RADIO ENCOUNTERS OF
THE THE THIRD KIND
By Terry Hayfield
January 23, 2003
NewsWithViews.com
There
is a “Third Kind” living amongst us in this Republic. This “Third Kind” comes in a political package disguising
themselves as Republicans (World Conservatives of the International
Democrat Union) and Democrats (World Liberals of The Third Way).
The “Third Kind” wants to establish a self-regulating classless
society on planet earth. I have had radio encounters with two Republican members of
the “Third Kind”, Anne Coulter (author of the best seller Slander) and David Horowitz (author of Empire and Revolution and How
to Beat the Democrats and
Other Subversive Ideas).
What you are about to read
will readily (and always) be identified by members of the “Third Kind”
as a conspiracy theory. By
calling this a conspiracy theory the “Third Kind” wants the reader to
envision this writer sporting a Hitler style mustache, dressed in
“brown-shirt” Khakis, setting in a room with book cases filled with
all kinds of “Hate” literature and the walls decorated with Swastikas
and portraits of Der Führer. People
such as Coulter and Horowitz do not want to talk about the very real
existence of the “Third Kind” nor do they want you to know what is
really taking place in this Republic and the world.
The
“Third Kind” is actually the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC).
The Radical Capitalist Class is group of people that are trying
desperately to spread a very specific American/British Capitalism based on
Fabian Socialism to encompass the globe.
It is the belief of the RCC that this Capitalism if left unopposed
will naturally evolve into a Socialism that will pave the way for
Communism. The RCC uses a
continuous process known as Permanent Revolution (War, Revolution and
Terrorism) to remove all impediments (national sovereignty) for the
necessary establishment of Free Trade in order to create a global Free
Market System (Economic Democracy), catalyst for Socialism.
The
ideas of this “Third Kind” are alien to the American people.
Here are a few facts to ponder:
In
1983, former Trilateral Commission (a Fabian Society Front group) members,
George Bush Sr. and Margaret Thatcher, founded an organization called the
International Democratic Union (IDU).
The IDU views itself as an organization of World Conservatives
dedicated to establishing a Free Market System and a “compassionate
conservatism.” There are 70
member parties from around the world to include the Republican Party.
At the gatherings of the IDU the members set around and plot
strategy “to win the political argument” and “planning winning
election strategies” for World Conservatism.
Every four years the IDU holds a major meeting to coincide with the
Republican National Convention in the same city, at the same time and with
the Republican National Committee. Recently
(June 10, 2002) George W. Bush hosted an election strategy meeting of the
IDU in the White House at which the President announced to the world of
this nation’s right to carry out pre-emptive military strikes
(translated, raw aggression) against Terrorist wherever they may be.
The IDU gave overwhelming support to this policy.
All these facts came from a 1979 Trilateral Commission membership
list, the June 11, 2002 Toledo Blade,
the May 8, 2002 Wall St. Journal
and www.IDU.org.
Yet,
when the current and leading political cheerleaders of the Republican
Party, namely Coulter and Horowitz, were confronted with the IDU’s
existence, they chanted “conspiracy theory” and pleaded ignorance,
despite saying more than they should have.
Now
for the Radio Encounters of the Third Kind:
Anne
Coulter, a bouncy and vivacious blonde, recently has been the darling on
the major media “talking head shows” plugging her recent best seller Slander
in support of the Republican Party’s election strategy.
The various talk show hosts has billed her as one of America’s
most intelligent women and an expert on the politics of the Republican Party.
Coulter’s message is about how the terrible Liberal Democrats
along with the Liberal biased Media slanders conservatives, especially
conservatives of the Religious Right. Her biggest criticism of these “Socialist radicals” is
the liberal accusing the conservative of “not being cerebral.”
Ms.
Coulter was interviewed on a July 19, 2002 Omaha, Nebraska AM radio talk
show. I had the opportunity
to be a “phone in” guest. I
wanted to know what kind of response Anne Coulter would give when
confronted about the Republican Party’s membership in the IDU.
In the first part of the interview Anne bemoaned the fact that the
Religious Right is slandered by the Liberal biased Media for belief in a
higher being and tax cuts. Coulter
also observed when media consumers have a choice they overwhelmingly
choose “conservative” talk shows.
