, the poorly written dossier cannot be verified. Contrary to memo claims, Michael Cohen, has never visited Prague, let alone met with Russian officials. Even CNN says it was a different Michael Cohen in Prague.

Soros: A Modern Goebbelist

The truth is the greatest enemy of the State. -Joseph Goebbels [1]

Recall President Barack Obama’s unwitting live microphone comments to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in March of 2012. “This is my last election;” he whispered “After my election, I have more flexibility.” Then, during the 2014 Ukrainian crisis, when Russia invaded and retook its historical base of Crimea, the presumably “hard as nails,” anti-Russian leader Obama offered ration kits to the Ukraine as he backpedaled on his Eastern European missile defense promise. When questioned on his backtracking, Obama blithely answered, “Ukraine is a core Russian interest but not an American one, so Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there.” Obama’s actions mirror the depth of hypocrisy that Soros and his ilk practice on a regular basis.

In the meantime, a company run by former KGB agents paid Bill Clinton speaking fees to the tune of $500,000 and the Clinton Foundation, raked in $2.35million for allowing a Russian-owned company to assume control of 20% of the world’s uranium supply. This deal literally shut the US out of the European market for uranium. Additionally it posed substantial security risks to the US and Europe So important to Russia was this sweetheart deal that Pravda, the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin, put this on the cover of its newspaper “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

Allowing no opportunity to go to waste, today’s Goebbelists eagerly follow in their masters footsteps by engaging paid thugs to start fights and bully Trump supporters as the MSM would label the Trump supporters as “racist bigots.”

Focusing on Trump’s inauguration, contemporary SA thugs purpose to bring about anarchy in this nation. One of the participating groups, #DISRUPTJ20, is even calling for a Queer Dance in front of the home of Vice President Mike Pence. Numerous progressive/communist organizations openly advertise for “volunteers” to incite mayhem that effectively shuts down Washington DC.

The largest private grassroots support organization in the United States, Demand Protest has recruited politically-motivated cohorts to protest Trump’s inauguration. So much for “grassroots” and “spontaneous!” Promising “volunteers” $50 an hour and $2,500 a month, Demand Protest seeks willing operatives to disrupt the ceremony. The group 4Chan claims that Demand Protest is Soros funded. Since Soros paid Ferguson and Trump protestors, this is not an unreasonable assumption.

Following Goebbels method of attacking without mercy, today’s entertainers openly mock Trump, his family and supporters. Recall the American Music Awards ceremony in November of 2016 and the Golden Globe Awards in January 2017, when actress Meryl Streep criticized Donald Trump while, at the same time, praising two specific groups dedicated to “protecting” journalists, namely, ProPublica and the Committee to Protect Journalists. Note: both groups are heavily funded by George Soros. One need only follow the money for evidence of Nazi ideology in the current media transmission and propaganda.

Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred. -Joseph Goebbels [1]

The West is under a propaganda attack unlike anything it has seen before. Every form of electronic media is being used to pound the message to us that discrimination is the American way. Paradoxically, those screaming the loudest about American “discrimination” are the same ones guilty of the most intolerance as demonstrated here; here: here and here. Claims of intolerance are even leveled against fellow liberals as evidenced by the largely Soros funded anti-Trump Women’s March on Washington.

The MSM dubs any article critical of the Soros/MSM myth as “fake news.” In early December, the EU is demanding an end to “fake news” to be enforced by social media companies. Accordingly Facebook, will now apply warning labels to stories deemed to be “fake,” as determined by the Poynter Institute. The Poynter Institute is funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Google, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Omidyar Network (founder of Ebay), the Craig Newmark Foundation and other globalist groups. So the fox is once again guarding the hen house.

The emergence of the “fake news” phenomenon is coincidentally, at a time where faith in American political system has plummeted. Conducted by Nathanael Persily and Jon Cohen, a large poll paints a dismal picture of what Americans feel about our political institutions and even their fellow Americans. Ignoring the fact that ours is a Constitutional Republic, 3,000 registered voters were asked a series of questions about how they felt about democracy in America. 40% of the respondents have “lost faith in America,” while 6% responded that they never had faith in America. A full 67% felt their fellow Americans are untrustworthy. A different poll measured faith in governments in the US government at 38%.

The British vote to leave the European Union (Brexit) and the election of Donald Trump as US president reflect the growing erosion in the faith of globalist policies that favor the banksters, government officials and multi-national corporations. Fed up with fewer jobs for lower pay and diminished benefits, coupled with a greater risk of violence from the immigrants not properly vetted, more and more people are waking up to the rigged game the elites have been playing for decades.

Propaganda works best when those being manipulated are confident that they are acting on their own free will. -Joseph Goebbels [1]

It’s apparent why George Soros and the Council on Foreign Relations are actively hostile towards Trump GOP controlled Congress. CFR Director of International Institutions and Global Governance, Stewart Patrick, wrote an article for CNN entitled “Future of US Relationship with UN in Doubt.” His fanciful tale continues the Soros theme of nationalism being bad, globalism being good. Patrick complains that Trump and the GOP are going to “whack” the UN by possibly withholding money to the UN, which, according to Patrick, remains the best bang for the US buck.

