Obama and Hillary surrogates put forth a false narrative of Russian collusion, but had no evidence to support the allegation.  It appears that on a second attempt, the Obama Administration got a FISA court order to monitor communications of the Trump campaign, treasure hunting for evidence to support the false narrative and apparently, there is none.  Now a backfire has put the Obama gang and their media lapdogs on the defensive. —J.D. Pendry

Wouldn’t it be nice to see the lying Socialist-loving media actually on the defensive and in a meltdown?  What’s funny is they’ve actually put a bit of truth out in the past, and now they’re having to eat their own words.  The NYTs asked Sean Spicer if there was proof of Obama’s wiretapping, and Sean said, “No,” but the NYTs itself printed the story on January 19, 2017.

Hopefully, our new AG go full bore after the former administration and their alleged illegal wiretapping!

Attorney General Sessions has not recused himself from an investigation into the latest wiretapping allegation and that just thrills me.  Trump has turned the tables on the left and their phony Russian election collusion stories.

The Gateway Pundit supplied an entire list of those the Obama administration had wiretapped.  However, Obama is denying he ever spied on Trump or his administration.  Yet, he has his handler, communist-bred Valerie Jarrett, in his rented townhouse, only blocks from the White House, to lead the charge to topple the peoples’ choice for President. Jarrett, from within the White House may have launched a Watergate style attack on Trump during the election, and is now continuing her attack.

Levin Calls for Congressional Investigation

Even former NeverTrumper and pro-Constitutional Convention talk show host, Mark Levin, has said, “The evidence is overwhelming.  This is not about President Trump’s tweet, it is about the Obama administration’s spying.  The question isn’t whether it spied, we know they went to the FISA court twice.  The question is, who did they spy on, and the extent of the spying.  That is, the Trump campaign, the Trump transition, Trump surrogates, and the American people.”

Levin called Obama’s efforts, “police state” tactics, and suggested that Obama’s actions should be the target of a congressional investigation.  He also stated that the theories about Russian interference in the presidential election were nothing more than conspiracy theories. Here’s the entire interview.

The Timeline

The first Obama FISA request came in June of 2016.  In July, Trump made a joke about Hillary’s missing emails saying that maybe Russia can find them.  This was the catalyst for the Socialist media to glom onto the fabrication that Russia hacked the election for Trump’s win.

In October, the Podesta emails kept flowing out from WikiLeaks, and new scandals were in the news daily.  Of course, the Clinton campaign blamed Trump and the Russians, spewing the allegation that the Russians hacked the Democrat emails. The truth of the matter is Podesta’s emails were obtained because he fell for a phishing scam.

When Julian Assange was interviewed in London by Sean Hannity, he clearly stated that Russia was not responsible for the hacking of the DNC. He has no reason to lie. We have just seen that the CIA department has possession of Russia hacking malware that can be used to make it appear that Russia’s fingerprints were on the DNC hacks. The CIA was possibly the source of the “hacks” during the election cycle. They didn’t give information to WikiLeaks, because Assange said that the source came from within the DNC, but these hacks were essentially made for no reason other than to provide a cover story that Russian hacking helped Trump win the election.

In October, the second FISA request was made by Obama, focusing on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks.  Again, no evidence whatsoever is found, but they continued their spying, ostensibly for national security reasons.

These are police state tactics where the standing administration is actually monitoring an opposing presidential campaign with surveillance by the federal government.  There should be media outrage, but the media is part of the problem.

In January of 2017, John McCain got into the act and turned over to the FBI the phony Buzzfeed intel “dossier” compiled by a foreign spy.  All of this was false, and nothing could be verified; the info had been floating around DC for months and ignored.

In early January, Obama decided to expand the NSA sharing and to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intel agencies before applying privacy protections.  Totally unheard of and dangerous, these reduced protections made it easier for intel on private citizens to be leaked or circulated.

Even worse is the NYT’s report on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies, FBI, CIA, NSA, and the Treasury Department are all monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties.  Yes, multi-agencies were working on this false story to destroy the peoples’ new president and his administration.

In February, the irreplaceable, NSA Chief, General Michael Flynn, fell prey to the lies of the FBI transcripts.  Obama’s Sally Yates, acting AG, is fired for insubordination.  The General, the finest appointee besides Sessions in Trump’s administration, ends up resigning over allegedly misleading VP Pence, most likely inadvertently, about the content of this normal conversation with the Russian Ambassador.

My own belief is that globalist VP Pence wanted to be rid of the General.  While in Germany days after Flynn’s resignation, Pence mentioned needlessly that Flynn was gone because of a “lack of trust.”  Spicer had uttered the same words.  I believe Pence is the core of why the General, who was a loyalist from the beginning, is gone.

Jeff Kredo is reporting that, “The CIA and Departments of Justice and Treasury are being sued by Judicial Watch for their role in leaking highly classified material as part of an effort to undermine the credibility of former Trump administration NSA Chief Michael Flynn, according to a recent announcement.”

Back to the timeline…later in February, the NYTs cited four current and former American officials in the Trump campaign who had “repeated contacts with Russian intel officials.  Of course, it’s been denied by the Trump administration, and then the NYTs admitted there was no evidence of any collusion between the campaign and the Russians.  Finally, the administration is raising questions about illegal intel leaks.

In March, the Bezos owned Washington Post reported that AG Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign, once at the Heritage Foundation, and once at a meeting in Sessions’ Senate office.

My previous article exposed just how many times the top Democratic Socialists have also met with the Russian ambassador as well as President Putin.

The Back Story

NSA Admiral Mike Rogers visited Trump Tower just 10 days after the election, and right after another Mike Rogers – the former House intelligence Chairman who retired after lying about the Benghazi fiasco – was kicked off the Trump transition team on intelligence.  No one could figure out why he was kicked out.  However, if you’ve read the Benghazi Brief you know how damaged, corrupted and untrustworthy Chairman Mike Rogers was – and he previously sat on the oversight gang of eight.

It appears that NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers didn’t want to participate in the spying scheme (Clapper, Brennan, etc.), of President Obama’s post presidency efforts to undermine Donald Trump.  It could be that NSA Rogers didn’t want to visit Trump Tower until Chairman Rogers was gone.

The end result was Admiral Rogers was fired.

Andrew McCarthy Sums It Up

Former prosecutor, Andrew McCarthy summarized the story in William F. Buckley’s NeverTrump National Review.

McCarthy tells that Obama and his minions wanted criminal investigations of Trump’s top people, yet there was nothing criminal to find.  Surprise, Surprise!  So what they did next was convert the investigation into an intel probe under FISA (The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act).  Parts of this story have been confirmed by the BBC, NYTs, and the McClatchy papers.

Normally a FISA surveillance is allowed by the court whenever the feds ask to spy on certain people, but not this time.  The court refused permission to spy on Trump’s people according to the BBC.  McCarthy commented that this is notable because, “the FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct national security surveillance.”

Not liking the refusals, the Obama administration came back during the final weeks of the campaign with a third request that didn’t specifically mention Trump. Then the request was granted by the court, BUT…reports from the Guardian and BBC don’t mention tapping of phones.

Of course, there have been denials by the Obama administration, which McCarthy calls “disingenuous on several levels.” Others have characterized them as a “non-denial denial.”

The Deep-Police-State

Newt Gingrich made the observation, “To think this happened to be done by some bureaucrats with no supervision, when you know, for example, that Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, spent an hour in secret with Bill Clinton just before they dropped charges against his wife. I mean all of this stuff smells to high heaven despite the best efforts of the elite media to cover it up.”  He said, “These Obama wiretaps of our President are very serious, and very dangerous to our liberties.”

The very first FISA request on Trump Tower came after Bill Clinton, and Obama’s AG Loretta Lynch, had their private meeting on the plane. [Link]

Gingrich made it clear that Schumer is trying to derail this presidency by keeping Obama appointees in power.  Schumer knows that Jeff Sessions is a man of integrity and character above reproach, but he attacks the finest in Trump’s administration.

FBI Director Comey

According to the NYTs, “The FBI director reportedly made the verbal request, to the Justice Department to publicly reject President Trump’s assertion that Obama ordered the tapping of Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. They said Mr. Comey argued that the highly-charged claim is false and must be corrected, but the department has not released any such statement.”

Director Comey allegedly said, and it’s only supported by anonymous sources, for the DOJ to refute the President’s allegations, because, “it falsely insinuates that the FBI broke the law.”

So, it’s okay with the FBI to falsely insinuate that the President broke the law, but nobody had better make that same claim about them.  Fake news?  Maybe. We’re still wondering why Comey was retained.

Obama’s Community Organizers

Donald Trump’s latest tweets sent arrows into the MSM and Obama’s Organizing for America (OFA).

Paul Sperry, writing for the New York Post, says OFA is an army of agitators 30,000 strong who will fight President Donald Trump at every turn of his presidency, and the ex-president “will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.”  Sperry writes that the ex-president is setting up a shadow government to sabotage the incoming administration through a network of leftist nonprofits led by OFA, which is growing its war chest (currently more than $40 million) and has some 250 offices nationwide.  OFA’s IRS filings, according to Sperry, indicate OFA has 32,525 volunteers nationwide.  The ex-president and his wife will oversee the operation from their foundation office near the White House.

Obama has moved some of his top players into the OFA.  He has even moved his co-president and handler, Valerie Jarrett, into his rented home.

Conclusion

Here’s the meat of this whole filthy deep-state spying sedition…the story is not the Trump campaign. The story is not the Russians hacked the election. The story is not the Trump campaign was working with the Russians. The story is the effort by Barack Hussein Obama — and the Democrat Party, and the New York Times, and Washington Post, and Politico — to sabotage and destroy the Trump presidency, and Monica Crowley knows this all too personally.

Crowley was set to be the senior director of communications at the National Security Council before a hit job by CNN destroyed her.  She was recently interviewed by Sean Hannity and said the following:

Look, what happened to me was a despicable straight up political hit job.  There is a very toxic and increasingly poisonous atmosphere of personal destruction in DC and the media.  It’s always been there, but now it’s on a whole different level.

The attack on me was a test.  What happened to me, what happened to General Flynn, what is happening to AG Sessions and others, is all of a piece.  There is a very dangerous and very effective destabilization campaign under way against this President, his administration, and his agenda.  What I hope the President and his senior aides understand is that these forces are not just looking to delegitimize him, they want to personally destroy him, destroy his presidency, and they would like to see the man in prison.

They are out for blood, and the reason they must destroy him is because Donald Trump is an alien organism that has been injected into the body politic by the American people to reform it.  He must not be allowed to succeed.  They want him and his people rejected from the system, just like any alien organism.  He must not be allowed to succeed, and I hope everyone around him understands that this is a war, and they will not end until they destroy the President of the United States.

David Brock and other organizations have already raised tens of millions of dollars for an impeachment process.  They want “jail to the chief.”  We are so far beyond normal politics.  We are in a very dangerous moment.  While President Trump is a very strong leader and a man of strong constitution, and he was able to survive all of this during the campaign and get elected president, I hope to God he is strong enough to withstand the monolithic opposition, a federal bureaucracy that is completely out to undermine him every day, and the intelligence community that is engaged in this as well.

If Trump succeeds, the country changes for the good, and the globalists do not want that to happen.

Please pray continually for our President, his administration, and our country.

The replace part of the President’s health care bill is under criticism for including tax credits.  The argument is that tax credits (or direct payments from the U.S. treasury) establish a new entitlement when they go to folks who either pay no taxes at all or who pay an amount in taxes less than the amount paid in the credit.  The credits are aimed at enabling those without the financial wherewithal to pay for private insurance to help manage the cost of insurance.  There is an alternative to tax credits that I discuss at some length in my book Restore the Republic.  That alternative would create an incentive for family members, businesses, health care providers and hospitals to pay for the care of the indigent without taxpayers footing the bill through tax credits.

In Restore the Republic, I recommend that legislation be passed to codify a tax deduction equal to a $1.50 for every $1.00 paid by an individual or corporation to pay for the health care of a person in need or an employee.  By codifying a deduction of this kind, people could substantially reduce their tax liability by doing what they likely would do were they not taxed so heavily (take care of their own).

Each taxpaying family member should be able to reduce his or her taxes significantly by covering the cost of health care (or health insurance) given another family member.  Each taxpaying employer should be able to reduce its taxes significantly by covering the cost of health care (or health insurance) given an employee.  Each physician, health care provider, or hospital should be able to reduce his or its taxes significantly by covering the cost of health care for the indigent.

This approach encourages philanthropy and family ties while at the same time granting significant tax relief.  It decreases funding of public sector health care programs while increasing private care and philanthropy.

Private philanthropy of this kind is far more efficient, accurate, and effective than government programs which are ordinarily rife with waste, fraud and abuse.

Therefore, as the Republican majority mulls over the President’s Obamacare replacement, it would do well to replace the tax credit approach with the tax deduction approach I have explained above.  By permitting the family member, business, health care provider and hospital to be given a meaningful tax deduction for taking care of their own, the President will likely build a greater base of support for his replacement plan than currently exist in the House and Senate.

Conservatives and libertarians rightly contend that tax deductions are likewise manipulative and distort private markets, but we live in a world of second bests.  Obamacare exists and so does the massive welfare state.  To wean the nation from both requires measures that afford a politically achievable transition.  The proposal I offer, of tax deductions for taxpayers to foot the medical and medical insurance bills of family members, employees, and the indigent is a realistic means to transform the health care market, making it far less public, far more responsive to the market, and far more capable of helping those in need than the current system.

Things are moving in hyper speed since President Trump was inaugurated. The attacks on him, his family, his cabinet picks, what he’s trying to accomplish for us – you name it – the shadow government has him in its cross hairs. The lying ‘mainstream’ media from print to cable have been exposed. The Democratic/Communist Party USA has been exposed as the party of racism and exploitation. They’re all in a panic as are those who control them and Washington, DC.

Tens of millions of we the people are fully aware America dodged the final nail in our coffin with the defeat of die-hard Marxist, Hildebeast Clinton. It wasn’t just a blow to her Highness who firmly believed it was “her” time, it was a blow to the evil forces in this country working feverishly to destroy our sovereign nation and transition us into world government.

I firmly believe as probably millions of others do that without the Internet we would have been toast long ago.

The Internet is an amazing tool. It has some of the darkest places you can imagine that promote child pornography, snuff films and debauchery beyond most decent people’s imagination.

It is a major revenue tool for retailers and service oriented businesses alike as well as helping people receive an education, fund-raising for worthy causes and so much more.

Have a question about cooking, gardening – you name it, the Internet is the place to go for a speedy answer.

It’s also full of lies, distortion and propaganda in the realm of what’s called politics whether it be in this country or countries around the globe. The amount of all three is dished out daily on thousands of web sites is enough to drown anyone. Web sites that print nothing but theories without a single fact to back them up seem to attract far too many people who quite frankly, don’t do any research themselves.

While I’ve been in the trenches going on 27 years full time, it wasn’t until July 1998 that I put up my own web site. Prior to that it was faxes, newsletters and very expensive long distance phone bills (long before unlimited calling by phone providers) trying to get the world out about things like stopping NAFTA, trying to explain the problem with the unconstitutional, privately owned “Federal” Reserve, fiat currency and more. And, yes, the push towards a ‘one world order’ even though people laughed in my face.

I’ve spent an enormous amount of time on the Internet doing research, verifying, reading and of course, writing this weekly column. As I wrote back in January, my experience tells me which web sites I can and cannot trust and which ones provide not just commentary but in-depth exposure of the sinister individuals behind the curtain. NWVs writers are very careful about which web sites we link to verify and back up what’s in our columns.

NWVs is just about ready to launch it’s new web site – something computer folks know about called ‘content based’. You can see it here — not all the links are working yet as there were more than 19,000 files to get transferred over. It should be finished sometime in early April. All of this has cost a lot of money and as I say so often, a web site like NWVs has to be treated as a business or it won’t survive. In the competitive world of commentary/news web sites one must stay up with technology or sink. The only exception here is that Paul Walter and his lovely wife do not get paid a salary or any other compensation. Only outside computer expertise.

I KNOW the commentaries and columns on this web site have made a big difference over the years. I wrote my first column here in 2002 and have watched things grow exponentially since then. The quality of writers is superb and they all donate their precious time to bring you the best in research, keeping all of us updated on the avalanche of ‘stuff’ going on as well as Sunday’s featured clergy. Can’t be beat.

NWVs writers give up their precious time while working (lawyers, bakers, educators, clergy, business owners) to make a difference by writing columns for NWVs. I know you appreciate them.

Yes, this is a request for donations. OUR beloved America, is at a very dangerous cross roads right now. The resistance by misguided Americans spoon-fed daily lies can only be countered by truth. By continuing to get facts out there instead of propaganda. By educating as many Americans as we can so that their blinders will be lifted.

President Trump is under siege. I mean can you imagine, even being the tough NY ‘street fighter’ he is what this has been like for him day after day? He is working to keep this republic sovereign while evil scum like George Sores and the GOP establishment as well as they Democratic/Communist Party USA are working to destroy us. Yes, I said the GOP establishment and I pointedly mean Rat Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and others with their forked tongues.

We can and must defeat them and they only way we can do that is through knowledge because knowledge is power. We won’t get another chance at saving our country before it turns very ugly.

Please show your support for NWVs today. Take the time to sign up as a monthly sponsor for $10.00 or $25.00 – less than the cost of a pizza. If enough readers of this web site did that NWVs would have a good idea of their monthly operating capital they can count on. Or, if you can’t do that, please be generous and make a donation right now. It’s very easy. Please click here to donate.

Don’t forget to join me on my radio show Monday, Wednesday and Friday evenings, 5:00 pm PST, 7:00 pm CST and 8:00 pm EST, to hear my guests, get up to date accurate information and call in with your thoughts and/or suggestions on the issues. And, every show for the next couple weeks for a lucky caller: A free signed copy of my book, Taking Politics Out of Solutions. To listen, click here.

[Devvy’s hot new book, Taking Politics Out of Solutions is now available. The most important issues destroying America are presented along with constitutional solutions neither the Republicans or Democrats will pursue. Get your copy now. Excellent discounts for 2 or more books, or on bulk orders.]

1828 Webster’s Dictionary – Chattel – 1. Law.  a “movable” article of personal property.  2. Any article of tangible property other than land, buildings, and other things annexed to land.

Important points found in I Samuel Chapter 8:

1. Verse 5 – Israel desired to forsake God as their sovereign King and asked for a king to judge them like the nations around them.
2. Verse 6 – Samuel was displeased, but God said they had already rejected Him and His Kingdom to serve other gods.
3. Verse 9 – God instructed Samuel to solemnly warn them of what would happen when they chose man’s law system to rule over them.
4. Verses 11-22 – Samuel told them what their new “god” would require of them for the “privilege of temporal man made security” they wanted, by following man’s civil authority over God’s righteous rule.
5. He will draft your sons and daughters for his military.
6. He will appoint underlings, (bureaucrats), to rule over society in large and small jurisdictions.
7. He would instruct the people to plow the king’s ground and reap his harvest!  He now assumed rule of all land.
8. The king would put them to “work”, (give them government jobs), manufacturing his weapons of war.
9. He would take the women and make them his palace staff.
10. He will take your best lands and give them to his lackeys and bureaucrats.
11. He would take a tenth of their goods and give them to his officers and servants.  In our “free” society today they take half or more!  We have become the land of the “fee” and the home of the “slave”!
12. He would draft your workers and best men, plus your livestock to do his work. (I) He will take a tenth of your livestock to give to his servants!

In verse 18 God told them that when all of this comes to pass that they would cry out to Him for mercy, but that He would not hear their pleas!

In verses 19-22 even after all the warnings and pleadings of God through Samuel, the people said, “Nay; but we will have a king over us; that we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us (represent them), and fight our battles.”  Totally in contrast to God’s Word in Is. 33:22. Samuel said so be it!  Go on home and wait!

Foolish people that we are!  To turn from The Creator of all things for our blessings and provision!  We have sold ourselves and our posterity into slavery with our selfish desires. Ps. 118: 7-9

Although it may be very uncomfortable for us to admit that history clearly reveals the truth that there has never been a nation that remained faithful to God and His Kingdom for long.  Usually during or after the second generation, a nations prosperity turns the people from God’s blessings to man’s greed and promises of security!  We inevitably turn to and prefer man’s laws system, i.e. kingdom, to the sovereign Creator of all!  How quickly we have forgotten the promise given in Mt. 6:33.

The first commandment in Ex. 20:3 states, “thou shalt have no other ‘gods’ before me.”  Strong’s concordance No. 430 – gods, goddess, etc., but also judges or magistrates.  In other words, we are to have no other law systems or “authorities” above His Kingdom laws.  In Mt. 22:37 you will find what is known as the “great” commandment.  The first part expresses the same point as Ex. 20:3.  God must be obeyed, honored and glorified before all others and all other authorities.

Once the first commandment is ignored and disobeyed, the destruction of an individual life, or a nation, is unavoidable and inevitable!  God is the Rock and Foundation of all creation! Ex. 32:4, I Sam. 2:2, Ps. 18:2, Is. 17:10  Jesus Christ is the Cornerstone of the true church! II Pet. 2:6-7  Not Peter, as the Roman Catholic cult teaches.  The church is built on no man, no man-made doctrine, nor of works of any kind, but rather on the sovereignty and grace of Christ our Lord!  Amen!

All societies and nations that forget God are destroyed and turned into Hell. Ps. 9:17  Nations that put God’s Kingdom as the Head of their civil authorities are a blessed, prosperous and peaceful society! Pro. 29:2, Ps. 33:12, Mt. 6:33  An unrighteous and immoral people are doomed to despotism!  Eventually the whole world, except for those who are born again, will fall under the control of a world tyranny! Rev. 13:8  They will “literally” worship their “god” right into Hell!  After all, he has promised them so many benefits for following him, how could anyone but a “fool” trust in a God they can’t see?!

Quoting the preserved Word of God seems to hold very little meaning to most of society today, but all will see one day that His Word is valid!  They will be judged by it and found without the blood of Christ applied to cleanse their eternal souls, and will be damned for all eternity.  But be that as it may, I will show one more passage to those who will see what the final outcome for a nation that turns its back on God and His Kingdom must be!

In Pro. 28:2 we are told that the sins of the people are the reason why they came under tyrannical leaders!  As John Calvin said, “When God wants to judge a nation, He gives them wicked rulers.”

We, as a society, and even those who may be sincere followers of Christ, have either ignorantly, or arrogantly, demanded our freedoms and liberty!  We want evil leaders that a sovereign God placed over us, to punish us, to cut our taxes, get rid of all the regulations and licenses (permits), that we need to work, travel and much more.  We want civil authority to go back into its rightful sphere of authority!  But folks, that won’t and indeed cannot happen.  An unrighteous, immoral, greedy, lazy and apathetic people that has not and will not demand righteous judgment and justice do not deserve what they cry out for! Is. 59:12-15

The blood of 60,000,000 innocent sacrifices we have allowed in our land, will not go unrecompensed!  America, i.e. Babylon, Sodom and Gomorrah, cannot be healed!  There is no true repentance or remorse for the transgressions we are all guilty of!  The people are too content to live in “Babylon” as a nation, and as a law system.  We have become fat and lazy!  Fearful of man but no real fear of God!  We “love” to have things the way they are, more than we hate  the evil and those that commit it!  We have become a “touchy feely” people!  We have very little Godly love in our hearts!  Godly love demands judgment and justice on evil doers! Jer. 5:28-32, Amos 5:15, Ps. 92:10, Ps. 139: 21-22, Rom. 12:9, I Pet. 3:11

One more passage from the complete, unchangeable, immutable and infallible Word of God found only in the 1611 KJV Bible in Neh. 9:32-38.  As a result of our transgressions of the unchanging law of God, whether intentional or unintentional, we are now “chattel”, property of evil rulers who have dominion over our property, our prosperity and our bodies.  And even now they have dominion over our minds, and make merchandise of us!  II Pet. 2:3

You!  You, must decide which law system and God you will serve into eternity!  We are all slaves to the Babylonian world system now!  Whether you admit it, or like it, or not!  It is the historic and Biblical truth!  No repentance, no freedom!

A moral and virtuous people have no need of maters, but an immoral people have need of an external force (masters) to control their lusts!

We must choose this day how far we will follow the anti Christ’s dictates!  Choose wisely!

In Christ’s service,

Pastor Butch Paugh

Barronelle Stutzman the owner of Arlene’s Flowers in Richland, Washington was ruled against by the Washington State Supreme Court. In 2013, a multi-year repeat customer asked her to provide the floral arrangements for his upcoming homosexual un-wedding ceremony. Mrs. Stutzman politely refused, explaining it would violate her religious beliefs on marriage. The homosexual “couple” responded by firing off a lawsuit against her with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union. The Benton County Court and the Washington State Supreme Court, have both ruled in favor of the homosexual pair, violating Stutzman’s right to freedom of religious exercise. The State Attorney General has also filed a lawsuit against Stutzman! These elected officials have put 72-year-old Stutzman at risk of not only losing her business but also her life savings and personal retirement assets.

Video of the Sermon:

What do American’s think about the persecution of Baronelle Stuzman as well as the persecution of many other Christian owners of wedding venues, bakers, photographers?

A survey done by Public Religion Research Institute – finding 58% of Americans support Homosexual Unmarraige “Weddings” and 42% of white Evangelical Protestants would force Christian business and ministries to provide services to these un-wedding events. So 58% of Americans are on board with the Washington Supreme Court and an astonishingly 42% of white Evangelical Protestants are all united in the commitment to force Christians to do things against their conscience especially when it comes to accommodations of homosexuals. This is a seismic shift away from the seventh and eighth commandment. So 42% of Evangelical Protestants want to persecute their fellow Christians who stand on the unchanging standard of God’s Law Word regarding marriage and sexual morality. So those who claim they are in the household of God, 42% of them are a huge problem in America! They want to come after their own brothers and sisters in Christ and cause them to be persecuted by the State for staying true to the Word of God.

So that is what a large swath of America thinks. What does God think about those so called Christians? We don’t have to wonder for it is spelled out in the letter from Jesus to the Church of Thyatira. After commending them, “I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first. Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.” So to put it mildly Jesus is not pleased. He is not pleased that there is a Jezebel in the church of America who is advocating for sexual immorality and which wants to persecute Christians who are faithful to their Lord and Savior. What has gone wrong with the spiritual harvest in American is akin to what was happening on the island of Crete. Turn to Titus 1:10 where Paul writing to his disciple tells him how to deal with the heresies of his day on Crete.

The Works Salvation Heresy – Titus 1:10-11 “For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake.”

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

Since the UN launched Agenda 21 in 1992 the push for total control of the entire population of the world has been underway.  What I have covered in these columns is just the tip of the iceberg of what they are attempting to do.  This can be easily done to a population that is uninformed.  This is why our education system does not teach about our history and does not teach on how to evaluate good and bad.  They simply tell you what is good and what is bad. These things are not taught in our public schools and are only briefly discussed in our places of so-called higher education.  It has become more brazen in the latter years because anyone with conservative views, patriotism or a belief in nation sovereignty is ridiculed and mocked.  Many have actually been failed in a class because of their conservative views and when taken to court the school wins. A professor at Polk State College has allegedly failed a humanities student after she refused to concede that Jesus is a “myth” or that Christianity oppresses women during a series of mandatory assignments at the Florida college.

According to a press release from the Liberty Counsel, a non-profit public interest law firm, Humanities Professor Lance “Lj” Russum gave a student a “zero” on four separate papers because the 16-year-old did not “conform to his personal worldviews of Marxism, Atheism, Feminism, and homosexuality.” The law firm has called for a full, private investigation of the professor and the course curriculum.

The course description for the class, “ Introduction to Humanities,” claims that students “are under no obligation to agree with classmates, authors, or the instructor, in fact, the instructor will often occupy the space of ‘Devil’s Advocate’ for the purpose of lively discussion.”

“The point of this is not to ‘bash’ any religion, we should NEVER favor one over another, they all come from the same source, HUMAN IMAGINATION and [sic] they demonstrate that humanity is one,” a copy of Russum’s class outline, riddled with grammatical errors, says.[1]

Even in cases of patriotism a school can demand that no American flags can be displayed on even tee shirts during Cinco de Mayo as it could be offensive to illegals that are attending the school: So, in order to keep from ticking off the Mexican kids at the American school celebrating a Mexican holiday, the American kids had to hide the symbol of their own culture they had opted to wear, a flag of the country that the Mexican kids were celebrating the Mexican holiday in. Did you get all of that?

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the school’s decision to have the kids turn their shirts inside out to keep from making the Mexican kids mad.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the officials’ concerns of racial violence outweighed students’ freedom of expression rights. Administrators feared the American-flag shirts would enflame the passions of Latino students celebrating the Mexican holiday. Live Oak High School, in the San Jose suburb of Morgan Hill, had a history of problems between white and Latino students on that day.

The unanimous three-judge panel said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

“Our role is not to second-guess the decision to have a Cinco de Mayo celebration or the precautions put in place to avoid violence,” Judge M. Margaret McKeown wrote for the panel. The past events “made it reasonable for school officials to proceed as though the threat of a potentially violent disturbance was real,” she wrote.[2]

All this is happening under Agenda 21.  National sovereignty is discouraged and mocked.  Christian faith is becoming illegal and now the UN has come up with Agenda 21 on steroids, Agenda 2030.  These people demand that everyone be equal is all aspects, financial, housing accommodations, healthcare access, education, even gender equality!

They want to end poverty worldwide [3] and the only way they can do that is to take away from those that have and give it to those that don’t have.  That’s called theft.  What they want is a worldwide welfare system with housing subsidies.  Personal property will not be allowed.  Having the right to ‘better ones self’ will not be allowed.  It is American’s welfare system on steroids and is designed for governmental control not a person betterment.

They also want to end hunger worldwide.[4]  Sounds like a good thing to do but their pathway to that is the use of GMO products.  As we’ve learned in an earlier column GMO products are not safe for animal or human consumption.  The FDA ignores ALL legitimate studies on the dangers of it because the results are in line with the Agenda 2030 goals, decreasing the earth’s population.

Their ‘quest’ for healthy lives[5] and well-being for all is a joke at best and a pathetic joke at that.  They will be requiring 100+ vaccines for all children and adults at gun point if necessary and prison for those that refuse.  Of course they will call this mass ‘prevention’ programs to improve the health of all citizens.  The problem is we have seen that they put chemicals in these vaccines that are detrimental to our health; mercury, aluminum and other carcinogens.

California has a mandatory vaccination program for children and last year after the vaccines were given there was a massive spike in the number of children with autism. According to new statistics, autism rates in California have exploded since the introduction of the mandatory vaccine bill last year. 

Following the introduction of the controversial SB277 bill, signed by Governor Jerry Brown, autism rates have risen a staggering 17%.

Althealthworks.com reports: cThe state of California passed its controversial mandatory vaccination law (SB 277), which removed personal and religious reasons from the list of being exempt from vaccinations, with the goal of increasing vaccination rates.

In 2016 the rates of autism in California public schools jumped 7% in general, but rose especially high for kindergarten kids – by 17%. As the Sacramento Bee reported, the number of kids diagnosed as autistic has risen seven-fold since 2001.

Increases have come each year, but in 2016 following the mandatory vaccination law, the rate jumped even higher than usual: a total of 6,368 additional cases were reported from the previous school year. Comparing the 2013-2014 school year to 2014-2015, the number of additional cases was 6,076. The school year prior to that saw an increase of 6,089; or 13 extra cases reported compared to the increase in ’14-15.

In total, a jump of nearly 300 extra cases was seen between the ’14-15 school year and the ’15-’16 one, after SB277 took effect. [6]

Even with this evidence the FDA will not do anything about what the government is doing to our kids.  I don’t have a problem with vaccines but when they are putting chemicals in there that have nothing to do with the purpose of the vaccine and they have proven to cause these problems, the program needs to be suspended until safety is guaranteed.

What they are doing is disguising the reason for what they are doing and claiming that it is for the betterment of society when in reality it is for the achievement of the One World Order where corporate elites control all you do, what you have, what you are allowed to achieve and what you do for a living.  If it doesn’t benefit them, you won’t be allowed to do it, but it must benefit them more than you.

There will come a time when they will not be able to be stopped.  That time is not now.  The church is still here and as long as the church continues to pray they will not win. But we must be alert and vigilant as to what our ‘government’ is doing.

Foot Notes

1. http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6490&CFID=11484451&CFTOKEN=34959998
2. http://freedomoutpost.com/federal-court-side-school-cinco-de-mayo-dress-code-students-cant-show-us-flag-shirt-cinco-de-mayo-might-upset-hispanics/
3. http://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html
4. http://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html
5. http://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html
6. http://yournewswire.com/autism-rates-california-mandatory-vaccine-bill/

When Will It Ever Stop?

Just what in the heck have all those Republicans been doing up there in D.C. for the past 8 years except passing unnecessary and citizen damaging bills to provide themselves job security.

You told your voters you didn’t like Obamacare but YOU didn’t have to participate. You told your voters YOU didn’t try to put something through in regard to Obamacare because Obama would have vetoed it.

God only knows what kind of excuse you have for not being willing to “impeach” Obama considering the crimes he committed against the people of this country. Do you legislators not consider yourselves as part of this country?

Paul Ryan, what an absolutely wasteful human being. He never, ever should have been elected as the Speaker of the House for having taken all that money to vote yes on the TPP.

You wasteful idiots who are using up good air to breathe work for us – the American people and I can guarantee it would take half as many of us to run this country than with how you are doing things.

I totally agree with Senator Rand Paul and his remarks regarding “Obamacare Lite”. What an absolute joke you people are and a waste of our hard-earned tax dollars.

Paul seems to think there are four major problems with the bill and I agree with him, but I believe there are others.

1. It retains subsidies. Obamacare was filled with subsidies for people to buy insurance. In “Lite”, the subsidies stay —- you know, they rebranded them like with Common Core and they are going to call them refundable tax credits. Some have even predicted that it’s going to be more expensive than the subsidies we have under Obamacare.

Did I miss something or isn’t the high cost of Obamacare one of the main reason it has failed?

As Rand Paul explained, “this isn’t you getting your own money back, this is you getting somebody else’s money. So, a family that makes $30,000 a year could get $14,000 that they didn’t pay. Let’s say they paid zero in income tax, they could get $14,000 back. One, we don’t have the money—it’s a new entitlement program and two, if you get $14,000 back do you think the insurance company is ever going to sell insurance for less than $14,000?” The $14K would become the starting point and would push insurance rates up.

I know people who have $1K and $2K dollar deductible’s and no major illness. We all knew there was no rhyme or reason as to how people have been paying premiums.

2. What Ryan’s Obamacare Lite bill does is they keep the Obamacare taxes—all of them—for a year. And then after a year, they keep the Cadillac Tax That’s the tax on if you have good insurance, Obamacare taxes you on that too. So, does Ryan’s monster plan.
3. They are also keeping the individual mandates. All these Republicans who are endorsing this mess said they were against the individual mandates. If you didn’t buy insurance you must pay a penalty to the government, which is nothing more than another tax.

Obamacare Lite, Ryan’s recklessly selfish plan, just made a few changes so you have to pay a penalty to the insurance companies. That is still a mandate no matter how you want to twist the words.

They are not handing something that is less with less government involvement. How did all this talk about getting the government out of our everyday lives” get changed around to be all consuming?

I consider that to still be a mandate that isn’t consistent with those of us who want less government involvement. So, they keep the subsidies, they keep the taxes, and then they keep the mandates.

The government doesn’t bail you out if your household is failing because you had lost your job or had to take a cut in pay because your boss was going under from all the mandates and regulations the government puts on them.

Ryan thinks he is cute and has us outsmarted in calling the “bail out” “reinsurance”. Don’t ask where he came up with that. Estimates are it could cost we the people through our weak government more than $100 million dollars.