One thing she did not explain is why
the Liberal biased Media networks had her on their Liberal biased
programs to speak kindly of conservatives.
Before I got to ask my very specific question she made the claim
the Liberal biased Media is 100% Socialist.
The
question:
“I
am a patriotic conservative. I
am so glad you stated there is a liberal control of the press.
My research shows in some way this is a two way street.
These same liberals since 1983 have not said a word about the
Republican Party’s membership of the International Democrat Union, that
is promoting the same liberal agenda on a global basis and then passes it
off as world conservatism. Can
you enlighten me on that?”
The
answer:
“No,
(emitting an uneasy laugh) I think that is your field of expertise.
I don’t exactly know what you are talking about.”
The
next question:
“That
is exactly what I run into. The
rank and file Republican does not know the Republican Party is a member of
a global Socialist organization. You
have demonstrated in the first half of your interview that you are against
this stuff and Gee, shouldn’t we know the Republican Party is promoting
international Socialism?”
The
answer:
“I,
I…I don’t think so…actually…um. I…mean I never understood the idea….um…um this,
this…um, secret organization theory, What are they doing behind our
backs? They take half our
money. When Clinton was
president he was gunning down religious fringe groups, shipping little
boys back to Cuba and I,…umm, ummm, (now with her voice raising) They
take half our money, wetland designation tells us what we can not do with
our land, what exactly do you think they are doing secretly, (voice really
tense and still raising in tone) “Good God”
Look what they are doing right in front of us!”
Next
question:
“That
is the point I am driving at! You
can ask any chairman of a state Republican Party about the Republican
Party membership in an international socialist organization…”
Hurried
response:
“We’re
talking about something I…ummm…don’t think exists.
We’ve kind of gone off the road here…Can I have another
call?”
It
was more than obvious Anne Coulter did not want to discuss the IDU.
There are only two reasons for this.
One of course is she really did not know about the IDU.
If this is the case then it is a stretch of the imagination to
consider Ms. Coulter an expert
on Republican politics. The
second reason is obviously she did know about the IDU and wasn’t about
to enter into a public discussion about the Republican Party’s
membership in an international Socialist organization.
The
plot thickens!
A
few weeks later David Horowitz was on the same radio station (August 6,
2002). Horowitz’s interview
was prefaced by one of the hosts describing how a previous interview was
scheduled in advance but had to be cancelled at the last minute because
Mr. Horowitz had been summoned to the George W. Bush Waco Texas ranch to
talk election strategy. This
was done to demonstrate the importance of his book How
to Defeat the Democrats and
Other Subversive Ideas. Would
Mr. Horowitz’s response be similar to Ms. Coulter’s?
First
question:
“Hello
Mr. Horowitz, how are you?
Answer:
“Fine.”
Second
question:
“I
was lucky enough to get an advanced uncorrected readers copy of How
to Beat the Democrats.
I do believe it is a book all Republicans should read. My
question is: I understand the tactics you are trying to put across to the
Republicans but, in lieu of the recent split between Al Gore and Joseph
Lieberman, it seems there is
a mad rush of Democrats going to the center, basically through the ages of
the Democratic Leadership Council which is also a member of an
international organization called The Third Way.
Consequently, at the
same time I started reading articles a couple of months ago, one from the Wall
Street Journal for May 8, something about an organization called the
International Democrat Union made up of World Conservatives, then in the
early part of June there was an IDU meeting at the White House that posed
these World Conservatives were right of center.
Does the Republican membership of an international organization
going to the right and vacating the center open the opportunity for the
likes of Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton, rated by the DLC as a moderate
to capture the political center?
Horowitz:
“Well
look! You don’t want to be fooled by rhetoric or labels.
How solid is Joe Lieberman’s conservative credentials, when it
took him ten seconds to abandon all his principals to jump into the arms
of Maxine Waters when he got that nomination.”
[Author’s
note: Mr. Horowitz cautions about being fooled by labels and
rhetoric, because I assume they are misleading.
Notice he did not acknowledge the existence of the IDU.]
“The
Democratic Party is pulled to the left by the unions, the racist NAACP
leftists, and the teacher’s union.
All these people are hard left.
It is a left wing party. It
will remain left wing until it is beaten year after year.”
