Geoff Metcalf -- Clarification: Follow up to 'Flipping off the UN'

CLARIFICATION

By Geoff Metcalf

February 2, 2004

NewsWithViews.com

"It is not a question of WHO is right or wrong, but WHAT is right or wrong that counts." -- Geoff Metcalf

I recently observed that those of us complaining about the dysfunctional malfeasance of the globalists nexus have been pleasantly surprised by the surprise visitation of some strange bedfellows.

Two incidents, that I see as very positive, sparked considerable email response from readers and listeners who thought I was being stroked and lulled into a false sense of confidence by Machiavellian manipulators.

Labor Secretary, Elaine Chao recently warned www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/1/ 23/103603.shtml that Americans must pay more attention to the United Nations and its related organizations and The Wall Street Journal documented in a recent column, 'The New Multilateralism' that outlined significant success of The Proliferation Security Initiative is a new effort that has already yielded success in the area of controlling weapons of mass destruction the UN could only dream about.

I asked if "we are in the midst of a globalist sea change?" and I got A LOT of response�ranging from "Hooah" to "are you out of your (expletive) mind?"

No, we are simply being deceived, again. Remember, one of their strategies is not to be a definable stationary target?
Bush can talk positive or negative about the UN or even demonstrate his independence over and over, but he can also surprise you at any future press conference or "state of the Union Address" by capitulating to them in some broad, far-reaching manner...and then you'll realize you played right into his (their) hands!
The purpose and authority for the invasion of Iraq was the U.N. resolution, lest you forget...This invasion actually builds up the U.N. quite contrary to your article, while the U.N is involving itself in every area of American life from education to wetlands.
Good article as always. But don't you think this is a case of the Bushies trying to placate the conservative and more importantly constitutionalist wing of the Republican Party from voting Libertarian or staying at home next November?
I just wonder if the powers that be see this tsunami (of public awareness regarding UN threat) coming and are trying to stall off the inevitable.
Bush and the rest of Bush's cabinet cite every week that they are fulfilling the UN mandate and state that they are there to make the UN stronger.
The nicest thing one could say about your support for Bush (43) is that you are naive. But most of us know you are smarter than that.
Geoff ... your support for Bush is self-serving, weak kneed or worse. To say that Bush is anti-UN is truly ... "disinformation".
President Bush is surrounded by members of the Council on Foreign Relations, whose most powerful members founded and continue to promote the United Nations. We are not in the midst of a global sea change; the aim of the game, according to CFR heavyweights, is to "restructure the United Nations."
We may be seeing a slight increase of the competition - within the overall conspiracy - between the communist movement and the international banking establishment.
In this article were you slamming the UN or not I could not quite make that out.
I agree with what you wrote in your editorial�I suspect that those who have spouted the globalist agenda for decades have not given up their plans�I read such words, as you quoted from Bush admininstration personnel, with a great deal of skeptisim.
If we are (seeing a sea change), I would advise the President to steer clear of open touring cars.

For the record (and for clarification), I do NOT really think we are in a sea change. The would-be controllers STILL want and intend to control everything and everybody. Their goal is unchanged.

However, the recent official "dissing" of the UN, and the introduction of programs that undermine the UN and introduce programs (like PSI) that are effective and WORK is STILL significant.

The one-worlders may be rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, but notwithstanding their presumed objectives, the glass is half full�not half empty.

This paradigm shift represents an opportunity to be exploited.

Too often folks get wrapped around the axle of "them" versus "us" and can't embrace good results without tainting it with WHO is involved and "hidden agendas".

Perhaps critics are right and the president is merely tweaking the globalist infrastructure. However, in the process he is helping us underscore the dysfunctional malfeasance of a broken ineffectual institution. And that IS a good thing.

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

"Geoff Metcalf is a nationally syndicated radio talk show host for TALK AMERICA and a veteran media performer. He has had an eclectic professional background covering a wide spectrum of radio, television, magazine, and newspapers. A former Green Beret and retired Army officer he is in great demand as a speaker. Visit Geoff's Web Site: www.geoffmetcalf.com. While you're at it - pick up a copy of Geoff's latest book! E-mail: geoff@geoffmetcalf.com

Home

"The one-worlders may be rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, but notwithstanding their presumed objectives, the glass is half full�not half empty."