WHITE GUILT ELECTED A DICTATOR
By
Betty Freauf
April 18, 2014
NewsWithViews.com
A number of responses to my last article comparing President Barack Obama to Cuba’s dictator, Fidel Castro believed we no longer have honest elections. One reminded me that in multiple states Obama received more votes than there were registered voters and there were many other states with abnormalities. He may be correct. Of course, all the responses came from I’m assuming 50 and older who could remember going to the neighborhood precincts on election day, standing in line visiting with our friends that we had not seen since the last election cycle. We used paper ballots distributed by the faithful Democrat and Republican precinct workers who were familiar with most people that came to vote and the political parties were allowed to send observers to the county election office when the count began so I’d like to think on the most part our elections were honest but now while white guilt may have elected Barack Obama in 2008, today with computers counting our votes that can be changed on a whim to produce certain results, all bets are off.
The 1962 book CUBA, CASTRO AND COMMUNISM by Edwin Stein says the real concentration of any dictatorship is on the youth – the younger the better. Young minds are pliable and can be moulded into a pattern by astute teachers and besides, it is the nature of youth to welcome change so understandably they’ll welcome those who offer change like Obama did. They supported Obamacare until they realized they were the ones who were going to have to pay for it.
The old are hardly worth the effort, the dictator figures. Too many of them remember our Constitutional Republic which the progressives beginning in the early thirties conveniently changed to a “democracy.” The elderly remember to some degree our personal freedom or some way of life better than day-to-day existence in a police state. They figure many of them are too set in their ways or too old to change. At any rate, most of them will become senile, if they don’t die, and they’re more bother than they’re worth.
As far as the middle-aged are concerned, history reveals a good percentage will be in favor of the Revolution. Those who are opposed for one reason or another, will be dealt with. If they have money or property, it will be confiscated, and the once wealthy strata of the country’s society will be encouraged to emigrate to another country, where somebody else must care for them. If they insist upon staying, there is always another, more final method: extermination.
The young can be taught to hate, for this is a quality not born in them, and this hate can be focused as the dictator requires. These children with young, impressionable minds can also be instructed to hate America as the “social justice” agenda is emphasized in textbooks - changed to accommodate a dictator like Obama who often defames our country. In Cuba, many children over 5 years old as possible are promoted to live at big scholastic centers so children will be under the influence of the teachers and not their families where their Christian views will be removed from them as they are “rehabilitated.”
CHRISTIAN BUSINESS OWNERS MUST BE REHABILITATED
Recently readers have heard about the abuses aimed at businesses such as photographers, bakeries, hair dressers and florists who have refused to compromise their Christian principles to serve same-sex weddings. In the one case in Oregon, last August an aggrieved couple took their case to the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. The bakery business closed its doors. Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian explained the Oregon Equality Act of 2007 to the state’s largest newspaper, the OREGONIAN. He said, “Everybody is entitled to their own beliefs, but that doesn’t mean that folks have the right to discriminate.” (This is a perfect example of an oxymoron by another governmental certifiable nincompoop)
“The goal is never to shut down a business. The goal is to REHABILITATE,” also known as re-education centers in communist countries. I can remember only a few years ago when it was OK for business to post signs that said, “No shirt, no shoes, no service.” It should be noted that Oregon has a lesbian Secretary of State and House Speaker – both Democrats and the city of Silverton, Oregon a few miles east of the state Capitol in Salem has a transgender mayor who adorns himself in clothes that reveals cleavage and wears short skirts. On several occasions he’s made national news. The latest is when it was discovered he is selling his outrageous shoes on the Internet to raise revenue for the city.
“DEMOCRACY” IN TRANSITION
But in Oregon, we have vote-by-mail which opens up the system to even more fraud. Washington followed suit a couple years ago but Oregon hasn’t followed Washington, so far at least, in legalizing marijuana. This vote-by-mail subject was on the front burner in Oregon as early as 1995 or earlier. Republicans controlled both the House and the Senate with current Democrat Governor Kitzhaber in his first term. Unfortunately, many senators were in such a hurry to adjourn, they may not have paid enough attention to the vote-by-mail bill. The measure passed in the last hectic hours of the session in June 1995. The Portland OREGONIAN in July 1995 reported “out with the polls; in with computers? The nation will be watching Oregon’s new all-vote-by-mail system and many hope to go on-line for political participation.” The younger generation has been programmed to accept this new computer technology but the older folks rightly foretold it would lead to even more corruption in the system.
BALLOT INTEGRITY SACRIFICED
Former Secretary of State, a Republican radical feminist, determined participation would be greater if we had “vote- by- mail,” which, of course it did. About 80% of the Beaver State’s eligible electorate participated in the 2000 general election, dramatically reversing years of declining turnout. But the process was also plagued with all sorts of problems one might expect when the desire for increased participation supersedes concern about ballot integrity. The WASHINGTON TIMES for November 29, 2000 noted, for instance, that “thousands of voters received two ballots’ while others “received none.” Moreover, “Around Portland, (where the intellectually elite live), a few voters…unwittingly dropped their ballots in unauthorized collection boxes, planted on down town corners or handed them to strangers outside county collection sites.” A friend who once contacted the Gorbachev Foundation for information received a mailing promoting Vote-by-Mail.
