Arguably the nation’s most prolific and successful non-government organization that investigates and exposes government and political corruption on Tuesday released what amounts to another stain on the reputations of former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton and General David Petraeus (U.S. Army Ret.).

Judicial Watch released a United States Department of the Army OpSec (Operational Security) PowerPoint presentation that depicts Hillary Clinton and others as examples of “insider threats.”

The graphic (right) was part of a presentation on the current cybersecurity threats and solutions to enemy infiltration of government cyber assets. Those included with Clinton and Petraeus are terrorist and former U.S. Army Major Nidal Hassan; military-intelligence leaker Bradley Manning (a/k/a Chelsea Manning); intelligence “hijacker” Edward Snowden; and the Washington Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis.

The informative documents were obtained by Judicial Watch officials in response to a Jan. 11, 2017, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking this specific PowerPoint presentation on operational security delivered to U.S. soldiers at Fort Leonard Wood under the command of Major General Kent D. Savre.

The lawsuit was filed after the Pentagon failed to respond to an Aug. 22, 2016, FOIA request for the PowerPoint presentation.

The PowerPoint presentation warns against “Critical Information Compromises” involving material such as the “itineraries of … senior executive service (SES)” and “very important persons (VIPs),” any of which can result in “Attack, Kidnapping, Publicity.”

It also cites “unsecure email” as an error that can lead to an enemy being able to “Kill, Counter, Clone.” Judicial Watch’s investigations into Clinton’s email practices while secretary of state repeatedly produced examples of Clinton aide Huma Abedin sharing the schedule and travel plans of Clinton on an unsecure email system.

The operational security brief was reportedly leaked, and then posted on the Facebook page “U.S. Army W.T.F! moments.” Administrators of the Facebook page said a picture came from a service member stationed at Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri, according to a Judicial Watch press statement on Wednesday.

Surprisingly, Clinton and Petraeus are cited as examples of “Careless or disgruntled employees.” Former Secretary Clinton conducted official government business using a non-state.gov email account, which was hosted on a server in her home in Chappaqua, New York. Judicial Watch’s extensive FOIA litigation pried loose Clinton email records, which proved she sent and received classified information on an unsecure server while serving as secretary of state.

“The fact that while Clinton was running for POTUS she was being discussed in a cybersecurity training session as an ‘Insider Threat’ along with the likes of a mass-murdering jihadist [Maj. Nidal Hassan] and an intelligence thief shows the attitude toward misconduct and crime displayed by Democrats,” said former U.S. Marine and police detective Michael Snipes. “In my opinion, she [Clinton] is lucky she only lost an election and had almost the entire news media in her pants-suit’s back pocket,” Snipes quipped.

“No wonder it took a lawsuit to extract this damning Pentagon analysis which recognizes former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as an “Inside Threat” to national security,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “I hope the Department of Justice takes note and proceeds with an appropriate investigation.”

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

The Michael Flynn resignation has changed the equation. Donald Trump’s enemies are now playing this Russian connection gambit for all the mileage they can get out of it. Flynn appears to have misled Vice President Pence and others about his communication with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Trust was killed. The Deep State’s collective antennae shot up higher than that wall will ever be!

Trump has had enemies before, but the Deep State is an entirely different animal. I think he and Steve Bannon, lacking experience with the real centers of power in the Western world, quite underestimated what they would be up against. Paul Craig Roberts reports that former NSA spy John Schindler sent out a tweet immediately following Flynn’s departure indicating that the Deep State was “going nuclear” against Trump, and that “he will die in jail.”

These are not folks The Donald is accustomed to making deals with. These are people who, along with the globalists they serve, have controlled every White House for at least the past 70 years. The last president who tried to stand up to them was shot to death in a motorcade: JFK. Then Bobby Kennedy, the immensely popular Democrat who would have been a shoo-in for the presidency in the 1968 election and would very likely have reopened the investigation into his brother’s murder, was also gunned down. To this day a man rots in prison who maintains he has no memory of the shooting.

In other words, Trump is up against folks who would kill him outright if they thought they could get away with it. In today’s connected environment of alternative and social media, Deep State denizens doubtless know that millions of people would react instantly if anything bad happened to Trump. I would not be surprised if pitchforks came out and there was blood in the streets of the Asylum on the Potomac. I do not think the Deep State wants that. Its minions and its masters would much prefer a slower route to technofeudalism.

Trump is a target because the platform he ran on, and has furthered since Inauguration Day, opposes everything the globalists want: open borders and free migration, “free trade” which makes global corporations richer, and a reversal of the de-industrialization of the U.S. that began with NAFTA and went into overdrive after the Meltdown of 2008.

He’s also a target because he’s doesn’t play political games. He’s not a Harvard-bred over-intellectualized ideologue, and says what he thinks. (Actually, he attended the more down-to-Earth Wharton School of Business.) He calls out the controlled mainstream media on its fake news. This might play in the rough-and-ready “red” culture of Peoria but is totally out of place in the antiseptic “blue” culture of the above-mentioned Asylum.

And now, his administration is in danger! We can’t pretend otherwise!

A new official narrative is being laid into place even as I write.

Please allow me to digress. I have been studying official narratives for over 20 years now, ever since I realized (mid-1990s) that the civil rights movement had been hijacked, and its replacement’s call for racial realignment instead of nondiscrimination was being defended by less-than-honest means. My first book grew out of that. Then it dawned on me that there were other official narratives besides the one on race and gender. Many.

Here is my working definition of an official narrative: a government-approved and media-sanitized account of some dramatic event, such as an assassination or terrorist attack or mass shooting. It can often be identified by having appeared in near-complete form very quickly after the event that prompted it, then being repeated endlessly in all major media outlets, along with powerful supporting images, its essentials never again questioned by “responsible” commentators — this despite a lack of actual evidence (witnesses, “smoking gun” physical evidence, etc.) and sometimes despite physical evidence to the contrary. A convenient enemy is named whose motivations explain the event. Patriotism may be invoked, or its opposite, as the situation requires: whatever manufactures consent around the narrative by leading the viewing audience to suspend independent judgment and trust the authorities. The final stage is to demonize anyone who questions the narrative as a “conspiracy theorist,” a meme the CIA invented out of whole cloth in 1967 to circumvent critics of the Warren Commission Report. Other weaponized words are now available, such as “truther.” All to cement the narrative in the masses’ minds and make it almost impossible for them to think it false.

Examples of official narratives: Oswald shot JFK and acted alone. Sirhan Sirhan shot his brother five years later and acted alone. James Earl Ray shot Dr. Martin Luther King that same year and acted alone. The Gulf of Tonkin attack actually happened. Timothy McVeigh’s truck bomb destroyed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City; he and Terry Nichols acted together with no involvement by “unknown others.” Osama bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks, in which 19 Saudis commandeered planes and flew them into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Two Chechen terrorists, acting on their own, were behind the Boston Marathon Bombing. There are others, but those will do for now.

Logic and evidence have nothing to do with the process of cementing an official narrative in place. This was the hardest thing to wrap my brain around, given my philosophical training and the value it places on critical thinking skills, which by definition do not yield to mere authority.

Combatting an official narrative is extremely difficult. Since it isn’t a product of logic or evidence, using logic and evidence against it is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. Done from within institutions, taking on an official narrative can be career suicide. Ask former faculty members of universities who questioned the official 9/11 narrative. Or ask James Tracy, fired from his tenured position at a Florida university following his questioning the Sandy Hook official narrative on his private blog.

Returning to Donald Trump, I fear we are watching another official narrative fall into place, especially since the end of Flynn’s brief tenure in the administration. It goes something like this: Trump and his associates had numerous nefarious contacts with Russian agents going back through last year’s campaign and before. In the end, Russian influence helped turn the tide in his favor and against Hillary Clinton … perhaps in exchange for lifting the sanctions put in place in response to yet another official narrative: Russia’s “invasion” of Crimea in 2014 (it was an annexation following an overwhelming popular vote, as most of the inhabitants of Crimea are ethnic Russians).

Were this true, and Trump knew about it (corporate media has revived the meme of “What did the president know, and when did he know it?” from the Nixon years), it would be grounds for impeachment.

The problem is, as with all official narratives, there is no evidence it is true. Trump-haters have been circulating the “35-page dossier” that was leaked to the media, one of many such illegal leaks. It contains nothing decisive, nothing that would stand up in a court of law. Moreover, “the Russians” can hardly be given credit for the record turnout at GOP primaries that led to Trump’s nomination; nor did “Russian hackers” tell millions of people who to vote for on November 8.

But: “there you go again, Yates, thinking logic and evidence matter”! There is truth to the claim that in today’s power-structured and media-saturated political economy, truth doesn’t matter. There is a sense in which we inhabit a truth-free world. We have for years.

The upshot is that Trump and Steve Bannon are dangerously close to being in over their heads. I don’t mean this in the usual sense, which deems them incompetent. I mean it in the sense that they’ve underestimated their enemies. Not the aggrieved Left, who still believe themselves entitled to a Hillary Clinton presidency. I mean the Deep State, an essential component of the globalist military-security-surveillance complex. I don’t think Trump had any idea what he was going up against, how powerful the CIA and other elements of the Deep State really are, or of their capacity to destroy his presidency possibly with plants on the inside.

Sometimes Trump has been his own enemy. He’s gotten careless. He’s easily distracted and gets off message (e.g., about his daughter Ivanka losing a Nordstrom contract — or whatever it was). He’s assumed he could run the government from the White House like it was one of his business empires. Frankly, I was afraid this would happen. Nomi Prins recently took note of the alarming number of former Goldman Sachs people now working in this administration. This is especially troubling given Trump’s (correct) campaign allegation that Hillary Clinton was owned, lock, stock, and barrel, by Goldman Sachs. He comes off looking hypocritical. Just the other day, Chuck Baldwin took note of the number of CFR members Trump has (hopefully unknowingly) taken on board.

It’s a fair question: can you “drain the swamp,” presumably of globalists, when your organization is full of people with present and not just past affiliations with globalist organizations like Goldman Sachs and the CFR?
Be all this as it may, Donald Trump is still doing his part!

Last Thursday, Trump gave a press conference. Having read an article in my (mainstream) Yahoo newsfeed calling it “crazy” and implying that it had been a disaster, I gave it a close listening. Trump made a few trivial errors, such as getting his electoral vote count wrong and claiming he’d gotten the most electoral votes since Reagan. During the Q&A session he seemed (to me) more rattled than usual. But under present circumstances who wouldn’t be? He’s never been a great speaker. He got important things spot on, however, such as the obvious media bias against him, a bias amounting to sheer hatred. If anything, he put corporate media in its place. They hate that. But as Commander in Chief with access to a great deal of classified information that could be dangerous to the country if it got out, he’s under no obligation to broadcast specific plans regarding Russia or North Korea to a mostly hostile audience.

Trump had to repeat himself more times than I could count, that these claims of Russian interference are an official narrative (my term obviously, not his). He noted, also correctly — this should be a no-brainer! — that given their status as “powerful nuclear countries,” peaceful relations between the U.S. and Russia would be better for everyone than the collision course the two nations were on during the Obama years and would have continued under another warmongering Clinton presidency.

Sadly, the Deep State does not want peaceful relations with Russia. That doesn’t fit their agenda, which may not be eventual war (one hopes not!) but a mere continuation of tensions that justify a continued flow of taxpayer dollars into the war machine and the covert Intel apparatus, filled with bureaucrats who pass reports around all day.

And the Deep State serves Trump’s real enemies, the globalists. Which is the main reason the Trump administration is in trouble.

I can’t know the immediate specifics of the globalist plan. I am sure there is one. I had been assuming that Brandon Smith had the right idea in that the globalists will allow what the controlled media call the “populist” insurgency to continue for a while, prick the global debt bubble (which would remove trillions from the global economy practically overnight), and blame the “populists.” It would be the biggest and most destructive official narrative ever: “populism” (i.e., national sovereignty, local economics, border controls, and all that other “deplorable” stuff) can lead nowhere except to economic devastation!

But maybe that’s not the plan! Aside from George Soros organizations bankrolling a few agents of disruption at places like Berkeley, I see little evidence of globalists themselves doing anything beyond overseeing publications on how terrible the “populist” insurgency will be for the global economy (i.e., how it threatens their moneyed interests), and how it is steeped in ignorance and a rejection of “expertise” (i.e., their agenda for the world). All they need do is wait, while Trump and his administration flounder helplessly against relentless media attacks driven by illegal leaks until it is rendered dysfunctional. Trump’s enemies are salivating at the prospect of his being impeached or forced to resign, as was Nixon, or possibly far worse — for if the charges of his having won an election due to covert Russian intervention he knew about could be made to stick, he could be tried for treason.

That would be the worst punishment the Deep State could inflict on someone who opposed them! Never again would we see an outsider attempt what Donald Trump has attempted, which is to oppose the Deep State and the globalists on their own territory, that of corporate-bought governance and controlled corporate media.

I don’t know that this will happen, of course. I pray that I am wrong, and that Trump will be able to ride this out.

For though I may not know the immediate specifics, I am reasonably sure of globalist goals. I have shelves of books and articles that spell many of them out, sometimes in their own words, and allow us to reasonably infer much more.

Globalism’s primary goal is corporate-controlled world government: a consolidation of wealth and power begun decades ago through the network of central banks anchored at the Bank for International Settlements, which in turn answers to the vast corporate leviathans in the City of London (home of N.M. Rothschild & Sons and the de facto seat, therefore, of the Rothschild-Rockefeller axis of evil; also the Fabian Society, the Bank of England, the London School of Economics where Soros and David Rockefeller Sr. both earned advanced degrees); furthered through semi-secret “think tanks” such as the CFR and the Trilateral Commission; continued today via “free trade” deals that free corporations to do as they please; and broadcast almost openly via Davos confabs (which Trump has not once attended, by the way).

Once in place, this power structure of power structures would be immune to attack from the outside, as it would control the resources necessary for mounting any sustainable opposition, especially finances and technology.

If the globalists win, no one alive today will ever again see a financially independent middle class, anywhere. There will be limited social mobility, carefully vetted and confined to globalist loyalists like the Mark Zuckerbergs of the world or other tech-obsessed geeks who invent all sorts of cool gadgets and apps but never question the dominant political economy. Those people will be allowed to get rich, as Zuckerberg has, and be praised in controlled media for their “entrepreneurship.” (Yes, Virginia, Zuckerberg is a globalist.)

If the globalists win, there will be no meaningful education; the focus will be on vocation. The potential power of subjects like mine has already been reduced to almost zero, after all. The twentieth century philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once described our subject as a “battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language.” Indeed! But where do we see that happening? Almost nowhere!

If the globalists win, there would be little or no work stability outside those tech circles just mentioned. Precarity, it is now called, will be the fate of the masses: labor that is part-time, temporary, consisting of “independent contractors” instead of real employees able to organize and bargain for better wages, work conditions, etc. Saving for retirement will be a thing of the past. For most millennials as it turns out, this is already true.

If the globalists win, there will eventually be total surveillance of all work and consumer activity — which will be child’s play once cash is eliminated in favor of electronic transactions, the use of cash eventually criminalized (only drug dealers, gun runners, and terrorists use cash will be that official narrative).

Needless to say, under corporate-controlled world government there will be no national borders of more than ceremonial significance. Mass migration will still be used to destroy the last remnants of the once-dominant culture in the U.S., a culture that will continue to be demonized as too white and too masculine, but was really too enamored of independence and self-reliance, with its guns and its God.

Speaking of Whom, if globalism wins, mass secularism will be the order of the day, not theism. No politically meaningful Christian activity will be allowed. You may see a contentless “spirituality” or perhaps the prosperity pseudo-gospel of the Jim Osteens or the “purpose-driven” message of Rick Warren (CFR). This is allowable in a culture whose real gods are money and power, and in which you “monetize yourself” or starve.

If the globalists win, there will still be abundant bread and circuses — mass consumption of unhealthy fast food, sports, celebrities, scandals, violent movies out of Hollywood, drugs (legal and illegal), etc., all to pacify the masses, in some cases damage their health, and ensure continued manufactured consent.

There will likely be continued theatrical wars, especially in the Middle East. Possibly the globalists will decide that Muslims have served its purpose and can be safely “terminated with extreme prejudice,” as it were. (Islamophobia was never more than another of those fake phobias, after all.)

For whatever it is worth, the Donald Trumps of our world are all that stand between the present and the rapid development of that world, technofeudalism, the specific political economy of corporate-controlled world government.

If Trump is taken out by the Deep State, that’s the future, which we can expect probably within ten years and possibly sooner, depending on how much chaos ensues. I wonder how many of Trump’s enemies, whether in the media, on the Left, or wherever, have any idea.

© 2017 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

Islam enjoys a large and influential ally among non-Muslims: A new generation of “Useful Idiots,” that Lenin identified living in liberal democracies who furthered the work of communism. This new generation of Useful Idiots also live in liberal democracies, but serves the cause of Islamofascism—another virulent form of totalitarian ideology.

Useful Idiots are naïve, they are foolish, they are ignorant of facts, they are unrealistically idealistic, they are dreamers and they are willfully in denial or deceptive. They hail from the ranks of the chronically unhappy. They are anarchists, they are aspiring revolutionaries, they are neurotics who are at war with life, the disaffected alienated from government, corporations, and just about any and all institutions of society. The Useful Idiot can be a billionaire, a movie star, an academe of renown, a politician, or from any other segment of the population. Arguably, the most dangerous variant of the Useful Idiot is the “Politically Correct.” He is the master practitioner of euphemism, hedging, doubletalk, and outright deception.

The Useful Idiot derives satisfaction from being anti-establishment. He finds perverse gratification in aiding the forces that aim to dismantle an existing order, whatever it may be: an order he neither approves of nor feels he belongs to.

The Useful Idiot is conflicted and dishonest. He fails to look inside himself and discover the causes of his own problems and unhappiness while he readily enlists himself in causes that validate his distorted perception.

Understandably, it is easier to blame others and the outside world than to examine oneself with an eye to self-discovery and self-improvement. Furthermore, criticizing and complaining—liberal practices of the Useful Idiot—require little talent and energy. The Useful Idiot is a great armchair philosopher and “Monday Morning Quarterback.”

The Useful Idiot is not the same as a person who honestly has a different point of view. A society without honest and open differences of views is a dead society. Critical, different and fresh ideas are the life blood of a living society—the very anathema of autocracies where the official position is sacrosanct.

Even a “normal” person spends a great deal more energy aiming to fix things out there than working to overcome his own flaws and shortcomings, or contribute positively to the larger society. People don’t like to take stock of what they are doing or not doing that is responsible for the conditions of which they disapprove.

But the Useful Idiot takes things much farther. The Useful Idiot, among other things, is a master practitioner of scapegoating. He assigns blame to others while absolving himself of responsibility, has a long handy list of candidates for blaming anything and everything, and by living a distorted life, he contributes to the ills of society.

The Useful Idiot may even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it suits him. Terms such as “Political Islam,” or “Radical Islam,” for instance, are contributions of the Useful Idiot. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam, simply because they are redundant. Islam, by its very nature and according to its charter—the Quran—is a radical political movement. It is the Useful Idiot who sanitizes Islam and misguides the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate.

Regrettably, a large segment of the population goes along with these nonsensical euphemisms depicting Islam because it prefers to believe them. It is less threatening to believe that only a hijacked small segment of Islam is radical or politically driven and that the main body of Islam is indeed moderate and non-political.

But Islam is political to the core. In Islam the mosque and State are one and the same—the mosque is the State. This arrangement goes back to the days of Muhammad himself. Islam is also radical in the extreme. Even the “moderate” Islam is radical in its beliefs as well as its deeds. Muslims believe that all non-Muslims, bar none, are hellfire bound and well-deserve being maltreated compared to believers.

No radical barbaric act of depravity is unthinkable for Muslims in dealing with others. They have destroyed precious statues of Buddha, leveled sacred monuments of other religions, and bulldozed the cemeteries of non-Muslims—a few examples of their utter extreme contempt toward others.

Muslims are radical even in their intrafaith dealings. Various sects and sub-sects pronounce other sects and sub-sects as heretic worthy of death; women are treated as chattel, deprived of many rights; hands are chopped for stealing even a loaf of bread; sexual violation is punished by stoning, and much much more. These are standard day-to-day ways of the mainstream “moderate” Muslims living under the stone-age laws of Sharia.

The “moderate” mainstream of Islam has been outright genocidal from inception. Their own historians record that Ali, the first imam of the Shiite and the son-in-law of Muhammad, with the help of another man, beheaded 700 Jewish men in the presence of the Prophet himself. The Prophet of Allah and his disciples took the murdered men’s women and children in slavery. Muslims have been, and continue to be, the most vicious and shameless practitioner of slavery. The slave trade, even today, is a thriving business in some Islamic lands where wealthy, perverted sheiks purchase children of the poor from traffickers for their sadistic gratification.

Muslims are taught deception and lying in the Quran itself—something that Muhammad practiced during his life whenever he found it expedient. Successive Islamic rulers and leaders have done the same. Khomeini, the founder of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, for instance, rallied the people under the banner of democracy. All along his support for democracy was not a commitment of an honest man, but a ruse. As soon as he gathered the reins of power, Khomeini went after the Useful Idiots of his time with vengeance. These best children of Iran, having been thoroughly deceived and used by the crafty phony populist-religionist, had to flee the country to avoid the fate of tens of thousands who were imprisoned or executed by the double-crossing imam.

Almost three decades after the tragic Islamic Revolution of 1979, the suffocating rule of Islam casts its death-bearing pall over Iranians. A proud people with enviable heritage is being systematically purged of its sense of identity and forced to think and behave like the barbaric and intolerant Muslims.

Iranians who had always treated women with equality, for instance, have seen them reduced by the stone-age clergy to sub-human status of Islamic teaching. Any attempt by the women of Iran to counter the misogynist rule of Muhammad’s mullahs is mercilessly suppressed. Women are beaten, imprisoned, raped and killed just as men are slaughtered without due process or mercy.

The lesson is clear. Beware of the Useful Idiots who live in liberal democracies. Knowingly or unknowingly, they serve as the greatest volunteer and effective soldiers of Islam. They pave the way for the advancement of Islam and they will assuredly be among the very first victims of Islam as soon as it assumes power.

© 2017 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

We are witnessing the impact of organized anti-American groups filled with anger and remorse because they have lost political control of our land. It appears they are determined to express their rage by riots, property destruction and violence against any who disagree with them. They have set about to destroy the freedom of speech employing anarchist riots to bring about destruction and bodily harm to anyone who holds a contrary view.

Reports say that “moneyed agitators like George Soros, who has funded professional rioters in the past, will be part of a February 17th nationwide anti-Trump protest that some are saying will be akin to or worse than those at Berkeley last week, where students who were angry that a conservative speaker was allowed on campus expressed their displeasure with anarchy, rioting, and senseless widespread property damage.”

Here is what they are calling for this Friday February 17, a general strike “’Let’s designate a day on which no one (that is, anyone who can do so without being fired) goes to work, a day when no one shops or spends money, a day on which we truly make our economic and political power felt, a day when we make it clear: how many of us there are, how strong and committed we are, how much we can accomplish…”

An official site for the event calling for a “24-hour occupation of public space in protest of the Trump administration… thousands have signed up.

The “demands” of the strike listed on the event page are enumerated:

1. No Ban, No Wall. Healthcare For All.
2. Healthcare is a human right. Medicare for All.
3. No Pipelines.
4. End the Global Gag Rule. (Euphemism for kill as many babies by abortion)

What might we expect on Friday? Maybe the Berkeley riots foreshadow what they want to take place.

Perhaps you have seen the video of the woman interviewed by ABC while on camera being pepper sprayed by a violent rioter who hates the freedom of speech so much that they used pepper spay to stop speech they did not like.

Does not that sounds like a fasicism? These Rioters claim they are opposing fascism when the facts is they are fascists. Fascism is what shutting down an event featuring a conservative speaker on a college campus is all about.

Women being bludgeoned by wooden poles all in the name of a riot to prohibit the freedom of speech of a man whose views the violent rioters disagree with. So their fascism tells them that when you disagree with someone you violently assault them, you destroy property and beat and hospitalize anyone who disagrees with you. These are the tactics and methods lifted directly from the Brown Shirts of Adolf Hitler. This was the exact technique the Brown Shirts used to bring Hitler to power. There is evidence that money behind these violent rioters who showed up at Ferguson, at Baltimore and Berkeley is George Soros, who by his own admission was part of the youth movement in Germany that brought Hitler to power. So here we have a fascist funding fascism on the streets of America.

What we see on the streets is domestic terrorism funded by a wealth domestic terrorist – Soros.

The evil character of those funding this from the top as well as those rioters on the streets is quite evident. What we need in America today is godly character – a restoration of those character traits which made America Great, those traits which underly a truly good and useful government, strong families, strong churches a culture which honors that which is honorable, righteous and good.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

One term that we are seeing more and more these days is the term ‘sustainability’. It sounds like a good thing but it is far from that. According to the UN sustainability requires that all aspects of life, work and industry MUST be controlled by government to attain the desired results of ‘sustainability’. You live where the government feels is the best place, high rise apartments, no suburban environments. You eat what they feel is best for you, GMO raised foods.

If you are old and sick, you have a duty to die. I came across this when the former governor of Colorado, Richard Lamm, was talking about city growth and how our population is out of control. This man has no respect for life and treats humans as nothing better than a plant. In 1984 he stated: Elderly people who are terminally ill have a ”duty to die and get out of the way” instead of trying to prolong their lives by artificial means, Gov. Richard D. Lamm of Colorado said Tuesday.

People who die without having life artificially extended are similar to ”leaves falling off a tree and forming humus for the other plants to grow up,” the Governor told a meeting of the Colorado Health Lawyers Association at St. Joseph’s Hospital.

”You’ve got a duty to die and get out of the way,” said the 48-year-old Governor. ”Let the other society, our kids, build a reasonable life.”

Some groups of the elderly immediately denounced Mr. Lamm for the statements. Reactions From Elderly

Dorothy Minkel, 75 years old, who has lobbied the Legislature for more than a decade on issues of the elderly, said, ”It is an insult for anyone to suggest we have a duty to die.”

Another lobbyist who represents elderly groups, Robert Robinson, 68 years old, said, ”To say they have a duty to die and get out of the way brings me back 40 years ago when a person in Germany not only advocated that but carried it through.”

At a Senior Day gathering today, one elderly woman told Mr. Lamm, ”I hate you for what you have said.” But others at the meeting in the First Baptist Church applauded the Governor after hearing his explanation. At the meeting with representatives of senior citizens groups, part of planned Senior Day activities at the Colorado capital, the Governor said, ”We are really approaching a time of almost technological immortatily when the machine and the tubes and the drugs and the heart pacemakers . . . literally force life on us.

”I believe we really should be very careful in terms of our technological miracles that we don’t impose life on people who, in fact, are suffering beyoind the ability for us to help.” In Support of Options.[1]

He was adamantly against the growth of the city of Denver into the suburbs. The city was growing in all directions but he refused to build the roads necessary to supply the growth stating that “If we don’t build the roads businesses won’t build there and people won’t live there. He believes that no one should be allowed to live in a single family home. It is a waste of valuable space to grow food. Did I mention that this fool is a Democrat? I live in the Denver area and experienced the results of his idiocy concerning growth. I received an email concerning part 6 of this series which did have a typo stating that the population freaks only want 500,000 people to occupy the planet. That figure should have been 500,000,000. But in that email it was pointed out that every man woman and child could be given a ¼ acre of land and everyone would fit in Australia. Again I have to state that population control organizations are only out for one thing and one thing only, control of every man woman and child and everything that they do.

Another thing that these Agenda 21 supporters do not want is cheap energy. Energy availability helps build wealth and lifts people out of the rolls of the dependent. This is the opposite of the goals of sustainable policy. America has more known oil reserves than most of the Middle East combined. The U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) just reported that United States “proven reserves” of crude oil in 2012 jumped by 15.4% to 29.2 billion barrels. This new official level is only about 13% of the declared reserves of Saudi Arabia.

But U.S. oil companies follow conservative accounting standards for legal and tax advantages in stating reserves that understates by as much as 90% the amount of that will be extracted from their wells. OPEC cartel members are notorious for inflating their reserves for political purposes, and Saudi Arabia was recently outted by WikiLeaks for overstating their reserves by 40%. American crude oil reserves are already greater than Saudi Arabia’s, and the U.S. lead will continue to expand.

Worldwide oil reserves are published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) each year. The 12 member Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) dominates EIA totals by claiming to hold about 75% of all global reserves. America is officially listed as 11th in reserve size; behind Saudi Arabia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Iran, Russian Federation, Venezuela, Mexico, and Canada. With the exception of the U.S., Russian Federation, and Canada, all the other “leaders” are members of OPEC.

But the U.S. must conservatively report “Proven Reserves” as the sum of the “book assets.”[2]

This is baffling because with these kinds of reserves you have to ask why are we still buying 70% of the oil we consume from nations that really don’t like us? Why are we not accessing this oil creating jobs for Americans? Much of our oil was locked up by George H.W. Bush in Anwar. Obama bragged that America’s oil output increased under his administration but it really didn’t have anything to do with him. Oil production on federal lands decreased because of his policies but oil production on private lands increased greatly.

Also it was the policies under George W. Bush that created the increases during his administration: While President Obama’s claim that domestic oil production has increased during each of the four years he has been in office is correct, both the CRS report U.S. Oil Imports and Exports and data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) show that domestic oil production increased at a similar rate during 2004 to 2008, the last four years of the George W. Bush administration. In other words, the increase in domestic oil production under President Obama is, in reality, a continuation of a trend which began under President Bush.

In addition, the President of the United States – any President of the United States – can only control oil and gas exploration and production on lands and offshore areas owned and controlled by the federal government. According to U.S. Oil Imports and Exports, 96% of the increase in domestic oil production since 2007 has taken place on privately owned, nonfederal lands, thus making it oil and gas production in which Presidents Obama and Bush had little or no role.

According to the EIA report Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, 2003-2011, only 31.8% of all domestic oil produced in 2011 came from federal lands under the president’s control. The 31.8% of oil and gas produced on federal lands in 2011 was actually below the nine-year average of 33.4%, the EIA report shows.

In reality, reports the EIA, 68.2% of the increase in U.S. oil and gas production in 2011 came from state and privately-owned lands not under the president’s control. While oil production on state and privately-owned lands increased by almost 150 million barrels from 2010 to 2011, production on federally-owned lands during 2011 actually decreased by 14% or 83 million barrels from a nine-year high reached in 2010.[3]

Some quote from ‘leaders’ in the Agenda 21 pushers:

Giving society cheap, abundant energy is the worst thing that could ever happen to the planet. –Professor Paul Ehrlich (Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University)

Complex technology of any sort is an insult on human dignity. It would be a little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it. –Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute)

The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet. –Jeremy Rifkin (Greenhouse Crisis Foundation)

Our ‘leaders’ have an agenda different that the American people. We must stop them and that has to be done at the ballot box. The last General Election was a good start.

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. Gov. Lamm asserts elderly if very ill have duty to die.
2. American oil reserves now top Saudi Arabia.
3. Should Obama Take Credit For Oil Production Hike.

At the end of February, I will be on my way again to speak on the west coast of California. The last time I was invited to speak there, I spent an evening with a family in the San Francisco bay area. They told me how wonderful it was to speak freely about their values with my wife and me. Apparently their values weren’t very welcomed in the public discourse of their geographical location. I can’t imagine that things have gotten better in light of the recent Berkeley University protests over the presence of Milo Yiannopoulos at the college.

Winston Churchill made the statement, “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry on as if nothing ever happened”.

The First Amendment happens to be that truth for our American universities. Some of these Universities are requiring “Safe Zones” to be set up on the campus to be a place where students can shield themselves from uncomfortable or dissenting viewpoints.

That is why Tennessee lawmakers are introducing a bill in the their legislature this week that seeks to protect freedom of speech in the “Volunteer State” universities.

Both the Tennessee House and Senate introduced the “Tennessee Freedom of Speech on College Campus Bill” last Thursday, which seeks to prevent state universities from adopting policies that “shield individuals from ideas and opinions considered unwelcome, disagreeable or even deeply offensive.”
The bill would prevent campus groups and school administrators from “closing off the discussion of ideas no matter how offensive or disagreeable.”

In addition, the bill would require every state school to “be open to any speaker whom students, student groups, or members of the faculty have invited.”

The founders of America staked their struggle on the ability to speak, assemble, and petition freely. In fact, there would be no America if there were no First Amendment.

To be fair, freedom of speech has always been a double-edged sword. Constitutional law states few exceptions for free speech, such as speech presenting clear and present danger to national security or public safety; and speech soliciting crime, violence, obscenity, and defamation. Americans have always been able to express their values and opinions freely.

Colonial scholars – all scholars for that matter – would agree that having absolute emotional insulation and comfort at all times is extremely elementary and it’s anti-intellectual.

Founding father, author, publisher, and printer, Benjamin Franklin, cherished the freedoms protected in the First Amendment, understanding, “Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government: When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved.”

“Free speech for me, but not for you,” has always been considered fascism, and that is the antithesis of liberty.

My suggestion to college students: quit being babies, use your intellect, speak back to what you disagree with, peacefully demonstrate and petition. Your emotional weakness and destructive tantrums are not a foundation that will sustain freedom.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved

Repeal The Uniform Monday Holiday Act

February 22, 2017, is the 285th anniversary of the birth in 1732 of General and President George Washington, the “Father Of Our Country.” Washington was the most universally respected and admired American in the age of the Founding Fathers, and in the history of America.

Once upon a time, George Washington’s Birthday was a National Holiday celebrated on the actual anniversary of his birth, February 22. On Washington’s Birthday, Americans paused to remember and honor him. Parents and schools taught American children about his life on his birthday; urged the children to learn about the Father Of His [Their] Country, and to follow his example of patriotic love of country, selfless service and sacrifice for freedom, personal honor, dedication to duty, fidelity to principle.

By observing Washington’s Birthday as a National Holiday on his actual birthdate, Feb. 22, the focus of the nation was on Washington, on the example he set by his extraordinary life, establishing him as “the Greatest American.”

However, all that changed in 1971. Congress, pressured by federal government bureaucrats and other employees and their unions, abolished “Washington’s Birthday” as a National Holiday. It was replaced with “Presidents’ Day” to be observed on the “third Monday of February” as a result of the “Uniform Monday Holiday Act,” which gave government employees their sought after three-day weekends.

As a result, American children in government schools learn little or nothing about the greatest man in the history of America, without whose extraordinary virtues and sacrifices they would not be free.

Therefore, I urge that “Washington’s Birthday” should be reinstated as a National Holiday. It should be celebrated on Washington’s actual birthday: February 22, not another day for the three-day holiday convenience of alleged “public servants” in government employment. Nor should Washington be lumped in with other, less deserving presidents in a concocted “Presidents Day.”

George Washington was acknowledged at the genesis of the United States of America as the “Father Of His Country,” the greatest of all Americans. He received such honors for good reasons that endure and should not be forgotten, or never taught to succeeding generations. He set an enduring example of fidelity to God and Country. His life should be known, remembered, honored, and emulated by Americans of this and and future generations, as he was by the generation of the Founding Fathers who knew him best.

George Washington was the most admired American by the Americans of the Founding Generation who created the free, Constitutional republic of America: “First in war, first in peace, first in the hearts of his countrymen,” as Washington was described by Revolutionary War hero Henry (“Light Horse Harry”) Lee. No president, no American, has every been so universally respected and admired as was Washington.

Washington set an enduring example in war by his conduct as Commanding General of the American Revolutionary Army in the War of Independence, 1776-1883, in which he was regarded as the “indispensable man” without whose leadership freedom would never have been achieved in the war against England, then the greatest military power on earth.

Washington continued setting the example in peace when he was elected by acclamation as president of the Constitutional Convention, and thereafter elected as the First President of the United States.

He set perhaps an even greater example by walking away from power and returning home to Virginia as a private citizen after his second term, refusing offers that he be president for life.

His act of humbly declining power as President and returning home stunned the world, in which the United States was then the only republic in a world of monarchs and potentates. He was hailed as a (then) modern “Cincinnatus,” the Roman general who walked away from imperial power when Rome ruled the world. When others grasped for power—then and now—George Washington, singularly, relinquished power, setting an unprecedented example of duty, honor, country, first.

After his death on Dec. 14, 1799, George Washington was hailed in the western world as “the greatest man of his age.” Even Napoleon, who had no small estimation of his own greatness, deferred to Washington, saying (on Feb. 9, 1800) : “This great man fought against tyranny; he established the liberty of his country. His memory will always be dear to the French people, as it will be to all freemen of the two worlds.”

Americans once believed those words. George Washington was the first American to be honored with a federal holiday. “Washington’s Birthday” was established by Act of Congress in 1879. As noted above,”Washington’s Birthday” holiday was observed on the anniversary of Washington’s birthday, February 22, until Congress, putting the care, comfort and convenience of government employees first, adopted the “Uniform Monday Holiday Act,” which became effective on Jan. 1, 1971.

That Act effectively subordinated remembrance of the example of George Washington’s life, and maintaining or inculcating those virtues in the national character, especially of the young, and immigrants who would be Americans, for the higher purpose of insuring that federal and other government employees will have nice three-day weekend holidays, while the rest of the country goes to work.

“Washington’s Birthday” holiday was in effect abolished from national consciousness in the 1970’s, when the the holiday was renamed “President’s Day,” submerging America’s greatest president, George Washington, into an undifferentiated mass of competent men and con men, the good, the bad, the ugly, the avaricious, meretricious, and salacious, who have managed, often by hook and crook, and lying through their teeth, to get themselves elected President.

With the abolition of George Washington’s Birthday, and Abraham Lincoln’s Birthday to satisfy government employees three-day weekend demands, the only American in all of history now to have a National Holiday in his name is Martin Luther King.

Concisely stated: It is the singular, unprecedented virtues, character, and example of George Washington which ought to be remembered and honored, singularly, on his actual birthday, February 22, as a National Holiday.

Therefore, let us Americans of this generation demand that Congress restore the “Washington’s Birthday” National Holiday to be observed on February 22, annually, the actual birth date of George Washington, no matter the lamentations of government bureaucrats and employees who may suffer the oppression of one less three-day weekend holiday.

© 2017 Rees Lloyd – All Rights Reserved

Some of the recent political convention speeches were a combination of Tony Robbins-inspired motivational techniques and transparent attempts at controlling and manipulating human consciousness, based on political platforms of outrageous lying and psychological manipulation. The political conventions with some exceptions were like virtual reality theatre directed by George Orwell. Nothing is what is seems to be and nothing is real. On the electronic menu of both political parties, false choices were offered up that were nothing more than illusions, and the politicians’ speeches were carefully crafted to appear as one thing, but are in reality completely something else.

All the psychological props and devices were employed to appease the parties’ demographic bases with virtual world candidates who appeared as pop-ups who used words like family, God, born-again, diversity, sustainable, “pro-life, but I don’t vote that way,” environmentalism, and racial identification. And there were promises and appeals to the working class, middle class, and various racial, religious, and gender groups. There was a Marxist candidate who apparently sold out his followers for money and globalist-elite candidates who masqueraded as candidates for the common people. The Joker or wild card in the “holodeck” (a virtual reality facility featured in the Star Trek movies and often used for recreational activities) is the major news media. The corporate media, which is totally controlled by six corporations owned by the global elite, offers nothing more than a “smoke and mirrors” show of endless babbling by inferior actors posing as journalists, who, with rare exceptions, are in reality nothing more than propagandists who offer almost nothing in the way of facts, accountability, and in-depth insights. It’s all the land of make believe like the Wizard of Oz, where we are not allowed to see the truth about the Wizard who hides behind the curtain.

How is it that so many of the American people fall for this stuff? Matt Drudge, the founder of the Drudge Report, made the comment that there is a sickness in the American people that makes them susceptible to leaders who lie and the irrational messages they give. What Matt Drudge was referring to was a kind of spiritual and psychological sickness that infects a very large percentage of the American public. In the last two decades this psychological sickness has taken hold over more and more minds, so that the majority of Americans are easily manipulated through emotion and slogans, rather than actual facts and logic. According to Michael Snyder of Economic Collapse “the percentage of Americans that own a home has fallen to the lowest level ever recorded.” Snyder continues “The reason for this, of course is that the Middle Class is dying. Last year we learned that Middle Class Americans now make up a minority of the population for the first time ever.” I go into this in detail in my book, A Prophecy of the Future of America 2016 – 2017 and explain how this is not an accident, but due to a deliberate “educational” strategy of the elite to artificially create a World Socialist Government.

Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World, warned us the power of totalitarian dictatorships using scientific mind control to dumb down the masses and make them compliant. He wrote about the use of non-stop distractions to keep people from paying attention to what is really going on in social or political situations. It’s kind of like the car chases, riots, celebrity craziness, and other media techniques to keep us watching our television screens.

Huxley writes “In their propaganda, today’s dictators rely for the most part on repetition, suppression and rationalization: the repetition of catchwords which they wish to be accepted as true, the suppression of facts which they wish to be ignored, the arousal and rationalization of passions which may be used in the interests of the Party or the State.” It sounds like Huxley is describing the programming content of politicians at convention, or a cable news network.

Aldous Huxley continues “As the art and science of manipulation come to be better understood, the dictators of the future will doubtless learn to combine these techniques with the non-stop distractions…” (Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, (Perennial Library, 1958), pgs. 363-7.

Despite the virtual reality illusion of the differences between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, the middle class has been dying for decades under both parties, who exist primarily to serve the elite: Wall Street and wealthy special interest groups. According to the Social Security Administration, 51 percent of American workers make less than $30,000 per year. But even that number is misleading because $30,000 per year could have bought a decent middle class lifestyle and a home in the 1960s and 1970s. The Federal Reserve states that 47 percent of all Americans could not afford to pay a $400 emergency room bill without borrowing the money. On top of that hard working Americans who sacrificed and slaved in jobs where they were provided a fair and decent health plan have had their health plans stolen from them! They have been forced to accept inferior health plans where the price of health care sky rockets every year and their health care premiums are so high that many don’t have the money to pay for them and so they choose not to get treated for all kinds of serious medical conditions.

Both political parties participated in this betrayal of the American people and the Republican elite have no intention of repealing or seriously changing the highly expensive and horrible health care plans which citizens have been forced to accept which do not allow them to keep or choose their doctor or healthcare provider, and at the most vulnerable time in their lives older Americans’ health care cost keeps getting higher and higher.

On every front Americans are being bludgeoned to accept an educational system that saddles families and their children with enormous debt and throws the children into a job market which can no longer offer higher paying jobs with decent benefits. The mass media only give lip service to these issues and give no in-depth coverage of any relevant news because their entire purpose is to conceal the truth from the public with endless “shock and awe” events that occupy the consciousness of the average American like “bread and circuses” did during the Roman Empire.

The reality is that a secretive elite class rule the world like kings and queens and have turned nations in Europe, America, and the rest of the world into feudal states where the middle class has been turned into a serf or slave class. At the same time, the elite or one percent have become wealthier than at any time in history, although the media will never do any serious coverage of this, but simply tap dance around the issue with Manchurian-candidate-media personalities on the left and the right concealing the full ramifications of what this means to the American people by offering up diversionary coverage and ignoring the real facts. The primary fact is that with very few exceptions both Republican and Democratic politicians work hand in glove with Wall Street and the international banks and when they retire they can be highly paid lobbyists for corporations or foreign nations like China, Iran, Pakistan, India, and Russia.

Why is it that the vast majority of Americans on the left and right cannot see the obvious? It’s not that Americans were not susceptible to propaganda and manipulation in previous generations; it’s that we are now in a time period where several generations of Americans have lost the ability to perceive and think rationally. After decades of scientifically dumbing down the American public through the educational system, media, and entertainment, the average person has no sense of history and no desire to understand history, and the educational process has robbed people of the ability to be creative, to ask questions, and to look at the big picture. Common Core and educational programs that “teach to the test” are designed to shut down right brain development and fool parents into thinking their children are learning because they do well on a test.

However, doing well on a test consists of regurgitating back the information that the teacher and the curriculum spoon-fed to the student. The child is encouraged to enter into collectivist and groupthink educational environments where as a team students come up with approved answers. The masses of scientifically dumbed down people in America and around the world did not come about by accident. It was part of a deliberate and long-term plan.

In 1947, Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley, was the first head of UNESCO, the United Nations Educational Scientific Cultural Organization. Both Aldous Huxley and Julian Huxley were Fabian Socialists and were at the very top of the occult elite. Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World, which was a science fiction novel about a dictatorship where people were genetically bred for certain classes in society and were controlled by scientific brainwashing and psychotropic drugs. Aldous Huxley also created the term “Scientific Dictatorship,” which he spoke about at a convention of neurological scientists at the University of California at Berkley in 1961, where he said that in the truly scientific dictatorship men and women could be programmed to love their slavery.

This was not just theoretical for the Huxleys and the rest of the global elite; it was their action plan for creating a new kind of technological Babylon and global dictatorship. Julian Huxley organized UNESCO at the UN for the purpose of helping the “emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas with its own broad purpose.” Huxley’s goal was a one world government that would be brought about by merging “two-super-nationalisms, or individualism versus collectivism; or the American versus the Russian way of life, or as Capitalism versus Communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism.” The psychosocial technology they would use to bring this about is the Hegelian Dialectic, which creates two opposites of extremes, thesis versus antithesis, to bring about a middle ground called synthesis. In the mass media and political arenas the liberal and conservative cable news networks serve as thesis and anti-thesis. In the political arena the Republican Party and the Democratic Party serve as thesis and anti-thesis.

On a global level the plan by Julian Huxley and others has been to create a single World Core Curriculum so that people of all nations think the same thing. This is what H.G. Wells intended when he created the “World Brain,” concept, or what others have called the “Hive Mind.” Computer technology is an essential part of this process and it is no accident that computer software billionaire Bill Gates is a primary backer of Common Core. Ironically, members of the elite like Gates send their children to non-Common Core private schools. In 2004, Bill Gates and Microsoft, along with UNESCO, partnered to create a globalist educational program for children worldwide.

The seeds of Common Core began in the 1940s, when Sir Julian Huxley created UNESCO to use global educational standards to indoctrinate students with a belief in “political unification in some sort of world government.” In 1949 UNESCO literature was distributed to use in the classroom to promote “world understanding.” UNESCO’s materials read “As long as the child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can only produce precarious results.” So, to deal with that, schools should use various means to “combat family attitudes.” UNESCO is clearly attacking nationalism or patriotism and targeting for destruction family attitudes or family values.

Later on, Robert Mueller, a former Deputy Secretary of the UN, created the details of Common Core as a planetary curriculum to be taught in all the schools on Earth. Robert Mueller is an occultist and Luciferian, a disciple of Alice Bailey, who founded Lucis Trust, formerly known as Lucifer Publishing Company, on the grounds of the UN. Alice Bailey was a disciple of Madame Blavatsky, the Russian occult teacher, who openly taught the worship of Lucifer.

The World Core Curriculum of Julian Huxley and Robert Mueller represents the Illuminati plan to create a one world government, one world religion, and one world economic system by using occult programs of scientific mind control along with computer technology to create global citizens who are content to serve as slaves in a “green” and “sustainable” New World Order. Like the Illuminati pyramid on the back of the U.S. dollar this will be a hierarchal and occult system that is diametrically opposed to Christianity, Christian moral values, national sovereignty, and the Bill of Rights and the freedoms it contains.

The entire global system is an anti-Christ system because it directly opposes Jesus Christ and the teachings of the Bible. It uses occult power and mind control terms like Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, and environmentalism to control the masses. But none of those words mean what they claim to mean. For example, Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 are simply code for radical socialist wealth distribution and top-down control systems.

In 1990 top level Vatican theologian Malachi Martin wrote The Keys of This Blood: The Struggle for World Dominion, where he outlined the goal of the globalist elite and the new humanist values they will promote, funded in part by the Carnegie Endowment Fund in partnership with organizations like the Moscow-based educational company Informatik, where the plan is to use the same kinds of textbooks all around the world. Malachi Martin explains the new kinds of values they will promote on a global level. For example, the word “good” will no longer have a moral or religious connotation. Good will simply mean global! The goal is to create a one-world community with a global mentality. (Source Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990).

In 1974, Alvin Toffler, who mentored “conservative” Newt Gingrich, wrote a report entitled, “Man, Education, and Society in the Year 2000.” Other participants were George Bush, James Baker of the Reagan Administration, and Edmund de Rothschild. They called for new values beyond the values of the home, church, and traditional school. What were these values?

“The home, the church and the school cannot be effective maintainers [of society] since the future cannot be predicted… The traditional cluster of knowledge, skills, values and concepts will not help our young face the future in their private life, the international situation…. Perhaps there is a need for the clarification of new values needed to solve future problems.” (Source “Man, Education and Society in the Year 2000,” a report issued by the Institute for Chief State School Officers, 1974. Summary written by Dr. Grant Venn, CSSO Institute Director.)

In 1984, The Robert Muller School in Texas, which uses Muller’s World Core Curriculum, was accredited despite Muller’s acknowledgement that his curriculum is based on “the teachings set forth in the books of Alice Bailey by [her spirit guide] the Tibetan teacher, Djwhal Khul.” The review team believed that the Robert Muller School curriculum was so outstanding that it should be used as a model for teacher education everywhere. In 1985 Robert Muller’s occult and globalist book New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality was published, and it influenced leading educators around the world.

Dr. Thomas Sowell summarized this mind-changing process in a 1993 article titled “Indoctrinating the Children”:

“The techniques of brainwashing developed in totalitarian countries are routinely used in psychological conditioning programs imposed on American school children. These include emotional shock and desensitization, psychological isolation from sources of support, stripping away defenses, manipulative cross-examination of the individual’s underlying moral values, and inducing acceptance of alternative values by psychological rather than rational means.”(Source Thomas Sowell, “Indoctrinating the Children,” in Forbes, February 1, 1993, p. 65.

The reason that fewer and fewer Americans can rationally and logically process accurate information about the true content presented by political conventions and the media is that they have gone through the scientific process of mind-changing that both Dr. Thomas Sowell and Aldous Huxley describe. Dr. Sowell writes that the scientific techniques of brainwashing developed in totalitarian countries are now being regularly used in psychological conditioning programs imposed on American school children.

He states that “emotional shock and desensitization, psychological isolation from sources of support, stripping away defenses…” are being used in American schools. Think for a moment about the actual physical structure of modern American schools. They are built to look somewhat like prisons and they have conspicuously few windows for children to look out into the real world. Why? The stated purpose is to prevent distraction. Really?

Even Aldous Huxley warned about the use of scientific propaganda and the techniques of repetition, suppression, rationalization, and the use of catchwords.

The challenge before each of us as individuals and as a culture is to not surrender our individual brains into the “World Brain,” which is slavery. There is only one way to do that and that is to THINK.

In my new book, A Prophecy of the Future of America 2016 – 2017, I expose the global economic system and the future of America in light of Bible prophecy.

© 2016 Paul McGuire – All Rights Reserved

“Those who cry the loudest are not always the ones who are hurt the most” – Aesop

Just for once, I didn’t have to be personally present to witness or understand the anger at the Women’s anti-Trump march recently held in London. I have suffered with frustration and anger, I have seen the damage it can cause, and I also recognise it in others. It is an ugly spirit. It is usually loud, indignant and demanding; sometimes it hides behind a quiet demeanour, victim hood, tears, or a painted smile. There is a lot of it about.

However, with barely one foot through the front door of The White House, it still came as a bit of a surprise that an exaggerated 100,000 angry women’s voices would be on him like a ton of bricks from this side of the Atlantic, and that the event would be heavily covered through all of our mainstream media. The new president of the United States, is suddenly not only responsible for offending the minority of voters in the USA, and creating world division; but he is now apparently responsible for every woman’s anguish here in the UK and across the world as well. I hope he has broad shoulders.

Jumping on the bandwagon of what some call group solidarity for all those people who think they are marginalized or feel deeply offended by laws being implemented on the other side of the Atlantic; there were plenty of others across the nation, from the comfort of their own home, who were being empowered by joining in with the criticism, the hatred, and the disbelief directed towards the new president of the United States who they consider to be against women and also very racist towards immigrants. I heard it in the workplace, in shops, at friend’s homes, and witnessed the sudden outage of indignation verbalizing itself at every conceivable moment. It was quite astonishing to hear that once more, especially after the Brexit result, and to see it displayed amidst the quiet acceptance and respect that many others felt towards the majority of voters in the USA.

Yet my observations came not only from watching the display of female anguish marching through the streets of London, believing they spoke for the nation, but from asking why this very large group of protestors, if they were concerned about women, were not directing their energy against the real perpetrators of abuse in our society today? There are plenty of them about. What has Donald Trump had to do with it?

Sometimes, it’s not those women who cry loudest who are the ones who are most hurt…….They are usually the ones who are most wrong.

Was Donald Trump acting as a catalyst for something else; an unhealed anguish deeply forgotten and buried? Why haven’t we witnessed such hatred for male leaders; home and abroad before?

Why did this anger turn itself against one man, without looking at its own guilt, and the wrong compromises it has already made with evil within its own home?

Silent Witness – The Missing Women

If demonstrators were upset about the unfair way that women are treated, I wondered why they were not around when just one British woman bought out a private prosecution against 2 male doctors who were discovered carrying out abortions on unborn baby girls in the UK, based purely on their gender. With an estimated 100,000,000 missing women based solely on the practice of gendercide across the world, it should surely be something worth speaking out against.

What a wonderful platform some of those speakers in that demonstration could have had to highlight that abuse in our own country. [Link]

Silent Witness – The Invisible Mother

I wondered if 100,000 demonstrators will march or speak out on the removal of the name ‘mothers’ which is now being called for by the BMA, (The British Medical Association), who have issued official internal guidelines to all of its members to implement and refer to a new mother as a ‘pregnant person’, thus removing the unique gift, joy and privilege of being called a mother; in order to not offend others.

The guidelines also promote the new title of Mx which can be used instead of Miss, Ms, Mrs or Mr. It will not be a Happy Mx Day when that suggestion finally takes a hold.

The road to genderless, non descript, non identifiable ‘nobodies’ is upon us. Will we question or blindly comply with these instructions?

You can read A Guide to Effective Communication, Inclusive Language in the Workplace issued by The British Medical Association.

Silent Witness – The Invisible Child

I wondered why 100,000 demonstrators have not vocally objected in the streets to the sexualizing of children through the promotion of soft porn through music videos, where a little girls ambition in life has now become demoted to using the power of her assets to become a sex symbol like Rhianna, Beyonce or Britney and little boy’s are trained early to see girls as pure objects for their desire?

Passing their antics off as powerful and liberating is an insult to women, but more alarmingly it is feeding a more sinister and abusive agenda to make sex and provocative behaviour in children, especially little girls, much more acceptable.

It was interesting to see some of the more provocative female celebrities being the ones to shout the loudest in some of the organized marches across the world.

Silent Witness – Human Chattel

However, most of all I have wondered why those 100,000 demonstrators have not focused their energy into something which would be helpful and expose the evil of human trafficking in the UK, the rising number of rapes across Europe, child slavery, child brides, forced marriage, honour based violence, and FGM, (female genital mutilation) which is highlighted as a cultural problem and where it is estimated that the number of girls and women who have undergone FGM in the UK is estimated to vary from anything from 66,000 to 280,000 with between 7,000 to 24,000 girls under 17 years of age at risk?

The slogan currently being used to highlight FGM is No Voice – No Choice.

As the Women’s anti-Trump movement in the UK now takes a stance against his restrictions on immigration and travel to the USA, with demonstrations up and down the country in many of the major cities, I refer to two of the many signs that I have witnessed in these rallies which reads:

‘Kindness is Everything’
‘Your cannot unify with Hate’

Promoting humanism in a country which is already divided, not through the efforts of Donald Trump, but by another system which has purposefully overcrowded one culture with another culture, people are already aware that their kindness has been mis-used.

Apart from genuine immigrants and refugees who have integrated over many years into the UK, who are friends to the UK, and consider themselves British; unfortunately there are many legal and illegal immigrants who are not so friendly now living within our society.

Many places in Europe have fallen backwards and become unrecognisable; there are many places where people, especially women, are very afraid to visit. There is no kindness or unity there.

An area known as Tower Hamlets is known to be one of the most dangerous places for women and girls in the east end of London.

You can read the 45 page document on the abuse against women and girls in Tower Hamlets.

Tower Hamlets is also known as one of the ‘no-go’ areas which are reportedly existing throughout the United Kingdom where people do not feel safe or protected anymore.

In an article by Soeren Khan from the Gatestone Institute in relation to European ‘no-go’ zones, fact or fiction; here are some of the comments from people who speak out against some of the areas which now populate the British Isles.

The article also speaks about how many people are desperately leaving some areas in which they feel that the British law, culture and values are being dominantly displaced by cultures which want to police themselves and others, rather than follow the law of the land. [Link]

• “There are some communities born under other skies who will not involve the police at all… there are communities from other cultures who would prefer to police themselves.” — Sir Tom Winsor, chief inspector of the police forces in England and Wales.
• “We are sleepwalking our way to segregation. We are becoming strangers to each other and leaving communities to be marooned outside the mainstream.” — Trevor Phillips, former chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality.
• “One of the results of [multiculturalism] has been to further alienate the young from the nation in which they were growing up and also to turn already separate communities into ‘no-go’ areas where adherence to this ideology [of Islamic extremism] has become a mark of acceptability.” Michael Nazir-Ali, former Bishop of Rochester.
• “There are things that I see when I’m driving around Birmingham that shouldn’t be happening. I only drive into these areas, never actually walk into these areas, I just wouldn’t. Just in case I did do something that…because of their culture or their religion it was a threat or it was an insult or something.” — Resident of Birmingham.
Who will fill the Void?

The protestors in the Women’s anti-Trump march I fear are being used in varying ways. An out-of-control reaction, an anger, by the protesters is creating an irrational and biased attack upon a president who may be initially daring to prioritize the safety of his own fellow citizens first, and it is also acting as a distraction against some of the real issues that we should all be talking about and not be shouted down upon in our own country. It is not racist to highlight such problems.

The real anguish which some women feel is that they do not feel safe, or protected in society. They feel badly let down by men, even the good ones. It was all very well to march in large numbers through a relatively safe street in London. It is not so nice to walk alone in places of society where no one cares for you.

When we no longer identify or respect the specific and special roles that each of the sexes possess, society becomes demoralized so low that it loses all respect for itself and each other, and becomes very weak. It does not recognise genuine strength, love or grace.
You can sense and see the growing weakness and lack of character and identity all around. Who is it that is orchestrating the demise of mankind and why do we have to be considered unkind to object to it?

Will men and women unite together and value their role in society, protect their children and stand up to evil in a rational way without falling prey to the political correctness and humanism which is destroying people?

Out of control anger, like over the top kindness, can kill people. The women’s anti-trump demonstration was a weak attempt at the countries collective failure to show true strength and kindness in the correct proportion when it should have done a long long time ago. Leaders have let us down.

Is it to late to turn back to a dignity now lost….?

Sources and Links

European ‘No-Go’ Zones: Fact or Fiction? Part 2: Britain.
2 – ‘Time to take a stand’: thousands across UK protest at Trump policy.
3 – Women’s March: UK protesters join anti-Donald Trump marches.
4 – European ‘No-Go’ Zones: Fact or Fiction? Part 2: Britain.
5 – A Guide to Effective Communication, Inclusive Language in the Workplace.
6 – Violence against Women and Girls Consultation Report 2013.
7 – Woman’s £47,000 bill over sex-selective abortions: Christian pro-life campaigner fails in bid to prosecute doctors who were filmed offering to terminate female foetuses.

[These are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and spirit of my country has changed over 50 years. Why the country does not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.]

© 2017 Shirley Edwards – All Rights Reserved

There are powers working behind the powers

“It would be so nice if something made sense for a change.” – Alice from Alice in Wonderland

According to Edgar Dale’s research, we retain about 5% of information we hear, 10% of information we read, 20% that we see, 50% we discuss, 75% we do and a whopping 90% we teach! So if you want to retain knowledge, DO it and TEACH it!

Teach it to your children, teach it to your friends, teach it to your peers, just teach! And then teach others to do the same. Ironically, this is the Great Commission and Jesus in His infinite wisdom covered this: “Go and make disciples [this is the DO part, which means you’ll retain 75% of what you’ve learned as Christ’s disciple by simply DOING it]…and teach them to obey …[this is the TEACH part. When we get to this point, we’ll really retain our learning!].