I also agree with Senator Paul and others that they should just repeal Obamacare and then vote on a separate bill to replace it. Why are we worried about doing anything? Obamacare was supposed to be for those who couldn’t afford insurance, yet they still had to participate or pay penalties and the ones it was aimed at are either choosing to pay the penalties because it is cheaper or they say they don’t need insurance.

Once again. our government getting into our lives – we want less involvement in our lives from D.C. They can stop writing all those bills which most people know nothing about and the legislators use them for job security.

We have no money because the yahoo’s in D.C. have no respect for the American people that go out and work hard every day to be able to take care of their families.

When one of the legislators tells you “we must take care of the people”, ask them why? Obamacare from the beginning was embedded in dishonest accounting, side winding regulations and Nancy Pelosi I defy you to disagree – you and your “vote for the bill and then you can read it”.

Paul mentioned in his interview that some of the legislators said the poor people need help. What about the rest of us – there is no Middle class anymore – you all made sure of that. Wouldn’t it be better to work with the insurance companies to lower the premium rate? Rand Paul said he suggested that and the other side replied, ” ‘No, no we want to give them dollars for Medicaid expansion and to buy insurance with subsidies.’ The problem is there is no money to give them so we just add to the deficit. The main thing driving the deficit up here are the entitlements.”

To Paul Ryan’ I say your “refundable tax credits” are just a new name for another “entitlement” program.

If the legislators in D.C. have nothing to really do and if they can’t seem to find the time to think or work constructively on creating a new health care bill, maybe they could work at cleaning up the deceit and corruption.

In fact, in today’s world of electronics, I’d like to know why we are still sending these men and women to D.C. Do you know how much money we would save by not having them in Washington? Why aren’t they sitting in their district offices so the PEOPLE have access to them? They could have meetings, vote and whatever else they do on Skype or a secure server. They should be where the PEOPLE can reach them not the lobbyist’s.

I learned today, about all the waste and I call it fraud on the American people by the IRS. $3500.00a night hotel rooms for a conference tagged as a training event? They even misappropriated the funds to pay for all the conferences.

If you legislators don’t have anything to do, work on getting rid of the IRS and ALL the non-essential departments which have been created over the years and work on disassociating us from the United Nation.

You are partially responsible for creating this SWAMP, now clean it up!

DO YOUR JOBS!

And by the way, they have named this new bag of worms “American Healthcare Act” – I personally resent that since I am an American and I find the bill a joke and I don’t want it to seem like I am endorsing it.

Thank you Mr. Ryan for thinking so little of the people of this country. Not only are we expected to pay for all the low-income children to go to any school they want, we have to pay for all the welfare folks medical insurance and then you expect us to take care of illegals and refugees and YOU! You like “mandates” so much, how about this time Congress is “mandated” to have to participate in your joke insurance.

The House Republicans’ replacement of Obamacare is here – the American Health Care Act!

According to the New York Times, the new plan would replace Obamacare’s individual mandate with a system of tax credits lawmakers hope would incentivize Americans to purchase their own plans, although the credits would eventually be reduced and phased out. It would also roll back Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid.

“We promised the American people we would drain the swamp and end business as usual in Washington,” said Utah Sen. Mike Lee. “This bill does not do that.”

Worse yet, over the last three major national elections beginning in 2010, Republicans have won congressional races across the country based on the promise to repeal Obamacare with a market-based, non-government-run solution.

Lee added that the proposal “is exactly the type of back-room dealing and rushed process that we criticized Democrats for, and it is not what we promised the American people.”

Hmmm, have you ever heard of Jonathan Gruber?  He is the MIT economist who was once considered to be the intellectual architect behind Obamacare. In 2009, Nancy Pelosi was quoting him publically and endorsing his published opinions regarding this enormous American debacle.

Later in 2014, Gruber candidly declared that the legislation was written in a way that was designed to deceive the American people and to exploit “the stupidity of the American voter.”

Gruber was very pleased, and pleased with himself apparently, that he and his cronies were able to fool us all.

It was for our own good, of course, that they did it.

You see, in the socialist mind, the progressive agenda is good for Americans, but Americans are just too dense to see it as clearly as socialists do.  So-called “liberals” are therefore reluctant to let the rest of us make our own decisions.  This reluctance leads them to lie to us “for our own good” and we now see both parties are guilty of it.

Let me ask the simple question, do you believe that government is a truth-teller?

Do you believe that government intervention in a marketplace makes the market more efficient and just?

Do you believe that government is the solution to our economic problems?

If you do, then maybe Jonathan Gruber is right.  Maybe you need someone like him, or your favorite political party, to lie to you for your own good.

But if you believe, as Ronald Reagan said, that government itself is the problem, you would expect that the party of Reagan, the party that has just won a sweeping victory, would use that victory to undo the farce of Obamacare.

But if the Republicans, who now hold both houses of Congress and the Presidency, fail to deliver a full repeal of the Obamacare mess, then we might have to admit that Mr. Gruber was right about our lack of judgment.

The Constitution does not grant the federal government any authority to meddle in our health care, so it wouldn’t matter even if the Republican replacement plan were a good one.

The operative clauses to look up here are Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution and the Tenth Amendment.  It will only take you about six minutes to read and understand that any replacement of Obamacare is more than just a Republican betrayal for American health care; it is a dangerous and tyrannical trespass into American homes and lives.

Make no mistake, repealing Obamacare is the Congress’s duty, and to replace it is the action of tyrants.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and the Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

What happens when the answers and the truth take different sides?*

Being raised in the world creates some difficult obstacles for understanding and wisdom outside of the paradigm of convention.  I had a conversation recently with someone about what I find troubling implications of pizzagate/pedogate and the rumor that if brought to light it allegedly would implicate a third of the Congress/Senate.  He dismissed the entire charge for investigation because it sounded “crazy” to him that a third of Congress could really be involved in child trafficking.

He later dismissed a pretty good presentation of evidence gathered from another individual because that same individual believed the WTC towers were brought down by explosives, not airplanes.  Mind you, the evidence on child and/or sex trafficking was what was being presented.

“…I am a king. For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice.” –Jesus to Pilate when brought in for questioning. [John 18:37 NASU]

We have an interesting concept here:  truth.  Pilate is trying to get to the bottom of the charges against Jesus.  To Pilate it should be a simple matter:  did Jesus break some law?  The simplicity is absent, however, because the desired outcome (death to Jesus) does not match any of the alleged “crimes”.  Pilate jumped ahead of the perfunctory Q & A in an attempt to get to the meaningful crux of the matter in how it would pertain to himself (Pilate):  “Are you the King of the Jews?”

You have to understand context.  Pilate is the “governor” of sorts for Rome in Judea, headquartered in Jerusalem.  He’s charged with keeping the peace between Rome and those being governed against their will:  the Jews.  It is treason to have any king but Caesar.  Pilate is trying to discern whether Jesus is a threat to Caesar.  He cares very little about any Jewish laws Jesus has broken; he only cares that there will not be an insurrection against Rome’s rule.

Jesus knows that calling Himself King of the Jews would be a threat to Rome.  Jesus responded to Pilate’s questions by acknowledging that He is indeed a King, but not of the Jews.  This is a mystery to Pilate.  Jesus knows Pilate does not have a grid for understanding the real issue at hand, and his response is akin to His knowledge of Pilate.  Jesus acknowledged what Pilate was looking for (“Are you a King?”), and Jesus’ reply is not a threat to Pilate.  Jesus then gives Pilate insight, (“My Kingdom is not of this world…”).

As Pilate grapples with this idea and tries to put it into context, he reasserts his question, “So you are a king?”  That’s when Jesus replies, “…I am a king. For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice.”

This is the moment of revelation for truth seekers.  We’re seeking truth, correct?  (But not everyone is seeking truth.  Some people are just seeking answers to confirm their beliefs and corroborate their biases.)   And when we get a response or data that answers the question differently than what we’re asking we have a moment of decision:  do we pursue this truth or disregard it?

If we pursue the new truth that has been presented, (e.g. So Jesus is a King, but not King of the Jews…), a whole new set of questions is presented.  And who has time for that??  Just answer my question and let me go on, is our typical thought. Unless we care more about truth than answers.

“Pilate said to Him, ‘What is truth?’”  (John 18:38 NASU)  He then dismissed the charges and tried to release Christ.  Why?  Because Pilate caught the greater truth, but was unwilling to pursue it.  The lazy man’s response is always exchanging truth for an answer.  Pilate got the truth (who Jesus really is), but exchanged it for the answer (He’s not a threat to Caesar).  He then dismissed the revelation in a manipulative brush off that was more for the sake of his conscience than a genuine question, “What is truth?”  [Now Pilate doesn’t have to actually do anything with the revelation, because he in essence discounted it.]

Now apply that to life.  It is a waste of time to expound on truth to people who just want answers.  Answers are easily found.  Truth rarely is.  Truth requires discipline and demands accountability.  If I possess truth, I cannot exchange it for something less without losing something myself.  I am accountable for the truth I possess.  And for those who seek and find truth, answers are simply not enough.

When we consider current events, national events, and even world events, the pursuit of truth becomes practically a full-time job.  Answers abound, but truth must be sought out.  And because people are at a myriad of different places in their lives, their understanding of truth varies considerably.  We have to understand this.  Truth is simple and complex at the same time, and truth can be duplex.  Sometimes this is hard to come to terms with.

Christ’s declarations of Himself and truth are weighty.  There are a lot of “Pilates” in this world that get a cursory glance of His truth and dismiss it with the “what is truth?” brush off.  No one is the better for this.  Christ said He came into the world to testify to the truth.  Testify means to bear witness.  [It comes from the Greek word “martureo” from where we also get the word “martyr”.  Martyrs are witnesses of Christ who are killed for their witness (or testimony).]

In the gospel of John where it records the night Jesus was betrayed, John recounts Christ’s words to His disciples.  It’s a lengthy discourse of instructions, declarations, explanations and warnings – of which many of these things the disciples clearly had no grid for understanding.  He seems to begin to wrap it up and He says this interesting thing, which we would do well to take notice of:

“I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now.” – John 16:12 NASU

What this should help us understand is that we can’t always grasp truths given to us.  It has to do with our present level of understanding and experience.  At the time Jesus was giving this discourse, His disciples seemed unable to comprehend that He was mere hours from His betrayal and death.  They were unable to grasp not only that He was going to die, but also that it was purposeful and part of the plan.  They could not grasp that.  They had nothing in their realm of experiences, nothing in their understanding of God and even current events that prepared them for this truth.  In fact, they did not even grasp it when He had resurrected.  [See John 20:9.]

And so it is with truth and the human heart and mind.  Our experiences coupled with our level of understanding are what either prevents truth from being understood and received, or grants it.  To put it on a current events level:

If my friend has only really listened to mainstream media, believes CNN to be factual and honest, and has an exemplar of patriotism that prevents contradictions or doubts from surfacing and being honestly evaluated, my assertions that circumstantial evidence exists of child trafficking rings implicating the political elite will be scorned.  There is no other way for that heart or mind to process my assertions.

It’s a waste of time for a truth seeker to do anything more than present information to someone looking for answers.  If the answers don’t come in the format they’re expecting or looking for, they reject the data.  Move on.  Don’t waste your time with answer gatherers.  There are people seeking truth that will evaluate your information on a deeper level.  You’re not responsible for others’ processing.  You’re responsible and accountable to your knowledge of the truth.

If my friend is merely an answer gatherer, if his real interest is in collecting data to reinforce his current way of thinking, I merely drop the information and go.  Anything more is fruitless.  But if my friend is a truth seeker, the information I drop becomes seeds.  If he doesn’t have a grid for understanding yet, the seeds will lie dormant until he does.  When he does, the seeds will sprout.  Either way, I drop truths as the occasions call.  Truth seekers seek out truth.  Answer gatherers build dossiers.

The principles of society and culture are adversaries of truth.  Our society is structured to present paradigms and status quos in a methodical procedure that necessitates adherence.  To look outside the prototype is discouraged and can actually be dangerous if it rocks the boat too much.

How did the disciples finally become enlightened enough to receive the truth?  (This is our key, because like it or not, if we’ve been raised in this world and its systems, our revelation of truth is skewed at best, nonexistent at worst.)   Christ Himself answered this right after He told them He couldn’t tell them anything else because they couldn’t handle it.

“But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.  He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose it to you.   All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you.” –John 16:13-15 NASU

Truth is heavy.  It requires responsibility, and sometimes a lot of responsibility.  But it is liberating.  There are truths I was given when I didn’t have a grid for understanding.  My mind rejected those truths, but my spirit tucked them away.  As I grew in wisdom and understanding, I was able to take those truths back out and begin to process them, or they confirmed things I was learning.  I take in a lot of data.  I read and research quite a bit.  I don’t understand or agree with everything I read and research.  I don’t know how some of it fits or if it even does.  So I table those things.  If they matter and I need to understand them, they come out eventually.

Truth comes in levels and layers.  We start with basic truths and as we’re faithful and responsible with those, we’re able to receive deeper levels of truth.  We operate on the levels of truth we’re walking in.  The place we decide to stop, stagnate, or plant ourselves in our learned truths, is the place we’ll stay.  It will define us and it will be the parameter for our learning.

Deeper levels of truth can seem to contradict more basic levels of truth.  The best way I can explain this is encourage one to read Romans 14.  Or consider the answers of Christ to His accusers in Luke 6:1-5.  The truth to the Pharisees was the showbread is only lawful for the priests to eat.  And that is truth.  But the truth Christ revealed was deeper.  The Pharisees had stopped on their basic truths of law and therefore were unable to receive the deeper truth of the spirit.  The deeper truth seemed to conflict the more basic truth, but both were truths.

Romans 14 explains how holding your brothers to your level of truth can be a stumbling block or hindrance.  The “weaker brother” who adheres to the law for his diet is still walking in truth, while the one who has deeper truth and is obeying it is simply walking in deeper truth.  God is able to make both stand. (vs. 4)  I would suggest that the level of truth one walks in has a direct impact on the level of liberty and responsibility one has.  This is why my expectations of behavior from my five year old vary differently than those of my fifteen year old.  Each’s understanding of truth is contingent on their ability to understand and their experiences for frame of reference.  If we’re maturing, our ability to comprehend and receive deeper truths should grow.  As believers, we need only ask the Spirit to disclose truths for us.  As He does, we should be prepared to receive them and respond accordingly.

The same disciples that could not comprehend Christ’s teachings before His death would go on to change their minds about a lot of things.  They would go on to see their world differently and to respond differently to it.  They would go on to “turn the world upside down”, change nations, people’s lives, and ultimately, the entire world.  Why?  Because Christ came to testify to the truth and people have responded to that truth for two millennia.

*borrowed from NeedtoBreathe song “Through Smoke”

The Republican leadership in Congress today rolled out their replacement for Obamacare. This legislation goes in the wrong direction from what President Trump promised on the campaign trail. The main reason healthcare costs are skyrocketing as quality of service diminishes is GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT. To correct the problem demands that government must get out of the way. The new Republican bill does not do that. it continues the myth that government must control how and where Americans buy their healthcare plans while regulating the options.

Senator Ran Paul is on the correct path in insisting on a competitive free market approach, getting government out of the process. My recent article, posted below, clearly states how this can be done. We must not let Speaker Paul Ryan and those entrenched Washington establishment Republicans fail us again through tough talk yet wrong policy!

Please contact your Senators and Representatives in Congress and demand they join Senator Rand Paul’s efforts to truly fix the U.S. health care system by getting government out of the way and let the free market system handle the needs of the people, as I have described below. The nation’s health, physically and financially, depends on it. Tom DeWeese

As the Republicans in Congress struggle to present a workable replacement to Obamacare, the solution is staring them in the face. It’s called free enterprise.

The only reason we need massive insurance programs today is because of government meddling in healthcare. It started with Medicare in which government dictated percentages it would pay for services. Insurance companies followed suit. Therefore, forcing doctors and hospitals to raise prices to make more money from those established percentages. To prove that fact, simply go to a hospital as an uninsured patient and observe how much they deduct from your final bill. Insurance would have had to pay the higher price.

Then, with the intrusion of government came the inevitable paperwork. Lots of it. Today, under the Affordable Care Act doctors and hospitals need full time staffs just to fill out the paperwork. That costs money. Eliminate it.

Now there are rules and regulations on who must be treated and what procedures must be used. Of course, like all things government, these rules and regulations haven’t been written by doctors, but by bureaucrats serving various special interests who stand to gain financially. Eliminate them.

What’s the solution? It’s simple. Get government completely out of the healthcare industry where they don’t belong. Don’t try to write whole new policies. Let the insurance companies create policies to fit the market’s needs. Let them advertise for customers. Let them fight it out among themselves in the market place and let the customers choose which company has the policy that fits their needs.

Repeal Obamacare with no government replacement and watch how fast and creatively these insurance companies rush to the solution, just like every industry, including car insurance.

Oh, but wait. You can’t do that, say the liberals with great compassion. We have these poor who can’t afford to pay for insurance. Well, there is a solution and it’s full of compassion.

In the America of the past we had a great legacy of charity. Americans are a generous people. We used to have community funds, service clubs and churches dedicated to helping the less fortunate. What happened to them? Nearly everyone has been replaced by a government program. Instead of people helping voluntarily according to their ability and interest, they have been ruthlessly and unrelentingly taxed to the point of suffocation. As a result, they have stopped giving to charities which subsequently have disappeared.

Yet, there is still a fantastic example of human generosity, concern and caring that exists today, even in the socialist world of control. Organizations like St. Jude Children Center and the Shriners Hospital collect money from private donations and provide services free to families in need. Imagine how such programs would soar and fulfill the needs of every American if we were all simply allowed to make our own choices with our own money.

Congress, just repeal Obamacare and let the free market work for everyone. Now, let’s get on with draining the rest of the swamp!

Part 1: Americans’ choices for unhealthy lives

Even before Obamacare became law, number-crunchers told Congress as well as the Main Stream Media that it could not be financially sustained. They promised collapse within a few years.

Additionally, Obamacare forced people to buy premiums against their will and Constitutional rights. It left the health-care industry in confusion.

Obama promised Americans they could keep their chosen doctors. They would enjoy lower premiums. Those claims turned out false.

Americans scratched their heads and voted for Donald Trump for president of the United States.

In reality, the majority of Americans don’t care about their health. Recent research states that 67 out of 100 Americans suffer from obesity of 20 to 50 pounds overweight. That’s two-thirds of the American public that works on their ill health. Half of that number suffers gross obesity of 50 to 100 pounds overweight. A stroll through the Midwest, east coast and west coast shows millions of Americans laboring to walk down the street with so much fat hanging over their belts or under their dresses.

Today, startling numbers in the millions of American children suffer obesity, diabetes and early onset heart disease. They suffer from high blood pressure in their teens.

The average American male watches 29 hours of TV weekly, which adds up to 4.1 hours daily, seven days a week. Women watch TV 24 hours week. That equates to 15 years of an average American’s life watching television.

Today, 36,000,000 (million) Americans smoke cigarettes. That results in slow motion death that kills 480,000 people annually from lung cancer, year after year. Thus, that’s 36 million people who could care less about their health.

Not to be outdone in the death department, 17,600,000 (million) alcoholics drink themselves into a slow motion death daily in the USA. If you look at the health-care programs, they show that 13 teenagers die of overdoses of alcohol-drugs every hour of the day, 24/7. That’s 113,000 deaths annually in the USA for our teenagers. Obviously, they don’t care about their health as they suffer from emotional chaos.

According to the Center for Disease Control, less than 50 percent of Americans exercise at all. That means their bodies become lumpy, dumpy and grumpy.

Americans gulp 43 gallons of soda pop annually. Coca-Cola and Mountain Dew as well as all the rest have been connected to heart disease, but Americans keep drinking them.

How even ONE can of Coke a day can increase the risk of heart failure by 20%:

• Study of 42,000 middle-aged men found two 200ml soft drinks each day was enough to increase the chance of heart failure by 23 per cent (Source: dailymail.uk.co)

Millions of Americans drink aspartame-sucralose-laced soda pop, sugar drinks, sport drinks and fruit juices. Those synthetic sugars wreak havoc on the their entire bodies starting with their livers, kidneys, hearts, pancreas and blood streams.

Americans devour red meat, pork and chickens, all laced with growth hormones, chemicals, anti-bodies and GMO-fed livestock.

Notice that no one discusses that Autism, 30 years ago affected 1 in 20,000 live births. Today, 1 child in 88 births suffers from Autism. What do you expect with all the chemicals fed into mothers during pregnancy.

Americans don’t realize and don’t care as they ingest genetically modified corn, soy, fruits and grains. They never question the GMO affected salmon with Frankensteinized DNA.

As they pop those corn chips into their mouths along with diet sodas and gobs of double cheese pizzas covered in pepperoni, ham and red meat—they attack their bodies with non-foods, poison foods and dyed foods.

Every time Americans visit fast food joints, they ingest MSG or Mono Sodium Glutamate, which is an excito-toxin that creates the need for yet another bacon-cheese-grease burger.

A pound here, a pound there, and soon, fat here, more fat there and heart attack to follow.

As you know, ALL of our commercial crops face enormous amounts of pesticide, insecticide and chemical fertilizers made from oil and other toxins. When you buy them from the local market, you eat those chemicals along with the dangerous foods.

In a single year, farmers spray or inject on our crops:

340,000 tons of herbicides
127,000 tons of insecticides
63,000 tons of other chemicals (Source: Earth Island Journal)

Facts clearly refute the misleading claims of Veneman and Monsanto: American industrial agriculture today dumps close to one billion pounds of pesticides on food crops each summer, producing a truly toxic harvest. The industry’s most prominent product, Monsanto’s “Roundup Ready” soybean, was designed to withstand intensive spraying, thus expanding sales of the firm’s highly popular – and highly toxic – herbicide, Roundup. Since the 1996 introduction of Roundup Ready, the use of glyphosate, a key Roundup ingredient that studies have linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, has risen.

Okay, if you’re not sick to your stomach, check your pulse. Your kids eat all this non-food or poisoned food.

Then, with GMO foods, high fructose corn syrup, totally created out of GMO corn, finds it way into almost EVERYTHING you eat. Read the labels on jams, jellies, peanut butter, cereals of all kinds, soft drinks, juice drinks, breads, just about every packaged food you eat and everything in a box, package or container.

Think of the dyes that lace all your foods to make them look pretty!

Is it sickening to learn about this information? You bet! In this three part series, you will discover how you can change course for yourself and your family.

In part 2, you will see how you are fooled by the AMA. You will discover how big firms lobby Congress to make sure nothing is labeled, i.e., GMO foods. Part 3: Wise choices toward healthy eating.

By Chip McLean

Evidently engaging in sedition by paying for-hire rioters doesn’t occupy enough of George Soros’ time, so he stays engaged in a whole host of globalist “let’s erase American sovereignty” activity. Now the Washington Times is reporting that Soros is funding groups who are pushing for lowering the voting age to 17.

For a very long time, voting was restricted – wisely – to those who had attained the age of 21. We also restricted voting to those who were American citizens and who weren’t taking dirt naps but Democrats and people like Soros have been finding all sorts of ways to get around those requirements as evidenced by the ever increasing voter fraud in Democrat controlled precincts…but I digress.

The voting age was lowered to 18 some years back as a response to the Viet Nam war era draft. While there may be some logic to “if you’re old enough to die for your country, you’re old enough to vote”, it also is a fact that we no longer have a draft – therefore the original impetus for lowering the voting age no longer exists.

The fact is that people don’t generally mature until well into their 20s. The founders recognized this fact, hence the voting age minimum of 21. Eighteen is indeed a stretch, but here we have Soros and Democrats trying to lower the bar to 17.

Does anyone think that the average 17 year old has the maturity, wisdom or a command of basic civics and issues to be a responsible voter?

There are even some groups pushing for 16!

Obviously Soros and the Democrats are pushing for this to increase their share of the electorate, as the Dems have been losing on just about every front you can think of in terms of governorships, state and county legislatures, not to mention the U.S. presidency and both houses of congress.

The Democrats – who I like to refer to as the “Gimmedat” party – appeal mainly to those who engage in identity politics, the ignorant and those who take much, but contribute nothing to society.

We’ve seen all of these “protests” designed not to exercise freedom of speech, but to trample the rights of others. There is no maturity or actual political discourse in what these miscreants are doing – heck, most of them don’t even know what they are protesting, beyond what anti-American talking points they have been given in “big gubmit” indoctrination centers, otherwise known as “public education”.

Burning  and smashing things that don’t belong to them and impeding the flow of traffic of those who actually work for a living is their modus operandi. They don’t exactly make a compelling case for lowering the voting age.

In fact they more closely resemble a bunch of pre-schoolers throwing a tantrum after being told they can’t have an expensive toy while in a public place.

Soros might as well push for lowering the voting age to three. He could then find plenty of “voters” willing to vote for the “Gimmedats”. The only problem would be arranging transportation as they won’t have driver licenses.

Of course, many Democrat voters don’t have those now…they’ll just need to double up on the number of buses and “community organizers”.

© Chip McLean, 2017. All rights reserved.

Protect me from the plots of the wicked, from mobs of evil men. They sharpen their tongues like swords and aim cruel words like arrows.  They are quick to spread their shameless lies; they destroy good men with cowardly slander.  Psalm 64:2-4

Fake News, Fake News, Fake News! 

AG Sessions is the latest to be under attack for speaking to the Ambassador from Russia.  The former Alabama Senator should never have recused himself from the investigation of the phony Russian connection to the election. Neither should Sessions have recused himself during the confirmation hearings of a future investigation into Bill and Hillary Clinton’s affairs.  With all the squawking by the democratic socialists, the liberal media, and the Soros/Obama organizers, they’ve latched onto this phony Russian involvement in the election story and are pumping it for all it’s worth.

The media’s lies are that Putin loves Trump, Trump loves Putin, and they got together to make sure Trump won the election via Russian interference…all lies.  Again, media is allowed to lie with impunity because of the 1964 Supreme Court decision, NYTs v. Sullivan.

The entire Trump administration simply must not cave to any of this, and they need to completely ignore these rabble rousers. The first to fall was, of course, the brilliant and knowledgeable General Michael Flynn, a loss to this administration that will never be replaced with anyone as capable or experienced as Flynn.  I really believe this was President Trump’s first and worst mistake.  Letting the talented Flynn resign instead of fighting the media lies was a big mistake.  He should have told both Pence and Flynn to ride it out and get back to work.  Flynn’s replacement, General McMaster, is nothing but a CFR globalist clone.

AG Jeff Sessions is probably the finest Christian man we’ve had in politics for decades.  Not only was he re-elected four times by Alabamians, but he was beloved by the citizenry, and that includes all races.  He has spent five decades as a champion of civil rights.

There is no way the media or any investigation can prove that Trump or any of his administration have worked with the Russians to win the election.  Now that AG Sessions has recused himself, an Obama lackey is in charge of the investigation into these false allegations, and that leads us to the real Trojan Horse.

The Internal Trojan Horse

There are many Obama appointee holdovers on the National Security Council affecting our military operations.  There are a handful of Obama appointee holdovers at the CIA who were groomed to oppose President Trump by John Brennan and Mike Morell, both of whom repeatedly lied about Benghazi.

There are Obama holdovers in NSA, DHS, EPA, and the FBI, including some members of the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, ISNA, MAS, etc., who are opposing President Trump.  The nine personnel who criminally released the content of General Mike Flynn’s telephone conversations with the Russian Ambassador to the press were Obama holdovers…another reason Trump should have told them to go pound sand and kept General Flynn.  Think I’m angry about it, you dang well bet I am…and my arrows all point to VP Pence.  Flynn should definitely still be in the administration!  The loss was catastrophic for the nation.

Socialist Democrats Lie Again

Democrats were aghast after learning Attorney General Jeff Sessions met twice, as a senator, before his confirmation as an AG, with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. without telling Congress at his confirmation hearing – but it turns out Sergey Kislyak is no stranger to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

The Russian Ambassador was seated with the democrats at the Joint Sessions of Congress meeting the other night.  He is a good friend of…here it comes, Chuckie Schumer!  And guess who else he’s met and enjoyed…a picture is worth a thousand words.

Funny thing too, Senator Nancy Pelosi claimed she’d never met with this Russian Ambassador, but in fact, she had, and she met with other high level Russian dignitaries. Link

Then you have Senator Clair McCaskill claiming she never met with the Russian Ambassador, but she apparently forgot about her tweets in January of 2013 where she stated she, along with several other democrats, was off to meet with him.  Link

During Obama’s reign, the longtime Russian ambassador met with seven Democratic senators in a single sit-down in 2013.  Ambassador Sergey Kisylak appeared at the Obama White House at least 22 times…running a silent coup on Trump.

As House Speaker Paul Ryan put it last week, “We meet with ambassadors all the time.”

Sessions Rejects Democrat Claims

The central issue dogging Sessions is not so much that he met with the ambassador, but that he claimed during his confirmation hearing he had no “communications” with Russian officials during his time as a Trump campaign surrogate. In a press conference, though, Sessions rejected claims he misled Congress and suggested he was answering in the context of campaign-related discussions, which he maintains he never had.

But some Sessions critics nevertheless portrayed meetings with Kislyak, whose country was accused of meddling in the 2016 campaign, as a rare summit, particularly for a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee like Sessions.

And no, Jeff Sessions didn’t perjure himself.  It’s not even a close call.  All of this is bunk, or as Limbaugh calls it, Barbara Streisand (B.S.).

Democrat Involvement with Russia

The Russian link to Obama is the real investigation. When Obama said to Russian Prime Minister, Medvedev, “You tell Vladimir, I’ll have much more flexibility after the election,” about reducing America’s nuclear stockpile, anyone with a brain knew what was going on.  The question arises again, what party is in bed with the Russians?  Sessions is certainly not alone.  The democrats love Russian dignitaries is an open book.

Let’s look at history, because it’s worth remembering the reprehensible behavior of Senator Ted Kennedy in 1984.  While Senator Al Franken and other Democrats have the vapors over a truthful, complete, and correct answer AG Jeff Sessions gave in his confirmation hearing, it’s worth remembering the reprehensible behavior of Senator Ted Kennedy in 1984.

This behavior didn’t involve launching a vehicle into a tidal channel while drunk. (The Bridge at Chappaquiddick by Jack Olsen)  This reprehensible behavior was collusion with America’s most deadly enemy in an effort to defeat Ronald Reagan’s reelection.

The memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy (P.J. Media):

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. “The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations,” the memorandum stated. “These issues, according to the senator, (Kennedy) will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”

Among the promises, Kennedy made the Soviets was that he would ensure that the television networks gave the Soviet leader primetime slots to speak directly to the American people, thus undermining Reagan’s framing of the sinister nature of the USSR.  Even then, the Democrats had the power to collude with the legacy media.  Kennedy also promised to help Andropov penetrate the American message with his Soviet agitprop.

Exactly right!  Even 30 years ago, Democrat senators were colluding with America’s enemies to bring down Republicans.

Limbaugh has said the real scandal is that a “silent coup” is underway against President Trump.  “There is the execution of an attempt at a peaceful coup,” said the radio talk show host last week. “A peaceful coup to oust Donald Trump is what we are witnessing. It’s been orchestrated by Obama and the Democrat Party. It’s that simple.”

Obama Collusion with Russia

The real collusion between our government and the Russians happened with Barack Hussein Obama.  How far back do you have to go to find where Trump and Putin were allegedly buddies…I’ll tell you.  It went all the way back to when Trump made a joke about Russia finding Hillary Clinton’s lost emails…the left grabbed onto it as though Trump was aligned with Russia.  Link  Anyone with a brain knew he was making a joke!

Remember when Clinton and Loretta Lynch met for a half hour on the plane before the AG was going to look into charging Hillary Clinton?  And Schumer is calling for Sessions’ resignation, for colluding with Russians, but according to Schumer it was okay for Clinton and Loretta Lynch to meet, with the story they were talking about their grandchildren.  Right…we all really believe that!  These are two-faced hypocrites, and everyone knows it.

The Russian Ambassador is at the core of this entire false narrative promoted by the Democratic socialists and their leftist owned media.  Sergey Kisylak has lamented that Washington, D.C. “has become lonely.”  He has told associates that, “he is surprised how people who once sought his company were now trying to stay away.”

Remember that Kisylak was a frequent visitor to the Obama White House, according to the Daily Caller.  Kisylak has always been a staunch defender of Russia and has at times attempted to undermine America’s foreign policy.  Link

Kisylak’s alliance with the left is far greater than it was ever established with the right, but the left wants to destroy Trump with their claim that Trump and Russia colluded to win the election and steal it from Hillary Clinton.  And there’s no evidence for this. They haven’t found any evidence, because there isn’t any and that’s because it couldn’t have happened!

Conclusion

Before he left office, Obama elevated insiders to political positions where they could not be fired.  This was done in order to work from the inside to destroy Trump. The President needs to find a way to get rid of them.  They’ve already done a great deal of damage, and now we’re hearing about massive wiretapping and spying on the new president and his administration.

At this point, Trump is probably eating his words.  On November 11, 2016, he called Obama a “very good man,” and said he would seek his counsel in the future.

Oh, what a mess! If they can’t run the country, Democrats will settle for ruining it—and the nooze media, and our great institutions of higher education, will help them.

I wonder if they understand that Barack Obama is constitutionally barred from being president again. Do they realize there’s no lawful way to award the presidency to Hillary Clinton, even if they were to succeed in their jihad to “drive Trump from office”? Either they honestly—if I may use that word when speaking of such people—don’t know these things, or just don’t care.

With all these liberals purposely trying to destabilize the country, why have I been writing fantasy novels? And why am I so pleased that my latest book has just been published?

“The Throne”  is the ninth book in my “Bell Mountain” series. My publisher describes these as “faithful fiction that reveals the Kingdom of God,” and readers say I do it without getting preachy. Give God the glory for that. He guides me as I write, and the books are a lot smarter than I am.

Why fantasy? Well, it’s a way of looking at life from a new perspective that’s not so easy to access via other types of fiction. It allows me to write for teens and even younger children without parting company from an adult audience. Readers of all ages have enjoyed these books, so why change?

In the fantasy world discovered in my books, the people of a great nation have, over the centuries, lost their sense of relationship to God. Their religion is a worldly political establishment, a set of rituals, carried on by force of habit more than anything else. But there are still characters who seek God—some of them not even knowing that He is what they seek; and the stories are about how God calls them to His service, and how they respond—in an age of war and revolution, bravery and treachery, miracles, prophecy, barbarian invasions, and acts of sacrificial heroism and darkest villainy.

It’s not so different from our real world, after all.

I’ve tried to make these fantasies stand out from those commonly found on our bookshelves today, taking for my models the works of C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien, but always taking care not to imitate them: there’s more than enough of that elsewhere. The stories are infused with a Biblical worldview: even more than Lewis and Tolkien, the Bible is my inspiration. This I have tried to do without being preachy, for the excellent reason that most readers are turned off by preachiness, which makes the author feel good but does little for them. Most of our fiction is a God-free zone, which makes it trivial at best and unwholesome at worst.

So in these stories you won’t find any mighty wizards casting spells, although there are characters who pretend to have such power. Hopefully I have weeded out all the common fantasy clichés—bawdy tavern wenches, lusty warriors with muscles on top of their muscles, and all the rest of them. There is nothing allowed in my stories that the Bible doesn’t allow: all the laws of nature remain in force. Anything accomplished by the characters has to be done the old-fashioned way—by them, without benefit of magic. And by the power of God.

I write these novels because I have been called to write them, and the reader response has been all I could have hoped for. I don’t expect, as a result of my weekly political and social commentaries, ever to hear from anyone who says, “Hey, thanks, you’ve talked me out of being a liberal!” That doesn’t even happen in a fantasy world.

I write these books in faith: because, in the long run, faith, if we have anything at all, is what we have.

It may not be morning in America again but if you listen really hard you can hear the neighborhood rooster taking in a deep breath.   Don’t get me wrong, not everything is coming up roses, but change is blowing in the wind.

The New World Order is the one that is gasping for breath.  I am not naïve’ enough to think that all of our problems are simply going to disappear, but I am here to tell you that for the first time in a score of years I have hope for the future I am leaving to my grandchildren.