REPUBLICANS IN BED WITH ENEMIES
The first danger sign I saw was the League of Women Voters as chief petitioners of Vote-by-Mail and unfortunately, our Marion County Clerk, another Republican, joined the chorus. In that same time frame, a member of the League of Women Voters was testifying on a Senate Joint Resolution in the Oregon legislature that proposed new campaign finance limitations, which, of course, the Supreme Court recently over ruled on the Feingold-McCain campaign finances claiming it stifles free speech and each person should be allowed to give any amount to the campaign of their choice.
About twenty years ago Evangelist Pat Robertson paid $2,500 to show on his T.V 700 Club a Votescam video exposing the League of Women voters using pencils to punch holes in the computer vote card. This is why I was perplexed to find Republicans in public office in my neck of the woods supporting the vote- by -mail with these women!
IS OBAMA LIBERATING THE U.S.
An interesting excerpt from a February 1962 AMERICAN OPINION entitled “Calling the shots” continues to describe Cuba’s Castro and how the Communists destroy the legitimate government of any country and start imposing on it the police-state methods which lead ultimately to their complete and detailed control. They ALWAYS say they have LIBERATED the country in question and then the author said, “It is only a few years, at the present rate, before they will be announcing that they have LIBERATED the U.S.” BTW, Hillary Clinton, a globalist George Soros supporter, visited Portland, Oregon recently. She was invited by the World Affairs Council. Thousands of useful idiots stood in line. The following day, while addressing the crowd in Las Vegas, a young blond woman threw a shoe at Hillary.
AMERICA ELECTS THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT
Of course, that statement in the 1962 AMERICAN OPINION was made fifty years ago about the time President Lyndon Baines Johnson was signing the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and Barack was born on August 4, 1961 in Kenya to a white American woman and a black man. The Communist leaders looked into their crystal ball and saw newspaper headlines in 2008 declaring the U.S. had made history by electing the first black president. It was being reported In October, 2008 that “U.S. Communist Party was feeling really smug about the upcoming election” for you see the Communists saw an opportunity after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to take this 3-year old lad under their wings and to begin grooming him to become President.
ONE SMALL PROBLEM FOR OBAMA TO BECOME PRESIDENT
There was only one problem – he wasn’t “natural born” so measures had to be put in place to take care of that little problem. I explained in last week’s article how Barack became the owner of a Connecticut social security number and while there was ample evidence in the presidential campaign that Barack Obama’s birth certificate was a fraud, the mainline media continued supporting his lie and FOX, who is supposed to be “fair and balanced” never touched the subject of his ineligibility.
And for that reason, Obama refused to supply his college transcripts which would have proven his actual place of birth and communists who had infiltrated the colleges ran cover for him. This was another red flag and yet he flew under the radar during the whole presidential campaign. He said on 4/11/14 regarding the Civil Rights 50th anniversary that “President Johnson argued and horse traded and bullied and persuaded until ultimately he signed the Civil Rights into law.” To prove my crystal ball analogy, then he added he also has lived out the promise due to LBJ’s efforts.
HELD HOSTAGE SINCE 1913
Americans are upset the way the country has gone since his election with continued police-state tactics such as using unconstitutional regulatory agencies to stifle economic growth to cattle grazing in Nevada and the IRS to harass conservative organizations who oppose Obama’s policies. It’s been well documented that the Sixteenth Amendment (IRS) was never ratified by the required number of states. We’ve been held hostage since 1913 when another Democrat president, Woodrow Wilson, was president. We saw the counterfeiting Federal Reserve created in the same year for the international bankers’ playground. And now the WASHINGTON POST has revealed that Social Security and Treasury are seizing taxpayer refunds for their parents’ decade-old debts.
Then there is talk about impeachment but who would we get to replace him? Whoopee- Lackluster Vice President Joe Biden. There are some constitutional scholars who are disagreeing on the course we should take to try to get our Republic returned to we, the people, but would a convention and some new amendments eliminate the problem? That’s doubtful.
|
Democrat President Woodrow Wilson’s reign was followed by Franklin D. Roosevelt with his unsustainable Social Security program later expanded to Medicare and Medicaid by another Democrat president, Lyndon Johnson. And not wanting to be outdone, Republican George W. Bush signed into law the prescription drug benefit. A recent article in the NEW AMERICAN by John White, who, like Edward Snowden, former National Security contractor now in exile in the Soviet Union, just happened to be privy to classified Navy communications regarding the Gulf of Tonkin event when President Johnson falsely accused Vietnam of attacking our ships so he could go to war. The deception was real…loss of more than 58,000 Americans, spending billions of dollars and disunity at home was the desired result. White learned later the provoked attack was in the planning stages months earlier.
So – some reader is going to ask why we stay in Oregon. We stay because there Is No Place to Run to Hide that is immune to this New World Order agenda. What has happened to cattle rancher Bundy in Nevada today could see your rights being infringed and your ox being gored tomorrow. The Patriots who came to support Bundy have caused the feds to back out citing “safety issues.” Together we stand, divided we fall. Thank God for the Second Amen dment.
� 2014 Betty Freauf - All Rights Reserved
Share
This Article
