Muslims are permitted lying to deceive non-believers
…and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But, I say unto you, that every idle word that man shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. —KJV Matthew 12:35-37
Why is it ok for Muslims to lie? For them Islam permits lying to deceive non-believers and to bring world denomination and for them, they believe Muhammad will not hold them accountable.
It is impossible to understand Islam and Muslims by listening to their protestations against terror and their proclamations of patriotism for America. Usually, it is wise and fair to give people the benefit of the doubt but when it comes to national safety and the future of America, we had better look twice, even thrice at Muslim patriotism.
Why? Because Islam permits lying! It is called “Al-taqiyya.” One Muslim said that Al-taqiyya means dissimulation then he expanded it to diplomacy but he should have gone further to deception. Now some Muslims who do not follow the Koran are as faithful Americans as any of us, but the problem is, we cannot tell the difference.
This is another reason among many that makes it difficult to trust what Muslims say. For them it is permissible to lie without fear of guilt, accountability or retribution. A lie in the defense of furthering Islam is even applauded in their “holy” books.
For Christians or those who want you to believe they are Christians, God takes a very different view. Of course if you choose to not believe in God that is your choice, but even most non-practicing Christians believe and aren’t just too sure what might be waiting for them on judgment day.
Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman into a bedroom and (4) to facilitate one on his journey. Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection. Muslims will tell you that concealment of a truth is not an abandonment of that truth if it benefits Islam.
So how did this “tactic” of lying becoming so popular for our elected and non-elected officials? Every day we find more and more corruption and collusion from those in D.C.
These concerns are focused on millions of dollars that Comey accepted from a Clinton Foundation defense contractor, Comey’s former membership on a Clinton Foundation corporate partner’s board, and his surprising financial relationship with his brother Peter Comey, who works at the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.
It’s called “pay to play” in the world of politics! When Obama nominated Comey to become FBI director in 2013, Comey promised the United States Senate that he would recuse himself on all cases involving former employers.
But Comey earned $6 million in one year alone from Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin became a Clinton Global Initiative member of the Foundation and the company admitted to becoming a Clinton Global Initiative member in 2010.
Peter Comey works for DLA Piper, the firm that performed the independent audit of the Clinton Foundation in November during Clinton-World’s first big push to put the email scandal behind them. DLA Piper’s employees taken as a whole represents a major Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign donation bloc and Clinton Foundation donation base.
DLA Piper ranks #5 on Hillary Clinton’s all-time career Top Contributors list, just ahead of Goldman Sachs.
We all know Hillary lied about Benghazi, email servers and a multiple of other topics over the years. Her first major offense was as a 27 year old staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigation. Lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman, when asked why Hillary Rodham was fired stated, “Because she is a liar. She is an unethical, dishonest lawyer; she conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the Committee, and the rules of confidentiality.”
The Clinton’s themselves are so unethical that their last name should be “unethical”.
Did America forget that former president Bill Clinton resigned his AR law license in order to avoid being formally disbarred? Or that the Supreme Court disbarred him from practicing before the Supreme Court? Americans should have felt that slap on their faces after having elected him twice.
So we know that Hillary messed up Benghazi for whatever reason we will never know because “what difference does it make?” A great deal if you are one of the loved ones of those brave men.
We know that as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped in the establishment of the Turkish Gülen Charter Schools and the Gülen Movement in the US with a brokered deal to split the revenue from the sale of the oil captured in Iraq by ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists, – a deal that was made between Prime Minister Erdogan’s and Gülen’s factions in Turkey and overseen by the CIA while the 2 men were still friends.
Then there is her deep dealings with the sale of America’s uranium to a Russian owned company, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation). A 2013 article explained how Russia’s atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company (Uranium One) with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. This made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers. Like they always say, there is more to the story.
Behind and at the core of all this activity were several men who were leaders of the Canadian mining industry and had been very large, major donors to the Clinton family Foundation. Members of the group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians what was to become known as Uranium One.
The sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that signed off was of course the U.S. State Dept, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clinton’s despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House in 2008 to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
$500,000 for a speech? Shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received his $500,000 speaking fee for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
The deal was strategically important to Mr. Putin, who shortly after the Americans gave their blessing sat down for a staged interview with Rosatom’ s chief executive, Sergei Kiriyenko. “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20 percent of U.S. reserves,” Mr. Kiriyenko told Mr. Putin.
When you are already sitting at the table, who cares if you undercut or sell out your own country, after all it is called treason, but only if your government acts on it. The path to a Russian acquisition of American uranium deposits began in 2005 in Kazakhstan, where the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra orchestrated his first big uranium deal with Mr. Clinton at his side.
The two men had flown aboard Mr. Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record.
Within days of the visit, Mr. Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium agency Kazatomprom.
Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. That deal made it perfectly clear that Uranium One was intent on becoming “a powerhouse in the United States uranium sector with the potential to become the domestic supplier of choice for U.S. utilities,” the company declared.
Five months later Giustra held a fund-raiser for the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, a project aimed at fostering progressive environmental and labor practices in the natural resources industry, to which he had pledged $100 million.
On another front, the Washington Post reported in 2015 that Giustra had formed in Canada a charity, the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (CGEP) that evaded the State Department ethics agreement Hillary signed in 2008 by concealing the names of some 1,100 donors. According to the Post, the CGEP “has spent nearly $30 million in current U.S. dollars since 2007; and nearly $25 million of that spending has gone directly to the Clinton Foundation.”
The icing on the cake for me has been learning the background information in regard to the Bundy and Hammond ranch fiasco which includes the fact there is a considerable amount of uranium on their land and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been given permission to shed blood in order to procure this uranium for very nefarious purposes.
As you may or may not know, Intellihub reported on Jan. 4, that the Hammond’s ranch and other ranch-lands surrounding the refuge sit atop a vast swath of precious metals, minerals, and uranium that’s heavily desired by not only the federal government, but foreign entities as well. Now, after further investigation, more pieces of the puzzle have been put in place and who but Hillary Rodham Clinton of the notorious Clinton crime family is in deep.
You say this cannot possibly be true – we are talking about the Clinton’s here who left OUR White House at the end of Clinton’s term in 2001 STEALING furniture, china and other items. Clinton’s offered they were gifts and they were, however the gift givers stated they were giving them to the “White House” not the Clinton’s personally.
In 2011, Bill Clinton gave a speech in Hong Kong for Ericsson (Swedish multinational communications technology company) – This really bothers me since Ericsson was openly doing business with the Iranian government at a time when the State Department had a list making these deals illegal. For this little event Clinton was paid $750,000 by Ericsson for a 45 minute speech. According to Clinton financial disclosures, in the previous ten years Ericsson had never sponsored a Clinton speech.
The backdoor part of this story is that 5 days after Clinton gave his speech, the State Department unveiled its new sanctions list for Iran, and Ericsson was not on the list with Hillary stating the State Dept. was going to allow them (Ericsson) to “police” themselves.” Even when Obama imposed sanctions on telecom sales by executive order in 2012, “those sanctions did not apply to Ericsson’s work in Iran.”
I personally believe the Clinton’s as a family do a much better job of lying than any Muslims. At least with the Muslims you know their agenda – with the Clinton’s you are never very sure except for pure “human greed at any cost”.
Oh and Goldstar Family of Khizr Khan and his wife – just to set the record straight. First of all why weren’t their parents there from any of the hundreds of our young men and women who have died in these wars in the past 12 years? You really need to read about his son’s war record. Khan, a stealth jihadist, would have Americans believe that he is just like them. He is a far cry from any of us.
For you see Khizr Khan is linked very deeply to the Muslim Brotherhood – the very same Muslim Brotherhood who our president has allowed to infiltrate our government and take our tax dollars and funnel them to Hamas. Khan is not a Constitutional American no matter how much he wants to wave it around.
In taking a further look you will find that Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was the co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah (the works of Muhammad) — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad. [LINK]
I do believe this country once held a trial and found the Rosenberg’s guilty of treason for far lesser charges than the Clinton’s or others are doing or have done to this country.
It appears the only way to survive in this country today is to be gay, a transgender, follow Lucifer and lie!