June 19, 2012
Last week I presented a realistic look at Romney’s 2012 chances. That analysis was based solely upon the electoral numbers needed to win and did not factor in the reality that Obama has set land-speed records for how fast a new administration can destroy a country, making Jimmy Carter look almost sane by comparison. In short, Obama can win with only 21 states, 20 of which have been voting Democrat for decades.
Despite Obama’s $6 Trillion wealth confiscation and redistribution plan aimed at funneling money to groups who helped him get elected in 2008, groups needed again in 2012, a growing number of Democrat faithful are defecting from the party or calling for Obama to be jettisoned from the DNC ticket, fantasizing about how different circumstances might be today under a Hillary administration.
It’s a bit disingenuous of course, as with Hillary at the helm of the State Department, also in a total shambles, a Hillary administration would not have been any better than the Obama administration. In fact, the Clinton’s may be running more of the Obama show than people know. Still, the natives are restless and the drumbeat for Obama’s head on a platter is getting louder.
Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell speculated with Newsmax in a recent interview, that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton might have made a better president than Barack Obama because Hillary at least has experience. Marxist experience, but experience.
Despite the trillions Obama poured into unions to prop up a failing global labor movement, the AFL-CIO just announced they are pulling funding from the Obama campaign in an unprecedented departure from decades of blind support for DNC candidates. Without labor union funding over the last forty years, there wouldn’t even be a Democrat Party today.
A growing number of democrats are shouting “Obama is killing the Democratic Party!” The shellacking unions took in the bogus Wisconsin recall was not possible without a significant number of defections within the Democrat faithful. Even lifelong democrats are fed up with the blatantly Marxist tactics and agenda of today’s DNC.
Obama got away with running as a moderate in 2008 because nobody knew this person. But he can’t do that again in 2012. Old blue dog Democrats are defecting because they don’t like neo-Marxist Democrats. Marxists running today’s Democrat Party are defecting because Obama wasn’t Marxist enough to suit their hard-left agenda. Even Obama’s anti-war supporters have watched Obama and Clinton start more wars and set more global fires over the last three years than all Republican administrations combined.
Washington Post writer Jennifer Rubin writes – “Not even Jimmy Carter did this much, I would suggest, to jerk his party to the left and hobble its electoral prospects. No wonder Clinton is on a rampage.”
According to Rubin, “He helped the GOP win the House majority in 2010 and make big gains in the Senate. His Obamacare has helped revive the Commerce Clause and given a boost to conservative jurisprudence. His refusal to support human rights has caused a bipartisan revulsion and reminded us that foreign policy must be girded by American values. He’s sent independents running into the GOP’s arms. He’s forced conservatives to think hard and express eloquently principles of religious liberty, limited government, free markets and Constitutional democracy.”
Uncharacteristic of Slick Willies traditional political prowess, Bill’s growing repertoire of so-called gaffes, better defined as Freudian slips of the tongue, put Bill in a head-to-head race with Joe Biden for the most gaffes in a single campaign season. But all of Bill’s Freudian slips are denigrating to Obama alone, causing many to ask, what is Bill Clinton really up to?
As chronicled in the Denver Post –“First there was the intra-party angst, fueled by questions about Clinton's dependability after he seemed to undermine the Obama campaign's attacks on Bain Capital by saying Romney had a sterling business record.”
Then came the employment report that showed the economy had added only 69,000 jobs in May, which renewed concerns among Democrats about how competitive the election might be and about whether Obama had any new ideas for fixing things.
Then came another Clinton moment, when he had to walk back a comment saying that the Bush tax cuts, even those for the wealthiest Americans, might have to be extended temporarily because the economy was weak — a comment 180 degrees off from the position of the White House. If you didn’t know any better, you’d assume that Bill Clinton was campaigning for Mitt Romney, not Barack Obama.
Then came the latest evidence that the Democrats were in danger of losing the fundraising wars, perhaps by hundreds of millions of dollars, in view of Romney's success in May and the potential war chests of Republican super PACs raising money through unlimited, and often secret, donations.
On the issue of the economy alone, people are chopping down trees just to keep up with the list of many reasons why Obama is unelectable in 2012 and numerous congressional Democrats are starting to distance themselves from Obama, sensing that their own re-election efforts could go down with the good ship Obama.
Oh, if they could just run Bill Clinton for office again, all would be well in the world. Democrats have only two bright moments in the last hundred years, JFK and Bill Clinton. Every other Democrat administration since the first American Marxist Woodrow Wilson -- has been a total disaster for America.
Since they can’t run Bill or JFK, they are trying to talk Hillary into a coup d'état, overthrowing Obama and Biden before the two idiots finish destroying what little is left of the once great and powerful Democrat Party.
How the stomach turns when all the rats start jumping ship.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Obama’s shrill attempts to recapture the “hope” many mistakenly placed in him just a few short years ago is falling largely on deaf ears, drowned out by the sound of rants and hisses from dwindling campaign crowds.
Romney has a tough road ahead, but Obama may be in trouble regardless. America was once the most prosperous and powerful nation known to mankind. Now it ranks #129 out of 215 nations economically. How much more progress can Americans afford to tolerate from progressives?
Not a single U.S. Founding Father would support today’s Marxist Democrats. How many modern citizens will, now that they are reaping the early rewards of progressive Marxism?