This can be applied to anything in life, really, right on down to the state of our nation. However, in order to get a better grip on this, it would help to understand cognitive biases. These biases can really short circuit our learning process. A bias is quite simply an inclination of the mind, the way a mind leans. Bias originates from “a weight on the side of a bowl which turns it from a straight line”. (From Webster’s 1828 dictionary) And if we’re honest, we’ll realize we all have biases. We all have minds that lean to our preferences, and our preferences are from our learning, our environment, our experiences, etc., so they vary.

Take for instance, the normalcy bias. This bias takes in what has been normal (usual) from our experiences. What we know as normal or usual, develops a bias in us for what we know, in other words, we lean toward what’s “normal” (or usual) for us. This is why children who grow up in abuse frequently abuse or turn to abusive partners. It’s the norm for them. This is why people who grow up in racist or prejudiced conditions think everyone is racist or prejudiced. The status quo in your life sets your mind to accept or receive your view of the status quo. This can be good, in that if your norm is healthy, you gravitate toward health; or it can be bad, in that if your norm is dysfunctional, that becomes your understanding.

The extreme danger in a normalcy bias is that the mind and/or emotions tend to reject data or circumstances that contradict its bias. The mind has difficulty computing new data that contradicts its norm. It may be factual data; it may be real; but because the mind doesn’t equate it with what it knows as normal, it doesn’t know how to process it and usually rejects it.

For example, I grew up staunchly patriotic. I was inspired by the founding of America. Its founders were heroes to me, and the premise of liberty for everyone was a beacon that lit my way. The history textbooks told me of great feats of US Presidents, and depicted a scenario that reinforced my bias. So when someone I greatly respect sent me a link and asked me to evaluate it, and that link was an hour and a half of evidence that 9/11 was not an issue of terrorists running planes into buildings, but instead all the evidence pointed to a planned demolition and a staged “attack”, my mind tilted. It did not compute. I believed that our government was the best in the world and were purely serving American’s best interests. I believed bad people wanted to destroy our nation because it contradicted their belief systems.

As I looked at document after document, listened to expert after expert, saw picture after picture, my mind was forced to either reevaluate or reject, and the mind’s tendency is to reject a contradiction to its bias. If we don’t understand that, we won’t overcome our biases.

Consider also the availability bias. This is when the mind develops a shortcut to judging the probability of a future event. It’s important to recognize that to the human mind, probability is processed as a feeling. Please get that. The human mind does not process probability by mathematical odds. It is not a factual process that happens in the mind. What happens is if the mind can recall a past event easily, it’s more likely to believe it will happen in the future. Memory and the feelings that connect with memories are the primary tools the mind uses for making judgments on probability.

For example, if I was abandoned by my parents at a young age, placed in multiple foster homes, and every time I began to attach to someone they or I were removed, my mind would process that future relationships have a high probability of rejection or abandonment. My mind will recall the past events easily, and those memories will carry sufficient emotional anguish and pain, and my mind will deduct that future relationships will result in rejection or abandonment. [This will probably sabotage future relationships, because I will be waiting for such to happen and possibly inadvertently cause them to happen, a self-fulfilled prophecy, if you will.]

This is extremely dangerous when you consider the impact and influence of the modern media. Consider what is being projected on the screen or paper, and let’s say it’s a plane crash. Now they play the video footage over and over for days and days. They interview survivors and witnesses who give emotional testimonies of the event. The event is replayed enough and makes enough impact on your emotions that the mind begins to project that plane crashes are probable, and you have a bit of anxiety the next time you board one, or a loved one flies. In reality, the odds of being in a plane crash are 1 in 29.4 million. You have better odds of dying in a bathtub (1 in 1 million) or dying by a dog attack (1 in 700,000). BUT the human mind projects probability by its availability and it uses its experiences and emotions to base its availability.

And lastly, consider the confirmation bias. This affects the way we view new information on a subject, and it’s a real snare to us. The human mind loses impartiality once we form an opinion. Let me repeat that, because this is a problem. The human mind loses impartiality once we form an opinion. This is extremely dangerous because it causes us to disregard new information if it contradicts our opinion, and this happens in varying levels depending on the strength of our opinion. Our subconscious minds believe any information that confirms our current thinking and it dismisses information that disagrees with it. Surely you can see how dangerous that is in a pursuit of truth.

So if I use the 9/11 example, the confirmation bias would strongly override the new data coming in and the mind would begin its work on rejecting the information. This is what makes discussion, debates and some dialogues so difficult. If the data coming in doesn’t support our previously held opinion or belief, we reject it. (Even though we SAY we’re open-minded, we really aren’t.)

Once we get a basic understanding of the mind’s natural biases and how it structures, we can go about circumventing our biases. This is really, really important if we really want truth. The problem is people believe their opinions are truth, and thus don’t challenge them or allow them to be challenged.

If we can begin to understand how these biases work to our detriment in a myriad of ways, we can begin to sift through daily events with better clarity and in healthier places. We should quickly be able to see how the media plays a huge role in influencing thinking and changing the status quo. For instance, if the narrative on the media outlets (news, entertainment, internet, etc.) is constantly projecting the LGBT agenda, whether it be in marches, protests, TV shows, stories, movies, retail, etc., then after a consistent barrage of data output the mind begins to accept the LGBT agenda as normal. In fact, the LGBT population in America is roughly 3.8% – hardly a majority of anything. (according to Gallup [1]) 3.8% of anything is never the norm and never the status quo. But by the way it is presented in our society, our minds are beginning to accept it as norm. Remember the availability bias? If something is put before you so you experience it regularly, you become biased toward it. Your mind accepts it as the norm, even if it isn’t.

And if the media outlets can change the social climate regarding something so insignificantly small (3.8%)in comparison to mainstream (96.2%) America, what else is it changing?

I have gotten to the point that I’ll switch on mainstream media for a brief lapse of time to see what they’re saying. Then I’ll ask myself is, “Why do they want me to believe that?” Because that’s why they spin the “news” the way they do. They are promoting something, and it is very rarely the truth. Oh they will use some truth in it, but it is never to lead its audience to truth. It is always to lead its audience to its agenda by drawing the conclusions they have led the audience to.

Once we can begin to see through the façade, we can equip ourselves to search for real truth. To do that, we must acknowledge biases in our own minds first, then recognize them in other’s. After we have a beat on that, we can data input and begin processing in a healthier way.

Biases are the reason I have so much trouble exposing agendas to the general public. It’s the reason my children cannot have healthy debates with their public education teachers and peers. It’s the reason my child couldn’t have a reasonable discussion in her high school class when someone said, “Jesus was the first liberal.” It’s the reason we don’t change our minds when new information is presented.

For instance, if I told you there’s an Establishment in America whose purpose is to dismantle the liberties of Americans, strip America of its power (militarily and economically), and emasculate America’s national sovereignty… And if I told you this Establishment was made up of Republicans and Democrats that party means nothing to them… And that the Reagans, Bushs, Clintons and Obamas are all inter-connected… That they have been devising this plan for over a century and pass the agenda down to future generations… That multi-millionaires and multi-billionaires are deliberately buying supporters and protestors to create racial, socio-economic, and social divisions, protests and crises…

What would be your reaction? If it was an adverse reaction, if you just can’t get your head around that way of thinking, if a list of reasons that could not be true begins forming based on your perspective of what’s normal or usual, you are deceived by a number of biases. If you agreed, was your next line of thinking, “yes, but I can’t tell people I believe that.” This reaction is still a product of biases.

As long as we’re captive to our biases, we are not agents of truth. Our paradigms need shattered if we want to see the picture correctly and more clearly. Keep these things in mind as you watch the media work feverishly to paint pictures of what’s going on in DC right now. As long as Trump doesn’t rock the Establishment’s boat TOO much, they’ll let him live. All the while, they are feverishly working to undercut him, undermine him, thwart his plans, impeach him, and somehow stop the unraveling effect he has on what they’ve already done and have purposed to do.

Is Trump part of the Establishment? I hope not. He seems to have qualities of both sides, but his actions are proving anti-Establishment and the media’s reactions to him are indicating he is anti-Establishment. However, there are areas where he has Establishment ties that don’t make sense.

What you see on the screen isn’t what’s really going on. There is an anti-American group of globalist bankers, criminals and thieves, (some are American, some aren’t), that have been systematically dismantling our economy, our legal system, our Constitution, our liberties and our sovereignty for decades now. They have handed down the agenda to their posterity who has continued the agenda. Their objective is to remove obstacles to meet their goal of world dominion. America is the last great obstacle. Europe is already in its decline. Russia and China are still obstacles but they are less formidable once America is crippled. For America to be destroyed, her economy will have to collapse, her military will have to be castrated, and its people disarmed and disorganized.

The Rockefeller family has led this group for a century, and where their power is waning recently, others have picked up the agenda. George Soros, (multi-billionaire close friend of Clintons), in an interview with Newsweek June 27, 2006, affirmed that he did say and does believe that “the main obstacle to a stable and just world is the United States”. To him and others, that “obstacle” needs brought down.

And the media is one of their most powerful tools. Really consider the meaning of these words David Rockefeller uttered in June of 1991:

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

This thinking, this agenda, this shadow government, Establishment, whatever you want to call it, does not resonate with the average American’s thinking. We don’t think like this, we don’t believe things like this, we don’t want to believe things like this. It is not normal or usual, it is not made available, and it is not confirmed with how we have been taught or molded. So we reject it. But when we move our biases aside and really take in the overwhelming data on the subject, and when we open our eyes past our prejudices and pet convictions, we cannot help but see that when we see it, things begin to make sense for a change.

© 2017 M. Smallback – All Rights Reserved

Every day something new comes to my in-box that shows why God became so angry at the sins and cruelties of man that He flooded the entire earth to get rid of them all except for one righteous man, Noah, and his family.

As civilization re-grew and advanced, so did the seemingly inventive cruelties that man has devised against his fellow man and other creatures. They are not content to cause people and animals to suffer, but they have carried that sin over to little babies about to be born. Tiny babies who are inconvenient for the parents who want no responsibility in life to tie them down when they could be out partying.

What is even more horrific, these immoral misfits, who keep Planned Parenthood in business, join lines to abort their babies whose little hearts start beating before six-weeks in the womb. In other words they are not only live babies, but they have a nervous system and feel pain the same as we do. Ultrasound has PROVED this.

Yet, these little lives are such a burden to unintentional parents that they don’t care how they get rid of the baby…just do it! And how do they get rid of them? A “doctor” goes inside the womb with a sharp scissor-like instrument that literally snips and tears the limbs off the baby….a live baby being dismembered who feels horrific agony and reacts by twisting while silently screaming. This doesn’t matter to the accidental parent who simply wants to be free from responsibilities.

Frankly this columnist believes that the only reason God has not destroyed the earth again by flooding, or even more apropos, by fire (since the sins of today are even greater than in the days of Noah), is because the coming of Jesus is now eminent and all evil will soon be cast into the lake of fire.

My keyboard is stained with the tears I’ve shed while reading and writing some of my columns. This latest story about the elephant that cried opened the floodgates. Animals were all created by God. They all have their individual personalities and have the same kind of feelings we do….feelings of fear, pain, love, joy, grief and anxiety.

This columnist has been friends with dogs, cats, lions, tigers, rhinos, elephants, virtually all kinds of God’s special creatures. How I pity someone who has never had the privilege of knowing an elephant. These magnificent beasts are intelligent, loyal, caring and very social animals. Yet they have been especially targeted by evil people for profit, killing elephants or disabling them so their tusks can be sawed off to sell–or simply killing them in order to display their heads in a family room.

This latest story tells of an elephant in India named, Raju, orphaned as a baby after his parents were killed by poachers. The baby was kept, immediately put into captivity and shackled in spiked chains that dug into his body and his legs. And that is how he lived for almost 50 years of his life. Every move he made was painful, indeed, agonizing. This very same thing recently happened to a big bear that was used in a roadside wild animal attraction.

If that was not bad enough, Raju was bought and sold several times, forced to become a ‘riding’ elephant for tourists from daylight to sundown, with every step he took being torturous because of the spiked chains that bound and punctured his legs. Plus his cruel owners would beat him.

Raju was in those chains 24 hours a day. Not even a moment of comfort was afforded him. Every time he was sold, the new handler would beat Raju for no reason but to show him who was ‘boss.” This is what this gentle giant endured for 50 years, a creature that had done no wrong to anyone.

When discovered, Raju was in pathetic condition. He hadn’t been fed properly for months. He had started eating scraps of plastic and paper in a desperate bid to survive. The word properly got out and a daring nighttime raid by a team of rescuers from Wildlife SOS along with 20 Forestry Commission officers and two policemen, swooped in to release Raju from his confinement and found him so tightly bound by those spiked chains that he could hardly move.

A team of 10 veterinarians also were with the group. The rescue was completed on July 4th, which marks America’s Independence Day, which had special significance for this particular rescue.

The owner of Raju, who lived in the Uttar Pradesh region of India, tried to stop the raid by attempting a standoff. The team secured the property and began to free Raju from the painful spike chains. Any activity in the area of the chain wounds was painful to the slightest touch. Raju made little beeping sounds, not from any pain, but in gratitude. This elephant knew he was being rescued and would be set free for the first time.

The team came with fruit and spoke softly to the pachyderm to put him at ease and to let him know they were there to free him. As the last chains were cut off him, Raju, began to cry…yes…cry with big tears rolling from his eyes. It was a very emotional moment for all involved. They gave him a sedative so they could load him into a truck to take him to a sanctuary.

And yes, animals do cry with big tears. I remember an elephant that had a little dog as his best friend for years. When that dog died, the elephant trumpeted in grief and yes, this columnist saw the tears come from his eyes. I have seen dogs cry with tears running down their faces when their owner died. I would often be called when someone dies and then prepare to do the funeral. That is when I saw this as fact, that yes, animals grieve like we do.

Raju was taken 350 miles to an elephant compound; The Wildlife SOS’s Elephant Conservation and Care Center Refuge in Mathura. Five female pachyderms excitedly flapped their ears, trumpeted greetings and touched Raju with their trunks, all signs of joy. Raju is experiencing happiness and comfort for the first time in his life. Elephants live to 70 or 80 years.

What Can Be Done to Prevent Animal Cruelty?

This columnist plans to work with a U.S. Senator to craft a bill to add a unit to Law Enforcement specifically to protect animals. The new officers’ unit would be: Law Enforcement for Animals–LEFA. These units would be actual police officers who have gone through the Academy, are armed and can make arrests.

LEFA can forcibly enter an area where animals are being tortured and arrest those responsible as well as seize their property to pay veterinarian bills and other costs. Many animal rescue organizations do undercover videos to record the horrors being perpetrated against animals, and that includes slaughter houses. They do not just kill the animals; they fully torture the innocent victims before the actual kill.

There is nothing humane about that process. I have seen some photos which have kept me up at nights. Those working undercover should be able to stop such a process and arrest the person involved. I could never understand how someone could simply film something so horrific without jumping into action to stop the torture of an animal.

The savages who do this must be arrested on the spot, and they can be, under this new unit. Those who are secretly video-taping can have a concealed weapon and take immediate action.

There can be special courts established to handle any case involving animals. This can all be set up, and it will be. I worked with one very famous U.S. Senator to craft and sponsor a bill making the import and export of ivory a criminal offense since elephants are viciously killed for their tusks. That bill was crafted, presented on the floor, and passed.

This one will be as well. But I need your help to back me…..not financial, but those of you–and that includes those who are retired–can help by sending letters, emails, signing petitions and making phone calls to officials as this bill is crafted. You will know exactly what is going on through my columns.

Indeed, please get a note off to me through the news site this column appears on to let me know I can count on you. One goal of this is to close all factory farms, shut down any and all roadside wildlife exhibitions, and to do frequent inspections wherever there are animals, including zoos.

Oh yes, there are those who will state that The Bible says; “Man shall have dominion over the animals.” The proper translation of that word, ‘dominion’ is: RESPECT–COOPERATE WITH the animals. So don’t try to use that Scripture verse to justify mistreating or torturing an animal. That is NOT what the Holy Scriptures implies. We must respect animals and cooperate and work with them since we all share this one planet.

Closing Thought: The death of babies keep Planned Parenthood alive….and prosperous…the love and protection of animals keeps man’s soul alive.

Photo 1 Caption: Raju in His New Home Welcomed by the Girls-Note the Puncture in His Leg

Photo 2 Caption: Raju Being Rescued with Wounds Being Treated.

Our thanks to Huffington Post for some of the details given for this story. Check out this link to the rescue compound that freed Raju.

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reser

Even though an incorrect decision may be the so-called “law of the case” as to the parties actually before the Supreme Court in a particular instance (and unchallengeable by them because no means of appeal is available), it can never constitute infallible legal dogma as to everyone else in all future instances. After all, Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that “[t]his Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land”—with no mention of decisions of the Supreme Court (or any other judicial tribunal) as being included within “the supreme Law”. Obviously, no such decision can ever qualify as “[t]his Constitution”, one of “the Laws of the United States”, or a “Treat[y] made * * * under the Authority of the United States”. For the Supreme Court itself is a mere creature of and subordinate to “[t]his Constitution”, not its creator or its superior. See U.S. Const. art. III, § 1. The Court’s decisions are not “Laws of the United States”, because “[a]ll legislative Powers * * * granted [by the Constitution] shall be vested in a Congress of the United States”, not in any judicial tribunal. See U.S. Const. art, I, § 1. And all “Treaties” derive exclusively from the President’s “Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur”, not from any part of the “[t]he Judicial Power of the United States * * * vested in [the] supreme Court”. Contrast U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2 with art. III, § 1.

So far, this commentary has focused on Mrs. Clinton’s catalogue of alleged misbehavior, because her shady affairs have received an overwhelming amount of perfervid attention in the domestic and even international media. Yet, in the long run, Mr. Trump must deal with several even more pressing concerns if America is to accept his “Oath or Affirmation” as genuine:

First, on various occasions he has demonstrated a willingness to question what actually happened on 9/11. This indicates his suspicion—which every thinking American shares—that the real culprits have not yet been identified, or if identified not yet brought to justice. See, e.g., Kevin Robert Ryan, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects (Microbloom, 2013). In light of the horrendous harms to persons and property perpetrated on 9/11—and especially the consequences of those crimes with respect to the elaboration of a national para-military police-state apparatus in this country, the systematic curtailment of Americans’ basic civil liberties, and the launching of highly questionable military adventures overseas during the Bush Administration and Mr. Obama’s residence in the White House, all in patent defiance of the Constitution—a refusal by Mr. Trump to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” through an honest and thoroughgoing investigation of the 9/11 Event would provide compelling evidence that he never intended to “take the * * * Oath or Affirmation” of the President truthfully as to that matter, either.

Second, prior to his inauguration Mr. Trump put himself on record as promising that, in his Administration, “[w]e [namely, the government of the United States] will stop looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments”. See [Link] (01 December 2016). This evidenced his belief—again, in which every thinking American along with the rest of the civilized world concurs—that rogue officials within the Bush Administration and among Mr. Obama’s entourage have engaged in such willful, wanton, and reckless aggression on more than one occasion. Again, in patent defiance of the Constitution, as everyone knows or ought to know that “the genius and character of our institutions are peaceful, and the power to declare war was not conferred upon Congress”—or anyone else—“for purposes of aggression or aggrandizement”. Fleming v. Page, 50 U.S. (9 Howard) 603, 614 (1850). In addition, everyone conversant with these matters knows that the CIA and the Pentagon should be the first rocks Mr. Trump ought to turn over in a search for the chief culprits. So if Mr. Trump now refuses to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” by allowing the miscreants who have been involved in “toppl[ing] regimes and overthrow[ing] governments” to escape justice, it would hardly be amiss to conclude that he never intended to “take the * * * Oath or Affirmation” of the President truthfully as to that matter, as well.

Moreover, Mr. Trump’s failure to take appropriate action as to this particular would demonstrate such imprudence as to draw into question, not only his personal capability (as opposed to his legal eligibility) to serve, but also his likelihood to survive, as President. For, rather than risk the frustration of their complots, the rogue officials who have engaged in “toppl[ing foreign] regimes and overthrow[ing foreign] governments” in the past and who undoubtedly intend to persevere in like endeavors in the future would hardly shrink from “toppl[ing]” and “overthrow[ing]” the Trump Administration—if not in the dramatic fashion their predecessors cut short President Kennedy’s tenure then in some other, but no less effective, manner—if Mr. Trump refused to give them the criminal leeway they desired. See, e.g., JFK and the Unspeakable. Why He Died and Why It Matters (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 2008; reprinted, New York, New York: Touchstone, 2010).

Indeed, they have already set out on this nefarious course, by floating in the media the fantastic assertions that “Russian hacking” exerted a decisive improper influence in favor of Mr. Trump’s election, that Mr. Trump himself is subject to blackmail by Russia, and that he is even a “dupe” or “useful idiot” working (albeit perhaps unconsciously) in Russia’s interests—by means of those canards casting a pall over the legitimacy of his Administration at its very inception. Although some observers fear that these and like tar brushes may have painted Mr. Trump into a corner, in reality they have provided him with an uniquely propitious opportunity to sweep out the responsible agencies with an iron broom. For if such charges are actually nothing more than “old grey mares”—that is, false narratives concocted by rogue operatives in “the intelligence community”—then the officials responsible for propagating them are arguably engaged in an attempt to overthrow the legitimate government of the United States through a coup d’état to be waged by Mr. Trump’s enemies in Congress and the bureaucracy, in the ever-hostile “mainstream media”, and in a gaggle of subversive NGOs intent upon applying within the United States their extensive experience in rigging “régime change” in various foreign countries. Inasmuch as the plotters of this coup must be aware that it could never be brought to completion absent the application of force at some stage (for instance, through the fomentation of violent civil disturbances on a massive scale), and therefore must already have included such operations in their plans, they have exposed themselves to serious charges. See 18 U.S.C. § 2384. Mr. Trump certainly enjoys both the authority and the ability to turn the tables on these conspirators. See 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333. But whether he can muster the gumption to do so remains to be seen.

Third, prior to his election, Mr. Trump expressed skepticism—also embraced by millions of Americans whose heads are not buried in the sand—as to whether Barack Obama was ever actually “eligible to the Office of President” as “a natural born Citizen”. See U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 4. Mr. Trump knew or should have known then, and knows or should know now, that inter alia:

(i) No report of an official, full-scale inquiry into Mr. Obama’s purported eligibility has ever been made public (or perhaps even conducted behind closed doors)—whether by Congress when it had the opportunities to do so, as I first explained in my NewsWithViews commentary “In the Shadow of Nemesis” (8 December 2008); or by law-enforcement agencies such as the FBI; or by the courts of either the United States or any State.

(ii) Mr. Obama’s parentage and the place of his birth, and their effects on his citizenship, continue to be the subjects of controversy.

(iii) The provenance and authenticity of Mr. Obama’s “birth certificate” (or whatever name should be attached to the document his minions caused to be publicized with his apparent approval) have been impugned through the research commissioned by former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, without adequate rebuttal from Mr. Obama’s camp.

(iv) Mr. Obama’s status as a citizen of Indonesia, resulting from his mother’s reported second marriage to an Indonesian and his subsequent translation to and sojourn in that land as a child, is still opaque.

(v) Whether, upon his return to the United States from Indonesia, Mr. Obama took the steps required at the time to reassert or to secure American citizenship has yet to be established in any public forum.

(vi) Whether, during Mr. Obama’s years in colleges and law school in this country, he claimed benefits or otherwise identified himself as a “foreign” student remains undetermined, because he has refused to release the relevant records.

(vii) Challenges have been leveled against the authenticity of both Mr. Obama’s purported registration with the Selective Service and his supposed Social Security card. And

(viii) Widely publicized statements emanating from Mr. Obama himself, from Michelle Obama, and from certain of Mr. Obama’s relatives over the years have cast doubts upon his citizenship.

The necessity for Mr. Trump to pry open this can of worms cannot be overstated—

(a) Although America has finally awakened from the long national nightmare of Mr. Obama’s residence in the White House, his “legacy” will continue to fester. If unmasked as ineligible for the office he pretended to hold, however, every measure he inflicted on this country while impersonating “the President” could and should be set aside as void ab initio. This would not unavoidably result in an hopelessly chaotic situation, if (for example) in good time and in a systematic fashion certain of the “Bills which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” during the period of Mr. Obama’s imposture Congress saw fit to “be presented [anew] to [Mr. Trump as] the [real] President of the United States” for him to “sign” or to “return * * * with his Objections”. See U.S. Const. art. I, § 7, cl. 2. Also, equivalent corrective steps could be taken to deal with those of Mr. Obama’s purported “executive” actions which Mr. Trump did not desire to adopt anew under his own authority; as well as with many judicial decisions predicated upon Mr. Obama’s unconstitutional handiwork, through (say) the Trump Administration’s invocation of the doctrine of Hazel-Atlas Glass Company v. Hartford-Empire Company, 322 U.S. 238 (1944). And if these measures did raise problems both complex and costly to resolve, the blame would not lie on Mr. Trump, but instead on the parties in official positions who refused to address the question of Mr. Obama’s ineligibility when it first arose.

(b) Exposure of Mr. Obama’s imposture (if such it was) would strike a crippling blow at the neo-Bolshevik “color revolution” now being organized by the Marxist intelligentsia in the suites of NGOs funded by renegade billionaires for the purpose of defaming, frustrating, sabotaging, and finally demolishing the Trump Administration. Deprived of Mr. Obama as its figurehead, neo-Bolshevism in this country would collapse in the confusion of internal struggles for power which would render it an impotent political force for years to come, if not destroy it altogether. Most important,

(c) Proof of Mr. Obama’s ineligibility would preserve the United States from the “precedent” of once having acquiesced in an usurper’s seizure of the White House. To be sure, purported “precedents” which violate the Constitution de facto do not change the Constitution de jure. For the Constitution of the United States is not cut from the same ill-woven cloth as the “constitution” of England, which throughout history has been altered by one successful “precedent” after another (even though many of them were patent usurpations). Nonetheless, it is one thing to suffer a thoroughly corrupt political figure (such as Mrs. Clinton is alleged to be) to escape prosecution—for that does not set a “precedent” which can immunize all such individuals in the future. It is one thing to cover up a “false flag” operation in which rogue officials in some “intelligence agencies” have participated (such as many Americans believe the 9/11 Event to have been)—for that, too, does not set a “precedent” which can exonerate all such miscreants in years to come. And it is even only one thing to countenance wars of aggression fomented by renegades within America’s “military-industrial complex” and “national-security” apparatus (such as this country’s on-going military adventures in the Middle East)—for that does not set a “precedent” capable of overruling the fundamental principle of the Nuremberg Tribunal. See Office of United States Chief of Counsel for Prosecution of Axis Criminality, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1946), Volume 1, Article 6, at 5. But usurpation of “the Office of President” for eight years by someone not eligible for that office in the first place, while almost everyone else in public life looked the other way and worked hand-in-glove with the usurper, is another thing altogether.

For if that is taken as an effectively binding “precedent” because it remains uncorrected when the evidence cries out for its correction, then Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution becomes a dead letter. And with it the Constitution as a whole—because, his tenure in the White House being utterly lawless in its inception, a faux “President” labors under no duty to, and surely will not, “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”, the Constitution first and foremost among them.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
In sum, as President Mr. Trump is not free simply to ignore these matters, if “the Deplorables” (and all other sensible Americans, for that matter) are to take his “Oath or Affirmation” seriously. Should he fail in this regard, then rather than becoming “great again” this country will soon find that its condition warrants the lugubrious prognosis put forward as a general rule of civilizational devolution by Oswald Spengler in his study Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Although this title is usually translated as The Decline of the West, the German noun Untergang can also be rendered, more ominously, as “downfall”, “ruin”, or “destruction”—which in this country’s case will be a fitting epitaph.

© 2017 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

According to seemingly reliable reports in the media, President Trump may have determined that his Administration will not conduct a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton (and presumably of the Clinton Foundation and those associated with it as well).

The reasons that were bruted for this decision prior to Mr. Trump’s inauguration should give one pause. First, various pundits contended that investigation of Mrs. Clinton would run afoul of some supposed “political tradition” in this country which discountenances prosecution of the loser of an election by the winner—when in fact Mrs. Clinton would be investigated, not because she lost the Presidential election, or even because of her dangerously aberrant political views, but instead because she has allegedly engaged in serious misbehavior, quite unconnected to the election, for which any other such perpetrator would surely be prosecuted sine die. Second, one of Mr. Trump’s aides mouthed the psychobabble that foregoing prosecution of Mrs. Clinton could “help her heal”—when “escape” would be the more accurate verb. Third, Mr. Trump himself announced: (i) that “I don’t think we have to delve back in the past”—notwithstanding that every criminal investigation does so; (ii) that prosecution of Mrs. Clinton “would be very, very divisive for the country”—as if affording her immunity from prosecution would not be; and (iii) that “I don’t want to hurt them [i.e., the Clintons]…they’re good people”—leaving to worrisome conjecture what Mr. Trump’s definition of “good people” might be. And most recently, when asked by a reporter whether no further investigations of Mrs. Clinton would be conducted, President Trump responded, “I certainly hope so”.

The most obviously justified criticism of Mr. Trump’s apparent willingness to allow Mrs. Clinton and others associated with her “to skate”, unscathed by honest and competent inquiries into their shadowy dealings, is that it proves once again how in the contemporary United States one body of law (or absence of law) specially privileges and protects the super-rich, the politically well-connected, and other big wheels, top noises, and string-pullers, while a quite different body of law bears down on everyone else. Any constitutionalist should be concerned, though, that something far more serious is involved here.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 7 of the Constitution provides that “[b]efore he [i.e., the President-elect] enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.’” The text of this “Oath or Affirmation”sets out, not a possibly inaccurate prediction cast in terms of the simple futurity of temporal sequence (“I shall”), but instead a strict promise of fidelity cast in terms of the emphatic futurity of a solemn assurance (“I will”). Moreover, “taking the * * * Oath or Affirmation” is the condition precedent sine qua non to “enter[ing] on the Execution of [the] Office [of President]”. Self-evidently, if it is not “take[n]” at all, a President-elect cannot “enter on the Execution of [that] Office”. No less plain is that a President-elect cannot “enter on the Execution of [that] Office” if he “take[s] the * * * Oath or Affirmation” falsely. For a false “Oath or Affirmation” is, by definition, fraudulent. And fraud vitiates and renders inoperative any and every act which it has facilitated. To be sure, the falsity of a representation as to the “Oath or Affirmation” might not be evident when it was uttered, because a rogue President-elect would be careful to engage in fraudulent concealment of his true state of mind when he deceitfully “t[ook] the * * * Oath or Affirmation”. That, however, is not the situation here.

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution sets forth the chief duty of the President, that “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”. Observe that the phrase “faithfully executed” in this provision echoes the phrase “faithfully execute” in the “Oath or Affirmation”. Thus, his “Oath or Affirmation” requires the President, “to the best of [his] Ability, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” by fulfilling the duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”, without any exception (because the Constitution allows for none).

It requires no extended argument to establish that, now installed in “the Office of President”, Mr. Trump disposes of every right and power necessary, sufficient, and convenient to ensure that “the Laws [shall] be faithfully executed” with respect to Mrs. Clinton and her associates. And no airy notion that she were in some sense and to some degree a “good person” could relieve Mr. Trump of the duty “faithfully [to] execute[ ]” “the Laws” as to her. (Indeed, as a “good person”, Mrs. Clinton herself should welcome the opportunity in an official forum to be absolved of the malodorous charges her record of “public service” seems to substantiate in many Americans’ estimation.)

To be sure, as is every American, Mrs. Clinton and her associates are entitled to the presumption of innocence. But, based upon what is already known about their behavior, this country is entitled to see them properly investigated, indicted, and prosecuted, in order to test that presumption in the crucible of a public trial, before a jury of their peers, pursuant to Article II, Section 2, Clause 3 and Amendments Five and Six of the Constitution surely, and Article III, Clause 1 possibly. Mr. Trump has, however, left the world with the distinct impression that he does not intend to press for investigations into Mrs. Clinton’s questionable affairs. As a matter of constitutional law (as well as common sense), the reasons he has advanced for this disinclination are unconvincing, if not patently specious. Therefore, if before his inauguration he actually did not, and following his inauguration still does not, intend under color of “the Office of President” to “take Care that the [applicable] Laws be faithfully executed” as to her, then he did not “take the * * * Oath or Affirmation” truthfully—and as a result did not “enter on the Execution of [the] Office [of President]” at all. If so, America finds herself confronted with yet another Presidency constitutionally questionable from its supposed inception.

Admittedly, this concern rests upon something of a fine legal point—although not one so fine as to be indiscernible on the face of the Constitution. In any event, the Constitution is festooned with fine points intended to impede and even impale rogue public officials in their malicious course. These points can serve their purposes, however, only if they are forcefully driven home, without any compunction, whenever suitable occasions arise. Few crimes are worse than the systematic prostitution, perversion, and betrayal of public office for private political and financial gain. But surely one of them is for someone to attempt to “enter on the Execution of [the] Office [of President]” knowingly and willfully intent upon allowing anyone who has notoriously engaged in such misbehavior to escape punishment.

Unfortunately, the running of various statutes of limitations might preclude prosecution of Mrs. Clinton and her associates with respect to some of their alleged misbehavior—although statutes of limitations can be removed or extended by legislation. See, e.g., Chase Securities Corporation v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 (1945); Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 (1885). Where statutes of limitations would impose a bar, though, it would still behoove the Trump Administration to investigate these matters thoroughly and report its findings completely to the public. See Lee Duigon’s recent NewsWithViews commentary “A Speech Mr. Trump Ought To Make” (17 November 2016).

As a complicating factor, it is not inconceivable that Mr. Trump might seek to finesse this apparently distasteful political situation in a legalistic fashion by purporting to extend some sort of blanket “pardon” to Mrs. Clinton and her associates. Any such “pardon” which issued before indictments had specified the crimes the members of the Clinton cabal had allegedly committed would be constitutionally problematic, however.

The nature and extent of the “Power” of the President under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution “to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment” is not defined in the Constitution—and therefore the specifics as to those matters must be derived from the similar power of the King in pre-constitutional Anglo-American law. “As this power has been exercised, from time immemorial, by the executive of that nation whose language is our language, and to whose judicial institutions ours bear a close relationship; we adopt their principles respecting the operation and effect of a pardon”. United States v. Wilson, 32 U.S. (7 Peters) 150, 160 (1833). Under the laws of England applicable to the Colonies prior to the Declaration of Independence—

* * * What is required to make a good Pardon of Felony in general: It seems to be laid down as a general Rule in many Books, that where-ever it may be reasonably intended that the King, when he granted such Pardon, was not fully apprised both of the Heinousness of the Crime, and also how far the Party stands convicted thereof upon Record, the Pardon is void, as being gained by Imposition upon the King. * * *
* * * It hath been holden, That anciently a Pardon of all Felonies, included all Treasons, as well as Felonies whatsoever, and might be pleaded to an Indictment for them: And it seems to be taken for granted, in many Books, that a Pardon of all Felonies in general, without describing any one particular Felony, may even at this Day, if the Party be neither attainted nor indicted, be pleaded in Bar of any Felony whatsoever, coming within the general Limitations of the Pardon, except Murder or Rape, and that the only Reason why it cannot also be pleaded to Murder of Rape, is because [a] Statute * * * requires an express Mention of them. But I find this point no where solemnly debated; neither doth it seem easy to reconcile it with the general Rules concerning Pardons, agreed to be good in other Cases; for if a Felony cannot be well pardoned where it may be reasonably intended that the King, when he granted the Pardon was not fully apprised of the State of the Case, much less doth it seem reasonable that it should be pardoned where it may well be intended that he was not apprised of it at all. And if a Felony whereof a Person be attainted cannot be well pardoned, even tho’ it appear that the King was informed of all the Circumstances of the Fact, unless it also appear that he was informed of the Attainder, mu ch less doth it seem reasonable that a Felony should be well pardoned where it doth not appear that he knew any Thing of it: For by this Means, where the King in Truth intends only to pardon one Felony, which may be very proper for his Mercy, he may by Consequence pardon the greatest Number of the most heinous Crimes, the least of which, had he been apprised of it, he would not have pardoned. And for these Reasons, as I suppose, general Pardons are commonly made by Act of Parliament; and have been of late Years very rarely granted by the Crown, without a particular Description of the Offence intended to be pardoned. * * * And therefore where the Books speak of Pardons of all Felonies in general as good, perhaps it may be reasonable for the most part to intend that they either speak of a Pardon by Parliament, or that they suppose that the particular Crime is mentioned in the Pardon, tho’ they do not express it.

William Hawkins, A Treatise of The Pleas of the Crown (London, England: E. and R. Nutt, and R. Gosling, Third Edition, 1739), Book II, Chapter 37, §§ 8 and 9, at 382-384 (marginal notes omitted). It should be kept in mind that, in contradistinction to Parliament, Congress has no power to issue “general Pardons” (or even any “Pardon” whatsoever), or to delegate such a nonexistent power to the President.

So, inasmuch as the details of much of Mrs. Clinton’s own alleged wrongdoing, let alone the suspected wrongdoing of numerous others associated with her, will remain shrouded in mystery until proper investigations have been conducted, it passes understanding how Mr. Trump could, with constitutional propriety, issue “general Pardons” to any members of the Clinton cabal.

To be sure, some decisions of the Supreme Court have seemingly expanded the Presidential “Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons” beyond the boundaries outlined above. The mere existence of such decisions, though, poses no insurmountable bar to the analysis presented here. For a decision of the Supreme Court on a point of constitutional law is not necessarily valid simply because the Court has handed it down. First, as was self-evident in principle well before the Constitution was even first imagined, “the law, and the opinion of the judge are not always convertible terms, or one and the same thing; since it sometimes may happen that the judge will mistake the law”. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: American Edition, Robert Bell, 1771), Volume 1, at 71. Second, in practice under the Constitution the Supreme Court itself has admitted that it has often erred in its constructions of that document. See Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 828-830 & note 1 (1991).

Therefore, no decision of the Supreme Court can be taken at face value as an infallible authority as to what the Constitution means.

Rather, the Constitution determines whether a decision of the Supreme Court is correct or incorrect. And in the final analysis only WE THE PEOPLE can render the Constitution’s meaning certain, because WE THE PEOPLE “ordain[ed] and establish[ed] th[e] Constitution” in the first place; and (as the Supreme Court itself has admitted) “[t]he power to enact carries with it final authority to declare the meaning of the legislation”. Compare the Preamble to the Constitution with Propper v. Clark, 337 U.S. 472, 484 (1949). For part two click below.

© 2017 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

No nation, empire, corporation, small business owner, or even a family can thrive if they are infiltrated by those who are spying on them and leaking out important or detrimental information. That also applies to the Trump administration that is seemingly more infiltrated with enemies from within than any other administration in United States history. Unfortunately, the federal government is filled to the brim with loyalists to the previous Obama regime, George Soros, illegal immigrants, etc. The goals of Obama, the NSA and the CIA still include the fulfilment of the Saul Alynski inspired and George Soros funded elimination of our constitutionally limited form of government.

Soros, like Obama believes that either big government or Islam should dominate over you and I. If it were not for decades of government school indoctrination throughout the republic, nether Obama, Soros or the legions of dirty leakers would be in position carry out their dastardly mission to destroy America from within. Because of the progressive government schools, about half of those born in this country are brainwashed into believing that it is racist, xenophobic and Islamophobic to simply seek to protect and guard our national borders like Mexicans do with their southern border.

Recently, Saudi Arabia expelled 40,000 Muslims who they deemed more extreme than they are from their country. Yet not a single complaint from the dingbats who start riots or block traffic because 600 criminal illegal immigrants were rounded up in America. That is more evidence that the education/indoctrination process in the United States is in serious need of a major overhaul. It is a crying shame that Yale University officials entertained the idea of honoring the criminal oriented Black Panthers. It is a violent organization full of progressive members who hate America. Those gumps have also brutalize Black Americans who refuse to live in their “tolerant bubble of hate.” I have yet to learn of the Black Panther socialists supporting one single idea that is good for Americans, Black, White or whatever.
Government school brainwashed American foot soldiers of intolerance in places like Minneapolis, Minnesota support Muslim refugees who have threatened to venture into prosperous neighborhoods to conduct violent acts against sovereign American citizens and their property. Then there are others from the progressive ranks who are training throughout the country on how to punch Americans in the face who support president Donald Trump.

But back to the leakers in government and the fact they need and deserve to be rounded up and punished. “We the People” must be willing to pull up our sleeves and work diligently to wipe out the pervasive atmosphere that contributes to the mentality that lends itself to such activities as leaking sensitive information to undermine a sitting president. It is pure evil insanity for leakers like those possibly in the bowels of the CIA or NSA to participate in the effort to prevent president Trump from rescuing our nation from those who quite honestly hate the strong pro-American posture of the president.

If I were President Trump along with ferreting out the leakers I would check out and probably get rid of the new phone and communication system former president Obama had installed just before leaving office. That is according to www.trunews.com. It is unfortunate the leakers do not understand or care that their mission of destruction can harm them as well as the administration of Donald Trump. In other words, without a strong emphasis on defeating those who are trying to harm America from within the government or the ranks of refugees and terrorists our way of life will only deteriorate beyond recognition.

Political opposition on genuine issues and principles is healthy for the country. But for dragon media elites on a mission of undermining for the sake of undermining through false stories and glomming onto illegal leaks in hopes of harming Trump is both unprofessional and potentially dangerous.

Certain leaks could prevent the ability to have needed honest conversations with allied leaders from around the world. Many of whom president Trump is trying to reassure that the United States is recommitted to being a strong leader of the free world, or what remains of it.

I am all for a full investigation. Not on retired General Mike Flynn, but on the Obama/Alysnki inspired mole leakers who are acting like the criminally insane progressive enemies from within that they are. Hang in there my fellow Americans it is going to get better and by God’s grace, America will be great again. It won’t be easy, but it will be worth the effort to make it happen. God bless you, God bless America and may America bless God. The Edwards Notebook, simply the best commentary in broadcasting can now be enjoyed during the Andrea Hawes talk show heard worldwide emanating from www.aweradio.org Saturdays 2:00 to 5:00 PM EST.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

The story of Montana’s Last Indian Water Compact reveals, like no other true story, the nature of the split in the Republican Party.

This story needs to be told, and I may be the only one who will ever tell it. To understand politics, you must understand this story.

You can get the Amazon Kindle version FREE from February 15 to 19

“Montana’s Last Indian Water Compact: The Truth about the Compact and the Republican Party” is available in paperback or Kindle on Amazon.

Montana’s CSKT Water Compact

Montana’s Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Water Compact in 2015 may have been the most important and controversial issue in Montana’s history.

Its ratification would resolve all Montana’s Indian water-rights issues forever. Its rejection would subject Montanans to a generation of the most-costly legal battles in Montana’s history.

Most Montana’s farmers and ranchers, city managers and business leaders supported the Compact. Democrat legislators supported the Compact.

Before November 2014, I opposed the Compact. But, as a physicist, I realized I should study the Compact. So, I read and organized the arguments on both sides.

By December 2014, I realized my original conclusion was wrong. The arguments against the Compact clearly failed and facts proved the Compact was necessary for Montana.

My book explains the well-documented four faces of the Republican Party and how one face opposed the Compact.

The Republican split

The Republican split occurs because the three faces that compose 80 percent of Republicans regularly support the Republican nominee, while the one face that composes 20 percent of the Republican Party regularly opposes the Republican nominee.

The source of the split is major ideological difference between the 80 percent and the 20 percent. Therefore, Republicans cannot resolve the split by compromise because these diverse ideologies cannot compromise. Only the 20 percent can resolve the split when they realize their ideology is factually and morally wrong. Don’t hold your breath.

The split over the Water Compact matched the split in the Republican Party. The 80 percent supported the Compact and the 20 percent opposed the Compact.

We call the 20-percent face of the Republican Party, VCEs. My book describes this designation in detail. They represent only 10 percent of all voters. Percentages differ somewhat in different states but the general pattern is consistent in all states.

Democrats and Republicans differ on partisan bills. However, the Compact was a bipartisan bill that all parties should have decided on facts and logic. But the VCEs disagreed.

Aristotle’s Golden Mean

Nelson Hultberg describes Aristotle’s Golden Mean in his book “The Golden Mean: Libertarian Politics, Conservative Values.” Aristotle concluded the middle 60 to 80 percent are much more likely to be correct than the radical 10 percent on each end of the political spectrum.

In the political spectrum, VCEs are to the right of 1.4 standard deviations from the mean. They are the last 10 percent on the right. They are the radical right.

VCEs were wrong about the Compact.

Compact proponents based their arguments on facts and logic.

Compact opponents based their arguments on delusions. They opposed the Compact because they believed it was an Agenda 21 government conspiracy to steal Montana’s water. The fact is Compact rejection would have caused Montana to lose control of its water. VCEs had their “facts” backwards.

VCEs are so convinced they are right, that they reject evidence that proves they are wrong. Their radical ideology led them to oppose the CSKT Water Compact and to reject all arguments that proved their claims were wrong.

They voted their conscience rather than their intelligence. They let their fears drive their decisions.

They opposed the Compact because their political religion dictated opposition. Their opposition to the Compact proves their political religion is wrong.

Why the split matters.

You might ask, why should the split matter because the Republican 80 percent can outvote the 20 percent?

The split matters because the 20 percent VCEs are much more politically active than the other 80 percent of Republicans. Neither Republican nor Democrat voters understand the difference between the Republican 80 percent and the radical VCEs 20 percent. Therefore, unaware voters elected VCEs to 80 percent of the Republican seats in Montana’s 2015 House.

Because the VCEs dominated the Republicans in Montana’s House and Republicans outnumbered the Democrats, Montana’s House ratified the Compact by only ONE vote.

The Compact was not an inconsequential bill that would have minor effect on Montana whether approved or rejected. The Compact was a significant bill that would have a dramatic effect on Montana’s economy, forever. Compact ratification would save Montana’s water rights and Compact rejection would lose Montana’s water rights, forever, plus cost Montana a whole lot of money.

Radical VCEs almost destroyed Montana. They still don’t get it. They don’t care to learn facts and logic. They have their political religion to guide them.

VCEs make bad political decisions. Montana’s Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Water Compact is a case in point.

Perfection or Rejection

As a group, VCEs have unique characteristics. They have a perfection obsession. They believe if something or someone is not perfect by their definition, they must vote to condemn the something or the someone to hell.
VCEs view the world as black and white with no gray scale. To them, it’s perfection or rejection.

VCEs demand Godly perfection of candidates and bills. Yet, they are far from Godly perfection themselves. Godly perfection does not exist in our real world. VCEs live in a dream world.

VCEs thought if they could find one imperfection in the Compact, that was a reason to reject the Compact. After 12 years of work funded by our taxpayers, VCEs decided the Compact was not good enough for them to send to heaven, so they voted to send the Compact to hell.

Negative Voting Mantra

Another unique characteristic is their negativity. Their preachers are negative. Compared to other Republicans, VCE’s see the cup as half empty whereas other Republicans see the cup as half full.

VCEs follow the Negative Voting Mantra: “A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.”

They use their Negative Voting Mantra to justify their votes against Republican nominees who are “not good enough” for them. They vote for third-party candidates who can’t win.

VCEs remove votes from the better candidate among candidates who can win. They achieve the exact opposite of their political goal. The Negative Voting Mantra achieves the greater evil and is immoral.

Positive Voting Principle

The alternative to the Negative Voting Mantra is the Positive Voting Principle. Aristotle’s Positive Voting Principle is:

Our moral duty is to vote to achieve the most possible good, which eliminates voting for candidates who cannot win, and eliminates mandatory conditions.

Stated simply, the Positive Voting Principle is:

Always vote and act to achieve the greatest possible good.

Historically, some very qualified philosophers have weighed in on the Positive Voting Principle and the Negative Voting Mantra. The Catholic Church and the six major Protestant churches support the Positive Voting Principle and reject the Negative Voting Mantra.

America’s Founding Fathers used the Positive Voting Principle. They voted for the greater good. If each Founding Father rejected what he thought was imperfect, they would not have approved our Constitution.

VCEs call themselves “Constitutionalists” but they reject the Positive Voting Principle that was necessary to produce our Constitution. The VCEs who opposed the CSKT Water Compact would have opposed our Constitution because it was not perfect.

Mandatory Conditions

VCE claim a candidate must meet certain “mandatory” conditions to get their vote. They think their mandatory conditions show they hold high moral standards. In fact, their mandatory condition show they do not understand morals and logic.

For example, some VCEs told me before the 2014 election, “I can’t vote for Ryan Zinke” because his prolife position “is not good enough” for me.

I replied that Ryan Zinke scored 90 percent on a prolife evaluation and his Democratic opponent scored zero. This did not matter to these VCEs. Zinke’s 90-percent score on a prolife test was “not good enough” for them. They required a score of 100 percent. They required perfection.

These VCEs believed it would have been a sin for them to vote for Zinke because he was not perfect. Yet they believe it was no sin to help the Democrat to win. They are not only illogical, they are immoral.

Their VCE mandatory conditions eliminated Ryan Zinke who was clearly the “greater good” candidate from their own VCE perspective.

Here how VCEs think:

Suppose you can vote for Candidate A, whose abortion policies will kill 10 million babies, or Candidate B, whose policies will kill 1 million babies. Who will you vote for?

All normal Christians will vote for Candidate B so they can save 9 million babies.

VCEs won’t vote to save 9 million babies because Candidate B is not perfect enough for them.

VCEs don’t understand bipartisan issues

VCEs believe all issues are partisan. They do not believe in bipartisan bills where Republicans should vote the same as Democrats, like paving our highways.

Compact opponents claimed Republicans should always vote the opposite of Democrats. They call Republicans who vote the same as Democrats, “RINOs.” They don’t understand that “RINO” applies only to partisan issues, not to bipartisan issues.

Therefore, they concluded, since the Democrats supported the Compact, all Republicans must oppose the Compact.

VCEs don’t understand Bible admonition on “works”

VCE they VCEs don’t understand the definition of the word “works.” They think their actions are works. They do not understand that works are the results of actions, not the actions themselves.

VCEs think they do good works if they vote their feelings or “conscience,” as VCE Ted Cruz told his audience to do at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

VCEs define “good” by how their actions make them “feel,” regardless of the consequences.

VCEs who opposed the CSKT Water Compact, voted their “conscience.”

VCEs claim they have a moral compass. But their compass points in the wrong direction.

It takes intelligence to predict results of our actions. We must use our intelligence to choose the action the brings the desired result.

VCEs elected Democrat US Senator Tester in 2012.

The VCEs voted Libertarian rather than for Republican Congressman Denny Rehberg for US Senate. The VCEs’ Libertarian votes were substantially more than Tester’s win over Rehberg. So, the VCEs elected Democrat Tester to the US Senate for six more years.

Now you know why the dominantly conservative State of Montana elects Democrats to key positions in Montana and Congress. It is because VCEs throw childish temper tantrums when Republican voters nominate non-VCE candidates.

Ryan Zinke won decisively in 2014 and 2016

VCEs would not support Ryan Zinke for Congress. But Ryan Zinke won the Republican primary election and the Republican nomination without their help.

Zinke proved Republican candidates do better when they get more votes in the middle of the political spectrum even if they lose votes from the radical VCEs

The Montana 2016 election results prove the VCEs have little influence in the outcome of major elections. VCEs simply do not have enough votes to change elections in their favor. The only effect they can have is to vote Libertarian to try to deprive a Republican candidate of a victory.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
Thanks to Republican voters in Montana, Ryan Zinke will be your next Secretary of Interior.

Voter wake-up call

The CSKT Water Compact is an example of how the far-right VCE Republicans make bad decisions.

All voters everywhere should realize the danger to themselves when they elect too many VCEs.

To read the full story and better understand Republican politics, get my book for FREE on Amazon from February 15 to 19.

© 2017 Edwin X Berry, Ph.D – All Rights Reserved

I’ve heard that making sausage is a pretty messy, ugly and unpleasant process to witness. Well so is implementing real change in Washington DC. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I believe God gave us Trump because I do not believe a pro-politician could pull off dismantling so many Leftist sacred cow strongholds at the lighting speed at which Trump is moving.

I remember Bahamian actor Sidney Poitier saying when he came to America he simply pursued his dream, undeterred by supposed limits for blacks. Consequently in 1964, Poitier became the first black to win an Academy Award for Best Actor.

Political outsider Trump is cleaning up the mess, undeterred by corrupt DC establishment procedures designed to continue the status quo. Consequently, we have Scott Pruitt fixing the overreaching anti-business tyranny of the EPA. We have Jeff Sessions who will implement equal justice for all Americans, unlike Obama’s attorneys general. One said he would not prosecuted fellow blacks. The other supports Black Lives Matter’s infamous lie that cops are racist. Leftists’ heads are exploding because new Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos vows to ensure that every child receives a quality education.

While some of the rude, crude and violent illegal actions of Leftist anti-Trump protesters is organic, the vast majority of it is paid for by America hating billionaire, George Soros. From the airport protests to the Women’s March to Black Lives Matter murdering cops and numerous other incidents of chaos in our streets, Soros is the money man behind the curtain. Soros is also tied to the Left’s campaign to impeach Trump.

Even before Trump took his oath of office, the Left launched their immoral, unethical and lawless 1,460-day (four-year) plan to destroy Trump. The Left intends to block Trump from implementing everything we elected him to do.

Despite Leftists cautioning their side to tone down their over-the-top hysteria, the Left’s rabid opposition to Trump continues to escalate to absurd levels. It’s a bright sunny day. If Trump comments about it, the Left will try to convince the public that it is raining, and Trump lied about the sun.

I submit that the Left can not tone down their brain-dead emotion-driven foot-stomping temper tantrums because it is who they are. It is like the old joke, “I helped you because you promised not to bite me. Why did you bite me?” The snake replied, “I’m a snake. It’s what I do.”

When Education Secretary Betsy DeVos showed up for work, she was attacked by protesters. One jerk even stood in front of DeVos’ car when she tried to leave. Folks, the Left is going to pull this crap every day for the next 4 years. When Leftists push free speech to breaking the law and destroying public and private property, I say lock their derrieres up! Thank God. Finally, a Republican administration that is doing just that.

The Left’s goal is to cement their lie that a majority of Americans regret voting for Trump and hate his agenda. In other words, they hope to “Bush” Trump. Relentless unchallenged distortions and lies about President George W. Bush caused his approval to plummet to 33% when he left office. Clearly, the Left has begun their triple-the-intensity campaign to do even worse damage to Trump’s approval.

All seeking to see America made great again (patriots) must pull out all the stops, using their creativity and every tool at their disposal to counter the Left’s tsunami of anti-Trump and anti-Trump agenda lies.

The Left relentlessly and creatively sold us their far-left-radical Trojan Horse disguised in the form of an articulate black man. From Greek columns in the background when he spoke, extra reverb on his microphone to kindergartners mandated to sing of his greatness, the Left practically branded Obama a deity. As part of Black History Month indoctrination, kindergartners were taught to sing, “Barack Obama is the man” and “He’s our man, yes we can!”

In celebration of capitalism and the entrepreneur spirit, it would be fun to see kids start Trump Lemonade stands.

Folks, the Left still does not get it. They do not understand the Trump Revolution. I realized something was amiss during the campaign. I witnessed thousands of Americans of all stripes from well-dressed white seniors to black bikers covered in tattoos waiting in line, enduring 85 degree Florida heat and sun, hoping to get into the Trump rally at Daytona Beach Convention Center.

If we are relentless in expressing our support for Trump implementing his 100 day plan, the Left’s efforts to “Bush” Trump via chaos in our streets, fake news and violence with fail.

Oh, one last point. I’ve heard concerns that the Left will react violently if we resume Trump rallies. Well, I am sorry folks, but freedom “ain’t” free. As a matter of fact, God has designed life in such a way that anything worth having requires backbone and risks.

Are you guys ready? Great! Let’s roll!

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

Everywhere you look, just now, it’s riots, protests, celebrities and Democrats asserting that President Donald Trump is mentally ill and mentally unfit to lead the country, yelling, cursing, name-calling, and, of course, violence. One tumor on the Internet remarked, “Donald Trump wants to burn the world so he can make a profit.” I’d like to know how anybody makes a profit by burning the world. But then to liberals “profit” is a dirty word.

I don’t put much stock in conspiracy theories; but to me, today’s crop of current events looks like a concerted effort, by Democrats, to create the illusion that no one in America wants Donald Trump to be president and that his election was an aberration, a thing that should not be. As another clown remarked, “Everyone in the whole world hates him!”

How does all this look like something that’s being done on purpose?

Look at all the professionally printed signs carried by the protesters. Who paid for that? And the fact that there always seems to be plenty of transportation on hand to get them on time to whatever it is they’re protesting—well, that suggests organization. And money. Can you say “George Soros”?

The organization was already in place, provided by teachers’ unions, universities, Democrat Party funds and special operations—as revealed by assorted videos released during the election campaign—left-wing advocacy groups, and other reliable sources. All they had to do was pump a little more money into it. And there’s always the nooze media, solidly in the bag for the Democrat Party, to magnify it with selected coverage.

The fact that Trump won the election anyhow, in spite of all this, indicates that the American people really did want him for their president, and that they really, truly don’t want to be bossed around anymore by liberals. The electoral map, showing results by county nationwide, is a sea of red marred by a few small stains of blue.

But the most dramatic proof that “Everybody hates Trump” is an illusion was provided a few nights ago—at the Grammy Awards.

A singer named Joy Villa showed up wearing a dress emblazoned with Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again.” Within hours of her appearance on TV, sales of her album increased by more than 18 million percent. Her album’s sales ranking on amazon.com went from 543,202… to three!

Whoa! Hold on, wait a minute! That’s not supposed to happen! I mean, everybody hates this—right? That’s what they’re telling us. How in the world could that have happened?

Hmmm… The Russians hacked the Grammys? Trump himself bought all those albums? It must’ve been racists! Or Climate Change deniers. Or maybe it didn’t happen at all: Steve Bannon and Fox News just cooked up that story. Oh, for a double wad of Play-Doh!

Liberals have a gift for saying things that are patently untrue, and then believing them after they’ve said them. It’s called lying, and it has served them well. They are also good at denying things that clearly are true. One liberal, on the telephone, declared to me that a certain book did not exist. “But it does,” I answered. “I have it right here on the table, right in front of me.” He still insisted to me that it did not exist. He also believes in Man-Made Global Warming.

So… they’ve tried everything, and now must fall back on a whopping great lie because everything else they’ve tried has failed. The nooze media has failed them. Hollywood has failed them. Left-wing billionaire money has failed them. Even the riots have come up short. So there’s nothing left to do but lie.

Sorry, liberals—but Joy Villa has well and truly kicked your butts.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

“Life is a fight, a fight to stay alive and a fight to keep others and government from taking your life or your liberty from you. Acknowledge that fact and you might just survive as a free man. Those awash in self-pity and think of themselves as victims will never be free and they will be a heavy burden on the rest of society.” —Ron Ewart

In the year 1620 and beyond, they crossed the Atlantic in sailing ships to get to America and freedom. The journey could take anywhere from six to 12 weeks to make the crossing, depending on the winds. Life aboard ship was primitive at best. Firsthand accounts speak of illness, cramped quarters, food and water rations. They had to endure scurvy, diphtheria, dysentery and seasickness. They were at the mercy of the captain, ship owners ….. and the sea. Many of them died during the passage. Because the journey was so long, when passengers died, their bodies were thrown overboard because there was no way to store them on the ship. The bones of thousands of Pilgrims are held forever in the bosom of the Atlantic Ocean, on their failed journey to freedom.

There was no government to protect the Pilgrims, pay their fare to the new land, or provide a handout if they got sick or destitute. Those who could not pay were required to remain on board the ship until they were sold into indentured servitude and forced to work to pay for their voyage.

When the surviving Pilgrims landed on the shores of America, they were faced with life in the wilderness and attacks by local Indian tribes. Health care and doctors were almost non-existent. You either survived because of your wits and plain dumb luck, or died from the elements, starvation, disease, or an Indian arrow.

They crossed the plains in covered wagons to reach some dream they had of owning land in the territories, or striking it rich in the gold fields. They built up little towns and roads, bridges, businesses and schools. Then the trains came and they could expand their travel and markets exponentially. The only thing the government did was to provide the land for the railroad companies and land grants to eager settlers, under the Homestead Act of 1862. If the settler worked and improved his land for five years, it was his land to keep for free and he will have earned it many times over.

But other than that, there was no government farming subsidies. There were no food stamps, rent assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, welfare, much less free college tuition. These hardy people built a nation and they did it with little help from government and even less government interference. They persevered by main strength and awkwardness. Many times they lost, but got up again and pressed forward. Their strength was built on adversity. They didn’t “cry”, “moan”, “groan”, or “complain” to government when the going got tough. They just worked harder or found a way to “fix” whatever they faced at the time. They didn’t win all the time but nevertheless, most never gave up. That beginning environment of adversity forged the strength of a nation and was the foundation of a strong, prosperous and exceptional America.