[Author’s
note: Horowitz then continues by painting the Democratic Party with
a list of labels using his best conservative rhetoric, as urged in his
book How to Beat the Democrats.
Now pay close attention to the following comparison.
Horowitz is still using labels and conservative rhetoric, see page
67 of How to Beat the Democrats.]
“If
you look at John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, you will not find one
scintilla of difference between them.
Kennedy was a hawk on defense.
He was a militant anti-communist.
He was for capital gains tax cut and a balanced budget.
And that should tell you how far to the left American politics has
slid in the last 40 years.”
[Author’s
note: Yes, Horowitz is correct, don’t get fooled by labels or
rhetoric. The key phrase from the above quotation is “And that should
tell you how far to the left American politics has slid to the left.”
Consider that for a moment. Horowitz
has hinted the Republican Party has moved to the left right along with the
Democrats!]
Question:
“Do
you have any comments on the International Democrat Union?”
Horowitz:
“The
Democrats would say… well I…you know.
I don’t know, I don’t know what the International Democrat
Union is an international organization.
The “Third Way” is a deception that we used to use when we were
in the left to avoid the stigma of Communism without embracing the
American way. And that to
bear, Hillary Clinton is a Socialist.
I don’t care what they say in front of the cameras.
They understand where the American people are and they are out to
fool them. And Republicans have to be vicious in their attacks on the
Democrats and strike first or be on the defensive.”
[Author’s
note: Horowitz claims he doesn’t
know what the IDU is or even if it is an international organization. He then proceeds to use labels and conservative rhetoric to
lead away from talking about the IDU.
Please also note Horowitz does recognize the existence of the Third
Way.]
Question:
“It
seems the Republican Party, being a member of the International Democrat
Union according to their web site, they are determining election policies
in their respective member parties in their respective countries?”
[Author’s
note: Pay close attention to the next response!]
Horowitz:
“
That’s…that’s…(raising his voice) way too conspiratorial. (his voice, still raising in intensity) Look!
Just imagine Al Gore was president when 911 Happened! If George Bush was
not in there we would not have declared war on the al-Qaeda!
We would have not taken the Taliban down!
And there would have been tens of thousands more Dead Americans!
That’s how I determine my
politics! I don’t
determine them by getting on the internet and finding some international
organization!”
[Author’s
note: The
Permanent Revolution is a continuous process of War, Revolution and Terror.]
If you notice from the above quote Horowitz determines his politics
by waging war and predicting future terror.
And still Horowitz will not acknowledge or even address the
existence of the IDU. Instead
he yells conspiracy!]
Statement:
“But
I found this information in the newspapers and the Wall
Street Journal!”
Horowitz
(now very agitated):
“The
United States is part of the UN. It’s
a left wing organization. The
US is in the UN, does that make the
US left wing? The UN is
always denouncing the United States, Britain and Israel.
That’s their business these days.”
[Authors
note: Just a few minutes ago Horowitz acknowledged a severe 40 year
leftward drift in American politics.]
Question
and statement (with a slight chuckle):
“OK,
I’m glad you brought that up! If
the UN is a left wing organization, then why is the Republican Party
pushing International Free Trade, which is a left wing policy? (my
voice rising trying to be heard over the loud protestations of Horowitz), I can
even back that up with Hamilton’s “Essay #12” from The Federalist Papers.”
Horowitz
(successfully drowning out my efforts):
“Ah
Look! I encounter people like you all the time.
Politics is a complex business, OK? (speed of elocution picks up),
You don’t get to be morally pure on everything!
Just because the US doesn’t get out of the UN doesn’t make it a
left wing party.”
[Author’s
note: I don’t wear “brown-shirt” khakis and I definitely do
not have pictures of Hitler on my walls.
And don’t forget Horowitz said there was no difference between
Kennedy and Reagan. This is a good indication America just may be well left of
the perceived American political center.]
Horowitz
(quickly changing to an apologetic and condescending tone):
“
I know I am on a religious station. Politics
is the art of the possible, not the ideal!
There is a big difference between politics and religion. Religion is about getting into heaven and if you mess with
the Devil you're damned. In
politics… politics is about getting into office!