Father Knows Best may only be available in reruns but I believe that we stand at the intersection of Main and High with a renewed spirit now that Hillary has gone the way of the Wicked Witch of the West.  America has chosen a sledgehammer rather than a broomstick.

When we find ourselves heading off of a cliff it would be a good idea if the driver of the car chose to hit reverse rather than FORWARD.  We Americans have lost our way and sometimes the best way to get back on to the right course is to return to the place where we made the wrong turn.

I am reminded today of the cautionary phrase popularized by Rod Serling’s Twilight Zone opening.  “Look!  A signpost up ahead.  Next stop, the Twilight Zone.”  Thank God that Mom and Pop America can still read and that they heeded the signposts.

What was that chilling line from The Eagle’s Hotel California…”You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave.”  We were certainly careening toward the village of no return.

I have no illusions about Donald Trump.  I have argued with my fellow Christians until I was blue in the face about the urgency I felt in making sure that the Clinton machine be defeated in the election of 2016.  Since the days of Poppy Bush and his pro-abortion grand-family GW’s clan, the New World Order has been rolling full bore like an out of control sixteen-wheeler down the interstate highway.

I warned that we were one election away from full-blown government tyranny crushing the rights of God-fearing Americans.  As one who spends his time challenging the status quo I understood that government had become a malevolent dictator.  Government had overthrown God and had already showed signs of being a wicked taskmaster to anyone who challenged its lordship.

Perhaps I have let my guard down but I no longer sleep with one eye open in fear of black SUV’s pulling up my driveway in the middle of the night.  The NWO is still alive and well but, at least for now, they are currently in defense mode pushing back against the new kid on the block at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

I am so relieved Obama is gone.  I am still rejoicing that the wicked witch is dead.  Oh how I long for the Old World Order.

The American family is on life support.  The intact Ozzie and Harriet family is a thing of the past.  While our leaders argue about “global issues” Main Street America is gasping for breath.  Government has their hands in everything from the size of the deck you can build onto your own home, to which restroom your son or daughter can tingle in, to what you can and cannot say about which particular special interest minority.

As Michael Savage would say, I want to return to the day when the chrome was thick and the women were straight.  The New World Order is real and they are on the run.  If Christians do not act and act NOW, the reprieve will be short lived.  Our only hope is to return to the Old World Order.

Donald Trump stepped on the throat of political correctness.  He hit the brakes on the out-of-control media manipulation of middles class minds.  He has made straight-talking in vogue again.

For the first time in two generations We The People seem to actually have an opportunity to reclaim a semblance of control over our own lives.  But Donald Trump is not king and we cannot count on him, and certainly not the Republican Party, to return America to our children.  But there is a breach in the NWO wall and it is suddenly possible for us to run into the gap. Although a wall on the border would be nice, it is the wall of liberty that must be restored.

Let’s face it friends, America needs to be rebuilt and I am not referring to our public infrastructure.  America’s moral infrastructure has crumbled and we cannot move forward until the foundations are restored.  Donald Trump is decriminalizing the name of Jesus.  That is the only foundation upon which we can rebuild…the only foundation which can endure.

James Madison warned us that “the Constitution” was made only for a moral and religious people.  It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

The state motto in Ohio is a verse from the Scriptures.  “With God, all things are possible.”  Do we believe it?  Do we think that God can help us make America Great Again?  We have tried it the secularist’s way and it is obvious that their methods do not work. Is it time to simply throw in the towel and wait for the promised pre-tribulation evacuation?

The task that lies ahead of us is daunting but it does appear as if the Lord has given us one last shot.  The Bible questions us, “If the foundations be destroyed what can the righteous do?”  So what are we gonna do?

I say it is time to grab a hammer and a trowel and start laying some bricks.

Let’s go back to the future.  Let’s re-establish the Old World Order.

This past Monday, March 6, marked the anniversary of the fall of the Alamo outside of San Antonio, Texas, back in 1836. This event is so significant in my mind that I always try to devote a column that honors the heroism of these men on or around the anniversary of the occasion.

For 13 days, 189 brave and determined patriots withstood Santa Anna’s seasoned army of over 4,000 troops. To a man, the defenders of that mission fort knew that they would never leave those ramparts alive. They had several opportunities to leave and live. Yet they chose to fight and die. How foolish they must look to this generation of spoiled Americans.

It is difficult to recall that stouthearted men such as Davy Crockett (a nationally renowned frontiersman and former congressman), Will Travis (only 26 years old with two small children at home), Jim Bowie (a wealthy landowner with properties on both sides of the Rio Grande), and Almaron Dickinson (a 36-year-old blacksmith and artillery captain who was one of the very last men to die at the Alamo and whose young wife and daughter were two of only three Alamo survivors) really existed. These were real men with real dreams and real desires. Real blood flowed through their veins. They loved their families and enjoyed life as much as any of us do. However, there was something different about them. They possessed a commitment to liberty that transcended personal safety and comfort.

Liberty is an easy word to say, but it is a hard word to live up to. Freedom involves much more than financial gain or personal pleasure. Accompanying Freedom is her constant and unattractive companion, Responsibility. Neither is she an only child. Courage and Honesty are her sisters. They are inseparable: destroy one and all will die.

Early in the siege, Travis wrote these words to the people of Texas: “Fellow Citizens & Compatriots: I am besieged by a thousand or more of the Mexicans under Santa Anna. . . . The enemy has demanded a surrender at discretion, otherwise, the garrison are to be put to the sword. . . . I have answered the demand with a cannon shot & our flag still waves proudly from the walls. I shall never surrender or retreat. . . . VICTORY OR DEATH! P.S. The Lord is on our side.”

As you read those words, remember that Travis and the others did not have the National Education Association (NEA) telling them how intolerant and narrow-minded their notions of honor and patriotism were. They didn’t have the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) telling them they were a hate group. A hostile media did not constantly castigate them as a bunch of wild-eyed extremists. As schoolchildren, they were not taught that their forefathers were nothing more than racist jerks. The TSA didn’t have them on a terrorist watch list. Neither did they have 501c3 pastors constantly filling their hearts and minds with this imbecilic “obey-the-government-no-matter-what” misinterpretation of Romans chapter 13.

The brave men at the Alamo labored under the belief that America (and Texas) really was “the land of the free and the home of the brave.” They believed in God and that their cause was just. They also believed that the freedom of future generations depended on their courage and resolve. They further believed their posterity would remember their sacrifice as an act of love and devotion. It all looks pale now.

By today’s standards, the gallant men of the Alamo appear rather foolish. After all, they had no chance of winning–none. Yet the call for pragmatism and compromise was never sounded. Instead, they answered the clarion call, “Victory or death!”

Please try to remember the heroes of the Alamo as you watch our spineless political, religious, and business leaders surrender to globalism, corporatism, socialism, and political correctness. Try to remember the heroes of the Alamo as you watch the Republicans and Democrats in Washington, D.C., create a more draconian Police State than Santa Anna could have even dreamed of creating.

One thing is certain: those courageous champions at the Alamo did not fight and die for a political party or for some “lesser of two evils” mantra. They fought and died for a cause–and that cause was liberty and independence.

In 1836, those 189 defenders of the Alamo joined the ranks of the world’s greatest freedom fighters. Patriots such as the 70 Christian men (most of whom were from Pastor Jonas Clark’s Church of Lexington) who stood against 800 British troops on April 19, 1775, at Lexington Green and the hundreds more who joined them at the Concord Bridge a little while later. Men such as the great freedom fighter, William Wallace, and his band of 7,000 Scots who stood against an English force of 18,000 trained British soldiers at the Battle of Stirling Bridge on September 11, 1297–and again on July 22, 1298, when Wallace and 5,000 Scots went up against an English force of over 15,000 soldiers at the Battle of Falkirk. And let’s not forget the single greatest example of men who chose to fight for liberty against the greatest of odds: the 300 Spartans who squared off against more than 100,000 Persians at the Battle of Thermopylae in August or September of 480 B.C. These stories–and hundreds like them–are the heritage of free men everywhere. And the willingness to stand against overwhelming odds for the cause of liberty is certainly America’s heritage.

At the same time, it is extremely important to note that the Alamo defenders (and the rest of the honorable men mentioned in the above paragraph) did NOT act as a mob. It is truly stated that no one has a right to take the law into his or her own hands. These men acted in accordance with the Natural Law of God, and thus their resistance was just and righteous.

I heard that a pastor recently said, “I can find no justification for America’s War for Independence in the scriptures.” (I hope many of his congregants found no justification for staying under his spiritual leadership after hearing that egregiously erroneous comment.) The only reason a pastor could say such a thing is because he is totally ignorant of Biblical Natural Law. Either that or he is a monarchical statist. Sadly, I would guess that a huge percentage of America’s pastors today actually share this pastor’s sentiment. (Why don’t you ask YOUR pastor what he thinks next Sunday?)

The heroes of the Alamo, as well as the heroes of America’s fight for independence, acted bravely and in good conscience under the moral law of God and the just laws of Nature. They did not act on their own authority but on the Natural authority of a Body Politic.

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.”

John Locke (The Father of America’s Founding Fathers) said, “If a long train of abuses, prevarications and artifices, all tending the same way, make the design visible to the people, and they cannot but feel what they lie under, and see whither they are going; it is not to be wondered, that they should then rouze themselves, and endeavour to put the rule into such hands which may secure to them the ends for which government was at first erected.”

Locke continued: “Whosoever uses force without right, as every one does in society, who does it without law, puts himself into a state of war with those against whom he so uses it; and in that state all former ties are cancelled, all other rights cease, and every one has a right to defend himself, and to resist the aggressor.”

In line with the law of conscience, for those who advance that civil society’s rules must be abandoned and armed resistance taken (thus putting society in a state of war), there is a standard of proof that must be met, so as to convince The People that the actions taken outside the rules of established law are justified. This is what our founders did when they penned a Declaration of Independence. The founders of the Republic of Texas did likewise.

This is why it is absolutely obligatory that:

1. People are thoroughly informed and educated regarding the Natural Law–including the divine principles regarding lawful resistance to government.

America’s founders were well versed in Natural Law. Their resistance to and separation from Great Britain–as well as the form of government that they created in the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights–were rightly predicated upon the “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” (Declaration)

2. Clergymen immediately familiarize themselves with the Natural Law of our Creator and quickly begin teaching these principles to their congregations.

Most New England pastors of Colonial America were scholars when it came to the understanding of Natural Law. Sadly, Natural Law has not been taught in America’s churches for over one hundred years–at least to any significant degree. The vast majority of pastors are totally ignorant of Natural Law. As a result, the people of this country have lost all cognizance of the integral relationship between Natural Law and a free society.

For this reason, I delivered a series of messages on the subject of Natural Law that are available on one DVD. The DVD series is entitled “Natural Law And Liberty.” The five messages on this DVD include:

• Biblical Evidence For Natural Law
  Christ’s Law Of The Sword
  The Law Of Necessity
  Liberty In Law
  The Importance Of Natural Law

Order the DVD Natural Law And Liberty DVD

3. State legislators, governors, attorney generals, judges, sheriffs, etc., not only become familiar with the Natural Law principles of liberty but also come to a comprehension and conviction of their responsibility and authority to use their office within State government to galvanize the Body Politic, “We The People,” in the defense of liberty.

The Alamo defenders, America’s Founding Fathers, William Wallace and his band of Scots, and King Leonidas and his fellow Spartans all acted in accordance with the Natural Law principles stated above. They did NOT engage in armed resistance as individuals or as a mob, but under the Natural Law authority of man’s Creator.

P.S. Several weeks ago, I informed readers of a fantastic new film that is currently in production. The movie is called “Mainstream: How Hollywood Movies And The New York Media Are Promoting The Globalist Agenda.” I am so committed to the production of this film that I have become an executive producer of the film. This movie is truly a blockbuster movie: there has never been another film like it.

The mainstream media and entertainment industries have done as much to corrupt the soul of American society as anything else–and more than most. And the entire mainstream media and entertainment companies are controlled by a very small handful of people. And this tiny but powerful cabal is controlling most of the information that the American people consume on a daily basis.

MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski (daughter of globalist heavyweight Zbigniew Brzezinski) actually let the cat out of the bag on the “Morning Joe” show recently by saying, “And it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, he [Donald Trump] could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. AND THAT, THAT IS OUR JOB.” [Emphasis added]

See the report: Brzezinski: ‘Our Job’ Is To Control ‘Exactly What People Think’

The new movie “Mainstream” is a brutally honest exposé of how the mainstream media and entertainment industries have tried to do what Ms. Brzezinksi emphatically stated was their intention to do: “control exactly what people think.”

I have said it for years: the mainstream media is nothing more than a propaganda machine for globalists in and out of the federal government. And now, a major motion picture is preparing to give the American people the details that mainstream media bosses hope you will never learn.

Some of the most notable freedomists alive are featured in this film, including Edwin Vieira, G. Edward Griffin, John McManus, Ron Paul and several more. Yes, I am also featured in the film.

You can imagine how many people do not want to see this movie produced and how many people are refusing to help fund it. That’s why I’m asking my readers to please help James Jaeger finish this film. Unless liberty-minded people support this film NOW, the project might grind to a halt. If you can give $50, $100, $500, $1,000, or more, I urge you to do so. And THANK YOU for your help!

Here is the online donation page to help fund this fantastic film, “Mainstream: How Hollywood Movies And The New York Media Are Promoting The Globalist Agenda”:

“Mainstream” Donate Form

If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form

I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:

Chuck Baldwin Live Store

According to the international whistleblower and government watchdog, Julian Assange, by the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, Trojan horses, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware.

Two of America’s top legal minds – both of whom were successful prosecutors and trial attorneys – believe that the new president is being victimized by a secret cabal comprised of Democratic politicians, their puppetmasters and the majority of news organizations.

Despite, the daily drumbeat by journalists that the claims of President Donald Trump are outrageous and without credibility, top-rated talk host and former chief of staff at the U.S. Justice Department Mark Levin and former prosecuting attorney and House Select Committee on Benghazi chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy are willing to bet-the-farm that Trump’s allegations will expose a conspiracy to delegitimize and bringdown a sitting president.

This week, President Donald Trump doubled-down on his accusations that his predecessor, President Barack Obama, wiretapped the Trump Tower in New York City during the run-up to the presidential election. Trump is calling on Congress to launch a formal investigation into the eavesdropping by a federal law enforcement or intelligence agency. However, Trump believes the House and Senate Intelligence Committees are the way to go.

Trump voiced his allegation on his Twitter account and compared the Obama spy situation to Nixon’s Watergate and the McCarthy Hearings.

Benghazi investigation leader, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-SC, said that if the surveillance indeed took place carried on then there are only a couple ways to justify the surveillance: Americans can either be wiretapped as part of a criminal inquiry, or as part of an intelligence gathering operation under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

“There is no other way for it lawfully to be done,” said Gowdy. “The good news about both of those … is there’s a paper trail. There’s an application. There are warrants — all of which can be reviewed.”

“The Obama team is no longer in charge,” Gowdy noted. “So any information the current Department of Justice has that suggests the previous Department of Justice acted inappropriately, they are welcome to release it.”

Gowdy on Monday also dismissed as premature any calls for any special prosecutor to investigate Russian links to Trump’s campaign

“There is no special prosecutor statute. There is no independent counsel statute. There’s a regulation that allows for the appointment of special counsel if the Department of Justice has a conflict and if all 92 U.S. attorneys have a conflict. Until that evidentiary burden has been satisfied, I don’t know why Republicans or Democrats are talking about special counsel,” Gowdy said.

“It’s too early. Special Counsel only applies to a criminal investigation,” he said, also adding that the FBI would be the agency to investigate a potential crime.

Unfortunately, Trump allowed far too many Obama minions to remain in the White House and in the various federal agencies.

“I want this investigated but not by FBI Director James Comey, who I wouldn’t hire as a traffic officer writing parking tickets in New York. He’s a failure as FBI chief and should be forced to resign or be fired,” said former New York City Detective Iris Aquino. “And Trump better take this opportunity to replace a lot of people in his agencies.”

Aquino believes that former intelligence chief James Clapper who also denied Trump’s allegations, has a history of lying and even perjured himself before a House panel. “There were more than 50 intelligence officers who complained that intelligence was tailored to backup President Barack Obama’s lies and his agenda,” she added

Conservative radio show host Mark Levin said the evidence was “overwhelming” that Obama conducted surveillance during Trump’s campaign. Levin, a former chief of staff in the U.S. Justice Department, called the effort a “silent coup” by the Obama administration and demanded that it be investigated.

Levin made the case that former President Obama and his operatives have actively worked to spy on, and undermine, President Donald Trump and his administration.

Levin spoke to “Fox & Friends” on Sunday and used liberal news sources to essentially prove that the Obama administration was behind spying on President Trump and others in his campaign during the election season.

WIKILEAKS RELEASES DOCUMENTS REGARDING ILLEGAL CIA SPYING IN U.S.

According to the international whistleblower and government watchdog, Julian Assange, by the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI), had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, Trojan horses, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware.

Such is the scale of the CIA’s undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had utilized more code than that used to run Facebook. The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified, noted Wikileaks founder Assange.

“In a statement to WikiLeaks the source details policy questions that they say urgently need to be debated in public, including whether the CIA’s hacking capabilities exceed its mandated powers and the problem of public oversight of the agency. The source wishes to initiate a public debate about the security, creation, use, proliferation and democratic control of cyberweapons,” wrote Assange.

Once a single cyber ‘weapon’ is ‘loose’ it can spread around the world in seconds, to be used by rival states, cyber mafia and teenage hackers alike.

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks editor stated that “There is an extreme proliferation risk in the development of cyber ‘weapons’. Comparisons can be drawn between the uncontrolled proliferation of such ‘weapons’, which results from the inability to contain them combined with their high market value, and the global arms trade. But the significance of “Year Zero” goes well beyond the choice between cyberwar and cyberpeace. The disclosure is also exceptional from a political, legal and forensic perspective.”

“When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know that your nation is doomed.”

We have seen that recently the new DNC chair would not rule out Hillary Clinton running for the president’s office in 2020. How could this be? It was promised by the now President Donald Trump that he was going to instruct his Attorney General to look into Hillary Clinton’s situation. As you know, instead, after he won office, he said that Americans “owe her a major debt of gratitude for her sacrifice to our country.”

This proves the point as to what happens when Americans leave off justice, which guards American liberties. Hillary Clinton is now calling for resistance to Trump.

She said, “We need to stay engaged… I’ll be with you every step of the way.”

How is it that she has been given that liberty?

Why hasn’t Trump lawfully dealt with the likes of the Clintons? He said that he would reinstate the rule of law.

The President said that Hillary has been caught selling uranium ore, which I warned months before anybody dared to speak out on the topic, to the Russians.  Yet, she is still free to attack him at will? America this is treason (Article 3, section 3 of the United States Constitution).

Americans just follow blindly behind because the right guy has on their favorite jersey. Americans have been put back to sleep with a blanket of deception (Matthew 13:25).

The enemy is wide-awake America, and they are busy, in the light of day, dividing people one against another.

^“And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.” -Mark 3:25

Furthermore, if you think that the enemies within and without are just going to give everything back over to the American people, think again. They are unlawfully attacking the rule of law, and Trump, who promised to enforce the law against them, is not!

We already know that when it comes to justice, surely you cannot depend upon the likes of the great American appeasers Gowdy, Issa, and Chaffetz.

This reminds me of pro wrestling.  You know, where the wrestlers act like archenemies on the mat and behind closed doors they are the best of friends.

All the while, the self-deceived fans are willfully played by the wiles of these paid actors.

But then again you cannot blame corrupt politicians for letting them get away with whatever you let them get away with….

 “Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome who have so enthusiastically acclaimed and adored him and rejoiced in their loss of freedom and danced in his path and given him triumphal processions. Blame the people who hail him when he speaks in the Forum of the new wonderful good society which shall now be Rome’s, interpreted to mean more money, more ease, more security, and more living fatly at the expense of the industrious.” -Cisero

What is truly astounding about all of that which takes place in the country by the corruption that is tolerated is that Americans actually, somehow or another, believe that WHAT THEY TOLERATE has no effect on them; and that these above said, or otherwise, are somehow above the law, which they swore to uphold.

Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means — to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal — would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face. -Supreme court justice Louis D. Brandies(1928).

“A nation ceases to be republican…when the will of the majority ceases to be the law.” –Thomas Jefferson

What is the purpose of news?  Any reasonable person would say that it is to find out what is happening of importance locally in their city, county, or state, what is happening nationally in their own country and what is happening globally.  That information, if presented objectively, would give a person a well-rounded overview of the total world in which he or she lives.  But that’s not what they get.

What is the purpose of the news media?  Once again, any reasonable person would say that the news media should report the “news” accurately and with as little bias as possible, except for one little nagging characteristic, humans are, by their very nature, biased.  The reporter who reports the news, the journalist who investigates and reports the news, the historian that writes history books about the news and the reader that reads the news and the history books are inherently biased and they are biased because of what is inside their “Little Black Box.”  Oh no!  Not that “Little Black Box” again!

Then you have to ask, “what is the news?”  The “news” is whatever a flawed and biased human being in the news media, who has the responsibility of reporting the “news”, decides what should be reported.  Since the reader, listener, or watcher of the “news” has no interaction with the news media on what is to be reported, he or she is a hapless victim of the inherent bias in the “news” that is reported and he or she must filter out the bias as best as each can, even though the reader is also biased.  Sadly, each reader, listener and watcher of the news, sees the news through a heavily distorted lens.

The news is a perception, not reality.

Does the news media have a societal duty to hold government accountable?   As the Founders debated the establishment of the Republic and the rules under which it would be governed, the role of a free press was paramount in their thinking.   They recognized that a free press could be a deterrent to a government going rogue but they were also concerned that a free press could deceive their readers rather than enlighten them, or be influenced by the powerful and the wealthy.  Their concerns were well founded because at that time there was an explosion of printing presses throughout the land and newspapers and pamphlets were sprouting up all over the place.  Objective reporting was not necessarily a prevailing theme at the time.   The term “fake news” did not originate because of a Trump presidency.

Journalists and pamphleteers were vital to the spreading of American ideals and gave rise to authors like Thomas Paine and Samuel Adams.  Each had a significant impact on the Revolution and the weeks and months after the Revolution.  The eighty-five Federalists Papers, which explored the ideas of a Constitutional Republic, were printed anonymously in New York newspapers in 1787 and 1788.

Can the news media be bought?  To the concerns that the Founding Fathers had about the news media being hijacked by the powerful and the wealthy, Forbes Magazine reported in June of 2016 that 15 billionaires own most of the American news outlets, from the major networks ABC, NBC and CBS, to the cable networks like FOX, MSNBC and CNN.  Michael Bloomberg, Rupert Murdock and George Soros are just three of those 15 billionaires.  Bloomberg LP has over 2,000 correspondents around the world collecting the “news”.  Who controls the final editing of all the news that is being reported by those 2,000 correspondents when Michael Bloomberg has a huge financial interest in the success or failure of the outlets he owns?  What is the bias of the correspondents and the editors and how does that bias influence what is being reported?  How is the reader supposed to filter out that bias?

Besides the financial interests of the billionaires in reporting the news, a fatal disease has infected journalism throughout the entire industry.  Rush Limbaugh, on his daily talk show program, interviewed a journalist student caller from college.  Rush asked the budding journalist why he wanted to become a journalist?  The answer should have stunned the entire listening audience.  The student stated that, “he wanted to become a journalist so he could change the world.”  Unfortunately, too many journalists have been infected with this same disease.

Besides the inherent bias, now predominantly liberal, the success or failure of the news media is driven by five factors: advertising revenues, paid subscriptions, ratings, the 24-hour news cycle and the impact of the internet and social media.  No business model allows success without sufficient revenues to support all of the activities of the news outlet.  Print media is suffering from lower advertising and subscription revenues and many have folded, or are on the brink of bankruptcy because of TV, the Internet and social media.   Radio, which offers a combination of music and talk, appears to be healthy but only from a local perspective.  National radio is not doing well unless merged with TV.  The TV media requires a little more detail.

National television has become talk radio, only in video form, with endless debate and analysis, camouflaged as news.  No TV platform is immune from this malady.  Turn on any TV news program and instead of the all-around broad news we were expecting, we get endless opinions and analysis by so-called experts, reporters and correspondents, better suited for the newspaper opinion page.  If you are looking for national and international news reported accurately, you will be hard pressed to find it.  And the analysis and opinions are heavily slanted towards the left side of the political aisle with just a pointless token segment from the other side, except maybe for FOX News.

Case in point was Trump’s speech before Congress.  The analysis and opinion went on and on and on for several days.  Now the news cycle is obsessed with the Republican-Russian-Putin conspiracy, driven by the blatant Progressive co-conspirators and racketeers in most of the news media.

To add insult to Trump’s injury, the other day he tweeted that Obama bugged his Trump Tower offices.  Is it true?  We haven’t a clue, but it will be the butt of the news cycle for many more days or even weeks to come.  Was Trump wise in saying it without presenting evidence, probably not?

In contrast, when was the last time you heard news from Central or South America, or Canada, or Australia?  Why isn’t the news media doing in depth reporting on Russia and their national motives and goals and how those motives and goals influence our foreign policy and the rest of the world?   How about reflecting on life in China and the objectives of their communist-run regime?

The sad truth is, the news has now boiled down to the never-ending Trump hour and what he is allegedly doing, according to the Progressives, to ruin the lives of those poor dependent Americans, those “hard working” and honest illegal aliens and those “peaceful” refugees coming in from Muslim countries.  The news is also riddled with social justice and environmental extremism, both liberal causes.

The duped reader, watcher and listener of the news can’t filter out the liberal bias in the news because the liberal bias overshadows the news.

In Seattle there were two newspapers, the Seattle Times and the Post Intelligencer (PI).  The PI was the liberal paper and the Times was the conservative paper.  Not so any more.  The PI went out of business and now the Seattle Times has taken up the mantle of Progressivism.  You can’t find balanced reporting any where in the Seattle Times.  Every article on climate change is slanted towards the government and environmental position.  There are no articles showing science from the opposite side.  Most of the columnists are New York Times columnists and everyone knows that the New York Times is a liberal newspaper.  But then the Seattle Times just reflects the political position of most of Seattle’s and Western Washington State residents.

As we have said in many of our articles, Progressivism has been embedded in all of our institutions, from education, to politics, to foreign policy, to health care, to the environment, to commerce, to finance and to the news media.  But worse, it has infected the mindset of the American people for several generations.  Progressivism has been set in stone in the body politic and it will take a jack hammer to break it up.

Each infected institution has become a co-conspirator and racketeer in pushing the radical Progressive agenda throughout the United States and they have been hugely successful.  But what most people don’t realize is, that Progressive agenda is the antithesis and enemy of a free America.  If you are poor, lazy, black, Latino, disabled, mentally challenged, refugee, or an illegal alien you are a protected class and rewarded by government, at taxpayer expense.  If you are successful you are a taxed class and frowned upon and ridiculed for being successful.  But it’s not altruism that drives the rewarding of the protected classes, it’s the lust for power.  Those welfare-style rewards you end up paying for, are solely for Democrat votes.

When the fourth estate carries the banner of one political ideology and weaves that ideology into every aspect of its reporting, it becomes an agenda-driven conspirator.  At that point the constitutional foundation of individual freedom is forever diminished, or silenced and is the Founding Father’s worst nightmare come true.  In such event, totalitarian government cannot be far behind.

But then with all that power, political influence and money supporting the news media, how are the people going to change it?  One way would be to start a drive to get millions of Americans to stop watching, reading, or listening to the NATIONAL news for one week.  We’re going to call this drive NARLO’s National NEWS BOYCOTT week, commencing on the first week in April and then again in the first weeks of July and October.  Check out the details on our web page HERE.  Done on a massive scale, the news outlets would have to listen and change their ways, especially if the boycott started eating into their revenues.

Only the people can make a difference on major issues, that is if the people even care about preserving and maintaining a free America.

Tell us if you LIKE this “Boycott” idea.

NOTE:　 The foregoing article represents the opinion of the author and is not necessarily shared by the owners, employees, representatives, or agents of the publisher.

I performed my original song, “We Are Americans” at the Orlando March 4 Trump Rally. It felt like a family reunion seeing patriots from the early days of the Tea Party movement; lots of hugs. The mood of the rally was electric. Everyone was happy, excited and fired-up about President Trump.

To the fake news media and Obama who think their orchestrated lying campaign to destroy Trump is working, I say, “Forget about it! It ain’t workin’!” Trump-mania is alive and well, stronger than ever!

Vendors were selling Trump caps, t-shirts and everything in between including Trump welcome mats. One elderly patriot adorned head-to-toe in red, white and blue Trump paraphernalia told me she feared putting a Trump welcome mat outside her front door. She said it is unfair that we cannot freely support our president without fear of attacks.

The emcee instructed all us speakers to stay close to the stage. However, I knew there were a few speakers ahead of me on the program so I wandered away into the crowd to chat with people.

A white gentleman shared with me his frustration trying to legally bring his foreign wife to the United States. He said after battling incompetence, submitting a mountain of documents and spending $18,000 thus far, his wife still has not been granted entry into the U.S. We talked about the unfairness. He is respecting and adhering to our immigration laws. And yet, Obama opened the flood gates to illegals totally un-vetted, gifting them government freebies unavailable to Americans. I told the brother to hang in there. Trump is cutting bureaucracy.

I met a white woman who is chair of a Republican Club. She said they have been reaching out to blacks in a sincere attempt to add more diversity to their club. She asked my advise. I chuckled and said, “Good luck with that.” I have been trying to get blacks to break their mindless loyalty to the democrats for over a decade. Still, I told the patriot sister to keep trying. With God’s help, suddenly mindsets can change.

I asked a young white kid around 14 years old about the unique flag he was waving; blue with a crescent moon and the word, liberty. The kid was an encyclopedia regarding American flags, giving me the full history. Blown away, I said, “You are way too smart for public school. You have got to be home schooled.” He replied, “Yes sir.” I knew it. In my years of touring the country on 14 Tea Party national bus tours, home schooled kids were strikingly different; calmer, smarter, behaved and well educated. Leftists are at war with parents trying to outlaw homeschooling. Everyone was excitedly buzzing about Trump tweeting about Obama bugging Trump Tower before the election. Enraged fake news, democrats and other leftists bash Trump for tweeting declaring it un-presidential. Clearly, Trump supporters, over 60 million Americans love it. They love Trump speaking directly to them, bypassing Leftist operatives disguised as mainstream media.

An Asian female speaker addressing the crowd said it took her 35 years to become a legal US citizen with the right to vote. She expressed how proud she was to be an American. The audience went nuts. They loved her.

Representatives from Hispanics, women and blacks for Trump spoke from the stage. They were warmly and enthusiastically embraced by the crowd. We were family, united in our love for our country, excited about President Trump and his agenda; putting America first and making her great again. Such was the theme of the day.

I chatted with blacks at the rally to support Trump. Interestingly, they were entrepreneurs. It is funny how when you’re a business person trying to achieve your American Dream, you are well aware of the road blocks placed in your path by high taxes and the government’s tyrannical, absurd regulations.

The biggest thing I noticed at the Orlando for Trump rally was the obvious political growth and political sophistication of the participants. Back in the early days of the Tea Party movement we were naive patriots. We thought we were fighting only against the socialist policies of a left-leaning president and the democrats.

Today, we know our enemies: radical Leftist Obama and his army of thugs; the fake news media; the corrupt Washington DC political establishment (Republicans and Democrats); and NeverTrumps – united in their mission to destroy Trump’s presidency.

We the People are politically well educated and well-organized. We are spiritually, emotionally and intellectually locked and loaded, really for battle – really to support and defend our new president.

Please continue moving forward, Mr President. We the People have your back!

One of the major concerns I have had with Donald Trump as a candidate, and continue to have with President Trump in the White House, is the all-too-often ambiguous, even amorphous, character of his pronouncements on important policies. To be sure, this defect might be only apparent—the unfortunate result of combining Mr. Trump’s penchant for truncated statements with my own inability to extrapolate from the few words he does provide a deeper meaning which he may intend for them to convey. (I readily admit that I must be counted among the ever-diminishing set of Americans who consider twitterite and fakebookish discourse truly deplorable means for attempting to communicate ideas with depth any greater than that of a cookie sheet.) On the other hand, perhaps Mr. Trump and his advisors are at fault for not offering more specificity in what they cause to be published below the White House’s by-line.

For a prime example of the latter demerit, most recently my attention was piqued when I came across the White House’s internet post entitled “Standing Up For Our Law Enforcement Community”. See [Link]. Unfortunately, this is an essay without a compelling theme reflective of Mr. Trump’s promise to “make America great again”. Rather than locating itself in a recognizably American historical and legal context, providing a critical overview of contemporary problems, and proposing a long-term political strategy consistent with fundamental constitutional principles, it offers little more than slogans—the main one being that “[t]he Trump Administration will be a law and order administration”. Inasmuch as the first and foremost duty of every President under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution is to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”, this glittering generality imparts to the reader precious little of actual substance. For the question remains: “What body of ‘law’ and what kind of ‘order’ will the Trump Administration enforce?” Oh, I realize (perhaps “hope” is the more accurate verb) that somewhere over the political rainbow there must be more in the minds of the author(s) of this post than the few paragraphs it contains. My concern, though, is: “What more?”

1. Although its title refers to “our law enforcement community”, the White House’s post nowhere even suggests that the latter “community” includes in any way, shape, or form “the Militia of the several States”, the one and only “community” to which the Constitution explicitly assigns the authority and responsibility “to execute the Laws of the Union” (and of their own States as well). See U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1; art. I, § 8, cl. 15; and amends. II and X. One must wonder, therefore, what extra-constitutional, non-constitutional, or even (Heaven forefend) anti-constitutional notion of “standing up for our law enforcement community” the White House has in mind, when it leaves out of consideration any rôle for the Militia.

This oversight is especially ominous in light of the neo-Bolshevist “color revolution” which “leftists” have launched throughout this country in order not simply to demoralize, demonize, and delegitimize, but ultimately to destroy entirely the Trump Administration—in service, not of “the working class”, but of predatory globalist multi-billionaires for whom “the working class” no longer counts for anything, any more than does any other conglomeration of “useful idiots” and “transmission belts” who and which can be aggregated and energized under the divisive banners of contemporary “identity politics”. Mr. Trump and his advisors will prove to be extraordinarily naïve, amateurish, and even feckless if they fail to realize that, absent timely revitalization of the Militia, not just the present Administration but also America as a whole will all too soon be submerged in very hot and deep political waters from which their extrication will be exceedingly difficult. And no, I am not referring to the National Guard—which is no “militia” at all (in the constitutional sense), but instead consists of the “Troops, or Ships of War” which the States may “keep * * * in time of Peace” “with[ ] the Consent of Congress” under Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 of the Constitution (that is, a component of “the standing army”). Rather, “the Militia of the several States” consist of all of WE THE PEOPLE—or at least that part of them which the Declaration of Independence styled “the good People”—who today constitute “the Whites” versus “the Reds” (in line with the dichotomy in the original Bolshevist “color revolution”). In keeping with the Declaration of Independence’s excoriation of King George III for “ha[ving] affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power”, “the good People” of the present time must impress upon the Trump Administration the imprudence of deploying the National Guard or any other component of the regular Armed Forces to deal with this matter under some variety of “martial law” (in the sense most Americans give to that term). Rather, reliance must be had on the Militia, as the true constitutional recourse against the domestic lawlessness of any contemporary “color revolution”. See Parts 6 and 7, below.

