Dr. Dennis Cuddy -- Conspiracy, Part 5

CONSPIRACY
PART 5

By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
April 28, 2014
NewsWithViews.com

When I told Jim that I had actually gotten a copy of the taped interview of THE WASHINGTON POST reporter and Prof. Quigley, Jim knew that I was very serious about the subject, and he was even beginning to believe that there was a power elite behind the scenes manipulating events and people's lives. So, he puzzlingly asked, "What do these people want? I mean, I know they want power and control, but for what purpose? What's their ultimate design for the world?"

I replied that I believe they intend to synthesize Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism into a World Socialist Government. "How did you come to that conclusion, Jim inquired. I told him about what I had come across earlier in Col. House's diaries along with the Lincoln Bloomfield quote, and then I said that when I heard President George H. W. Bush use the term, "New World Order," I recalled that the famous Fabian Socialist H. G. Wells had written a book by that same title in 1939. In the book, he projected just such a synthesis and also said "countless people...will hate the new world order...and will die protesting against.

"Aw, c'mon," Jim replied with disbelief. "You mean to tell me that Wells predicted 'The New Word Order,' using those exact words, over 70 years ago?" I found Jim's incredulity amusing, given all that I had already provided him in the way of documentation concerning the power elite. "Actually," I said, "Wells' THE NEW WORLD ORDER was the last of his efforts in this regard, as he had earlier written THE OPEN CONSPIRACY: BLUE PRINTS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION in 1928, and THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME in 1933. In this 1933 book, Wells had actually predicted a Second World War would begin around 1940 over a German-Polish dispute, and that the 'Modern World-State' (New World Order) would begin around 40 years from then and come out of something that would occur in Basra, Iraq. He said that although world government 'had been plainly coming for years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere.' Wells had even written a book in 1901 titled ANTICIPATIONS, in which he acknowledged that the men of the New World Order 'will not be squeamish either in facing or inflicting death....They will have an ideal that will make killing worth the while.'"

This talk about "inflicting death" and "killing" was upsetting to Jim, who tried to dismiss it by saying, "Look, Orwell's Big Brother wound up killing a lot of people, too, but that's just fiction. No one really intends to kill a lot of people in the future in order to establish some kind of Socialist Utopia."

I said, "Hey, you don't have to believe me. Just look at the statements of leading Fabians like George Bernard Shaw and Bertrand Russell themselves. In THE INTELLIGENT WOMAN'S GUIDE TO SOCIALISM AND CAPITALISM, Shaw proposed that under Socialism 'you would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner."

And Bertrand Russell in THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON SOCIETY related: 'I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology...verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective....Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated....Population can be kept from increasing....Perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full....A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a (socialist) world government....'"

"OK," Jim blurted out, "so some wild Socialists rant about what they might do in the future if they ever get a World Socialist Government. That still doesn't mean a decade by decade plan was being successfully carried out to get to that point. For example, you talked about Lord Esher and Henry Morgenthau,Sr. wanting to get America into World War I. Did any Fabian beside Wells or any leading American official even have any foreknowledge of America's entry into World War II?

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily E-Mail Alerts!

Jim was right, of course. A couple of people promoting America's entry into the First World War could be seen as an isolated event. Therefore, I searched for Fabian possible foreknowledge about Pearl Harbor, and found that on December 5, 1941 Sir Julian Huxley (a Fabian) said that he hoped America and Japan would be at war "next week." The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor occurred just two days later on Sunday, the first day of the "next week."

As for foreknowledge by an American official, I found that President Roosevelt's Secretary of War, Henry Stimson (a founder of the Council on Foreign Relations and member of Skull & Bones), had written the following in his diary for November 25, 1941: "President Roosevelt brought up the event that we are likely to be attacked perhaps (as soon as) next Monday, for the Japanese are notorious for making an attack without warning, and the question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot."

Click here for part -----> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,

Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.