When the wave of European immigrants passed through Ellis Island (1892 to 1954) eager to come to the land of the free and the home of the brave, government provided little to no assistance. In fact, the government went to great lengths to see that the arriving immigrants could support themselves and had enough money to get started in their new land. The government even initiated a “head tax” for arriving immigrants. They were screened for disease and other maladies. Up to 20% of the arriving immigrants were returned to their native country for one reason or another.

Not so today. Illegal immigrants that evade the Border Patrol receive no screening for disease or the ability to sustain themselves. There is little effort to round them up and deport them for breaking our immigration laws, once “lost” in the general population. Instead, they are molly coddled, pampered, paid and protected by sanctuary jurisdictions and immigration advocates.

Legal and illegal immigrants and refugees arriving in America receive all kinds of government assistance, a monumental burden on the American taxpayer, a huge drag on the economy and a giant magnet to attract more of them. It is no wonder that America is broke and deep in debt.

But let’s get back to the “Poor Me” whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America that inhabit our colleges, ghettos and immigrant enclaves. Millions of Americans and legal and illegal immigrants have become the “poor me” generation, most of them subscribing to the left side of politics. Their forbearers of colonial and pioneer days are rolling in their graves to see how their descendants turned out. More than half of them wouldn’t survive under the conditions our forefathers and mothers had to endure. If they suddenly found themselves in the wilderness, most of them wouldn’t have the slightest idea on how to survive, because they haven’t been taught.

They haven’t been taught about self-reliance, personal responsibility and individual freedom. They haven’t been trained to survive when the going gets tough. Adversity builds strength and character. The easy life, where there is no discipline and where everything is provided for them, leads to personal weakness, low self-esteem and the desire to indulge in pleasures of the flesh. Instead of looking to them selves to solve their own problems, they have been taught to look to government and government is only too eager to “help” them, but with a string attached. The string comes at the voting booth where those receiving the government “help” are obliged to vote for those providing the “help.”

We all know which Party is offering the “help”, with money from the Public Treasury to which none in the Party own any piece thereof. Under law, they call this robbing-the-till for personal gain what it is, grand theft, punishable by fines and imprisonment. Unfortunately, the “help” this Party offered to its “Poor Me” groupies turned out to be a very expensive, slowly evaporating mirage on a distant horizon. That “help” just converted otherwise potentially strong individuals, into crybabies and bowls of quivering yellow jelly and made them helpless cripples.

What we do know is that those reading this column are probably not members of the “Poor Me” generation.

Ever since the government-triggered Great Depression and the rapid rise of socialism under FDR, America has been headed downhill, away from individual freedom, self-reliance and personal responsibility and towards collectivism, dependency and government control of everything. The passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913, which created the Federal Reserve and the IRS, was no coincidence. It was no coincidence that the government, in the late 1920’s, retained the University of Illinois and Harvard University to study how to control people through their subconscious minds. It was no coincidence that the U. S. economy suddenly collapsed in 1929. It was no coincidence that socialism rose rapidly under FDR during the 1930’s and beyond. It was no coincidence that the gold standard was abolished in 1933. America was bankrupt, threatened by Communism and headed for Hell. Socialism and top-down control of the masses was government’s and the central bankers’ answer.

We just received a response to one of our recent articles where the person described, in one paragraph, what happened to America since the 1930’s. He wrote:

“The ‘Master Plan’ for the USA has always been to reduce the USA to a third world feudal state by diluting the gene and intelligence pool, degrading education, attacking tradition and culture, abolishing the nuclear family, promoting sexual perversion and abnormality and hybrid relationships, debasing the currency, eliminating the middle class, dissolving Christianity, ignoring the Constitution, weakening and removing personal liberty and base freedoms, and importing as many impoverished and uneducated persons from around the globe to economically and socially drain as much life from the US as possible ….. Marxism masquerading as immigration. The US has been in the crosshairs for decades because to take down the ‘Crown Jewel’ of the Western world is to send a message to all other countries that they can also be co-opted. ‘Front end’ rationale for any action taken by this government is not ever the reason for the action. Ponder no longer on the matter. The destruction of western civilization is the goal.”
When you throw back the curtain and expose the politicians, central bankers and industrialist “Wizards” calling the shots, this gentleman cannot be too far off the mark. The whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America are the result of actions of the “Wizards” pulling the strings of international money, commerce, trade, wars and politics. The “Wizards” have bought off the people with a few pieces of silver and filled their “Little Black Boxes” with hogwash, mush and propaganda.

These same “Wizards” (mostly Progressives) have convinced the “Poor Me” generation that because they are poor, sick, out of work, an illegal immigrant, refugee, Black, Latino, gay, transgender, or just plain lazy, they have an irrevocable claim to everyone else’s money and sweat labor, or special treatment from government. To pay for their alleged irrevocable claim, or special treatment, the government collects that money in an act of forced charity ….. at the point of a gun. Charity should have never become the purview of government and was never authorized by the Constitution. Charity, to be true charity, must be voluntary, not mandatory. Mandatory charity is slavery by any other name.

Sadly, the weakest among us have sold their souls and given away their freedom for so little because their parents did not teach them critical thinking, personal responsibility, to question everything, how to recognize a fraud and to never trust government.

Everything you think you know is probably a government, media, or academia created illusion with the sole intent of controlling the masses. The international environmental movement and social justice were designed to that end and to re-distribute the wealth of western nations. Economy destroying, expensive legislative actions to limit alleged man-caused global warming, are just one of the elements of the international environmental plan of control.

Americans have been hoodwinked by “100+ Years of Progressive Rule” that champion a collectivist culture, social justice, radical environmentalism, appeasement of our enemies, a massive welfare state, illegal immigrants, sanctuary cities, open borders and mindless compliant citizens. Progressives have created multiples of a “Poor Me” generation, awash in self-pity, low self-esteem and rabid self-indulgence, requiring that their only salvation is being dependent on Mother government when things go wrong in their lives and things are always going wrong in their lives.

With over half of the American people steeped in this “dependent” culture, planted there by decades of constant Progressive indoctrination and brainwashing, the fate of America is pre-ordained unless President Trump and those that support him can trigger a massive flashback to the time of self-reliance, independence, personal responsibility and individual freedom. As we stated in our last article: “A successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.”

But like the fighter pilot says after consuming over half of his fuel, “we have passed the point of no return ….. without midair refueling.” We had better hope that midair refueling happens soon ….. very soon, or Progressivism, collectivism and socialism will have won and individual freedom will have been thrown on the trash heap of forgotten Republics.

If you LIKED this article, let us know. Constructive comments welcome.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

While the Democrats and so-called moderate Republicans yell and scream over U.S. President Donald Trump’s efforts to stop the influx of Muslims from seven nations known to be hotbeds of radical Islam terrorists, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel under intense pressure by the German people is now seeking the deportation of the same refugees she originally welcomed with opened arms.

Merkel announced her 180-degree turn in her nation’s refugee policy and says she will unveil plans this week to increase deportations of immigrants especially those suspected of being involved in anti-West terrorism or materially-supporting radical groups.

“Instead of looking more closely at the experiences of other nations who allowed tens of thousands of unvetted immigrants from nations in the midst of battling against unbridled Muslim barbarity, the American leftists and globalists continue their deceptive immigration agenda especially those ‘citizens-of-the-world’ news purveyors,” said former police captain and political science instructor Laura Manza-McCarthy.

“While American politicians and activists fight the Trump administration on behalf of illegal immigration, German, Italian and other European Union countries can’t deport them fast enough,” she added.

Merkel’s German plan will tighten up the nation’s well-intentioned but flawed asylum system. Merkel, as a liberal politician, will use her plan to quell the outrage of critics on the right and the center of Germany’s political spectrum. As in the United States there is a majority who claim her refugee policy is — and has been since the beginning –too liberal and potentially dangerous.

When the Muslim refugee crisis emerged, France, Italy, Germany and other European countries opened the floodgates and took in millions of Muslims from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen and other countries involved in the global jihad.

Merkel is expected to announce a number of changes to the immigration processing of Muslims this week. For example, the Germans will build immigrant centers near airports for those deemed suspicious asylum seekers. This will allow the police to hold on to people thought to be a security threat. The actual mass deportations are to be handled not by police but by a newly created department charged with coordinating the large number of deportations expected.

Immigration, especially immigrants from war-zones in the Middle East and North Africa, has been a hot-button political issue in Germany since the summer of 2015, when Merkel adopted a welcoming stance towards refugees fleeing Syria and other war-torn nations.

According to the German news media, of the 280,000 Muslims that arrived last year, 80,000 have been deported. More than 50,000 of them volunteered to be deported. However, according to David Knudsen, a former immigration cop, the reason for so many volunteering is that they are given free transportation plus close to $2,500.00 (U.S.) if they return to their countries without incident.

As with Germany, Italy’s government is said to be ready for immigrant deportations. In 2016, Italy received more than 180,000 immigrants traveling by watercraft from Libya alone. At first, only 4,000 Muslims were deported by Italian authorities. But now it appears the Italian citizenry is not happy with the results of liberal “compassion” and they want fewer asylum seekers from Muslim communities in North Africa.

German authorities at first directed their police forces to follow their new rules: “When reporting on criminal offenses, details about the religious, ethnic or other background information of the suspects or perpetrators is to be mentioned only if it is absolutely necessary to understand the reported event. Remember that such references could foment prejudices against minorities.”

Actual Translation: We want to sell the German public on this Muslim migrant inundation. So don’t tell the people that Muslim migrants are involved in sexual assaults and rapes on a near-daily basis.

This is treason, as it is leading Germany to national disaster, and the German Press Council should be prosecuted. But who would initiate such a prosecution? Angela Merkel?

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

The American people must hear the truth about the nature of Islamic doctrine continually until they are totally aware of its threat to their way of life and the US Constitution. Sadly, our Churches and other religious institutions dare not speak up for fear of being accused of intolerance toward another religion. Our academia, the university teachers and professors, left or right, dare not, because, most likely, they would be expelled and lose their income. Our elected officials and politicians dare not because they are mostly master practitioners of euphemism, hedging, doubletalk, and outright deception, and they need your votes as well as your money. Many media contributors and editors dare not because they could lose subscribers and be shut down. Countless entrepreneurs and businessmen dare not because they might lose customers and clientele. Even ordinary workers dare not because they might be fired or called bigots and racists. So, I thought I would tell you!

America is faced with a formidable adversary. This adversary has a name: Islam, not radical Islam or political Islam, just Islam. Muslims don’t call it radical Islam, why should we? I think it is time to revisit the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and see if Islam is qualified as a religion. Is this an outlandishly absurd proposal? Not at all, serious problems require equally serious solutions. The call for evaluation of the First Amendment may be seen as an attempt to curb Islam or other militant cults. The truth is: it is. It is truly a matter of survival of the United States and the free world.

It is long past time to take a stand and shift the debate to orthodox Islam. There is no need to exhaustingly investigate every other religion on the planet in order to compare them or offer an opinion about their relative “goodness” in declaring that on the whole, Islam perpetuates malevolence and violence. Let others devolve into religious disagreements. But for the press and some commentators who would further question: “OK great, so now what? You claim Islam is malevolent. How do we combat that?” Your response is already clear: Through the spread of truth, not deceit. Through voluntary social sanctions and laws in every civilized country that forbid evil practices like Sharia, coercion and violence against women, threats against those who disagree, honor killings, apostasy and other hate crimes. Let the world know the truth and decide for itself. Let Muslims who come to their senses, opt out.

Religion and Islam

America, with a long history of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the “hands off” practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call. The dictionary supplies a sociologically useless definition for religion: “The expression of man’s belief in and reverence for a superhuman power recognized as the Creator and Governor of the universe.” Just about anyone or any group under this definition can start a religion, and indeed they do—and some do so at significant costs to others.

Muslims, under the banner of religion, are infringing blatantly on the rights of others, not only in Islamic countries, but also in much of the non-Muslim world. By their acts of dogmatic barbarity, Muslims are slowly awakening non-Muslim democracies to the imminent threat of Islamic terrorism keen on destroying their free secular and free societies.

As more and more Muslims arrive in America, as they reproduce with great fertility, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power and become a serious challenge to the American system of governance—representative democracy. As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use for it whatsoever. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form of a Caliphate. Making a mockery of democracy, subverting its workings, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of government, invented by the infidels.

Quran 5:50 “Do they then seek the legislation of (the Days of) Ignorance? And who is better in legislating than Allah for a people who have Faith.”

Quran 5:45 “And whoever rules not by what Allah has revealed, those are the wrongdoers.”

Quran 12:40 “The rule is only for Allah.”

We must begin to declare Islam evil, not from a sectarian perspective, but from a universal, humanist one. Every encroachment of Islam as a religion must be rejected, harassed and discouraged by all people everywhere. Any leftist attempts to give aid and comfort to this religion of hate must be denounced and frustrated at every turn.

Christianity

Unlike some peaceful religions such as Baha’i, Buddhism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism and Christianity which advocate universally understood principles of good within their Holy books, and perhaps other religious doctrines (with which I am not personally familiar), Islam cannot be reformed. An example, when the Roman Catholic church was reformed, it was the church that was found to be in violation of Biblical teachings. It had in many ways become anti-Christian.

Reform restored orthodoxy to the plain and well-understood concepts revealed by Christ and the disciples (one of the reasons it took so long was the church forbade lay-people from reading the bible or translating it from the obsolete language of Latin…so Europeans were largely ignorant except for what they were told…see the story of Martin Luther). Some evolutionary ideas such as the abolition of slavery were not addressed in the Bible (in part because Christ was after souls not bodies), but the other teachings such as compassion, forgiveness, non-violence, and brotherly love are and were always incompatible with slavery. Therefore, it should be no surprise that eventually Christians in Europe and America led the abolitionist movement (they were scripturally correct). If a Christian bombs an abortion clinic, there is no scriptural commandment supporting this. It is unchristian (however, it is not unchristian to denounce abortion and seek to make it illegal and thus prevent abortionists from practicing their craft).

It is sad when the counter-argument to this definition of Christianity is lame references to Old Testament violence. Old Testament stories are taught in Christianity as historical fact, not prescriptions based on Christian ethics. If to a Christian, God is sanctioned a violent act, it is 100% irrelevant to the New Covenant that is taught by Jesus. So, to say…yeah but the Bible has violence in it too is insultingly banal, simplistic and misleading.

If some Christians abused their doctrine and hid behind the Cross to justify their personal desire to kill, enslave, and conquer, then they are and always were sinners and they are wrong; and this is why Christianity has taken the natural form it has today…as a religion of peace and compassion (even if many supposed Christians continue to sin). This is not to say that Christians are unable to defend themselves, or intervene to stop injustice. Christians are taught to hate the sin and love the sinner…period! The decision to become aggressive is always a burden on the Christian conscience.

In comparison, Islam does not tolerate revisionism in its beliefs or practices over time. Reform is not at play, because one cannot point to Jihadists or terrorists and say Muhammad did not advocate it. He most certainly did, and delighted in his evil thoughts. Islam is a literal religion, taking unabrogated scripture as eternal and absolute. Moreover, there are no calls in Islam for compassion, forgiveness, non-violence, and brotherly love. Instead there are specific prescriptions to retain evil with evil, eternal warfare, religious hegemony, slavery, killing Jews, taxing nonbelievers, stoning, promulgating terror, establishing a caste social system, and perpetuating discrimination against women. The only way to reform Islam is to discard Sharia, but also to purge the Quran itself of its enormous Suras that are not only patently false, but totally repugnant to a civilized humanity. This line of thinking, to sanitize Islam is explicitly forbidden in the Quran:

Quran 2:85: “Do you, then, believe in some parts of the divine writ and deny the truth of other parts? What, then, could be the reward of those among you who do such things but ignominy in the life of this world and, on the Day of Resurrection; they will be consigned to most grievous suffering? For God is not unmindful of what you do.”

Radical Islam

There is no such thing as “radical Islam.” I have refused to accept several organizations that seek to combat or expose the antics of “radical” or “extreme” Islam, because I know that it is not extremism that is causing the violence…it’s mainstream, typical, normal, traditional, specified, canonical Islam.

There are those who with a wink and a nod understand this but continue to work as revisionists because they are afraid of starting a religious war, even as they feel compelled to do something. They tell me, “You can’t openly accuse an entire religion of being evil! That would just incite them and make them hate us even more.” My response: the war started in the 7th century, and if in the 21st century we still refuse to accept that reality, then there is perhaps no hope at all for civilization. Nothing good can come from self-deception.

I argue that any belief system that licenses murder in the name of Jihad and the conquering and subduing of the world of the infidels by the Umma, should be outlawed. The prophet Mohammad brewed up a militant, radical and extremely irrational imperialistic cult that sought world dominance. My fellow travelers, let us make one thing clear; Islam is no more a religion deserving our respect or legal recognition than is cannibalism.

And those who take a “liberal” view of Islam should be forced to back up their nouveau interpretation with unabrogated scriptural facts. Unless such “reformists” can denounce fascist Islam with scripture, they are the true radicals, which is why we never see them pointing to scriptural arguments against jihad…they cannot because they are lying. Islamic terrorists are doing exactly what the prophet Muhammad demanded. And his demands were not suggestions and were not ephemeral. They were “perfect,” eternal ultimata. Islamic terrorists are faithful and true to what is written in the book of Quran.

Islam Enablers

A consortium composed of pandering politicians, left and right, blinded by short-term self-interest and egotism, attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiots, are the witting or unwitting promoters of Umma-ism.

Recall how many times former President George W. Bush praised Islam? Recall President George Bush’s love affairs with the Shaikh Abdullah of Saudi Arabia?

Didn’t President Obama go around the Muslim heartland and sing the praises of Islam at every stop? Didn’t he bow with great deference to the King of Islam in Saudi Arabia? Didn’t he proudly proclaim Islam as the faith of his near and dear kindred? Didn’t he, time and again, tell us that Islam is indeed the religion of peace? Didn’t he with his captivating oratory skills cite passages from the Quran to show how reverent he was toward this religion? Didn’t he appoint a raft of “devoted” Muslims to sensitive and high posts in government? Didn’t the Obama administration pull back all training materials used for law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive?

Here are some statements from both Presidents Bush and Obama:

1. “Ours is a war not against a religion, not against the Muslim faith. But ours is a war against individuals who absolutely hate what America stands for.” GWB
2. “They’re terrorists. And we are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam.” BHO
3. “Our war is not against Islam, or against faith practiced by the Muslim people. Our war is a war against evil.” GWB
4. “Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.” GWB
5. “The terrorists do not speak for over a billion Muslims who reject their hateful ideology.” BHO

6. “There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion.” GWB
7. “This great religion in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted to justify violence.” BHO

It is long past time for Americans to call upon the lawmakers of the United States of America to immediately create a safety board and commissioner to study and examine the dangers of Islamic doctrine in our society. Islam today is dysfunctional, to say the least. As a matter of fact, Islam went astray from the very beginning and inflicted a great deal of suffering on both its followers and those who resisted its advance.

In the monumental task of dealing with Islam, every individual, group and government must combine their resources and energies to prevail. The destiny of the civilized world hangs in the balance. Shirking this responsibility is an unpardonable act of every enlightened human being and organization that values individual freedom, liberty and dignity.

© 2017 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

Recently I published “Why the Left Has No Credibility.” Sadly, things have gotten worse just in the short time since that appeared. There’s truth to the adage that just when you think things can’t get worse, they do.

Presumably all have heard about the riot at University of California at Berkeley, in response to a planned appearance by Breitbart.com writer Milo Yiannopoulos. A peaceful demonstration, which by itself fell within what the First Amendment protects and wouldn’t have led to the cancellation of the speech, turned violent when around 150 people showed up wearing masks. They started breaking windows, setting fires, and physically attacking anyone within reach. Naturally the University had to cancel the event out of legitimate public safety concerns.

The First Amendment, it should go without saying, doesn’t protect violence!
These people, who were very well organized, were clearly not students. Robert Reich, formerly Bill Clinton’s labor secretary and now a professor out there, suggested (without producing any substantive evidence) that Yiannopoulos and Breitbart.com orchestrated the riots themselves, to lend support to an idea Donald Trump tweeted the next day, that federal funds should be pulled from universities where conservative speakers get shut down by violent protests.

Reich was alleging that the “alt-right” had perpetuated a false flag, in other words.

This is what passes for serious punditry by Established (i.e., paid) columnists these days.

I could have spent 50 years and not come up with a whopper like that! Small wonder these folks have lost control of the national narrative and have to draw on silly memes like “alternative facts.”

Later, we learned of the usual George Soros connection. This group was the recipient of a $50,000 grant from a Soros-funded organization.

Has anyone kept track of how much trouble this one globalist billionaire has caused in his life?

A similar occurrence took place the next night at New York University. The speaker was British-born Canadian author Gavin McInnes, whose commentary routinely appears here. Invited by the College Republicans, he lasted something like 20 minutes in the face of constant heckling and disruptions. Outside, police had to intervene as a near-riot broke out. You can watch the spectacle here — if you’ve a strong stomach. How interesting that so few people involved in these protests can speak a single sentence without torrents of obscenities pouring out. Note, too, the arrangement of balloons into a stuffed animal shape mounted on one guy’s head as he meanders about lecturing anyone who will listen about “white supremacy.”

I’d like someone to tell me how many rights “white supremacists” have taken from anyone this year.

The real fun begins at around 10:15, with a leftie meltdown of volcanic proportions. It makes the one I linked to last week look tame by comparison. She’s screaming at the top of her lungs at police, and then, at 11:06, she drops the real bombshell.

She says she’s a professor. The way she introduces it, is supposed to give her a badge of credibility.

Her name is Rebecca Goyette, and she portrays herself elsewhere as some kind of artist — look at her public Facebook page.

She’s not a real professor, as it turns out (age restricted: again, strong stomachs only!). Maybe, in her delusional leftie-pervert universe, she thinks she’s a professor. Who knows?

Some of the onlookers, having heard her say she’s a professor and taking her at her word (how interesting, that they would do that), are clearly as bemused as I am (“she’s a professor,” says someone, presumably scratching his head).

What she is, is a complete nutjob!

What seems clear is that an increasingly violent and deranged Left appears more determined than ever to shut down all conservative presence on campuses — completely. Their favorite words are now fascist, Nazi, neo-Nazi, and white supremacist.

I guess racism, sexism and homophobia are losing their force. Too many people now see through those.

Richard Spencer, credited with coining the phrase alt-right, was doing an interview in Washington on Inauguration weekend when someone lurched out of the crowd and sucker-punched him in the face — on video, no less!

And again, a loudmouthed celebrity, covered by mainstream media, calls for what would amount to a military coup against the Trump administration — not exclusively in response to Donald Trump’s attempt to protect America’s borders. One need only reflect on the irony: the Left went ballistic when, late in the final Presidential Debate, Trump hesitated to say he would automatically accept the results of a Hillary Clinton victory.

The Left is refusing to accept the Trump victory, and its militancy is getting increasingly dangerous. A journalist and writer I once respected, Chris Hedges, author of the very good War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning (2002), now goes into a weekly torrent of hysterics. In his latest, he calls for resistance to make America ungovernable. He calls for nonviolence, as if not realizing either that the Left already crossed that bridge, or that protesters don’t have to engage in open violence to endanger innocent people’s lives when, e.g., they are obstructing highways as they’ve done for the past year now.

Now I’d be the first to admit that Trump’s executive order of Friday, January 27, could have been planned better, e.g., written to exempt green card holders, employees of the U.S. government traveling with passports from the affected nations, and others with permanent residency in the U.S. whom, one can presume, have gone through a rigorous vetting process. Had I been Trump, I would have issued a preliminary statement that the order was coming and given as many people as possible it would likely affect sufficient time to get their ducks in a row. But that’s just me. I think executive orders are, at best, blunt instruments. Trump hardly invented the executive order as a means of governing. I’m not sure a more nuanced and careful approach would have made the slightest difference to the angry, violent Left, though.

I’ve mentioned survivalist writer Brandon Smith’s view that Left and Right are being orchestrated into a head-on violent confrontation. He writes, “Instead of admitting that their ideology is a failure in every respect, [the Left is] doubling down. When this evolution is complete, the Left WILL resort to direct violent action on a larger scale, and they will do so with a clear conscience because, in their minds, they are fighting fascism. Ironically, it will be this behavior by leftists that may actually push conservatives towards a fascist model. Conservatives may decide to fight crazy with more crazy.” As if to confirm Smith’s fears, some idiot Social Justice Warrior threatened this. If he or his buddies actually went through with it, President Trump might see little choice except to send in Homeland Security to deal with the problem. I doubt they would hesitate to use deadly force.

Trump would then be playing into the hands of the globalists just as the Left has been doing. Smith continues, “If under Trump conservatives fall to temptation and exploit the ‘ring of power’ that is government to exert dominance in the name of stopping the Left, then they will ultimately be destroyed as well. In this case history will not remember conservatives as freedom fighters rebelling against globalist machinations, but as evil ‘populists’ that caused global economic collapse and the re-establishment of the institution of fascism. The globalists can swoop in after the dust has settled and use the American collapse fable as a story to tell children for the next century. A reminder that nationalism and sovereignty are harbingers of war and death.”

You see, not all of us are sure about all that Trump is doing. Smith believes he was the globalists’ choice all along. His reasoning is not implausible. Is he “draining the swamp”? Nomi Prins, former banking analyst and strategist turned author of It Takes a Pillage: Behind the Bonuses, Bailouts, and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street (2009) and All the President’s Bankers (2014), believes the number of Goldman Sachs people in Trump’s administration is more than a mere cause for concern. Prins advocates something Trump has not to my knowledge mentioned: reinstating Glass-Steagall, which would restore the separation between commercial and investment banking. Others on Trump’s cabinet such as billionaire Rex Tillerson (former Exxon/Mobil CEO) are accustomed to getting what they want through top-down decrees. Someone better tell him, what might have kept his employees in line won’t work with the Chinese, and that he needs to not treat them like adolescent school boys needing to be told how to behave.

There may be the need, that is, for a credible critical stance — a credible “Trumpism” other than Donald Trump and his administration: critical of globalism, favorable towards sensible border security, but better thought-out and articulated, and taking note of the things Trump is ignoring or deeming unimportant. I attempted a possible beginning for such a project here (though I must credit the writer who called himself Publius Decius Mus and essays such as this for inspiration).

I stated in my earlier article that Trump’s number one enemies are the globalists, not the Left. The present-day Left, in the U.S. at least, couldn’t tie its collective shoelaces without Soros money or cushy academic positions.

The U.S. national debt, as I write, is $19.97 trillion. Total U.S. indebtedness including unfunded liabilities is, according to some estimates, over ten times that. To the best of my knowledge, Trump has said nothing about this looming debt bomb. He can’t possibly not know about it. I am sure Steve Bannon knows about it. He strikes me as a bright guy. If you factor in the even larger derivatives bubble (larger still; its the exact size appears to depend on whom you consult), we are literally sitting atop the largest set of asset bubbles in world history. Much of what even Trump is planning presupposes that the bubble will last. The problem is, they never do. They always pop sooner or later. Or are popped, when the truly powerful prick them. Something they are quite capable of, as soon as more “populists” are elected (Brandon Smith again).

Marine Le Pen in France who has launched her campaign for the Presidency there as an attack on globalization, radical Islamism, and on calling for a referendum on France’s remaining in the EU. I think she will win. So, I believe, will Geert Wilder, her counterpart in the Netherlands.

The real question: are “populists” being set up to take the fall when the superelite pops the bubble they created?

There is more than a ghost of a chance that we will know before the end of this year! That we will know within four years is probably a given!

The Left is completely unaware of this, of course. Like five-year-olds having temper tantrums when their parents won’t let them play in the street, they have no sense of the real danger. What they have is visibility, due to money, popularity, and the sort of sensationalism that wins visibility these days.

Those of us who are aware of the danger are consigned to Facebook (where we are at the mercy of “algorithms” that weed out unwanted information, so that it simply never appears in newsfeeds), blogs, and sites like this one that may get some Web traffic but ultimately not enough to make a difference. Sad. Truly sad.

© 2017 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

“Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.” —James 5:1-2 (KJV)

Those of us who are of a Judeo-Christian upbringing have had our eyes opened as to what is happening in our world. We have been called all kinds of names for our efforts in research to show the world the truth.

The men and women responsible for all the turmoil, division and pure ugliness in our world today want the total power that was once given to God. Not the God of Muhammad who states through the Quran that all should die who do not believe as they do, but our God of forgiveness who has never asked his followers to murder anyone just because they don’t believe in him.

Our world is now filled with those who worship Satan/Lucifer believing that is the way to the power and the control they so crave. Their largest target in this has been our children through education. I can show you document after document that clearly states that fact and no I am not going to once again provide you the links to those documents – stop being lazy and go find them yourselves.

I am tired of pandering to the lazy, self-absorbed people who rely on others to do their work for them and then if it doesn’t fit neatly into their pocket, they call us names and defy what has been presented.

Parents today are the laziest – especially with kids having kids. The family structure is broken down and as long as someone else is willing to take care of your kids – you’re happy. Meanwhile, Satan lurks in the corners providing the sins of the world and telling them it is ok.

If you needed proof of what I am saying, the recent Women’s March on Inauguration Day should give it to you.

We have satanic prayers being said at city and county council meeting because they are afraid they will be sued. Why would they be sued, Satanism has never been recognized as a religion and why aren’t you willing to stand up for your rights? You continue to give them away and then wonder why the world is walking all over you.

Now we have after school Satanic based clubs put on by Satanic men and women asking to be allowed to form in your schools. We have leaders of the Satanic Temple in Salem, Mass of all places gathering in a Victorian mansion plotting to bring their message to our kids in public schools around the country. Giving a hint as to their true focus and foe, they are aiming at the schools which host evangelical “Good News Clubs” once again using “separation of church and state” as their legal grounds when there is no such thing.

Doug Mesner, who goes by the professional name Lucien Greaves, is co-founder and spokesman for the Satanic Temple. They point out that Christian evangelical groups already have infiltrated the lives of America’s children through after-school religious programming in public schools, and they appear determined to give young students a choice: Jesus or Satan.

Mesner stated, “It’s critical that children understand that there are multiple perspectives on all issues, and that they have a choice in how they think. Really? WHERE ARE THE PARENTS?

All this because of a 2001 ruling by the Supreme Court stating that “excluding an after school program of religious views amounted to a violation of free-speech rights”. Given it was the Liberty Council which led the law suit, Mesner “thanks the Liberty Council for opening the doors to the After School Satan Clubs through their dedication to religious liberty”.

I would like to remind Mr. Mesner that Satanism has never been addressed or considered as a religion, but a philosophy or mindset having claimed they “don’t” worship Satan but are actually atheists. But now Mr. Mesner is going to refer to his clubs purpose as religious to be in line with the Supreme Court ruling.

I don’t know about you but in my world a young child does not have any choice in these matters except between right and wrong and it is the parents place to teach that – not a Satan worshipping group or a change agent teacher. This goal of separating our children from the family structure is destroying this country and the world.

I was always under the impression that as long as you lived under the roof of your parents who were feeding and clothing you, you followed their rules. Once you are on your own, then you have the right and choice to make your own decisions – those of right and wrong.

Once again they are bringing “separation of church and state” one of the most emotional and controversial subjects of our land into the discussion and I defy them to find that wording in the Constitution or any other founding documents.

The Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” and it gives 2 very clear statements.

The control or destruction of Judeo-Christian beliefs has been around for a long time and has taken on a stronger force with the increased push for a liberal world of “everything and anything goes” even if it goes against your beliefs and rights because “YOU” don’t count.

Since our schools and courts have decided to follow the 45 goals of the Communist Manifesto we are now traveling a road our Founders never intended to follow. But those choosing to follow Satan have already laid out the plans in the Manifesto for the destruction of our world to create theirs.

There is to be no coexistence – it is to be total control.

But you see, this helps them endorse their premise the “constitution is outdated, antiquated and the groundwork laid out by our founding fathers is to no longer apply”. Really! The Founders groundwork has carried this country for over 200 years until the very larger than life “money men” who follow no religion but the Lucifer of money have decided they want it their way.

Prophecy has predicted it; the Founders warned of it; the money hungry monsters of the world are doing it and middle and lower income Americans are in their way.

“Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.” James 5:3 (KJV)

Our Founders knew tyranny – they had lived it and when they came to this country in the name of religious liberty and freedom they established charter government’s and these charters were to make sure they were never prevented from practicing their religion again. Also put in place were “test acts’ which are the “oaths” a person is expected to take before taking any office in government.

Look up the Baptist minister John Leland who met with Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and explained his fear that the protection of religious liberty was not being properly addressed. This was in regard to all religions. Leland struck a deal with the two men that he would represent Virginia at the Constitutional Convention if they would make sure the religious liberties were protected and they did – in the Bill of Rights.

At times Americans question taxation and the right of the government to tax. At this same time some of the founders wanted to pass a bill establishing taxation to pay for Christian teachers. Jefferson and Madison were adamantly opposed to this measure stating they felt “taxation” was a direct assault on the religious liberty they had fought so hard to protect.

Our founders knew that whatever in government they taxed they would have an obligation to regulate it. As with the example of the Christian teachers, if they taxed them they would have become employees of the government and what the government employs it also dictates to.

And here we are – with plenty of taxes and the laws regulating them.

This is the best example I can give you as to the danger behind vouchers begin used for religious schools. Once a religious school of any kind takes one penny from the Federal government they are no longer private and will be under regulation of the government.

Are we now to give that liberty over to God’s bad angel Satan who has never followed the rules, but wanted his own and he now wishes to rein over our children with no protection?

The “After School Satan Club” they say will be actually presenting a “curriculum” emphasizing the development of reasoning and social skills. The group says meetings will include a healthful snack, literature lesson, creative learning activities, a science lesson, puzzle solving and an art project. Every child will receive a membership card and must have a signed parental­ permission slip to attend.

I am not as concerned as to the curriculum they state they are going to be presenting by their flyers, but what is going to be coming from their forked tongues.

And now we have come full circle and are back to the parents. What is the duty of a parent remembering that our children are a gift from God and they are his possession given over to us as a “loan” so to speak? We have been given the task of raising them up from a state of complete dependence to a state of complete independence so that we can release them to God by the time they reach maturity.

The fault of our children to not have the Lord in their lives and family in their heart falls squarely on the parents. It is not stated any better than in Proverbs 22:6 – “Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”

Many parents have so disconnected from their children’s lives as to allow them, as directed by the government, to be in the hands of strangers 9 ½ months of the year, five days a week for 6-7 hours a day knowing absolutely nothing about the people feeding their minds.

Why have parents allowed their schools to become United Nations schools using United Nations curriculums? To be placed in International Baccalaurate schools? Gulen Charter schools – why would you put your child in a Muslim school if you aren’t Muslim?

What do you know about these schools, the people running them or the actual curriculum being taught? Why have we allowed our elected school boards to go along with the indoctrination of our children and for what – a pay check? Power? Control?

Do I have to once again remind you of the speech the former General Counsel Bob Chanin of the NEA gave when speaking at their convention? He stated, “In my opinion, the NEA and its affiliates are such effective advocates. Despite what some among us might like to believe, it is NOT because of our creative ideas; it is NOT because of the merit of our positions; it is NOT because we care about children; and it is NOT because of a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have POWER and we have POWER because there are more than 3.2M people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them. The unions that can best protect the rights and advance their interests as education employees.” [YouTube Video]

Parents, unless you are willing to turn all responsibility to whom your children are to become over to strangers, it is certainly the time to know fully what is happening within the school your child attends. Better still home school or form a home school coalition and you will have a much better handle on who and what is bringing your child up and molding his/her mind for the rest of their lives.

When there is a will there is a way!

© 2017 Diane Kepus – All Rights Reserved

She is an ordinary looking woman who would not stand out in a crowd. She is unassuming, quiet and goes about her business without flair. Yet strangers who never met her will approach her on the street to reveal their innermost thoughts. Indeed they feel they MUST talk to her…a woman they had never met, nor did they even know her name.

It is not her beauty even though she is attractive, nor the way she dresses which is simple but tasteful. She does have something within her that cannot escape the attention of everyone who gets even just a glimpse of her….or even sees her in the distance.

Priscilla Martinez is a devoted Christian who carries the earned title, Chaplain. Her love of God is so resilient that it radiates from her, and like a magnet pulls people to her. Here is an extraordinary case of someone being so genuinely filled with The Holy Spirit that people MUST come to her.

There is a reason for this as explained in John 12:32: Jesus said, “If you lift me up, I will draw all men to myself,” or as some translations say, “I will draw all people toward me.” If any individual lifts up Jesus in their lives, he will draw all people toward Him, meaning that when He resides in those who lift him up people will be drawn to that person.

That Scripture has also been interpreted to say, “If you lift me up, I will draw all men unto thee.” In any translation this shows that people will be drawn toward those who lift up Jesus in their hearts and in their lives. And so it is with Chaplain Priscilla Martinez.

One example happened not long ago on a street in Brentwood, California. While walking down the sidewalk a woman crossed to her side of the walk and told her about a friend of hers who was at that moment dying in a hospital (Kaiser-Antioch). Her friend was in the emergency room and asked Chaplain Priscilla (the other woman did not know she was a chaplain) if she would go to see her.

Again, this woman knew nothing about her but felt compelled to go to her on that street. Chaplain Priscilla said, “I will go immediately.” And that she did. She went straight to the emergency room, went inside and could hear the woman screaming as she flailed uncontrollably in her bed. Her distressed family was in the room with her.

When Chaplain Priscilla went in they asked who she was. She told them. Then they asked her why she was there. “To pray with your mother,” she answered. A son in the family arrogantly got in Priscilla’s face and said, “And what is that going to do? First of all, we are atheists.” “I was asked to come,” the chaplain stated firmly. The family walked out of the room to the waiting room, leaving Chaplain Priscilla alone with their mother, who was still screaming and flailing.

As this anointed woman of God began to pray for this very ill and agitated patient, she gradually stopped screaming, came to her senses and suddenly was at peace. Chaplain Priscilla stayed only a few more minutes, then took her leave.

Going to the elevator she saw the family in the glassed in waiting room and nodded her head that she was leaving. They immediately got up to go to their mother’s room and to their astonishment, found her comfortable and peaceful.

While Chaplain Priscilla was still waiting for the elevator (God’s timing) the son rushed back out of the room and said to Priscilla, “What shot did they give her?”

“Oh they didn’t give her any shot.”

“Then what happened to her?”

“She got prayed for,” Chaplain Priscilla answered calmly just as the elevator door opened, she got in, the door closed and she was on her way. This certainly gave that atheist family something to think about.

Seeing her success, some would think her life was working out for her because she was raised with privileges without any of the life struggles that most of them encounter. Indeed many non-achievers who have experienced rejection and other difficulties believe this about anyone who is successful. How wrong they are. Chaplain Priscilla has dealt with struggles like everyone else including the worst kind of heart ache and health problems, probably more than most.

She once had been a very successful real estate agent with high-end properties and had accumulated a sizable nest egg. Her health began to decline, and then, the most heart wrenching of all, her husband committed suicide. Another member of her family had earlier been put on suicide watch. Her savings dwindled to practically nothing. She was devastated.

She began attending a church where I was on the pastoral staff and she gave herself totally to God, became very active in the church and began teaching Bible classes. Something radiated throughout her indicating that she had been set apart for God’s service.

She felt strengthened by the church and enrolled in my chaplain’s training program. After several weeks of course work and joining me on the spur of a moment to take part in crisis situations, the final exercise before being certified was to take place at a military Stand Down. Homeless veterans are bused in to a makeshift army camp set up on a fairgrounds for four days where counseling is provided by the chaplains in training.

She was loved by the veterans and especially related to the women vets. She was limping. When asked about it she fluffed it off saying she would be seeing a doctor when the Stand Down was over. That foot appeared to be very painful during that last day, yet she would go nowhere until that requirement had been fulfilled completely. Then, I would learn later, the next day after the stand down ended, she had surgery on her foot. She is a fiercely dedicated woman.

She became a chaplain for Shepherd’s Gate, a shelter for battered women. She even went to court with them when they were to confront the husband who had mistreated them. Most were terrified of having to face the brutal man they had married. Chaplain Priscilla was right there with each woman and brought such calm to the entire court room that one official stated to her, “We need more people like you in this courtroom.”

When I left California, I put her in charge of the chaplain’s training program. She became a member of His Presence Church in Brentwood (Pastor Felix Golden) where she trained her first chaplains. Her first graduating class brought us 21 new chaplains. I was there to speak and present the certificates. All of her chaplains have full time chaplaincies. One colorful African young woman became the chaplain of…now get this…the wives and families of the Golden State Warriors. They all have been placed.

It took a long time for her to get over the unexpected death of her husband but would much later meet and marry Hector Martinez, a very good man who is so proud of her, watches her fulfill her ministry including weddings, dedications and funerals along with speaking engagements. He supports her totally and watches her in awe as she carries out her duties.

There is so much more to the story of this remarkable woman whom you will never forget from the moment you first meet her. She has expanded the chaplaincy program and added to the curriculum. She is constantly on the go to minister to those who need her. What a blessing she is to everyone she encounters. She is truly a gift from God.

Photo Caption: Chaplain Priscilla Martinez
Photo Credit: Private Photo

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reserved

=We live in a day when God’s Law is Considered a Strange Thing—Hosea 8:12 “I have written for him the great things of My Law, But they are considered a strange thing.” As I was reading Hosea this verse jumped out at me as descriptive of our day. God’s Law is great, in fact it is the supreme Law of the Universe and He has given it to us in writing. But today when you speak of the great things of God’s Law many people including many who say they are Christians consider God’s Law a strange thing. Indeed it is as if the world is turned upside down and every thing God identifies in His Word as right is now considered wrong and what is wrong is now considered right.

Think for example what God’s law states is the purpose of civil govern-ment in Romans 13:4 “For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.”

Does the civil government actually do this? 86,000 illegal aliens who have committed crimes and then been convicted of those crimes in America were released on the streets of our land. Thousands of those went on to commit additional crimes. In 2015, 196 of these criminals were convicted of homicide, and ICE released them back on the streets rather than deporting them. In that same year ICE released 19,723 aliens with a combined 64,197 convictions, 934 sex offenses and 804 robberies, 216 kidnapping and 196 homicide related offenses.[1]

These are people who broke the law breaking into our country, proceeded to commit and be convicted of some very serious crimes but then the government released these criminals back on the the streets of America to commit more crimes. In other words our government did the opposite of what God’s Law tells us that civil government is supposed to do. Could we call it lawlessness? Government lawlessness?

Then along comes President Trump who establishes a temporary restric-tion on people coming into our land. The reaction has been interesting to watch – protests, violent demonstrations and the whole leftist media-academia screaming that Trump is breaking the law with his executive order regarding immigration. Now it is true that the President has no ability to make law, his job is only to see that the laws are faithfully enforced as our Constitution clearly states. So was Trump making law from the Oval Office?

I did a bit of digging to see the existing immigration law in America. There are elements of the McCarren – Walters Act of 1952 that were not amended by the 1965 Act or other subsequent Acts, and therefore are still the law of the land. Specifically the McCarren – Walters Act “allowed the government to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in subversive activities and also allowed the barring of suspected subversives from entering the country. It was used to bar members and former members and “fellow travelers” of the Communist Party from entry into the United States, even those who had not been associated with the party for decades.”[2]

This is the basis it seems that Carter used against the Iranians during the Iranian hostage crisis when he deported nearly 15,000 and banned others from entry into the country. If we under-stand that Mohammedans from those seven countries pose this same type of threat today, the Executive Order appears to me to be simply enforcing this aspect of the McCarren – Walters Act which is still the law of the land today. And that law comports with God’s Law which is the supreme law of the universe. What we see clearly is that God’s standard, His perfect Law is rejected by the “wise of this world.”

True leadership in any area of life is leadership which walks in accordance with God’s Law. The kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ is the only everlasting Kingdom which exists. It will conquer all.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

One of the things that our politicians have bought into is that our planet is over populated. The only way I can look at this is I don’t believe that God created something that was going to careen out of control and put every living beings life in jeopardy. That’s not the God I serve. So when some foolish scientist or politician tells me we have to cut back the population of the world I have to give him//her the look of what planet are you from.

Many people believe that planet Earth can only sustain a population of about 500,000. Really? That’s less than 200,000 more that the population of the United States! This kind of insane talk has been around for almost 90 years. But in the third field that Keynes proposed, state regulation remains as taboo today as it was 87 years ago. “The time has already come,” he wrote, “when each country needs a considered national policy about what size of population, whether larger or smaller than at present or the same, is most expedient.”

Keynes merely asserted his point. Professors Emmott and Dorling make their cases in more detail, and in doing so they exemplify the two approaches to the population question that have dominated this debate for centuries.

Emmott takes the natural scientists’ approach—the perspective of biologists, chemists, and physicists (though one that originated, ironically enough, with Robert Malthus—one of the fathers of modern economics). It sees the growth of human population, like that of other living things, as being constrained by the carrying capacity of the ecosystem: A physical limit defined by the scarce availability of natural resources.

Dorling, on the other hand, takes the social scientists’ approach—the way of geographers, economists, and anthropologists. This sees population growth as determined by political, social, and economic factors, rather than physical conditions.

At one level, the natural scientists’ approach is correct. There must be some physical limit to the number of human beings that can be sustained by the earth. In practice, however, the social scientists’ approach is the more relevant one. Human beings live in society and for many millennia now the binding constraints on population growth have been not physical but social and political. Famines, as Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen demonstrated, are generally the result of political failures, not natural causes.[1]

The disgusting thing about this is the only way to reach the goals they have set is to eliminate people! All this is part of Agenda 21 or what they have renamed 2030. Sustainability, population control in other words, control everything that we do, eat, what medications we can have, how we can live, where we can live and so on. Understand this, All of earth’s population will fit in Texas with the density of Paris.! We are in no way even beginning to over populate this planet. What they are attempting is nothing more than total control of every man, woman and child on the Earth.

Bill Gates has dumped hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccines because he believes that it is the best way to help control population. In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, “probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero.”

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number — P (for People) — might be reduced. He says:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”[2] Believe me he is not talking about extending lives with the vaccines nor is he talking about keeping people healthy for reproducing. His plan is as sinister as it gets. He was a seemingly nice guy in the first half of his life. An average American who made his fortune by selling hardware and software worth of billions, becoming a worldwide icon and a living example of the American Dream.

But, in the second half of his life, he teamed up with the world’s “elite” in an attempt to reduce the world’s population by billions… and he means business!

He soon became one of the most infamous depopulation activists, lecturing on genocidal vaccines, conducting vaccination campaigns that crippled and killed countless people in the third world countries, designing GMO mosquitoes that could carry and inject deadly viruses, and he’s constantly finding new methods of achieving his sick plans.[3]

Gates is not the only one with this mindset: Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing. – David Brower (Sierra Club)

A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion. At a more frugal European standard of living two to three billion would be possible. – United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment. This is just scratching the surface of the elites attempt to depopulate planet Earth.

Another thing the elites and our politicians have bought into is that the free market system is unsustainable, unfair and must be stopped in order to sustain life on the planet. Now you can understand all the new regulations Obama initiated, an astounding 65 a day everyday he was in office, stifling small businesses and raising the cost of operating a business so that it is not.
Keep in mind that virtually all Democrats in Congress are globalists, 70 of them are card carrying members of the Communist Party USA. Private industry is not something that they approve of because it is too hard to control. On May 22, 2008 Maxine Waters let it slip that “This Liberal Would

Be All About Taking Over The Oil Companies”[4] Why did she say that?
They refused to allow Congress to control them in the manner that Democrats wanted that control. Obama tried to nationalize the health industry, he put the government in charge of ‘rebuilding’ the auto industry and they have done their level best to attain complete control of the energy industry. Can you see now why they are so upset at Donald Trump? He will dismantle almost all of their infrastructure and they will have to start all over again. Hillary would have sealed the deal and destroyed America as we know it. Redistribution of wealth is behind every policy that comes out of the UN. The EPA is the attack dog to shut down entire industries such as the coal industry.

Difficult to operate a manufacturing business in US, impossible to start a new one. “0” economic growth advocated at 2012 Economic Summit. Rebuilding of roads and other infrastructure discouraged so as to not ‘ disrupt the well ordered society”. We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects.

We must reclaim the roads and plowed lands, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land. – David Foreman (earth First) They’ve done this in California and it has made the drought they are in worse.

Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of morality control. – Professor Maurice King (Population Control Advocate)

We believe planning should be a tool for allocating resources . . . and eliminating the greatest inequalities of wealth and power in our society . . . because the free market has proven itself incapable of doing this. – Plannersnetwork.org Statement of Principles. The American Planning Association is a member and supporter of these principles.[5]

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. Too Many people and Population Control.
2. Bill Gates on Vaccines.
3. Bill Gates Foundation.
4. Maxine Water this liberal would be all about taking over the oil companies.
5. [YouTube Video]. 

Being Iranian is defined by a state of mind, not by a place of residence. The barbaric Islamist mullahs and their mercenaries presently ruling Iran are not Iranians. They are Islamofascists who have betrayed their magnificent heritage and have enlisted themselves in the service of a most oppressive, discriminating, and demeaning ideology.

Iranians are proud spiritual descendants of King Cyrus the Great, the author of the first charter of human rights. Some of Cyrus’ children live in the patch of land called Iran. The overwhelming majority—free humans with human beliefs—live in every country, city, and village of the earth.

These world-wide people, one and all, irrespective of nationality, color, or creed are Iranians because they all adhere to the Cyrus Charter; they practice and defend its lofty tenets; and, transfer this precious humanity’s treasure to the next generation.

Unequivocal genetic findings have clearly established that biologically there is only one human race; that the genetic variation within a single troop of chimpanzees, for instance, is greater than that of any two human groupings, no matter how different they may appear physically.

What makes people different is not their biology, but the “software” that runs them. There is ample proof to support the above assertion. A case in point is the present menace posed by the people whose life is programmed by the software of Islam: an ideology anathema to the Cyrus Charter. And the results are self-evident. Hate, superstition, violence, and a raft of other inhuman beliefs drives these religious fascists. These captive followers of the primitive Islamic Charter are both the perpetrators and the victims of much suffering. The result is backward Islamic societies that are intent at dragging the rest of the world into the same sorry state. Misery likes company, it is said.

We recognize that the dysfunctional Islamic software is deeply engrained in the minds of many Muslims who opt to remain in mental bondage rather than purge their minds of the Islamic software and join the rest of the human family with a new emancipating program for life—liberty.

Islamic clergy, the parasitic prime beneficiaries of Islam, are master practitioners of the carrot and stick strategy. By drawing heavily from the Quran and the Hadith, the conniving mullahs and imams have assembled a potent arsenal of threats and promises to keep the faithful in line. They had little trouble in so doing, since Islamic scripture is replete with graphic horrific punishment awaiting the wayward and the unbelievers, while the rewards for the obedient docile, if he is male, are described as endless variety of sensual pleasures. Anyone daring to leave the corral of Islam is apostate and automatically condemned to death. And that’s just for starters. The punishment awaiting the ungrateful deserter of the one and only true path, Islam threatens, is a raft of horrific eternal torment in Allah’s hell.

And for the true faithful—the mindless robot—the promised rewards, all physical pleasures, are infinite and eternal.

In spite of these horrid threats and empty promises, more and more people are beginning to recognize Islam for what it is. It is difficult, but not impossible to leave the fraudulent Islam’s captivity. Hundreds of thousands have done so successfully and have enjoyed the blessings of liberty.

A great threat facing free people is the recently petrodollar energized Islam embarking on a campaign of recruiting more people under its dark banner. Millions of disenfranchised underclasses in the non-Islamic world, and millions more mentally under-developed may flock to Islam, deluded by its empty promises.

Islam is no longer in its own self-made cage. It has broken out and has established powerful presence in much of the non-Islamic world. Islam is a charter of submission. It is a sworn enemy of freedom and views the Cyrus Charter as heresy. Freedom and tyranny are incompatible. Free people must do all they can to preserve their birthright of liberty and assist others to break from the bondage of Islamic captivity.

The interdependent world community faces great challenges that demand a united effort, uncompromisingly based on justice, to meet the various ills it faces. We can no longer be complacent about events in distant world affecting alien people. Distances are bridged and alien people are now diverse members of the human family.

We honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. for proclaiming from a Birmingham jail, “Injustice anywhere is threat to justice everywhere.” To demand justice for others, he risked his life, left his native Georgia, and ended in jail of the-then-bigoted south—Birmingham, Alabama. We “Iranians” of the world—free humans—must do no less. We must demand justice for our belief-kin who are suffering under the yoke of Islamofascism in Iran or anywhere in the world.

We also do well to recall the example of an Irish-American President—John F. Kennedy—looking at the Communists’ Wall of Shame in Berlin, proclaiming, “Ich bin ein Berliner”— “I am a Berliner.” By so claiming, he helped rally free people of the world that brought down the wall and created a momentum that eventually swept the totalitarian Communist wall-builders into the dustbin of history.

Now the world is facing wall-builders of a different kind: the Islamofascists who have been at their shameless work for centuries. As their walls built with superstition, discrimination and blood are crumbling; they are intent at building walls in new territories.

But once again, human decency is rising to the challenge. This time in the voice and actions of billions of free people who proclaim: we are also children of Iran in the spirit of Cyrus the Great; “we meet any challenge and pay any price” to defeat Islamofascism; and, we will not rest until humanity is completely free of the despotic rule of Islam.

We Iranians and Iranian-Americans in spirit—free people of the world–greatly cherish liberty, where the mind is imbued with enlightenment, and every individual by the virtue of being born human is afforded measured freedom. It is within the open expanse of liberty that each and every person can be at his or her best. And when the individual person is at his best, humanity is at its best.

© 2016 Amil Imani – All Rights Reserved

As a severely wounded Vietnam veteran, retired in 1968 as a double leg amputee, the brave men and women who have protected us on active military duty, in the intelligence community, in law enforcement and first responders, have always been uppermost in my mind for their commitment, dedication, and often their ultimate sacrifice in fulfilling a purpose and calling to protect us in our beloved America.

Over the recent past years, it is my observation that only lip service officially has been given to these loyal Americans on the front lines daily in far flung overseas field of fight and daily on the front lines combatting crime and terrorism in the homeland. In my war, Viet Nam, a vocal minority of the population protested the war and the warriors. In recent years, I have been heartened that the majority of our citizens have measurably and demonstrably honored our military. However, on the home front our police often have been vilified and murdered in the streets, witness Dallas, Texas. It has been an appalling demonstration of strife on our own turf.

This past weekend I was brought to tears of joy, often by what I observed as demonstrated by our new President, Donald J. Trump. My witness to his actions and participations in recent days at the Inaugural events have been most heartening as to where his heart and soul reside.

As a teenager in Washington, I watched as members of the Old Guard marched their paces in front of the revered site at the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery. The day before the inauguration, there was our President-elect paying his respects at this memorial. There must have been many demands on his time, yet he took the time to visit Arlington. After the luncheon in the Capitol following the official inauguration, I viewed our new Commander-in-Chief and President and Mrs. Trump and Vice President and Mrs. Pence on the bottom steps of the east Capitol side, flanking probably the Commanding General of the Military District of Washington, in their first official function relating to the military. The active military units to be marching in the Inaugural Parade passed in review. There were few spectators. The Capitol grounds were closed off for security.

Viewing the parade, it was obvious the extraordinary security placed around the President’s vehicle. When he exited, as it turns out, only shortly twice on the parade route, he was immediately “surrounded” by Secret Service, who were prepared to stop bullets if any of the protesters, who were so prevalent in the Capitol, had been so inclined to become world famous in infamy.

Then there was the parade itself. There the President was standing for most of the parade, saluting smartly, presumably each time our national colors passed him. It was especially noticeable, that, before each active military unit marched past the reviewing stand, that that service branch member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stood between the President and Vice President to honor their marchers. The family members of our military fallen in action were prominently represented as were our Disabled American Veterans and Paralyzed Veterans of America. My own service academy, West Point, was minimally represented in a small contingent of cadets, a far cry from the entire 2500-member Corps of Cadets, which marched in President Kennedy’s parade in 1961. (With pride, I marched with my fellow cadets on that bitterly cold day!)

Typically, in the past, there have been a number of balls inaugural night, but only a reduced number this time, presumably only three. One, most important and heart-warming assuredly, was the Armed Forces Ball attended by our new President Trump. How it warmed my heart to view the President and First Lady, the Pences, and the new President’s immediate family on the dance floor at the Armed Forces Ball, dancing with members of the backbone and soul of our military, our enlisted men and women!

It had been written, perhaps as “Fake News,” that our new President was to take the weekend off, following the inauguration day activities. But, not for this new and vigorous Chief Executive. On Saturday, he was at the National Cathedral for a prayer service. On the morning of the inauguration he attended a worship service at the Church of the Presidents, St. John’s Episcopal, across Lafayette Square from the White House and immediately west of the headquarters building of Veterans Affairs, where I served in the administration of President George H.W. Bush. Pastor Robert Jeffress in his sermon harkened back to the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem by Nehemiah in mid-fifth century B.C. Nehemiah, like our new President Trump, was subject to constant attacks. But Nehemiah, as will our new President, prevailed over all and accomplished his mission.

President Trump’s first agency visit was to the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley on Saturday afternoon. It certainly did not look like he took the weekend off. His leadership style was in full bloom as he called attention to the endeavors of the CIA in combatting our enemies overseas. He brought significant and appropriate attention to his new CIA chief, Mike Pompeo.

A good and great leader gets with the ‘troops” and this was a classic example of his style.

On Sunday, he continued his expression of his respect for our Americans, who are on the homeland’s front lines in serving and protecting us. He held a White House reception for law enforcement and first responders. He called an individual forward to stand between him and VP Pence and I presume it was the head of Secret Service. President Trump stated words to the effect that he felt well-protected from the beginning. In the keeping of his relaxed and humorous style he called up FBI chief James Comey and joked, “He is more famous than I.”

The most single expression of the respect to be commanded most deservedly by this new Commander-in -Chief is the story I heard about a high school senior residing in the northeast. A West Point classmate related he had been working with the senior for admission to West Point. He said he would not have entered West Point had President Trump’s opponent become president, but was more than proud under President Trump to serve his country as an officer and as a graduate of West Point and is proceeding to obtain admission to the Academy.

That is my story and I am sticking with it! God bless America, our military, intelligence community, law enforcement, and first responders. It is morning in America again!

© 2017 Allen B. Clark – All Rights Reserved

My 89 year old black preacher dad’s heart attack had Mary and me rushing from Florida to Baltimore Maryland. Dad is doing fine. Praise God.

While in town, I visited my 60 something year old cousin in the hospital suffering with diabetes. They amputated half his foot. Sadly, he is scheduled for them to amputate his leg up to his knee. What do you say to someone who is about to lose their leg? I prayed for wisdom. My visit with him was wonderful. It strengthen my resolve to seriously deal with my challenges with the disease.

Dad was out of the hospital. I dropped in at his home to discover Dad was hosting a Superbowl party. His home was filled with black seniors from his church. Dad proudly introduced me as his eldest son. They were all Democrats and Falcons fans.

The conversation turned to education. Surprisingly, a guest said she thought it was wrong for schools to allow black students to speak Ebonics rather than insisting they learn English. She said keeping blacks ill-equipped to enter the work force is a form of slavery. Excited, I chimed in, “Amen Sister! It is insulting to think blacks are too stupid to learn English.” I explained that the Left always seeks to lower standards for blacks. I continued, “Back in 1952 when dad broke the color barrier to become a Baltimore City firefighter, all he asked for was an opportunity to compete. He did not ask that they lower a single standard for him.” I said dad won Firefighter of the Year two times. Dad beamed hearing me brag on him in front of his friends.

After visiting my dad, I arrived at my brother’s home just before kickoff of the Super Bowl. A family millennial said he heard the Falcons playbook mysteriously disappeared and suddenly returned. He cited Patriots’ scandals, spy gate and deflate gate. Thus, he concluded the Patriots win because they always cheat. The truth is the Patriots win because they are a well-oiled machine, disciplined and masterfully coached.

I explained to my brother that our young relative believed what is known in politics as a false narrative. Obsessed with destroying Trump, the fake news media has launched at least 16 stories (false narratives) against Trump. The fake news media relentlessly sells the public false narratives. For example: I heard on the local news that January 2017 was a record-breaking month of Baltimore homicides, 32 in 31 days (blacks murdering blacks). Ignoring the facts, the fake news media has convinced many Baltimore blacks that police are their greatest Nemesis.