2. The White House’s post asserts that “[o]ne of the fundamental rights of every American is to live in a safe community * * * free of crime and violence”. It does not, however, answer (or even ask) the question: “‘Safe’ at what cost?” The Constitution does. One of the goals it sets out in its Preamble is to “ensure domestic Tranquility”, which obviously describes the situation which obtains in “a safe community * * * free of crime and violence”. Another goal identified in that same place is to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”. And the Preamble links these two goals with the unqualified conjunction “and”, thereby demanding that both of them are to be achieved simultaneously, not one to be sacrificed for the supposed benefit of the other. For self-evident to the Founders (just as it should be to contemporary Americans) is that this country can never secure the full measure of “domestic Tranquility” without maximizing “the Blessings of Liberty”, and vice versa.
3. So it is troubling that the White House’s post takes the one-sided position that “[t]he dangerous anti-police atmosphere in America is wrong. The Trump Administration will end it.” For this fails to recognize that two quite different types of “anti-police” activism exist in this country today. One of them intends to undermine “domestic Tranquility” by sabotaging the legitimate work of law-enforcement agencies in every way possible, and therefore should be exposed and eradicated; whereas the other desires to protect “the Blessings of Liberty” against threats emanating from rogue law-enforcement personnel, and therefore should be praised and promoted.

The “anti-police atmosphere” antagonistic to “domestic Tranquility” is being propagated by groups intent upon engendering divisions and mutual antagonisms within society, and especially turning as many Americans as possible against their own governments at every level of the federal system, so as to create the chaotic conditions propitious for waging a successful neo-Bolshevist “color revolution”. The strategy at work is quite simple: Because, of all governmental agencies, police forces interact with the citizenry on the closest day-to-day basis, most common Americans tend to treat them, rightly or wrongly, as particularly representative of “the government” as a whole. If ordinary people can be inveigled to turn against the police in particular, they will naturally turn as well against the government in general. If they do so in large enough numbers, society will become effectively ungovernable, and thus ripe for all sorts of political upheavals. So the White House’s post is correct to emphasize that “[o]ur job is not to make life more comfortable for the rioter, the looter, or the violent disrupter”—because, although most of these street criminals are little more than “useful idiots”, they (along with the other “disrupters” who know precisely what they are about) constitute the first wave of cannon fodder in the initial offensive in the neo-Bolsheviks’ “color revolution”. If they cannot be checked at the outset, their aggression will only increase in its scope and intensify in its destructive effects.

On the other hand, the contemporary “anti-police atmosphere” favorable to “the Blessings of Liberty” is the result of many Americans’ fully justifiable complaints about intolerable levels of patently lawless, yet all-too-often unpunished, behavior by rogue law-enforcement personnel occurring across the length and breadth of this country. Of course, in a free society operating under “the rule of law” (and especially the constraints of “the rule of constitutional law”), any misconduct by law-enforcement agencies should be denounced as excessive, and every malefactor in their ranks should be held maximally accountable for his misconduct. After all, when an officer of the law breaks some law, he violates not only that particular law which he has a general duty to obey in his capacity as an ordinary citizen, but also the very principle of law-enforcement itself which he (unlike an ordinary citizen) is specially sworn to uphold. So, when a representative of the law breaks the law and gets away with his misbehavior under color of the law, his actions inevitably generate disrespect for all law among everyone else. Today, though, the level of police misconduct throughout America is, not simply excessive, but even extremely so, primarily because of the manner in which it tends to be mishandled. All too typically, such misconduct as comes to public attention is explained away by spokesmen for “police unions”, then excused by departmental “internal affairs” investigators and accommodating prosecutors who “find” that the perpetrators’ actions were in accord with various “policies” and “guidelines” (as if those magic words could set at naught constitutional commands). And later on, civil lawsuits brought by the victims are dismissed or otherwise frustrated on the grounds that the perpetrators are privileged to avoid personal liability perforce of fantastic “immunity” defenses of one sort or another concocted by the kangaroo courts under color of “judicial supremacy”.

In light of these circumstances, how can the Trump Administration fulfill the promise that it “will end [the anti-police atmosphere in America]”—but as to both aspects of that “atmosphere”? The White House’s post is not wrong to point out that “[o]ur country needs more law enforcement, more community engagement, and more effective policing”. The proper manner in which to meet these needs, though, remains the question. Not surprisingly, the Constitution supplies the answer.

The Constitution of the United States provides no explicit mandate or permission for the professional police or like law-enforcement agencies found throughout this country today. The only institutions within the federal system to which the Constitution assigns the authority and responsibility “to execute the Laws of the Union” are “the Militia of the several States”; and the only individual officeholder to which the Constitution assigns the authority and responsibility to “take Care that the Law be faithfully executed” is the President, to whom it also entrusts the status of “Commander in Chief * * * of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States”. See U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cls. 15 and 16; art. II, § 3; and art. II, § 2, cl. 1. Self-evidently, “execut[ing] the Laws of the Union” and “tak[ing] Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” involve quintessential “law-enforcement” and “police” functions. Similarly, because “the Militia of the several States” are the States’ own governmental institutions, with permanent place in the federal system, and because the Constitution, through the Second Amendment, declares that only “[a] well regulated Militia” is “necessary to the security of a free State”, “law-enforcement” or “police” functions which relate to the provision of “security” under State and Local law must devolve upon “the Militia of the several States” in each of the States, and upon each of the Governors of “the several States” in their capacities as commanders in chief of their own States’ Militia. Moreover, inasmuch as each of “the Militia of the several States” must be “[a] well regulated Militia” and “[a] well regulated Militia” must be composed of the body of the people, in the final analysis the American people themselves, properly organized in “well regulated Militia”, should assume primary responsibility for the performance of all “law-enforcement” and “police” functions. This, of course, is no constitutional accident. For in a constitutional republic in which the people themselves exercise sovereignty (as described below), who but the people themselves can be entrusted with the task of policing the people themselves?

So if, as the White House’s post opines, “[o]ur country needs more law enforcement”, the true constitutional source of the additional manpower should be the Militia. Being composed of every able-bodied adult from sixteen years of age upwards (until justly exempted on the basis of superannuation), the Militia could supply far more individuals already qualified, or capable of being trained, to perform any and every “law-enforcement” and “police” function which both the Union and the several States might require. (Actually, if the job were to be done with scrupulous attention to the Constitution, all present-day  police forces and other law-enforcement agencies at the State and Local levels should be integrated within the Militia largely in their present forms, augmented by such other specially trained units and reserve formations as the circumstances in various States and Localities might warrant.) If “[o]ur country needs * * * more community engagement [in ‘law enforcement’]”, in what more efficacious and safe manner could this goal be met than by enlisting the whole community in each community in the effort? No “anti-police atmosphere” could ever arise were the people themselves the police and the police the people. And if “[o]ur country needs * * * more effective policing”, how could this be better guaranteed than by drawing participants in “police” functions from the most extensive pool of talent extant in any community: namely, essentially the entire adult community itself? Not only that: When in the form and with the authority of “well regulated Militia” the people in Local communities will police themselves, law enforcement will necessarily become more effective than it is or ever could be now, because then the people with the greatest personal incentives to maintain proper “law and order” will be directly in charge. No longer will the people in any Locality be subject to a police force of élitist professionals who (as is all too often the case today) envision themselves as aloof from, superior to, and even the antagonists of the very community which they are supposed to protect and serve.

4. The White House’s post assures its readers that “[s]upporting law enforcement means supporting our citizens’ ability to protect themselves”. On the one hand, this statement is a mere truism—because, as America’s Founders well knew, “[s]elf-defence * * * , as it is justly called the primary law of nature, so it is not, neither can it be in fact, taken away by the law of society”. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Robert Bell, American Edition, 4 Volumes & Appendix, 1771-1773), Volume 3, at 4. Whether performed by the individual or by the community, self-defense is the most important, being in the final analysis the indispensable, form of “law enforcement”. On the other hand, unfortunately, the post’s statement sets legal and political priorities in reverse, even perverse, order—because actually enabling citizens to protect themselves individually and collectively must always come before “[s]upporting law enforcement” in the form of modern-day professional police forces. After all, self-defense presupposes the absence of timely and effective assistance from even honest and competent law-enforcement agencies; whereas, in all too many instances today, through their execution of constitutionally questionable “gun-control” laws rogue law-enforcement personnel across this country hinder or entirely frustrate ordinary citizens’ ability to execute “the primary law of nature” for their own individual and societal protection.

Self-evidently, “the security of a free State” depends upon the ability of its constituent citizens to defend both themselves as individuals and their “free State” as a collective—and the Second Amendment declares that, for these purposes, “[a] well regulated Militia” is “necessary”, not subordinate to various law-enforcement establishments not only less inclusive than such a Militia but also lacking a Militia’s constitutional credentials. Thus, the only way in which the statement “[s]upporting law enforcement means supporting our citizens’ ability to protect themselves” can be read in a fully constitutional manner is for the Militia to become the primary institutions of “law enforcement” at every level of the federal system. This is plainly possible even at the level of the General Government, because the Constitution empowers Congress “[t]o provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union”, without exception. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 15. And because “the Militia of the several States” are the States’ own governmental institutions, the States can assign to them whatever “law-enforcement” responsibilities may be “necessary to the security of a free State” in those jurisdictions, when the Militia are not “called into the actual Service of the United States”. Compare U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1 and art. I, § 8, cl. 16 with amends. II and X.

To be sure, the White House’s post goes on to promise that “[w]e [i.e., the Trump Administration] will uphold Americans’ Second Amendment rights at every level of our judicial system”.The apparent exclusive concern with “our judicial system” is perplexing, however. Does President Trump believe that “our judicial system” wields exclusive authority under the false doctrine of “judicial supremacy” to determine with finality what “Americans’ Second Amendment rights” are? Or is that the province of the Constitution, which the Legislative and Executive Branches of the General Government, the States, and ultimately WE THE PEOPLE must interpret and apply for themselves when “our judicial system” neglects, fails, or refuses to protect those rights?

Even those Americans who are satisfied with the decisions of the Supreme Court in the Heller and McDonald cases, and who assume that President Trump will succeed in appointing to the Court new Justices who will scrupulously adhere to those precedents, must realize that, because of the practical vicissitudes of litigation, many if not most rulings of consequence to be rendered by the inferior courts of the United States and the States’ courts with respect to the Second Amendment will never be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Inasmuch as these lower courts are now overpopulated with opponents of the Second Amendment, reliance on “our judicial system” will result in numerous judicial screeds as much at odds with “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” as Circuit Judge James A. Wynn, Jr.’s grotesquely unconstitutional concurring opinion in United States v. Robinson, No. 14-4902 (4th Cir., 23 January 2017). Under these circumstances, can President Trump—or the American people—trust “our judicial system” to guarantee “the security of a free State” as the Second Amendment understands it? Or should President Trump work to empower Americans to exercise “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” in “well regulated Militia”, impervious to modern-day “gun control”? These questions answer themselves, the first in the negative, the second in the affirmative.

5. The White House’s post describes President Trump as “dedicated to enforcing our border laws, ending sanctuary cities, and stemming the tide of lawlessness associated with illegal immigration”. These ends are admirable; but the means by which the President and his advisors believe that he can actually accomplish them remain as opaque as they are conjectural. I need not repeat here what I have written about these matters in my NewsWithViews commentaries “How the President Can Secure the Borders” (18 August 2015), “A Trumped-up Controversy” (20 February 2016), and “No Sanctuaries in ‘Sanctuary Cities’” (3 December 2016). What does deserve renewed emphasis, though, is the indispensable constitutional rôle which the Militia can and must play in the fulfillment of these tasks, under President Trump’s assertion of leadership as “Commander in Chief * * * of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States”, in order to fulfill his duty to “take Care that the Laws [pertaining to immigration] be faithfully executed”. See U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1 and art. II, § 3.

Not just the present tidal wave of patently illegal immigration, but also since the late 1960s the excessive extent of ostensibly legal immigration by aliens unwilling or unable to assimilate themselves within an uniquely American culture, amount to actual hostile invasions of this country. I do not employ the term “invasions” in a loosely metaphorical sense, either. For these incursions are not simply historical accidents, akin to the serial “barbarian invasions” that first splintered, then helped to shatter entirely, the Roman Empire. Rather, they are part and parcel of modern neo-Bolshevism’s long-operative strategy to deny Americans the right vouchsafed to them by the Declaration of Independence to retain “among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal status to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them”; to demolish the United States as a functioning polity; and to drag “the good People” of this country into a “new world order” administered by supra-national mega-banks and -corporations serving the selfish interests of a globalist kleptocracy composed of multi-billionaires. This amounts to a new twist on Leninism/Trotskyism—because “the revolution’s” contemporary financiers are so sure of themselves that they no longer feel the need to operate largely behind the scenes (in the manner of, say, Alexander Helphand), but instead brazenly flaunt their rôles as “the revolution’s” mentors and even directors out in the open, in the person of such as George Soros.

The neo-Bolsheviks’ tactics emphasize enlarging the fissures already in existence throughout American society, and engendering as many new ones as possible, so as to be able to employ “identify politics” in service of a divide-and-conquer approach of multifaceted “class warfare”. The old Leninist/Trotskyist dichotomy of “classes” has been expanded from the original purely economic Marxist categories of “the proletariat” and “the bourgeoisie” to embrace divisions delineated by race, religion, sex (or even worse, “gender”), economic status, political allegiances to such deceptive conceptions as “left” and “right”, rural versus urban attitudes and lifestyles, and so on—until American society now finds itself on the verge of being permanently Balkanized into a chaotic jumble of squabbling sects unified only by their joint participation in an orgy of mutual antagonisms and recriminations. Already, “mainstream” political discourse accepts without demur this country’s bifurcation into “blue States” and “red States” (although, to conform to the relevant historical antecedent, the colors should be reversed; and, better yet, “white” substituted for “blue”). Plainly enough, this situation by itself is incompatible—indeed, at war—with attainment of the Preamble’s goals “to form a more perfect Union” and “insure domestic Tranquility”.

The contemporary agitation from various quarters for “open borders” attempts to hornswoggle gullible Americans into condemning as “xenophobic”, “racist”, or otherwise contemptibly “discriminatory” the laws of the Union which control immigration, so as to make it politically impossible for this country to repel the invasions of aliens now assaulting it. “Hornswoggle” is the properly descriptive verb, too, because no such thing as “open borders” can exist under the Declaration of Independence. For if other nations can systematically dump their unwanted populations into the United States, or if individual foreigners in unlimited numbers can impose themselves on this country, then Americans will no longer “assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them”. Neither can “open borders” exist under the Constitution. For, as the Preamble attests, WE THE PEOPLE “ordain[ed] and establish[ed] th[e] Constitution” in order to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—not to aliens whom THE PEOPLE refuse to accept into their community in the first place, or to some future posterity of those undesired aliens who succeed in insinuating themselves into the United States.

More than a century ago, the Supreme Court rejected the argument for “open borders” pressed upon it by radical attorney Clarence Darrow, that “[n]o power is delegated by the Constitution to the general government over alien friends with reference to their admission into the United States”, with the rejoinder that “[r]epeated decisions of this court have determined that Congress has the power to exclude aliens from the United States; to prescribe the terms and conditions on which they may come in; to establish regulations for sending out of the country such aliens as have entered in violation of law, and to commit the enforcement of such conditions and regulations to executive officers; that the deportation of an alien who is found to be here in violation of law is not a deprivation of liberty without due process of law, and that the provisions of the Constitution securing the right of trial by jury have no application.” United States ex rel. Turner v. Williams, 194 U.S. 279, 287 (argument of counsel), 289-290 (opinion of the Court) (1904). And inasmuch as the Constitution recognizes no alleged “right” of “alien friends” to immigrate into the United States, it surely denies any such “right” to “alien enemies”, whether openly declared as such, or clandestine in their purposes, or merely potentially dangerous because of their beliefs or associations.

The Bill of Rights provides no exceptions to this rule. At issue in Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972), was a statute which declared ineligible to obtain admission into the United States aliens who advocated the “doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship”. Mandel, a self-described “revolutionary Marxist” who openly espoused “the economic, governmental, and international doctrines of world communism”, was denied a visa to participate in lectures and conferences sponsored by various American universities and think-tanks. Joined by several American “university professors * * * who [had] invited [him] to speak”, Mandel brought suit on the grounds that denial of his visa violated the complainants’ rights under the First Amendment, denied them the equal protection of the laws, and deprived them of procedural due process. Id. at 754-760. The Supreme Court overruled these contentions:

It is clear that Mandel personally, as an unadmitted and nonresident alien, had no constitutional right of entry to this country as a nonimmigrant or otherwise. United States ex rel. Turner v. Williams, 194 U.S. 279, 292 (1904). * * *

*     *     *     *     *

This case, therefore, comes down to the narrow issue whether the First Amendment confers upon the * * * professors, because they wish to hear, speak, and debate with Mandel in person, the ability to determine that Mandel should be permitted to enter the country, or, in other words, to compel * * * Mandel’s admission.

*     *     *     *     *

Recognition that First Amendment rights are implicated, however, is not dispositive of our inquiry here. * * * The Court without exception has sustained Congress’ “plenary power to make rules for the admission of aliens and to exclude those who possess those characteristics which Congress has forbidden.” * * * “[O]ver no conceivable subject is the legislative power of Congress more complete than it is over” the admission of aliens.

*     *     *     *     *

We are not inclined in the present context to reconsider this line of cases. Indeed, the [complainants] * * * recognize the force of these many precedents. * * * [T]hey concede that Congress could enact a blanket prohibition against all aliens falling into the class defined by [the statute], and that First Amendment rights could not override that decision. * * * But they contend that by providing a waiver procedure, Congress clearly intended that persons ineligible under the broad provision of the [statute] would be temporarily admitted * * * . They argue that the Executive’s implementation of this congressional mandate * * * must be limited by the First Amendment rights of persons like [the complainants]. * * *

[The complainants’] First Amendment argument would prove too much. In almost every instance of an alien excludable under [the statute], there are probably those who would wish to meet and speak with him. * * * Were we to endorse the proposition that governmental power to withhold a waiver must yield whenever a bona fide claim is made that American citizens wish to meet and talk with an alien excludable under [the statute], one of two unsatisfactory results would necessarily ensue. Either every claim would prevail, in which case the plenary discretionary authority Congress granted to the Executive becomes a nullity, or courts in each case would be required to weigh the strength of the audience’s interest against that of the Government in refusing a waiver * * * , according to some as yet undetermined standard. * * * Indeed, it is precisely for this reason that the waiver decision has, properly, been placed in the hands of the Executive.

*     *     *     *     *

In summary, plenary congressional power to make policies and rules for exclusion of aliens has long been firmly established. In the case of an alien excludable under [the statute], Congress has delegated conditional exercise of this power to the Executive. We hold that when the Executive exercises this power negatively on the basis of a facially legitimate and bona fide reason, the courts will neither look behind the exercise of that discretion, nor test it by balancing its justification against the First Amendment interests of those who seek personal communication with the applicant.

Id. at 762, 765-766, and 767-770.

It should be obvious that, if this reasoning is valid with respect to “the freedom of speech” guaranteed by the First Amendment, then it applies with equal force to all of the other rights that Amendment covers—such that exclusion of aliens on the basis of their religion, or of the predominant religion of their countries of origin, or of the observation that many of them misbehave under color of their religion in countries which incautiously admit them as immigrants, is no less valid. As the Court observed in United States ex rel. Turner v. Williams, 194 U.S. 279, 292 (1904),

[i]t is, of course, true that if an alien is not permitted to enter this country, or, having entered contrary to law, is expelled, he is in fact cut off from worshiping or speaking or publishing or petitioning in the country, but that is merely because of his exclusion therefrom. He does not become one of the people to whom these things are secured by our Constitution by an attempt to enter forbidden by law. To appeal to the Constitution is to concede that this is a land governed by that supreme law, and as under it the power to exclude has been determined to exist, those who are excluded cannot assert the rights in general obtaining in a land to which they do not belong as citizens or otherwise.

Therefore, “[t]he Bill of Rights is a futile authority for the alien seeking admission for the first time to these shores”. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590, 596 note 5 (1953). As the Court explained in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259, 265 (1990),

[t]he Preamble [to the Constitution] declares that the Constitution is ordained and established by “the people of the United States.” The Second Amendment protects “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” and the Ninth and Tenth Amendments provide that certain rights and powers are retained and reserved to “the people.” * * * While this textual exegesis is by no means conclusive, it suggests that “the people” * * * refers to a class of persons who are part of a national community or who have otherwise developed sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of the community.

Pace the Court, however, “this textual exegesis” is certainly far more than merely “suggest[ive]”. For no one could possibly believe that aliens may demand entry into this country while exercising a purported “right” under color of the Second Amendment “to keep and bear Arms” in their hands, or (more specifically) that armed Moslem jihadists intent upon imposing Sharia by means of the “‘[p]olitical power [which] grows out of the barrel of a gun’” may demand entry under color of the Second and Tenth Amendments combined. Compare Mao Tse-tung, Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung (Peking, China: Foreign Languages Press, 1966) at 61, with Arthur L. Corbin, “Legal Analysis and Terminology”, 29 Yale Law Journal 163 (1919), at 168-169 (definition of a legal “power”).

Going further, the Court in Verdugo-Urquidez pointed out that previous cases which have applied principles of equal protection and due process to aliens “establish only that aliens receive constitutional protections when they have come within the territory of the United States and developed substantial connections with this country.” 494 U.S. at 271. “‘In the exercise of its broad power over naturalization and immigration, Congress regularly makes rules which would be unacceptable if applied to citizens’”. Id. at 273, quoting Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 79-80 (1976).

In the light of these precedents, the recent decision in Washington v. Trump, No. 17-35105 (9th Cir., 9 February 2017), purporting to uphold a temporary stay of President Trump’s recent Executive Order on immigration, is (to borrow Bentham’s deprecatory phrase) “nonsense on stilts”. Yet in the latter decision this country witnesses what the White House’s post calls “our judicial system” being intentionally misused by “useful idiots” within the political hierarchies of the States of Washington and Minnesota in order to frustrate the constitutional authority of Congress and the Executive! How should President Trump respond? Recently, the noted journalist and author Seth Lipsky asked me whether Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution applies to this problem; so I shall take that provision as an example of what President Trump and his legal advisors should consider—

The Constitution commands that “[t]he United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion”. Art. IV, § 4. Which implies, of course, that no State can claim a license either (i) to set aside her own “Republican Form of Government” or expose her own citizens to an “Invasion”, or (ii) to obstruct the United States in their execution of their constitutional power and duty to “guarantee * * * a Republican Form of Government” within that State’s territory and “protect” that State’s citizens “against Invasion” by whatever means may be available to the General Government. And without any necessity for any State subject to an “Invasion” to agree to the United States’ exercise of their constitutional duty to deal with that affliction—for, unlike the second clause of Article IV, Section 4, which requires an “Application of the Legislature [of a State], or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened)”, before the United States may “protect” a State “against domestic Violence”, the first clause imposes no such restriction.

Now, even were contemporary neo-Bolsheviks, other subversives of various persuasions, and assorted “useful idiots” not working tirelessly to promote irreconcilable social divisions through “Invasion[s]” of aliens indisposed to assimilate (or, worse yet, predisposed not to assimilate) to traditional American culture, such immigration would inevitably destroy “a Republican Form of Government” in each of the several States. What the Constitution describes as “a Republican Form of Government” is “one constructed on th[e] principle, that the Supreme Power resides in the body of the people”. Compare U.S. Const. art. IV, § 4 with Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 Dallas) 419, 457 (1793) (opinion of Wilson, J.). If, however, the United States no longer consist of one “people”, substantially united in political understanding and purpose, maintenance of “a Republican Form of Government” in any of the several States is impossible. Inasmuch as, whether by conscious design or merely by its unintended consequence, unlimited immigration precludes such unity, it fatally threatens “a Republican Form of Government” in every State. Which (among other reasons) is why the Constitution provides that “[t]he Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing [i.e., as of 1788] shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight”—thereby recognizing the plenary power of Congress to “prohibit[ ]” any and all such “Migration or Importation” in those States after that date, and in all other States at any time. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 1. And that is why (among other reasons) the Constitution delegates to Congress the allied powers “[t]o establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (as to “Migration”), “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations * * * and with the Indian Tribes” (as to “Importation”), “[t]o provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union[ and] repel Invasions”, and “[t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers”. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cls. 4, 3, 15, and 18. For through the exercise of these powers by Congress and the execution by the President of the statutes Congress enacts pursuant to them, “[t]he United States” can “guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government” by “protect[ing] each of them against Invasion” by aliens.

Moreover, the Second Amendment refers to “the security of a free State”, as to which it declares that “[a] well regulated Militia” is “necessary”. The term “a free State” is a general conception, to which (in the estimation of the Founders) all of “the several States” conformed at the time (1791) and were expected always to conform thereafter (along with such other States as later entered the Union). The term “free State” is perhaps best understood by consideration of the German noun “Freistaat” (literally, “free state”), the primary meaning of which is “republic”, with the adjectival form, “freistaatlich”, meaning “republican”. Thus, the term “a free State” in the Second Amendment should be equated with the term “a Republican Form of Government” in the original Constitution, such that “a free State” denotes a polity “constructed on th[e] principle, that the Supreme Power resides in the body of the people”. And, plainly enough, no “free State”can enjoy “security” when it is exposed to incessant “Invasion[s]” by aliens. So, just as “[a] well regulated Militia” is “necessary to the security of a free State”, such a Militia is necessary to the security of a “Republican Form of Government” free from the fear, let alone the actuality, of “Invasion”. This should be obvious, because the essence of both “a free State” and “a Republican Form of Government” is that “the Supreme Power resides in the body of the people”, and “a well regulated militia[ is] composed of the body of the people”. See Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776) art. 13 (emphases supplied). In particular, then, by executing “the Laws of the Union” so as to “repel Invasions” of illegal aliens when other components of the Constitution’s federal system prove themselves inadequate or even inimical to that task, the Militia can guarantee (as can no other institutions) that “the Supreme Power [always] resides in the body of the [American] people” who themselves make up the Militia, rather than being gradually usurped by foreign interlopers with no conceivable claim to any portion of that “Power”. See U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 15.

Inasmuch as issues arising under Article IV, Section 4 typically involve “political questions” as to which the Judiciary is constitutionally incompetent to afford relief to parties challenging the actions of Congress and the Executive, President Trump can—and should—simply disregard aberrant decisions such as Washington v. Trump (while, of course, providing the public with a complete explanation for his actions). See, e.g., Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 Howard) 1 (1849). And both he and Congress enjoy other, even more potent means to deal with rogue judges. See, e.g., my book How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary (San Antonio, Texas: Vision Forum Ministries, 2004). Whether the President’s legal advisors will properly instruct him—and steady his nerves—on these matters remains uncertain, though.

6. The White House’s post concludes with the truism that “[i]t is the first duty of government to keep the innocent safe”, and emphasizes the application of this duty to “especially those Americans who have not known safe neighborhoods for a very long time”. This is all well and good, as far as it goes. Yet it does not go nearly far enough. For the most serious threat to the safety of “the good People” throughout this country is not simply everyday “street crime” (as bad as that may be), but instead the crescent neo-Bolshevist “color revolution” for which the streets constitute merely one theater of operations.

The architects of America’s emergent “color revolution” have honed their theory of “régime change” to a razor’s edge, and tested it in various places around the world with some notable success. Throughout this country its practitioners in the Rotenfrontkämpferbund are numerous, well organized, adequately funded, and fanatic (if not lunatic) in their willingness to apply whatever measures of rhetorical and even physical violence they deem expedient to smash all opposition to their demands. The big “mainstream media”, choruses of puffed-up political pundits, and gaggles of goofy “celebrities” apologize for, encourage, and even glamorize these tactics. And rogue public officials at every level of the federal system openly lend their support to the revolutionaries. The goal of this “color revolution” is to render America effectively ungovernable during President Trump’s tenure, by impugning the legitimacy of any and every law, governmental policy, and action of his Administration that contradicts a single jot or tittle of the neo-Bolsheviks’ agenda—enforcing these incessant complaints with massive orchestrated disruptions of the political, legal, and social order, thereby creating a new order based upon chaos, on the strength of which the neo-Bolsheviks hope to usurp the power of “a state within the state”, with President Trump reduced to an impotent, ridiculous “bubblehead”.

At first glance, “the color revolution’s” reliance on strong-arm tactics appears to impale this country on the horns of a dilemma (which, no doubt, is the neo-Bolsheviks’ intention). On the one hand, “the good People” cannot be left to the mercy of neo-Bolshevist thugs, unable to protect themselves unless they turn to the kind of ad hoc self-help that smacks of vigilantism—for that will reduce this country to an ungovernable condition, inasmuch as “order” imposed without “law” (other than “the law of the jungle”) is not “government” at all. Yet, on the other hand, true constitutionalists must stand firm against the all-too-natural inclination of ordinary citizens assaulted by massive social unrest to “tighten the screws” by employing police-state tactics up to and including “martial law”—for that will render this country ungovernable, too, inasmuch as “martial law” is not a form of government permissible under the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The only sure and certain way to avoid both of these mutually undesirable alternatives is to revitalize the Militia, thereby returning to “the good People” the ability, together with the absolute legal authority, to protect themselves. See my book By Tyranny Out of Necessity: The Bastardy of “Martial Law” (Ashland, Ohio: Bookmasters, Inc., Revised & Expanded Second Edition, 2014, 2016), especially at 531-676.

After all, as America’s sovereigns WE THE PEOPLE are “the government”—both as its source and as its ultimate executors, as well as its beneficiaries. Public officials can do nothing—at least legitimately—without THE PEOPLE’S approval and coöperation, both passive and active. So if (as the White House’s post opines) “keep[ing] the innocent safe” is “the first duty of government”, then it is the first duty of THE PEOPLE themselves—who, having the greatest incentive to remain safe, will surely be most assiduous in fulfilling it. And because “keep[ing] the innocent safe” is obviously a defining characteristic of what the Second Amendment calls “the security of a free State”, then the revitalization of “well regulated Militia”—composed of THE PEOPLE themselves—is “necessary” to that end.

7. President Trump must also take into account that the open neo-Bolshevist “color revolution” is not the only, or even the most dangerous, subversive force deployed against his Administration, as well as against himself personally. He must also reckon with what students of these matters denote as “the Deep State”—namely, the clandestine rogue apparatus lodged within the bowels of the “military-industrial” and especially the “national-security” complexes, which considers itself the real “state within the state”, ruling over this country as a law unto itself alone. See, e.g., Paul Craig Roberts, “The Trump Presidency: RIP”, Paul Craig Roberts Institute for Political Economy (16 February 2017); and my commentary “An Ominous Start” (1 January 2017) at <edwinvieira.com>, pages 6-7.

In the long run, it does not much matter whether the Deep State is proceeding independently along the same lines as the neo-Bolsheviks, or whether it is loosely allied with them, or whether it is a full partner in their operations, or even whether it is actually in control of the whole shebang—for the immediate goal of both the Deep State and the neo-Bolsheviks is the same: to wit, the utter destruction both of the Trump Administration and of Mr. Trump himself, with their ultimate purpose being the defeat of WE THE PEOPLE’S reassertion of constitutional authority over this country. (Although, as Mark Twain quipped, history does not repeat itself, it often rhymes, the closest historical couplet in this case being, of course, the tacit alliance between the “left-fascist” Stalin and the “right-fascist” Hitler, through which the German Communist Rotenfrontkämpferbund effectively colluded with its supposed opponent, the Nazi Sturmabteilung, to overthrow the social-democratic Weimar Republic and set the stage for the Second World War. See, e.g., Viktor Suvorov, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II [Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2013]).

Whatever the relationship between the fascistic “right” of the Deep State and the equally fascistic “left” of American neo-Bolshevism may be, the Deep State has already revealed its own hand, in spades, in the recent “Flynn-flammery” it has apparently imposed on President Trump. See, e.g., Richard Pollock, “EXCLUSIVE: How The Nation’s Spooks Played The Game ‘Kill Mike Flynn’”, The Daily Caller (15 February 2017); Jay Syrmopoulos, “Open Warfare Declared In DC As Deep State ‘Goes Nuclear’–Trump ‘Will Die In Jail’”, The Freethoughtproject (15 February 2017); Pepe Escobar, “The Swamp Strikes Back”, Offguardian (16 February 2017); and Joachim Hagopian, “Reasons Why Michael Flynn Was Fatality #1 in the Trump Presidency”, LewRockwell.com (17 February 2017).1 The only adequate response to this dire threat is for President Trump to bring to bear against the Deep State the full power of constitutional “law enforcement”, and sweep all of the renegades out of the “military-industrial” and “national-security” complexes with an iron broom. Compare 18 U.S.C. §§ 2383 through 2385 (the emergent problem) with 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333 (a necessary part of the solution).

8. In the final analysis, if the Trump Administration intends to “stand[ ] up for our law enforcement community” in the fullest constitutional sense of that promise, it must first recognize of whom “our law enforcement community” actually consists—namely, WE THE PEOPLE themselves—and then realize that “standing up” for that “community” demands the revitalization of those constitutional institutions in which WE THE PEOPLE personally participate, to the point of exercising actual day-to-day decision and direction. If President Trump does nothing else during his tenure in office, he must leave America with the permanent legacy of “well regulated Militia” in every one of the several States, able to “execute the Laws of the Union” in “the actual Service of the United States” against all enemies, whether foreign interlopers or (especially) domestic subversives. And he must begin to do so immediately. For his—and America’s—enemies will not afford him the luxury of being able to “play for time”. Today is his time. Tomorrow will be too late. Procrastination was apparently President Kennedy’s undoing. See, e.g., JFK and the Unspeakable. Why He Died and Why It Matters (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 2008; reprinted, New York, New York: Touchstone, 2010). President Trump would be well advised to take that lesson to heart.

[1]. Some supporters of President Trump have floated the alternative explanation that Flynn’s resignation was actually part of the normal course of events within the Administration. See “Dr. Steve Pieczenik Says Michael Flynn Was Purposefully Removed, The Left Are Intellectual Frustrated Children”, iBankCoin (16 February 2017). This thesis is exceedingly difficult to credit, however. For it would have been both unnecessary and highly counterproductive for the Administration to subscribe to a narrative based on Flynn’s telephonic indiscretion and later dishonesty in describing his behavior, together with allegations of “leaks” by person or persons unknown inside but hostile to the Administration, when a simple press-release stating that Flynn had resigned to make way for a better-qualified replacement would have sufficed—without providing the big “mainstream media” with additional ammunition for their on-going barrage that President Trump is a crony, a stooge, a dupe, or otherwise an “asset” of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

U.S. Senators Charles Schumer, John McCain, Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer provide excellent examples for the need for term limits.

U.S. House members Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, John Lewis and John Conyers, Jr. prove the need for term limits in the House.

At 80, Senator John McCain, (R-AZ), fails to function with any understanding of what’s going on in America in 2017.  California Senator Diane Feinstein faces her 85th birthday coming up.  Totally out of touch with what’s happening in modern day California!  Barbara Boxer, 76, clings to power with little comprehension of the calamities facing California.

Each of them should have turned themselves out to pasture 20 years ago.  It takes brains, vitality, energy and comprehension of current realities to guide a nation in the 21st century.

Instead, over the age of 80, many, many people face dementia challenges, loss of memory and the inability to make articulate solutions or decisions.

As in the case of House member Nancy Pelosi, 77, her ranting in front of Congress illustrates a desperate need for term limits.  John Conyers from Michigan tips the scale at 86 years of age.  Maxine Waters of California and John Lewis illustrate the need for Congressional members to possess at least a high school education.  In her last speech, she demanded we win the war with Korea.  She wants to impeach Trump after a month in office.  Lewis told the press, “Trump isn’t a legitimate president.”

If you visited the offices of our over-70 crowd of Congressional members, oftentimes, aides cover for their bosses’ shortcomings.  Speechwriters make them sound like competent elected officials—but in reality, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers remain totally disconnected from current realities facing America.

Why do constituents re-elect them term after term?

That must be the question of the century!  If you look at Senator John McCain, he signed the 1986 Immigration Amnesty to give instant citizenship to 4,000,000 illegal aliens. He promised to secure the borders so that wouldn’t happen again.  Thirty-one years later he wants another amnesty of over 20 million illegal aliens.  He failed his state of Arizona, which suffers hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens—which siphon taxes from schools, medical care, anchor babies, ESL courses, free breakfast and lunch programs, illegal workers, fraud, unpaid taxes by employers, crime, drunk driving, rapes, robberies, shoplifting and car thefts.