You make pacts with the devil all the time putting together a
majority coalition to allow you to rule!”
End
of interview.
Horowitz,
just like Anne Coulter, denied knowing of the International Democratic
Union, but did not hesitate to label something he didn’t
know about a conspiracy theory. Again there are only two reasons for
this. One is Horowitz
didn’t know of the IDU. But,
how could a man, who had been summoned to George Bush’s presence, to
discuss electoral strategy (a
man claiming to have authored the Republican manual for election strategy)
have not known about the June 10th, 2002 White House
hosting of an IDU election strategy session that was covered by the
Associated Press? Something
is grossly wrong here. Which
leads to the second reason. Horowitz
does know about the IDU and does not want the rank and file Republican to
know about it.
There
may be a reason for Mr. Horowitz’s “ignorance” of the IDU.
Horowitz does know about the Permanent Revolution.
This he cannot deny. There
is a section of How to Defeat the Democrats dedicated to “The Unrepentant Left.”
In “Chapter 4,” on page 199, Horowitz vents his anger at a
member of the radical left. It
goes like this:
“Far
from renouncing her communist and terrorist past, Boudin is part of the
same radical network that fuels Linda Evans’ seditious projects and
remains an integral part of the permanent revolution both signed onto in
the 1960s.”
The
use of the term permanent revolution,
was not some idle choice of vitriolic rhetoric to demean the radical left.
Horowitz knew exactly what he was writing.
One only has to turn to his 1969 epic Empire
and Revolution. A
series of footnotes at the bottom of pages 28, 29 and 30 reveals “the
alter ego” of Horowitz.
“Lenin
referred to ‘uninterrupted’ or ‘continuous’ revolution rather than
‘permanent revolution,’ which had been revived as a term by Parvus and
Trotsky.” (p. 28.)
“The
bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the
instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and
with them the whole relations of society.” (p.29.)
“Capitalist
production according to Marx and Engels had centralized population and
industry and concentrated property in a few hands.
The ‘necessary consequence’ of this was political
centralization. ‘Independent,
or but loosely connected provinces, with separate interests, laws,
governments and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one
nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national
class-interest, one frontier and one customs-tariff.” (p. 30.
David
Horowitz knows of the existence of the Permanent Revolution.
Like any other conflict of man there are at least two sides in the
struggle. In the case of the
Permanent Revolution the combatants have been Worker Socialists (The Third
Way) and Corporate Socialists (today’s International Democrat Union).
In his youth Horowitz was very active and a leader of The Third
Way. In his maturity Horowitz
deserted his Worker Socialist “brothers” in Permanent Revolution and
switched sides to the Corporate Socialist cause, now his “new brothers
in Permanent Revolution.”
Like
his days in The Third Way, to couch his communism and shun his allegiance
to America, Horowitz now hides his communism behind a conservative
“cloak” of new found Americanism in the form of World Conservatism.
But for some reason Horowitz, The Republican National Committee and
the Republican Party do not want the rank and file members of the party to
know the concept of “compassionate
conservatism” comes from the International Democrat Union, just another
Fabian Socialist front group helping to transform Capitalism into
Communism.
Just
a few last comments. Please consider all the things Horowitz did say.
He compared the perceived conservative Ronald Reagan to a 1960s
very liberal Democrat and graduate of the Fabian Socialist London School
of Economics, John F. Kennedy. Horowitz
acknowledged a severe leftward drift in American politics.
And most damning of all, in order for the Republican “Third
Kind” to rule (not get elected) they must consistently “make pacts
with the Devil”.
© 2003 - Terry Hayfield -
All Rights Reserved
Terry attended Bowling Green State
University, 1966-71. Major, Economic geography and English
Education. Served in Viet Nam as Medical Records Clerk (71G20).
Elected to vice-president (1978-1981) of Local #1907 of the International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, representing hourly workers for RCA
Semi-conductors, Findlay, Ohio.
In 1983 started extensive data exchange with Congressman Larwence McDonald
(D) of Georgia and then chairman of the John Birch Society.
Congressman McDonald was planning on seeking the 1984 Democratic
presidential nomination. We were in the middle of negotiating my
becoming his campaign manager when he boarded the fatal Korean Air 007.
E-Mail: Catzman666@aol.com