Traveling back home to Florida, we stopped in West Virginia to visit Mary’s mom and look for a home to purchase. It is time to move closer to family. West Virginia is only a few hours from my dad in Baltimore.

We bunked at Mary’s sister and her husband’s home. My brother-in-law said when they moved to West Virginia, he received his Democrat voter card immediately at the DMV when he got his West Virginia driver’s license. In took several weeks for his wife’s Republican voter card to arrive in the mail.

I said my dad taught me as a child that the democrats were for the little guy working man and the republicans were for the rich. I told my brother-in-law that lifelong Democrats like my dad and Mary’s mom do not realize that the Democratic Party has changed. It has become the party of every anti-God, anti-American and wacko group.

I told him about the Democrat supported Black Lives Matter rally at which an anti-Trump protester delivered an F-bomb filled rant against whites over the megaphone. The protester instructed the crowd, “We need to start killing people!”

I told my brother-in-law that Democrats control school curriculum. Starting in kindergarten, students are taught to not only embrace, but be “open-minded” to experimenting with homosexuality. An elementary student explained the lesson to his fellow students. “Let’s say it’s like a new kind of vegetable or something. If you’re not very open minded then you won’t try it.” Democrat judges are decreeing that parents are not permitted to opt out their children.

My brother-in-law was shocked.

A final note about the Superbowl. I watched it with my brother who has coached kids football for 30 years. He said NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell suspending Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady for 4 games over deflated footballs was nonsense. We agreed that Brady is hated for political reasons. Not only is Brady a Trump supporter, he is handsome, married to a model and a winner. Leftists are repulsed by such success, viewing it as unfair.

My brother said it would be sweet if the Patriots won the Superbowl forcing Goodell to present Brady with the championship trophy. When Goodell presented the trophy to Robert Kraft, owner of the Patriots, fans practically booed Goodell off the stage. He kept his presentation speech extremely brief. I loved it.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

It will take the passing of quite some time before many Americans can erase the image of the Senate’s new Democratic Minority Leader Charles “Chuck” Schumer being overly emotional when describing President Donald Trump’s ban on unvetted Muslims from seven terrorist-havens in the Middle East.

What most Americans believe is a common-sense policy appeared to have caused the career politician to choke back tears in his favorite place — in front of TV cameras and microphones. “Schumer — battle-hardened partisan — appeared to have a difficult time talking about Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim refugee resettlement. Schumer labeled Trump’s executive order “mean-spirited and un-American,” which sounded like a political symphony to the Trump-hating propaganda meisters covering the Schumer performance.

“This political hack really gets my goat! He’s been a member of both houses of Congress for many, many years and I’ve never seen Schumer holding tears back after thousands of Americans were killed fighting the enemy — Islamic terrorists. He never shed a single tear for the victims of the Benghazi attack. He’s a disgrace as an American not to mention a shady Senator,” says Schumer’s fellow New Yorker, Henry McGrath, a retired NYPD cop.

Schumer has also been quoted as saying, “Tears are running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight as a grand tradition of America, welcoming immigrants, that has existed since America was founded has been stomped on.”

“Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is the chief obstructionist of domestic policies and appointments of President Donald Trump,” well-known police adviser and former NRA publications editor John M. Snyder noted this week.

“Schumer opposes the civil right to keep and bear arms as well as the civil right to life itself,” Snyder added.

President Trump himself has called Schumer the “clown of clowns,” while top talk show host — and former Justice Department chief of staff — Mark Levin called him a hypocrite since Schumer is a staunch “gun-grabber” who wishes to disarm American citizens while he packs a concealed handgun and is usually surrounded by armed protection officers.

“Hopefully,” Snyder said, “there are enough patriots in the Senate Democratic Caucus to overcome Schumer’s attempts to thwart the will of voters as expressed last November in the victory they gave Trump for his America first positions.”

“Schumer plots to prevent Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominees who support the right to life and the right to keep and bear arms. He worked to derail the appointment of gun rights and life rights supporter Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) as Attorney General,” said the top spokesperson for gun rights.

Snyder said, “Sen. Schumer is a leading opponent of the right to life and of the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of life. He promotes abortion and even partial birth abortion. He promotes bans on the acquisition and use of firearms and certain types of firearms by law-abiding citizens. Citizens want them for the defense of life as well as for other legitimate purposes.”

“Schumer, the ‘clown of clowns,’ is a leading spokesman in the United States today for what St. John Paul termed the ‘culture of death.'”

Snyder pointed out that, “Clown Schumer attacks President Trump as a hard right guy. But the Senate Minority Leader himself is a ring leader of the loony left. Voters have dumped these nut cakes. Senators should approve Trump’s pick for Attorney General. They should reject Schumer’s plan to hold up approval of Supreme Court nominees.

“They also should enact legislation in support of the right to life and of the right to keep and bear arms. Among the latter is the proposed Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017, H.R. 38, by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) with 140 cosponsors.

H.R. 38 “would require states to recognize the validity of every other state’s gun carry licenses, but it would require concealed carriers to follow the specific laws of whatever state in which they are carrying,” reported the Washington Free Beacon.

The bill “ads language designed to ensure that those in Constitutional Carry states, where no permit is required to concealed carry, are protected by the legislation,” continued the Beacon.

The bill also would allow concealed carry in the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, and on lands under the authority of the Bureau of Land Management, Army Corps of Engineers, and Bureau of Reclamation.

H.R. 38 has been referred to the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives.

“We need national reciprocity for concealed gun carry,” said Snyder.

“A positive state CCW or concealed carry policy enables a qualified individual to carry a particular concealed firearm within his or her state of jurisdiction if legally permitted to do so,” Snyder noted.

“With national reciprocity, a state-issued CCW permit would be honored throughout the country, similar to the way in which state-issued driving permits now are honored throughout the country,” he added.

“In a survey of United States police chiefs and sheriffs conducted last year by the National Association of Chiefs of Police, over 86 percent said they supported nationwide recognition of state issued concealed weapons permits,” Snyder.

“With President Trump now in office and with Republicans in charge of both houses of Congress, proponents of the individual Second Amendment civil right to keep and bear arms can and should advance the American freedom agenda,” Snyder said.

“In addition to fostering national reciprocity for concealed firearm carry,” he added, “Washington should slash the law enforcement funding of cities and states following policies contrary to the spirit of the Second Amendment, and repeal federal laws interfering with Second Amendment liberties.”

A practicing Catholic, Snyder has been named “the dean of Washington gun lobbyists” by the Washington Post and New York Times, “a champion of the right of self-defense” by the Washington Times, the “gun dean” by Human Events, and “the senior rights activist in Washington” by Shotgun News. The Trace designated him a power broker.

He holds AB and MA degrees in government from Georgetown University. He has been an NRA magazine editor and official of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and Second Amendment Foundation. He directs Telum Associates, LL.C, and serves on boards of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, Council for America, and American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

The election of Donald Trump for president of the United States represents the desire of many Americans to see our republic rescued from utter oblivion. Of course, “We the People” who desire America to be great again are not so naïve to think that Trump alone can improve the fortunes of the United States. However, the president is the commander in chief endowed with powers and responsibilities. Among the most important is to protect the United States from harm.

The president is commissioned to do all he can to protect America from enemies both foreign and domestic. Kit would not hurt if the judicial branch would agree.

Unfortunately, we now live in a time when a sizeable segment of society and the government are positioned to expend all their energies to stop the administration of Donald Trump from properly protecting our republic. The recent 9th Circuit court upholding a suspension of President Trump’s travel order is a perfect example. The surface level battle presented for the incurably ignorant masses is of a political nature. The progressive anti-American protection democrats and rinos verses patriotic republicans and Christians who desire America protected is connected to a deeper spiritual battle. I am basically referring to the ongoing struggle between those that desire destruction and the wiping away of our unalienable rights, personal and responsibilities against those who want a Constitution and God influenced American nation of truth self-reliance, protected borders and national sovereignty.

I have mentioned several times in the past in my radio commentary, The Edwards Notebook that the democrats are literally at war against the Christian and Constitutional influences that were major parts of the foundation of what has been great about our republic.

Among the major reasons why Chucky Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, John Lewis, Cory Booker and all progressives are hell bent on destroying Trump is their hatred of Christianity, personal responsibility and liberty . Let us not forget, the unalienable rights America used to be known for recognizing were derived from Judeo/Christian ethics or principles. They comprise the foundation of freedom from tyranny. President Trump fully understands that not only should we be free from government overreach, but also safe from those who seek to illegally invade our nation to do harm. I must say, it doesn’t matter if someone seeks to harm us or not. If they come into America illegally, they should be quickly deported, and if they commit another criminal act such as robbing or killing Americans they should be at the very least, jailed for a long, long time.

The ongoing campaign against president Trump is also being fueled by his bold stance for the right of Christians to operate freely in society. The Donald has boldly done what many “holier than thou” Christians have been either afraid or unwilling to do. He spoke out boldly against the obvious unethical, un American liberal control of every element of the government including the Appellate Court which now is endangering our nation to it’s very core by ruling against Trump’s common sense effort to vet those coming into our republic from nations where vetting is not existent.

History has plainly exhibited for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear that nations seeking to embrace firm Christian values are usually more prosperous and freer than those where such beliefs are rejected or not allowed. The progressives know this and understand that they must convince you that you need them more than the wits, rights and abilities that God gave you. This explains how most Black Americans remain stuck in the back end of the golden donkey, near the bottom of economic growth and living standards in the United States.

For progressives to succeed in their mission to permanently damage America, large percentages of the population must be kept ignorant, as bitter victims and indoctrinated against America. That is why they so energetically hate Donald Trump, Betsy Devos, Dr. Ben Carson and others who will fight to unshackle Americans from the ravages of wrong thinking and actions that derive from the poisonous indoctrinations of the political left that has infiltrated every segment of communicating in the country.

Progressives like the anti-Constitutional Ninth Circuit Judges do not appreciate our unalienable rights, which come from God. They are even against our nation’s ability to protect herself from real enemies. There is an authentic tug of war over the soul of America. I just happen to believe that the ongoing progressive war against our patriotic president will ultimately fail. This final note, let us pray for Providential guidance in president Trump’s dealing with Israel as she also fights for her unalienable right to exist. God bless you, God bless America and may America bless God.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

All of the sudden the word pedophile has wriggled its way into mainstream America. Just like the diabolical double of transgenderism and homosexuality, a generation ago the mere mention of those illnesses was something whispered out of earshot of anyone under the age of eighteen.
As the book of Ephesians clearly states there were some topics that warned we “let it not be named once among you.” Even thought this spiritual wickedness has been around since the fall of man, the idea that such deviancy would ever be taught to our children was unthinkable.

Lest we forget, and before I duck for cover from the verbal grenades of the tolerance crowd, let me remind you that there was a time not so long ago when deviant sexual behavior was considered a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Association.

As history records it wasn’t until 1973, thanks to the “research” of deviant homosexual pedophile Alfred Kinsey and his pornographic book Sexual Behavior in the American Male that “scientific” research in regards to sexual behavior was reclassified. It would be safe to say that Kinsey and his gaggle of homosexualists were the first true science deniers. (Bone up…sorry for the poor choice of words… on homo-history here).

Deviant sex proponents have put on a full court press ever since. With the help of the ungodly courts and the lie of the separation between the church and the state they were successful in overturning nearly 6000 years of recorded history with the “legalization” of what God, and nearly all civil societies had deemed an abomination.

Today, talk of sexual options are as common and varied as more and more abominable sexual behaviors are thrust in front of innocent, unsuspecting children in kindergarten. It has given new meaning to asking children if they have learned their ABC’s.

What is going on in our public schools is nothing less than moral molestation.
I hate to go old fashioned on you but there was a time in America when we took seriously the crime of corruption of a minor.

The Law Dictionary defines it as “actions of an adult that convince or influence a minor to do something wrongful, criminal or immoral such as performing a sexual action.

In accordance with that there was also a crime of “improper influence” which was defined as “to attempt to convince someone to perform an act that is not proper or immoral or an offense which they would not otherwise commit had they not been influenced or convinced to do so”

Today, we just call those two crimes “public education.” They simply changed the definition of “immoral,” classified it as normal, and shoved it down the throats (sorry again) of America’s elementary school students.

When will God-fearing “normal” Americans rise up and declare that enough is enough? Engaging in personal deviant behavior is one thing. Teaching it to unsuspecting innocent children is another. The molestation of the innocent mind is spiritual rape.

Pornography is defined as printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.” Look at this picture. Is this not intended to “stimulate erotic” feelings in the viewer? Is it not designed to “influence” confused children? Is this not emotional pornography?

What is the common thread in a vast majority of the sexual deviancy we see in America? Could it be the indoctrination of young innocent minds into the acceptance of abnormal sexual behaviors in our social experiment laboratories known as American Public Schools?

The sexual anarchists are running America. The promotion of sexual deviancy has led to an epidemic of brokenheartedness in parents who lost their precious children to the mental molestation masquerading as education in our deviant driven gender bender, amoral curriculum.

You may want to stop reading right here because what I am about to say is graphic…but it goes to the heart of the argument. CONTINUE AT YOUR OWN RISK.

America’s public schools are designed to shape society. We stopped “educating” our children a long time ago. The schools spend hours trying to convince children not to smoke cigarettes because it could be hazardous to their health. Yet they encourage them to engage in homosexual sodomy which is far more dangerous than smoking.

Let’s be honest here. Would you rather your teenage son was caught smoking in the restroom or sucking on his classmate’s camel? What is wrong with us?

I rejoice that Betsy DeVoss is the new Secretary of Education. I pray she oversees the shuttering of this diabolical cabinet. In the meantime…get your kids out of the public schools.

Rape is not always sexual. If we love our children the molestation of the mind must stop.

© 2017 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

No one spends $100 million to make a movie intending it to lose a heap of money. They expect to make money. They expect a lot of people will pay to see it.

Soon to be released, “Fifty Shades Darker” is the sequel to “Fifty Shades of Grey,” a movie celebrating and promoting the perversion of “bondage and domination”—in which one partner, usually the woman, gets her jollies by being tied up and smacked around by the other. In the “Fifty Shades” franchise, it’s always the woman. Somehow this is supposed to be liberating, and feminists are too busy protesting in favor of abortion to devote any time to protesting against this. Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

According to a review by The Express, this sequel is “far kinkier than the original” and “almost pornographic at times.” Almost? What do they have to do to go beyond “almost”? Never mind, I don’t really want to know.

It used to be that, if you wanted stuff like that, you had to get it furtively, sneak it into your den somehow. Now you take your date to see it at your local nabe. Stand in line, buy a ticket. You won’t blush if anybody sees you there.

True, there is a fair to excellent chance that this turkey will bomb at the box office; but Hollywood is betting that it won’t. And they’re willing to take the risk because this is what they do: this is their own piece of the fundamental transformation of America.

At one time, to release a movie like this would have been unthinkable. But our culture has been changed, drastically, and not for the better. What with our teachers’ unions, our colleges and universities, and Democrat politicians pushing and promoting transgenderism—or “gender fluidity,” as they sometimes like to call it—as if their very lives depended on it, what was once seen as perverted and bizarre has been pushed at least into the borders of the cultural mainstream.

To cite just one example: an Italian priest is in the soup now for “holding orgies on church property” and arranging visits to “naturist swingers’ resorts.” “Naturist” means they take their clothes off. Police caught him with a briefcase full of “sex toys” and similar paraphernalia; and he also got up to other tricks which I will not mention here. They had him dead to rights, so he broke down and confessed—and not in a confessional booth, but in a police interrogation room.

The Church seems determined to boot him out of the priesthood altogether, but questions remain. What made him think he could get away with this? What made him decide to do it in the first place? They say he had upwards of “30 lovers.” Who were they, and what made them look to a priest to be their pander?

There have always been corrupt and wicked clergymen. Read Dante. Read Boccaccio. We also have schoolteachers, professional people, and public officials every bit as slimy as this single priest. Are they learning this from movies, or is Hollywood just making movies that reflect the state of our culture? Probably a bit of both.

We want prosperity. We want liberty. But in order to have those things, you also need to have the family, a free market, religious faith—and decency. We can’t wallow in sleaze and hope for stable families, a rational economy, and a personal code of behavior that allows others to trust you and expect you to treat them as you would want them to treat you. If you want to see what happens to a society when the family breaks down, the market doesn’t work, and nobody bothers to obey the law—well, that isn’t hard to see. Spend a few nights in the worst parts of Chicago.

It’s a very good thing that we won a presidential election against the party that boos God at its national convention. But our culture has a long, long way to go before it’s healthy again. Winning an election won’t help us unless we can win back our culture from the culture-killers.

They’re the moral imbeciles who educate and entertain our children; and we mustn’t let them do it anymore.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

According to the Federal Highway Administration, more than 68,000 American bridges are structurally deficient. They estimate the cost to repair and maintain those bridges at $71 Billion. The Transportation.gov website has determined that most of America’s roads are in poor condition, ranging from 19% in Georgia to 73% in Illinois.

Any good engineer will tell you that “deferred maintenance” (putting off repairs and maintenance) leads to higher costs ….. much higher costs. “Deferred maintenance” is what America has done to her roads, bridges, train tracks, tunnels, airports, water and sewer lines, natural gas and oil pipelines and electrical generation and power distribution facilities.

Most maintenance and repairs for infrastructure are put off because of the lack of money. But how can such a rich country allow its infrastructure to decay so badly. It puts American lives at risk and raises the cost of property damage, auto and truck repairs and insurance, astronomically? How can a country that boasts the highest standard of living on the planet be out of money and so deep in debt? The answer lies directly at the foot of “100+ Years of Progressive Rule.”

Like many pundits often say, “follow the money”.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION:

The most reliable estimates state that illegal immigrants cost the American taxpayer around $113 Billion per year, $84 Billion of which is shouldered by the states. These estimates are over and above any contributions made to the economy by illegal immigrants.

Obviously, these estimates do not include the huge costs of the Border Patrol ($12 Billion in 2013, currently over 20,000 agents), Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) ($5.8 Billion in FY 2011- 20,000 employees), or the cost of detainment. As an example, the federal government paid GEO Group $32,000,000 to build a containment center at the border, or $52,632 per bed. The government pays GEO Group $15,000,000 a year to operate the facility.

But the illegal immigrants detained at this one facility stay for an average of only 12 hours before most of them are released into the general population with a bond to make a court appearance. In 2010 it was reported that 715,000 of these illegal immigrants released on bond, failed to appear at the court hearings and are now living in the shadows and costing taxpayers billions of dollars every year. That number has probably doubled since 2010. Apparently, the Trump administration has stopped Obama’s “catch and release” policy and illegal immigrants will be ushered back across the border to whence they came, that is if some Democrat State Attorney general doesn’t convince some federal judge to overturn Trump’s order.

The hard truth is, Border Patrol and ICE spend the lion’s share of their time controlling border security and enforcing immigration law because of illegal immigrants. On top of that, the Border Patrol and ICE are up against open defiance from hundreds of “Sanctuary Cities.” Thus, the real cost of illegal immigration is in the billions of dollars above the $113 Billion estimate.

We are told that the compassionate thing to do is to absorb as many legal and illegal immigrants that we can. Just how many illegal immigrants, that are now costing the American taxpayer $113 Billion per year or more, can America afford? It only takes $71 Billion to fix America’s bridges.

But one of the other nagging questions is, how many non-assimilating illegal immigrants does it take to irreversibly alter the culture of a nation in the name of compassion? It is a fact! Too much multi-culturalism, with irreconcilable differences, destroys a free nation. It is destroying ours.

REFUGEES:

Very seldom do you see press reports on the cost to the American taxpayer for refugee resettlement programs. Since 1983 when the Office of Refugee Resettlements (ORR) was established pursuant to “The Refugee Act of 1980 (Section 413(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act”, well over 2,500,000 refugees, from many parts of the globe, have been admitted to the U. S. The five-year cost for each refugee has been calculated at $64,370, or over $257,000 per household. The total annual cost is well over $3 Billion but increases every year as more refugees get on the program ….. and never get off. This does not include State Department, Health and Human Services, or Department of Homeland Security costs involved in the refugee program. Further, welfare use is staggering among refugees. Officials never count refugee welfare usage as part of the cost of the program. Yet, when it is included, some estimates put the total cost of the refugee program to as much as $20 billion a year. But worse, most refugees seldom assimilate into American culture, especially Muslim refugees.

According to the “2009 HUD Report to Congress on Refugee Resettlement”, only 57.7% of refugees become self-sufficient after 5 years. Obviously then, 42.3% remain on resettlement programs, or welfare, or both. However, the definition of “self-sufficiency” has been steadily defined downward. A refugee can be considered “self-sufficient” while using all of the welfare programs available to legal Americans.

Until Trump’s recent Executive Order, the program gradually shifted towards the resettlement of refugees from Muslim countries. Yes, there are some Christians or other minorities, but most are Muslims. In the early 90’s the percentage of Muslim refugees was near zero. By 2000 the program was 44% Muslim. The Muslim component decreased after 911, but today is back up to about 40% and is likely to rise. Strangely, membership in a U.S.-registered Islamic terrorist group is not a bar to entry on the program as long as the refugee was not a “direct participant” in “terrorist” activity.

More often than not, the United Nations dictates the refugees that America must take. Even worse, thanks to Obama, America is now being forced to absorb 1,250 Muslim refugees that Australia refused entry.

To many, the refugee resettlement program is a self-perpetuating global enterprise. Staff and management of the hundreds of taxpayer supported U.S. contractors are largely refugees or immigrants themselves that want to add their extended families or friends to the refugee program. Like so many government programs, the refugee resettlement program has become an ever-expanding cash cow for charitable organizations. There is so much federal money available to charitable organizations for refugee resettlement, private capital has been driven out.

Here again, we are told that the compassionate thing to do is to absorb as many refugees as we can. But how many refugees at some $20 Billion per year, can America afford? It doesn’t seem like much in the general scheme of things, but the costs never go down. They just keep rising, year, after year, after year.

Once again, how many non-assimilating refugees does it take to permanently alter the culture of a nation in the name of compassion? Even compatible people can’t get along very well. In-compatible people start fights and wars. Too much multi-culturalism, with irreconcilable differences, destroys a free nation. It is destroying ours as it is destroying Europe.

ADDICTION AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE:

In this category we are talking about REAL money. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the total annual cost for Tobacco abuse is $295 Billion with $130 Billion going to health care. The total cost of Alcohol abuse is $224 Billion with $25 Billion going to health care. The total cost of illicit drug abuse is $193 Billion with $11 Billion going to health care. This comes to a staggering $712 Billion per year and doesn’t include the cost that addiction inflicts on human lives.

“A study funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) found that 77.4 percent of treatment in 2003 was paid for by Medicaid, Medicare, and other federal, state and local sources, up from 50.4 percent in 1986. Meanwhile, the private sector’s share of the treatment cost burden slipped from 49.6 percent in 1986 to 22.6 percent in 2003.”

If these numbers are even remotely correct and if the taxpayer is really picking up 77.4% of the cost of addiction and substance abuse, the taxpayer is footing $551 Billion of the total annual cost. You can repair a lot of roads and fix a lot of bridges for $551 Billion. America is indeed a sick, decadent and weak nation because of rampant substance abuse. Our drug addiction also feeds the brutal drug cartels and makes them powerful billionaires that kill for sport.

MEANS-TESTED WELFARE:

According to the Heritage Foundation, “The American welfare system is very complex. It involves six major federal departments that include Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, the Labor Department, Department of Treasury and Department of Education. The total estimated annual cost for state and federal welfare is $927 Billion from 79 welfare, interrelated, overlapping agencies and programs that distribute means-tested welfare. It is not unusual for a poor family to receive benefits from four different departments through as many as six or seven overlapping programs.”

The opportunities to abuse all of these programs are immense. The “Federal Safety Net” website has published statistics for welfare fraud. For fiscal year 2015, $711.4 Billion was spent on 14 welfare categories. Of that $711.4 Billion, $71.5 Billion (10.1%) was due to fraud.

How much of that $711.4 Billion goes to welfare cheats and freeloaders is almost impossible to quantify. But if all of the fraud were assigned to welfare cheats and freeloaders, that amount would repair and maintain all of America’s bridges.

The Center for Immigration Studies calculated that illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 per year, using at least one or more welfare programs. At 11,000,000 estimated illegal immigrants in America, (it is probably much higher than that) the cost to the American taxpayer for illegal immigrants using welfare programs comes to over $1.57 Billion per year.

IRRATIONAL COMPASSION:

Yes, America is a rich and prosperous nation with a deep culture of compassion for those less fortunate. But when compassion for refugees, illegal immigrants, addicts, the disabled and the poor becomes irrational, without regard to the resources necessary to sustain that compassion; when compassion starts eating into the very resources necessary to defend the nation and maintain its standard of living; when compassion becomes government-enforced charity at the point of a gun and destroys our cherished individual liberties; when compassion starts irrevocably altering the long-accepted culture of a nation; when compassion becomes a threat to our national security; when compassion is used as a tool by one party to buy votes to gain perpetual power as the Progressives have done for over 100 years; when compassion creates a debt that can never be repaid, then compassion becomes a mindless obsession for its own sake and is, in fact, the very definition of insanity. We will have become a poisonous spider stinging itself to death.

Everyone wants to come to America and share the freedoms we observe and millions don’t mind breaking our laws to get here, or overstaying their visas. Millions of Americans and non-Americans want to “partake” in America’s generosity, even if they have no right to “partake.” Many want to come here to kill us.

Seven billion people live on this planet and at least 80% of that seven Billion are living in war or poverty, or under brutal dictators. America can only absorb a tiny fraction of that 80% without drowning. If we don’t control our compassion for refugees and illegal immigrants, we will significantly reduce or eliminate our freedoms, change our culture to a point that it will be unrecognizable, get so far in debt there is no recovery and put our national security in grave peril.

Our roads, bridges, tunnels, train tracks, airports and utilities will never be repaired or properly maintained. This insane, Progressive-driven, “let ’em all in” mentality on the guise of compassion, or votes, will SWAMP our own lifeboat.

We predict that by the year 2040, nothing will remain of the Founder’s dream of liberty for all men under a Constitutional Republic, if America continues on its current path of irrational compassion.

Give us your TAKE on the issue.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“Life is a fight, a fight to stay alive and a fight to keep others and government from taking your life or your liberty from you. Acknowledge that fact and you might just survive as a free man. Those awash in self-pity and think of themselves as victims will never be free and they will be a heavy burden on the rest of society.” —Ron Ewart

In the year 1620 and beyond, they crossed the Atlantic in sailing ships to get to America and freedom. The journey could take anywhere from six to 12 weeks to make the crossing, depending on the winds. Life aboard ship was primitive at best. Firsthand accounts speak of illness, cramped quarters, food and water rations. They had to endure scurvy, diphtheria, dysentery and seasickness. They were at the mercy of the captain, ship owners ….. and the sea. Many of them died during the passage. Because the journey was so long, when passengers died, their bodies were thrown overboard because there was no way to store them on the ship. The bones of thousands of Pilgrims are held forever in the bosom of the Atlantic Ocean, on their failed journey to freedom.

There was no government to protect the Pilgrims, pay their fare to the new land, or provide a handout if they got sick or destitute. Those who could not pay were required to remain on board the ship until they were sold into indentured servitude and forced to work to pay for their voyage.

When the surviving Pilgrims landed on the shores of America, they were faced with life in the wilderness and attacks by local Indian tribes. Health care and doctors were almost non-existent. You either survived because of your wits and plain dumb luck, or died from the elements, starvation, disease, or an Indian arrow.

They crossed the plains in covered wagons to reach some dream they had of owning land in the territories, or striking it rich in the gold fields. They built up little towns and roads, bridges, businesses and schools. Then the trains came and they could expand their travel and markets exponentially. The only thing the government did was to provide the land for the railroad companies and land grants to eager settlers, under the Homestead Act of 1862. If the settler worked and improved his land for five years, it was his land to keep for free and he will have earned it many times over.

But other than that, there was no government farming subsidies. There were no food stamps, rent assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, welfare, much less free college tuition. These hardy people built a nation and they did it with little help from government and even less government interference. They persevered by main strength and awkwardness. Many times they lost, but got up again and pressed forward. Their strength was built on adversity. They didn’t “cry”, “moan”, “groan”, or “complain” to government when the going got tough. They just worked harder or found a way to “fix” whatever they faced at the time. They didn’t win all the time but nevertheless, most never gave up. That beginning environment of adversity forged the strength of a nation and was the foundation of a strong, prosperous and exceptional America.

When the wave of European immigrants passed through Ellis Island (1892 to 1954) eager to come to the land of the free and the home of the brave, government provided little to no assistance. In fact, the government went to great lengths to see that the arriving immigrants could support themselves and had enough money to get started in their new land. The government even initiated a “head tax” for arriving immigrants. They were screened for disease and other maladies. Up to 20% of the arriving immigrants were returned to their native country for one reason or another.

Not so today. Illegal immigrants that evade the Border Patrol receive no screening for disease or the ability to sustain themselves. There is little effort to round them up and deport them for breaking our immigration laws, once “lost” in the general population. Instead, they are molly coddled, pampered, paid and protected by sanctuary jurisdictions and immigration advocates.

Legal and illegal immigrants and refugees arriving in America receive all kinds of government assistance, a monumental burden on the American taxpayer, a huge drag on the economy and a giant magnet to attract more of them. It is no wonder that America is broke and deep in debt.

But let’s get back to the “Poor Me” whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America that inhabit our colleges, ghettos and immigrant enclaves. Millions of Americans and legal and illegal immigrants have become the “poor me” generation, most of them subscribing to the left side of politics. Their forbearers of colonial and pioneer days are rolling in their graves to see how their descendants turned out. More than half of them wouldn’t survive under the conditions our forefathers and mothers had to endure. If they suddenly found themselves in the wilderness, most of them wouldn’t have the slightest idea on how to survive, because they haven’t been taught.

They haven’t been taught about self-reliance, personal responsibility and individual freedom. They haven’t been trained to survive when the going gets tough. Adversity builds strength and character. The easy life, where there is no discipline and where everything is provided for them, leads to personal weakness, low self-esteem and the desire to indulge in pleasures of the flesh. Instead of looking to them selves to solve their own problems, they have been taught to look to government and government is only too eager to “help” them, but with a string attached. The string comes at the voting booth where those receiving the government “help” are obliged to vote for those providing the “help.”

We all know which Party is offering the “help”, with money from the Public Treasury to which none in the Party own any piece thereof. Under law, they call this robbing-the-till for personal gain what it is, grand theft, punishable by fines and imprisonment. Unfortunately, the “help” this Party offered to its “Poor Me” groupies turned out to be a very expensive, slowly evaporating mirage on a distant horizon. That “help” just converted otherwise potentially strong individuals, into crybabies and bowls of quivering yellow jelly and made them helpless cripples.

What we do know is that those reading this column are probably not members of the “Poor Me” generation.

Ever since the government-triggered Great Depression and the rapid rise of socialism under FDR, America has been headed downhill, away from individual freedom, self-reliance and personal responsibility and towards collectivism, dependency and government control of everything. The passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913, which created the Federal Reserve and the IRS, was no coincidence. It was no coincidence that the government, in the late 1920’s, retained the University of Illinois and Harvard University to study how to control people through their subconscious minds. It was no coincidence that the U. S. economy suddenly collapsed in 1929. It was no coincidence that socialism rose rapidly under FDR during the 1930’s and beyond. It was no coincidence that the gold standard was abolished in 1933. America was bankrupt, threatened by Communism and headed for Hell. Socialism and top-down control of the masses was government’s and the central bankers’ answer.

We just received a response to one of our recent articles where the person described, in one paragraph, what happened to America since the 1930’s. He wrote:

“The ‘Master Plan’ for the USA has always been to reduce the USA to a third world feudal state by diluting the gene and intelligence pool, degrading education, attacking tradition and culture, abolishing the nuclear family, promoting sexual perversion and abnormality and hybrid relationships, debasing the currency, eliminating the middle class, dissolving Christianity, ignoring the Constitution, weakening and removing personal liberty and base freedoms, and importing as many impoverished and uneducated persons from around the globe to economically and socially drain as much life from the US as possible ….. Marxism masquerading as immigration. The US has been in the crosshairs for decades because to take down the ‘Crown Jewel’ of the Western world is to send a message to all other countries that they can also be co-opted. ‘Front end’ rationale for any action taken by this government is not ever the reason for the action. Ponder no longer on the matter. The destruction of western civilization is the goal.”
When you throw back the curtain and expose the politicians, central bankers and industrialist “Wizards” calling the shots, this gentleman cannot be too far off the mark. The whiners, crybabies, protestors and self-ascribed victims in America are the result of actions of the “Wizards” pulling the strings of international money, commerce, trade, wars and politics. The “Wizards” have bought off the people with a few pieces of silver and filled their “Little Black Boxes” with hogwash, mush and propaganda.

These same “Wizards” (mostly Progressives) have convinced the “Poor Me” generation that because they are poor, sick, out of work, an illegal immigrant, refugee, Black, Latino, gay, transgender, or just plain lazy, they have an irrevocable claim to everyone else’s money and sweat labor, or special treatment from government. To pay for their alleged irrevocable claim, or special treatment, the government collects that money in an act of forced charity ….. at the point of a gun. Charity should have never become the purview of government and was never authorized by the Constitution. Charity, to be true charity, must be voluntary, not mandatory. Mandatory charity is slavery by any other name.

Sadly, the weakest among us have sold their souls and given away their freedom for so little because their parents did not teach them critical thinking, personal responsibility, to question everything, how to recognize a fraud and to never trust government.

Everything you think you know is probably a government, media, or academia created illusion with the sole intent of controlling the masses. The international environmental movement and social justice were designed to that end and to re-distribute the wealth of western nations. Economy destroying, expensive legislative actions to limit alleged man-caused global warming, are just one of the elements of the international environmental plan of control.

Americans have been hoodwinked by “100+ Years of Progressive Rule” that champion a collectivist culture, social justice, radical environmentalism, appeasement of our enemies, a massive welfare state, illegal immigrants, sanctuary cities, open borders and mindless compliant citizens. Progressives have created multiples of a “Poor Me” generation, awash in self-pity, low self-esteem and rabid self-indulgence, requiring that their only salvation is being dependent on Mother government when things go wrong in their lives and things are always going wrong in their lives.

With over half of the American people steeped in this “dependent” culture, planted there by decades of constant Progressive indoctrination and brainwashing, the fate of America is pre-ordained unless President Trump and those that support him can trigger a massive flashback to the time of self-reliance, independence, personal responsibility and individual freedom. As we stated in our last article: “A successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.”

But like the fighter pilot says after consuming over half of his fuel, “we have passed the point of no return ….. without midair refueling.” We had better hope that midair refueling happens soon ….. very soon, or Progressivism, collectivism and socialism will have won and individual freedom will have been thrown on the trash heap of forgotten Republics.

If you LIKED this article, let us know. Constructive comments welcome.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

The United States Code refers to the Declaration of Independence as the “organic law” of the United States. And the Declaration clearly claims that there is an Almighty Creator God, that our rights come from Him, and that the purpose of civil government is to protect and defend the God-given rights of the people. The Declaration makes reference to the Bible, God’s Word, as the source of earthly, legal authority.

Civil government includes federal, state, and local city governments like the town of Rienzi, Mississippi, where this past weekend more than 1/3 of the town’s population showed up to a rally in defense of a Christian flag flying over their Veterans Memorial Park.

It seems the Freedom from Religion organization wrote a letter that threatened a half-million-dollar lawsuit against the small town of 300 people if the flag wasn’t taken down.

Some folks like organizer Kevin Nelms responded like Americans, declaring, “We’re not gonna let other people, or a foundation, or anybody else up in Wisconsin tell us that we can’t fly our flag! You’re gonna take one down; we’re gonna put a hundred back up.”

Unfortunately there were city government leaders showing a bit more bewilderment and naiveté. Believing that he had no choice in the matter, Rienzi Mayor Walter Williams pulled the flag down, saying, “I never dreamed that something like this would have happened in a town this small, but it happened.”

I am sure this mayor is shocked that the First Amendment, which states, “Congress shall make no Law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” would be used as a legal threat by an assailing organization that hates God.

So, the legal question I present to you is whether the city has broken the law by flying a Christian flag, among others, at a Veterans memorial? In other words, does flying a flag equate to Congress making a law, the effect of which is to establish an official United States religion?

Well, the answer seems to clearly be “NO” for at least two very simple reasons:

1. The city of Renzi is NOT “Congress”
2. A flag being hung is not a “law”

In order to find that a flag hung in Mississippi (or anywhere else) is a violation of the Establishment Clause, the first thing you have to conclude is that the city of Renzi is, in legal contemplation, the Congress of the United States.

Crazy, you say?

I agree. But this is exactly the conclusion that some maintain through a “legal fiction” the courts call the “Incorporation Doctrine.”

George Washington, our First President, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces that won the war for our independence, and the President of the Congress that gave us our Constitution and the First Amendment, insisted:

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labour to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and citizens.”

In other words, George Washington would have called dysfunctional organizations like the Freedom from Religion “un-Patriotic” and therefore “un-American”! So along with the city of Renzi, let’s be Patriots and hang our Christian flags!

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved

“No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” —Albert Einstein

“You never change something by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” —Buckminster Fuller

The (Un)Affordable Care Act, Barack Obama’s signature legislation, has been a disaster. I probably don’t to argue this before most readers of this site. With the start of the “Trump years,” the GOP-controlled Congress looked to have its best opportunity ever to get rid of this disaster.

Some have gotten cold feet, however. In a sense, this is understandable. As they look at the details and see that since the law went into effect, its fine-print complexities have insinuated themselves deeply into the insurance, health care and Medicare bureaucracies, changing them from the inside to fit its requirements. The idea of striking Obamacare down all at once has its appeal, but to those on the inside, doing so looks like it might risk a situation where, in a very short period of time, not just millions of people are uninsured again, but hundreds of thousands of employees in these industries are left high and dry: needing to make decisions, some medical and some financial, with no idea what the rules now are.

This is the problem when industries are placed under the thumb of massive bureaucracies. The latter make themselves “indispensable.” They expand into new areas, which become the scene of still more constantly-changing laws and regulations. This is also the problem when much of the population hasn’t been educated to think independently. Toss out the rule book, and they are at sea!

Be this last as it may, we need is to wake up and realize we are kidding ourselves if we think the present mess has a centralized “fix.” I sincerely hope “repeal and replace” doesn’t mean what it sounds like, because if it does, the GOP will replace one mess with an even bigger mess, and the GOP will own it. I am led to believe Donald Trump is working on a “fix.” I hope he doesn’t replace one form of centralization for another form of centralization. For the same reason, it won’t work, and he will end up owning the resulting mess.

Get rid of this kind of system we must! Its price tag is too high, and many of its “benefits” are illusory. The other day Simon Black (of Sovereign Man) wrote why his elderly stepfather, a Medicare patient, was dropped by his doctor. There is no summing this up:

“… [P]hysicians across the country have been firing Medicare patients; and according to a late 2015 study from the Kaiser Family Foundation, 21% of physicians are not taking new Medicare patients.

“Much of this trend is based on stiff penalties and financial disincentives from the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), and 2015’s Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization (MACRA) Act.

“MACRA in particular is completely mystifying.

“The law created a whopping 2,400 pages of regulations that Medicare physicians are expected to know and follow.

“Many of the rules are debilitating.

“For instance, MACRA changed how physicians can be reimbursed for their Medicare patients by establishing a bizarre set of standards to determine if a physician is providing “value.”

“As an example, if a patient ends up in the emergency room, his or her physician can incur a steep penalty.

“This explains why my stepdad was dropped by his doctor.

“The healthcare system has been broken to the point that physicians now have a greater incentive to fire their Medicare patients than to treat them.
“One Florida-based physician summed up the situation like this:

“I have decided to opt-out of Medicare, acknowledging that I can no longer play a game that is rigged against me; one that I can never win because of constantly changing rules, and one where the stakes include fines and even potential jail time.”

“The irony is that all these new laws and regulations were designed to “save” Medicare.”

Most people do not know it, but the medical profession has one of the highest rates of mental health disorders such as depression, substance abuse as a form of coping, and suicide. There is abundant malfeasance: absurdly long hours causing sleep-deprivation; there is bullying and abuses of power; etc. Medicine and health care have become extremely high-stress occupations. Burnout is common. A young MD suffering from depression or who has become hooked on “uppers” to stay awake during a 24-hour shift knows he needs help but fears seeking it because doing so could cost him his medical license and end his career.

Moreover, the third leading cause of preventable death is the medical profession itself (exceeded only by heart disease and cancer). Illnesses, injuries and deaths do occur in hospitals due to physician and surgeon error.

A major factor here is drowning medical professionals in thousands upon thousands of regulations they are expected to understand and comply with; penalties for not doing so range from debilitating fines to prison time.

Thus what Americans have is the world’s most expensive, most bureaucratic, and arguably least functional health care system. This system cannot be “reformed.” It can only be escaped from, until its dysfunction in the face of superior alternatives collapses it. This article is about escaping this system. It will require a paradigm shift of major proportions, especially in this age of entitlements, dependences, and a population that can’t think without a book of rules to follow. We cannot simply “repeal and replace” Obamacare. We need a different way of thinking about public health.

Two preliminaries. (1) We have to realize what disasters like Obamacare and MACRA are intended to do. Obamacare’s primary purpose was not just to insure the uninsured, although doing so, for as many as possible, did make it look good on paper. What Obamacare was intended to do was Make Money for Big Pharma and Big Insurance. Money lost from insuring preexisting conditions was more than made up for via skyrocketing premiums, and deductibles high enough to make the system unaffordable for those of modest means. It and MACRA were designed to increase the level of control over the public as well as over the medical profession. When the federal government can unconstitutionally force you to buy health insurance, and unconstitutionally sic the IRS on you with whopping $600-plus penalties if you don’t, your aren’t free. As George Carlin put it in one of his best routines (warning: language!), “You have owners! They own you!”

Obamacare may have been designed to fail, to pave the way for a single-payer system. Why is single-payer bad? It works in, say, Denmark, does it not? Perhaps. Denmark’s population is a little over 5 and a half million. Over 324 million people live in the U.S. (more, if you count illegal aliens). It is insane to think a system workable in small countries can be just as effective in a country with a population almost 60 times higher!

So what’s the answer?

Some years ago (late 1990s, to be exact), I took a series of courses in health promotion and education. It was, by most standards, an unusual program. There wasn’t a lot about health; leaving aside what I thought even then was an unhealthy obsession with sex, there was far more psychology, directed towards behavior change. I’d been thinking of a new career. I saw useful ideas in the program. But it became clear: what was good here was incompatible with top-down enforcements typical of bureaucracy. What I learned about myself (surprise, surprise): I don’t have the patience or temperament necessary to fit into a public health bureaucracy. For one thing, I tend to ask questions instead of following a book of rules blindly. After a couple of stints writing reports for a consulting group (and one collaboration journal article with one of the leaders) I abandoned the career option. But not the ideas, which I’ve used myself with some effectiveness.

They are the key to the best replacement for Obamacare.

The program called them the Three Levels of Prevention. That, as it turns out, is a misnomer. A far better phrase: the Three Levels of Health Care.

The first level is that of Primary Prevention. The second, Secondary Treatment (my term). The third, Tertiary Care (my term).

I’ve seen all three in action. The first is by far the most important if Americans, as a society, want to get control over their health care. So I’ll spend the most time on it.

Primary Prevention is everything you do to avoid getting sick, injured, etc. It draws on the adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Primary Prevention involves learning about nutrition, including how to read food labels in stores. People who do not do this, are setting themselves up for trouble later in life. I have no special diets to offer here. I know people who have gotten results with, say, the Paleo Diet. I’ve not studied specific diets such as this, though, so I cannot be either for them or against them. Since our body systems are all slightly different, as are our habits and levels of motivation, what “works” for one person may not be as effective as what “works” for another. What matters is, you absolutely need to know what you are putting in your body, and be sure it really belongs there. Remember: food corporations and grocery chains don’t care. They just want to sell you products and Make Money. It’s a buyer-beware world. It is up to us—we, the people—to educate ourselves and each other about what’s in our food, and eat the right things. Much of this is common horse sense. You cannot get enough fresh vegetables and fresh fruits. Nuts are also good. Meat is optional; it contains an abundance of protein, but you can live without meat. It is harder to digest than fruits and vegetables. What counts is getting vitamins and other necessary nutrients. I try to eat at least one orange and at least one apple per day. I also feast on broccoli. It was an acquired taste, but I can now eat it cold, with a salad. Cooking it actually robs it of some of its nutritional value.

Primary Prevention may involve learning to grow your own food. When you do, you know exactly what is in it. It involves knowledge about food preparation — what happens to food when ingredients are mixed, cooked, and so on. Primary Prevention has some don’ts. Minimize your alcohol intake. Shrink your caffeine intake. Do without if you can (the latter, alas, is a hurdle I’ve not cleared — but as a coffee drinker I rarely have more than two cups per morning). By all means reduce your intakes of white bread and sugar. Stay away from high fructose corn syrup laden soft drinks! It is common knowledge that these lead to obesity, and obesity comes with its own set of health risks. But don’t do so-called diet drinks, either, as artificial sweeteners come with additional problems. Eat less salt. Steer clear of fast food, unless it’s a salad, and other junk food. And above all, don’t smoke!

Never forget, where food is concerned you’re invariably dealing with people who have their grubby paws out, waiting for your hard-earned cash. They don’t care about your health. They care about Making Money. It is up to you to assume full ownership of your health! That’s what Primary Prevention is all about!

Primary Prevention also involves exercise, whether for weight control or other purposes. Joining a health club or gym is optional but not required. Taking long walks is a form of exercise. Primary Prevention involves stress reduction (walking on back streets or roads is again very good for this; so are deep breathing exercises), getting enough sleep at night, establishing a routine for maximum productivity, and other things that, at first glance, might not seem to have much to do with health, but in fact do if your aim is a life that is all it can be: a life of wellness, or well-being that is more than a mere absence of illness.

Lest the preceding sound “new-agish” to some readers, getting right with God and maintaining a prayerful relationship with Him is, in my humble opinion, the ultimate stress reducer and potential maximizer of personal wellness.

Primary Preventive actions strengthens your body’s systems. We all learned about the ‘germ theory of disease’ as children, but “germs” are all around us. The point is for our systems to be able to resist the ones that make us sick. That’s called building up our immune systems. Proper nutrition, including sufficient quantities of vitamins, etc., helps accomplish this. As does avoiding risky behaviors of all kinds.

Little if any of this can be had in classrooms. Never forget, too: public education is not designed to truly educate but to socialize, to transform children and adolescents into mindless consumers and obedient sheeple. You must take charge of your health education.

Ask yourself: which is easier to control: an alert and healthy populace that practices all the above? Or a sickly, overweight, lethargic sheeple who have no idea about nutrition or how to read food labels and no incentive to learn? Which group Makes more Money for corporations, e.g., those which comprise Big Food (Monsanto, Tyson) and Big Pharma (Merck, etc.)?

A healthy population, moreover, does not need as many services from doctors, clinics, hospitals, and so on. A healthy population has fewer worries over who is insured and who isn’t.

All reasons why there is little real incentive for serious health education in a society based on mass consumption and control, where Money has become a surrogate for God.

To learn Primary Prevention is to begin to secede from the present-day health care system. To communicate Primary Prevention to one’s loved ones is to inspire them to say this, and to educate others in the benefits of health self-reliance.

In that case, what about the other two Levels of Health Care. At the risk of sounding anticlimactic:

Secondary Treatment is medical care in the familiar sense of going to the doctor and getting a diagnosis you hope is correct, prescription medicine you hope will work and not have nasty side effects, etc. Its purpose is to restore your body system to its previous state (health). Always remember: most likely your doctor has been taught only which drugs are most likely to “cure” what, and may know little or nothing about nutrition and Primary Prevention for the reason already stated: they don’t Make Money! Your best bet is to minimize your need for Secondary Treatment, and we’re back to Primary Prevention. Never forget: these days, for all the reasons stated above, your doctor is under tremendous pressure, including time constraints as he/she has to cram as many patients as possible into his workday.

I believe that if the present mess continues — if we do not scrap altogether the idea of a centralized health care payment system on the Obamacare model — we will see a shortage of doctors within the next ten years. That alone will make Secondary Treatment less of an option, and not an option at all if you’re in the boonies and can’t find a doctor to treat you!

Tertiary Care tries to establish new stability after a severe disruption — such as a stroke or a heart attack. My mother was a stroke recovery patient with partial paralysis on her right side, so I saw Tertiary Care first hand. I have encountered claims that strokes can be treated at the Secondary level and their damage reduced to almost nothing if it happens fast enough (within an hour or so). I have not investigated these claims, so I cannot vouch for their authenticity, but they are interesting. Since my parents lived in a rural area, this was not an option for my mom. Her Tertiary Care treatment involved blood-thinning drugs (again, there can be side effects), physical therapy, and speech therapy. Tertiary Care also involves family members: at the time, my father and myself: counseling, patience, fall prevention, how to maneuver a partially disabled elderly person into and out of bed, etc.

Tertiary Care is no fun. Hence it behooves us all to learn what might make it necessary, and we’re back to sound nutrition and other best Primary Prevention practices, as these will reduce your risk of heart disease or stroke later in life. It is important to realize that in real health education, we are discussing processes that exact their worst effects after long period of time. Hence to appreciate the value of Primary Prevention is to become a Long Term Thinker. You cannot live exclusively in the present. Indulge today, and you’ll pay the consequences tomorrow.

Educating the Three Levels of Health Care offers the only viable way out of our present morass. Has anyone noticed: there is not a word about actual health care in the (Un)Affordable Care Act? Of course not! Again: its purpose was not health care but about how it was to be paid for, and again who Makes Money! I’ve had economics-types tell me, The problem with Primary Prevention is, it doesn’t sell. If that’s the case, we can forget about ever again having a healthy population, and about stopping the advance toward a world government that answers to global corporations—including those which profit handsomely from people being sick!

The alternative to bureaucratic, centralized systems — including anything similar that ends up intended to “replace” Obamacare — is to withdraw from them, to refuse to participate in them beyond the minimal requirements of the law. What you withdraw into are systems whose fundamental principle is self-reliance: educating one’s own and each other, as opposed to dependence on strangers with their hands out, or on the public education system.

Those who practice Primary Prevention will find their health care costs dropping to almost nothing. They won’t need insurance. They won’t need Medicare. The problems posed by our present health care nightmare can be made to go away only if the bureaucratic, centralized systems that created the nightmare are rendered obsolete!

© 2017 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

President Trump is calling for a major new investment for rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure of highways, bridges and more. There is no question that it needs to be done. However, it’s vitally important that local, state and federal government agencies avoid calls to fund this massive effort through so-called Public/Private Partnerships (PPPs). Local officials must understand that there is a vast difference between calls for a competitive biding process to select private companies for the projects verses an actual partnership with government.

During the first years of the Clinton Administration in the early 1990s, there was much fanfare about a new policy to “reinvent government.” It was sold as a way to make government more efficient and less costly. It would, said its proponents, “bring business technologies to public service.” In addition, the promise was that the new way would bring in private money to programs and projects, rather than tax dollars.

Pro-business, anti-big-government conservatives and libertarians were intrigued. The backbone of the plan was a call for “public/private partnerships.” Now that sounded like their kind of program. Government, they said, would finally tap the tremendous power of the entrepreneurial process and the force of the free market into making government more effective and efficient. It sounded so revolutionary and so American.

There are certain areas where private business contracts do jobs such as running school cafeterias through a competitive biding system. That type of arrangement certainly does serve the tax payers, encourages innovation and provides better service. That, however, is not how Public/Private Partnerships work.

Today that Clinton-led “reinvention” has revealed itself to be the policy known as Sustainable Development, which in reality is much more government operating through a top-down managed society. Sustainable Development policy calls for population control; development control; technology control and resource control. It is a direct assault on private property ownership and single family homes. It is the root of massive reorganization of American cities known as Smart Growth. It’s all tied to a specific agenda with a pre-determined outcome. To enforce the Sustainable policies proponents have worked hard to recruit private international corporations to work directly with them to promote the policies through the creation of Public/Private Partnerships.

It is little understood by the general public how Public/Private Partnerships are actually used, not as a way to diminish the size of government, but in fact, to increase government’s power. In truth, many PPPs are nothing more than government-sanctioned monopolies. These privileged few businesses are granted special favors like tax breaks, free use of eminent domain, non-compete clauses in government contracts, and specific guarantees of return on their investments. That means the companies, in partnership with the government, can fix their prices, charging beyond what the market demands. They can use their relationship with government to put competition out of business. This is not free enterprise, nor is it government controlled by the people.

A private developer, which has entered into a Public/Private Partnership with government, for example, can now obtain the power of eminent domain to build on land not open to its competitors. The fact is governments in partnership with private developers simply considers all property to be their common domain, to be used as they desire under the excuse of some undefined common good. For example a lower middle class neighborhood with a hundred small homes on quarter acre lots can be torn down and replaced with an upscale high-rise development. This gives builders, developers and the real estate industry new products to market. The new building will also generate more tax dollars for the community, thereby benefiting the “common good.” All will seem to benefit with the exception of the original property owners who were pushed out and displaced ?? all for the common good. That’s how PPP’s are sold as a positive for the community. But other citizens are losers too as voters lose control of their government.

Private companies are now systematically buying up water treatment plants in communities across the nation, in effect, gaining control of the water supply and controlling water consumption, another major goal of Sustainable policy blueprint. At an April, 2007 meeting in Calgary, Canada, as part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, then being promoted by former President George W. Bush to create a North American Union, government officials, business leaders and academics met to discuss redistributing Canada’s water to Mexico and the U.S. Southwest.

Canada has water, lots of it, and the Public/Private Partnerships of the SPP were swarming on it like locusts as they sought to drain it from Canada’s rivers and lakes and ship it to potential profit centers south of the Canadian border. Los Angeles was a prime prospective buyer.

The most popular PPPs involve the nation’s highway system. Private companies are buying control of them through PPPs with state departments of transportation. Herein lays the direct threat if PPP’s should become the driving force behind President Trump’s plan to rebuild infrastructure.

Of course, it’s not just American companies entering into PPPs with our government. Foreign companies are being met with open arms by local, state and federal officials who see a way to use private corporations and their massive bank accounts to fund projects.

As the Associated Press reported on July 15, 2006, “On a single day in June (2006) an Australian-Spanish partnership paid $3.6 billion to lease the Indiana Toll Road. An Australian company bought a 99 year lease on Virginia’s Pocahontas Parkway, and Texas officials decided to let a Spanish-American partnership build and run a toll road for 50 years.”

PPPs were the driving force behind the proposed Trans Texas Corridor that was to run from Mexico, clear through the center of the United States to Canada. A Spanish Company called Cintra was given the contract to build the TTC. There was no competitive bidding process. Cintra was the only candidate for the project.

In fact, that Spanish-American partnership in Texas and its lease with the Texas Department of Transportation to build and run the Trans Texas Corridor contained a “no-compete” clause which prohibited anyone, including the Texas government from building new highways or expanding existing ones which might run in competition with the TTC.

The highway was to provide few exit ramps. Communities that currently ran in the path of the existing state highway depended on traffic from it to provide business for restaurants, hotels and gas stations. The lack of exit ramps was done specifically to allow Cintra to build its own such services right in the middle of the TTC, eliminating the need to exit. Why was this important? Because the Cintra contract with Texas provided the company guaranteed profits.

Second, the TTC was to cut directly across 500,000 acres of prime Texas farm land. With no exit ramps farms and ranches would be cut in two. A barn might be on the opposite side of the massive highway from the rest of the farm, causing the farmer to drive as many as 50 miles to get to it. Property rights were not a consideration in the PPP contract for the highway. Communities, also, were to be cut in two, preventing police, fire, ambulances and school busses from reaching certain areas. Local rule was not a consideration in the PPP contract. That is not free enterprise.

Private companies operating in the free market lack one thing government has – the power of coercion. That’s a good thing. The free market operates with you making the decisions based on personal choice. Under Public/Private Partnerships the choices are decided for you in meetings behind closed doors.

Meanwhile, private companies that are not part of a PPP are unable to compete with those which are. They are shut out of competition from the establishment of economic development zones, which provide the chosen elite with reduced real estate taxes and financial aid. Companies, which find themselves outside of the elite status of the PPP may suddenly run into regulatory difficulties to get their own projects completed. It’s not just a coincidence? All of these things are happening through agreements between certain industries and government.

PPPs are one of the reasons many people find they can no longer fight city hall. The private companies gain the power of government to do as they please – and the governments earn the independence of the companies, no longer needing to answer to voters. It’s the perfect partnership. Their power is awesome and near absolute.

What Public/Private Partnerships are not, however, is capitalism or free enterprise, though it may have some of the trappings of such. The marketplace is still there. Its laws have not been repealed. But ultimately, corporatism does not trust the marketplace to do what the elites want.

In truth, Public/Private Partnerships are little more than a Mussolini type fascism of government and private industry organized in a near impenetrable force of power and collusion. Local and state governments interested in free market solutions and lower costs to tax payers must resist the temptation for an easy fix through the trap of the PPPs. For they only lead to higher costs and more government control.

© 2017 Tom DeWeese – All Rights Reserved

DO NOT MISS THIS BEAUTIFUL MOVIE

A Dog’s Purpose, no matter what the bogus animal protection group, PETA, claims in order to keep you from attending. Those hippie types have organized boycott petitions for this movie with 68,000 signatures while using their own fake news press releases to dissuade patrons from buying tickets to the most meaningful film that one could ever see.

Don’t fall for this. Go and see this movie without delay. It is a totally satisfying and fulfilling movie. And if you love animals, such as this columnist, you will be greatly moved. Indeed, when you go home, you will want to give extra hugs to your own pets with the feeling that you know them better after seeing this expertly crafted film that truly captures the personality and inner feelings of a dog.

It is to be noted that all of PETAs efforts to sabotage this movie, part of their shakedown for profit, is based upon lies. They LIED about an incident they claimed took place during the filming of this wonderful movie. They falsely claimed that a “terrified” German Shepherd was thrown into the rapids, and once in the water, went under, with personnel rushing in to “rescue” it.

That dog was in no danger. The “rapids” were created in a huge water tank constructed on set. The dog had rehearsed the dramatic scene several times where he rescues a kidnapped little girl who had been thrown into the rapids by her abductor. Being at the time a K-9 police dog, he jumped in to rescue her, going under water to pull her to the top, then to the shore.

The dog had rehearsed the scene, at another location at the tank, and balked at having to do this in a location he was not familiar with. PETA profited by selling a video of this supposed event to TV networks and sent releases to print newspapers, milking it for all it was worth to raise money for their organization and to shake down producers. They are an extortion racket under the guise of being an animal protection agency, which they are not.

That video they claimed was so urgent, was taped over FIFTEEN MONTHS AGO. So if PETA reps were on set, and videotaped this, why didn’t they jump in and put a stop to the production and get the dog to safety if this had really happened? They had no interest in the animal. They actually kill more animals than they “save.” While I support several animal rescue organizations I would not give PETA one penny.

It was all a ploy to gain them publicity at the opening of a movie based on an all time best-selling book. They virtually hijacked the advance publicity and anticipation in order to bring all that attention to themselves. Publicity is their motivation. How many remember when these nutty PETA woman stripped totally naked in a very public area of San Francisco to protest the wearing of fur? This alone shows what they are all about.

Plus, the carefully examined video was shown to be heavily edited to make it appear to be an event that was not. Again, PETA LIED to make a case to bring them publicity and stimulate donations at the expense of the movie company and movie goers who would be deprived of seeing an excellent film.

And it is to be added, that PETA executes animals in their shelters, not even keeping them in there for the required time mandated by law so that their owners have time to come and claim them. They even kidnap dogs and euthanize them in the van taking the innocent animal away. They should never present themselves as an animal protective organization.

But wait, don’t they do some good? They do. But remember, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

The nation-wide release of the film had good attendance for the first two days of their opening weekend, even though the PETA protests did result in lower ticket sales. Fortunately, the pickets could not be at the theater I attended with my family, since it was in a shopping center on private property. It was good that they could not perform their feigned concern there. Had they tried to block me they would have quickly learned that the laws of gravity are still intact.

Then there are those ‘reviewers’ who snickered at the film with words like, “fluff, syrupy, tearjerker, overly sentimental, schmaltzy ” and they even criticized the words the dog audibly thought, for instance, when he expressed love for Ethan’s girl friend by thinking, “I like her. She smells like cheese.” This is probably how a dog would think. Yet this misguided critic took issue with the animal’s thought, calling this “bad script writing.” That ‘reviewer’ was in full frontal attack mode.