In other words, he turned his own state into a Third World country.

Senator Charles Schumer, (D-NY), undermines the current president based on party rather than responsibility to the American people. Instead of confirming cabinet appointees, Schumer creates inane headlines like the Russians pulled the levers in the voting booths across this country.  If Hillary Clinton had won the White House, you would never hear a word about the Russians.

Schumer undercuts Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court.  If Hillary Clinton had won, Schumer would have rubber stamped the nomination.

British Lord Acton said, “Power corrupts; and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Our Constitutional Republic needs fresh blood, fresh minds, and fresh bodies representing 328 million American citizens.  It needs new ideas, workable plans and forward thinking leaders from all 50 states.

Einstein said, “The problems in the world today are so enormous, they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them.”

Therefore, we need to rid ourselves of the Schumer’s, McCain’s and Feinstein’s, et al., who got us into the mess we’re in today.  Since the U.S. electorate that keeps electing those old ditties cannot grasp the Acton quote, we need to help them and ourselves down the road to a higher calling with term limits.

U.S. Senators:  12 years maximum terms.

U.S. House of Representatives:  6 years maximum terms.

A huge percentage of Congressional members prove themselves career corrupt criminals.  If they weren’t, you would see changes for the better instead of everything for the worse.

With term limits, you wouldn’t see every toaster, ladder, washer, dryer, refrigerator and 90 percent of our mercantile goods arriving from China.  You wouldn’t see $19.5 trillion in national debt because honest politicians serving our country would fix that financial mess instead of kicking the can down the road.  You wouldn’t see our borders totally open and 20 to 31 million illegal aliens roaming around our country.  You wouldn’t see trade deficits because they are killing our country.  We could manufacture the same products with our workers.

You would see responsible citizen politicians ready to shut down our borders to mass immigration because it’s destroying the fabric of our society.  We don’t need more immigrants, but we do need more jobs for our 48 million citizens subsisting on food stamps.

Term limits: their time has come.

It is time to take the Bull of Islam by the Horns and call it out for what it is.

“There is no such thing as “radical Islam.” I have refused to accept several organizations that seek to combat or expose the antics of “radical” or “extreme” Islam, because I know that it is not extremism that is causing the violence…it’s mainstream, typical, normal, traditional, specified, canonical [based on religious law] Islam.”  Amil Imani  (See more below.) [emphasis added]

“Making Allah the author of the Quran, I think, is the prime lie perpetrated on mankind for more than a millennium. We can, with certainty, say that it was not even Muhammad alone who authored the Qur’an. In fact, the major part of the Qur’an was either composed by or inspired and written by a few other individuals. Abul Kasem at FaithFreedom.org  Kasem lists at least 15 people instrumental in compiling the Quran (Koran). [emphasis added]

Taqlid (or taqleed): explained:  Taqlid is the belief that Allah is the One God.  Mohammad was his prophet.  The Quran (and the Hadith and Sira) are eternal and perfect.  No questions will be entertained.  It will always be as it has always been.  Masha Allah. (God has willed it).

There are nuances in taqlid.  Certain special people are more knowledgeable and are to be followed but there are many confusing exceptions if they put out contradictory statements.

Generally Taqlid means that Islam cannot be reformed or changed or improved or altered.  It is perfect as is.

Ponder that.  Take in fully what it means.

The Quran on Violence: Excerpts –

Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”

Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

Quran (4:74) – “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.”

Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned;

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah”

Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them)

Sahih Muslim (1:33) – the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.

Sahih Bukhari (11:626) – [Muhammad said:] “I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes.”

Sahih Muslim (1:149) – “Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause…”

Sahih Muslim (20:4696) – “the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'”  [A sentence to Hell in Islam.]

Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, “Kill any Jew who falls under your power.”

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

Contemporary Sunni theologian al-Qaradawi: “It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of people of Dar al-Harb  [ie. non-Muslim people who resist Islamic conquest]  is not protected… In modern war, all of society, with all its classes and ethnic groups, is mobilized to participate in the war, to aid its continuation, and to provide it with the material and human fuel required for it to assure the victory of the state fighting its enemies. Every citizen in society must take upon himself a role in the effort to provide for the battle. The entire domestic front, including professionals, laborers, and industrialists, stands behind the fighting army, even if it does not bear arms.”

Is al-Qaradawi clear enough that ALL Muslims are to support jihad?

If you cling tenaciously to Islam then you can never be a moderate, no matter how much you keep your mouth shut.  Islam is as Islam does.

ARE THE ROSE COLORED GLASSES OFF YET?

So, shall we join a beheading in progress?  Religiously it is preferred that they start with the front of the neck in order to release large quantities of blood, praying to Allah, while then using a sharp blade and brute force to shatter bones that get in the way.

Here and  Here  and Here are Muslim beheading videos from the Net.  I do not recommend watching these if you enjoy sleeping the sleep of  bliss or if you are a Snowflake…  And I seriously recommend AGAINST watching any of these if you have PTSD.

The middle link is to Walid Shoebat’s site.  Walid is a converted Christian Palestinian Arab who has lots more moxy than I do.  With his intent and intense ongoing war against Islam I find it hard to believe that he still walks this earth.

His site is always pro-Christian.  And his site is often graphic, or horrific, if you prefer, as he chronicles the gut wrenching, vicious, brutal, barbaric attacks of Muslims against others.

VICIOUS IS AS VICIOUS DOES

If beheadings aren’t your interest, how about “female genital mutilation”?  That’s what the media euphemistically call it.  The UN has estimated that 200 million women in 30 countries have been mutilated.

Clitorectomy (or clitoridectomy) is the complete – or partial – removal of the girl’s clitoris.  This can be done with old broken glass shards, used razors, or anything else that’s sharp enough to cut into her.

And this unbelievably cruel “cutting” is usually done between the ages of  5 and 15 so the memory will always be there.  There is no medical reason for doing this.

There is however a male Islamic religious reason for this: to insure sexual fidelity.  If she cannot enjoy sex, then she will be less likely to wander into a dalliance.

It is always stunningly amazing that the “Pink Bonnet Sisters” – that noisy enraged, crazed bastion of pseudo-liberated clitorally-intact foul mouthed fulminating feminists – still eagerly embrace Islam; and Muslim refugees; and the tired old moniker  “The Religion of Peace”.

STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES  (and we’ve got plenty of it…)

Let’s return to Amil Imani . He is an Iranian-American who recently published a piece at NewsWithViews.com called CHRISTIANITY AND RADICAL ISLAM: BREAKING THE SILENCE.

With his permission I have pulled some salient quotes which are meant to roust  the sleeping, pierce the shield of Political Correctness, crack the polished veneers of the “Tolerant”, and otherwise offend fence-sitters.

“As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use for it whatsoever. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form of a Caliphate. Making a mockery of democracy, subverting its workings, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of government, invented by the infidels.” [emphasis added]

“I argue that any belief system that licenses murder in the name of Jihad and the conquering and subduing of the world of the infidels by the Umma  [the Muslim community],  should be outlawed. The prophet Mohammad brewed up a militant, radical and extremely irrational imperialistic cult that sought world dominance. My fellow travelers, let us make one thing clear; Islam is no more a religion deserving our respect or legal recognition than is cannibalism.” [emphasis added]

In Amil’s article he lists 7 “moderate” quotes about Islam from

George W Bush and from Obama.  It is very illustrative to see what these gents had to say about an archaic, cruel, 7^th century, violent, never-to-be reformed (it is forbidden in the Quran) religion that opposes any laws or Constitution other than Sharia, combined with abject prostration to Allah.   Allahu Akbar!

By the way, according to Robert Spencer what Allahu Akbar really means is,
“God is greater!”  emphasizing that Allah is superior to all, without exception.

“Islamic terrorists are doing exactly what the prophet Muhammad demanded. And his demands were not suggestions and were not ephemeral. They were “perfect,” eternal ultimata.  Islamic terrorists are faithful and true to what is written in the book of Quran.”   From Amil.

The point here is, so are all practicing Muslims.  TAQLID is the unquestioning imitation of precedent.  They are not allowed to “reform” their religion.  Muhammad was the perfect example.  Mohammad was the Prophet of Allah.  Allah wrote the Quran (Koran).

Any Muslim openly disagreeing with Taqlid would at the very least be an apostate –  a denier of the tenets of Islam –  offensive in the eyes of Allah, and likely headed to a quick and possibly very awful death.

But remember always that the Quran allows lies, deceit, cruelty, machinations, and anything else that a Muslim believes will advance Islam.  No Muslim is bound to any honor in dealing with the infidels, the unbelievers, the Kafir.

The upshot here is that ALL Muslims – Muslims being anyone who has embraced the religion of Islam – are bound to Sharia, the Code of Law derived from the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sira.  It is not for them to question but to obey without question.  True, some are more militant than others but the universal truth is that Islam must rule the world by Caliphate; that all will be Muslims; or tax-paying subordinates to Muslims; or dead.

“I know that it is not extremism that is causing the violence…it’s mainstream, typical, normal, traditional, specified, canonical Islam.”   Amil Imani

ISLAM IS AS ISLAM DOES.  Masha Allah.  [God has willed it so.]

The Trump Administration is evaluating how best to transfer back to the states powers that have been usurped by the federal government since the New Deal, including an ever greater role planned for the states in public education, health care, public safety, land management, and pollution control.  There is in the President’s intended devolution of power to the states an opportunity for reduction in federal spending and in state burdens.  There is also an opportunity for the Trump Administration to evaluate every unfunded federal mandate imposed on the states and eliminate all which are redundant of state functions or interfere with state-tailored means to address the underlying issues, which means are likely to be less costly and more effective.  This devolution of power signals a return to dual federalism, including less federal paternalism and more state-centric solutions to the peculiar problems of each state’s citizens.

During the Reagan Administration, President Reagan issued Executive Order 12291 and Congress passed the State and Local Cost Estimate Act of 1981.  Those measures were designed to quantify the cost to the states of unfunded federal mandates.  Hundreds of pieces of federal legislation contain unfunded mandates, including prominently the No Child Left Behind Act, Medicaid, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Safe Drinking Act, the Wilderness Act, and the Endangered Species Act.  No one knows for sure the total cost to the states of the mandates now imposed nationwide but they are likely in the tens of billions of dollars.

The order of federal business since the New Deal has been to remove discretion from the states by imposing federal fiats of one kind or another, frequently without funding support.  Those legislative commands either compel the states to undertake initiatives at state expense to receive other federal benefits or compel the states to act without any financial help.  Over the last thirty years traditional state functions in education, health and welfare, and criminal justice have been usurped by the federal government, leaving much of the cost of compliance on the states.

As was apparent at the recent National Governors’ Conference, a majority of Governors view the mandates as overwhelming, rendering the states increasingly mere functionaries of the federal government, and denying the states discretionary funds sufficient to implement their own tailored plans at less cost.

The great deregulation initiative commenced on February 24 with President Trump’s Executive Order on Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda should be followed by an additional Executive Order to require a review with the aid of the states’ Attorneys General of all unfunded federal mandates.  That order should anticipate a move by the Administration to alleviate the states of the mandates.

First, all unfunded mandates which are redundant of state functions should be identified as appropriate for repeal.  Second, all anachronistic unfunded mandates and those which impose costs that exceed benefits should also be up for termination.  Third, all mandates in areas that could more appropriately be addressed by state and local officials should likewise be slated for elimination.

Then, with the mandates identified that are in need of elimination and the support of a majority of the nation’s Governors, the Trump Administration’s allies in Congress should introduce legislation to eliminate the unfunded mandates.  The reduction in cost burdens pm the states combined with the greater freedom the states will acquire to address issues of education, health care, public safety, land management, and pollution will lead to less costly and more efficient government overall, as well as to a revitalization of the dual federalist constitutional system intended by the Founding Fathers.

In my long life time I have never seen what we’re seeing right now after the legitimate election of Donald Trump. It’s understandable and normal for any losing candidate to feel disappointment over not winning the grand prize – that includes the candidate’s supporters. But, Hildebeast Clinton’s mentally unhinged followers are dangerous and becoming more so by the day.

So is the criminal impostor, Barry Soetoro aka Obama, who left the White House in January. Barry never had any intention of leaving politics behind and do what is considered normal for departing presidents: astronomical bucks for speeches, vacations and book deals. Allegedly Barry and that foul piece of baggage he’s married to – Moochelle – have been offered a package deal: one book by each of them for a cool $60 million.

Nice work if you can get it and all you have to be is a die hard Marxist who sold his country down the road. Or, a fake First Lady who swam through train cars of taxpayer dollars for eight years to support her privileged and lavish lifestyle. $85 million in new debt slapped on our backs.

It was reported last week another communist sympathizer, former WH Senior adviser to the fake president, Valerie Jarrett, has moved into Barry and Moochelle’s new mansion in DC. Also reported is the old community organizer, Obama, has been busy organizing large numbers of blind zealots to do his bidding: Destroy President Trump, his cabinet picks and his promise to the voters. I assume that’s why the former ‘shadow president’ (Jarrett) moved into a married couple’s mansion so close to the capitol and White House.

FBI Files Document Communism in Valerie Jarrett’s Family

Every day of the week it’s one accusation after another after another against President Trump or one of his people. Even when there is no proof the accusations –  think Russia –  the prostitute media, mainstream newspapers, talk radio and cable news networks just continue beating a dead horse with the biggest, flashiest and untrue headlines.

The hot one right now is the Obama (fake) administration spied on President Trump. Officials Not Denying Trump Wiretapping, Obama Claiming No Involvement. We know damn well Obama would never get his hands dirty: “I’d be careful about reporting that Obama said there was no wiretapping. Statement just said that neither he nor the WH ordered it.”

“The evidence is overwhelming…They went to the FISA Court twice.”
Lewandowski: Obama Bugged Senator Sessions While He Was STILL SENATOR Last Year (VIDEO)
NSA Whistleblower: Agency ‘Absolutely’ Tapping Trump’s Calls
US Senator Demands Public Release of FISA Court Warrant Request from Alleged Obama Surveillance of Trump Tower

Could this be another Watergate? Considering how stupid Hillary and Obama’s operatives have been over the years, well, could be. I guess we’ll find out more in the coming weeks.

We know that inside some of the intelligence agencies are Obama hold overs that should be booted as soon as possible. The leaks coming out of foggy bottom are criminal and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should get to it. Unfortunately, James Comey is still the director of the FBI and on March 4, 2017 Comey turned on Trump: Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump’s Wiretapping Claim – “Mr. Comey’s request is a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president, putting the nation’s top law enforcement official in the position of questioning Mr. Trump’s truthfulness.”

It’s enough to gag a maggot and yet millions of Americans believe all those red herrings tossed around because their blind loyalty is to the Democratic/Communist Party USA, they hate President Trump or they’re too lazy to actually try to verify what’s shoved down their throats.

Over the course of Obama’s illegitimate ‘presidency’ America has become so racially divided and charged I’m surprised there haven’t been even more riots. Obama’s support of the foul and toxic fake religion, Islam, has put this country at great risk. Anyone who has done enough research fully understands how Muslims come into a country and work full time to take it over and establish their totalitarian Sharia Law. Obama and his minions worked tirelessly to see it happen.

President Trump on the other hand came charging into town and said, oh, no – the corruption has to stop. Destroying American jobs through ‘free’ trade treaties has to stop. The massive illegals invasion fully supported by the Democratic/Communist Party USA, the ACLU and numerous pro- illegals groups has to stop. Not only are we taking in millions who sneak into our house, they go right on the gravy train while Americans struggle each day. That has to stop. Allowing terrorists and drug cartels to cross our borders has to stop.

The list of what President Trump is trying to accomplish which will benefit ALL Americans is being rejected by the Trump haters even though each one of them (except the illegals) will benefit. Trump haters are too stupid and too indoctrinated to understand what I just wrote. As a matter of fact, those useful fools are embarking on a March 15th post card day around the world: Send your hateful post card to President Trump and tell him we do not want him or his plans to save this country:

“On March 15th, each of us will mail Donald Trump a postcard that publicly expresses our opposition to him. And we, in vast numbers, from all corners of the world, will overwhelm the man with his unpopularity and failure. We will show the media and the politicians what standing with him—and against us—means. And most importantly, we will bury the White House post office in pink slips, all informing Donnie that he’s fired!

“No alternative fact or Russian translation will explain away our record-breaking, officially-verifiable, warehouse-filling flood of fury. Hank Aaron currently holds the record for fan mail, having received 900,000 pieces in a year. We’re setting a new record: over a million pieces in a day, with not a single nice thing to say.

“So sharpen your wit, unsheathe your writing implements, and see if your sincerest ill-wishes can pierce Donald’s famously thin skin. (Dump Despicable Donnie! He’s not my President! Impeach Dumpy Donnie! Not smart enough to be my President! Stop walking all over our Constitution! Donnie the dictator belongs in Russia!). “Prepare for March 15th, 2017, a day hereafter to be known as #TheIdesOfTrump”

Yes, there is an internal war going on in this country fed by Soros money and true radicals who hate freedom and liberty. A dangerous internal war deliberately fostered and funded to overthrow a legally elected president less than two months into office.

Bolstered by all the political bickering and lies coming out of Washington, DC and the airwaves, low information party loyals simply cannot accept reality. All they see is the hatred they spew at Presdient Trump, his family and administration. I’ve said it so many times before: Donald Trump was somewhat of an American icon before he decided to run. There was never any hint of racism and in fact the opposite is true based on his actions and generosity.

There was no hint of anti-semitism; his daughter, Ivanka, is married to a Jew. There was nothing but we love ‘The Donald’ on the Apprentice and all his other and various interests and businesses – like world class hotels and golf courses. Now, he’s hated like nothing I’ve ever seen.

The silent majority came out last November and finally had their voices roar last November. Americans came out by the tens of millions to vote for Trump. Not just Republicans, but independents and Democrats alike. White, black, Latino, Mexican – it didn’t’ matter. What mattered is what Trump promised to do for them.

Due to the massive attacks on Trump and his people every day with sickening casualties like Gen. Mike Flynn, those who voted for President Trump are out in cities across the country holding rallies in support of him and what he’s trying to accomplish.

This past Saturday peaceful Americans who gathered to support Trump were met with violence – just like ‘controversial’ speakers on college campuses who happen to be conservative. One man at a Trump rally was badly bloodied by fools who shout they’re trying to Stop Fascism! when they don’t even know what they’re talking about.

ACLU, CAIR, Obama, Soros, and Others Sued for Allegedly Inciting Violence Over Trump’s Executive Order Over Muslim Immigration

Complaint Alleges Klayman Was Assaulted By Muslim Woman at LAX Airport

(Los Angeles, Ca., March 2, 2017). “Today, Larry Klayman, the founder of both Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch and a former federal prosecutor filed a complaint before the U.S. District for the Central District of California (Case No. 2:17-cv-01705), alleging that the ACLU, the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) (which was previously named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal terrorist trial in Texas), Barack Obama, George Soros, and former Attorney General Eric Holder, whose law firm represents the ACLU in various matters, and other named defendants all conspired and acted to further violent protests over President Trump’s initial executive order to implement a 90-day moratorium on immigration for 7 predominantly Muslim Middle Eastern countries.

“As a result of this alleged incitement to violent protests, the complaint alleges that Klayman was assaulted by a Muslim woman in the baggage claim area of Southwest Airlines. Just weeks earlier a terrorist attack had occurred in the baggage claim area at Ft. Lauderdale International Airport, killing and severely wounding several travelers. Klayman, the complaint alleges, thus believed at the time of the assault at LAX that he and others were under terrorist attack and about to be killed or severely harmed physically.

“During the time of the protests of President Trump’s initial immigration order, the ACLU, allegedly whipping up violent protest in concert with other defendants, raised reportedly over 24 million USD in just one weekend, profiting from its alleged illegal actions. The complaint thus alleges that this was in effect a racketeering enterprise.

“Klayman had this to say upon filing the complaint: “The ACLU, CAIR, Obama, Soros and Holder and the other defendants must be held to account for their actions, in my opinion designed to destroy the Trump presidency to further their socialist and pro-Muslim agendas. I got caught in their crossfire. I therefore will not stand by and allow the nation to be destroyed by these leftists who have no respect for law and order! My complaint asks for over ten million USD in damages, as well as punitive damages for these malicious acts to prevent this from happening again.” For more information or to view the complaint, go to www.freedomwatchusa.org or contact daj142182@gmail.com or (424) 274 2579.

George Soros became an American citizen purely for monetary reasons and to be closer to the ugly violence he supports and promotes. Soros is about an evil an individual as you will come across. Personally, I think he should be indicted and tried for sedition.

Klayman is also going after other who promote violence and mayhem:

* Dallas Sergeant Demetrick Pennie and Larry Klayman ask court for emergency hearing over death threats allegedly furthered or made by defendants in lawsuit against Farrakan, Nation of Islam, Sharpton and others to stop violence against police and other law enforcement officers

* Sergeant Demetrick Pennie of Dallas Police Department becomes plaintiff in class action suit against Black Lives Matter, Farrakhan, Nation of Islam, Sharpton, Eric Holder, Obama, Clinton, Soros and others over allegedly inciting and financing threats and violence against law enforcement!

While the attacks against President Trump, his cabinet and nominations play out in the media, it appears violence is going to be the push back by those who hate him and all he’s trying to do for this country.  They are being egged on by other departed Obama cabinet members as well as Democrat incumbents in Congress.

Loretta Lynch: Need more marching, blood, death on streets – Senate Dems post her impassioned plea on Facebook page as ‘words of inspiration’

Mousy little ‘met with Billy Clinton fame’ – has graduated to revolutionary. How quaint. How dangerous.

Will the violence become more violent and widespread by Trump haters and Muslims biding their time? It will unless Democrats in Congress, Democratic ‘civil’ rights leaders and scum like Jarrett and her old boss come out and take a firm stand and condemn the violence. Otherwise, I believe we will see America again as it was in the 70s over Viet Nam – a burning nation. Too bad not a single state in the Union has reconstituted the constitutional militia to deal with just such a situation.

Links:

1 –  Absolutely must listen to Jon Rappaport. Bookmark it!
2 –  Scientists Successfully Store Computer Data Files In DNA

[Newswithviews.com operates strictly on donations from you the reader. There are no salaries or perks. It costs a bundle of money every month to run a site as large as NWVs. If you want to see NWVs continue it’s critical work, please make a donation right NOW. Please do not assume someone else will because when that happens, no funds come in for operations. So, please click here and make that donation before you move on to something else. Thanks so much.]

President Barack Obama, who possesses quite a history of ordering wiretaps and computer hackings of his perceived enemies, is being accused on Saturday of having had his minions wiretap the campaign headquarters of a GOP candidate he feared would eliminate his so-called legacy.

According to a number of news stories, President Donald Trump accused former President Obama of ordering his Trump Tower phones tapped during the final weeks of Trump’s campaign leading up to his November 8, 2016 election victory over Hillary Clinton.

In tweets posted early Saturday morning, the President compared Obama’s alleged wiretapping to both “McCarthyism” and “Nixon/Watergate.”

“Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism,” Trump said in his Twitter post at 6:35 a.m.

At 6:49 a.m., President Trump wrote: “Is it legal for a sitting President to be “wire tapping” a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!”

While Trump appears to know there’s blood in the water of the Democrats, he has not revealed how he discovered Obama’s alleged espionage, which appears to have been conducted without proper procedure.

“This is a serious charge against a former president, but Obama does have a history of spying on perceived enemies. Fox News Channel’s Washington correspondent James Rosen was one of the targets of an Obama spy operation as was CBS News’ Emmy-winning journalist Sharyl Attkinsson,” said former police detective, attorney and political strategist Joel Murray.

“In fact, CBS practically helped Obama’s people persecute Attkinsson, which isn’t really a stretch since her boss at CBS News was David Rhodes, the brother of Obama’s deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes who has his own controversies,” Murray added.

Ironically, Ben Rhodes tweeted a response to Trump’s statements: “No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you.” However, Rhodes has been caught several times bending the truth and he once admitted lying in order to get Americans to accept the Iranian nuclear deal.

Also former President Obama called the allegations false. He said that “neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen.”

“A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice,” said Kevin Lewis in a statement released hours after accusations that Obama ordered a “Nixon/Watergate” plot to wiretap the telephones in Trump Tower prior to the 2016 presidential election.

“As part of that practice,” continued Lewis, “neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen.”

But those statements by Lewis and Rhodes may be departures from the record. In the case of journalist James Rosen, according to The Guardian, a left-wing British newspaper, instead of relying on the threat of a contempt charge to get journalists to divulge their sources, the Obama administration used warrantless wiretapping and dragnet records seizures to identify who was talking to whom.

ELECTRONIC EAVESDROPPING

According to electronic eavesdropping expert Jacob Gusack, “wire” communications are made through the use of wire, cable or similar connection between the point of origin and the point of reception: it’s the classic telephone call. In order for a communication to be by “wire,” it must contain a human voice. So, an e-mail message doesn’t qualify.

Oral communications are uttered or spoken, and the speaker has an expectation that it’s private and will not be intercepted. For example, there is no violation of the Act when agents intercept and record a prisoner’s conversations with other inmates because the prisoner has no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison.

“An ‘electronic’ communication is one that does not contain the human voice, but contains things like words or pictures. E-mail messages are the best example of such communications.

“Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which protects e-mail messages from interception and disclosure to third parties, an exception allows employers to monitor employee email in the ordinary course of business. Although the meaning of that exception is not yet settled, it may permit an employer to monitor “business-related,” but not personal, communications, or courts may look to whether the employer had a legitimate business reason for monitoring employee communications,” Gusack, a former police surveillance expert, noted.

Knowing that Trump and his family have access to some of law enforcement’s and private security’s top officials, it is not difficult for the new President to find out if his privacy was compromised. These New York City firms — usually comprised of retired police officials and federal law enforcement agents — are routinely hired to “sweep” facilities.

According to Frank Sizemore, a retired police captain, he and his operatives inspect power lines, selected telephone lines, cellular phones, land line phones with bug detection equipment, Telephone Analyzers, telephone line analysis and instrument analysis.

They also use discreet detection equipment to detect hidden electronic devices and any bugs, regardless of whether the wiretap or bug device is hard wired, wireless / radiating or not. A complete physical search is conducted within interior surfaces, wall plates, phones, ceilings, lamps, furniture, planters, wall decorations, ventilation ducts, lighting fixture and electrical fixtures.

In 1969 a 22 year old woman, who had previously attempted suicide, unmarried, unemployed and pregnant for the third time sought to have an abortion in a State that understanding God’s Law ruled that it was illegal. There was a group of lawyers who learned of her desire and they conspired together to change the law. The subsequent lawsuit, resulted in the 1973 Supreme Court’s infamous opinion know as Roe v. Wade. Her name was not Roe, she was Norma McCorvey. She gave birth to the “Roe” baby in June 1970 almost three years before the Supreme Court opinion was written. What did Norma do after giving birth she gave her daughter to a loving adoptive family. She chose life.

After the court’s ruling, McCorvey had lived quietly for several years before revealing herself as Jane Roe in the 1980s. She also confessed to lying when she said the pregnancy was the result of rape.

Decades later, McCorvey underwent a conversion, becoming an evangelical Christian and joining the pro life movement. She said,

“I don’t believe in abortion even in an extreme situation. If the woman is impregnated by a rapist, it’s still a child. You’re not to act as your own God,” she told The Associated Press in 1998. What she came to understand was that she had been lied to and used by those committed to child sacrifice. She understood that from the moment of conception a baby is human being made in the image of God and precious in His sight. She came to see what an horrific evil was wrought by that law suit she participated in. She repented and worked diligently to undo the opinion which had unleashed this weapon of mass destruction. She confessed that she had lied, that she was lied to and she was used to do a wicked thing. She came to the truth, seeing that the lie called abortion murdered 60 million babies in America. A week ago yesterday Norma went to be with her Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, passing from this world in a Katy, Texas assisted living facility after serving her Lord as a most unique and powerful pro-life witness for 22 years.

What we learn from her story of tragedy and redemption is that there is truth and there is a lie. When you follow the lie, death, hell and destruction come your way; but when you follow the truth eternal life, joy and fulfillment follow.

Lies are not without consequences – even severe consequences. And lies are often accompanied by two supporting companions. Let’s look at the terrible trio this morning with an eye to understanding how to escape the rat trap of lies in Titus 1:10.

The Word of God is the ultimate lie detector – if we have ourselves immersed in the Word of God we will be equipped to detect all sorts of lies. You do not discover the lies by studying the lies, instead the more your are filled with the knowledge of the truth, the better you will be at detecting the lies. And there are many lies today – perhaps we should speak of an epidemic of falsehood of which the fake news is just the tip of the iceberg because there is the whole realm of fake science as well. Just for example consider the mantra of global warming. It has been shown to be based on scientists lying about the evidence. Consider four of the big ones, the massive lies – there is a multitude more but these four are big ones.

• Evolution – denying the only eyewitness to the Creation.
• Human life begins only when the umbilical cord is cut – this is the lie underpinning the deception of abortion.
• Man can change the Law – i.e. Redefining marriage for example.
• Man is basically good.

The Sword of the Lord dispels each of these big lies.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

Video of the Sermon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heI65BPf2yo

In this segment we will look at what our government has allowed to pass as healthcare. Agenda calls it ‘sustainable medicine’ but in reality it is far from it.  It should be called sustainable population control.  The thought of actually helping people has never crossed their minds.  What their goal is controlling population growth and, unfortunately, this requires the elimination of people.  Cancer does two things for the designers of Agenda 21 (2030) it makes billions for them and it lowers the population.  You will find that most vaccines now days have chemicals in them that have nothing to do with what you are vaccinated for, mercury is the most commonly used chemical that is a deadly to the human body. Most medical researchers argue that this is probably a coincidence: Autism symptoms tend to become apparent around the same time that children are scheduled to get routine vaccines.

Although there are two separate issues concerning vaccines and autism, they’re often lumped together. One has to do with the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine; the other involves vaccines containing the chemical preservative thimerosal, which contains a form of mercury that has been suspected of causing autism and has recently been removed from most vaccines.

The MMR scare started 10 years ago with a report published in The Lancet that described the cases of eight children who, as their parents recalled, developed autistic symptoms and digestive ailments shortly after getting their first MMR dose. The researchers proposed that the vaccine might trigger a previously unknown form of regressive autism. They suggested that maybe the measles virus in the vaccine lodged in the intestine, causing some kind of reaction that then affected the brain.[1]  Remember in a previous column the former Governor of Colorado, Richard Lamm, stated that we have a ‘duty to die’.  This is the mindset of the Agenda 21 crowd.  Everything has a globalist mentality.  Individualism is discouraged; patriotism is shunned and even shamed in favor of the globalist mentality.  Sustainable Medicine makes decisions through visioning councils that determine what shall be done or not done to each body in its group in its native habitat. Sustainable Medicine experts do not refer to citizens in sovereign nations but to ‘humans’ in their ‘settlements’

Sustainable Medicine uses two classes of public actions to affect the largest numbers of people worldwide most efficiently. The first class of actions attacks high technology products. The method is to create a public health crisis that forces government or industry to eliminate a valuable medical or surgical technology that because of its expense and inequitable distribution makes it medically ‘unsustainable.’ Sustainable Medicine therefore clamors to eliminate such important, life-saving and life-extending medical devices as flexible polyvinylchloride plastic tubings treated with phthalates. During the past 50 years, flexible medical tubing has revolutionized breathing machines, intravenous medicating and blood transfusing, kidney dialysis, parenteral feeding, and neonatal medicine and surgery.

Sustainable Medicine’s second class of public action attacks ideas of high technology scientific progress. The method is to revise people’s expectations for health, for medical care, and for long life in harmony with the environment�. Sustainable Medicine devotees celebrate human death as natural, inevitable, and environmentally beneficial. Rather than a mere right to die, Sustainable Medicine inculcates a duty to die. Sustainable Medicine is the pivot around which all other Sustainable Development revolves. Principle #1 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992) states: Human beings are at the center of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.[2]  Notice the statement ‘life in harmony with nature.  This is a declaration that the concerns of nature come before the concerns of man.

I remember listening to a radio program several years ago and a call in guest was against anything that might harm ‘nature’.  He was a vegetarian by choice because he believed that animals had just as much right to live as a human did.  The radio host gave him a hypothetical situation of the caller and his family were lost in the woods and had not eaten for days.  They were on the verge of starvation and needed to eat.  He had a gun and saw a deer.  Would he shoot the deer to feed his family?  The guest stated he would shoot and eat his son before the animal because the animals were here first and had the right to live.  I can’t remember ever being as shocked as I was at his response.  Biblical statements say the man was here first and then the animals and that Adam named them after they were made.  Now I understand that many ignore what is called intelligent design even those in the church.  Many say that mankind is not supposed to eat meat in a reference to Genesis 1:29  And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.  They think this is a reference to eating only things that grow out of the ground.  They ignore that after the flood God instructed Noah and his family to eat meat: Genesis 9:3  Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.

This is the mentality that is being forced on our kids in public schools.  I am against virtually all public schooling as it is today for that reason.  Even in medical school the emphasis is not really on saving life.  It can’t be when the means for prevention are ignored.  Remember their term ‘sustainable’.  It has a sinister meaning.  It sounds good but is far from it.  Tom DeWeese states: “Sustainable communities encourage people to work together…” There certainly are members of our society who take the whole Sustainablist agenda to heart and love to get involved improving their community. They clean out river banks, collect trash along roadways, recycle, watch their thermostats, and ride their bikes whenever possible. Good for them. That’s their decision and they are free to make it.

But there are others who may have a different vision on how they want to live. Perhaps they don’t agree with the dire predictions about environmental Armageddon. How do they fit in the Agenda for the 21st Century?

They are dealt with. Their children in the public schools are pummeled with the political correctness of being proper environmental stewards. Guilt plays a huge part in that indoctrination. It’s necessary so future generations will be prepared to “work” together in their communities. In addition, in many schools now, the children are required to fulfill a certain number of hours of community service in order to qualify for their diploma. In a Sustainable world, proper attitude is at least as important as scholarship. Today’s curriculum to ensure proper citizenship is called Common Core. It is the curriculum of Agenda 21 and is intended to be “life-long.” [3]

Vaccinations are only a small part of the plan of population control, a deadly part but a small part.  We all have to stay vigilant and be aware of what the politicians are really trying to prepare for us.  A real education is necessary.  The education kids get in public schools are indoctrinations only.

Foot Notes

1. WebMD Special Report: Autism – Searching for Answers
2. Sustainable Medicine + Sustainable Development = Duty to Die – Part 1
3. The “Agenda for the 21st Century” is the root of your fight

A little over a week ago I visited the home of James Madison, the Father of the U.S. Constitution.  I often reflect on his words about this internationally cherished document of governance:

“Every word [of the Constitution] decides a question between power and liberty.”

 Last night I had the opportunity and honor to speak to a full house at an Eagle Forum meeting in Huntington Beach, California.  A member of the audience told me, “Our Governor is ignoring immigration laws and making our state a sanctuary for illegal aliens that are threatening our life, liberty, and property.”  She then asked me, “Why is Trump not doing anything about this?”

It was a great question. However, it is not Trump that should be doing something about it.

Let me explain with the following analogy:

You’re a good parent.  So let’s suppose you think it wise to buy a watchdog so that when your little girl plays in the front yard, the dog can protect and defend her from any intruders who may wish to do her harm.

After a little time goes by the puppy you bought becomes a full-grown animal.  His muscles become fully developed, his teeth are big and sharp, and now he towers over your little girl.   You are worried that he is becoming too aggressive and one day you look out the door and witness your worst fear – you see the dog attacking your daughter.

As you burst out the front door, she has gotten free and is cowering in the corner of the fence by the tree.  The dog is charging across the yard and in a few seconds will be at her throat again.  You only have time to do what your instincts tell you to do, and you throw yourself between the dog and the child – between the danger and the daughter.

