Syria: Trump’s Bay of Pigs?
There are extraordinary parallels between John F. Kennedy and Donald Trump.
Since the end of WWII, most American presidents have been members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) or have been under its control. Perhaps the only exception in this series of American presidents “elected” by the CFR conspirators was John F. Kennedy, who came to be elected president thanks to his father’s money and links to the Chicago Mafia. The conspirators simply accepted him because they though he was too young and inexperienced, his only interest was chasing girls and, therefore, easy to handle. But, particularly after the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy woke up to the reality surrounding him and began seeing many things he had not noticed before, and he didn’t like them.
On January 20, 1961, John F. Kennedy was inaugurated as the Thirty-Fifth President of the United States. His inaugural address was a patriotic call for advancing America socially and economically. In it, he challenged the Soviets to use the “wonders of science” for economic progress and space exploration instead of militarism.
President Kennedy’s inaugural address was a true harbinger of the big changes he planned to make in American foreign policy. In the first part the new president clearly expressed his intention to end the ongoing imperial policies:
“To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom.” 
The second part of his speech was a clear reference to the futility of the Cold War policy and the risks to mankind it involved,
“Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.” 
Soon after, Kennedy began an aggressive program to “get America moving again,” and declared that the 1960s would be the decade of development for America. He stressed the importance of creating an abundant and growing supply of cheap energy. Unfortunately, however, Kennedy was not aware that the CFR conspirators had already decided that the 1960s would be the decade that would mark the beginning of energy scarcity, deindustrialization and non-development in America.
Kennedy began pushing his agenda to accomplish his promise to the American people clearly expressed in the motto of his presidential campaign: “Get America Moving Again” — closely resembling Trump’s “Make America Great Again.” JFK was aware that, for some reason he may not have fully understood at the time, America had stopped in its tracks toward progress. Therefore, economic growth was Kennedy’s main goal of his domestic agenda. He expressed this concern in a speech to the Congress on February 2, 1961, where he presented his Program to Restore Momentum to the American Economy.
Like Trump’s, Kennedy’s inaugural address was a clear defiance of the traditional CFR-created American foreign policy. It marked the beginning of a new type of foreign policy seeking a peaceful solution to the unproductive, dangerous Cold War against the Soviet Union and changing the world’s future direction. Kennedy wanted to make clear to Soviet chairman Nikita Khrushchev that he did not prefer a Cold War, much less a nuclear war, but a genuine peace based on negotiations and mutual cooperation. He also wanted to put and end to the U.S. imperial foreign policy, which only benefited a small group of bankers and transnational corporations, not the American people, and begin a new approach of U.S. policy toward Latin America and the Third World.
In foreign policy, Kennedy also took some policy initiatives that indicated he was going to carry out the promises he had made as a candidate. The measures he had in mind indicated a radical change from traditional U.S. foreign policy. Among these were respect for the sovereignty; autonomy and independence of other nations, as well as promoting expanded opportunities and higher standards of living.
Kennedy was opposed to foreign policies based on the domination of weak, poor nations by powerful ones, conducive to perpetuating economic backwardness and exploitation of natural resources. He expressed this clearly in a message he sent to Congress just two months after he was sworn into office in which he stated: “1960s can be — and must be — the crucial “decade of development” for Latin America, Africa, the Middle east, and Asia.”
On February 1959, in a speech to the Senate, Senator Kennedy had strongly criticized what he saw as a gap more dangerous than the missile gap. It was precisely in that speech where Kennedy clearly expressed his critical view of what was wrong with U.S. foreign policy
“As nation, we [should] think not of war but of peace; not of crusades of conflict but of covenants of cooperation; not of the pageantry of imperialism but of the pride of new states freshly risen to independence.” 
Kennedy’s mention of what he defined as “the pageantry of imperialism,” was a direct attack on the architects of the so-called “American imperialism” — which was actually the imperialism of the oil magnates, Wall Street bankers and CEOs of transnational corporations ensconced at the Council on Foreign Relations. Proof of it was that, soon after Kennedy began implementing his policies, the CFR-controlled media, particularly the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Time, LIFE, Fortune and the emerging TV news, launched a systematic stream of criticism — exactly as they have been doing to Donald Trump.