These critics have a problem with expressing love, emotion or deep feelings. They believe in showing no emotion no matter what happens. They are hardhearted and unfeeling. They are the kind of parents who will not say the words, “I love you,” to their wives and children. As a chaplain I constantly deal with the wives and offspring of those sorry individuals. They are incapable of having deep feelings. So their “reviews” are not worth even reading. There is no honesty in them.

THE MOVIE: This film traces a dog’s life, through several lives. When he dies, he becomes another dog, but with the same knowledge and deep feelings for certain people. From the beginning the dog named Bailey is wondering what his purpose is in life. We hear his thoughts and feelings with a wonderful voice job by Josh Gad

His purpose becomes clearer and clearer with each life he lives. The film ends with the most touching and wonderful conclusion one could ever hope for as everything in his life comes together in a most remarkable way as the dog finds the answer to his purpose.

The cast is great, believable and handle their roles so realistically that the audience feels they are witnessing a real event. Ethan is a main character who comes in the story as a very young boy played by Bryce Gheisar. K.J. Apa plays him as a teenager. We see him age, played by Dennis Quaid, with a powerful final scene when he realizes the spirit of the dog he had loved and grown up with was in another dog’s body that Bailey now inhabited.

The touching ending could not be better. What great writing by the author of the book, W. Bruce Cameron. The movie was true to the book with only a couple of minor exceptions but this did not distract or alter the content of the book.

Do support this film with your attendance. The animals were NOT mistreated in the slightest. They are all absolutely charming and you can’t help but fall in love with all of them. This film gets four stars from this reviewer. PETA gets four enemas.

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reserved

The honeymoon is over already. Upon accepting the Oath of Office as POTUS 45, Donald Trump hit the ground running with a clear intent to keep every promise that garnered him the people’s trust, against all odds in 2016. The first week included a flurry of Executive actions aimed at enforcing U.S. Laws that the Obama Administration had refused to enforce for eight years. That’s all it took to ignite a full-scale mutiny from establishment stooges on both sides of the partisan aisle.

The icing on the cake was a backlash from lawmakers and federal court activists as they worked to thwart Trumps temporary ban of the continued importing of potential jihadists – from seven countries identified by Obama intelligence reports as particularly dangerous.

All Immigration and Naturalization Authority

In the enumerated powers of Congress in Article I – Section VIII of the U.S. Constitution, all legal authority and power over the matter of immigration and naturalization to the U.S. is assigned to the U.S. Congress. Not only do the states have no authority over U.S. immigration and naturalization laws, neither do the Executive or Judicial branches of the Federal government.

States and cities in the U.S. that claim or are defacto “sanctuaries” for illegal activities are operating at odds with the law on a matter that enjoys Federal Supremacy. Not all federal laws or policies enjoy legal supremacy. However, Article VI, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution is known as the Supremacy Clause. It provides that the “Constitution, and the Laws of the United States … shall be the supreme Law of the Land” when the federal government is exercising any of the powers enumerated in the Constitution. Such laws must prevail over any conflicting or inconsistent exercise of power.

All laws concerning immigration and naturalization to the U.S. as passed by Congress, are powers enumerated in the Constitution and they must prevail over any conflicting or inconsistent state, executive or judicial exercise of power.

Because no one has enforced U.S. immigration and naturalization laws since their last reform in 1986, Trumps effort to enforce those laws today is meeting with resistance from illegal actors, both illegal members of society and the politicians who need their votes.

But recent acts by the judiciary are particularly offensive and dangerous.

The States have no Standing

Because the power to regulate immigration and naturalization is the sole power of congress in Article I, the Executive and Judicial branches have the same power as the states and cities on the matter, NONE!

The constitutional authority of the Executive branch and Judicial branch is limited to the enforcement of the laws passed by congress. When either the Executive branch, as was the case with the Obama Administration, or Judicial branch, which is the case today, refuse to uphold or enforce existing immigration laws passed by congress, they are not only failing in their Oaths and assigned duties to the people, they are acting out against those laws and the people.

Such acts, whether by a sitting president, the courts, the states or cities, fall under the legal definition of sedition – “Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order.”

Certainly, anyone who has taken an Oath to uphold and enforce the U.S. Constitution and the laws of this land and then, refuses to do so, further acting out in a manner to prevent even the Commander-in-Chief from doing so, is guilty of sedition, at the very least. Maybe treason as well!

Inciting the well-organized and funded riots across the country since the election, all on the bases and with the intent of undermining U.S. laws, can easily be defined as aiding and abetting known enemies of the United States with the clear intent to overthrown the U.S. Constitutional Republican form of government… a clear and overt act of treason.

Trump’s Temporary Ban

As Commander-in-Chief with the sole responsibility of protecting the United States against foreign invasion, infiltration or threats to national security at the top of his job description, the POTUS takes an Oath to uphold and enforce the laws passed by Congress, so long as those laws are themselves “constitutional.”

Trump did exactly that upon taking office. The Trump administration announced that it would temporarily bar entry to refugees from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen due to terrorism concerns. Not only are these nations currently engaged in internal wars with known terrorist groups today, numerous terror attacks on U.S. soil over the past eight years have involved immigrants from all of these countries.

For the record, “Muslim is not a nationality.” The ban is not a ban on Muslims, it is a ban on entry to the U.S. from nations known to harbor terrorist organizations with ill intent towards the United States.

The temporary ban concerning seven countries identified by Obama era intelligence reports, is not only within the legal purview of the POTUS, it is his highest obligation under his Oath of Office.

Obama Federal Court Appointee NY

The first effort to thwart the law resulted in the immediate firing of interim Attorney General Sally Yates, who had unconstitutionally issued an order to her Department of Justice “to not enforce the law.”

Only days later, New York US Judge Ann M. Donnelly, appointed by Barack Obama and championed by Democrat Senator Chucky Schumer, issued a ruling in an attempt to block Trumps Executive action to enforce our laws.
Supported by a few establishment congressional turncoat republicans like McCain, Graham and Ryan, and of course lawless democrats, the old presumption of court authority on the matter was used to foment and incite organized and funded riots across the country. It was a pure partisan political ruling with no real authority over the subject, as Trump was acting within his authority, duties and Oath of office.

Judge Ann M. Donnelly should meet the same end as Sally Yates… as both acted outside of their authority and against the Rule of Law.

Pending Senate confirmation of Sen. Jeff Sessions as the new Attorney General, Dana Boente, US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was sworn in at 9 p.m. ET, per an administration official. A few hours later, Boente issued a statement rescinding Yates’ order, instructing DOJ lawyers to “defend the lawful orders of our President.”

DOJ errors in Appeal

Due to Senate delays in confirming Sessions as Attorney General, the DOJ is left scrambling for a clear direction on critical legal matters involving national security. The result was for the DOJ to waste time and energy engaging in the legal battle over the ban that has netted a law suit by sanctuary states Washington, New York and Massachusetts, and now an appeals court ruling from the 9th circuit, none of which have any legal authority on the subject of immigration and naturalization beyond their obligation to uphold and enforce federal laws.

Let me point out that the U.S. Constitution gives the courts NO lawmaking authority whatsoever. Not one single American ever elected even one judge on any federal court. The Constitution does not create an oligarchy of unaccountable and unelected political activists to run our country. The constitutional authority and responsibility of the judicial branch is extremely limited, despite the fact that they have become accustomed to overstepping that authority for decades.

Worst of All

While these gutless legal beagles play games with national security, Trump’s new head of the Department of Homeland Security appears to be taking orders from unelected judges instead of the Commander-in-Chief.

Federal Judge James Robart, a George W. Bush appointee who presides in Seattle, halted the enforcement of Trump’s order Friday night, effective nationwide.

Washington (CNN) “President Donald Trump’s government moved swiftly Saturday to comply with a federal judge’s order halting his travel ban — even as Trump himself denounced the judge — but readied its legal defense of the controversial executive action.

The Department of Homeland Security announced it has suspended all actions to implement the immigration order and will resume standard inspections of travelers as it did prior to the signing of the travel ban. But it said the Justice Department — which is expected to file an emergency motion to stop the order — needed to challenge the ruling “at the earliest possible time.”

“(Trump’s order) is intended to protect the homeland and the American people, and the President has no higher duty and responsibility than to do so,” acting DHS press secretary Gillian Christensen said when announcing the suspension.”

Bordering on Mutiny

General John F. Kelly is a highly-decorated career Marine with extensive leadership experience. No one knows the U.S. chain of command better than General Kelly. Kelly is the newly seated Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, appointed by President Donald Trump.

“The Department of Homeland Security has a vital mission: to secure the nation from the many threats we face. This requires the dedication of more than 240,000 employees in jobs that range from aviation and border security to emergency response, from cybersecurity analyst to chemical facility inspector. Our duties are wide-ranging, and our goal is clear – keeping America safe.”

As General Kelly well knows, this is also the primary mandate of the Commander-in-Chief, President Trump. He also knows that the order issued by Trump was both legal and necessary to the security of the United States and that the Commander-in-Chief had the full authority to issue that directive.

So, why did General Kelly allow an unelected judicial activist to overrule the Commander-in-Chief by issuing the following DHS directive? DHS Statement on Compliance with Recent Court Order.

Why is General John Kelly, new Trump Secretary of DHS taking orders from known left-wing judicial activists instead of the Commander-in-Chief? Were any of these judges elected President of the United States? Have all of them taken an oath to uphold and enforce the U.S. Constitution and U.S laws? Does the Department of Homeland Security take orders from unelected judges, or from the POTUS?

When federal courts ordered Barack Hussein Obama to cease and desist in his executive amnesty, he simply ignored those orders and continued his executive amnesty with total immunity. Obama didn’t pay any attention at all to those court opinions… despite the fact that Obama’s order was unlawful and unconstitutional on its face – an overt refusal to enforce federal laws in direct violation of his oath, placing all of America at risk.

Obama totally ignored those court orders and there was no price to pay whatsoever. The same IG who sat silent as Obama ignored court orders to stop his “illegal” executive amnesty, is now looking into Trump’s “legal” temporary vetting ban.

In the end, it all adds up to just how much swamp needs to be drained…

But it also begs the question… Is Trump really up to this task? Does he really have the backbone to fight and defeat these anti-American activists in the courts and congress in order to “drain this swamp?” Do his appointees, like General Kelly and Jeff Sessions, really have what it takes to put these illegal activists in their place and return this country to the Rule of Constitutional Law?

Or is it all just smoke and mirrors… creating the impression of draining the swamp while allowing the swamp to run roughshod over the Trump Administration and the people, until the people get so fed up that they take matters into their own hands?

Because Trump is moving at light-speed, and so are his enemies, we won’t have to wait long to see the answers to these questions.

Obama had the courage to defy the courts, even as he acted illegally. Does Trump and his team have the courage to defy these activist judges in the name of the law? We will know the answer to this question in days… not weeks.

If Trump and his cabinet is serious about draining this swamp, they must start stepping on heads right away. The political left (including people like McCain, Graham and Ryan) must be shut down. They must be stopped from using activist judges appointed by Obama to thwart Trumps attempts to secure the USA and enforce our laws… or else the notion of draining this swamp is a joke!

The people are hoping and watching. Trump was chosen to lead a Revolution! The people will give him a chance to do that, but not for long…

© 2017 JB Williams – All Rights Reserved

I would like to begin today with a few verses of Scripture that I believe you are all fa- miliar with. The first passage is from the book of Deuteronomy. For those who are un- aware, Deuteronomy contains the messages of Moses written in the final days of his life. The Israelites had wandered in the desert for a generation. Many of those who had wit- nessed God’s miracles during the Exodus had, by now, passed away, and so Moses was speaking to a new generation, one that had not witnessed God’s power, miracles or the giving of the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai. As Moses’ life was coming to an end, he was speaking to the KIDS of those who had been firsthand witnesses, giv- ing a final reminder of the most important things this new generation needed to know. He was passing down the sage advice and wisdom of an elder, as a leader, as God’s chosen man.

His listeners at the time were fearful. Moses had been their leader their entire lives. Now, Joshua was about to assume that role. The people were camped on the plains of Moab, about to enter the Promised Land. They were doubtful, afraid, facing impending war with the inhabitants of the land, and tempted to run away, yet there was nowhere to run. No direction to go but forward — led by a new leader they were not quite sure of yet. Additionally, they were about to start a whole new way of life. Rather than being wanderers, they were now to become settlers, pioneers. Finally, they would have a place to put down roots and call “home,” in the land the Lord had promised their parents and grandparents. An entirely new concept to them.

So in his old age, as Moses wrote these words, you can imagine he was careful to make sure he emphasized those things that were most vitally important. Thus, his writ- ings in Deuteronomy were his last chance to give final instructions as to how to live a Godly, righteous and pleasing life before the Lord, and thereby receive the blessings of God, raise healthy families in Godly homes, create a nation and a culture that would flourish and be pleasing before the Lord. And it was his hope that these precious words would be heeded and followed for all future generations. He didn’t just make a speech or give a sermon — he WROTE THESE WORDS DOWN — for his people then, and for all of mankind, for all time. Ancient wisdom of antiquity, yet we can still read these very words for ourselves today. Despite the fact that evil men have done their best to stamp out God’s Word from existence, from the minute it was originally written and in every gen- eration since, it simply cannot be done… praise the Lord for His loving instruction, not willing that any should be lost, or left without His divine guidance.

In Chapter 5 of Deuteronomy, Moses repeated the Law given to him by God Himself, as recorded in the book of Exodus. Then, in Chapter six, he emphasized this: “And these words that I?command you today shall be on your heart. You shall teach them dili- gently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.”

As you read the Bible and understand the history of God’s people — and perhaps more importantly, the history of the WORLD — you realize that when these words of Moses were followed, the family unit — and the culture at large — was always blessed by God.

But when the wisdom and instruction of God were abandoned, families collapsed, chil- dren ran wild and anarchy and cursing of nations resulted, every time. Today it has been more than 3400 years since Moses penned the words of Deuteronomy. Few today read them anymore at all; and when they are proclaimed in our churches, they seem to go in one ear and directly out the other. They’ve become nothing more than “nice plati- tudes” — but almost no one really takes them seriously anymore.

As a result, we see our entire WORLD in turmoil, and here at home in the United States, the word “family” has been completely redefined to be the exact OPPOSITE of God’s design. Men sodomizing other men and calling THAT a “family.” Women aban- doning their natural affections, turning instead to other women and calling THAT a “fam- ily.” And now we’ve strayed so far from God that we can’t even say for sure which gender we are…. how twisted we become when we abandon the laws of God and nature!

The basic building blocks of a Godly, righteous society have been undermined by the enemy of our souls, working through evil men and women who despise God’s author- ity. The definition of “family” has now been replaced by moral relativism, re-written to mean whatever WE want it to mean. As we go about being “wise in our own eyes,” the foundation of our families has crumbled and we no longer look to God for wisdom and rescue. Now we look to secular thinkers and government to be our saviors. How’s that been working for us? Surely abandoning the antiquated precepts of a “superstitious, Pa- triarchal religion’” would free us and bring about utopia on earth, right? Take a look around. I report, YOU decide.

Next, I would like to remind you of a verse we hear often, written by the wisest man on earth, Solomon. Proverbs 2: 6, “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old, he will not depart from it.” Paul reiterates the concept of properly raising chil- dren in Ephesians chapter 6: “bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.”

Yet what has happened to our kids today? I certainly do not mean to criticize ALL young people, because I know MANY who are stellar examples of integrity, honor, courage and Godliness. In fact, I know SOME who are more Godly, courageous, bold and honorable than most adults. But as I follow the news from our college campuses around America, I am NOT encouraged. Their worldviews and ideology are twisted and demented, their minds depraved. As I see the herds of young people after public High School and Middle School lets out for the day, walking in packs down the street, all looking down, all staring blankly, mezmerized by their smart phones, I can guaran- tee you, they’re not reading Scripture. Statistics bear out the fact that our public schools here in America are failing our kids. Despite the fact that there are many good, well- meaning teachers in these schools, the dumbing down of America, I truly believe, is in- tentional and orchestrated. This is by design.

Here are some statistics: According to the website RankingAmerica, the US ranks 24th in LITERACY, while at the same time, 2nd in IGNORANCE of moral, social and historical knowledge. We also rank 1st in all the nations of world when it comes to ANXIETY DISORDERS, 4th in the world in PORNOGRAPHY USE and 21st in over- all HAPPINESS. Meanwhile, more and more Americans are leaving church, aban- doning their faith and embracing either no faith at all, or choosing Secular Humanism and Moral Relativism; not to mention the concept of “Democratic Socialism,” which could be better described as “Mobocracy.” According to studies, a full 85% of young people leave their faith in Christ the minute they leave home and begin college. I dare say that many never had much faith to begin with, due to inadequate Christian educa- tion from their churches and a lack of consistent, Godly leadership in the home.

In the book “Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers,” authors Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton report: “The ma- jority of teenagers are incredibly inarticulate about their faith, religious beliefs and prac- tices, and its place in their lives. The de facto dominant religion among contemporary.

U.S. teenagers is what they call ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’: A God exists who cre- ated and orders the world and watches over human life on earth; God wants people to be good, nice, and fair to each other, as taught in the Bible and by most world religions; the central goal of life is to be happy and to feel good about oneself; God does not need to be particularly involved in one’s life except when God is needed to resolve a problem; and good people go to heaven when they die.”

These are the predominant beliefs of modern American teenagers; and while most attended a Christian church during their childhood, their faith and theology is absurdly shallow. So what WAS their church experience growing up? Bible STORIES in Sun- day School and “Childrens’ Church” where they heard a story, presented like a fairy tale, then colored a picture page and were given a snack and had play time. Then they returned to the secular public schools where God was never allowed, but foul cursing of His name was readily accepted in the hallways; the truth of His Word was replaced by the lies of secular science, and the radical leftist opinions of God-hating socialist in- structors formed the worldviews of our precious children. Parents did NOT keep the commands of God on their hearts, nor teach them to their children diligently in their homes, when they walked by the way, when they laid down or when they rose up. They left all that to the “Church.”

Then the kids went off to college where the instructors seem to have two main goals for incoming freshmen: 1) get them to abandon any shred of Christian faith they may have left and 2) get them to question their sexuality and experiment freely with alterna- tive lifestyles. When those children returned to their parents, their parents no longer recognized them, and wondered where they went wrong… after all, they took them to church every Sunday!

Now, it’s confession time for me. And I hope you will grant me some grace. I was raised in a Christian home. I was the first kid in my town to ever sign up to be an “AWANA clubber.” We attended a rock-solid Bible church and I learned and memorized God’s Word from my earliest childhood. But as I became a teenager, I began to drift. AWANA, for me, had ended. I was too old. Our youth group at church was not the best. I still read the Bible on my own, but the enticements of the world drew me in. I made many poor choices as a youth and many mistakes I still regret today.

I never finished college, but while I was there, I wrote for the college newspaper. Be- lieve it or not, I wrote an article advocating Jesse Jackson for president. Yes, within just a few months of attending a state-run public college, I had already sipped the liberal Kool-aide. I attended only one year, and decided it was not for me. I can’t imagine what would have happened to me had I stayed for four years or longer. Instead, I went out and learned a trade and opened my own business — a photography studio. That was the best education I could have ever obtained, because I not only taught myself a trade, but the experience also trained me up for life in the real world, and the Holy Spirit con- tinued to work within me, and guided me back to clear thinking.

It took a while to shake off the indoctrination of liberalism I had received during my time in college. I remember hearing Rush Limbaugh speak on the radio for the first time, and thought he was a real “jerk” because of his conservative stance. And it’s incredibly embarassing for me to admit today, but I also stood in line for four hours in 1990 to hear Jerry Brown, now the governor of California, speak as he campaigned for president. Then I stood for another hour afterwards to shake his hand. (Incidentally, he had the soft- est, most delicate hands I’ve ever encountered on a human being ever before, or ever since — clearly, he has never done a single day’s hard work in his life).

But I DID grow up. As the Scripture says, “when they are old, they will not depart from it.” The thing with this, though, is, it takes some people a LOT longer to grow up, and “old” is not a specified age. Yet the promise remains. But the promise includes a com- mand: “Train up a child in the way he should go.”

Our country’s culture and our world is in complete disarray today because we have multiple generations that have never done that. They have let their kids “decide for themselves” regarding any sort of faith. They have NOT trained them up. They have NOT taught them in the home and parents have NOT modeled the Christian life in front of their children.

When my wife and I got married, we determined to do life right, and to raise our children knowing Jesus. We prayed for each one from the moment they were conceived, and together as a family every day. Our kids are not perfect, but neither have they de- parted from what they know is true, or ever strayed, for very long, from the narrow road.

God’s Word lays out, clearly, to all who will hear, instructions for building the Foun- dation of the Family, which truly IS the Foundation of a Godly society, culture and na- tion. Doing life any other way will only bring calamity, which we see now, regularly, in our daily news.

On March 10th and 11th, we are hosting our annual Wisconsin Christian?News Ministry Expo and Conference titled “REVIVING THE REMNANT BY REVEALING THE TRUTH.” Julaine Appling of the Wisconsin Family Council will speak on the topic of The Foundation of the Family. During the Conference, we will also be addressing all the other most vital and urgent things that we, as Christians, need to learn about and act upon in these troubled times. Usama Dakdok will Reveal the Truth about Islam. Peter Labarbera will Reveal the Truth about the Homosexual Agenda, Coach Dave Dauben- mire will Reveal the Truth about Making the Church Great Again, Pastor Matt Trewhella will Reveal the Truth about Why Abortion Should Matter to the Church, and Pastor Terry Fischer will speak on the Revelation of Jesus Christ. This is the most powerful lineup of speakers we have ever assembled, and we will be addressing the most vital and im- portant things that we, as God’s remnant Church MUST deal with in such a time as this. Please plan now to join us. It will be the most powerful event you’ve been to in a very long time. Call me for me details.

Audio CDs and transcripts of this message are available when you call me at Wisconsin Christian News, (715) 486-8066. Or email Rob@WisconsinChristianNews.com and ask for message number 188.

© 2017 Rob Pue – All Rights Reserved

President Trump’s move to restrict people coming into our land from seven Mohammedan countries in the Middle East has sparked widespread controversy. Most Americans are well aware that our current immigration system is conducted in such a way that there is no economic benefit for most American citizens. But the President’s decision was not for purposes of economic protection for our country.

As I spoke in Saint Louis to the Educational Policy Conference 28 this past weekend on the Bible in the Constitution, there were many speakers who highlighted the history of Mohammedanism and the current dangers it presents to our Christian Constitutional Republic. Jihad is a real danger to as all, to our lives, liberties and our property.

The President is charged in Art II Sec 3 of our Constitution with “taking Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…” We know that for multiple decades now our immigration laws have not been faithfully executed by any sitting President nor by his administration. We also know from the history of immigration to our land that our Constitution absolutely permits us to restrict or to even cut off immigration from any country in the world.

Consider what was done “in 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, which, per the terms of the Angell Treaty, suspended the immigration of Chinese laborers (skilled or unskilled) for a period of 10 years. The Act also required every Chinese person traveling in or out of the country to carry a certificate identifying his or her status as a laborer, scholar, diplomat, or merchant.”[1] So our Federal government certainly can Constitutionally place broad country specific restrictions on immigration. It seems to me that President Trump is simply fulfilling his oath of office “taking Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

Jihad is for real and has serious consequences. The persecution of the church has ramped up world wide at an astonishing level. Open doors ministry has documented 1207 Christian martyrdoms world wide in 2016, and expects that number to rise this year. North Korea and nine Mohammedan countries made their top ten list of the worst persecuting countries.

Gordon Conwell’s Center for the Study of Global Christianity estimates that 900,000 Christians have been killed for their faith in the past ten years. The report noted that 30% of the martyrdoms took place at the hands of Mohammedan terrorists. The study also found that Christians are the most despised people group in the world. But there is another side to the story.

A Wind in the House of Islam by David Garrison is the story of the nine geo–cultural variants of Islam around the world – what the author calls ‘rooms in the House of Islam’ – and how the Wind of God’s Spirit is blowing through every one of them. Garrison spent three years traveling 250,000 miles through every corner of the Muslim world to investigate reports of Muslims turning to faith in Christ.

In his research he collected the stories of over 1,000 former Muslim who’ve become Christians, asking them the question: “What did God use to bring you to faith in Jesus Christ? Tell me your story.” The result is an unprecedented look into the greatest turning of Muslims to Christ in history; stories of men and women who have sacrificed everything – home, family, even their lives – to follow Jesus. His account tells of men and women from Africa to Indonesia and everywhere in between; how God is at work through answered prayers, and through dreams and visions and through technology (Internet, satellite television, video and audio tools).

What we need to see in all this is that no matter how hard Satan tries, he cannot defeat the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ; the gates of Hell shall never prevail and ultimately Christ Jesus shall rule over all as King of kings and Lord of lords.

The main takeaways are these: 1) Christianity is growing today as never before on earth; 2) There is great need for sound Biblical teaching among new converts, for syncretism and pseudo-Christianity are rampant.

Those take aways are exactly parallel to what Paul was writing to his disciple Titus regarding for the work of ministry committed to his care. We do well to learn these same principles at this juncture of history as they clearly apply in our day.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

As we continue to look at what our politicians have allowed to be done to the American people. Keep in mind that the FDA is supposed to keep everything that we consume safe yet there are way too many things that they ‘approve’ that are grave dangers to the human body. Let’s take a look at fluoride. Fluoride is a rat poison. I don’t see a real great need to be putting rat poison in my body. There are studies after studies on the negative side effects of fluoride that it baffles the mind that the FDA has given it a thumbs up.

The biggest reason to fluoridate the water is to help prevent cavities. Dentists bathe the teeth in fluoride to strengthen them. But the evidence that drinking this rat poison has the same effect is non-existant. Two-thirds of Americans drink tap water that has added fluoride. Unlike other chemicals added to water, which are intended to treat the water itself, fluoride is intended to treat the people who drink the water, whether they want the treatment or not.

As the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) puts it, “Fluoridating water supplies can thus fairly be described as a form of mass medication, which is why most European countries have rejected the practice.”

In the U.S., many people assume the fluoride in drinking water is beneficial for their teeth, an assumption that has been widely spread by public health agencies.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has partnered with the American Dental Association (ADA) in saying fluoridation is “nature’s way to prevent tooth decay” — a statement that is both misleading and inaccurate.

The Fluoride in Drinking Water Is Not Natural

The CDC and ADA state that “some communities are lucky enough to have naturally occurring optimal levels of fluoride in their water supplies.”
While it’s true that fluoride is naturally occurring in some areas, leading to high levels in certain water supplies “naturally,” naturally occurring substances are not automatically safe (think of arsenic, for instance).

When people are exposed to high levels of naturally occurring fluoride, severe disease can result. Data from India’s Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry indicate that nearly 49 million people are living in areas where fluoride levels in water are above the permissible levels.[1]

Fluoride has also been linked to diabetes and low IQ. (This could explain the mental condition of liberals!) Professor Paul Connett, Ph.D., director of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), debates professor Mike Berridge, Ph.D., of the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research in New Zealand on the topic of water fluoridation.

This debate was 12 years in the making; it’s taken that long to find someone willing to debate Connett and defend the controversial practice of water fluoridation. It’s a pressing issue in the U.S. as well as in New Zealand, one of the few countries in the world where water fluoridation is still practiced.

At present, only about 52 percent of New Zealand’s population receives fluoridated water, but proposed legislation could change this and essentially require mandatory water fluoridation for all of New Zealand.

In order to support this introduction of mandatory water fluoridation, the New Zealand Ministry of Health recently called on an expert panel to review the data surrounding water fluoridation, and the panel, not surprisingly, concluded it is safe.

However, information provided by Connett in the debate should easily undermine the fluoridation mandate, as the practice has been linked to a number of health harms, including lowered IQ.

Fluoride Proponents Make Error in Reviewing IQ Study, Inaccurately Claim Fluoridation Is Safe

In 2014 Lancet Neurology released a study, authored by a Harvard doctor, among others, that classified fluoride as a developmental neurotoxin.[2] It wasn’t the first time.

In 2012, a meta-analysis, also by Harvard researchers, clearly showed that children exposed to fluoride in drinking water had lower IQ, by an average of seven points, in areas with raised concentrations.[2]

There are thousands of articles you can search that gives both pro and con on fluoridation but the bottom line is do we really need a poison added to our drinking water?

Then we have artificial sweeteners. These can and are as deadly as any other poison they have approved for our consumption. Aspartame is the most dangerous substance that is added to our food. Aspartame is the technical name for the brand names NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, and Equal-Measure. It was discovered by accident in 1965 when James Schlatter, a chemist of G.D. Searle Company, was testing an anti-ulcer drug.

Aspartame accounts for over 75 percent of the adverse reactions to food additives reported to the FDA. Many of these reactions are very serious, including seizures and death. A few of the 90 different documented symptoms listed in the report as part of aspartame dangers are:

Headaches/migraines, Dizziness, Seizures, Weight gain, Depression, Heart palpitations, Breathing difficulties, Tinnitus[3] and a bucket full of other things. Then there are chronic illnesses can be triggered or worsened by using aspartame: Brain tumors, Multiple sclerosis, Epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, Mental retardation, Lymphoma, Birth defects, Fibromyalgia [3] and others. You have to ask if these can be activated or worsened by the use of aspartame then why is it allowed to be used? It’s like watching a commercial for a new drug and the list of side effects is worse than the disease that it is being used to fight! The use of common sense has been forgotten and lobbyists have been allowed to line politicians pockets to the detriment of the American people. This is occurring on both sides of the isle.

The subject of climate change is the result of human activity is laughable at best. When we listen to ‘scientists’ that say man is destroying the planet causing climate change you have to scratch your head when they also say that it was climate change that killed off most of the animals that lived in Australia 25 million years ago. Man wasn’t around 25 million years ago. Were the dinosaurs driving too many cars?

Remember the volcano that blew in Iceland in 2014? That shut down air travel over Europe for almost two weeks. It was reported that that eruption wiped out all the CO2 and particulate savings done by every man woman and child worldwide for the previous five years! In just three days. That volcano is still erupting putting CO2 into the air. An average volcano puts as much CO2 into the air as 250-300 million automobiles! There are over 1500 active volcanoes in the world above ground and over 30,000 on the continental ridge! Of all the greenhouse gases CO2 is only 3.62% of those gases and man’s contribution to that is only 3.4% of that![4]

Methane is another greenhouse gas but of all the gases it is only .066%. Surprisingly the biggest contributor to global warming or climate change or whatever they want to call it is . . . . water![5] Over 95% of the cause of global warming is water. I don’t think that any activity by man will effect this in any way but if you know this then the government can’t control you. They want you to think that YOU are the problem and YOU need to be controlled. Our politicians are more than willing to let that happen as long as their pockets are lined.

Just to give a little proof that global warming is phony: No matter is the science of global warming is all phony . . . climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world. (Income redistribution) – Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment)

We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy. – Tim Worth (President, UN Foundation)

It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true. – Paul Watson (Co-founder of Greenpeace)

Next week we’ll look at population control.

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. Fluoridated water less cavities?.
2. Water fluoridation and diabetes.
3. Aspartame most dangerous substance added to food.
4. Contrubution to global warming.
5. Greenhouse Data. 

Legislating From The Bench and putting America in danger

The federal judge — who on Friday issued a restraining order on President Donald Trump’s program to prevent Muslim refugees and visitors from a number of terrorist hotbeds from entering the United States until they can be vetted and certified as no threat to American citizens — is an activist who believes his job is to provide social justice rather than interpreting the U.S. Constitution. www.judicialselectionstrikeforce.org

Ironically he is the same judge who made national headlines in 2016 when he ruled that “Black Lives Matter” in a federal courtroom, thus giving a radical, violence-prone group legitimacy.

U.S. District Court Judge James Robart made his Black Lives Matter declaration while hearing a case against the Seattle (Washington) Police Department that opposed the implementation of new police procedures that city. According to Lt. Stuart Larkingwicz of the American Federation of Police, Robart’s actions and statements amounted to a federal judge officially supported the activist group from the bench.

A check of Robart’s overall career reveals he once represented Southeast Asian immigrants attempting to “jump in front of the immigration line” prior to his judicial work for the federal court system. His biggest case involved police and black citizens in Seattle:

The Seattle Police Department was accused of using excessive force against non-whites in the city. The police chief and other officials promised to make changes in order to avoid federal civil prosecution. But Robart insisted the police union had been dragging its feet implementing changes.

Robart then scolded the police officers’ union during an August 2016 hearing. “The court and the citizens of Seattle will not be held hostage for increased payments and benefits,” he said. “I’m sure the entire city of Seattle would march behind me.”

“This decision was all politics and no substance. It’s not based on anything in the U.S. Constitution, either. When Obama had a ban on Iraqis and others coming into the country, where was Judge Robart? He was on the bench then, as well. He’s a part of the RINO [Republican in name only] wing of the GOP and sees his job as being someone who will mete out ‘social justice’ to the downtrodden,” said former military officer, police commander and political strategist Michael Baker.

Also, on Saturday, veteran watchdog Larry Klayman, the founder of both Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch and a former Justice Department prosecutor, issued a statement in the wake of the what he calls an illegal decision by a federal judge in Seattle to place a temporary restraining order on the recent executive action by President Donald Trump to put a 90-day hold on immigration from 7 Middle Eastern countries, all of which harbor huge numbers of Muslim terrorists bent on harming the United States. www.freedomwatchusa.org.

Klayman had this to say:

“The ruling is regrettably not surprising, as this judge not only disobeyed and flouted the law but apparently was more intent on making a name for himself in a very leftist state, Washington, and around the nation. While he was nominated by former President George W. Bush, this means little to nothing. The Bush family and many of its Republican establishment officials, after the unsuccessful presidential campaign of Jeb Bush, not only harbor an animus against President Trump, but W.’s appointed federal judges during his failed administration were generally not strict constructionists of the Constitution, or the rule of law. In addition to this renegade Seattle judge, James Robart, who also has taken over control of the Seattle Police Department, I am reminded of another W. appointee, federal judge Murray Snow who presides in the federal court in Phoenix, Arizona, who not only also has taken control of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, but unethically persecuted former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, boasting to his wife that he was bent on destroying Arpaio while presiding over a contempt trial sparked by the ultra-leftist and itself unethical ACLU.

“The bottom line is this: Judge Robart has illegally and unconstitutionally blocked executive power to curtail immigration of non-citizens and non-permanent residents, all of which have no rights to enter this country at will. Here, there was not even a bar put in place by President Trump, but simply a temporary hold on issuing visas to allow time to put in place an extreme vetting process to weed out terrorists.

Thus, President Trump’s reaction to this outrageous grab of judicial power was mild. Judge Robart should be impeached for his blatant political act and illegal grandstanding, obviously designed to make a name for himself. www.freedomwatchusa.org.

“Finally, this underscores why Freedom Watch’s Judicial Selection Strike Force Coalition is so important an endeavor. There currently are about 100 judicial vacancies on the federal lower courts and we intend to vet and recommend judges to President Trump for appointment who adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law in general, like Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch. Currently, by and large what we have on the federal bench, with some exceptions, are ‘politicians in robes.’ This is very dangerous, as federal judges are our most important public servants, as they were intended by the framers of the Constitution to be independent and free of politics to protect We the People from the tyranny of the other two branches of government. What we see with Judge Robart’s illegal ruling ironically is ‘judicial tyranny’!”

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

Quoting Yogi Berra, “It’s like deja-vu, all over again.” Now that the Republicans are back in power the Left (democrats, Hollywood and mainstream media) have dusted off all their old rude crude tactics in an attempt to brand America a hellhole of discontentment, pain, suffering and unfairness.

Obamacare caused Cancer patients to lose their life-saving doctors. Millions of Americans lost health care plans they were happy with which Obama promised they could keep. He lied. Blacks suffered big-time under Obama, moving backwards.

Americans on food stamps skyrocketed from 31.9 million to 47.6 million under Obama. Ninety-seven million Americans left the labor force under Obama.

To seduce new future democrat voters, Obama produced TV commercials for Spanish soap operas to encourage illegals to apply for food stamps. Meanwhile, Americans struggled to make ends meet. Expanding the definition of disability shot costs to $200 billion a year while cutting assistance to real disabled Americans.

Yes, there was real pain and suffering under Obama. And yet, fake news portrayed Obama’s regime as 8 years of sweetness and light. The Left’s daily lie was if mean white racist Republicans in congress had only cooperated with him, Obama could have done so much more. The truth is congress did cooperate, fearful of opposing the first black president.

Within hours of Trump taking the oath of office, Leftists were out in full force behaving like vulgar lawless maniacs. Suddenly, Trump is an evil lord making everyone’s life miserable. Leftists began fund-raising, 40 mil thus far, to impeach Trump. Their henchmen began physically and politically beating up any and everyone they discover voted for Trump.

This headline really got my goat. “Girls Scouts Under Fire for Marching in Trump’s Inaugural Parade”

Folks, this is the kind of deplorable arrogant bullying from the Left that we have passively tolerated for far too long. C’mon, beating up on the girl scouts? Really? The Left pulls this crap because they can. My political activism began around 2008. Since then, all I have heard from experts on our side is do not push back too hard, less we make Leftists angry and we get negative press. News flash, fake news demonizes us even when we do nothing.

Remember that best-seller, “All I Really Needed to Know, I learned in Kindergarten”? I was a small kid. When bullies in our Baltimore projects confiscated my lunch money, cousin Jimmy got in their faces. The bullying ended. This is how we must deal with Leftist bullies. I love Trump’s zero-tolerance with being slandered by fake news. Trump’s Chief-of-Staff Reince Priebus proclaimed, “We’re not going to sit around and take it.”

Now, about that demeaning anti-Trump women thing in DC. Fake news claimed half a million women showed up. It was awful folks, triple X rated. Leftist media celebrated and normalized profanity, deviancy and vulgarity. With kids in the audience, Madonna repeatedly dropped F bombs and told president Trump to “suck a d***.” Ashley Judd ranted about bloody sheets and tampons. Thousands of women wore hats they described as “p**** hats” at the rally. Unbelievably, Trump’s life was boldly threatened from the podium. One protest sign read, “Black Trans Queer Lives Matter.” I thought, how many of them are there in the world? Ten?

Call me crazy, but what are these women so upset about?

For crying out loud, Leftists have branded maleness a mental illness. Fathers are disrespected and portrayed as idiots in sitcoms and movies. Women dominate college campuses because guys refuse to stomach being told what jerks they are in forced feminist “re-education” courses. Though fake news ignores it, there is an aggressive feminist War on Masculinity. Women have confided in me their discomfort watching football with the players running around wearing pink.

Leftist media glorified a lesbian couple for trying to feminize “queer” their 17 month old baby boy, forcing him to wear tutus. The parents admitted, “he hates it.” The couple says they are frustrated by their son’s male tendencies.

I ask again, what on earth was that mob of crazies in DC so angry about? Women hold 60% of personal wealth, 51% of stocks in the US and live longer. And, they own most of the shoes.

I am black. I cannot imagine waking up, looking at myself in the bathroom mirror and saying, “Hey big guy, America is really screwing you. Spend 3 grand traveling to DC to protest.”

Folks, the insane out-of-control anti-Trump protesters are a minority. Trump’s landslide electoral victory proves that. Still, we can no longer allow breaking the law and bullying people with impunity.

Cousin Jimmy went nose to nose with my Nemesis, “Leave Peanut alone!” The cowardly bullies obeyed.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil – to one who is striking at the root. — Henry David Thoreau

The American Republic is in grave danger, and we are past the time for Band Aid cures. In order to produce major changes, we need to find the true source of the problem and strike at it hard.

In the film Aliens, the spaceship’s crew under attack finally realizes that just taking out the aliens one by one is an exercise in futility and frustration, because they reproduce faster than the crew can kill them. Then a member of the crew realizes that in order to solve the problem they must begin by taking out the alien queen.

In the same fashion, taking out the CIA will not solve the problem. To eliminate the cause of evil, we most strike at the root. Unless we get rid of the Alien Queen, we will not solve the problem. The best solution to our problem is to terminate the Alien Queen with extreme prejudice.

This alien queen is the one who hatched not only the CIA, but also the Fed, the DHS, the IRS, NSC, NSA, FEMA, TSA and the rest of the aberrations working hard to destroy the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution. The Alien Queen is currently hatching dozens of eggs that will provide replacements for the new generations of Kissingers, Brzezinskis, Carters, Soroses, Strongs, Clintons and Bushes. And the evil Alien Queen’s nest is at the Harold Pratt House in Manhattan, headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations and center of the Invisible Government of the United States.

It has become evident that the people who control the Invisible Government of the United States want to destroy this country — this is basically what the New Gay World Order is all about. This is difficult to understand, because not even some of the worst dictators and tyrants the world has known wanted to destroy their own countries. Perhaps an explanation for this is that, with the exception of the Rockefellers and the Morgans, the rest of the people who constitute the Invisible Government of the United States — the Warburgs, the Rothschilds, the Schiffs, the Lehmans, the Kuhns, the Loebs, — are not even Americans and don’t care a rat’s ass about this country, its Constitution and its people

For close to a century, the CFR has been the main source of anti-American activity in the world. The main goals of this group of international bankers have been the elimination of the U.S. sovereignty, the opening of the borders and the cancellation of the Constitution, as well as the elimination of 85 percent of the planet’s population and the reduction of the survivors to pre-industrial levels of consumption in a global government under their control.

CFR members have openly spoken about their agenda in innumerable occasions.

In 1942, the chairman of the National Council of Churches and CFR founder John Foster Dulles, issued a report claiming that “a new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative,” and called for

… a world government, strong immediate limitation of national sovereignty, international control of all armies and navies, a universal system of money, world-wide freedom of immigration, progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade and a democratically controlled world bank.

In 1944, a Confidential CFR memorandum to the State Department read:

The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a superstate organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education….

In his 1945 book Modern Man is Obsolete, CFR member Norman Cousins stated:

We even debate the question of “surrendering” some of our sovereignty — as though there is still something to surrender. There is nothing left to surrender. There is something to gain. A common world sovereignty … would mean that no state could act unilaterally from the central authority as a method to achieve its aims. . . . There is no need to discuss the historical reasons pointing to and arguing for world government.

In September 1946, in an address to the UNESCO, Assistant Secretary of State William B. Benton (CFR), stated:

You are expected to help carry out the UNESCO program within the United States. … We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty.

In 1952, the 30th anniversary issue of Foreign Affairs published “Reflections on Our National Purpose,” a leading article by CFR member Kingman Brewster, Jr. In it, he expresses his idea that the U.S. national purpose should be to abolish the American nation. According to Brewster,

It is hard to see how we will engage the youth, and stand any chance of competing for the respect of mankind generally, if we continue to be more concerned with the sovereignty of nations than with the ultimate sovereignty of peoples.

The CFR’s concerted attack on the U.S. sovereignty didn’t pass unnoticed by the American people and many Americans expressed their distaste for this treacherous organization. As a result, in 1952, in response to growing concern about the illicit, conspiratorial activities of the CFR, the U.S. Congress created a Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations (commonly referred to as the Reece Committee). The final report in 1954 stated that the Committee had found that the CFR controlled most of these Foundations and it’s aim was to abolish national sovereignty and that the CFR “overly propagandizes the globalist concept.” Its two main objectives are world government and global banking.

Unfortunately, nothing came out of the Reece Committee. But, in 1956 the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) J. Edgar Hoover (not a CFR member), received hundreds of letters from concerned citizens and members of Congress, accusing the Council on Foreign Relations of treason and promoting communism through its agents infiltrated into the U.S. government. Hoover ordered an investigation but, soon after, President Eisenhower (CFR) dictated an order prohibiting the FBI from investigating federal government employees.

You don’t need to be a “conspiracy theorist” to reach the conclusion that an anti-American, internationalist organization, whose goal is the elimination of the U.S. national sovereignty and borders as a first step to create a one-world government, has infiltrated and is now in control of the U.S. government.

As an American, you should be concerned after knowing that the CFR, an organization whose members have not been elected by the American people, has successfully penetrated the three branches of the American government, particularly the executive branch. The CFR has penetrated since its creation the U.S. diplomatic corps and its intelligence services. It is now in an accelerated process of penetrating the U.S. military.

During the administration of George H. W. Bush, most Cabinet members were also CFR members. You should be even more concerned after knowing that the number of CFR members in the Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama administrations was even higher. In these four administrations, most members of the powerful National Security Council have been also CFR members. The number of CFR members in the Obama administration has broken all previous records.

Given the fact that, like horse whisperers, members of the Cabinet and the NSC are the ones who tell American presidents what to do, it happens that the list of the people who have had a cardinal role in the revolutionary changes America has experienced in the past 50 years reads like a membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations. This cannot be the product of a coincidence.

Actually, behind every act of treason to the American people, and aggression against the peoples of the world, you will find, hiding in the shadows, one or more members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

I think that one of the things President Trump should do as soon as he is sworn as President is to reopen the investigation of the CFR’s treacherous activities. If what we suspect is confirmed by the facts, this anti-American organization must be banned and its members banned to run for office or occupy government positions. The main culprits must be charged with treason and, if found guilty, sent to prison.

Also, the more than a hundred of senior members of the U.S. military who have betrayed America by joining this treacherous organization must be dishonorably discharged and tried for high treason. The ones already retired must lose their retirement benefits.

The CFR is mainly an organization of the bankers, to the bankers and for the bankers. Those bankers are the ones who own the U.S. national is rapidly reaching $20 billion. This means that every American citizen owes $61,339.00 to the bankers and every taxpayer owes them $166,773.00.

This humongous debt is unpayable. Moreover, is morally repugnant and unethical that American taxpayers need to work so hard to feed the banking leeches by paying every year the interest of this debt. Usury must end. The U.S. debt must be terminated!

So, one of the first things President Trump should do is to cancel the U.S. national debt. He can accomplish this very easily by sending, delivered by military courier, a letter to every loan shark banker who owns the Fed containing a $1.00 bill as final payment for the debt, politely reminding them that the U.S. has the most powerful military forces in the world and would not tolerate any reprisals. Next, he should end the Federal Reserve Bank and order the Treasury Department to print U.S. dollars backed by gold and silver.

Once the evil Alien Queen is deprived of her sustenance and her nest is destroyed, she will die and Americans will finally heave a huge sigh of relief.

Requiescat in Inferno!

Servando is the uthor of Psychological Warfare and the New World Order and I Dare Call It Treason, and the DVDs Treason in America and Partners in Treason, all of them available at NewsWithViews.

© 2017 Servando Gonzalez – All Rights Reserved

The ongoing battle for control of the United States of America

Surely we are living in the immediate days before Christ’s return. The signs are everywhere, and just as Christ and the prophets foretold, the mass of the people are ignorant of it. The subject in this paper is globalism vs. national sovereignty, and the ongoing battle for control of the United States of America.

America seems about as divided as it could be, perhaps equaling the days leading up to and involving the Civil War. The battle lines are not as clear, and the battle ground is muddy from propaganda, lies and half-truths. I’m going to tell it like I see it and it will be difficult for some people to receive and/or even understand. Regardless, this is my current viewpoint and understanding of what we’re facing, as 2017 kicks off with Trump at the helm and a fury of antagonists raging across our land.

Simply put, there are people who want to control the world as they see fit. Money and power go hand in hand. Money buys and corrupts power, and power takes money. It’s an epic game of rock, paper, scissors, with two of the powers trying to eliminate the third. If the third can be eliminated, really only one will remain. For the sake of this allegory we’ll call it money, power and freedom. If money and power can eliminate freedom, the battle is over because the money and power merge and there’s nothing left to overcome. If freedom can manage the money and/or power, freedom will keep things better balanced, or at least keep money and/or power at bay.

Today, January 25, 2017 in America, we have a five-day old President who at his inauguration declared war on the establishment of political power in Washington D.C. He said, and I quote,

“…today we are not merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.”

Why, oh why, did a huge percentage of Americans NOT rejoice at those words?? This is the closest thing to the American spirit that I have heard in my lifetime, and in my studies of history, I can’t recall a time so epic. (And there are some epic times in America’s history!)

This President has basically waged war on the establishment. To understand the ramifications of this, you have to have some understanding of what the “establishment” is. The establishment is not the Democratic Party and it’s not the Republican Party. It’s a small group of people who may identify with one of those parties or the other, but their agenda is the same. Their agenda is to own the wealth of the world and control its population. And they have a massive game plan to accomplish this. They don’t care which political party is in the White House. It’s irrelevant to them. They use their wealth and their power to control, intimidate, bribe, blackmail, or kill to meet their objectives. From my own studies, there hasn’t been an American President since Woodrow Wilson that was not controlled and/or run by them.

IF Trump cannot be controlled by them, America is in the best place it has been since the early 1900s. Their tentacles are far-reaching and they have agents in almost every possible sphere they can (CIA, FBI, NASA, military, House, Senate, DHS, etc.) Some of Trump’s appointments seem weak (comparatively) or controversial, but at a nominal glance I’m encouraged because they seem to be outside the establishment circle.

In a perfect world, globalism would make sense: “the belief or advocacy that political policies should take worldwide issues into account before focusing on national or state concerns”. [Encarta] If all nations and all areas of the world had the same objectives of honoring life, personal liberty, and the overall well-being of humanity, this would be somewhat simpler to do. However, this is not the case. Realistically, personal responsibility MUST take place before a corporate vision can be successful.

Our family decided to adopt a child out of the state system. We brought the child into our home. The child refused to follow our rules. The child was violent and destructive, deceptive and two-faced. The child began very damaging behaviors to our children already in the home. It was with excruciating emotional angst that we had to discuss the possibility that maybe we should NOT take this child in. We wanted to give the child a home. Our family was willing to love and support this child, but this child was unwilling to alter behavior or thoughts to be healthy in our home. We made the extremely difficult and painful choice to NOT adopt this child after all. The health of our family was at stake. The lives of other children would be so altered (was already happening) as to change their course. We simply could not do it. Globalism would have done it. That’s the difference between globalism and national sovereignty.

Had we gone ahead with the adoption, the dynamics of our family would have changed drastically and dramatically in the coming months and years, altered actually for the rest of our time on earth. Abuse was a part of this scenario, and abuse carries afflicters and victims with their varying circumstances. Our family identity would not be the same. Ever. As the head of our home, we had to decide to take care of the needs in our family first, and not damn the needs of our family for the sake of the destruction that would come simply from embracing things counter to our convictions.

Nations are nations because of cultural needs and identities. A people group that associate with one another form a nation, set up a boundary and governing laws, and then protect those boundaries in an effort to protect its citizens. That’s healthy. Boundaries are enforced and protected from those with harmful or destructive intentions. That’s healthy. The needs of my family may not be the same as the needs for yours. Am I supposed to alter my family’s needs to accommodate yours? I happen to follow the God of ancient Israel, the Creator of earth. If you follow the gods of Egypt, should I have to embrace your gods in my family? It would change the construction and fabric of our identity. Liberty tells me I should be able to worship my God and not have to worship yours. Globalism tells me I have to incorporate your beliefs into my own. And whoever is in power can then tell everyone what beliefs are to be adhered to.

Now if I decide I don’t like my current beliefs but like yours, then I can change my mind and I might want to move to become your close family friend to appease my new beliefs. That’s called changing citizenship. With personal autonomy and national sovereignty, we can do that. We have that choice. I just move to the country, state or neighborhood that aligns better with my new convictions. With globalism, that change is unnecessary and not possible because we’re put under one umbrella and must placate and acquiesce to whatever the standing rule is. There’s no protection for personal liberty in globalism. There’s no room for personal growth. The rule of thumb becomes what’s best for the community, and what’s best for the community is dictated by the ones with the power (which usually equates to those with the money).

America was the great experiment in personal liberty. And that experiment has afforded generations of Americans to exercise their rights in ways other parts of the world had never had the opportunity to do. It grew a nation of inventors and creators and scientists and authors (and the list goes on and on), and a nation that quickly rose to the top of affordable living, affluence, accessibility to needs and wants, and was dubbed the “land of opportunity” because it was founded on personal liberty. [And yes, many of those liberties were fought for, i.e. race and gender issues, etc., and yes there is much blight on our record, but our record still stands above every other nation of the world.]

Freedom is the enemy of absolute power. Period. And there is a growing group of people who want absolute power. They have diligently passed this baton on down several generations in the ultimate desire to have ultimate control for personal gain, at the expense of those they are attempting to control or govern.

As a Christian this is so easily identified in God. God is the ultimate power. He created all things and has power over all things. Yet He has given His creation freedom and chooses to not intervene with His power just to be “in control”. We are not His puppets. We are not killed or waylaid if we do not act in accordance with His character. My belief or unbelief in Him does not change His purposes or His plans. As Christ said, “He sends the rain on the just and the unjust.”

The spirit behind those who would want ultimate power and control is completely contradictory to God, who has ultimate power and control yet chooses to yield it in favor of personal liberty. (This is why Christianity is so offensive to Islam. We do not require your beliefs and we do not demand your allegiance. We give you the information we have and let you choose.) The spirit of globalism is the antithesis of freedom. It destroys individuality and creativity. Its agenda is power and control over people, but it masquerades as a “community” idea.

Globalism is the spirit of Babylon. This is Genesis 11 and Revelation 17-18. It is a people who do not want the rule of God. They want to call the shots, and they don’t want anyone to tell them their shots are in conflict with God. So they silence, contain, and/or eliminate the opposition. The American spirit and the Constitution of the U.S. give its citizens the freedom to believe as they believe and do as they are convicted, as long as their beliefs and convictions don’t harm another. The globalist spirit will dictate beliefs by dictating laws aimed at behaviors, and this works well if you’re of the same convictions as the globalists’ laws. If not, you have no liberty to do or believe differently.

Trump’s first actions were to secure national sovereignty. He removed the U.S. from TPP, which gives America sovereignty back in its trade policies, and not under the rule of a non-American entity. He is renegotiating (with the threat of removing America altogether) NAFTA to restore America’s sovereignty to dictate its own trade arrangements. He instated a temporary ban on Middle East refugees in order to vet the immigration process more diligently for the security of America. These are areas the prior POTUS and the establishment set out to strip America of its power and wealth. If America can be stripped of its power and wealth (remember the rock, paper, scissors analogy?), it can be stripped of its ability to ensure freedom and can be removed as a hindrance to the globalist agenda to rule the world.

Unfortunately, the screaming tantrum voices of an ignorant population of Americans are insistent on making this election about personal pet issues.

Obamacare was designed to ultimately fail, but not until it had stripped Americans of their wealth and the federal budget of its wealth. Trump wants to repeal Obamacare and replace it with healthcare that is not contingent solely on the federal government. He wants to enable states to meet the need of its citizens’ healthcare. We’ve mastered the art of being offended in America this past decade. We’re so busy being offended we’re unable to see what’s really going on. Obamacare was never about providing healthcare to American citizens. It was about removing autonomy from doctors, removing wealth from citizens and private sectors, and dictating mandates while stripping its citizens of their voice.

The media is owned and run by the establishment. They direct our attention where they want it to be and deliberately misinform areas they can’t completely hide or control. There is a deliberate effort to divide Americans, and depicting scenarios that trigger emotional responses to people’s pet issues (that have really just become idols) seems the easiest way to fool the people. People jump on these bandwagons with personal offenses and neglect to see they’ve played right into the establishment’s hands, like puppets on a string.

As Christians, we need to seize this opportunity before us as the Israelites did when Cyrus proclaimed Jerusalem was to rebuild the house of the Lord. The Scripture plainly says “the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus” and the people were called to respond. Not everyone responded, just those who understood the significance of the moment. While the details are different, the essence is the same. God has moved to stay the hand of the globalist agenda in America; we must respond. The spirit of globalism will prevail until our Lord’s return, but He plainly says He will bring this spirit down. (Revelation 18)

We do not need to declare America a “Christian nation”. That is unnecessary and will stir up the opposition faster than anything. We simply need to BE a nation of Christians. We need to live according to the mandates of our faith. We are to be the city on a hill, the light of the world, the salt of the earth. Then those who are lost will go to the hill, those who are blind will go to the light, and those who are tired of the drudgery of the world will go get salt.

The Scriptures are pretty clear about how this is going to go down. We’re going to be co-laboring for Christ at the same time the world is partnering with darkness. It’s all going to be going on at the same time when He returns. (Matthew 24:36-51) Christians are ambassadors of Christ. (Ephesians 6:20) We represent Him, His interests, and His Kingdom in the nation we’re a foreigner to. We don’t really have the same customs as the world we’re posited in, but we exist there anyway until Christ brings our Kingdom. God ordained the nations and gave them their boundaries (Deut 32:8, Acts 17:26), and America is ours. We are to “occupy until He [Jesus] comes” (Luke 19:13) – and “occupy” there means “to busy oneself with, i.e. to trade” (Strong’s). So we’re to be busy with our trades, our gifts and abilities, being light and salt, declaring the Kingdom of God as we know it, and representing Christ here in America.

Time is short. Let’s be about our King’s business.

© 2017 M. Smallback – All Rights Reserved

I Hope More Women Speak Out Against This Devil’s Work!

My friend Kelleigh Nelson wrote a wonderful, right on target” article about this supposed “Women’s March”. Woman like me didn’t really know anything about it, but then I am a Trump supporter and I’m sure they wouldn’t want to hear my two cents worth.

What I don’t understand is, no matter how much these women believe they have been persecuted, with one of their complaints being that Hillary Clinton didn’t win or Trump did or both – why is it these women believe they are entitled to their rights at the expense of mine and others?

Look who some of your speakers were – Madonna? A radical who believes she should have her way about everything she believes in while spewing her vile lifestyle on the rest of us and the heck with everyone else. She is vulgar and has been using Hollywood for years to get her own way and America’s money. 

“Blow Up MY White House”??? I didn’t support your last president Madonna because I saw him for what he was but I never thought about murdering him in a building that houses many other lives or anywhere else. I just wanted him to go away! Did you ever stop to think about the others in the White House? Maybe America will get lucky and they will deport you.

Ashley Judd – are you proud? What a foul mouth – no wonder you support Hillary! Judd ranted “Our pu**ies are for our pleasure, for birthing a new generations of filthy, vulgar, nasty, proud, Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Sikh, generations of nasty women.” Is that how you see all of us? I pray all those women who voted for Trump and some who didn’t open their eyes and never spend another dime on one of your movies or charities.

Ashley Judd, another Hollywood mouth piece that believes she have the right to use their money and fame to lead the direction for the rest of the women of the world.

Scarlett Johansson and her good buddy Cecile Richards – the leaders of the Legalized Murder of Unborn Babies. Oh I am sorry, I forgot you don’t consider then living, breathing human beings. Maybe your mothers should have aborted you for as much conflict as you are responsible for. And then to add insult to injury you want the American people to pay for you and others to have your free sex and legalized murder.

Can’t afford birth control and you want us to pay for that too – you’re nuts. Either keep your legs closed or get fixed! And I am NOT going to pay for that either. Your personal enjoyment is not my problem or responsibility.

“No judgment, no questions asked, Planned Parenthood provided a safe place where I could be treated with gentle guidance,” Johansson said. “Now, I may have been 15 and surprisingly self-sufficient, but I bet there isn’t one person here who has not been helped by Planned Parenthood, directly or otherwise.” I think you are wrong!

I do disagree with you since not all women look at life with such indifference and that includes the morals and values you live by. Basic healthcare is when you have a heart attack, cancer or other health issues, not the legal murder of unborn babies.

You may at times have been able to obtain birth control from one of their clinics and if they had stayed providing basic health care to young girls you could then have billed their insurance companies or Medicaid. But no, their counselors have been teaching them about different forms of sex, making deals with traffickers and pimps for money, selling babies body parts and they aren’t following the law when a young girl comes into one of those PP clinics and tells them they have been raped, because it isn’t getting reported to the police. How many kids have died because you instructed them on the “chocking” sex reminding them the need for a “safe” word?

Then you present us with a so-called woman who supports Hamas and Sharia Law. I don’t care if she is Palestinian or some other nationality. I would not support her for her support of Sharia and as a woman I am not sure how you can. Muslim Sharia men’s treatment of women far outweigh any negative treatment you seem to think you are getting in this country.

Linda Sarsour is presented to American women as someone to look up too? Are you all kidding? Just last month she was with Salah Sarsour, a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and former Hamas operative who was jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of his alleged work for the terrorist group.

Sarsour served as a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and she is one of four lead organizers for the Women’s March. Linda Sarsour has close ties to that organization, which was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) terrorism case. HLF was found to have funneled money to Hamas, which was designated a terrorist group in the 1990s.

According to a November 2001 FBI memorandum, Jamil Sarsour, brother of Salah Sarsour, was arrested in 1998 for funding Hamas and told Israeli investigators that Salah Sarsour was involved in funding Hamas through his fundraising for the Holy Land Foundation (HLF)”. 