You don’t stop to think what will happen to you.  Your desire and your duty come together in an instant.  You thrust yourself between the aggressor and the victim.

What you just did was an act of interposition.

You interposed between the agency that was originally a protector, but had become a threat, and the person you have the duty to protect.

Remember the word — interposition.

The doctrine of interposition is as American as apple pie, baseball, and jazz.

Interposition is precisely what the Declaration of Independence was all about – our Founders interposed for us against tyranny – and it is precisely what we want our state and local officials to do.  Our sheriffs, our police, our local judges, our legislators, and our appointed officials are duty-bound to rush out into the front yard and get between the people and the lawless actions of the federal or, in this case, state government.

Looking to the federal government to fix our state problems is the very reason we have an out of control federal government.  We must stop depending on the “Fed” to fix our states, or most assuredly they will take the power and never return the liberty.  Remember what Madison said?

What we should be looking for is state representatives and senators and sheriffs and judges who will “rush out to the front yard” and interpose between the “Monster of the State” and us.

Video of this Column: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpzbFkrVgK0

While piddling around in my work shop, I heard this sound bite on the radio of Trump talking about his upcoming speech to congress that evening.

President Trump said, “All I can do is speak from the heart and say what I want to do.” I thought, “Wow, what a concept.” Involved as an activist in the business of politics since 2008, I can tell you that Trump has been a laughing stock in the political arena ever since he announced he was running for the presidency.

Look at this clown. He doesn’t behavior like a politician. He doesn’t even know how to speak like a professional politician. No, Trump is just a guy who does not talk down to us and does not ramble on and on with a bunch of intellectual sounding crap. In the black hood where I come from, we called it jive. Obama was a masterful jive talker.

Folks, I relate to Trump because I do not know how to sound smart the way liberals do while advocating insane, evil and ungodly nonsense. My dad is a preacher. My late mom was a domestic worker. They taught all five of their kids to trust God, be responsible, hard work and always try to do the right thing. Thus, I do not know how to sound like a politician. My instincts are to look people in the eye, speak from the heart and tell the truth.

Trump’s down to earth, straight talk nature is exactly why 60 something million Americans have bonded with him. Meanwhile, political snobs and fake news media still do not get it. The political establishment, Obama’s army of domestic terrorists and fake news media will continue using their standard tried and true tactics to destroy Trump. They will fail.

Watching Trump address Congress, it struck me, “Oh my gosh, every common sense thing Trump says he intends to do beneficial to America is vehemently opposed by the democrats.” What on earth has happened to my dad’s Democrat Party? My fellow Americans, our greatest threat is not ISIS. It is the Democrat Party.

Here are just a few Trump putting America first promises that have enraged democrats, launching a scorched earth policy to stop him.

“A new national pride is sweeping across our nation.” Democrat controlled public schools have been teaching our kids that patriotism is racist.

“All the nations of the world—friend or foe—will find that America is strong, America is proud, and America is free.” Remember Obama touring the world apologizing for our greatness?

“We’ve financed and built one global project after another, but ignored the fates of our children in the inner cities of Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit—and so many other places throughout our land.” As an American who happens to be black, it baffled me for years why black democrats seemed content with cities they control like Chicago, Baltimore and Detroit becoming hellholes of black poverty and black on black crime. Then, it dawned on me. Democrat blacks are not black. They are first and foremost liberals who seek power via government control and dependency.

“We’ve defended the borders of other nations, while leaving our own borders wide open, for anyone to cross—and for drugs to pour in at a now unprecedented rate.” Democrats believe America is too white. They want open borders to attract future democrat voters of color.

“Our military will be given the resources its brave warriors so richly deserve.” The Democrat Party leadership are old hippies, flower children who hate our military and guns.

“We have begun to drain the swamp of government corruption by imposing a 5 year ban on lobbying by executive branch officials –- and a lifetime ban on becoming lobbyists for a foreign government.” Folks, taking the power away from the DC cartel and giving it back to We the People as our Founders intended has Trump atop the excrement list of both political parties.

“We have withdrawn the United States from the job-killing Trans-Pacific Partnership.” Democrats hate this. Who do we think we are?

“…my Administration has answered the pleas of the American people for immigration enforcement and border security. By finally enforcing our immigration laws, we will raise wages, help the unemployed, save billions of dollars, and make our communities safer for everyone. We want all Americans to succeed –- but that can’t happen in an environment of lawless chaos. We must restore integrity and the rule of law to our borders.” Folks, democrats say screw the law, screw jobs and screw national security. They want as many unskilled government dependent illegals flooding across our borders as possible. Obama spent a whopping $113 billion, $1,117 each, settling illegals into our country, priming them to become democrat voters.

We’ve heard much about Trump’s narcissism. Call me crazy because I don’t see that when I watch and hear him speak. I see a man aware and humbled by the job placed upon his shoulders, committed to getting it done; committed to keeping his campaign promises; committed to making America great again.

Finally, those on the left, so distressed because their candidate lost, (even though it has been proven she is a crook and has committed sedition against her country), are taking to the streets in full force even going so far as to admit they are worshipping Satan.

What holds more power than the word’s that come forth from one’s mouth?

I would like to remind the left and so called no-Trump Republicans who refuse to support their President, all the Executive Orders that Obama put his signature on applied to everyone. There was no notation at the bottom of the paper that stated this only applies to certain people. You are in as much danger of his orders being used against you as any of the rest of us.

Now you have also taken on the additional challenge of supporting the so called “in danger refugees”. Are you going to feed, clothe, house and provide medical care for them? Most of you “squawker’s” are in college and/or don’t have a job. The working Americans are already carrying your fair share. You don’t know anything about your country or really anything about those in office.

You believe the refugees should come here and be taken care of and I might add, with no background checks. The countries they are coming from do not keep records on the bad guys like we do – how are you going to know if they respect our country or if they want us murdered, paving the way for Sharia Law like in England where they have 80+ active Sharia courts. You do understand don’t you that Sharia is NOT a religion, but Muslim law?  Enough of those who practice Sharia have come right and said we are to die but then if you are now following Lucifer, it really is the same thing. Why aren’t you willing to watch and learn from what has been happening in Europe?

You say they are all friendly and just a few have caused any problems. What if it is your child or parents who are in the line of fire the next time? Who are you going to blame? Lucifer? Police? Certainly, not yourself for supporting this evilness.

You throw in our faces that the churches are helping the refugees come over here and get settled, but you are so out of it you don’t even know they are being paid for their efforts and after 3 months they get to walk away and the refugees are on their own. Once again, I ask you – are you going to feed, clothe, house and provide medical care for them? Take them into your homes and protect them against the rest of the “big, bad Americans”?

You relish in the good things about this country like being able to say what you like and then you follow the likes of someone like Linda Sansour, Palestinian Muslim who supports Sharia and Hamas.

I would like to introduce you to the “invisible” Awan brothers (Abid, Imran and Jamal and Imran’s wife Hina Alvi) who had been hired during the Obama administration and were placed within the State Department.

Last week it was released the 3 brothers who had been hired during Obama’s administration and were placed in the position to manage the IT offices for members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence were let go. Three members of the Intelligence panel and five members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs were among the dozens of members who employed the brothers on a shared basis including Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

Why haven’t you heard about this from the “fake news networks”? Could it be they aren’t willing to admit that ALL the Muslims in this country aren’t “good guys” and some are even connected to CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood and/or both?

The brothers are the very ones the media couldn’t wait to claim they had been mistreated by the Trump administration. Shortly after Trump took office, and before Rex Tillerson was even confirmed as Secretary of State, a slew of State Department officials were removed from their positions (or were forced to resign) as part of an effort to “clean house” at the State Department.  The whole affair was haphazardly covered by the media, especially by Jeff Bezos’s blog, which insinuated that the departures were “an ongoing mass exodus of senior Foreign Service officers who don’t want to stick around for the Trump era.”

When push came to shove and the truth came out, it was revealed part of those who were removed from their positions certainly deserved to lose their jobs and make a trip straight to the jailhouse.

On January 29th, United States Special Forces executed an operation inside Yemen, against al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), with the aim of gathering intelligence and killing leaders of the group.  The raid was planned under the Obama administration, but the decision to execute the raid was “punted” to Trump, using the pretext of waiting for a “low loom” (moonless) night to execute the raid with maximum secrecy:

While the operation had been proposed, it was never green-lighted because Obama felt going into the mission would mark a “significant escalation” in Yemen and should be left to the next administration to decide according to the WSJ. In addition, defense officials expected the Trump administration to be more willing to approve dangerous missions, something that was almost certainly known by any remaining personnel who stayed on after Obama left office.

Though the raid was in many ways a success, the mission is shadowed by the death of Navy SEAL William “Ryan” Owens, (Seal Team 6) as well as injuries to three other servicemen. While the commandos did everything necessary to maintain the element of surprise, it appears as though AQAP adversaries on the ground had advance warning of the attack:  “Initial reports are almost always wrong, but it doesn’t appear to be a failure of planning or intelligence,” said a former special forces officer.

Almost immediately, the raiding force on the ground took intense fire, according to the briefing paper and a senior military official. Occupants of the targeted house and its compound, along with their guard force, moved to a separate cluster of houses nearby where families, including women and children, were staying.

 Armed women also fired on the U.S. and Emirati forces. “There were a lot of female combatants who were part of this,” said Navy Capt. Jeff Davis, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman. “We saw during this operation, as it was taking place, that female fighters ran to pre-established positions — as though they had trained to be ready, and trained to be combatants — and engaged with us.”

While most knew about the Yemen raid, most did not know about the dismissal of the three Awan brothers, Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan.  On February 2nd, they were abruptly removed from their positions of managing information technology for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.  Though they were initially suspected merely of stealing equipment, a connection with the previously-hacked computers of Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) revealed something far more sinister:  Because of the positions the brothers held, it gave them direct access to our military secrets, just like the one that had just taken place.

I would like to add these “men” were all receiving an annual salary of over $160K a year when the average is well under $100K even for those who have worked there for years.

I am at this moment so very proud of my President and his acknowledgment of William “Ryan” Owens and his service to our country in his address to Congress. His address to Williams wife Corrine was heart-felt and sincere. Her emotion and love for her husband very apparent. Too many are gone that Americans have no idea who they are. Trumps remarks to Owens wife will stay etched on the hearts and minds of Americans who care for a very long time.

The fake news media has been more interested in spreading what they hoped was the news rather than what actually was the news. My friend, Captain Joseph R. John (Navy-Ret.) recently wrote an article stating he believed the Muslim Brotherhood “fifth column” has “infiltrated U.S. Government,” and if he is correct, the Awan brothers could very well be a part of this infiltration.

If in doubt of Captain Johns statement, go do your own research and look up all the Muslims that Obama placed in key positions within our government during his term in office.

One of the three Democratic lawmakers who employed the Awan brothers and who is on the HPSCI is Rep. Andre Carson D-IN who is a ranking member on the Emerging Threats subcommittee and also serves on the Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture subcommittee. He is also a Muslim who has what the Center for Security Policy (CSP) calls “extensive and longstanding ties to organizations and individuals associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Two years ago, the center documented those ties in a paper that said:

“Among those with whom Rep. Carson has been involved as a guest speaker, panelist, fundraiser, recipient of funds, etc., are: The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and several of its chapters across the country; the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA); the Muslim American Society (MAS); and the Brotherhood’s new proto-political party, the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO).”

The Justice Department named CAIR and ISNA as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, a criminal plot to provide material support to Hamas terrorists. USCMO and ICNA were also implicated. Federal prosecutors referred to MAS as the “overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

In case you are not aware, in 2010 there was a “CALL TO JIHAD” by Anwar Al-Awlaki.

Just today CAIR was caught storing a huge weapons cash in a Florida mosque to be used for training for Hamas. This is supposed to be a place of worship for these supposed “PEACEFUL” Muslims who practice Sharia. Don’t you believe ISIS when they say their game plan is to murder all who do not believe in Sharia?

Rumors have long been out there stating Muslims were using their Mosque’s for training facilities and more than just worship to Mohammad. It is true that if Muslims living in this country do not support Sharia and want to live among us peacefully they should be welcomed. However, members of the radical groups both within and without our country have time and time again stated if we do not believe in Sharia we are “infidels” and “infidels” are to die.

This same mosque has been calling for churches to be gun free zones. CAIR’s Florida Regional Operations Dir., Nezar Hamze has been very busy spreading his thoughts and ideas about guns to the very people most likely to use them against Americans. The Society of Sarasota and Bradenton not only is anti-American, but they support suicide bombers and their families.

Why is it the Democrats and Satan worshippers only want Conservative Christians to not have any guns? Just what do you suppose would happen if the NRA was giving talks at our local churches or gun classes?

Hired by Obama and deeply embedded within the Muslim Brotherhood and other organizations, you need to be aware of how close these men are to you and your government.

Arif Alikahn, Former Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Policy Development:  Now a Distinguished Visiting Professor of DHS and Counterterrorism at the National Defense University, Alikahn also served as Deputy Mayor for Public Safety for the City of Los Angeles where he reportedly derailed the LAPD’s efforts to monitor the city’s Muslim community — particularly its radical mosques and madrassas where certain 9/11 hijackers were said to have received support. He is affiliated with MPAC, which has called the terrorist group Hezbollah a “liberation movement.”

These men were all exposed in “Rumors of War III”

Salam al-Marayati, Founder and Executive Director of Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC): Marayati is an Iraqi immigrant who drew national attention over a decade ago when then-House Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt nominated him to serve on the National Commission on Terrorism. Backlash over al-Marayati’s defense of Hezbollah and other Islamic groups prompted a withdrawal of the nomination. The Center for Security Policy reports that MPAC was formed in 1986 as the Political Action Committee for the Islamic Center for Southern California, one of the largest Wahhabi mosques in the country. While MPAC later fractioned-off, one of the founders of the Islamic Center, Hassan Hathout, was a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood who also spent time in Egyptian prison.

Mohamed Elibiary, Homeland Security Advisory Committee Member: He is the former president of the Freedom and Justice Foundation, which was billed to “promote a Centrist Public Policy environment in Texas by coordinating the state level government and interfaith community relations for the organized Texas Muslim community.” He spoke at a 2004 conference in Dallas praising the “Great Islamic Visionary” Ayatollah Khomeini.  Most recently he is famous for leaking highly sensitive intelligence documents to a media outlet in Texas.

Rashad Hussain, State Department Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation: The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report uncovered that Hussain spoke at a conference sponsored by the Muslim Brotherhood affiliate, the Association of Muslim Social Scientists. An internal Brotherhood document dubbed the Social Scientists as one of “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” Hussain also spoke at the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding of Georgetown University, which reportedly receives Saudi funding and is directed by Muslim Brotherhood advocate, John Esposito. In 2004, Hussain also participated in the Muslim Students Association’s annual conference, a group founded by the Muslim Brotherhood and known as one of its front-groups. The report also asserts that many of the Student Associations’ nearly 600 college chapters “have engaged in extremism and the group closely collaborates with the other Brotherhood fronts.”

Imam Mohamed Magid, Homeland Security Countering Violent Extremism Working Group Member: He is a Sudanese-born president for the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) with alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. ISNA’s parent is the Muslim Student Association. ISNA completed a $21 million headquarters in Indianapolis using funds raised in part from Muslim Brotherhood.

Eboo Patel, Obama Administration Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships: Patel spoke at a Muslim Students Association and ISNA convention, appearing on a panel alongside Tariq Ramadan, grandson of the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder, and Siraj Wahhaj, who was named as a possible co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and has defended the convicted WTC bombers. Wahhaj allegedly advocates the Islamic takeover of America.

And let us not leave out – Huma Abedin, Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: Perhaps most famous for being wife of the disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner, Huma Abedin appears to have family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. In an interview with FrontPageMag, anti-Islamist author Walid Shoebat explained that Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin, is involved with the Muslim Brotherhood and that Huma’s brother, Hassan, sits in on the board of the Oxford Centre For Islamic Studies (OCIS) where he is a fellow and partners with other board members including “Al-Qaeda associate, Omar Naseef and the notorious Muslim Brotherhood leader Sheikh Youssef Qaradawi; both have been listed as OCIS Trustees.”

And the beloved Valarie Jarrett! And finally, Khizr Khan – you know the Dad at the DNC convention who son died over 12 years ago – Some Gold Star family. Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was the co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighty’s Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah (the works of Muhammad) — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad.

The truth and real reason Khan does not like Trump is because his law firm “specializes” in and is financially and legally deeply tied to the industry programs of selling EB-5 and H-1B visas as a means for foreigners to buy a position into this country. Khan’s law firm is making millions from these types of scheme’s.

Instead of attempting to crucify Your President for what he said, how about trying to digest Khan’s deep ties to not only the Muslim Brotherhood, the Saudi Arabia government, international Islamists investors through his law firm, but the Clinton’s and the Clinton Foundation. How about paying attention to TRUTH?

Every American in this country has a right to protect their families and property – the Constitution and Bill of Rights give us those rights – that which the liberals wish to throw away so freely.

Do you want your children taught by a professor who masturbates to the rape and torture of very small children? Are you comfortable knowing tuition fees help fund these crimes because too many universities and colleges refuse to install software that could report to law enforcement attempts to trade in child pornography by their professors and staff? These are the questions Dr. Lori Handrahan, Ph.D in Washington, D.C.  asks as she proceeded to list 63 pages of names, ages, professions and colleges and/or universities where these abuses have taken place.

CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATORS AND COLLEGE PRESIDENTS

So those of you who read this article are encouraged to contact the provosts or presidents of the educational institutions in your community and ask if the institution has installed software, like Net Clean, that reports to law enforcement attempts on their network to trafficking in children. If not, why not?

Then contact your respective elected legislators and ask that a bill be introduced in order to receive funding that such software be installed at all colleges.  Please don’t think the college to which your child is enrolled is exempt because this sickness ranges across the board involving all sexes. While I reviewed 63 pages, I’ve attempted to pick out the worst of the worst and then batch them by colleges or professions and ages.

Let’s start out with Alyssa Azotea, a 37 year old Simmons College psychology professor arrested on August 28, 2015 on four felony counts of child pornography and three misdemeanor counts of endangering the welfare of a child. She and her boyfriend had been discussing molesting a five year old child. She told her boyfriend “he should allow himself to become aroused by young girls that he sees in public and that he should then report back to her.”

Diane Ross, a 45 year old Chair of the English Department at Lake Forest College, was arrested May 2000, and charged with three felony counts of dissemination of child pornography. She was indicted, July 2000 on 13 counts of sending child porn which included young girls and adults involved in sexual intercourse, oral sex and masturbation. Ross pleaded guilty and was sentenced, October 2000, to two years probation, with no jail time. Ross was caught when members of her “child porn ring” came under investigation in California. Ross received her undergraduate, graduate and doctoral degrees from Yale University. She is the mother of two children and was a local Girl Scout troop leader.

A WAKE UP CALL FOR PARENTS

Justin Bradley May, a 34 year old economics professor at William and Mary was arrested, July 2010 on child pornography production. He pleaded guilty on 18 October 2010 and was sentenced, 3 February 2013, to 15 years in jail followed by 10 years supervised release.

The prosecuting attorney said, “It is shocking that a college professor manipulated a young girl for his own sexual gratification. This case is a wake-up call to parents and kids alike that the race of evil is often the ordinary and the familiar, including people in positions of trust.” He was producing child pornography on his college computer.

SOME FATHERS ARE EVIL

Michael Morris, a 50 year old Assistant Dean at University of Virginia (UVA) and father of two teenage daughters, was arrested and charged, 6 November 2013 on child porn charges. Morris was an “ultimate” member of Gigatribe, a peer-to-peer (P2P) program he used to trade PTHC “pre-teen hard core” brutal torture of children under 12 years old. His on-line name was “funshooter2006.” At the time of his arrest, he was caught with 4,000 images/videos of child sex abuse including the abuse of toddlers. He was indicted on two counts of distributing or receiving child porn and one count of possessing child porn. He pleaded guilty to all three charges on 21 April 2014 and was sentenced, 14 July 2014, to 8.8 years in federal jail and 20 years supervised release.

OLD GUYS HAVE NO SHAME

Walter Korte, a 72 year old film professor also at the University of Virginia, was arrested, 2 August 2016, and charged by the university’s police department, with two counts of child pornography possession. He was indicted, 5 December 2016, to two counts of child porn possession. Korte’s sentencing  is currently set for May 2017.

Brian Meadows, a retired 76 year old professor at University of Cincinnati, was arrested 4 November 2016, on two counts of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and three counts of voyeurism. Meadows had set up a hidden camera in the locker rooms at Cincinnati Sports Club, a health club he belong to, in order to film “children in the nude” and “using the restroom.” He is free on bond pending his next court date.

James Uphoff, a 76 year old retired early childhood education professor from Wright State University, was arrested, August 2013, on child porn charges. In October 2013, Uphoff pleaded guilty to one count of child porn possession and was sentenced, 10 September 2014, to 1.2 years in federal prison. He had been trading in child sex abuse for at least a decade. While he was out on bail, pending sentencing, he was caught, again, with child porn. No new charges were brought.  Upon his first arrest, investigators found 500 images and two videos of child sex abuse, including children in bondage on Uphoff’s computers. He was caught when he left child sex abuse images on a university printer/copier which was discovered and reported to university police. This triggered a search of Uphoff’s university computer and his home. Uphoff had cultivated a reputation as a leading expert on early childhood education. He also volunteered for the Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Montgomery County Juvenile Court and served as Ohio’s Education Association Union President and president of the Oakwood School Board.

And perhaps the oldest, Elliott McGinnies, 94 year old emeritus psychology professor at American University was charged, 9 October 2015, for sex crimes against children. McGinnies was arrested in 1986 for sexual assault of a nine year old girl. He never spent a day in jail.  Charges keep getting dropped by the prosecution.

DAY CARE WORKERS FAIL TO REPORT

In 1990, American University’s president, Richard Berendzen called day cares, for over a year, seeking sex with children. He contacted Susan Eva Allen, a mother operating a day care whose husband was a detective with Fairfax County Police Department. Allen recorded more than 30 hours of calls. Berendzen asked if “she and her husband included their children in sex.” He told her he masturbated while talking with her an offered to procure a child for her to use as a “sex slave.” He described going to sex slave auctions in Chicago and Detroit, bragged about his abuse of children, his child porn collection, a four year old girl “sex slave” and strapping his wife to a wheel. Benendzen’s calls to Susan Allen followed “a pattern.” Investigators had been trying to identify the caller on the tape for a year. From January to April 1990, alone, he called 10-15 other local day cares. He also admitted to calling “as many as 15 women.” Media reports noted other witnesses, including a retired South Carolina police officer, but no one, except for Susan Allen, came forward. The Washington Post reported at the time “charges were not brought in a second case.” Berendzen never spent a day in jail. He remained a professor at American University.”

Then there is James Cavalcoli, a 51 year old bioinformatics professor at the University of Michigan who was arrested at the University 7 August 2015 when he attempted to meet an undercover police officer who was pretending to be a father offering his son for sex abuse. He had traveled from Michigan to Florida with the intention of raping a child. Cavalcoli had posted, at least twice, online requests to meet fathers offering their children for rape when he traveled to Indiana and Ireland. He was sentenced, 30 March 2016, to ten years in prison followed by five years of supervised release. Cavalcoli is the THIRD UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN employee to be arrested on child sex abuse charges.

PEDIATRIC ABUSERS

Stephen Jenson, a pediatric oncologist at University of Michigan, was arrested December 2011 and sentenced in March 2013 to three years in federal prison on one count of child porn possession.  The original four counts of possessing child sexually abusive material, brought by the state were dropped in lieu of federal charges. Jenson left his thumb drive plugged in a computer in the Pediatric Emergency Department. A female resident found the memory stick and discovered child rape which she reported. University of Michigan’s lawyers said her “concerns” were “unfounded” and refused to contact law enforcement. Six months later the incident was “re-reported” and police were notified. Jenson continued to have access to children in the pediatric unit during the delay.

Richard Kelly, a 56 year old father of a two year old and a pediatric endocrinologist at Boston Children’s Hospital and pediatrics instructor at Harvard Medical School, was arrested, 13 September 2012, on child porn charges. He pleaded guilty, November 2013, to three charges of receiving and possessing child pornography and was sentenced, 12 March 2014, to six and half years in federal prison followed by five and half years supervised release.  Kelly had been the Medical Director at Phillips Academy for 19 years before suddenly resigning. He was receiving child sex abuse DVDs at Phillips academy. Kelly possessed over 100 DVDs of child sex abuse at the time of his arrest.

Christopher Pelloski, a 42 year old director of Pediatric Radiation Oncology Program at Ohio State University and father of 5 year old twins, was arrested, 16 July 2013, on child pornography charges. He pleaded guilty, 15 November 2013 and was sentenced, 11 July 2014, to only one year in prison and five years of supervised release. He is a registered sex offender.  Pelloski’s medical license was revoked in Ohio. He was trading in child rape on his university computer, including a 7 year old girl forced to perform sex acts and a “girl no older than 12 being anally raped by an adult man.” Pelloski had been trading in child rape and torture for six years.

James Quinn, a 59 year old criminology professor at University of North Texas (UNT), was arrested, May 2015, on child porn charges. Quinn was arraigned, 20 August 2015, on nine felony child porn counts. Quinn resigned from the University on 4, June 2015 after his May arrest. He was free on bond.

Another University of North Texas (UNT) professor, Alan Marchard, had been arrested by campus police, on child porn charges in 2003. Marchard had been using his university computer to trade in child rape. UNT would not comment on whether Quinn was doing the same. Marchard pleaded guilty, August 2004, to four counts of child porn possession and received six years of probation with no jail time.. UNT had placed Marchard on paid leave. He later resigned. Marchard is a registered sex offender.

Micah Maurio, a 28 year old part-time music professor at the University of Southern Maine (USM), was arrested, 5 December 2014, and charged with dissemination of sexually explicit material of someone under the age of 12. USM suspended Maurio, without pay, “pending a decision on his continued employment with the University of Southern Maine.” Upon his arrest he had “hundreds of images of child pornography.” Maurio was released on personal recognizance and was free pending sentencing. It is not clear what Maurio was sentenced to as the State of Maine had not released these public court records at the time these 63 pages were printed.  Maurio is currently a registered sex offender. And there have been other reports of child sex abuse by University of Maine professors. In 2001, Senior Child Protection staffer Cynthia Wellman claimed University of Maine professors were sexually abusing children, along with Child Protection Staff, on campus. The State of Maine has refused to open a criminal investigation.

Robert Joel Rice, a 58 year old war game developer at Army War College, was charged, April 2013, with 130 child porn counts. After many delays, Rice was sentenced, 28 December 2016, to 12 years in federal prison, and 10 years of supervised released, concurrent with a four year prison sentence from a military court-martial in October 2016. The Army War College continued to employ Rice and allowed him supervised access to Army computers pending sentencing. He was free on bail pending sentencing. At the time of his arrest, Rice had more than 30,000 images/videos of child sex abuse. His wife had discovered these and notified police.

RELIGIOUS LEADERS NOT IMMUNE

Donald Ratcliff, a 61 year old Christian education professor who specialized in child psychology at Wheaton College was arrested, 1 March 2012 and pleaded guilty, 5 August 2013, to one count of child pornography. He was sentenced, 26 February 2014 to 3.5 years in prison. He told investigators he wanted images/video of child sex abuse and rape and masturbated. He saw his criminal behavior as “moral” and claimed “research in Europe determined viewing such images was a way to avoid becoming a pedophile.” Wheaton College is a Christian institution and the alma mater of evangelist Billy Graham. Ratcliff had been a professor at Wheaton since 2006 and was the author of ten books on children’s spirituality.

Then there is Benjamin Felker, a 28 year old employee of Wheaton College, was arrested, September 2016, and charged with four felony counts of possession of child pornography on his home computer. He was placed on unpaid leave and barred from the campus.

Walter Lee Williams, a 66 year old professor of Anthropology, History, and Gender studies, at the University of Southern California, was arrested, June 2013 and charged with the sexual exploitation of children and child porn possession and production.  Williams pleaded guilty, September 2014, to one federal count of engaging in illicit sexual contact in foreign places. He was sentenced, December 2014, to five years in federal prison. Williams had also been traveling to the Philippines to engage in sex abuse of children and produce child porn. He was a member of the Buddhist Universal Association. He has published ten books and taught American Indian Studies.

Joseph Benz, a 52 year old award winning psychology professor at the University of Nebraska, was arrested, 22 May 2013, and charged at the state level, with three counts each of child porn possession and distribution. Benz had been active with the Boy Scouts. Two days after his arrest, the Boy Scouts of America suspended Benz and permanently removed him from all current and future association.

NORMALIZING THE SUBJECT OF SEXUAL ABUSE

Benjamin Levin, 63 year old “celebrated professor” at University of Toronto and former Deputy Minister of Education in Canada , was charged with 61 counts of producing and distributing child porn. Although Levin is Canadian, given his statute within the North American education community and the scope of his crimes, his case must be mentioned. Levin pleaded guilty to three counts in exchange for having the other charges dropped. He said, in on-line chats, he was interested in “normalizing the subject of sexual touching of children.” Levin said “he wished he had a son but he’d nonetheless sexually abused a couple of boys as well as his own girls.” Levin “hoped his daughter would ‘share’ their own children (his grandchildren) with him.” He further expressed his desire to have sexual intercourse with the three kids his chat -pal (an undercover investigator) pretended to have had and then introduced the woman, in cyberspace, to another person who apparently had sexual interest in children and, once all nicely interconnected, they discussed the sexual abuse of kids.

DOES YOUR CHILD HAVE TALENT?

Andrew Campbell, a 35 year old English professor at Wake Tech Community College, was charged with 12 counts of child exploitation for trade in child pornography. He was also a volunteer at Duke University’s Talent identification Program mentoring young children. He was originally held at the Wake County detention center on $900,000 bond pending sentencing. He was sentenced, 1 June 2014 to probation only. He is a registered sex offender.

Adam Zydney, a 26 year old former instructor at the John Hopkins Center for Talented Youth (a summer program for K-12 grade children) and a Penn State graduate student in the math department, was arrested on 31 August 2015, on child sex abuse charges. He faced 836 felony counts of child pornography possession. At the time Zydney had over 500 files of child sex abuse. He told investigators he had been trading in child sex abuse since he was a teenager. Adam is the son of school board member Laurel Zydney.

NATIONAL NEWS SILENT

After reading about all the aforementioned abuses, wouldn’t you think this would be national news instead of quietly reporting it in the involved communities only? For instance, in February 2017 a PizzaGate pedophilia ring was busted and hundreds were arrested in Hollywood. Then there were 522 arrested in the PizzaGate Super Bowl Sex Trafficking story in February.  President Trump in a meeting surrounded with his staff and others promised the full force of government to stop this human trafficking and child abuse and now with the appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General maybe the promised eminent arrests will be made. There was some talk in the meeting that a second offense of a pedophile would get the death penalty.

GOVERNMENT IS ONE GIANT PEDOPHILE RING

However, let us not forget that political cronyism is alive and well and it is normal for high Cabal members to assist new recruits and lend a helping hand in gaining access to higher positions in the Ruling Cabal and acquiring more and more wealth, power, position and status. But there is always a big cost to all this, says Preston James Ph.D. at the People for Life and Freedom.  One must go through increasingly criminal initiations, at some point involving sexual perversions, sexual inversions, pedophilia, and even human sacrifice to get to the very top. Of course, all these initiation ceremonies are videoed and used as canned blackmail for a future date…

Thousands of perverts in all professions are involved in this sinister and subterranean, Satanic in nature cult – a sodomite’s dream in 1987- but it is debunked by the mainstream news today. Christians need to pray and fast. Supernatural warfare is desperately needed like never before.

Peaceful dissent and protest is a hallmark of American freedom.  Rioting, destroying business, and attacking people who disagree with you are hallmarks of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Communist China, North Korea…  If you are either too stupid to understand that or you actually embrace this approach, then you are not American.  Not even close.  J. D. Pendry

J.D. Pendry is absolutely spot on, and the filthy tirades by the so-called Hollywood elite in the first women’s march, demanding more dead babies, was enough to show grassroots Americans that those women are demonically possessed.  And yes, the initial women’s march was co-organized by a pro-Palestinian Islamic woman named Linda Sarsour.  The photo of her picture on a van, is from the first march.

The foolish women attending these marches cannot see that it behooves Islamics to promote American women to kill their unborn babies.  Why?  Because the typical Islamic family produces 6.2 children and this is how they take over nation states, by sheer numbers. American women have two children per family, sometimes less, sometimes none, and barely replace themselves.  The American women involved in this are being played by Islamists for the takeover of the western world, and they’re too stupid to even see it.

The Truth from Oriana Fallaci

Italian journalist, Oriana Fallaci, had the chutzpah to tell the truth about Islam. She did it quite well in her little book, The Rage and the Pride. To read it is to understand the destruction of Europe.  Oriana warned America that the same would happen to us. She had death threats from Islamists, over and over again, but she stood for the truth.

To paraphrase this wonderful brave woman, she said of Islam,

First, they immigrate, then they breed like rats, then they use the laws of the country they’re infiltrating to gain special accommodations for their religious views. Then, when there are enough of them, they disrupt the normal lives of the country’s people, and then the so-called ‘moderates’ join in. And pretty soon, the country is lost.

No, not all Islamists are like this, but a large majority are, and they want to dominate the world. Islam is not a religion, nor is it peaceful, and they do not worship the same God as Judeo-Christians. Islam is found in the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, and it is involved in these Women’s Marches, both the first one, and now the second one.

Convicted Terrorist Organizes March

Notice the garbage left by the first march, unlike when pro-lifers march on D.C., and there is nothing to empty except garbage cans.  These women are destructive, and this is shown explicitly by those who are organizing these militant marches.  Like J.D. Pendry said, “they are not Americans.”   A manifesto published in The Guardian on 6 February 17, states this very fact…a “new wave of militant feminist struggle.”  Struggle to kill their unborn babies, the very children who have different DNA and who are growing inside the mother’s body? Is that their struggle?  That baby is not part of her body, it is a totally different human being, but they would rather kill the child than allow it life, because their lives center around their own self-identity and nothing else.

“Militant” feminist struggle somehow seems appropriate, considering one of these so-called feminists is Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a former “Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine” (PFLP) terrorist who was sentenced to life in prison in Israel in 1970 for her involvement in two terrorist bombings in Jerusalem in 1969.  One of the bombings killed two students while they were shopping for groceries (both males) – but Odeh only spent 10 years in prison before being released in a prisoner exchange with the PFLP in 1980.

How Odeh managed to become a US citizen in 2004 without proper vetting is beyond most Americans, and this is what our President wants to stop.  Apparently, the INS never bothered to check even google, or they’d have found she was a convicted terrorist.

In 2014, she was convicted of immigration fraud for the lies she told to enter this country, mainly for concealing her arrest, conviction, and imprisonment for the 1969 bombings. However, she won the right to a new trial this coming spring, by claiming she had been suffering from PTSD at the time she lied on her application. Oh, and in her time as a citizen, she worked for a while as an Obamacare navigator.  She also served as associate director at the Arab American Action Network in Chicago, Illinois.  Odeh’s history is a perfect reason she never should have been allowed in our country.

Americans need to understand that our own government has worked against the citizens to implement the new world order and globalism.  This is why the hatred of Donald Trump is so vitriolic.  He is not a globalist.  He has promised to keep these barbaric savages from infiltrating and destroying our beloved country.

This is why we need our President’s Executive Order stopping potential Islamic terrorists from coming into the United States.  The danger to American citizens has been exposed time and again, and the rotten leftist appointed judiciary is fighting the man who wants to protect us!

Odeh’s Manifesto Document

Rasmea Yousef Odeh, actually co-authored this Manifesto document with Communist Angela Davis, and Maoist Tithi Bhattacharya.  The left believes this Islamist woman is a hero, despite her murdering past and imprisonment.