Once again, all roads lead to Soros. Patrick was a research fellow at the Center for Global Development, a liberal think tank with ties to another philanthropic group (started by Bill Gates and George Soros among other globalists) called “One”. In his article, Patrick praises the incoming UN Chief, Antonio Guterres as an “accomplished and dynamic leader” capable of “fending off the negative impact of a unilaterally-inclined US administration and a micromanaging Congress.” Enjoying complete support of China and Russia, Guterres was active with “Friends of Europe,” which is also sponsored by Soros. Moreover, as UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Guterres worked with Soros’ “Open Society Foundation” that instigated the Muslim immigrant invasion of Europe.

George Soros,’ writing in a January 2017 Op Ed piece, defends those countries he calls “Open Societies,” ones that are willing to sacrifice part of their sovereignty for the common good. His plea smacks of “piecemeal social engineering” involving small, incremental steps toward establishing supranational governance. He states that the election of a would be dictator, Donald Trump; the British vote for leaving the European Union (Brexit); and the Italian vote against Constitutional Amendments creating a less democratically created but more powerful central government show a popular move away from globalism. The reason we are told is a buildup of resentment of governmental policies favoring the elites causing an increasing number of people to favor a tyrannical “nationalist” government instead of Soros-style transnational “open societies.”

Since the election, the clarion call has again been ringing for the end of the Electoral College. The expressed intent of groups like Refuse Fascism, and #DISRUPTJ20, is to shut down Washington DC. Ultimately they want to instigate the rebellion of tens of millions of people against the Trump/Pence administration and eventually remove them from office. Remember, these are groups being supported by an actual Nazi collaborator, George Soros who would like nothing better than to eliminate the votes of some 63 million Americans who voted for Trump/Pence.

Soros: A Modern Goebbelist

“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Zbigniew Brzezinski

Owned by the Rothschild family, the globalist mouthpiece Economist [90] magazine warns of severe economic pain in the post-Brexit world of Great Britain. As the article states, “If the price is economic pain, so be it.” In the US, we are warned that, by rejecting the “philanthropy” of Soros’ “Open Society Foundation,” we are embracing tyranny; while democracy is endangered by dark forces that plan to reverse the advances made by minorities. To the contrary, foundations that “care” about civil society—i.e., Open Society, Carnegie Corporation, Ford, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, MacArthur and Mott—need to move to the forefront.

The same people warning of encroaching tyranny should the continued trend of rejecting globalism continue, are now offering up technocracy as an alternative. In an article posted by Bloomberg, a self-described “globalist,” and apparent fan of George Soros, Professor Tyler Cowen is calling on Trump to bring in more “experts” to rule over America. Cowen’s bottom line is fear; his solution is for technocrats to save us, as they did in 2008, when the experts swindled trillions from common citizens.

Featuring Chinese President XI Jinping and German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the top of the page, Huffington Post recently released the article, “Sick of Democracy? The US could learn a lot from these Countries.” In it, we are warned that because populism has triumphed over pragmatism, we’re basically doomed. The article’s author, Parag Khanna, is a Fellow at the Soros/Bill and Melinda Gates/MacArthur funded “New America Foundation.” He is a respected member of academia and a well-connected globalist as pointed out in Time Magazine and the Washington Post.

In Khanna’s view, we best ditch the President for a council, like communist China has. Otherwise, people will lose even more faith in US democracy. As experts in their fields, technocrats should run the hundreds of governmental agencies that control every aspect of American life. Though unelected, they “know what they are doing,” and they’re free to do what needs to be done. A parliamentary system of unelected tyrants also promises to get more done than Congress. Khanna’s article supports his book, Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State, which implies democracy is dead. Long live technocracy.

In yet another attempt to spread chaos, Soros funded CNN ran a bizarre news story on 1/19/2017 about what would happen to the US government should Trump, Pence, and Congressional leaders be assassinated before Trump was sworn into office. The result would be a continuance of the Obama administration. Aside from being borderline treasonous and possibly inciting an attempt on Trump’s life, why did they not run the same story when Obama was sworn into office?

Aspiring to be the invisible power behind the throne, George Soros is the Joseph Goebbels of our time. With help from fellow billionaires, well-connected academics, government officials and ruthless thugs, Soros relentlessly tears apart the fabric of the US while, at the same time, he finances solutions to problems he has helped create.

Unfortunately, Soros-nemesis Donald Trump will inherit a nation on the brink of civil war with the greatest national debt in world history, a shrinking labor force, and growing numbers on welfare and in poverty. Added to many other economic indicators, these conditions signal a rapidly approaching financial collapse destined to dwarf the 2008 recession. Under a Trump presidency, that collapse could incite unprecedented rioting as disgruntled citizens, at long last, demand a different government.

If Trump is going to succeed in draining the swamp of Washington DC, it will only be because of divine intervention. There are too many bottom feeders in DC for one man or one team to fight and be successful against. We, the people of God need to fervently seek God’s blessing on Trump, his family and his administration for it will take a miracle to stop the globalist plot to destroy this country.

“It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -George Soros

© 2017 – Steven Neill – All Rights Reserved