The FBI memo stated that the Sarsours passed money in $1,000 and $2,000 increments to a Hamas operative named Adel Awadallah through their Milwaukee furniture store. Awadallah was a commander in the Qassam Brigades, a Hamas’ militant wing.

Linda Sarsour tweeted earlier this month about “all the beautiful dead Islamic State fighters under the boots of Kurdish Women.” What about all the Christian women of all ages who have been raped, tortured and murdered my Muslim Sharia torturers? She followed with “A jihadi killed by a woman is a disgrace to Allah Such women need celebrating protecting their rights. 

So now I understand – your rights are important but anyone that disagrees with you, their rights are to be ignored. You are in the wrong country lady! What is Sarsours wish for women – that Palestine rule and all citizens of Israel and those that support them are to die?

They very fact you believe you have the right to have everything your way shows that even though you were born in this country, there is nothing American about you.

Well maybe, just maybe the world would be a better place if these women’s mothers had aborted them, but I still would not support their abortion even if I knew what they were going to grow up to be – selfish, self-centered – it’s all about me – liberal whack jobs.

An article written by Karen Hua stated “with Planned Parenthood as an official partner, the march aims to raise awareness of women’s rights to reproductive healthcare, funds, and protection.” So Planned Parenthood was an official partner – did they use tax dollars from those grants they been getting from the Fed’s all these years?

You women have been indoctrinated by the very systems the rest of us are against and gave us the basis to elect Trump. You want this country to be progressive, socialist and walk the line with communism. Get out – we do not want you here. This is not what this country was founded for and obviously you want something different. Go form your own country and don’t let my door of Liberty hit you in the ass on your way out!

And take your Palestinian, Socialist voting, Sharia supporting, Hamas funding friend with you.

They are all filled with the sign of the unholy one – spewing their “666” agenda. I pray that more women and men wake up to this behavior that they are getting away with because our Constitution gives them the right to speak their minds. If gives us the right to respond.

And one final note – I see Cher, Beyonce, and some of your other female friends were some of those that stated if Trump was elected they were going to leave the U.S. What the heck are you still doing here? We don’t want you here, we don’t need you or your liberal antics or lousy of entertainment

The ending of Kelleighs article was perfect: Journalist Daniel Greenfield said it far better than I ever could, “There were those who celebrated and those who mourned the fall of the USSR. So too there are those who celebrate and those who mourn the end of Obama. The tears of leftist hipsters crying over Obama are no different than those of the old women holding up Stalin’s portrait on May Day in the Red Square.”

On the tenth day of the new administration of President Donald Trump, among the many issues the White House faces is the obvious corruption within the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Last year in the thick of the battle for the presidency between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Trump, Conservative lawmakers were up-in-arms over reports emanating from records obtained directly from the IRS and documents they received from watchdog groups such as Judicial Watch.

As a result of seeing overwhelming evidence corruption, misconduct and harassment aimed at President Barack Obama’s so-called “enemies list,” Republican lawmakers proposed a total revamping of the IRS from top to bottom. The GOP members of congress accused the agency of being a political arm of the Democratic Party rather than a nonpartisan, government tax collection agency, according to the House pf Representatives Oversight Committee’s report titled, “Making Sure Targeting Never Happens: Getting Politics Out of the IRS and Other Solutions.”

The Oversight Committee’s Republican members, led at that time by Chairman Darrell Issa, R-California, claimed they possess overwhelming evidence that President Barack Obama’s unprecedented condemnation of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the controversial Citizens United case encouraged IRS’s upper-echelon staff members to target conservative groups such as the numerous Tea Party organizations, pro-gun owner groups, and other conservative or libertarian organizations.

The GOP’s congressional report also states that too many IRS executives were overwhelmed with kicking off the IRS’s role in the Affordable Care Act of 2010, a/k/a ObamaCare, which in essence allowed IRS officials like Lois Lerner, the former director of tax-exempt groups and the central figure in the Tea Party controversy, to have too much autonomy for a political operative in a supposedly non-political position.

Under the President Barack Obama, the IRS has become a partisan “body and full-fledged arm of the administration in power,” the Oversight report said.

One of the key changes sought by the Oversight Committee’s Republican members report is the elimination of the position of Commissioner of the IRS and the creation of a bipartisan group that could manage the agency that is responsible for handling trillions of taxpayer dollars.

Rep. Darrell Issa’s report states:

“Other operational failures within the IRS contributed to the targeting. The IRS trained its agents to identify and elevate applications that could draw media attention, even though media attention has no bearing on a group’s qualification for tax-exemption.

“As Washington employees evaluated the applications, they evaluated whether the groups’ activities were “good” nonprofit activities or merely “emotional” propaganda with “little educational value. The IRS allowed these tax-exempt applications to languish for years without action. Subsequently, as it sought to work through the backlog, the agency requested inappropriate and burdensome information from groups applying for tax-exempt status.”

But the committee member jokingly referred to as Issa’s arch-rival, Maryland Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings, condemned the new report, and took issue with the proposal to eliminate the IRS commissioner’s position.

However, during the Issa-led IRS probe, information obtained by the public-interest group, Judicial Watch, pointed to Rep. Cummings as being one of the Democrats who had complained to Lerner about the non-profit groups that opposed the overall Democratic Party political agenda.

One of the Republican proposals that angered Obama and his minions was the suggestion that the Affordable Care Act implementation be taken away from the IRS and given to a more nonpartisan group that’s free from White House manipulation. However, ACA may be a moot point since it is either imploding by itself or it will be rescinded and replaced with a more conservative approach — in other words no Democrats with their hands in the pockets of the American people.

In addition, the Senate Judiciary Committee also found evidence of conspiracy between taxpayer-supported Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates, since PPFA knew about the violations and changed oversight procedures in order to allow the violations to continue. The Judiciary Committee’s findings are available in a Majority Staff Report published this month. The IRS, although quick to investigate nonprofit groups that are pro-life and Christian, has never investigated Planned Parenthood.

If not for David Daleiden’s videos, Congress would not have initiated investigations into Planned Parenthood’s business model that includes profiting from the sale of fetal organs and tissues. We would not have seen firsthand the cavalier and callous manner in which the abortion industry discusses the dismemberment of innocent human beings.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

American Christianity has lost the killer instinct.
For most of you reading this the thought of killer instinct and Christianity do not seem to go together. In our desire to “show the love of Jesus” we have permitted the Name of the Lord to be dragged through the mud.

I always find it interesting that Christians think it glorifies the Lord to come up on the losing side of the debate. It is the FEAR of the Lord that is the beginning of wisdom. The political world no longer fears Christianity and as a result they have no fear of the Lord.

“In wrath remember mercy.” When was the last time you heard a pastor preach on the wrath of God?

The election of 2016 will go down in history as a watershed moment in the battle for Western Civilization. Against all odds the most anti-Christian Party in the history of American was jettisoned from their perch of power. The miraculous election of Donald Trump did not happen without the intervention of Almighty God.

We can argue all day as to whether his election was a blessing or a curse but no matter which side of the goal line you stand you cannot deny the Supernatural intervention. Donald Trump was God’s foot-in-the-door to the anti-Christ Clinton’s and their criminal enterprise with their machinations designed to heave the final shovel of dirt on this once Christian American Republic.

It is my belief that very few Christians understand how close we were to the criminalization of Christianity and the overthrow of Western Civilization. The fact that you think what I just said was hyperbole shows just how blind you were to the sword of Damocles swaying over our necks.

I believe in the very depths of my being that Almighty God has given us a temporary and final reprieve from the outpouring of His terrible wrath. Could it be that in His wrath he has remembered mercy?

Look my Christian friends. We are in a war. As hard as it may be for you to believe the Bible teaches us that the Devil has a team. In the past couple of months his team has come out of shadows and is in full-force rebellion against all things righteous.

The biggest mistake that an athlete can ever make is to underestimate your opponent. Our enemy plays to win. They do not take no for an answer. They are relentless in their attack and they are unrelenting in their desire to overthrow the King of Kings. We have only begun to experience the depth of wickedness to which they will descend in order to regain the lofty perch from which they have ruled.

History will record that we are embarking on the Gettysburg of this cataclysmic battle. We must win NOW or we will never have the chance to win again. Yes, my friends, it is that serious.

Why don’t Christians play to win? Why do we think it glorifies the Lord to see the enemies of the cross seize control of this nation? Why do Christians fall all over themselves in attempt to show how loving and tolerant we are? Why won’t we fight for righteousness in support of the Conquering King we claim to serve? Why are we so hell-bent on loving the Devil’s team more than we love the Lord’s?

Please don’t give me that “we win in the end” crap. It is nothing more than a cowardly excuse to keep us from engaging the enemy. Jesus came to “destroy the works of the Devil.” Why doesn’t it bother us that our enemies are ruling over us right now? When will we rise up and see His Kingdom come “in earth” as it is in Heaven?

Despite what you have been miss-taught this world does not belong to Satan. Jesus won it back at Calvary. ALL POWER IS GIVEN UNTO ME BOTH IN HEAVEN AND IN EARTH! If Jesus has ALL power…how much power is left to the Devil? What in the name of hell is Satan doing controlling this nation?

The haters of God are on the rampage. For the first time in two generations they are on the defensive. They are no longer calling the shots as God’s bulldozer is clearing the field of political correctness. It is time for those of us on God’s team to go for the kill.

Growing up I loved the story of David and Goliath and the upset victory that he pulled over the uncircumcised Philistine. David didn’t show the love of Jesus to Goliath. He didn’t reach across the aisle and reason with him. He didn’t negotiate the terms of surrender with the Giant. He didn’t share the Gospel or the Four Spiritual laws with him.

David ran towards his enemy, slung a stone at him, knocked him to the ground, cut off his head, and paraded his stinkin noggin down Main Street in Jerusalem.

I had a friend tell me one time when I was taking on a pretty imposing foe, “If you shoot the King you better make sure that you kill him.”

Somebody slung a stone and dropped the communist/progressive/anti-Christian giant masquerading as a political ideology. Christians are going to have to make a decision as to whether it is more Godly to love our enemies or crush our enemies. The giant is wounded and I think it would be wise to follow David’s example and cut off the head of the snake.

Our enemies want to destroy us…why don’t we want to destroy them?

All good coaches understand the importance of momentum. When you get the opponent on their haunches you do all that you can to crush them. Our team has finally awakened and our opponent is wounded. Now is not the time love them…now is the time to bury them.

We cannot go soft and allow them to pull victory out of the jaws of defeat. God has given us victory over our enemies. This opportunity will not come again.

“The Lord is a man of war: The Lord is His name!” Let’s follow David’s lead.

It is time to go for the jugular.

© 2017 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

It was the year 1969 when a great American story in the form of Andrea Hawes began. She grew up in rural Thomson, GA firmly ensconced in a nurturing environment. She was born to teenage sweethearts Annette Lee and Vietnam veteran Joe Nathan Hawes. Thanks to the unfaltering mercy and love of God and the devotion of both her mother and grandparents, little Andrea blossomed into a vivacious teenager full of high expectations, an inquisitive nature and high intelligence and an abundance of wisdom.

There is a Biblical scripture that reads: the wise will hear and increase their learning, and the person of understanding will acquire wise counsel and the skill to steer his course wisely and lead others to the truth. In so many ways that describes the life and times of Andrea Hawes. From her early childhood, Andrea was blessed to have a mom who gave her a bedrock Biblical foundation. It proved to be a stabilizing rudder through her adventurous years of traveling throughout America and the world as a rock musician. I can assure you as one who used to be a huge fan of rock that, Andrea’s skills as a writer and performer are superb. Two of my favorite selections from her Midnight Ritual CD are Come Inside and Believe in Me.

Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the story of Andrea Hawes is about her transformation from free- wheeling young rocker princess who demonstrated for abortion or as she dubs it “murdering babies, into a patriotic happy warrior against the massive progressive onslaught against America. Ms. Hawes is now a fully armed walking, talking, writing war machine against the ravages of the 1960s inspired cultural war against our republic that has destabilized everything from the family to even some Christian denominations.

Her sterling book, Generation X! Millennials! Run! Escape from Aquarius accurately chronicles the devastating effects of promoting drugs, sex and rock and roll over God, family and country. A major turning point in Andrea’s life occurred on the bright sunny morning of September 11th 2001. On that fateful day, she was on her way to work in lower Manhattan in New York City when Saudi Arabian pilots were slamming jets into the twin towers of the world trade center.

In her most worthy book, Ms. Hawes pointed out how a relative she contacted concerning the tragedy expressed a bit of gladness over the gruesome attacks. Because of that and numerous other events, eventually Andrea came to the realization that the thinking processes of many Americans had been ruined. One of the main culprits was the free love hippie generation of the age of Aquarius, death to America and no common sense.

I personally regard Andrea Hawes’s book “Escape from Aquarius” a high quality informative read. Not only for Generation X and Millennials, but for all Americans. You can simply go to #Amazon for your copy. I have already read it twice and will be referring to Escape from Aquarius for some time to come. In ten chapters are the formulas for success in overcoming the scourge of the 1960s-cultural revelation or debacle. To put it bluntly, “Escape from Aquarius” is a blue print on how to pinpoint societal problems and a way to overcome them as well.

Most definitely, the Biblical scripture instructing parents to train up a child in the way that he should go and he will surely not depart is exhibited in the exiting life of Andrea. It was the Biblical teachings of her mom and the commonsense encouragement of her grandfather that were the anchors that prevented her from permanently going adrift during a time of involvement in the chaos of the leftist cultural revolution. In fact, those earlier teaching are the primary influences in her life to this very day.

Andrea Hawes easily deconstructs the evil designs of those who are hell bent on destroying America morally, mentally and spiritually. In her Book “Escape from Aquarius” and during her popular weekly talk show on aweradio.org Saturdays at 2:00 to 5:00 PM EST by the grace of God, she single handedly rescues the minds of those who have been misled in government schools and by progressive leaning entertainers. Andrea Hawes’s unique approach is not only informative, concise and engaging but her brand of witty humor will have you laughing at the utter failing folly of those on the leftist wrong side of history.

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

There have been many instances during and after the election for the presidency of dem-onstrators burning or defecating on the Flag of the United States– all, or almost all, self-defined disaffected Democrats, progressive liberals, socialists, communists, or race-or-sex based political activists.

This desecration of the Flag is the result of a decision in 1989 by five lawyer-judges on the Supreme Court in Texas vs. Johnson that burning the Flag, or defecating upon it, is “speech” protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Although the people of the United States had the ability from the very founding of the country to 1989 to protect the Flag from desecration by law in their communities and States, those five lawyer-judges on the Supreme Court — the other four disagreeing — nullified all the laws that had been enacted in all of the States to protect the Flag from desecration. The American people, after 213 years, lost the ability to decide if and how to protect the Flag.

Almost immediately, American patriots, particularly veterans, acted to reverse that 5-to-4 Supreme Court decision. Congress and States, passed laws to protect the Flag. However, they we’re dead on arrival in the Supreme Court. Therefore, there is no option: The only way to pro-tect the Flag is to pass a Constitutional amendment giving Congress the authority to enact pro-tective legislation..

The Citizens Flag Alliance, involving some 140 veterans, civic, business, and fraternal organizations, was created to urge Congress to adopt a Flag Amendment stating simply: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.” The Flag Amendment does not dictate what a Congressional enactment should state; it only empowers Congress to legislate to protect the Flag from desecration.

The Citizens Flag Alliance, led by its first chairman, Maj. Gen. Patrick H. Brady, a Medal of Honor recipient (Vietnam) who is regarded as America’s most decorated living vet-eran, succeeded in convincing the House to adopt the Flag Amendment six times with each new Congress, and came within one (1) vote in the Senate of adoption in 2006, which would send the Flag Amendment to the States for ratification by vote of the people.

However, in the November elections in that same year, 2006, the Democrats regained control of the Congress, stalling the Flag Amendment effort. With the election of Barack Obama as President in 2008, the effort to pass the Flag Amendment appeared, and was, futile.

All that has been changed by the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, who has called for “consequences” for desecration of the Flag; election of a Republican majority in House and Senate; and what appears to be a renewed patriotic spirit in America.

“We are revitalizing and relaunching the Citizens Flag Alliance campaign to persuade Congress to adopt the Flag Amendment in the new 115th Congress, and send it to the States for ratification by vote of the people,” said Jill Druskis of the American Legion, president of the Citizens Flag Alliance.

Gen. Brady, who led the Citizens Flag Alliance for ten years before stepping down as chairman in 2007, has issued a call for all veterans and other patriots to join with the CFA in actively urging Congress to adopt the Flag Amendment.

“If ever there was a time to revitalize the Flag Amendment movement, it is now,” said Gen. Brady. “We need to re-energize the Citizens Flag Alliance and create a nationwide grass roots movement to convince the new 115th Congress to pass the Flag Amendment, and restore to the American people their right to decide if and how our Flag should be protected.

There are 23-million living American veterans. As one, I believe that burning the Flag, or defecating on the Flag, is an insult to every American veteran who is serving, or has served–including the 1.4-million veterans who have given their lives in war in defense of America under the Flag.

Further, as a Constitutional and Civil Rights attorney, I believe that the five lawyers on the Supreme Court who have decided that “burning” or “defecating” on the Flag is a form of “speech,” are not only wrong in a jurisprudential sense, but as a matter of common sense exer-cised by non-lawyer mere mortals. Indeed, I believe that any lawyer-judge who dictates to the nation that “defecation” is “speech” is not only guilty of judicial tyranny, but is talking out of the wrong orifice himself or herself and should be impeached for inanity if not insanity.

Does any American possessed of common sense really believe that Founding Fathers Gen. George Washington, presiding officer at the Constitutional Convention, our first American President, the Father Of Our Country, or Thomas Jefferson, Father of the Declaration of Inde-pendence, or James Madison, Father of the Constitution, or any of the Founding Fathers who established the Constitution believed that burning or “defecating” on the Flag was not only “speech” but speech the Founding Fathers, patriots all, intended to be protected in the First Amendment?

Only lawyers could reach such an absurd decision, and then impose it on the American people. However, that decision by five lawyer-judges on the Supreme Court while the other four lawyer-judges disagreed, makes burning or defecating on the Flag a “legal right,” only. It does not make it “right” to do.

Burning the Flag or defecating on the Flag is a cowardly, narcissistic, morally despicable “wrong.” The Flag must be protected from such disgraceful actions. Supreme Court decisions are not writ in stone; they are reversible by the ultimate American sovereign–“We, the People.”

Join and support the call of the Citizens Flag Alliance and of Gen. Patrick Brady to de-mand that Congress pass the Flag Amendment to protect the Flag from desecration and send it to the States for ratification so that “We, the People” may have the “right,” again, to decide whether and how the Flag should be protected from desecration.

For more information: CitizensFlagAlliance.org,

HONOR OUR FLAG —PASS THE FLAG AMENDMENT

© 2017 Rees Lloyd – All Rights Reserved

Let’s have a contest. Let’s see who’s more clueless—liberal politicians, liberal scientists… or actors. Ready? And they’re off!

Sometime soon, Democrat politicians from all over the country will be meeting in West Virginia for a “retreat.” The topic of their deliberations will be “how to talk to real Americans” who don’t live in New York, San Francisco, or Chicago and who aren’t mentally ill.

They’re convinced, you see, that they didn’t lose the last election because “real Americans” rejected their insane program, but only because they never found quite the right sales pitch for it. Oh, and also the Russians hacked them. I suspect they think all they’ve got to do is hire somebody to put on a plaid shirt and pretend he’s a real American from somewhere in the Midwest, and then he can go into his spiel for the Democrats’ DeLuxe Fun-Pack of open borders, Global Warming and a huge carbon tax, transgender bathrooms, importing lots and lots of Muslims without first checking to see they’re not jihad johnnies, massive new federal spending programs, Obamacare, and an explosive growth of government power, just to name a few.

They can’t believe we were so stupid as to reject this stuff: we really want it, but we’re too stupid to know we want it. So all they have to do is not make it look like something a bunch of liberals are trying to force down our throats. Wouldn’t you love to be a fly on the wall for one of those pow-wows? “These people! They’re so dumb, you can’t even trick them!” There has to be a way to work around our deplorable stupidity. As the smartest people on the planet, they ought to be able to find one.

Meanwhile, the European Space Agency has unveiled a plan to set up a colony on the South Pole of the Moon, a sort of Club Med for ninnies, complete with a “Lunar Temple” and “dome of contemplation.” Don’t even ask what they expect to contemplate. Says the ESA head honcho, the Moon colony will be “a fresh start, a place where there are no social conventions, no nations and no religion, somewhere where these concepts will need to be rethought from scratch.”

Wow, who can resist that? What would it be like, to live with “no social conventions”? I thought we already had a place like that: it’s called Detroit. And no religion! There’s nothing like a “temple” with “no religion” involved in it. Don’t even ask who or what they propose to worship in lieu of God. It’s a bit surprising that this John Lennon wannabe forgot to throw in “imagine no possessions,” either, while he was at it. Just think—a whole colony devoid of all those things that make us human. If that’s not clueless, what is?

And then, a few nights ago, we had the SAG Awards, another confab of back-slapping “entertainers” who, like the politicians that they serve, wouldn’t know a real American if they found one in their breadbox.

Highlighting the affair was “Laugh-In” relic Lily Tomlin, who likened our new president, Donald Trump, to “the Nazis.” I guess she saw some Nazis in a movie once.

Silly Lily was all hot to trot for the next big protest march—they think protest marches full of snarling, cursing leftids will somehow convince the rest of us to abandon everything we hold dear and sign up to be progressives—and was contemplating, without benefit of a dome, “What sign I should make for the next march: Global Warming, Standing Rock, LGBT issues, immigration—there are so many things.” If she was any more persuasive, she could make a living selling salve door-to-door.

So, my fellow deplorables—who wins the Clueless Derby? With such an embarrassment of poverty, it’s naturally very difficult to pick the winner.

I’ll understand if you vote it a three-way tie.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

I have often wondered if the major university campuses have a special course for University Women to teach them the “F” word. Females seem so proficient at that once they graduate. Call the course, “Give Me an ‘F’ and I’ll give you an ‘A’!” Have it taught by a finger-gesticulating (wink-wink) burly, short cropped PhD female, of course, to get the full effect……. But I digress….

To the point: I have witnessed many things much more horrific than the Women’s March in D.C. this past January 21st. However, I do not believe I have ever seen anything more revoltingly disgusting done in the name of women.

Ladies. Girls. The gentler sex. Peaches and cream. Sugar and spice. Mom/Mommy. Granny/Grandma. Aunt/Sister. Oh, and Pro-Life.

ALL THROWN UNDER THE BUS!!

And in the name of what? Let me just tell you “what”. And those “sisters” out there aren’t going to like it one bit, too bad.

What the whole wide world saw on display was a raging torrent of hate. At Trump, you assume? Oh sure, he was in the mix. But he was used more for venting rather than the being the full object. What actually was on display in full living pink technicolor was an unkempt force of shrieking, foul females literally and loudly hating their womanhood and all things associated with being a woman.

THAT is what we saw in that march – a bunch of females screaming about their genitalia and the functions thereof, hating themselves and their womanliness. Then crudely, vilely, viciously letting the world know all about it, – and how rough they have it in comparison to men. (Shed a tear here.)

Well, “sisters”, there are surgical options opened to you to remedy all of those complaints. Just don’t do it on my tax dollars.

And “sisters”, I’ll tell you something else you’ll like even less. Back in the day your disgusting vitriolic diatribe was called Penis Envy. Put that in your little pink bonnets, huh?

SENDING OUT THE SNOWFLAKES….

Sean Hannity had some ditsy female guest on his radio show on Friday, January 27th. She was all PRO the march; and Madonna’s threat about blowing up the White House was just artistic free speech. He asked her (several times) about partial birth abortion which she said she was good with because there is no such thing… I could not make this up. She told Sean that partial birth abortion did not create infanticide (the killing of a baby).

Apparently in her safe space no one had bothered her with the Planned Parenthood videos of selling baby body parts and suggesting different ways of performing partial birth abortions, done in the very last days of the pregnancy, ie, at or near term, so as to make better, more mature organ parts available for sale.

Clearly she had also not bothered herself with details of abortionist Kermit Gosnell, now serving time for multiple infanticides. These truly gruesome details are available in a book called “Gosnell”.

She explained to Sean Hannity – very patiently – that partial birth abortion was when the child was surgically removed by Caesarean Section. The baby was NOT killed. And if there was just more sex education then there would be less of an issue with abortion…

Wouldst that were true! It would be so easy to birth the baby and hand it over to an adoption agency. But killing the baby is just more feminine, you think?

And did you all catch Hillary when she said that the baby shouldn’t be considered a baby until it’s mother took it home? In case Mom changed her mind about having the baby? In fact if I recall correctly Hillary also mentioned that the baby shouldn’t be considered a baby for two weeks after the birth…….. I don’t believe she ever indicated what should be done with the gurgling, fist-waving little thingie there in the newborn nursery…..

SEEDS OF SHARIA

How could any good (?), progressive, sex pontificating, Me-First, pro-abortionist, wear-what-I-want (or not), LGBT-hugging, social justice, open borders, smoking/drinking/drugging angry socialist feminist ever trip into the waiting arms of Sharia Law? (Hey, it worked for Hillary & Huma!)

How in the name of Allah did they have a Brooklyn-born Palestinian Muslim female social worker as one of their Women’s March co-chairs? Linda Sarsour. The pictures I’ve seen show her in a full hijab, a nun-like head covering, though in her case they are quite gaily colored. And her eyes are heavily made up. Very Western.

Maybe that’s it: she wears makeup so she must be okay. Forget the mandates against women in the Qu-ran (Koran): rape, honor killings, beatings, mutilation, subjugation, and lots of motherhood. And I guess it would never occur to Linda Sarsour to throw some of the gay boys off a high roof.

ABORTION

Not to worry! While you’re hugging Linda Sarsour like a comfortable little pink teddy bear, Islam has it all figured out for you, dear “sisters” and snowflakes. According to the Muslim site zawaj.com they teach that the soul enters the fetus at 120 days, or 4 months. With the fewest possible exceptions it is unlawful under Islam to abort the fetus before 120 days. With absolutely no exceptions, it is also unlawful to abort the fetus on or after 120 days. Rape and incest are not reasons.

Like Climate Change/Global Warming, clearly we have settled science by consensus here… Male Muslim consensus you understand. And devout Muslim agent Linda Sarsour is a poster girl for this Women’s March? Talk about a serious disconnect.

HITLER, AND TOUPEES……

While a “NAAAA-STEEEEE” woman was bemoaning the feel of Hitler in the streets of D.C. – a moustache exchanged for a toupee – she was apparently coincidentally mindlessly embracing devout Muslim Palestinian Linda Sarsour.

I know I mentioned this before but let’s draw out a new and uncomfortable – for them – observation. In the 1940s, when Hitler’s Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, the Desert Fox, was romping victoriously with his North Afrika Korps, just who was Hitler’s talented general aligning himself with? Why, the Muslim Arabs, of course. He was going to liberate them from British rule. Hitler, Rommel, Arab Muslims. Got it? Muslims, Rommel, Hitler: Friends.

So, when we want to talk about Hitler, let’s keep it straight who was holding hands with whom.

((Speaking of the Brits, Teresa May, PM, is distressed with Trump’s temporary ban on Mid-East immigration. 80 years ago the Brits were a dominant force in North Africa. Now, the most prevalent male name for newborns inside Britain is Mohammad. (Talk about the sun setting on the empire…))

THE OTHER MARCH

I don’t have a number on the tens of thousands that Marched for Life on January 27th in Washington, D.C. How thrilling it must have been for them to have the Vice-President come and speak, how hopeful that some of this will be rolled back.

But I’ll make a bet that just like the Tea Party versus the Occupiers, the Right-to-Lifers left one heck of a lot less trash than did the sisters, snowflakes, and the beta boys. And no broken windows, torched cars, injured cops, graffiti…? Anyone want to take me up on that…?

Hey God! Thanks for your blessings!

GO TRUMP!!

PS: Given what President Trump has already done so far, what’s he going to do with the last 3½ years of this first term of his presidency?

PS2: Just in. Thanks to JT. Reba sings of God. Video. Guaranteed to make the Left crazier than they already are. Enjoy and share.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!
GOD BLESS DONALD TRUMP!
AND GOD BLESS YOU AND ALL YOUR DREAMS!

© 2017 Ronnie Herne – All Rights Reserved

The Democrats are shocked, dumbstruck, blinded-sided and apoplectic! How could a brash, untamed, crude billionaire businessman appear on the political scene and shake the very timbers of 100 plus years of Progressive rule? How dare this champion slayer of the establishment, challenge the Progressive Way that has been silently and with premeditation, infiltrated the fabric of America and lies embedded in every American institution, as well as being buried in the “Little Black Box” of at least four generations of millions of duped Americans. (See “Little Black Box Theory”)

From President Wilson’s Sixteenth Amendment, to FDR’s unconscionable perversion of the U. S. Constitution and his giant leap into socialism, to President Johnson’s Great Society failed welfare experiment and to President Obama’s delusion of hope, change and foreign policy through appeasement, America, on the flawed ideology of Progressivism, has slid so far from its roots of individual liberty and international influence and power, as to be unrecognizable. America is flat broke, deep in debt and has embarrassed itself to the rest of the world.

But for decades and to this day, much of America was and is in silent foment over Progressive rule. Taxes mounted to the point of wealth confiscation to pay for Progressive vote-buying policies. Regulations at the federal, state and local levels were growing exponentially. By the late 1960’s radical environmentalism had taken control over every human activity and added strangling regulations and huge costs to everything Americans buy, including their homes, energy and food.

From 1950 to 2016 the national debt, driven by Progressive policies, grew 20 fold from less than $1 Trillion in 1950 to almost $20 Trillion in 2016. During Obama’s 8-year term in office, the national debt doubled from $10 Trillion to almost $20 Trillion. (20,000,000,000,000 one-dollar bills laid end to end would reach almost 2 billion miles into deep space, or 247,000,000 miles past the orbit of the Planet Uranus.)

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), by 2026 the national debt is estimated to increase to $33 Trillion because of unfunded Progressive legislation. The cost burden to taxpayers for regulations, welfare, benefits to illegal aliens and government give-away programs keep increasing. (See: “The Masses Need A Course in Economics, Capital and Freedom”)

Government intrusion into our private lives has risen to the point from which revolutions are born.

Federal agencies like the Bureau of Land Management and U. S. Fish and Wildlife were and are attacking ranchers and farmers across the American West like never before, in the name of radical environmentalism. Those unwarranted attacks on private land ownership have led to seething anger and armed standoffs between ranchers and armed bureaucrats. (If you are a rural landowner, you need the information, products and services offered by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS (NARLO) to defend against these attacks.)

Businesses were and still are being overwhelmed with regulations, taxes, time-consuming paperwork and many businesses have had to endure unwarranted raids by drunk-with-power federal agencies, on trumped up charges. To escape the taxes and regulations, large businesses that could, were taking their manufacturing operations offshore. Cities, run mostly by Democrats, were being decimated and headed for bankruptcy and ruin as the manufacturing jobs dried up and the cost of welfare for the victims rose. As a result, these dying cities have become a greater drain on the federal budget.

Our foreign policy based on Obama’s weakness and appeasement, encouraged the rise of radical Islamic terrorism and Americans were dying in significant numbers, as America joined the rest of the world in frequent terror attacks.

Russia and China have taken advantage of America’s weakness and are engaging in armed incursions into other sovereign nations, or claiming possession of whole oceans and international shipping lanes.

Illegal immigration into our country from central and South America and enemy nations has become a mass illegal invasion of America from cultures that are not compatible with a free society. They have brought with them drugs, sex slaves, disease, crime, terrorism, a socialist mindset and in some cases a religion that is diametrically opposed to America’s Judeo-Christian heritage. These illegal aliens protest in the streets of “Sanctuary Cities” for “their” rights, while waving the Mexican, or some other non-American flag. The cost to taxpaying Americans is in the multi-billions of dollars every year. The federal government’s criminal mismanagement of this human invasion, borders on treason.

(See: “Sanctuary Cities Slap Every Lawful American in the Face”)

The seeds of dissent and discontent were and are boiling in undercurrents across the land. Utterances of resistance were silent no more. Talk of armed revolution danced more frequently in the minds of some reactionaries. The size of militia groups has grown larger. Open violations of law by normally law-abiding citizens were becoming more frequent. Rising regulations were making more Americans lawbreakers. America, as a free nation, appeared to be doomed.

But then a strange thing happened on the way to the 2016 presidential election. A very imperfect, un-conventional, almost guttural, outspoken, married-three-times, non-politician, billionaire businessman decided to throw his hat into the presidential ring. His chances at the start of the campaign to win the Republican nomination were slim to none. The pundits predicted his demise was just a matter of a few days, weeks, or months away at best. They were wrong.

Throughout the year and a half campaign Trump continued to throw indelicate arrows at everyone who dared to challenge his candidacy, including the press and his Republican challengers. When it wasn’t going his way, he placed the blame on the polls, or cheating by other Republican candidates. It didn’t matter. He called his Republican opponents all kinds of names. It didn’t matter. One by one his challengers dropped out, not being able to excite those people that rallied around Trump, that Hillary Clinton called a “basket of deplorables”.

Trump promised things to his followers that could only be accomplished if he was King, but the followers hung on and they grew in numbers every day. In spite of every negative torpedo the press, Democrats and establishment Republicans could throw at him, including being called a racist and sexual predator, to just about everyone’s surprise, Donald J. Trump won the Republican nomination. Meanwhile, all the soothsayers were betting on the candidacy of “Crooked Hillary”, as Trump loved to call her. They were betting on her all the way up to 11:00 PM Eastern Time on the day of the election.

During the three months from the Republican Convention, leading up to the November 6th election, Trump continued his barrage of tweets and indiscrete utterances. He would say outlandish things that couldn’t be supported by the facts. It didn’t matter. His loyalists remained steadfast. Instead of allowing minor irritants to pass, he would tweet a response that would set the media on fire and prolong the irritant. It didn’t matter.

He defied all the nay-sayers, odds-makers and prognosticators and by 11:00 PM Eastern time on the day of the election, one by one the swing states had fallen to Trump and the Electoral College was his. Trump was now President-Elect and the Democrats were dumb-founded, in disarray ….. and mad as Hell. How could this have happened when Hillary was pre-anointed by the Progressive establishment and the press for her to become the next President? The skids were greased and over a billion dollars in donations were spent, but she lost anyway. It was unfathomable, unthinkable!

Nevertheless, from the day of the election to Trump’s Inauguration on January 20th, 2017, the dissenters and detractors never gave up. The Democrats were shocked and bewildered and the press couldn’t figure out how they got it so wrong, not realizing that the 2016 election was a referendum on Progressivism. Negative press against Trump flowed like water over a falls and continues to this day and will continue for the length of his presidency.

The day after the Inauguration, millions of women marched in cities across America and across the globe, in open defiance of Trump and the anti-Progressive policies he promised to in-act. Trump was and is to these women and all other liberals, the archenemy of Progressivism.

Now we know that anyone that has been paying attention knows all of this, but how many know just how bad Progressivism has been for America. Progressivism has weakened the very fabric of America’s strength, her people and made millions of them weak, docile, compliant and hopeless dependent on government. Progressives have divided America up into constituency groups of race, age and gender (Democrat voting blocks) that constantly berate constitutional principles for and on behalf of the Democrats, while beating the political drums for a free hand out, or a special benefit, without regard to the cost.

Progressivism is a philosophy of government that has broken the back and bankrupted this once great land and stolen her individual freedom by using vote-buying, indoctrination, brainwashing, propaganda, hype, distortions and outright lies. Progressivism is why America is flat broke and deep in debt.

In sharp contrast, tens of millions of Trump supporters found him to be a needed breath of fresh air. He was the change-maker to save America from the scourge of Progressivism, collectivism and globalism. He was the slayer of all things Progressive and the drainer of the alligator and mosquito infested establishment swamp. With bravado rarely seen in a politician, he promised he would rise up America into the promise of her Founding Fathers. He would bring back the jobs and raise the poor and downtrodden out of poverty. He would re-build our roads, train tracks, tunnels and bridges. He would strengthen our military and restore America to the super power she was destined to be. He would tell our enemies their days are numbered. Many conservatives have waited decades to hear these words and promises of immediate action.

Trump even nominated powerful people to his cabinet that would get the “job” done.

With any luck, he, President Donald J. Trump, will bring back the pride of being an American and return America’s exceptionalism, economically, financially, culturally, spiritually and militarily.

Hopefully, Trump can also stop this man-caused global warming insanity being foisted upon the American people by environmentally crazed Progressives. (Three years of alleged warming is nothing compared to geologic time. The planet has warmed about every 100,000 years to today’s temperatures and higher in the last 500,000 years, prior to the industrial revolution.)

(See: “Please, Please, Democrats, Sue to Defend Climate Change”)

It’s no wonder that Democrats, liberals and Progressives are scared and shaking in their boots. Good Lord, Roe vs. Wade might be overturned. Women might lose their free contraceptives, free loaders might lose their government checks and illegal aliens could be deported. It’s no wonder they are marching in the streets in large numbers. Their world of collectivism, multi-culturalism, irrational compassion, sanctuary cities, political correctness, “free-stuff”, amnesty for illegal aliens and the one-world-order could be collapsing around them.

If Trump is even partially successful and we expect him to be in spite of his frequent gaffs, the fallacy of Progressivism will be exposed once and for all. The socialist poison they have fed to the American people for the last 100 plus years will come up against the Trump anti-dote of individual liberty, free trade, economic prosperity and national strength. Progressivism will be on trial all across America and with a little help from providence, the rule of law, freedom, liberty, the American people and the free world will be the winners.

A successful Trump presidency may very well prevent the revolution that was coming to America, if Progressivism were to prevail.

Throughout history, all Republics eventually evolve into socialism and oppression. After years of socialist oppression the people finally resort to the last alternative to preserve freedom ….. revolution. But we don’t have to repeat history if the American people will always maintain the mindset that freedom isn’t free and acknowledge that, “we are only one generation away from slavery.”

Under Trump, “Progressive rule may be up for grabs for now,” but it has a nasty habit of re-appearing as a lesion on the skin of humanity, if the people don’t take the difficult task of “cutting out” that lesion every now and then ….. by any means necessary.

Did you LIKE this article?

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

“A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.” -Joseph Goebbels

Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Francesco Gramsci and Saul Alinsky were all malevolent masterminds of manipulating others into becoming willing puppets of the State. Lenin’s “What Is to Be Done?;” Trotsky’s “In Defense of Marxism,” Gramsci’s “Prison Notebooks” and Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” were all written to push strategy and propaganda onto the masses. All have succeeded in spreading malignant evil. But aside from Lenin, none lived to become absolute masters over every form of media and, arguably, none were as effective as Joseph Goebbels.

The Reich Minister for Propaganda and Popular Enlightenment, Goebbels, was the architect of Hitler’s rise to power in the Nazi Party and thereafter, his ascension to de facto dictator over the Third Reich. one of the most brutal empires in history. According to writer H.R. Trevor-Roper, “Goebbels was an impresario of genius, the first man to realize the full potentialities of mass media for political purposes in a dynamic totalitarian state.” He perceived early on how the masses could be easily led by skillful use of modern media and he grasped the reins of that media to propel Hitler into power and Nazi Germany into war.

We are always strongest in the offensive. -Joseph Goebbels

Born in 1897, Joseph Goebbels was rejected by the German Army in WWI due to a clubbed foot so instead, he attended Heidelberg University where he was awarded a doctorate of philosophy in 1920. His disability, slight physical stature and his resentment of the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles turned Goebbels into a very embittered man in the early 1920’s. Seeing an outlet for his anger, Goebbels joined the Nazi Party in 1924.

Goebbels was, at first, critical of another young and angry German by the name of Adolph Hitler. But in one of those cruel ironies of life, Hitler later became a friend to Goebbels. Goebbels first task was to build up Nazi support in the city of Berlin. He approached this like he approached everything in his life, by attacking it. The Nazi’s main rivals were the communists. In order to defeat them, Goebbels would often storm into their meetings and take over the microphone as his “Sturmabteilung” (SA) paramilitaries would beat dissenters into submission. Then, as would become his lifetime practice, he would accuse the communists of starting the fight.

Seeing Goebbels’ deeply rooted scorn for humanity, his ability to sow confusion and hatred, his thirst for power and his command of mass persuasion, Hitler unleashed Goebbels during the election campaigns of 1932. Goebbels was hugely responsible for Hitler’s election as Chancellor. Following the election, the German Parliament building, the Reichstag, was deliberately torched allowing Hitler to become the dictator of Germany.

Goebbels was rewarded by being made Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, a position he held until 1945. He now had complete control over all radio, cinema, newspapers and other arts. His works are still spoken of today as masterpieces of propaganda; he created the Cult of “Der Fuehrer” to turn Hitler into a messianic figure as well as using all the media in Nazi controlled areas to denounce his enemies. Films like Franz Hippler’s “Der Ewige Jude” depicting Jews as rats became the norm as the “Final Solution” took hold.

Writer Peter Bjel [11] described Goebbels use of the cinema thusly: “If the Nazis were movie-mad, then the Third Reich was movie-made, a fantasy order that in equal measure was dream machine and a death factory.”

During the first few years of the war, it was easy for Goebbels to persuade the Germans of the inevitable victory of Hitler and the Third Reich, but that all changed with the shattering defeat of the German 6th Army under General Friedrich Paulus at Stalingrad in 1943. His statement following the defeat showed the new direction Goebbels would take the Germans: “An entire Army had sacrificed itself ‘for all of us,’ and indeed, for western civilization. Goethe and Beethoven, Augustus and Pericles were being defended in the wilds of the East.” In a flash, the myth of German invincibility was smashed and the focus became the subhuman brutality and stupidity of the Soviet solder as opposed to willing sacrifice of the German hero.

In spite of the devastating defeats Germany had after Stalingrad, Goebbels propaganda machine was still able to convince the people that theirs was a righteous and glorious cause worth dying for. Die for it Goebbels did, as the Russian Army was crushing the pitiful German army in Berlin and the city lay in ruins, Goebbels poisoned his six children, shot his wife and then himself. The man who used the arts to propel one of the most evil men in history was dead, but his legacy of evil lives on.

Along the way, power hungry zealots have used Goebbels’ writings to support their own nefarious designs. Case in point: After Trump’s election victory, Nazi collaborator George Soros joined other global elites along with their mainstream media (MSM) lapdogs to do just that. In accordance with Goebbels playbook they blamed “Russian” hacking for Hillary Clinton’s loss and Donald Trump’s victory. Attacks included organized so called “grass root” riots and a campaign to intimidate members of the Electoral College into changing their votes from Trump to Clinton.

The “Russian hacking” meme was created as a cover for the Wikileaks release of thousands of damning emails which exposed collusion between the Democratic National Committee, the MSM and the Hillary Campaign to steal the Democratic Party’s nomination from Bernie Sanders. Their release showcased Hillary’s blatantly illegal disregard for US Top Secret documents and “pay to play” activities in which Hillary actively engaged while she was Secretary of State. A majority of democrats have proven themselves to be as morally corrupt as the DNC leadership by focusing concern on a scapegoat for Hillary’s loss instead of the scandals her emails exposed.

The similarity between the current attempts by George Soros to destroy what little is remaining of the American Republic and Hitler’s rise to power cannot be ignored. As Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch failed to raise Hitler to power, so did Soros’s Electoral College non-event and post-election riots fail to propel Hillary into the office of US President. But continuing to reach into his Nazi bag of tricks, Soros and company use another Goebbels strategy:

“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.” -Joseph Goebbels [1]

On January 10th, the media exploded with the scoop of a lifetime when CNN released news on the existence of a report linking President-elect Donald Trump to the “Russian” hacking scandal. Compiled by retired British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, the report claimed that Russia had gathered compromising data about the President-elect. Originally, Mr. Steele was hired by anti-Trump Republicans to dig up dirt on Trump, however, the funding continued from an anonymous Democrat donor.

Later that evening, the ultra-liberal web site “Buzz-Feed” released the entire report. Supposedly originating from Russian intelligence members, it consisted of a series of memos alleging that Russian agents have been blackmailing Trump over footage of himself with Russian prostitutes. In truth, the dossier has more holes in it than the Obama administration’s explanation of what happened at Benghazi.

For example, months before CNN and Buzz-Feed published the report; it had been passed over as fake news. NBC sources deny CNN reports that Trump had been given a two page briefing about the dossier. Moreover, the poorly written dossier cannot be verified. Contrary to memo claims, Michael Cohen, has never visited Prague, let alone met with Russian officials. Even CNN says it was a different Michael Cohen in Prague.

Soros: A Modern Goebbelist

The truth is the greatest enemy of the State. -Joseph Goebbels [1]

Recall President Barack Obama’s unwitting live microphone comments to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in March of 2012. “This is my last election;” he whispered “After my election, I have more flexibility.” Then, during the 2014 Ukrainian crisis, when Russia invaded and retook its historical base of Crimea, the presumably “hard as nails,” anti-Russian leader Obama offered ration kits to the Ukraine as he backpedaled on his Eastern European missile defense promise. When questioned on his backtracking, Obama blithely answered, “Ukraine is a core Russian interest but not an American one, so Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there.” Obama’s actions mirror the depth of hypocrisy that Soros and his ilk practice on a regular basis.

In the meantime, a company run by former KGB agents paid Bill Clinton speaking fees to the tune of $500,000 and the Clinton Foundation, raked in $2.35million for allowing a Russian-owned company to assume control of 20% of the world’s uranium supply. This deal literally shut the US out of the European market for uranium. Additionally it posed substantial security risks to the US and Europe So important to Russia was this sweetheart deal that Pravda, the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin, put this on the cover of its newspaper “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

Allowing no opportunity to go to waste, today’s Goebbelists eagerly follow in their masters footsteps by engaging paid thugs to start fights and bully Trump supporters as the MSM would label the Trump supporters as “racist bigots.”

Focusing on Trump’s inauguration, contemporary SA thugs purpose to bring about anarchy in this nation. One of the participating groups, #DISRUPTJ20, is even calling for a Queer Dance in front of the home of Vice President Mike Pence. Numerous progressive/communist organizations openly advertise for “volunteers” to incite mayhem that effectively shuts down Washington DC.

The largest private grassroots support organization in the United States, Demand Protest has recruited politically-motivated cohorts to protest Trump’s inauguration. So much for “grassroots” and “spontaneous!” Promising “volunteers” $50 an hour and $2,500 a month, Demand Protest seeks willing operatives to disrupt the ceremony. The group 4Chan claims that Demand Protest is Soros funded. Since Soros paid Ferguson and Trump protestors, this is not an unreasonable assumption.

Following Goebbels method of attacking without mercy, today’s entertainers openly mock Trump, his family and supporters. Recall the American Music Awards ceremony in November of 2016 and the Golden Globe Awards in January 2017, when actress Meryl Streep criticized Donald Trump while, at the same time, praising two specific groups dedicated to “protecting” journalists, namely, ProPublica and the Committee to Protect Journalists. Note: both groups are heavily funded by George Soros. One need only follow the money for evidence of Nazi ideology in the current media transmission and propaganda.

Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred. -Joseph Goebbels [1]

The West is under a propaganda attack unlike anything it has seen before. Every form of electronic media is being used to pound the message to us that discrimination is the American way. Paradoxically, those screaming the loudest about American “discrimination” are the same ones guilty of the most intolerance as demonstrated here; here: here and here. Claims of intolerance are even leveled against fellow liberals as evidenced by the largely Soros funded anti-Trump Women’s March on Washington.

The MSM dubs any article critical of the Soros/MSM myth as “fake news.” In early December, the EU is demanding an end to “fake news” to be enforced by social media companies. Accordingly Facebook, will now apply warning labels to stories deemed to be “fake,” as determined by the Poynter Institute. The Poynter Institute is funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Google, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Omidyar Network (founder of Ebay), the Craig Newmark Foundation and other globalist groups. So the fox is once again guarding the hen house.

The emergence of the “fake news” phenomenon is coincidentally, at a time where faith in American political system has plummeted. Conducted by Nathanael Persily and Jon Cohen, a large poll paints a dismal picture of what Americans feel about our political institutions and even their fellow Americans. Ignoring the fact that ours is a Constitutional Republic, 3,000 registered voters were asked a series of questions about how they felt about democracy in America. 40% of the respondents have “lost faith in America,” while 6% responded that they never had faith in America. A full 67% felt their fellow Americans are untrustworthy. A different poll measured faith in governments in the US government at 38%.

The British vote to leave the European Union (Brexit) and the election of Donald Trump as US president reflect the growing erosion in the faith of globalist policies that favor the banksters, government officials and multi-national corporations. Fed up with fewer jobs for lower pay and diminished benefits, coupled with a greater risk of violence from the immigrants not properly vetted, more and more people are waking up to the rigged game the elites have been playing for decades.

Propaganda works best when those being manipulated are confident that they are acting on their own free will. -Joseph Goebbels [1]

It’s apparent why George Soros and the Council on Foreign Relations are actively hostile towards Trump GOP controlled Congress. CFR Director of International Institutions and Global Governance, Stewart Patrick, wrote an article for CNN entitled “Future of US Relationship with UN in Doubt.” His fanciful tale continues the Soros theme of nationalism being bad, globalism being good. Patrick complains that Trump and the GOP are going to “whack” the UN by possibly withholding money to the UN, which, according to Patrick, remains the best bang for the US buck.

Once again, all roads lead to Soros. Patrick was a research fellow at the Center for Global Development, a liberal think tank with ties to another philanthropic group (started by Bill Gates and George Soros among other globalists) called “One”. In his article, Patrick praises the incoming UN Chief, Antonio Guterres as an “accomplished and dynamic leader” capable of “fending off the negative impact of a unilaterally-inclined US administration and a micromanaging Congress.” Enjoying complete support of China and Russia, Guterres was active with “Friends of Europe,” which is also sponsored by Soros. Moreover, as UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Guterres worked with Soros’ “Open Society Foundation” that instigated the Muslim immigrant invasion of Europe.

George Soros,’ writing in a January 2017 Op Ed piece, defends those countries he calls “Open Societies,” ones that are willing to sacrifice part of their sovereignty for the common good. His plea smacks of “piecemeal social engineering” involving small, incremental steps toward establishing supranational governance. He states that the election of a would be dictator, Donald Trump; the British vote for leaving the European Union (Brexit); and the Italian vote against Constitutional Amendments creating a less democratically created but more powerful central government show a popular move away from globalism. The reason we are told is a buildup of resentment of governmental policies favoring the elites causing an increasing number of people to favor a tyrannical “nationalist” government instead of Soros-style transnational “open societies.”

Since the election, the clarion call has again been ringing for the end of the Electoral College. The expressed intent of groups like Refuse Fascism, and #DISRUPTJ20, is to shut down Washington DC. Ultimately they want to instigate the rebellion of tens of millions of people against the Trump/Pence administration and eventually remove them from office. Remember, these are groups being supported by an actual Nazi collaborator, George Soros who would like nothing better than to eliminate the votes of some 63 million Americans who voted for Trump/Pence.

Soros: A Modern Goebbelist

“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Zbigniew Brzezinski

Owned by the Rothschild family, the globalist mouthpiece Economist [90] magazine warns of severe economic pain in the post-Brexit world of Great Britain. As the article states, “If the price is economic pain, so be it.” In the US, we are warned that, by rejecting the “philanthropy” of Soros’ “Open Society Foundation,” we are embracing tyranny; while democracy is endangered by dark forces that plan to reverse the advances made by minorities. To the contrary, foundations that “care” about civil society—i.e., Open Society, Carnegie Corporation, Ford, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, MacArthur and Mott—need to move to the forefront.

The same people warning of encroaching tyranny should the continued trend of rejecting globalism continue, are now offering up technocracy as an alternative. In an article posted by Bloomberg, a self-described “globalist,” and apparent fan of George Soros, Professor Tyler Cowen is calling on Trump to bring in more “experts” to rule over America. Cowen’s bottom line is fear; his solution is for technocrats to save us, as they did in 2008, when the experts swindled trillions from common citizens.

Featuring Chinese President XI Jinping and German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the top of the page, Huffington Post recently released the article, “Sick of Democracy? The US could learn a lot from these Countries.” In it, we are warned that because populism has triumphed over pragmatism, we’re basically doomed. The article’s author, Parag Khanna, is a Fellow at the Soros/Bill and Melinda Gates/MacArthur funded “New America Foundation.” He is a respected member of academia and a well-connected globalist as pointed out in Time Magazine and the Washington Post.

In Khanna’s view, we best ditch the President for a council, like communist China has. Otherwise, people will lose even more faith in US democracy. As experts in their fields, technocrats should run the hundreds of governmental agencies that control every aspect of American life. Though unelected, they “know what they are doing,” and they’re free to do what needs to be done. A parliamentary system of unelected tyrants also promises to get more done than Congress. Khanna’s article supports his book, Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State, which implies democracy is dead. Long live technocracy.

In yet another attempt to spread chaos, Soros funded CNN ran a bizarre news story on 1/19/2017 about what would happen to the US government should Trump, Pence, and Congressional leaders be assassinated before Trump was sworn into office. The result would be a continuance of the Obama administration. Aside from being borderline treasonous and possibly inciting an attempt on Trump’s life, why did they not run the same story when Obama was sworn into office?

Aspiring to be the invisible power behind the throne, George Soros is the Joseph Goebbels of our time. With help from fellow billionaires, well-connected academics, government officials and ruthless thugs, Soros relentlessly tears apart the fabric of the US while, at the same time, he finances solutions to problems he has helped create.

Unfortunately, Soros-nemesis Donald Trump will inherit a nation on the brink of civil war with the greatest national debt in world history, a shrinking labor force, and growing numbers on welfare and in poverty. Added to many other economic indicators, these conditions signal a rapidly approaching financial collapse destined to dwarf the 2008 recession. Under a Trump presidency, that collapse could incite unprecedented rioting as disgruntled citizens, at long last, demand a different government.

If Trump is going to succeed in draining the swamp of Washington DC, it will only be because of divine intervention. There are too many bottom feeders in DC for one man or one team to fight and be successful against. We, the people of God need to fervently seek God’s blessing on Trump, his family and his administration for it will take a miracle to stop the globalist plot to destroy this country.

“It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -George Soros

© 2017 – Steven Neill – All Rights Reserved

After twenty four years of a relentless drive for centralized government power through Clinton, Bush and Obama, finally there is a chance to roll back some of the destruction to our Republic. Donald Trump has an historic opportunity to fulfill his promise to “drain the swamp,” meaning getting rid of the corruption, the power grabs, and the disregard for Constitutional law.

It’s vital to understand that federal agencies are basically operating without oversight, free to create thousands of rules and regulations that become the force of law. These rules come complete with threats of legal action and intimidation. Much of this enforcement is done behind the scenes, away from the public eye. But the result can destroy property, business, and lives.

To take effective action against this situation and fulfill on his promise, President Trumps must set a very specific priority for federal policy:

1. Assure the complete protection of private property rights for every American.
2. Immediately begin the process of reigning in the power, over reach, and illegal policies of every federal agency. One of the worst offenders of federal overreach and intimidation is fully represented in the day to day operations of the agency for Housing and Urban Development (HUD.)
HUD pretends to be the agency that represents low income citizens to assure they have “fair housing” choices and are protected from discrimination. In reality HUD’s policies do massive damage to the poor and steal away their ability to improve their station. After years of HUD intervention in development policy, the net result is more poor, bigger ghettos and less hope of improvement.

If President Trump intends to end poverty and help rebuild American wealth and restore the hopes and dreams of the poor and middle class, then private property ownership is the single most effective way to achieve it. Welfare and government programs will not do it. The poor simply have no avenue available to build personal wealth. All that is provided to them is a routine government handout which assures lifelong servitude to the government.

Right now HUD is enforcing a program called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) to destroy the property rights and property values of the middle class in communities across the nation. In the campaign candidate Trump promised to end this program. Now he must do it!

HUD is using the program for pure social engineering to change the very culture of the nation, and destroy the concept of property ownership. In the process, AFFH is using law suits and intimidation to destroy the founder’s concept of local rule in communities by taking away their freedom of self determination and development.

Now Trump has appointed Dr. Ben Carson as the new HUD Secretary. Many say he’s not qualified to run such a massive agency. Does he understand the problems he faces with this agency’s unrelenting assault on property rights and local home rule? What must he do to reign in this renegade agency? Here are a few immediate steps Carson can take to stop this assault on property owners and local communities, while actually helping the poor.

First. Stop the grants. HUD and other agencies dangle federal money in front of local communities as a trap to force them to impose the HUD policies. These grants come with specific strings attached that make the communities spend more money and create more rules and regulations. The end result is that local rule is compromised, property rights and values are destroyed and cities are eventually transformed into politically correct, environmentally propagandized stack and pack utopian nightmares.

To help curb this federal assault on local communities Dr. Carson must greatly diminish availability of grant programs and make sure the remaining programs are written in precise, straight forward language clearly outlining the rules for use of the grant.

Second. Stop the drive for the establishment of regional non-elected governments. They force on communities a “one-size-fits all” approach and take government further from the people. Only the representatives chosen by the people should make policy for the community.

Under AFFH rules, HUD is automatically placing communities into specific regions and enforcing a once size fits all policy. Many times local officials are not even informed that they are placed in such regions. Regionalism is the most effective tool for controlling private property, using rules and regulations from a ruling body no one voted for and no one can challenge or questions its policies.

Third. Work with Congress to write specific legislation that limits the Agency’s ability to create regulations beyond the intended scope of the programs. Over the years Congress has deliberately written legislation in near neutral language, leaving it up to the agencies to make their own rules. This failure to define exactly the meaning and intent of the legislation has allowed the bureaucracy to impose hundreds of thousands of rules and regulations that help to destroy the economy while building the power of the agency.

Fourth. Encourage whistleblowers to report on bad policy inside the agency. Who knows the situation better? Allow them to speak. Reward them for new, workable ideas for cutting costs and streamlining agency practices. Everyone knows that the federal bureaucracy is a mess in inefficiency, overreach and waste. The agency should be rewarded for cutting its budget rather than engaging in the annual “spend it or lose it derby” that encourages waste and spending to avoid budget cuts.

Cut the HUD budget to a point that it can only conduct the programs intended, thereby stopping its over reach, using congressional oversight to assure it remains under control.

Fifth. Move immediately to close down the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule. Federal agencies are to be of assistance to local communities, not a threat. Under AFFH law suits are becoming a way of life for local officials. It is the very definition of tyranny from the federal juggernaut. If Donald Trump wants to drain the swamp, AFFH is the number one alligator to be eliminated. Senator Mike Lee of Utah has already introduced legislation to de-fund it. He is ready, willing and able to work with Secretary Carson to get it done.

These guidelines are a good start and should be Carson’s goal for the first 100 days. Then he might want to consider starting a serious effort to eventually abolish HUD completely. It’s a socialist dinosaur and a threat to limited government in a free America.

© 2017 Tom DeWeese – All Rights Reserved

There are times in all of our lives when monumental events take place that require our attendance. The days of January 20th and 21st of 2017 were such a time, compelling many thousands of Americans to Washington, D.C., for the inauguration of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States.

The faithful, knowing the significance of what was to take place, would not allow the issues of home, business, job, travel, and money to keep them away. They were richly rewarded for their sacrifice.

We arrived Thursday evening for Friday’s inauguration and left Saturday evening after the feminist rally. What an eventful two days!

I assume the inauguration and its activities were no different than any others. The day was filled with the usual snafus of losing relatives in large crowds, long lines for almost everything, security everywhere, mazes of fences. It took 30 minutes to walk two blocks. Phones were dead by 2:00pm. Cold, wet, lack of sleep, tickets that didn’t work, and being late for everything.

But none of the inconveniences mattered because we all came, not so much to witness another inauguration, but to witness history.

THE CEREMONY

We arrived in the red section by 7:15am for the program that was to begin at 9:30. Being my first presidential inauguration, I was quite impressed with all of the pomp and splendor of the ceremony.

I agreed with all political persuasions over the impressive display of our Constitution in action with the 220 year tradition of the peaceful transfer of power for the office of chief magistrate – the president. There was a real sense of American pride in the ceremony because nothing in life, especially in politics, lasts 220 years.

As the ceremony got closer to the swearing in of the new president, things became more emotional because of who soon would be given the oath of office. It wasn’t the usual globalist-controlled establishment candidate of either party. It was Donald Trump, the true American nationalist.