Angela Davis and Communism

Angela Davis is a Stalinist professor and longtime supporter of the Black Panthers who blocked voting districts in 2008 in order to elect Obama. My cousin lived in Philadelphia at the time and actually emailed me about what was happening.  And Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, actually dropped the case against them.

Davis is best known for being acquitted in a 1972 trial after three guns she bought were used in a courtroom shootout that resulted in the death of a judge. She celebrated by going to Cuba.  In the 70s, when my family and I lived in Moline, Illinois, we attended a church, the denomination of which I was raised in…and they had a meeting after the service on Sunday morning.  After this meeting, I never stepped foot in this church again, because I found that monies we donated to this church, which were going to the Synod, were funding Communist Angela Davis.

Maoisist Tithi Bhattacharya

A third co-author, Tithi Bhattacharya, praised Maoism in an essay for the International Socialist Review, noting that Maoists are “on the terrorist list of the US State Department, Canada, and the European Union.”  Maoism is a political philosophy which builds upon both Marxism and Leninism.  Just lovely, and totally anathema to the founding of our beloved country based on freedom and liberty.

These women think this is an international grass-roots affair, and they are promising more information on how to participate in protests throughout our country, all of which are financed and promoted by George Soros and Barack Hussein Obama’s Indivisible movement.  They are actually urging women to walk off their jobs and join a demonstration near them to promote the murder of unborn babies, and hatred of our new President.

This group of Islamic and communist leftists wants women to spend their day blocking roads, bridges, and squares and abstaining from any domestic care and sexual relations with their spouses, and boycotting any pro-Trump businesses.  They also want everyone to wear red in solidarity.

Violence, Not Peaceful Demonstrations

The hostility and belligerence of the manifesto and its call for a “militant” uprising is yet another indicator that liberals are increasingly willing to justify violence in the name of opposing Trump. After the Berkeley campus erupted in flames and violence to protest the planned appearance of Milo Yiannopoulos, many socialist activists took to Twitter to cheer them on.  Hollywood stars Debra Messing and Sarah Silverman both tweeted their support, with Messing saying, “Resistance works,” and Silverman ranting, “Wake up and join the resistance.  Once the military is with us, fascists get overthrown.  Mad king and his handlers go bye-bye.”

The insanity is that they don’t realize they are the fascists…not our new President.

The organizers of this second march believe that it is okay to punch people in the face if you hate them.  And now, Trump supporters are not the only targets, these protestors are even angry at liberal democrats, allegedly because they too are “linked to the corporate capitalist structure,” according to Angela Davis.

Conclusion

In our President’s first message to the joint session of Congress, he said, “Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States. We are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical Islamic terrorism.”  Rasmea Yousef Odeh is a radical Islamic terrorist, and she is one of the organizers of this latest women’s march.

The rage at losing their globalist socialist new world order candidate has made them vicious, sadistic and cold blooded, and their fanatical pro-abortion stances are seen as demonic in nature.  The filth they spewed at the last march was repulsive and abhorrent.  They lacked the female refinement of good manners and good taste, and dove headfirst into the sewers of vulgar and offensive obscenities.  Please pray for them.

Trump supporters want to keep our sovereign nation, our faith in God, our freedoms and liberties.  We want borders that protect our citizens, jobs that pay enough to raise our families, free market healthcare, and lower taxes, and those are just a few reasons why we elected Donald J. Trump as our President.

Pray for him, hold his feet to the fire, and tweet to him how you feel.  He is a man chosen by God, and it is our prayers that will give him the wisdom to lead our country.

I have a vital update for you on our battle to stop the HUD assault on private property.

Senator Mike Lee of Utah has just introduced a new bill to stop the AFFH Rule.

This bill MUST be passed in Congress!

That’s why it’s URGENT that you sign the attached petition to Senator Mike Lee right now!

Let me explain:

Last year, the federal agency – Housing and Urban Development (HUD) began enforcing the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule,” (AFFH).

This was Barack Obama’s most radical assault on American private property rights and locally elected governments.

It’s actually worse than Obamacare!

The AFFH Rule is designed to destroy your property RIGHTS.

The AFFH Rule will destroy your property VALUES.

The AFFH Rule will destroy whole neighborhoods.

And the AFFH Rule will virtually erase the very concept of local rule by the people you have elected to run your city and county – overriding them through the dictates of federal agents.

HELP STOP AFFH – SIGN OUR PETITION

Here are the facts.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requires EVERY community that applies for HUD grants to perform massive demographic analyses locally and regionally to determine if there are enough low income and minority people living in every neighborhood.

HUD will search the records of every person in each neighborhood for income levels, race, color, religion, national origin and much more.

If there aren’t enough of each category to satisfy HUD’s vague rules, HUD will claim that the community is in violation! Next, HUD will file law suits against the community to enforce its will. HUD is already doing this in many communities across the nation.

This is social engineering at its worst.

And HUD will demand such an assessment of every neighborhood every five years!

You will have no choice of the kind of neighborhood you wish to live in.

You will see your property values plummet. Your equity in the home you have worked so hard to create will be lost.

And even worse – AFFH is the total destruction of your locally elected government. Home rule in America will die under AFFH.

If you think AFFH will not apply to your community – you are wrong!

It won’t matter who you elect to city council or county commission. Even if you elect people who are opposed to AFFH and the HUD invasion.

HUD is already pouring over the last census reports to map out their strategy for your neighborhood.

In each step HUD maintains control.

And more…

As I’ve been warning you about Agenda 21 for over 20 years, nearly every community in the nation has already put together their comprehensive plans to impose Sustainable Development Smart Growth policy that controls development, energy use, water use, and enforces public transportation over your private use of your car.

In every one of those communities that have put these plans in place – they have taken HUD grants to pay for it.

Now my worst fears have become reality. The federal government, through AFFH, is becoming nothing less than a dictatorship. 

As I have issued my warning over the years, people laughed when I said Sustainable Development turned your communities into little Soviets? Well – here it is!

AFFH is redistribution of wealth.

AFFH is destruction of private property ownership.

AFFH is a top down dictatorship that destroys local control.

But let’s not beat around the bush. Let’s call AFFH what it really is!

COMMUNISM!!!

Can it be stopped?

Yes!

But you must take action today – right now!!!!

Here’s how.

Senator Mike Lee is a huge opponent of the AFFH Rule.

That’s why, as soon as the new 115^th Congress began, he immediately introduced the “Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act” (S.103).

The Bill’s specific purpose is to defund AFFH and restore local home rule to your city council and county commission.

That’s why it’s URGENT that you sign the petition in support of Senator Lee’s S.103 Bill.

HELP STOP AFFH – SIGN OUR PETITION

He must be able to show the rest of the Senate that he has the support of the American people to pass this Bill.

Senator Lee introduced the same Bill that into the Senate last year. But with Barack Obama serving as president there was simply no hope that it would be signed into law, even if it passed the Senate.

But now we have Donald Trump in the White House and he supports defunding AFFH. He will sign the Bill — if it reaches his desk.

S.103 must be passed in the Senate. And I have been assured that Representative Paul Gosar from Arizona will then lead the Bill through the House of Representatives and get it to President Trump’s desk for signing.

We are this close to wiping out one of the worst actions taken by Barack Obama!

That’s why it is URGENT that you take three actions right now.

First, sign the attached petition to Senator Mike Lee giving your support to his Bill – the Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act (S.103). He needs thousands of signed petitions in support of his amendment to show other members of the Senate that he has strong support from the American people.

HELP STOP AFFH – SIGN OUR PETITION

Second, call your two U.S. Senators and demand that they support S.103. Also, ask them to also sign on as a co-sponsor. Tell them we must stop funding for AFFH to restore private property rights and local home rule in America. 

Click here for a directory of phone numbers

Third, please send an emergency contribution to me at the American Policy Center so I can lead this fight to stop AFFH. As you know, APC has been the leader in the fight to stop Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. There will be an option to make a donation on the petition.

The fight to stop AFFH is our most important battle in that fight. If we loose the effort to stop AFFH, then we will have no ability to stop Agenda 21. It’s that simple!  I must have your financial support to stay in this fight.

Please take these actions right now. You and I must build support to pass S.103 or our private property and local rule are lost.

In 1962 Detroit, MI was the wealthiest city on earth. The former motor capital of the world was once part of a mega industrial trilogy that included Cleveland and Pittsburgh. At the time of their industrial zenith, Cleveland, Detroit, and Pittsburgh were the world’s manufacturing floor. Made in the USA was symbolic of our industrial might and high standard of quality.

Unfortunately, our industrial power was eventually reduced by at least one third. Over seventy thousand manufacturing plants have been shuttered primarily because of political and ideologically inspired shenanigans by activist politicians who fooled the people into supporting destructive policies that brought about the decline of America in numerous areas ranging from morality, education, and of course manufacturing.

Both Cleveland and Pittsburgh are partially recovered with revived enlivened and appealing downtowns as well as numerous neighborhoods that are attracting millennials in droves looking for walkable urban enclaves with bistros, restaurants, parks etc. The Cleveland Museum of art and other cultural attractions there and in Pittsburgh now receive many thousands of tourists from around the world. Detroit is beginning to show signs of a turnaround downtown and in the midtown district. I must admit, that when I first saw the citywide decrepit conditions throughout Detroit years ago, I was utterly shocked and dismayed.

I had to learn why would such a high percentage of one place put up with such horrible conditions for over five decades. It was so disheartening to witness the vicious gnashing of teeth by many Detroit residents against any ideas proven elsewhere to improve the quality of life on any level or issue.

Of course, we all know the ongoing after effects of numerous decades of the dummying down of several generations against all that is good and intellectually stimulating. For example, despite horrible deaths of over 100 million citizens around the world due to communist cruelties, the number of American college students now prefer the boot heal of communism over unalienable rights or personal liberty.

History reminds us that the democrat party has for the most part been an organization of oppression in one form or another. In decades past, democrats physically attacked black Americans who dared to use their God given brains to rise above the lowly ranks prescribed to them by those vicious democrats who’s mission was to deny liberty to certain people because of their skin color.

In time, the democrat policies of physical KKK racist abuse grew out of favor. Then there was a slick switch to non-violent forms of oppression. It is summed up in the Curley effect. As described in a noteworthy article written by Harvard scholars Edward Glaeser and Andrei Steifer in which they described the “Curley Effect.” It is named after its noted prototype, James Michael Curley, who served four (non-consecutive) terms as mayor of Boston, between 1914 and 1950. What Curley did in order to entrench socialist democrat party control of the Cradle of Freedom was diabolical.

As mayor, he used the strategy of “increasing the relative size of his political base through distortionary-wealth reducing policies.” Democrats are or should be known for implementing wealth redistribution, massive red tape regulations, burdensome tax increases, etc. that make it gruesomely difficult to conduct viable economic activities. While at the same time convincing people they are oh so oppressed and need to continue to vote for more democrat party political oppression to get them the help that never improves the quality of their miserable lives. Of course, those redistributive, regulatory and over taxation policies made urban dwellers and many cities overall much poorer. Gary, Indiana, Detroit, MI, and Hartford, Connecticut are prime examples.

Many people get sucked into the progressive democrat party vortex of dependency upon their political patrons or plantation lords. Then they become a permanently locked in pro-democrat party voting bloc. Some others smart enough to know they were ill-effected by such redistributive policies emigrate to other cities. Unfortunately, many are not intelligent enough to change their voting patterns and ruin the cities and states they move to by voting democrat. Thus, spreading the dreadful disease of Curleyist policies to more cities and states. Colorado and Salt Lake City are prime examples of that pattern of destruction, where droves of citizens escaped from California, but continue to vote democrat in order to create the political climate they sought to escape from.

The Curleyists constantly get away with engaging in incendiary class-warfare rhetoric that demonizes wealthy people as exploiters of the poor. It is a shame that millions of Americans are more oppressed today than Frederick Douglas was after he decided to escape from slavery and create a very successful life for himself.

He sought the truth about life in Christ, our Constitution, Bill of Rights and the concept of living well by his own intelligence and effort. Douglas clearly understood that through providential guidance, a willingness to work and not give up that he could achieve greatness. He knew better than to accept the scraps of life from the democrats of his day who wanted to dominate him and all black people.

Today, many Americans could benefit from utilizing the level of common sense and faith Frederick Douglas benefited from long ago. If not, they will continue to exist in squander while progressive politicians implement the Curley effect to keep them on a treadmill to nowhere. The ever growing presence of The Edwards Notebook radio commentary is now heard on The Exceptional Conservative Network throughout the broadcast day and night.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 86 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

American statesman Ben Franklin once said, “We better all hang together or we’ll all hang separately.”

He referred to the fact that each signatory of the Declaration of the Independence faced death at the hands of the British back on July 4, 1776.

Today, we face the most fragmented and fractured electorate since the Vietnam War era. Democrats blame republicans for many ills facing this nation. And vice versa! Ironically, both parties equally contributed to America’s horrific $19.5 trillion debt. Both parties voted for the 15-year long war in Afghanistan and Iraq costing taxpayers trillions of dollars—but accomplishing nothing. Both parties watched America’s inner cities turn into war zones like Chicago, and unemployed Americans into the millions.

Each blames the other. When Obama entered the White House, he promised “hope and change.” Instead, he doubled the national debt. He promised to bring jobs. Instead he added 10 million people to food stamp rolls. Instead of peace, he continued war in the Middle East. Instead of helping African-Americans gain educations and jobs, he spent a lot of time on the golf course.

During the State of the Union by President Donald Trump, democratic women wore white outfits in protest of the president’s policies. Minority speaker for the House, Nancy Pelosi sat dejectedly in her seat with a scowl and sour attitude.

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) grimaced during the entire speech. Muslim House member Keith Ellison (D-MN) sat with anger written all over his face during the entire speech. He never stood to honor the widow of the slain Navy Seal William Ryan Owens. House Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) stayed home.

During the speech, democrats rarely stood, made a few snide comments and pointed their thumbs down at several of Trump’s attempts to call for unity on both sides of the aisle in order for Congress to go to work for the American people.

Instead, you could cut the air with a steak knife with the animosity seething from the democrats. They appeared to still be in a state of shock over Hillary Clinton losing.

At one point, Trump singled out several individuals for their heroism, courage and determination. When he recognized Carryn Owns, widow with three small children, and the wife of the Navy Seal William Ryan Owens, the entire Congressional body erupted in the longest applause on record—but the Muslim Keith Ellison sat angrily in his chair. Few in the MSM admit that Ellison maintains ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization.

When Trump talked about stopping illegal immigration and terrorism by extreme vetting and building a wall on the Mexican border, democrats fumed in their seats. When he spoke about creating V.O.I.C.E. “Victims of immigration crime enforcement,” democrats rankled in their seats.

Across the country, over 300 Sanctuary Cities allow illegal aliens to work and roam freely in violation of U.S. laws. When Trump pledged to bring them to justice, New York City’s Mayor DeBlazio promised to fight Trump. Same with Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Colorado’s Governor John Hickenlooper. Same with California’s Governor Jerry Brown. All of them pledged to continue violating U.S. laws. No matter how many Americans die at the hands of illegal aliens!

At the end of the speech, TV anchor Brit Hume said, “Trump knocked it out of the park tonight.”

Pundit Chris Wallace said, “Donald J. Trump because President Trump of the United States tonight.”

Nonetheless, Schumer, Pelosi, Ellison and many other democrats fumed and scowled their way out of the chambers after the speech. They degraded the speech as well as the president in front of television cameras.

Much the same bitterness occurred at the Continental Congress back in Ben Franklin’s time. As the old statesman sat during the proceedings, he witnessed the anger and cynicism at that time. He came up with and I am paraphrasing, “All of us must state our cases for this new country. And, we must compromise in order to birth our new nation with a sense of purpose and cohesiveness. If not, we shall fragment beyond repair.”

Today in 2017, if the democrats and republicans remain at odds with each other, we all lose. If the mayors and city councils of Sanctuary Cities continue violating US laws, we all lose. If we allowed endless legal and illegal immigration, we all lose. If governors of states defy our laws on the books, they promote anarchy and civil conflict.

If we fail to maintain and enforce our laws, if we fail to compromise for America’s values and her peoples’ rights—our country faces degradation into a Third World country. It’s that simple and it’s that ugly.

“America’s veterans deserve the very best health care because they’ve earned it.” -Jim Ramstad, U.S. Congressman
My husband died eight years ago and I took the opportunity to go on a journey of self-discovery that, for a time, led me to Austin, Texas, and then back home to Oklahoma City.

Within days of returning home, I learned that an old political buddy, Bill Duncan, was in town, doing something interesting.   So who is Bill Duncan, you ask? He’s the fellow my Fifth District Congressman, Ernest Istook, hired in 1995 to clean up the medical system.  At the time, I served as head of Ross Perot’s Reform Party Health Committee so this gave me a good reason to pay attention to what was going on with Bill.  Reformers were in the business of finding ways to clean up government.

A third of Bill’s job was to make sure the new Office of Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of Health wouldn’t get screwed up.  When the NIH Director attacked it, Bill created the legislation, passed by Senator Tom Harkin, that created the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). It’s very existence was as welcome as ants at a picnic because our American medical system is based on using drugs, surgery and other high tech (read expensive) modes of treating illness and injury. Technically, the medical philosophy that our medical establishment practices is called “allopathy”.  Consequently, the CAM department had many enemies, and still does.

As an economist by training, Bill’s overall assignment was to make the U.S. healthcare system more effective, more efficient, and less expensive. His doctorate is in political science, economics, and public law, but he also has an MBA from Boston University.  In his program, which he took in Germany, Harvard professors came to Germany and taught the program from Harvard’s books.  This gave him a great basis for understanding the mandate from Rep. Istook. This included reducing regulatory burdens, increasing market availability of affordable health insurance, and driving new and effective treatments and technologies, including ones with no patent, into use.

To put this in perspective, in 1920, Oklahoma citizens voted to repeal a law that would have allowed the state allopathic medical board to outlaw what we, here in Oklahoma, call “natural healing arts”.  Some of the healing arts on the chopping block included homeopathy, naturopathy, Chinese Medicine, herbalism and an assortment of other methods of healing our Indian Medicine Men and others also practiced.  Changes in law made in 1994, thanks to major citizen action, clarified the fact that those who did not practice allopathy practiced “non-allopathic” healing arts, duh!  It’s a technical point that matters in certain circles.

So, translation, Bill’s job for 10 years was to find stuff that worked that didn’t cost an arm and a leg because it was basically cheap, and, or it might not be allopathic.  Along the way, he became a walking encyclopedia of all sorts of healing modalities, many that are readily available in other parts of the world and the reason other nations have lower costs and better outcomes.

After five years of searching, Bill stumbled across was hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) which is basically oxygen pressed into your body at up to two times sea level atmospheric pressure.  It is an old technology from 1937 you may have heard of because it was first used for deep sea divers who rose to the surface too quickly and got the bends.  A quick infusion of high pressure oxygen normalized the blood oxygen levels needed to clean things up.  It directly prevented brain injury caused by these nitrogen bubbles disrupting the brain’s delicate circulatory system.  That is why when you go into a hyperbaric oxygen chamber your session inside is called a dive.

Rep. Istook was the leader of the Amputee Coalition, thanks to Oklahoma’s own John Sabolich,   the world’s foremost innovative prosthetics designer.  Bill discovered that HBOT would prevent 75% of all amputations, and forced Medicare to begin paying for HBOT for diabetic foot wounds.  He has been credited by Jane Orient, M.D., Executive Director of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, with preventing the amputation of more feet and limbs than anyone else.   Today, every hospital with a hyperbaric center can directly thank Bill for making foot salvage possible.

In recent years, HBOT treatments have been approved in the US for 14 types of conditions, from three kinds of brain injury (including the bends, carbon monoxide poisoning, and brain infection), and three kinds of chronic non-healing wounds (crush injury, arterial insufficiency, including diabetic foot wounds, radiation necrosis and compromised flaps and graphs.)  It is also used for burns and bone infection and sudden hearing loss.  How does it work?  Physics.  It uses pressure to drive oxygen into the fluids of the body, which allows them to achieve levels 7 to 12 times what you and I are breathing right now.

In China and Russia, they have whole hospitals set up with nothing but rows of chambers on each floor of the hospital.  It is particularly helpful in treating drug and alcohol addiction.  The British offer HBOT as a private sector treatment and consider it so safe that no physician prescription or supervision is required all the way to 2.0 atmospheres or 15 pounds of pressure.  That was by act of Parliament.  The Israelis replicated the U.S. brain injury work at Louisiana State University, and offer HBOT to every citizen because it is so effective in treating traumatic brain injury (TBI) and blast injury.  Keep in mind Israel is basically a war zone with intermittent shelling from people who want to blow the country off the map.

So what is TBI, you ask?  It is when you you get a whack in the head or when your brain matter gets sloshed around when you are in a car wreck and you get whiplash.  It is everything from being dazed to being unconscious.  Work done at UCLA in the 1960s demonstrated that a nine mile per hour collision is enough to cause unconsciousness, thus leaving a brain injury.  As these injuries accumulate over a lifetime, eventually the person’s quality of life, social interactions, economic productivity and other areas of the life suffer.

Bill realized that the largest number of people with TBI here in the states were veterans.  Like blind people after World War II, these people were “normal” before they served our country at great personal sacrifice.  They are often diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).  PTSD is actually a brain injury, because you have to have 2 of 3 mild traumatic brain injury symptoms, built into the diagnostic questionnaire, in order be diagnosed with PTSD.  Thus PTSD is NOT a moral issue, or not being “man” enough to “take the blast” or the pressures and stresses of combat.  HBOT treatments heal the brain cells.   There are three kinds of brain injuries.  A whack in the head which includes whiplash as your brain matter gets sloshed around.  A sudden change in air pressure like bomb blasts, cannon fire, tornadoes etc…   AND all manner of toxic stuff, Mercury being the most prevalent and the hardest to clean up.

Today over one million Vets are suffering from PTSD from the current war.  According to extensive study by the Veterans Administration in the 1980s, 38.5% of all who served in Vietnam have brain injury or PTSD.  They have very debilitating symptoms, from a loss of executive function (like thinking clearly or being able to plan ahead), to a 15+ point IQ loss, to debilitating headaches, light sensitivity, depression, and inability to sleep.  They often lack emotional control, traceable directly to the injury to the membrane on the frontal lobe that gives us impulse control.  They self-medicate with alcohol and other substances to quiet their overactive amygdale (the place in your brain involved in a wide range of normal behavioral functions and psychiatric conditions).  There are millions of them who are living in the streets, in jail, living lives of quiet desperation hiding in the back room of their homes literally in the dark afraid to come out.  They are a burden to their families and society because they are often not  breadwinners.  The cost is estimated at an economic and government burden of up to $60,000 per year, on average, because their families, especially if they are National Guard, often results in families needing to depend on charity and/or public assistance just to survive.   The national average for suicide among current war vets is 29/100,000 or 22/day.  In Oklahoma, the rate is 61/100,000 or twice the national average.

Bill, having a Ph.D. in Economics and Political Science, had the ability to put the numbers together.  When he discovered HBOT, he realized if fully implemented, to its potential, it would lower hospital costs by 20%, through both reduction in long term injury and disability when used acutely, and through greatly improved surgical and burn outcomes.  There is 78 years of world-wide scientific evidence and studies to show that this implementation is massively cost effective.  Further, by treating both acute and chronic brain injury with the only effective treatment discovered in the past 78 years, mandatory and entitlement spending on everything from prisons to welfare to education to disability payments, and to great increases in individual productivity, would benefit every city, county, state and federal budget.  That is because the 73 agencies whose budgets that Bill oversaw when he worked for Rep. Istook in Congress, contained the safety net and other services that untreated brain injured people wind up using.

After Rep. Istook left office, he was replaced by Mary Fallin (now Oklahoma governor) who understood the implications of setting up a mass production HBOT system of clinics in cities and towns across the country.   Four times the TBI Treatment Act passed the U.S. House floor, unanimously, but each time it was killed in the Senate by forces connected to the Veterans Administration.  Why VA officials don’t want HBOT for vets one can only chalk up to politics that is conducted in cloakrooms and wherever else special interest groups lurk.  Some VA hospitals already have HBOT chambers collecting dust in the basement.

When Mary Fallin came home and was elected governor she still liked the idea so Bill wrote legislation that was passed unanimously by the Oklahoma legislature.  A key new twist to the story was that in order to pay for free services for all vets, he located a federal law passed after WWI that said that if a state paid for military service-related injuries, the federal government must pay back the state.   Thus, one of the features of the Oklahoma legislation was to set up a revolving account managed by Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs, that would pay the HBOT clinic and then be replenished by the federal government.  This was a great idea.  However, the lurkers in the cloakroom did it again.   At the last minute, during the rush at the end of the legislative session, an amendment to the final bill was added, cutting the seed money to set up the funding system.  The next year, the current legislation was passed, but still without funding.

To normal people, this should have been the end of the project….but not Bill.   He knew what he had and, for all the right reasons, he plunged ahead cobbling together a project that no Harvard Business School scholar could have laid out in a formal business plan in advance.

Bill began the Patriot Clinic as a non-profit demonstration project so treatment would be delivered effectively and safely, and show governments and society and the medical system how, by creating a high volume specialty HBOT clinic, he could start making a big dent in helping restore the health and the shattered lives of millions of vets.  It was further discovered that police officers and fire fighters are also subject to many of these same kinds of injuries, and many of them were treated successfully as well.  To lawmakers, he could show how the numbers added up when vets, once burdens on the State, could be sources of revenue when they were restored to health able to work and get back to taxpayer status.  Each veteran or other person we return to work is $4,000 in annual tax revenue to the state government, and $16,800 income to the Federal government.  Better yet, a $25,000 one-time treatment cost results in about 80% of the young people who could not work being able to return to work.  For those who were working, the gain of 15 to 25 IQ points is the equivalent of $20,000 to $30,000 increase in wage income.

So the Patriot Clinics organization was born and Bill set out to establish the headquarters clinic here in Oklahoma City.   He borrowed several chambers, rented space in an old indoor tennis court, scrounged basic furniture, got somebody to donate hundreds of scrubs for patients to wear in the chambers.   Several civic groups wrote him some checks to pay for the rent, electricity and the like.  Then Bill put the word out to let every one know he was open for business.

Patients first came in trickles.  Then they came in droves all grateful that, finally, somebody wanted to really help them get well.   Then something unexpected happened.  Since the clinic was obviously not some slick, well-financed medical facility, grateful patients and their families started to help out.  Some brought toilet paper, bottled water and cleaning supplies.  Somehow a washer and dryer appeared and the mountains of laundry (scrubs, towels, sheets and pillowcases for the chambers) that piled up every day, managed to be taken care of by whoever was there that day.   Still others would pick up a broom or do other maintenance.  One lady insisted that she be the official bathroom cleaning lady and kept the facilities as pristine as any professional cleaning service.

And, Bill, who had started this project for all the right reasons and on a wing and a prayer, achieved a miracle.  Over the past three years, on donations of $280,000, Patriot Clinics delivered $12,000 hyperbaric treatments per patient, without cost to people who were trapped in their brain injury and had no escape from this life-destroying condition.  Slightly over $4 million in hyperbaric treatment was delivered for $280,000.  In addition, they were able to deploy other therapies to help those with PTSD, such as an 11- needle acupuncture protocol, developed with the help of the head of the local acupuncture school, that turns off the emotional charge in PTSD in most patients with just a few treatments.  Further, this deployment replicated the results of the Louisiana State University, Oklahoma State University, and experience in Israel, where people, in the first 40 treatments, got back 15 IQ points (the difference between a high school dropout and a college graduate), a 39% reduction in post-concussion syndrome (sleep disorder, light sensitivity, executive function difficulty), 30% reduction in PTSD (the largest of any published treatment), a 51% reduction in depression, and a 96% improvement in emotional control.

Anyone doing public policy or education, or dealing with incarcerated individuals can realize the significance of this set of normal and routine medical improvements.  It’s a non-invasive treatment as easy as breathing and flying up and down in an airplane.  HBOT, at these low-pressures, is one of the safest practices in medicine, as Carol Henricks, MD, recently told the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.  It has the second lowest medical malpractice rate next to acupuncture.

You can see a lot of the science at www.HBOT.com.

The science proving that HBOT does repair TBI is also on the Patriot Clinics website with a mountain of other key information.   Now as many as 40 private HBOT clinics are doing their bit providing free treatments to vets when they can but the need is so great, many have nearly gone out of business providing compassionate care. Bill’s plan from the beginning was to build a prototype model here in Oklahoma City so similar clinics could be reproduced in every city and town in America, to help clean up the PTSD crisis. It also would provide direct relief to police officers, fire fighters, National Guard, and other first responders who serve under difficult circumstances every day.

The bottom line is that Bill, for all his years of public service as a Congressional aide, has accomplished what he was assigned to do.   He has found EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE CARE THAT CAN BE EASILY PROVIDED IN EVERY COMMUNITY ACROSS THE NATION.  Or, in Harvard Business School parlance, Bill Duncan has created a new business model for treating America’s Number One health problem….PTSD…. With effective care at a reasonable price.

BILL NEEDS YOUR HELP – ASAP

After tweaking his organizational model into a proven reality, he now needs to step back and hire real staff to run the place so he can have the time necessary to write regulations to finish the job set forth by the legislature.   He also needs time to work out the paperwork so that patients with whiplash can file claims with their auto insurance companies.  Fire fighters, policemen and other first responders can also be covered by their insurance companies once the required endless paperwork can be organized to fit into the payment system.  Tornado victims, and kids with autism, and kids who got bopped in the head playing soccer also have benefited from treatment at Patriot Clinics, so insurance claim arrangements need to be worked out for them, also.  Why, because the way the law was written, all citizens of Oklahoma are to be served even if they are not vets.

Bill needs a quick infusion of $100,000 to hire full time staff to run the clinic.  Firefighters and EMTs (including those from the National Guard), can be quickly trained to man the chambers for the next several months so he can put into place these other sources of revenue.  This tangle of paperwork to insure that the clinic will be able to stand on its own from now on without constant fund drives to keep the lights on takes time to complete.

Most of all, Bill needs the time to answer requests from people all over the country who want to establish Patriot Clinics in their towns.  This has turned into a grass roots movement and Bill needs your help to make it grow.

So, please take a look at the website and consider making a donation for real healthcare for our vets and everyone else. And….be sure to encourage everyone you know to help, too.  This is the time to act.  It DOES MATTER.

————————–

Elissa Meininger became a noted health policy historian as well as a political activist after almost dying from years of mercury poisoning caused by mercury leaching from the “silver” dental amalgam fillings in her teeth. Bedridden and unable to carry on a coherent conversation, (and unable to obtain a diagnosis from any of the MDs she had consulted), she turned to a traditional naturopath who had no difficulty recognizing and explaining the source of the large array of chronic problems from which she had suffered most of her life. This diagnosis saved her life, but even today, such consultation remains illegal in many states.

Committed to reforming the medical system, Elissa embarked over 20 years ago on an array of projects geared to bringing enlightened medical treatment to the American people, including providing prepared statements for various U.S. Congressional and White House Commission hearings on health freedom legislation and policy, and testifying numerous times before the Oklahoma state legislature.

She is the former Vice President of Friends of Freedom International and co-columnist, with Carolyn Dean, MD/ND, of many articles posted on the NewsWithViews.com.

E-Mail: elissa.newswithviews@gmail.com

It is long past time to establish a Religious Review Board (RRB). Is this an outlandishly absurd proposal? Not at all. Serious problems require equally serious solutions.   The call for establishing a Religious Review Board may be seen as an attempt to curb Islam. The truth is: it is.

Encroaching Islam with its rule of Sharia presents an imminent threat to subvert and replace the Constitution that governs our lives. Unlike Muslims who practice taqiyya -lying or dissimulation-I proudly speak the truth. Truth should never be sacrificed at the altar of any goal. I firmly believe that truthfulness is indeed the foundation of all virtues.

As things stand now, there are numerous boards at most levels of government, business, and community which govern our lives. All of these agencies are charged with the responsibility of looking after the welfare of the people they serve. The Food and Drug Administration, for instance, must pass on the safety and quality of the food we eat; the Aviation Safety Board works to ensure safe flights; a local school board strives to create the environment that best serves the educational and safety needs of the pupils. Boards serve every community and businesses of any size.

The Food and Drug Administration makes sure we don’t use contaminated food and drugs that can harm our bodies. Yet, there are no oversight boards that would check against things that contaminate the mind and present a clear threat of unraveling our democracy’s social compact as we know and cherish it. Shouldn’t these dangers to our beliefs and way of life be monitored and combated, or should they be allowed a free hand to work their damage?

Religion is a powerful force. And as is the case with any force, it can do the work of good or that of evil. And, when there is a multiplicity of religions at loggerheads with one another, the forces clash and any benefit that religion offers is offset by potentially huge costs.

Given that the formerly vast and a largely segregated planet has shrunk into a “global village,” the disparate peoples isolated from one another for millennia are now a village community.

The-thrown-together diverse peoples are in urgent need of adopting a set of common rules that would allow individuals as well as groups maximum latitude of faith, coupled with responsibility, and free of any practices that infringe on the rights of others or demonize them. Islam, as a matter of belief, considers all non-Muslims, even the so-called people of the Book, as infidels-people who are to be subjugated or cleansed from Allah’s earth.

America, with a long history of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call.

The dictionary supplies a sociologically useless definition for religion: “The expression of man’s belief in and reverence for a superhuman power recognized as the creator and governor of the universe.” Just about anyone or any group under this definition can start a religion, and they indeed do-and some do so at significant costs to others.

Muslims, under the banner of religion, are infringing blatantly on the rights of others, not only in Islamic countries, but also in much of the non-Muslim world. By their acts of dogmatic savagery, Muslims are finally awaking the non-Muslim democracies to the imminent threat of Islamofascism keen on destroying their free secular societies.

Islam was birthed by primitives of some 1400 years ago and over time invaded much of the world at the point of a sword. Presently, the Islamists, with their treasuries flush with petrodollars, are in a great position to realize their perennial dream of bringing the world under the rule of Muhammad’s Umma. On the one hand, Pakistan is already a nuclear power and Iran aims to be one before very long. On the other, Muslim governments and wealthy Sheikhs are funding Islamic schools, centers and front organizations in the West to work from within at the unraveling of the non-Islamic democratic systems.

The large number of Muslims arrival of recent years is posing a serious problem to this nation of all nations. Bluntly speaking, no one can be a Muslim and an American at the same time. Here are some of the reasons.

1) A Muslim is, first and foremost, an Ummaist-a citizen of international Islam. So, when a Muslim takes the American Pledge of Allegiance, he is either ignorant of the implication of his pledge or is lying willfully. Ignorance is never a valid reason in the court of law, and lying in the process of becoming a citizen is grounds for denying the application and even deporting the violator. Sadly enough, Taqiyya-lying, or dissimulation-is not only condoned, it is recommended to Muslims in their scripture. Hence, a Muslim can and would lie without any compunction, whenever it is expedient.

2) Muslims, by belief and practice, are the most blatant violators of human rights. We hardly need to detail here Muslims’ systemic cruel treatment of unbelievers, women of all persuasions, and any and all minorities across the globe. To Muslims, human rights have a different meaning, and its protective provisions are reserved strictly for Muslims-primarily for Muslim men. Just a couple of examples should suffice for now.

A) Oppression of women, for one, is so systemic in Islam that to this day women are, at best, second-class citizens under Islamic law. Saudi Arabia, the custodian of Islamdom, denies women the right to drive, vote or hold elective offices-the most basic rights of citizens in democratic societies. For another, no non-Islamic literature is allowed in Saudi Arabia.

1. B) Any Christian, for instance, is denied to entry to the Kingdom with a Bible. Further, severe punishment is meted out to anyone daring to disagree with Islam or espouse a different religion. Iran’s resurgent Shiism often vies with Saudi Arabia in its mistreatment of religious and non-religious minorities. To the fanatical ruling gang in Iran, it is their brand of Islam or disenfranchisement of rights of citizenship and even death for the “sin” of apostasy. And of course, there is no point at all in talking about the savage Islamic Taliban or ISIS.