Unfortunately, Kennedy was not aware that the negative trend of the American economy he was trying to stop and reverse had not been the result of chance or incompetence, but of a carefully-conceived plan to destroy the U.S. economy and change America into a third world country. Many years before, the globalist conspirators at the Council on Foreign Relations have already decided that, far from being the decade of development, the 1960s would be the decade devoted to lowering the levels of education by turning it into indoctrination as well as lowering American standards of living and increasing poverty levels by systematically destroying the U.S. industrial base.
June 10, 1963. In the commencement address at American University in Washington, D.C., President Kennedy announced that the Soviets had expressed a desire to negotiate a nuclear test ban treaty and that the U.S had postponed some planned atmospheric nuclear tests. An interesting detail is that President Kennedy’s efforts to end the Cold War closely resembled Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev’s Doctrine of Peaceful Coexistence.
One of the fateful steps taken by Kennedy after he was sworn as president was to scrap the National Security Council mechanism. Being statutory, he could not abolish the NSC unilaterally, but he simply ignored it. Then, after the Bay of Pigs debacle —which actually was a very successful PSYOP carried out by the CFR conspirators — he fired CIA Director Allen Dulles, a senior CFR conspirator closely associated to the Rockefeller gang, as well as Richard Bissell, the man in charge of CIA’s covert operations and also a CFR member, and told some close friends that he wanted to “splitter” the CIA “into a thousand pieces and scatter [it] to the winds.” Unfortunately, the CFR conspirators already had a counter plan to prevent JFK from carrying out his plan.
Most Americans who gave their votes to Trump are still shocked trying to understand the logic of his ordering a missile attack against Syria, a sovereign state we are not at war with. Even if the sarin gas attack on civilians was real — something that has all the characteristics of a false flag operation — the U.S. has no right whatsoever to continue acting as the policeman of the world. Actually, to stop these foreign entanglements was one of the reasons why most people gave their vote to Trump.
Moreover, the fact that Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, the Neocons, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and other CFR-controlled media praised Trump’s illegal military action against Syria is a clear indication that his decision was wrong.
I hope that, after President Trump realizes his advisors lied about Syria exactly as JFK’s advisors lied about the Bay of Pigs operation, he admits his mistake, gets rid of the traitors around him and corrects the course of the ship of state according to what he solemnly promised the American people in his Inaugural Address.
© 2017 Servando Gonzales – All Rights Reserved
- President John F. Kennedy Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961, [Link]
- President John F. Kennedy Washington, D.C. January 20, 1961, [Link]
- See Ted Sorenson, “JFK’s inaugural address was world-changing” The Guardian, April 22, 2007.
- John F. Kennnedy, “Foreign Aid,” House Documents, 87th Congress, 1st Session, Doc. No. 117, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
- Remarks of Senator John F. Kennedy in the Senate, February 19, 1959, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, [Link]
- Early in July 1955, at a closed plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, Premier Khrushchev laid out the new goals of Soviet policy. He solidified the concept of a new approach in Soviet foreign policy in 1956 at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and again at Twenty-First Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, held in Moscow from January 25 to February 5, 1959, of what later was known as his “Doctrine of Peaceful Co-existence,” accompanied by the slogan “To catch up and overtake the West” in economic well-being, and an improvement in the Soviet Union’s internal affairs.
- Lyman B. Kirkpatrick, Jr., The Real CIA (New York: McMillan, 1968), p. 261.
- Contrary to common lore, the Bay of Pigs operation was a total success for the CFR conspirators: its true goal was to destroy the anti-Castro opposition in Cuba and the U.S. and consolidate Castro in power, and it was fully accomplished. For a detailed analysis of the Bay of Pigs PsyOp, see Servando Gonzalez, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order (Oakland, CA: Spooks Books, 2010), pp. 193-200.
- Kennedy’s words about the splintering the CIA quoted in Taylor Branch and George Crile, “The Kennedy Vendetta,” Harper’s, August 1975, p. 50.
- There is strong evidence that the whole chemical attack on the Syrian people by its own government is a fabrication, part of a PsyOp to justify U.S. military intervention against Syria.
- Kennedy made the fateful decision of changing the landing place of the invasion from Trinidad to the Bay of Pigs, which caused the failure of the operation because CFR secret agents McGeorge Bundy and Adlai Stevenson persuaded him to do so. Also. CIA Director Allen Dulles (CFR) and CIA Chief of Covert Operations Richard Bissell (CFR) told Kennedy the invasion would be a success.