It was then that I thought, “Is this really happening? I can’t believe it. Maybe it really is!” With the emotion came a Field of Dreams moment, “Is this heaven?” While meditating on what seemed to me to be a miracle of a Donald Trump presidency, on the big screen came the next speaker, Chuck Schumer. Then reality set in and, “No, it’s Iowa.”

After a good round of booing for Senator Schumer, which came from the cheaper seats in the back and then moved toward the front, came the time for Donald Trump to take the oath of office and become the 45th president of the United States.

FROM PARADE TO K STREET

From the ceremony we moved as quickly as possible to the parade checkpoints where we were met with a line that took 90 minutes to get through. Our parade bleacher ticket was useless because security would not allow any crossing of Pennsylvania Ave. So we spotted an open area near 11th and Pennsylvania.

On the way we had to go through a gauntlet of protesters who did not seem to like my Trump hat and proceeded to put their signs in my face, complemented by a barrage of unpleasant language.

We were fortunate to see the new president and his family in his short inaugural walk. While waiting, we heard the stories of riots on K Street, windows being smashed and cars burned. Between the option of finishing the parade or checking out the action on K Street, we decided to head toward the riot area. There’s something about being a teen in Wisconsin in the 60’s that compels one towards riots. It’s just part of our upbringing.

On the way to K Street and the protest at Franklin Park, we saw the broken windows at McDonalds, Starbucks, and Wells Fargo. From there, we came upon the Washington Post building with a completely burnt stretch limo in front.

I couldn’t help but laugh to see the 90+ riot police having to guard the entrance of the Washington Post, a national newspaper which for decades has encouraged leftist revolutionary activity, and who now needed riot police to protect their building from the revolutionary anarchists they helped create. The same goes for the damage at Starbucks – well known as a business icon of political correctness. Sometimes anarchists just don’t know when to stop.

One other humorous note, something I didn’t notice until I viewed the pictures, was the ‘for lease’ sign at the ground floor level of the Washington Post. What has happened to America’s former #2 newspaper? Riots, police protection, and now having to lease out office space?

DIXIE VISITS D.C.

Visiting the District of Columbia from here in North Florida, ten minutes from the Georgia line, was a little more intense than when Andy, Aunt Bee, and Opie visited Raleigh. I was not aware that we were twice going to engage in heated arguments on the D.C. metro line.

Friday night, decked out in our tuxes and headed to the ball, we took the metro from Maryland. On the second stop, an older man entered and, seeing our tuxes, let out a blast loud enough for everyone to hear: “Donald Trump is a fascist pig!” To which I followed with equal volume, “What university did you attend to learn to talk like that?” After a few more exchanges we ended our discussion.

After the ball, we made our way across Chinatown to the metro station only to witness an old Cadillac speeding down the street being chased by six cop cars. I guess this is what happens on Friday night in the nation’s capital.

After midnight, we barely caught the last metro back to Maryland. On our next stop, two female protesters in their mid-20s entered. We struck up a conversation with them about feminism and it went south when I asked the question: “Don’t you girls eventually want to find a husband who loves you, have babies, raise a family, and have grandchildren you can enjoy in your old age?” Well, when I mentioned the baby word, one of them became enraged and followed my question with, “You can take your f______ Bible, beer and ________, and put it up your _______.” From there, I sued for peace and wished them well as they left.

I need to be a little better prepared for the metro on my next visit to D.C. But, all things considered, it was a very difficult week for the inhabitants of the nation’s capital.

THE BALL

As in all inaugurations, there must be a plethora of inaugural balls, and to my surprise, my ticket to the Freedom Ball actually did work. We arrived around 9:00pm and were able to see the new president speak and dance with the first lady. Fittingly, they danced to Sinatra’s “My Way.”

I asked an older couple from Alabama, “Is this a political victory celebration party or a beauty contest?” I witnessed one dolled-up beauty after another. In light of Saturday’s D.C. invasion of feminists, it was wonderful to see conservative, female, Trump supporters, who not only like real men, but delight in the fact that God created them to be the fairer sex. My thought from the ball was that Trump’s people need to use photos of the ball as a recruiting tool to pluck out the last few remaining men in the Democratic Party.

UNDERCOVER AT THE RALLY

Some time Saturday morning, after breakfast with friends, we decided to take the Doobie Brother’s 1976 advice by “Takin’ It to the Streets,” and spy out the Women’s March on Washington.

Near the capital, we were met with a huge crowd of feminists shouting and carrying their homemade signs. We heard the noise of the rally speakers so we worked our way through wall-to-wall protesters. After 90 minutes, we finally got within 120 feet of the stage. On the way, we took in every possible sign. My favorite was two older ladies holding duplicate signs with the Mad-Man actress January Jones on the bottom and a text above which read, “I can’t believe we are still having to fight this s___.”

So much of the signage was filled with vulgarities and female sexual anatomy. It was disheartening to see young girls holding up these kinds of signs that their mothers had made. It is such a tragedy to see them so radicalized at such a young age.

Soon after we arrived near the stage, out strolled the 60’s revolutionary icon and Communist Party leader, Angela Davis. Instead of “where have you gone, Joe DiMaggio?” I changed Simon and Garfunkel’s lyric to, “Where have you been, Angela Davis?” Angela, it’s been 45 years! Her revolutionary activity now seems to be directed at the perceived evils of male patriarchy. Oh well, it was still an experience to see her in person.

Soon after Davis, to the podium came the 58 year old Madonna, looking fit and energized. Her infamous reputation was not damaged in the least by her behavior.

The word “profane” is not enough to describe the “material girl.” Out came one vulgarity after another to the delight of the crowd. The worst the language, the louder the cheers. Her threat to blow up the White House has now gotten her into trouble with the Secret Service.

After three hours inside the modern feminist movement, it was time to leave. I left thinking of the great disservice these feminists did to themselves and their cause with all of the foul language, signage, anger and radical rhetoric. What normal woman would join such a foul movement?

THE SPEECH

In advance of the inauguration, I wondered what the text of the inaugural speech would be. Would it be an olive branch offered to his many enemies with conciliatory language? Or would Trump seek a text with flowery language and try to come across as some kind of new American statesman? We ended up with neither.

Trump’s inaugural address was epic; a speech for the ages. It was unique to Trump and will prove to be one of the greatest of all presidential inaugural speeches. It was classic Trump – nationalist to the core. A speech for his people and one easily understood. The most striking thing in his talk was the gauntlet he threw down to those who follow the legacy of his predecessors, and those in the platform of both parties. It was also a declaration of war on all things Establishment. A war, he explained, against those who use government to enrich themselves at the expense of the American people.

Trump’s war is one where he will gladly be the leader of the forgotten people of America: the middle class. It will be a war against the global establishment for the prosperity of the American people.

Instead of softening his campaign rhetoric, he doubled down on anything and anyone who was anti-American. It was pure, classic, Trump Americana. So much could be said about his speech. Two of the best articles on this subject would be recent ones by Peggy Noonan and Joseph Farah.

The great fear of the enemies of America is not so much the speech, but the man Trump, who they know will deliver on his promises.

CONCLUSION

Having attended the Republican convention in August, an accurate comparison between Cleveland and D.C. would be that Cleveland was a carnival with displays of protests, while D.C. was a war.

For the attendees visiting the inauguration in Washington, D.C. came a realization of what President Trump is up against in the battle against the forces of globalism, and in his efforts to drain the D.C. swamp.

His most challenging internal enemies who will seek to oppose his reforms will not be the Democratic Party, but will be Paul Ryan and other establishment Republicans within his own party.

I am writing this article 5-days into the Trump presidency, on Wednesday of his first work-week, I’m still trying to sort out all the great things he accomplished on Monday. A friend called and said, “it’s like Christmas every day!” What a start for our new “America reformer.”

In his first week in office, I was taken again with another Field of Dreams moment: “Is this really happening? Is this a miracle from heaven?” Then I watched a replay of his inaugural speech and saw Paul Ryan sitting in the background and came back to reality, “No, it’s Iowa.”

Yes, the reality of “Iowa” and our present national condition should prompt from us two immediate actions:

• We must aggressively pray for the protection of our new president and seek to help him in his grand efforts to reform the federal government.

• We must also never forget that the realm of civil government is a limited realm. Our new “American reformer” can only do so much because his sphere of authority is a limited sphere. But what is unlimited are the reforms initiated by individual Americans, Christian organizations, and the church. My reference here is to the realm of culture where we all live. This realm is unlimited.

Some of the areas where we need to labor are the reform of local government, the family, the rejection of feminism and the restoration of true womanhood, the vision for large families, the rejection of government schools, giving our children a Christian education, and teaching our people a thorough and comprehensive Christian worldview so they can take their gifts and callings into the culture and change it to the glory of God.

We’ve been given a reprieve in Trump – a reprieve we don’t deserve. We have experienced a historic political awakening that has given us President Trump with a new and better political vision for America.

The greater and more important awakening that has not come yet is the awakening of Christian people. This is an awakening that will someday take place where the Christian people will set aside all their religious games and activities for a new vision to expand Christ’s rule and Kingdom in the earth; a vision where the church can once again be the greatest and guiding influence within the nations and peoples of the world.

We are still “in Iowa.” Do not look to our new president as some sort of cultural savior. We need to get to work while there is still time. Western Civilization is a creation of applied Christianity and its restoration cannot come politically. It must come in the culture and in the lives of the people.

© 2017 Thomas Ertl – All Rights Reserved

By Paco the Toad

(Servando is on vacation visiting friends in Rwanda and Burundi. This article was written by his colleague Paco the Toad. Paco is Pepe the Frog’s twin brother. He lives in Commiefornia.)

Humor and satire are the second-best tools to fight tyranny. — Servando Gonzalez.

I really liked Donald Trump. I never doubted his intention of making America great again. Nevertheless, after knowing that John McCain, a real American hero who never told a lie and a true conservative who has never found a war he didn’t like, is accusing Trump of being a secret agent of the Communist tyrant Vladimir Putin,[1] I have to confess that now I have some serious doubts about Tump.

Moreover, after doing some research on the Internet I found disturbing facts that have compounded my doubts. Why does Trump refuse to show his birth certificate? Is it true that he never drives because he doesn’t have a valid driver’s license? Why has he ordered to seal all his student records? Why does he have a Social Security card from Oklahoma, a state where he has never lived?

The idea that Donald Trump is nothing but an impostor and Putin’s secret agent may seem a little difficult to accept, but actually it is the only one that can fully explain why Trump won the election. Evidently, Trump stole the election from Hillary Clinton thanks to an anti-democratic feature called the Electoral College. Some people suspect that it was introduced in the American electoral system by Putin’s agents. Adding to the suspicion is the fact that, as I found in WikiLies, the term “electoral college” is actually the literal translation of the Russian term “electaralnya callegya,” a concept introduced to the Soviet Constitution in 1929 by Communist leader Vladimir Lenin.

What if McCain is right? What if, as some Liberal progressive CIA officers suspect, Donald Trump is actually Ivan Ivanovitch Trumpovsky, a KGB sleeper[2] who has been pushed to the White House by Putin’s KGB hackers? What if agent Trumpovsky’s true goal is not to make America great again, but to destroy America as we know it and turning it into a Communist dictatorship?

These are very serious concerns we should consider.

Now, if agent Trumpovsky wants to destroy America, how he will do it? What measures he would take? His KGB controllers most likely have already given him a cell phone and a pen. What Executive Orders he would sign?

Well, the very first thing he will do is to destroy America’s integrity as a sovereign country by opening the borders to a veritable invasion of illegal aliens, some of them people who don’t share America’s values and some who are outright criminals. Another thing he may do is bringing to the country thousands of “refugees” from Muslim countries.

Then, to guarantee that eventually the alien invaders take control of America by sheer force of their numbers, he will promote abortion among American women. To this effect he will create a pro-abortion organization he will duplicitously call Planned Parenthood.

Moreover, to guarantee the destruction of the family, he most promote feminism and the right of women to work. This will leave the children in the hands of Communist militants to be educated as anti-Christian Communists.

In coordination with the above, agent Trumpovsky will turn our schools and universities into centers of Communist indoctrination. In order to avoid criticism from American patriots he may also create the concept of “palitichesky karrectnyesni” [Russian for political correctness]. Also, under the false idea of multiculturalism he may encourage the substitution of American values for other values [or lack of them]. This is very dangerous, because, as John McCain and other conservative patriots know, Vladimir Putting has turned Russia into a Communist anti-Christian nation. So, Christianity is one of the things agent Trumpovsky will try to eradicate in America.

Also, if he wants to destroy the American middle class and the U.S. economy as a whole, Trumpovsky may encourage big corporations to close their factories here and outsource the jobs to lower-paying countries such as Mexico and China. He may also pass laws allowing the corporations to avoid paying taxes for earnings abroad.

In order to force Americans to lower their standard of living without being blamed for it, he may use the mainstream media and corrupt scientists to convince the people that the planet is warming up, the Polar bears are dying, Miami will soon be under 30 feet of sea water, and the only way to stop the catastrophe is by eating less, driving less, and becoming dirty poor.

One sure thing agent Trumpovsky may try is to impose on Americans an ineffcient system of public health. He may call it the Affordable Communist Care Act — which will prove to be totally unaffordable for most Americans.

Also, following the principle of “divide and conquer,” agent Trumpovsky may foment racial hatred and discontent among minorities. He will easily accomplish this by allegedly fighting against racial prejudices and discrimination.

Another thing this KGB agent will surely do is change the U.S. military, a fine-tuned fighting machine, into a lab for social engineering. Soon after we will see gay flags flying at the Pentagon.

If agent Trumpovsky really wants to destroy America’s love for freedom a sure thing to do is to create, under the pretext of protecting us from terrorists, a KGB-operated Transportation Security Administration. The TSA would be an efficient tool in turning Americans into sheep. In a short time we will have generations of American sheeple who cannot conceive boarding a plane without taking their shoes off and being groped by a commie pervert.

Communists detest freedom, so, a thing agent Trumpovsky most likely may try is to create a false flag attack on a big American city and blame foreign terrorists for it. This attack may justify his creation of a Stasi-like organization he may name the Officialnyi Homelandsky Securichestvy (Office of Homeland Security). After this, he may militarize the police and change America into a police state very similar to what a country occupied by the Russian Army would look like.

Also, in coordination with the Communists-controlled CIA, agent Trumpovsky will launch a disinformation campaign to make Americans believe that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by Muslim terrorists, not by members of the anti-American organization Communists for Revolution (CFR) infiltrated in the U.S. government. People who questioned this will be called “conspiracy theorists.”

Last, but not least, one thing agent Trumpovsky surely will do is ban guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans.[3] Guns are the people’s last line of defense against tyranny, so the Russian Communists will try to deprive Americans of their guns before invading and imposing their Communist totalitarian dictatorship upon us.

Well, all of this is very scary.

I don’t know about you, but as a true Liberal progressive I am awash in frustration, anger, hopelessness, confusion and fear. It seems that agent Trumpovsky’s goal is to destroy our cherished democracy and force us to live in fear without even a semblance of honor, dignity and safety in a communist representative Republic guided by a Constitution written long ago by white male rich Communists.

Finally, one of the things that will give us a clear indication if agent Trumpovsky is pushing America into the road of Communism is the composition of his Cabinet. If his Secretary of State, National Security Adviser, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Treasure, CIA Director, UN Ambassador and Chief of Staff are members of the dreaded Communists for Revolution (CFR) organization, this would be a danger red flag. The CFR is a treacherous anti-American organization whose ultimate goal is turning America into a Communist country.

So, if you see any of those things I have mentioned above beginning to happen in America, it would be a clear signal to run for the hills and rebel against agent Trumpovsky and his evil master, Communist atheist Vladimir Putin.[4]

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinions expressed in this article are solely the opinions of Paco the Toad and are not necessarily the opinions of NewsWithViews.com, its employees, representatives, their pets, or other contributing writers, including Servando Gonzalez.]

Servando is the uthor of Psychological Warfare and the New World Order and I Dare Call It Treason, and the DVDs Treason in America and Partners in Treason, all of them available at NewsWithViews.

© 2017 Servando Gonzalez – All Rights Reserved

According to the so-called “press,” Trump and his team are “lying” with their assertions that massive election and/or voter fraud has taken place in the United States. Members of the “press” have repeatedly stated that “Trump is lying” about voter fraud in U.S. elections, referring to those claims as “untrue, unfounded or unsubstantiated” alleging that “no evidence exists” to support these claims of fraud.

Keep in mind that they rushed to report “unsubstantiated” lies about Trump and Russia, but refuse to report known facts concerning highly substantiated election fraud.

It is on this foundation of quicksand that “press” outlets like CNN are working to undermine President Trumps credibility. It’s not just the Commie News Network (CNN) though. Shep Smith at Fox News is on board, as is the New York Times, Salon and many other outlets. It doesn’t stop there though… Republican Senators like Lindsey Graham and John McCain are also out on that limb.

For the record – mass election fraud has gone on in the USA for a long time and it is at record levels in the 2016 elections and everyone knows it.

1. Illegal Alien voting is election fraud – California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont and Washington all issue state photo IDs to illegal aliens. None of these states issue a license that identifies the driver as an “illegal alien.” Most, if not all of these states, also use the Department of Motor Vehicles to register voters at the same time they issue a driver’s license. Because these illegal aliens have a) proof of residence; b) a government issued photo; and c) appear on the voter registration rolls… they can and do vote in our elections. – This is “election fraud” as it is illegal for any non-citizen to vote in any U.S. election.

2. Motor voter laws – can allow someone to register to vote and cast their vote at the same time. This allows individuals to register to vote whether they are legally eligible or not, in multiple districts and vote immediately. By the time the system catches someone registered illegally, the election is long over and never reversed. Governor Kasich’s Ohio leads the way on this trick!

3. More votes than voters is election fraud – Although all of the national press outlets refused to report it, local news outlets have reported numerous accounts of election fraud, such as these reports in 37% of Detroit districts in 2016 of more votes than voters in those districts. This is verified evidence of election fraud. Dead voters are all too common in many districts across the country.

4. Obama’s Refugee Resettlement fraud – Most Americans do not know that when someone enters our country as a “refugee” (regardless of their real status at entry), our government gives them a fast track to U.S. citizenship, including voting rights. Today’s refugees are tomorrows U.S. voters. This is one of several methods used by politicians to alter U.S. voter demographics.

5. Foreign Campaign Donations – It’s no secret that both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton relied heavily on international campaign donations. Under U.S. Law, foreign donations to political campaigns, used to influence U.S. voters, are illegal. Foreign campaign financing is election fraud and it has happened in the hundreds of millions of dollars for numerous democrat politicians, including funds laundered through “bundlers” and the Clinton Foundation.

6. Democratic Party operatives bussed voters to multiple districts – Caught on hidden camera admitting bussing voters to multiple districts to vote multiple times. Just because the “press” denies it, does not mean it didn’t happen. The evidence is overwhelming. Voting in multiple districts is election fraud.

7. Disrupting opposition campaigns – using violence and intimidation intended to silence free campaign speech and threaten voters is election fraud. Again, the evidence of these acts are well-known and widely reported, in particular, the shutting down of Trump rallies in 2016.

8. Paid protests – by the extreme left intended to create the false impression of an organic uprising by “the people” when in fact millions of dollars are poured into these paid riots by known financiers of anti-American activism, like George Soros, is an overt effort to subvert U.S. law and incite riots, vandalism and violence against innocent Americans. These are not legal forms of political electioneering. This is fraud as well.

I could keep going for an entire book on this subject, using known verifiable facts and vetted evidence to make the case that election fraud in America is quite real. So, the people lying about this subject are not Donald Trump or his administrative staff. Most of these FRAUD tactics are the result of The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 under Bill Clinton and a Democrat controlled Congress.

All eight of the above items present very real evidence of massive election fraud. But in case that isn’t enough for the “press” who acts like they are entirely unaware of these facts, here’s a video of California Governor Brown and then President Barack Obama telling illegal aliens to “get out and vote.”

According to then President Obama, because our voting system is confidential, illegal aliens can vote… “if you vote, you are a citizen” even if you are NOT a citizen of the USA, according to Obama. Listen to that again! In fact, only three days before the 2016 election, Barack Obama encouraged illegal activity in the upcoming election.

ICE agents have even testified that they routinely arrest illegal aliens with voter registrations on them at the time of the arrest.

So, clearly the “press” is lying about the subject of massive election fraud in America. With so much evidence in plain public view, how do they think they can get away with such a bald-faced lie, all designed to undermine President Trump and his agenda to secure America from all sorts of illegal invaders?

Hitler’s propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels answers this question very precisely…

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

So, unless and until “the people” wake up and reject all lies by all the “press,” the lies will continue until the people believe those lies or end them. It worked for Hitler and it is working against millions in America right now! Just look at the enemy in our streets! The current “press” is just another swamp that must be drained.

If this concerns you, contact The North American Law Center…

© 2017 JB Williams – All Rights Reserved

Rahm Emanuel Rather Have More Gun Control

President Donald Trump once again warned Democratic Party officials in Chicago — especially Mayor Rahm Emanuel — and the news media that if they can’t stop the Windy City’s climbing murder and violent crime rate, Trump’s Washington, D.C. team will take action to protect the people — whites, blacks, Latinos and Asians — from the street predators, gang-bangers and other criminals.

Mayor Emanuel said that he welcomes the chance to partner with federal agencies to curb violence in Chicago. Then he said that illegal immigrants are welcome, as well and his city will remain a sanctuary. He also blamed the high crime rate on the relative ease with which the people in Chicago purchase illegal weapons including assault rifles. He blames other states in the region that have less-stringent gun control policies.

While a number of conservatives claim that policing and crimefighting policies and actions — the police function — are relegated to the individual states, it has become commonplace for the U.S. Department of Justice to go into cities, towns and counties to investigate local cops and police agencies.

Trump believes that these so-called police racism and misconduct cases are at best unnecessary, at worst they are fraudulent based on political correctness and the liberal-left’s anti-police, anti-military standards.

Trump spoke about The Windy City’s crime and violence after the Chicago Police Department released year-end crime stats on New Year’s Day. It showed that Chicago’s homicide numbers were worse than the larger cities of New York and Los Angeles combined.

“Chicago murder rate is record setting – 4,331 shooting victims with 762 murders in 2016. If Mayor can’t do it he must ask for Federal help!” the future White House occupant tweeted.

During his campaign against race-baiting Democrat Hillary Clinton, Trump often highlighted the plight of blacks in Chicago. He promised them a safer, economically sound community free from gangs, drugs and violence. Whenever he asked for their votes, Trump would say, “Give me a chance [as president]. What have you got to lose?”

2016 Chicago Crime Statistics Released

Chicago, Illinois, released its annual crime report for 2016, arguably one of the most violent years for big cities in more than a decade. According to the statistics, there were 762 homicides in 2016 with a daily average of two murders. It is the most killings committed in that city in more than two decades.

Chicago, which has the third largest city population in the country, also witnessed upwards of 1,000 more shooting incidents than it experienced in 2015, according to statistics provided by the beleaguered Chicago Police Department.

“The numbers are staggering especially the dozens of shootings and monthly death tolls that weren’t seen in perhaps 20 years. The increase in last year’s homicides compared to 2015, when 485 were reported, is the largest spike in 60 years,” noted Chicago’s Top Cop Edward “Eddie” Johnson.

Police Superintendent Johnson said during a press conference on New Year’s Day, “Chicago is among many U.S. cities that have [seen] a spike in violence, including [a spike] in attacks on police.”

He told reporters that the anger at police over their alleged use of excessive force, especially deadly physical force, has actually “emboldened criminals” to commit even more violent crimes.

While Johnson doesn’t say it — being a good Democrat in a city practically bought and paid for by the Democratic Party Machine — many believe that President Barack Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General Eric Holder, and former Obama White House minion, now Chicago’s mayor, Rahm Emmanuel may share a large part of the blame for increased friction between minorities and law enforcement.

He also said it’s becoming clearer to criminals that they have little to fear from the criminal justice system, which is run by mostly liberal Democrats. For example, not a week goes by without a news story describing another large-scale prison release by Obama, including those illegal aliens released after serving time for violent crimes who remain on the streets of Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and other large U.S. cities.

Ironically, it’s those cities that consider themselves “sanctuary cities” that are seeing the highest increases in street crime. But rather than address that issue, Attorney General Loretta Lynch spends millions of tax dollars and man-hours investigating police departments and officers.

Also on Sunday, the CBS News show 60 Minutes made “some outlandish, and illogical accusations” against the Chicago Police Department: The report blamed the police officers for the increase in Chicago’s murder rate and violent crimes such as armed robberies, rapes, aggravated assaults and other serious offenses.

According to officials at the organization Blue Lives Matter, “The introduction to the [60 Minutes] segment described Chicago as being a city that more closely resembles a ‘war zone’ as opposed to one of America’s great cities.” They also said, “It’s [being] widely reported that Chicago had 762 murders, and 1,400 people wounded by gun shots during the year 2016. And 60 Minutes described the Chicago Police Department as being an agency on its heels.”

Blue Lives Matter is a media company, founded and run entirely by active and retired law enforcement officers.

“The segment was hosted by CBS Correspondent Bill Whitaker who wasted no time pinpointing what he described as being an “alarming cause” for the drastic uptick in murders on the streets of Chicago. Whitaker passionately (some might say ignorantly) placed the full blame at the feet of the courageous men and women who proudly wear the badge and patrol this described “war zone that is Chicago,” the group wrote in their statement.

Blue Lives Matter’s officials stated:

“Bill Whitaker revealed some statistics that were obtained from inside the Chicago Police Department. The data reveals an annual comparison of 2016 and 2015 pertaining to the police activity levels. It also showed that in August 2015 police officers stopped and questioned 49,257 people as a result of pro-active policing measures. A year later that number decreased to 8,859, which is about an 80% decline in people stopped and questioned.”

The data used by Whitaker can be found in the full transcript provided by CBS 60 Minutes.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

Friday January 20th was quite a day. The drama and excitement, the parade, the celebration, the pomp, formalities, tradition and pageantry as well as the dinners and gala balls, it was quite a spectacle. But what was most important on inauguration day? A mere 30 seconds, those critically important moments when Donald Trump took his oath of office to become the 45th President of these United States.

Video of the Sermon

Nothing else was more important on that momentous day. Those 35 words spoken by Donald Trump are the only thing that was required on that day. And it took about all of 30 seconds.

Our Constitution requires the President and all elected and appointed repre-sentatives, judges and other officials of the Federal government to take an oath. Only the President’s oath is actually spelled out in the Constitution.

Why did our Founders require an oath? To hold each person in office to the highest level of accountability, not to the people (I’m not sure that our Presi-dent fully understands this as he spoke of his oath in terms of loyalty to the people) the oath is not to the people but to God and the perspective is that of judgment day when God will evaluate our performance regarding that oath. Our founders knew that given fallen human nature, the tendency of anyone who is granted power will tend to abuse that power unless they are held in check. Knowing that it is not possible for We the People to constantly monitor and check every action of one who represents us, they required by oath that the office holder place themselves before God who sees all and knows all. He can discern every action, thought, word and even motivation. Consider what God’s Word tells us about the oath.

Ecclesiastes 5:4-6 “When thou vowest a vow unto God, defer not to pay it; for he hath no pleasure in fools: pay that which thou hast vowed. Better is it that thou shouldest not vow, than that thou shouldest vow and not pay.

Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin; neither say thou before the angel, that it was an error: wherefore should God be angry at thy voice, and destroy the work of thine hands?”

One of our founders Noah Webster understood that words may be perverted and twisted over time. So he wrote the very first American dictionary to give to future generations a clear understanding of what these words in our founding documents actually mean. Websters 1828 “OATH, n.

“A solemn affirmation or declaration, made with an appeal to God for the truth of what is affirmed.

The appeal to God in an oath, implies that the person imprecates His venge-ance and renounces His favor if the declaration is false, or if the declaration is a promise, the person invokes the vengeance of God if he should fail to fulfill it. A false oath is called perjury.” So an oath is a dangerous thing. If one takes an oath but then violates that oath, by that very oath they have instructed God to bring His curses down upon their sorry heads.

That this why the hand of the oath taker is placed on the Bible, implied by that action is “May the curses contained in this book fall upon me if I fail to fulfill this oath I am now taking.” President Trump swore his oath with his hand on two Bibles, one was the “bible he was given by his mother when he graduated from Sunday Church Primary School at First Presbyterian Church in Jamaica, New York, in 1955,” and the other one used by many Presidents in the past.

• US Con Art II Sec 1 states, “Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Our founders recognized the great value of oaths and that the Republic they were designing would never succeed if all the people did not consider oath taking a very serious business.

• Washington’s Farewell Address (once read by every school child and con-sidered to be the most important political statement in the whole history of our country) states plainly, “Let it be simply asked where is the security for prosperity, for reputation for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in the Courts of Jus-tice?” Washington knew that once people began disregarding the true meaning of an oath as a solemn vow before Almighty God for which He will hold each oath taker fully accountable the Republic would be lost.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
• In 1 Timothy 2:1-2 we are instructed, “I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.”

• We should pray for President Trump that he will fulfill the oath he has made, otherwise he is bringing harm upon himself. And knowing the con-dition of Washington, D.C. I believe it will be extremely difficult for him to keep the oath which he has made.

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

In this series we need to look at what our politicians have done to us concerning the food we eat. Our FDA has allowed Genetically Modified Organisms, GMO, to be introduced into our food supply. These foods are genetically engineered to resist Roundup® weed killer. The theory is this crop will survive being sprayed with Roundup® for better weed control of products. What I believe is these companies that produce GMO products do so so that they will control the world’s food supply. They say it is to produce more food to feed the world. A few facts from the 1970’s proves that GMO’s are not necessary. In the 1970’s the United States had 6% of the farmable land in the world. Russia had 30%. Russia couldn’t feed themselves and we feed the world.

In independent studies GMO foods are not shown to be safe for human or animal consumption. Monsanto’s study says they are. The government seems to only pay attention to Monsanto’s study. Many nations refuse to accept America’s GMO products and some won’t allow GMO’s to be grown in their countries. Well over 90% of corn grown in America is GMO. Around 92% of the soy grown in America is GMO. Tomatoes, potatoes, apples and other products grown in America are GMO. The FDA has just approved GMO salmon raised on GMO feed to be sold.

Consumers have been fighting to at least get GMO products labeled for years but the lobbyists for the GMO producers dump millions of dollars into the coffers of politicians to stop the bill. The worst part of this is the House passed a bill that bans States from requiring the labeling of GMO products EVEN if the State already had a law that required it. This is called the DARK Act: Legislation dubbed the Deny Americans the Right to Know, or DARK Act (H.R. 1599), passed the House of Representatives yesterday by a vote of 275-150. The bill preempts state and local authority to label and regulate genetically engineered (GE) foods. A Senate version of this bill has not yet been introduced.

The bill, backed largely by House Republicans, codifies a voluntary labeling system approach, blocks the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from ever implementing mandatory GE food labeling and allows food companies to continue to make misleading “natural” claims for foods that contain GE ingredients.

A number of farm state Democrats joined House Republicans in passing the bill. Twelve Republicans voted against the bill citing infringement of states’ rights and local control.

“It’s outrageous that some House lawmakers voted to ignore the wishes of nine out of 10 Americans,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president of government affairs for Environmental Working Group (EWG). “Today’s vote to deny Americans the right to know what’s in their food and how it’s grown was a foregone conclusion. This House was bought and paid for by corporate interests, so it’s no surprise that it passed a bill to block states and the FDA from giving consumers basic information about their food.”

More than 300 organizations, companies and food industry and social justice leaders oppose the DARK Act in the face of massive spending and lobbying by big chemical and food companies, according to EWG. Polls show a large majority of people in key states and across the country support mandatory GMO labeling. [1] Notice that it was the Republicans that pushed this bill!

Many independent studies have proven that GMO’s are not fit for human or animal to eat. David Suzuki a world renowned geneticist, PHD, LLD, CC, OBC has stated “Any politician or scientist who tells you these [GMO] products are safe is either very stupid or lying.”[2] There are too many questions and not enough answers. The head of the US Department of Agriculture for the last 6 years is Tom Vilsack, a Obama nominee, who supported Obama’s agenda which included the proliferation of GMO products in the market. Vilsack was the origin of the seed pre-emption bill in 2005, which many people here in Iowa fought because it took away local government’s possibility of ever having a regulation on seeds- where GE would be grown, having GE-free buffers, banning pharma corn locally, etc. Representative Sandy Greiner, the Republican sponsor of the bill, bragged on the House Floor that Vilsack put her up to it right after his state of the state address.

* Vilsack has a glowing reputation as being a schill for agribusiness biotech giants like Monsanto. Sustainable ag advocated across the country were spreading the word of Vilsack’s history as he was attempting to appeal to voters in his presidential bid. An activist from the west coast even made this youtube animation about Vilsack. [3]

The dangers of GMO products are being ignored for the sake of corporate profits. “Most studies with GM foods indicate that they may cause hepatic, pancreatic, renal, and reproductive effects and may alter haematological [blood], biochemical, and immunologic parameters, the significance of which remains to be solved with chronic toxicity studies.” – Dona A, Arvanitoyannis IS. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2009; 49: 164–175 [4]

There are three possible sources of adverse health effects from GM foods:

• The GM gene product – for example, the Bt toxin in GM insecticidal crops – may be toxic or allergenic
• The GM transformation process may produce mutagenic effects, gene regulatory effects, or effects at other levels of biological structure and function that result in new toxins or allergens and/or disturbed nutritional value
• Changes in farming practices linked to the use of a GMO may result in toxic residues – for example, higher levels of crop contamination with the herbicide Roundup are an inevitable result of using GM Roundup Ready® crops (see Sections 4, 5).[5]
These studies show abnormal growths in lab rats that the FDA ignores. Mice and rabbits also showed very negative health effects from GMO food: Mice fed GM soy showed disturbed liver, pancreas and testes function. The researchers found abnormally formed cell nuclei and nucleoli in liver cells, which indicates increased metabolism and potentially altered patterns of gene expression.

• Mice fed GM soy over their lifetime (24 months) showed more acute signs of ageing in the liver than the control group fed non-GM soy.
• Rabbits fed GM soy showed enzyme function disturbances in kidney and heart.
• Female rats fed GM soy showed changes in uterus and ovaries compared with controls fed organic non-GM soy or a non-soy diet.[6]
You have to ask yourself why our politicians refuse to look out for the safety of the American people when so many other nations have banned GMO products? With mounting scientific evidence about the human and environmental costs of GE foods and industrial agriculture, 64 nations now require the labeling of foods containing GE ingredients.

Many nations have banned GE crops altogether, including parts of the EU, Austria, China, India, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, Greece, Bulgaria, Poland, Italy and Russia.

With so many rejecting GE foods, major U.S. exports of soy and corn have lost international trade value. One expert estimated $200 to 300 million per year are lost in European exports alone.

With regard to China, U.S. corn exports dropped 85 percent in one year (2013 to 2014), according to the trade association, which bases its estimates on data from export companies.

In Europe, the GMO tug-of-war continues, as 58 GE foods remain legal for import, with 17 new ones added in April 2015 (maize, cotton, soybean, oilseed rape, sugar beets, and carnations). 4 Individual EU states are granted the option of opting-out.

Here in the U.S., industry’s greed rages on. Corporate leaders and government officials refuse to heed GMO warnings — even from their own scientists.[7]

I haven’t even scratched the surface of the GMO controversy. I could do 10 columns and not cover half of it all. I want to show you that it is vitally important that we send competent people to Washington that will do things that benefit and protect us not just line their pockets. Right now the majority are there for themselves and to promote the global agenda. This election proved that we can change that.

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. House passes dark act banning states from requiring gmo labels on food.
2. David Zuzuki speaks out against genetically modified food.
3. Six reasons why obama appointing monsantos buddy.
4. GMO Myths and Truths.
5. GMO Myths and Truths.
6. GMO Myths and Truths.
7. Food dangers.

Because the Supreme Court Can Be Ignored

On Saturday, feminist abortion rights activists gathered to protest the inauguration of President Donald Trump. The following day, pro-life Americans celebrated the Sanctity of Human Life, a day celebrated as a tradition started in 1984 by President Ronald Reagan in response to the 11th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, in which the Supreme Court issued an opinion that denied the right to life to an unborn child.

Regrettably, even with the efforts of pro-life Americans and presidents, abortion is NOT disappearing in this country and I believe this is, in part, because we are using the WRONG METHOD to attack it; for example, by “trying to overturn Roe v. Wade.”

Why do you say this, Jake? Well, for starters, Article 1, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution states that ALL legislative authority rests with Congress. The Supreme Court, as part of the Judicial branch, does not make law, but merely rules on their opinions. Those opinions are relative ONLY to the parties involved, not to the nation.

Congress, who makes law in accordance to the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God, has NEVER passed any legislation to “legalize” abortion, THEREFORE THERE IS NO LAW TO OVERTURN.

Even if Congress did pass such “law,” it would be what our founders called “pretended legislation” as it violates the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.

Unbeknownst to most Americans, previous horrendous Supreme Court decisions have dissolved because they were ignored, not overruled or overturned. Here are two examples:

Dred Scott: This was a War-Between-the-States-era decision ruling that people of African descent were property and could not be U. S. citizens. Clearly this opinion of the court had no practical or legal authority so it was ignored.

Buck v. Bell (1927): Championed by Oliver Wendell Holmes, the court ruled that incompetent/imbecilic women should be sterilized. Almost 70,000 were sterilized before this was stopped. It was stopped because of public opinion, not because the decision was overturned.

Founding father and First Amendment architect Fisher Ames knew decisively the importance of establishing MORALITY as the heart of public opinion.

“Constitutions,” said Ames, “are but paper; society is the substratum of government.”

I submit that to stop abortion, going through the courts is irrelevant and even lend credibility to the murderous Roe v Wade decision, which has never had legal legs to stand on.

Instead of lawsuits, it is imperative we increase our efforts in educating the public on the immorality of killing innocent children of any age, including in the womb.

Truth must define the terms and set the parameters of the argument. For example, if the Supreme Court ruled it was okay to kill any child under the age of three for any reason, would that make it okay? Would their ruling make it legal? How many children would be killed because of a “terrible-2-year-old’s bad day”? How would we view parents who did such a thing?

With the narrative on this foundation of questioning, no legislation is needed. Moral outrage will ensue in the hearts of the people and their representatives, and Roe v, Wade will fade into history, just like Dred Scott and Buck v Bell, while state governors and attorney generals will again enforce the law of our land which protects the right to life and criminalizes abortionists.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved

The other day, information came my way about the fate of Yazidi girls and women at the hands of ISIS. The Yazidi are a Kurdish people indigenous to what was Mesopotamia. They live primarily in what is now the Nineveh Province in what is now northwestern Iraq, although there are Yazidi communities in both Syria and Turkey. Their religion is a blend of Zoroastrianism, Islam, Judaism and Christianity, with links to Sufiism.
They had already been caught between U.S. troops and Iraqi insurgents. Not being Muslims and being a peaceful people, they were sitting targets for the Islamic State.

ISIS militants came to the Yazidi region of Shingal on August 3, 2014. Thousands of Yazidis were killed, kidnapped, or sexually enslaved. The article I received spoke of Yazidi girls being “sold” for a few packs of cigarettes.

Mirza Ismael, who chairs the Yazidi Human Rights Organization-International, said, “Some of these women and girls have had to watch 7-, 8-, and 9-year-old children bleed to death before their eyes, after being raped by ISIS militia multiple times a day. ISIS militias have burned Yazidi girls alive for refusing to convert and marry ISIS men. Why? Because we are not Muslims and because our path is the path of peace. For this we are being burned alive: for living as men and women of peace.”

There is, of course, a massive international slave and “sex worker” trade in that part of the world. Girls who have not yet entered puberty, some of them kidnapped, are repeatedly gang raped by ISIS militiamen many of whom are pedophiles. If the girls cry out in protest, they are beaten bloody, often to death. Those who try to escape and are caught can have their noses or ears or hands or feet cut off.

Radical Islam, of course, sees women as less than property. It is illegal in countries controlled by Radical Islam for women to receive an education. Most can’t read or write their native language. They are forbidden to leave their houses without male approval.

I present this live horror show as the perfect backdrop for these highly-touted (by Western corporate media, anyway) women’s marches in Washington and other major Western cities following the Trump inauguration, protesting actions they seem to believe the Trump administration is about to undertake.

There were many speakers at these events. One of them, actress Ashley Judd, read a poem in which she asked why “tampons are taxed when Viagra and Rogaine are not.”

In this one query, given all we reviewed above, you should see the reasons why the American Left has no credibility — none whatsoever. It had none before the Donald Trump era began on January 20. But now the fact (and it isn’t an “alternative fact”) is out in the open, or should be.

People like Ashley Judd, other celebrities including far wealthier and more famous ones like Madonna, live in a bubble of privilege — and I don’t mean that leftist invention, “white privilege.” I mean the privilege of being able to open their mouths and be heard by millions despite their utter cluelessness.

One of the criticisms I sometimes hear of U.S. citizens is that when all is said and done, we know little of what goes on outside our borders. I doubt most Americans have heard of the Yazidi, or know that ISIS overwhelmed them on August 3, 2014. After all, I’m sure Kim Kardashian did something that week!

It is unclear how many women participated in these grandiose marches. What is clear is that they have no idea how well off they are compared to their counterparts elsewhere in the world. As children they were taught to read and write. They went to school alongside boys. As adults they can come and go as they please, without asking permission. They can go to college and pursue careers. They can gain visibility (with or without actual talent). Some of the world’s wealthiest celebrities are American women.

Yes, yes, yes, I know there were women who struggled and fought for those rights. I saw a list on the Left-leaning Medium site just the other day. I also know that today’s whiners aren’t qualified to polish those women’s shoes.

One of their biggest fears seems to be that under the Trump administration and the new GOP-controlled Congress they might lose the “right” to kill their unborn children and have the U.S. federal government pay for it if they can’t pay for it themselves, which means taxpayers, some of whom are pro-life, will continue being coerced into helping fund the killing of unborn babies.

They are afraid Planned Parenthood might be defunded and shut down. I have the feeling, though, that the Madonnas and Ashley Judds of the world have enough money between them — that there is enough money in the community of celebrity women generally — that they could keep Planned Parenthood open, privately funded, and serving women’s legitimate health needs. I wonder if this has occurred to any of them. Probably not. They would have to stop whining, get up off their celebrated duffs, and start doing something useful.

Why do I keep mentioning Madonna?

Because the other day she was quoted as having thought about “blowing up the White House.” When I read that, what raced through my mind was, “Why isn’t that a terroristic threat?”

Then Secret Service started looking into the matter. She did some of her fanciest backpedaling, saying her remark was taken out of context. I don’t believe she meant it literally, of course. She was just doing what Left-leaning celebrities do best, which is shoot off their mouths. But with the thought now out on the table, who knows what one of her fanatic followers might do?

The American Left has lost control of the public narrative. Other voices, including from alternative media with alternative narratives, are now being listened to. Leftists can’t stand it, and are reacting as they typically do when they can’t have their way: getting verbally abusive and violent.

Outside the now-infamous Deploraball [sic.] in Washington the night before the Inauguration, writer James Allsup, a Trump supporter from Seattle, was targeted outside the event by leftist protesters along with some of his fellow attendees. Pushing and shoving ensued. After hearing someone yell, “Die, Nazi!” Allsup was punched while others filmed it, then struck in the head with a metal flagpole. He had to go to the ER for stitches.

This was only one example, and it is hardly an outlier. We reported on the harassment of Trump supporters and attendees of his rallies as far back as last spring, when thousands of University of Illinois at Chicago students took to the streets, compelling Trump to cancel a scheduled appearance out of public safety concerns.

It was not Trump supporters, moreover, who began to shut down major thoroughfares and interstate highways trying to block attendees from reaching Hillary Clinton rallies.

Now there is abundant evidence that the Left is in total meltdown mode. A friend of mine who lives in Texas sent me this the other day.

I know that was painful. She either didn’t know she was being filmed or didn’t care.

Do these people have any idea how silly they look and sound?

Author and blogger Charles Hugh Smith has a brilliant essay about what happened to the Left. He goes further into the history of Marxism then we need to worry about here, but what it boils down to: their obsessions with political correctness and identity politics cost the Left the support of the American working class.

For all practical purposes, they threw this support away, because so many American workers are straight white Christian males, and straight white Christian males are history’s biggest villains, didn’t you know?

A lot of Democrats have yet to figure out that had they not throw this obviously important segment of the electorate under the bus, their candidate might have won!

That wouldn’t have given the Left credibility. The Clintons sold out to the postmodern religions of money and power years ago; neither would know any other reality if it walked up and bit them. Hillary’s arrogant refusal to campaign in certain states was a dead giveaway: she didn’t think she’d need the white working class vote to defeat Donald Trump.

She lost each of those states to Trump. Reality always gets the last laugh.

Now, Bernie Sanders has offered to work with Trump on trade issues. Sanders just might be getting it (maybe, I hope).

The American Left’s ignorance may be exceeded only by its volume and its capacity for violence, but leftists are not Donald Trump’s most formidable enemies.

The globalists — or the superelite, the global elite, or the international financial cartel, call them what you will — are Trump’s most formidable enemies. Those paying attention know they just held their annual World Economic Forum confab in Davos, Switzerland. The number one topic: “populist” insurgencies in Europe (think: Brexit, Geert Wilder in the Netherlands, Marine Le Pen in France) as well as in the U.S., i.e., the growing resistance to their economic domination of the planet, with all its externalities which include the wanton destruction of advanced nations’ middle classes and mass migrations caused by their incessant wars. Globalists, incidentally, like wars! Wars are very profitable! Ask those in the upper echelons of Halliburton!

The proximate cause of the European “populist” insurgency is Muslim mass migration which is tearing their countries apart. France, reeling from multiple terror attacks over the past couple of years, has a problem dwarfing anything the U.S. has to worry about.

I’ve long thought Trump misplayed his hand with Mexicans. He could have pointed out that Mexico’s agricultural workers were hurt as badly by NAFTA as the U.S. manufacturing base. He would have had Hispanic communities on his side, as he moves to renegotiate or scrap superelite-driven “free trade” deals and enforce U.S. immigration laws just as Mexico enforces its immigration laws.

Muslims from places where ISIS is now established are far more dangerous. When a leftist whines about Islamophobia — among all the fake phobias the Left has invented over the years, that one has to be the stupidest! — I want to ask her how many more San Bernardino type workplace shootings or Orlando type nightclub massacres she would countenance, and what she would say to families of innocent people killed by newly transplanted Muslim immigrants who turned out to be ISIS sympathizers?

I’m sure the pseudo-intellectuals who championed Europe’s open borders policies didn’t think they’d be dealing with violent, unassimilable populations destroying neighborhoods in France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, and elsewhere. So please don’t somebody write me and tell me nothing like that could happen in the U.S.

Well, under Donald Trump’s watch it won’t happen. I think — I hope! — we can be assured of that!

The problem, though, remains the globalists, the superelite. They haven’t gone away, and I don’t believe for five seconds they are willing to allow one rogue “blue collar billionaire” to upend plans they’ve been working on longer than most of us have been alive without trying to do something about it — something possibly worse than anything Madonna might have thought up. Just keep in mind: Trump has inherited a mammoth stock market bubble; global debt has never been higher; the only thing standing between the present world and a massive depression is continued money printing by central banks. Were there a planned economic downturn — the Meltdown of 2008 on steroids! — given their control over corporate media, and given the gullibility the Left regularly displays, for globalists to get away with blaming Trump and other “populists” would be child’s play!

These are the things that worry me the most right now! Plus the fact that everything the Left is saying and doing to try and weaken and delegitimize Donald Trump plays right into the hands of the globalists.

If the Left wanted to make itself useful, its members would forget their marches and start monitoring pro-globalist sites on the Internet. There are quite a few, actually, like The Economist, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy Magazine, Bloomberg, and Project Syndicate. Globalists, in their hubris, cannot keep their mouths shut, either. Across the aisle, survivalist author Brandon Smith has useful advice on how globalists think. My book Four Cardinal Errors: Reasons for the Decline of the American Republic (2011) is still in print, as is my “The Real Matrix” series. The latter is incomplete, but not terribly dated.

In other words, now that Donald Trump is President there is work to be done informing those who care about where the real danger lies. And frankly — I hate to be blunt about it, but — leftists, you are in the way!

© 2017 Steven Yates – All Rights Reserved

WASHINGTON, D.C. –The days of a gentle slap on the wrist accompanied by whispering, “Naughty Naughty,” are over. There’s a new sheriff in town who takes a different approach to thuggery. Two hundred and thirty of the masked rioters who tried to invade the Inauguration of the new President were arrested, charged with Felony Rioting by the U.S. Attorney and face 10 years in prison along with a $25,000 fine. At last, justice will be served for political criminal activity.

All welfare benefits should be cancelled for those involved in the riots with the intention of interfering with the constitutional process of electing a president and causing destruction. Every penny of the fine should be paid in full before release, and that sentence should be 10 years of hard labor which is not unreasonable. Justice Department, please take note.

The protesters seem to have plenty of stamina and physical strength to throw things around, swing sledge hammers into store windows to smash them, set cars on fire along with trash bins that they threw into the streets and set ablaze. They also publicly burned the American Flag. So they are not lacking physical strength to work. These hoodlums should not be collecting welfare or other benefits. They owe US. We owe them nothing. They are perfectly able to work and earn their keep.

It is a new day in America. There is no more coddling criminals, no more ‘political correctness’ but instead, stern punishment for lawlessness and creating havoc.

A Presidential inauguration Ceremony is supposed to be a distinguished event. That is how it was designed. Communist Leader George Soros paid protesters to disrupt this transfer of power in D.C. in an attempt to spoil the most important event in the country. He did not succeed.

These paid imbeciles attacked people trying to get to the inauguration, harassed attendees (actually striking some), set cars on fire, tried to block entrances to the ceremony, and broke store windows. They set a stretch limo on fire and spray painted, “We the People” on the side of the burning limousine. They smashed TV trucks which is strange since the main payoff for these nitwits is television attention. That shows how bright they are.

TV personality Larry King was in his studio doing a program. When he came out he found that all the windows of his SUV had been smashed.

The anarchists were dressed head to toe in black with faces covered so as not to be identifiable, which is illegal. One of the rioters draped himself or herself in a rainbow flag.

Soros not only set up various organizations to carry out these ‘protests,’ but also worked with 50 organizations, mostly sponsoring Muslim organizations, to put together the national women’s march throughout the U.S. the day after the inauguration to make it appear that nobody liked Trump. Not so. Millions upon millions of people love President Trump and are happily relieved that he is now our Commander-in-Chief.

And by the way, the trash these women left strewn in the streets was the worst to ever be seen. They did not have the decency to clean up their mess since they have no decency.

What has NOT been adequately reported is the LOOTING that has become a mainstay of such anti-American events. They kept that quiet so as not to make the looters look bad and cause stereotyping. Store windows were broken as Black Lives Matter participants, as usual, grabbed what they could. They should have their welfare benefits cancelled as well.

This rampage by anti-Americans took place only two blocks from the White House. Six police officers were injured by being hit with rocks thrown at them. It is of interest to know that “Bikers for Trump,” a sturdy looking group was on hand to deal with some of the protesters. The anarchists held back in the presence of the bikers knowing full well that the bikers were ready and more than willing to do serious battle.

A note to President Donald Trump. BRAVO! Yes withdraw all welfare and other government benefits from everyone who took place in those third world style riots. And this should include everyone who is a part of Black Lives Matter, another creation of Soros. Begin proceedings to charge George Soros with Treason and Sedition. There is more than enough evidence to show that he is a traitor and it is time to deal with him as such.

His home country Hungary is preparing to take actions against him. Russia would love to get their hands on him and Israel wants him in their hands. He needs to be dealt with and removed from the scene. His enormous wealth can be confiscated to repair the damage he and those he hired have caused not only to America, but countries throughout the world whose economies have been wrecked by Soros as well as currencies around the world being devalued due to his manipulation.

When you think of the recent events, one must ask, where’s the beef? The new President wants America to again be prosperous, our military strengthened in order to protect us from enemies, and better relations with the world and for Christians to not have to hide their faith or Who they worship .He wants better job opportunities for America and for families to live in peace.

He wants to turn Obama’s misrepresented health care plan around and replace that with affordable health care for everyone. He wants to do more for our veterans and military (he just gave military personnel their first raise), actual education for our children, and to carefully vet anyone who wants to come here from other countries. And he will block all efforts to prevent citizens from saying, Merry Christmas during the Holiday season.

So what can be objectionable to this agenda? Absolutely nothing. It is something to be desired for all with the exception of these ignorant misinformed bums who think they will be better under Communism, better known as The New World Order. I have seen what life under Communism is like. Believe me, you do NOT want that. And President Trump believes in the celebration of life for all.

Yes, we have a new sheriff in town and millions of people are backing him and praying for him. We have been ushered, by God, into a new era…a new day. With God’s help, we have taken back our country. Let us never forget What God has done for us. Christians, be visible.

ANALYZING TODAY’S NEWS FOR TOMORROW’S HISTORY

© 2017 Rev. Austin Miles – All Rights Reserved

On January 20th, 2017, in an Inauguration Day ceremony full of tradition, Donald Trump was sworn in as President of the United States.

Two years ago, who would have believed this? Trump had talked about running for president before, and even had considered running against Obama in the latter’s re-election campaign in the 2012 election.

But it wasn’t until June of 2015 that Trump threw his hat into the ring, and after that moment, the American political scene was not the same.

Pundits and politicians had confidentially assured their listeners that Donald Trump couldn’t win. And yet, he did.

Bernie Sanders, who ran against Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries, recently recognized Trump’s Triumph. Quoth Bernie, “Trump took on the Republican establishment, he took on the Democratic establishment, took on the media establishment, and he ended up winning the election to become President of the United States. And that is an extraordinary accomplishment. And it talks about perseverance, it talks about very strong political instincts, it talks about a way to connect with people.”

It’s true. My family and I went to see Trump twice in rallies in the state in which I reside. Trump had a way of connecting with people. Despite being a billionaire New Yorker, he could relate to working class folks and rednecks throughout the country, including in the South, the Midwest and the Upper Midwest, which helped push him to a majority in the electoral college.

Trump’s forthright way of speaking can get him into trouble, but it also served him well, as he smashed conventional paradigms and brought taboo subjects into the mainstream.

For example, there was the proposed ban on Muslim immigration, which he backed off somewhat. But the very fact that he raised it put it on the mainstream front burner.

On foreign policy, Trump’s campaign brought a new perspective, making it possible to consider a new approach.

It’s been twenty-five years since the Cold War ended, and the world has changed. Yet many American policy-makers seem stuck in the Cold War.
Russia, for example, is no longer communist and is a great nation. Doesn’t it make sense to improve relations with Russia? This does not mean we will always see eye to eye or that there are no differences. But pretending that Russia is a world threat as it was during the Cold War is a serious error when we should be looking at common interests.

On immigration, Trump’s campaign brought up subjects that some of us have been writing about for years, and which some have been dealing with for decades. But the Republican establishment didn’t want these issues really dealt with and continued to placate the Cheap Labor Lobby.

Trump began by talking about illegal immigration, but before it was over his campaign had actually moved into the area of legal immigration as well. These are issues of public policy that Americans have a right to discuss. Election night was a great one, as by early a.m. of November 9th it became obvious even to the Mainstream Media that Donald Trump had triumphed. What a great night.

Several months later, on January 20th, 2017, Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States.

The Inauguration ceremony is a part of American history and civic life, and is always interesting to watch. And this time, we were able to see the inauguration of Donald Trump, a man who defied the odds and the political establishment and who, we hope, can move our country in a different direction.

I was at school during the ceremony, so I showed it in my classroom. It was a great day.

My 17-year old son David was actually at the inauguration in Washington, D.C, attending as part of a 4-H Club trip.

David had already been selected for the trip even before the nomination. So he could have wound up being at Hillary’s inauguration!

But, Trump triumphed and that’s good, as David is an avid Trumpster even though he wasn’t quite old enough to vote.

David had a great time in Washington, and returned with various sorts of Trump presidential paraphernalia: President Trump caps, t-shirts, flags, newspapers, keychains, a stocking cap, a button, a Donald Trump bobblehead, a stocking cap and even a pair of President Trump socks!

To conclude: Donald Trump is now the 45th President of the United States. Let us hope he makes great strides to improve our national situation, and let us do our part as well.

© 2017 Allan Wall – All Rights Reserved

We are seeing the words of Scripture play out in living color before our very eyes every single day now, though the unsaved world can not comprehend it. With all we have to contend with, it’s easy for us to get distracted, focusing on the things we see in this physical world every day, and forgetting about the invisible, spiritual world all around us. But this is where the REAL war is actually being waged.

The abominations we SEE on this earth are actually just the manifestations of intense warfare being played out in the spiritual realm. Ephesians 6 tells us, “We do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but…against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” There is a whole SPIRITUAL WORLD “out there” that we do not see while we live in these earthly bodies, yet it is as just as real as the ground we walk on. And these “spiritual forces of evil” are working overtime against all of us. Peter warns us to be aware of this. “Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, looking for someone to devour.”

Scripture tells us that these last days will be times of great deception and delusion. People will have seared consciences and reprobate minds — they will be unable to think or discern truth any longer, because they have chosen — get this: they have CHOSEN to deny God!

You may think that “all” I do is publish a Christian newspaper, and broadcast a Christian commentary program on the radio. I won’t go into ALL I do, but part of my work includes taking and responding to prayer requests that we receive here by mail, email, telephone and through our website. We get a lot of prayer requests, we always have. But now increasingly, the prayer requests are for matters pertaining to spiritual warfare, demonic attack, loved ones denying God, following strange religions, cults and demonic deception. There is a pattern to this and it is increasing at an alarming, exponential pace.

I’d like to share some of these prayer requests with you here. I am not giving any names or betraying any trust here, but I want to share some examples of what I’m talking about. This first one came from a concerned mother and grandmother in Minnesota: “Please pray for my son and his son. Please pray against witchcraft attacks through the birth mother of my grandson. There has been intense spiritual warfare over my grandson since he was born 15 years ago. His mother is heavily into the occult.”

From a young woman in Wisconsin: “Please pray for me. I grew up going to church but for the past ten years I have been studying a lot of different religions, mainly practicing Wicca for the last few years. Recently I have been reading your newspaper and the Bible and have had intense mental anguish over all this. I feel like the devil is pulling at me with a dark presence I can’t explain.”

From a man in South Dakota: “My wife and I were married in a Christian church ten years ago, but we haven’t been following God for most of our marriage. I’ve been more serious than she has, and now I just really feel like I need to get right with God again and I wish we could do this together. My wife has been into New Age stuff for a while now, like earth worship and native American spirits, and she has gotten more and more hostile to Christianity. She says if I want to be a Christian that’s fine, but Christianity doesn’t ‘work’ for her, and she is happy doing her own thing. But the closer I get to God, the meaner she gets toward me. I even have to hide just to read my Bible if I don’t want a fight…”

The great spiritual battle rages on: it is God, our Creator versus Satan, the deceiver. Where did it all start? Satan rebelled against God by refusing to worship Him, and by demanding to be worshiped himself. God cast him out and so now he seeks revenge. His greatest revenge is achieved by destroying the lives and souls of God’s precious children — you and me. He preys on the ignorant, the weak and vulnerable. He lies, he tempts and he leads his victims to eternal damnation. The worst thing anyone could ever do to me would be to hurt one of my kids. Surely any loving parent would feel the same. How much more must our Heavenly Father be crushed when His own dear children are led astray and slaughtered.

Now, if you don’t know God and understand Scripture, I’m sure this sounds as ridiculous, as primitive and superstitious as tales of Greek mythology. But I assure you, the story is true. And frighteningly real. In our human arrogance, we think we have “evolved,” that our intellect has expanded and our knowledge increased. We think we understand things now, because we’ve opened our minds to an amazing “universal consciousness,” through the teachings of the New Age.

Of course, most everyone believes in a Creator, a higher power. The true atheist is rare, indeed. But those who practice “New Age Spirituality” believe that all paths lead to God. Like the spokes of a wheel, leading to a central point. All peoples of the earth have their own traditions, their own understandings of who God is. God reveals Himself to all of us in many different, but “loving” ways, and it is our job to find, and then embrace the path that “works” for us, …accepting that all people are given their own special path to God, the ‘Great Spirit’ — and each one is equally valid and true.

Do not judge anyone by the path they choose, because we are all “one,” we are all on this journey together, and regardless of how we choose to get there, we will all eventually take our own personal path and arrive at the center of the “wheel,” as long as we embrace this journey with love. We will all find God in our own way, and that’s ok.

Have you heard this before? These are the modern teachings of the “New Age.” This “New Age” spirituality manifests in many ways and goes by many names… but the root of all these false teachings is the same: Lucifer, Satan, the devil. Now, I am sure that statement sounds terribly narrow minded and exceedingly arrogant. But please, if you are as open minded and loving as you claim to be, my enlightened New Age friends, I challenge you to hear me out.

Many New Agers delight to find some secret knowledge, perhaps even “ancient” wisdom that the world has long forgotten. Perhaps ancient wisdom that has been suppressed by self-serving religious leaders (namely Christians) who have hidden this knowledge away to maintain their own power over the people. Now, New Agers revere all sorts of writings and books, and often the older a book of knowledge is, the better. Yet they will recoil at the thought of reading God’s Holy Word, the Bible, which, ironically, has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, to be the most reliable work of antiquity the world has ever seen. Friends, know this: just because the Bible is freely available and not some “secret, hidden thing” does not mean it is not true. It simply means that no matter how much Satan and evil men through the centuries have tried to destroy it, it is still here. Miraculously and lovingly preserved by God for all generations, so we can know Him in a personal way, …if we really want to.

The first incidence of Lucifer deceiving mankind was in the Garden of Eden. There, he approached Eve, the first woman, when her husband was not around. This is significant. I am not being a “male chauvinist” when I say that God’s plan for a man included protecting and defending his wife. Not because women are stupider or more incompetent than men. Because Satan specifically targets women for abuse and deception. He goes after them deliberately and intensely because he hates women. Why? Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that God’s Son, Jesus Christ, would be born of a woman. Scripture tells us that there is enmity between Satan and women. He hates them intensely and he targets them directly.

The first thing Lucifer did to deceive mankind was to get Eve to question and doubt God. The lure was the promise of becoming “like God” with great knowledge and wisdom. This is the same lie that is told today in the form of “New Age Spirituality” — some forms of this religion even promise that you can become your own god when you evolve high enough spiritually and are reincarnated enough times.

Ever wonder why, in our culture today, it is “cool” to talk about all kinds of religion and spirituality — EXCEPT Jesus? The daytime talk shows are replete with pagan spirituality. Wicca, Transcendental Meditation, Yoga, Gaia worship, along with channeling, reincarnation, shamanism, occultism. Anything goes. EXCEPT Jesus. And if they DO speak of Jesus, I guarantee it will be by a teacher or author with some “new” concept of God and Christ that goes directly AGAINST the teachings of Scripture. They will claim to have some profound new way of looking at God, some brilliant new enlightened insight, but it is a lie. You see, God doesn’t change, and Satan doesn’t care which god you worship, as long as it isn’t the real one.

The Bible tells us in 2nd Timothy that these false teachers will go after women specifically, just as Satan does. In Chapter 3, Verses 6 & 7 we have this: “They…worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.” Once again, I am not bashing women here, nor is God’s word. But it is significant that Oprah, Ellen and other shows of this nature are watched mostly by women. And the content of these shows is often glorifying of New Age, false spirituality, NEVER true Christianity. This is by design. Because Satan hates women and he targets them purposely. These women love this stuff, and if you are one of them, I dare say you find my message today particularly offensive and possibly even cruel. But just as the Scripture tells us, you love studying these alternative spiritual practices, don’t you? They challenge your mind and excite you. You find it fascinating. You can’t get enough. But read the Scripture again: These false teachers have wormed their way into your home; they have gained control over your thoughts and your mind so that you will reject the God of the Bible and believe it is really YOUR idea, making your own choice; just as the Scripture says, you are “always learning, but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.” In short, biblical Christianity “doesn’t work” for you. You don’t get it.

Another great lie of the devil is that “all you need is love.” If your “spiritual path” is done in love, then it is peaceful, good, pure and right, and all such beautiful paths will take you ultimately to God. But this is contrary to the Bible. What did Jesus say? “I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father, except by Me.” Since both concepts cannot be right, one must be wrong. The seeker sees two options: all paths are equally valid as long as they are loving. Except the Christian path, which is arrogant. Result: reject the Christian path… it is not loving or inclusive. Satan is big on counterfeit love. Currently, he is having a field day with the deception that “love is love” and that marriage can even be between two men or two women if that’s what you want; after all, if no one is hurt by it, why not?

This is another satanic deception. The theme of the Wiccan religion is: “if it hurts no one, do what you will.” Many of those practicing paganism and Wicca believe they are operating in love and benevolence. They see themselves as “good” witches, practicing “white” witchcraft. They really believe and embrace the freedom of, “if it hurt no one, do what you will.”

But have you heard of Aleister Crowley? He is one of the most famous satanists in history, and the author of the satanic “Book of the Law.” He channeled the book while on a trip to Egypt with his wife in 1904. While in a trance, he was given the words by a mysterious spirit who said, “I am the snake that giveth knowledge. To worship me, take wine and strange drugs whereof I will tell my prophet (Crowley)… and ‘Do what thou wilt’ shall be the whole of the law…”

And so here is the serpent, the snake, Lucifer, Satan admitting who he is. He comes promising to give knowledge. His succinct message: “Do what thou wilt.” To the Wiccans he says, “If it hurt no one, do what you will.” To Eve he said, “Did God really say…?” “You won’t surely die; for God knows that when you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

Satan is still promising to give knowledge and wisdom. He is still promising you can do as you please, that all paths lead to the same promise of god, and he even cloaks his demonic claws in a disguise of love. Scripture tells us he appears to us as an angel of light, so that we will believe him. If you’re caught up in strange spirituality that goes contrary to the Word of God, I challenge you to think on these things today. There is so much more to learn on this subject, and I will continue this teaching next time. Meanwhile, please, consider this: If what you THOUGHT you knew about your spirituality turned out to be WRONG, WHEN would you like to know?

Audio versions and transcripts of this message are available when you call me at Wisconsin Christian News, (715) 486-8066. Or email Rob@WisconsinChristianNews.com. Ask for message number 152.

© 2017 Rob Pue – All Rights Reserved

I recently went against my vow to not attend a Hollywood movie because of the unrelenting bias against everything good and decent exhibited by most those who are involved in the movie industry. But being a lover of history, especially when it involves stories of ordinary people that accomplish extraordinary goals in spite what appears to be impossible odds to overcome.

The curiosity bug got the best of me. So as the old saying goes, never say never. So I gave in and agreed to go see the movie Hidden figures along with my wife who had been enthusiastically looking forward to viewing the feature film. I must admit that my interest in the movie was aroused over the true story nature content.

Hidden figures is an incredible story about to say the very least. Three outstanding Americans who only happened to be black and decided not to allow any barriers to prevent them from succeeding. They relied on both their own determination and Providential guidance. The phenomenal untold story of mathematicians Katherine G. Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan and Mary Jackson working for NASA at a time when black men were not even hired there to sweep floors in nothing short of miraculous.

The ladies served as the real brains behind one of the greatest adventures ever. It was the launch of astronaut John Glenn into orbit around earth. It was a stunning achievement that renewed our republic’s confidence, turned around the space race and galvanized the world. The visionary never give up trio overcame every Virginia democrat party racist inspired act of bigotry. Despite the unending insults and unwarranted indignities, the three women overcame trials and inspired generations to dream big. They showed us all how to never succumb to the sick desires of those who want to see people fail.

The movie headliners, Taraji P. Hensen as Katherine G. Johnson, Octavia Spencer as Dorothy Vaughan and Jannelle Monae’ as Mary Jackson and their supporting cast reminded me of worthy advice my Dad gave to me when I was a little boy suffering from severe asthma and struggling physically. He said: ‘son you can overcome and find a way win this battle of illness.” Little did I know while struggling to draw breath that I would one day overcome the asthma and obtain a high level of physical fitness, that I still maintain today.

When I turn on the tele and view mobs of brutish Americans and illegal immigrants mixed in for good measure grumbling about whatever issue their paymaster George Soros has them focused on, I have great concern for our republic.

But while I was watching the Hidden Figures movie, I could not help but be inspired to fight harder to succeed in what is my calling and purpose. Without giving away too much of the movie details, I am amazed at how those three pioneers and coworkers never allowed bitterness to overtake their lives and inhibit their ability to turn evil setbacks into advancements.
The crybabies of today fail to realize that as my Dad explained to me, life is a series of challenges no matter your station in life. I marvel at how those ladies chose greatness over America hating bitterness. In addition they didn’t run around complaining to whomever would listen either. Complaining doesn’t really help anyway. The Biblical definition of complaining means to be left behind. Most of the street complainers are literally left behind economically, intellectually and spiritually.

The ladies featured in Hidden Figures seemed to understand something I came to realize years ago. Despite the awful treatment they endured, they were still blessed to be in the United States where there were great opportunities worth fighting for. Not many nations back then or even today offer opportunities for even the more privileged citizens such as those in caste system nations like India during the 1960s.

Have you noticed how in today’s America certain people exaggerate problems and make authentic situations much worse for others by trying to destroy businesses, block traffic and ruin public spaces. The difference between people like those great ladies of NASA who fought the right way to obtain an authentic life of success and were prepared for opportunities and achieved greatness and the gruesome progressive gumps of today is astronomical. The rioters of today do not have a real leg to stand on when they yelp about oppression except maybe if they would refer to the economic oppression of eight years of the Obama administration. Obama’s policies destroyed or diminished economic opportunities for most Americans.

The big culprit in the inability of people today to comprehend or care about authentic issues like the three ladies of NASA could is the government school system. It has seriously damaged the capacity of many people to comprehend right from wrong, up from down or in some cases they prefer evil over good, while pretending to be standing up for “justice.” In fact the so-called victims of today cannot perceive reality while many collect paychecks from George Soros to help create bigger problems than the ones they complain about.

I am thankful that God has heard the prayers of millions of Americans over the past few years and has mercifully allowed a serious chance for the restoration of American greatness, power leadership in the world as a land of opportunity for all who desire to be all that God has called us to be. Thank you Katherine G. Jackson, Dorothy Vaughan and Janelle Monae’ for showing us how to overcome evil without becoming evil yourselves. God Bless You, God Bless America and May America Bless God. Please join me Tuesdays & Thursdays at 5:06 AM and Saturdays at 4:06 AM on The Captain’s America Third Watch nationwide via flagship station AM 860 WGUL Tampa, Florida or www.am860theanswer.com

Don’t miss a page from The Edwards Notebook commentary overnights on the Captain’s America-Third Watch, simply the best Live overnight radio show broadcasting across the United States from flagship radio station AM 860 The Answer. Also via the internet on Conservative radio, iHeart, Freedom in America Radio, Net Talk World and more.

© 2017 Ron Edwards – All Rights Reserved

As the 45th President and Vice President of the United States were sworn into office, America’s enemies within took to the streets and it was pure evil and ignorance on parade. From DisrputJ20 to the so-called “women’s rights” advocates, the enemies within could not wait to demonstrate just how messed up many in American society are after decades of leftist indoctrination.

The protesters for peace were anything but peaceful. The young and foolish who worry that “Trump will destroy America” were busy destroying America themselves, as they broke out windows of retail stores, office buildings and hotels. These are not protesters, they are pure anarchists.

They claim to be protesting the election and inauguration of Donald Trump. But why? On what basis were these indoctrinated, trained, funded and mobilized malcontents protesting a man who has never done anything to deserve such hate and fearmongering?

In cities across America and as far away as Madrid, women were out in force to protest someone they clearly know nothing about. What was it about his inaugural speech that set them in motion? What caused these women to identify themselves as mere vaginas? Who is behind the so-called women’s rights operation? Why were they protesting Donald Trump?

Do these protesters (aka anarchists) object to Trump’s foundational promises? – “We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and restore its promise for all of our people.” Do they not include themselves as “citizens of America?”

Was it this? – “Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people.” – Do they not include themselves among “the people” to whom Trump promised to return governmental powers?

Why do these so-called protesters object to such all-American ideas?

Why are anarchists protesting “the power of the people” responsible for the Trump Revolution, in favor of tyrannical central power in D.C. under Obama’s pen? Why are women displaying themselves as nothing but a vagina complete with “p**syhats” – demanding their right as women, to become men, to kill their young, to destroy the family unit and the basic fabric of any decent society?

As a man, I would never wear a penis hat anywhere I wanted to be taken seriously!

Why is a woman in Madrid flashing her breasts in public, calling for all women to “grab patriarchy by the balls?” Is Trump the new president of Madrid? Why did Madonna threaten to “blow up the White House” as women cheered her on? Blow up the White House? For what possible reason?

Contrast with Obama never-ending self-adulation, Trump was saying “It belongs to everyone gathered here today and everyone watching all across America. This is your day. This is your celebration. And this, the United States of America, is your country.” Why did this upset Americas enemies within?

Trump was elected based on specific promises he appears on his way to keeping. Which of those promises is causing this backlash from the media, women and anarchist kids?

• We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and restore its promise for all of our people.
• For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth. Politicians prospered, but the jobs left and the factories closed.
• What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.
• January 20th, 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.
• The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.
• At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction, that a nation exists to serve its citizens.
• We will follow two simple rules; buy American and hire American.

Or was it this promise that upset the snowflakes? “From this day forward, it’s going to be only America first, America first.”

Only anti-American zealots here or around the globe would object to anything Trump has promised to do over the coming four years. There is nothing in Trump’s campaign promises or Inaugural statements that any true American or real woman should or would find objectional.

Enemies within

What rights do men have in America that women don’t have? How can women pretend to be a minority interest when they make up a majority of American citizens, 52% to be exact? What anarchist would find objection with Trump’s promise to return our Federal Government to – of, by and for all Americans?

Why do these anti-American zealots refer to our Constitutional Republic as a mere mob rule democracy, and then act out in totally undemocratic manner and method, opposing a democratic election process?

These people are not just enemies of Donald Trump. They are enemies of all Americans and all American principles and values. They are anti-American at their core and foundation.

Besides the right to be men, marry each other and kill American children for their own convenience, what do the women in this movement really stand for? Women are born in control of “reproductive rights.” 99.9% of the time, violent rape being the exception, women control all reproductive rights with a simple YES or NO. Men cannot bear children without them… Nor can women bear children without men.

So, what is this really all about?

Just as the left did with minority race groups, minority gender and sexual preference groups and unionized labor have been tricked, coopted, indoctrinated, trained, funded and mobilized to oppose all foundational American principles and values in the name of their special interest items, so have a significant number of women in America been hijacked.

In the late 60s and early 70s, a group of anti-American terrorists operating under Weather Underground issued an operational manifesto titled Prairie Fire, written about extensively in a FIVE STAR book about the 2016 people’s revolt against the establishment, TRUMPED The New American Revolution.

Prairie Fire lays out the strategic plan of the anti-imperialist global left to hijack and co-opt every minority special interest group in America and use them to destroy America from within by simply indoctrinating these groups against American principles and values and convincing them that the political left is working for them… when in fact, they had all of these groups working for their cause, global Marxism in America.

Today, some call it progressive, but there is nothing progressive about Democratic Socialism, a modern term for Marxism, a gentler term for communism.

The people rioting in the streets over the past few days are not anti-Trump. They are anti-America… They do not believe in or support a constitutional inalienable right to Life. They do not believe in or support freedom or individual liberty. They do not support the right of every American citizen to define and pursue happiness under their own dreams and energies… They do not believe in a morally and ethically fit society capable of self-governance… They oppose ALL these things, openly!

It is these things they protest, not Trump. Trump is the target simply because he has proclaimed these things as the foundation of his personal beliefs, his campaign and his administration. They hate Trump simply because he has taken a stand for these things…

Everyone who voted for Trump believes in those same principles and values… which makes the anarchists in our streets, enemies to us all.
When will the Americans who oppose all of these anti-American zealots rise up and shut them down? When will we stop them from destroying our cities, our people and our country? When will enough be enough?

© 2017 JB Williams – All Rights Reserved

A group of twenty of my buddies and I just returned from Washington DC where we spent the weekend engaging folks with the Gospel of the Kingdom of God. Despite what you might have heard the Inauguration and parade was a very peaceful and inspiring event. Although there were episodes of violence initiated by the anarchists, they had very little impact on what was actually happening on the National Mall or along the parade route.
Now the Million Feminazi March on Saturday was another story. Femininity was in short supply but it does seem as if the women who attended have been successful in attaining their main goals. They claim to want to be treated equally with men and from what I witnessed I would have to say that they have been very successful.

Their goals can be whittled down two issues. They want to be free to act as vulgar and nasty as men, and they want to have sex without any consequences. Their foul mouth and vulgar signs accomplished the first goal, while abortion secures the second. Women love sex. And just like men they want to be free to sleep around.

We are watching the suicide of womanhood.

Our goal in travelling to Washington was to awaken the conscience of a nation to how comfortable we have become with sin. The failure of the church to call out sin has led to an epidemic of it in our nation. Calling certain behaviors sin is not a very popular activity these days and is sure to draw the ire of both sinners and saints in today’s who-are-you-to-judge culture.

So we created a T-Shirt that all of our guys wore when we journeyed to the parades. They were the single greatest Gospel-conversation starter I have ever used.

On the Front the shirts said TRUTH SOUNDS LIKE HATE. The back of the shirt declared JESUS IS THE JUDGE and then listed some of the most prominent sins in America. Take a look and I’ll explain how they work.

One of the most common retorts we hear when we are ministering on the streets is YOU GUYS ARE HATERS!! We simply point to the front of the shirt and smile. TRUTH SOUNDS LIKE HATE.

The next volley they fire is WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE? We simply turn around and show them the back of the shirt which declares that Jesus has already passed judgment…therefore…

• ABORTION IS MURDER
• HOMOSEXUALITY IS SIN
• ISLAM IS A LIE
• EVOLUTION IS A DELUSION
• FEMINISM IS REBELLION
• LIBERALISM IS FALSE RELIGION
• CONSERVATISM IS PRETEND SALT
The shirts led to hundreds of Gospel conversations and hundreds of cell phone pictures. The average person is not used to such straight-forward communications.

Donald Trump has driven a stake through the heart of Political Correctness. It is time for Christians to unashamedly declare the Truth of the Bible. The acceptance of sin IN THE CHURCH has caused the average Christian to become “good for nothing except to trodden under the foot of man.” Only a return to calling sin by its real name will allow the Spirit of Truth to penetrate the heart of the sinner. They don’t call the Bible the “SWORD OF THE SPIRIT” for nothing.”

It is time for an end to politically correct sin. The Bible uses the term Sodomy…not Gay. It calls sleeping around fornication. Telling an untruth is not misspeaking, it is lying. The killing of an unborn baby is murder, not choice.

As is often the case the ones who take the most offense to our shirts are church goers who tell us that we should “love the sinner but hate the sin.” That sounds nice, but that was a quote that came from Gandhi…not Jesus.

The Bible tells us that we “shall know the Truth and the Truth shall make us free.” Why are we so afraid to speak the Truth? Why do we want to soften the message and use politically correct words to describe what the Bible calls sin? Why do we want to turn the salt of the earth into sugar?

What is written on the front of the shirt is only part of the message. As we found out again this weekend in DC…The Truth Is Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth.

Jesus is the Truth. It is time we started calling things the way HE sees them.

If you are courageous enough to wear one you can get a shirt of your own by going to https://coachdavelive.com/donate.

Jesus is the Judge. Truth only sounds like hate. Only the truth will set others free.

© 2017 Dave Daubenmire – All Rights Reserved

Within mere seconds of Donald Trump’s swearing-in as president last week, all references—repeat, all—to Climate Change/Global Warming/Whatevuh were deleted from the official White House website. Adios, sayonara, don’t let the door hit you in the kiester on your way out. In the words of John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel: “Hooray!”

This is the kind of shot across the bows that also takes off the prow of the ship. This is a declaration of war on the whole one-world, globalist, far-left utopian project. There is wailing and gnashing of teeth in Davos. John Kerry is in sackcloth and ashes—or would be, if he knew what it was.

A year ago, it would have all been inconceivable. We, the people, were licked. Sure, we kept electing Republicans to Congress, because they promised to stop Obama—and then they didn’t. They sat there dremmeling while the Far Left tore open our southern border, ordered little girls’ bathrooms opened to grown men, betrayed our allies while aiding and comforting our enemies, and did everything in its power to “fundamentally transform” this country into a Third World hellhole. Who could stop them?

Well, we did. We, the unwashed, the deplorables, the bitter clingers, the lowly peasants of flyover country. All it took was just one leader, just one—Donald Trump, of all people—to stand up to the monster and say, “No!” Something that regular Republicans just couldn’t do. And all he had to do was beat the Democrats, the Republican establishment, the entire nooze media, Hollywood, the entire “education” establishment, the labor unions, and the international whoopee crowd.

And so he did. Because we, the undefended regular people of America, we, the despised, stood by him. No matter what they threw at him, they couldn’t take him down—because God gave him the courage and we stood by him.

Some of us don’t yet understand what we’ve won. This is the Day of Liberation. It’s gonna take some time for that to sink in.

That’s why Trump’s instantaneous disowning of Climate Change was so important. “Save The Planet” was the best excuse the secular utopians ever cooked up, an excuse for doing virtually anything. “Climate Change” was supposed to scare the whole world into subservience. And so arrogant, so sure of themselves were they, the globalists, that they paraded their private jets, their limousines, their mansions, their posh vacations and all the rest of it—like 19th-century maharajahs pondering down the street on jeweled elephants, they paraded their power and wealth right up into our noses. They hardly even bothered to conceal the lies, the cheating, the intimidation of their critics. Why should they? The media was on their side.

“Save The Planet” was supposed to give them everything they’d ever dreamed of—government meddling in every aspect of human life, taxation like you’ve never seen before, suppression of dissent on a global scale, and, ultimately, a world government with themselves, the enlightened ones, towering over the defenseless masses. All for our own good, of course.

That’s what the Climate Change scam was supposed to give them—but our new president said “No!” Boy, are they going to have a terribly difficult time trying to carry out their little project without the participation of the world’s largest and most advanced economy. And every populist hero and heroine in the rest of the world is going to be thinking, from now on, “If Donald Trump can do it, why can’t we?” Go, go, go, Marine Le Pen!

This is what we have to understand. Against all the odds, against all expectation, we suddenly have a God-given opportunity to crush liberalism in America. We now have a president who’s more than willing to do it. He will need the cooperation of the Republicans in Congress, and it’s our job, as voters, to scare them into giving it.

For it turns out that the Left is not as powerful as they thought it was, the movie stars are not as well-loved as they think they are—how easily we could replace them!—and causes like feminism, abortion, open borders, race-hustling, and transgender bathrooms are not as popular as President *Batteries Not Included and Nancy Pelosi thought they were.

Deplorables, stand tall! This is our chance!

Let’s make the most of it.

I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there.

© 2017 Lee Duigon – All Rights Reserved

Last week we described how “Sanctuary Cities Slap Every Lawful American in the Face.” But sanctuary cities are just a symptom of a much larger problem. That larger problem lies in the grossly negligent, if not criminal mismanagement of the existing immigration system and immigration law, by the federal government. It is also embodied in the unconstitutional, irrational compassion displayed by liberal Americans and politicians over the plight of the nation’s poor, minorities, or illegal immigrants, millions of whom want to live off billions of American taxpayer dollars through government-enforced charity.

In reality, most, if not all of the problems of America can be solved with fairly simple solutions, if it wasn’t for the fact that those problems were obfuscated and clouded by a special interest agenda, or a bunch of politicians looking to pander to some group for votes, money, or an easy path to re-election. Never mind common sense or constitutional principles, or what a normal, reasonable and prudent person knows what is right.

Only government can make things complicated, ambiguous and essentially impossible to implement, much less understand. Only government can take a simple solution and convert it into 2,000 pages of double speak, political correctness and legal mumbo-gumbo, that would take a gaggle of outrageously high-paid lawyers to unravel, or find fertile grounds for never-ending lawsuits. Only government can manufacture a complex solution when there is already a simple solution available to us by just enforcing current laws.

Such is the case with illiterate, non-English speaking, illegal aliens that are pouring into this country by the millions, taking jobs, importing drugs, sexual slaves and other crimes, bringing in diseases America has eradicated years ago, over-whelming every social service offered by government and adversely “coloring” the political landscape.

Prior to Trump becoming President, we had an exchange with a gentleman who took issue with our stand on illegal immigration. This exchange illustrates the wide divide between opposing positions and perhaps why the problem hasn’t been resolved. To set the stage, this gentleman is a farmer and a recent legal immigrant from Europe and probably a liberal. Perhaps these characteristics are a window to his position and bias. The following message outlines the basis for his arguments. Our response follows his message.

“I do not have to remind you that the 6 million Jews were exterminated through rounding them up through the help of employers, regulated by the government. Visit the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam, if you will, but if you deny 12 million people (or more) to make a living, they will resort to begging and stealing!!”

“So here is the simple solution: All of the illegal immigrants have to get a sponsor who will take care of them so that they are not a burden to society. (Employers will find a way to organize that) They can get citizenship (under some formula) if they do the following: pay their taxes, learn English, integrate in someway in US society, pay their debts and stay out of trouble (legally). So what is wrong with 12 million people who are working hard, which we need, because we do not want the jobs they do and which become citizens in due time?”

“The ‘illegal immigrants’ have become legal because of us not acting earlier.”

“Anyway, quit whining about it, but come up with the solution.”

We responded to this gentleman with the following:

“You have two biases that “color” your position. First, you are a farmer and second, you are a legal immigrant. But the American farmer is used to getting all kinds of government handouts for about 8 decades now from the American taxpayer, thanks to FDR. Maybe not you personally, but way too many farmers are receiving subsidies from our government that we get to pay for, when most farmers are profitable and do not need a subsidy. And even if they weren’t profitable, there is nothing in our Constitution that grants farmers the right to taxpayer-funded subsidies.

Now, the farmers get an additional handout from our government by a failed immigration policy that tolerates illegal immigration because illegal aliens will supposedly take jobs (in the agricultural industry) that Americans don’t want. That, of course, is pure bunk as they are also taking jobs in all kinds of other industries that Americans would definitely take ….. construction for one. Why? Cheap labor!

Long before illegal aliens came here to pick crops, as kids, we picked strawberries, loganberries and apples to earn pocket money. There are still a lot of American kids out there who would do the jobs at low wages, if those jobs weren’t being sucked up by illegal aliens, or regulated out of existence.”

“And to equate the situation with illegal aliens with what Hitler did in rounding up the Jews, is absolutely insulting, uncalled for and without merit.”

“The hard truth is that millions of Americans are tired of paying billions of their tax dollars every year to subsidize a group of people who seem to find it perfectly OK to thumb their collective noses at our laws and come here, uneducated and jump on America’s social services because they get paid so little by the agriculture industry, while educated immigrants who come here legally must wait years for citizenship. Further, illegal aliens come here with a socialist mindset and in large numbers are sure to turn this country socialistic if it wasn’t for the fact we are there already. How dare they come to this country illegally, trample on our laws and then protest in the streets by the hundreds of thousands for civil rights, amnesty and government services, all the while waving a Mexican Flag.”

“Do you have any idea what happens to a citizen of another country entering Mexico, protesting in the streets for government handouts? The Mexican government wouldn’t tolerate for one second what our Government tolerates daily, the cost of which is charged to the American taxpayer. It’s ludicrous, if not patently unjust! Americans cannot bear the entire burden of the third-world poor on their paychecks.”

“And your last comment about ‘quit whining’ is also insulting. Many of us have offered solutions to the problem because it isn’t rocket science. All we have to do is enforce our current laws. However, we have five solutions that will provide almost immediate relief to this problem.”

1) Close and protect our borders from infiltration by illegal aliens, drugs and terrorists, by whatever means, including physical force. If there were severe penalties for crossing our borders, there would be less of it.
2) Enforce current law.
3) Immediately deport all illegal aliens that are caught without documentation, no hearings, no nothing. They are not entitled to due process and no right exists that entitles them to driver’s licenses and government services.
4) Punish employers who hire illegal aliens and make them responsible for proving citizenship of their employees. As an employer, we took validating citizenship very seriously. If there was any question, we investigated.
5) As some states are doing now, stop all social benefits, education, bilingual services, emergency services and social services to any individual or family that is not a legal citizen of the United States unless here on a valid visa or green card and watch how fast they will self-deport.

“It is a tough stance but in the end we have learned that tough love is the best love and produces the best results, especially for an addiction by illegal aliens to American taxpayer-funded generosity. If these five things were vigorously implemented, the magnet for the illegal aliens coming here would mostly go away and so would the problem. A few states have already demonstrated that these solutions work. But then, when did our federal government do anything that was in the best interests of the American taxpayer, except pass laws to extract more taxes from them?”

“Your solution to get an American sponsor for 12 to 20 million illegal aliens is pie in the sky. It isn’t going to happen. In short, as we stated in our LAST ARTICLE, any benefits derived from illegal aliens are far outweighed by the negatives they cause and it has to stop or we will be overrun, if we haven’t been already.”

“We are not about to turn over America to people who break our laws and think they now deserve amnesty because they are allegedly hard working and industrious. If illegal aliens are allowed to break our laws, while legal Americans are forced to obey them (and pay through the nose for those who break the law) then the law becomes meaningless. When the law becomes meaningless chaos reigns. With chaos comes a police state.”

“And just because our government has tolerated the law breakers for all these years, does not justify continued law breaking and it does not eradicate the crime for those who committed them.”

Now some of you may agree with the good farmer, but the questions he raises are based on false premises and irrational compassion and the solutions he offers will lead to chaos and the eventual destruction of freedom and American sovereignty. Anyone who can’t see this is living in a virtual reality. We are not anti-immigrant, we are anti-breaking-the-law and rewarding lawbreakers with amnesty and unlimited social services that they don’t deserve and that legal Americans have to fund. When do you get it folks? Government has made you an indentured slave, at the point of a gun, to every illegal immigrant that crosses our borders and sucks up your tax dollars. If this continues, then Americans are nothing but chumps and puppets of an out-of-control, tyrannical government.

Illegal immigration has been festering in America since the ink was dry on the Constitution. Racial bias and ethnic purity, along with financial, economic and security fears have driven immigration policy right, left, up, down and inside out for well over 150 years, every time a wave of immigration hits American shores.

Government always reacts to immigration woes. It is never proactive. Government policies can inhibit or enhance legal and illegal immigration. Since President Johnson’s 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, government’s policies have essentially created several magnets to illegal immigration. President Reagan’s granting amnesty to over 3,000,000 illegal aliens without the enforcement of and severely penalizing illegal employment, just added to the magnets. President Obama’s immigration executive orders have just accelerated illegal immigration.

But the worst magnet was the bastardization of the 14th Amendment that created what is now known as “Anchor Babies” where any child born in America, from anywhere on the planet, automatically becomes a citizen of the United States, allowing extended families to legally join the “baby.”

Why do they come here? That’s simple. They are leaving hopelessly crime-ridden, socialist countries where war, poverty, hunger and corruption impact their daily existence. Consequently, when they come here, their mindset is already socialist and they are looking for free handouts from government because they believe that government owes them. Democrats are all too willing to use “our” money to oblige them, ever since FDR re-invented the Constitution in his own socialist image.

Like most liberals, those hundreds of thousands of women and others marching last Sunday against a Trump presidency, say they want “justice.” But their idea of justice is “free stuff” for free loaders and illegal aliens, on the back of the American taxpayer. Irrational compassion, at any cost, or for votes, will be the downfall of the American Republic.

Why aren’t these illegal aliens stopped at the borders? Because the federal government, especially under the Obama Administration, refused to adequately protect our borders and enforce our laws. Hopefully, Trump will reverse this long, expensive, tragic injustice perpetrated on lawful, tax-paying Americans. We wish him well and we sincerely hope he can break up an over 100-year old, fully entrenched, liberal “System” ….. before it’s too late.

[EDITORS NOTE: The opinion in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2017 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

A few days before Inauguration day, my 89 year old black preacher dad said God is responsible for Trump becoming president. I thought about the scripture in which God says, “My ways are not your ways.” Frustrated with Obama declaring America no longer a Christian nation while cramming the Left’s ant-God and anti-America agenda down our throats, millions have been intensely praying for our country. If I were God, I would have answered Americans’ prayers by making Ted Cruz president. But God is smarter than me.

Trump is exactly what America needs at this point in time. No traditional politician could get away with confronting anti-American Leftist operatives in the media, calling out Washington establishment corruption and boldly vow to put America first. Few Republicans would have the cojones to even try.

As usual despicable Leftist media distorted Trump’s awesome Inaugural Address, saying Trump’s speech was reminiscent of Hitler.

Meanwhile, Americans were crying tears of joy. They have not heard such common sense patriotism in a very, very long time. The Left still does not understand who they are dealing with in Trump and why We the People chose him over Hillary. Standard Leftist tactics for silencing, destroying, intimidating and blocking Republicans (calling them racist, sexist and homophobic) have failed miserably on Trump.

Unlike most pro politicians, Trump has not been neutered in the politically correct school of politicking 101. Our 45th president is simply a patriotic brilliant businessman following his instincts to make America great again.

Here are a few vows Trump made in his Inaugural Address that are as repulsive to the Left as showing Dracula the cross.

“…we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.”

“This American carnage stops right here and stops right now.”

“From this day forward, a new vision will govern our land. From this moment on, it’s going to be America First.” Them’s fightin’ words to the Left (Democrats, Hollywood and mainstream media).

“We will get our people off of welfare and back to work…” The Democrats’ insidious scheme is to always hand out more welfare checks, getting as many Americans as possible addicted, enslaved and dependent upon government.

“I will fight for you with every breath in my body — and I will never, ever let you down.”

“For many decades, we’ve enriched foreign industry at the expense of American industry; subsidized the armies of other countries while allowing for the very sad depletion of our military; we’ve defended other nation’s borders while refusing to defend our own; and spent trillions of dollars overseas while America’s infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay.” Leftists barfed.

“America will start winning again, winning like never before.” Leftist heads exploded.

Trump vowing to govern according to the best interest of our country is basic common sense. And yet, it sounded extraordinary and cause for celebration because Obama’s governing has been the complete opposite.

I strongly encourage President Trump to stay who he is. Keep fearlessly pushing back when attacked by deplorable racially divisive democrat hacks like John Lewis and Maxine Waters.

Keep tweeting Mr President. It is a highly effective way to speak directly to the American people, bypassing democrat operatives disguised as mainstream media.

By the way, I LOVED it when Trump exposed CNN as a propaganda outlet, calling them fake news during his press conference. sunk to a new low, incredibly sowing seeds to inspire the assassination of Trump. This is why it blows my mind that some on our side are offended that Trump does not play by the Left’s dictates for Republican behavior. Trump realizes that it is absurd to respect, try to reason or work with unreasonable evil people obsessed with plotting your demise.

Extreme times require extreme measures. It is not the case that the Left loves America, but simply disagrees about how to make her great. The Left hates America and is repulsed by Trump’s desire to make her great. Therefore, the Left must be defeated.

Mr President, please to do not succumb to the Left’s mantra that you should dial-back your behavior; becoming more presidential. This is their trap to control you; trick you into abandoning your instincts which won you the presidency with a majority of Americans in your corner, watching your back.

Bottom line: Mr President, We the People are with you. Please, please, please stay who you are. God bless you and your family. And may God continue blessing America!

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Chairman – CampaignToDefeatObama.com

© 2017 Lloyd Marcus – All Rights Reserved

Alabama Congressman Mike Rogers has introduced a new bill (H.R. 193) to end U.S. membership in the United Nations. The bill is the reintroduction of his American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 1205) from the last Congress. And of course, that was basically the same bill introduced year after year by former Congressman Ron Paul.

In the past, both Paul’s and Roger’s bills have been ignored by Congress, but things are changing. Americans are beginning to understand the UN threat. Obama has actually stood before the UN General Assembly and called for Americans to surrender our national sovereignty to this world body.

As Obama worked feverishly to build UN intrusion into our lives through actions like Agenda 21 and by joining the UN’s Strong Cities Network to militarize our police, the rest of the world has started to revolt against UN global policies that are destroying their national independence and economies.

The Brexit vote in England was the shockwave heard around the world. The European Union is the first such organization of the UN’s goal to create such unions in every region of the world, including North and South American Unions; an Asian Union and so forth. The EU was to be the wave of the future. England struggled under its shackles until it could no longer stand it and so revolted. As the vote came in suddenly other members of the EU started thinking ? if England can escape, why not them? Sudddenly the global New World Order juggernaut has begun to show cracks.

Meanwhile France is about to elect its own Trump-style president ready to pull back its global policies as Italy rebels in its own way. Worst of all for the UN globalists, their one excuse for power, Climate Change, is being discredited as President Elect Trump prepares to throw out the Paris Treaty along with the TPP.

However, it was the most recent Obama shenanigans in allowing a massive UN attack on Israel over its settlements in favor of a non-existent Palestine that has created the strongest ever anti-UN sentiment in the U.S. Pulling back on paying UN dues has been expressed by several in Congress as support for such a sentiment has begun to grow across the nation. Without the United States and its money the UN is nothing. It will cease to exist in a very short time, just as did the old League of Nations.

Now, to feed that growing sentiment Congressman Rogers has again introduced the legislative means to make it happen. This time more and more Americans are listening.

To help readers understand why the UN is such a threat to our nation and freedom-loving people everywhere, I am reissuing my opening statement given in a debate over the UN before the 200 year old English debating society, Cambridge Union in 2006. At the time I was debating the former UK Ambassador, Lord David Hanney; the head of the Liberal Party and member of Parliament, Simon Hughes; and the head of the UN Millennium Project, Salil Shetty.

Rep. Mike Rogers’ H.R. 193 must now be seriously considered and passed by Congress. The time is finally here to make a strong stand to get the United States out of the United Nations.

OPENING STATEMENT
BY TOM DEWEESE

BEFORE THE CAMBRIDGE UNION SOCIETY

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
October 26, 2006

“This House believes that the United Nations is a dead loss.”
It is reasonable that honest, compassionate people seek a means for governments to come together to discuss and air their differences.

It is also reasonable that honest, compassionate people should desire some way to voluntarily pool resources to provide charitable aid to those who are starving or are victims of natural disaster.

Indeed this is the image of the United Nations that has been sold to the world since its inception.

It is not, however, the reality.

The world is in chaos and, quite frankly, it’s the UN’s fault. It gives validity to zealots and petty bigots. It helps to keep tyrannical dictators in power. It gives a voice to international terrorists.

Delay. Negotiate. Recommend. Study. Reconsider. Do nothing. This is the game the UN has played in nearly every international crisis.

It is the reason North Korea remains a threat after 50 years.

It is the reason Zimbabwe’s murderous Robert Mugabe is able to steal his election and then steal the land of white property owners, drive the nation into economic ruin and starvation without an international protest, boycott, or sanction. Instead, Mugabe is given a voice in the UN’s Sustainable Development conference in South Africa.

It is the reason why the Chinese government is able to ignore UN rules not to its liking — while growing as an international military and economic threat.

And it is the reason why a terrorist nation like Syria can be given a seat on the UN’s Human Rights Council.

The United Nations, internally, is a mess. It now finds itself buried under scandals.

It has Oil-for-Food scandals. Smuggling scandals. And theft scandals.

Peace keeping missions actually bring fear to the local citizens they are supposed to protect. Rob, rape and pillage seem to be the UN’s modus operandi. How can we be surprised by such revelations?

Who has the power to oversee and control its actions? The people don’t vote on UN actions. The media has little access behind the scenes. Who audits the accounting books?

Of course, even its supporters will readily agree that such problems exist. They are quick to jump in and call for “reform.” However, when talking reform, one must be very careful of what the word may mean.

UN reports on reform don’t indicate a simple desire to plug holes in UN spending — or to clear up scandals. Quite the contrary. According to Kofi Annan, Maurice Strong and many others, reform means global governance.

Since its inception, the UN has advocated the desire to eradicate sovereign nations — while imposing what it calls “world-mindedness.” A 1949 UNESCO document said, “nationalism (is) the major obstacle to the development of world-mindedness.” In the 1990’s, Maurice Strong said, “it is not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation/states, however powerful.”

There in lies the true goal of the United Nations. And that belies its public image as simply a place where nations may come to air their differences and act responsibly. Instead, the UN is openly working to gain power for itself in order to become independent and supreme over its member nations.

To do that it needs the power to tax. On September 19th (2006) plans were approved to begin the creation of a global tax, mostly through airline tickets to help pay for the treatment of aids. They of course euphemistically call it a contribution.

There are several other tax schemes on the UN wish list, including a carbon tax on Co2 emissions, a currency tax on transactions of foreign currency exchanges, and taxes on the Internet, to name a few. If the UN gains the power to tax and the enforcement power necessary to collect them, then the UN will become an unstoppable force in the world. A monster free from its chains.

And, of course, the UN wants its own military. It already has its own court.

These three things; the ability to collect taxes to provide nearly unlimited funds from independent sources; the ability to enforce its will with a military force; and a court system to impose its own brand of justice, are all that is required to create a government.

Imagine a world run by the justice of China, with the economics of Cuba and the military might of the United States. Such is the world of the future under United Nations global governance.

Public relations propaganda aside, clearly, the United Nations wants to be much more than a place where nations can come together to air their differences under a voluntary membership association.

The truth is, today, fifty years after the inception of the United Nations, the international community is a dangerous place. Today the world has more wars, more poverty and more suffering that anytime in human history.

Obviously, the United Nations is irrelevant as a body to deliver world peace. Just as obviously, the UN is more interested in meddling in the sovereign affairs of nations, seeking to impose its own agenda over development, production and what it calls social equity in a drive to set itself up for global governance.

Using images of dire environmental emergencies or life-threatening diseases or starving children, the UN promotes an agenda which really seeks to redistribute the world’s wealth. Its only answer is government control – and confiscation of individual wealth and property.

Nowhere is there mentioned in a single UN document that I have read an advocacy for the right to own private property. In fact, quite the opposite is the case as nearly every UN document, report, working paper, program, treaty, protocol, declaration and resolution is dedicated to the confiscation, redistribution, regulation and tax of someone’s property.

It is a fact that the inability to own private property creates poverty. It is also a fact that confiscation of private property never helps to eradicate poverty. It is bad economic policy. Yet that is the UN’s only solution to the massive suffering throughout the world. Take it from one source to give to another. And that, I contend, is the very root of the suffering – not the solution.

The UN was wrong from its very beginning and wrong now because it has always sought to interfere with national sovereignty rather than to provide a unique forum to help keep the peace.

The United Nations is not “dysfunctional” as some “reformists” have claimed. It is a criminal enterprise in which no moral nation should ever participate, let alone perpetuate.

© 2017 Tom DeWeese – All Rights Reserved

Pompeo will dig into Obama’s suspicious intel practices

U.S. Senate Democrats, led by New York’s Chuck Schumer, the minority leader, argued that a CIA director are dragging their feet on confirming Rep. Mike Pompeo. They — Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut and others –claim Pompeo has “controversial views on surveillance and other issues that need to be debated on the floor.” But more than one observer, such as former military intelligence officer and police commander Larry McIntire, believe they fear a CIA run by Pompeo because of the shenanigans by President Barack Obama’s CIA appointees and supporters.

“Democrat lawmakers appear to be concerned – even fearful — that one of their fellow members of Congress will be confirmed to head of the Central Intelligence Agency. But it will take an Obama-sized ‘skeleton in his closet’ to stop U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo’s rise to the government position he has worked his entire life to achieve,” said the now retired McIntire. “I’d say that Pompeo may open a new can of worms especially when it comes to the Obama and [Secretary of State John] Kerry nuclear weapons agreement with Iran,” he noted.

The great fear many Democrats have is that Pompeo may attempt to finish a probe as the Director on Central that he started while he served on the House Intelligence Committee: the big pay-off to Iran.

But the Democrats are having a hard time finding something to put the kibosh on the confirmation. The Republican congressman possess quite a resume.

Pompeo while still a teenager shined as a cadet at the United States Military Academy at West Point. In fact, he graduated first in his class from the academy in 1986. According to his official biography, he also graduated from Harvard’s School of Law and easily passed the bar exam.

His military record includes serving as a cavalry officer patrolling the Iron Curtain before the fall of the Berlin Wall. He also served with the 2nd Squadron, 7th Cavalry in the Fourth Infantry Division. He served his last tour of duty in the first war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. The 7th Cavalry is considered an elite unit going back to the Indian Wars in the 1800s.

As a House Intelligence Committee member, Pompeo said only a few weeks ago that he has additional evidence that the Obama administration weaseled its way around U.S. sanctions law when it sent $1.7 billion to Iran, according to news reports.

Rep. Pompeo is on the record stating disclosures made to him by the Treasury Department in a letter that the first $400 million cash payment to Iran was wired to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and then electronically-transferred to an account at the National Bank of Switzerland.

The Federal Reserve followed up by “withdraw[ing] the funds from its account as Swiss franc banknotes and the U.S. government physically transported them to Geneva” before overseeing the handover to an Iranian central bank official.

GOP lawmakers have been probing the legality of the payments for months to determine if the money was ransom for the release of American prisoners who were held hostage in the Islamic Republic, but Pompeo says, “[This] administration has not provided most of the information [being sought] by the committee members. By stonewalling our inquiries, President Obama seems to be hiding whether or not he and others broke U.S. law by sending $1.7 billion in cash to Iran,” Pompeo told the news media at the time.

“Americans can plainly see that the Obama administration laundered this money in order to circumvent U.S. law and appease the Islamic Republic of Iran,” He accused.

Other critics of the transfer, such as the American Action Forum, say that Iran has used tens of millions of the $1.7 billion it received from the U.S. to bolster its worldwide terrorism operations, including giving funds to organizations which have murdered American citizens.

As a teenager, he enrolled at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He graduated first in his class from West Point in 1986. According to his official biography, he then served as a cavalry officer patrolling the Iron Curtain before the fall of the Berlin Wall. He also served with the 2nd Squadron, 7th Cavalry in the Fourth Infantry Division. He served his last tour in the Gulf War under President George H.W. Bush.

The House Intelligence Committee member says he has additional evidence that the Obama administration skirted U.S. sanctions law when it sent $1.7 billion to Iran, according to reports.

Rep. Mike Pompeo said disclosures made to him by the Treasury Department in a letter, after he requested details of the money transfer, show that the first $400 million cash payment to Iran was wired to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) and then moved to an account at the Swiss National Bank.

FRBNY then “withdrew the funds from its account as Swiss franc banknotes and the U.S. government physically transported them to Geneva” before overseeing the handover to an Iranian central bank official.

Congress has been looking into the legality of the payments for months to determine as well if they were ransom for the release of Americans who were held in the Islamic Republic, but Pompeo says the administration has not provided most of the information they seek.

“By withholding critical details and stonewalling congressional inquiries, President Obama seems to be hiding whether or not he and others broke U.S. law by sending $1.7 billion in cash to Iran,” Pompeo told the Free Beacon.

“But Americans can plainly see that the Obama administration laundered this money in order to circumvent U.S. law and appease the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Other critics of the transfer, such as the American Action Forum (AAF), say that Iran has used tens of millions of the $1.7 billion it received from the U.S. to bolster its worldwide terrorism operations, including giving funds to organizations which have murdered American citizens.

In her report, AAF’s Rachel Hoff wrote: When the Obama Administration sent Iran a total of $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, many questioned if these payment constituted a “ransom” for the release of American prisoners. The State Department, however, insists the payment was only used as “leverage” to ensure the prisoners were released. (The United States has a longstanding policy that it does not pay ransoms for American prisoners or hostages.) The nature of the cash transfers to Iran is an important question, but it is also worth considering the payment itself.

Iran recently passed a law requiring that the $1.7 billion U.S. payment be directed to the Iranian military. Previous AAF research reported that Iran reports spending 65 percent of its military budget on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Iranian elite paramilitary force. The IRGC actively supports terrorist organizations throughout the Middle East, spending millions of dollars every year to support the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza. Iran also sends billions of dollars every year to the Assad regime in Syria.

It is unlikely that Iran accurately reports its military or paramilitary spending, but the reported budget figures are useful as a minimum baseline. Applying the official spending levels to the U.S. payment to Iran, the $1.7 billion could mean $1.1 billion for the IRGC. Paying ransoms in exchange for Americans held abroad is one bad policy—indirectly funding terrorism is another.

© 2017 NWV – All Rights Reserved

Myopia is nearsightedness and it “is the most common refractive error of the eye…If you are nearsighted, you typically will have difficulty reading road signs and seeing distant objects clearly.”[1] But there is another form of nearsightedness; seeing the items right under your nose, but missing the truly significant items in the distance. That nearsightedness can bring disaster. One example occurred this Thursday in the Baltimore City Council.
“The consent decree just approved on Thursday … cements into place the next step toward a virtual federal takeover of the Baltimore Police Department (BPD).

The decree itself provides all the damning evidence. First, the incident: the death of Freddie Gray in 2015, followed by riots incited by a Marxist group funded by a billionaire. Those riots were followed by charges that the BPD used illegal measures to ensure public safety.

The U.S. government illegally and unconstitutionally investigated those charges, concluding that something must be done. Under implied threats, the consent decree was born, with obligations and mandates and changes to be enforced by a federal judge.” And sadly Baltimore is not the first city to surrender to Federal tyranny. “During the Obama administration, similar consent decrees have been implemented in 15 cities, including New Orleans, Oakland, Los Angeles, and Albuquerque.”[2]

The actions of the City Council were myopic in this regard. When the police powers are not directly accountable to the people, which our State Constitution requires, history shows an inevitable record – the God given rights of the people will not be protected by the police. When the local police nationalized history shows they become the tools of tyranny and the people are helpless to stop it especially when they have been previously disarmed and thereby unable to protect themselves. Study the history of the Gestapo, or the Red Terror of NKVD (Soviet secret police) or The Tiananmen Square massacre, along with multiple examples where hundreds of millions were murdered by their own government using the nationalized police to kill them.

The Twentieth Century was the bloodiest century in all of history; but the two World Wars and numerous violent, bloody revolutions did not even contribute to the largest number of deaths.

“Let’s start with a number: 262 million. That’s the number of unarmed people the late Prof. R. J. Rummel estimated governments murdered in mass killings he termed “democide” during the 20th century. “This democide murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century,” he wrote.

Unsurprisingly, the bloodiest body count was run up by totalitarian regimes, though authoritarians were busy stacking up the corpses, too, if in smaller piles. Democracies were also responsible for unjustifiable deaths, especially in subduing resistance in their colonial possessions (think: Belgian Congo) and in indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets during wars (think: Hiroshima), but to a far lesser degree than Communists, Nazis, and overdecorated generalissimos….So keeping any sort of government on a short leash is just good sense.” It is myopic not to do so.

Now you might think, not to worry, a police state wouldn’t trouble you, after all you are a law abiding patriotic citizen. But think of this, “Heritage Foundation warns that “the number of criminal offenses in the U.S. Code increased from 3,000 in the early 1980s to 4,000 by 2000 to over 4,450 by 2008., [currently at over 22 million words and that is not to mention the Federal Regulations created by administrative edict]” Those laws, originally limited to obvious crimes, now touch on areas of life that most people would never guess to be of interest to prosecutors and law enforcement officers.

Civil liberties attorney Harvey Silverglate made a similar point in his 2009 book, Three Felonies a Day. He says that laws have not only proliferated, but they’re applied in unpredictable and arbitrary ways, so that it’s virtually impossible for Americans to avoid subjecting themselves to potential arrest, prosecution, and imprisonment. That’s to say, you can break a law by accident, and end up behind bars…Radley Balko wrote 2013’s Rise of the Warrior Cop to document the increasingly military-style weapons, attitudes, and tactics of the nation’s police forces as they enforce those myriad laws and keep the prisons stuffed to the brim. Last year he wrote ‘too many cops today have been conditioned to see the people they serve not as citizens with rights, but as an enemy.’”[3]

I believe that history teaches it is extremely myopic to hand over the local police powers to a centralized government authority. But there are many other examples of myopia; consider how most people live their lives. They study hard to achieve the degrees and certifications to find a good job. They put some money aside for when they reach that stage of life when they can no longer work. But as they move toward retirement they rarely lift their eyes higher than that goal, they don’t think about their own departure from this world, they don’t ask what lies beyond. That is myopic. This life on average lasts for seventy or eighty years, but what lies beyond that is so much greater than eighty years that the comparison is comical. Myopia about eternity is very prevalent today. Turn to Titus 1 where Paul addresses this myopia.

Titus 1:2 “Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God’s elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness; In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began; But hath in due times manifested his word through preaching, which is committed unto me according to the commandment of God our Saviour;”

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
Paul lived in the hope of eternity, he never let it out of his view. That perspective is what we need for ourselves, our families, our churches and our country.

And Not a Shot Is Fired: Baltimore City Council Assents to Federal Consent Decree Over Its Police Department

Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Rev. David Whitney – All Rights Reserved

As we continue to look at what our politicians have done to America we have to wonder just what their objective is. When we look at it closely we can see that it isn’t the best for Americans. In the early 20th Century we began to see a shift from natural remedies to chemical controlling of diseases that target the results of a disease instead of targeting the reason for the disease.

As an example let’s look at diabetes. I know of no one that is born with diabetes. I know that there are many causes for the disease, heredity, diet, lack of exercise and other things but my point is something caused it. Why mask the results instead of addressing the cause? Simple. Money! Some may say that I am wrong and you have a right to your opinion but facts are facts. The American Diabetes Association (Association) released new research on March 6, 2013 estimating the total costs of diagnosed diabetes have risen to $245 billion in 2012 from $174 billion in 2007, when the cost was last examined.

This figure represents a 41 percent increase over a five year period.

The study, Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012, was commissioned by the Association and addresses the increased financial burden, health resources used and lost productivity associated with diabetes in 2012. The study includes a detailed breakdown of costs along gender, racial and ethnic lines, and also includes a breakdown of costs on a state-by-state basis.

The total estimated cost of diagnosed diabetes in 2012 is $245 billion, including $176 billion in direct medical costs and $69 billion in reduced productivity.

The largest components of medical expenditures are:

• hospital inpatient care (43% of the total medical cost),
• prescription medications to treat complications of diabetes (18%),
• anti-diabetic agents and diabetes supplies (12%),
• physician office visits (9%), and
• nursing/residential facility stays (8%).
People with diagnosed diabetes incur average medical expenditures of about $13,700 per year, of which about $7,900 is attributed to diabetes. People with diagnosed diabetes, on average, have medical expenditures approximately 2.3 times higher than what expenditures would be in the absence of diabetes.[1]

There is an effort, I believe, by big pharma to create the need for some kind of medicine from them so they have a good bottom line. Their concern is their pocket, not your health. Pay attention to the next commercial about a medication. There are more side effects that are worse than the disease!

They get away with it because they warn you about them. Many cause cancer! But they have drugs for that too, but most of the time these very expensive drugs don’t work. Dr. Peter Glidden cites a recent study that concludes better than 97% of the time, chemotherapy does not work. Yet it’s one of the main treatments in the battle against cancer. Dr. Glidden explains why that’s still the case. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the developed world, and yet we are still in the dark ages when it comes to treating and understanding it.

The colossal failure of conventional cancer treatments reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what cancer – the “enemy” – actually is. For one, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are both intrinsically carcinogenic treatments. The only justification for their use, in fact, is that they are highly effective at damaging the DNA within cells – with the hope that the cancer cells will be more susceptible to being harmed than the healthy ones (sadly, not always true).

The reality, however, is that the “collateral damage” from treatment is inevitable; it is not a matter of “if,” but to what degree the damaging side effects will occur. As in real modern warfare, the decision to strike is often based on deciding how much collateral damage to “civilian” populations is deemed acceptable. This is not unlike the fixation in toxicological risk assessments for drugs, environmental pollutants, food additives, etc., where determining “an acceptable level of harm” (a rather horrible oxymoron) to the exposed population is the first order of business.

Chemo Agent Classified by the WHO as Carcinogenic

The DNA-damaging, or genotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, according to the prevailing wisdom, are the #1 cause of cancer initiation and promotion. This is known as the “Mutational Theory” of cancer, and has been the dominant explanation for half a century.[2]

What doctors seem to ignore is that cancer cannot survive in an alkaline environment they, for the most part, ignore this and go with chemicals that literally kill everything in hopes that it kills the cancer before it kills the patient. A doctor uses two standard household items and has had great success with patients that were terminal. 185 out of 200 lived at least 15 more years CANCER FREE! after being diagnosed as terminal.[3] This is a ‘natural’ cure which in many cases has been outlawed.[4] Why would they do this? Population control. Remember in an earlier column in this series I state that the elites want the world’s population to drop from six billion to 500,000,000.

If this seems hard to believe that our government would do this but time and time again we see the government raid a natural supplement supplier with swat teams, take products, computers, research materials and in many cases never charge the company with anything. They never get their computers, research materials and inventory back either. It is just a show of force to let the industry know that they are not going to put up with keeping people healthy. Here’s a brief overview of some of the campaigns of terror the FDA has initiated against natural healers, nutritional supplement companies and other organizations. Many were conducted using armed agents wielding assault rifles and automatic weapons, dressed in body armor. All of them were intended to destroy natural medicine, thereby protecting the profits of drug companies and conventional medicine practitioners.

1987: The Life Extension Raids

The Life Extension Foundation (www.LEF.org) has long been targeted by the FDA. It is a non-profit organization that publishes information about the healing power of nutritional supplements and genuine anti-aging breakthroughs from the world of natural health.

On February 26, 1987, approximately 25 armed FDA agents and U.S. Marshals burst through the glass doors of the Ft. Lauderdale offices of the Life Extension Foundation with guns drawn. A second group of FDA agents simultaneously attacked the LEF warehouse, where they detained LEF founder William Faloon at gunpoint.

1990 – The El Cajon pet food store raid

In 1990, FDA agents raided the pet food store of Sissy Harrington-McGill, a 57-year-old pet lover who was guilty of the “crime” of claiming that vitamins would help keep pets healthy. Without a search warrant, FDA agents ransacked her store, confiscating products and literature.

She was later tried and convicted of violating the Health Claims Law, a law that did not exist at the time of the raid and was never passed by the U.S. Congress. Nonetheless, likely due to FDA pressure on the presiding judge, she was sentenced to 179 days in prison and fined $10,000 for daring to say that vitamins are good for puppy dogs![5]

We haven’t even begun to talk about pesticides, Monsanto and the whole GMO debacle.

© 2017 Roger Anghis – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

1. Cost of diabetes.
2. Chemotherapy doesnt work 97 of the time video.
3. Health/holistic alternative medicine.
4. Herbal Medicine Illegal.
5. Tyranny in the USA: The true history of FDA raids on healers, vitamin shops and supplement companies.

This week I had the privilege to attend the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump. While this is truly an honorable day and tradition for Americans, did you know there are seven distinct religious activities in the first presidential inauguration that have been repeated in whole or part during every subsequent inauguration? They include:

1- The use of the Bible to administer the oath
2- Solemnifying the oath with multiple religious expressions (placing a hand on the Bible, saying “So help me God,” and then kissing the Bible)
3- Prayers offered by the president himself
4- Religious content in the inaugural address
5- The president calling on the people to pray or acknowledge God
6- Church inaugural worship services
7- Clergy-led prayers

The first inauguration under our current Constitution occurred in New York City, which served as the nation’s capital during the first year of the new federal government.

The papers reported the activities:

“[O]n the morning of the day on which our illustrious President will be invested with his office, the bells will ring at nine o’clock, when the people may go up to the house of God and in a solemn manner commit the new government, with its important train of consequences, to the holy protection and blessing of the Most High.”

The ceremony took place on the balcony at Federal Hall with a huge crowd gathered below watching the proceedings.

Washington placed his left hand upon the open 1767 King James Bible, raised his right hand, took the oath of office, then bent over and reverently kissed the Bible.

As the first-ever presidential address, Washington’s precedent began with prayer, explaining:

“It would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being Who rules over the universe, Who presides in the councils of nations, and Whose providential aids can supply every human defect – that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes.”[1]

After concluding his address, Washington offered its closing prayer:

“Having thus imparted to you my sentiments as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave – but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the Human Race in humble supplication [prayer] that . . . His Divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this government must depend.[2]

The next activities were arranged by Congress itself when the Senate directed:

“That after the oath shall have been administered to the President, he – attended by the Vice-President and members of the Senate and House of Representatives – proceed to St. Paul’s Chapel to hear Divine service.”[3]

The House had approved the same resolution,[4] so the president and Congress thus went en masse to church as an official body. As affirmed by congressional records.

So you see our Constitutional Government was birthed and covered with a holy Christian cloak and, while this inauguration will likely be an experience I will never forget, I believe there is something more important than ceremonies. My prayer is that posterity will look with honor on our labor to preserve the indispensable supports of political prosperity that Washington attributed to “Religion and Morality”.

Learn more about your Constitution with Jake MacAulay and his Institute on the Constitution and receive your free gift.

© 2017 Jake MacAulay – All Rights Reserved