   3) Respect for the rule of law, as it is understood and practiced by civilized people, is an instrument of convenience to be used to advantage and to be violated when it is not, for the Muslim. A Muslim believes in a different law-the Sharia: a set of Stone Age rules. Violation of the non-Muslim laws, therefore, is no violation at all to a Muslim.

   What is incredible is the gall and audacity of Muslims in demanding that Western and other democracies legalize Sharia in their societies. Large populations of Muslims, most recent arrivals, in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, and Sweden are experiencing the insistent demands by Muslims to have Sharia rule their Islamic communities. This is just the beginning and it may seem relatively harmless to the simpletons in our midst. Yet, once Sharia is recognized to any extent, it will reach out to rule not only on matters that concern Muslims, but also to those that may involve a Muslim and non-Muslim. Under Sharia, a Muslim man married to a non-Muslim woman is able to divorce the woman at will, automatically have custody of the children, and literally toss the wife out of “his” home with no compensation.

   4) As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use at all. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form of a Caliphate-a theocracy. Making a mockery of democracy, subverting its working, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of governance invented by infidels.

   To Muslims, Umma-ism-international Islamism-is the legitimate form of government. Umma-ism is another form of despotism such as Communism and Fascism, with the added feature of enjoying “divine” authority.

   The world has good examples of Umma-ism in practice to scrutinize Islamic autocracies. Khamenei of Iran is not called “Caliph.” He is called the “Supreme Guide.” The Saudi King is just another Caliph vessel of the “divine.” These Islamic despots are every bit as vile as the Hitlers, the Stalins, the Pol Pots, the Castros and the Mussolinis. The government these Islamic autocrats head is infested to the core with the Islamic disease of oppression, corruption and the absence of accountability to the people.

   Democracies believe that government must be of, by, and for the people. Umma-ism is anathema to this sacrosanct fundamental democratic ideal.

   As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, they gather more power to undermine democratic rule. A consortium composed of pandering politicians, blinded with short-term self-interest and egoism; attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiot liberals, universities, is the witting or unwitting promoter of Umma-ism.

There is an urgent need for the establishment of a Religious Review Board by the Trump administration tasked with a mission to ensure that no “religion” preaches and practices in violation of the United States’ Constitution. Islam is incompatible with democracy and subversive of our way of life and one that blesses this nation. It is imperative that we fight Islamofascism with the same determination that we fought other enemies of freedom such as Nazism, Fascism, and Communism.

Remember when they booed God at the Democrat National Convention, 2012? It should have told us what we were in for, but Mitt Romney found a way to lose the election in spite of that display.

Now, five years later, we have managed to win a national election—and Democrats are back to booing God. The latest example was at a Republican town hall meeting in Louisiana, hosted by Sen. Bill Cassidy, at which Democrat “protesters”—do they even know what they’re “protesting”?—loudly booed both the opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance.

The prayer got them really riled up. “Prayer? Prayer?” cried one incredulous progressive. “Pray on your own time!” bellowed another. And a woman, at the top of her lungs, invoked the name of Lucifer, who runs American leftism when George Soros is otherwise occupied. They got especially raucous at the mention of Jesus’ name; and then they heckled and booed the recitation of the Pledge. At this point we usually hear liberals deny they’re anti-Christian and angrily declare, “Don’t you dare question our patriotism!”

Again, these people are energetically showing us who they are, and shame on us if we don’t listen.

Why do liberals hate God? Because they’re after His job. They want to sit where He sits, and they insist that they can and will do all the things He should have done, but couldn’t do because He doesn’t exist. They, by the brute force of an all-powerful government run by themselves, will wipe out income inequality, abolish hate, war, poverty, disease, and while they’re at it, Save The Planet. And we’ll all live happily ever after as Citizens of the World. They haven’t gotten around yet to offering us forgiveness of sins and eternal life, but they’re working on it.

So they boo God, boo the country, and put up yard signs, as one of my neighbors has done, proclaiming such gems of tolerance and wisdom as “Patriotism is for Scoundrels,” “Blankety-blank Clingers,” “Black Lives Matter,” “Science (they mean Global Warming, evolution, and abortion) is Real”… and, as the bottom line, “Kindness is Everything!” I don’t think I want to know how they define kindness. The Bible has already told me that: “the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel” (Proverbs 12:10). Leftist “kindness” usually involves a lot of barbed wire and piles of dead bodies.

Just how addled are these liberals? Turn to one of our great state universities for an example. At the University of Michigan, “students”—don’t ask what they’re students of—are demanding that the university set aside “no whites allowed” space where “persons of color,” and no one else, can “organize and work for social justice.” It takes liberals to give a bad name to “justice.”

There used to be a lot of spaces set aside for persons of color only—in cafeterias, buses, rest rooms, and schools. It was called segregation, and it took the Supreme Court, the president, the National Guard, and several acts of Congress to bring it to an end—not to mention Martin Luther King Jr., and many others, being thrown in jail for opposing segregation. It was a really bad thing, right? And now these college students want it back. They should be more careful what they wish for.

They have cut the cable that anchored them to God, and now try to tie up to the water. Anyone can see how well that works.

Does anyone agree with me that drastically cutting the funds to the universities, and cutting the whole system back down to size, would be a fabulously good idea? I mean, how many master’s degrees in Gender Studies and Social Justice Studies does the country need? How much does a student pay for an advanced degree in Women’s Studies, and what good does it do her? That and a lot of serious groveling just might land you a job behind the counter at the 7-11.

Whether or not these liberals are beyond hope of repair is not for us to say. But we need to have our heads examined if we even think about ever again allowing them to run the country. They hate everything we love, and they will take it away from us if they can.

During President Donald Trump’s first address to Congress on Tuesday night, one political nemesis, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, invited a Muslim refugee from Iraq to sit with her as a non-verbal statement of her opposition to Trump’s attempt to prevent Muslim terrorists from entering the country without first undergoing an “extreme vetting” process.

The liberal left has teamed up with extremist and violent Islamists in its next salvo against newly-inaugurated U.S. President Donald Trump.

On March 8, International Women’s Day, a follow-up event to the January 21 Women’s March on Washington, will be staged.

One of the co-authors of the “militant” manifesto behind the nationwide event is convicted Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Yousef Odeh.

Odeh was convicted in Israel in 1970 for being involved in two fatal bombings. Odeh spent 10 years in jail before she was released in a prisoner exchange in 1980.

She moved to the U.S. by omitting her terror conviction on her immigration papers and served as the associate director of the Arab American Action Network in Chicago and later as an ObamaCare navigator. In 2014, she was convicted in the U.S. for concealing her past and thus illegally obtaining U.S. citizenship.

After claiming she forgot about her conviction and imprisonment in Israel due to post traumatic stress disorder, she was awarded a new trial which is currently pending.

The women’s event manifesto, printed as an open letter in The Guardian, calls for “striking, marching, blocking roads, bridges, and squares, abstaining from domestic, care and sex work” and “boycotting” pro-Trump businesses.

All women are requested to wear red in solidarity for a day of “anti-capitalist feminism.”

Odeh’s co-authors include Angela Davis, a self-professed communist professor (now retired), who was a supporter of the original Black Panthers and a 1960s radical icon. Davis was prosecuted and acquitted in 1972 for an armed takeover of a California courtroom that resulted in the murder of a judge.

The January 21 Women’s March on Washington was organized by Islamist apologist and activist Linda Sarsour, a supporter of shariah law.

“Shariah law is reasonable and once u read into the details it makes a lot of sense. People just know the basics,” tweeted Sarsour.

As for women with whom she does not agree, Sarsour tweeted, “Brigitte Gabriel=Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She’s asking 4 an a$$ whippin’. I wish I could take their vaginas away – they don’t deserve to be women.”

Veterans group slams Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Democrats for giving illegal aliens priority

The fulfillment of Trump’s promise to revamp and enforce immigration laws this year has met with an enormous amount of press coverage by a news media that opposes immigration control, along with the political leaders the ladies and gentlemen of the press appear to serve. While most Americans support their warfighters, a large number of the population buy into the Democratic Party’s narrative.

The media’s and political left’s dirty, little secret is the fact that far too many military veterans are living on the streets in cities that proudly proclaim they are “sanctuaries” for illegal aliens, some of whom are breaking laws other than merely immigration statutes. In addition, while illegal aliens are receiving free healthcare, food stamps, housing assistance and other necessities, America’s war veterans are dying because of limited medical assistance.

On Monday morning, representatives of the non-profit group Veterans Assisting Veterans (VAV) appeared on the top-rated show “Fox & Friends” to discuss their reasons for opposing the immigration proposals of leftist Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts,  and other Democrats who view the daily increase of illegal aliens in the U.S. as a promise of more voters for their party.  http://www.veteransassistingveterans.com/

VAV’s spokesman John MacDonald told the show’s anchors: “The point is this: Elizabeth Warren and people like her seem to have a very hard time understanding the difference between legal and illegal. And you know what, there’s been plenty of immigrants who have served in the U.S. military and our hats are off to all of them, and of course we love their service and their contribution to our country. But, I find it very hard to believe that Elizabeth Warren wants to lump all immigrants into the same category. It seems to be the fact that she’s more interested in creating political theater than she is actually helping Americans.”

MacDonald is an Air force veteran and radio talk show host at WCAP in Lowell, Massachusetts.  “This is a call to action, to our fellow veterans, so they can understand we need to speak out.  People need to understand these politicians work for us, we don’t work for them. It was legal immigrants and United States citizens that voted for Elizabeth Warren. Illegal immigrants didn’t vote for her,” he said during his Fox News Channel appearance.

Meanwhile, VAV’s President Dennis Moschella said during the same show:  “There’s hundreds of veterans dying every day. … Why don’t we address those problems first, and then we’ll worry about other people coming into our country.”

Moschella, who now serves as the Revere Police Department’s community resource officer, said, “There’s hundreds of veterans [who] are dying every day, whether through illness, old age or suicide. Why don’t we address those problems first, then we’ll worry about other people coming into our country.”

“We’re not trying to be political with this,” MacDonald insisted. “We’re here trying to mobilize our fellow veterans to say, ‘You know what, instead of working on illegal activity, instead of finding ways to bring people in who are illegal … how about you help the people that are standing in line, some people that are here legally who are trying to obtain their citizenship? And how about you run to the microphones and help the veterans who provided you the opportunity to speak this way?’”

Yesterday, March 1, 2017, was my father’s 110^th birthday anniversary. Dad was born March 1, 1907–the same year that “The Duke” John Wayne was born. The 6’4” Duke passed away in 1979; my 5’6” father passed away in 1993.

Edwin J. (EJ) Baldwin was the eldest of five children. He was born in a little village in northern Michigan. My grandparents moved to Little Rock, Arkansas, shortly after Dad was born; and Dad and his siblings were all raised on a small farm outside of Little Rock. Dad didn’t leave Arkansas until shortly before I was born. He passed away just a few days before his 86^th birthday.

Dad was raised in a religious home; his father was a deacon in the church. However, by the time Dad was a teenager he had been totally turned off by the hypocrisy of dead religion and found his thrill at the bottom of a bottle. Though only a young man, Dad had mastered the art of moonshining and was known far and wide for the quality of his home-brewed whiskey.

Dad also mastered the welding trade. There were none better. He worked on projects all over the country, including the St. Louis arch. When Pearl Harbor was bombed, Dad and his two brothers marched down to the recruiter’s office and signed up. One brother joined the Navy; the other brother joined the Marines and was wounded in the Pacific. Dad was in his mid-thirties when Japan struck our fleet in Hawaii (his brothers were much younger), and with his age and welding skills, Uncle Sam put Dad to work on a secret project that he never would divulge. As with most of the “Greatest Generation,” my dad was fiercely patriotic.

I remember driving my mother and father from my home at the time on the Gulf Coast of Florida to my hometown of La Porte, Indiana (where Dad had moved shortly before I was born). As we made that 900-mile trip along Interstate 65, I was intrigued at something Dad did: he saluted every American flag that he saw en route. Every single one! I had never seen him do anything like that before. He passed away four months later. That trip was the last one Dad made on this earth. I have never forgotten it. Did Dad have a premonition that on this trip he was saying goodbye to “the land of the free” and about to head out to a land that is even freer? I think so.

As previously mentioned, Dad was a master welder. He came from a long line of craftsmen. His father was a carpenter. His one brother was a master plumber, and his youngest brother was a master machinist. These were hard-working, blue collar men that took great pride and personal satisfaction in the quality of their work. Their word was their bond; and they were as honest as the day is long. I never knew any of them to not keep their word–about anything.

My father lived through two world wars, the Great Depression, the Korean and Vietnam conflicts, and the assassination of President Kennedy. He went from riding on a horse and buggy to watching a man step foot on the moon.

As I said, Dad mastered the art of whiskey making as a young man. Unfortunately, he also became a slave to his product. It didn’t take Dad long to become an alcoholic. Dad was never mean or physically abusive when he was drunk. Instead, he would go on binges in which he would ride the rails, hoboing all over the country. His drinking cost him his first family, and by the time he was in his early forties, his health was gone.

He entered the Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) program, and step number three of that program changed his life forever. The third step of the AA program says, “[We] made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.”

Well, Dad clearly didn’t understand God (as he would say repeatedly) and set out on a journey to try and satisfy this third step in AA. His search took him to the High Street Baptist Church and Pastor Harvey Hicks in Little Rock. Harvey himself was a former alcoholic and, therefore, talked Dad’s language. Harvey led my father to the Lord, and Dad’s life was transformed forever. Not only did God save my father’s soul, He healed my father’s body. (And He didn’t need Benny Hinn to do it.)

From the day Dad was converted to Christ to the day of his death some forty-six years later, Dad never touched another drink of alcoholic beverage. Say what you want; I know it was a divine miracle.

If you or a family member suffers from addiction (or if someone you know has a loved one who suffers from addiction), I will send you a CD (DVDs not available) of my father’s true-life story as recorded on the international radio program “Unshackled,” produced by the Pacific Garden Mission in Chicago, Illinois. There is NO CHARGE for this CD. Order Dad’s true-life story here:

“Unshackled” – The Edwin J. Baldwin Story

After Dad’s conversion, he moved to the city of my birth and spent the rest of his life there. He became a chaplain in the La Porte County jail. Later, he became a chaplain in the Indiana State Prison (a maximum security prison) in Michigan City. I guess you could say I cut my ministerial teeth as a boy with my dad in the jails and prisons of northern Indiana.

More than anyone else, my dad taught me the value of hard work, honesty, and devotion to God. My father was 45 years old when I was born, and growing up, I had no clue as to how valuable being raised by a father who was old enough to be my grandfather would eventually be to me.

I heard Dad and Mom (she was almost 40 when I was born) talk about things that impacted their generation. At the time, it seemed old-fashioned to me. But as I grew older, I realized that I had been privileged to be personally educated and influenced by people who had lived in and experienced a world that was quickly passing away–a world that my peers had absolutely no insight to.

Think about it: my grandfather was born in 1880. My grandfather! That was only two generations ago for me; and this is 2017.

My father and grandfather were old school. They didn’t believe in debt. The only thing I know that my dad borrowed money for was our house. If he couldn’t afford it, he didn’t buy it. It was that simple. When granddad passed away, he left no debts; and when my dad passed away, he left no debts.

When I graduated from high school and went to college, I had to work a full-time job in order to pay my own way. I worked in a factory, a grocery store, sold vacuum cleaners, and did whatever I had to do to pay my way through school. Dad couldn’t afford to pay my way through college; and I didn’t expect him to. There was no such thing as handouts or entitlements in the Baldwin household. If you got it, you worked for it. I learned that lesson early on when I got my driver’s license and wanted my own car. You guessed it: I had to earn the money for it, buy my own gas and oil, insurance, car repairs, etc. But that life lesson has served me well throughout my life.

At the age of 23, my wife and I launched out by faith with no money and no financial backing of any kind to a city where I had never lived–and went to work. All I had was a deep faith in God and a strong willingness to work hard–both of which I learned from my father. And then, at the age of 58, my wife and I moved 2,600 miles across the country and did it again.

Can you imagine? When most men my age are looking for financial security and a comfortable retirement, I left all of that behind and started a brand new work in a city and State in which we had never lived and where we knew no one (except I did know Rick Jore who lives a few miles south of where we live and who remains my dear friend). And not only did we start a new fellowship from scratch, we started a fellowship that is not a non-profit organization, which means donations to our fellowship are not tax-deductible. Everyone said we were crazy; everyone said we would starve. But we are now in our seventh year, our fellowship is thriving, and I haven’t missed a meal since moving here.

What I’m trying to point out is that everything I have done in my life, every risk I have taken, every step of faith I have made, every decision to defy the way it’s “supposed” to be done, every decision to tackle any issue head-on (no matter how controversial or unpopular), every decision to back away from no enemy, every decision to be willing to change a long held theological position if I come to realize I was wrong–no matter how many feathers are ruffled or how much support I might lose–is ALL due to what I learned at the feet of and in the home of this remarkable man, Edwin J. Baldwin.

Oh, I should tell you this part of the story: my mother never had any children before me. She had been told by doctors that she had a medical condition that would prevent her from ever having children. But shortly after she and my dad were married, Dad started praying that the Lord would give them a son and that their son would grow up to be a preacher. And in spite of everything the doctors had told my mom–and at the age of almost 40–she gave birth to a little boy. And, well, that little boy grew up and became a preacher. And, of course, that little boy was me.

I still have vivid memories of my dad and the life lessons he taught me. I remember the stories he told me about growing up in the early years of the Twentieth Century; about the Great Depression; about the war; about the time my granddad had to take a man’s life in self-defense; about his drinking days; about the hobo jungles; about the welding jobs; about the spiritual revival that took place in Pendleton Prison after he told his life story to the inmates there; about the pain and sorrow his drinking had inflicted upon his first wife and my two half-sisters and the lifelong grief and remorse he had over all of that; about Harvey Hicks; and about his miraculous conversion.

Harvey Hicks died when I was a toddler, but I still remember how Mom had found out about it while Dad was at work. And after she called the factory where Dad worked and told him about Harvey’s passing, Dad was overcome with such grief that he could not continue to work. His boss was a very kind and understanding man, and he let Dad come home for the rest of the day. I remember how grief-stricken Dad was when he heard that the man who had won him to Christ had passed away. Obviously, I never met Harvey Hicks. But I love that man. I love what he did for my dad. I’m looking forward to telling him how much I love him when it’s my turn to join those great men in a much better place.

My dad has been in Heaven for over 24 years now, and he is still the most influential man in my life. I’ve never known a more courageous yet compassionate man. He was as hard as a nail and as soft as a pillow at the same time. He feared no one but God; and he loved God with all of his heart. He is the greatest man I’ve ever known.

Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form

I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:

Chuck Baldwin Live Store

PRO-TRUMP SPIRIT OF AMERICA RALLY

Stop the Fight, Let’s Unite

On Saturday, March 4th, Spirit of America rallies will take place all over the country. The events are being heralded as Pro-Trump rallies, intended to unite and counter the divisional protest marches being held in opposition to our President.

Main Street Patriots has a list of events, by State, with times and locations available HERE. There is also a Facebook Page HERE – March for Trump is HERE. 

Vincent Harvey, an Air Force veteran felt it was time to do something positive for President Trump. Haney said, “The idea for the event came out of the blue. I was inspired to do something supportive to offset the wave of negativity and lies.” Haney was inspired after seeing multiple protests, including the debased Women’s March, and the violence and destruction by Soros paid protestors.

What first started out as a single march in Washington D.C. has grown into a nationwide movement. The grassroots formed March4Trump is receiving increased sponsorship for its nationwide event. The goal of these marches and rallies is to peacefully unite all people. March4Trump is seeking only individuals who wish to spread love rather than hate, unite rather than divide, and support rather than resistance.

Joy Villa DC Keynote Speaker

March4Trump is pleased to announce, Singer Joy Villa , has accepted our invitation to be a keynote speaker at the March 4th event in Washington DC. She, along with the March4Trump Organization, are seeking to unite the Nation together in support of our newly elected President.

Joy Villa gained national attention by attending the Grammy’s in a Make America Great Again gown designed by, Andre Soriano. Ms. Villa was one of a select few among the Hollywood elite to publicly show support for President Donald J. Trump. “I support our country and our president, I’m proud to be an American woman supporting March4Trump,” said Villa in a statement.

This bold statement brought other celebrity’s out who were silent about their support. Her support of Trump increased her record sales, and boosted Ms. Villa’s self-released five song E.P. “I Make the Static” to number one on both iTunes and Amazon’s Best Sellers Lists, and gave her hit number 12 on the Billboard charts.

Other well-known celebrities will attend marches across the country. This is a peaceful assembly. The promoters are asking that marchers do not impede traffic, litter, vandalize, or do anything else unbefitting to Americans supporting our President. Any violators will be asked to leave and turned over to authorities when appropriate. If your intentions are other than peaceful this event is not for you. 

“A nation that kills its children in the womb has lost its soul.”

On February 21, 2017, Life site news reported:

This morning, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe vetoed a bill defunding Planned Parenthood of its non-Medicaid funds.

The bill passed the House 60-33 and the Senate 20-19. It would have given healthcare programs that don’t perform or promote abortion priority state funding over organizations that commit abortions.

Planned Parenthood’s non-abortion services are able to be billed through Medicaid, although pro-life advocates point out that this money is fungible and helps the abortion-centered organization operate.

Planned Parenthood tweeted that at the veto, McAuliffe said, “Discrimination breeds hatred and we will not tolerate that here in the commonwealth of Virginia.”

The question I have for all of America is, why is it that these representatives of the people in our Constitutional Republic (Article 4, Section 4 of the US Constitution) are continuously given a pass when they support these organizations, which have no lawful standing in the sight of Heaven or America, when it comes to the murder of the innocent children? (Proverbs 6:17)

Americans know that there is nothing on this side of Jerusalem which can justify the murder of the innocent.

Why is it that these representatives are getting a pass from the American people? They honor what I despise, namely, corruption.

Furthermore, why is it that this governor is so adamant about supporting the likes of a known criminal organization like Planned Parenthood?

Maybe this will help shed some light on Governor Terry McAuliffe (Ephesians 5:11).

Did you know that he was under investigation concerning his campaign donations from people like the Clinton Criminal family?

This criminal is also receiving donations from an organization that is aimed at murdering children.

Lest you forget….

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” —Founder of Planned Parenthood Margret Sanger [YouTube Video]

“It’s no secret that this bill is aimed at destroying Planned Parenthood,” said McAuliffe.

He added that such a law would make Virginia appear unwelcome to new businesses, reported The Virginian-Pilot: “We will not tolerate socially divisive issues that put walls up.”

The Virginia Bureau of Watchdog.org reported that Planned Parenthood contributed more than $1.7 million to McAuliffe’s gubernatorial campaign in 2013. Abortion industry lobbying organization NARAL donated $56,000 to his campaign, as well.

America, how do you show mercy to a people who show little to no regard when it comes to enforcing the law against the crime, which establishes justice? (Luke 12:2)

After all, justice does guard American liberty (Isaiah 51:4).

Why am I saying this? No matter how many times you bring things to the light, the American people, for the most part, act as if it is someone else’s responsibility to right the wrongs (Deuteronomy 4:1).

How many of our veterans fought, bled and died magnifying the law against tyrants that Americans are tolerating within? Remember,

“Where the law ends, tyranny begins.” —William Pitt [YouTube Video]

A judge, because of his love for the law and society, shows mercy by pronouncing (Enforcing the law) sentence against (Judgment) them that violate law. Luke 11:42

America, you are the law (Under God)!

“A nation ceases to be republican…when the will of the majority ceases to be the law.” —Thomas Jefferson

Depending on how thankful you are, will be to the degree that you tolerate crime (2 Corinthians 7:10). How much do you honor those who sacrificed their all for the freedoms which you now have? Do you live for what they died for? (2 Corinthians 5:15)

© 2017 Bradlee Dean – All Rights Reserved

“The one sure way to conciliate a tiger is to allow oneself to be devoured.” —Konrad Adenauer, First Chancellor of West Germany 1949 to 1963

Back in October of 2012 we wrote an article describing our “Little Black Box” theory. We wrote: “This theory applies across the board to almost everything we believe in and everything we do in our lives. It is inescapable and what is in the “Little Black Box” determines, to a large margin, how our lives will turn out. It determines our thoughts, religious beliefs, sexual proclivities, our fears, our strengths, our weaknesses, our successes or failures and even our political persuasions.”

“The content of the “Little Black Box” and thus a person’s point of reference, begins to fill up at a very early age and is set in stone by age 20. The person is not aware, nor do they have any control over what goes into it. All of us are totally innocent victims of what goes into our “Little Black Boxes.”

The theory applies to Donald Trump as well. So what has filled up Donald Trump’s “Little Black Box” that makes him who he is?

Trump, born in June of 1946, was the silver spoon son of Frederick C. and Mary Macleod Trump and was the 4th of five children born to the family. Fred Trump Jr. was a successful builder and developer who specialized in middle-income apartments in an around New York City.

The parents sent young Donald age 13, to the New York Military Academy. He did well at the Academy both socially and academically, rising to be a star athlete and student leader by the time of his graduation in 1964. Young Trump would later attend and graduate from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania in 1968 with a degree in economics.

But a window into each person’s life, is the life of the child’s parents, a life and environment that starts filling up the “Little Black Box” of every person, literally from the day of birth. That early life is a complex mixture of genetics, home life, financial status, life-altering events, neighborhoods and relationships with parents, siblings, school kids and teachers. With boys, usually the influence of a father and even a grandfather can have the most impact on the direction and path of a boy child and it was no different with young Donald.

Fred Trump, Donald’s father, was the son of German immigrants, Frederick and Elizabeth Drumpf. When Donald’s grandfather, Frederick Drumpf, became an American citizen in 1892, he changed his last name to Trump. Changing their names was not an uncommon practice with European immigrants to America.

Frederick Drumpf, now Trump, as a single man, moved to Seattle in 1891 to run a couple of restaurants in the Red Light District. The restaurants catered to mostly Alaska gold seekers that were flooding into Seattle and were not places for respectable women. After the Klondike gold rush wound down in about 1901, Frederick headed back to Germany where he married Elizabeth. The German government promptly expelled Frederick and his now pregnant wife, back to America because Germany felt that Frederick was trying to avoid his American taxes and army obligations.

Fred Trump Jr., son of Donald Trump’s grandfather, went into the real estate business at the tender age of 22 with his mother, Elizabeth. He lost his father when he was 13. Fred Jr. built single-family homes and pioneered the concept of supermarkets. During World War II, Fred’s company built barracks and garden apartments for U. S. Navy personnel. Fred and his mother became quite successful.

Donald Trump joined the company in 1968 (Donald was just 22 at the time) and in 1971 was given control of the company, whereupon he changed the name of the Company to the Trump Organization. It was previously called the “Elizabeth Trump & Son Company.” True to his growing ego, Donald wanted to put his own brand on the company and drop the brand of his father and grandmother.

The truth is, Donald Trump has lived a highly privileged, upper crust life, all of his life. Like most silver spoons, he is used to getting his way. His second wife, Marla Maples, said Trump thinks of himself as a King. Yes, he’s been married three times but being a successful silver spoon-business tycoon and a ladies man shouldn’t, in itself, disqualify him from becoming president. Many wealthy people have become president, FDR being one of them. Bill Clinton was the consummate ladies man.

But not all was peaches and cream for the Donald. In 1973 the U. S. Justice Department Civil Rights Division filed a civil suit against the Trump Organization, now under the Donald’s control, charging that the company refused to rent to Blacks. In any event, a settlement was reached between the Trump Organization and the Justice Department that required Trump to list all vacancies with the Urban League and advertise them in minority papers. (Trump is quite used to lawsuits as the records show he has been involved in over 3,500 of them in the last three decades.)

In spite of being targeted by the Justice Department, the Trump Organization has become a worldwide, multi-billion dollar company under Donald Trump’s direction and has made Donald, now 70, a multi-billionaire in his own right. The Trump Organization has provided jobs and incomes for thousands of people of all ages, races and gender. He must be doing something right. Yes, some of his Atlantic City ventures went bust, but the real estate business always has been and always will be highly risky and prone to down turns and business reversals from market disruptions, competition, rising interest rates and unsustainable debt.

Nevertheless, no matter how powerful Donald Trump thinks he is, he is up against something even more powerful than himself. Trump is up against what most conservatives are up against, “The System”. We describe “The System” in an article entitled, “The System – Impenetrable, Inflexible and Un-Yielding” as follows:

“The ‘System’ is an intertwined entanglement of interlocking national and international interests of commerce, finance and trade, accompanied by government enablers of the ‘System’ in the executive, judicial and legislative branches ….. and bureaucrats. The tentacles of one interest are inextricably interwoven into the tentacles of all the other interests. Finding out what drives one, leads to a complex maze of closed doors, backrooms, deep subterranean caverns and secret meetings. All the sources are purposely hidden and camouflaged. Traces to find the truth go down dead end paths, or are blocked by impenetrable obstacles. Sources of the ‘System’s’ power are elusive and they are anything but constitutional.”

“Examples of the ‘System’ include unions, socialists, environmentalists, central bankers and the broad category of government, at every level. They drive America’s institutions and public education (or should we say indoctrination) ‘Systems.’ Attorneys, judges, court clerks, the ABA and tens of thousands of local, state and federal rules, drive the judicial ‘System’, such that if true justice ever finds a court, it will have become a worldwide miracle.”

Ninety percent of “The System’s” core contains the elements of global socialism, communism and Progressivism, driven by the financial motives and greed of the global elite. In America, the largest element in “The System” is Progressivism, which is just a different name for socialism and communism.

Astoundingly, after losing the election to Trump, the Progressives are moving even further left, with the likes of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and two other far-left lunatics who are vying to become the head of the Democrat National Committee (DNC). (Perez won) The 2016 election was a repudiation of Progressive policies and yet the Democrat’s answer is to move farther left. The word insanity comes to mind.

Unfortunately, until the arrival of Reagan and now Donald Trump, Republicans and conservatives have been giving in to Progressives for so many years Progressives believe in their heart of hearts that they own America. Their weapon of choice is irrational compassion and they beat conservatives over the head with it. That is why there has been and will continue to be, massive push back against the Trump agenda, for as long as he is in office. Progressives and the media will do everything in their power to undo Trump with their shadow government. It will be amazing if he finishes out even one term before they render him impotent at the 2018 mid-term, impeach him ….. or he is killed.

But conservatives get what they deserve because they have been giving into Progressives for over 100 years. If you never draw a line in the sand, the line keeps moving into your defenses until you have no ground left to defend. Conservatives hold the losing hand because we have always given into the pressure of the false ideology called Progressivism. Progressivism always plays well to the uninformed masses and Progressives in the government exploit that ignorance for their own gain and maintaining perpetual power. Conservatives will never have the winning hand unless they stand their ground. Because eventually, the only hand Conservatives will have left, if they don’t stand their ground, is violence and that is very seldom a winning hand, especially if the other side holds all the power ….. and controls the heavy artillery.

Some have said conservatives should just capitulate entirely to Progressives and let the chips fall where they may, hoping that the uninformed masses will finally see the light on who really is responsible for the damage being done to America. Others have said conservatives should “give in” just a little bit to Progressivism in the hopes of getting a better “deal”, but that is what conservatives have been doing for far too long. Short of violence, total capitulation may be the last peaceful hand conservatives have left to play.

Because we keep “giving in” we have thrown ourselves into the tiger’s mouth and we are about to be devoured, if we haven’t been devoured already. Because freedom doesn’t sell well to the morally weak and the bought-off masses, which are in the majority, we have lost our peaceful negotiating power to defend it. Conservatives have believed the other side when they say that they agree in principle to what conservatives are saying, without acknowledging the fact that Progressives haven’t the slightest intention of ever putting those principles into practice. In effect, they lie and conservatives fall for it every time. Those, for whom the lies serve, will never vote against the liars and in most cases they are too uninformed to recognize the lies in the first place.

The only logical conclusion we can come to, is Progressives are intentionally trying to destroy a free America for perpetual control. (See our new video entitled: “Progressivism, An Existential Threat to Freedom.”) That makes the Progressives enemies of America and enemies of the people. But over half the American people just don’t know it, or refuse to acknowledge it. They do so because they are blinded by the intense light of all of the “free” stuff they get from government.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is what Trump and the 63,000,000 Americans that voted for him, are up against. It remains to be seen whether the personal power in Trump’s “Little Black Box” and those 63,000,000 Americans are more powerful than America’s Progressive “System.” If Trump doesn’t break “The System” in his first term, it may never be broken.

Did this article STIR YOUR BLOOD? Let us know.

By the way, if you are a rural landowner, you owe it to yourself to check out NARLO’s powerful, legally intimidating, constitutional NO TRESPASSING SIGNS. Well over 6,000 of these powerful signs have been installed on rural lands all over America.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

Post-Christian American culture—hot dog! Isn’t it just fantastically wonderful?

Maybe you heard about what happened this weekend in Orange, Connecticut, and Proctor, Vermont, when they tried to hold outdoor Easter egg hunts. With thousands of Easter eggs laid out on the ground, “parents”—in the sense of persons who have physically begotten children—jumped the starting signals and swarmed onto the fields to scarf up all the eggs. The scene in Proctor got nasty enough that the police had to be called in to break it up.

Last year they had an Easter egg hunt in Sacramento, California, that turned into an even bigger mess, with persons calling themselves parents trampling and cursing small children, and knocking them aside, as they charged out to get the eggs.

My parents were not like that. In fact, nobody had parents like that, once upon a time.

Who can explain this behavior? It’s certainly not religious zeal. Why should the sight of some Easter eggs inflame them to riot?

Oh, but that’s nothing. Imagine being brought up by those parents.

Happily, we don’t have to rely entirely on our imaginations. There is abundant evidence as to what is the result, to children, of being raised and educated by putzes and pumpkinheads. All you have to do is look at what’s happening in our—ahem!—colleges and universities.

At Emory University this month, students went all to pieces when somebody scrawled “Trump 2016” on the sidewalk. Students said they felt “afraid,” and “unsafe.” They demanded that the university authorities protect them from such dire menaces as election slogans, etc. The authorities complied, and came up with a new “chalking policy” that says you can’t scribble anything onto the sidewalk or the walls unless they pre-approve it first.

Sheesh. When I was in college, it was “Frodo lives.”

But in those days, the colleges were selling us “dissent” as the supreme social good, an end in itself, blah-blah. By “dissent” they meant opposing the Vietnam War. If you dissented from their dissent, they got rather cross with you.

But they didn’t collapse into fetal position and snivel and whine because you disagreed with them! They were much more likely to beat you up or vandalize your car. The campus was the place for lively conversations, once upon a time.

Then we’ve got the associate professor of English (what else?) who has vowed to call the police every day, from now on, to report the presence of ROTC cadets on campus—where, as a matter of fact and custom, they are usually to be found. Yes, this tenured piece of protoplasm has vowed to call 911 and waste police time—because the ROTC unit on campus makes her experience sheer terror, first, and then unbearable rage. This is like calling the police to report squirrels in the park; only in this case, the caller is an even bigger squirrel. She admits that the first time she saw the cadets performing drill, she actually hid under her desk.

If the kiddies have not been adequately warped by their Easter egg-fanatic parents, and their pitiful public schools, they go to college to have the job finished by the likes of this professor, if they can get her out from under her desk. Her academic specialty, by the way, is something called “Body Studies,” which includes instruction in “bondage and discipline.” Your tuition dollars at work.

America has too many colleges and universities with too many idiots teaching too many pseudo-studies for too much money, and way too many of her young people going there.

Oh, yeah, this is going to turn out just great for America. This is a fundamental transformation that every pea-brain can be proud of. Is the idea to make us so pathetic and contemptible that our foreign enemies won’t want to conquer us?

Like I say: kill the culture, and it’ll kill you right back.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2016 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved